Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Nature Portfolio

Nature Portfolio is a division of dedicated to publishing high-impact peer-reviewed scientific journals, with its flagship being the interdisciplinary weekly , established in 1869 to advance scientific knowledge and address societal challenges through primary , reviews, news, and analysis. It encompasses over 60 journals spanning fields such as , physics, , , and earth sciences, including specialized titles like Nature Genetics, Nature Physics, and open-access platforms like and . Renowned for rigorous and selective acceptance criteria that prioritize transformative discoveries with broad implications, Nature Portfolio reaches approximately 9 million monthly readers globally and maintains editorial offices in major cities including , , , , and . Its journals have historically disseminated seminal findings, contributing to scientific progress, though some lower-tier titles within the portfolio, such as , have drawn criticism for inconsistent quality and higher retraction rates amid broader challenges in scientific publishing integrity. As part of an academic ecosystem prone to institutional biases, Nature Portfolio's editorial decisions reflect prevailing trends in funding and peer consensus, which empirical scrutiny reveals as often skewed toward certain ideological priors over unvarnished causal mechanisms.

History

Origins of Nature Journal

Nature was conceived in the late 1860s amid growing demand for a weekly publication dedicated to advancing scientific discourse, distinct from the slower-paced proceedings of learned societies that dominated existing journals. Astronomer , seeking a forum for rapid dissemination of scientific innovations and debates, collaborated with publisher Alexander Macmillan to launch the venture. Macmillan, founder of the Macmillan publishing house in , agreed to underwrite the project despite prior failures of similar science periodicals, viewing it as a means to promote empirical inquiry in an era shaped by Darwin's evolutionary theories and industrial advancements. The inaugural issue appeared on November 4, 1869, establishing as a multidisciplinary weekly illustrated aimed at a broad readership of scientists, educators, and the scientifically inclined public. Lockyer assumed the role of founding editor, shaping its editorial vision to prioritize original research, correspondence, and commentary on emerging discoveries across disciplines like physics, , and astronomy. Unlike predecessors such as Recreative Science, which ceased after brief runs, emphasized accessibility and timeliness, featuring contributions from prominent Victorian figures while tolerating initial financial losses for over three decades under Macmillan's patronage. This foundational commitment to survival through editorial rigor and publisher support enabled its transition from a modest enterprise to a enduring platform for scientific progress.

Expansion and Key Milestones

The journal's expansion accelerated in the late as scientific disciplines proliferated, prompting the development of specialized Nature-branded titles to capture emerging fields. In 1983, Bio/Technology was launched, later rebranded as Nature Biotechnology in 1996, marking an early foray into biotechnology publishing amid rising interest in and industrial applications. This was followed by Nature Genetics in 1992, which focused on genetic research during the ramp-up to the , providing a dedicated venue for studies linking genes to phenotypes and diseases. Nature Medicine debuted in January 1995, emphasizing with direct implications for disease mechanisms and therapies, reflecting the growing emphasis on clinically relevant basic science. These launches represented a strategic shift from Nature's multidisciplinary roots toward a portfolio of high-impact specialist journals, leveraging the parent brand's prestige to attract top submissions in niche areas. Further milestones included the establishment of Nature Neuroscience in 1998 and the inaugural Nature Reviews journal, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, in 2000, initiating a review series that synthesized advances across subfields like , , and . By the early 2000s, the Nature Publishing Group (NPG) had expanded its global footprint with offices in key locations—Washington, D.C. (1970), (1985), and (1987), and (1989)—facilitating international recruitment of editors and broader author outreach. This period also saw digital innovations, such as the full online launch of Nature.com in 1997, enabling electronic submissions and access, which boosted submission volumes and revenue from institutional subscriptions. NPG's portfolio grew to include over 50 titles by 2010, incorporating open-access options in select journals and partnerships like the 2000 acquisition of rights to , diversifying beyond primary research into magazines and supplementary content. Key operational expansions included the 1971 experiment with weekly specialist supplements—Nature Physical Sciences, Nature New Biology, and Nature Social Sciences—aimed at addressing disciplinary fragmentation, though discontinued in 1973 after circulation failed to justify the split. Under editor John Maddox (1966–1973 and 1980–1995), the journal increased its coverage of policy, ethics, and interdisciplinary topics, with article volume rising to support weekly publication. These developments solidified NPG's model of , where new journals inherited Nature's rigorous peer-review standards while targeting specific communities, contributing to revenue growth through bundled subscriptions and heightened . By 2015, the portfolio encompassed dozens of peer-reviewed outlets, setting the stage for broader mergers while maintaining selectivity, with flagship titles achieving impact factors exceeding 30.

Formation of Springer Nature and Rebranding

Springer Nature emerged from the merger of , a major publisher in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, with the majority of Macmillan Science and Education, which encompassed and . The agreement was announced on January 15, 2015, by , owner of Macmillan Science and Education, and , majority owner of Springer Science+Business Media. Regulatory approvals from authorities including the and U.S. Department of Justice were obtained, enabling completion of the transaction. The merged entity, , was officially created on May 6, 2015, headquartered in and , with Holtzbrinck holding a 53% stake and 47%. This combination integrated Springer's broad portfolio of over 2,500 journals and books with Nature Publishing Group's flagship titles, such as and , aiming to enhance global research dissemination and operational scale. The formation preserved the distinct of Nature journals while leveraging shared infrastructure for distribution and technology. Subsequently, on December 3, 2020, Springer Nature announced the rebranding of its Nature Research imprint to Nature Portfolio, prompted by internal and external feedback highlighting the division's evolution into a comprehensive suite of journals, services, and tools beyond traditional publishing. The rename aimed to simplify identification of its offerings, which include the flagship Nature journal, over 50 Nature-branded research journals, the Nature Partner Journals (npj) series, and supporting services like preprint platforms and data repositories. No alterations were made to editorial processes, content standards, or the core mission of advancing scientific discovery, with the change emphasizing the portfolio's role in serving diverse research communities. This rebranding aligned with Springer Nature's post-merger strategy to unify branding under a structure that highlights high-impact, multidisciplinary outputs.

Ownership and Organization

Parent Company Structure

Nature Portfolio functions as the research publishing division of , a multinational academic publisher established on May 6, 2015, via the merger of —majority-owned by —and Macmillan Science and Education, which encompassed the former Nature Publishing Group under ownership. This structure positions Springer Nature as a integrated entity combining expertise in scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly publishing, with Nature Portfolio retaining operational focus on high-impact journals like while benefiting from the broader group's resources in books, databases, and open-access platforms. Springer Nature operates as a AG & Co. KGaA (a German limited partnership with shares), headquartered in Berlin, with a dual governance model comprising a Management Board for executive decisions and a Supervisory Board for oversight. Ownership is dominated by two entities: Holtzbrinck Publishing Group, a Stuttgart-based family-controlled firm founded in 1948 with stakes in education, media, and digital services, holding 50.6% as of June 30, 2025; and funds managed by BC Partners, a London-headquartered private equity firm specializing in buyouts, controlling approximately 36%. The balance reflects public float following the company's October 2024 initial public offering on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, which valued equity at €4.5 billion and introduced minority institutional investors without altering majority control. Holtzbrinck exercises strategic influence through board representation, ensuring alignment with long-term publishing goals amid the private equity dynamics of BC Partners' stake. This bifurcated ownership—family enterprise versus —has shaped Springer Nature's evolution, with Holtzbrinck's heritage in scientific imprints like providing continuity, while ' involvement, dating to its 2010 acquisition of , emphasizes efficiency and expansion, including digital transformations and acquisitions exceeding 100 since 2015. No single entity holds outright control beyond Holtzbrinck's slim majority, fostering a structure resilient to market shifts but occasionally scrutinized for profit prioritization in access debates.

Leadership and Governance

, the parent company of Nature Portfolio, operates under a structure consisting of a and a Management Board, as mandated by for its AG & Co. KGaA legal form. The , responsible for overseeing management, appointing executives, and ensuring compliance with strategic goals, is chaired by Dr. Stefan von Holtzbrinck and comprises eight members, including independent directors such as Nikos Stathopoulos and Obi Felten, alongside representatives from major shareholders like and . This structure emphasizes shareholder interests, with Holtzbrinck holding approximately 50.6% ownership as of the latest disclosures, influencing toward long-term scientific over short-term profits. The Management Board handles day-to-day operations and strategy execution. Frank Vrancken Peeters has served as since September 2019, having joined in 2017 as ; his tenure has focused on and expansion amid hybrid revenue models. Key executives include Alexandra Dambeck as , responsible for financial oversight and reporting, and Steven Inchcoombe as Chief Publishing and Solutions Officer, who directs content strategy across portfolios including titles. Other members, such as Rachel Jacobs (Group ) and Carolyn Honour (), support legal, ethical publishing standards, and global sales. For Nature Portfolio specifically, editorial governance falls under the Chief Editor of , , who assumed the role in 2018 as the first woman in that position and serves as Chief Editorial Advisor for the broader portfolio. , a with prior experience editing Nature Reviews Genetics, leads interdisciplinary editorial teams emphasizing rigorous and standards, while aligning with Nature's overarching policies on and . This layered integrates corporate oversight with domain-specific expertise, though critics have noted potential conflicts in balancing motives with scientific in high-impact decisions.

Global Operations and Revenue Model

Nature Portfolio operates as a division of , with principal editorial and operational offices in , , , , and , complemented by additional facilities in , , , and other global cities to manage submissions, , and production across time zones. This distributed structure enables handling of manuscripts from authors in over 100 countries, supporting multilingual author services while maintaining English as the primary publication language. In , dedicated offices in , , , , , , and facilitate regional outreach, including localized events and partnerships with institutions in high-growth research markets like and . The revenue model centers on a hybrid approach combining subscription-based access for high-impact journals like Nature and its research titles, with open access options via article processing charges (APCs) averaging €9,000–€11,000 for fully OA outlets such as Scientific Reports. Institutional subscriptions, often negotiated through consortia like Plan S-compliant deals, account for the majority of income, reflecting the premium pricing justified by rigorous peer review and citation impact. APC revenues have grown amid mandates from funders like the Wellcome Trust and cOAlition S, contributing to the Research division's overall expansion. Within Springer Nature's 2024 total revenue of €1,847 million (up 5% underlying growth), the Research segment—including Nature Portfolio—generated €1,414 million, propelled by 6% volume growth in journals and accelerated adoption, though offset by some subscription churn from economic pressures on libraries. Supplementary streams include reprints, in review publications, and licensing data for , but core earnings derive from paywalled content and transformative agreements blending subscriptions with fees. This model sustains high margins, with adjusted operating profit reaching €512 million group-wide in 2024, underscoring the scalability of despite rising production costs for multimedia supplements.

Publishing Portfolio

Core Journals and Flagship Titles

, the flagship journal of Nature Portfolio, is a weekly multidisciplinary publication established on November 4, 1869, that features peer-reviewed primary articles, reviews, and news across the natural sciences, emphasizing discoveries with broad implications. It is recognized as the foremost globally, with editorial leadership under Editor-in-Chief Magdalena Skipper and offices in , , , , and to facilitate global input. The journal prioritizes originality, significance, and interdisciplinary appeal in its selections, often setting benchmarks for . The core journals under Nature Portfolio extend this flagship model through discipline-specific weekly titles branded as Nature research journals, which publish high-impact primary research in targeted fields such as , , , and . Examples include Nature Biotechnology, focusing on biotechnological innovations since its inception in 1983; Nature Genetics, dedicated to genetic and genomic studies; and Nature Medicine, covering translational . These journals maintain rigorous standards akin to Nature, with monthly or online-weekly formats, and incorporate supplementary content like perspectives and protocols to support . Nature Communications complements the core portfolio as a high-volume, fully open-access multidisciplinary launched in , accepting significant advances across sciences with an emphasis on rapid publication and broad dissemination. It handles submissions declined from flagship titles, leveraging shared referee reports for efficiency, and has grown to publish thousands of articles annually, broadening access while upholding quality through dedicated editorial teams. Collectively, these titles form the backbone of Nature Portfolio's prestige, with over 60 journals in total contributing to its influence in advancing empirical scientific knowledge.

Specialized Series and Open Access Journals

Nature Portfolio maintains several specialized journal series focused on in-depth reviews, methodological protocols, and targeted disciplinary advancements. The Nature Reviews series comprises over 20 titles, such as Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (established 2002) and Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (launched 2000), which publish commissioned review articles, perspectives, and commentaries synthesizing current knowledge in fields like , , and . These journals emphasize critical analysis over primary data, with rigorous editorial oversight ensuring comprehensive coverage of emerging trends and unresolved challenges. Complementing this, Nature Protocols, initiated in 2006, specializes in peer-reviewed, step-by-step methodological protocols across biological, chemical, and clinical domains, including techniques for organoid culture, CRISPR editing, and . The journal prioritizes , with protocols validated by expert labs and accompanied by guides, addressing a key need in experimental sciences where methodological transparency impacts research reliability. On the open access front, Nature Portfolio operates a growing suite of fully journals, including multidisciplinary outlets like (launched June 2011), which has published hundreds of thousands of articles by 2025 across life, physical, and social sciences, emphasizing sound, incremental findings without prioritizing novelty. (started 2010) serves as a selective OA platform for significant advances, with an acceptance rate under 10% and article processing charges (APCs) funding immediate accessibility. The npj (Nature Partner Journals) series represents a hybrid of specialization and , comprising over 50 community-partnered titles as of 2025, such as npj Vaccines (2016) and npj Climate and (2018), each tailored to niche areas like antimicrobials, , and . These journals foster discipline-specific editorial boards, promoting rapid publication and broad dissemination under licensing, while maintaining Portfolio's quality standards through integrated . By 2024, the portfolio encompassed 57 fully OA journals, reflecting a strategic expansion to enhance global research equity.

Books, Reviews, and Supplementary Products

The Nature Reviews series, part of the Portfolio, consists of over 20 specialized journals that publish commissioned, peer-reviewed review articles synthesizing advances in fields such as , , and . Titles include Nature Reviews Cancer, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, and Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, which filter and contextualize primary literature to assist researchers, clinicians, and students in staying abreast of developments without exhaustive reading of original papers. These articles emphasize mechanistic insights, clinical implications, and future directions, often illustrated with custom figures and timelines. Nature Protocols serves as a supplementary product, functioning as an dedicated to detailed, reproducible methods from peer-reviewed primary . It features step-by-step protocols with guides, , and validation for techniques in disciplines like , protein , and , ensuring methods are proven and adaptable. Authors must link protocols to an associated original study, promoting and replication in experimental science. Supplementary information (SI) accompanies many Nature Portfolio articles, providing extended such as additional figures, datasets, videos, or statistical analyses not included in the main text due to constraints. SI files, submitted in formats like PDF or Excel, must be self-contained and cited in the primary , with guidelines limiting size to under 10 MB per file to maintain accessibility. This practice enhances article completeness while adhering to journal policies on availability. While the Nature Portfolio emphasizes journals and protocols over monographs, , its parent entity, maintains a vast portfolio exceeding 300,000 titles in scientific, technical, and medical subjects, including reference works and proceedings that occasionally incorporate Nature-branded content or expertise. Nature's main features curated reviews and essays on , evaluating works for methodological rigor and conceptual impact rather than producing standalone books.

Editorial and Peer Review Processes

Selection Criteria and Impact Factors

Nature Portfolio journals maintain rigorous selection criteria centered on the originality, significance, and interdisciplinary appeal of submitted research. Editors initially evaluate manuscripts for alignment with the journal's scope, technical validity, and potential to influence multiple fields or advance fundamental knowledge, rejecting the majority at this stage without external review. For flagship titles like Nature, only approximately 8% of submissions ultimately achieve acceptance, reflecting a threshold that prioritizes transformative contributions over incremental findings. Advancing manuscripts undergo single-anonymized by 2-4 independent experts selected for their domain authority and lack of conflicts, who assess methodological soundness, data , and broader implications. Editors retain final authority, weighing input against the journal's emphasis on concise, high-impact narratives—typically limiting articles to 2,500-4,300 words with minimal display items to ensure . This , applied consistently across the portfolio, favors empirical rigor and causal insight over speculative claims, though critics have noted occasional prioritization of novelty at the expense of depth in fast-paced fields. Impact factors, derived from Clarivate's as the average citations per article in the prior two years, serve as proxies for journal influence within Nature Portfolio. The flagship holds a 2024 impact factor of 48.5, underscoring its role in disseminating paradigm-shifting work across disciplines. Specialized titles exhibit strong but varied metrics, such as at 15.7 (2024), reflecting broader accessibility while upholding selectivity.
Journal2024 Impact FactorSource
Nature48.5
15.7
~4.6 (2023; 2024 pending full release)
These figures, while indicative of concentration, are field-dependent and do not fully capture qualitative or risks of from high-volume publishing in open-access variants.

Handling of Revisions and Rejections

Manuscripts submitted to Nature Portfolio journals undergo rigorous editorial screening, with approximately 92% rejected, the majority without external due to insufficient novelty, broad interest, or technical soundness. Editors assess submissions for alignment with journal criteria, rejecting those deemed inappropriate promptly to expedite the process. Upon external review, editors synthesize referee reports—typically from 2-4 experts—and render decisions independent of a mere vote, weighing scientific merit, interdisciplinary appeal, and potential impact. Possible outcomes include outright acceptance (rare, with or without minor editorial revisions), invitation to revise addressing specific concerns, or rejection. Revisions may involve 1-3 rounds, often requiring additional experiments for deferred decisions; authors must submit point-by-point responses to referee comments alongside revised . Original reviewers are routinely re-engaged to evaluate revisions, receiving the updated manuscript, prior reports, and author rebuttals, ensuring in . Rejections post-review occur when concerns such as unestablished claims, technical flaws, or limited advance cannot be remedied adequately, though some decisions indicate that substantial revisions addressing all issues could warrant resubmission as a new manuscript. Resubmission is not permitted for outright rejections without explicit encouragement, preventing redundant processing. In transparent —standard for many Nature Portfolio titles since , with author opt-in—rejection letters, comments, and rebuttals may be published online upon request, promoting accountability while maintaining anonymity unless waived. Authors dissatisfied with rejections may appeal to the handling editor, submitting a formal scientific argument highlighting overlooked evidence or referee errors, though success is rare absent compelling technical flaws. Appeals prioritize active submissions and are decided by the editorial team without routine new referees; unresolved process complaints escalate to the chief editor, with ethics violations handled per COPE guidelines via 's Research Integrity Group.

Innovations in Publishing Standards

Nature Portfolio has implemented policies mandating the prompt availability of , materials, code, and protocols as a condition of publication across its journals, requiring authors to include a data availability statement detailing access methods. This policy, formalized in editorial guidelines, aims to enhance by enabling independent verification, with non-compliance potentially leading to rejection. Enforcement includes of data accessibility, extending to clinical trial registration and deposition in public repositories where applicable. In June 2025, extended transparent to all primary research articles, making publication of the full file—including reviewer comments, editor summaries, and author rebuttals—the default for submissions received on or after June 16, if accepted. Reviewers' identities remain anonymous unless voluntarily disclosed, balancing transparency with confidentiality. This builds on optional pilots in select journals since 2018, addressing concerns over opaque processes by providing public insight into editorial decisions without altering acceptance criteria. To bolster scientific rigor, Nature Portfolio journals require adherence to standardized reporting checklists, such as those for randomized trials, observational studies, and data, alongside policies prohibiting image manipulation beyond acceptable adjustments. These measures, updated iteratively, respond to challenges identified in surveys of life sciences research, where factors like incomplete methods descriptions contribute to irreproducibility rates exceeding 50% in some fields. In 2017, endorsed the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines, incorporating levels of , , and preregistration tailored to disciplines. Recent editorial policies also address emerging technologies, such as prohibiting AI-generated images or videos in publications due to unresolved legal and authenticity issues, while permitting AI-assisted text generation if disclosed and not used to fabricate data. Additionally, initiatives encourage experienced reviewers to mentor early-career researchers (ECRs) during the process, fostering skill development without compromising review quality. These standards collectively prioritize empirical verifiability over unsubstantiated claims, though their impact on overall reproducibility remains under evaluation amid broader industry critiques.

Business and Access Models

Subscription vs. Open Access Strategies

Nature Portfolio primarily operates a hybrid publishing model across its journals, including flagship titles like Nature, where authors can select either subscription-based publication or gold open access upon acceptance. In the subscription route, articles are accessible only to institutional subscribers or via pay-per-view, funding the journal through reader-side payments while maintaining traditional barriers to widespread dissemination. This approach sustains revenue from multi-year institutional licenses, which form a core component of Springer Nature's research segment earnings, reported at €1,414 million in 2024 with underlying growth of 6%. For , authors or their funders pay an () to make the final version freely available under a , with 's APC set at $12,690 USD (or equivalent in GBP/EUR) as of 2024. This gold OA option applies to primary research articles in hybrid journals but excludes non-primary content like reviews, which remain subscription-only. Nature Portfolio extends OA choices to all primary research outputs, supported by fully OA titles such as , but hybrid formats dominate the portfolio to balance accessibility with financial stability. Strategically, the portfolio leverages transformative agreements (TAs) with institutions, combining subscription fees for reading access with covered APCs for publishing, facilitating a gradual shift without fully abandoning subscriptions. These , numbering over 3,700 globally by , have accelerated adoption, with 44% of Springer Nature's primary research articles published in 2023, rising to 50% in , driven by higher publication volumes and fees contributing to transactional revenue of €532 million. Such agreements, exemplified by the 2022 UC-Springer Nature deal including Nature Portfolio, enable corresponding authors from participating institutions to publish without direct APC payment, though overall revenue growth reflects sustained hybrid profitability amid expansion. This dual strategy mitigates risks of subscription erosion—evident in broader industry trends—while capitalizing on funder mandates for , though critics note hybrid models can yield overlapping revenues from both payers.

Pricing Structures and Author Fees

Nature Portfolio journals primarily operate under a hybrid model, combining subscription-based access with optional publication. In subscription mode, authors face no mandatory publication fees, though charges may apply for color figures, over-length articles, or excess pages, as specified on individual journal guidelines. Institutional subscriptions fund reader access, with pricing negotiated directly between and libraries or consortia, often reflecting the volume of subscription articles exclusive of open access content. For , authors or their funding institutions pay article processing charges (APCs) to make articles freely available under licenses. APCs vary significantly by journal title and are listed on each journal's submission guidelines or fees section. In hybrid journals like , the APC for gold open access primary research articles stands at €10,690 (equivalent to £9,190 or $12,690), covering publication costs without additional page or color fees in most cases. Fully open access titles, such as , mandate APCs starting at €2,390, while others like fall within the broader portfolio range determined at acceptance. These fees support immediate open access but have drawn scrutiny for escalating costs, with hybrid Nature Portfolio APCs reaching approximately $12,290 in recent years amid rising operational expenses.
Journal ExamplePublishing ModelAPC (EUR, approximate)
Nature10,690
Scientific Reports2,390
Springer Nature offers APC waivers to mitigate barriers: full waivers for corresponding authors from World Bank-classified low-income economies (e.g., , ) and 50% discounts for select lower-middle-income countries with GDP under $200 billion (e.g., , ), requested at submission. Discretionary waivers address exceptional financial hardship, though eligibility excludes certain pilots or hybrid options where subscription remains viable. No submission fees apply across the portfolio, emphasizing post-acceptance costs tied to chosen access models.

Institutional Agreements and Partnerships

, the parent organization of Nature Portfolio, has established numerous transformative agreements with academic institutions worldwide to support the transition to publishing. These primarily take the form of Read and Publish deals, which bundle subscription-based reading access with coverage of article processing charges (APCs) for publication in journals, including many Nature Portfolio titles. Such agreements enable corresponding authors affiliated with participating institutions to publish without incurring direct fees, provided the research meets eligibility criteria like funding from compliant sources. As of 2025, over 1,000 institutions globally participate in these arrangements, spanning regions including the , , , and . In the United States, notable examples include the University of California's transformative agreement with , initially signed in 2021 and expanded in July 2022 to explicitly incorporate journals, allowing UC-affiliated authors to make research freely available across Springer Nature's hybrid portfolio. Similarly, the (BTAA) entered an Open Publishing Agreement in June 2025, marking the first uncapped deal for unlimited publishing in Springer Nature hybrid journals, including titles, alongside multi-year reading access for member libraries. Vanderbilt University finalized a comparable agreement in February 2025, facilitating outputs in and other flagship science journals for its researchers. These U.S.-focused pacts reflect a broader trend toward offsetting APCs through consortial negotiations, with Springer Nature reporting increased OA uptake in participating hybrid journals. Internationally, agreements mirror this model; for instance, the Council of Australian University Librarians (CAUL) negotiated a Read and Publish deal covering most Springer Nature hybrid journals, active through 2025, which includes Nature Portfolio options for Australian authors. In Europe and the UK, partnerships like those with the Max Planck Society and various national consortia provide similar APC waivers, often tied to Plan S compliance. While these deals promote broader dissemination of research, eligibility typically requires hybrid (not fully OA) journals and adherence to specific metadata standards, with Springer Nature verifying institutional affiliations via tools like Ringgold identifiers. Beyond publishing, Nature Portfolio offers supplementary partnerships for content promotion and custom services, such as aligning institutional research with targeted outreach, though these are secondary to core access agreements.

Scientific Impact and Achievements

Contributions to Major Discoveries

Nature Portfolio journals, particularly , have published foundational papers that advanced understanding in fields from to . These publications often represent first reports of empirical breakthroughs, enabling subsequent and applications. For example, the 1953 paper by James D. Watson and Francis H. C. Crick describing the double-helical structure of DNA provided a mechanistic basis for and spurred developments in and . Similarly, the 1975 report by Georges J. F. Köhler and on for producing monoclonal antibodies revolutionized and diagnostics, facilitating targeted therapies for diseases like cancer. In physics and , Nature featured the 1985 discovery of the C<sub>60</sub> molecule by Harold W. Kroto, Richard E. Smalley, and Robert F. Curl, which opened avenues in and carbon-based materials such as . That same year, Joe Farman, Brian Gardiner, and Jonathan Shanklin documented the Antarctic ozone hole, linking it to chlorofluorocarbons and prompting the 1987 Protocol's global phase-out of ozone-depleting substances. In astronomy, the 1995 detection of , a Jupiter-mass orbiting a Sun-like star, by and challenged planetary formation models and ignited searches, leading to thousands of confirmed worlds. More recent contributions include the 1997 cloning of the sheep by and colleagues, demonstrating in mammals and laying groundwork for debates. In , the 2021 AlphaFold2 paper by John Jumper et al. achieved near-atomic accuracy in , accelerating and structural genomics efforts. These publications, selected for their rigorous and rapid dissemination, have collectively influenced over 100 Nobel Prizes linked to Nature papers, underscoring the portfolio's role in catalyzing empirical progress.

Citation Metrics and Global Influence

Nature's flagship journal maintains one of the highest Journal Impact Factors (JIF) in multidisciplinary sciences at 48.5 for 2024, calculated by as the average citations per article published in 2022–2023. Its 5-year JIF stands at 55.0, reflecting sustained longevity, while the reaches 1442, indicating 1442 articles each cited at least 1442 times according to data through 2025. These metrics underscore Nature's dominance in volume, with articles averaging 21.7 citations per year post-2024 publication. Across the portfolio, reports a 2024 JIF of 15.7 and 5-year JIF of 17.2, positioning it among top multidisciplinary open-access outlets. , emphasizing high-volume output, garnered over 834,000 citations in 2024, ranking as the third-most-cited journal globally by total citations received that year despite a lower JIF of 3.9, driven by its broad scope and accessibility. Portfolio-wide, these journals collectively amass millions of annual citations, with Nature-branded titles contributing disproportionately to global scientific discourse.
Journal2024 JIF5-Year JIFKey Citation Note
Nature48.555.0h-index 1442
Nature Communications15.717.2Eigenfactor 1.49791
Scientific Reports3.94.3>834,000 citations in 2024
Global influence manifests in the portfolio's pervasive role shaping research agendas, with citations originating from institutions worldwide and informing , as evidenced by frequent and governmental references to its outputs. For instance, papers frequently top lists of most-influential 21st-century works by count, extending impact beyond into technological and medical advancements. This reach stems from rigorous selection favoring novel, verifiable findings, though metrics like JIF are critiqued for incentivizing -prone topics over replicability; nonetheless, empirical data affirm the portfolio's outsized role in disseminating high-evidence .

Role in Advancing Empirical Research

Nature Portfolio journals advance by disseminating peer-reviewed studies that emphasize experimental evidence, quantitative , and derived from controlled observations and replicable methodologies. These publications set benchmarks for methodological , requiring authors to provide detailed protocols, raw datasets, and statistical validations to enable verification. For example, editorial policies mandate availability statements that specify how underlying datasets can be accessed, either through public repositories or upon reasonable request, thereby supporting empirical replication and reducing reliance on unverified claims. This framework has facilitated advancements in fields like physics and , where empirical findings from -published papers have informed subsequent experiments, such as those building on early crystallographic analyses. The portfolio's role extends to amplifying empirical discoveries with broad implications, including the detection of pulsars through observations and empirical modeling in that predicted observable phenomena later confirmed experimentally. By curating content for significance and technical soundness over novelty alone, Nature journals influence research agendas, prompting targeted empirical investigations; for instance, publications on empirical modeling techniques have guided predictive simulations grounded in real-world data rather than abstraction. High citation rates of these works—stemming from rigorous selection—drive cumulative empirical progress, as seen in interdisciplinary applications where initial datasets spur meta-analyses and longitudinal studies. Critically, while these mechanisms promote causal through evidence prioritization, the portfolio's policies also address potential gaps by integrating code and materials sharing requirements, though adherence varies by discipline. Overall, Portfolio's commitment to verifiable has underpinned paradigm shifts, from genomic sequencing validations to modeling based on observational records, ensuring that scientific remains tethered to testable realities.

Criticisms and Controversies

Publication Bias and Reproducibility Issues

Publication bias in high-impact journals such as those in the Portfolio favors studies with statistically significant or novel positive results over null or negative findings, distorting the scientific literature by underrepresenting non-confirmatory outcomes. This selective publishing incentivizes questionable research practices like p-hacking and (hypothesizing after results are known), as authors prioritize "exciting" results to meet the journals' emphasis on broad interest and impact. Empirical analyses indicate that top-tier journals, including , exhibit stronger positive bias compared to lower-impact outlets, with effect sizes often inflated due to this filtering process. To mitigate such bias, Nature Portfolio journals have adopted Registered Reports, a format where peer review occurs before data collection based on study design and rationale, with in-principle acceptance regardless of results. Introduced in select titles by 2023, this approach has shown promise in reducing outcome-dependent publication decisions, though adoption remains limited across the portfolio. Despite these reforms, critics argue that the prestige-driven model of journals perpetuates bias, as null results, even from rigorous Registered Reports, rarely achieve the same visibility or citations as positive ones. The reproducibility crisis has been prominently documented in Nature's own surveys, revealing systemic failures in replicating published findings. In a 2016 poll of over 1,500 researchers, more than 70% reported inability to reproduce another scientist's experiments, while over 50% failed to replicate their own, attributing issues to selective , low statistical power, and pressure to publish novel results. A 2024 survey echoed this, with 72% of biomedical researchers viewing their field as in crisis, linking irreproducibility to "" incentives amplified by journals like that reward high-impact claims over incremental verification. Nature Portfolio publications have not been immune, with numerous retractions tied to irreproducible or fabricated underscoring lapses. For instance, a 2020 Nature paper linking microbial genomes to cancer was retracted in 2023 after replication attempts exposed methodological flaws and unsubstantiated claims. Broader analyses show retractions in journals often stem from irreproducibility, with early-career authors facing career penalties that deter thorough validation efforts. While has implemented stricter availability policies since 2014, surveys indicate persistent gaps, as only a minority of papers provide sufficient materials for verification. These issues highlight how the portfolio's focus on groundbreaking discoveries can prioritize speed and novelty over robust, replicable evidence.

Allegations of Editorial and Institutional Bias

In August 2022, Nature Human Behaviour, a journal under the Nature Portfolio, published an editorial titled "Science must respect the dignity and rights of all humans," announcing that it would prioritize "equity and inclusion" in editorial decisions, potentially rejecting scientifically valid research if it risked being misinterpreted or misused to fuel discrimination or social hierarchies, even absent methodological flaws. Critics, including physicist and the for and Expression (), argued this policy subordinated empirical merit to ideological concerns, effectively introducing political censorship into and eroding open scientific inquiry. Journalist described it as a shift toward altering or retracting valid findings based on potential societal offense, contrasting with traditional commitments to over moral signaling. Nature's editorial leadership has faced accusations of left-leaning political bias, exemplified by its October 2020 endorsement of for U.S. president, where editors cited Trump's alleged disregard for evidence and democracy as incompatible with scientific values, while praising Biden's alignment with them. This marked a rare intervention by a into electoral , with subsequent research finding it diminished conservative trust in the publication and U.S. scientists without swaying voter preferences. A 2016 survey indicated that most of its readership self-identifies on the liberal left of the , potentially influencing content selection and framing in politically charged fields like climate policy and . Institutionally, Springer Nature, which oversees the Nature Portfolio, drew criticism in June 2025 when the second Trump administration terminated approximately $20 million in U.S. federal contracts and subscriptions across agencies including the NIH and EPA, citing the publisher's perceived "woke" ideological slant, politicized content, and concessions to foreign influences such as China in retraction decisions. Administration officials highlighted instances of biased peer review and editorial favoritism toward narratives aligning with progressive priorities, prompting the shift to alternative access models. Springer Nature did not publicly contest the bias claims but emphasized its commitment to editorial independence amid the funding cuts.

Retractions, Fraud, and Quality Control Failures

Nature Portfolio journals have retracted numerous papers due to evidence of , falsification, or other , underscoring occasional lapses in pre-publication quality controls despite their emphasis on rigorous . High-profile cases often emerge from intense post-publication scrutiny, as the visibility of Nature-branded publications attracts detailed examination that reveals flaws missed initially. Retraction rates in top-tier journals like those in Nature Portfolio correlate with higher impact factors, reflecting greater detection rather than inherently poorer safeguards, though systemic pressures for novel results can incentivize . A prominent example involved two 2014 Nature papers claiming stimulus-triggered acquisition of pluripotency (STAP) in cells via mild stress, which garnered widespread attention before swift investigations uncovered duplicated images, selective data reporting, and irreproducibility; both were retracted on July 2, 2014, with lead author Haruko Obokata accepting responsibility for errors but denying intentional fraud. Similarly, a 2020 Nature article by Ranga Dias and colleagues asserting room-temperature superconductivity in a carbon-sulfur hydride under high pressure was retracted in September 2022 following an external review that identified fabricated data, including manipulated resistance measurements and undisclosed synthesis details; Dias contested the findings, but the journal cited insufficient evidence supporting the claims. A third related paper from the group in Nature was also retracted in November 2023 amid ongoing allegations of plagiarism and falsification. Longer-term quality issues surfaced in a highly cited 2002 Nature paper by Catherine Verfaillie et al., asserting broad pluripotency in adult bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells; retracted on June 17, 2024, after data sleuths flagged inconsistencies like anomalous cell images and failed replication attempts, with editors losing confidence in the conclusions despite over 4,400 citations accumulated over 22 years. In Nature Communications, a 2023 study claiming a new carbon allotrope (body-centered cubic) was retracted in September 2024 due to faked electron microscopy data, as confirmed by independent verification. Within the broader Nature Portfolio, has drawn criticism for lax oversight, with an October 2024 open letter from research integrity experts accusing it of publishing fraudulent papers despite flagged concerns, including image manipulations and implausible results; the journal had issued 231 retractions by late 2024, representing about 0.3% of its output, amid 450 high-risk papers identified by fraud-detection tools. These incidents highlight vulnerabilities in , such as overburdened processes and reliance on author-supplied data, prompting Nature Portfolio to adopt measures like transparent review files since June 2025 and enhanced screening, though skeptics argue incentives favoring publication volume over verification persist across .

Recent Developments

New Journal Launches (2024–2025)

In January 2024, Portfolio launched three new journals to address emerging interdisciplinary challenges. publishes research, opinions, and ideas on , spanning sciences, , and , with a focus on infrastructure, , and in cities; it is edited by Chief Editor Bill Burnside and operates as a transformative journal transitioning to full . covers cutting-edge applied chemistry and physics relevant to , targeting industrial processes and for chemists, physicists, environmental scientists, and materials experts; Chief Editor Tom Dursch oversees its rigorous as another transformative title. provides review and commentary articles on topics, aiming to connect specialists and explore future developments; it is led by Chief Editor Olga Bubnova. In January 2025, Nature Portfolio introduced two subscription-based Nature Reviews journals emphasizing critical environmental and ecological themes. Nature Reviews Clean Technology features reviews, perspectives, and opinion pieces on technologies and processes that minimize environmental impacts, such as clean energy and waste reduction, serving experts, students, practitioners, and policymakers; Chief Editor Laura Zinke guides its content. Nature Reviews synthesizes research in , , and to address , promoting equitable solutions and highlighting geographic research gaps; it is edited by Chief Editor Alexa McKay. These launches continue Nature Portfolio's expansion, which has added over 30 titles since 2015, all subjected to professional editorial oversight and .

Responses to Industry Challenges

In June 2025, Nature Portfolio extended transparent peer review to all its primary research journals, including Nature, requiring that peer review reports, editor decision letters, and author rebuttals be published alongside accepted articles by default. This policy change, effective for submissions from June 16, 2025, seeks to increase accountability in editorial decisions, reduce undisclosed biases in refereeing, and allow broader scrutiny of the review process, building on a pilot program introduced in select journals years earlier. To counter reproducibility challenges, Nature Portfolio enforces standardized reporting guidelines mandating the deposition of , analysis code, materials, and protocols in public repositories for relevant studies, with non-compliance grounds for rejection or post-publication correction. These measures, updated iteratively since , align with endorsed frameworks like the TOP Guidelines and aim to enable independent verification amid documented low replication rates in fields such as , where large-scale trials have shown success rates below 50%. Addressing retractions and , Nature Portfolio maintains a dedicated policy for post-publication amendments, issuing corrections, expressions of concern, or full retractions for substantiated issues like or methodological flaws, as demonstrated in the October 2024 retraction of a prominent study due to plan misstatements. The portfolio also curates collections on replication efforts and negative results to counteract favoring positive outcomes, with editorial emphasis on structural reforms like preregistration incentives. On access and equity barriers, Nature Portfolio has accelerated open access through hybrid models and transformative agreements, reporting in August 2025 that over 50% of its articles were in 2024, correlating with higher citation impacts and global usage from low-resource regions. These steps respond to critiques of paywall-restricted knowledge, though article processing charges remain high at approximately $11,250 for gold in flagship titles.

Future Directions and Adaptations

, encompassing , anticipates sustained revenue growth in 2025 driven by its (OA) pivot, with OA comprising 50% of primary research articles by the end of 2024 and further expansion projected amid rising article processing charges. This adaptation responds to funder mandates and global accessibility demands, enabling wider dissemination of high-impact findings while leveraging hybrid models to balance subscription revenues. Integration of () represents a core strategic direction, with applications aimed at streamlining editorial workflows, accelerating , and enhancing content discovery to reduce publication timelines. AI tools are also deployed for misconduct detection and research support, such as generating summaries or identifying relevant literature, under strict human oversight to mitigate biases and uphold integrity. Springer Nature's commitment includes ethical guidelines ensuring AI augments rather than replaces expert judgment in advancing discovery. Portfolio expansion continues through targeted journal launches, including Nature Reviews Clean Technology and Nature Reviews Biodiversity debuting in January 2025, focusing on and ecological challenges to capture interdisciplinary growth areas. These initiatives adapt to evolving research priorities like climate mitigation, positioning Nature Portfolio to influence emerging fields amid intensifying global pressures. In response to reproducibility challenges, future adaptations emphasize reinforced policies, including mandatory data availability and preregistration incentives, with potentially aiding statistical validation and replication efforts to bolster empirical rigor. Progress in these areas aligns with first-quarter updates confirming on-track and quality initiatives.

References

  1. [1]
    About Nature Portfolio
    Nature Portfolio is here to serve the research community by publishing its most significant discoveries—findings that advance knowledge ...
  2. [2]
    Nature Portfolio expands with two new titles for 2025
    Mar 27, 2024 · Nature Portfolio expands with two new titles for 2025. London ... Nature (founded in 1869) is the leading, international weekly journal of science ...
  3. [3]
    Nature Portfolio journals | Springer Nature | For Librarians
    With over 60 publications, including Nature, spanning diverse scientific fields, the Nature Portfolio stands out for its rigorous peer review process.
  4. [4]
    Peer Review | Nature Portfolio
    Nature Portfolio journals are peer-reviewed: Articles, Letters, Brief Communications, Matters Arising, Technical Reports, Analysis, Resources, Reviews, ...
  5. [5]
    What is the reputation of 'Scientific Reports', published by Nature ...
    May 31, 2021 · Scientific Reports (SR) is a mixed bag. There are some very good articles and some not so much. Many articles are published without solid or ...
  6. [6]
    Editorial policies | Nature Portfolio
    The Nature Portfolio includes all journals with Nature in their name, the Communications journals, the npj series, Scientific Reports and Scientific Data. A ...Confidentiality · Artificial Intelligence (AI) · Authorship · Competing interests
  7. [7]
    History of Nature
    Nature portfolio policies · Open access. Author & Researcher services. Reprints & permissions · Research data · Language editing · Scientific editing · Nature ...
  8. [8]
    How Nature contributed to science's discriminatory legacy
    Sep 28, 2022 · Nature was founded in 1869 by astronomer Norman Lockyer and publisher Alexander Macmillan. It was designed to publish contributions from an ...<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    About Us - Springer Nature
    We are a global and progressive business, founded on a heritage of trusted and respected brands – including Springer, founded ... Nature Portfolio · BMC.
  10. [10]
    Credibility, peer review, and Nature, 1945–1990 | Notes and Records
    Jul 1, 2015 · Nature, a weekly for-profit journal that publishes research from across scientific disciplines, was founded in 1869 under the leadership of the ...
  11. [11]
    Nature Medicine
    30th Anniversary Series on the Future of Medicine. As Nature Medicine celebrates the 30th anniversary of its launch, we reflect on what the future holds for ...Volume 31 Issue 10, October... · Submission Guidelines · Journal Information
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    Nature owner merges with publishing giant
    Jan 15, 2015 · Macmillan Science and Education, the London-based publisher of Nature and Scientific American, will merge with Berlin-based Springer Science+Business Media.Missing: formation | Show results with:formation
  14. [14]
    Holtzbrinck Publishing Group and BC Partners announce ...
    Holtzbrinck Publishing Group (Holtzbrinck) and BC Partners (BCP) announced today that they have reached an agreement to merge Springer Science+Business Media.Missing: formation | Show results with:formation
  15. [15]
    A new name for Nature Research | Springer Nature Group
    From this flagship title, through the breadth of our journals and services, this remains unchanged. Our renaming to Nature Portfolio strengthens our commitment ...
  16. [16]
    Corporate Governance - Springer Nature Group
    Springer Nature has a dual board structure made up of a Supervisory Board and a Management Board. The Supervisory Board is responsible for supervising and ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Springer Nature Annual Report 2024
    Dec 31, 2024 · Springer Nature AG & Co. KGaA is a listed partnership limited by shares, incorporated in Germany with its registered office in Berlin ( ...
  18. [18]
    Shareholder Structure - Springer Nature Group - Investor Relations
    Jun 30, 2025 · Shareholder Structure1) A majority owned and controlled indirect subsidiary of funds that are advised by BC Partners LLP>
  19. [19]
    S&C Advises Springer Nature in IPO Valuing Company's Equity at ...
    Oct 7, 2024 · Following the IPO, Holtzbrinck Publishing Group indirectly holds around 50.6% and BC Partners indirectly holds around 36.0% of the company's ...
  20. [20]
    Research Companies: Springer Nature - SPARC
    The Springer Nature Group is the result of the 2015 merger of Springer Science+Business Media with the majority of the businesses owned by Holtzbrinck and ...Missing: formation | Show results with:formation
  21. [21]
    Supervisory Board - Springer Nature Group
    The Supervisory Board oversees Springer Nature's management, with three independent members. Dr. Stefan von Holtzbrinck is the Chair, and Nikos Stathopoulos is ...
  22. [22]
    Executive Team - Springer Nature Group
    Frank Vrancken Peeters, Chief Executive Officer, Member of the Management Board, Alexandra Dambeck, Alexandra Dambeck, Chief Financial Officer, Member of the ...
  23. [23]
    About the Editors | Nature
    Editor in Chief Magdalena Skipper, PhD, Springer Nature, UK | ORCID. As Editor in Chief, Magdalena leads Nature's magazine and research editorial teams.
  24. [24]
    Locations and Contact - Springer Nature Group
    This page provides contact info for questions, concerns, and global office locations. Raise concerns via the "Speak Up" system. Contact info for authors, ...
  25. [25]
    Nature Portfolio Asia-Pacific
    Nature Portfolio has offices conveniently located throughout the Asia-Pacific - Tokyo, Shanghai, Seoul, Melbourne and New Delhi, Singapore and Sydney.Missing: operations | Show results with:operations
  26. [26]
    Springer Nature achieves revenue and profit targets and projects ...
    Mar 18, 2025 · Springer Nature's 2024 revenue was €1,847 million, with a 5% increase, and adjusted operating profit of €512 million, a 7% increase. 2025  ...
  27. [27]
    Nature
    Nature portfolio policies · Open access. Author & Researcher services. Reprints & permissions · Research data · Language editing · Scientific editing · Nature ...History of Nature · Journals A-Z · About Nature Portfolio · Journal Information
  28. [28]
    About Nature Portfolio journals
    A weekly, international journal, publishing papers from any area of science with great potential impact and whose importance extends well beyond the confines ...
  29. [29]
    Subscribe to Nature
    Nature is the foremost international weekly scientific journal in the world and is the flagship journal for Nature Portfolio. It publishes the finest peer ...
  30. [30]
    Nature Reviews Journals | For Librarians - Springer Nature
    The Nature Reviews journals act as a filter to help busy students, researchers and clinicians keep up to date with the latest scientific literature.
  31. [31]
    Nature Protocols
    Nature Protocols is an online journal publishing high-quality, citable, peer-reviewed protocols from the leading laboratories in all fields of biological ...Journal Information · For Authors · Browse Articles · Volume 20
  32. [32]
    Journal Information | Nature Protocols
    Nature Protocols covers techniques in biological, chemical, and clinical sciences, with protocols, reviews, and other related content. It has no external ...
  33. [33]
    Scientific Reports - Nature
    Your hub for global discovery. An open access Nature Portfolio journal publishing research from the natural sciences, psychology, medicine, and engineering.About · For authors · Open access funding · Open Access Fees and Funding
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
    npj Series | Nature Portfolio
    The npj journals are community-focused, researcher-edited, and a partnership with Nature Portfolio, with a less selective acceptance criterion.
  36. [36]
    Collections in the spotlight: Nature Portfolio - WUR
    Jun 20, 2024 · Nature was first published in London in 1869. The journals in Nature Portfolio are renowned for their rigorous peer-review process, high-impact ...
  37. [37]
    Journals A-Z - Nature
    Nature publishes journals like Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, Nature Aging, Nature Biotechnology, Nature Communications, and Nature Reviews Genetics.<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Aims & Scope | Nature Protocols
    Nature Protocols publishes secondary research articles - predominantly Protocols (including Protocol Updates and Protocol Extensions), but also techniques- ...
  39. [39]
    Preparing your submission | Nature Protocols
    All of our protocols have been proven to work already and a supporting primary research paper is a publication requirement. Protocols are externally peer- ...
  40. [40]
    Supplementary information - Nature
    This document provides guidelines on submission of Supplementary Information (SI), including content of SI, the type of files we can accept, the size ...Missing: products | Show results with:products
  41. [41]
    Supplementary information - Nature Support
    Oct 12, 2024 · Supplementary information is additional data supplied by some authors to accompany articles published in the printed journal and is not provided for all ...
  42. [42]
    Books | Products - Springer Nature
    Springer Nature offers 300000+ books—an essential resource for students and researchers across STM, humanities, and social sciences.
  43. [43]
    Science books & culture articles - Nature
    Browse the latest articles on books & culture from the world's leading research journal ... About Nature Portfolio. About us · Press releases · Press office ...
  44. [44]
    Editorial criteria and processes | Nature
    Nature requires original, important research with interdisciplinary interest. Only about 8% of submissions are accepted, with editors making the final decision.
  45. [45]
    Initial submission - Nature
    Submissions for Articles, Reviews and Perspectives, and Matters Arising must be submitted via our online submission system.
  46. [46]
    How to publish your paper | Nature Portfolio
    For more information on how to publish papers in a specific Nature Portfolio title, please visit the author instructions page for the journal that is of ...Missing: renamed | Show results with:renamed<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    Journal Metrics | Nature
    Journal Impact Factor: 48.5 (2024) · 5-year Journal Impact Factor: 55.0 (2024) · Immediacy Index: 11.8 (2024) · Eigenfactor® Score: 0.97161 (2024) · Article ...
  48. [48]
    Journal Information | Nature Communications
    Nature Communications has a 2-year impact factor: 15.7 (2024), 5-year Journal Impact Factor: 17.2 (2024), Article downloads of 177,272,701 (2024), and 8 days ( ...
  49. [49]
    Nature Portfolio academic journal impact factors - Nature Support
    Sep 21, 2024 · An impact factor is, broadly speaking, a measurement of the the average number of times recent articles in a specific journal were cited in a particular year.
  50. [50]
    Revisions and Feedback - Nature
    Reviewers are normally asked to referee all revisions of a paper, and are informed of the decisions being taken by the editors.
  51. [51]
    Appeals & Complaints | Nature Portfolio
    To appeal a rejection, contact the Handling Editor. For process complaints, contact the Chief Editor/Editor-in-Chief. For ethics, follow publication ethics ...
  52. [52]
    Reporting standards and availability of data, materials, code and ...
    Nature Portfolio journals aim to improve the transparency of reporting and reproducibility of published results across all areas of science. Where relevant, ...
  53. [53]
    Transparent peer review to be extended to all of Nature's research ...
    Jun 16, 2025 · It means that, over time, more Nature papers will include a peer-review file. The identity of the reviewers will remain anonymous, unless they ...
  54. [54]
    Transparent peer review (TPR) now standard for all newly submitted ...
    All primary research articles submitted to Nature will automatically undergo transparent peer review (TPR) as standard, if they are selected for publication.
  55. [55]
    Peer Review | Nature
    For submissions received on or after 16th June 2025, this peer review file will be published alongside all our original research articles. Please refer to the ...
  56. [56]
    Scientific Rigour and Reproducibility - Nature
    Journals, scientists, institutions and funders all have a part in tackling reproducibility. Nature has taken substantive steps to improve the transparency ...Missing: innovations | Show results with:innovations
  57. [57]
    Nature Research and Springer Formally Endorse Guidelines that ...
    Mar 16, 2017 · The guidelines allow journals to use standards that are appropriate for their discipline. Given the variation in practices across fields, each ...
  58. [58]
    Artificial Intelligence (AI) | Nature Portfolio
    Nature Portfolio journals occasionally use internal Springer Nature-developed artificial intelligence tools to support the generation of accessory content, such ...
  59. [59]
    Supporting ECRs in peer review at Nature journals | For Researchers
    Nov 5, 2024 · An innovative initiative in Nature journals is changing this, by encouraging experienced peer reviewers to involve an ECR in the review process.
  60. [60]
    Publishing options | Nature
    The difference is that when an article is accepted for publication, the author/s or funder/s pay an Article Processing Charge (APC). The final version of the ...Missing: strategies | Show results with:strategies
  61. [61]
    Open access at the Nature Portfolio
    For authors who wish to publish their research open access, the Nature Portfolio offers open access options for all primary research.
  62. [62]
    With 44% of its published articles now open access (OA), Springer ...
    Aug 8, 2024 · 44% of the publisher's primary research is now published OA in its hybrid and fully OA journals, up from 38% in 2022.
  63. [63]
    Nature portfolio now included in UC-Springer Nature open access ...
    Jul 27, 2022 · Beginning August 1, 2022, UC corresponding authors publishing in the Nature portfolio of journals will be able to publish their articles as open access.
  64. [64]
    The oligopoly's shift to open access: How the big five academic ...
    Nov 1, 2023 · The publishers obtained a total of $612.5 million for gold and $448.3 million for hybrid articles published between 2015 and 2018. The ...
  65. [65]
    Costs of publishing in Springer Nature journal
    Jul 21, 2025 · APC are listed on individual journal pages, either in Fees and Funding section on within Submission guidelines.Missing: structures | Show results with:structures
  66. [66]
    Journal Price List | For Librarians - Springer Nature
    Open access articles are assessed separately from subscription articles and a subscription price only reflects access to subscription articles. As always ...
  67. [67]
    Is the pay-to-publish model for open access pricing scientists out?
    Aug 1, 2024 · At the high end, the Nature portfolio of hybrid journals charged $11,690 that year; the fee is now $12,290. (The gold open-access Science ...
  68. [68]
    apc waivers | Open science - Springer Nature
    APC waivers are not offered for open access publication in Springer Nature hybrid and transformative titles, as authors without the funds to publish open access ...
  69. [69]
    Open access agreements | Open science - Springer Nature
    Many institutions cover researchers' OA publishing costs (known as article processing charges, or APCs) as part of OA agreements with Springer Nature.Individual Institutional... · United States of America · Egypt · United Kingdom
  70. [70]
    Springer Nature Transformative Open Access Agreement
    The agreement enables UC authors who publish with Springer Nature to make their research freely available to the world to read.<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    BTAA, Springer Nature announce first unlimited open access ...
    Jun 6, 2025 · This OPA deal offers all authors across participating institutions unlimited open access publishing in Springer's hybrid journals portfolio — ...<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    Heard Libraries and Springer Nature establish open access ...
    Feb 27, 2025 · Vanderbilt University's Jean and Alexander Heard Libraries have announced an open access agreement with Springer Nature, a global leader in research publishing.
  73. [73]
    Read & Publish Agreements Negotiated by CAUL: Springer Nature
    This agreement allows authors from participating institutions to publish in most of Springer Nature's hybrid journals without the need for any transactional ...
  74. [74]
    Partnerships and Services | Nature Portfolio
    Why partner with us? · Advertise your product or service · Promote your organization or research · Align your organization with the leading scientific publisher ...
  75. [75]
    Nature and the Nature research journals | Nature Portfolio
    As part of the Nature Portfolio, Nature has spent the last 150 years championing and supporting scientific work. Alongside our Nature research journals, ...
  76. [76]
    Nature - SCImago
    Nature ; SJR 2024. 18.288 Q1 ; H-Index. 1442 ; Publication type. Journals ; ISSN. 00280836, 14764687 ; Coverage. 1869-2025 ...
  77. [77]
    Giving great research the attention it deserves | Advancing Discovery
    Oct 2, 2025 · As an illustration, research articles in Nature-branded journals published in 2024 have each been cited on average 21.7 times per year, 8 times ...
  78. [78]
    Journal Metrics | Nature Portfolio
    This page provides information on peer review performance and citation metrics for the Nature Portfolio journals. Data are collected annually for full calendar ...
  79. [79]
    Nature Portfolio
    Nature Portfolio supports scientists, publishes high-quality open access research, and brings discoveries to a wide audience. It is part of Springer Nature.Portfolio journals · Nature and the Nature... · For Authors · Npj Series
  80. [80]
    Journal Metrics | Nature Communications
    Citation Impact · Journal Impact Factor: 15.7 (2024) · 5-year Journal Impact Factor: 17.2 (2024) · Immediacy Index: 3.5 (2024) · Eigenfactor® Score: 1.49791 (2024) ...
  81. [81]
    A Nature analysis shows the 25 highest-cited papers published in ...
    Apr 19, 2025 · A Nature analysis shows the 25 highest-cited papers published in the 21st Century and explores why they are breaking records. Read the article: ...
  82. [82]
    The Clarivate Impact Factor
    The Clarivate impact factor measures how often an average article in a journal is cited, calculated by dividing current year citations by the previous two ...
  83. [83]
    Data Availability Statements | Publish your research - Springer Nature
    An article's data availability statement lets a reader know where and how to access data that support the results and analysis.
  84. [84]
    Empirical modeling - Nature
    May 28, 2024 · Empirical modeling involves the development of models that explain, predict, or simulate a particular aspect of the world, rather than purely theoretical or ...
  85. [85]
    Data sharing: putting Nature's policy to the test - PMC - NIH
    Policies for sharing research data promote reproducibility of published results by supporting independent verification of raw data, methods and conclusions.<|separator|>
  86. [86]
    Reducing publication bias with Registered Reports - Nature
    Sep 5, 2024 · This positive publication bias is detrimental to science, as it can skew our understanding of research areas and has the potential to influence ...
  87. [87]
    Nature's Take: Can Registered Reports help tackle publication bias?
    May 12, 2023 · Many researchers have been critical of the biases that the publication process can introduce into science. For example, they argue that a focus ...
  88. [88]
    Is positive publication bias really a bias, or an intentionally created ...
    The publication of researches with negative or null results is on the verge of extinction, thus creating an intentional bias known as publication bias. This ...
  89. [89]
    Publication bias is bad for science if not necessarily scientists
    Apr 30, 2025 · Publication bias occurs when the outcome of an experiment or research study influences the decision whether to publish it (this phenomenon is ...
  90. [90]
    1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility - Nature
    May 25, 2016 · More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments, and more than half have failed to reproduce their own ...
  91. [91]
    72% of biomedical researchers say field in crisis: survey
    Nov 5, 2024 · A 2016 survey by the journal Nature put stark numbers to the scope of science's reproducibility problems. More than 70% of researchers ...
  92. [92]
    'Publish or perish' culture blamed for reproducibility crisis - Nature
    Jan 20, 2025 · Nearly three-quarters of biomedical researchers think there is a reproducibility crisis in science, according to a survey published in November.Missing: innovations | Show results with:innovations
  93. [93]
    nature retractions - Retraction Watch
    A 2020 paper that claimed to find a link between microbial genomes in tissue and cancer has been retracted following an analysis that called the results ...
  94. [94]
    Characterizing the effect of retractions on publishing careers - Nature
    Apr 11, 2025 · Retracting academic papers is a fundamental tool of quality control, but it may have far-reaching consequences for retracted authors and their careers.
  95. [95]
    Corrections, Retractions and Matters Arising | Nature Portfolio
    The Nature Portfolio journals will issue corrections, retraction statements and other post-publication updates including Editor's Notes and Editorial ...
  96. [96]
    Reproducibility and transparency: what's going on and how can we ...
    Jan 27, 2025 · 3. The current issues with reproducibility and transparency in science have often been termed a “crisis”; what do you think is driving this ...
  97. [97]
    "Science shouldn't offend". So says Nature Magazine, which used to ...
    Aug 29, 2022 · The new editorial policy of Nature Human Behavior basically trashes free and open inquiry and scientific merit.
  98. [98]
    Nature Human Misbehavior: politicized science is neither ... - FIRE
    Sep 14, 2022 · Should academic journals appoint themselves to be social justice gatekeepers? The editors of the renowned journal Nature Human Behavior ...
  99. [99]
    It Is Bad To Alter Or Retract Published Research That Has No ...
    Aug 29, 2022 · On August 18, the journal Nature Human Behavior published an editorial called “Science must respect the dignity and rights of all humans.” The ...
  100. [100]
    Why Nature supports Joe Biden for US president
    Oct 14, 2020 · Joe Biden's trust in truth, evidence, science and democracy make him the only choice in the US election.
  101. [101]
    Political endorsement by Nature and trust in scientific expertise ...
    Mar 20, 2023 · High-profile political endorsements by scientific publications have become common in recent years, raising concerns about backlash against ...
  102. [102]
    Academia must resist political confirmation bias - Nature
    Nov 29, 2016 · According to surveys and statistics, most Nature readers place themselves on the liberal left of the political spectrum.
  103. [103]
    Trump cuts subscriptions to Springer Nature journals | Science | AAAS
    Jun 27, 2025 · The Trump administration has ended several US science agencies' subscriptions to Springer Nature journals, including the prestigious Nature titles.
  104. [104]
    Scoop: Trump admin cuts contracts with scientific publishing giant
    Jun 25, 2025 · The Trump administration has terminated millions worth of funding for Springer Nature, a German-owned scientific publishing giant.
  105. [105]
    Trump admin ends Springer Nature contracts over political bias ...
    Jun 26, 2025 · Springer Nature retracted articles for "compromised peer review process," "inappropriate or irrelevant references," and "citation behavior ...
  106. [106]
    Biomedical paper retractions have quadrupled in 20 years — why?
    May 31, 2024 · Two-thirds of these papers were withdrawn for reasons relating to research misconduct, such as data and image manipulation or authorship fraud.
  107. [107]
    Why high-profile journals have more retractions - Nature
    Sep 17, 2014 · The 2011 report proposed a “retraction index”, a measure of the likelihood that a paper in a given journal will eventually be pulled from the literature.
  108. [108]
    Retracted Science and the Retraction Index - PMC - NIH
    Using a novel measure that we call the “retraction index,” we found that the frequency of retraction varies among journals and shows a strong correlation with ...
  109. [109]
    STAP retracted - Nature
    Jul 2, 2014 · This week, Nature publishes retractions of two high-profile papers that claimed a major advance in the field of stem cells (see page 112).
  110. [110]
    Superconductivity scandal: the inside story of deception in a rising ...
    Mar 8, 2024 · But Dias is now infamous for the scandal that surrounds his work. Nature has since retracted his second paper and many other research ...
  111. [111]
    Third room temperature superconductivity paper retracted as group's ...
    Nov 9, 2023 · ... fraud, and allegations of plagiarism earlier in his career. Dias and ... In September 2022, against Dias's objections, Nature decided to retract ...
  112. [112]
    Nature retracts highly cited 2002 paper that claimed adult stem cells ...
    Jun 18, 2024 · The retracted article, “Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow,” has been controversial since its publication. Still, ...
  113. [113]
    Faked data prompts retraction of Nature journal study claiming ...
    Sep 3, 2024 · You DO have evidence the major claim is corrupt: you detected intentional fraud in the paper, and if a person is willing to lie about something ...
  114. [114]
    Open letter from fraud sleuths raises concerns over research ...
    Oct 24, 2024 · Open letter from fraud sleuths raises concerns over research integrity at Scientific Reports. By Rupali Dabas24 October 2024.
  115. [115]
  116. [116]
    The peer-review crisis: how to fix an overloaded system - Nature
    Aug 6, 2025 · Journals and funders are trying to boost the speed and effectiveness of review processes that are under strain.More Recent Than You Think · Review Rewards · Improving Efficiency And...
  117. [117]
    Nature Portfolio to expand with three new journals in 2024
    Mar 16, 2023 · Nature Portfolio will welcome three new Nature journals in January 2024. Publisher Springer Nature is adding to its SDGs and engineering ...
  118. [118]
    The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and ...
    Jul 25, 2023 · The emergence of large-scale replication projects yielding successful rates substantially lower than expected caused the behavioural, ...
  119. [119]
    'Doing good science is hard': retraction of high-profile reproducibility ...
    Oct 14, 2024 · A paper by some of the biggest names in scientific integrity is retracted for issues including misstatements about the research plan.
  120. [120]
    Replication and replicability - Nature
    Value of negative results and failures to replicate. Reactions to the 'replication crisis' (e.g., structural and community-driven changes)Missing: responses | Show results with:responses
  121. [121]
    Springer Nature Issues an Open-Access Progress Update
    Aug 7, 2025 · In the 10th year of transformative agreements for the company, Springer Nature issues a look at its progress in open access.
  122. [122]
    What Does 50% OA Mean for Us? | Advancing Discovery
    Apr 11, 2025 · We set a bold target: publish 50% of our primary research open access (OA) by the end of 2024. This goal was driven by the need to make research widely ...
  123. [123]
    Springer Nature forecasts 2025 revenue boost amid Open Access ...
    Mar 18, 2025 · German publishing group Springer Nature forecast higher revenue for 2025 on Tuesday, after it posted full-year revenue in line with market ...
  124. [124]
    Perspectives on AI in scholarly communications - Springer Nature
    We have been exploring how we can best use AI to help researchers get published faster and find relevant content more quickly, to make sure research can be ...
  125. [125]
    Artificial Intelligence | Springer Nature Group
    Springer Nature is committed to unlock the potential of AI and other emerging technologies to advance scientific discovery and innovation.Missing: plans | Show results with:plans
  126. [126]
    AI as the Accelerating Force of Scientific Progress - Springer Nature
    Aug 19, 2025 · AI can help scale this democratisation of science communication—bringing discoveries to millions in ways that inform, inspire, and build trust.
  127. [127]
    Challenges in irreproducible research - Nature
    Journals, scientists, institutions and funders all have a part in tackling reproducibility. Nature has taken substantive steps to improve the transparency and ...
  128. [128]
    Springer Nature reports strong start to 2025
    May 13, 2025 · Strategic priorities on track: Solid progress in Open Access (OA) and AI initiatives ... future business development and strategic direction of ...