Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Parity of a permutation

In group theory, the parity of a permutation refers to the classification of a permutation in the S_n (the group of all bijections from a of n elements to itself) as either even or odd, based on the parity of the number of transpositions required to decompose it. A permutation is even if it can be expressed as a product of an even number of transpositions (2-cycles), and odd if the number is odd; this parity is invariant regardless of the specific decomposition chosen, ensuring a well-defined \operatorname{sgn}: S_n \to \{1, -1\} where even permutations map to 1 and odd to -1. This is a , meaning \operatorname{sgn}(\sigma \tau) = \operatorname{sgn}(\sigma) \operatorname{sgn}(\tau) for any permutations \sigma, \tau \in S_n, and it remains unchanged under inversion (\operatorname{sgn}(\sigma^{-1}) = \operatorname{sgn}(\sigma)) or conjugation. For , the parity follows a simple rule: a k-cycle has sign (-1)^{k-1}, so odd-length cycles are even permutations while even-length cycles are odd. These properties divide S_n (for n \geq 2) into two equal-sized classes of even and odd permutations, each comprising half of the n! total elements. The even permutations form a normal subgroup of S_n known as the alternating group A_n, which has index 2 and order n!/2; it is simple for n \geq 5, making it a fundamental object in the study of finite groups. Beyond group theory, permutation parity is central to linear algebra, appearing in the Leibniz formula for the determinant of an n \times n matrix A = (a_{ij}), given by \det(A) = \sum_{\sigma \in S_n} \operatorname{sgn}(\sigma) \prod_{i=1}^n a_{i,\sigma(i)}, where the sign weights each permutation term to capture the matrix's invertibility and orientation-preserving properties. It also arises in combinatorics (e.g., counting inversions), topology, and physics (e.g., distinguishing bosons and fermions in quantum mechanics via even and odd representations). Historically, the concept of permutation parity originated in the late 18th century with observations by Vandermonde and was proven by Cauchy in 1815; early 20th-century terminology referred to even permutations as "positive" and odd as "negative."

Basic Concepts

Definition

A permutation of a finite set X with n elements is a bijective from X to itself, rearranging the elements of the set. The collection of all such permutations, denoted S_n when X = \{1, 2, \dots, n\}, forms the under the operation of , which serves as the foundational structure for studying permutations in group theory. The parity of a permutation \sigma \in S_n refers to whether \sigma is even or odd, determined intuitively by its into transpositions (2-cycles): \sigma is even if it can be written as a product of an even number of transpositions, and odd if an odd number. This even-odd distinction, known as the of the permutation, is independent of the specific used. In group theory, the parity induces a homomorphism \delta: S_n \to \{\pm 1\}, where even permutations map to +1 and odd ones to -1, partitioning S_n into cosets. The kernel of this homomorphism is the A_n, the normal subgroup of all even permutations, which has index 2 in S_n and plays a central role in the structure of symmetric groups. The notion of permutation signs originated with early investigations by around 1770 in the context of polynomial equations, and was systematically developed by in papers from 1815 and 1844–45 on permutation groups. The specific term "," emphasizing the even-odd character, arose in the amid these foundational studies.

Examples

To illustrate the concept of , consider the S_3, which consists of all of the set \{1, 2, 3\}. There are six elements in S_3, which can be expressed in cycle notation as follows: the identity permutation (1), the transpositions (1\,2), (1\,3), and (2\,3), and the 3-cycles (1\,2\,3) and (1\,3\,2). The even permutations are the identity and the two 3-cycles, while the odd permutations are the three transpositions.
Permutation (Cycle Notation)Parity
(1) (identity)Even
(1\,2\,3)Even
(1\,3\,2)Even
(1\,2)
(1\,3)
(2\,3)
This classification can be visualized by considering how permutations rearrange the positions of 1, 2, and 3, akin to reflecting or rotating objects in space. Even permutations, such as the 3-cycle (1\,2\,3), preserve the overall "" or orientation of the arrangement, similar to a , while odd permutations, like the transposition (1\,2), reverse it, like a . In the larger symmetric group S_4, which permutes \{1, 2, 3, 4\}, parity applies similarly without needing to enumerate all 24 elements. For instance, the 4-cycle (1\,2\,3\,4) is an odd permutation, the double transposition (1\,2)(3\,4) is even, and the single transposition (1\,2) is odd. A common misconception is that the parity of a cycle matches its length's parity directly; in reality, even-length cycles like the 4-cycle are odd permutations, as their parity is determined by the number of transpositions needed to express them (an odd number in this case). The assigns +1 to even and -1 to odd ones, capturing this distinction succinctly.

Definitions

Inversion Count

An inversion in a \pi of \{1, 2, \dots, n\}, written in one-line notation as \pi = (\pi(1), \pi(2), \dots, \pi(n)), is a pair of indices (i, j) such that i < j but \pi(i) > \pi(j). This captures instances where a larger appears before a smaller one in the sequence. The inversion count, denoted \inv(\pi), is the total number of such inversions in \pi, formally given by \inv(\pi) = \sum_{1 \leq i < j \leq n} \mathbf{1}_{\pi(i) > \pi(j)}, where \mathbf{1} is the that equals 1 if the condition holds and 0 otherwise. The parity of the permutation is then determined by the parity of this count: \pi is even if \inv(\pi) is even and odd if \inv(\pi) is odd, with the sign function defined as \sgn(\pi) = (-1)^{\inv(\pi)}. Equivalently, the parity is \inv(\pi) \mod 2. To compute the inversion count, examine all pairs (i, j) with i < j and check if \pi(i) > \pi(j). Consider the example \pi = (2, 1, 3):
  • For i=1, j=2: \pi(1)=2 > \pi(2)=1, so one inversion.
  • For i=1, j=3: \pi(1)=2 < \pi(3)=3, no inversion.
  • For i=2, j=3: \pi(2)=1 < \pi(3)=3, no inversion.
Thus, \inv(\pi) = 1, which is odd, so \pi has odd parity and \sgn(\pi) = -1. This approach offers a direct combinatorial method to determine parity by pairwise comparisons, avoiding the need for decomposition into transpositions or cycles, and finds extensive use in enumerative combinatorics, such as in generating functions that track inversions across permutations.

Transposition Decomposition

Any permutation \pi in the symmetric group S_n can be expressed as a product of transpositions. The parity of \pi is defined to be even if the number of transpositions in such a decomposition is even, and odd if odd; the sign function is then \operatorname{sgn}(\pi) = (-1)^k, where k is the number of transpositions. This parity is independent of the choice of decomposition, as any two decompositions into transpositions have lengths congruent modulo 2. The symmetric group S_n is generated by the set of adjacent transpositions \{(i\, i+1) \mid i=1,\dots,n-1\}, meaning every permutation can be written as a product of these generators. The parity of \pi is thus the parity of the number of adjacent transpositions in such an expression. For example, algorithms like restore a permuted sequence to identity by swapping adjacent out-of-order elements, and the total number of such swaps determines the parity via the even or odd count. The cycle decomposition provides a direct way to compute this parity. A k-cycle decomposes into k-1 transpositions, so its sign is (-1)^{k-1}. For a permutation \pi whose disjoint cycle decomposition consists of cycles of lengths k_1, \dots, k_m (including 1-cycles for fixed points), the sign is the product over the cycle signs: \operatorname{sgn}(\pi) = \prod_{i=1}^m (-1)^{k_i - 1} = (-1)^{\sum_{i=1}^m (k_i - 1)}. Since \sum k_i = n, this simplifies to \sum (k_i - 1) = n - m, where m = c(\pi) is the total number of cycles including fixed points. Thus, \operatorname{sgn}(\pi) = (-1)^{n - c(\pi)}.[1] As an example, the 3-cycle \pi = (1\, 2\, 3) in S_3 decomposes as (1\, 2\, 3) = (1\, 3)(1\, 2), a product of two transpositions, confirming even parity with \operatorname{sgn}(\pi) = 1. In cycle terms, it has one cycle of length 3 (c(\pi) = 1), so \operatorname{sgn}(\pi) = (-1)^{3-1} = 1. This definition via transpositions is equivalent to the parity of the inversion count of the permutation.

Equivalence and Proofs

Equivalence Proof

The equivalence between the two definitions of the parity of a permutation is established by the following theorem: for any permutation \pi \in S_n, the sign \operatorname{sgn}(\pi) defined as (-1)^{\operatorname{inv}(\pi)}, where \operatorname{inv}(\pi) is the number of inversions of \pi, equals the sign defined as (-1)^k, where k is the number of transpositions in any decomposition of \pi into a product of transpositions. To prove this, first consider adjacent transpositions, which are transpositions of the form \tau_{i,i+1} = (i \ i+1). A key lemma states that multiplying a permutation by an adjacent transposition changes the number of inversions by exactly 1. Specifically, for any \pi \in S_n and adjacent transposition \tau = (k \ k+1), |\operatorname{inv}(\tau \pi) - \operatorname{inv}(\pi)| = 1. This holds because the inversions of \tau \pi differ from those of \pi only in pairs involving the images under \pi of positions that interact with k and k+1; if \pi(k) < \pi(k+1), then \tau \pi introduces exactly one new inversion, and vice versa. Next, note that every (not necessarily adjacent) can be expressed as a product of an odd number of adjacent transpositions. For example, the (i \ j) with j > i+1 decomposes into $2(j-i)-1 adjacent transpositions, which is . Thus, any general is an permutation in the sense of adjacent transpositions, and the remains consistent. The full proof proceeds by on the number m of (general) transpositions in a \pi = \tau_1 \tau_2 \cdots \tau_m. For the base case m=0, \pi is the , which has zero inversions (even) and even . Assume the result holds for decompositions with fewer than m transpositions. Each \tau_i can be written as an odd product of adjacent transpositions, so \pi is a product of an odd total number of adjacent transpositions if m is , and even if m is even. By iterated application of the adjacent , each such multiplication changes the inversion count by an odd amount (specifically, ±1, which is ), so the total change in inversions from the has the same as m. Thus, \operatorname{inv}(\pi) and m have the same . A supporting lemma confirms that under multiplication by an odd permutation (such as a ), the number of inversions changes by an odd amount overall. This ensures consistency across decompositions. Therefore, both definitions yield the same from the S_n to \{ \pm 1 \}, where even permutations map to +1 and to -1.

Alternative Proofs

One alternative definition of the of a permutation \pi \in S_n is given by the of its associated P_\pi, where (P_\pi)_{i,j} = 1 if j = \pi(i) and 0 otherwise. This matrix represents the linear transformation that permutes the vectors according to \pi. The \det(P_\pi) equals +1 if \pi is even and -1 if \pi is , providing a well-defined parity independent of decomposition into transpositions or inversions. To see this equivalence, apply the Leibniz formula for the : \det(P_\pi) = \sum_{\sigma \in S_n} \sgn(\sigma) \prod_{i=1}^n (P_\pi)_{i, \sigma(i)}, where \sgn(\sigma) is the sign from the standard transposition definition. The product \prod_{i=1}^n (P_\pi)_{i, \sigma(i)} is nonzero only when \sigma = \pi, as it requires $1s exactly on the positions defined by \pi; otherwise, it includes a 0. Thus, the sum reduces to a single term \sgn(\pi) \cdot 1 = \sgn(\pi), confirming that the determinant matches the transposition-based sign. This approach leverages properties of to verify the parity's consistency, as the determinant is uniquely defined via row reduction or cofactor expansion, yielding \pm 1 for permutation matrices. Another perspective uses generating functions to demonstrate that the number of even permutations equals the number of odd permutations for n \geq 2, reinforcing the bipartition implied by any consistent definition. The generating function for the signed sum over permutations is derived from the , where the of a permutation equals (-1)^{n - c(\pi)} and c(\pi) is the number of (equivalent to the transposition via the relation that a k-cycle has (-1)^{k-1}). The relevant exponent is \sum_{k=1}^\infty (-1)^{k-1} \frac{x^k}{k} = [\log](/page/Log)(1 + x), so the generating function is \exp([\log](/page/Log)(1 + x)) = 1 + x. The coefficients imply \sum_{\pi \in S_n} \operatorname{sgn}(\pi) = 0 for n > 1, hence |A_n| = n!/2. This approach confirms the balanced count without direct , assuming the cycle-based aligns with transpositions. A topological interpretation views the through braid diagrams, offering an geometric proof of its well-definedness. Represent \pi as a on n strands by connecting the top endpoint i to the bottom \pi(i) with straight lines in the plane, then count the crossings modulo 2. Each crossing corresponds to an inversion, and the total crossing equals the permutation's . Reidemeister moves, which preserve the class, change the crossing number by an even amount, ensuring the is across equivalent diagrams. Closing the braid to a further ties this to invariants, but the finite crossing flip (one change alters by 1) limits the argument to the permutation case. This homomorphism to \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z} (forgetting information) proves the 's independence from presentation. Historically, Augustin-Louis Cauchy provided an early 19th-century proof of parity equivalence in his 1815 memoir, using cycle decompositions and fixed-point-free involutions to count even and odd permutations separately. Cauchy showed that every permutation decomposes into disjoint cycles, with the sign determined by the parity of the sum of (cycle length minus one) over cycles, equivalent to the number of even-length cycles modulo 2. For fixed-point-free involutions (pairings without 1-cycles), he paired even and odd cases via conjugation or substitution, demonstrating equal counts without relying on inversions. This argument, predating modern group theory, established the sign homomorphism's consistency by induction on cycle structure, influencing later algebraic developments.

Properties

Algebraic Properties

The sign function, denoted \operatorname{sgn}: S_n \to \{\pm 1\}, maps each to +1 if it is even and -1 if it is odd, and it is a satisfying \operatorname{sgn}(\pi \tau) = \operatorname{sgn}(\pi) \operatorname{sgn}(\tau) for all \pi, \tau \in S_n. The kernel of this homomorphism is precisely the A_n, consisting of all even permutations, while the image is the \{\pm 1\}. Consequently, A_n is a of S_n of index 2. For n \geq 5, the A_n is , meaning it has no nontrivial other than itself and the trivial . This underscores the fundamental role of in the structure of s, as A_n captures the "even" half of S_n without further decomposition. In the S_n, conjugacy classes are determined by type, and since the of a permutation depends on its structure—specifically, \operatorname{sgn}(\pi) = (-1)^{n - c(\pi)} where c(\pi) is the number of (including fixed points)—conjugate permutations share the same . Thus, each lies entirely within either the even or odd permutations, preserving under conjugation. Equivalently, in additive notation, the \operatorname{parity}: S_n \to \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z} (where even permutations map to 0 and to 1) satisfies \operatorname{parity}(\pi \circ \tau) = \operatorname{parity}(\pi) + \operatorname{parity}(\tau) \pmod{2} for all \pi, \tau \in S_n, reflecting the property modulo 2. The homomorphism also influences solvability: S_n is solvable n \leq 4, as for n \geq 5, the normal series \{e\} \trianglelefteq A_n \trianglelefteq S_n features a simple non-abelian factor A_n (not solvable) and a \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}, preventing overall solvability. Similarly, A_n itself is not solvable for n \geq 5 due to its simplicity.

Combinatorial Properties

The parity of a permutation, defined as the parity of its number of inversions, leads to a balanced of the S_n into even and odd permutations for n \geq 2. Combinatorially, this equality arises from the inversion P_n(q) = \sum_{\pi \in S_n} q^{\operatorname{inv}(\pi)}, which equals the q-factorial _q! = \prod_{k=1}^n \frac{1 - q^k}{1 - q}. Evaluating at q = -1 yields P_n(-1) = 0 for n \geq 2, since the numerator includes the factor $1 - (-1)^2 = 0; thus, the alternating over inversion counts is zero, implying the number of permutations with even inversions equals those with odd inversions, each n!/2. Let I(n,k) denote the Mahonian number, the count of permutations in S_n with exactly k inversions; then the number of even permutations is \sum_{k \equiv 0 \pmod{2}} I(n,k). Every permutation \pi \in S_n corresponds uniquely to an inversion table I(\pi) = (a_1, a_2, \dots, a_n), where a_j is the number of entries to the left of j in the one-line notation of \pi that exceed j, satisfying $0 \leq a_j \leq j-1. The total number of inversions is the \sum_{j=1}^n a_j, so the of \pi is the of this modulo 2. This representation facilitates enumerative studies, as the for inversion tables tracks the distribution of these entries, directly linking to Mahonian statistics where q enumerates inversions. The Mahonian numbers I(n,k) form the coefficients of the q-analog of the , providing a refined count that incorporates through evaluation techniques like the one at q = -[1](/page/−1). For instance, the sign homomorphism, which assigns +[1](/page/1) to even permutations and -[1](/page/−1) to odd ones, can be viewed combinatorially as extracting the imbalance from these generating functions, confirming the equality without . In sorting applications, the parity manifests in algorithms like bubble sort, where each adjacent swap resolves exactly one inversion, so the total number of swaps equals the inversion count and thus has the same parity as the permutation. For an odd permutation, bubble sort requires an odd number of such swaps to reach the identity.

Applications and Generalizations

Relation to Determinants

The determinant of an n \times n matrix A = (a_{ij}) is given by the Leibniz formula: \det(A) = \sum_{\pi \in S_n} \operatorname{sign}(\pi) \prod_{i=1}^n a_{i, \pi(i)}, where the sum is over all permutations \pi in the S_n, and \operatorname{sign}(\pi) is the of \pi. This formula incorporates the parity to ensure the alternating multilinear properties of the determinant, distinguishing it from the permanent, which omits the sign factor. A permutation matrix P_\pi corresponding to \pi \in S_n is the n \times n with entries (P_\pi)_{i,j} = \delta_{i, \pi(j)}, where \delta is the (1 if indices match, 0 otherwise). The of such a equals the of the : \det(P_\pi) = \operatorname{sign}(\pi). For example, in the case n=2, the yields P_{id} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}, \quad \det(P_{id}) = 1 = \operatorname{sign}(id), while the (1\ 2) gives P_{(1\ 2)} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \quad \det(P_{(1\ 2)}) = -1 = \operatorname{sign}((1\ 2)). This relation follows from the Leibniz formula applied to P_\pi, where only the identity product contributes without sign alternation except for the parity effect. In linear algebra, the parity of a determines whether the associated linear transformation preserves or reverses . For a via an even ( +), the transformation has positive and preserves the of the ; an odd ( -) reverses it. This is evident in row operations: swapping two rows of a , an odd , multiplies the by -, flipping the and thus reversing . For a 2×2 \begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{pmatrix} with \det = ad - bc > 0, swapping rows yields \begin{pmatrix} c & d \\ a & b \end{pmatrix} with \det = cb - da = -(ad - bc) < 0./08%3A_Permutations_and_the_Determinant/8.02%3A_Determinants) The Leibniz formula traces its origins to around 1693, who developed early expressions for 3×3 in the context of solving linear systems. advanced the theory in 1812, providing a general treatment and introducing the permanent as the signless analogue \operatorname{per}(A) = \sum_{\pi \in S_n} \prod_{i=1}^n a_{i, \pi(i)} to contrast with the alternating . This distinction highlights the role of permutation parity in capturing antisymmetry essential to .

Generalizations to Other Structures

The concept of parity extends naturally to signed permutations, which form the hyperoctahedral group B_n, consisting of all bijections of \{1, \dots, n\} that may include sign changes on elements. In this setting, the sign of a signed permutation \sigma is defined as \operatorname{sgn}(\sigma) = \operatorname{sgn}(\pi) \prod_{i=1}^n \operatorname{sgn}(\sigma(i)), where \pi is the underlying unsigned permutation obtained by ignoring signs, and the product accounts for the number of negative signs. This total sign equals (-1)^{\ell(\sigma)}, where \ell(\sigma) is the Coxeter length of \sigma with respect to the standard generators of B_n. More broadly, parity generalizes to arbitrary s via the function \ell(w) relative to a fixed set of simple reflections. The of an element w is \ell(w) \mod 2, which defines a nontrivial from the to \{\pm 1\}, known as the sign representation, where \varepsilon(w) = (-1)^{\ell(w)}. In Weyl groups, which are finite s arising in , this plays a key role in distinguishing even and odd elements, analogous to the subgroup in the symmetric case. In the context of Young tableaux, the Robinson–Schensted–Knuth (RSK) correspondence maps a \sigma \in S_n to a pair of standard Young tableaux (P, Q) of the same shape. The of \sigma equals the product of the signs of the row-reading permutations of P and Q, where the sign of a tableau is that of the permutation obtained by reading entries row by row. This relation preserves the parity under the , linking combinatorial structures to the . Modular generalizations adapt to settings over finite fields or via q-analogs. Over not 2, the homomorphism persists in general linear groups, but in 2, collapses as even and odd permutations coincide. q-Analogs replace the with representations of Hecke algebras, where the q-sign sends the T_i to -q, yielding a deformation that recovers the classical at q=1; this appears in q-analogs of the via Schur-Weyl duality over quantum groups. In , parity distinguishes irreducible characters of the A_n from those of S_n: the sign of S_n restricts to the trivial representation on A_n, splitting characters into even and odd types, with applications in decomposing tensor products and computing branching rules.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Sign of permutations - Keith Conrad
    Just remember that a cycle's parity is determined by its length and is opposite to the parity of its length (e.g., transpositions have length 2 and sign −1).
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Permutations, the Parity Theorem, and Determinants
    The Parity Theorem says that whenever an even (resp. odd) permutation is ex- pressed as a composition of transpositions, the number of transpositions must ...
  3. [3]
    3.1: Symmetric Groups - Mathematics LibreTexts
    Nov 20, 2024 · Definition: Symmetric Group​​ Let n ∈ N . Let X = { 1 , … , n } , be a set. Then is the set of all the bijections from to (permutations).
  4. [4]
    [PDF] The Alternating Group
    The alternating group (An) is the set of even permutations in Sn, which is the kernel of δ, and is a normal subgroup of Sn.
  5. [5]
    Cauchy on Permutations and the Origin of Group Theory | Ex Libris
    Dec 14, 2014 · Cauchy published two early memoirs on permutations in January 1815, exactly two hundred years ago. He acknowledged Lagrange and other ...
  6. [6]
    An Historical Note on the Parity of Permutations - jstor
    Nov 1, 1971 · I. The first is to explain that early studies of permutations occurred in a context in which the polynomial P is quite natural.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Chapter 3. The Symmetric and Alternating Groups
    3.10 Example: In cycle notation, considering Dn as a subgroup of Sn, we have. S3 = D3 = {(1),(12),(13),(23),(123),(132)}. S4 = {(1),(12),(13),(14),(23),(24),(34) ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  8. [8]
    Intuitive explanation of even/odd permutation - Math Stack Exchange
    Jul 31, 2014 · A permutation on n symbols is even or odd according to whether it preserves or reverses orientation when acting on the standard basis of n-space.Motivation behind studying Alternating Groups - Math Stack ExchangeOdd/Even Permutations - abstract algebra - Math Stack ExchangeMore results from math.stackexchange.com
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Permutation Puzzles
    Example 7.1 Determine whether the following permutations are odd or even. (a) ... The end-game permutation could be a 4-cycle, which is an odd permutation.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] 12. Elementary Matrices and Determinants Permutations
    The inversion number of a permutation σ is the number of pairs i < j such that σ(i) > σ(j); it's the number of 'numbers that appear left of smaller numbers' in ...
  11. [11]
    26.13 Permutations: Cycle Notation
    Given a permutation σ ∈ 𝔖 n , the inversion number of σ , denoted inv ( σ ) , is the least number of adjacent transpositions required to represent σ . Again, ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] The sign of a permutation - Purdue Math
    If a permutation σ is expressible as a product of an even. (respectively odd) number of transpositions, then any decomposition of σ as a product of ...Missing: via | Show results with:via
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Lecture 2.3: Symmetric and alternating groups
    The group Sn is generated by transpositions. Intuitively, this means that ... In fact, we only need adjacent transpositions to generate Sn: Sn = h (1 2) ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Untitled
    ... to its "natural order". Every permutation through a number of "swaps". ノ technical transpositions. 1 2 3 4 σ=2413. 2413. → 1423. ཀ ི་. 3 swaps. ⇒. Sign (o).
  15. [15]
    [PDF] MATH 433 Applied Algebra Lecture 12: Sign of a permutation
    The set of all permutations of {1,2,...,n} is called the symmetric group on n symbols and denoted S(n). Theorem Any permutation can be expressed as a product of.
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Permutations First, if S is any set, the set G of bijective (i.e. invert
    Proof of Theorem 2: Let N(σ) denote the number of inversions in the permutation σ, i.e. the number of pairs (k, l) ∈ {1,...,n}2 such that k<l and σ(k) > σ(l).
  17. [17]
    [PDF] 18.06.23: Determinants & Permutations - MIT
    Jun 18, 2023 · This is a general pattern: the determinant of a permutation matrix 𝑃𝜎 is called the sign of the permutation 𝜎: sgn(𝜎) ≔ det(𝑃𝜎). In ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Notes on exponential generating functions and structures
    By similar reasoning you can show that secx is the exponential generating function for even alternating permutations (which start and end with an increasing ...
  19. [19]
    Conceptual reason why the sign of a permutation is well-defined?
    Mar 8, 2022 · The symmetric group Sym(X) acts on X, D, and D/G, so we get a homomorphism Sym(X)→Sym(D/G)≃{±1}. Each transposition (ij) maps to − ...
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
    [PDF] SIMPLICITY OF An - KEITH CONRAD
    A finite group is simple if it's nontrivial and its only normal subgroups are the trivial subgroup and the whole group. For n ≥ 5, the group An is simple.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] CONJUGATION IN A GROUP 1. Introduction A reflection across one ...
    If π is an even permutation, then σπσ-1 is also even, so a conjugacy class in Sn that contains one even permutation contains only even permutations. However, ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] The sign of a permutation, and realizing permutations as linear ...
    It has the property that for every i 6= j, sgn( (ij))= −1. Proof ... Since a transposition has sign −1 and sgn is a homomorphism, the claim follows.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Symmetric group
    The group. Sn is solvable if and only if n ≤ 4. This is an essential part of the proof of the Abel–Ruffini theorem that shows that for every n > 4 there are ...Missing: S_n A_n
  25. [25]
    [PDF] The Alternating Group
    Thus, Sn and An are not solvable. We now provide two applications of the theorems we have proven about An so far. The first application is to subgroups of index ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] 18.212: Algebraic Combinatorics Introduction
    This q-factorial gives us a corresponding q-binomial coefficient as well: ... even versus odd number of inversions. This turns out to be equal to the ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Combinatorics: The Art of Counting - Michigan State University
    Sep 21, 2020 · sum of entries of tableau 𝑇. 233. 𝑆 ⊎ 𝑇 disjoint union of sets 𝑆 ... The inversion table of 𝜋 is 𝐼(𝜋) = (𝑎1, 𝑎2, ... , 𝑎𝑛) ...
  28. [28]
    Number of swaps to sort when only adjacent swapping allowed
    Sep 29, 2022 · A sorted array has no inversions. An adjacent swap can reduce one inversion. Doing x adjacent swaps can reduce x inversions in an array.
  29. [29]
    Determinants, permanents and some applications to statistical ...
    Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz set the basis for their study around 1683, but some historians place the origin of the concept in ancient China and Japan, ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Permutations and the Determinant 1 Introduction 2 Definition for and ...
    Mar 12, 2007 · The permutation id has sign 1 and the permutation σ has sign −1. Hence the determinant is given by det A = a11a22 − a12a21.
  31. [31]
    [PDF] 4 Determinants
    The sign of a permutation matrix is (−1)k, where k is the number of row inter- changes needed to change the matrix to be the identity. Example. The identity ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Geometry of linear transformations - Vipul Naik
    (12) The sign of the determinant being positive means the transformation is orientation-preserving. The sign of the determinant being negative means the ...
  33. [33]
    Matrices and determinants - MacTutor History of Mathematics
    It was Cauchy in 1812 who used 'determinant' in its modern sense. Cauchy's work is the most complete of the early works on determinants. He reproved the earlier ...Missing: permanents | Show results with:permanents
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Permanental ideals of Hankel matrices - Purdue Math
    Cauchy [4] and Binet [3] introduced the concept of permanent in 1812 as a special type of alternating symmetric function. The greater part of results.
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Signed Permutation Statistics and Cycle Type
    The goal of this paper is to derive a multivariate generating function counting signed permutations л by three statistics: their descent number d(π), major ...
  36. [36]
    Schur-Weyl reciprocity for the q-analogue of the alternating group
    Jan 25, 2006 · We establish Schur-Weyl reciprocity for the q-analogue of the alternating group. We analyze the sign q-permutation representation of the Hecke algebra.