Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Nature Index

The Nature Index is a database developed by Nature Portfolio that tracks author affiliations and institutional relationships in research articles published in 145 high-quality natural and health science journals selected for their reputation by panels of active scientists. Launched on November 12, 2014, it serves as an indicator of high-quality research output by institutions, countries, and sectors worldwide, focusing on primary research articles while excluding reviews, editorials, and other non-research content. The index employs two primary metrics to quantify contributions: Count, which assigns one unit per article to each affiliated institution or country regardless of author position, and Share, a fractional count that apportions credit based on the proportion of authors from a given institution relative to the total, ensuring the maximum combined Share per article equals 1.0 and treating all authors as equal contributors. Launched in 2014 with 68 natural science journals, the Nature Index expanded in June 2023 to include health sciences, reaching 145 journals and broadening its scope to better reflect multidisciplinary trends and collaborations. Its purpose is to enable comparisons of research performance across academic, , and commercial entities; explore global collaborations; and highlight emerging hotspots in scientific output, with annual supplements such as the Nature Index 2025 Research Leaders ranking top performers by Share and Count over calendar year periods (e.g., January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024). Independent of publisher influence in journal selection, the index is validated through global researcher surveys and undergoes periodic reviews to maintain relevance. Key applications include benchmarking institutional productivity, informing policy decisions, and tracking subject-specific trends like or , making it a vital tool for understanding the landscape of elite scientific .

Overview and History

Definition and Purpose

The Nature Index is a database compiled by Research Intelligence, a division of , that tracks author affiliations and institutional relationships in primary research articles published across 145 selected natural-science and health-science journals. It captures detailed affiliation data for every author on these articles, enabling analysis of research contributions without incorporating journal-level metrics such as impact factors. Launched in November 2014, the index emphasizes high-reputation journals chosen independently by panels of active researchers through a rigorous selection process informed by global surveys. The primary purpose of the Nature Index is to offer transparent indicators of high-quality output, collaborations, and institutional partnerships by focusing solely on contributions to elite journals. This approach allows users—institutions, policymakers, and funders—to assess performance trends over time, such as rolling 12-month periods, while avoiding biases introduced by broader citation-based evaluations. Data from the index, including numerical outputs for the most recent 12 months, is made publicly accessible under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license, promoting open analysis while protecting commercial applications. What distinguishes the Nature Index from wider bibliometric databases is its deliberate restriction to a curated subset of top-tier journals, representing the "upper echelon" of research in natural and health sciences to highlight exceptional output rather than total volume. This selective scope ensures a focus on quality-driven metrics derived directly from authorship, providing a more reliable proxy for institutional and national research excellence in fields like physical sciences, chemistry, biological sciences, and environmental sciences, and now health sciences.

Development and Evolution

The Nature Index was launched in November 2014 by Nature Publishing Group (now part of ) as a beta-test platform to address growing demand for reliable, transparent indicators of institutional and national research performance in high-quality scientific output. This initiative built on earlier efforts, including the Nature Publishing Index compiled since 2005, but formalized a comprehensive database tracking author affiliations in select journals to highlight collaborations and contributions without relying on potentially biased metrics like journal impact factors. The initial version encompassed 68 leading natural-science journals, selected in 2011 by an independent panel of actively publishing scientists and validated through an online survey of researchers, ensuring a focus on reputable outlets across disciplines such as , earth sciences, life sciences, and physical sciences. In 2018, the Index underwent significant revisions to enhance subject balance and coverage, expanding from 68 to 82 journals after consultation with panels of approximately 60 academics and a global survey of over 6,600 researchers. These changes added 18 journals, including titles like and Nature Climate Change, while removing or replacing four others to reduce over-representation in fields like astronomy and bolster areas such as earth and environmental sciences, where tracked articles doubled. The revisions also simplified counting methods by adopting fractional counts directly, eliminating prior weighting adjustments. Starting in 2016, began publishing annual supplements based on the previous year's data, providing snapshots of top-performing institutions, countries, and sectors to track evolving trends in research output. A major evolution occurred in June 2023, when the Index incorporated 64 health-science journals, increasing the total to 145 and significantly improving representation in , , and clinical disciplines previously underrepresented. This expansion was driven by a panel of 55 clinical researchers and informed by a survey of 1,200 identifying preferred venues, aiming to capture about 4% of primary in clinical fields from data while focusing on rigorous article types like clinical trials. Journal selections remain independent, conducted by scientist panels without publisher influence, with ongoing biennial reviews to adapt to emerging fields and maintain selectivity. The 2025 Research Leaders edition, drawing on 2024 data, underscores these adaptations by highlighting China's continued dominance, with its Share metric rising 17% to 32,122 and eight of the top 10 global institutions based there.

Methodology

Journal Selection Process

The journals included in the Nature Index are selected by panels composed of actively who are unaffiliated with , ensuring an objective evaluation based on journal reputation and influence within the natural and health sciences. These panels, typically comprising around 60 academics per review cycle, assess journals to represent the upper echelon of high-quality research outlets, focusing on multidisciplinary flagships and highly selective discipline-specific publications. The selection criteria emphasize prestige, citation impact, and comprehensive field representation across disciplines such as biological sciences, , earth and environmental sciences, and health sciences, while deliberately excluding metrics like the Journal Impact Factor to avoid biases associated with such indicators. This process is validated through global surveys of thousands of researchers—for instance, over 6,600 in the 2018 review—to confirm consensus on journal quality and relevance, targeting coverage of approximately 4-5% of primary research articles in relevant categories per subject area. The approach prioritizes journals known for rigorous and influential contributions, irrespective of publisher. As of the 2023 expansion, the Nature Index tracks 145 journals, including prominent multidisciplinary titles like , , and , as well as specialized outlets such as and Nano Letters. The full list is publicly available on the official Nature Index website. Periodic reviews maintain relevance; for example, the 2018 revision expanded from 68 to 82 natural-science journals to better balance disciplinary coverage, while the 2023 update added 64 health-science journals, such as and The New England Journal of Medicine, to address previous gaps in clinical and medical research representation. These updates, informed by panels of experts including 55 clinical researchers in 2023, ensure the index evolves with scientific priorities.

Metrics and Calculations

The Nature Index employs several key metrics to quantify output and among institutions and countries/territories, drawing from articles published in selected high-quality journals. These metrics emphasize fractional attribution to account for multi-author and multi-institutional contributions, assuming equal input from all authors on a paper. The primary measures are Article Count, Share, Adjusted Share, and Bilateral Collaboration Score, each designed to provide distinct insights into publication activity without overemphasizing sheer volume. Article Count (AC), the simplest metric, assigns a value of 1 to an or / for each in the Nature Index journals that includes at least one affiliated , irrespective of the total number of authors or their positions. This approach allows the same to contribute to the Count of multiple entities if authors from different institutions or countries are involved, thus reflecting broad participation but potentially inflating totals for highly collaborative fields. For example, a paper with authors from three institutions would add 1 to the Article Count of each. Share provides a more nuanced fractional attribution, normalizing contributions to avoid overcounting in large collaborations. For each article, the total Share equals 1, which is divided equally among all authors; an individual author's Share is then further divided proportionally if they list multiple affiliations. The formula for an 's Share from a single article is the sum over its affiliated authors of \frac{1}{\text{total number of authors}} \times \frac{1}{\text{number of affiliations for that author}}. This method assumes equal contributions from all authors and handles multi-affiliations by proportional division, ensuring the maximum combined Share across all entities per article remains 1.0. For instance, in a with 5 authors each affiliated solely with one institution, each author's institution receives a Share of 0.2; if one author has dual affiliations, their Share splits equally (0.1 to each). The total Share for an entity is the sum of its Shares across all relevant articles. Adjusted Share refines the Share metric by normalizing for annual fluctuations in the overall volume of articles published in Nature Index journals, enabling fairer year-over-year comparisons. It is calculated as Adjusted Share = Share \times \frac{\text{total articles in base year}}{\text{total articles in current year}}, where the base year (e.g., for analyses in 2024) serves as the reference point. This adjustment accounts for variations such as a 2-5% change in journal output, scaling Shares up or down proportionally to simulate output at base-year levels. For example, if the current year has 10% fewer articles than the base year, Adjusted Shares are multiplied by 1.11 to equalize the baseline. The Bilateral Collaboration Score (CS) quantifies the intensity of partnerships between two specific entities, such as institutions or countries/territories, by focusing on co-authored s. It is the sum, over all papers co-authored by both entities, of each entity's Share on those papers—effectively CS = \sum (\text{Share}_A + \text{Share}_B) for each collaborative article. This metric highlights mutual contributions without double-counting the paper itself, providing a symmetric measure of joint output; for instance, if two institutions each receive a Share of 0.3 on a co-authored paper, that paper contributes 0.6 to their CS. CS requires at least one co-authored article and is particularly useful for tracking evolving alliances in .

Data Periods and Updates

The Nature Index employs two primary data periods to capture research output: the annual Research Leaders, which analyze a complete calendar year, and the Current Index, which uses a rolling 12-month window for ongoing tracking. The 2025 Research Leaders edition, for example, draws on data from all primary research articles published between January 1 and December 31, 2024. This structure allows for both snapshot assessments of yearly performance and dynamic monitoring of recent trends. Data collection is automated, focusing on author affiliations listed in primary research articles from 145 high-quality natural- and health-sciences journals, sourced directly from publisher databases and integrated by Nature Research Intelligence. The dataset for the 2025 Research Leaders encompasses 90,283 such articles, involving contributions from approximately 30,110 institutions across around 172 countries and territories. This process ensures comprehensive coverage of global research affiliations without manual intervention. Updates to the Nature Index are released monthly for the Current Index, incorporating the most recent 12-month rolling data under a BY-NC-SA 4.0 license, while the annual Research Leaders supplements are published in June—for instance, the June 2025 edition details the prior year's full dataset. These refreshes include calculations of percentage changes in Adjusted Share to enable , as seen in the 2024 data where China's Share rose by 17.4% compared to a 10.1% decline for the from the previous year. The metrics of Share and , applied to these periods, provide the foundation for institutional and national evaluations.

Rankings

Leading Institutions

The Nature Index rankings for leading institutions are determined by the Share metric, which measures the fractional contribution of authors from each institution to articles published in a select group of high-quality natural-science and health-science journals. In the 2025 Research Leaders edition, based on data from to December 31, 2024, Chinese institutions dominate the top 10, occupying eight positions, reflecting a broader surge in research output from . The () maintains its position as the global leader with a Share of 2,776.90, far surpassing the second-place in the United States, which recorded 1,155.19. Other prominent Chinese performers include the University of Science and Technology of China (third, 850.60), (fourth, 819.57), and (fifth, 812.32). This concentration underscores 's expanded investment in research infrastructure and talent recruitment. The following table summarizes the top 10 institutions:
RankInstitutionCountry/TerritoryShare (2024)
1Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)China2,776.90
2Harvard UniversityUnited States of America (USA)1,155.19
3University of Science and Technology of China (USTC)China850.60
4Zhejiang University (ZJU)China819.57
5Peking University (PKU)China812.32
6University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS)China793.59
7Tsinghua UniversityChina769.57
8Nanjing University (NJU)China755.20
9Max Planck SocietyGermany752.22
10Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU)China713.24
Analysis of the 2025 rankings reveals a 17% increase in overall Share to 32,122, driving a rise in the number of Chinese institutions in the 100 from 37 in 2023 to 43 in 2024, signaling strengthened dominance in high-impact research. In contrast, Western institutions like Harvard experienced a 17.5% decline in adjusted Share, while the in saw a marginal 0.4% drop despite holding ninth place overall. Sector breakdowns highlight the prevalence of academic institutions in the top ranks, with non-academic entities like the —ranked as the leading /NGO with a dedicated Share of 650.78—demonstrating the impact of specialized research networks outside universities. Regionally, remains anchored by Harvard, though its lead is narrowing amid broader declines in U.S. institutional performance.

Leading Countries and Territories

In the 2025 Nature Index Research Leaders, based on output data from 2024, secured the top position among countries and territories with a total Share of 32,122, reflecting a 17.4% year-over-year increase that widened its lead over competitors. The ranked second with a Share of 22,083, but experienced a notable 10.1% decline, signaling challenges in maintaining prior dominance amid funding constraints and shifting global priorities. placed third, underscoring Europe's continued but relatively stable contribution to high-quality research. This ranking illustrates broader trends in research output, where Share metrics—representing fractional authorship contributions—highlight not just volume but also collaborative impact across 145 tracked journals. China's surge is driven by substantial investments in , outpacing the in PhD production and institutional capacity, with eight of the top 10 global institutions being , including the at number one. In contrast, Western countries like the , , , and the saw Share declines of at least 9%, attributed to proposed budget cuts in agencies such as the NIH and NSF. Asia's ascendance is evident regionally, with 15 of the top 25 institutions worldwide now , reflecting a geopolitical shift toward Eastern innovation hubs. The Nature Index distinguishes territories such as SAR China as separate entities from , allowing for granular analysis of regional outputs; for instance, Hong Kong maintains a strong independent presence in health sciences. In , which ranks fifth overall, the leads national contributions with a Share of 390.94, emphasizing strengths in physical and biological sciences despite a 9% year-over-year decrease. These patterns underscore how national policies and institutional strategies influence global research landscapes, with capturing increasing momentum while traditional Western leaders face relative erosion.

Sector-Specific Analyses

The Nature Index categorizes its data into four main sectors—physical sciences, , earth and environmental sciences, and sciences—to provide granular insights into research output across disciplines, with subject-specific breakdowns derived from journal classifications in the Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List. These classifications ensure that contributions are attributed to relevant fields based on the primary focus of the publishing journal, allowing for targeted analyses that reveal disciplinary strengths not evident in aggregate rankings. For instance, in the physical sciences sector, which encompasses physics, , and , has consistently demonstrated robust performance due to its emphasis on fundamental research in areas like quantum technologies and . In the life sciences sector, the United States maintains a dominant position, driven by leading contributions in biological sciences such as and , reflecting the scale of funding from institutions like the . The sector's subject categories, including biochemistry and , highlight trends toward interdisciplinary work, with increased collaboration evident in climate-related biological studies, such as biodiversity impacts on ecosystems. A separate health sciences sector was introduced in to address the growing volume of biomedical research, where has shown rapid ascent, particularly in clinical and , bolstered by national initiatives like the Healthy China 2030 plan. Recent 2025 data from the Nature Index underscores these variations: leads in chemistry, with strengths in synthetic and materials chemistry, and in earth and environmental sciences, where its output in atmospheric and geological research has surged due to investments in challenges. In contrast, the tops biological sciences within life sciences, exemplified by high-impact work from and the Broad Institute on applications. The Nature Index also features a sub-index for the flagship journals and , which captures multidisciplinary breakthroughs across sectors, often highlighting collaborative efforts in emerging fields like climate science. Sector analyses extend to non-profit and organizational (NPO/NGO) contributions, where the leads, particularly in physical and life sciences, due to its network of institutes fostering international partnerships on global issues like transitions. These breakdowns reveal evolving trends, such as heightened cross-sector collaborations in climate-related research, where earth sciences outputs have integrated life sciences perspectives on , supported by joint funding from bodies like the .

Applications and Criticisms

The Nature Index serves as a key tool for policymakers, funding agencies, and research institutions to performance and evaluate the of investments. By tracking contributions to high-quality publications in natural and sciences, it enables comparisons across institutions, cities, and countries, helping stakeholders identify strengths and allocate resources effectively. For instance, governments use the Index to monitor the returns on public R&D spending, such as in tracking how funding translates into global output. This approach aligns with the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA), which advocates for evaluations that go beyond journal impact factors to emphasize the quality and quantity of research outputs. The Nature Index supports DORA principles by focusing solely on author affiliations in a curated set of reputable journals, without incorporating citation-based metrics, thus promoting a more balanced assessment of institutional productivity. A prominent trend revealed by the Nature Index is the surge in international collaborations, quantified through the Collaboration Score (), a metric introduced in 2024 that measures the proportion of co-authored articles involving multiple countries. This score highlights how global partnerships drive high-quality research, with CS values rising across major economies as researchers increasingly work across borders to tackle complex challenges. From 2023 to 2024 (as reported in the 2025 Research Leaders supplement), the Index documented significant regional shifts, including a 17.4% growth in 's research Share—the primary metric of author contributions—reaching 32,122, underscoring Asia's expanding dominance in scientific output. In contrast, Western countries like the experienced relative declines, with their institutional rankings slipping as Asian hubs, particularly in , captured more top positions. For example, bilateral ties between and the remain robust, accounting for a substantial portion of international co-authorships. The Nature Index provides specialized tools for mapping collaborations, including interactive visualizations and graphs that illustrate institutional partnerships and geographic networks, allowing users to explore patterns in . These features facilitate the identification of prolific alliances, such as those between leading and labs. Annual supplements from the Nature Index further illuminate emerging hotspots, such as the integration of in health sciences, where outputs have grown rapidly in areas like diagnostics and . These publications analyze sector-specific trends, spotlighting how interdisciplinary collaborations are accelerating innovations in fields blending with biomedical research.

Limitations and Debates

The Nature Index tracks only a small proportion of output, capturing approximately 78,000 articles in 2023 from 145 high-quality journals, compared to an estimated 3.3 million science and engineering articles published worldwide in 2022. This selective focus on elite journals means it represents roughly 2-3% of total scientific publications, potentially overlooking significant contributions in lower-impact or specialized outlets. A key methodological limitation is the assumption of equal contributions among co-authors for calculating the Share metric, where the total share of 1.0 per article is divided equally regardless of author order, role, or actual involvement. This approach, while simplifying attribution, ignores variations in individual efforts and can distort evaluations, particularly in large collaborations common in fields like physics or biomedicine. Additionally, the Index provides no normalization for institution size, research focus, or field-specific publication norms, allowing larger entities or those aligned with Index-tracked disciplines to dominate rankings without adjusting for these disparities. Multi-affiliation challenges further complicate interpretations, as the credits Share to all listed institutions for an , including overseas labs or secondary addresses. This can inflate scores for countries or organizations, for instance, when researchers maintain primary ties abroad but list multiple affiliations, leading to overcounting in national aggregates without mechanisms to prioritize primary contributions. Critics argue that the Index exhibits biases toward English-language and Western-centric journals, which dominate the selected titles and disadvantage research from non-English-speaking regions or the Global South. High-impact outlets often prioritize topics and data from developed nations, marginalizing context-specific studies from elsewhere and perpetuating inequities in global research visibility. The 2023 expansion to include more health sciences journals broadened coverage—reaching 91.58% of topics in that field—but has incomplete representation in areas like (33.11%), raising questions about balanced disciplinary focus. Debates intensify around potential misuse of the Index for funding or hiring decisions, despite official warnings aligned with the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA), which emphasizes multifaceted evaluation beyond journal outputs. The Nature Index FAQ explicitly states it should not serve as a sole metric, yet media reports sometimes overemphasize raw rankings, such as China's ascent in Share without contextualizing limitations like field biases or institutional scale. This has sparked concerns over simplistic narratives that undervalue qualitative impacts, such as societal relevance or innovation beyond publications.

References

  1. [1]
    FAQ | Nature Index
    The Nature Index includes only primary research articles published in the 145 selected journals tracked by the Nature Index. For a small number of large physics ...How were journals selected for... · What are the limitations of the...
  2. [2]
    Introducing the index - Nature
    ### Summary of Nature Index Introduction
  3. [3]
    Nature Index
    Discover the world's leading research institutions, explore collaborations, compare research performance, track top papers with Nature Index.2025 Research Leaders2024 Research LeadersResearch leadersIndiaNature Index 2025 Research ...
  4. [4]
    A guide to the Nature Index
    Nov 20, 2024 · The Nature Index is a database of author affiliations and institutional relationships. The index tracks contributions to research articles published in high- ...
  5. [5]
    Health sciences added to the Nature Index | News
    Jun 15, 2023 · The 64 medical journals included in the Nature Index are intended to represent a consensual upper echelon of journals in the health sciences ...
  6. [6]
    Nature Index | Nature Research Intelligence
    One centralised, holistic source of research trends to track emerging research topics and guide your decision making. Learn more. Nature Research Intelligence ...
  7. [7]
    Revisions to the Nature Index | News
    Jun 6, 2018 · The 82 journals included in the Nature Index reflect the breadth of literature published in the natural sciences. They represent the titles in ...
  8. [8]
    Using the Index | Nature Index
    The Nature Index is a database of author affiliations and institutional relationships. The index tracks contributions to research articles published in 82 high ...
  9. [9]
    A brief guide to the Nature Index
    The Nature Index is an open database of author affiliations and institutional relationships. The Index tracks contributions to research articles.
  10. [10]
    Institution rankings | Nature Index
    ... License. Numerical information only is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
  11. [11]
    Launch of the Nature Index
    Nov 12, 2014 · This week, Nature Publishing Group introduces the Nature Index. The platform is a database of the contributions made by the world's research ...
  12. [12]
    Nature Index 2016 Research Leaders
    The 2016 Research Leaders are based on Nature Index data from 2015, and include leading institutions in various sectors and subject areas.
  13. [13]
    Data released in this year's independent Nature Index Research ...
    Jun 11, 2025 · The country's Share, the Nature Index's key metric of author contribution to high-quality research, reached 32,122, a 17% increase on 2023, with ...Missing: expansion | Show results with:expansion
  14. [14]
    Nature Index 2025 Research Leaders: Western institutions lose long ...
    Jun 11, 2025 · Western research institutions continue to tumble in the annual Nature Index Research Leaders rankings as those based in China soar.
  15. [15]
    A Guide to the Nature Index - Nature Index 2025 Research Leaders
    The index tracks contributions to research articles published in high-quality natural-science and health-science journals, chosen based on reputation by an ...
  16. [16]
    A guide to the Nature Index
    Oct 31, 2018 · Another metric is bilateral collaboration score (CS). A bilateral collaboration can be between any two institutions or countries/regions co- ...Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  17. [17]
    Tables - Nature Index 2025 Research Leaders
    Researchers from 30,110 institutions and collaborations contributed articles to the 2025 Research Leaders. ... Nature Index data from 1 January 2024 to 31 ...Leading institutions · Leading countries/territories · Leading academic institutions
  18. [18]
    Nature Index 2025 Research Leaders: United States losing ground ...
    Jun 11, 2025 · It was only in 2023 that the United States lost the top spot to China in the Research Leaders list, which ranks countries, territories and ...Missing: total | Show results with:total
  19. [19]
    2025 Research Leaders: Leading countries/territories | Nature Index
    Nature Index data and methods are transparent and available under a creative commons licence at nature.com/nature-index/. Springer Nature remains neutral ...
  20. [20]
    2025 Research Leaders: Leading institutions | Nature Index
    The 2025 Research Leaders are based on Nature Index data from 1 January 2024 to 31 December 2024. ... License. Numerical information only is licensed under ...Footnote · Nature Index · Nature Research Intelligence
  21. [21]
    Nature Index 2025 Research Leaders: United States losing ground ...
    Jun 11, 2025 · South Korea, for example, moved up from eighth to seventh in Research Leaders 2025, and grew its adjusted Share in the biological sciences by ...
  22. [22]
    2025 Research Leaders: Leading institutions | Nature Index
    1, The University of Tokyo (UTokyo), Japan, 390.94 ; 2, Kyoto University, Japan, 250.03 ; 3, Osaka University, Japan, 190.28 ; 4, RIKEN, Japan, 122.75 ...Missing: top | Show results with:top
  23. [23]
    Benchmark Research | Research profile | Nature Index
    The Nature Index tracks primary research articles from 145 natural-science and health-science journals, chosen based on reputation by an independent group ...
  24. [24]
    Announcement: Nature journals support the San Francisco ...
    Apr 27, 2017 · Nature Research will this week formally sign up to the principles outlined in the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment, commonly known as DORA.
  25. [25]
    Is the Nature Index at odds with DORA?
    May 25, 2017 · The Nature Index enables the tracking of institutional research output and collaboration at the city, state and country levels. It is therefore ...
  26. [26]
    Data released in this year's independent Nature Index Research ...
    Jun 11, 2025 · Nature Index's signature metric, Share, is a fractional count for an article allocated to an institution, city or country/region, that takes ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Which collaborations produce the most high-quality research? - Nature
    Dec 4, 2024 · A new way to explore collaboration trends in the Nature Index reveals the most prolific partnerships between institutions.
  28. [28]
    International collaboration | Nature Index
    The Nature Index tracks the affiliations of high-quality scientific articles. Updated monthly, the Nature Index presents research outputs by institution and ...
  29. [29]
    Broadening collaborators | Nature Index
    Broadening collaborators tracks the leading institutions collaborating with institutions located in countries/territories outside of the top 50 countries/ ...
  30. [30]
    Nature Index Supplements
    Nature Index 2021 Science Cities. Many of the world's leading science cities are active in research related to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
  31. [31]
    A guide to the Nature Index
    Oct 12, 2022 · The index tracks contributions to research articles published in 82 high-quality natural-science journals, chosen by an independent group of ...
  32. [32]
    Nature Index Artificial Intelligence supplement investigates ...
    Nature Index Artificial Intelligence supplement investigates emerging trends in AI research output - December 10, 2020. Escalating computing power ...Missing: annual hotspots
  33. [33]
    Why did the Nature Index grow by 16% in 2024? | News
    in 2023, there were almost 78,000 articles tracked, up from just below 60,000 in 2015. But part of this can be explained by ...
  34. [34]
    Publication Output by Region, Country, or Economy and by Scientific ...
    Dec 11, 2023 · Total worldwide S&E publication output reached 3.3 million articles in 2022, based on entries in the Scopus database.
  35. [35]
    Discussion about the new Nature Index - Scientometrics
    ### Key Criticisms of the Nature Index
  36. [36]
    A better measure of research from the global south | News - Nature
    Jul 6, 2018 · ... journals are predominantly in English and biased towards publishing data from the United States and Western Europe. With the exception of an ...
  37. [37]
    Are Nature Index journals a valid basis for academic assessment
    Jul 9, 2025 · Journal listings play an important role in current journal evaluation, publication reference, research assessment and position promotion.Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
  38. [38]
    Read the Declaration | DORA
    The Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) recognizes the need to improve the ways in which the outputs of scholarly research are evaluated.
  39. [39]
    China overtakes US in contributions to nature and science journals
    May 24, 2023 · China has overtaken the US to become the biggest contributor to nature-science journals, in a sign of the country's growing influence in the world of academic ...