Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Perkasa

Pertubuhan Pribumi Perkasa Malaysia (PERKASA), translating to "Mighty Indigenous Organisation of Malaysia," is a in focused on safeguarding the constitutional special rights and privileges granted to s and other bumiputera under Article 153 of the Federal Constitution. Founded by Datuk Seri Ibrahim Ali shortly after the 2008 general election, which saw significant gains by opposition parties advocating for policy reforms, PERKASA positioned itself as a defender of interests against perceived dilutions of measures like the . The organization has mobilized rallies, public campaigns, and political advocacy to promote unity and economic empowerment, often criticizing multi-ethnic coalitions and liberal reforms as threats to dominance. Under Ali's leadership until his resignation in 2018, PERKASA gained notoriety for provocative statements and actions, including calls to defend Islamic sanctity and opposition to interfaith dialogues deemed compromising. Subsequent leaders, such as Syed Hassan Syed Ali, have continued its involvement in contemporary issues, including solidarity events for political figures aligned with causes and protests against perceived injustices toward the community. While praised by supporters for amplifying marginalized voices in a diversifying society, critics from mainstream outlets have labeled its rhetoric as divisive, though such portrayals often reflect institutional preferences for egalitarian narratives over constitutional particularism.

History

Formation and Early Years

Pertubuhan Pribumi Perkasa Malaysia (Perkasa) was founded in 2009 by Ibrahim Ali, a former (UMNO) member who had become an independent politician, as a dedicated to advancing nationalist interests. The group's establishment occurred in the wake of the March 8, 2008, general election, during which the ruling (BN) coalition, led by UMNO, lost its two-thirds parliamentary majority and control of five state assemblies, including Malay-majority ones like and , prompting alarm among Malay leaders over divided ethnic votes and the rising influence of the opposition alliance. Perkasa emerged from widespread dissatisfaction within Malay conservative circles with UMNO's perceived softening on affirmative action and failure to staunch the erosion of bumiputera privileges, which include quotas in education, public sector employment, and economic opportunities enshrined under the New Economic Policy. Ibrahim Ali positioned the organization as a vehicle to pressure the government externally, arguing that internal UMNO reforms alone could not adequately address these vulnerabilities exposed by the election results, where ethnic Malays showed splintered support toward opposition parties like Parti Keadilan Rakyat and Parti Islam Se-Malaysia. In its early phase, Perkasa concentrated on mobilizing grassroots sentiment by emphasizing the inviolability of Article 153 of the Federal Constitution, which entrusts the Yang di-Pertuan Agong with safeguarding the special position of s and natives of and . Public rallies and statements from Ali underscored the need to defend these constitutional provisions against liberal reforms and multicultural pressures, framing the group's mission as a bulwark against any dilution of dominance in national politics and .

Evolution Through Political Shifts

Following the 2013 general election (GE13), in which () retained power with a reduced majority of 133 seats against Pakatan Rakyat's 89, Perkasa asserted its instrumental role in mobilizing Malay voters to secure 's victory, demanding recognition and policy concessions to safeguard measures like the (). This stance positioned the organization as a bulwark against opposition-driven reforms perceived to erode Malay privileges, including vocal campaigns urging adherence to constitutional provisions for Bumiputera interests amid 's internal debates on . The 2018 general election marked a seismic shift with Pakatan Harapan (PH)'s upset win, securing 113 seats and ending BN's 61-year rule, prompting Perkasa to decry the new coalition—particularly its inclusion of the Democratic Action Party (DAP)—as a threat to Malay dominance through proposed dilutions of NEP-linked quotas in education and business. Throughout PH's tenure from May 2018 to February 2020, Perkasa sustained critiques of the government's multicultural tilt, framing reforms like institutional overhauls as concessions to non-Malay influences that undermined ethnic hierarchies enshrined in Article 153 of the Constitution. The subsequent political flux, including the Sheraton Hotel defections leading to Muhyiddin Yassin's Perikatan Nasional government in March 2020 and further instability until Anwar Ibrahim's unity government in November 2022, saw Perkasa adapt by aligning selectively with Malay-centric elements while rejecting hybrid coalitions diluting special rights. Into the , Perkasa underwent transition with Syed Hasan Syed Ali succeeding as , enabling continuity in amid Malaysia's fragmented . Under his stewardship, the group organized a rights rally on May 24, 2025, emphasizing preservation of constitutional powers despite logistical hurdles from the . In February 2025, Syed Hasan issued statements warning against "systematic efforts" by DAP to equalize racial privileges, particularly in economic and land allocations, reinforcing Perkasa's fixed commitment to primacy irrespective of governing alliances. This evolution underscores the organization's resilience, pivoting from electoral support for to oppositional vigilance across regimes while prioritizing unchanging defenses of ethnic entitlements.

Ideology and Objectives

Advocacy for Malay Supremacy and Rights

Perkasa's core doctrine emphasizes (Malay lordship) as a foundational principle for preserving political dominance, economic equity, and cultural preeminence for Malays, whom it regards as the stewards of Malaysia's structure. This advocacy frames Malay primacy not as ethnic but as a pragmatic response to structural imbalances that historically undermined national cohesion, asserting that diluting such primacy risks destabilizing the multi-ethnic polity. The organization's rationale draws directly from the 13 May 1969 racial riots, which exposed acute pre-existing disparities—Malays, comprising about 50% of the population, held only 2.4% of total equity capital in 1970—prompting the New Economic Policy (NEP) as a causal intervention to avert future eruptions of inter-ethnic violence through targeted redistribution. Perkasa contends that sustaining Ketuanan Melayu via affirmative measures like the NEP is empirically justified, as these policies demonstrably narrowed poverty and ownership gaps, enabling Malay corporate equity to rise substantially from its 1970 baseline and fostering a viable Malay entrepreneurial class. In rejecting universal , Perkasa prioritizes race-conscious policies over color-blind alternatives, arguing that empirical outcomes under the NEP—such as elevated Bumiputera participation in corporate ownership and management—validate their necessity in Malaysia's context of entrenched ethnic economic , where non-intervention perpetuated dominance by other groups. It views challenges to this framework, including pushes for ICERD ratification in , as existential threats that would dismantle constitutional safeguards under 153, potentially unraveling the social compact forged post-1969 by invalidating preferential mechanisms proven to mitigate conflict risks.

Alignment with Constitutional Provisions

Perkasa asserts that Article 153 of the Federal Constitution mandates the reservation of quotas for Malays and bumiputera in public services, education, scholarships, exhibition permits, and trading licenses as enduring safeguards for their special position, rather than provisional subject to periodic review or amendment. The organization interprets the provision's language—entrusting the Yang di-Pertuan Agong with ongoing responsibility to "safeguard" these interests—as prohibiting dilution through needs-based alternatives, emphasizing that judicial interpretations have upheld the quotas' reasonableness without deeming them temporary. In defending these clauses, Perkasa contrasts its stance with reformist proposals from opposition parties like the (DAP), which advocate shifting to class- or merit-based policies, arguing that such changes would exacerbate bumiputera underrepresentation in high- sectors where ethnic disparities persist despite decades of implementation. For instance, mean household incomes remain lower for households compared to and ones, with bumiputera equity ownership in corporations hovering below the 30% target set under the , underscoring the need for race-specific protections over universal needs assessments. Perkasa frames its advocacy as adherence to the framers' intent at , where the Party's granted and equal to non-s conditional on enshrining to ensure national stability in a multiethnic federation, rejecting characterizations of its position as supremacist by positioning it as constitutional preservation against erosion. This interpretation aligns with government reaffirmations that 153 remains non-negotiable, as echoed in executive statements upholding bumiputera quotas amid political debates.

Critique of Multiculturalism and Liberal Reforms

Perkasa has consistently critiqued and associated liberal reforms as empirically misguided attempts to impose normative equality on 's ethnically stratified society, disregarding the causal primacy of political and economic dominance for stability. Organization leaders, including president Ibrahim Ali, argue that such policies erode the constitutional safeguards for bumiputera under Articles 153, fostering resentment rather than cohesion by sidelining the historical vulnerabilities of the majority. This stance positions Perkasa against egalitarian dilutions of , which they claim succeed in by addressing entrenched disparities absent in purely meritocratic alternatives. In contrasting models, Perkasa rejects Singapore's color-blind approach as inadequate for advancement, dismissing ministerial assertions of superior outcomes for Singaporean Malays as insulting and unsubstantiated, while crediting Malaysia's bumiputera quotas with tangible gains in ownership—from under 2% in 1970 to approximately 23% by the —and broader economic inclusion. The group demands intensified quotas, such as 60% bumiputera and enrollment reserves, to counter perceived abuses while affirming the system's overall efficacy in building a middle class and contributing to national GDP through diversified participation. They contend that abandoning these for liberal universalism would replicate Singapore's persistent socioeconomic lags, where integration policies have not erased income and educational gaps relative to other groups. Perkasa extends this critique to educational reforms, opposing shifts toward English-medium dominance that risk diluting Bahasa Melayu and Malay cultural fortitude against external influences. While advocating English readiness in rural to equip bumiputera for global competition, Ibrahim Ali has questioned excessive emphasis on English mastery, prioritizing preservation as foundational to ethnic identity and resilience. The organization similarly scrutinizes NGOs like as proxies for non-Malay urban interests challenging bumiputera-centric governance, mounting counter-marches against their reform agendas amid data indicating disproportionate non-Malay participation in such urban protests. Perkasa frames these as liberal fronts eroding Malay safeguards, urging securitization of constitutional prerogatives over purportedly neutral electoral tweaks.

Organizational Structure

Leadership Succession

Pertubuhan Pribumi Perkasa Malaysia (Perkasa) was founded in March 2009 by Datuk Ibrahim Ali, who assumed the role of its inaugural president, emphasizing a defense of rights and bumiputera privileges amid perceived threats from multicultural policies. Ali's leadership from 2009 onward was marked by provocative public statements aimed at rallying support, including calls to protect constitutional supremacy against opposition parties like the (DAP), though these often drew legal scrutiny for seditious content without altering the organization's core ideological commitment. Ali tendered his resignation as on May 16, 2018, citing personal reasons, but the Perkasa Supreme Council initially rejected it, as it had a prior attempt in 2013, reflecting internal efforts to retain his symbolic influence despite accumulating personal controversies such as multiple investigations and public clashes. This transition period underscored the organization's reliance on advisory structures, including councils with ties to UMNO-linked nationalists, to preserve doctrinal continuity in advocating primacy even as Ali shifted focus to other ventures like founding PUTRA in 2019. By late 2018 or early thereafter, effective leadership passed to Syed Hasan Syed Ali, previously the secretary-general, ensuring the group's unyielding stance on ethnic interests persisted amid Malaysia's post-2018 political flux. Under Syed Hasan Syed Ali's presidency, confirmed in multiple public statements from 2024 onward, Perkasa has sustained its adversarial posture toward perceived dilutions of privileges, navigating the 2021-2022 government of national unity by critiquing non-Malay influences while aligning with broader conservative coalitions. This succession highlights ideological resilience, with Syed Hasan's prior role in internal dynamics facilitating a seamless shift that prioritized organizational purity over individual leader's personal liabilities, as evidenced by continued emphasis on constitutional safeguards despite evolving national alliances.

Membership and Internal Dynamics

Perkasa's membership base consists primarily of s from rural and semi-urban regions, motivated by concerns over perceived dilutions of policies originating from the (NEP) framework established in 1971. These members, often grassroots supporters, view the group's emphasis on constitutional privileges under Article 153 as a bulwark against multicultural encroachments and that they believe disadvantage communities. While precise membership figures remain unverified and sparsely documented, the organization has been described as drawing from a dedicated cadre aligned with its pribumi agenda, fostering loyalty through shared cultural and economic anxieties rather than formal recruitment drives. Internally, Perkasa operates via a decentralized network of state-level branches, such as those in key areas like , to coordinate local activities and sustain volunteer engagement without heavy reliance on centralized . This prioritizes ideological around bumiputera primacy, with operations funded mainly through member donations, sympathetic contributions from interests, and from events promoting the cause. Adherence to core principles has helped mitigate potential factionalism, particularly following transitions in leadership influence, by channeling disputes toward unified rather than schisms, maintaining operational focus on internal over external politicking.

Key Activities and Campaigns

Defense of Bumiputera Policies

Perkasa mounted vigorous opposition to the New Economic Model (NEM) unveiled by Prime Minister Najib Razak in March 2010, which sought to transition affirmative action from strict race-based quotas to a more needs-oriented framework, potentially diluting Bumiputera preferences in equity ownership and public procurement. The group coordinated with multiple Malay rights organizations to protest the reforms, asserting that such changes threatened the socioeconomic safeguards enshrined in Article 153 of the Malaysian Constitution, which mandates special provisions for Malays and natives of Sabah and Sarawak. Perkasa's leadership warned that abandoning race-specific measures would perpetuate Malay economic exclusion, citing the NEM's emphasis on high-income growth as incompatible with addressing entrenched disparities in corporate equity, where Bumiputera holdings remained below the 30% target despite decades of policy implementation. In advocating retention of the 30% corporate equity quota for Bumiputera, Perkasa highlighted empirical shortfalls, noting that official estimates placed actual private-sector Bumiputera ownership at approximately 23-25% as of the early , far short of the New Economic Policy's (NEP) objectives and attributable to competitive disadvantages in capital access and business networks. The organization rejected dilution proposals as economically shortsighted, arguing that without quotas, participation in (SMEs)—which constitute over 90% of businesses but exhibit high failure rates exceeding 50% within five years—would collapse due to insufficient institutional support and historical capital deficits. By , Perkasa escalated demands to a 60% equity threshold, positioning these quotas not as racial entitlements but as causal interventions to rectify structural imbalances in a dominated by non-Bumiputera conglomerates. Perkasa collaborated with over 70 affiliated Malay NGOs to lobby for indefinite NEP extensions past its 2020 deadline, pressuring (UMNO) conservatives through joint statements and assemblies to prioritize sustained amid reformist pressures. These efforts framed policy preservation as grounded in economic realism, emphasizing data on persistent wealth concentration—where non-Bumiputera groups controlled 40-50% of corporate assets despite comprising a minority—as justification for ongoing quotas to foster self-reliant Bumiputera industrial communities. Public forums and declarations, such as those urging Najib in September to implement "corrective measures" without hesitation, portrayed the defense as pragmatic equity-building for the ethnic majority, countering narratives of policy as outdated by invoking constitutional imperatives and observed market failures in quota-free scenarios.

Responses to Electoral and Social Challenges

Perkasa vehemently opposed the 2.0 rally held on July 9, 2011, viewing it as a potential source of agitation that could undermine Malay interests and national stability. Led by president Ibrahim Ali, the organization planned a concurrent "Peace March" to counter the event, warning of possible violence from participants and positioning their action as a safeguard for public order. This response emphasized rallying Malay voters to bolster electoral turnout, arguing that higher participation from the majority community would ensure outcomes aligned with constitutional protections for Bumiputera rights rather than reforms perceived as externally driven. After Pakatan Harapan's upset victory in the 14th general election on May 9, 2018, Perkasa intensified critiques of the coalition's approach to race-based policies, pointing to pre-election pledges that the group had dismissed as dismissive of concerns over rights. As Harapan grappled with unfulfilled commitments amid internal debates on reforms, Perkasa forecasted political fragility from eroding these safeguards, a prognosis realized in the Sheraton Move of February 23, 2020, when defections collapsed the government and installed a more -centric administration under . In the unity government era commencing November 24, 2022, with Anwar Ibrahim's appointment as , Perkasa cautioned against the inclusion of non-Malay-dominated parties like DAP in the cabinet, interpreting it as a dilution of Malay privileges through overly inclusive . Ibrahim Ali highlighted the democratic framework's role in fragmenting solidarity, arguing it hindered unified advocacy for Bumiputera priorities amid multi-ethnic power-sharing.

Recent Positions on National Issues

In February 2025, Perkasa president Syed Hasan publicly criticized the (DAP) for promoting policies that seek to equate the status of Malays with other ethnic groups, arguing that such efforts undermine constitutionally enshrined Malay privileges under Article 153 of the Federal Constitution, which mandates special protections for Malays and natives of and as the foundational ethnic groups of the nation. Hasan's statements emphasized the asymmetry in national policy reflecting Malaysia's historical and demographic realities, where Malays constitute the majority and is the official religion per Article 3, rejecting any dilution of these provisions in favor of uniform racial treatment. Perkasa has maintained its advocacy for prioritizing Malay economic interests in recovery measures following the , citing government data from 2020-2022 showing disproportionate job losses and income declines among Bumiputera households—estimated at 25-30% higher than non-Bumiputera groups due to reliance on informal sectors and micro-enterprises—while opposing extensions of aid without quotas to preserve long-term equity aligned with objectives. This stance, reiterated in internal briefings, insists that post-pandemic fiscal allocations, such as those under the PEMERKASA package totaling RM20 billion in targeted support, must reinforce rather than erode Bumiputera-specific incentives to address persistent wealth gaps evidenced by Household Income Survey data indicating Bumiputera at RM5,240 versus RM6,610 for Chinese households in 2022. Amid Malaysia's assumption of the chairmanship on January 1, 2025, Perkasa urged a foreign policy orientation that elevates and Islamic priorities within regional , advocating for stronger on issues like Palestinian rights and trade standards over neutral , to align initiatives with domestic constitutional imperatives and counter perceived dilutions of in global forums.

Controversies

Incidents Involving Seditious or Inflammatory Statements

In March 2013, Perkasa president Datuk Ibrahim Ali called on Muslims to burn Malay-language Bibles distributed by the Bible Society of Malaysia that used the word to refer to God, arguing it threatened Islamic sanctity and could confuse Muslims. The statement drew widespread condemnation from Christian groups, opposition politicians, and international observers as inflammatory and potentially inciting , with Malaysia's Bar Council urging prosecution under laws. However, the Attorney General's Chambers declined to charge Ali in , determining that the full context showed no seditious tendency, as the remarks were framed as a of 's position under Article 3(1) of the Constitution, which declares the religion of the . Perkasa maintained the call was protected speech advocating for the majority's religious rights, emphasizing constitutional primacy of over non-Muslim usages that risked dilution of faith. On December 12, 2012, Ibrahim Ali described as a threat, citing their disproportionate support for opposition parties in elections as evidence of disloyalty undermining political dominance. This echoed Perkasa's broader publications and rhetoric in the warning of ethnic economic imbalances, where Chinese Malaysians, comprising about 23% of the population, controlled over 70% of corporate equity and wealth, potentially eroding bumiputera sovereignty without safeguards. Critics, including advocates, labeled the remarks seditious for fostering racial paranoia, but Perkasa defended them as data-driven , pointing to empirical disparities in wealth distribution as causal risks to national stability if unaddressed. No sedition charges followed, with supporters arguing such speech was essential for majority groups to assert rights against perceived existential threats, akin to protections in other multi-ethnic states.

Clashes with Opposition Groups and Minorities

In response to the Bersih 2.0 rally organized by the on July 9, 2011, Perkasa announced plans for a in to prevent perceived chaos and disruption by the opposition-led demonstration, which it viewed as a threat to interests and national stability. Perkasa president Ibrahim Ali warned of potential violence against Bersih participants, framing the counter-action as necessary defense against anti-establishment agitation that could undermine Bumiputera privileges under the . Ultimately, the planned rally was canceled to avoid internal divisions among Malays, though the threats heightened tensions with opposition supporters. During its inaugural open house on January 29, 2012, Perkasa distributed approximately RM10,000 in cash aid to around 300 ethnic senior citizens, but used white-colored ang pow envelopes—a hue associated with mourning and funerals in —prompting widespread outrage and accusations of deliberate racial insensitivity. The incident symbolized, in Perkasa's defensive narrative, resistance to perceived ingratitude among non-Malays for benefits, though the group later expressed regret, claiming it was inadvertent and not intended to offend. community leaders demanded apologies, viewing it as a provocative slight amid broader ethnic frictions over . Perkasa vehemently opposed efforts to repatriate the ashes of leader following his death on September 16, 2013, arguing that his historical role in the communist —which killed thousands of —remained an unhealed wound incompatible with national reconciliation. The group warned that allowing the remains into would provoke public backlash and hurt communities still scarred by the insurgency's violence, positioning its stance as protective of victims' memory against opposition calls for leniency. In religious disputes, Perkasa confronted Christian minorities over the use of "" in Bahasa Malaysia publications, demanding expulsion of the envoy in July 2013 for allegedly confusing Muslims and asserting the term's exclusivity to as per 's social contract prioritizing Malay-Islamic norms. Ibrahim called for the burning of Bibles containing the word, framing it as a defensive measure to safeguard Islamic sanctity against perceived proselytization, which escalated interfaith tensions amid rulings upholding the . Similarly, Perkasa vice-president Zulkifli Noordin's remarks criticizing Hindu practices drew complaints from Hindu groups in 2013 for fostering hostility, though Perkasa defended them as upholding constitutional protections for the majority's religious primacy. In January 2013, Perkasa president Ibrahim Ali called for the burning of Malay-language Bibles containing the word "Allah," arguing it was necessary to defend Islam against perceived proselytization efforts targeting Muslims, consistent with Syariah principles prohibiting conversion inducement. The Attorney-General's Chambers declined to prosecute Ali under the Sedition Act 1948, determining his statements lacked intent to incite hatred and were made in defense of Islamic sensitivities, despite police investigations. This decision prompted immediate public condemnation from the Christian Federation of Malaysia, which described it as granting extremists "carte blanche" to threaten minorities, and the Bar Council, which urged private prosecution authorization. The non-prosecution fueled accusations of , as the Act was invoked against opposition figures and critics in over 20 cases in alone, including opposition MPs and NGO activists, while Perkasa leaders faced no similar sedition charges for comparable rhetoric. Critics, including DAP leaders, highlighted this disparity, noting Ali's immunity contrasted with prosecutions of non-Malay or opposition voices for lesser offenses. In parallel, Ali's 2014 contempt of court conviction—stemming from comments undermining a judicial ruling—was overturned on appeal, with the Court of Appeal citing procedural errors and setting aside the one-day jail term and fine. Despite the inflammatory nature of Ali's statements, no documented incidents of violence or Bible burnings followed, with reports confirming the did not translate to public disorder or attacks on Christian sites. This absence of escalation underscored claims by supporters that media amplification exaggerated risks, while Perkasa maintained strong backing from constituencies who viewed the positions as safeguarding bumiputera interests under Article 153 of the Constitution. The events reinforced perceptions of institutional leniency toward Malay nationalist groups, even as they drew rebukes from international observers like for uneven application of laws.

Reception and Impact

Supporters' Perspectives and Achievements

Supporters of Perkasa view the organization as a steadfast defender of the constitutional special rights afforded to Malays and Bumiputera under Article 153 of the Malaysian Federal Constitution, which mandates safeguards for their interests in public services, , and economic opportunities. They argue that Perkasa's advocacy counters perceived erosions of these protections amid and multicultural pressures, positioning the group as essential for preserving indigenous socioeconomic equity in a nation where Malays form the majority but face competitive disadvantages in certain sectors. A key achievement cited by backers is Perkasa's role in derailing the Malaysian government's initial push to ratify the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) in 2018. On November 23, 2018, Perkasa led an anti-ICERD rally in , drawing thousands who protested that ratification would undermine quotas and Bumiputera privileges. Hours later, the Prime Minister's Office announced would not proceed, attributing the reversal to widespread domestic opposition amplified by such mobilizations. Perkasa's sustained campaigns have also been credited with reinforcing the continuity of (NEP)-era interventions, originally launched in 1971 to uplift Bumiputera economic participation through quotas and preferences. Despite the NEP's formal conclusion in 1990, supporters point to Perkasa's pressure on successive administrations—particularly post-2008—as instrumental in extending equivalent policies under subsequent frameworks like the National Development Policy, maintaining Bumiputera stakes in corporate equity at around 30% and university admission quotas favoring them. From this vantage, Perkasa's efforts enhance unity by heightening awareness of collective interests, evidenced by turnout at its rallies and the persistence of these policies amid debates, which proponents link to sustained inter-ethnic equilibrium and averted escalations in socioeconomic disparities.

Critics' Assessments and Societal Effects

Critics from opposition-leaning outlets have labeled Perkasa as a driver of ethnic animosity, arguing its exacerbates tensions between s and non-s by portraying the latter as threats to dominance. For instance, in December 2011, a commentary described Perkasa members as "thugs" fueling Malaysia's slide toward a "fanatical Islamic totalitarian " that suppresses minorities, citing the group's vocal opposition to multicultural initiatives. Such assessments often highlight Perkasa's campaigns against non- economic influence, which critics claim heighten societal without evidence of corresponding spikes; Malaysia has recorded no major ethnic riots akin to the events, with showing stable interethnic relations amid rhetorical clashes. Perkasa has faced charges of promoting that erodes democratic , with detractors asserting its defense of exclusive privileges undermines equal . These views, voiced in analyses of Perkasa's alignment with hardline NGOs, contend the group's advocacy for unyielding Bumiputera policies fosters exclusionary . Yet, such policies trace to Article 153 of the Malaysian Constitution, which constitutionally safeguards special rights, suggesting critiques overlook entrenched legal frameworks rather than Perkasa's isolated influence. On societal effects, opponents argue Perkasa's stances alienate minorities, potentially stifling national cohesion and for non-Bumiputera groups. However, empirical data indicate non-Malay households—particularly and —have achieved absolute income gains under the Bumiputera-favoring system, with poverty rates across ethnicities falling substantially since the 1970s , even as relative gaps persist. This growth occurred alongside Perkasa's rise post-2009, challenging direct causal links between the group's activities and minority disenfranchisement, as overall GDP per capita rose from approximately RM15,000 in 2009 to over RM40,000 by 2023 without ethnic economic collapse.

Broader Influence on Malaysian Politics

Perkasa has exerted pressure on the (UMNO) and the (BN) coalition to adopt firmer positions on rights and bumiputera policies, particularly in response to electoral threats from opposition parties emphasizing multiracial appeals. Following the 2008 general election losses for BN, which saw significant gains by the opposition, Perkasa's advocacy for unyielding defense of Article 153 of the Malaysian Constitution—guaranteeing special privileges for s and natives—amplified internal debates within UMNO, compelling party leaders to counterbalance reformist tendencies with assertions of primacy to retain core voter support. This dynamic contributed to UMNO's strategic hardening during the lead-up to the 2013 elections, where Perkasa's mobilization of affiliated NGOs influenced campaign rhetoric on affirmative action continuity, despite UMNO officials downplaying the group's direct electoral clout. In the context of post-1969 empirical lessons from the race riots, which precipitated the New Economic Policy's race-based redistribution to avert , Perkasa's insistence on preserving bumiputera frameworks has reinforced political resistance to "progressive" shifts toward needs-based or meritocratic alternatives. By framing dilutions of these policies as existential threats to socioeconomic stability—evidenced by persistent gaps in equity despite decades of implementation—Perkasa has shaped discourse to prioritize causal factors like demographic imbalances and urban migration over liberal critiques, thereby sustaining BN's and later unity government coalitions' commitments to policy continuity amid 2022 electoral fragmentation. This influence manifested in the post-2022 unity pact under , where -centric coalitions like leveraged similar nationalist appeals to check reforms, aligning with Perkasa's broader push against perceived erosion of special rights. Long-term, Perkasa's activities hold potential to foster consolidation amid demographic pressures, including a youth bulge where Malays constitute a growing cohort facing economic . Surveys indicate sustained support among young Malays for bumiputera privileges, with only 28 percent favoring reforms in a Straits Times poll, reflecting entrenched views that these policies mitigate historical disadvantages rather than perpetuate division. This sentiment, coupled with Perkasa's networking across 76 Malay NGOs, positions the group as a to pluralistic , potentially stabilizing by channeling grievances into unified electoral blocs rather than unrest, though critics attribute heightened polarization to such ethno-nationalist reinforcement.

References

  1. [1]
    Perkasa: The Last Bastion for the Malay Masses - Malaysia Today
    I met Ibrahim last month and he told me that the major objectives for establishing Perkasa is to protect the Article 153 of the Malaysian's Constitution and ...
  2. [2]
    Ibrahim Ali steps down as Perkasa head - Malaysiakini
    May 16, 2018 · Ibrahim Ali has resigned as the president of Perkasa, a Malay rights pressure group which he founded and led since 2008.
  3. [3]
    Malay unity elusive under democratic govt, says Ibrahim Ali | Malaysia
    Aug 23, 2024 · This marks a shift in stance from the self-proclaimed Malay rights advocate, who founded Perkasa in 2008 – a right-wing Malay rights civil ...
  4. [4]
    Perkasa: Only Rulers can unite Muslims | FMT - Free Malaysia Today
    Sep 29, 2016 · Perkasa moots formation of Islamic Brotherhood Council, under the purview of the Conference of Rulers.
  5. [5]
    NGOs to bring 5,000 members to Najib solidarity gathering - The Star
    Jan 4, 2025 · KUALA LUMPUR: Two NGOs - Gerakan Pembela Ummah (Ummah) and Pertubuhan Pribumi Perkasa Malaysia (Perkasa) - together with Malay historian ...
  6. [6]
    Perkasa chief Syed Hassan Syed Ali says the gathering ... - Facebook
    May 24, 2025 · Perkasa chief Syed Hassan Syed Ali says the gathering is a 'manifestation of Malay disappointment'. #FMTNews #FMTEng.<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Perkasa, 2 others set up Interracial NGOs Council | Malay Mail
    “The setting up of Mirac also proves that Perkasa not only struggles for the interests of the Malays but also of the other races, and the nation's,” he said at ...
  8. [8]
    The real deal with Perkasa - The Nut Graph
    The real deal with Perkasa. By Deborah Loh. March 16, 2010. WHY interview Datuk Ibrahim Ali? Because his nationalistic non-governmental organisation (NGO) ...
  9. [9]
    Malaysia's Electoral Upheaval - Journal of Democracy
    This paper looks at the roles played by Anwar Ibrahim, the Opposition and civil society in this historical election, and argues that Malaysian politics will ...
  10. [10]
    Like us or not we helped BN win GE13, Perkasa tells Najib
    Whether or not Datuk Seri Najib Razak agrees with Perkasa's views, he must admit it had helped keep his Barisan ...
  11. [11]
    Perkasa - Wikipedia
    Pertubuhan Pribumi Perkasa is a Malay supremacist non-governmental organisation (NGO) that was formed by Ibrahim Ali in the aftermath of the 2008 general ...
  12. [12]
    PERKASA, in criticism of DAP, warns against efforts to equate other ...
    Feb 16, 2025 · PERKASA president Syed Hasan Syed Ali has warned of a systematic effort to equate other races with Malays, particularly regarding Malay privileges.
  13. [13]
    Malay rights rally goes ahead without incident, police to issue ...
    May 24, 2025 · This is important for the preservation of the Malay powers,” Pertubuhan Pribumi Perkasa Malaysia (Perkasa) president Syed Hasan Syed Ali said ...
  14. [14]
    A 'Malay Malaysia', but in what sense Islamic? - New Mandala
    Mar 29, 2018 · The Najib government needs to win new legitimacy at GE14 if it's to juggle Malay, Islamic, and royal claims, amid a restive East Malaysia.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] The New Economic Policy: Goals and Strategy
    In 1970, Malays and Malay interests owned 2.4% of equity capital, while. Indians held 1.1%. The Chinese, on the other hand, accounted for 27.2%,. Others 6.0 ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Successful Economic Development in a Multi-Ethnic Society
    Malaysians thus went from owning less than 40 percent of their corporate sector in 1970 to owning three- fourths of it in 1990, a truly amazing achievement ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  17. [17]
    2021/36 "Malaysia's New Economic Policy and the 30% Bumiputera ...
    Mar 25, 2021 · The New Economic Policy (NEP) has scripted Malaysia's development for 50 years, with the 30% Bumiputera equity target as the main protagonist.
  18. [18]
    Ethnic inequality and poverty in Malaysia since May 1969. Part 1
    Under the NEP, the Bumiputera were to receive favorable access to education, housing, public-sector jobs and corporate share ownership. Such ethnically-grounded ...
  19. [19]
    PAS wants anti-ICERD rally to send clear message to the world ...
    Members of Malay rights group Perkasa holding up banners yesterday to assert their rights and in opposition to any move to ratify ICERD. – The Malaysian Insight ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] table of contents - Pusat KOMAS
    Mar 21, 2019 · However, the government's efforts to ratify the ICERD were met with strong opposition from conservative Malay-Muslim groups and ... Perkasa's ...
  21. [21]
    Quota System In Education Provided Under Article 153 Of Federal ...
    Jul 9, 2023 · The quota system in education for ethnic Malays and Bumiputeras is part of the country's affirmative action which is provided for under Article 153 of the ...
  22. [22]
    Quotas in universities provided for in Federal Constitution | FMT
    Jul 11, 2023 · Article 153 of the Federal Constitution clearly mandates the reservation of quotas for Malays and natives of any of the states of Sabah and ...
  23. [23]
    Vol. 7, No. 3, Azmi SHAROM - Southeast Asian Studies
    Dec 27, 2018 · Furthermore, Article 153 makes clear that any such affirmative action must be reasonable in nature. Reasonableness is a factor that requires ...
  24. [24]
    Income inequality among different ethnic groups: the case of Malaysia
    Sep 11, 2019 · Household income inequality, as measured by the Gini coefficient, narrowed from 0.513 in 1970 to 0.446 in 1989 to 0.410 in 2014. On the other ...Missing: underrepresentation | Show results with:underrepresentation
  25. [25]
    World Bank: Study shows income divide within races more an issue ...
    Feb 5, 2025 · Malaysia has the highest rate of income inequality among peers nearing high-income status, with intra-ethnic disparity being the biggest contributor.
  26. [26]
    Of citizenship and Bumiputra rights | Daily Express Malaysia
    Jul 28, 2024 · The “social contract” at Malayan independence involved granting citizenship to non-Malays in exchange for recognizing the special position of ...
  27. [27]
    Article 153 row: Perkasa, why bully a pastor? - Malaysiakini
    Jan 2, 2012 · The way these Perkasa boys have reacted makes one wonder if the mentioning of Article 153 by any non-Malay is like committing a deadly sin. Then ...
  28. [28]
    PM gives assurance, no change to Bumiputera quota ... - NST Online
    Jun 30, 2024 · Article 153 reserves quotas for Malays and natives of Sabah and Sarawak in various services and permits. This, he said, was despite the ...
  29. [29]
    'Article 153 will be upheld' | The Star
    Feb 21, 2024 · The government will continue to uphold the position and principles of the Federal Constitution, including the special position of the Malays and bumiputras.
  30. [30]
    The Rise of Constitutional Patriotism in Malaysian Civil Society
    Jun 26, 2013 · This paper aims to account for the resurgent interest in the protections provided in the Malaysian Federal Constitution and to understand ...
  31. [31]
    Perkasa: Singapore minister's remark an insult to King, government ...
    Perkasa says statement made by K Shanmugam, who is Singapore's home affairs minister, on Singapore Malays doing better than Malays in Malaysia, was uncalled ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Perkasa demands 60pc Bumi equity, public university quotas
    Perkasa will push for 60 per cent Bumiputera equity targets and quotas for enrolment in public universities, double ...
  33. [33]
    Perkasa tells Najib not to agonise over empowering Bumiputera
    Sep 18, 2013 · Meanwhile, Perkasa has also urged Putrajaya today to pump RM1.4 trillion into the Bumiputera community to ensure the success of the revamped NEM ...
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
    Perkasa: Can we implement Cambridge Accessible Tests properly?
    Mar 22, 2017 · Meanwhile, Perkasa president Ibrahim Ali questioned the obsession with the mastery of English. Although he acknowledged the importance of ...
  36. [36]
    Perkasa marching against Bersih abusing rights - Malaysiakini
    Jun 19, 2011 · The scheduled Walk for Democracy organised by Bersih 2.0 - the coalition for free and fair elections comprising 62 NGOs - on July 9 is in ...
  37. [37]
    On Twitter, Malaysians split over alleged Chinese domination of ...
    Twitter users in Peninsular Malaysia were divided in their views on the reported Chinese domination of Bersih 4, ...
  38. [38]
    IRF Press Statement on PERKASA's Opposition to BERSIH 2.0 ...
    Jun 21, 2011 · We read the news on PERKASA's Ibrahim Ali claims to defend peace and stopping BERSIH 2.0 coalition from holding a demonstration on July 9 ...
  39. [39]
    Perkasa rejects Ibrahim Ali's resignation as president - The Star
    May 10, 2013 · Perkasa rejects Ibrahim Ali's resignation as president. Nation. Friday, 10 May 2013. 4:35 PM MYT. Related News. Fear against 'Malay Proclamation ...
  40. [40]
    Ibrahim Ali (politician) - Wikipedia
    Perkasa. After the 2008 Malaysian general election, Ibrahim has founded Perkasa, a non-governmental organisation (NGO) and pressure group for Malay rights, ...Early life and education · Political career · Perkasa · Controversies
  41. [41]
    NGOs to submit memo against sale of MAHB's shares | FMT
    Jan 13, 2025 · Perkasa president Syed Hasan Syed Ali says there is no benefit in selling MAHB's shares to foreign companies.
  42. [42]
    Perkasa condemns widespread corruption - spares only PAS
    May 21, 2025 · Despite this bleak reality, Perkasa president Syed Hasan Syed Ali commended PAS for standing firm and resisting the pervasive culture of ...
  43. [43]
    Who are Perkasa? - Malaysia Today
    Feb 17, 2010 · Written by Dr Lim Teck Ghee, CPI. Dr Farish Noor's assessment of Perkasa as “a class issue… reflecting the anxieties of poor Malays who are ...
  44. [44]
    Perkasa, power and the manufacture of consent | Malay Mail
    Pertubuhan Pribumi Perkasa Malaysia was established in September 2008 in a ceremony which was sanctified by former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad. This was ...<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    Perkasa members can join Tun M's party - Ibrahim Ali | AWANI ...
    Any member of Pertubuhan Pribumi Perkasa Malaysia (Perkasa) can join and support Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad's new political party if they want, Perkasa ...
  46. [46]
    APSN | Time to curb Malaysia's racial attack dogs
    Perkasa led several Malay groups to oppose the New Economic Model (NEM) mooted by Najib to transform Malaysia into a high-income and high-growth economy by ...
  47. [47]
    Countries at the Crossroads 2012 - Malaysia - Refworld
    Sep 20, 2012 · With a free hand, UMNO then introduced the New Economic Policy (NEP), a program whose quotas on public and private sector hiring, state ...
  48. [48]
    Revisiting the Bumiputera corporate equity issue - Lim Kit Siang's Blog
    Sep 5, 2010 · It is understandable why Perkasa and similar parasitic groups are raging away at the corporate equity issue. The ultra nationalist movement ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Growth Challenges of SMEs: Empirical Evidence in Sabah, Malaysia
    The failure rate of SMEs in Malaysia is alarming, whereby 60% of the new SMEs fail within five years of establishment. Additionally, only 4 out of. 10 SMEs ...
  50. [50]
    Perkasa Pushes BN Around: Not Bad for an NGO - Malaysia Today
    Since it was founded, Perkasa has lobbied for the New Economic Policy (NEP) to favour Malays and Bumiputras. ... Its deputy permanent ... So why are they so ...
  51. [51]
    After Christians, Ibrahim Ali declares war on Bersih - Malaysiakini
    'Ibrahim Ali lies through his bare teeth in saying Bersih 2.0 is bent on violence. Is there a reason for Bersih to be so? How would it benefit the cause?'
  52. [52]
    Anything can happen on July 9, Perkasa warns - YouTube
    Jun 19, 2011 · Perkasa's president Ibrahim Ali has claimed the group's planned 'Peace March' on July 9 is aimed at defending the peace and stopping the ...
  53. [53]
    Perkasa slams Opposition manifestos, labelling them an insult to ...
    PAS and Pakatan Harapan's (PH) manifestos for the 14th general elections (GE14) is an insult of the people's ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Malaysian COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Packages
    During the pandemic, given the physical restrictions imposed on many populations, it became difficult to make sure that those who needed aid from the government ...
  55. [55]
    Breakdown Of PEMERKASA Initiatives For Malaysian Startups & SMEs
    Mar 19, 2021 · A full list of initiatives under the latest economic stimulus package, PEMERKASA that will mainly benefit vulnerable groups in Malaysia.
  56. [56]
    ASEAN Malaysia 2025
    Official page for the ASEAN-Malaysia Chairmanship 2025. Notional ... Copyright © 2025 Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Malaysia. All Rights Reserved ...Missing: Perkasa | Show results with:Perkasa
  57. [57]
    MP's call to burn Bibles heightens election tensions in Malaysia ...
    Malaysia's Bar Council said on Wednesday an independent member of parliament should be prosecuted on grounds he called for the mass burning of Bibles as ...
  58. [58]
    Can't book Ibrahim Ali for bible-burning threat when he's defending ...
    Oct 27, 2014 · In a statement, the AGC also said Ibrahim's remarks failed to qualify for action under the Sedition Act 1948 as it lacked a “seditious tendency” ...
  59. [59]
    A-G defends decision on Perkasa chief's Bible-burning threat, says ...
    Oct 27, 2014 · "When studied in its entire context, Datuk Ibrahim's statement is not categorised as having seditious tendencies. "It was clear Datuk Ibrahim ...
  60. [60]
  61. [61]
    A case of publicity for stupidity - Malaysiakini
    Aug 4, 2010 · 'Ibrahim Ali behaves the way he is because he and the Umno-led BN regime come out of essentially the same mould.'.
  62. [62]
    Ibrahim Ali – A Man of Hate - Malaysia Today
    Ibrahim Ali is certainly in the latter category. This man is hateful, racist, vile and most of all, mentally subnormal. I know it is ill-mannered or ...Missing: statements | Show results with:statements
  63. [63]
    Creating a Culture of Fear - Human Rights Watch
    Oct 26, 2015 · This report examines how the Malaysian government is using and abusing such laws, and the ways in which the laws themselves fall short of international ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Addressing Discrimination and Inequality in Malaysia
    Article 153(5) states that this Article does not override Article 136. Tun. Suffian Hashim has interpreted the relationship between Articles 136 and. 153 in ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  65. [65]
    Perkasa ready to counter Bersih rally - Malaysiakini
    Jun 13, 2011 · Right-wing Malay rights group Perkasa has warned that it will hold a counter-protest to prevent the planned Bersih 2.0 rally from "causing ...
  66. [66]
    'Perkasa rally called off to avoid clash among Malays' - Malaysia ...
    Jul 29, 2011 · (Yahoo News/Malaysiakini) – Perkasa president Ibrahim Ali claimed that he had called off the July 9 rally to counter the Bersih 2.0 march at ...
  67. [67]
    Ibrahim Ali dishes out RM10,000 in white 'angpow' - YouTube
    Jan 29, 2012 · Some 300 senior citizens and residents received a boon at Perkasa's first Chinese New Year open house today as close to RM10,000 was handed out.
  68. [68]
    Perkasa expresses regret over 'white' ang pow incident - The Star
    Feb 1, 2012 · PETALING JAYA: Perkasa president Datuk Ibrahim Ali has expressed regret over the inadvertent distribution of "white" ang pow during its ...
  69. [69]
    Cultural gaff sparks fury among Chinese in Malaysia - China.org.cn
    Feb 7, 2012 · Furious Chinese residents in Malaysia have demanded an apology from Malaysian rights group Perkasa after the group handed out white packets ...
  70. [70]
    Perkasa opposes any attempt to bring back Chin Peng's remains
    Sep 15, 2013 · Malay right-wing group Perkasa will oppose any attempt to bring back Chin Peng's remains to Malaysia. “If when he was alive we objected to him ...Missing: threats | Show results with:threats
  71. [71]
    Allowing Chin Peng's return will hurt people - Perkasa | AWANI ...
    Pertubuhan Pribumi Perkasa (Perkasa), the Malay right-wing group, on Thursday voiced opposition to a proposal to allow the return to the country of former ...
  72. [72]
    Perkasa wants Vatican envoy expelled, claims Christians out to ...
    Jul 16, 2013 · Christians here intend to “confuse” Muslims with their usage of the word “Allah”, Perkasa alleged today as it joined other Malay rights groups in demanding the ...
  73. [73]
    Hindu group decries no action against Perkasa veep - Malaysiakini
    Mar 30, 2013 · Hindu Sangam says Zulkifli had allegedly made anti-Hindu remarks in 2011 but authorities have chosen to do nothing.
  74. [74]
    Call to burn Bibles heightens Malaysian election tensions | Reuters
    Jan 23, 2013 · Malaysia's Bar Council said on Wednesday an independent member of parliament should be prosecuted on grounds he called for the mass burning ...
  75. [75]
    Christians say not prosecuting Ibrahim Ali gives carte blanche to ...
    Oct 16, 2014 · ... burn our Holy Bible are considered an act in defence of Islam. "The ... Ibrahim had not been charged with sedition. Ibrahim's call in ...
  76. [76]
    Authorise Bar Council to prosecute Ibrahim Ali for bible-burning call ...
    Nov 20, 2014 · KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 20 ― The Attorney-General should authorise the Bar Council to prosecute Perkasa president Datuk Ibrahim Ali for his call ...Missing: ban | Show results with:ban
  77. [77]
    Not difficult to make case against Ibrahim Ali, former sedition 'victim ...
    Pointing to his conviction under the colonial era law for attempting to speak up for an alleged rape victim in 1998, Lim told Putrajaya that an individual's ...
  78. [78]
    Life after Anwar - New Mandala
    Feb 12, 2015 · In 2014 over 20 sedition cases were prosecuted or investigated, directed against members of the opposition, NGOs, journalists, lawyers and even ...
  79. [79]
    What has happened to Gani Patail's promise to review sedition ...
    Oct 31, 2014 · ... Perkasa President Ibrahim Ali for his threat to burn the Bible ... What has happened to Gani Patail's promise to review sedition charges?
  80. [80]
    Appeals Court sets aside Ibrahim Ali's conviction, jail term, fine for ...
    Perkasa president Datuk Ibrahim Ali's conviction, one-day jail term and fine for contempt of court was set aside by the Court of Appeal.
  81. [81]
    Malaysian Christians Lash Government after Supremacist Evades ...
    Oct 13, 2014 · ICC Note: Hate speech and religious intolerance has been rising in Malaysia. Ibrahim Ali, the founder and president of Malay supremacist ...
  82. [82]
    Malay quota is about national security, Perkasa tells Khairy | FMT
    Apr 20, 2017 · Perkasa chief Ibrahim Ali says doing away with the quota system favouring Malays will result in social strife.Missing: successes | Show results with:successes
  83. [83]
    Perkasa holds anti-ICERD rally, hours before PMO confirms no ...
    Nov 23, 2018 · Shortly after the Perkasa protest, the Prime Minister's Office issued a statement saying Malaysia will not ratify ICERD. There are 13 other ...
  84. [84]
    Why Malaysia backpedalled on ICERD ratification
    Nov 23, 2018 · KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia on Friday reversed a pledge to ratify a UN convention against racial discrimination, following backlash from groups ...
  85. [85]
    [PDF] BTI 2014 | Malaysia Country Report
    The Malay leaders then forged a political alliance with the major Chinese and Indian parties. This set a pattern in which the office of the prime minister was ...
  86. [86]
    Vol. 11, No. 2, Hwok-Aun Lee - Southeast Asian Studies
    Advocates assert that the NEP achieved tremendous success but remains unfinished business; detractors vouch that the NEP largely failed and has overstayed ...
  87. [87]
    Malaysia: Malays rally amid worries over government 'weakness'
    Dec 8, 2018 · Malaysia is one of only 14 countries in the world that have yet to sign the International Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial ...
  88. [88]
    Pointless to argue with Perkasa thugs - Malaysiakini
    Dec 29, 2011 · Malaysia is slowly degenerating into a fanatical Islamic totalitarian regime, fueled by extremists who are hell-bent on suppressing minorities.
  89. [89]
    What Perkasa and Malaysiakini Have in Common - Academia.edu
    It has also been the focus of the international news media where terrorism issues are concerned. On 17th July 2009, once again Indonesia is traumatised yet with ...
  90. [90]
    [PDF] Electoral Malpractice in Malaysia: The Methods and ... - Kai Ostwald
    NGOs like Pertubuhan Pribumi Perkasa (Perkasa) and Ikatan Muslimim Malaysia (ISMA), who view themselves as defenders of Islam and of the Malays, whose ...<|separator|>
  91. [91]
    [PDF] Malaysia's Protracted Affirmative Action Policy and the Evolving ...
    This paper examines the evolution of the Bumiputera Commercial and Industrial Community. (BCIC) in the context of Malaysia's protracted affirmative action ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  92. [92]
    The cases of BERSIH, HINDRAF and Perkasa - ResearchGate
    Download Citation | On Jan 1, 2014, A.R. Govindasamy published Social movements in contemporary Malaysia: The cases of BERSIH, HINDRAF and Perkasa | Find, ...
  93. [93]
    Perkasa not the force it thinks it is, Umno leaders say | Malay Mail
    Yesterday, Ibrahim claimed Perkasa's clout had contributed to Umno and BN's victory in the 13th general election, despite his defeat in Pasir Mas to PAS's Nik ...
  94. [94]
    Towards a More Democratic Regime and Society? The Politics of ...
    The rising antagonistic attitudes and tension between the Malay majority and ethnic and religious minorities in Malaysia since 2007 is intriguing because it ...
  95. [95]
    Asian Angle | Malaysia's youth survey reveals deep ethnic divides ...
    Oct 13, 2024 · A recent survey of Malaysian youth reveals stark ethnic divisions, with Malays largely supporting existing preferential policies while non-Malays advocate for ...
  96. [96]
    Malaysia's young Malays talk race and privilege | The Straits Times
    Nov 23, 2024 · ST's own poll shows 28 per cent of young Malay respondents say bumiputera privileges should be kept, but reformed. 68% of Malay Respondents ...