Pope Nicholas V
Tommaso Parentucelli (15 November 1397 – 24 March 1455), who reigned as Pope Nicholas V from his election on 6 March 1447 until his death, was the 208th pope of the Catholic Church and sovereign of the Papal States.[1][2] Born in Sarzana in the Republic of Genoa to a physician father, Parentucelli rose through ecclesiastical ranks via scholarly pursuits in Bologna and Florence before his rapid elevation to the papacy following the death of Eugene IV.[2] A leading figure in the early Italian Renaissance, he championed humanism by establishing the Vatican Library in 1448 through the consolidation of approximately 350 Greek, Latin, and Hebrew manuscripts, aiming to create a repository "for the common convenience of the learned" that integrated pagan classical texts with Christian doctrine.[3][4] Nicholas V's patronage extended to artists, scholars, and architects, including commissions for translations of ancient works and early efforts to restore Rome's infrastructure, such as fortifying the city's walls and planning the reconstruction of St. Peter's Basilica.[5] His diplomatic achievements included reconciling the papacy with various European powers, notably through the Concordat of Vienna in 1448 with Holy Roman Emperor Frederick III, whom he crowned in 1452, thereby stabilizing papal influence in Germany.[5] However, his pontificate drew lasting controversy for issuing the bulls Dum Diversas (18 June 1452) and Romanus Pontifex (8 January 1455), which granted Portugal's King Afonso V rights to invade, conquer, and reduce to "perpetual servitude" Saracens, pagans, and other non-Christians in Africa and beyond, providing ecclesiastical sanction for the enslavement of infidels in the context of crusading expansion and laying a doctrinal foundation for the emerging Atlantic slave trade.[6][7] These pronouncements reflected a causal prioritization of religious conversion and territorial dominion over individual liberties, privileging empirical geopolitical necessities of the era amid Ottoman threats, though they have been critiqued in modern historiography for enabling racialized exploitation.[7]