Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Principles for Responsible Investment

The Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is a voluntary framework developed under United Nations auspices to guide institutional investors in incorporating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors into investment analysis, decision-making, ownership practices, and reporting. Launched in April 2006 at the New York Stock Exchange by then-UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, the initiative emerged from consultations in 2005 involving a group of institutional investors and experts, aiming to align investment activities with broader economic, social, and environmental objectives. As of March 2024, the PRI counts 5,345 signatories—including asset owners and investment managers—collectively overseeing assets under management exceeding $128 trillion, though signing entails no legal obligations beyond a commitment to consider the principles and report progress periodically. The framework outlines six core principles: integrating ESG issues into investment processes; exercising ownership rights with ESG in mind; seeking appropriate ESG disclosures from investee entities; promoting acceptance of the principles within the investment sector; working collaboratively to advance their implementation; and regularly reporting on related activities. Proponents argue that these steps enhance long-term risk-adjusted returns by addressing material non-financial risks, yet empirical studies on ESG integration's impact on performance remain inconclusive, with some analyses indicating negligible or context-dependent effects on financial outcomes. While the PRI has driven widespread adoption of ESG reporting frameworks and investor collaborations on stewardship, it has drawn criticism for emphasizing disclosure and procedural compliance over verifiable real-world impacts, potentially diverting focus from fiduciary duties to maximize returns. Critics, including those highlighting political influences on ESG criteria, contend that the initiative may prioritize ideological goals—such as stringent environmental mandates—over evidence-based investment strategies, amid broader backlash against sustainable investing for insufficiently demonstrating superior economic value or planetary benefits.

Overview

Definition and Core Objectives

The Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is a United Nations-supported initiative launched in 2006 that provides a voluntary framework of six principles to assist institutional investors in incorporating (ESG) factors into their analysis, decision-making, ownership practices, and engagement activities. The PRI defines responsible as the practice of considering ESG issues alongside financial factors to manage risks, generate sustainable long-term returns, and support broader societal goals such as . As of 2024, over 5,000 signatories representing exceeding $120 trillion have committed to the principles, reflecting widespread adoption among funds, asset managers, and other investors. The core objectives of the PRI center on aligning strategies with principles of to mitigate material risks and capture opportunities arising from considerations, thereby enhancing portfolio resilience and contributing to global challenges like and . Signatories are encouraged to report annually on their implementation efforts, fostering and within the community. The initiative emphasizes , urging investors to work collectively with companies, regulators, and other stakeholders to promote , , and that advance responsible practices across . While the PRI's stated goals include improving investment outcomes through better and ethical alignment, independent analyses have questioned the empirical link between integration and superior financial performance, with some evidence suggesting that ESG-focused strategies may introduce biases or underperform benchmarks in certain market conditions due to overemphasis on non-financial metrics. Nonetheless, proponents argue that ignoring factors exposes investors to systemic risks, such as regulatory shifts or , justifying the framework's focus on holistic analysis. The PRI remains non-prescriptive, offering flexible guidance rather than rigid mandates to accommodate diverse investment approaches.

The Six Principles

The Principles for Responsible Investment consist of six voluntary and aspirational guidelines designed to integrate (ESG) factors into investment practices, thereby aiming to foster a sustainable while aligning with investors' duties to beneficiaries. Developed collaboratively by institutional investors under auspices and launched in 2006, these principles provide a flexible framework of possible actions rather than prescriptive rules, allowing signatories to adapt implementation to their specific contexts, , and regulatory environments. Signatories publicly commit to incorporating the principles, periodically assessing their effectiveness, and reporting on progress through a "comply-or-explain" mechanism, which encourages transparency without mandating uniform outcomes. The principles emphasize long-term value creation by recognizing that ESG risks and opportunities can materially affect investment performance, though empirical evidence on their net impact remains debated, with some studies showing correlations between ESG integration and risk-adjusted returns while others highlight potential trade-offs in short-term performance or opportunity costs. They are structured to promote individual and collective action among investors, including asset owners, investment managers, and service providers, with over 5,000 signatories managing approximately $121 trillion in assets as of 2023.

Historical Development

Founding and Initial Launch (2006)

In early 2005, Secretary-General initiated the development of the Principles for Responsible Investment by inviting a group of the world's largest institutional investors to participate in the process. A core working group of 20 investors from 12 countries was formed, supported by a broader advisory group of approximately 70 experts drawn from the investment industry, intergovernmental organizations, and civil society. This effort was coordinated by the UN Global Compact and the UN Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI), focusing on creating voluntary principles to integrate (ESG) factors into investment analysis and decision-making. The Principles were publicly launched on April 27, 2006, at the , with Annan presiding over the event attended by representatives of founding signatories. The initiative outlined six principles emphasizing the incorporation of issues to enhance long-term investment returns and contribute to sustainable markets, as articulated by Annan in emphasizing that "the era of exploiting the world's resources without regard for long-term consequences is over." Initial commitments came from 100 institutional investors across 16 countries, representing over $2 trillion in assets under management, including prominent entities such as the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), the Investment Board, and TIAA-CREF. The launch marked a collaborative push by asset owners and managers to address perceived gaps in traditional investment practices, with signatories pledging to report on their implementation efforts annually. This foundational step aimed to foster a framework where considerations were viewed as material to financial performance, though the voluntary nature relied on self-reported adherence without initial enforcement mechanisms.

Expansion and Milestones (2007–2023)

Following its launch in 2006 with approximately 100 founding signatories representing over $6 trillion in (AUM), the PRI saw initial expansion through additional commitments from institutional investors focused on integrating (ESG) factors. By 2007, the framework had attracted further signatories, establishing a pattern of consistent growth driven by voluntary commitments from asset owners and managers worldwide. Signatory numbers expanded steadily over the subsequent years, reflecting broader adoption amid rising interest in sustainable practices. Key data points illustrate this trajectory:
YearApproximate SignatoriesNotes
2006100Founding group, primarily institutional investors.
2014>1,300Representing over $45 trillion AUM; launch of PRI Academy for training.
2020~3,100Included asset owners, managers, and service providers.
20214,000Milestone surpassed with over 600 asset owners; 42% year-on-year increase in new signatories (938 added in 2020/21).
20235,391As of March 31; 4,841 investors and 550 service providers, operating in over 80 countries.
This growth corresponded with AUM expansion, reaching over $121 trillion by early 2023, with asset owners alone managing more than $65 trillion. Notable milestones included the 2014 establishment of the PRI , which by 2023 had trained nearly 30,000 professionals in 90 countries on responsible practices. In 2017, the PRI outlined strategic goals for the following decade, emphasizing collaboration with asset owners to foster a sustainable . Geographic diversification accelerated, with increased sign-ups from emerging markets in and , alongside enhancements to reporting frameworks that achieved a 98% submission rate in 2023—the highest recorded. These developments supported broader implementation of the six principles, though growth was uneven, with service providers comprising a growing share of new commitments.

Organizational Framework

Governance and Secretariat

The PRI Association, a UK-registered non-profit , is governed by a responsible for its long-term success, including setting strategy, , and , as well as delegating implementation to the executive team and monitoring performance. The Board meets regularly, convening eight times between April 1, 2023, and March 31, 2024, and ensures to signatories and stakeholders through oversight mechanisms. Its composition emphasizes representation from signatory categories to align with the organization's investor-led mission, governed by the PRI . The Board comprises one independent chair and ten elected directors: seven elected by asset owner signatories, two by investment manager signatories, and one by service provider signatories, with elections conducted to promote and . Directors serve in a capacity as individuals, independent of their affiliations, focusing on the PRI's objectives rather than representing specific entities. Board committees, such as those for , , and , provide specialized guidance and recommendations to enhance oversight on issues like company and . The PRI Secretariat functions as the operational executive arm, implementing Board-approved strategies by offering guidance materials, facilitating signatory working groups, and supporting the integration of (ESG) factors into investment practices. It produces resources for reporting, assessment, and , while centralizing operational, , and planning functions in a business partnering model to serve over 5,000 signatories as of 2023. The Secretariat operates independently from the , though the PRI maintains voluntary ties to UN principles, with staff focused on , development, and capacity-building initiatives. This structure delegates day-to-day execution to the executive while reserving strategic direction for the Board, ensuring alignment with signatory commitments established since the PRI's 2006 launch.

Signatory Requirements and Growth

Organizations seeking signatory status with the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) must publicly commit to implementing the six Principles, which involves signing a declaration form and submitting an application. This commitment requires establishing a formalized responsible investment policy that addresses (ESG) factors, along with a governance structure to oversee its integration into investment processes. Signatories are obligated to report annually on their responsible investment activities through the PRI's Reporting Framework, which assesses adherence via modules such as Policy, Governance & Strategy (PGS). Failure to meet the three core minimum requirements—documented in four PGS indicators—or to submit reports can result in placement on a , remedial actions, or termination of signatory status after . Membership fees are scaled according to (AUM), supporting PRI operations while incentivizing larger institutions to join. PRI signatory numbers have expanded steadily since the initiative's 2006 launch with approximately 100 founding investors. By March 2023, total signatories reached 5,391, comprising 4,841 investors and 550 service providers, reflecting a 10% year-on-year increase from the prior period. This growth accelerated from fewer than 2,000 signatories around 2018 to over 5,000 by the early , driven by rising institutional interest in integration amid regulatory and market pressures. In the 2024 reporting cycle, 3,048 signatories submitted data, underscoring sustained participation despite the voluntary nature of the framework. Collective AUM under signatory management exceeded $100 trillion by the mid-, amplifying the initiative's global influence.

Implementation Mechanisms

Reporting and Assessment Framework

The Investor Reporting Framework requires signatories to the Principles for Responsible Investment to disclose their responsible investment practices annually, enabling assessment of adherence to the six principles through structured indicators. Comprising 13 modules as of 2025, the framework addresses topics including organisational overview, and , , manager selection and monitoring, asset class-specific implementation (e.g., , listed equity), sustainability outcomes, and such as third-party assurance. Each module contains core indicators, which are mandatory for applicable signatories, and plus indicators, which are voluntary and allow for deeper ; mandatory requirements vary by signatory type, with asset owners typically reporting via manager oversight rather than direct asset class modules. All signatories beyond their initial must submit the mandatory Senior Leadership Statement and the new Other Responsible Investment Reporting Obligations module, which captures compliance with regional regulations and voluntary frameworks on themes like and . occurs through an online PRI Reporting Tool during an annual window, typically spanning several months and covering a chosen 12-month period (e.g., calendar year 2024 data submitted in 2025); the tool includes validation mechanisms to minimize errors, though PRI does not independently verify submissions and relies on signatory self-assurance or audits. Failure to report results in termination of signatory status, with delisted entities eligible to reapply only after completing in a subsequent cycle. Upon submission, signatories receive public Transparency Reports detailing core indicators, accessible via the PRI website to promote market transparency, alongside private versions including voluntary disclosures. PRI generates confidential Assessment Reports, scoring performance per module or asset class on a 1- to 5-star scale (equivalent to E to A grades), calculated as percentages reflecting implementation depth, consistency, sophistication, and evidence quality—e.g., 0-25% yields 1 star, while over 90% yields 5 stars—with no aggregate organisational score. These assessments aim to benchmark practices and drive improvements, with scores shareable at signatories' discretion. Updates to the 2025 framework include the introduction of outcomes-based indicators in the Sustainability Outcomes module, comprising 18 voluntary questions on target-setting, progress tracking, and actions like capital reallocation, aligning with PRI's 10-year blueprint for emphasising real-world impacts over process alone. Minor indicator refinements, such as elevating TCFD-aligned questions to core status, reflect signatory feedback and PRI's strategic priorities on and , while pre-filling 96% of prior responses facilitates continuity.

Educational and Collaborative Tools

The PRI provides educational resources primarily through the PRI Academy, an online platform offering self-paced courses on responsible topics such as ESG integration, , and . These courses, including "Understanding ESG," "Applied Responsible ," and "Nature and for Investors," have trained over 30,000 professionals globally as of 2025, aiming to bridge skills gaps in . In September 2025, the PRI Academy partnered with Wharton Executive Education to launch a global program on responsible , featuring interactive modules and expert faculty for professionals. Collaborative tools include the PRI's coordination of investor-led engagements on sustainability issues, such as and , where signatories pool resources for joint actions. These initiatives, detailed on the PRI's , encompass PRI-led projects like the 2023 effort and supported engagements under the Leadership Programme with UNEP FI, involving over 4,000 signatories in and target-setting. Additionally, advisory committees and working groups facilitate by guiding PRI's work programs, enabling signatories to contribute to policy development, , and implementation of the six principles. The PRI supports these efforts through tools for coordination and knowledge sharing, as highlighted in the organization's 2024 . These mechanisms emphasize practical application over theoretical , though participation requires signatory commitment to annual reporting.

Key Initiatives and Projects

The Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) has developed guidance asserting that duties mandate the consideration of material (ESG) factors as part of prudent investment decision-making to maximize long-term financial returns for beneficiaries. This stance is central to PRI's "Fiduciary Duty in the 21st Century" initiative, launched in collaboration with the UN Environment Programme Initiative (UNEP FI) around 2014, which produced a series of country-specific roadmaps and a final report in October 2019 analyzing legal frameworks in eight jurisdictions: , , , , , , the , and the . The report concluded that failing to integrate relevant ESG issues—deemed long-term value drivers and material risks—constitutes a of duty, as these duties require fiduciaries to act in beneficiaries' best interests by addressing all economically relevant factors rather than prioritizing short-term gains. PRI's guidance emphasizes that investor duties, including the (prudence) and loyalty, bind asset managers and owners to incorporate risks into analysis and stewardship activities, provided they demonstrate financial supported by evidence. For instance, the 2016 U.S. Roadmap under this project clarified that U.S. fiduciaries, particularly for retirement plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), face no legal barrier to ESG integration and may incur for ignoring material ESG risks, such as climate-related exposures, that could affect portfolio performance. PRI extends this through technical resources, such as its 2019 asset owner guide on fiduciary obligations, which advises clarifying legal duties toward beneficiaries and embedding ESG in investment policies to align with standards. In response to evolving regulatory landscapes, PRI's policy work interprets fiduciary duties as increasingly requiring ESG consideration; a 2025 analysis noted that financial regulators in multiple jurisdictions now view ESG materiality as integral to , urging investors to update practices accordingly. Additional guidance targets specific contexts, such as a report on U.S. corporate directors' duties, which states that ESG factors must be weighed when they implicate material legal compliance or financial risks under state corporate laws. These materials aim to equip PRI's over 5,000 signatories—managing exceeding $120 trillion as of 2023—with tools to demonstrate compliance, including model clauses for investment mandates and frameworks that tie ESG analysis to fiduciary prudence. Through webinars, toolkits, and collaborative advocacy, PRI promotes the view that ESG integration enhances, rather than detracts from, fulfillment of legal obligations, countering earlier misconceptions of conflict.

ESG Integration Research and Guidelines

The Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) defines ESG integration as the systematic and explicit inclusion of material (ESG) factors into traditional financial analysis and investment decisions, emphasizing analysis of all relevant risks and opportunities alongside financial metrics. This approach, outlined in Principle 1 of the PRI framework, requires signatories to incorporate ESG issues into investment policy statements and decision-making processes to potentially enhance risk-adjusted returns, though on financial outperformance remains debated in broader academic literature. PRI provides technical guidelines to assist signatories, such as the " integration in listed : A technical guide" published on April 18, 2023, which details a five-part process for embedding ESG considerations into strategies, including data sourcing, scoring, and portfolio . Similarly, the "Guidance and case studies for integration: and ," co-developed with the and released on September 12, 2018, offers practical methods and real-world examples for applying ESG analysis across , focusing on techniques like and qualitative adjustments to valuation models. Additional resources include "A practical guide to integration for investing," which advises on linking ESG ratings to expected returns and volatility while constructing portfolios aligned with profiles. In terms of , PRI commissions and curates reviews of studies to support practices, such as a September 25, 2024, analysis concluding that ESG factors can reduce portfolio volatility and enable better single-stock selection, drawing on evidence of lower risk for high-quality ESG performers without sacrificing returns. The organization maintains a of top resources on ESG , highlighting peer-reviewed papers that examine its application in screening and , though these often reflect proponent perspectives from PRI-affiliated networks. PRI's ESG Framework, introduced in 2018, serves as a tool for signatories to evaluate peer practices, categorizing techniques from qualitative analysis to quantitative modeling while stressing the need for to avoid diluting financial focus. These guidelines and research are integrated into PRI's annual reporting framework, where signatories must disclose ESG integration levels in modules like Listed Equity—Direct, with references to the above tools for and as of the 2020 framework update. Specialized guides extend to niche areas, such as "A practical guide to ESG integration in sovereign debt" from August 29, 2019, which outlines analysis and portfolio adjustments based on ESG risks like stability. While PRI posits that such integration mitigates long-term risks, independent critiques note inconsistent evidence of causal links to superior performance, attributing positive findings partly to selection biases in sampled studies.

Training and Capacity Building

The PRI Academy, established by the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI), delivers online training courses aimed at equipping investment professionals with skills in incorporating (ESG) factors into decision-making processes. These self-paced modules, which have engaged over 30,000 professionals globally, cover foundational concepts such as ESG materiality and practical applications like advanced responsible (RI) analysis. Flagship offerings include "Applied Responsible Investment," a comprehensive course examining RI from theory to implementation techniques for ESG analysis, and "Responsible Investment in ," an introductory module emphasizing ESG issue materiality. PRI's certified learning programs, accredited by the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) standards and recognized by the Investment Ethics Leadership Alliance (IELA), enable participants to earn credentials in areas like integration and climate risk assessment for investors. Specialized courses target senior stakeholders, such as "Responsible Investment for Boards and Trustees," which addresses regulatory expectations and roles in RI practices. Additional modules focus on emerging topics, including "Nature and for Investors," which details biodiversity risks and opportunities, and " in Alternative Investments," tailored to non-traditional . In partnership with Wharton Executive Education, PRI launched a global executive program on responsible investment leadership on September 12, 2025, integrating duties with strategies, , and geopolitical scenario planning. This initiative underscores PRI's emphasis on aligning RI with core investment responsibilities, as articulated by PRI leadership. Complementing these efforts, PRI announced a Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) capacity-building forum on May 1, 2025, to support investors, banks, and insurers in advancing nature-related actions through targeted and . These programs collectively aim to build institutional capabilities without prescriptive enforcement, relying on voluntary participation to foster ESG-aware investment practices.

Empirical Impact and Evidence

Adoption Metrics and Global Reach

As of October 2024, the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) network comprised more than 5,300 signatories, including asset owners, investment managers, and service providers, collectively managing over $128 trillion in (AUM). These figures reflect self-reported data from signatories, with AUM calculated based on the latest available submissions and scaled for fee purposes by the PRI . Signatory growth has been uneven in recent years. In the 2024-25 financial year, 344 organizations joined , while 429 were delisted, primarily managers, resulting in a net decline. This follows periods of rapid expansion, such as the 42% increase in new signatories during 2020-21, driven by heightened focus on amid global events like the . Overall, the PRI has expanded from its initial 100 signatories at launch in 2006 to its current scale, though delistings highlight challenges in maintaining active commitments. The PRI's global reach spans nearly 100 countries, with signatories distributed across regions but concentrated in developed markets. Among reporting signatories analyzed in recent PRI data, 55% are headquartered in Europe, 24% in North America, and 7% in Asia, reflecting stronger adoption in jurisdictions with established regulatory frameworks for environmental, social, and governance (ESG) integration. Faster growth has occurred in emerging regions, including Latin America (77% increase in signatories in prior years) and China (46%), supported by PRI's regional teams and targeted outreach. This distribution underscores the initiative's emphasis on broadening participation beyond Western-centric investors, though Asia-Pacific and Africa remain underrepresented relative to global investment flows.

Studies on Financial Performance and Returns

A meta-analysis of over 2,000 studies published between 1970 and 2015 found that approximately 90% of analyses reported either no negative or a positive relationship between factors and financial performance, with investor-focused studies showing 65% positive or neutral outcomes and only 13% negative. Subsequent meta-reviews, including one covering 45 studies on socially responsible investing (SRI) up to 2023, concluded that SRI portfolios neither systematically outperform nor underperform conventional benchmarks on average, though results vary by time period and market conditions. These findings are tempered by methodological critiques, such as potential favoring positive results and challenges in isolating ESG's causal impact amid confounding factors like firm size or sector exposure. Specific research on PRI signatories indicates mixed performance relative to non-signatories. A 2021 analysis across major markets found that PRI signatories achieved higher five-year net returns in the , , and , but lower returns in the , attributing differences to regional regulatory environments and . However, a separate study examining active post-PRI signing reported that while increased, net returns declined by an average of 0.5-1% annually, suggesting that adherence to PRI principles may introduce constraints on investment flexibility without commensurate risk-adjusted gains. In the private equity context, PRI-aligned funds showed no significant outperformance over conventional peers from 2000-2014, with returns driven more by and than integration. Recent empirical evidence highlights underperformance in certain contexts, particularly amid volatility. High-ESG portfolios exhibited modest underperformance relative to low-ESG counterparts in global studies from 2010-2023, with annualized return gaps of 0.2-0.5% attributed to exclusions from high-carbon sectors during periods of elevated prices. ESG funds recorded their worst relative performance in 2023, underperforming benchmarks by up to 5% in aggregate, leading to $13 billion in net outflows as investors prioritized returns amid rising interest rates and rebounds. ESG-scored portfolios similarly underperformed market indices under CAPM models from 2015-2022, with negative alphas indicating failure to exceed risk-adjusted benchmarks after fees. These patterns underscore that while long-term meta-evidence leans neutral, short-term deviations often reflect ESG screens' opportunity costs in cyclical industries, challenging claims of consistent alpha generation.

Criticisms and Debates

Enforcement Gaps and Greenwashing Risks

The Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) framework relies on voluntary commitments from signatories, who pledge to incorporate (ESG) factors into investment processes but face no binding legal obligations or penalties for substantive non-compliance beyond potential delisting for failure to submit annual self-reported assessments. This structure, while promoting broad adoption—over 5,300 signatories managing $121 trillion in assets as of —lacks independent verification of , allowing discrepancies between public commitments and actual practices. PRI assessments evaluate quality but do not portfolio-level ESG integration or outcomes, creating enforcement gaps that critics argue undermine credibility. These gaps heighten greenwashing risks, where signatories signal ESG adherence for reputational benefits without corresponding actions, potentially misleading investors and beneficiaries. Empirical studies document such behavior among subsets of signatories; for instance, hedge fund managers endorsing PRI exhibit greenwashing when their ESG scores remain low, underperforming non-signatory peers by 2.45% annually net of fees and expenses from 2008 to 2018. Similarly, partially committed U.S.-based signatories have been found to greenwash by leveraging PRI affiliation for marketing while maintaining limited ESG engagement, exploiting the absence of rigorous oversight. Quantitatively, one analysis of ESG mutual funds identified greenwashing in 178 of 489 PRI signatory funds, encompassing $37.17 billion in out of $139.07 billion total, often through peer-driven imitation of superficial ESG labeling without verifiable impact. Regulators have noted related vulnerabilities, with bodies like Australia's ASIC pursuing cases against ESG claims, though PRI's voluntary model complicates global harmonization of anti-greenwashing measures. Such risks persist amid broader ESG litigation trends, where unsubstantiated claims erode trust without systematic links to stock returns in aggregate studies. PRI has acknowledged these challenges internally, citing litigation from ESG backlash as a principal in its 2023 accounts, yet remains peer-dependent rather than coercive.

Conflicts with Fiduciary Duties

Critics contend that the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI), by encouraging the incorporation of (ESG) factors into investment decisions, can create tensions with traditional duties, which mandate that investment managers prioritize the financial interests of beneficiaries above non-pecuniary goals. obligations, rooted in and statutes like the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) in the United States, impose duties of loyalty and , requiring actions solely to maximize risk-adjusted returns without subordinating them to external agendas. When PRI signatories engage in practices such as from companies or to advance ESG objectives, these may breach the duty of loyalty if motivated by ethical preferences rather than evidence of superior financial outcomes, potentially exposing managers to liability for forgoing profitable opportunities. Legal challenges have emerged testing these conflicts, particularly in defined benefit plans and public pension funds. In a January 2025 ruling, a U.S. district court held that the inclusion of ESG-focused funds in an ERISA plan could constitute a breach of the duty of loyalty, as fiduciaries allegedly invested millions in underperforming assets to pursue non-financial aims, violating requirements to act impartially and solely for participant benefit. Similarly, lawsuits against major asset managers, including PRI signatories like , have alleged that ESG integration sacrifices returns—such as by boycotting energy sectors amid high commodity prices—for ideological reasons, directly conflicting with standards that demand empirical justification for any deviation from strategies. PRI maintains that ESG considerations fulfill fiduciary duties by addressing material risks like climate change, citing financial materiality as alignment with long-term value creation. However, skeptics, including legal analysts, highlight ambiguities in ESG metrics and the risk of "collateral benefits" pursuit—such as reputational gains or regulatory favor—overriding loyalty, especially in shareholder primacy jurisdictions where ESG lacks uniform regulatory backing. Empirical gaps in proving consistent ESG outperformance amplify these concerns, as unverified assumptions of materiality may lead to suboptimal allocations, prompting regulatory scrutiny and state-level divestments from PRI-affiliated funds deemed to prioritize activism over returns.

Ideological and Political Controversies

Critics of the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) contend that the initiative embeds progressive ideological priorities into investment practices, subordinating financial returns to environmental activism and social engineering aligned with objectives. Organizations like the have highlighted PRI's role in encouraging signatories to adopt frameworks that prioritize decarbonization and reforms, potentially distorting signals and penalizing sectors such as fuels without commensurate risk-adjusted benefits. This perspective posits that PRI's voluntary principles, while framed as enhancing long-term value, facilitate collective investor pressure on companies to conform to non-financial goals, echoing critiques of "" where asset managers wield to advance policy preferences on issues like climate transition and quotas. In the United States, these concerns have fueled a political backlash, with Republican-led state legislatures enacting or proposing measures to curb ESG integration by public pension funds and financial institutions affiliated with PRI signatories. Between 2021 and 2023, at least 17 states passed laws restricting investments that discriminate against energy producers, while approximately 165 anti-ESG bills were introduced across 37 states in 2023 alone, targeting practices such as and requiring prioritization of pecuniary factors over ideological ones. Proponents of these laws argue that PRI-influenced , including collaborative engagements on net-zero commitments, exposes taxpayers' assets to , as evidenced by state divestments from major PRI signatories like , which managed over $10 trillion in assets as of 2023 and faced scrutiny for its ESG advocacy. PRI has countered such criticisms by emphasizing that ESG incorporation aligns with fiduciary duties through material risk assessment, citing legal precedents like the Dutch regulator's 2019 determination that ignoring ESG factors constitutes imprudence. However, detractors maintain this defense overlooks empirical evidence of underperformance in ESG-heavy portfolios during energy price spikes, such as in 2022 when oil majors outperformed broader indices amid geopolitical tensions, suggesting ideological bias in PRI's guidance may favor regulatory capture over empirical causality. The debate underscores tensions between globalist frameworks and national economic sovereignty, with PRI's UN backing amplifying perceptions of supranational influence on domestic capital allocation.

Recent Developments (2024–2025)

Strategic Updates and Policy Advocacy

In August 2024, the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) launched its 2024-27 strategic plan, replacing the prior 2021-24 framework to address evolving challenges in responsible investment amid a diversifying signatory base exceeding 5,000 organizations managing over $120 trillion in assets. The plan emphasizes two primary objectives: enhancing value delivery to signatories through tailored support in a fragmented regulatory landscape and fostering progression in integration without prescriptive uniformity. It outlines four focus areas—driving signatory advancement in responsible practices, clarifying investor commitments to stakeholders, influencing systemic market improvements, and operationalizing internal efficiencies—with annual updates to adapt to geopolitical and economic shifts. The strategy incorporates feedback from signatory consultations, prioritizing practical tools like enhanced reporting frameworks and peer benchmarking over ideological mandates, while acknowledging fiduciary constraints in regions with anti-ESG regulatory pushback, such as certain U.S. states. By mid-2025, implementation included the release of updated methodologies for , aiming to reduce administrative burdens and improve data comparability across . On policy advocacy, PRI intensified efforts in 2024-25 by publishing country-specific recommendations in September 2024, urging governments to align regulations with long-term financial stability, such as mandating disclosure of climate-related risks without overriding investor discretion. These priorities targeted barriers like inconsistent biodiversity metrics and stewardship codes, advocating for public-private collaborations to mitigate transition risks in energy sectors. In August 2025, PRI extended this with 2025-26 priorities, emphasizing policy stability to prevent capital flight from sustainable strategies, while critiquing overly punitive carbon taxes that could distort markets absent empirical evidence of net benefits. Advocacy activities involved coalitions with bodies like the UN Global Compact, focusing on empirical data from PRI's own signatory surveys to substantiate claims of ESG's role in risk-adjusted returns, though independent analyses question causal links to outperformance.

Reporting Framework Evolutions

The PRI Reporting Framework began as a voluntary launched in 2006 concurrently with the Principles themselves, enabling signatories to disclose their of responsible activities without mandatory . By June 2012, the framework evolved into a more formalized annual reporting process through a pilot initiative focused on ESG incorporation, providing signatories with standardized questions on , , and asset-class-specific practices to enhance and peer . A significant overhaul occurred in , introducing a revised framework effective for reports due by March 31, 2021, which expanded indicators to assess the depth of factor integration, stewardship activities, and emerging outcomes, while streamlining modules for direct investors, listed equity, and . Subsequent annual updates prioritized respondent burden reduction and data utility; in 2024, the PRI Board implemented a flexible reporting model permitting partial submissions and grace periods based on signatory feedback from prior cycles, alongside refinements to climate and stewardship indicators to align with regulatory developments like the EU's Disclosure Regulation. The 2025 framework maintained alignment with 2023–2024 content for dataset stability, supporting longitudinal analysis of signatory progress, while mandating new modules such as the Senior Leadership Statement on responsible investment and the Other Responsible Investment Obligations for disclosing alignments with external standards; the reporting window spanned May 7 to July 30, 2025, with over 140% submission growth in early phases compared to prior years. These iterations reflect the PRI's aim to balance comprehensive disclosure with practicality, positioning the framework as a for future "pathways" toward streamlined, outcome-oriented mandatory reporting amid global efforts, with 2026 introducing fully mandatory elements across all signatories to enforce accountability.

References

  1. [1]
    About the PRI | PRI Web Page - UN PRI
    The six Principles for Responsible Investment offer a menu of possible actions for incorporating ESG issues into investment practice. The Principles were ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Principles for Responsible Investment
    Sep 10, 2024 · There were 5,345 signatories (4,827 investors and 518 service providers) to the Principles at 31 March 2024 (0.83% below 31 March 2023). Total ...
  3. [3]
    What are the Principles for Responsible Investment? | PRI Web Page
    The six Principles for Responsible Investment offer a menu of possible actions for incorporating ESG issues into investment practice.
  4. [4]
    Expectations for the real-world impact of sustainable investing are ...
    Oct 4, 2024 · Principles for Responsible Investment and adding “sustainable” to their fund names. Our research, however, shows that high expectations for ...
  5. [5]
    Where have companies committed to the Principles for Responsible ...
    Jan 22, 2024 · The PRI initiative was launched in April 2006 by a group of institutional investors in collaboration with the United Nations. By the end of 2023 ...
  6. [6]
    What's Behind The ESG Investment Backlash - Forbes
    Jan 29, 2023 · The past couple of years have been a topsy-turvy time for investment aiming to improve environmental, social, and governance (ESG) outcomes.
  7. [7]
    ESG Investing Isn't Designed to Save the Planet
    Aug 1, 2022 · ESG (environmental, social, and governance) investing will not tackle our generation's urgent environmental and social challenges.<|separator|>
  8. [8]
    Are Critiques of Sustainable Investing Moderating? - Morningstar
    Oct 9, 2024 · Sustainable investing has been widely criticized over the past two years for practicing “woke capitalism” and abandoning fiduciary duty.
  9. [9]
    What is responsible investment? - UN PRI
    Responsible investment involves considering environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues when making investment decisions and influencing companies or ...
  10. [10]
    PRI | Home
    The PRI, a UN-supported network of investors, works to promote sustainable investment through the incorporation of environmental, social and governance ...About the PRI · Signatories · Reporting & assessment · Investment tools
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Principles Responsible Investment - CT.gov
    Who governs the Principles for Responsible Investment project? The PRI is governed by a 13-person board made up of 11 elected asset owner signatory.
  12. [12]
    UN Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) Definition
    The UN Principles for Responsible Investment is an organization dedicated to promoting environmental and social responsibility among the world's investors. The ...
  13. [13]
    SECRETARY-GENERAL LAUNCHES 'PRINCIPLES FOR ...
    Apr 27, 2006 · 27 April 2006. SECRETARY-GENERAL LAUNCHES 'PRINCIPLES FOR RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT' BACKED BY WORLD'S LARGEST INVESTORS. 27 April 2006. Secretary ...
  14. [14]
    Growth of the collective AUM of PRI signatories.... - ResearchGate
    Since its inception in 2006, the United Nations-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) have grown to over 1300 signatories representing over $45 ...
  15. [15]
    Do Signatories To The Principles For Responsible Investment ...
    Aug 4, 2020 · One consequence of this is that there are now around 3,100 signatories (asset owners, asset managers, and service providers) to the Principles ...
  16. [16]
    UN PRI Reaches 4,000 Signatories - Markets Media
    Jun 15, 2021 · The addition of over a 100 signatories took us past another significant milestone of 600 asset owner signatories. Diverse signatories – the rise ...
  17. [17]
    New and former signatories - UN PRI
    We were delighted to welcome 938 [1] new signatories to the Principles for Responsible Investment in 2020/21, representing a 42% increase on the previous year.
  18. [18]
    Responsible investment ecosystems - UN PRI
    Signatory numbers have increased 10% year-on-year, reaching 5,391 signatories (4,841 investors and 550 service providers) by 31 March 2023.Enhancing Signatory Support · Continued Global Growth · Asset Owner Focus
  19. [19]
    Principles for Responsible Investment outlines goals for next 10 years
    May 22, 2017 · Principles for Responsible Investment outlined its plans to work with asset owners to build a sustainable financial system.
  20. [20]
    The Board - UN PRI
    The board is collectively responsible for the long-term success of the PRI, in particular: setting the strategy, risk appetite and structure;; delegating the ...
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    [PDF] principles for responsible investment 2023 signatory general ...
    Sep 21, 2023 · The PRI Board is composed of one independent chair and ten elected directors. □ seven directors elected by asset owner signatories;. □ two ...
  23. [23]
    Board committees - UN PRI
    The committee's purpose is to provide guidance to the Executive and make recommendations to the Board as necessary on: the Board and company's governance.<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Principles for Responsible Investment - Fasecolda
    □ implementation support from a PRI secretariat that will produce guidance materials and facilitate working groups exploring issues of common interest.
  25. [25]
    Become a Signatory - UN PRI
    The six steps to becoming a PRI signatory. Declaration. Sign the declaration form and commit to the Principles for Responsible Investment. Apply.
  26. [26]
    Minimum requirements for investor membership | Reporting guidance
    The minimum requirements for investor membership play an important role in supporting the PRI's mission to achieve a sustainable global financial system.
  27. [27]
    [PDF] MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR PRI INVESTOR SIGNATORIES
    Mar 2, 2024 · Investor signatories must have a formalised approach to responsible investment and/or formalised guidelines on environmental, social and/or ...
  28. [28]
    Investor Reporting Framework | Reporting guidance - UN PRI
    Signatories report on their responsible investment activities by using the PRI's Reporting Framework. The reporting window opens in May.Streamlined Pri Reporting In... · Introductory Guides · Thematic Reporting Guides
  29. [29]
    [PDF] SIGNATORY ACCOUNTABILITY RULES
    Signatories will be asked to provide their reason(s) for not meeting the minimum requirements and the PRI will aim to provide relevant support including an ...
  30. [30]
    Operations - UN PRI
    We intend to centralise all of our operational, strategy and planning functions, and provide these in a supporting and collaborative business partnering model ...Missing: secretariat | Show results with:secretariat
  31. [31]
    [PDF] 2022-23 ANNUAL REPORT - UN PRI
    The Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI). The PRI works with its international network of signatories to put the six Principles for Responsible ...<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Enhancing how we operate - UN PRI
    Responsible investment's rapid growth is reflected in PRI signatory numbers, which were less than 2,000 five years ago and are well clear of 5,000 today.
  33. [33]
    PRI data shows responsible investing continues to grow - UN PRI
    Mar 26, 2025 · PRI's 2024 annual reporting process saw 3,048 signatories - both asset owners and investment managers - report on their activity, with the data ...
  34. [34]
    UN PRI: What Businesses Need to Know - Persefoni
    Apr 12, 2024 · The UN's Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is an international organization designed to promote sustainability in investing.What is the PRI? · Six Principles of Responsible... · Why is the PRI Important?Missing: definition core
  35. [35]
    [PDF] 2025 Reporting Framework: Overview and structure guide
    The new module, Other Responsible Investment Reporting Obligations (ORO), gives you the opportunity to indicate the extent of your organisation's required ...
  36. [36]
    The reporting process | Reporting guidance - UN PRI
    Signatories commit to reporting on their responsible investment activities when signing the Principles.
  37. [37]
    Reporting outputs | Reporting guidance | PRI - UN PRI
    The PRI uses various validation mechanisms in the Reporting Tool, depending on the question type, which reduces misreporting. The Reporting Framework contains ...What Signatories Receive · 2024 Transparency And... · How Reports Are Scored
  38. [38]
    [PDF] 2025 assessment methodology for investors
    Signatories that have previously submitted a publicly available report and met the minimum requirements will be able to submit a partial report, responding to.
  39. [39]
    PRI Academy
    Enhance your skills in sustainable finance by joining 30000+ investment professionals through our responsible investment training courses.Our courses · Applied Responsible Investment · Nature and Biodiversity for... · FAQs
  40. [40]
    The PRI Academy | PRI Web Page - UN PRI
    The PRI Academy · World-leading ESG training for the global investment sector · Current courses · Empowering organisations to bridge the ESG skills gap.
  41. [41]
    PRI Academy and Wharton Executive Education Launch Global ...
    Sep 12, 2025 · The course is open to participants globally and will feature expert faculty, interactive modules, and practical insights from leading ...<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    Collaborative engagements - UN PRI
    The PRI coordinates collaborative investor engagements on sustainability issues. Find details below of current PRI-led and PRI-supported engagements.
  43. [43]
    PRI to launch collaborative nature stewardship initiative
    Jan 17, 2023 · The Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is planning the launch of a collaborative stewardship initiative on nature.
  44. [44]
    Investment Leadership Programme - UNEP FI
    UNEP FI works with investors through the Investment Leadership Programme (ILP), a joint initiative with the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI).
  45. [45]
    Advisory committees and working groups - UN PRI
    Advisory committees and working groups guide the PRI's work and help to implement our work programmes.
  46. [46]
    Investor duties - UN PRI
    Investor duties are binding legal standards applied to financial professionals who have been contracted to make investment decisions on behalf of others.
  47. [47]
    Fiduciary duty in the 21st century final report - UN PRI
    Oct 22, 2019 · This report describes how the integration of economic, social and governance (ESG) issues into investment practice and decision making is an increasingly ...
  48. [48]
    Fiduciary Duty in the 21st Century | Request PDF - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · The report, based on interviews and analysis in 8 countries (the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, Australia, South Africa, ...
  49. [49]
    About the Fiduciary Duty in the 21st Century programme
    Nov 6, 2020 · The report concluded that “Failing to consider all long-term investment value drivers, including ESG issues, is a failure of fiduciary duty”.
  50. [50]
    [PDF] FIDUCIARY DUTY IN THE - UNEP FI
    In this view, I welcome the latest report of the PRI and UNEP FI. “Fiduciary duty in the 21st century” which puts forward in-depth policy recommendations. The ...
  51. [51]
    An overview of investor duties - UN PRI
    Nov 6, 2020 · Investor duties are binding legal standards applied to financial professionals who have been contracted to make investment decisions on behalf of others.
  52. [52]
    ESG and Fiduciary Duties: A Roadmap for the US Capital Market
    Nov 1, 2016 · Our work is part of a three-year project to end any remaining debate about whether fiduciary duty is a barrier to the integration of ESG factors ...
  53. [53]
    Fiduciary Duty in the 21st Century - Responsible Investor
    Apr 10, 2018 · The 2016 Fiduciary Duty in the 21st Century US Roadmap found that fiduciaries – particularly of retirement plans – feared legal liability if ...<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Step 1 – Fiduciary obligations | Technical guide - UN PRI
    Jul 3, 2019 · Asset owners and their fiduciaries need to understand and clarify the legal obligations towards their beneficiaries. These include fiduciary, ...
  55. [55]
    Interpreting investor duties: The evolving context - UN PRI
    Apr 9, 2025 · Investors are required to incorporate material risks, including relevant ESG issues, into investment practice and decision-making in pursuit of financial ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] The Duty of US Company Directors to Consider Relevant ESG Factors
    The fiduciary duties of directors of US corporations require directors to take into account ESG factors when they bear on material legal compliance issues or ...
  57. [57]
    What is ESG integration? | Article - UN PRI
    Apr 25, 2018 · ESG integration is the analysis of all material factors in investment analysis and investment decisions, including environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ...It Does Not Mean That · Risk, Return And... · Materiality<|separator|>
  58. [58]
    [PDF] ESG INTEGRATION: HOW ARE SOCIAL ISSUES INFLUENCING ...
    The PRI defines ESG integration as “the systematic and explicit inclusion of material ESG factors into investment analysis and investment decisions”.
  59. [59]
    ESG integration in listed equity: A technical guide - UN PRI
    Apr 18, 2023 · This guide aims to support listed equity investors in integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations into their strategies.
  60. [60]
    Guidance and case studies for ESG integration: equities and fixed ...
    Sep 12, 2018 · Set out by the CFA Institute and the PRI, this best practice report helps investors understand how they can better integrate ESG factors ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO ESG INTEGRATION FOR EQUITY ... - ICGN
    The PRI defines ESG integration as “the systematic and explicit inclusion of material ESG factors into investment analysis and investment decisions”. It is ...
  62. [62]
    Part III: ESG factors and returns – a review of recent research - UN PRI
    Sep 25, 2024 · ESG principles can benefit single-stock returns, with shares of better-quality companies able to perform better than inferior peers and benefit ...
  63. [63]
    Top academic resources on responsible investment - UN PRI
    A selection of rigorous and high-quality academic studies in the following areas: ESG screening and integration; ESG shareholder engagement and activism.
  64. [64]
    The ESG integration framework | Article - UN PRI
    Oct 8, 2018 · The ESG Integration Framework is meant to be a reference so that practitioners can analyze their peers' ESG integration techniques and identify those ...Research: The Inner Circle · Qualitative Analysis · Security Level: The Middle...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] PRI REPORTING FRAMEWORK 2020 Direct — Listed Equity ...
    For guidance and case studies refer to chapter 1 of the PRI's ESG Integration publication and the. Guidance and case studies for ESG integration: equities and ...
  66. [66]
    A practical guide to ESG integration in sovereign debt - UN PRI
    Aug 29, 2019 · This guide is designed to help PRI signatories integrate ESG factors into the research and analysis of sovereign issuers and the construction of sovereign debt ...
  67. [67]
    ESG Integration in Investment Management: Myths and Realities
    Myth Number 2: ESG is already well integrated into mainstream investment management. Reality: The UNPRI signatories have committed themselves only to adhering ...
  68. [68]
    Applied Responsible Investment - Courses - PRI Academy
    Description. PRI Academy's flagship course, Applied RI provides a comprehensive examination of responsible investment, from theory to practical application.
  69. [69]
    Responsible Investment Courses (RI Training) - PRI Academy
    Online responsible investment courses for investment professionals – flexible, self-paced modules. Gain practical RI investing skills – enroll now.Understanding ESG · Certified Learning · Applied Responsible... · RI in 60 Minutes
  70. [70]
    Certified Learning - PRI Academy
    Complete our high-quality online courses, accredited by CPD and recognised by IELA to build your skills, confidence, and professional capability.
  71. [71]
    Responsible Investment for Boards and Trustees
    Course Objective: This course provides senior leaders with an overview of responsible investment practices, focusing on regulatory expectations, ...
  72. [72]
    Nature and Biodiversity for Investors - Courses - PRI Academy
    This course introduces nature and biodiversity issues for investors, equipping learners with the knowledge to understand the importance of biodiversity.<|control11|><|separator|>
  73. [73]
    PRI and Wharton Executive Education launch global programme on ...
    Sep 12, 2025 · “This course underpins how fiduciary responsibility and responsible investing go hand in hand. As a central platform for executive learning, the ...Missing: training | Show results with:training
  74. [74]
    PRI announces TNFD capacity-building initiative to accelerate ...
    May 1, 2025 · PRI announces TNFD capacity-building initiative to accelerate nature action ... The forum will support investors, banks, insurers and real economy ...
  75. [75]
    PRI 2024 - Once again rewarded for our responsible investment ...
    The PRI has more than 5,300 signatories, representing more than $128 trillion in assets under management as of the end of October 2024.
  76. [76]
    Update on UN PRI Reporting | 06 | 2025 - Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
    Jun 16, 2025 · The PRI is widely adopted by investors, with over 5,300 signatories as of March 2024, representing total assets under management of $128.4 ...
  77. [77]
    Financial information - UN PRI
    The annual signatory fee is payable each April and is scaled according to each signatory's category. Fees are calculated based on signatories' latest AUM (for ...
  78. [78]
    PRI to engage members on boosting investment manager board ...
    Sep 22, 2025 · The 2024-25 reporting period saw 429 signatories delist from the PRI, while 344 firms joined the network. Asset owners accounted for 40 of the ...
  79. [79]
    [PDF] GLOBAL RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT TRENDS: - UN PRI
    “A synergistic, collaborative relationship between asset owners and managers is vital to achieving critical sustainability outcomes. Asset owners must ...
  80. [80]
    Regional support - UN PRI
    The PRI works with more than 5,000 signatories globally, in nearly 100 countries worldwide. With a team of nearly 40 professionals located in 17 cities around ...Missing: reach | Show results with:reach
  81. [81]
    Enhance our global footprint - UN PRI
    Regional growth​​ Latin America (77%) and China (46%) were among our fastest-growing markets for signatories overall this year.Missing: geographical distribution
  82. [82]
    Annual Report 2025 - UN PRI
    In the 2024/25 financial year, more than 1,000 signatories took part in or endorsed investor initiatives led, co-led or supported by the PRI.
  83. [83]
    [PDF] ESG AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: - NYU Stern
    Looking at investor studies, 65% showed positive or neutral performance compared to conventional investments with only 13% indicating negative findings. A ...
  84. [84]
    The performance of socially responsible investments: A meta‐analysis
    Jun 17, 2023 · We use a meta-analysis to examine the performance of socially responsible investing (SRI). We find that, on average, SRI neither outperforms nor underperforms ...2 Hypotheses · 4 Results · 4.5 Meta-Regression
  85. [85]
    Does Sustainability Generate Better Financial Performance Review ...
    Aggregate conclusions from a sample suggest that the financial performance of ESG investing has on average been indistinguishable from conventional investing ( ...<|separator|>
  86. [86]
    PRI signatories outperform non-signatories - Top1000funds.com
    Jul 27, 2021 · PRI signatories had a higher five-year average net return in USA, Canada, and the UK. In the Netherlands, PRI signatories had lower returns, but ...
  87. [87]
    Signing the UN PRI Brings In More Money and Lowers Returns
    New research suggests that the UN's Principles for Responsible Investing may not be having the desired effect on active asset managers who sign on.
  88. [88]
    UN PRI and Private Equity returns. Empirical evidence from the US ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · The paper aims at assessing economic impact of the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UN PRI) on investment performance.<|separator|>
  89. [89]
    ESG investment performance and global attention to sustainability
    The findings suggest a weak relationship between the ESG ratings and expected returns, with some evidence of modest underperformance of high ESG stocks.Esg Investment Performance... · 5. Esg Portfolio Performance · 5.2. Esg Portfolio Returns...
  90. [90]
    ESG funds faced their worst year on record in 2023 - Yahoo Finance
    Feb 6, 2024 · ESG funds faced their worst year on record in 2023. Investors poured $13 billion out of underperforming funds, according to a new report.
  91. [91]
    (PDF) The Effect of ESG Scores on Portfolio Performance. Evidence ...
    This means that these portfolios underperform the risk-free rate. The CAPM results show that all portfolios using ESG-based scores underperformed the market.
  92. [92]
    Performance of negatively screened sustainable investments during ...
    Pavlova and de Boyrie (2022) find the ESG Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) do not underperform the market during the COVID pandemic. The group of lower ESG ETF ...
  93. [93]
    Does an Asset Owner's Institutional Setting Influence Its Decision to ...
    Jun 6, 2019 · Post-2011 the nature of the PRI as a voluntary association changed slightly as it started introducing mandatory enforced requirements of its ...<|separator|>
  94. [94]
    [PDF] Greenwashing: Evidence from Hedge Funds
    To investigate the investment implications of greenwashing, we show first that hedge funds managed by PRI signatories underperform other hedge funds by 2.45% ...
  95. [95]
    [PDF] Greenwashing - UN PRI
    We find that a non-trivial number of hedge fund PRI signatories indulge in greenwashing. Hedge funds that greenwash underperform both genuinely green and ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  96. [96]
    Do PRI signatory investors walk the talk? | Blog post - UN PRI
    Jan 19, 2021 · Taken together, these findings suggest that partially committed US-based PRI signatories undertake greenwashing to benefit from the increased ...
  97. [97]
    Peer-driven greenwashing: insights from ESG mutual funds in the ...
    Jun 30, 2025 · However, we find that 178 out of 489 PRI signatories are actually greenwashing funds and $37.17bn out of $139.07bn are under managed by ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  98. [98]
    'Nuance missing' in ASIC's greenwashing crackdown: UN PRI
    May 8, 2024 · PRI says Australian regulators such as ASIC are not having enough dialogue with the private sector even as they go about a greenwashing crackdown.
  99. [99]
    Litigation Risks Posed by “Greenwashing” Claims for ESG Funds
    Apr 25, 2022 · The growing ESG fund sector has also been the subject of recent public criticism from various quarters, particularly claims of greenwashing ...
  100. [100]
    [PDF] The financial impact of greenwashing controversies
    Dec 19, 2023 · Greenwashing undermines trust, but no systematic relationship was found between greenwashing and stock returns. Some studies show negative ...
  101. [101]
    PRI flags risk from ESG backlash-related litigation in annual accounts
    Aug 23, 2023 · Group says litigation is a principal risk due to political environment in some regions, also notes reputational, staffing risks.Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  102. [102]
    [PDF] ESG INVESTMENT AND REFORMING THE FIDUCIARY DUTY
    ESG investment emphasizes corporate governance, environmental, and social impact. Environmental factors include climate change; social factors include labor ...
  103. [103]
    Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Fiduciary Duty
    In the 2006 United Nations project, Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI), signors pledged to six principles for the advancement of ESG in investing.6
  104. [104]
    ESG Battlegrounds: A Closer Look at Fiduciary Duties and the ...
    Mar 13, 2024 · This article will focus on the assertion that leading investment companies have violated the fiduciary duty of loyalty by sacrificing financial gains for ...
  105. [105]
    Court Says Inclusion of ESG Funds Could Breach Duty of Loyalty
    Jan 13, 2025 · The suit alleged that they “breached their fiduciary duties in violation of ERISA by investing millions of dollars of American Airlines ...
  106. [106]
    The First ESG Breach of Fiduciary Duty Lawsuits
    Jun 5, 2023 · Explore the legal landscape of breach of fiduciary duty lawsuits in the ESG realm, analyzing their implications and legal outcomes.
  107. [107]
    The Threats Posed by Environmental, Social, and Governance ...
    Jul 12, 2024 · Similarly, the UN's Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) explicitly encourages businesses to sign on to an ESG program of “investment ...
  108. [108]
    What Does the ESG Backlash Mean for Human Rights? - CSIS
    Aug 16, 2023 · The use of ESG considerations by companies and investors has recently faced backlash at the state and federal level in the United States.
  109. [109]
    Anti-ESG bills found unified opposition in US statehouses - UN PRI
    Jul 25, 2023 · State lawmakers introduced approximately 165 “anti-ESG” proposals in 37 states, according to a report published by Pleiades Strategies.Missing: movement | Show results with:movement
  110. [110]
    The Politicization of ESG Investing - Harvard ALI Social Impact Review
    In the US, pension fund managers and elected officials of several states are taking diametrically opposed and partisan political positions.
  111. [111]
    UN Principles for Responsible Investment - InfluenceWatch
    Signers include institutions that have a history of embracing left-leaning policies or labor union ties such as the California State Teachers Retirement ...Missing: ideological | Show results with:ideological<|separator|>
  112. [112]
    PRI Strategy 2024-27 | PRI Web Page - UN PRI
    The PRI's new strategic plan responds to the changing world around us and how we will support progress in ways that acknowledge our diverse signatory base.
  113. [113]
    Meeting investors where they're at: PRI launches new strategy
    Aug 8, 2024 · The strategy plan describes how we will deliver for signatories across four focus areas: Driving signatory progression on responsible investment ...Missing: 2024-2027 | Show results with:2024-2027
  114. [114]
    PRI Strategy Plan 2024-2027 - Malk Partners
    Aug 12, 2024 · The new strategy has two overarching objectives: maximizing PRI's value to signatories in a rapidly evolving responsible investment environment ...
  115. [115]
    [PDF] POLICY BRIEFING - Principles for Responsible Investment
    An across-the-board focus on enabling responsible investment practices can help build an economy that is diversified, responsive to economic changes, insulated ...
  116. [116]
    PRI policy priorities 2024-25
    Sep 24, 2024 · This briefing provides country-based policy recommendations to support responsible and sustainable investment.
  117. [117]
    PRI policy priorities 2025-26 - UN PRI
    Aug 20, 2025 · This briefing provides country-based policy recommendations to support responsible and sustainable investment.
  118. [118]
    Integrate the Principles for Responsible Investment | UN Global ...
    The United Nations-supported Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) initiative ... Launched in 2006 by UNEP Finance Initiative and the UN Global ...
  119. [119]
    PRI updates reporting framework to reflect changing landscape
    Feb 3, 2023 · PRI reporting first took place in its current form in 2012 and is designed to provide signatories with clarity around their responsible ...<|separator|>
  120. [120]
    [PDF] PRI's new Reporting Framework - Ogier
    The new. RF is effective for the 2021 reporting cycle, and all current PRI signatories must report on their RI activities by. 31 March 2021. PRI's reporting.<|separator|>
  121. [121]
    2024 reporting is evolving: summary of changes and answers to ...
    Jan 17, 2024 · The PRI Board responded to signatory feedback and has introduced a flexible approach to reporting in 2024 – see December 2023 R&A Update.
  122. [122]
    PRI Reporting in 2025: A stable baseline to support the transition to ...
    Aug 6, 2024 · The content of the 2025 Reporting Framework will be closely aligned to that of 2024 and 2023, ensuring the stability of the reporting dataset ...
  123. [123]
    2025 reporting will start on 7 May | Reporting update - UN PRI
    Apr 6, 2025 · The 12-week PRI reporting window will open on 7 May and close on 30 July (23:59 local time). Signatories that complete the full Reporting Framework receive ...
  124. [124]
    2026 PRI Reporting – New and Mandatory For All
    Aug 27, 2025 · Now that the 2025 PRI Reporting window has come to a close, it's time to plan for 2026. 2026 PRI reporting is changing – it's new, and it's ...