Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Payot

Payot, also spelled peyot or pe'ot and meaning "corners" in Hebrew, are the sidelocks of uncut hair at the temples worn by observant Jewish males as a fulfillment of the Torah's prohibition against rounding the corners of the head. This practice derives from Leviticus 19:27, which states, "You shall not round off the edge of your scalp, nor mar the edge of your beard," interpreted by rabbinic tradition to require leaving hair in the area from the forehead's edge to behind the ear, extending downward to at least the cheekbone or jaw joint. The custom is observed across Jewish communities, though the length and styling of payot vary significantly; while some maintain minimal to comply with the halakhic minimum, Hasidic and certain Haredi groups often allow them to grow long and curl them as a distinctive marker of and group identity. Boys typically receive their first haircut around age three in the upsherinish ceremony, leaving the payot intact thereafter to symbolize entry into and adherence to this commandment. This , rooted in Talmudic , predates Hasidism and reflects a broader Jewish emphasis on distinguishing physical observance from surrounding cultures, with no evidence of it being merely a modern or sectarian innovation. Variations exist among ethnic Jewish groups, such as who style payot in tight curls or Indian who historically wore them prominently, underscoring the practice's adaptability while preserving its core biblical mandate. In contemporary settings, payot serve as visible identifiers of religious commitment, sometimes tucked or styled practically, yet they remain a non-negotiable element of prohibitions that extend to using or clippers in forbidden areas to avoid violating the Torah's intent.

Scriptural and Historical Foundations

Biblical Commandment

The biblical commandment foundational to payot originates in Leviticus 19:27, which prohibits: "You shall not round the corners of your head, nor mar the corners of your beard." This directive explicitly forbids shaving or cutting the hair at the temples— the "corners" or edges of the head—and the extremities of the beard, practices that would leave the scalp partially bald except for a central tuft. The prohibition addresses ritualistic common among ancient Near Eastern idolaters, including Canaanites, who shaved the sides of the head around the ears and the upper as elements of pagan worship or rites. Such , documented in ancient texts and archaeological inferences, served to invoke deities or mark cultic devotion, contrasting sharply with the Israelite mandate for unaltered bodily edges to signify exclusive allegiance to . By preserving these hair growths, the law enforces a visible physical against into surrounding polytheistic norms. This verse reflects a core biblical principle of distinction through corporeal integrity: the human form, as created, must not be disfigured in mimicry of foreign rituals, thereby causally linking to spiritual fidelity and communal separation. Evidence from Mesopotamian and records corroborates similar tonsuring in idolatrous contexts, underscoring the commandment's intent to reject such mutilations as antithetical to covenantal purity.

Historical Evolution

The basic practice of retaining sidelocks to avoid rounding the corners of the head, as prescribed in :27, was maintained during the Second Temple period (c. 516 BCE–70 ) as a marker distinguishing from surrounding cultures that shaved the sides in association with idolatry. Scholarly analysis indicates that communities like the preserve a form of peyot that continues ancient customs, suggesting continuity in minimal observance rather than stylized elongation during antiquity. Following the Temple's destruction in 70 , conditions amplified the role of such practices in preserving identity amid assimilation pressures from Hellenistic and Roman influences. In the medieval period, Jewish scholars known as , including (1138–1204), codified precise definitions of the prohibited area—from the temples forward to a point even with the earlobes—in works like the (Hilchot 12:1–6), establishing baseline requirements for compliance. This elaboration occurred against a backdrop of external threats, such as the during the in 1096 and subsequent expulsions, including from in 1290 and in 1306, which prompted heightened emphasis on visible piety to reinforce communal cohesion. Responsa literature from this era, addressing grooming queries, reflects adaptations to ensure the mitzvah's fulfillment without excess, prioritizing distinction over aesthetic uniformity. From the 16th to 18th centuries, Eastern European Jewish communities, particularly in and , increasingly adopted longer payot as expressions of religious devotion, influenced by the dissemination of from , which stressed meticulous commandment observance to invoke spiritual repair. This pre-Hasidic development served practical purposes in demarcating piety amid expanding Christian majorities in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, where visible markers aided internal solidarity without relying solely on mystical rationales.

Halachic Interpretations

Core Requirements

The core halachic obligation regarding payot stems from the Torah's prohibition in Leviticus 19:27 against rounding the corners (pe'ot) of the head or marring the edges of the beard, interpreted by the Talmud as forbidding the destruction of hair growth in the temple region to distinguish from pagan practices. This applies exclusively to Jewish males from the age of bar mitzvah (13 years), requiring them to preserve hair in the pe'ah area—spanning from the temples adjacent to the ears down to the jaw joint—without shaving or excessive trimming that would eliminate the sidelocks. The (Yoreh De'ah 181) codifies this consensus by prohibiting razor shaving entirely in this zone and permitting scissor trimming only to a minimal extent, ensuring the hair remains intact to avoid any causal breach of the commandment. To meet the empirical minimum for compliance, poskim determine the sidelocks must extend at least 0.5 cm (equivalent to a #2 guard), sufficient for the hair to fold over and touch its root when pulled, thereby providing verifiable adherence without risking invalidation. This standard reflects rabbinic emphasis on leaving observable length in unbroken observance, prioritizing fidelity to the textual over aesthetic uniformity.

Rabbinic Debates

Rashi's commentary on Leviticus 19:27 describes the prohibited act as evening the temples (tzad'ot) to align with the hairline behind the ear and cheek, thereby rounding the head, which underscores that the pe'ah—the hair to be preserved—refers to the temple region extending forward from the ear's posterior boundary. This interpretation emphasizes anatomical continuity to avoid the verse's literal encirclement, rooted in the verse's intent to distinguish Israelite grooming from pagan practices. In Mishneh Torah (Hilchot Avodah Zarah 12:1), Rambam codifies the pe'ot as the hair commencing at the temple's edge in front of the ear, prohibiting its removal by razor as a direct negative commandment, with 12:6 specifying that leaving at least five hairs exempts one from liability even if razored elsewhere in the area. Rambam's threshold derives from Talmudic analysis of minimal fulfillment, prioritizing empirical avoidance of total eradication over aesthetic length. Divergences arise from causal interpretations of the verse's "corners" (pe'ot rosh), with some poskim, following 's emphasis on posterior alignment, debating whether the core pe'ah lies partially behind the ear's cartilage to prevent any perceived rounding via over-trimming anterior hair. Others align strictly with Rambam's frontal focus, arguing that the (e.g., Makkot 20a discussions on prohibitions) targets the visible sideburn zone anterior to the ear for its ritual distinctiveness. , expanding on Rashi in Talmudic sugyot, probe these boundaries by reconciling textual literalism with practical observance, rejecting leniencies that risk violating the essence amid varying hair growth patterns. No single resolution prevails, as halachic works like the (Yoreh De'ah 181) defer to custom while upholding the ban. Stringency in pe'ah length emerged as a safeguard against inadvertent violation, particularly in 18th-century Eastern European (Litvish and proto-Hasidic) communities responding to pressures for secular conformity. Poskim such as the Noda B'Yehuda (Yoreh De'ah 126, circa 1770s) advocated "overgrowth" beyond minimal requirements to empirically ensure the mitzvah's integrity, countering enlightenment-era assimilation that favored cropped modern styles. This approach, verifiable in responsa prioritizing causal fidelity to Leviticus over convenience, contrasts with Sephardic leniency allowing shorter , highlighting halacha's epistemic deference to context-specific caution without mandating uniformity. Modern decisors, like the Aruch HaShulchan (Yoreh De'ah 181:5, 1900s), reaffirm textual primacy, permitting trimming to finger-holdable length if not razored, yet note persistent debate underscores the commandment's interpretive depth.

Variations Across Communities

Hasidic Styles

In Hasidic communities, payot are typically grown long, often extending below the shoulders, and styled into tight curls that hang visibly in front of or alongside the ears, serving as a prominent marker of devotion and distinction from non-observant . This emphasis on elongated and curled sidelocks emerged prominently after the founding of Hasidism by Rabbi Israel Baal Shem Tov in the 1730s in (modern-day ), where adherents sought to embody spiritual vitality through outward expressions of piety that contrasted with the asceticism of prior . The curls are formed manually, using fingers, pencils, or similar tools to train the hair, avoiding heat-based methods like curling irons to align with traditional grooming norms. Variations in payot styling exist across Hasidic dynasties, reflecting group-specific customs tied to their rebbes' interpretations of separation from secular influences. For instance, Satmar Hasidim favor thicker, more robust sidelocks with pronounced curls, underscoring a stringent approach to insularity developed under Rabbi Joel Teitelbaum in the 20th century amid post-Holocaust reconstruction in the United States. In contrast, Chabad-Lubavitch members often maintain looser or less tightly coiled payot, consistent with their outreach-oriented philosophy that balances traditional markers with broader engagement, as articulated in teachings from Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson. Other groups, such as Belz, wrap untrimmed payot around the ears multiple times to preserve length without dangling visibility, a practice documented in communal photographs from mid-20th-century Israel. Photographic records from 19th-century , including daguerreotypes of Hasidic gatherings in and , illustrate the of these styles as a deliberate counter to Haskalah-era assimilation, where maskilim ( proponents) adopted cropped hair to emulate fashions starting in the . Hasidic resistance preserved payot as a tangible rejection of modernization, with textual accounts from dynastic courts emphasizing their role in fostering communal cohesion amid pogroms and emancipation pressures between 1848 and 1881.

Lithuanian and Yeshivish Styles

In Lithuanian (Litvish) and communities, payot consist of short, uncurled strands of hair from the temples, typically trimmed close to the minimal length prescribed by halachic interpretations of :27 to avoid rounding the corners of the head. These sidelocks are frequently positioned discreetly behind the ears, emphasizing functionality over visibility. This style prevails among adherents of the yeshiva-centered tradition originating in 19th-century , where the focus on analytical in institutions like the , founded in 1803, cultivated a preference for understated observance. The brevity and lack of styling in Litvish and payot contrast sharply with the longer, often elaborately curled variants in Hasidic groups, reflecting a broader cultural orientation toward intellectual pursuits rather than mystical or expressive displays. Halachic authorities in these circles, such as those associated with the Brisker dynasty, permit such provided the peyot area—from the to behind the ear—retains uncut hair sufficient to fulfill the prohibition. Community practices, observable in photographs from Lakewood yeshivas and Litvish enclaves, consistently show straight, inconspicuous sidelocks, underscoring a commitment to substantive religious compliance without aesthetic enhancement. Among baalei teshuva integrating into these communities, payot may occasionally extend slightly longer than the traditional short form but remain uncurled and untucked in formal settings, preserving the anti-ornamental . This adaptation maintains the straight configuration as a marker of alignment with values, distinct from the groomed curls of other subgroups. Debates in affirm that tucking behind the ears does not invalidate the , as the hair's position does not alter its halachic status once grown.

Sephardic and Yemenite Styles

Sephardic observance of payot typically adheres to the interpretation of (Rambam) in , Hilchot 12:1, which prohibits the complete removal of sideburns but permits trimming them with or other non-razor methods to avoid the biblical "rounding" of the head's corners. This ruling, emphasizing minimal elongation beyond basic growth from the temples, results in shorter, less elaborate sideburns among Sephardic communities, such as those originating from and , where payot often appear as neatly trimmed edges rather than extended locks. In contrast, Yemenite (Teimani) Jews maintain longer, often straight or simply styled sidelocks known as simanim ("signs"), which extend prominently to distinguish men from Muslim neighbors in historical society, where dhimmis faced restrictions and Jews sought visible markers of . This practice, termed simanim to underscore their role as identifiers, aligns with halachic requirements while adapting to the socio-political context of Muslim-majority , including periods of that reinforced external symbols of separation. Scholarly examinations link these elongated payot to ancient customs, preserved through medieval traditions amid climatic and cultural pressures, with 20th-century immigration waves to documenting continuity in style among Teimanim.

Symbolic and Cultural Significance

Religious Piety and Separation

Payot embody fidelity to the commandment in :27, which prohibits rounding the "edges of your head" or destroying the "edges of your ," interpreted by Jewish authorities as a directive against cutting the hair at the temples. This literal physical observance functions as a visible marker of , linking bodily discipline directly to spiritual adherence by serving as a perpetual reminder of divine injunctions against idolatrous practices prevalent in ancient Near Eastern cultures. According to rabbinic commentary, such as that of Rabbi , payot symbolically separate rational faculties from baser impulses, reinforcing internal moral order through external conformity. Beyond personal devotion, payot demarcate observant from non-Jewish societal norms, rooted in the verse's causal aim to reject pagan rituals involving specific hair alterations. This distinction has historically resisted assimilation, as evident in Eastern European Jewish communities where maintaining payot preserved Torah-centric identity against Enlightenment-era pressures to adopt secular appearances. Empirical data from surveys of reveal high retention rates in subgroups emphasizing visible markers like payot, with overall continuity at 67% and reaching 83% among those under 30, particularly in Haredi communities where such practices are normative and correlate with intergenerational transmission of observance. These rates exceed those of less visibly distinct Jewish denominations, suggesting that overt symbols bolster identity resilience against cultural dilution.

Communal Identity and Practices

In Hasidic communities, such as those in Brooklyn's enclaves, payot serve as distinctive visual cues that enable rapid of fellow adherents, thereby strengthening social bonds and intra-communal interactions. Ethnographic on Hasidic groups highlights how such grooming practices contribute to the maintenance of group cohesion by visually distinguishing committed members during everyday encounters. Payot play a role in mate selection within these insular settings, where prospective matches are often evaluated based on visible markers of and communal , as families seek to ensure continuity of traditions through endogamous pairings. Leadership figures, including rabbis, frequently exhibit prominent payot, aiding in their recognition and authority within the of Brooklyn's Hasidic sects like or Lubavitch. Grooming of payot integrates into daily rituals, with men often curling or adjusting sidelocks as part of morning preparations for davening, embedding personal discipline within collective prayer observances and countering tendencies toward . In lifecycle events, the ceremony marks a boy's transition at age three, where hair is first cut to leave payot intact, symbolizing entry into gendered religious norms and communal expectations. Demographic data from Haredi populations, where payot observance is prevalent, reveal fertility rates of 6-7 children per woman, correlating with the insularity fostered by such traditional markers that sustain high levels of group retention and norm enforcement. Surveys confirm that these communities' adherence to visible like payot underpins their rapid growth, with global Haredi numbers reaching approximately 2.1 million and annual increases of 3.5-4%.

Modern Observance and Debates

Current Practices

In 21st-century Haredi and Hasidic communities, payot maintenance constitutes a routine aspect of male grooming, with widespread observance in population centers such as , where Haredim number over 1.3 million as of 2023, and New York City's Hasidic neighborhoods, which exhibit some of the fastest growth rates among Jewish groups due to high . Men typically allow sidelocks to grow beyond the earlobes before styling them through twirling into ringlets, wrapping around the ears, or tucking behind for practicality in urban environments. Hygiene and grooming integrate modern tools while adhering to halachic boundaries; electric clippers set to a #2 guard (approximately 1/4 inch or 0.6 cm) are commonly used for trimming, as permitted by post-2000 rabbinic authorities including Rav Belsky to avoid violating the prohibition on rounding the head's corners, provided the cut does not mimic a . This approach balances ritual requirements with contemporary sanitation needs, with hair often moistened and manually curled daily rather than relying on chemical products. Demographic expansions, including influxes from baalei teshuva adopting stricter customs, sustain payot prevalence amid overall Haredi population increases—from roughly 1.5 million globally in 2010 to 2.1 million by 2020—verifiable via fertility-driven growth data and community surveys showing sustained ritual adherence.

Assimilation Pressures and Criticisms

In response to heightened following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel, officials advised citizens abroad to downplay visible signs of Jewish or identity, including religious attire, to mitigate risks amid a reported 400% surge in global incidents. Similar guidance emerged from security experts in 2025, urging concealment of markers like payot during travel due to targeted assaults on visibly Jews. Secular critics, including some Jewish communal leaders, have labeled such visible practices as archaic, arguing they exacerbate vulnerability in diverse societies by signaling rather than . Historical precedents underscore the inefficacy of assimilation strategies for averting persecution. During the (1478–1834), forced conversions produced conversos—Jews outwardly assimilating into Christian society—yet the tribunal pursued thousands for suspected , executing over 3,000 and imprisoning many more, demonstrating that nominal conformity failed to eradicate targeting based on ancestry. In the (1933–1945), Nazi racial laws classified by descent regardless of religious observance or assimilation; even highly integrated German , comprising about 1% of the population pre-1933, faced systematic exclusion, with over 160,000 deported and murdered, as perpetrators prioritized biological criteria over cultural blending. Internally, and view payot as non-binding customs tied to outdated interpretations of :27, prioritizing ethical values over ritual minutiae, with observance rates near zero in these denominations. communities, conversely, maintain payot as a literal fulfillment of the prohibition against rounding temple hair, essential for preserving halakhic fidelity against dilution. Defenders of payot counter criticisms by citing empirical data on identity retention: a 2020 Pew Research survey found 67% of those raised remain so, far exceeding rates in less observant streams, attributing this to visible markers reinforcing communal boundaries amid secular pressures. This contrasts with assimilation's historical null yield on safety, as evidenced by the and , where concessions neither quelled animus nor ensured survival, bolstering arguments for steadfast piety as a causal bulwark against cultural erosion.

References

  1. [1]
    Why Do Orthodox Jewish Men Have Sidecurls? - Jew in the City
    Jun 4, 2018 · Those sidecurls are called “peiyot” in Hebrew, meaning corners. This is commonly Yiddishized as “peiyes” and is usually rendered in English in a variety of ...
  2. [2]
    Why Do Some Chassidic Jews Have Long Sidelocks (Peyot)?
    It should first be pointed out that, contrary to the common misconception, leaving sidelocks (peyot) is not just a “chassidic” thing; it's a Jewish thing.
  3. [3]
    Why Do So Many Orthodox Men Have Beards? - My Jewish Learning
    It is a longstanding Jewish tradition for men to grow beards. The practice derives from Leviticus 19:27 in the Torah, which states: “You shall not round off ...
  4. [4]
    Why men wear sidelocks (peyot) « Ask The Rabbi « - Ohr Somayach
    The length interpretation is based on the word "peyot", which means "corners", referring to the corners of the head. See Rashi on the verse in Vayikra 19:27 ...
  5. [5]
    Peyos - Sidelocks - Aish.com
    The word peyos refers to sideburns. The exact definition of sideburns refers to the hair in front of the ears that extends to underneath the cheekbone.<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Vayechi: Prohibition on Shaving - OU Life - Orthodox Union
    This explains the importance of the sidelocks, or “corners” of the beard (peyot), which grow beside the brow. An additional hint at the importance of the ...
  7. [7]
    What You Need to Know About Haircuts in Halacha - Chabad.org
    The Torah states, “Do not round off [the hair] at the edges (payot) of your heads.”9 The Talmud10 explains that the term “payot” refers to the hair between the ...
  8. [8]
    251. Payes: The prohibition against rounding the sides of the head
    Jewish men are prohibited to shave off or otherwise remove the hair on their temples in front of the ears (basically, the upper part of one's sideburns).
  9. [9]
    YUTorah - Halachos of Peyos Harosh
    One of the clearly distinguishable physical characteristics of the torah observant Jewish male is the “side locks” that grow on either side of his head. The ...
  10. [10]
    Almost Cut My Hair - OU Life - Orthodox Union
    Dec 25, 2018 · Men are not permitted to shave their sidelocks, called payes or payot. While not all observant Jewish men wear beards, removing the facial ...
  11. [11]
    Peyot (but not Peyote) - Gateways Organization
    Aug 23, 2017 · A Jewish male must leave sideburns (peyot which means “corners”) down to the joints of the jaw that are opposite the ear, approximately a third of the way down ...
  12. [12]
    Leviticus 19:27 Commentaries: 'You shall not round off ... - Bible Hub
    (27) Round the corners of your heads.—That is, they are not to shave off the hair around the temples and behind the ears, so as to leave the head bald ...
  13. [13]
    Pagan hairstyle forbidden in Leviticus 19, who had it?
    Jun 12, 2012 · There is a curious law in Leviticus that seems to refer to avoiding an ancient pagan rite. Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges ...Missing: near | Show results with:near
  14. [14]
    Topical Bible: Those who shave their temples
    In ancient Near Eastern societies, certain hair-cutting practices were associated with idolatrous rituals and mourning customs. By instructing the Israelites to ...Missing: meaning | Show results with:meaning
  15. [15]
    Does Leviticus 19:27 Prohibit Haircuts? | Biblical Christianity
    May 6, 2015 · Leviticus 19:27 prohibits not rounding hair corners, related to a ritual disfigurement, not general haircuts, and not a cultural one.Missing: payot east
  16. [16]
    The Prohibition of Shaving in the Torah and Halacha - TheTorah.com
    May 1, 2014 · The Torah prohibits a mourning ritual called tonsuring, ie, the pulling out or cutting of hair to express sorrow.
  17. [17]
    What is the history of Teimani peyos? - Mi Yodeya - Stack Exchange
    Mar 7, 2014 · Scholarly evidence points to peyoth (or simanim, as they are referred to in the Yemenite community) being a continuation of ancient custom.
  18. [18]
    Pe'os, Beards, and Dress Codes - Din - Ask the Rabbi - Dinonline
    May 4, 2012 · ... Rambam, Laws of Idolatry, chap. 12, no. 3 (Rambam has a different definition of how many hairs must be left); Chasam Sofer no. 139 ...<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Expulsions and Burnings - Jewish History
    Expulsions and Burnings. In face of the persecutions during the First and Second Crusades, the Jews of France emigrated to Europe, including England.
  20. [20]
    Judaism - Lurianic Kabbala, Mysticism, Mysticism | Britannica
    Inspired by the methods of the itinerant preachers whose activity was becoming more intense among eastern European Jews in the 18th century, his teaching took ...Missing: payot | Show results with:payot
  21. [21]
    Hasidism: A Mystical Movement within Eastern European Judaism
    Mar 13, 2019 · Hasidism is a mystical religious revival movement within Judaism, which draws from the Kabbalist tradition. It was called into existence by the ...Missing: payot | Show results with:payot
  22. [22]
    Clarifying Pei'ot and Electric Shavers Part 1, By Rabbi ... - Kol Torah
    Apr 30, 2020 · [14] According to Tosafot one should trim the Pei'ot only as far as scissors can cut. The Shulchan Aruch (Yoreh De'ah 181:2) cites both opinions ...Missing: 360 | Show results with:360
  23. [23]
    How Short to Trim Peyos? - OU Kosher Halacha Yomis
    Rav Belsky, zt”l ruled that the minimum setting that can be used on one's peyos with an electronic hair trimmer would be a “two” (the equivalent of a quarter ...Missing: consensus | Show results with:consensus
  24. [24]
    5. Not to cut the Peyos – Cutting the hair in the Halachic location of ...
    Feb 3, 2025 · One is to avoid using less than a number two [by American blade] to cut any of the hair in the Halachic area of the Peyos.Missing: 360 | Show results with:360
  25. [25]
    Rashi on Leviticus 19:27 - Sefaria
    לא תקפו פאת ראשכם. זֶה הַמַּשְׁוֶה צְדָעָיו לַאֲחוֹרֵי אָזְנוֹ וּלְפַדַּחְתּוֹ, וְנִמְצָא הֶקֵּף רֹאשׁוֹ עָגֹל סָבִיב, שֶׁעַל אֲחוֹרֵי אָזְנָיו עִקְּרֵי שְׂעָרוֹ לְמַעְלָה מִצְּדָעָיו הַרְבֵּה: לא תקיפו פאת ראשכם YE SHALL NOT ...Missing: peah | Show results with:peah
  26. [26]
    The Baal Shem Tov—A Brief Biography - Chabad.org
    The Baal Shem Tov was a leader who revolutionized Jewish thought and breathed new life into a swooning nation. The effects of his teachings continue to be ...
  27. [27]
    The Baal Shem Tov | My Jewish Learning
    The Baal Shem Tov is an 18th century Ukrainian rabbi credited with founding the Hasidic movement. Born Israel ben Eliezer around the year 1700 in western ...
  28. [28]
    How Do Hasidic Jews Curl Their Sidelocks? - Jew in the City
    May 15, 2019 · Hasidic Jews curl their sidelocks by perming, training with a pencil or finger, and sometimes using Vaseline.
  29. [29]
    How do ultra-orthodox Jewish men get those perfect side curls?
    Apr 27, 2016 · The Belz Hasidim are careful to never trim their payot; rather, they wrap their sidelocks around their ears as many times as necessary. Many ...
  30. [30]
    Why do chassidim curl their payot? - Mi Yodeya - Stack Exchange
    Dec 28, 2017 · Understanding there are many styles of wearing payot, in my personal experience nearly all chassidim I have met wear them tightly curled in front of their ears.
  31. [31]
    How Haskalah Misread 19th Century Anti-Semitism - Jewish History
    The Haskalah or Jewish Enlightenment movement swept through Eastern European Jewry in the mid-1800s, but misjudged the racial anti-Semitism of Czarist ...
  32. [32]
    Payos behind the ears? Why? - The Yeshiva World
    May 3, 2019 · I have noticed that in the yeshivish velt having payos behind your ears is becoming the new norm, especially with younger kids.Missing: payot | Show results with:payot
  33. [33]
    Peyot behind ears? - halacha - Mi Yodeya - Stack Exchange
    Mar 12, 2014 · Definitions: Peyot area: The (almost) triangular area between the top of the ear, the corner of the forehead and where the skull meets the jaw. ...Missing: Litvish style<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    The Peyos of Yemenite Jewry - The Yeshiva World
    Nov 18, 2010 · Taymanim refer to their payot as their “simanim”. Why “simanim” (signs)?. Because in Tayman (Yemen), a moslem country, ALL the men have ...Missing: sidelocks | Show results with:sidelocks
  35. [35]
    18 Facts You Should Know About Yemenite Jews - Chabad.org
    16. They Call Sidelocks “Simanim”. Although Jewish law requires that males leave their sidelocks, or peyot, they may be trimmed within certain guidelines ...
  36. [36]
    Denominational switching among U.S. Jews: Reform Judaism has ...
    Jun 22, 2021 · Orthodox and Reform Judaism have the highest retention rates of the three major branches. Two-thirds of adults who were raised as Orthodox (67%) ...Missing: visible markers payot
  37. [37]
    Orthodox "Retention" and Kiruv: The Bad News and the Good News
    Aug 19, 2014 · The good news: among Orthodox Jews under 30, the retention rate is 83 percent. Noteworthy is that Orthodox retention rates are vastly lower ...
  38. [38]
    COMPARING MODESTY IN ORTHODOX JEWISH WOMEN AND ...
    Ayala Fader states that during her ethnographic study on the Hasidic Jews in Brooklyn, she barely heard about male modesty.465 Thus, she further maintains ...
  39. [39]
    Among the Hasidim | The Walrus
    Feb 22, 2017 · Different sects usually can be identified by slight variations in dress: outfits that imitate the styles favoured by the Polish and Lithuanian ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Hair Today, Gone Tomorrow: Upsherin, Alef-Bet, and the Childhood ...
    Second, upsherin finds voice as a unique childhood ritual within the Jewish male life cycle, gaining importance because of its role in teaching gendered ...<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    The Global Haredi Population
    The global Haredi Jewish population is about 2,100,000, growing at 3.5-4.0% annually, with 6-7 children per woman, and life expectancy of 83-86 years.Missing: markers payot observance
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Ultra-Orthodox fertility and marriage in the United States
    Nov 8, 2023 · Ultra-Orthodox Jews in America have high fertility, very low teen fertility and marriage rates, and fairly egalitarian marriage ages.Missing: markers payot observance
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Annual Statistical Report on Ultra-Orthodox (Haredi) Society in Israel
    The factors underlying this particularly rapid growth are high fertility rates, modern standards of living and medicine, a young average age at marriage, and ...
  44. [44]
    US Census: Haredi areas among fastest-growing in New York, New ...
    Aug 19, 2021 · High birth rates tend to drive population growth in Orthodox communities generally; Lakewood's birth rate is among the highest in the world.
  45. [45]
    Haredi Jews around the world: Population trends and estimates | JPR
    May 3, 2022 · The global Haredi population is estimated at 2,100,000, constituting about 14% of the total Jewish population in the world. Together, Israel ...Missing: York payot
  46. [46]
    Amid Rising Antisemitism, Israel Calls on Citizens Abroad ... - Haaretz
    Nov 3, 2023 · Amid Rising Antisemitism, Israel Calls on Citizens Abroad to Downplay Public Signs of 'Jewish or Israeli Identity'. Israel's Foreign Ministry ...
  47. [47]
    Israelis Warned To Conceal Jewish Identity Abroad Amid Global ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · AntisemitismWorld. Israelis Warned To Conceal Jewish Identity Abroad Amid Global Rise In Antisemitism. Yediot Ahronot and security officials ...
  48. [48]
    Antisemitism Concerns Push More Jews to Hide Their Faith | AJC
    Mar 14, 2025 · That troubling fact is made clear in the just-released State of Antisemitism in America 2024 Report from the American Jewish Committee. For the ...Missing: spikes 2023-2025 symbols
  49. [49]
    [PDF] THE FAILURE OF JEWISH ASSIMILATION IN POST ...
    It was my approach to anti-Semitism and the assimilation of Hungarian. Jews ... sidelocks, in Kassa, throw off their gabardines in Miskolcz and become barons and.
  50. [50]
    Antisemitism - Yad Vashem
    Nazi Germany and the Jews 1933-1939; Antisemitism. Antisemitism. Hatred of the ... In the past a Jew could theoretically avoid persecution by assimilating ...
  51. [51]
    What is the most fundamental difference between Reform Judaism ...
    The fundamental difference is the approach to Torah and the implications of that approach. Orthodox Judaism holds that the Torah and the Oral Tradition ...
  52. [52]
    Jewish Americans in 2020 | Pew Research Center
    May 11, 2021 · Orthodox and Reform Judaism exhibit the highest retention rates of the major streams; 67% of Americans raised as Orthodox Jews by religion ...
  53. [53]
    Frequently Asked Questions about the Holocaust for Educators
    The Holocaust was the systematic, state-sponsored, persecution and murder of six million Jews by the Nazi regime and its collaborators between 1933 and 1945.