Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Induction

Induction is a term with multiple meanings across various fields of study and application. In philosophy and logic, it refers to a method of reasoning that derives general principles from specific observations. Other notable uses include: The philosophical aspects, including inductive reasoning and the problem of induction, are detailed in the relevant section below.^[1]

Philosophy

Inductive reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical inference that derives general principles or conclusions from specific observations or particular instances, enabling the extension of knowledge beyond the observed data. This method contrasts with deductive reasoning, which starts from general premises to reach specific conclusions that follow necessarily if the premises are true; in inductive reasoning, the conclusions are supported by evidence but remain probabilistic and subject to revision with new information. Aristotle first systematically discussed induction (epagōgē) in his Prior Analytics, describing it as a process through which one arrives at universal propositions by examining particular cases, often clearer to perception than syllogistic deduction.^[2] The historical development of inductive reasoning traces back to ancient philosophy, with Aristotle laying foundational ideas in works like the Posterior Analytics, where he positioned induction as essential for grasping first principles through sensory experience. In the 17th century, Francis Bacon advanced this approach in his Novum Organum (1620), advocating a systematic inductive method for scientific inquiry that emphasized careful observation, experimentation, and gradual generalization to avoid hasty deductions from unexamined assumptions. Bacon's framework marked a shift toward empiricism, influencing the scientific revolution by promoting induction as a tool for discovering natural laws.^[3] A classic example of inductive reasoning is observing numerous white swans and concluding that all swans are white; this generalization holds until counterexamples, such as black swans, are discovered, highlighting the method's reliance on incomplete evidence. In everyday and scientific contexts, induction underpins hypothesis formation, such as predicting weather patterns from past data or theorizing biological traits from sampled organisms. Its strengths lie in fostering discovery and practical predictions, as it allows progress in fields where complete deduction is impossible, aligning closely with empiricist philosophy that prioritizes sensory experience as the source of knowledge. However, inductive reasoning has inherent limitations, as its conclusions lack absolute certainty and depend on the assumption of nature's uniformity—the idea that future instances will resemble past ones, an unproven presupposition central to David Hume's analysis in An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748). Hume argued that this assumption cannot be justified deductively without circularity, nor inductively without begging the question, yet it remains indispensable for empirical science and daily decision-making. This underscores induction's role in empiricism, where knowledge builds cumulatively from observations, though always tentatively.

Problem of induction

The problem of induction, as formulated by David Hume in the 18th century, centers on the challenge of justifying inductive inferences, which generalize from observed instances to unobserved cases. Hume contended that no logical necessity compels the belief that the future will resemble the past or that nature is uniform, since such assumptions cannot be derived deductively from experience without circularity—relying on induction to justify induction itself. This leads to epistemological skepticism, as custom and habit, rather than reason, underpin our reliance on induction in everyday and scientific practice. In A Treatise of Human Nature (1739), particularly Book 1, Part III, Section VI, Hume illustrates this through the inference from repeated conjunctions of events (e.g., the sun rising) to expectations of their continuation, arguing that such projections lack rational warrant beyond psychological propensity.^[4] Responses to Hume's challenge have taken diverse forms, seeking to either bypass or reframe the issue. Karl Popper's falsificationism, developed in The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1934), rejects induction outright as a demarcation criterion for science, proposing instead that scientific theories are deductively testable and advanced through bold conjectures subject to rigorous refutation, thereby avoiding the need for inductive confirmation. Bayesian approaches offer a probabilistic resolution by modeling induction as the updating of prior beliefs with new evidence via Bayes' theorem, yielding posterior probabilities that reflect degrees of rational confidence without presupposing uniformity; this framework treats induction as a coherent method for belief revision under uncertainty, though it inherits questions about the choice of priors.^[5]^[1] Modern debates have extended Hume's problem, notably through Nelson Goodman's "new riddle of induction" in Fact, Fiction, and Forecast (1955), which questions the projectibility of predicates in inductive generalizations. Goodman introduced the hypothetical predicate "grue"—defined as green for objects observed before a specific time t and blue thereafter—to show that observed emeralds being green equally supports both the green hypothesis and the grue hypothesis, yet we preferentially project "green" due to its entrenchment in linguistic and scientific practice; this highlights that induction depends not just on logical form but on the selective confirmation of certain predicates over others, complicating any uniform justification.^[6] The problem of induction carries profound implications for the philosophy of science, underscoring the underdetermination of theories by data, where empirically equivalent theories can fit the same observations but differ in untested predictions, as elaborated in the Quine-Duhem thesis. Consequently, scientific progress often relies on pragmatic justifications—such as theoretical simplicity, coherence with background knowledge, and fruitfulness in generating new research—rather than purely logical or evidential entailment, acknowledging induction's indispensable yet philosophically vulnerable role in empirical inquiry.^[7]

Mathematics

Mathematical induction

Mathematical induction is a rigorous method for proving that a property or statement holds for every natural number, providing a foundation for many theorems in number theory and beyond. It relies on the well-ordering of the natural numbers and serves as a deductive tool, distinct from the informal, probabilistic inductive reasoning discussed in philosophy. The principle ensures completeness over the infinite set of natural numbers by establishing a chain of implications starting from a base case. Formally, the principle of mathematical induction states that for a predicate P(n) defined on the natural numbers \mathbb{N} (starting from 1), if P(1) is true and for every k \geq 1, P(k) implies P(k+1), then P(n) holds for all n \in \mathbb{N}./01%3A_Tools_for_Analysis/1.03%3A_The_Natural_Numbers_and_Mathematical_Induction) This can be expressed as:

\forall n \in \mathbb{N},\ P(n) \quad \text{if} \quad \left( P(1) \land \forall k \geq 1,\ P(k) \to P(k+1) \right).

^[8] The origins of mathematical induction trace back to the 17th century, where Blaise Pascal employed the method explicitly in his Traité du triangle arithmétique (1654) to prove properties of binomial coefficients in Pascal's triangle.^[9] It was later formalized as an axiom within the foundations of arithmetic by Giuseppe Peano in his 1889 work Arithmetices principia, nova methodo exposita, where it appears as the induction axiom among the postulates defining the natural numbers.^[10] To apply mathematical induction, one first verifies the base case by directly proving P(1) holds. Next, in the inductive step, assume P(k) is true for an arbitrary k \geq 1 (known as the induction hypothesis), and then derive P(k+1) using this assumption along with any necessary definitions or prior results. If both steps succeed, the principle guarantees P(n) for all natural numbers n.^[11] A classic example is proving the formula for the sum of the first n natural numbers: P(n) is $1 + 2 + \cdots + n = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}. For the base case, when n=1, the left side is 1 and the right side is \frac{1 \cdot 2}{2} = 1, so it holds. Assume P(k): $1 + 2 + \cdots + k = \frac{k(k+1)}{2}. For k+1,

$1 + 2 + \cdots + k + (k+1) = \frac{k(k+1)}{2} + (k+1) = \frac{k(k+1) + 2(k+1)}{2} = \frac{(k+1)(k+2)}{2},

confirming P(k+1). Thus, the formula is true for all n \geq 1./01%3A_Tools_for_Analysis/1.03%3A_The_Natural_Numbers_and_Mathematical_Induction) Another example involves divisibility: Let P(n) be $4^n - 1 is divisible by 3 for n \geq 1. Base case: For n=1, $4^1 - 1 = 3, which is divisible by 3. Assume P(k): $4^k - 1 = 3m for some integer m. Then for k+1,

$4^{k+1} - 1 = 4 \cdot 4^k - 1 = 4(3m + 1) - 1 = 12m + 4 - 1 = 12m + 3 = 3(4m + 1),

which is divisible by 3, so P(k+1) holds.^[11] A variant known as strong induction strengthens the inductive hypothesis to assume P(m) holds for all m \leq k (or all m < k, depending on formulation) and uses this to prove P(k+1). This is equivalent in power to ordinary induction but often simplifies proofs involving multiple prior cases, such as those in recursive definitions or prime factorization./01%3A_Proofs/05%3A_Induction/5.02%3A_Strong_Induction)

Structural induction

Structural induction is a proof technique tailored for recursively defined sets and structures, extending the principles of mathematical induction to non-linear, tree-like or compositional objects such as lists, trees, or formal expressions. In this method, a structure is defined by base cases (e.g., atomic elements) and recursive rules (constructors that combine smaller structures), and a property P is shown to hold for all elements by verifying P for the bases and demonstrating that if P holds for all immediate substructures, then P holds for any structure built from them using the constructors.^[12] This approach ensures completeness because the recursive definition guarantees that every structure is finitely generated from the bases via constructors, with no infinite regressions.^[13] The proof process divides into a base case and an inductive case. In the base case, P is established directly for the atomic or minimal structures, such as empty lists or single nodes. In the inductive case, one assumes P holds for all proper substructures (the induction hypothesis) and uses this to prove P for a structure formed by applying a constructor to those substructures; the "smaller" relation is typically defined by structural size, like tree height or subtree embedding, ensuring well-foundedness to avoid circular reasoning.^[14] This mirrors mathematical induction on natural numbers but applies to arbitrary recursive domains where progress is measured by decomposition into subparts rather than ordinal increment.^[12] Structural induction finds applications in computer science for verifying properties of data structures and algorithms, such as ensuring balanced parentheses in expression trees or the invariance of program states under recursive operations, and in algebra for establishing structural theorems on recursively generated groups or monoids. A representative example is proving that every full binary tree with n internal nodes has exactly n+1 leaves: for the base case of a single leaf (0 internal nodes, 1 leaf), the property holds; inductively, if left and right subtrees satisfy the property with n_L and n_R internal nodes respectively (thus n_L + 1 and n_R + 1 leaves), attaching them to a new root yields n = n_L + n_R + 1 internal nodes and (n_L + 1) + (n_R + 1) = n + 1 leaves.^[15] Another application is proving well-foundedness in term rewriting systems, where structural induction on terms shows that a rewrite relation preserves a well-ordering measure, ensuring termination by demonstrating no infinite reduction sequences exist.^[14] This method emerged in the 20th century amid developments in recursion theory and formal proof systems, particularly through its connection to Noetherian induction, which generalizes induction to partially ordered sets lacking infinite descending chains and traces to Emmy Noether's 1921 work on the ascending chain condition for ideals in commutative rings.^[16] A foundational concept linking structural induction to semantics is its role in domain theory, where recursively defined functions or types are modeled as least fixed points of continuous semantic operators on complete partial orders, and structural induction rigorously justifies that properties propagate through these fixed-point constructions.^[17]

Physics

Electromagnetic induction

Electromagnetic induction is a fundamental principle in physics describing the generation of an electromotive force (EMF) across a conductor due to a changing magnetic field. This phenomenon occurs when the magnetic flux through a closed loop changes over time, inducing a current if the loop forms part of a complete circuit. The discovery revolutionized the understanding of electricity and magnetism, laying the groundwork for modern electrical engineering.^[18]^[19]^[20] The principle was first experimentally demonstrated by Michael Faraday in 1831 through a series of investigations involving coils of wire and permanent magnets. In one key setup, Faraday moved a magnet into and out of a coil connected to a galvanometer, observing transient currents that reversed direction with the magnet's motion. This showed that relative motion between a conductor and a magnetic field produces electricity. Further experiments confirmed induction without direct contact, solely through varying magnetic fields. A notable demonstration was Faraday's rotating disk homopolar generator, where a copper disk spun between the poles of a horseshoe magnet, generating a continuous DC voltage between the disk's axis and periphery via brushes.^[18]^[19]^[20] Faraday's law quantifies this effect, stating that the magnitude of the induced EMF is equal to the negative rate of change of magnetic flux through the circuit:

\mathcal{E} = -\frac{d\Phi_B}{dt}

where \mathcal{E} is the induced EMF and \Phi_B is the magnetic flux, defined as \Phi_B = \int \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{A} over the surface bounded by the loop. The negative sign incorporates the directionality provided by Lenz's law, formulated by Heinrich Lenz in 1834, which asserts that the induced current creates a magnetic field opposing the change in flux, thereby conserving energy. For instance, if a bar magnet approaches a coil, the induced current flows to produce a field repelling the magnet.^[21] In differential form, electromagnetic induction is expressed within Maxwell's equations as \nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}, linking the curl of the electric field to the time-varying magnetic field and unifying electricity and magnetism. This formulation appears in James Clerk Maxwell's 1865 treatise on the electromagnetic field. Applications of electromagnetic induction form the basis for electric generators, which convert mechanical energy into electrical energy by rotating coils in magnetic fields, and transformers, which transfer energy between circuits via mutual induction to step up or down voltages efficiently. A simple qualitative example is a magnet moving through a coil, inducing a current detectable by a connected meter, illustrating the principle without complex machinery. This phenomenon also underpins induction motors, where rotating magnetic fields induce currents in a rotor to produce torque.^[22]^[23]

Induction motor

An induction motor is an alternating current (AC) electric motor that operates on the principle of electromagnetic induction to generate torque without a direct electrical connection to the rotor. In this device, a rotating magnetic field produced by the stator windings induces currents in the rotor conductors, creating a secondary magnetic field that interacts with the stator field to produce rotational force. This design allows for robust, low-maintenance operation and has made induction motors the workhorse of industrial applications since their invention.^[24] The polyphase induction motor was independently invented by Galileo Ferraris and Nikola Tesla in the 1880s, with Tesla filing a patent application in October 1887 and receiving U.S. Patent 381,968 in May 1888 for his electro-magnetic motor, marking a pivotal advancement in AC technology during the late 19th century. Tesla's design addressed limitations of earlier motors by enabling efficient polyphase AC power transmission and motor operation, which Westinghouse Electric later commercialized. Development in the 1880s and 1890s built on earlier work with polyphase systems, leading to widespread adoption by the early 20th century.^[25]^[26] Key components of an induction motor include the stator, which consists of windings connected to the AC supply to generate the rotating magnetic field, and the rotor, typically featuring conductive bars or windings embedded in a laminated core. The rotor operates at a speed slightly less than the synchronous speed of the magnetic field, defined by the slip s = \frac{n_s - n_r}{n_s}, where n_s is the synchronous speed in revolutions per minute and n_r is the actual rotor speed; this slip, usually 2-5%, is essential for inducing the rotor currents that produce torque.^[24]^[27] Induction motors are classified into two main types: squirrel-cage and wound-rotor. The squirrel-cage rotor, with its short-circuited aluminum or copper bars resembling a cage, offers simplicity, robustness, and low cost, making it suitable for constant-speed applications without maintenance for slip rings. In contrast, the wound-rotor type features windings connected to external resistors via slip rings, allowing speed control by varying resistance and providing higher starting torque for demanding loads.^[24]^[28] Performance characteristics of induction motors are illustrated by their torque-speed curve, which shows low starting torque, a rapid rise to a peak near synchronous speed, and then a decline as speed approaches synchronism, enabling stable operation under varying loads. These motors achieve efficiencies of 90-93%, surpassing traditional DC motors, which suffer from brush and commutator losses that reduce efficiency to 80-85% in comparable sizes, while offering advantages in reliability and reduced maintenance.^[29]^[30]^[31] Induction motors dominate industrial applications such as pumps, fans, compressors, and conveyor systems due to their durability and compatibility with AC power grids. As of 2025, electric motors, predominantly induction types, account for approximately 45-53% of global electricity consumption, underscoring their critical role in energy-intensive sectors.^[32]^[33]^[34]

Biology and medicine

Labor induction

Labor induction is a medical procedure used to artificially initiate childbirth when spontaneous labor does not occur, particularly in cases where continuing the pregnancy poses risks to the mother or fetus. This process involves mechanical, pharmacological, or surgical methods to stimulate uterine contractions and cervical ripening, aiming to mimic natural labor onset. It is typically recommended when the benefits outweigh potential complications, with guidelines emphasizing assessment of cervical readiness using the Bishop score, a scoring system evaluating dilation, effacement, station, consistency, and position of the cervix.^[35]^[36] Common methods include pharmacological approaches such as intravenous oxytocin infusion (Pitocin), which stimulates contractions by mimicking the natural hormone, and prostaglandins like misoprostol or dinoprostone, administered vaginally or orally to soften and dilate the cervix. Mechanical methods involve membrane stripping, where a healthcare provider manually separates the amniotic sac from the uterine wall to release prostaglandins, or the use of a Foley catheter balloon to apply gentle pressure for cervical dilation. Surgical options, such as amniotomy (artificial rupture of membranes), are often combined with oxytocin to augment labor progression. These methods are selected based on cervical status and patient factors, with outpatient cervical ripening considered safe for low-risk cases.^[37]^[38]^[39] Indications for labor induction align with American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommendations, including post-term pregnancy beyond 41–42 weeks, where risks like placental insufficiency increase; maternal conditions such as preeclampsia or gestational diabetes; and fetal issues like growth restriction or oligohydramnios. Induction at 39 weeks may also be offered for low-risk nulliparous women to reduce cesarean rates, per updated ACOG guidance.^[40]^[41]^[36] Risks associated with labor induction include uterine hyperstimulation, leading to excessive contractions that may cause fetal distress, as well as increased chances of infection from membrane rupture or instrumentation. It can elevate the cesarean delivery rate to approximately 30% in cases with unfavorable cervical conditions, though this varies by method and parity. Close fetal monitoring via cardiotocography is standard to detect abnormalities promptly.^[37]^[42]^[35] Historically, labor induction advanced significantly with the introduction of synthetic oxytocin (Pitocin) in 1953, enabling controlled intravenous administration for safer induction compared to earlier pituitary extracts used since 1913. Modern protocols, influenced by figures like Edward Bishop who popularized elective induction in the 1950s, now prioritize evidence-based timing and cervical assessment to optimize outcomes.^[43]^[44]^[45] Outcomes of labor induction show success rates of 75–90% for vaginal delivery when performed for valid indications, particularly with favorable Bishop scores, though failed inductions may necessitate cesarean section. Continuous monitoring and multidisciplinary care contribute to maternal and neonatal safety, with studies indicating no long-term adverse effects on infants when appropriately managed.^[38]^[36]

Enzyme induction

Enzyme induction refers to the process by which the synthesis of specific enzymes is upregulated in response to the presence of substrates, inducers, or environmental signals, enabling cells to adaptively increase metabolic capacity. This phenomenon occurs primarily through transcriptional activation of genes encoding the enzymes, allowing organisms to efficiently metabolize nutrients or detoxify xenobiotics without constitutively expressing costly proteins.^[46] The foundational mechanism of enzyme induction was elucidated in the lac operon model of Escherichia coli, where lactose acts as an inducer to stimulate β-galactosidase production for lactose metabolism. In this system, the inducer binds to the LacI repressor protein, causing a conformational change that releases the repressor from the operator site, thereby derepressing the promoter and allowing RNA polymerase to transcribe the lacZ, lacY, and lacA genes. This model, proposed by Jacob and Monod in 1961, demonstrated that induction involves reversible binding of inducers to repressor proteins, leading to rapid gene expression changes within minutes to hours.^[47] Induced enzymes typically have half-lives ranging from hours to days, balancing quick response with sustained activity until the inducer is removed.^[48] A prominent example is the induction of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes in the liver, where drugs like phenobarbital activate nuclear receptors such as CAR and PXR, which in turn bind to response elements in CYP gene promoters to enhance transcription. This increases CYP levels by 5- to 20-fold, accelerating the metabolism of xenobiotics and endogenous compounds. Similarly, chronic ethanol exposure induces cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) in hepatocytes, elevating its levels to facilitate additional ethanol oxidation to acetaldehyde beyond the primary alcohol dehydrogenase pathway, aiding in alcohol detoxification.^[49]^[50] Physiologically, enzyme induction serves as an adaptive response for nutrient breakdown and detoxification, conserving energy by producing enzymes only when needed, such as during exposure to dietary toxins or pathogens. This mechanism provides evolutionary advantages by enhancing survival in variable environments, where inducible systems allow flexible metabolism of diverse substrates without the metabolic burden of permanent high enzyme levels. For instance, CYP induction protects against plant alkaloids or pollutants, promoting fitness in herbivorous or exposed populations.^[46]^[51] In pharmacology, enzyme induction leads to significant drug interactions; rifampin, a potent CYP3A4 inducer via PXR activation, can reduce the efficacy of oral contraceptives by accelerating their metabolism, potentially increasing unintended pregnancy risk by 2- to 3-fold in co-administered patients. Such interactions necessitate dose adjustments or alternative therapies to maintain therapeutic levels.^[52] Recent advances in the 2020s have leveraged CRISPR-based tools for precise enzyme induction in synthetic biology, enabling inducible CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) systems that recruit activators to promoters for tunable gene expression. These approaches, such as drug-inducible dCas9 variants, facilitate engineering of microbial factories for biofuel production or targeted therapeutics, achieving up to 100-fold induction with minimal off-target effects.^[53]

Chemistry

Inductive effect

The inductive effect in organic chemistry refers to the permanent polarization of a sigma bond due to differences in electronegativity between atoms, resulting in the transmission of partial charge through the bonding framework. This effect arises when an electron-withdrawing group (denoted as -I) pulls electron density away from adjacent bonds, creating a dipole, while an electron-donating group (+I) pushes electron density toward them. For instance, halogen atoms like fluorine exhibit a strong -I effect due to their high electronegativity, whereas alkyl groups such as methyl (-CH₃) display a +I effect by donating electron density inductively.^[54]^[55]^[56]^[57] The concept of the inductive effect emerged in the 1930s as part of the development of physical organic chemistry, building on early ideas from G.N. Lewis and refined through the work of Christopher Ingold and others who integrated it into electronic theories of reactivity. It was quantified in the mid-20th century using Hammett constants, specifically the inductive substituent parameter σ_I, which isolates the through-bond electronic influence of substituents on reaction rates and equilibria in benzene derivatives. This parameter allows for linear free-energy relationships, where σ_I values for groups like -F (0.52) reflect their electron-withdrawing strength, aiding in predictive modeling of molecular behavior. The effect is inherently qualitative in its basic form but links to measurable properties like dipole moments, given by the equation \mu = q \cdot d where \mu is the dipole moment, q is the partial charge separation, and d is the distance between charges, illustrating how inductive polarization manifests experimentally.^[58]^[59]^[60] The inductive effect significantly influences reactivity by altering electron density at remote sites. In carbonyl compounds, an electron-withdrawing group adjacent to the alpha carbon acidifies the alpha-hydrogens through inductive withdrawal, stabilizing the enolate anion formed upon deprotonation and facilitating reactions like aldol condensations. Similarly, it modulates carbocation stability in processes such as SN1 reactions, where +I groups like -CH₃ donate electrons to delocalize the positive charge more effectively than hydrogen, while -I groups like -F destabilize it; this follows the stability order CH₃-CH₂⁺ > CH₃⁺ > F-CH₂⁺, enhancing solvolysis rates in tertiary versus primary alkyl halides. An illustrative example is the acidity trend among binary hydrides, where HF (pK_a 3.17) is more acidic than H₂O (pK_a 15.7) and NH₃ (pK_a 38) due to fluorine's stronger -I effect polarizing the H-X bond and stabilizing the conjugate base F⁻ relative to OH⁻ and NH₂⁻. In SN1 reactivity, substituents like alkyl groups accelerate ionization by inductively stabilizing the intermediate carbocation, as seen in the faster hydrolysis of tert-butyl chloride compared to methyl chloride.^[61]^[62]^[63]^[64] Applications of the inductive effect extend to modern drug design, where substituent modifications predictably tune molecular properties like acidity, lipophilicity, and receptor binding affinity; for example, introducing fluorine atoms leverages their -I effect to enhance metabolic stability in pharmaceuticals such as fluoroquinolones. Recent computational advances, including density functional theory (DFT) modeling, enable precise simulation of inductive effects in complex molecules as of 2024–2025, allowing virtual screening of substituents for optimized pharmacokinetics without extensive synthesis. These DFT approaches, often using functionals like B3LYP, quantify charge shifts and dipole variations, supporting high-throughput design in medicinal chemistry.^[65]^[66]^[67]

Induction period

The induction period in chemical kinetics refers to the initial phase of a reaction characterized by a slow or negligible rate, preceding an acceleration in the reaction velocity. This lag arises as reactive intermediates accumulate to levels sufficient for the reaction to proceed rapidly, often resulting in sigmoidal kinetic curves. Such periods are particularly common in autocatalytic processes and chain reactions, where the buildup of catalysts or propagating species drives the transition to faster kinetics.^[68] The primary causes of the induction period include the time required for nucleation in crystallization reactions, the depletion of inhibitors that suppress early reactivity, and the initiation phase in free-radical chain reactions where radicals must accumulate despite termination steps. In autocatalytic systems, the slow formation of a product that itself catalyzes the reaction prolongs the initial lag until a critical concentration is reached. These mechanisms ensure that the reaction does not commence at full speed immediately upon mixing reactants, allowing for controlled progression under certain conditions.^[69]^[70] Representative examples illustrate the induction period's role in diverse chemical contexts. In free-radical polymerization of monomers like styrene, the period corresponds to the exhaustion of added inhibitors, delaying chain propagation until radicals dominate, which can extend from minutes to hours depending on inhibitor concentration. In hydrocarbon oxidation, such as the combustion of methane, an induction period manifests as a delay before explosive acceleration, characterized by sigmoidal oxygen consumption profiles due to the slow buildup of peroxyl radicals. These cases highlight how the period can influence reaction safety and yield in industrial processes.^[71]^[72] Measurement of the induction period typically involves monitoring reaction progress through techniques like spectroscopy to detect intermediate species or isothermal calorimetry to track heat evolution, identifying the time from initiation to the onset of rapid change. The duration is highly sensitive to temperature, decreasing exponentially with rising heat as per Arrhenius kinetics, and to catalysts, which shorten the lag by facilitating intermediate formation. Quantitative assessment often uses the intersection of tangent lines on kinetic plots to define the period's endpoint precisely.^[73]^[69] Historically, the induction period was first recognized in 19th-century investigations of autocatalytic reactions, such as the acid-catalyzed inversion of sucrose studied by Wilhelmy in 1850, where product accumulation accelerated the rate. Its significance grew in the early 20th century with studies of chain reactions, including Semenov's 1935 work on gas-phase explosions, establishing it as a key feature in radical mechanisms. In modern chemical engineering, understanding the induction period is crucial for designing safe reactors, particularly in polymerization to predict and mitigate runaway reactions, as emphasized in recent guidelines for handling reactive chemicals.^[74]^[75] A central concept is the transition in rate laws during the induction period, often shifting from near-zero order, dominated by slow initiation, to first-order or autocatalytic kinetics once intermediates reach threshold levels, enabling predictive modeling of acceleration phases. This dynamic underpins applications in stability assessment, where the period's length serves as a metric for antioxidant efficacy in polymer degradation.^[69]

Computing

Inductive logic programming

Inductive logic programming (ILP) is a machine learning approach that combines inductive inference with logic programming to learn logical rules, typically expressed as Horn clauses, from positive and negative examples alongside background knowledge. This process involves generalization to form hypotheses that cover the examples and specialization to avoid overgeneralization, enabling the automatic synthesis of first-order logic programs that explain observed data while adhering to logical consistency. ILP distinguishes itself by producing interpretable, symbolic rules that can handle complex relational structures, making it suitable for domains where explainability is crucial.^[76]^[77] Key algorithms in ILP include the First-Order Inductive Learner (FOIL), introduced in 1990, which extends attribute-value learning techniques to first-order logic by iteratively building clauses through hill-climbing in the space of possible literals, using information gain to select features that best separate positive from negative examples. Another seminal system, Progol, developed by Stephen Muggleton in the mid-1990s, employs inverse entailment—a method that inverts logical deduction to generate hypotheses by computing the least general generalization relative to background knowledge and examples, followed by a beam search for refinement. The learning process in ILP typically starts with positive and negative examples, performs a heuristic search over the hypothesis space, and applies compression principles like minimum description length (MDL) to select concise theories that minimize the total encoded length of the hypothesis and the data it explains. A central structure in this search is the subsumption lattice, which orders hypotheses by the theta-subsumption relation, where more general clauses subsume more specific ones, guiding efficient exploration while ensuring logical entailment.^[78]^[79] ILP originated in the late 1980s through work by Stephen Muggleton and Wray Buntine, who introduced inverse resolution in the system CIGOL, marking the formal intersection of inductive learning and logic programming; this evolved rapidly in the 1990s with systems like FOIL and Progol, establishing ILP as a distinct field focused on scalable rule induction. By 2025, ILP has integrated with neural-symbolic AI frameworks, such as logical neural networks, to enhance rule learning from noisy data by combining symbolic reasoning with neural pattern recognition, improving scalability in hybrid systems. Applications include drug design, where ILP induces rules predicting molecular properties like receptor binding from structural examples, accelerating candidate identification with transparent models, and natural language processing, where it learns grammars as logic programs to parse relational structures in text. These uses leverage ILP's data efficiency, often succeeding with fewer examples than statistical methods due to its incorporation of domain knowledge. Inductive bias in ILP manifests as preferences for simpler, more general rules within the subsumption lattice, aligning with broader machine learning assumptions that favor parsimonious explanations.^[80]^[81]^[82]^[83]

Inductive bias

In machine learning, inductive bias refers to the set of assumptions embedded in a learning algorithm that influence its preference for one generalization over another, even when multiple hypotheses are consistent with the training data.^[84] These biases restrict the hypothesis space, enabling the algorithm to make predictions on unseen data by favoring solutions that align with prior knowledge or structural constraints, such as simplicity or regularity. A classic example is the application of Occam's razor in decision tree algorithms, where shorter trees are preferred over more complex ones that fit the data equally well, under the assumption that simpler models are more likely to generalize.^[84] Inductive bias is essential for effective learning from finite datasets, as an unbiased learner would merely memorize examples without generalizing beyond them. The No Free Lunch theorem demonstrates that no learning algorithm can perform optimally across all possible problems without some form of bias; any advantage in one domain comes at the expense of performance in others, underscoring the need for task-specific assumptions.^[85] For instance, linear models incorporate a bias toward linear relationships and smoothness in the function space, making them efficient for problems where the target output varies linearly with inputs but potentially inadequate for nonlinear patterns. In contrast, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) embed biases toward translation invariance and spatial locality, allowing them to detect features like edges or textures regardless of their position in an image, which is particularly effective for computer vision tasks. The strength of an inductive bias is evaluated through the bias-variance tradeoff, where a strong bias reduces variance (sensitivity to training data fluctuations) but may increase bias (systematic errors from model misspecification), aiming to minimize overall expected error. Techniques like cross-validation assess generalization by partitioning data to estimate how well the biased model performs on held-out samples. Historically, the concept was formalized by Tom Mitchell in 1980, who argued that biases are necessary for the inductive leap from specific examples to general rules. In contemporary contexts, such as large language models based on transformers, implicit inductive biases emerge from architectural choices like self-attention, which favor sequential dependencies and compositional structures, enhancing performance on natural language tasks despite vast training data.^[86]^[84]^[87] By restricting the hypothesis space, inductive bias prevents overfitting and promotes robust generalization across machine learning paradigms.

Technology and engineering

Induction heating

Induction heating is a non-contact process that utilizes electromagnetic induction to generate heat directly within electrically conductive materials, primarily metals, through the induction of alternating currents. This method relies on two primary mechanisms: eddy current losses and hysteresis losses. Eddy currents are induced in the workpiece by a rapidly changing magnetic field produced by an alternating current in a surrounding coil, leading to resistive heating via the Joule effect, where power dissipation follows the relation P = I^2 R, with I representing the induced current and R the material's resistance. Hysteresis losses, applicable to ferromagnetic materials, arise from the energy required to reverse magnetic domains during each cycle of the alternating field, contributing additional heat through molecular friction.^[88]^[89] A typical induction heating system comprises several key components to generate and control the process. The power supply, often an inverter-based unit, converts line frequency AC to high-frequency AC (typically 1 kHz to several MHz) to drive the system efficiently. The work coil, or inductor, is a hollow copper tube shaped to surround the workpiece without contact, through which cooling water circulates to manage heat buildup. For applications like surface hardening, a quenching system may be integrated to rapidly cool the heated area with water or polymer sprays, achieving desired metallurgical properties such as martensite formation. These components work together in a resonant circuit to maximize energy transfer to the workpiece.^[90]^[91] The technology traces its roots to the late 19th century, with inventor Edward A. Colby, associated with the Weston Electrical Instrument Company, pioneering practical induction furnaces through two U.S. patents granted in 1890, enabling controlled melting and heating of metals. Building on Michael Faraday's 1831 discovery of electromagnetic induction, Colby's designs laid the groundwork for industrial use. In the 2020s, advancements in high-frequency induction have extended to additive manufacturing, such as 3D printing custom copper inductors for precise heating in metal fabrication, enhancing coil durability and performance over traditional methods.^[92]^[93] Induction heating finds diverse applications in manufacturing and consumer products due to its controllability and speed. In metal forging, it rapidly heats billets to plastic deformation temperatures, reducing cycle times in automotive and aerospace parts production. Brazing uses localized heating to join metals with filler alloys, common in tool manufacturing without flux contamination. Domestic induction cooktops employ flat coils under glass surfaces to heat compatible ferromagnetic pots efficiently, achieving over 80% energy efficiency compared to traditional conduction or gas methods, which often fall below 40%. Overall, the process minimizes heat loss to surroundings, promoting sustainability.^[94]^[95] Safety considerations in induction heating stem from the skin effect, where induced currents concentrate near the workpiece surface, limiting penetration depth and preventing excessive internal heating. Penetration depth \delta is inversely proportional to frequency, approximated by \delta = \sqrt{\frac{2\rho}{\omega \mu}}, where \rho is resistivity, \omega is angular frequency, and \mu is permeability; thus, high frequencies (e.g., 100 kHz) suit surface treatments with depths under 1 mm, while low frequencies (e.g., 50 Hz) enable deeper heating up to centimeters. Operators must use shielding to mitigate electromagnetic field exposure, and interlocks prevent operation with open coils, making it safer than open-flame methods by avoiding direct contact and combustion risks.^[96]^[97] Among its advantages, induction heating offers precise temperature control through adjustable power and frequency, enabling uniform heating without oxidation or scaling for cleaner surfaces. It is energy-efficient, with minimal ambient heat, reducing operational costs and environmental impact. However, disadvantages include high initial equipment costs due to sophisticated power electronics and the limitation to conductive materials, excluding non-metals without adaptations.^[98]^[99]

Induction welding

Induction welding is a solid-state joining process that utilizes electromagnetic induction to generate localized heat at the interface of metal parts, primarily for tubes, pipes, and sheets. High-frequency alternating current (typically in the range of 200 kHz or higher) flows through a specially designed induction coil positioned around the joint area, creating an alternating magnetic field that induces eddy currents in the conductive metal edges. These eddy currents produce resistive heating, raising the temperature to approximately 900–1200°C, sufficient for plastic deformation but below the melting point, followed by mechanical pressure from forging rolls or clamps to forge the heated edges into a metallurgical bond. This process relies on the principles of induction heating for thermal input but emphasizes precise control to achieve weld integrity without filler material or fusion.^[100]^[101]^[102] A key variant is continuous high-frequency induction welding (HFIW), commonly used in pipe production, where a flat steel strip (skelp) is progressively formed into a tubular shape and passed through the induction coil at high speeds, heating the abutting edges before immediate squeezing to form a longitudinal seam weld. This method ensures uniform heating and is scalable for high-volume manufacturing.^[100]^[101] The primary types of induction welding include butt welding, suitable for end-to-end joining of tubes and pipes, and seam welding for longitudinal joints in sheet-formed structures. Butt welding aligns the edges squarely and heats them uniformly across the interface, often applied in automotive exhaust tube assembly where precision and leak-proof seals are critical. Seam welding, meanwhile, targets the formed edges of cylindrical sections, widely employed in oil and gas pipeline production to create durable, high-strength line pipes capable of withstanding high pressures. These applications leverage the process's ability to produce clean, narrow heat-affected zones, enhancing joint strength in demanding environments.^[101]^[103]^[104] Induction welding emerged in the mid-20th century, with significant development following World War II. The technique gained prominence in the 1950s through innovations in high-frequency power supplies, notably the 1955 invention of high-frequency induction welding by Tom E. Crawford, which enabled efficient seam welding for tubular products. Early adoption focused on industrial pipe manufacturing, evolving from basic resistance welding methods to more precise electromagnetic approaches. By the late 20th century, advancements in solid-state inverters improved frequency control and energy efficiency, broadening its use in sectors requiring high-speed production. Recent progress includes optimized coil geometries and simulation tools for better process predictability, though hybrid integrations with other heating methods remain an area of ongoing research for enhanced penetration in thick sections.^[105]^[106]^[101] Key process parameters include coil design, current magnitude, frequency, and cooling systems, all tailored to material thickness, alloy composition, and desired metallurgy. Coils are often configured as split or transverse types to concentrate the magnetic field at the edges, with frequencies ranging from 100–500 kHz for optimal skin depth in carbon steels. Current levels typically operate in the 1–10 kA range, depending on power requirements (e.g., 80 kW systems at 3 kA), to achieve rapid heating without excessive penetration. Cooling, via water circulation through the coil and sometimes air or spray on the weld, prevents overheating, controls grain growth, and minimizes residual stresses, ensuring compliance with microstructural standards for high-strength applications. Precise parameter tuning via finite element modeling helps mitigate variations in heating uniformity.^[101]^[107]^[108] The process offers notable benefits, including high welding speeds of 16–150 m/min, enabling throughput rates far exceeding traditional arc welding, and minimal thermal distortion due to confined heat input, which preserves dimensional accuracy in thin-walled components. It also promotes energy efficiency by directly heating the workpiece without contact, reducing oxidation risks compared to open-flame methods. However, challenges persist, particularly susceptibility to surface oxides, which can lead to penetrator defects—elongated inclusions that compromise weld toughness and fatigue resistance in pipeline steels. Effective surface preparation, such as pickling or inert gas shielding, is essential to mitigate these issues and ensure defect-free joints.^[109]^[110]^[111] For pipeline applications, induction welding adheres to standards like API 5L, which specifies requirements for seamless and welded steel line pipe, including high-frequency induction-welded seams, to ensure integrity under high-pressure hydrocarbon transport. This standard mandates tensile strength, impact toughness, and nondestructive testing (e.g., ultrasonic inspection) to verify weld quality, with tolerances on wall thickness and diameter critical for field jointing. Compliance supports safe operation in sour service environments, where resistance to hydrogen-induced cracking is paramount.^[104]^[112]^[113]

References

[1]
Deductive and Inductive Arguments - Philosophy Home Page
Induction: an argument whose premises, if true, provide some evidence for the truth of its conclusion. Inductive arguments can range in probability from very ...
[2]
Deductive Vs. Inductive Reasoning | Psych 256 - Sites at Penn State
Aug 2, 2016 · Inductive ... reasoning have deeply-rooted origins in philosophy, going as far back to Aristotle, perplexing philosophers throughout history.
[3]
[PDF] The Justification(s) of Induction(s)1 §1. Introduction. - PhilSci-Archive
David Hume impoverished people's understanding of what inductions are, and helped give false focus to the question of the warrantability of inductive inferences ...
[4]
[PDF] Hume and the classical problem of induction
Mar 23, 2006 · The problem of induction is explaining the rationality of believing conclusions based on premises. Hume argues neither reason nor experience ...
[5]
[PDF] A Material Solution to the Problem of Induction
Jul 24, 2009 · The problem of induction, also known as “Hume's problem of induction,” is a demonstration that there can be no justification for any rule of ...
[6]
Induction and Deduction - SMU Physics
Induction. Induction is the creative part of science. The scientist must carefully study a phenomenon, then formulate a hypothesis to explain the phenomenon.Missing: applications | Show results with:applications
[7]
The Problem of Induction | PH100: Problems of Philosophy
Nov 3, 2014 · Inductive inference is a type of method that many scientists use to arrive at general claims from premises and observed samples.
[8]
Prior Analytics by Aristotle - The Internet Classics Archive
Part 1. We must first state the subject of our inquiry and the faculty to which it belongs: its subject is demonstration and the faculty that carries it out ...
[9]
[PDF] The New Organon: or True Directions Concerning the Interpretation ...
though it were part of the original text. Occasional •bullets, and also ... His title Novum Organum could mean 'The New Organon' or more modestly 'A ...
[10]
A Treatise of Human Nature - Project Gutenberg
No quality of human nature is more remarkable, both in itself and in its consequences, than that propensity we have to sympathize with others.
[11]
[PDF] Karl Popper: The Logic of Scientific Discovery - Philotextes
The Logic of Scientific Discovery is a translation of Logik der Forschung, published in Vienna in the autumn of 1934 (with the imprint '1935'). The.
[12]
The Problem of Induction - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Mar 21, 2018 · Such inferences from the observed to the unobserved, or to general laws, are known as “inductive inferences”. The original source of what has ...
[13]
[PDF] THE NEW RIDDLE OF INDUCTION
emeroses are grue and hence the prediction that roses subsequently esamined will be blue.
[14]
Underdetermination of Scientific Theory
Aug 12, 2009 · The simple idea that the evidence available to us at a given time may be insufficient to determine what beliefs we should hold in response to it.Holist Underdetermination and... · Empirically Equivalent Theories
[15]
[PDF] Principle of Mathematical Induction
The principle of mathematical induction states: if a is in P, and for all k ≥ a, if k is in P, then k + 1 is in P, then P = {x ∈ Z | x ≥ a}.<|separator|>
[16]
[PDF] Pascal's Treatise on the Arithmetical Triangle
The project's primary aim is for students of introductory discrete mathematics to learn the concept of mathematical induction and its application directly from ...
[17]
Arithmetices principia: nova methodo : Giuseppe Peano
Jul 15, 2009 · 1889. Publisher: Fratres Bocca. Collection: americana. Book from the ... PDF download · download 1 file · SINGLE PAGE PROCESSED JP2 ZIP download.
[18]
[PDF] Proof by Induction - Mathcentre
Proof by induction involves proving a base case, assuming P(k) is correct, and proving P(k+1) using P(k), showing P(n) is true for all n.
[19]
https://www.ias.ac.in/article/fulltext/reso/007/03/0035-0045
[20]
[PDF] Structural Induction - CS 6371: Advanced Programming Languages
Formal (rule-based) definitions of programming languages create a foundation for mathematical proofs of correctness for real programs. essential for assuring ...
[21]
Structural Induction - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Structural induction is a method used in proof assistants like Coq and Isabelle, based on well-founded relations on data types.Missing: applications | Show results with:applications
[22]
[PDF] CMSC 250: Structural Mathematical Induction - UMD MATH
Apr 20, 2023 · Example 3.5. Recall how binary trees are defined recursively. Let's prove that N(T) = E(T) + 1 for any binary tree T. (a) Base Case: If T is ...
[23]
Well founded induction attributed to Noether - MathOverflow
Nov 24, 2013 · In algebraic geometry it's an incredible common proof technique to do induction over the poset of closed subvarieties of an algebraic variety.Emanuel Lasker, Max Noether, and Emmy NoetherHistorically first uses of mathematical inductionMore results from mathoverflow.net
[24]
[PDF] Denotational Semantics and Domain Theory
is well-defined by structural induction. Each AST has exactly one meaning ... Internal structure of domains supports the least fixed-point construction.
[25]
The birth of the electric machines: a commentary on Faraday (1832 ...
Here we review the status of the subject—the relationship between magnetism and electricity both before and after Faraday's paper and delve into the details of ...
[26]
[PDF] Michael Faraday· Discovery of Electromagnetic Induction
On November 24,1831. Faraday read his paper on electroIl1agnetic induction to the august audience at The Royal Society. Soon after he left for a holiday in ...
[27]
On the Unipolar Generator: An Experimental and Theoretical Study
The first homopolar generator was developed by Michael Faraday in 1831, during his experiments. It is frequently called the Faraday disc or Faraday wheel in ...
[28]
Faraday's law, Lenz's law, and conservation of energy - AIP Publishing
Mar 1, 2004 · We describe an experiment in which the induced electromotive force in a coil caused by an accelerating magnet and the position of the moving magnet are ...
[29]
'…a paper …I hold to be great guns': a commentary on Maxwell ...
Apr 13, 2015 · Maxwell's great paper of 1865 established his dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field. The origins of the paper lay in his earlier papers of 1856.
[30]
Applications of electromagnetic induction - Physics
Jul 22, 1999 · Electromagnetic induction is an incredibly useful phenomenon with a wide variety of applications. Induction is used in power generation and power transmission.
[31]
Induction Motor: How Does it Work? (Basics & Types) | Electrical4U
Apr 22, 2024 · Working Principle: Induction motors operate on the principle where an alternating current induces a magnetic field in the stator, which then ...What is an Induction Motor? · Synchronous Speed · Working Principle of Induction...
[32]
Electro-magnetic motor - US381968A - Google Patents
Dynamo-electric means for transmitting mechanical power from a driving shaft to a driven shaft and comprising structurally interrelated motor and generator ...
[33]
Tesla - Master of Lightning: War of the Currents - PBS
In November and December of 1887, Tesla filed for seven U.S. patents in the field of polyphase AC motors and power transmission. These comprised a complete ...
[34]
[PDF] Induction Motor Theory - PDH Online
The synchronous speed of the motor is given by equation 1 : SS = (120 X f) / P. = (120 X 60) / 8. = 900 rpm. Rotor speed (motor slip is known), equation 2 : RS ...
[35]
Exploring Three-Phase Motors: Types and Operating Principles
Apr 21, 2024 · A variation of the squirrel-cage motor is the wound-rotor induction motor. This motor was designed to meet the need for a variable-speed, three- ...
[36]
Motor Torque-Speed Curves - MATLAB & Simulink - MathWorks
The Induction Motor torque-speed curve is typical of this type of motor having a low starting torque, and a peak torque just below synchronous speed. Note that ...
[37]
Comparing the Efficiency of Different Electric Motor Types
Nov 30, 2023 · Depending on speed variability and the number of stator poles, an induction motor can achieve 90–93% efficiency. Synchronous Motors. Synchronous ...
[38]
None
Nothing is retrieved...<|control11|><|separator|>
[39]
Induction Motors: A Revolution in the Industry
Apr 25, 2025 · Induction motors dominate the industry. They account for about 55% of energy consumption in industries, and use 25% of all energy generated.
[40]
[PDF] Towards Energy Efficiency at Induction Motors-Technical and ...
Aug 27, 2025 · Forty to forty three percents of electricity consumption worldwide is accounted to electrical motors and 6046 Mt emission of CO2. By 2030,.
[41]
Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor - AAFP
Indications for Induction. Induction of labor is indicated when the risks of continuing the pregnancy outweigh the risks of induction, with the goal of ...
[42]
Induction of Labor - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Maternal indications that warrant labor induction include hypertensive disorders and pregestational and gestational diabetes. This activity reviews the ...
[43]
Labor induction - Mayo Clinic
Jun 28, 2024 · Infection. Some methods of labor induction, such as rupturing the membranes, might increase the risk of infection for both you and your baby.<|separator|>
[44]
Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety
Jul 13, 2023 · The combination of oxytocin plus amniotomy is among the most effective methods for labor induction, particularly for patients with a favorable ...
[45]
Cervical Ripening in Pregnancy - Obstetrics & Gynecology
Jun 18, 2025 · ACOG suggests that outpatient cervical ripening is a safe and effective way to reduce the time from admission to delivery in low-risk patients.
[46]
When Pregnancy Goes Past Your Due Date - ACOG
Labor induction may be recommended if your pregnancy reaches 41 weeks. Induction is started using medications or other methods. To induce labor, your cervix ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[47]
Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks | ACOG
Women who have induction at 39 weeks should be allowed up to 24 hours or longer for the early phase of labor.Missing: 2023 | Show results with:2023
[48]
8 Questions to Ask Your Doctor Before Labor Induction - ACOG
On the downside, induction can sometimes cause the uterus to contract too hard or too fast, which can affect your fetus's heart rate. Treatment may be given to ...
[49]
The history of labour induction: How did we get here? - PubMed
Induction methods were unreliable until the 20th century, when pituitary extract, and then synthetic oxytocin and prostaglandins, became available. " ...
[50]
“Elective Induction of Labor” (1955), by Edward Bishop
Feb 16, 2017 · In the first method, an obstetrician administered a drug, called pitocin, to the pregnant woman to initiate her contractions. Pitocin is a ...
[51]
[PDF] Pitocin - accessdata.fda.gov
It is indicated for (1) induction of labor in patients with a medical indication for the initiation of labor, such as Rh problems, maternal diabetes, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[52]
Emerging roles of xenobiotic detoxification enzymes in metabolic ...
The primary function of this increase in expression and induction of drug metabolizing enzymes is to assist in the metabolism and clearance of the initial AhR ...
[53]
Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins - PubMed
1961 Jun:3:318-56. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(61)80072-7. Authors. F JACOB, J MONOD. PMID: 13718526; DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(61)80072-7. No abstract available ...
[54]
Characterization of the Time Course of Carbamazepine Deinduction ...
The estimated rate constant for enzyme degradation was 0.00805 hr-1, corresponding to a half-life of the combined enzymes of 86.1 hours (3.6 days).
[55]
In the regulation of cytochrome P450 genes, phenobarbital targets ...
The expression of these enzymes can be adapted to the needs for detoxification by a process called induction. Phenobarbital (PB) is the prototype of a number of ...
[56]
Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction of a Cytochrome P450 Family ...
May 26, 2022 · Xenobiotic-metabolizing P450s represent an interesting case study for enzyme evolution since they are involved in protecting animals from a ...
[57]
Antibiotic and oral contraceptive drug interactions: Is there a need ...
Rifampin, an antituberculosis, antistaphylococcal agent, was first reported to decrease oral contraceptive efficacy through the induction of hepatic enzymes (12) ...
[58]
Multistable and dynamic CRISPRi-based synthetic circuits - Nature
Jun 2, 2020 · An inducible CRISPR interference library for genetic interrogation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae biology. Article Open access 27 November 2020 ...
[59]
An inducible CRISPR activation tool for accelerating plant ... - NIH
Jan 18, 2024 · The inducible CRISPR activation (CRISPR-a) system offers unparalleled precision and versatility for regulating endogenous genes, ...Missing: synthetic | Show results with:synthetic
[60]
[PDF] resonance and induction tutorial
The terms "resonance" and "induction" refer to the electronic effects that atoms or functional groups may have within a compound. These effects are defined ...
[61]
Acids and Bases – Organic Chemistry - Maricopa Open Digital Press
Inductive effect is a distance dependent effect. The farther the halogen atom is from the acidic hydrogen, weaker is the inductive effect (Figure 3.3). Figure ...
[62]
[PDF] Acids and Bases - SDSU Chemistry
Feb 3, 2019 · Inductive Effects. ❖ Inductive effects are electronic effects transmitted through bonds (σ-bonds). ❖ The inductive effect of a group can be.
[63]
Inductive effects in amino acids and peptides: Ionization constants ...
Inductive effects are defined as the polarization of a bond by electronegativity differentials between the atoms of adjacent bonds. These effects propagate ...
[64]
[PDF] The Inductive Effect in Organic Chemistry - UNL Digital Commons
It is an example of how an attractive and firmly held idea is transmitted from generation to generation, despite legions of commentaries in the literature, most ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[65]
Computational Benchmarks for Hammett Electronic Parameters
Feb 6, 2024 · In this work, we perform a quantitative comparison of a wide range of computed parameters obtained from different protocols against experimental ...
[66]
Dipole Moments - Chemistry LibreTexts
Jan 29, 2023 · Using the equation above, the dipole moment is calculated to be 1.85 D by multiplying the distance between the oxygen and hydrogen atoms by the ...
[67]
6.1 The Acidity of the α-Hydrogens – Organic Chemistry II
Alpha-hydrogens in carbonyl compounds are more acidic than in alkanes due to the carbonyl group, which stabilizes the anion via resonance.
[68]
Inductive and resonance effects on the acidities of phenol, enols ...
Inductive effects account for 1/3 of the enhanced acidity of phenol versus cyclohexanol, 2/5 of the enhanced acidity of enol versus methanol, and l/4 of the ...
[69]
carbocations (or carbonium ions) - Chemguide
The alkyl group has a positive inductive effect. This is sometimes shown as, for example: The arrow shows the electrons being "pushed" away from the CH3 group.
[70]
explaining stability trend of carbocations tertiary > secondary ...
It is argued that this inductive effect increases with increase in the number of electron charge donating alkyl groups attached to the carbon atom carrying the ...
[71]
[Application of methyl in drug design] - PubMed
Methyl can modulate the physicochemical, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic properties by ortho effect, inductive effect, and conformational effect. It also ...
[72]
Exploring the Inductive Effect through Computational Modeling
Jun 14, 2024 · A straightforward, laptop-friendly computational chemistry laboratory exercise has been developed that facilitates students' understanding of the inductive ...
[73]
Inductive effects in molecular contacts enable wide-bandgap ...
May 15, 2025 · We demonstrate that the energy level of SAMs can be systematically tuned in a stepwise manner via inductive effects in the conjugated moieties.
[74]
induction period (I03019) - IUPAC
An induction period is the initial slow phase of a chemical reaction which later accelerates, often observed with radical reactions.
[75]
(PDF) Induction periods: Theory and applications - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · The theory outlined in this paper can be applied not only for thermooxidation in condensed phase, but also for other processes exhibiting the ...
[76]
The Induction Period in Chain Reactions - AIP Publishing
These are given as functions of the individual rate constants for the separate reactions, the extent of the reaction and the percent of stationary state ...
[77]
Insights into relevant mechanistic aspects about the induction period ...
The induction period and the subsequent autoaccelerated polymerization of a Cu 0 /Me 6 TREN-catalyzed system originate from the accumulation of soluble copper ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[78]
Studies in Auto-oxidation. V. The Induction Period in Auto-oxidation1
Selective Oxygenation of Cyclohexene by Dioxygen via an Iron(V)-Oxo Complex-Autocatalyzed Reaction. Inorganic Chemistry 2017, 56 (9) , 5096-5104.
[79]
Chemical Reaction Kinetics - Mettler Toledo
Investigate key stages of a reaction or process, such as reaction start, induction period, accumulation, conversion and endpoint. Detect reaction stalling ...
[80]
[PDF] the control of runaway polymerisation reactions by - IChemE
They illustrate that, even at elevated temperatures, small quantities of chemical inhibitors can markedly increase the induction period prior to rapid ...
[81]
[PDF] UN/SCETDG/66/INF.26 - UNECE
Jun 11, 2025 · After this period, a reaction occurs at an increasing rate. This time period is called the polymerization induction time (PIT) and is used to ...
[82]
[PDF] Inductive Logic Programming At 30: A New Introduction
Inductive logic programming (ILP) (Muggleton, 1991) is a form of ML. As with other forms of ML, the goal of ILP is to induce a hypothesis that generalises ...
[83]
https://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume4/page03a/page03a.pdf
[84]
Inverse entailment and progol | New Generation Computing
Apr 2, 1995 · This paper firstly provides a re-appraisal of the development of techniques for inverting deduction, secondly introduces Mode-Directed Inverse Entailment (MDIE)
[85]
Inductive Logic Programming - Theory
Given background knowledge , H=rlgg_B (E) will be the hypothesis within the relative subsumption lattice with the fewest possible errors of commission ...
[86]
[PDF] The Origins of Inductive Logic Programming: A Prehistoric Tale
Marvin's generalisation method was used by Buntine (1986, 1988) in his theory of generalised subsumption and this formed the foundation for. Muggleton and ...
[87]
Neuro-Symbolic Inductive Logic Programming with Logical Neural ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Recent work on neuro-symbolic inductive logic programming has led to promising approaches that can learn explanatory rules from noisy, ...
[88]
Drug Design by Machine Learning: The Use of Inductive Logic ...
The machine learning program GOLEM from the field of inductive logic programming was applied to the drug design problem of modeling structure-activityMissing: applications NLP
[89]
[PDF] ILP: A Short Look Back and a Longer Look Forward
A strength of ILP for NLP is that grammars can be represented as logic programs, so the same algorithms used to learn pharmacophores can be applied to learning.
[90]
[PDF] The Need for Biases in Learning Generalizations by Tom M. Mitchell
This paper defines precisely the notion of bias in generaliza- tion problems, then shows that biases are necessary for the inductive leap. Classes of ...
[91]
No free lunch theorems for optimization | IEEE Journals & Magazine
Apr 30, 1997 · A number of "no free lunch" (NFL) theorems are presented which establish that for any algorithm, any elevated performance over one class of problems is offset ...Missing: machine | Show results with:machine
[92]
[PDF] Neural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma
Neural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma. Stuart ... Neural Computation 4, 1-58 (1992). 1992 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Page 2. 2. 5. Geman, E.
[93]
Syntactic Inductive Bias in Transformer Language Models
Abstract. A line of work on Transformer-based language models such as BERT has attempted to use syntactic inductive bias to enhance the pretraining process, ...Missing: large paper
[94]
How Induction Heating Works | Ultraflex Power Technologies
Jul 18, 2025 · Hysteresis losses – these occur only in magnetic materials such as iron, nickel, cobalt, etc., due to the friction between the molecules when ...Induction Heating Calculation · Efficiency of Induction Heating · Business Case
[95]
Basics of Induction Heating | Radyne Corporation
Induction heating is due to the hysteresis and eddy-current losses. Hysteresis losses only occur in magnetic materials such as steel, nickel, and very few ...
[96]
Components of Induction Heating
A typical induction heater system includes a power supply, impedance matching circuit, tank circuit, and applicator. The applicator which is the induction coil ...
[97]
What is Induction Heating and How do Induction Coils Work? - AZoM
Jan 27, 2015 · An induction heating system comprises a tank circuit, a power supply, and a work coil. In industrial applications, there is sufficient current ...
[98]
Weston Electrical Instrument Corp
Jan 2, 2017 · He is notable for inventing the induction furnace, for which he received two patents in 1890, and he spent much of his later career in this ...Missing: heating | Show results with:heating
[99]
How 3D Printing Coils Exceeded R&D Expectations
Apr 15, 2025 · Research on 3D printing induction coils finds that coils are stronger and have a longer life when compared to traditionally manufactured coils.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[100]
10 Advantages of Using Induction Heating in Manufacturing - Ambrell
Feb 14, 2024 · Induction heating heats materials directly and rapidly, reducing processing times compared to traditional methods. This means faster production cycles and ...
[101]
Efficiency of Induction Heating - UltraFlex Power Technologies
May 8, 2024 · 4.) For batch heating processes, the efficiency can be even greater since you only spend energy with Induction Heating when you need to heat.
[102]
Advanced Induction Heating Concepts - Radyne Corporation
Skin effect is more pronounced when the resistivity is low or magnetic permeability is high. Frequency impact on depth. Frequency. Induction heated products do ...
[103]
Essentials of Induction Heating | What You Need To Know - Ambrell
... (skin effect). Higher operating frequencies have a shallow skin depth, while ... Is Induction Heating considered to be a safe process? brazing-thumb Any ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[104]
What Are the Advantages of Induction Heating? - J.F. Heat Treating Inc
Jun 24, 2022 · The main benefits of induction heating include energy efficiency, precise heating, safe and clean operation, and pollution-free function.
[105]
Induction Heating - GeeksforGeeks
Jul 23, 2025 · Hysteresis Loss : It is caused due to flow of the current in any direction inn case of magnetization and demagnetization. Eddy Current Loss : ...
[106]
Induction welding for precise tube and pipe production | ENRX
In this process, pipes pass an induction coil at high speed. As they do so, their edges are heated, then squeezed together to form a longitudinal weld seam.
[107]
Induction welding steady state: case study - CEnOS platform
Oct 19, 2024 · Induction welding is an efficient method used for welding sheets into tubes or pipes. This method is using high-frequency (HF) current.
[108]
Induction Welding - ScienceDirect
Induction welding uses induction heating from radio frequency alternating current to magnetically excite an implant placed at the joint interface of the two ...
[109]
Induction heating solutions for tube and pipe
In the automotive industry, there are different parts that can be produced by induction welding or brazing with high precision as fluid pipes or exhaust tube.
[110]
What Is API ERW Line Pipe? The Evolution to High-Frequency ...
Feb 20, 2025 · This line pipe type is produced following ASTM A572 and API 5L requirements, unless otherwise specified, in welded or seamless conditions.
[111]
World welding development history
Mar 13, 2024 · In 1955, Tom Crawford of the United States invented high-frequency induction welding. In 1956, China established the Harbin Welding Research ...
[112]
High Frequency Weld Process Robustness Testing - United Technical
Sep 15, 2021 · High Frequency Induction Welding (HFIW) is commonly used to weld the opposing edges of a rollformed tube to produce tubular products (one ...<|separator|>
[113]
Optimization of process parameters for induction welding of ...
In this paper, a process parameter optimization method of induction heating temperature field was proposed, in which finite element simulation as data supply.
[114]
Electromagnetic forces in induction heating - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · For example, currents of 10 kA and higher are not unusual for many induction heat treating applications, including shaft hardening and gear ...
[115]
Three Dimensional Analysis of High Frequency Induction Welding of ...
High frequency induction welding is widely employed for longitudinal seam welding ... weld speed ranging from 16 m ∕ min to 20 m ∕ min ⁠.
[116]
ASM HTS 19 Improving Inductive Welding System Performance with ...
The target line speed is 150 m/min and the frequency used for initial study is 200 kHz. The minimum temperature in the cross section of the tube at the apex was ...
[117]
[PDF] Investigation of penetrator defect formation during high frequency ...
The aim of this study is to investigate the formation of oxide defects known as penetrators during high frequency induction welding process of high strength low ...
[118]
API 5L Pipe Specification (46th Edition Updated on 2024) - Octal Steel
API 5L pipes are carbon steel pipes used for oil and gas transmissions. They include pipes manufactured in seamless and welded (ERW, SAW).Missing: induction | Show results with:induction
[119]
[PDF] API 5L: Specification for Line Pipe
API standards are published to facilitate the broad availability of proven, sound engineer- ing and operating practices. These standards are not intended to ...