Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Priority to the right

Priority to the right is a right-of-way rule in road traffic systems where vehicles drive on the right-hand side of the road, stipulating that at uncontrolled intersections—those without traffic lights, stop signs, yield signs, or traffic officers—drivers must yield to any vehicle approaching from their right.^[1] This rule is codified in Article 18, paragraph 4(a) of the 1968 Vienna Convention on Road Traffic, which states that in right-hand traffic states, drivers shall give way to vehicles approaching from the right at such intersections.^[1] The convention, administered by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), has been ratified by over 80 countries and serves as a framework for harmonizing international road traffic regulations to enhance safety and facilitate cross-border travel. The rule originated in France as "priorité à droite" and was introduced in the early 20th century to manage urban traffic flow, later spreading across continental Europe through international agreements like the 1926 Paris Convention on the Unification of Road Signals.^[2] In France, it remains a default principle at junctions unless overridden by signage, road markings, or other priority indicators, applying to all vehicles including those on secondary roads entering from the right. Exceptions include high-speed roads like dual carriageways and motorways, where vehicles already on the main road have priority, and most roundabouts, where circulating traffic takes precedence.^[3] Many European countries, including Germany (known as "Rechts-vor-Links"), Belgium, the Netherlands, and Switzerland, apply similar versions of the rule at uncontrolled junctions to prevent collisions and promote cautious driving in built-up areas.^[4] However, implementation varies; for instance, some nations like Austria and Germany have largely replaced it with priority roads marked by signs, reducing its application in favor of designated main routes.^[5] Outside Europe, the rule is used in parts of Canada, such as Ontario, where at uncontrolled intersections, drivers must yield to vehicles arriving from the right if both arrive simultaneously.^[6] The priority to the right principle aims to simplify decision-making at unmarked crossings by establishing a clear default hierarchy based on approach direction, thereby slowing traffic speeds in urban environments and minimizing accidents.^[7] Despite its benefits, it has faced criticism for causing confusion among unfamiliar drivers and contributing to incidents at complex junctions, leading to ongoing reforms in signposting and education across adopting countries.^[3]

Definition and Legal Basis

Core Principle

The core principle of priority to the right stipulates that, in countries where vehicles drive on the right side of the road, a driver must yield the right-of-way to any vehicle approaching from the right at an intersection, unless otherwise indicated by traffic signals, signs, or markings. This rule serves as the default right-of-way system for situations where no explicit priority is assigned, ensuring orderly traffic flow by requiring drivers to check their right side before proceeding.^[1] The scope of this principle is confined to uncontrolled intersections—those lacking traffic lights, stop signs, or yield signs—as well as side roads merging onto main roads and certain low-speed roundabouts without dedicated signage. It does not apply to pedestrian footpaths, bicycle paths, or unpaved tracks, where other rules govern movement. This limitation helps maintain clarity, focusing the rule on vehicular traffic in standard road environments where ambiguity might otherwise arise.^[1] The rationale behind priority to the right is to enhance road safety by providing a simple, intuitive default mechanism that prevents collisions at junctions without the need for signage at every possible location, which would be impractical and costly. By establishing a predictable hierarchy based on direction of approach, the rule reduces hesitation and confusion among drivers, thereby minimizing accident risks in areas with variable traffic volumes. This principle is codified in Article 18 of the Vienna Convention on Road Traffic, forming the international basis for its application in signatory states.^[1]^[7] In practice, this manifests visually at a T-junction or unmarked crossroads, where a vehicle on the minor road approaching from the left must stop or slow to allow the vehicle coming from the right on the intersecting road to pass first. Similarly, at a four-way intersection with no controls, each driver yields to the one on their immediate right, creating a clockwise progression of movement once all have assessed the situation. This geometric simplicity aligns with natural driver instincts in right-hand traffic systems, further supporting safe navigation.^[1]

International Framework

The 1968 Vienna Convention on Road Traffic codifies the priority to the right rule as a fundamental aspect of international road safety standards. Article 18, paragraph 4(a), explicitly requires that, in states where traffic keeps to the right, "the driver of a vehicle shall give way, at intersections other than those specified in paragraph 2 of this Article, to a vehicle approaching from his right." This provision establishes a uniform yielding mechanism at uncontrolled intersections, promoting predictability and reducing collision risks in cross-border travel.^[1] The convention, adopted by the United Nations Economic and Social Council, entered into force on May 21, 1977, and has 91 contracting parties as of August 2024, predominantly in Europe and right-hand traffic regions, including Austria, Belarus, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Russia, and Spain.^[8] While binding only for international traffic among signatories, it serves as a non-mandatory model that encourages harmonization of traffic regulations globally.^[9] In recognition of varying driving orientations, Article 18, paragraph 4(b), reverses the rule for left-hand traffic states, mandating that drivers give way to vehicles approaching from the left, thereby adapting the priority principle to maintain consistency in approach dynamics.^[1] This inversion applies in left-hand traffic countries that are parties to the convention, such as Thailand. The convention profoundly shapes domestic highway codes in signatory nations by designating priority to the right (or left in left-hand traffic contexts) as the default rule at intersections lacking specific signage or signals, thereby embedding the principle into national legislation for both local and international drivers.^[9] For instance, this framework directly informs the traffic rules in European Union member states, where it reinforces the absence of signs as implying yielding to the right, enhancing cross-border compatibility without overriding local enforcement nuances.^[10]

Historical Development

Origins in Europe

The priority to the right rule emerged in early 20th-century Europe as a response to the rapid increase in automobile usage, which led to frequent accidents at uncontrolled intersections, particularly in rural areas where roads often crossed without signage or signals. In France, the principle was proposed as early as 1904 by Jules Perrigot during discussions on traffic standardization and was endorsed at the First International Congress of Tourism and Automobile Traffic in 1905. It was formally codified in the Decree of 27 May 1921, which established priority to the right at intersections involving roads of equal importance, while granting precedence to national roads outside urban areas; this measure aimed to reduce chaos in mixed traffic environments comprising horse-drawn vehicles, bicycles, and motorized transport.^[11] The rule was slightly refined in the Decree of 31 December 1922, which also introduced minimum age requirements for drivers but preserved the core priority mechanism.^[11] Following World War I, the rule spread across continental Europe through bilateral agreements and multilateral efforts to harmonize traffic regulations amid postwar reconstruction and rising cross-border travel. A key milestone was the International Convention relative to Motor Traffic, signed in Paris on 24 April 1926, which recommended priority to the right for right-hand traffic countries at unsignaled junctions to enhance safety and uniformity.^[12] This convention influenced early adoptions in neighboring countries, facilitating the exchange of vehicles and drivers without confusion at borders. In France, further formalization occurred with the Decree of 12 April 1927, mandating that drivers yield to traffic approaching from the right at junctions and crossroads.^[13] By the late 1920s and 1930s, the rule gained traction in other continental nations prior to the 1968 Vienna Convention on Road Traffic, which later standardized it internationally. In Germany, it was incorporated into the Reichs-Straßenverkehrs-Ordnung (StVO) of 1934, stipulating that at crossings and junctions, the vehicle approaching from the right has priority, except where overridden by signs or signals; this addressed similar accident risks in rural crossroads and supported the growing motorization of the era.^[14] Countries like Belgium, the Netherlands, and Switzerland implemented comparable provisions in their national codes during the interwar period, often through adaptations of the 1926 convention. In urban settings, such as Paris, the rule saw widespread application by the 1930s following the stabilization of priority regulations in 1932, helping manage dense traffic at city intersections where signage was limited.^[13]

Global Adoption

Following the establishment of the priority to the right rule in Europe, its adoption spread worldwide, particularly through international agreements and domestic legislation in right-hand traffic nations. The 1968 Vienna Convention on Road Traffic, which codified the principle in Article 18, paragraph 4(a) for uncontrolled intersections, facilitated this expansion after entering into force in 1977. Ratifications accelerated post-1968, with over 50 countries incorporating the rule by the 1980s as part of harmonized traffic standards. For instance, in Latin America, Brazil ratified the convention in 1980 and integrated the rule into its traffic code for uncontrolled crossroads, requiring drivers to yield to vehicles approaching from the right. Mexico, although a signatory since 1968 without formal ratification, independently adopted the principle as the default for unmarked intersections under its federal traffic regulations.^[8] In Asia, the convention's influence led to widespread implementation in urban and rural settings. Japan ratified in 1973, establishing priority to the right as the basic rule for uncontrolled intersections in its Road Traffic Act, emphasizing yielding to the right in the absence of signs. South Korea acceded in 1974, applying the same default yield to vehicles from the right at unmarked junctions under its Road Traffic Act. These adoptions aligned national laws with global norms while accommodating local driving densities.^[8] North America saw the rule's integration through both international and domestic means, often at four-way stops and uncontrolled junctions. In the United States, which did not ratify the Vienna Convention, the principle emerged in early 20th-century model laws, including the 1928 National Committee on Uniform Traffic Laws and Ordinances' Model Traffic Ordinance, influencing state codes to require yielding to the vehicle on the right when arrivals are simultaneous at uncontrolled intersections. Most states apply this today, as outlined in federal safety guidelines. Canada ratified the convention in 1970, with provinces like Ontario and British Columbia enforcing it as the default yield rule at unmarked intersections under the Highway Traffic Act.^[15]^[8] In Oceania and select Asian city-states, the rule became standard for various junction types, with adaptations for local conditions. Australia acceded to the convention in 1974, incorporating priority to the right for uncontrolled crossroads and T-junctions under state road rules, where drivers on terminating roads yield to through traffic from the right unless signed otherwise. New Zealand followed with accession in 1977, applying the same principle in the Land Transport Rule for equal-priority intersections. Singapore, acceding in 1985, integrated it into its dense urban framework via the Road Traffic Act, using enhanced signage and markings to manage high-volume tropical traffic flows while upholding the yield-to-right default. These implementations reflected UN-driven standardization, building on the U.S. model's early influence from the 1920s.^[8]^[16]

Usage in Practice

Application at Intersections

At uncontrolled crossroads, where no traffic signals, signs, or markings dictate priority, the priority to the right rule requires drivers to yield to any vehicle approaching from their right, ensuring safe passage without collision. If two vehicles arrive simultaneously from opposite directions, both must yield to any traffic from the right; otherwise, the first to arrive proceeds, promoting orderly flow in the absence of controls. This principle stems from international agreements standardizing road behavior to minimize accidents at equal-status junctions.^[7] In T-junctions and Y-intersections, the vehicle approaching on the terminating road must yield to all traffic from the right along the main road, allowing continuous movement on the through path while adhering to the right-priority principle. For instance, a driver entering from the side road yields to oncoming vehicles on the main road that are positioned to the right, preventing conflicts at these asymmetrical junctions. This application balances the rule's universality with the geometry of the intersection, where the main road's continuity is prioritized unless otherwise indicated.^[4]^[17] At roundabouts, entering traffic yields to circulating vehicles approaching from the right, facilitating smooth rotation in right-hand traffic systems; this aligns with the priority to the right by treating the circulating flow as having established right-of-way. Unless specific signage alters this—such as yield markers on entry—the rule ensures entering drivers pause for ongoing traffic, reducing entry delays and enhancing capacity. Overriding signs or lights may supersede this at complex junctions.^[18]^[4] The priority to the right extends to pedestrian and cyclist integration at shared junctions, where drivers must yield to non-motorized users approaching from the right, treating them equivalently to vehicles to safeguard vulnerable road users. At unmarked crossings within junctions, this means halting for pedestrians or cyclists whose paths intersect from the right, fostering inclusive traffic dynamics. This adaptation applies broadly to mixed-use areas, emphasizing caution during turns or entries.^[4]^[7] The rule presupposes clear sightlines for effective application, requiring drivers to reduce speed in areas of obscured visibility, such as curves or foliage, to allow timely yielding and stopping. In low-visibility conditions, maintaining a speed that permits reaction within the available distance is mandatory, preventing reliance on assumptions about approaching traffic from the right. This factor underscores the rule's dependence on proactive observation for safety.^[19]^[20]

Country-Specific Variations

In France, the priority to the right rule, known as priorité à droite, serves as the default right-of-way principle at uncontrolled intersections unless overridden by signage, leading to high reliance on it in areas with minimal regulatory markers.^[3] This is particularly evident in urban settings like the Arc de Triomphe roundabout in Paris, where vehicles entering from the right maintain priority, contributing to the junction's fluid yet chaotic flow without yield signs on approaches.^[18] Strict enforcement applies nationwide under Article R415-6 of the Code de la route, emphasizing vigilance for side roads on the right. Germany integrates the priority to the right, termed Rechts vor Links, directly into Section 8 of the Straßenverkehrs-Ordnung (StVO), requiring drivers to yield to vehicles approaching from the right at unmarked intersections. This rule is commonly applied in rural areas where signage is sparse, but it is frequently superseded by give-way or priority signs at busier urban junctions to enhance predictability.^[21] The principle promotes equal footing among road users when no other regulations apply, though violations can result in fines up to €70.^[22] In the United States, implementation of priority to the right varies by state, with no uniform federal mandate; for instance, California Vehicle Code §21800(b)(1) stipulates that when two vehicles enter an intersection simultaneously from different directions, the driver on the left must yield to the one on the right.^[23] This applies primarily at two-way stop intersections, where through traffic on the uncontrolled road has inherent priority, but not at four-way stops, which follow a first-arrival sequence instead.^[24] Similar provisions exist in states like Texas and New York, though local ordinances may add nuances, such as pedestrian considerations. Belgium applies priority to the right nationwide as the baseline rule for uncontrolled intersections, but allows local opt-outs through signage, particularly in high-traffic zones like Brussels.^[25] Non-compliance with right-of-way rules, including this principle, contributed to 4,661 accidents in 2018, accounting for about 13 incidents daily and highlighting enforcement challenges.^[26] Data from 2024 indicates 44,246 total road victims, down from over 45,000 in 2023, though specific attributions to priority violations remain underreported.^[27]^[28] Australia restricts priority to the right primarily to uncontrolled T-junctions and crossroads without signs, where drivers must yield to vehicles approaching from the right under Australian Road Rules Regulation 72.^[16] At T-intersections, vehicles on the terminating road give way to those on the continuous path, limiting broader application compared to European systems.^[29] This approach balances flow on major roads while avoiding confusion at complex setups. Japan employs priority to the right at uncontrolled intersections per Article 36 of the Road Traffic Act, requiring yields to vehicles from the right unless signs dictate otherwise.^[30] It operates alongside stringent pedestrian priority, where drivers must always yield to those crossing at marked or unmarked points, even on green lights.^[31] This dual emphasis fosters caution in dense urban environments like Tokyo.

Signage and Enforcement

Standard Indicators

The priority to the right rule serves as the default at uncontrolled intersections in countries adhering to the Vienna Convention on Road Traffic, where no signage is required to indicate it; the absence of any regulatory signs implies that drivers must yield to vehicles approaching from the right, as stipulated in Article 18.^[1] This convention-based approach ensures uniformity across signatory nations, promoting intuitive compliance without additional markers at standard junctions. To reinforce the rule on minor roads entering priority routes, yield signs—designated as sign B,1 in the Vienna Convention on Road Signs and Signals—are employed. These consist of an inverted equilateral triangle with a red border and a white or yellow background, typically left blank without inscriptions or symbols to maintain universality.^[32] The sign notifies drivers to give way to all vehicles on the intersecting road they are approaching, aligning with the priority to the right principle. Placement occurs at the approach to the intersection on the yielding road, often supplemented by advance warning signs for clarity.^[32] At higher-risk junctions where a complete halt is necessary before assessing right-of-way, stop signs—sign B,2—are mandated. These feature an octagonal shape with a red background and white lettering spelling "STOP" (or an equivalent in the local language), requiring drivers to come to a full stop prior to yielding to traffic from the right.^[32] Like yield signs, they are positioned on the approach to the intersection on the non-priority road. These indicators, including the white triangle on a red background for yielding, are standardized internationally and adopted globally by Vienna Convention signatories to facilitate cross-border driving safety.^[32] While core designs remain consistent, minor local adaptations in wording or color shades may occur in some countries, as explored in the Optional and Local Signs section.

Optional and Local Signs

In jurisdictions applying the priority to the right rule, optional signs such as the Belgian B9 priority road indicator designate main roads where drivers are exempt from yielding to traffic from the right at subsequent intersections, until terminated by the B11 end of priority road sign.^[33] These signs, typically a yellow diamond with a white border for the priority road and a slashed version for its end, provide clarity on non-default priority without mandating universal compliance.^[33] Advance warning signs, often triangular with icons of vehicles approaching from the right, alert drivers to upcoming uncontrolled junctions where the priority rule applies, positioned 150 to 250 meters in advance depending on road conditions and speed limits.^[34] In Germany, for instance, the uncontrolled intersection warning sign (A,21 per Vienna Convention standards) emphasizes yielding to right-entering traffic, enhancing anticipation without altering the core rule.^[35] Local adaptations include France's "cédez le passage" panels, inverted red triangles that optionally reinforce yielding to right-of-way traffic at side roads or junctions, particularly where the default rule might be overlooked.^[3] In the United States, where priority to the right applies at unsignalized intersections when vehicles arrive simultaneously, advisory plaques like "Traffic from Right Does Not Stop" (W4-4aPR) can supplement stop signs to clarify non-yielding cross traffic.^[36] For roundabouts, signage such as "Yield to Traffic in Circle" accompanied by directional arrows clarifies entry protocol, ensuring drivers defer to circulating vehicles rather than solely right-entering ones.^[37] This optional reinforcement aligns with the rule's principles at circular junctions. Digital or temporary signs in construction zones, such as portable yield indicators or electronic displays, temporarily invoke or suspend the priority rule to manage altered traffic flows, often using standard symbols with added context like arrows or text.^[38] In European work zones, these flexible installations adapt to site-specific needs without permanent infrastructure changes.^[39]

Enforcement

Enforcement of the priority to the right rule varies by country but typically involves traffic police monitoring intersections, especially in urban areas, with violations resulting in fines and potential license points. In France, failing to yield can incur fines of €35 to €135 and up to 4 points on the driver's license.^[40] In Germany, violations may lead to fines starting at €10 for minor infractions, escalating for accidents caused by non-compliance, enforced through on-site stops or automated cameras at high-risk junctions.^[41] These measures aim to promote adherence and reduce collisions at uncontrolled intersections.

Exceptions and Reforms

Overriding Rules

In systems employing the priority to the right rule, traffic signals such as stoplights, directional arrows, or flashing beacons supersede the default yielding obligation, dictating the right-of-way based on signal indications regardless of approach direction. For instance, a green light grants passage to vehicles facing it, nullifying any priority from the right, while a red or yellow signal requires halting. This override ensures orderly flow at controlled intersections, as codified in national traffic regulations like Germany's Straßenverkehrs-Ordnung (StVO) §8, which prioritizes signal compliance over lateral approach rules. Designated priority roads, often marked by specific signage such as a yellow diamond in France or a similar emblem in Belgium, confer absolute right-of-way to traffic on the main route, requiring all intersecting vehicles—including those from the right—to yield irrespective of the default rule. These routes are typically major thoroughfares where continuous flow is prioritized, and side roads must stop or give way. In France, vehicles on such designated paths have priority both within and outside urban areas. Emergency vehicles, activated by sirens and flashing lights (typically blue in Europe), hold unconditional priority, obligating all other road users to yield immediately and clear the path without regard to the priority to the right or any other junction rule. This applies across jurisdictions, including France's Code de la route Article R415-12, which mandates that all drivers yield to priority vehicles announcing their approach with sirens and lights. Similarly, in Germany, StVO §38 requires all drivers to facilitate passage for police, fire, and ambulance units. Pedestrians and other vulnerable users, such as cyclists on marked crosswalks or dedicated paths, are granted precedence over vehicles, even if the vehicle holds default priority to the right; drivers must yield to those already crossing or clearly intending to do so. In France, Article R415-11 of the Code de la route explicitly requires vehicles to stop for pedestrians engaged in or preparing to cross at intersections or zebra crossings. Germany's StVO §26 reinforces this by prohibiting passage if it endangers pedestrians in marked areas. This protection extends to situations where a vehicle from the left might otherwise proceed under the default rule. At unmarked or equally controlled junctions where the priority to the right does not clearly apply due to symmetric approaches, the first-arrival principle governs, allowing the earliest vehicle to proceed while others yield; if arrivals are simultaneous, vehicles from the right retain precedence. This nuanced override prevents standoffs, as per Belgian traffic regulations, which supplement the right-priority default with arrival order at balanced crossroads. Trams and rail vehicles possess inherent priority over automobiles at crossings, requiring all drivers to yield regardless of direction or default rules, due to their limited maneuverability; for example, in Belgium, trams always take precedence even from the left.^[42]

Abolition Efforts

In Belgium, a significant national debate on abolishing the priority to the right rule emerged in 2017-2018, driven by concerns over road safety. Experts from motoring organizations VAB and Touring highlighted that the rule contributed to approximately 15,000 collisions annually, accounting for about 5% of all material damage insurance claims related to priority confusion.^[43] This push gained momentum following local initiatives, with proponents arguing the rule was outdated and exacerbated accidents due to inconsistent signage and driver inattention. Local abolitions began in earnest with the municipality of Glabbeek in late 2017, where the rule was replaced by a "first arrival" system supplemented by full signage at intersections.^[43] Other Flemish municipalities, including Lubbeek, Gooik, Wervik, Tielt-Winge, Bekkevoort, Linter, Geel, Dilbeek, and Lede, followed suit by installing comprehensive yield signs—such as 300 in Lede alone across 34 junctions—to eliminate reliance on the default rule. Pilot implementations in these areas reported accident reductions of 20-30%, with Glabbeek specifically seeing priority-related incidents drop from 18 to 3 within the first year.^[43] In other regions, similar practicality-driven reforms have been explored. In the United States, where priority to the right is not a standard default, several states and municipalities have increasingly adopted all-way stops at unsignalized intersections to enhance safety and reduce confusion, particularly in residential and suburban settings. Key arguments for these changes center on the rule's potential for confusion among non-local drivers, tourists, and novices, leading to higher error rates at complex or poorly marked junctions. Alternatives like the Netherlands' "shark teeth" road markings—triangular yield indicators painted on the approaching lane—have been cited as effective for clearly assigning priority without default rules, allowing flexible application across varied intersection types.^[44] Outcomes have been mixed, with partial success in Belgium through expanded local authority to implement signage-based systems, but no full national abolition; the rule remains embedded in the updated Highway Code. The new federal highway code effective from autumn 2025 retains the priority to the right as the default rule, while allowing greater local flexibility for signage-based overrides.^[45]^[46]

References

[1]
[PDF] Convention on Road Traffic - UNECE
(a) In States where traffic keeps to the right the driver of a vehicle shall give way, at intersections other than those specified in paragraph 2 of this.
[2]
What are the origins of the French priorité à droite rule?
Oct 12, 2023 · It was introduced across Europe following an international convention in Paris on April 24, 1926, and was an attempt to reduce the number of ...
[3]
France's priorité à droite rule – what it means and when it applies
Jul 18, 2025 · "Priorité à droite" means the driver from the left must give way to the driver from the right at intersections, unless signs indicate otherwise ...
[4]
Right of Way, Right before Left and other Priority Rules in Germany
The vehicle coming from road A has priority over the vehicle approaching from the road D, as road A is on the right of road D. The same rule applies if both ...
[5]
Roundabouts | E-4571/2010 - European Parliament
While in Austria and Germany, for example, priority to vehicles coming from the right ('priorité à droite') has mostly been abolished, and in Spain, Poland, ...
[6]
Driving through intersections | The Official Ministry of Transportation (MTO) Driver’s Handbook
### Summary of Priority to the Right, Right-of-Way Rules, and Exceptions at Uncontrolled Intersections
[7]
Priority rules – driving licence theory - Körkortonline.se
B must give way to A, and A must in turn give way to C. This means that according to the priority-to-the-right rule C is to drive first, then A and finally B.
[8]
Vienna Convention on Road Traffic [of] 1968 - UNTC
The Convention was prepared and opened for signature by the United Nations Conference on Road Traffic, held at Vienna from 7 October to 8 November 1968.
[9]
50 years on, the 1968 Conventions on Road Traffic and Road Signs ...
Nov 7, 2018 · The 1968 Convention on Road Signs and Signals, which counts 66 Contracting Parties in Europe, Africa, the Middle East, Asia and Latin America, ...
[10]
C_2005157EN.01003401.xml - EUR-Lex - European Union
This Convention is the most comprehensive in terms of road traffic regulations, dedicating a whole 30-article chapter to the rules of the road and laying ...
[11]
[PDF] la naissance du Code de la route - Temis
Il proposait notamment la « priorité à droite ». Un projet de loi gouvernemental sur le retrait du permis de conduire et l'augmentation des contrôles fut déposé ...
[12]
[PDF] International Convention relative to Motor Traffic - UK Treaties Online
International Convention* relative to Motor Traffic. Paris, April 24, 1926. [His Majesty's•Ratification deposited October 24, 1929.].
[13]
Le Code de la route a 100 ans: ce que vous ne savez (peut-être) pas
May 24, 2021 · Les règles de priorité ne sont stabilisées qu'en 1932. En 1922, le "permis de conduire" remplace le "certificat de capacité", et une épreuve ...
[14]
[PDF] Reichs-Straßenverkehrs-Ordnung nebst Einführungsverordnung
(1) An Kreuzungen und Einmündungen von Straßen ist bevorrechtigt, wer von rechts kommt; jedoch haben Kraftfahrzeuge und durch Maschinen.
[15]
[PDF] Right Of Way Rules - NHTSA
When two vehicles get to the intersection at the same time, the vehicle on the right goes first; it has the right-of-way. If neither the base rule or furthest ...
[16]
Intersections | NSW Government
The car turning right from the road ending at a T-intersection (Car A) must give way to the car going straight ahead on the continuing road (Car B)
[17]
T-junction priority scheme and road user's yielding behavior
In T-junctions with priority to the straight road approaching speed is lower. · In T-junctions with priority to the straight road visual attention is higher. · T- ...Missing: rationale | Show results with:rationale
[18]
10 lesser-known French road rules you need to know | RAC Drive
Dec 13, 2024 · Here are two golden rules to understanding French roundabouts. On most roundabouts in France, the standard cédez le passage – give way – is in place.
[19]
Digest Section 4 Rules of the Road - Ohio Department of Public Safety
Jan 26, 2024 · A reasonable speed is necessary for a driver to maintain control of the vehicle and to bring it to a stop within an assured clear distance ...
[20]
Driving simulator study on speed and lateral position - ScienceDirect
Priority to the right signs with additional road marking resulted in lowest speed under both visibility conditions. For all priority rules, lateral position ...
[21]
Driving in Germany: 'right before left' rule - Kaiserslautern American
Oct 13, 2023 · The right before left rule apply at intersections when there are no traffic signs, when there are no traffic lights and when there is no police directing ...
[22]
The German Driving Laws and Fines - Traffic Fines 2025
Rating 4.3 · Review by Mathias VoigtThe German schedule of fines is a unified compilation of all German traffic violations and fines according to German driving laws.
[23]
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=VEH&sectionNum=21800
[24]
Vehicle Code § 21800 to 21804 CVC - "Failure to Yield"
Vehicle Code 21800 (b)(1) CVC states that if two vehicles enter an intersection at the same time, the driver on the left must yield to the driver on the right.
[25]
Getting Around in Belgium - Frommers
An important driving rule to be aware of is the priorité de droite (priority from the right), which makes it perfectly legal most of the time to pull out ...
[26]
Uncertainty on road rules kills 49 people on Belgian roads every year
Feb 6, 2020 · In 2018, a total of 4,661 accidents happened in which not respecting the right of way played a major role, or about 13 per day, according to ...Missing: droite | Show results with:droite
[27]
Driving for zero deaths: Can Belgium achieve its ambitious road ...
Jul 4, 2024 · Putting the brakes on road casualties. 2023 saw a total of 45,243 victims of road accidents. Though the vast majority only suffered minor ...
[28]
Giving way | Transport and motoring | Queensland Government
Nov 1, 2022 · You must give way to vehicles on your right at an uncontrolled crossroad—this is a crossroad without any traffic lights, lines or signs. In this ...
[29]
Road Traffic Act - English - Japanese Law Translation
The purpose of this Act is to prevent road hazards and otherwise ensure the safety and fluidity of traffic, as well as to contribute to preventing blockages.
[30]
Traffic Rules in Japan | JAF
Drivers and cyclists must keep to the left, while pedestrians should keep to the right side of the road. · Drivers must yield to pedestrians. · You must not drive ...
[31]
https://english.jaf.or.jp/driving-in-japan/traffic-rules
[32]
[PDF] Vienna Convention on Road Signs and Signals - UNECE
The UNECE has, since its creation in 1947, developed international regulations on the various components of road traffic: the road, the vehicle and road users.
[33]
Road and Traffic Signs in Belgium - What You Need to Know
Priority road signs in Belgium are designed to clarify who has priority at the junction / road ahead. If driving in a country where you drive on the other side ...Missing: B1 | Show results with:B1
[34]
German road signs | Driving in Germany - IamExpat.de
Jun 4, 2025 · Traffic signs in Germany: Warning signs ; Uncontrolled intersection ahead. No right-of-way at next intersection; yield to traffic from the right ...
[35]
2009 Edition Chapter 2C. Warning Signs And Object Markers
... traffic controls established at the intersection. Guidance: 03 Plaques with the appropriate alternative messages of TRAFFIC FROM LEFT (RIGHT) DOES NOT STOP ...Fhwa - mutcd · Figure 2C-9 · Figure 2C-1 · Figure 2C-6
[36]
Roundabouts | WSDOT - | WA.gov
There are not traffic signals or stop signs in a modern roundabout. Drivers entering the roundabout yield to traffic already in the roundabout, then enter ...
[37]
Signs for road works and temporary situations - GOV.UK
Dec 5, 2023 · Temporary signs indicating lane priority at junctions; Signs for works traffic; Convoy working; Mobile road works and lane closures; Temporary ...Missing: Europe | Show results with:Europe
[38]
International Road Sign Guide for Travelers - Auto Europe
Signatories of the Vienna Convention define the mandatory sign design as circular with a blue or white background. White signs will have a red border, while ...
[39]
Driving in Belgium - RAC
All vehicles coming from the right have priority. However, it should also be noted that trams always have priority, whether they are on the left or right.
[40]
Priority to right does more harm than good, say experts
Mar 27, 2019 · In practice, however, the rule “does more harm than good” by being responsible for 15,000 accidents a year, the experts say.Missing: abolition 2017-2018
[41]
A common urban intersection in the Netherlands - Bicycle Dutch
Feb 20, 2018 · A clear indication of the priority, also in the road surface. The shark's teeth indicate you must yield. The so-called piano teeth markings ...
[42]
Priority from the right rule to remain in new Highway Code | VRT NWS
Mar 27, 2019 · "In the new Highway Code that has been set to the Council of State for scrutiny there is no abolition. The basic rule remains. However, it is up ...