Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Progressive Policy Institute


The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) is a non-profit 501(c)(3) public policy think tank based in , founded in 1989 by Will Marshall to serve as the intellectual hub for the New Democrat movement within the .
It earned a reputation as Clinton's "idea mill," contributing policy innovations that shaped his administration's approach, blending market-oriented reforms with social investment to promote economic growth and opportunity.
PPI advocates for "radically pragmatic" center-left policies, emphasizing pro-worker, pro-business, and pro-innovation strategies, including fiscally responsible public investments, fairer tax systems, expanded apprenticeships, reduced costs in healthcare and housing, and pragmatic solutions on , , , and clean energy transitions.
Notable achievements include organizing the Clinton-Blair dialogues and launching initiatives like the Project on Center-Left Renewal to counter and modernize progressive governance.

Founding and Early History

Establishment and Democratic Leadership Council Ties (1989–1992)

The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) was founded in June 1989 by Will Marshall, a policy advisor who had previously served as the first policy director of the (DLC). The , established in 1985 by figures including Al From, sought to steer the away from its post-1960s leftward shift toward more centrist, pro-growth policies emphasizing fiscal responsibility, , and . PPI was created as the 's dedicated to translate these broad themes into detailed policy proposals, operating nominally independently but functioning as its intellectual engine. From its inception, PPI's mission centered on developing pragmatic, market-oriented ideas for Democratic governance, including early explorations of programs, enterprise zones for , and government reinvention to reduce . These efforts aligned closely with the 's "New Democrat" agenda, which critiqued traditional liberal orthodoxy on issues like entitlements and trade. By 1992, as the gained traction in recruiting figures like , PPI had positioned itself as a key resource for policy innovation, though its influence expanded significantly only after the 1992 election. Initial funding came from private donors, including supporters of the centrist cause, enabling a small staff to produce reports and briefings that fleshed out DLC priorities without relying on government grants. PPI's early ties to the DLC were structural and ideological: Marshall's dual roles ensured seamless coordination, with the institute serving as a facade for policy advancement within Democratic circles. This period marked the beginning of PPI's role in challenging party orthodoxy, producing blueprints that emphasized empirical outcomes over ideological purity, such as proposals for work-based and expanded trade. By late 1992, the institute had cultivated relationships with emerging leaders, setting the stage for its later prominence, though it remained a modest operation with limited public profile compared to established think tanks.

Development as Clinton's "Idea Mill" (1993–2000)

Following Bill Clinton's election as president in November 1992, the Progressive Policy Institute solidified its position as a primary intellectual resource for the new administration, earning the moniker of Clinton's "idea mill" for generating centrist policy proposals aligned with the New Democrat agenda. Founded in 1989 by Will Marshall as the arm of the , PPI focused on pragmatic reforms emphasizing market incentives, personal responsibility, and fiscal discipline over traditional expansions of . During Clinton's first term, starting in January 1993, the institute produced reports and analyses that informed early administration priorities, including deficit reduction through spending restraint and strategies, which contributed to balancing the federal budget by 1998 after inheriting a $290 billion deficit. PPI played a pivotal role in shaping , advocating for time limits and work requirements to replace open-ended entitlements with , ideas that underpinned the bipartisan Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act signed by on August 22, 1996. Institute analyses, including those circulated in domestic policy discussions, emphasized empirical evidence from state experiments showing that work-focused programs reduced dependency more effectively than cash aid alone. Similarly, PPI supported initiatives, drawing on New Democrat principles of , which aligned with the creation of under the National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993, enabling over 20,000 participants annually by the late 1990s to address , environment, and needs through volunteerism tied to stipends and education awards. In government efficiency, PPI endorsed entrepreneurial approaches outlined in David Osborne's 1992 book Reinventing Government—co-authored with Ted Gaebler and linked to the institute's network—which influenced Vice President Al Gore's National Performance Review launched in March 1993, aiming to streamline federal operations and cut 252,000 civilian positions by 1998 while saving $137 billion. The institute also facilitated the "Third Way" framework, organizing dialogues between Clinton and British Prime Minister Tony Blair starting in the mid-1990s, promoting policies blending social investment with market competition, such as skills training and trade liberalization exemplified by the North American Free Trade Agreement ratified in 1993. These efforts helped PPI translate broad DLC themes into actionable legislation, including the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, which funded 100,000 new police officers and community policing amid rising urban crime rates peaking in 1991. By 2000, as Clinton's second term concluded, had influenced over a dozen major policy adoptions, from welfare caseload reductions of 60% since 1996 peaks to sustained creating 22.7 million jobs, though critics attributed some outcomes to broader macroeconomic trends rather than specific interventions. The institute's emphasis on evidence-based reforms, often drawing from state-level data and private-sector models, distinguished it from more ideological think tanks, fostering a consensus on issues like pilots and expanded Earned Income Tax Credits that lifted 7.2 million people out of by 1999. This period marked PPI's maturation into a high-impact , with its ideas enduring beyond the administration despite partisan divides.

Organizational Evolution and Structure

Post-Clinton Reorientation and Expansion (2001–2019)

Following the conclusion of President Bill Clinton's administration in January 2001, the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) persisted in promoting pragmatic, innovation-driven policies within the Democratic ecosystem, though its influence waned alongside the Democratic Leadership Council's (DLC) diminishing prominence after the 2004 elections. PPI's research emphasized productivity enhancement, technological adoption, and balanced regulation, as evidenced by its 2002 "New State Economic Index," which measured states' embrace of high-tech growth strategies like business R&D investment, reaching record GDP shares that year. The institute critiqued overregulation's drag on dynamism, with a analysis documenting intensified rules in sectors like and from 2000 to 2010, while advocating targeted reforms to sustain economic expansion without populist retreats. A pivotal reorientation occurred in spring 2009, when PPI formally split from the DLC amid the latter's internal challenges and reduced relevance under the Obama administration, enabling PPI to relaunch as an autonomous entity. This independence, under founder Will Marshall's ongoing presidency, freed PPI to pursue broader centrist agendas unencumbered by DLC's partisan branding, positioning it as a critic of both left-wing interventionism and right-wing isolationism. The split reflected broader center-left fragmentation, with PPI inheriting the DLC's intellectual legacy while adapting to post-financial crisis realities, including calls for fiscal responsibility and pro-growth incentives. The relaunch spurred programmatic expansion, with PPI amplifying output on transitions and global competitiveness. By 2012, it hosted conferences on data-driven growth implications, synthesizing research into blueprints for innovation-led recovery. In 2016, amid populist surges from both and , PPI issued "Unleashing Innovation and Growth," a comprehensive agenda prioritizing R&D credits, modernization, and openness to counter stagnation, drawing on showing productivity plunges since 2000 necessitating structural reforms over . This period also saw PPI's Project on Center-Left Renewal evolve from 2000s dialogues, fostering international networks to renew moderate progressive strategies against elite-driven polarization. By 2019, expansions culminated in reports like "Funding America's Future," outlining equitable growth budgets with investments in and reduced regulatory barriers, solidifying PPI's role as a hub for evidence-based alternatives to ideological extremes.

Integration of Center for New Liberalism and Recent Growth (2020–Present)

In 2020, the (PPI) integrated the (CNL), establishing it as an internal hub to house the intellectual output of the —an online advocacy group originating from communities like the subreddit r/neoliberal—and to foster engagement with younger liberals disillusioned by progressive orthodoxy. This move consolidated PPI's efforts to modernize center-left politics, addressing prior fragmentation between the branding and CNL's emerging identity, which had proven cumbersome for outreach to activists, elected officials, and allies. Under PPI's umbrella, CNL expanded rapidly, developing a network exceeding 80 chapters worldwide by 2022, alongside a garnering millions of listens and generating over 60 million impressions per month. These initiatives enabled CNL to host U.S. members of , publish policy analyses, and organize events such as the New Directions conference in March 2022, emphasizing pragmatic reforms over ideological purity. In September 2022, CNL streamlined its online presence with a unified website, further aligning its operations with PPI's Washington, D.C.-based infrastructure while retaining autonomy in grassroots mobilization. This integration contributed to PPI's broader organizational growth from 2020 onward, manifesting in heightened policy productivity and international footprint. PPI launched initiatives like the Project on Center-Left Renewal to update progressive strategies against populism and expanded offices to the , , and , enhancing global collaboration with pragmatic think tanks. Concurrently, PPI amplified its output, issuing reports on tech-driven economic resilience (June 2025), fiscal blueprints for growth like Paying for Progress (July 2024), and coalition efforts on antitrust enforcement (September 2022), reflecting sustained influence in Democratic policy circles amid post-pandemic recovery debates.

Leadership and Key Personnel

Founding and Long-Term Leaders

The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) was established in 1989 by Will Marshall as a affiliated with the (DLC), aimed at developing innovative policy ideas for centrist Democrats. Marshall, a former journalist and DLC executive director, founded PPI to counter perceptions of the as overly ideological and to promote pragmatic, market-oriented reforms within a progressive framework. The organization quickly positioned itself as an intellectual hub for "New Democrats," emphasizing , fiscal responsibility, and initiatives that influenced the party's direction in the 1990s. Will Marshall has served as PPI's president and primary leader since its , providing continuity through decades of policy shifts and organizational changes. Under his long-term stewardship, PPI evolved from a DLC offshoot into an independent entity post-2000, while maintaining a focus on third-way that blends progressive goals with pro-growth strategies. Marshall's tenure, spanning over 35 years as of 2025, has been marked by his role in authoring key reports on topics like reinventing and , often drawing on empirical analyses of and global competitiveness metrics. No other individual has held a comparably enduring leadership position, underscoring Marshall's foundational and sustained influence on the institute's mission and output.

Current Executive Team and Notable Contributors

The Progressive Policy Institute's executive team is headed by Will Marshall, who serves as president and founded the organization in 1989 to advance policies within the . Lindsay Mark Lewis acts as chief executive officer, a role she has held while also serving on the board since 2010, overseeing operational and strategic direction. Key vice presidents include Michael Mandel, vice president and chief economist, who focuses on economic innovation and data-driven policy analysis; Diana Moss, vice president and director of competition policy, specializing in antitrust and market regulation; Ed Gresser, vice president and director for trade and global markets, with prior government experience in trade negotiations; Ben Ritz, vice president of policy development, leading initiatives on domestic reforms; and Stuart Malec, vice president of public affairs, managing communications and outreach. Notable contributors encompass senior fellows and advisors such as Paul Weinstein Jr., a senior fellow and board secretary-treasurer with expertise in and former roles in the Obama administration; Jason Gold, senior fellow contributing to financial and regulatory analyses; and David Evans, senior advisor on and competition issues. The board of directors, chaired by Will Marshall with Lindsay Mark Lewis as vice chair, includes members like , a longtime scholar; Chris Kelly, technology executive; and recent additions such as Elizabeth Bowyer, Robin Lake, and Bernard F. McKay, appointed in 2021 to bolster expertise in finance, education, and .

Center for New Liberalism

Origins in Online Neoliberal Advocacy

The Center for New Liberalism originated from the Neoliberal Project, an online advocacy initiative co-founded in 2017 by Jeremiah Johnson and Colin Mortimer to promote market-oriented liberal policies among younger demographics. The project emerged amid rising on both political flanks, positioning itself as a counter to ideological extremes by emphasizing evidence-based reforms in areas like housing deregulation, immigration liberalization, and free-market innovation. Initially operating as a digital-first network, it utilized —particularly the handle @ne0liberal—to foster discussions, memes, and virtual events that attracted thousands of members seeking pragmatic alternatives to interventionism and conservative . By summer , the Neoliberal Project had formalized into a and action group, hosting online panels, policy briefs, and community chapters to build intellectual infrastructure for "neoliberalism" rebranded as forward-looking . , a policy analyst with experience in Democratic circles, and Mortimer, focused on community outreach, drew from historical neoliberal thinkers like while adapting to contemporary challenges such as urban affordability and technological disruption. The effort gained traction through viral online content critiquing rent control and trade , amassing a following of politically engaged and Gen Z participants who viewed neoliberal advocacy as a bulwark against zero-sum politics. This online foundation enabled rapid scaling, with over 80 chapters established globally by the time of its integration with the Progressive Policy Institute. The project's emphasis on digital engagement reflected a deliberate strategy to bypass traditional gatekeepers in and media, where skepticism toward prevailed, allowing direct mobilization of dispersed advocates. In February 2020, the Neoliberal Project affiliated with the Progressive Policy Institute, rebranding as the Center for New Liberalism to signal a maturation from meme-driven discourse to institutionalized policy influence while retaining its core online advocacy roots. This transition preserved the center's commitment to bottom-up , evidenced by ongoing podcasts, chapter networks, and data-driven critiques of regulatory overreach.

Rebranding, Goals, and Activities Under PPI

In February 2020, the Neoliberal Project, originally founded in 2017 as an stemming from the subreddit r/neoliberal, integrated with the (PPI) and rebranded as the Center for New Liberalism (CNL) to formalize its operations as a initiative focused on younger advocates of market-oriented . This shift moved the organization from a primarily digital, meme-driven to a structured entity under PPI's umbrella, emphasizing institutional credibility while retaining grassroots elements. By September 2022, CNL further updated its branding with a new website and refined messaging, describing the name as "new(ish)" to signal continuity with its neoliberal roots amid concerns that the term "neoliberal" had become politically toxic in progressive circles. The primary goals of CNL under PPI center on defending and promoting classical liberal principles adapted for contemporary challenges, including democratic representation, equality under the law, an , and freedoms of speech, association, religion, and movement. It advocates for evidence-based, pragmatic policies that prioritize market mechanisms, innovation, and internationalism over ideological purity, positioning itself against both populist and expansive government interventions seen as inefficient or liberty-eroding. This orientation aligns with PPI's broader ethos but targets and Gen Z through accessible, non-academic outreach to counter perceived excesses in and economic . Activities under PPI have emphasized grassroots expansion, with CNL establishing over 80 chapters worldwide by 2024, claiming more than 10,000 members engaged in local for liberal reforms. These chapters host events, debates, and campaigns promoting policies like immigration , , and criminal justice reforms grounded in data-driven outcomes rather than moral posturing. CNL also produces online content, op-eds, and merchandise to sustain its digital-first presence, while collaborating with PPI on research into economic dynamism and technological progress. Critics from left-leaning outlets have characterized these efforts as an attempt by centrist institutions to repackage corporate-friendly for younger demographics, though CNL maintains its focus on empirical policy wins over partisan branding.

Ideological Orientation and Core Principles

Third Way Politics and Pragmatic Centrism

The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) emerged as the intellectual birthplace of politics within the , positioning itself as a proponent of centrist reforms that integrate free-market principles with social democratic goals. Founded in 1989 by the , PPI served as an "idea mill" for President Bill Clinton's administration, advocating policies that emphasized fiscal discipline, , and expanded trade to foster economic opportunity while maintaining commitments to and healthcare access. This approach rejected both unchecked government expansion and conservatism, instead promoting targeted interventions to harness market dynamics for broad-based prosperity. PPI's role extended internationally through its orchestration of Third Way dialogues in the late 1990s and early 2000s, bridging U.S. with Tony Blair's in Britain to exchange strategies on modernizing center-left governance. These efforts underscored a core tenet of thinking: adapting progressive ideals to post-industrial realities by prioritizing , skills training, and public-private partnerships over traditional redistribution or regulatory overreach. For instance, PPI championed Clinton-era initiatives like the 1996 , which imposed work requirements and time limits on benefits, resulting in a 60% decline in welfare caseloads by 2000 while poverty rates fell to two-decade lows. In the realm of pragmatic , PPI advances "radically pragmatic" policies that eschew ideological purity in favor of empirical outcomes and bipartisan feasibility, as evidenced by its ongoing advocacy for innovation-driven growth, fiscal responsibility, and reforms in areas like apprenticeships and clean energy transitions. This orientation critiques both populist extremes—left-wing demands for expansive entitlements and right-wing resistance to strategic investments—while urging Democrats to reclaim working-class voters through pro-worker, pro-business measures such as tax credits for and streamlined permitting for . PPI's framework insists on active but efficient government, drawing on data to support claims like the economic multiplier effects of vocational , where each invested yields up to $2.50 in lifetime gains. Such positions reflect a to causal mechanisms of progress, including development and technological adaptation, over abstract egalitarian mandates.

Critiques of Populism and Emphasis on Market-Oriented Reforms

The Progressive Policy Institute has consistently critiqued for fostering an "us versus them" mentality that reinforces and social mistrust, thereby hindering consensus-building on economic challenges. In a report, PPI argued that populists peddle nostalgia for America's past industrial glory—evoking strong unions and pensions—while offering few practical ideas for prospering in the global , instead promoting dead-end policies like and nativism that raise living costs and stifle growth. Specific examples include opposition to trade agreements such as the , calls to deport immigrants en masse, and demands to break up banks, which PPI views as exacerbating stagnation rather than addressing root causes like post-2000 slowdowns (averaging 1.2% annually versus 2.2% pre-2000). PPI extends this critique to economic populism across parties, noting that post-2016 rhetoric from both Trump-era and subsequent Democratic approaches has failed to reverse real median earnings declines for non-college workers (down 14% over four decades per data), despite posturing as pro-worker. In 2018 analysis, the institute identified as a broader threat to , enabling zero-sum conflicts, erosion, and authoritarian tendencies through and anti-institutionalism, as seen in advocacy by UKIP and Viktor Orbán's "illiberal democracy" in . To counter these, PPI's Project on Center-Left Renewal, launched in January 2023, promotes strategies to combat radical right-wing 's hallmarks—hostility to , , and international bodies—by fostering center-left competitiveness without mirroring populist divisiveness. As an alternative, PPI emphasizes market-oriented reforms to drive innovation, entrepreneurship, and inclusive growth, positioning them as a response to populist anger over wealth gaps and downward mobility. Key proposals include establishing a to eliminate outdated rules, shifting taxation toward consumption with a corporate rate cut to 15% to spur investment, and leveraging public-private partnerships for (e.g., Miami's project saving 50% via private capital). In , PPI advocates expanding charter schools (proposing $333 million in funding), creating one million apprenticeships at $1 billion cost, and three-year degrees to reduce college expenses by 25% (saving $8,893–$30,094 per student), aiming to boost and add $2.7 trillion to GDP by 2030 through integration. These reforms prioritize competition and opportunity over redistribution, critiquing "free" populist promises like universal tuition as cost-shifting without skill-building.

Policy Focus Areas

Economic Innovation and Growth Strategies

The Progressive Policy Institute promotes through policies that prioritize , regulatory streamlining, and market incentives to enhance productivity and competitiveness. In its 2016 report "Unleashing Innovation and Growth," PPI outlined a blueprint for an "innovation platform" to digitize physical industries like , projecting potential GDP gains of $2.7 trillion by 2030 via advanced technologies such as additive manufacturing, alongside calls for tripling Advanced Manufacturing Centers in deindustrialized states. This approach contrasts populist by emphasizing open agreements, such as the covering 40% of global GDP, to expand markets and facilitate free data flows for small businesses. Recent initiatives focus on emerging technologies like to drive state-level growth. PPI's 2025 AI Innovation Toolbox, authored by chief economist Michael Mandel, recommends five tools for governors: tax incentives to attract AI startups and data centers amid $180 billion in early-2025 AI investments by tech giants; investments and demand-side energy policies to address rising electricity demands; university partnerships for AI research and workforce pipelines; targeted retraining via career technical education; and extension programs to help small and midsize businesses adopt AI, drawing on examples from states like and . Complementing this, the Innovation Frontier Project commissions global research to accelerate breakthroughs in areas like climate mitigation and disease prevention, evaluating how incentives influence rates at the "knowledge frontier." Fiscal reforms form a core pillar, with PPI advocating pro-growth tax shifts in its July 2024 "Paying for Progress" blueprint, including replacing payroll taxes with consumption and unearned income levies, simplifying the individual for progressivity, and lowering the to 15% to spur investment, while modernizing entitlements like and Social Security to cut deficits by over $2 trillion annually and stabilize debt-to-GDP ratios. Regulatory proposals include establishing a Regulatory Improvement Commission to eliminate outdated rules and easing lending caps to 27.5%, potentially generating 140,000 jobs. Infrastructure strategies leverage public-private partnerships, such as a proposed Infrastructure Bank channeling private capital, with streamlined reviews reducing project timelines to two years and costs by 30%. Workforce development integrates with innovation goals through "career pathways" combining training and apprenticeships—aiming for 1 million slots with $1 billion in funding—and education reforms like three-year college degrees to cut costs by 25%, alongside K-12 autonomy models proven in districts like New Orleans, where charter-heavy systems tripled effectiveness in eight years. These elements collectively aim to foster broad-based opportunity by aligning with technological frontiers, as reiterated in PPI's 2022 New Skills for a New Economy project emphasizing federal and state investments in adaptable labor markets.

Technology, Education, and Domestic Reforms

The Progressive Policy Institute promotes technology policies that prioritize innovation and economic growth while mitigating risks through targeted interventions rather than broad regulatory overreach. In October 2024, PPI released a report advocating for a coherent U.S. competition policy in the digital sector, emphasizing the need to foster frontier technologies like without stifling platform scale that enables investments in . The institute has critiqued aggressive antitrust actions against major tech firms, arguing in the same month that such measures diminish incentives for large-scale, long-term innovations critical to U.S. competitiveness. PPI also highlights the tech sector's role in local resilience, as detailed in a June 2025 report showing that tech, information, and clusters drive employment and wage growth in diverse U.S. counties. In education, PPI supports systemic reforms centered on accountability, school choice, and performance-based improvements to address declining student outcomes. Through its Reinventing America's Schools project, the institute endorses strategies such as expanding schools and empowering parents with options, drawing on evidence from high-performing districts. A September 2025 report declared U.S. public schools in crisis, citing stagnant proficiency rates and proposing a bipartisan nine-point agenda that includes universal proficiency goals by 2035, rigorous teacher evaluations, and closing underperforming schools to reallocate resources. PPI points to New Orleans' post- overhaul—featuring widespread conversion and centralized oversight—as a model that boosted graduation rates from 54% in 2005 to 84% by 2023 and narrowed racial achievement gaps. Additionally, the institute advocates for civic reforms to instill a shared identity, recommending K-12 curricula on constitutional principles and college-level requirements for courses in . PPI's domestic reform proposals emphasize pragmatic, market-oriented solutions to enhance affordability, efficiency, and opportunity in areas like , , and government operations. A September 2024 report on housing affordability urged of laws, incentives for modular , and public-private partnerships to increase supply for working families, projecting that such measures could reduce costs by 20-30% in high-demand metros. The institute's July 2024 budget blueprint outlines tax code simplification, including shifting from taxes to taxes, to fund entitlements while promoting work and savings without raising top marginal rates. PPI also calls for Social Security adjustments, such as gradual retirement age increases tied to gains, to ensure and expand benefits for low earners through means-tested supplements. In government modernization, PPI advocates digitizing services and adopting AI tools to cut administrative costs, as explored in a 2020 analysis estimating potential savings of $100 billion annually from IT upgrades.

Policy Influence and Achievements

Contributions to Democratic Policymaking

The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI), established in 1989 as the think tank for the Democratic Leadership Council, served as the intellectual hub for the New Democrat movement and functioned as an "idea mill" for President Bill Clinton's administration, shaping centrist policies that emphasized fiscal discipline, work-based social programs, and market-friendly reforms. PPI's advocacy influenced key legislative achievements, including the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, which replaced the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program with Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), imposing time limits and work requirements to promote self-sufficiency over indefinite entitlements. This reform, signed by Clinton after PPI's promotion of performance-based welfare tied to employment, reduced welfare caseloads by over 60% from 1996 to 2000 while correlating with employment gains among single mothers. PPI also contributed to Democratic support for trade liberalization, aligning with Clinton's negotiation and passage of the () in 1993, which the institute framed as essential for and competitiveness despite intra-party opposition from labor-aligned factions. By providing research and arguments for integrating trade with worker adjustment assistance, PPI helped Democrats reconcile pro-growth internationalism with domestic concerns, paving the way for subsequent agreements like the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement. Additionally, the institute's emphasis on balanced budgets and entitlement restraint informed Clinton's fiscal strategy, which achieved federal surpluses from 1998 to 2001 through spending controls and . In , PPI bolstered the , founded in 1997, by supplying policy blueprints that enabled its members to advocate for bipartisan compromises on issues like technology regulation and economic innovation, maintaining a moderating influence amid partisan polarization. More recently, PPI has guided Democratic strategists through post-election analyses and reports, such as its 2024 election review urging a shift from programmatic expansion to pragmatic, worker-focused policies to regain voter trust, and proposals for reforming social safety nets to address fiscal shortfalls projected over the next 30 years. These efforts underscore PPI's ongoing role in steering the party toward evidence-based reforms prioritizing empirical outcomes over ideological purity.

Empirical Impacts and Key Endorsed Initiatives

The (PPI) played a formative role in advocating for the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, which replaced the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) entitlement with the (TANF) program emphasizing work requirements, time limits, and state flexibility. has credited the reform with transforming from a cycle of dependency into a system promoting self-sufficiency, noting its role in diminishing welfare as a partisan flashpoint. Empirical outcomes included a 60% decline in national welfare caseloads from 1994 to 2005, reaching the lowest levels since the 1960s, alongside substantial increases in among single mothers, with labor force participation rising from 60% in 1994 to over 75% by 2000. These shifts correlated with a strong , though critics from organizations like the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities have argued that the reforms weakened the safety net, contributing to rises in deep during recessions despite short-term employment gains. In , has championed schools, , and portfolio models of district governance as mechanisms to foster innovation and accountability, drawing on evidence from urban reforms. A key example endorses is New Orleans' post-Hurricane overhaul, where the near-total shift to an autonomous system by 2010—coupled with centralized accountability, closure of failing schools, and universal choice—yielded measurable gains: fourth-grade reading proficiency rose from 44% to 54% at basic or above levels between 2005 and 2024, eighth-grade reading from 26% to 65%, fourth-grade math from 41% to 49%, and eighth-grade math from 30% to 42%; graduation rates climbed from 54% in 2004 to 79% in 2023, with college enrollment increasing from 37% to 65%. Independent analyses, such as those from the Education Research Alliance of New Orleans, attribute these improvements to the replacement of low-performing operators with higher-quality ones, with transferred students achieving equal or superior outcomes within one year and sustained progress thereafter, though acknowledges ongoing challenges like retention. PPI's broader endorsement of scaling aligns with studies showing competitive pressures from s improving district-wide ; in cities where charters comprise at least 33% of enrollment, achievement gaps between low-income and higher-income students have narrowed, with effects strengthening as exceeds tipping points around 25-30%. However, evaluations of charter impacts vary, with some research indicating modest or context-specific benefits rather than uniform superiority over traditional publics, underscoring the causal role of rigorous oversight and replication of high performers as PPI advocates. PPI has also supported expansions in programs like , viewing them as tools for and skill-building tied to and workforce development, though quantifiable long-term impacts on participant outcomes remain less extensively documented compared to welfare and school reforms. Overall, PPI frames these initiatives as evidence of pragmatic, market-oriented policies driving measurable progress in , , and reduced institutional failure, while emphasizing the need for ongoing adaptation to sustain gains.

Criticisms and Controversies

Accusations of Neoliberal Corporatism from the Left

Critics on the political left, including outlets aligned with democratic socialist perspectives, have characterized the (PPI) as emblematic of neoliberal within the , arguing that its advocacy for market-oriented reforms prioritizes corporate profitability over robust social welfare and worker protections. This view stems from PPI's origins as the think tank of the (), founded in 1985 to steer Democrats toward "" centrism, which left-leaning commentators contend diluted traditional progressive commitments by embracing , free trade agreements like , and entitlement reforms perceived as measures. For instance, a 1990 analysis in portrayed PPI's promotion of entrepreneurial government and private-sector incentives as a form of neoliberal ideology that influenced media narratives and policy, sidelining structural critiques of inequality in favor of efficiency-driven solutions. Further accusations focus on PPI's funding sources and policy outputs, which detractors claim foster undue corporate influence. In 2019, The Intercept reported that ExxonMobil provided financial support to PPI, coinciding with the institute's publications opposing expansive climate liability lawsuits against fossil fuel companies, positions critics interpreted as shielding polluters under the guise of pragmatic legal reform. Similarly, progressive watchdog groups and commentators have highlighted PPI's historical ties to business-friendly initiatives, such as endorsing public-private partnerships and opposing aggressive antitrust measures, as evidence of corporatist capture that aligns Democratic policy with elite economic interests rather than grassroots demands for wealth redistribution or universal programs. These critiques often reference PPI's role in the 1990s DLC era, where it backed welfare restructuring under President Clinton, which Jacobin magazine later described as part of a broader New Democrat abandonment of expansive social safety nets in deference to fiscal conservatism and market discipline. PPI has countered such charges by emphasizing its independence and focus on evidence-based , but left-wing skeptics maintain that its donor base—including corporate entities—and centrist framing inherently tilt toward neoliberal outcomes, such as technology-driven strategies that benefit over labor unions or public investment in deindustrialized communities. This tension reflects broader intra-Democratic debates, where PPI's model is seen by some as a vector for that undermines anti-capitalist impulses on the left, particularly in areas like trade policy and regulatory relief.

Challenges from Conservatives on Fiscal and Regulatory Positions

Conservatives have criticized the Progressive Policy Institute () for its fiscal positions, arguing that the think tank's emphasis on revenue increases through progressive taxation fails to prioritize deep spending reductions as the primary path to control. In analyses of long-term strategies, PPI has proposed raising federal revenues to approximately 21.6% of GDP by 2034, including higher taxes on high earners, which right-leaning critics contend distorts economic incentives and burdens job creators without addressing structural entitlements bloat. Such approaches, they assert, reflect a reluctance to confront programs like Social Security and , which conservatives view as the core drivers of fiscal unsustainability. PPI's opposition to the 2017 (TCJA) further fueled conservative rebukes, with the institute decrying the legislation for exacerbating deficits through unoffset corporate and individual rate reductions. Conservative analysts countered that the TCJA's simplification and growth-oriented cuts empirically boosted revenues via expanded economic activity, rejecting PPI's baseline assumptions as overly pessimistic and disconnected from supply-side evidence. This stance, critics argued, positions PPI as reflexively antagonistic to tax relief, prioritizing budgetary orthodoxy over empirical outcomes like the post-TCJA wage gains and investment surges observed through 2019. On regulatory matters, conservatives have faulted PPI for advocating incremental reforms over wholesale , claiming the think tank's proposals perpetuate an overreaching administrative state. PPI's endorsement of a Regulatory Improvement Commission to review and update rules, rather than sunset outdated ones en masse, has been dismissed by right-wing commentators as a technocratic Band-Aid that preserves regulatory accumulation's drag on productivity—estimated at 2% of annual GDP growth loss per some models. Detractors highlight PPI's resistance to blanket rollbacks, as articulated in its reports favoring "constant updating" of rules, as evidence of insufficient commitment to free-market principles amid evidence that under the early administration correlated with resurgence. These critiques often frame PPI's centrism as a diluted that compromises on core tenets of , with figures like those at the analogizing it to unfulfilled promises of restraint under prior centrist regimes, where rhetoric masked persistent spending and interventionism.

References

  1. [1]
    Policy Innovation & Political Reform | About | PPI
    Founded in 1989, PPI started as the intellectual home of the New Democrats and earned a reputation as President Bill Clinton's “idea mill.” It helped to ...People · Careers · Locations
  2. [2]
    Will Marshall - Progressive Policy Institute
    Will Marshall is president and founder of the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI), a catalyst for political change and policy innovation.
  3. [3]
    Minting New Democrats - Philanthropy Roundtable
    In 1989, the DLC formed a nonprofit research arm, the Progressive Policy Institute, to operate as a think tank for centrist Democrats. Wall Street magnate ...
  4. [4]
    The Making of the New Democrats - jstor
    5' In June 1989 a think tank, Progressive Policy Institute. (PPI), was created, nominally separate from the DLC, while the DLC itself undertook more movement- ...
  5. [5]
    WITH FRIENDS IN HIGH PLACES, DEMOCRATIC THINK TANK ...
    Dec 6, 1992 · Founded in 1989 to put flesh on the general themes espoused by the centrist DLC, the Progressive Policy Institute is the Mighty Mouse of the ...<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Will Marshall - NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY
    Will Marshall is president and founder of the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI), established in 1989 as a center for political innovation in Washington, DC.
  7. [7]
    Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) - Discover the Networks
    The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) was established in 1989 as the think tank of the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC), a now-defunct organization whose ...
  8. [8]
    Marshall for The Hill: How Welfare Vanished as a Political Issue
    Aug 29, 2016 · The bill Clinton signed replaced the 61-year-old federal entitlement to cash benefits with a new program, Temporary Assistance to Needy Families ...
  9. [9]
    PPI [Progressive Policy Institute] - Clinton Digital Library
    Domestic Policy Council, Bruce Reed, and Welfare Reform Series, “PPI [Progressive Policy Institute],” Clinton Digital Library, accessed September 27, 2025, ...
  10. [10]
    David Osborne - Progressive Policy Institute
    In 1993, he served as a senior advisor to Vice President Gore, to help run what the Vice President often called his “reinventing government task force,” the ...
  11. [11]
    The end of the DLC era - Politico
    ... founded the DLC and its allied think tank, the Progressive Policy Institute. PPI, which Marshall still runs, spun off from the DLC in 2009 ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  12. [12]
    Power of Progressive Economics: The Clinton Years
    Oct 28, 2011 · President Clinton's policies helped spur the economy out of the doldrums by focusing on the middle class and by making targeted public ...
  13. [13]
    Progressive Policy Institute - Summary from LegiStorm
    The Progressive Policy Institute is an independent, innovative and high-impact DC-based think tank founded in 1989.Missing: founders | Show results with:founders
  14. [14]
    [PDF] The Progressive Policy Institute's Technology and New Economy ...
    “Business-funded R&D as a share of GDP has continued its upward climb, reaching its highest levels ever in 2000.” Page 41. 3 8 PROGRESSIVE POLICY INSTITUTE.
  15. [15]
    Where Regulation Did and Did Not Intensify, 2000-2010
    Jan 5, 2011 · The second point is that the growth of regulation over the past ... © 2025 Progressive Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved. |; Privacy ...
  16. [16]
    PPI Relaunches - Progressive Policy Institute
    Nov 25, 2009 · Last spring, the Progressive Policy Institute and the Democratic Leadership Council formally split, and now a revamped PPI is up and running ...
  17. [17]
    The end of the Democratic Leadership Council era - Politico
    DLC CEO Bruce Reed, a former senior Clinton White House aide, decided in 2009 ... Progressive Policy Institute. Get reporter alerts. Ben Smith. Email. More on ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] The New Politics of Production - Progressive Policy Institute
    Since 2000, the economy has downshifted again, averaging under. 2 per cent growth per year.2 Research from the Kauffman Foundation also suggests a loss of ...Missing: leadership | Show results with:leadership
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Unleashing Innovation and Growth - Progressive Policy Institute
    This starts with policies for stimulating productive investment, innovation and entre- preneurship, because we can't share wealth we're not creating. It ...
  20. [20]
    Project on Center-Left Renewal - Progressive Policy Institute
    PPI has a strong track record of intellectual leadership going back to the late 1990s and 2000s, when we launched the “Third Way” dialogues between the New ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Funding America's Future: A Progressive Budget for Equitable Growth
    Jul 11, 2019 · 3 Ben Ritz and Brendan McDermott, Ending America's Public Investment Drought (Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute, 2018), 21-. 26, ...
  22. [22]
    Can these Gen Z and millennial wonks make neoliberalism cool ...
    Nov 8, 2022 · The think tank created its Center for New Liberalism in 2020 to house the Neoliberal Project and other intellectual work, but ultimately ...Missing: present | Show results with:present<|control11|><|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Our New Website and a New(ish) Name - Center for New Liberalism
    Sep 21, 2022 · Since 2020, we have been a part of the Progressive Policy Institute, a storied Washington DC think tank that traces its roots back as the brain ...
  24. [24]
    New PPI Report Finds Tech and E-Commerce Sectors Are a ...
    Jun 10, 2025 · A new report from the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) highlights counties where the tech, information, and e-commerce (TIE) sector is driving growth.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Paying for Progress: - Progressive Policy Institute
    Jul 11, 2024 · Diana Moss, “Taking Stock of Merger Enforcement Under the Biden Administration,” Progressive Policy Institute, March 2024, ... Center for New ...
  26. [26]
    PPI Leads Coalition Letter Urging House Leadership to Oppose ...
    Sep 26, 2022 · Progressive Policy Institute (PPI). Center for New Liberalism (CNL). Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA). Blackstone Valley ...
  27. [27]
    Progressive Policy Institute - InfluenceWatch
    The Progressive Policy Institute is a center-left organization which focuses on domestic policy issues including economic policy, technology, entitlement ...
  28. [28]
    Lindsay Mark Lewis - Progressive Policy Institute
    Lindsay Mark Lewis is the Chief Executive Officer and has been a Board Member of the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) since 2010.Missing: current | Show results with:current
  29. [29]
    Leadership & Staff | People | PPI - Progressive Policy Institute
    Will Marshall. President ; Lindsay Mark Lewis. Chief Executive Officer ; Michael Mandel. Vice President and Chief Economist ; Diana Moss. Vice President and ...
  30. [30]
    Michael Mandel - Progressive Policy Institute
    Dr. Michael Mandel is Vice President and Chief Economist at the Progressive Policy Institute in Washington DC and senior fellow at the Mack Institute for ...
  31. [31]
    Ed Gresser - Progressive Policy Institute
    Ed Gresser is Vice President and Director for Trade and Global Markets at PPI. Ed rejoined PPI in 2021, after an earlier tour from 2001-2011.Missing: current | Show results with:current
  32. [32]
    PPI's Third Way Foundation Adds Three New Members to the ...
    Aug 25, 2021 · PPI's Third Way Foundation Adds Three New Members to the Institute's Board of Directors · Elizabeth “Liz” Bowyer · Robin Lake · Bernard F. McKay ...
  33. [33]
    Jeremiah Johnson - Center for New Liberalism
    Jeremiah Johnson is the co-founder of the Center for New Liberalism. He co-founded CNL along with Colin Mortimer in 2017 to promote liberal ideas.Missing: Project | Show results with:Project
  34. [34]
    141: Jeremiah Johnson - Neoliberal - by Will Jarvis
    Mar 31, 2023 · I founded the neoliberal project in 2017, or 2018, depending on how exact you want to be. The neoliberal project is a kind of center left ...
  35. [35]
    The New Old Liberals - Columbia Journalism Review
    Jun 10, 2024 · A political group aiming to provide a home for Zoomer, Gen Z, and millennial voters who feel alienated by the Democratic Party's progressive tilt.Missing: present | Show results with:present
  36. [36]
    RELEASE: Young Neoliberals Link Up With PPI - Progressive Policy ...
    “Over the last several years, we have built the Neoliberal Project into an online community of politically engaged young individuals who are pushing back ...
  37. [37]
    https://palladiummag.com/2020/05/28/palladium-podcast-35-jeremiah-johnson-on-the-neoliberal-project/
  38. [38]
    Center for New Liberalism
    Our network of 80+ chapters around the world advocate for pragmatic, liberal change and values. Join A ChapterMissing: Progressive 2020- present
  39. [39]
    Progressive Policy Institute - Wikiwand
    The organization's executive director is Lindsay Lewis. Its chief economic strategist is Michael Mandel, who writes on innovation, growth, and the reduction of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  40. [40]
    What New Liberals Believe
    We believe in core liberal principles like democratic representation, equality before the law, an open society, and the freedom of speech, association, religion ...Missing: PPI | Show results with:PPI
  41. [41]
    CNL In The Washington post - Center for New Liberalism
    Nov 8, 2024 · ... Institute (PPI), a moderate-left think tank whose Center for New Liberalism has established more than 80 chapters claiming over 10,000 ...Missing: goals | Show results with:goals
  42. [42]
    Corporate America's Attempt to Rebrand Centrist Politics for Zoomers
    Aug 31, 2023 · According to the Washington Post, Progressive Policy Institute's Center for New Liberalism started out as an organic subreddit, Ne0liberal ...Missing: present | Show results with:present
  43. [43]
    Unleashing Innovation and Growth: A Progressive Alternative to ...
    Mar 15, 2016 · Progressives owe U.S. voters a hopeful alternative to populist outrage and the false panaceas of nativism, protectionism, and democratic ...
  44. [44]
    Economic Populism From Both Parties Fails Working Americans
    May 23, 2025 · Unfortunately, they have proved better at posturing as working-class tribunes than at tangibly improving their lives.Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Three Threats to Liberal Democracy - Progressive Policy Institute
    “In short, populism plunges democratic societies into an endless series of moralized zero sum conflicts, it threatens the rights of minorities, and it enables.
  46. [46]
    PPI Unveils AI Innovation Toolbox to Help Governors Compete in the Emerging Tech Economy - Progressive Policy Institute
    ### Summary of the AI Innovation Toolbox
  47. [47]
    Innovation Frontier Project - Progressive Policy Institute
    The Innovation Frontier Project commissions research from talented academics and regulatory experts around the world to bring new ideas and ambitious policy ...Missing: growth strategies
  48. [48]
    Paying for Progress: A Blueprint to Cut Costs, Boost Growth, and ...
    Jul 23, 2024 · Our blueprint would raise enough revenue to fund our government through a tax code that is simpler, more progressive, and more pro-growth than current policy.Missing: 2020 | Show results with:2020
  49. [49]
    PPI's New Skills for A New Economy Project to Promote Workforce ...
    Dec 15, 2022 · The New Skills for a New Economy Project will help shape policy discussions at the federal and state levels around investments in a robust ...Missing: growth | Show results with:growth
  50. [50]
    New PPI Report Calls for Coherent U.S. Competition Policy in the ...
    Oct 17, 2024 · Today, the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) released a groundbreaking new report, “In Search of a Competition Policy for the Digital Sector,” ...
  51. [51]
    Antitrust regulators shouldn't disassemble one of America's engines ...
    Oct 10, 2024 · “Antitrust regulations that reduce the size and limit the scope of tech firms weaken their incentives to make the large-scale, long-run ...
  52. [52]
    Reinventing America's Schools - Progressive Policy Institute
    The Reinventing America's Schools Project seeks to refocus national leadership around proven strategies to improve public schools and educational achievement.
  53. [53]
    New PPI Report Declares America's Schools in Crisis, Urges a Bold ...
    Sep 9, 2025 · Canter outlines a sweeping nine-point reform agenda to rebuild public education and restore national confidence in schools: A goal of universal ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] 20 Years of Reinvention: - Education Reform in New Orleans
    The Progressive Policy Institute is a catalyst for policy innovation and political reform based in Washington, D.C. Its mission is to create radically ...
  55. [55]
    Teaching Students What It Means to Be an American
    Jul 1, 2024 · The report outlines nine actionable strategies at the K-12 and college levels to teach students a common American identity.
  56. [56]
    PPI Launches New Report on Improving Housing for Working ...
    Sep 10, 2024 · The report tackles the rising housing costs and offers pragmatic solutions to improve affordability for working families across the United States.Missing: domestic | Show results with:domestic
  57. [57]
    A progressive case for Social Security reform
    preserving and expanding Social Security.
  58. [58]
    What It Takes: Modernizing Government IT to Meet 21st Century ...
    Sep 25, 2020 · We need a big push to modernize government, using new digital tools not only to deliver services more efficiently, but to reengineer public services.<|control11|><|separator|>
  59. [59]
    The 20th Anniversary of Welfare Reform - Progressive Policy Institute
    Aug 22, 2016 · The 1996 bill replaced the old welfare entitlement with a performance-based block grant called Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF).
  60. [60]
    The future of NAFTA and the state of U.S.-Mexico relations
    The implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1994 signaled a new beginning in the countries' relationship, opening the Mexican ...
  61. [61]
    Getting Democrats to “Yes” on Trump's New NAFTA
    Jun 17, 2019 · President Trump is apparently a trade alchemist. He's taken the core of NAFTA (the “worst trade deal ever”), liberally sprinkled in modern ...
  62. [62]
    PPI Statement Celebrating the 25th Anniversary of the New ...
    May 16, 2022 · The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) is a catalyst for policy ... Clinton's “idea mill.” Many of its mold-breaking ideas have been ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] And the Way Ahead for Democrats - Progressive Policy Institute
    Democrats must stop reflexively defending the programmatic status quo at a time when working families feel forgotten and disrespected by Washington policymakers.
  64. [64]
    Reform That Rewards Work: A New Vision for Strengthening Social ...
    Aug 11, 2025 · Altogether, PPI's proposed reforms would close half of the program's shortfall over the next 30 years through benefit changes while reducing ...Missing: welfare | Show results with:welfare
  65. [65]
    The Outcomes of 1996 Welfare Reform - Brookings Institution
    Jul 19, 2006 · Between 1994 and 2005, the caseload declined about 60 percent. The number of families receiving cash welfare is now the lowest it has been since ...
  66. [66]
    After 1996 Welfare Law, a Weaker Safety Net and More Children in ...
    Aug 9, 2016 · In a federally funded evaluation of 11 programs, all of the programs raised employment rates somewhat in the short term and several reduced ...
  67. [67]
    Searching for the Tipping Point: Scaling Up Public School Choice ...
    Oct 10, 2024 · An opinion poll released in May 2024 by Democrats for Education Reform found that 77% of parents, including 80% of Black and 71% of Hispanic ...<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    The Charter School Dust-Up: Examining the evidence on enrollment ...
    The data showed that average achievement is higher in regular public schools than in charter schools, both for students overall and for low-income students.
  69. [69]
    National Service, AmeriCorps, and the Future of Education
    Jun 25, 2025 · PPI & Reinventing America's Schools: National Service, AmeriCorps, and the Future of Education. Wednesday, June 25 at 1:00 p.m. ET.
  70. [70]
    The Poverty of Neoliberalism - The American Prospect
    Jun 1, 1990 · ... Progressive Policy Institute. Journalists have been particularly influenced by neoliberal ideas. Much of the press seems to have accepted ...
  71. [71]
    https://jacobinmag.com/2022/07/new-democrats-social-welfare-programs-dlc-left-behind
  72. [72]
    Exxon Mobil Is Funding the Progressive Policy Institute - The Intercept
    Sep 6, 2019 · In an email, PPI Executive Director Lindsay Lewis said the money was used for general support and that “we only accept general support funding ...
  73. [73]
    Democrats and Neoliberalism - New America
    Clinton, who served as the head of the DLC in the early 1990s, emerged as the most influential advocate of the ideas in Reinventing Government, praising it as a ...
  74. [74]
    How Seven Think Tanks Would Use Tax Revenues To Help Reduce ...
    Jul 23, 2024 · Groups such as CAP (20.8 percent) and PPI (21.6 percent) would raise taxes substantially more in 2034 and even more in 2054, 21.8 percent of GDP ...
  75. [75]
    GOP Doubles Down on Deceptive Budget-Busting Tax Plan
    May 16, 2025 · PPI warned last week that Republicans' “Big Beautiful Bill” was shaping up to repeat and compound many of the problems that doomed Joe Biden's “ ...
  76. [76]
    Regulators Deserve a Nudge, Not a Shove
    Jun 28, 2024 · As expected, anti-regulation voices are sounding off with unbridled glee as conservative lawmakers blow the dust off of old legislative ...Missing: fiscal positions
  77. [77]
    [PDF] The “Third Way”: Marketing Mirage or Trojan Horse? - Fraser Institute
    Considerable em- phasis is placed upon the so-called “Three Politi- cal Horsemen” of the Third Way–-America's Bill. Clinton, Britain's Tony Blair, and Germany's ...