Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Third Way

The Third Way is a centrist political ideology that emerged in the 1990s as an attempt to reconcile social democratic commitments to welfare and equality with market-oriented economic policies suited to globalization and technological change.^[1] Articulated primarily by British sociologist Anthony Giddens, it posits that traditional left-right divisions based on class struggle have become obsolete, advocating instead for a pragmatic blend of opportunity, responsibility, and community through reforms like workfare, fiscal prudence, and public-private partnerships.^[2]^[3] Pioneered by leaders such as U.S. President Bill Clinton and U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair, the Third Way influenced center-left governments in multiple countries, including Germany's Gerhard Schröder and Canada's Jean Chrétien, emphasizing welfare-to-work programs, trade liberalization, and crime reduction alongside targeted social investments.^[4]^[5] These policies were credited with economic expansions and budget surpluses in the late 1990s, such as Clinton's 1996 welfare reform that reduced caseloads by over 60% and correlated with low unemployment, though causal links remain debated amid broader global trends. Blair's New Labour similarly achieved sustained growth and poverty reduction via minimum wage and education initiatives, but faced scrutiny for increasing inequality and public debt.^[4] Critics from the left argue the Third Way diluted socialist principles by prioritizing neoliberal deregulation and financialization, contributing to wage stagnation for low-skilled workers and the 2008 financial crisis through lax oversight, while right-wing detractors viewed it as insufficiently committed to free markets and burdened by residual state intervention.^[6] Empirical analyses suggest mixed outcomes: while it facilitated electoral successes for center-left parties and moderate inequality reductions in some metrics, it often failed to address structural causes of social exclusion, prompting a backlash toward populism in subsequent decades.^[4]

Conceptual Foundations

Definition and Core Principles

The Third Way denotes a centrist political framework that aims to integrate free-market economics with commitments to social equity, presenting itself as a renewal of social democracy adapted to globalization and technological change. Articulated by sociologist Anthony Giddens in his 1998 work The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy, it rejects the statist interventions of old-left socialism and the minimal government of traditional conservatism, favoring instead pragmatic policies that promote economic competitiveness alongside investments in human capital.^[7]^[8] This approach gained traction among center-left leaders seeking electoral viability in post-Cold War environments, emphasizing adaptability over ideological purity.^[4] At its economic core, the Third Way endorses market liberalization, deregulation, and entrepreneurship to foster growth and innovation, while advocating fiscal discipline through balanced budgets and reduced public debt to enable sustainable welfare spending. Proponents argue this combination sustains prosperity without exacerbating inequality, as evidenced by the U.S. federal budget surpluses from 1998 to 2001 under President Bill Clinton, achieved via spending restraint and revenue from economic expansion rather than tax hikes on the middle class.^[8]^[9] Social policies shift from passive redistribution to "investive" strategies, prioritizing education, skills training, and lifelong learning to enhance employability and equality of opportunity over equality of outcome.^[10] Politically, it stresses reciprocal obligations in welfare systems—termed "rights and responsibilities"—reforming benefits into workfare programs that mandate job-seeking in exchange for support, aiming to reduce dependency and poverty traps. Community empowerment and civic engagement are highlighted, with devolution of power to local levels and partnerships between state, market, and civil society to address issues like crime and social exclusion through preventive measures rather than punitive ones alone.^[11] Giddens outlined additional tenets such as ecological sustainability, tolerance of diversity, and cosmopolitan internationalism tempered by national identity preservation, though implementation varied, often prioritizing electoral pragmatism.^[7] Critics from the left contend these principles dilute socialist aims by accommodating neoliberal trends, yet empirical outcomes in adopters like the UK under Tony Blair showed reduced unemployment and child poverty rates in the late 1990s.^[8]^[6]

Theoretical Underpinnings and Influences

![Bill Clinton with Anthony Giddens](./assets/Bill_Clinton_with_Professor_Anthony_Giddens_Joint_Chair The Third Way's theoretical foundations are rooted in the revisionist tradition of social democracy, which seeks to adapt socialist principles to modern economic realities without relying on revolutionary change or extensive nationalization. Eduard Bernstein's Evolutionary Socialism (1899) laid early groundwork by advocating gradual reforms through parliamentary means, rejecting Marxist orthodoxy in favor of pragmatic cooperation with capitalist structures to achieve social goals.^[6] This evolutionary approach influenced later thinkers, emphasizing empirical adaptation over ideological purity. Anthony Giddens emerged as the preeminent theorist of the Third Way in the late 1990s, drawing on his structuration theory—which posits that social structures are both the medium and outcome of human actions—to argue for a reflexive, adaptive politics suited to "late modernity." In The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy (1998), Giddens critiqued both neoliberal market fundamentalism and outdated social democratic statism, proposing instead a synthesis that prioritizes equal opportunity, personal responsibility, and community investment amid globalization and individualization.^[12]^[13] He contended that traditional left-wing egalitarianism focused excessively on outcome equality, advocating a shift toward enabling life chances through education, skills, and workfare policies.^[14] Communitarian philosophy further shaped the Third Way, with influences from thinkers like Amitai Etzioni, who stressed balancing individual rights with communal obligations and moral responsibilities. This manifested in policies promoting "no rights without responsibilities," such as welfare reforms conditioning benefits on job-seeking efforts. Giddens integrated these ideas to counterbalance market individualism, arguing for active state roles in fostering social capital and ecological sustainability without reverting to command economies.^[8] Economically, the Third Way incorporated elements of New Keynesianism, favoring fiscal discipline, supply-side investments in human capital, and regulated markets over demand-side stimulus or laissez-faire deregulation. This reflected a post-Cold War consensus on globalization's irreversibility, where social democrats accepted private enterprise's efficiency while seeking to mitigate its inequalities through targeted interventions rather than redistribution alone. Critics from the traditional left, however, viewed this as a capitulation to neoliberalism, though proponents like Giddens maintained it represented a realistic third path beyond socialism's collapse and conservatism's excesses.^[15]^[2]

Historical Development

Early Precursors and Intellectual Roots

The intellectual roots of the Third Way lie in revisionist socialism, which emerged in the late 19th century as a departure from orthodox Marxism's emphasis on revolutionary overthrow of capitalism. German theorist Eduard Bernstein, in his 1899 work Evolutionary Socialism, argued that socialism could be achieved through gradual democratic reforms within a capitalist framework, rejecting violent revolution in favor of incremental improvements via trade unions, cooperatives, and state intervention to address inequalities.^[16] This evolutionary approach influenced the development of social democracy, prioritizing pragmatic adaptation to market realities over ideological purity.^[17] In the mid-20th century, post-World War II revisionism within European social democratic parties built on Bernstein's foundations, adapting to the realities of mixed economies. British Labour politician Anthony Crosland's 1956 book The Future of Socialism contended that public ownership of industry was not essential to socialist goals; instead, equality could be advanced through progressive taxation, welfare provision, and harnessing capitalist efficiency for redistribution, marking a shift from nationalization to outcome-focused policies.^[18] Crosland's emphasis on social ends over doctrinal means prefigured Third Way efforts to reconcile market dynamism with social justice, influencing Labour's internal debates during the 1950s and 1960s.^[11] Even outside socialist traditions, interwar conservative thought contributed parallel ideas of moderation. In 1938, British politician Harold Macmillan outlined The Middle Way as a compromise between laissez-faire capitalism and full socialism, advocating planned investment, housing reforms, and welfare safeguards to stabilize the economy while retaining private enterprise amid the Great Depression's failures.^[19] These precursors—spanning revisionist socialism's acceptance of markets and moderate conservatism's interventionism—provided the conceptual groundwork for later Third Way syntheses, particularly as social democrats grappled with 1970s stagflation and the limits of Keynesian expansionism.^[17]

Emergence in the Post-Cold War Era

The dissolution of the Soviet Union in December 1991 invalidated traditional Marxist alternatives to capitalism, compelling center-left parties in the West to adapt their platforms to a unipolar world dominated by market-oriented democracies. This ideological reconfiguration, occurring amid globalization and technological change, fostered the Third Way as a pragmatic synthesis: endorsing competitive markets and fiscal discipline while pursuing equality through opportunity and targeted interventions rather than redistribution alone. Early manifestations emphasized moving beyond both state socialism and unrestrained laissez-faire, with proponents arguing that post-Cold War realities demanded innovation in social democracy to regain electoral viability.^[6]^[20] In the United States, the Democratic Leadership Council's efforts to moderate the Democratic Party intensified after 1988 defeats, culminating in Bill Clinton's 1992 presidential victory as a "New Democrat." Clinton's platform integrated free-market reforms, such as the 1993 North American Free Trade Agreement and the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act overhauling welfare, with rhetoric on "ending welfare as we know it" to promote work incentives. These policies, framed as balancing compassion with toughness on dependency, positioned the Third Way as electorally potent, influencing international analogs by showcasing center-left governance compatible with economic growth and deficit reduction.^[21]^[22] Across the Atlantic, Tony Blair's ascension to Labour Party leadership in July 1994 marked the Third Way's crystallization in Europe, with the 1995 abandonment of Clause IV—renouncing wholesale nationalization—signaling a decisive rupture from postwar socialism. Blair collaborated with sociologist Anthony Giddens, whose 1998 publication The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy outlined principles like "no rights without responsibilities" and investment in human capital over passive benefits. Giddens' framework, emphasizing a "radical centre" responsive to globalization, underpinned Blair's policies and the 1998 "Third Way" declaration co-authored with European leaders, exporting the model continent-wide.^[12]^[23]^[24]

Global Dissemination in the 1990s and 2000s

![Gerhard Schröder cropped](./assets/2004-09-13%252C_El_canciller_de_Alemania_cropped The Third Way's appeal extended beyond the United States and United Kingdom following the 1992 reelection of Bill Clinton and the 1997 victory of Tony Blair's New Labour, inspiring center-left parties in Europe to adopt similar centrist, market-oriented reforms blended with social policies.^[20] In Germany, Chancellor Gerhard Schröder's Social Democratic Party (SPD) embraced the "Neue Mitte" framework in 1998, emphasizing modernization through welfare restructuring and economic competitiveness while rejecting traditional socialism.^[25] This approach culminated in a joint declaration with Blair in June 1999, titled "Europe: The Third Way/Die Neue Mitte," which advocated for active welfare states, employability-focused labor markets, and fiscal prudence across the European Union.^[26]^[27] In the Netherlands, Prime Minister Wim Kok's Labour Party (PvdA) pursued Third Way-aligned policies from 1994 onward in coalition governments, implementing the "Operation Decent Work" reforms that cut welfare benefits, promoted part-time employment, and deregulated labor markets to achieve low unemployment rates by the late 1990s.^[25]^[28] Kok's model, often cited in international Third Way discussions, balanced economic growth with social inclusion, influencing EU-wide debates on flexibility and security.^[28] Across the Atlantic, Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chrétien's Liberal government from 1993 integrated Third Way elements by achieving federal budget surpluses through spending cuts and tax reforms, while reforming unemployment insurance into employment insurance to encourage workforce participation.^[29] These measures, enacted amid the 1995 Quebec referendum and fiscal crises, reduced public debt from 68% to 29% of GDP by 2004, positioning Canada as a model of pragmatic social democracy.^[29] In Australia, the Australian Labor Party under Bob Hawke (1983–1991) and Paul Keating (1991–1996) pioneered deregulatory reforms in the 1980s and early 1990s, including floating the dollar in 1983, tariff reductions, and enterprise bargaining, which prefigured Third Way economics by integrating market liberalization with targeted social investments.^[30] Keating explicitly framed these as a "third way" between protectionism and unchecked neoliberalism, influencing global center-left strategies into the 2000s.^[31] By the early 2000s, Third Way variants appeared in countries like Brazil under Fernando Henrique Cardoso, though adaptations varied amid local economic pressures.^[32] The paradigm's dissemination peaked around 1998–2000 but faced scrutiny as inequality persisted despite growth.^[20]

Key National Implementations

United Kingdom under New Labour

The implementation of the Third Way in the United Kingdom occurred under the Labour Party's New Labour government, led by Tony Blair from 1997 to 2007 and Gordon Brown from 2007 to 2010. Blair articulated the Third Way in a 1998 pamphlet as a modernization of social democracy, emphasizing the integration of market economics with social justice, where the state fosters opportunity and responsibility rather than relying on traditional welfare redistribution or laissez-faire capitalism.^[24] This approach involved rejecting Clause IV of the Labour Party constitution in 1995, which had committed the party to public ownership of industry, and instead prioritizing fiscal prudence, such as adhering to Conservative spending plans in the first two years of government.^[33] Economically, New Labour granted operational independence to the Bank of England in May 1997 to set interest rates, targeting 2% inflation, which contributed to macroeconomic stability and average annual GDP growth of 2.3% from 1997 to 2010.^[34] Policies included introducing a national minimum wage of £3.60 per hour in 1999, rising to £5.93 by 2010, and welfare-to-work programs like the New Deal, which provided training and job subsidies to reduce unemployment from 7.6% in 1997 to 5.2% by 2007.^[35] Investments in public services doubled health spending from £64 billion in 1996-97 to £128 billion by 2009-10, while education reforms such as academies aimed to improve standards, though productivity growth remained below the OECD average at 1.5% annually.^[36] Private Finance Initiative (PFI) contracts expanded infrastructure but accumulated off-balance-sheet liabilities exceeding £50 billion by 2010.^[35] Social policies reflected Third Way principles of community and responsibility, with initiatives like Sure Start centers, established in 1999 to support early childhood development in deprived areas, reaching over 700,000 children by 2010, and tax credits that lifted 600,000 children out of poverty between 1998-99 and 2008-09 according to Institute for Fiscal Studies estimates.^[37] However, child poverty fell from 3.4 million in 1997 to 2.9 million by 2007, short of the government's target to eradicate it by 2020.^[38] Immigration policy liberalized, with net migration rising from 48,000 in 1997 to 252,000 by 2009, contributing to labor market flexibility but straining public services in some regions. Critics, including economists assessing post-1997 performance, argue that while inequality measures like the Gini coefficient stabilized around 0.34, the approach converged with neoliberalism by emphasizing markets over state ownership, leading to increased household debt and vulnerability to the 2008 financial crisis.^[35]^[39] In foreign policy, Blair's government pursued an "ethical dimension," intervening in Kosovo in 1999 and Sierra Leone in 2000, but the 2003 Iraq invasion, justified partly on humanitarian grounds, exemplified activist interventionism aligned with Third Way globalism, though it drew domestic opposition and inquiries later deeming intelligence flawed.^[33] Overall, New Labour's Third Way secured three election victories in 1997, 2001, and 2005, transforming the party into an electoral force but sparking debates on whether it diluted socialist roots for centrism.^[40]

United States via the Democratic Leadership Council

The Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) was founded on February 2, 1985, by Al From, a Democratic strategist, along with moderate politicians including then-Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton and Tennessee Senator Al Gore Jr., in response to the Democratic Party's landslide defeat in the 1984 presidential election under Walter Mondale.^[41]^[42] The organization sought to steer the party away from its leftward shift since the late 1960s, advocating for a pragmatic, centrist approach that emphasized fiscal discipline, pro-growth economic policies, and rejection of big-government liberalism to regain electoral viability among moderate and independent voters.^[43]^[44] Key DLC policies included support for balanced budgets, free trade agreements like the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), welfare reform with work requirements and time limits, tougher crime measures such as the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, and education initiatives like national standards and charter schools, all framed as blending market incentives with limited government intervention to foster opportunity and responsibility.^[42]^[45] Through its affiliated Progressive Policy Institute, founded in 1989 by Will Marshall, the DLC developed intellectual underpinnings for these ideas, influencing a generation of "New Democrats" who prioritized empirical results over ideological purity.^[46] Bill Clinton's ascension to DLC chairmanship in 1990 propelled the group's influence, as he integrated its tenets into his 1992 presidential campaign, promising to "end welfare as we know it" and achieve deficit reduction, which contributed to his victories in 1992 and 1996.^[47]^[48] Clinton explicitly described his governance as a "Third Way," distinct from both traditional liberalism and conservatism, focusing on active but efficient government that rewarded work, invested in human capital, and reformed entitlements—evident in the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, which replaced Aid to Families with Dependent Children with Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, imposing federal work mandates and block grants to states.^[48]^[45] His administration's 1993 budget, which raised taxes on high earners while cutting spending and achieving surpluses by 1998, further exemplified DLC fiscal conservatism alongside expansions like the earned income tax credit.^[42] The DLC's model influenced subsequent Democratic leaders, including Vice President Al Gore's 2000 campaign and elements of Barack Obama's 2008 platform, though the organization dissolved in 2011 amid perceptions of declining relevance in a more polarized party landscape.^[42] Critics from the party's left argued that DLC policies eroded core commitments to labor and the working class by embracing neoliberal elements, but proponents credited it with enabling Democratic control of the White House for 12 of 16 years from 1993 to 2009 through voter appeal in swing states.^[42]

Germany and the Neue Mitte

In Germany, the Third Way manifested as the Neue Mitte (New Center), a centrist reorientation of social democracy promoted by the Social Democratic Party (SPD) under Chancellor Gerhard Schröder. This approach sought to reconcile market-oriented economics with social protections amid post-unification economic challenges, including high unemployment exceeding 10% in the early 1990s. Schröder's SPD, in coalition with the Greens, assumed power on October 27, 1998, following a federal election victory that ended 16 years of Christian Democratic rule under Helmut Kohl.^[49]^[50] The Neue Mitte gained prominence through a June 1998 joint declaration, "Europe: The Third Way/Die Neue Mitte," co-authored by Schröder and British Prime Minister Tony Blair. This document outlined a progressive agenda for European social democrats, emphasizing competitiveness, entrepreneurship, and welfare reform over traditional state interventionism, while rejecting both unchecked markets and rigid socialism. It positioned the Neue Mitte as a pragmatic response to globalization, advocating policies like flexible labor markets and fiscal responsibility to foster employment without eroding social cohesion. The declaration influenced SPD campaign rhetoric, framing Schröder's leadership as a modernizing force capable of addressing Germany's lagging growth rates, which averaged under 2% annually in the late 1990s.^[51]^[52] Central to implementation was the Agenda 2010, a comprehensive reform package announced by Schröder on March 14, 2003, comprising labor market deregulation, welfare restructuring, and tax adjustments. Key components included the Hartz IV reforms, effective January 1, 2005, which merged unemployment benefits and social assistance into a single means-tested system (Arbeitslosengeld II), reducing benefit duration from up to 32 months to 12 for most recipients and introducing stricter job-search requirements with sanctions for non-compliance. Additional measures deregulated temporary employment agencies and eased hiring/firing rules to boost flexibility, aiming to lower structural unemployment that persisted above 8% despite economic recovery. These changes, often dubbed "Hartz reforms" after commissioner Peter Hartz, drew from Third Way principles of activating the workforce through incentives rather than passive support.^[53]^[54]^[55] Empirically, Agenda 2010 contributed to Germany's economic rebound, with unemployment falling to 5.5% by 2008 from a peak of 11.7% in 2005, alongside rising exports and a current account surplus exceeding 6% of GDP by 2007. Productivity gains stemmed from wage restraint via negotiated alliances with unions and expanded low-wage sectors, enabling the "German jobs miracle" post-2005. However, the reforms exacerbated income inequality, with the Gini coefficient rising from 0.27 in 2000 to 0.30 by 2010, and faced internal SPD backlash for undermining traditional welfare commitments, contributing to the party's 2005 electoral setback. Critics, including trade unions, argued the measures prioritized neoliberal convergence over causal protections for vulnerable groups, though proponents credited them with averting deeper stagnation akin to France's rigid labor model.^[56]^[57]^[58]

Other European and International Cases

In the Netherlands, Prime Minister Wim Kok of the Labour Party (PvdA) pursued policies aligned with Third Way principles through two "purple coalitions" from 1994 to 2002, combining social democrats with liberal parties to emphasize fiscal discipline, labor market flexibility, and welfare reform without raising taxes significantly. Kok's government reduced unemployment from 8.5% in 1994 to 2.7% by 2001 via activation policies and public-private partnerships, while maintaining a balanced budget and adhering to the Maastricht criteria for European monetary union. Although Kok cautioned against explicitly adopting the "Third Way" label to avoid alienating traditional voters, U.S. President Bill Clinton praised the Dutch model as a leading example of progressive governance integrating market incentives with social protections.^[59]^[60]^[61] In Italy, the Democratic Party under Matteo Renzi from 2014 onward incorporated Third Way elements, focusing on structural reforms to boost competitiveness, such as the Jobs Act of 2015 which eased hiring and firing regulations to reduce youth unemployment from 42.7% in 2014 to 35.6% by 2017, alongside commitments to fiscal consolidation and EU integration. Renzi positioned the party as a modernizing force blending pro-market policies with social investments, drawing comparisons to Tony Blair's New Labour, though critics argued it diluted traditional socialist commitments in favor of centrist appeal. Former Prime Minister Romano Prodi also advocated similar approaches earlier, emphasizing innovation and globalization within a social democratic framework.^[62] Beyond Europe, Canada's Liberal government under Prime Minister Jean Chrétien from 1993 to 2003 implemented Third Way-style austerity and reforms, slashing federal spending by 20% in the mid-1990s to eliminate a $42 billion deficit by 1997, while preserving core social programs like universal healthcare and introducing targeted investments in education and innovation. This centrist approach combined deficit reduction with pro-growth measures, achieving budget surpluses averaging $10 billion annually from 1998 to 2003 and reducing unemployment to 6.8% by 2000, positioning Canada as a model of progressive fiscal responsibility amid global economic pressures. Chrétien explicitly aligned with Third Way governance, stressing technological advancement and a mixed economy.^[63]^[64] In Australia, the Hawke-Keating Labor governments from 1983 to 1996 pioneered reforms that influenced later Third Way strategies, including floating the dollar in 1983, deregulating financial markets, and introducing enterprise bargaining in 1991 to enhance productivity while expanding superannuation coverage to 80% of workers by 1996. These measures shifted from protectionism to openness, reducing tariffs from 27% to 5% over the period and fostering GDP growth averaging 3.5% annually, though they sparked debates over whether the agenda represented true Third Way centrism or adapted Australian Laborism prioritizing consensus via the Prices and Incomes Accord with unions. Bob Hawke and Paul Keating's emphasis on microeconomic reform and human capital investment laid groundwork for global Third Way dissemination.^[65]^[66]

Policy Frameworks

Economic Approaches and Market Integration

The Third Way economic framework prioritized market mechanisms and globalization over traditional state interventionism, rejecting Keynesian fiscal stimulus and nationalization in favor of supply-side incentives, entrepreneurship, and fiscal discipline to foster competitiveness in a globalized economy.^[67] This approach viewed markets as efficient allocators of resources but necessitated regulatory frameworks to address market failures and ensure social investment in human capital, such as education and skills training, rather than passive income support.^[68] Proponents argued that such policies reconciled economic efficiency with social justice by promoting opportunity over equality of outcome, emphasizing active labor market policies like workfare programs that conditioned benefits on employment or training.^[8] Market integration formed a cornerstone, with Third Way governments embracing free trade agreements and supranational economic structures to enhance growth and adapt to globalization's irreversibility. In the United States, President Bill Clinton signed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) on January 1, 1994, which eliminated tariffs across North America and boosted trade volumes to over $1 trillion annually by the early 2000s, though it faced criticism for job displacement in manufacturing.^[69] Clinton's administration also pursued financial deregulation, including the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, which repealed parts of the Glass-Steagall Act to allow interstate banking mergers, contributing to expanded credit access but later linked to systemic risks.^[70] Welfare reforms exemplified the shift toward market-conforming social policy, as seen in the U.S. Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, which imposed five-year lifetime limits on federal cash assistance and mandated work requirements for recipients, reducing welfare caseloads by over 60% by 2000 while correlating with low unemployment and poverty declines.^[71]^[72] In the United Kingdom, Tony Blair's New Labour retained Margaret Thatcher's privatizations and union reforms, granting operational independence to the Bank of England in 1997 to prioritize inflation control over employment targets, while introducing tax credits and minimum wage policies to integrate low-skilled workers into the market.^[24] These measures aimed to create a "competition state" focused on investment in infrastructure and skills to attract global capital.^[10] European variants, such as Germany's Agenda 2010 under Gerhard Schröder from 2003, combined labor market flexibilization—easing hiring and firing rules—with reduced unemployment benefits to lower non-wage labor costs and integrate into the Eurozone's single market, yielding export-led growth but widening income inequality.^[12] Overall, Third Way economics sought to harness market dynamism for inclusive growth, with empirical outcomes including U.S. budget surpluses from 1998 to 2001 and sustained GDP expansion averaging 3.9% annually during Clinton's tenure, though long-term critiques highlight vulnerability to financial instability from deregulation.^[72] Third Way approaches to social and welfare policy emphasized reforming traditional welfare systems to prioritize work activation, personal responsibility, and targeted investments in human capital over unconditional entitlements, aiming to reduce long-term dependency while maintaining social safety nets. Proponents argued this "active welfare" model addressed the perceived failures of both unrestricted state provision, which could foster disincentives to employment, and pure market liberalization, which risked exacerbating inequality without support for the vulnerable. Reforms typically involved time-limited benefits, work requirements, job training programs, and conditionality, such as sanctions for non-compliance with job search obligations, reflecting a causal view that sustainable poverty reduction stems from labor market participation rather than redistribution alone.^[73]^[74] In the United States, the Democratic Leadership Council's influence culminated in the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1996, signed by President Bill Clinton, which replaced the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program with Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). This legislation imposed a five-year lifetime limit on federal cash assistance, mandated work requirements for recipients (e.g., 30 hours per week for single parents), and converted federal funding into block grants to states, totaling about $16.5 billion annually, allowing flexibility in program design but eliminating the prior entitlement status. Caseloads plummeted from 12.2 million recipients in 1996 to 1.9 million by 2011, correlating with a rise in employment rates among single mothers from 60% in 1995 to 75% by 2000, alongside a 50% increase in child support collections to $24 billion by 2005; however, critics noted persistent deep poverty for some families pushed off rolls, with child poverty rates stabilizing around 16-18% post-reform rather than declining further.^[75]^[76]^[77] Under New Labour in the United Kingdom, Prime Minister Tony Blair's government pursued welfare-to-work initiatives, including the New Deal programs launched in 1998, which offered job subsidies, training, and voluntary placements to the long-term unemployed, targeting 250,000 out-of-work individuals initially under a "something for something" principle where benefits were conditional on participation. Complementary measures included the Working Families Tax Credit introduced in 1999 and later expanded into tax credits that lifted 2.2 million children out of poverty between 1998 and 2008, reducing the relative child poverty rate from 26% in 1998 to 12% by 2010 through increased public spending on family supports rising from 0.5% to 2.5% of GDP. These efforts halved the number of children in poverty from 3.7 million to 1.7 million over a decade, though progress stalled post-2008 amid the financial crisis, with absolute poverty metrics showing less sustained gains.^[78]^[79]^[80] In Germany, Chancellor Gerhard Schröder's Agenda 2010, enacted from 2003 to 2005 and incorporating the Hartz IV reforms, merged unemployment insurance with social assistance into a single means-tested benefit (Arbeitslosengeld II), reducing the standard unemployment benefit duration from 32 months to 12 months for most recipients, easing hiring and firing regulations, and introducing stricter job acceptance rules with benefit sanctions up to 100% for refusal of suitable work. These changes, part of a broader push for labor market flexibility including deregulation of temporary agencies and promotion of low-wage "mini-jobs," contributed to unemployment falling from 5.2 million (11.3% rate) in 2005 to 2.9 million (6.1%) by 2010, though they also widened income inequality, with the Gini coefficient rising from 0.27 in 2000 to 0.30 by 2010, and increased in-work poverty affecting 8% of employees by 2015. Empirical analyses attribute much of the employment gains to export-led growth but credit the reforms for curbing structural barriers, despite political backlash within the Social Democratic Party.^[81]^[55]^[82]

Foreign Policy and Interventionism

Third Way foreign policy centered on multilateral engagement through institutions like NATO and the UN, coupled with readiness for humanitarian interventions to address ethnic cleansing, failed states, and threats to global stability. This approach rejected isolationism and rigid non-interventionism, instead prioritizing the promotion of democracy, human rights, and market-oriented globalization as means to foster long-term security. Leaders framed interventions as moral imperatives aligned with national interests, often bypassing full UN Security Council approval when vetoes loomed, as in Kosovo. Empirical outcomes varied: Balkan operations generally stabilized regions and averted mass atrocities, though earlier efforts like Somalia highlighted risks of mission creep and withdrawal under fire. In the United States under Bill Clinton, interventions exemplified this stance. NATO airstrikes in 1995 targeted Bosnian Serb positions amid atrocities against civilians, paving the way for the Dayton Accords that ended the Bosnian War; U.S. forces, numbering around 20,000 as part of NATO, enforced the peace without combat casualties, enabling elections in 1996.^[83] The 1999 Kosovo campaign involved 78 days of NATO bombing to halt Serbian ethnic cleansing of Albanians, leading to Serbian withdrawal, NATO peacekeeping, and de facto Kosovo autonomy, again with no U.S. battle deaths.^[83] These actions contrasted with non-interventions, such as Rwanda's 1994 genocide where 800,000 perished without decisive U.S. involvement, prompting Clinton's later apology.^[83] Tony Blair in the United Kingdom articulated a formal doctrine in his April 1999 Chicago speech, outlining criteria for intervention: genuine humanitarian need, exhaustion of diplomacy, operational feasibility, sustained commitment, and international consensus where possible.^[84] Applied immediately to Kosovo, it justified NATO action despite lacking UN authorization due to anticipated Russian and Chinese vetoes. Blair's government extended this to Sierra Leone in May 2000, deploying forces that bolstered the legitimate administration against rebels, restoring order within weeks and earning praise for effectiveness.^[85] Support for NATO's 1999 enlargement, incorporating Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic, underscored commitment to integrating post-communist states into Western security structures.^[86] In Germany, Gerhard Schröder's Neue Mitte administration marked a cautious embrace of interventionism, endorsing the Kosovo air campaign—Germany's first combat role since 1945—while emphasizing multilateral legitimacy under NATO.^[87] However, Schröder opposed the 2003 Iraq invasion absent UN approval, diverging from Blair and highlighting Third Way flexibility on unilateralism versus alliance cohesion.^[87] This variance reflected domestic constraints and a preference for reformed multilateralism over adventurism, though Kosovo's precedent normalized German contributions to collective defense.

Criticisms and Intellectual Debates

Charges of Neoliberal Convergence

Critics on the political left have charged that the Third Way, as implemented by figures like Tony Blair and Bill Clinton, effectively converged with neoliberalism by prioritizing market liberalization, fiscal austerity, and reduced state intervention in the economy over traditional social democratic commitments to redistribution and labor protections.^[88]^[20] This perspective posits that Third Way governments, facing the post-Cold War dominance of free-market ideologies, adapted socialist parties to neoliberal parameters rather than challenging them, resulting in policies that favored financial capital and globalization at the expense of working-class interests.^[6] For instance, in the United States, the Democratic Leadership Council's influence under Clinton led to the 1993 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which accelerated deindustrialization and wage stagnation for manufacturing workers, aligning with neoliberal trade liberalization goals.^[89] In the United Kingdom, New Labour's retention and expansion of Margaret Thatcher's privatizations—such as the Private Finance Initiative (PFI) introduced in 1992 and scaled up after 1997—exemplified this convergence, as public services were increasingly subcontracted to private firms with profit motives overriding universal access.^[90] Blair's administration also pursued light-touch financial regulation, contributing to the 2008 global financial crisis by enabling unchecked banking expansion, a hallmark of neoliberal deregulation critiqued for prioritizing growth over systemic stability.^[91] These policies, while rhetorically framed as "modernizing" welfare through workfare and conditionality, mirrored neoliberal emphases on individual responsibility and market discipline, leading to rising income inequality; UK Gini coefficients increased from 0.34 in 1997 to 0.36 by 2008 under Labour.^[15]^[92] Defenders of the Third Way, such as sociologist Anthony Giddens, countered that it represented a pragmatic synthesis transcending neoliberalism's pure market fetishism by combining economic competitiveness with social investment, yet empirical outcomes—such as Clinton's 1999 repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, which facilitated financial speculation—have fueled arguments that such distinctions were superficial, with Third Way regimes embedding neoliberal globalization into center-left governance.^[93] This convergence, critics argue, severed ties between social democratic parties and their labor bases, as evidenced by declining union membership (from 13.5 million in the US in 1990 to 11.1 million by 2000) and electoral shifts toward populism in subsequent decades.^[94]^[88]

Abandonment of Traditional Left Principles

Critics of the Third Way, particularly from the traditional left, argued that it represented a deliberate departure from core socialist commitments, such as public ownership of key industries and unconditional welfare entitlements, in favor of market-oriented policies that prioritized economic growth over egalitarian redistribution.^[15] In the United Kingdom, Tony Blair's New Labour government formalized this shift in 1995 by revising Clause IV of the Labour Party constitution, which had historically pledged "common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange" as a foundational principle since 1918; the revision removed explicit advocacy for nationalization, symbolizing an acceptance of private enterprise and capitalism as compatible with social democratic goals, a move decried by party left-wingers as forsaking socialism for electoral viability.^[95] This change reflected broader empirical realities, including the inefficiencies of state-owned enterprises like British Steel and British Leyland in the 1970s, which incurred substantial losses and contributed to economic stagnation, prompting a pragmatic reevaluation rather than ideological purity.^[96] In the United States, Bill Clinton's signing of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act on August 22, 1996, exemplified the abandonment of welfare as an open-ended entitlement, replacing the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program—rooted in the New Deal's expansive social safety net—with Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), which imposed five-year lifetime limits and mandatory work requirements for recipients; left-leaning critics viewed this as a betrayal of Democratic principles by devolving control to states and emphasizing personal responsibility over structural remedies for poverty.^[97] Empirical data post-reform showed caseloads dropping 60% from 1996 to 2000, correlating with low unemployment and rising labor force participation among single mothers, suggesting the policy's causal effectiveness in reducing dependency amid a booming economy, though detractors contended it ignored underlying inequalities perpetuated by market forces.^[98] Third Way approaches across Europe, such as Gerhard Schröder's Agenda 2010 in Germany starting in 2003, further eroded traditional left stances by deregulating labor markets, cutting unemployment benefits, and promoting private pensions over state guarantees, moves that critics like neo-Marxist scholars labeled as capitulation to globalization and neoliberal imperatives, abandoning the postwar social democratic model of full employment through state intervention.^[59] These reforms were justified by proponents on first-principles grounds: state-heavy models had fostered rigidities and fiscal burdens, as evidenced by the Eurozone's 1980s-1990s stagnation with average GDP growth under 2% annually in high-welfare nations, whereas market integration spurred innovation and competitiveness without proportionally increasing inequality when paired with targeted investments.^[99] Nonetheless, the shift alienated working-class bases, with union membership declining 20% in the UK under New Labour from 1997 to 2010, underscoring a causal disconnect from historical left reliance on organized labor.^[100] Sources advancing these abandonment critiques, often from academic or activist outlets with left-wing orientations, merit scrutiny for potential bias toward idealized socialism, as empirical failures of command economies—like the Soviet Union's collapse in 1991—undermined the viability of unadapted traditional principles.^[6]

Overemphasis on Centrism and Empirical Shortcomings

Critics contend that the Third Way's strategic pivot toward centrism sacrificed longstanding social democratic commitments to egalitarianism and state intervention in favor of pragmatic triangulation, rendering policies ideologically indistinct and overly responsive to market signals rather than principled reforms. Proponents like Anthony Giddens advocated this as a necessary adaptation to globalization and electoral realities, yet detractors, including political theorists, argue it fostered vagueness and opportunism, diluting core left-wing values such as robust redistribution and worker protections to appeal to median voters.^[2]^[101] In practice, this manifested in New Labour's retention of Thatcher-era market-oriented structures, such as privatization legacies and light-touch financial regulation, which prioritized consensus over confrontational class-based advocacy. Empirically, this centrist orientation yielded mixed outcomes, with macroeconomic gains overshadowed by failures to curb rising inequality despite promises of inclusive prosperity. In the United Kingdom under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown (1997–2010), absolute poverty declined—child poverty fell by about 1.7 million people through targeted credits and minimum wage hikes—but income inequality, as measured by the Gini coefficient, increased slightly from 0.340 in 1996/97 to 0.352 in 2007/08, reflecting gains disproportionately captured by top earners amid housing and asset bubbles.^[102]^[103] Similarly, in the United States during Bill Clinton's presidency (1993–2001), the official poverty rate dropped from 15.1% to 11.3%, buoyed by economic expansion and welfare-to-work reforms, yet income inequality rose by approximately 12%, with the top income quintile's share expanding while median wages stagnated relative to productivity gains.^[104]^[105] Critics attribute these shortcomings to the Third Way's reluctance to pursue aggressive fiscal redistribution or regulatory overhauls, instead relying on growth trickle-down effects that empirically favored capital over labor, exacerbating wealth concentration as evidenced by surging top 1% income shares in both nations.^[6] The insistence on centrist positioning also contributed to long-term empirical deficits in social cohesion and mobility. UK data indicate that while educational investments expanded access, intergenerational mobility stalled, with the Gini coefficient for opportunity remaining higher than in comparable European social democracies, underscoring a failure to dismantle inherited inequalities through bolder structural interventions.^[106] In the US, Clinton-era financial deregulation, framed as pro-growth centrism, facilitated short-term booms but sowed seeds for the 2008 crisis, where subprime lending disparities disproportionately harmed low-income households without offsetting poverty traps.^[107] These outcomes highlight a causal disconnect: by calibrating policies to perceived electoral medians rather than evidence-based causal drivers of disparity—like union erosion or asset inflation—the Third Way achieved surface-level stability at the expense of enduring equity, as subsequent stagnation in real wages and rising precarity attest.^[108]

Empirical Outcomes and Legacy

Under the Clinton administration in the United States (1993–2001), Third Way policies contributed to robust economic expansion, with approximately 22 million jobs created and the longest peacetime economic boom on record, alongside a shift from annual budget deficits nearing $290 billion in 1992 to surpluses exceeding $230 billion by the late 1990s.^[72]^[69] In the United Kingdom under New Labour (1997–2010), annual per capita GDP growth averaged 2.4%, surpassing the 2.1% historical average for the prior half-century, supported by fiscal prudence, including adherence to spending rules that balanced current budgets.^[109] These outcomes stemmed partly from market-oriented reforms, such as welfare-to-work initiatives emphasizing employment over indefinite benefits, which boosted labor force participation among low-income groups.^[73] Social welfare reforms, including the U.S. Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, reduced welfare caseloads by over 60% and correlated with employment gains for single mothers, while overall poverty rates fell from 15.1% in 1993 to 11.8% by 2000.^[110]^[111] In the UK, child poverty declined nearly 50% on an absolute measure from 1997 levels, aided by tax credits and activation programs that lifted millions out of relative poverty until around 2005, though progress stalled thereafter amid rising living costs.00028-0/fulltext) Crime rates also decreased substantially; UK incidents per the British Crime Survey dropped from 16.7 million in 1997 to 10.7 million in 2008, attributable in part to expanded policing and targeted interventions.^[112] However, these periods saw widening income inequality, with the U.S. Gini coefficient rising 12% from 0.498 in 1993 to 0.555 in 2000, driven by tech sector gains and globalization effects amplified by deregulatory measures like the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.^[104] Similarly, the UK Gini increased slightly from about 0.34 in 1997 to 0.36 by 2007–08, reflecting gains concentrated at the top amid light-touch financial regulation that later contributed to the 2008 crisis vulnerabilities.^[102]^[113] While empirical data affirm short-term gains in growth and reduced welfare dependency, causal links to Third Way policies remain debated, as global trends and prior momentum played roles, and long-term social cohesion suffered from heightened precarity in low-wage jobs.^[114]

Electoral Consequences and Decline

The adoption of Third Way policies initially yielded significant electoral gains for center-left parties in the 1990s, enabling them to secure governing majorities after periods of conservative dominance. In the United Kingdom, Tony Blair's New Labour achieved a landslide victory in the 1997 general election, capturing 43.2% of the vote and 418 of 659 seats in the House of Commons, marking the party's largest parliamentary majority to date.^[115] Similarly, in Germany, Gerhard Schröder's Social Democratic Party (SPD) won 40.9% of the vote in the 1998 federal election, forming a coalition government that implemented Agenda 2010 reforms emblematic of Third Way market-oriented social democracy. These successes stemmed from repositioning parties as pragmatic alternatives to both traditional socialism and unchecked conservatism, appealing to middle-class voters while retaining core support.^[88] However, by the mid-2000s, electoral erosion became evident as Third Way emphases on fiscal discipline, welfare reform, and globalization failed to mitigate rising income inequality and cultural dislocations, alienating working-class bases. In the UK, Labour's vote share declined from 40.7% in 2001 to 35.2% in 2005 and further to 29.0% in 2010, culminating in defeat under Gordon Brown, who had continued Blair-era policies amid the global financial crisis. Across Western Europe, social democratic parties experienced an average vote share drop of over 10 percentage points from the 1990s peak, with rightward economic shifts exacerbating losses in high-inequality contexts by eroding support among low-income voters.^[116]^[117] This pattern, termed "Pasokification" after the Greek PASOK party's collapse from 43.9% in 2009 to 12.3% in 2012, reflected broader voter flight to radical alternatives amid perceived abandonment of redistributionist principles.^[88] The 2010s accelerated the decline, as Third Way centrism confronted populist backlash, with center-left parties losing ground to both far-right and far-left challengers. In Germany, the SPD's vote share fell to 20.5% in the 2017 federal election, its worst postwar result, before a modest rebound to 25.7% in 2021 amid coalition dependencies rather than outright dominance. France's Socialist Party, under François Hollande—who echoed Third Way triangulation—plummeted from governing power in 2012 to 7.4% in the 2017 legislative elections, as voters defected to Emmanuel Macron's liberal centrism and Marine Le Pen's National Rally. In Sweden, the Social Democrats' long-term hold weakened, with vote shares dipping below 30% by the late 2010s, correlating with immigration strains and economic anxieties unaddressed by prior market-friendly reforms. These losses, averaging a 9-21% influence reduction for major social democratic parties from 1950-2009 baselines extended into the 2010s, were attributed to ideological convergence with neoliberalism, which sapped distinctiveness and fueled abstention or shifts to anti-establishment options.^[118]^[119] By the 2020s, the electoral toll underscored Third Way's vulnerability to deglobalization pressures and identity politics, with even recent victories masking fragility. The UK Labour Party's 2024 general election win under Keir Starmer secured 33.7% of the vote—its lowest share for a majority government—but reflected anti-Conservative sentiment more than endorsement of continued centrist policies, amid Reform UK's populist gains signaling persistent working-class disaffection. In Europe, social democrats' average parliamentary participation yielded modest results, often below 25%, as far-right advances in nations like Italy and the Netherlands capitalized on unmet promises of balanced prosperity. This decline, linked causally to over-reliance on empirical technocracy without cultural safeguards, prompted internal reckonings, though adaptations remained contested.^[115]^[120]^[121]

Recent Adaptations and Critiques (Post-2020)

In the United Kingdom, Keir Starmer's leadership of the Labour Party has been characterized as a revival of Third Way principles, emphasizing pragmatic centrism and competence to secure electoral success amid polarization. Starmer's approach, which prioritized broad appeal and moderated left-wing positions, contributed to Labour's landslide victory in the July 4, 2024, general election, winning 412 seats with 33.7% of the vote.^[122]^[123] This adaptation sought to distance the party from Jeremy Corbyn's more radical socialism, focusing instead on economic stability and national renewal to recapture centrist voters alienated by Brexit and populism.^[124] In Germany, Olaf Scholz's Social Democratic Party (SPD) drew on Third Way legacies from Gerhard Schröder's era, blending market-oriented reforms with social policies during the 2021 federal election campaign. Scholz, who served as finance minister, positioned himself as a steady, merit-based leader advocating for a "respectful middle" that balanced fiscal responsibility with welfare enhancements, leading the SPD to 25.7% of the vote and coalition government formation.^[125]^[126] Post-election, Scholz's administration pursued incremental adaptations, such as the 2022 debt brake suspension for energy crisis relief amid the Ukraine war, aiming to integrate Third Way fiscal prudence with targeted state intervention.^[127] In the United States, the centrist think tank Third Way has advocated for Democratic Party renewal post-2020, promoting policies that emphasize patriotism, economic populism against extremes, and rejection of identity politics purity tests to build sustainable majorities. A February 2025 report outlined strategies for broader voter outreach, including minority and working-class appeal through pragmatic reforms rather than expansive government programs.^[128]^[129] Critiques of these post-2020 adaptations highlight the Third Way's perceived inadequacy in addressing rising populism, inequality, and cultural divides. Left-wing commentators argue that Starmer's centrism accepts conservative frames on immigration and globalization, failing to mobilize a transformative vision and risking voter apathy, as evidenced by Labour's narrow policy margins despite electoral dominance.^[130]^[131] Similarly, Scholz's SPD experienced a sharp decline, polling below 15% by early 2025 amid coalition fractures and failure to counter Alternative for Germany (AfD) gains, underscoring a broader European crisis in Third Way social-liberalism unable to stem far-right resurgence.^[61]^[132] In the U.S., progressive factions have lambasted Third Way strategies as overly corporate and concessionary to Republican narratives, prioritizing elite consensus over bold redistribution and thus contributing to Democratic losses in 2024 by alienating the base.^[133]^[134] Academic analyses further contend that centre-left adherence to Third Way neoliberal elements exacerbates vulnerabilities to populist critiques, as empirical outcomes like stagnant wages and regional disparities persist despite centrist governance.^[15]^[92] These developments reflect ongoing debates over whether Third Way adaptations can evolve beyond 1990s paradigms to confront 2020s challenges like deglobalization and identity conflicts, or if they represent a maladaptive retreat from structural reforms.^[135]

References

[1]
https://www.tutor2u.net/politics/reference/third-way-socialism
[2]
What is the Third Way? | Issue 133 - Philosophy Now
A 'Third Way' is usually taken to mean a position that rejects the extreme views to be found at either end of the left/right spectrum.
[3]
A brief history of the third way | Politics | The Guardian
Feb 10, 2003 · Developed by the sociologist and director of the London School of Economics, Prof Anthony Giddens, the third way stated that the old class-based divisions of ...<|separator|>
[4]
The Big Idea - Brookings Institution
Here is one of the great divides within the Third Way. Many of its leaders, Blair and Clinton notably, embrace the global market and free trade The French ...
[5]
Third Way Politics | History, Usage & Criticism - Study.com
The Third Way has been used since Marxist times, referring to different forms of government ideology, including traditional left- and right-wing ideologies.
[6]
The Third Way: Myth and Reality - Monthly Review
According to Third Way theory, historical developments have dissolved old class-based politics and rendered class struggle approaches irrelevant. New ...
[7]
[PDF] Anthony Giddens The Third Way
The Third Way is characterized by several core principles that distinguish it from other political ideologies: Social Justice: While embracing capitalism, the ...
[8]
[PDF] The “Third Way”: Marketing Mirage or Trojan Horse? - Fraser Institute
Giddens, “Third Way politics... is simply mod- ernized social democracy ... The core principles of the Third Way were first articulated in the “New ...
[9]
What is the third way? | The Week
Sep 25, 2019 · The third way is a centrist position that broadly adopts - and attempts to reconcile - centre-left social policy and centre-right economic policy.Missing: principles | Show results with:principles
[10]
The Politics Shed - Third Way - Google Sites
Third way believes in: a greater focus on equality of opportunity rather than equality of outcome. liberalisation of the economy to provide more money for ...
[11]
[PDF] Left, Right and the third way - University of Sussex
So, a third way stands for social justice and economy efficien- cy, individual autonomy and equality, rights and responsibilities, a successful market ...Missing: fiscal | Show results with:fiscal
[12]
Third way | History & Features - Britannica
Aug 29, 2025 · Third way, in politics, a proposed alternative between two hitherto dominant models, namely left-wing and right-wing political groups.
[13]
https://www.tutor2u.net/politics/reference/anthony-giddens-1938
[14]
The Third Way and its Critics: Giddens, Anthony - Amazon.com
The idea of finding a 'third way' in politics has become a focus of discussion across the world. Political leaders, in the US, Europe, Asia and Latin ...
[15]
Reframing centre-left neoliberalism: New Keynesian theory, Third ...
Jan 6, 2025 · The intellectual roots of the Third Way movement in fact go much deeper. They reflect a coming together of several strands of 'progressive' ...
[16]
Eduard Bernstein: Evolutionary Socialism (Conclusion)
Mar 16, 2003 · If it be capitalists who increase and not those with no possessions, then we are going ever further from our goal the more evolution progresses, ...
[17]
[PDF] Revisionism Revisited The Third Way and European Social ...
There is no logical connection between these principles, but both result historically from the origins of social democracy in the labour movement and from its ...
[18]
Up From Liberalism - Jacobin
Decades before Tony Blair and Bill Clinton took power, Anthony Crosland posited another third way. Crosland, a British Labour politician, gazed upon the ...Missing: connection | Show results with:connection
[19]
Some reflections on the third way Samuel Brittan: Canterbury 20/11 ...
Much earlier on, in 1938, Harold Macmillan published a book entitled The Middle Way which was meant to be a compromise between capitalism and socialism. He.Missing: precursor | Show results with:precursor
[20]
How the Third Way Made Neoliberal Politics Seem Inevitable
Dec 13, 2022 · The third way made neoliberal politics seem inevitable. An overhyped new paradigm proved to be a slogan without a movement.
[21]
How the Democrats Traded the New Deal for Neoliberalism - Jacobin
Jul 1, 2022 · In 1992, Bill Clinton ran for president promising to “end welfare as we know it.” This rightward turn was part of a broader attempt by the ...
[22]
Comeback in '90s Offers Democrats a Bit of Hope. But Not Much.
Jul 23, 2025 · Clinton's victory was the culmination of a campaign by a renegade organization of moderate Democrats, most from the South and the West, to move ...
[23]
The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy - Polity books
The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy · January 1999 · 176 pages · 138 x 217 mm / 5 x 9 in.
[24]
Tony Blair The Third Way September 21, 1998
Tony Blair The Third Way September 21, 1998. Excerpts from the Original Electronic Text at the web site of BritainUSA.com.
[25]
The Third Way International - Jacobin
Feb 11, 2016 · The Third Way advocates pledged their devotion to the mission of expanding “opportunity, not government.” The war on poverty was replaced by a “ ...
[26]
Parties and the Third Way - Oxford Academic - Oxford University Press
This chapter provides a history of social democratic parties in the nineteen-nineties, describing how the parties of the left embraced a third way agenda ...
[27]
Law and order in the '90s: why Blair and Schröder ... - LSE Blogs
Oct 5, 2017 · Tony Blair and Gerhard Schröder were both elected in the late 1990s. But whereas Blair's government toughened law and order policies in the UK, the German ...
[28]
Remarks in a Discussion Entitled "The Third Way: Progressive ...
Apr 25, 1999 · Wim Kok's country has the highest percentage of voluntary part-time workers in all of Europe; that is, they choose to do so. And they've ...Missing: 1990s | Show results with:1990s
[29]
Why were Third Way policies popular in the 90s/early 2000s? - Reddit
Jun 18, 2021 · Third Way policies are basically fiscally centre-right policies created my centre-left governments/parties. They aim to sort of negotiate with right-leaning ...Thoughts On The Big 4 of The Third Way? : r/SocialDemocracyDo you guys consider Third Way to be a form of social democracy?More results from www.reddit.com
[30]
[PDF] AUSTRALIA, CANADA, A - ShareOK
economic policies of the Hawke and Keating Labor governments of the 1980s and ... Third Way” progressivism. These neo-liberal policies involved a shift in ...
[31]
[PDF] The 'third way' in action - UQ eSpace - The University of Queensland
This research draws on the perceptions of 35 elite informants within government, nongovernmental organizations, for-profit, union and community sectors across ...
[32]
The Third Way and beyond: Criticisms, futures and alternatives - jstor
Giddens's Third Way rests on his social theory of modernisation and globalisation, and employs the notion of 'generative equality' to propose a new model for ...
[33]
United Kingdom - Blair, Politics, Devolution | Britannica
The new path of the party was to be a middle one, in the phraseology of New Labour, a “third way,” supposedly embracing both social justice and the market. Not ...
[34]
The UK Economy Grew Much More Strongly Under Labour 1997-2010
Under Labour from 1997-2010 the economy grew at an average of 2.3% per year. Since the Conservatives took over in May 2010, the UK economy has only grown at 1.2 ...
[35]
Economic Record of New Labour 1997-2010
May 1, 2024 · The IFS calculate the net effect of government policy was the poorest 10% of households gained around 13% in their incomes, whilst the richest ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
[36]
https://academic.oup.com/oxrep/article/29/1/113/403944
[37]
[PDF] The Public Finances: 1997 to 2010 - IFS
When Labour took office in 1997, the public finances were already starting to improve following the deterioration seen during the recession of the early 1990s, ...
[38]
The Labour years: Could have done better - The Guardian
Sep 24, 2010 · In 1997, Labour inherited 3.4 million poor children – 26% of all children. By 2007 there were still 2.9 million.<|separator|>
[39]
New Labour's Domestic Policies: Neoliberal, Social Democratic or a ...
Nov 14, 2018 · It has become commonplace to label the New Labour governments of 1997–2010 a neoliberal project that inflated the property market and financial sector.
[40]
https://www.tutor2u.net/politics/topics/new-labour
[41]
From the archives: The emergence of the Democratic Leadership ...
Aug 4, 2018 · With Riley, the founders included Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton, then 38, and Tennessee Sen. Albert Gore Jr., 37 at the time.
[42]
The end of the DLC era - Politico
Feb 7, 2011 · The DLC was formed in the 1980s - the debacle of the 1984 Mondale campaign was a key motivator - to wage just that kind of intra-party war ...Missing: United | Show results with:United
[43]
Democratic Leadership Council | Organization | C-SPAN.org
The Democratic Leadership Council was a non-profit 501 corporation founded in 1985 that, upon its formation, argued the United States Democratic Party should ...
[44]
No Modesty, Please, We're the DLC | American Enterprise Institute
When a group of moderate, business-oriented Democrats organized the Democratic Leadership Council in 1985, at the peak of the Reagan Revolution, ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
[45]
Remarks to the Democratic Leadership Council National Conversation
Jun 4, 1998 · We have called our approach "the third way," with a Government that is more active, more effective, less expensive; one that can bring us ...
[46]
Democratic Leadership Council - SourceWatch
The Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) was co-founded in 1985 by Will Marshall, who served as its first Policy Director and who is the founder and President ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
[47]
Recruiting Bill Clinton - The Atlantic
Dec 3, 2013 · To bring about real change in the Democratic Party, the Democratic Leadership Conference, which we had founded in 1985 to expand the party's ...<|separator|>
[48]
Remarks to the Democratic Leadership Council in Hyde Park, New ...
May 21, 2000 · 42nd President of the United States: 1993 ‐ 2001. Remarks to the ... Our approach came to be known as the Third Way. But basically, it ...<|separator|>
[49]
The SPD and the Neue Mitte in Germany - SpringerLink
When on 27 September 1998, Helmut Kohl, a Christian Democract, was voted out of office after 16 years and a Social Democrat, Gerhard Schroeder, ...
[50]
The “Third Way” Advocated by Gerhard Schröder and Tony Blair ...
In 1999, British Prime Minister Tony Blair and German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder published a joint policy document to outline an agenda for European ...
[51]
[PDF] WORKING DOCUMENTS No. 2 Europe: The Third Way/Die Neue Mitte
Tony Blair and Gerhard Schroeder. June 1998. Page 2. 2. Introduction. Social democrats are in government in almost all the countries of the Union. Social.
[52]
The Third Way/Die Neue Mitte - Dissent Magazine
The Third Way/Die Neue Mitte Tony Blair and Gerhard Schroeder. This manifesto, issued by the prime ministers of Britain and Germany, seemed to us to warrant ...
[53]
[PDF] The Political Economy of Germany's 'Agenda 2010' Reforms - LSE
Germany's 'Agenda 2010' labour and welfare reforms contradict conventional wisdom that its political economy with many veto players disallows paradigmatic.
[54]
Agenda 2010 Revisited – AGI - American-German Institute
Feb 14, 2013 · Ten years after its birth, Agenda 2010, the series of structural reforms announced and implemented by then German Chancellor Gerhard ...
[55]
The Hartz employment reforms in Germany - Centre for Public Impact
Sep 2, 2019 · The Hartz reforms, which included restructuring the Federal Employment Agency, implementing stricter sanctions and introducing a low-wage sector, were enacted ...
[56]
Does Germany need to rethink Agenda 2010? - Hertie School
Mar 30, 2017 · Since the Agenda was enacted, Germany has become a roaring economic powerhouse, with unemployment at around just 4% and a large trade surplus.
[57]
Towards Convergence? New Labour's Third Way and the SPD's ...
Aug 10, 2025 · The chances for the second Schröder government's Agenda 2010 reforms to be enacted were slim as the government lacked a majority in the ...
[58]
Agenda 2010: a Model for Europe? - Green European Journal
Jan 3, 2013 · The Third Way: the German version · Decreasing the duration of unemployment benefit from 32 to 12 months · Decreasing barriers to implementing ...
[59]
The riddle of the missing feathers: rise and decline of the Dutch ...
Mar 15, 2020 · In this paper, a revision of the history of the Dutch Third Way – based on an extensive analysis of publications by party members and interviews with party ...Missing: intellectual | Show results with:intellectual<|separator|>
[60]
Remarks by the President and Prime Minister Wim Kok of the ...
Remarks by the President and Prime Minister Wim Kok of the Netherlands (9/28/00) ... Third Way leader in the world. And if you look at the success of the ...
[61]
rise and decline of the Dutch Third Way - Taylor & Francis Online
Nov 29, 2024 · Wim Kok actively implored his social democratic colleagues to be cautious with their political rhetoric and to Lnot fly the Third Way flag too ...
[62]
Matteo's third way: what lessons could Labour learn from Renzi's ...
Jun 9, 2015 · Renzi's success in breaking the stalemate in Italian politics lies in his emphasis on merit over equality: moving beyond the so called 'vetocracy'.
[63]
[PDF] Breaking Free of Neoliberalism: Canada's Challenge
The Chrétien. Liberals pursued a Third Way approach of fiscal prudence, low taxes and investments in human capital and the knowledge economy (Chrétien was ...
[64]
Chrétien to use world stage to outline election platform
Jun 1, 2000 · The trip is meant to reposition Mr. Chrétien as a politician in the vanguard of the so-called Third Way, the term used by British Prime Minister ...
[65]
Australian Antecedents of the Third Way - Sage Journals
The Hawke-Keating government did embark on a series of major economic and social reforms starting in its first year of office, but its initiatives (apart from ...
[66]
The Third Way Isn't Dead Yet - Jacobin
Nov 5, 2018 · Though some dispute it, the Bob Hawke-Paul Keating model was a version of what would come to be characterized in the 1990s as Third Way social ...
[67]
Third way - Globalization, Economics, Politics | Britannica
Oct 17, 2025 · Notable here was the third way's commitment to raising environmental consciousness (and standards), to the democratic family, to coparenting, to ...<|separator|>
[68]
The Economics of the “Third Way” - SciELO
This paper seeks to outline the type of economic analysis which we perceive to be involved in the ideas on the 'third way'. In the UK, the emergence and ...
[69]
Economic Changes and Welfare Reform | United States History II
His moves to reform welfare, open trade, and deregulate financial markets were particular hallmarks of Clinton's Third Way, a new Democratic embrace of ...
[70]
Bill Clinton's Long Economic Shadow - Democracy Journal
Welfare reform, while eventually passed in 1996, was put on Clinton's back burner during most of the President's first term.Missing: Third | Show results with:Third
[71]
Prosperity Reigned on His Watch - Brookings Institution
But give Bill Clinton credit for having the courage to sign welfare reform and realize the rather unexpected and remarkable results that have followed so far.
[72]
The Clinton Presidency: Historic Economic Growth - The White House
The results of President Clinton's economic leadership are clear. Record budget deficits have become record surpluses, 22 million new jobs have been created.
[73]
[PDF] A 'third way' in welfare reform? Evidence from the United Kingdom
Like the New Democrats in the Clinton administration, New Labour has followed a distinctive path in its welfare reform and other policy initiatives.
[74]
The Third Way's Social Investment State - Oxford Academic
In their joint statement of the Third Way/Die Neue Mitte, Tony Blair and Gerhard Schröder assert that 'public expenditure as a proportion of national income has ...
[75]
The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation ...
Aug 31, 1996 · As a result of these efforts and President Clinton's efforts to strengthen the economy, child support collections have increased by nearly 50% ...
[76]
The 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity ...
Oct 30, 2017 · The public impact ... The decline of the caseload indicates that American families were made to rely less on government welfare services overall.The initiative · The public impact · Political commitment · Strength of evidence
[77]
Welfare Reform Reauthorization: An Overview of Problems and Issues
The 1996 legislation stated that the purposes of the program were to assist needy families, fight welfare dependency by promoting work and marriage, reduce ...<|separator|>
[78]
Tony Blair has offered what he called a "new ... - BBC Politics 97
In a fundamental reshaping of the welfare system he said he was proposing a "something for something" deal providing jobs or training for 250,000 out-of-work ...
[79]
[PDF] A Look Back at the UK Child Poverty Target Transferable Themes for ...
In 1999, Prime Minister Tony Blair announced that the Labour. Government of the time, and future governments, would work to eradicate child poverty with targets ...<|separator|>
[80]
New Labour, Welfare, and Distribution | Inequality and the State
Our historic aim will be for ours to be the first generation to end child poverty, and it will take a generation. It is a 20-year mission, but I ...
[81]
'Agenda 2010' – DW – 06/06/2017
Jun 6, 2017 · Agenda 2010 was a legislative package of labor market and welfare reforms intended to reduce unemployment and jumpstart Germany's economy.
[82]
Hartz IV: The Solution to the Unemployment Problems in the ...
The Hartz IV reforms are consistently regarded as a successful German model for the reduction of structural unemployment.
[83]
Bill Clinton: Foreign Affairs | Miller Center
Clinton's forceful stand in Bosnia and Kosovo enhanced his foreign policy resume. Dealings with the Former Soviet Union. The former Soviet Union and its East ...Missing: Way | Show results with:Way
[84]
[PDF] THE BLAIR DOCTRINE April, 1999 Speaking before the Chicago ...
We will not have succeeded until an international force has entered Kosovo and allowed the refugees to return to their homes. Milosevic will have no veto on the ...<|separator|>
[85]
Tony Blair's speech to the Foreign Policy centre | Iraq - The Guardian
Mar 21, 2006 · We have constructed a foreign policy agenda that has sought to link, in values, military action in Kosovo, Sierra Leone, Afghanistan and Iraq ...
[86]
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_142021.htm
[87]
Former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder on Foreign Policy
Apr 1, 2013 · In a SPIEGEL interview, former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder, 68, talks about how difficult it is for citizens to accept military deployments abroad.Missing: Third | Show results with:Third
[88]
Pro-Market Third Way Policies Caused Electoral Disaster - Jacobin
Feb 2, 2024 · Neoliberalized left parties turned toward finance and away from labor, severed their connection with their base, and intensified neoliberal ...Missing: post- origins
[89]
Neoliberalism and the Third Wave | Journal of Democracy
While the third wave largely rode a global wave of neoliberalism, late-stage neoliberalism's crisis has now become democracy's crisis. About the Author. Rachel ...
[90]
[PDF] Neoliberalism the Third Way and Social Work.pdf
This paper will critically assess the central claims of neoliberalism in the light of experience in the UK and internationally, evaluate the ways in which Third ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[91]
Neo-liberalism, the 'third way' or what? Recent social democratic ...
Feb 4, 2011 · The 'third way', understood in this sense, must be seen as a social democratic response to the economic conditions in which Keynesian demand ...
[92]
Why the Center Left Struggles to Escape Its Neoliberal Past - Jacobin
Feb 19, 2025 · To its critics, the Third Way marked the turning point in which these parties abandoned their traditional tenets and working-class ...
[93]
Is there a third way? A response to Giddens's the Third Way - PubMed
It shows that Giddens stereotypes both the neoliberal and the social democratic positions to an unrecognizable degree, failing to portray the varieties of ...<|separator|>
[94]
The Road (Not?) Taken: Anthony Giddens, the Third Way, and the ...
Anthony Giddens is clearly the most visible and important social theorist today to develop and defend this idea of a third way.
[95]
Clause IV: a brief history | Labour - The Guardian
Aug 9, 2015 · For those on the leftwing of the party, however, the vote only confirmed how willing Labour was to abandon its socialist past to get elected.
[96]
[PDF] The Third Way and beyond: criticisms, futures and alternatives
Armando Barrientos is Lecturer in Public Economics and Development at the. Institute for Development Policy and Management at the University of.
[97]
Interview: Welfare reform, 10 years later - Brookings Institution
Aug 24, 2006 · Some critics charged Clinton with abandoning his party or trying to strengthen his political position in a cynical bid to be re-elected (he ...
[98]
Welfare Reform (Part 1) - The Heritage Foundation
It was a victory that enabled many people to curb their reliance on government assistance, by placing a high value on strengthening families, and requiring ...Missing: abandonment | Show results with:abandonment
[99]
[PDF] The Third Way and the End of Politics
The Third Way has thus subtly redefined the traditional concern of the left for social justice. It is now an issue not of structural economic disadvantage ...
[100]
How New Labour Abandoned Workers - Tribune
Jan 4, 2024 · They believed that Labour needed to ruthlessly centralise power inside the party to minimise the power of members, ditch Clause IV (its historic ...
[101]
A Critique of Centrism | INOMICS
The emergence, in the 90s, of 'third way' advocates, Bill Clinton and Tony Blair, marked the triumphant return and the advent of centrism's most celebrated ...
[102]
Labour's record on inequality and social mobility: 1997 to 2010
Jun 17, 2019 · Inequality rose slightly under Labour according to the “Gini Coefficient”, which measures the overall distribution of incomes across the country ...
[103]
[PDF] Living standards under Labour - IFS
measure of income dispersion – the Gini coefficient – is mapped out in Figure 2, which shows that inequality grew over the first two years of this Parliament, ...
[104]
Income Inequality went Up 12 Percent under Clinton, Zero under Bush
Jan 20, 2012 · However, Clinton raised the top marginal rate in 1993 to 39.6 percent, and this also ushered in a long period of increasing income inequality.
[105]
Occupy the 1990s: Income Inequality Soared During Bill Clinton's ...
May 20, 2016 · The 1990s boom ended in a tech-stock meltdown and then a housing bubble and bust does remove some shine from Bill Clinton's economic record and legacy.
[106]
Did Blair and Brown fail on inequality? - Lane Kenworthy
Jun 1, 2009 · This month, it was revealed that the UK's Gini coefficient, measuring inequality between rich and poor, had reached its highest level on record ...
[107]
[PDF] Rising income inequality in the U.S. was fuelled by Ronald ...
Rising income inequality in the U.S. was fuelled by Ronald Reagan's attacks on union strength, and continued by Bill Clinton's financial deregulation.
[108]
Third Way Politics = Bad Policy - History News Network
As it does so, the state makes things worse, so it intervenes more to "fix" the problems it created, paving the way for more "reforms"-and problems. This ...Missing: empirical UK
[109]
Blair's economic legacy - BBC
May 10, 2007 · The economy has grown at an annual per capita rate of 2.4% a year. This is rather better than the average for the last half century, which is 2.1%.<|separator|>
[110]
Welfare Reform, Success or Failure? It Worked - Brookings Institution
Experience with welfare reform since 1996 shows conclusively that most low-income families are capable of finding and holding jobs.
[111]
The Clinton Presidency: Key Accomplishments - The White House
Lowest poverty rate in 20 years. Since Congress passed President Clinton's Economic Plan in 1993, the poverty rate declined from 15.1 percent to 11.8 percent ...
[112]
Is Labour only government to show falling crime? – Channel 4 News
Apr 29, 2010 · Although the BCS does show a significant overall fall in crime levels under Labour – from 16.7 million incidents in 1997 to 10.7 million in 2008 ...
[113]
[PDF] Income inequality in the UK - Institute for Fiscal Studies
During the 1990s and 2000s inequality fluctuated and rose slowly to reach a peak in 2007-08, when the Gini coefficient reached 0.36. Source: Author's ...
[114]
[PDF] new labour's anti-poverty strategy 1997-2010 - Sciences Po
Essentially, the combination of economic growth, a buoyant labour market, activation programmes and tax credits reduced poverty until c.2005, but since then ...
[115]
What happened in the 2024 UK general election?
Jul 11, 2024 · For example, in the 1997 election, Labour gained 22% more seats in parliament, and Tony Blair's vote share in his Sedgefield constituency ...
[116]
The rightward shift and electoral decline of social democratic parties ...
May 14, 2021 · Results reveal that rightward economic movements of Social Democrats significantly reduce their vote share under higher levels of income inequality.
[117]
[PDF] Transformation of the Left - Bibliothek der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung
Across Western Europe, social democratic parties have on average experienced a decline of their vote share in parlia men tary elections of more.
[118]
What Explains the Electoral Crisis of Social Democracy? A ...
Apr 11, 2022 · The causes for the decline of social democratic parties are highly contested among researchers. This article provides a systematic review of the ...
[119]
Populism and the Decline of Social Democracy
In both Eastern and Western Europe, social-democratic parties have shifted to the center on economic policy, not only sapping the electoral strength of ...Missing: losses 2000s
[120]
“This is the final fall”. An electoral history of European Social ... - Cairn
Jun 24, 2021 · Social democratic parties only participated in national elections within a democratic framework in eight States and the average result was modest.
[121]
The decline of Europe's social democratic parties | openDemocracy
Mar 16, 2010 · On previous occasions of decline, social democracy has bounced back in Europe, but this time the record includes ideological and cultural ...
[122]
UK Election Result is a Victory for Ruthless Competence - Third Way
Jul 8, 2024 · The Labour Party's victory in last week's parliamentary election in the United Kingdom proves the potency of bold, pragmatic centrism.
[123]
Blair, Starmer and the Revival of British Centrism - Providence
Jul 25, 2024 · The Labour Party and Keir Starmer's landslide election victory on July 4th simply confirmed the inevitable. Starmer's rebranded moderate ...
[124]
https://www.tutor2u.net/politics/blog/is-starmers-labour-new-labour-mark-ii
[125]
Who is Olaf Scholz, Germany's successor to Merkel? - Al Jazeera
Sep 30, 2021 · More radical in his youth, Scholz became a disciple of Schroeder's Third Way politics, backing his plan to overhaul the German welfare system.
[126]
Olaf Scholz: 'Merit in society must not be limited to top-earners'
Sep 8, 2021 · Germany's vice-chancellor and finance minister, Olaf Scholz, has this summer surprisingly lifted his Social Democratic party (SPD) ... third way ...
[127]
Olaf Scholz, the improbable role model – Future of social democracy
Sep 4, 2023 · In economic and socio-political terms, it has to be much more left-wing than the 'third way'. Instead of romantic talk of 'employability ...
[128]
Renewing the Democratic Party - Third Way
Feb 2, 2025 · ... Democratic Leadership Council's 1991 New Orleans Declaration. Party reformers should organize unconstrained, open-minded debates on the ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[129]
Centrist Dem group rails against leftist identity politics and purity tests
Mar 2, 2025 · Centrist Democrats produced a five-page document of takeaways at a retreat organized by Third Way. Workers mount DNC signage as reparations continue.
[130]
Labour's Centrism Is a Dead End - Jacobin
In an effort to appeal to the median voter, Britain's prime minister, Keir Starmer, has accepted the Right's talking points on immigration and economics.
[131]
The 'third way' may have worked for New Labour, but it is impossible ...
May 13, 2021 · The party can't win by reprising Tony Blair's strategy – because the political and economic conditions of the 1990s are not coming back.
[132]
Polycrisis and far-right resurgence in Germany
Mar 28, 2025 · 24 The paper Europe: The Third Way (1998; Friedrich Ebert Foundation) published by Tony Blair and Schröder, laid out the new common convictions.<|separator|>
[133]
The DLC "Third Way" Is The Wrong Way
Apr 18, 2025 · The real ultimate betrayal from Bill Clinton was during the welfare fight. The devastation that he inflicted on low income, women can never ...<|separator|>
[134]
What do you think of the recent controversial Third-Way Democrat ...
Mar 8, 2025 · There was recently a document by the Third-Way Democrats about how to improve the party. It was criticized by the Progressives and other ...
[135]
[PDF] AFTER POPULISM? - New Left Review
In the absence of dense social networks, populism sought to mobilize voters via social media platforms, replacing an ineffective horizontalism with a strategy ...