Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Next-generation firewall

A next-generation firewall (NGFW) is a network security device that extends beyond traditional stateful firewalls by incorporating deep packet inspection (DPI), application-level awareness, and integrated intrusion prevention systems (IPS) to provide advanced threat protection at the network perimeter. Unlike conventional firewalls that primarily filter traffic based on ports, protocols, and IP addresses, NGFWs inspect the content of data packets to identify and block sophisticated threats such as malware, exploits, and unauthorized applications. This evolution addresses the limitations of earlier firewall generations in handling encrypted traffic and application-layer attacks in modern, complex networks. Key features of NGFWs include application awareness and control, which enables granular visibility and management of applications regardless of port usage, allowing administrators to enforce policies based on user identity, device type, or risk level. They also integrate intrusion prevention, using signature-based and anomaly detection to proactively block attacks in real-time, often combined with external threat intelligence feeds for updated signatures on emerging threats. Additional capabilities encompass URL filtering to restrict access to malicious sites, SSL/TLS decryption for inspecting encrypted traffic, and sandboxing to analyze unknown files in isolated environments before they enter the network. These features collectively enhance breach prevention by reducing detection times from industry averages of 100-200 days to minutes or hours. NGFWs can be deployed as hardware appliances, software solutions, or cloud-based services (Firewall-as-a-Service), offering flexibility for on-premises, , or remote environments. They differ from standalone or firewalls by providing tightly integrated functionality, ensuring comprehensive without performance bottlenecks from loose couplings. As cyber threats grow more evasive, NGFWs have become a standard for enterprise , supporting , centralized management, and with broader ecosystems to maintain visibility across users, devices, and applications.

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

A next-generation (NGFW) is a third-generation technology that performs across Layers 3 through 7 of the , enabling context-aware security decisions that extend beyond basic port and protocol filtering. Unlike earlier , NGFWs integrate application-level visibility to identify and control specific applications regardless of the ports or protocols used, incorporating features such as intrusion prevention and user identity integration. The primary purpose of an NGFW is to safeguard enterprise networks against sophisticated cyber threats, including advanced persistent threats (APTs), by enforcing granular security policies based on user identity, application behavior, and content characteristics. This allows organizations to mitigate risks from , exploits, and unauthorized while maintaining productivity through precise traffic control. NGFWs emerged in response to the limitations of stateful firewalls, particularly their inability to effectively encrypted and the proliferation of web-based applications in the post-2000s era. Stateful firewalls, operating primarily at Layers 3 and 4, could not inspect encrypted payloads or adapt to applications that dynamically shift ports, leaving networks vulnerable to tunneled threats and application-layer attacks. In operation, NGFWs are typically deployed inline to enable traffic inspection and enforcement through configurable rulesets that combine IP addresses, user credentials, and application for comprehensive detection and response.

Core Components

-based next-generation firewalls (NGFWs) rely on specialized to handle high-volume traffic efficiently. These systems typically incorporate multi-core processors that enable execution of tasks, allowing simultaneous handling of multiple sessions without degradation. Additionally, application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) accelerate critical functions such as packet and analysis, reducing latency in data-intensive environments. NGFW is designed for , with models offering throughput capacities ranging from 1 Gbps for small branch deployments to over 100 Gbps for centers, ensuring adaptability to varying demands. Software and cloud-based NGFWs, in contrast, leverage virtualized resources for similar capabilities. The software architecture of an NGFW forms the operational backbone, integrating modular components for policy enforcement and system . At its core is the policy engine, which evaluates traffic against predefined rules based on attributes like source, destination, and context, enabling dynamic decision-making. subsystems capture detailed event data for auditing, , and forensic analysis, while centralized consoles—such as unified interfaces—facilitate , , and updates across distributed deployments. Key modules enhance the NGFW's analytical capabilities. The deep packet inspection (DPI) engine examines packet payloads beyond headers to identify applications and protocols accurately, supporting application-layer visibility. User identity mapping integrates with directory services like to correlate IP addresses with authenticated users or groups, allowing identity-based access controls. SSL/TLS decryption capabilities intercept and inspect encrypted traffic by terminating sessions, analyzing content, and re-encrypting it, thereby addressing hidden risks in secure communications. For seamless integration in modern networks, NGFWs adhere to interoperability standards that promote compatibility with broader ecosystems. They natively support VPN protocols for secure site-to-site and remote access connectivity, ensuring encrypted tunneling compliant with industry specifications. Furthermore, enable orchestration with environments, allowing automated policy synchronization and traffic steering for optimized performance.

Historical Development

Origins in Stateful Inspection

The concept of stateful inspection emerged in the early as a significant advancement over stateless packet filtering firewalls, which evaluated each packet independently without context. Developed by Software Technologies, stateful inspection introduced connection-tracking mechanisms that monitored the state of network connections, such as sessions, to make more informed decisions about allowing or blocking traffic. This approach was formalized in a key filed on December 15, 1993, by inventor and assigned to , describing a system for inspecting inbound and outbound data packets using stored results from prior inspections to enforce security rules dynamically. By tracking states like SYN, ACK, and FIN in handshakes, stateful inspection firewalls could permit return traffic for established connections while blocking unsolicited packets, addressing vulnerabilities in earlier filtering methods that ignored session context. Despite these improvements, stateful inspection firewalls operated primarily at Layers 3 and 4 of the , lacking visibility into application-layer (Layer 7) content, which limited their ability to detect sophisticated threats embedded in payloads. This shortfall became evident in the early 2000s with exploits like the worm, discovered in July 2001, which targeted a vulnerability in Microsoft's (IIS) software. The worm propagated via HTTP requests, infecting over 350,000 servers in its first wave and launching denial-of-service attacks, evading traditional stateful firewalls that could not inspect or block malicious application data within seemingly legitimate . Such incidents highlighted the need for deeper protocol analysis to counter application-specific , as rising internet usage amplified threats hidden in HTTP and emerging traffic. By the mid-2000s, the limitations of stateful inspection prompted the conceptualization of next-generation firewalls (NGFWs), which emphasized Layer 7 awareness to identify and control applications regardless of port usage. This shift was driven by the proliferation of web-based malware, including drive-by downloads and exploits in encrypted sessions, which accounted for a growing share of network attacks as adoption surged. Early NGFW ideas built on stateful foundations but incorporated (DPI) techniques, originally developed in networks during the late 1990s and early for quality-of-service (QoS) management and . In telecom contexts, DPI enabled operators to classify and prioritize traffic types, such as VoIP over bulk downloads, by examining packet s beyond headers. Standards from the (IETF), including RFC 793 on connection states and later documents like RFC 3303 on architectures, provided conceptual support for multi-layer inspection by defining protocol behaviors that stateful systems could extend to application layers. These elements laid the groundwork for NGFWs to integrate connection tracking with payload analysis, marking a pivotal in technology.

Key Milestones and Innovations

The term "next-generation firewall" (NGFW) was formally defined by in 2009, emphasizing capabilities beyond traditional -based inspection, including application awareness, user identity integration, and advanced threat prevention to address evolving needs. This definition marked a pivotal shift, as it standardized expectations for firewalls to provide deeper visibility and control over application-layer traffic. In the same period, launched the industry's first commercial NGFW in 2008, introducing App-ID technology, which uses signature-based, protocol-decoding, and methods to identify applications regardless of , , or evasion tactics, enabling granular . Between 2012 and 2015, NGFW innovations advanced significantly with the integration of sandboxing for zero-day threat detection, exemplified by FireEye's Multi-Vector Virtual Execution (MVX) engine, which deploys virtualized environments to safely execute and analyze suspicious files, revealing behaviors that signature-based methods miss. Concurrently, capabilities matured in NGFWs, incorporating real-time behavioral analysis and to block exploits more effectively than standalone solutions. This era also saw the convergence of unified threat management (UTM) features into NGFWs, where vendors combined antivirus, filtering, and VPN into a single platform with application-layer intelligence, reducing complexity while enhancing comprehensive protection for mid-sized enterprises. From 2018 to 2022, (ML) adoption transformed NGFW , allowing systems to learn normal traffic patterns and flag deviations indicative of advanced persistent threats without predefined rules. , for instance, released the first ML-powered NGFW in 2020 via PAN-OS 10.0, using supervised and algorithms to predict and prevent command-and-control communications. The 2020 breach, which affected up to 18,000 organizations through malicious software updates (though only a small subset were actively compromised), accelerated NGFW upgrades by underscoring the limitations of perimeter defenses and driving demand for integrated zero-day protection mechanisms like sandboxing and ML-driven inspection. By 2023 to 2025, NGFW innovations focused on future-proofing against quantum threats, with vendors like and incorporating (PQC) algorithms, such as NIST-standardized lattice-based encryption (e.g., and ), to resist quantum computer attacks on traditional public-key systems. Additionally, API-based threat sharing emerged as a key advancement, leveraging the framework to standardize and exchange indicators of compromise (IOCs) across ecosystems, enabling NGFWs to dynamically update defenses against tactics like credential access or lateral movement in real time.

Technical Features

Application-Layer Visibility

Next-generation firewalls (NGFWs) provide deep visibility into network traffic at the (Layer 7 of the ), enabling identification and control of applications regardless of the underlying transport protocols or ports used. This capability transcends traditional port-based filtering by analyzing traffic patterns, payloads, and behaviors to accurately detect and categorize applications such as or RDP even when tunneled over non-standard ports like HTTP (). The core mechanisms for achieving this visibility include signature-based identification, which matches traffic against predefined patterns unique to specific applications, and heuristic methods that employ behavioral to detect evasive or unknown applications. For instance, signatures examine handshakes and content structures, while heuristics assess attributes like packet size, session duration, and data flow rates to infer application types, such as or VoIP communications. Behavioral further enhances detection by monitoring ongoing interactions for anomalies, like unusual patterns indicative of propagation, allowing NGFWs to classify and respond to emerging threats without relying solely on known signatures. User and content awareness is integrated through user identification technologies that map IP addresses to individual users or groups via integration with directory services such as , enabling (RBAC) policies that tie security rules to identities rather than just network attributes. This allows administrators to enforce granular permissions, such as permitting executive users access to collaboration tools while restricting the same for general employees. Additionally, NGFWs perform decryption and re-encryption of SSL/TLS traffic—now comprising well over 95% of —to inspect encrypted payloads for application details and content, ensuring visibility into otherwise opaque sessions without compromising for non-suspicious flows. Policy enforcement leverages this visibility to apply highly specific rules, such as blocking file uploads in applications like while allowing downloads, or restricting administrative functions in cloud services based on user roles. To address , NGFWs use application risk scoring—which evaluates factors like vulnerability, potential, and bandwidth consumption—to dynamically filter or alert on unauthorized apps, helping organizations discover and control unsanctioned tools without broad prohibitions. Performance considerations are critical, as full Layer 7 inspection can introduce ; thus, NGFWs employ optimization techniques like selective decryption, where only high-risk categories (e.g., financial or healthcare apps) undergo full scrutiny, bypassing decryption for trusted, low-risk traffic to maintain throughput without sacrificing .

Integrated Threat Prevention

Next-generation firewalls (NGFWs) incorporate integrated prevention mechanisms that extend beyond basic packet filtering to actively detect and block sophisticated attacks in real time. These features leverage and contextual analysis to identify exploits, , and unauthorized data flows, often operating inline to enforce policies without disrupting legitimate traffic. By combining multiple detection engines, NGFWs provide layered defense against known and emerging , reducing the need for disparate appliances. The intrusion prevention system (IPS) in NGFWs uses signature-based detection to match network traffic against predefined patterns of known exploits, such as attempts that target database vulnerabilities. Anomaly-based detection complements this by establishing baselines of normal traffic behavior and flagging deviations, like unusual data volumes indicative of or worm propagation. In inline mode, the IPS blocks malicious packets directly by dropping them or resetting connections, whereas monitoring mode logs events for analysis without interruption; this dual capability allows administrators to balance security and performance. Antivirus and anti-malware components in NGFWs perform file scanning to detect known viruses and trojans using databases updated from threat intelligence feeds. For zero-day s, these systems integrate sandboxing environments that detonate suspicious files in isolated virtual machines to observe malicious behavior, such as encryption attempts. Integration with services like enables rapid reputation checks against crowdsourced malware samples, enhancing detection rates to over 98% in cloud-assisted deployments. URL and filtering in NGFWs rely on reputation-based scoring to to malicious or high-risk websites, preventing drive-by downloads or attacks by categorizing domains using real-time threat intelligence. prevention (DLP) extends this by inspecting outbound for sensitive information, such as credit card numbers or proprietary documents, and enforcing policies to or encrypt exfiltrating data. These features apply granular controls at the , ensuring compliance while mitigating insider threats. Advanced threat prevention in NGFWs includes cloud-based sandboxes, akin to Palo Alto Networks' WildFire, which analyze unknown executables through dynamic detonation and machine learning to generate inline signatures for immediate blocking across the network. As of 2025, many NGFWs incorporate artificial intelligence and machine learning for adaptive threat detection, improving accuracy in identifying evolving attack patterns. Correlation engines aggregate events from multiple sessions, using contextual data like user identity and application context to detect coordinated attacks, such as advanced persistent threats spanning IPS alerts and malware scans. This unified approach enables proactive mitigation for comprehensive visibility.

Comparison with Traditional Firewalls

Architectural Differences

Traditional firewalls operate primarily at Layers 3 and 4 of the , employing port- and protocol-based filtering mechanisms, either stateless or stateful, to inspect packet headers and manage network traffic based on addresses, ports, and connection states. This design relies on discrete hardware appliances for core functions, often supplemented by separate devices for advanced features like intrusion prevention systems () or unified threat management (UTM), leading to fragmented architectures with multiple points of traversal for traffic inspection. In contrast, next-generation firewalls (NGFWs) adopt a unified architecture that integrates multiple functions—such as stateful , application awareness, and prevention—into a single device or software instance, eliminating the need for disparate appliances. A key element is the single-pass processing , where traffic undergoes all inspections simultaneously in one traversal, avoiding the repetitive handling and re-queuing common in traditional multi-pass systems, which thereby reduces processing overhead and latency. This parallel processing approach ensures efficient resource utilization while maintaining consistent performance under varying loads. NGFWs enhance scalability through built-in clustering mechanisms for and load balancing, allowing multiple units to operate as a cohesive system to handle increased traffic volumes without single points of failure. Additionally, NGFWs support instances deployable on hypervisors, enabling flexible scaling in or environments, in opposition to the hardware-bound, physical constraints of traditional firewalls that limit adaptability to dynamic infrastructures. Management in NGFWs emphasizes centralized policy orchestration, where security rules and configurations are managed from a unified console across distributed deployments, facilitating consistent enforcement and simplified administration. This contrasts with the siloed configurations of traditional firewalls, which often require device-specific tools and manual synchronization, increasing operational complexity and error risks.

Performance and Security Enhancements

Next-generation firewalls (NGFWs) deliver substantial performance improvements over traditional firewalls by sustaining high throughput levels even when advanced features like (DPI) are fully enabled. For example, models such as the NGFW 5206 achieve sustained throughput exceeding 10 Gbps with DPI active, enabling comprehensive without bottlenecking network operations. This capability contrasts with traditional firewalls, where enabling similar inspections often reduces speeds by up to 95% due to decryption overhead. Furthermore, NGFWs incorporate context-aware rules that evaluate user identity, application behavior, and content specifics, significantly reducing false positives compared to rigid port- or protocol-based filtering in legacy systems. In terms of security enhancements, NGFWs excel at addressing encrypted threats, which constitute approximately 95% of (as of 2025) but are often overlooked by traditional firewalls that inspect only 20-30% of such flows to avoid performance hits. NGFWs mitigate this gap through efficient SSL/TLS decryption and inspection, providing broader visibility into potential or hidden in encrypted sessions. Industry benchmarks highlight their efficacy, with NGFWs blocking advanced threats at rates exceeding 99% in controlled tests, far surpassing the limited coverage of traditional approaches. Key metrics underscore these advantages: NGFWs operate with latencies below 5 µs in inline deployment modes, preserving application responsiveness during real-time threat scanning. From a perspective, consolidating multiple tools into a single NGFW platform yields strong returns, with Forrester studies reporting up to 318% ROI over three years, including approximately 40% reductions in operational costs through streamlined management and fewer point solutions. Despite these benefits, NGFWs introduce trade-offs in management complexity, as their policy tuning demands expertise in application-layer rules and integration with broader ecosystems, unlike the straightforward, port-centric configurations of traditional firewalls that require less ongoing adjustment.

Generational Advancements

Next-generation firewalls (NGFWs) are considered the third generation of firewall technology, introduced around 2008, building on packet filtering and stateful inspection to provide application-layer visibility and integrated threat prevention. From 2008 to 2012, early NGFWs marked a foundational shift by integrating basic application identification (App-ID) and functionalities into a single platform, primarily aimed at consolidating and replacing fragmented point solutions like standalone and application control tools. This era emphasized layer-7 visibility to identify applications irrespective of ports or protocols, enabling more granular policy enforcement based on actual usage rather than IP addresses alone. For instance, early NGFWs decoded traffic to distinguish between applications such as web browsing and , while embedded provided inline threat blocking to mitigate exploits without performance degradation. In the , particularly from 2013 to 2018, NGFWs introduced greater through user-defined risk assessments and enhanced analytics capabilities to support threat hunting activities. Administrators could configure policies tied to risk levels assigned to applications and users, allowing automated adjustments to rules based on predefined thresholds for potential vulnerabilities or needs. Additionally, integrated and tools emerged, facilitating of network events to identify patterns indicative of advanced persistent threats, thereby shifting from reactive to more proactive defense postures. These advancements streamlined operations by reducing manual rule tuning and enabling teams to correlate application behavior with user activities for deeper investigations. Since the late 2010s, evolving through 2025, NGFWs have incorporated (AI) and (ML) for , including behavioral baselining to establish normal patterns and detect deviations in . This allowed NGFWs to autonomously respond to anomalies, such as unusual or lateral movement, by quarantining threats without human intervention, leveraging models trained on vast datasets to predict and preempt zero-day attacks. Features like inline engines analyzed encrypted traffic and file-based threats with high accuracy, marking a transition to self-adapting security that minimizes false positives through continuous learning. Key metrics of these advancements include the significant expansion in application identification, evolving from hundreds of identifiers in early implementations to thousands (over 3,000 in leading systems as of 2024) incorporating variants, protocols, and , which supports comprehensive control over diverse traffic. Furthermore, the integration of and (UEBA) has become standard, combining ML-driven of users, devices, and entities to flag insider risks or compromised accounts alongside traditional functions. These developments underscore NGFWs' progression toward intelligent, scalable protection in complex environments.

Integration with Cloud and Zero-Trust Models

Next-generation firewalls (NGFWs) have evolved into cloud-native solutions that deploy as virtual appliances in major public cloud platforms such as AWS and , enabling seamless integration with platform-as-a-service (PaaS) features like auto-scaling to handle fluctuating workloads without manual intervention. These virtual appliances operate as managed services, dynamically adjusting capacity through mechanisms like Gateway Load Balancing in , ensuring and elastic scaling for traffic inspection in virtual networks (VNets). In containerized environments, NGFWs support microsegmentation by enforcing granular network policies based on workload identities and attributes, such as environment tags or application roles, to isolate traffic between containers even on the same host. This approach uses network-based controls within the NGFW to monitor and adapt policies in real-time as containers spin up or down, enhancing security in dynamic or setups. Integration with zero-trust models positions NGFWs as key enforcement points for continuous , where they inspect traffic in based on user identity, device posture, location, and behavior to prevent unauthorized . By supporting Zero Trust Network (ZTNA) protocols, NGFWs enable that grants users only the necessary permissions for specific applications, reducing the through adaptive microsegmentation and . This continuous authentication process aligns with zero-trust principles by assuming no inherent trust and requiring re- at every interaction, often integrated with advanced threat detection like intrusion prevention systems (). In the 2020s, NGFWs have converged with (SASE) frameworks, embedding firewall-as-a-service (FWaaS) capabilities into cloud-delivered platforms that unify networking and security functions such as , secure web gateways, and ZTNA. This convergence allows NGFWs to provide application-layer visibility and threat prevention directly at the edge, simplifying management for distributed workforces and optimizing performance in hybrid environments. For edge computing, SASE-embedded NGFWs handle high-velocity traffic through intelligent steering based on metrics like and , supporting network slicing to route applications securely across standalone networks while maintaining zero-trust controls via micro-tunnels. These adaptations address key challenges in multi-cloud setups, where fragmented visibility across providers like AWS, , and can hinder threat detection and response. NGFWs provide centralized monitoring and unified policy enforcement to bridge these gaps, enabling real-time analysis of traffic across environments for improved observability. For , such as GDPR, cloud NGFWs facilitate policy portability through centralized management tools that apply consistent data protection rules— including consent tracking and breach notification—across clouds without reconfiguration, supported by automated audit trails.

References

  1. [1]
    Definition of Next-generation Firewalls (NGFWs) - IT Glossary - Gartner
    Next-generation firewalls (NGFWs) are deep-packet inspection firewalls that move beyond port/protocol inspection and blocking to add application-level ...Missing: key features
  2. [2]
    What Is a Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW)? - Cisco
    A next-generation firewall (NGFW) is a network security device that provides capabilities beyond a traditional, stateful firewall.
  3. [3]
    What is a next-generation firewall (NGFW)? - Cloudflare
    A next-generation firewall (NGFW) is a security appliance that analyzes and controls network traffic, processing it more deeply than traditional firewalls.
  4. [4]
    What Is Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) | Important Features
    Next Generation Firewalls leverage intrusion prevention and deep packet inspection to block malicious traffic. Learn more about their key features.Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
  5. [5]
    Next Generation Firewall - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) is a network firewall that goes beyond traditional firewalls by making decisions at the application layer, in addition to ...
  6. [6]
    What Is a Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW)? A Complete Guide
    A next-generation firewall (NGFW) is a network security device that identifies and controls applications, users, and content to enforce security policies.Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
  7. [7]
    Stateful Firewall vs. Stateless Firewalls: What's the Difference?
    Difficulty in Handling Encrypted Traffic: While stateful firewalls are effective at inspecting unencrypted traffic, they may have limitations in dealing with ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Next-Generation Firewalls For Dummies - Palo Alto Networks
    Here, in that familiar For Dummies Part of Tens format, we present ten features to look for and criteria to consider when choosing a next-generation firewall.
  9. [9]
    Next-Generation Firewall Hardware - Palo Alto Networks
    Your security starts with Palo Alto Networks firewalls. Our new, industry-leading ML-Powered Next-Generation Firewall is here.View hardware architecture · PA-400 Series · PA-1400 Series · PA-3400 Series
  10. [10]
    [PDF] NEXT-GENERATION FIREWALL SERVICES DATASHEET
    User Firewall. Integrates with directory services such as Active Directory to create firewall policies associated with specific users or groups to enforce ...
  11. [11]
    What is a Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW)? - zenarmor.com
    Apr 2, 2022 · Next-generation firewalls accomplish this by using deep packet inspection to identify and control applications regardless of their IP port.
  12. [12]
    A Comprehensive Guide to SD-WAN Security - Zenarmor
    Jan 3, 2024 · Next-generation firewalls (NGFWs), VPN tunnels, IP security (IPsec), and application traffic microsegmentation are the main components of SD-WAN ...Missing: interoperability | Show results with:interoperability
  13. [13]
    System for securing inbound and outbound data packet flow in a ...
    A filter module allows controlling network security by specifying security rules for traffic in the network and accepting or dropping communication packets.
  14. [14]
    CAIDA Analysis of Code-Red
    Jul 30, 2020 · On July 12, 2001, a worm began to exploit the aforementioned buffer-overflow vulnerability in Microsoft's IIS webservers. Upon infecting a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
    The Code Red worm 20 years on – what have we learned?
    Jul 15, 2021 · July 2001 is when the infamous Code Red computer worm showed up, spread fast, and all but consumed the internet for several days.
  16. [16]
    A Practical History of the Firewall – Part 4: The Next Generation
    Apr 9, 2024 · The stateful inspection firewall was the dominant technology in the enterprise until Palo Alto Networks defined the “next-generation firewall”.
  17. [17]
    Review of the Internet traffic management practices of Internet ...
    Mar 3, 2009 · Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) is a form of computer network packet filtering. ... Deep Packet Inspection and Communications Laws and Policies.
  18. [18]
    RFC 3303 - Middlebox communication architecture and framework
    ... stateful inspection firewall devices and NAT devices). The MIDCOM protocol will consist of a session setup phase, run-time session phase, and a session ...
  19. [19]
    Defining the Next-Generation Firewall - Gartner
    Oct 12, 2009 · Gartner defines the next-generation firewall as the capabilities required for increased enterprise cybersecurity, as first-generation firewalls ...
  20. [20]
    The History of Firewalls | Who Invented the Firewall? - Palo Alto ...
    Palo Alto Networks introduced the first NGFW in 2008. Who named firewall? The term "firewall" in the context of network security was named by ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] FireEye Network Security
    FireEye Network Security is an effective cyber threat protection solution that helps organizations minimize the risk of costly breaches by accurately detecting ...Missing: NGFW | Show results with:NGFW
  22. [22]
    UTM v NGFW: A Single Shade of Gray - Anitian
    Sep 25, 2012 · There is no difference between UTM and NGFW. These are the same technologies with the same capabilities being marketed and promoted as different ...Missing: advancements | Show results with:advancements
  23. [23]
    Fortinet Advances Quantum-Safe Security to Guard Against ...
    Jul 22, 2025 · Fortinet announces expanded innovations within FortiOS that protect against quantum-computing threats to current encryption standards.Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
  24. [24]
    Palo Alto Networks Delivers Enterprise Wide Quantum Security ...
    14 new 5th-generation Next-Generation Firewall models — that future-proof ...Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
  25. [25]
    What Is MITRE ATT&CK Framework? - Palo Alto Networks
    The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques, derived from real-world observations, used to map, detect, and mitigate ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] App-ID - Palo Alto Networks
    next-generation firewalls are restoring visibility and control over the applications traversing the network to the firewall, the most strategic security ...
  27. [27]
    Cloudflare's 2025 Annual Founders' Letter
    Sep 21, 2025 · ... percent of the Internet was encrypted, today well over 95 percent is encrypted. We're proud of the role we played in making that happen ...
  28. [28]
    Firewall Protection: How Does a Firewall Protect the Network?
    One of the standout features of Check Point's NGFW is its ability to control applications based on user identity and group roles. Explore this deep access ...
  29. [29]
    Traffic Log Fields - Palo Alto Networks
    Jul 22, 2025 · Traffic Log Fields ; Application Risk (risk_of_app). Risk level associated with the application (1=lowest to 5=highest). ; Application ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Guide to Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS)
    An intrusion prevention system (IPS) is software that has all the capabilities of an intrusion detection system and can also attempt to stop possible incidents.
  31. [31]
    Cisco Firepower NGIPS Data Sheet
    Cisco Firepower NGIPS sets a new standard for network threat protection. It integrates real-time contextual awareness, security automation, advanced malware ...
  32. [32]
    WildFire - Palo Alto Networks
    WildFire leverages a suite of cloud-based malware detection techniques and inline ML to identify and protect against unknown file-based threats.
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    Security Profile: Data Filtering - Palo Alto Networks
    Use Data Filtering profiles to prevent sensitive, confidential, and proprietary information—such as credit card or social security numbers or internal ...
  35. [35]
    WildFire Datasheet - Palo Alto Networks
    Palo Alto Networks WildFire cloud-based malware analysis solution uses machine learning and crowdsourced intelligence to prevent unknown threats inline.
  36. [36]
    Integrated Next-Generation Network Security Model
    ### Summary of Integrated Threat Prevention in Next-Generation Firewalls
  37. [37]
    Next-Generation Firewall vs. Traditional Firewall - Check Point
    Traditional firewalls and NGFWs both incorporate core firewall capabilities and play a similar role in a corporate cybersecurity architecture.
  38. [38]
    Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) - Miercom: Independent Analysis ...
    McAfee NGFW 5206. McAfee NGFW 5206 handles sustained throughput over 10 Gbps, one of the highest firewall throughputs with DPI enabled. Additional McAfee NGFW ...
  39. [39]
    Can Your Firewall See Threats Hidden in Encrypted Traffic?
    Dec 27, 2022 · When firewalls encounter encrypted traffic, they must decrypt it before inspecting it. This degrades performance by up to 95 percent, according to tests ...
  40. [40]
    NGFW vs. WAF: Which Do You Need? - DEVOPSdigest
    Oct 27, 2025 · That's what prevents alert fatigue, missed context, and false positives that burn your team's time. Check Point CloudGuard's platform doesn ...
  41. [41]
    Traditional Firewalls Can't Keep Up with Encrypted Traffic Growth
    Sep 22, 2022 · A growing percentage of Internet traffic is protected by encryption. While estimates vary, most agree that at least 80% of Internet traffic ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Next Generation Firewall Test Report – Fortinet FortiGate 3200D v5 ...
    Excessive concurrent HTTP connections – Latency within the NGFW is causing excessive delays and increased response time. ○. Unsuccessful HTTP transactions – ...
  43. [43]
    Latency limit between 2 secure firewall clusters between DC's
    Jul 29, 2021 · The Cluster Control Link (CCL) must have L2 reachability with <10ms of latency. Source: Cisco Live presentation BRKSEC-3032 by Andrew ...
  44. [44]
    Forrester Study: 318% ROI with Fortinet Data Center Security
    The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Fortinet NGFW for Data Center and AI-Powered ...
  45. [45]
    10 Things To Test In Your Future NGFW: Automation
    Mar 30, 2018 · Someone must sift through many security events to identify which are high-risk, determining the point of entry that is likely compromised. Once ...Missing: defined | Show results with:defined
  46. [46]
    What Defines a Next-Generation Firewall? | Fortinet
    Jul 30, 2021 · A next-generation firewall (NGFW) is the only type of firewall that provides the capabilities to protect modern businesses against emerging cyberthreats.
  47. [47]
    What is an ML-Powered NGFW? - Palo Alto Networks
    Explore how an ML-powered NGFW enhances cybersecurity by using machine learning to detect threats, prevent attacks, and automate real-time network security.Missing: third predictive analytics
  48. [48]
    Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) - See Top Products - Fortinet
    Rating 5.0 (22) FortiGate NGFWs protect data, assets, and users in hybrid environments, using AI-centric threat intelligence and patented ASICs for faster security processing.Missing: packet engine mapping
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Palo Alto Networks ML-Powered Next-Generation Firewall Feature ...
    Our ML-Powered Next-Generation Firewalls empower you to stop zero-day threats using ML, AI, and inline deep learning. The consolidated platform approach ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Fortinet Secure SD-WAN Data Sheet
    Application Identification and Control. 5000+ application signatures, 3000+ industrial signatures, first packet Identification, deep packet inspection ...
  51. [51]
    What is UEBA (User and Entity Behavior Analytics)?
    UEBA is an evolving cybersecurity solution that uses advanced analytics to detect user and entity behavior anomalies within an organization's network.
  52. [52]
    NGFW: AI-Powered Firewall for Zero Trust Security - Versa Networks
    AI-powered ATP: Uses AI/ML, sandboxes, static/dynamic analysis, and UEBA, aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK framework ... Native integration with cloud environments ...
  53. [53]
    Cloud NGFW for Azure - Palo Alto Networks
    Incorporates an automated cloud firewall model that dynamically scales with your network traffic and meets unpredictable throughput demands with Gateway Load ...
  54. [54]
    What Is Microsegmentation? - Palo Alto Networks
    Microsegmentation is a security method of managing network access between workloads. With microsegmentation, administrators can manage security policies ...
  55. [55]
    How NGFW Fits into Your Zero Trust Strategy - Versa Networks
    Feb 5, 2025 · Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFW) boost Zero Trust with deep threat detection, access controls, and simple management. Secure your hybrid and ...
  56. [56]
    What Is SASE (Secure Access Service Edge)? - Fortinet
    Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) is a cloud-delivered framework that converges essential networking and security functions into a unified platform.
  57. [57]
    The Future of Connectivity: What Happens When 5G and SASE ...
    Apr 19, 2024 · 5G delivers a more agile form of WAN connectivity, SASE (Secure Access Service Edge) represents a convergence of WAN networking and security.Missing: NGFW | Show results with:NGFW
  58. [58]
    Multi-Cloud Security: Challenges, Pillars, and Best Practices | Fortinet
    Fragmented multi-cloud setup makes threat response and data security challenging. Multi-cloud security ensures visibility and strengthens overall defenses.
  59. [59]
    How To Integrate Cloud NGFW Into Multi-Cloud Strategies?
    Dec 22, 2024 · Cloud NGFWs integrate seamlessly with native cloud services such as AWS Firewall Manager, Azure Sentinel, and Google Cloud Security Command ...