Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Operation U-Go

Operation U-Go was the Imperial Japanese Army's code name for its ambitious offensive launched on 8 March 1944 into from , as part of the broader in the Second World War. Commanded by Lieutenant General of the Fifteenth Army, the operation involved approximately 85,000 troops divided into three divisions advancing through dense jungle terrain toward the strategic Allied strongholds of and , with the dual aims of disrupting British supply lines via the Imphal Plain and preempting an anticipated Allied counteroffensive into . The plan also harbored hopes of linking with Indian nationalist forces, such as the under , to incite widespread rebellion against British rule, though this political dimension proved secondary to the military objectives. Despite initial penetrations that encircled and threatened , Operation U-Go collapsed by July 1944 due to profound logistical failures, including inadequate supply provisions across mountainous terrain exacerbated by the onset of rains, compounded by superiority enabling effective resupply and reinforcement of besieged forces. troops suffered catastrophic , with estimates indicating over casualties from combat, , and , reducing the invading force to a fraction of its starting strength and marking one of the most decisive defeats in the Imperial Army's history. Mutaguchi's insistence on the offensive, despite internal dissent over its feasibility, led to his relief from command and highlighted systemic doctrinal shortcomings in sustained offensive operations without naval or air dominance. The failure shifted momentum decisively to the Allies, paving the way for subsequent British-led counteroffensives that recaptured by 1945.

Strategic Background

Position in the Burma Campaign

The Burma Campaign commenced with the Japanese invasion of Burma in January 1942, following their occupation of Thailand, which facilitated rapid advances against lightly defended Allied positions. Japanese forces captured Rangoon on 8 March 1942, severing the primary Allied supply route to China via the Burma Road, and pressed northward, compelling British, Indian, and Chinese troops into a disorganized retreat across difficult terrain marked by monsoons, disease, and supply shortages. By May 1942, the remnants of the British Burma Corps, numbering around 12,000 survivors, had straggled into India after incurring approximately 13,500 casualties in killed, wounded, and missing during the withdrawal. In the aftermath of the 1942 defeat, Allied forces under British command prioritized stabilizing defenses along the India-Burma border to prevent further Japanese incursions into and . This involved reorganizing shattered units, fortifying frontier positions, and initiating long-term logistical improvements, including the construction of the beginning in December 1942 from Ledo in , , aimed at restoring an overland supply artery to through northern once recaptured. The road's development, costing around $149 million and involving thousands of laborers, underscored the Allies' shift toward sustaining operations in the theater despite Japanese control of central . By 1943, in had evolved into a primary Allied logistical hub, leveraging its airfield for airlifting supplies and troops essential for probing operations into , while served as a strategic chokepoint on the mountain road connecting railhead to . These sites anchored the defensive line in northeastern , enabling the accumulation of resources for potential counteroffensives and protecting the vital Manipur Road, which facilitated the movement of divisions between fronts. The stabilization efforts, though punctuated by limited and often unsuccessful raids like those in , positioned the Allies to contest dominance in the region heading into 1944.

Japanese Objectives and Motivations

The primary strategic objective of Operation U-Go was to capture the plain in northeastern to destroy Allied forward bases and sever supply lines supporting operations into and against forces in . This involved advancing divisions to occupy by mid-April 1944, securing its airfields and resources as a for further defense, while blocking reinforcements via and potentially . The plan, formalized in Area Army directives on 12 August 1943, aimed to establish the Mountain Range as a fortified line to counter anticipated Allied pincer offensives from and . Lieutenant General , commanding the Fifteenth Army, drove the offensive's conceptualization, viewing it as essential to preempt British threats exposed by Chindit incursions like Operation Longcloth in 1943. He argued that Japanese and could compensate for logistical strains and lack of air superiority, enabling a rapid seizure of British stocks to sustain the invasion and force enemy withdrawal from the theater. Southern Army orders from 7 August 1943 allocated approximately seven divisions for the early 1944 thrust, reflecting high command's acceptance of offensive action as the optimal defense amid resource constraints. Broader motivations tied to ' approval via Army Directive No. 1776 on 7 January 1944 encompassed disrupting British colonial stability by exploiting anti-colonial unrest in , potentially inciting popular resistance to weaken Allied cohesion. This aligned with efforts to safeguard Burma's oil fields and rice production against Allied reconquest, while coordinating with operations to blunt advances from multiple fronts and maintain the defensive perimeter on the Asian mainland.

Planning and Forces

Japanese Planning Process and Debates

Lieutenant General , commander of the Japanese 15th Army, conceived Operation U-Go in as an offensive into northeastern to disrupt Allied supply lines and preempt British advances into . Drawing from successes in the 1942 , Mutaguchi advocated a bold thrust across the toward and , assuming Japanese infantry spirit would overcome terrain challenges. General , commander of Burma Area Army, approved the concept on May 5, 1943, despite reservations about combat strength and , directing detailed planning for a launch no earlier than early 1944. formalized the operation via Army Directive No. 1776 on January 7, 1944, after a conference resolved timing debates. The plan divided the 15th Army into three prongs for convergence on : the 33rd under Ichiro Yanagida would advance from the Chin Hills in the south; the 15th under Masao Yamauchi from the east via Homalin; and the 31st under Kotoku Sato from the north toward to sever rail links. Each , totaling around 85,000 troops with light artillery and pack animals, aimed to cross the on March 15, 1944, and capture within three weeks to preempt the . Mutaguchi envisioned exploiting captured Allied airfields for air support, with the offensive timed to end by mid-April before seasonal rains rendered roads impassable. Logistical preparations assumed self-sufficiency through and seizure of depots, with divisions carrying munitions for 20 days and rations stockpiled at Kalewa for equivalent periods. relied on 30,000 pack horses, 40,000 oxen, and limited motorized units—reduced from 150 requested to 26 companies—prioritizing over heavy equipment, as roads like Ye-U-Kalewa remained incomplete until February 1944. No provisions accounted for extended sieges or Allied air resupply, with supply lines stretching 300 miles to and 600 to Rangoon, vulnerable to interdiction. Subordinates voiced strong opposition during planning conferences, including Takeichi Obata, 15th , who criticized inadequate strength and was replaced in May 1943. commanders Yanagida and Sato highlighted transport shortages, risks, and overextended lines in and late 1943 briefings, with Yanagida proposing suspension by March 25, 1944, due to incomplete roads and enemy reinforcements. Yamauchi similarly deemed encirclement of infeasible without superior logistics. Mutaguchi dismissed these as defeatist, fueled by overconfidence in prior rapid advances like , prioritizing offensive momentum over empirical supply data. Kawabe echoed logistical doubts but deferred to Mutaguchi's insistence, avoiding direct override amid command culture constraints.

Role of Azad Hind and the Indian National Army

The Indian National Army (INA), reorganized under Subhas Chandra Bose's leadership as part of the provisional government of Azad Hind established on October 21, 1943, provided approximately 12,000 troops in its 1st Division for Operation U-Go, drawn primarily from Indian prisoners of war captured by Japanese forces in Southeast Asia and supplemented by civilian volunteers. This division, comprising units such as the Subhas Brigade and Gandhi Brigade, was attached to the Japanese 15th Army's 15th and 31st Divisions for the advance into Manipur, reflecting Bose's insistence on INA participation in frontline combat rather than auxiliary roles like espionage. The troops' anti-colonial ideology, centered on expelling British rule from India, aligned with Japanese strategic aims but operated under severe logistical constraints shared with their allies, including inadequate supplies and reliance on overextended supply lines from Burma. Bose envisioned the offensive as a and effort to undermine British authority, with INA forces tasked not only with but also establishing administrative outposts in captured territories to assert Azad Hind's provisional governance and incite defections among units. broadcasts and leaflets urged soldiers to join the struggle, framing the as a pivotal step toward , though Bose's broader strategy depended on success to legitimize Azad Hind's claims. In practice, INA units conducted reconnaissance probes and limited assaults near , such as the Subhas Brigade's actions south of the city in late March 1944, but encountered fierce resistance from well-supplied Allied forces and failed to secure significant breakthroughs or provoke widespread mutinies. Combat effectiveness was hampered by the same environmental and logistical hardships afflicting the , including rains, , and , leading to high rates of among INA ranks—estimated at over 50% during the retreat phase—as troops faced and minimal local Manipuri support for the invaders. By June 1944, as Japanese forces withdrew, INA remnants disintegrated further, with many soldiers surrendering or dispersing due to the absence of anticipated uprisings and the offensive's collapse, underscoring the limited tangible military impact despite ideological fervor.

Allied Defenses and Intelligence

Lieutenant General William Slim commanded the Fourteenth Army, which bore primary responsibility for defending against the anticipated Japanese offensive. Scoones' IV Corps, stationed at , consisted of roughly 100,000 personnel drawn from , , , and East African divisions, including the 17th , 20th , and 23rd Divisions, supplemented by the 50th Parachute Brigade and artillery units. These forces were concentrated on the plain, a region featuring six airfields—four all-weather and two fair-weather strips—that facilitated rapid reinforcement and sustained logistics. British , particularly decrypts of Japanese communications, provided early warnings of the Fifteenth Army's buildup and intentions for an via the Chin Hills and , allowing Slim to redirect the 5th Indian Division from to via airlift in February 1944 and to evacuate non-essential personnel preemptively. This intelligence countered Japanese efforts at deception, such as simulated withdrawals, by confirming troop concentrations exceeding 85,000 men under Lieutenant General . Defensive preparations emphasized fortified positions on the plain, with strongpoints, , and artillery emplacements designed to withstand , while ridge, approximately 80 miles north, served as a critical forward bastion manned by a mixed of , , and troops, reinforced with supplies stockpiled in advance. Air superiority enabled by RAF 221 Group and US troop carrier squadrons ensured that IV Corps could maintain operations through airdrops totaling nearly 19,000 tons of supplies and evacuation of over 13,000 casualties once besieged. These adaptations, grounded in empirical assessment of terrain and , positioned the Allies to absorb and repel the assault without reliance on overland supply lines vulnerable to Japanese .

Prelude Operations

Operation Ha-Go

Operation Ha-Go was a diversionary offensive launched in the region of on 4 1944 by the 55th Division of the Japanese Twenty-Eighth Army, commanded by Lieutenant General Shozo Sakurai. The primary objective was to infiltrate Allied lines, seize supply depots such as those at Bawli and the Admin Box near Ngakyedauk Pass, and compel British XV Corps to commit reserves southward, thereby weakening defenses along the front for the concurrent main thrust of Operation U-Go. Approximately 8,000 troops from the division, organized into columns including the Sakurai Column for river crossings, advanced rapidly using across the Kalapanzin River, bypassing strongpoints to encircle the 7th Division's administrative area. Allied forces, primarily elements of the 5th and 7th Indian Divisions under XV Corps, initially faced isolation as Japanese forces cut communications, but held the Admin Box—a defended supply enclosure—from 5 to 23 February 1944 through determined close-quarters defense supported by concentrated artillery fire. counterattacks, spearheaded by the 25th Dragoons' and tanks—the first effective armored employment in the theater—exploited Japanese vulnerabilities to anti-tank weapons, while resupply drops sustained the , marking the debut of sustained air in the campaign. Japanese assaults faltered against these tactics, with attackers suffering heavy losses in repeated charges and unable to breach fortified positions amid the hilly, jungled terrain. By late February, stretched supply lines and mounting attrition forced Sakurai to order a withdrawal, completed by early , during which Japanese troops abandoned significant heavy equipment, including pieces, due to ammunition shortages and pack transport limitations. Japanese casualties totaled approximately 5,000 dead and wounded across the operation, with only about 3,000 of the initial 8,000 effectives remaining combat-effective, contrasted against Allied losses of around 3,000, primarily wounded, in the Admin Box fighting alone. The operation's failure to secure supplies or fully divert reserves highlighted critical Japanese logistical frailties in sustaining offensive momentum over difficult without reliable capture of enemy stocks—a recurring in Burma operations—yet these indicators of overextended lines and Allied material superiority were insufficiently integrated into U-Go's broader planning, fostering undue optimism about rapid advances into despite evident risks of isolation and starvation.

Main Offensive

Initial Japanese Advance

Operation U-Go commenced on 7 March 1944, when the Japanese 33rd Division, under Yanagida Motoharu, initiated its advance from positions near Fort White along the Tiddim Road toward , aiming to envelop Allied forces from the south. Concurrently, the 15th and 31st Divisions of Renya Mutaguchi's 15th Army finalized preparations for crossing the , with the 15th Division tasked to strike from the northwest via and the 31st Division directed toward through the . On 15 March, the 15th and 31st Divisions crossed the Chindwin at points near Paungbyin, Tamanthi, and Homalin with minimal opposition, capitalizing on operational surprise as Allied attention was diverted elsewhere. The 31st Division pushed rapidly through the rugged Range and , capturing on 21 March and severing sections of the Kohima-Imphal road, while the 33rd Division progressed along dual axes—the Tiddim-Bishenpur and Tamu-Palel roads—encircling elements of the British Indian 17th Division by mid-month. These early penetrations benefited from the element of surprise and light initial resistance, though progress was constrained by the steep, jungle-cloaked terrain and exclusive reliance on pack animals for transport, as roads were impassable to vehicles. Allied reconnaissance soon detected the incursions, prompting RAF interdiction strikes that began disrupting Japanese columns by mid-March, including attacks on roadblocks and advancing elements. Detachments of the , integrated with ese units primarily for auxiliary and propaganda roles, accompanied the vanguard to facilitate local contacts and establish nascent forward positions amid the advance.

Battle of Imphal

The 15th and 33rd achieved partial encirclement of by late March 1944, severing the Imphal-Kohima road on 29 March and isolating Allied IV Corps units, including the 17th Indian to the south. Elements of the 33rd advanced along the Tiddim Road, capturing Allied supply dumps on the Imphal plain, while the 15th pushed from the northeast after overrunning positions near Tamu. These gains, however, could not be exploited due to Japanese shortages of and , limiting their ability to distribute captured ammunition and rations effectively before rains intensified in May. The Allied defenders, centered on the 17th and 20th Indian under Lieutenant-General Geoffrey Scoones, consolidated around the plain's six airfields to protect evacuation and resupply capabilities. April saw the onset of the siege's ground fighting, with Japanese assaults focusing on breaking into the plain. At Bishenpur on 15-16 April, the 33rd 's 214th and 215th s attacked defended ridges, incurring approximately 289 and 500 casualties respectively against positions held by and battalions that suffered up to 75% losses in some units. Tank battles supported these engagements; earlier on 15 March near Tamu, Lee tanks destroyed all Japanese Type 95 light tanks committed by the 15th , denying armored support for subsequent pushes. The National Army's 2nd Guerrilla (Gandhi ), attached in auxiliary roles to the 33rd for pathfinding and raids, joined the 28 April assault on Palel airfield but failed to secure it amid heavy fire. Allied perseverance in May relied on air resupply, with U.S. and RAF transports delivering over 18,000 tons of , , and rations to the encircled forces by early June, enabling counterattacks that inflicted further attrition on Japanese units already strained by and inadequate logistics. Despite reaching within 4 miles of central at peak strength, the Japanese could not seize airfields like Palel or Imphal main due to entrenched defenses, insufficient anti-tank weapons, and Allied aerial interdiction of their supply lines. The 33rd Division alone recorded 3,500 combat casualties by 23 May, while INA auxiliary elements, including late-arriving 4th Guerrilla Regiment detachments, endured high attrition from combat exposure, , and tropical illnesses without achieving operational breakthroughs. Early downpours in late May exacerbated Japanese immobility, preventing consolidation of gains amid mounting exhaustion.

Battle of Kohima

The Battle of Kohima, fought from early April to late June 1944, served as the northern anchor of Allied defenses during , preventing forces from linking their and fronts. Elements of the 31st Division under Kotoku Sato reached on 5 April after advancing from the , initiating assaults on 6 April against a makeshift of about 2,500 , , and troops, primarily from the 4th Division's reassembled units, , and supporting artillery. The defenders held key positions on the ridge, a series of steep, interconnected hillocks at elevations over 5,000 feet, which provided natural defensive advantages including clear fields of fire and limited approach routes for attackers. Intense defined the siege phase from 6 to 20 April, with Japanese infantry launching repeated charges against fortified positions. On 13 April, fighting erupted around the Deputy Commissioner's Bungalow and its adjacent tennis court, where troops of the 2nd Dorset Regiment and 4th Royal West Kent Regiment engaged in hand-to-hand struggles amid trenches and bunkers, repelling assaults that involved grenades, bayonets, and small arms at ranges under 50 yards. The "," centered on this area, saw defenders withstand waves of attacks from the Japanese 58th and 138th Regiments, inflicting heavy casualties while enduring and fire that devastated the landscape. By 18 April, the garrison had secured the ridge's crest, though at the cost of severe shortages in water, food, and ammunition, supplied sporadically by air drops. Relief arrived on 20 April when the 2nd British Division, advancing from Dimapur, broke through Japanese lines to reinforce the exhausted defenders, marking the end of the siege. Sato's failure to seize Kohima by early May allowed IV Corps elements to maintain cohesion, enabling a coordinated Allied counteroffensive that exploited the terrain's defensibility and Japanese overextension. The battle's outcome hinged on the garrison's tenacious hold on high ground, which denied the Japanese a vital supply route and observation post overlooking Imphal, shifting initiative to Allied forces by June.

Logistical Failures and Retreat

By mid-June 1944, the Japanese 15th Army under Lieutenant General faced acute supply shortages that critically undermined its operational capacity during Operation U-Go. Initial stocks of rice and other provisions, transported laboriously over rugged terrain using limited pack animals and porters, were rapidly depleted, with the army's reliance on capturing Allied depots at proving insufficient to sustain forward divisions. The failure to seize these stockpiles left troops foraging for wild yams and grass, exacerbating amid extended combat exposure. The onset of the monsoon in early June compounded these logistical breakdowns, flooding rivers and trails that served as supply routes and hindering the movement of remaining draft animals, of which most— including thousands of mules and —had already perished from exhaustion or enemy action. Disease outbreaks, particularly and , further decimated ranks, as unsanitary conditions and weakened immunity from facilitated rapid spread among concentrated forces unable to evacuate the sick effectively. These environmental and health factors, intertwined with overextended lines, eroded combat effectiveness and forced a shift from offensive maneuvers to survival imperatives. On 9 July 1944, Mutaguchi acknowledged the offensive's collapse and issued orders for a general retreat across the , initiating a disorganized withdrawal under pursuit by Allied forces led by General William Slim. Allied air superiority, achieved through dominance over Burmese skies, enabled relentless bombing of Japanese troop concentrations and stragglers, disrupting attempts at reorganization and inflicting additional attrition on the retreating columns. During the retreat to the Chindwin, approximately 20,000 personnel succumbed primarily to and exhaustion, as fragmented units lacked , medical support, or coherent command to navigate the monsoon-saturated terrain. This phase marked the causal culmination of premeditated logistical underestimation, where the 15th Army's advance without adequate sustainment—predicated on rapid victory—devolved into a , sealing Operation U-Go's failure independent of frontline tactical engagements.

Aftermath and Consequences

Casualties and Losses

The Japanese 15th Army, comprising approximately 85,000 troops at the outset of Operation U-Go in , suffered approximately 53,000 by July 1944, including around 30,000 killed in combat and several thousand more deaths from and during the retreat. These losses rendered the army combat-ineffective, with divisions reduced to less than half strength and lacking artillery and transport. Allied forces, primarily and troops under IV Corps at and XXXIII Corps at , incurred about 17,000 total , including roughly 6,000 dead, across the from March to July 1944. These figures encompassed 12,500 at and 4,000 at , with rotations of fresh units and air evacuation of over 13,000 wounded mitigating long-term degradation. The (INA), deployed alongside forces with elements of the 1st Division totaling around 3,000 men near , experienced approximately 2,500 , many of whom surrendered to Allied forces or deserted amid logistical collapse and low morale by mid-1944.
ForceTotal CasualtiesKilledNotes
15th ~53,000~30,000+ (combat); additional from /Primarily non-combat deaths during ; depleted to ineffective status.
Allied (/Indian)~17,000~6,000Supported by air supplies and reinforcements; included 12,500 at , 4,000 at .
~2,500Not specifiedHigh rates of surrender/desertion; limited effective combat role.

Strategic Repercussions

The failure of Operation U-Go critically undermined Japanese military capacity in the theater, as the Fifteenth Army suffered irreplaceable losses in manpower and , exhausting its reserves and exposing central to Allied penetration. This depletion directly facilitated the British Fourteenth Army's initiation of Operation Capital on 12 October 1944, a methodical advance southward that captured key positions like Mawlu and Indaw by December, setting the stage for the broader reconquest of and the fall of Rangoon on 3 May 1945. The defensive successes at and preserved vital Allied infrastructure, including the Imphal airfields, which transitioned from besieged supply hubs—delivering over 600 tons of daily during —to forward bases supporting subsequent offensives, thereby enhancing logistical sustainability and troop morale across the South-East Asia Command. This shift not only neutralized the immediate Japanese threat to India's frontier but also restored Allied initiative, enabling coordinated pushes that fragmented Japanese cohesion and prevented any regrouping in northern . Although the Indian National Army's deployment alongside Japanese forces during U-Go aimed to spark anti- uprisings, the offensive's collapse confined INA gains to minor tactical roles without eliciting mass defections or revolts among Indian troops or civilians, limiting its operational influence. However, the publicized involvement and subsequent British trials of INA personnel from late 1945 onward fueled nationalist sentiments, eroding colonial legitimacy by highlighting perceived disloyalty within the and accelerating demands for post-war self-rule in .

Historiographical Perspectives and Debates

Historians concur that Renya Mutaguchi's conception of Operation U-Go was marred by profound logistical oversights, including inadequate provisions for supply lines across the challenging terrain, which doomed the 15th to and despite initial advances. Mutaguchi's , rooted in prior successes like the 1942 conquest of , disregarded warnings from subordinates about the impossibility of sustaining troops without robust rearward support, a failing exacerbated by the 's doctrinal emphasis on offensive spirit over material preparation. This consensus, drawn from post-war analyses of records, underscores how Mutaguchi's rejection of phased in favor of rapid encirclement mirrored systemic underestimation of modern warfare's sustainment demands. Debates persist on whether aggressive aerial resupply could have mitigated these deficiencies, with some arguing that reallocating Japan's limited —numbering fewer than 200 serviceable units in theater by —might have prolonged the siege of , potentially forcing Allied capitulation before monsoon rains. Counterarguments, supported by operational data, emphasize the Allies' overwhelming air superiority, with RAF and USAAF squadrons delivering over 4,000 tons of supplies monthly to via C-47 Dakotas, while Japanese efforts faltered due to fuel shortages and Allied interdiction, rendering hypothetical boosts infeasible. ULTRA-derived intelligence further tipped the scales, enabling William Slim to anticipate and counter thrusts, as evidenced by preemptive reinforcements to on April 6, 1944; this challenges narratives attributing failure solely to aggression, highlighting Allied predictive edges absent in planning. The Indian National Army's (INA) integration into U-Go remains contentious, with military historians dismissing its combat efficacy—its , totaling around 7,000 men, suffered 1,800 casualties without decisive breakthroughs or inciting mutinies—as negligible amid the broader collapse. expectations of INA-triggered uprisings proved illusory, as no verifiable mass defections occurred during the campaign, debunking propagandistic claims of imminent Indian revolt. Yet, politically, the INA's post-war trials in 1945-1946 amplified nationalist fervor, drawing millions to protests and eroding legitimacy, thus causally accelerating in 1947 beyond mere battlefield symbolism—a linkage affirmed by contemporaneous Indian political records over romanticized martial narratives.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] The Burma Campaign of the Japanese Fifteenth Army - DTIC
    Operation U-Go, the failed India offensive, intensified this drastic change in fortunes. The Japanese Army launched Operation U-Go on March 8, 1944.<|separator|>
  2. [2]
    Battles of Imphal and Kohima | National Army Museum
    In March 1944, the Japanese Fifteenth Army began an advance against India's north-east frontier to forestall a planned British invasion of Burma. They intended ...Missing: U- | Show results with:U-
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
    Battles of Imphal and Kohima - Historic UK
    Aug 14, 2025 · In March 1944, the Imperial Japanese Army launched Operation U-Go across the border from Burma into north east India.
  5. [5]
    How the Japanese Turned Success into Failure in Burma - UK Essays
    Feb 8, 2020 · This article looks to assess how the Japanese turned success into failure during the Burma campaign of 1944. Specifically looking into the ...
  6. [6]
    Imphal: Battle Royale at the Gateway to India
    General Mutaguchi, aware of what was going on, planned to forestall a British counter-offensive with an offensive of his own. He would launch his 15th Army ...By John Brown · Mutaguchi Tries To Get The... · Imphal Under Heavy Attack<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Japanese conquest of Burma, December 1941-May 1942
    Japanese conquest of Burma, December 1941-May 1942. Home - Book Shop - Wars ... The key to the invasion of Burma was the Japanese occupation of Thailand ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Burma, 1942 - U.S. Army Center of Military History
    The occupation of Burma would protect gains already secured in the southwest Pacific, set the stage for a possible invasion of India that conceivably could link ...
  9. [9]
    The Retreat From Burma - AMERICAN HERITAGE
    Twelve thousand of the Burma Corps straggled into India between May 12 and 20, leaving behind 13,500 casualties in killed, wounded, and missing during their ...
  10. [10]
    The Far East campaign | National Army Museum
    As a land invasion had long been thought unlikely, the defences of Burma (now Myanmar) had been neglected. When the Japanese attack began in January 1942, the ...
  11. [11]
    History of the Ledo Road 1942-44 - CBI Theater
    The purpose of this was to start additional points working in both directions from Namlip. On 1 September personnel of the 823rd Engineer Aviation Battalion ...
  12. [12]
    Black Soldiers and the Ledo Road (1942-1945) - BlackPast.org
    Oct 24, 2017 · The United States spent around $149 million dollars to build the road. In December of 1942 construction of the road began in Ledo, India, with ...
  13. [13]
    Listen To 8 People Describe The War In Burma In Their Own Words
    In September 1942, the Indian 14th Division launched a failed campaign to recapture the Arakan coastal plain in western Burma. The Japanese put up a strong ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] 15TH ARMY OPERATIONS IN IMPHAL AREA AND WITHDRAWAL ...
    prepare for Operations No. 21, No. 22 and No. 32. 2. Standard operational control for the. U-Go Operation: a. The Burma Area Army will take the offensive in ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] The Battles of Imphal and Kohima
    Mar 24, 2025 · While there are already rich historical accounts in English from the Allied perspective and the Imphal Peace. Museum has started to recover ...
  16. [16]
    Goonhammer Historicals: The Indian National Army – The Forgotten ...
    May 23, 2024 · The initial plan was for the INA to be used primarily for espionage and propaganda during this offensive, but Bose managed to succeed where ...
  17. [17]
    The Other Side of the Hill: The Indian National Army in Battle India ...
    Dr Sundaram, in conversation with Dr Robert Lyman, talks to us about the Indian National Army (INA) which deployed almost 16,000 men in Northeastern India and ...Missing: U- Go<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    INA: IMPHAL AND KOHIMA 1944 - War History
    Dec 13, 2024 · Alongside the Japanese now stood about 40,000 men of Subhas Bose's INA. Its commanders launched a major propaganda offensive too. They told ...
  19. [19]
    The Indian national army in the Imphal offensive
    However, real Indian National Army efforts began during the final offensive in. 1944 when large groups of the Singapore-trained Bahadur and. Intelligence Groups ...
  20. [20]
    Out of Defeat, a Hard-Won Triumph - Warfare History Network
    Apr 20, 2022 · General William Slim's British 14th “Forgotten” Army turned the arduous campaign against the Japanese in Burma from frustration to victory.
  21. [21]
    Battle of Imphal-Kohima - World War II Database
    While Japan had no original plans to invade India, Lieutenant General Renya ... Japanese brigadier who committed Haraluru in battle of Kohima -Imphal 1944.<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Stout Pilots and Aircraft: Air Transport in the 1944 Burma–India ...
    Nov 24, 2020 · Scoones' British IV Corps was cut off at Imphal. Four divisions ... On 30 April, Scoones sent Slim an appreciation of the situation at Imphal.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Magic and Ultra in the China-Burma-India Theater - DTIC
    The Japanese offensive against India was Operation U-GO. The 5th Air Division established a forward headquarters in Kalaw. JAS, 30, 31 March 1944, SRS-030 ...
  24. [24]
    British intelligence on Japan before the Imphal–Kohima battle, 1943 ...
    ... Operation U-Go [attack on Imphal] has much greater value than the operation itself.22. The logic of Mutaguchi and IGHQ reflected the strategic culture of the ...
  25. [25]
    The Battle of Kohima, 1944: 'Sieges Have Been Longer, but Few ...
    Jan 14, 2023 · Gen. Geoffrey Scoones' IV Corps. Scoones answered to the Fourteenth Army under then-General William Slim, who oversaw the entire front along the ...
  26. [26]
    Defending the 'Admin Box' In Burma's Arakan Region
    By February 14, HA-GO was fatally behind schedule. By now, Tanahashi's ... Operation HA-GO. He had lost 5,000 men dead around the Admin Box, Ngakyedauk ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Japanese 55th Division in the Ha-Go Offensive, January 1944
    Japanese 55th Division in the Ha-Go Offensive. 3/4 February 1944 ... Sakurai Column: (assault column to break across the Kalapanzin. River). 112th ...Missing: Operation objectives
  28. [28]
    [PDF] What Lessons Does the Burma Campaign Hold? - DTIC
    Feb 8, 1994 · The Japanese crafted their U-GO. (Grand Design) plan with the aim to decisively engage and destroy the British advance base in the Assam area ( ...
  29. [29]
    Imphal - The Pacific War Online Encyclopedia
    Although neither man voiced it, Mutaguchi recalled postwar that there developed an unspoken understanding between the two that the operation must be abandoned ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Imphal-Kohima - DTIC
    This is an analysis of the World War II battles which centered around imphal and Kohima near the India-Burma border during March -. July 1944.
  31. [31]
    [PDF] The War Against Japan: The decisive battles - General Staff
    ... PLANNING FOR 1943-1944. (September -November 1943). I. CHAPTER II . THE ADMINISTRATIVE. BACKGROUND (September-November 1943). 17. CHAPTER III . THE INDIAN ARMY ...
  32. [32]
    The 2nd Dorset Regiment at the Battle of Kohima
    Apr 20, 2024 · ... tennis court in the grounds of the Deputy Commissioner's Bungalow. ... For over a month, this tennis court was the scene of fierce hand-to-hand ...
  33. [33]
    That Great Bitter Battle of Kohima - Warfare History Network
    Throughout the course of the Japanese assault on Imphal, the British forces there would throw back repeated Japanese attacks. The fighting was fierce, often ...
  34. [34]
    Battle of the Tennis Court | Operations & Codenames of WWII
    ... deputy commissioner's bungalow, including the tennis court, beginning around ... The 'Battle of the Tennis Court' was the turning point of the 'Battle of Kohima', ...
  35. [35]
    The Siege of Kohima (April 1944) - Walking the Battlefields
    Feb 28, 2023 · Even after the relief had started, Lieutenant General Sato's 31st Division continued assaulting Garrison Hill although they were eventually ...
  36. [36]
    Burma - The Pacific War Online Encyclopedia
    For the Japanese, Ha-Go was merely a preliminary operation aimed at pinning down Slim's reserves in the Arakan. The main Japanese attack would come further ...The First Burma Campaign · U-Go · Myitkyina Recaptured
  37. [37]
    Imphal & Kohima: Turning point in Burma - The Past
    Jan 11, 2024 · There were good reasons why Imphal and Kohima became the main focus of the struggle between British and Commonwealth forces and imperial Japan ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Winning the Burma Air Battle and Breaking the Ground Siege at ...
    Jan 16, 2025 · In early 1944, the Japanese Fifteenth Army attacked from western Burma into India but was stopped by British and Indian troops at Imphal and ...
  39. [39]
    Outfoxed in Burma - Warfare History Network
    With the 15th Army smashed, its divisions down to less than half strength, most of their guns and trucks lost, and their supply line cut, Kimura ordered his ...
  40. [40]
  41. [41]
    Bill Slim and the reasons for victory in India (1944) and Burma (1945)
    Jul 2, 2025 · During the battles at Imphal and Kohima, the Japanese suffered a crushing defeat. 15 Army sustained 53,500 casualties out of a total of 84,300 ...
  42. [42]
    We Tell Their Stories: Casualties of Kohima and Imphal | CWGF
    Feb 27, 2024 · We tell the stories of casualties from the iconic battle of Kohima and Imphal. Discover how we keep their stories alive & support our ...
  43. [43]
    The Reconquest of Burma 1944-45: From Operation Capital to
    Sep 13, 2023 · After detailing the composition of opposing forces and their plans, the author chronologically charts the Allied push during Operation Capital, ...
  44. [44]
    The Battles of Imphal and Kohima, 1944 - Royal Armouries
    In March 1944, the Empire of Japan launched Operation U-Go, the invasion of British India. 85,000 Japanese troops under the command of Lieutenant General Renya ...
  45. [45]
    Britain and Decolonisation in South East and South Asia, 1945-1948
    ... Indian National Army (INA)) – all combined in ending the British rule (Raj) in India. Thus India's war effort also helped pave the way for independence ...Missing: U- | Show results with:U-
  46. [46]
    Burma Campaign – 1944 Invasion of India | SCM Globe
    Jun 14, 2015 · Most casualties occurred during the chaotic retreat due to starvation, disease ... After the end of Operation U-Go, the Japanese withdrew many of ...Missing: flooding | Show results with:flooding
  47. [47]
  48. [48]
    Journeys back along the roads to Mandalay, Imphal and Kohima
    Apr 22, 2021 · [In 1940-1] U Aung San went over to the Japanese, and raised what we might call a Quisling army to come in at the tail of the Japanese and help ...
  49. [49]
    New book offers Japanese perspective on Kohima, Imphal World ...
    Mar 26, 2025 · The strategic failures of Operation Imphal—and the broader campaign in Burma—highlight the perils of inflexible command structures and ...Missing: Debates logistics
  50. [50]
    New Documentary Records Memories of Japan's Invasion of India in ...
    Sep 21, 2016 · Memories of a Forgotten War is Utpal Borpujari's new documentary about the failed Japanese invasion of India during World War II.