Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Performance index rating

The Performance Index Rating (PIR) is a statistical formula employed in basketball to quantify a player's overall contribution to a game by summing positive actions such as points, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, and fouls drawn while subtracting negative actions including missed field goals, missed free throws, turnovers, shots blocked, and fouls committed.^[1] Considered the European variant of the broader Tendex rating system, PIR provides a balanced, game-specific valuation that rewards efficiency and versatility on the court.^[2] The formula for PIR is calculated as follows:
PIR = (Points + Rebounds + Assists + Steals + Blocks + Fouls Received) - (Missed Field Goals + Missed Free Throws + Turnovers + Blocks Received + Fouls Committed).^[1] This simple yet comprehensive aggregation avoids complex adjustments for pace or minutes played, making it straightforward for real-time evaluation, though it is often normalized per game or per minute for comparative purposes across seasons or players.^[1] Unlike efficiency metrics in leagues like the NBA, which incorporate per-minute scaling or advanced factors such as offensive rating, PIR emphasizes raw contributions without weighting for team context, which can sometimes undervalue role players in high-pace games. First introduced in the Spanish ACB League in 1991, PIR originated in European basketball contexts and has been officially adopted by the International Basketball Federation (FIBA) for player valuation, with widespread use in competitions such as the EuroLeague, EuroCup, and ACB League.^[2] It plays a key role in determining awards like Most Valuable Player (MVP) selections for games, weeks, or entire seasons, as well as in team-building strategies where coaches and analysts employ it—often alongside multiobjective algorithms—to optimize rosters under constraints like budget, nationality quotas, and positional needs.^[2] In recent years, PIR has been integrated into advanced analytics for talent scouting and performance prediction, particularly in elite youth and professional levels, though it has limitations in fully accounting for physical demands or player interactions compared to more comprehensive metrics.^[3]

Overview

Definition

The Performance Index Rating (PIR) is a composite statistic in basketball that quantifies a player's overall contribution to their team's performance during a single game, expressed as a numerical value.^[2] This metric, officially used by the International Basketball Federation (FIBA), serves as an evaluation tool in European professional leagues, including the EuroLeague, where it assesses individual impact comprehensively.^[4] PIR represents the net sum of a player's positive actions—such as scoring points, securing rebounds, and providing assists—subtracted by negative actions, including turnovers, missed shots, and fouls committed.^[4] High PIR values signal exceptional performance in a game, often associated with MVP-level play.^[5]

Purpose and significance

The Performance Index Rating (PIR) serves as a primary tool in basketball analytics to deliver a holistic, single-number assessment of a player's efficiency, integrating both offensive and defensive contributions while accounting for errors, thereby surpassing the limitations of isolated statistics such as points or assists.^[2] This total-game metric provides a balanced evaluation of a player's overall impact, which can be normalized per minute or per game for objective comparisons across varying playing times and contexts.^[2] In leagues like the EuroLeague, PIR holds significant weight in recognizing excellence, particularly for determining the MVP of the Round, which is awarded to the player achieving the highest PIR among those on victorious teams.^[6] For seasonal honors, including the Regular Season MVP and All-EuroLeague Team selections, top PIR averages serve as a key indicator of consistent elite performance, influencing voter considerations alongside team success and individual stats.^[7] Similarly, in the EuroCup, PIR drives round-based MVP awards, underscoring its role in highlighting versatile players who excel across multiple facets of play.^[8] PIR aids scouting and coaching by pinpointing versatile contributors who positively affect both offense and defense, as its formula rewards actions like rebounds and steals while penalizing turnovers and fouls, thus guiding roster decisions and in-game strategies.^[2] Recruitment agencies frequently employ PIR to compare prospects from diverse leagues, enhancing the identification of high-impact talents for team building.^[2] Empirically, PIR demonstrates statistical reliability in linking individual and team performance to outcomes, with aggregate team PIR explaining 46% of final standings variation in comparable leagues like the ACB.^[9]^[2] This correlation affirms PIR's predictive value for game results, positioning it as a dependable metric for assessing contributions beyond raw scoring.^[9]

History

Origins and development

The Performance Index Rating (PIR) originated in 1991 within the Spanish Liga ACB, Europe's premier domestic basketball league, where it was developed as a comprehensive statistical tool to evaluate player contributions beyond traditional scoring metrics.^[2] This index was initially implemented to determine weekly and seasonal Most Valuable Player (MVP) awards, emphasizing all-around performance by aggregating positive actions like points, rebounds, and assists while penalizing inefficiencies such as turnovers and missed shots. The creation addressed the need for a standardized valuation system in professional basketball, drawing inspiration from earlier efficiency concepts.^[2] By the late 1990s, as European basketball sought greater analytical uniformity amid varying league styles—from fast-paced offenses in Eastern Europe to methodical approaches in Western competitions—the Euroleague Basketball Company, under the ULEB (now EuroLeague), adopted and refined PIR for continental use. Influenced by FIBA's endorsement of the metric for its balanced assessment of offensive and defensive contributions, Euroleague officials integrated PIR to facilitate cross-border player comparisons and highlight versatile performers essential to team success.^[2] A pivotal milestone came with PIR's official introduction in the 2000-01 EuroLeague season, marking the competition's inaugural year under independent ULEB management following its split from FIBA's SuproLeague. From this point, PIR became a core official statistic, tracked for every game to quantify individual impact and inform awards like MVP selections, thereby establishing a benchmark for player evaluation in elite European basketball.

Adoption in basketball leagues

The Performance Index Rating (PIR) was first adopted by the Spanish Liga ACB in 1991, where it was introduced as a standardized metric for evaluating player contributions and determining weekly and regular season MVP awards.^[10] This marked the initial integration of PIR into official league operations, establishing it as a comprehensive measure beyond traditional box-score statistics like points and rebounds. The league's regulatory framework mandated its calculation for award eligibility, setting a precedent for objective performance assessment in professional basketball. Following its success in Spain, PIR was adopted by the EuroLeague as an official statistic, becoming a cornerstone for player rankings and awards such as the MVP of the Round, which is awarded based on the highest PIR among players on victorious teams.^[6] The metric's inclusion influenced league-wide statistical reporting and scouting practices, with EuroLeague regulations requiring its computation for all games to support fair comparisons across competitions. Its mandatory use in MVP selections underscored PIR's role in quantifying overall impact, including positive actions like assists and blocks alongside penalties for turnovers and fouls. PIR's adoption extended to other European leagues, where it supplemented traditional stats to inform player evaluations and team strategies.^[9] By the early 2000s, the metric had gained traction across continental competitions, promoting consistency in performance analysis. In parallel, the International Basketball Federation (FIBA) incorporated PIR as a mathematical model for post-game player valuation in major events, thereby standardizing its application in international play and aligning domestic leagues with global benchmarks.^[2] The regulatory emphasis on PIR significantly shaped award processes, with high averages often determining recipients in high-stakes scenarios. For instance, Vassilis Spanoulis of Olympiacos Piraeus led the EuroLeague in career PIR, achieving standout seasonal averages that contributed to his three Final Four MVP honors in 2009, 2012, and 2013, highlighting the metric's influence on recognizing versatile performers.^[11] This adoption across leagues fostered a more nuanced understanding of player efficiency, though it required uniform data collection protocols to ensure accuracy in official records.

Calculation

Core formula

The Performance Index Rating (PIR) is calculated using a straightforward additive formula that rewards positive contributions while penalizing errors and inefficiencies in a player's performance during a game. The exact equation is:

\text{PIR} = (\text{Points} + \text{Rebounds} + \text{Assists} + \text{Steals} + \text{Blocks} + \text{Fouls Drawn}) - (\text{Missed Field Goals} + \text{Missed Free Throws} + \text{Turnovers} + \text{Shots Rejected} + \text{Fouls Committed})

This formula aggregates standard box score statistics without weighting, where positive terms capture a player's scoring, playmaking, rebounding, and defensive impacts, and negative terms deduct for shooting misses, ball-handling errors, fouls given, and blocks suffered (shots rejected).^[4] The result is an integer value computed per game, rounded to the nearest whole number with no decimals, providing a net efficiency score that can be positive, zero, or negative depending on the balance of contributions and mistakes.^[12] For example, consider a player who scores 20 points, grabs 5 rebounds, records 3 assists, commits 2 turnovers, and misses 1 free throw, with no other relevant statistics (such as missed field goals, fouls, steals, blocks, or shots rejected assumed to be zero for simplicity). The PIR would be calculated as $20 + 5 + 3 - 2 - 1 = 25.^[1]

Positive and negative components

The Performance Index Rating (PIR) in EuroLeague basketball incorporates a balanced set of positive contributions that reward a player's offensive scoring, rebounding, playmaking, and defensive actions, each valued at +1 point per occurrence. Points scored are added directly at a 1:1 ratio, encompassing all successful field goals (two-pointers and three-pointers) and free throws, to recognize overall scoring efficiency without separate adjustments for shot types. Rebounds, including both offensive and defensive varieties, contribute +1 each, highlighting the importance of possession control. Assists, steals, and blocks each add +1, valuing facilitation and disruptive defense equally to individual scoring. Additionally, fouls drawn receive +1, incentivizing aggressive play that forces opponents into penalties without risking personal fouls.^[13] This equal 1:1 weighting across positive components promotes a holistic evaluation of player impact, emphasizing balanced contributions over specialization in one area; for instance, a block is weighted identically to a rebound to underscore defensive value comparable to offensive rebounding. Unlike metrics such as the NBA's Player Efficiency Rating, which uses adjusted weights derived from regression models, PIR's uniform scaling simplifies assessment and aligns with FIBA's emphasis on comprehensive performance in international play.^[13] Negative components deduct -1 for each instance, penalizing inefficiencies and errors to ensure accountability in decision-making and execution. Missed field goals, whether two-point or three-point attempts, subtract -1 each, directly countering the positive from successful shots embedded in points to reward shooting accuracy; missed field goals are only recorded if the attempt was unsuccessful and no foul was called in the act of shooting. Missed free throws also deduct -1 per miss, reinforcing the need for composure in uncontested opportunities; missed free throws are only penalized if unsuccessful and no violation occurred. Turnovers and personal fouls each result in -1, discouraging poor ball handling and undisciplined play that harms team possession and flow. Shots rejected—defined as blocks by opponents on the player's attempts—add another -1, in addition to the missed field goal penalty, to further account for defensive vulnerabilities. Notably, PIR does not penalize fouls drawn, focusing deductions solely on the player's own infractions.^[13] The rationale for these negative deductions mirrors the positive side's equal weighting, aiming to deter unbalanced risk-taking while maintaining parity in how errors affect the rating; for example, a turnover is treated equivalently to a missed shot to stress possession security across all facets of the game. This structure, established by EuroLeague Basketball, derives from FIBA guidelines and has been refined to better capture real-game contributions, though critics note its simplicity may overlook contextual factors like pace. Seminal analyses, such as those evaluating PIR against advanced models like Win Score, affirm its utility in promoting versatile playstyles in European competitions.^[13]^[9]

Applications

Use in EuroLeague and European competitions

The Performance Index Rating (PIR) has been an official statistic in the EuroLeague since the 2000-01 season, serving as a key metric for evaluating individual player contributions and facilitating rankings throughout the competition.^[14] It plays a central role in determining the MVP of the Round award, where the player with the highest PIR among those on winning teams in a given round receives the honor. For instance, in the 2023-24 season, Shane Larkin of Anadolu Efes Istanbul led the league in average PIR with 18.5, highlighting its prominence in spotlighting top performers.^[15]^[14] In broader European competitions under Euroleague Basketball, such as the EuroCup, PIR is similarly integrated into player statistics and awards, providing a standardized measure for assessing efficiency across games. While playoff seeding in these tournaments primarily relies on head-to-head records, point differentials, and overall standings, PIR supports ancillary evaluations like player eligibility and performance benchmarks during postseason play.^[16] It originated in the Spanish Liga ACB in 1991 and continues to be used there for player evaluation, awards, and comparative analysis in one of Europe's top domestic leagues.^[17] At the game level, real-time PIR calculations are displayed during EuroLeague broadcasts via official game centers and highlight reels, allowing fans and analysts to gauge ongoing contributions dynamically. Teams leverage cumulative PIR data for roster management and strategic decisions, as it offers a holistic view of player value beyond basic box scores; research indicates its use in European leagues for talent selection and performance scouting.^[2] A notable example of PIR's impact occurred in the 2021 EuroLeague Final Four, where Anadolu Efes Istanbul clinched the championship with standout individual efforts, including Vasilije Micic's 28 PIR in the final against FC Barcelona, contributing to the team's overall superior efficiency that correlated with their victory. Efes' aggregated player performances underscored how high PIR outputs can drive success in high-stakes tournament settings.^[18]^[19]

Extensions to other sports and contexts

Composite performance index metrics with similar names have been developed independently in other domains to evaluate performance, though they are distinct from basketball's PIR formula. In trail running, the International Trail Running Association (ITRA) employs a Performance Index that aggregates achievements, calculated as the weighted average of a runner's top five race scores over the preceding 36 months.^[20] This index caps at 1000 points and serves to rank athletes globally by comparing their results against race-specific factors like distance, elevation, and difficulty, enabling fair cross-event evaluations.^[21] Unlike basketball's PIR, which remains open-ended, the ITRA version provides a bounded scale to standardize comparisons among elite trail runners.^[22] In education, a distinct adaptation appears in Ohio's school accountability system, where the Performance Index has been used since the 2013-14 school year to aggregate student outcomes on state assessments for report cards. This index incorporates all achievement levels from grades 3 through high school, assigning weighted points to each student's performance—such as 1.0 for proficient—resulting in a composite score that reflects overall school or district effectiveness without solely focusing on proficiency thresholds.^[23] Higher achievement levels contribute greater weights, ensuring the metric captures nuanced progress across the student body, though it diverges from sports-based metrics by emphasizing educational benchmarks over individual contributions.^[24] In soccer, various systems like the Castrol Performance Index or ESPN's Player Performance Index rate players by combining metrics such as goals, assists, and defensive actions into a holistic score, but these lack a unified scale or methodology across leagues.^[25] Similarly, in video games, Chris Sawyer's Locomotion uses a Performance Index to gauge player efficiency in managing transport networks, derived from profits relative to operating costs and cargo delivery success, though it functions more as a gameplay motivator than a competitive ranking tool.^[26] A key distinction in these non-basketball applications is the frequent use of capped or percentage-based scaling—such as ITRA's 0-1000 range—contrasting with PIR's unbounded integer outputs in basketball.^[20]

Comparisons and limitations

Relation to other player metrics

The Performance Index Rating (PIR) differs from the Player Efficiency Rating (PER), a metric developed for the NBA, in its simplicity and lack of adjustments. While PER normalizes performance on a per-minute basis, incorporates pace of play, and factors in team elements like assist rates to estimate overall productivity relative to league averages, PIR relies on unadjusted raw box-score contributions without such contextual modifications.^[27] This makes PIR more straightforward for quick assessments in European competitions but less attuned to varying game tempos or role-specific impacts compared to PER.^[9] In comparison to Game Score, another metric created by NBA analyst John Hollinger, PIR shares the approach of aggregating positive and negative actions but applies equal weighting to all components rather than differentiated coefficients. Game Score assigns specific values, such as 0.4 points per made field goal and 0.7 per offensive rebound, to reflect estimated marginal contributions, resulting in a cumulative score that emphasizes scoring efficiency and rebounding more heavily.^[28] PIR, by contrast, treats each made shot or rebound as a uniform +1 and each miss or turnover as -1, without distinguishing between shot types or rebound locations, which can undervalue certain defensive plays.^[4] PIR builds upon the NBA's Efficiency (EFF) metric by incorporating additional elements tailored to FIBA rules, expanding its scope beyond basic production. EFF is calculated as PTS + REB + AST + STL + BLK - (FGA - FGM) - (FTA - FTM) - TO, focusing solely on core offensive and defensive contributions minus shooting inefficiencies and errors.^[29] PIR extends this formula by adding +1 for fouls drawn and -1 for fouls committed and blocks received, thus penalizing disciplinary lapses and rewarding drawing contact more explicitly, while also accounting for shots blocked against the player.^[9] Empirical studies indicate strong associations between PIR and team success in the EuroLeague, with aggregate player PIR explaining approximately 76% of the variance in team wins, corresponding to a correlation around 0.87—higher than simpler metrics like points per game.^[9] This predictive power underscores PIR's utility in linking individual efficiency to outcomes, though it remains less nuanced than win-share estimates that adjust for opponent strength.^[30]

Criticisms and alternatives

One notable criticism of the Performance Index Rating (PIR) is its lack of a clear statistical foundation, which can lead to unreliable assessments of a player's contribution to team success.^[30] Unlike metrics grounded in regression models or game outcomes, PIR simply aggregates box score statistics with equal weights for various actions, treating a missed free throw and a missed field goal attempt identically despite their differing impacts on possession efficiency.^[9] This approach over-penalizes volume shooters, as missed shots deduct points without considering shot quality or the rewards of successful makes, potentially undervaluing high-usage players who generate scoring opportunities.^[9] PIR also ignores key contextual factors, such as pace of play and minutes played, resulting in inflated ratings for players who benefit from longer court time without normalizing for efficiency.^[9] It fails to account for opponent strength or game situations, limiting its ability to evaluate performance against varying defensive schemes or in high-stakes moments like clutch plays.^[9] These limitations can allow for potential manipulation, such as players drawing fouls to gain +1 points per foul received while minimizing personal fouls (-1 each), though excessive fouling committed—leading to disqualification—harms the score. In comparisons with other metrics, PIR shows low correlation with advanced models like WINSCORE, highlighting its divergence from outcome-based evaluations.^[9] As alternatives, advanced metrics like Real Plus-Minus (RPM) and Box Plus-Minus (BPM) address PIR's shortcomings by incorporating team-level impact through plus/minus data adjusted for teammates and opponents, providing a more holistic view of on-court contributions.^[31] Win Shares offers another option, estimating a player's share of team wins based on offensive, defensive, and marginal contributions, which better ties individual stats to collective success. These metrics, widely used in the NBA, outperform PIR in correlating with team victories and player value.^[30] Proposed reforms include weighted adjustments to PIR components—for instance, increasing the value of blocks by 1.5 times to better reflect their defensive worth—or integrating plus/minus elements to account for context, as tested in simulations showing improved alignment with win outcomes.^[9] Such modifications, like those in the WINSCORE model, normalize for playing time endogeneity and opponent adjustments, enhancing reliability across positions and game paces.^[30]

References

[1]
Players' selection for basketball teams, through Performance Index ...
Sep 4, 2019 · The Performance Index Rating (PIR) is the mathematical model used by the International Basketball Federation (FIBA) to valuate players after a ...
[2]
Tendex Explained - NBAstuffer
Tendex is Dave Heeren's player evaluation metric which is generally considered the first player rating system with linear weights.
[3]
[PDF] Differences in Physical Demands and Player's Individual ...
Oct 29, 2024 · Referring to individual player performance, one of the most common metrics in European basketball is the performance index rating (PIR), which ...
[4]
Betting Trends: Efficiency in the Euroleague and the NBA - Eurohoops
Apr 20, 2023 · Whereas the NBA effectiveness formula is decided per game, the Euroleague effectiveness formula is decided per minute. This is because NBA games ...
[5]
Turk Telekom rides strong frontcourt play to victory in London
Oct 29, 2025 · He poured in 22 points, dished 6 assists and committed just 1 turnover, finishing with a PIR of 34. Turk Telekom also tightened up defensively.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[6]
Euroleague Basketball adjusts its EuroLeague awards structure
Dec 17, 2024 · The MVP of the Round is awarded to the player with the highest PIR (performance index rating) among those players whose teams were victorious in ...
[7]
Awards Watch: EuroLeague MVP
Feb 16, 2024 · He is averaging 19.4 points, a career-high 4.3 rebounds and 5.3 assists for a PIR average of 21.6.
[8]
Performance index rating - Wikipedia
The performance index rating (PIR) is a basketball mathematical statistical formula that is used by the EuroLeague Commercial Assets (ECA)'s first and ...
[9]
[PDF] WINSCORE Revisited: A Model-Based Evaluation of Player ...
The Performance Index Rating (PIR) is a statistical formula used in basketball to evaluate a player's overall performance. It simply aggregates various positive ...
[10]
Performance Index Rating | A Basketball Term at Sports Pundit
The Performance Index Rating is a statistic or player rating in basketball, which is used to determine the season and weekly Most Valuable Players. It was ...
[11]
Vassilis Spanoulis - Olympiacos BC
Personal Level. Greek League MVP 2008-09, 2015-16; MVP Final Four Euroleague 2009, 2012, 2013 ; Collective Level. European Champion 2009, 2012, 2013 ...
[12]
Performance Index Rating - vCalc
Aug 12, 2024 · The Performance Index Rating calculator computes a basketball metric is used by the Euroleague Basketball Company's first and second tier competition.
[13]
Performance Index Rating Calculator (PIR)
Nov 7, 2024 · Performance Index Rating (PIR) is a total performance metric. European Basketball leagues use it.
[14]
[PDF] EUROLEAGUE BASKETBALL STATISTICS CRITERIA MANUAL
However, missed shots will not be recorded if the player is fouled in the act of shooting, but they will be entered if any other foul or any violation is called ...
[15]
EuroLeague Team and Player Stats
Stats · Performance Index Rating. AS Monaco. 102.6 PIR · 2. Zalgiris Kaunas · Points scored. Hapoel Tel Aviv. 90.9 PTS · 2. · Assists. AS Monaco. 21.3 AST · 2.
[16]
https://www.euroleaguebasketball.net/en/eurocup/stats/
[17]
EuroCup Team and Player Stats - Euroleague Basketball
Players. Performance Index Rating. RUSSELL, DARON. 25.0 PIR. 2. FLYNN, MALACHI. 24.3. PIR · 3. HARPER, JARED. 24.2. PIR · 4. MILETIC, DUSAN. 21.5. PIR · 5. YEBO ...
[18]
FC Barcelona vs Anadolu Efes Istanbul 2021-05-30 11:30
FCB vs EFS · 23 PIR · 28 PIR.
[19]
Final Four records: PIR - Euroleague Basketball
May 22, 2024 · Check out the single-game, single-season and all-time Final Four records below in 13 different statistical categories.Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
[20]
ITRA Performance Index
The ITRA Performance Index (PI) is a tool that estimates a runner's level of performance. The performance index can be used to compare the level of different ...
[21]
All about the ITRA performance index
The performance index can be used to compare the level of different trail runners around the world and is built on a scale up to a maximum of 1000 points.Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
[22]
A Guide to Mountain, Ultra, and Trail Runner Rankings - iRunFar
Apr 27, 2023 · The ITRA Performance Index is the most established global ranking system for trail runners. The scale maxes out at 1,000 points, which is ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[23]
Traditional Report Cards - Ohio Department of Education
Oct 8, 2025 · The Performance Index score accounts for the level of achievement of every student, not just whether they are “proficient.” Each test a student ...
[24]
[PDF] 2024-2025 Guide to Ohio School Report Cards
Performance Index: This measure uses the performance level results for students in grades 3 through high school on Ohio's State Tests. It accounts for the ...
[25]
Summarizing physical performance in professional soccer - Nature
Jun 24, 2024 · The aims of this study were to create a composite index to measure the overall players' physical performance in professional soccer matches.
[26]
Performance index calculation - Transport Tycoon Forums
Jun 25, 2008 · This statistic is calculated based on two factors: - Monthly Units of Cargo Delivered x Delivery Distance: The amount of cargo you successfully deliver every ...How to keep the "Performance Index" climb fast and stably?Gaining Performance Index % - Transport Tycoon ForumsMore results from www.tt-forums.net
[27]
Calculating PER | Basketball-Reference.com
In John's words, "The PER sums up all a player's positive accomplishments, subtracts the negative accomplishments, and returns a per-minute rating of a player' ...
[28]
Game Score in Basketball Explained - NBAstuffer
Game Score is a player evaluation metric which can be considered John Hollinger's simple and linear version of the Player Efficiency Rating. Game Score Formula ...
[29]
NBA Efficiency Metric Explained - NBAstuffer
NBA Efficiency is a player evaluation metric indicating linear efficiency, calculated as: (Points)+(Rebounds)+(Steals)+(Assists)+(Blocked Shots)-(Turnovers)-( ...
[30]
WINSCORE Revisited: A Model-Based Evaluation of Player ... - SSRN
May 7, 2025 · This paper revisits WINSCORE, an approach proposed by Berri et al. (2006), which links individual player statistics directly to team outcomes.<|control11|><|separator|>
[31]
Differences in Physical Demands and Player's Individual ... - MDPI
Referring to individual player performance, one of the most common metrics in European basketball is the performance index rating (PIR), which combines all the ...
[32]
About Box Plus/Minus (BPM) | Basketball-Reference.com
like Player Impact Plus/Minus and Real Plus/Minus. There are ... Win Shares here at Basketball Reference, and Dave Berri's Wins Produced. The ...