Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Redshift-space distortions

Redshift-space distortions (RSD) refer to the apparent anisotropies in the observed clustering of galaxies caused by the peculiar velocities of galaxies relative to the Hubble flow, which distort their positions along the line of sight in redshift space compared to their true positions in real space.^[1] These distortions arise because galaxy redshifts, used to infer distances, combine the cosmological redshift from the expansion of the universe with additional Doppler shifts from peculiar motions, leading to systematic errors in mapping three-dimensional structures.^[2] On large scales, coherent infall toward overdense regions enhances clustering along the line of sight, known as the Kaiser effect, which boosts the power spectrum by a factor of (1 + \beta \mu^2)^2, where \beta \approx \Omega_m^{0.6}/b, \Omega_m is the matter density parameter, b is the galaxy bias, and \mu is the cosine of the angle to the line of sight.^[1] On smaller scales, random virial motions within galaxy clusters elongate structures into the "fingers-of-God" effect, smearing out the observed distribution.^[3] RSD provide a powerful probe of cosmology, enabling measurements of the growth rate of cosmic structure f and constraints on parameters like \Omega_m, as quantified through the anisotropy of the correlation function or power spectrum, with the ratio of quadrupole to monopole moments yielding \beta.^[2] Observations from surveys such as 2dFGRS and VVDS have measured \beta \approx 0.4-0.7 at low to intermediate redshifts, consistent with \LambdaCDM models assuming \Omega_m \approx 0.3 and b \approx 1.^[3]

Introduction

Definition and Basic Concept

Redshift-space distortions (RSDs) arise in galaxy surveys because the observed redshifts of galaxies combine the effects of the universe's cosmological expansion, known as the Hubble flow, with the peculiar velocities of galaxies relative to this mean expansion. The redshift z is interpreted as a distance s = cz / H_0 along the line of sight, where c is the speed of light and H_0 is the Hubble constant, but peculiar velocities v perturb this mapping such that the inferred position s = r + v \cdot \hat{r}/(a H), with r the true comoving distance and a the scale factor. This mixing causes galaxies to appear displaced from their true positions primarily along the line of sight, distorting the apparent three-dimensional distribution of galaxies compared to their real-space configuration.^[4]^[5] The resulting distortions introduce anisotropy in the observed clustering, breaking the statistical isotropy expected in real space. On large scales, where peculiar velocities are coherent and aligned with the density field due to gravitational infall toward overdensities, the effect compresses structures along the line of sight, creating a "squashing" or enhancement of clustering in the radial direction relative to the transverse plane. Conversely, on small scales within virialized clusters, random peculiar velocities lead to elongation along the line of sight, manifesting as radially extended "fingers-of-god" that smear out dense regions. These opposing effects highlight how RSDs encode dynamical information about galaxy motions, distinguishing redshift space from the isotropic real-space distribution.^[4]^[6] The concept of RSDs was first proposed by Sargent and Turner in 1977 as a statistical method to detect anisotropies in galaxy pair redshifts and positions, enabling estimates of the cosmological density parameter from these velocity-induced distortions. This idea was later formalized in the linear theory framework by Kaiser in 1987, who derived the mapping between real- and redshift-space clustering and demonstrated its implications for large-scale structure. Schematic diagrams of galaxy maps typically illustrate this by contrasting isotropic, spherical overdensities in real space with flattened, pancake-like structures on large scales and finger-like extensions on small scales in redshift space, underscoring the visual impact of these distortions.^[7]^[5]^[4]

Cosmological Significance

Redshift-space distortions (RSD) play a pivotal role in cosmology by enabling precise measurements of the growth rate of cosmic structure, denoted as f, which quantifies how density perturbations evolve over time in response to gravity and dark energy. In the linear regime, RSD manifest as anisotropic enhancements in the clustering of galaxies along the line of sight, parameterized by \beta = f / b, where b is the galaxy bias factor that accounts for how galaxies trace the underlying matter distribution. This parameter allows direct inference of f, typically scaling as f \approx \Omega_m^{0.55} in general relativity, providing a test of structure growth independent of the cosmic microwave background.^[8] Measurements of f \sigma_8, where \sigma_8 is the amplitude of matter fluctuations on 8 h^{-1} Mpc scales, from RSD have tightened constraints on \Omega_m and \sigma_8 across redshift ranges, offering insights into the balance between matter density and dark energy.^[9] RSD also interconnect with the Alcock-Paczynski effect, which arises from assuming incorrect cosmological distances in redshift space, leading to distortions in the observed geometry of large-scale structure. By combining RSD-induced dynamical anisotropies with the geometric distortions from Alcock-Paczynski, surveys can simultaneously constrain the angular diameter distance and Hubble parameter, enhancing distance ladder measurements without relying solely on standard rulers like baryon acoustic oscillations. This synergy improves cosmological parameter estimation, particularly for probing dark energy evolution at intermediate redshifts.^[10] In the context of gravity theories, RSD provide a powerful discriminator between the standard \LambdaCDM model and modified gravity alternatives, as deviations in the growth rate f would alter the predicted anisotropies. Observations of RSD have been used to place tight bounds on parameters like \sigma_8 and \Omega_m, with tensions in these values across datasets prompting investigations into models such as f(R) gravity or coupled dark energy, where enhanced growth could resolve discrepancies. For instance, large-scale RSD measurements help test whether gravity remains general relativistic on cosmological scales, with future surveys expected to achieve percent-level precision on these constraints.^[11] Key milestones in RSD observations occurred in the 1990s, with the Center for Astrophysics (CfA) redshift survey providing the first detection of large-scale anisotropy consistent with the linear Kaiser effect, confirming predictions of coherent infall into overdensities. The Las Campanas Redshift Survey (LCRS) further solidified these findings by measuring redshift-space clustering distortions in a larger sample, validating the framework for structure growth on scales beyond 10 h^{-1} Mpc.^[12]

Theoretical Foundations

Redshift Measurements and Hubble Flow

Redshift is quantified by the parameter z = \frac{\Delta \lambda}{\lambda}, where \Delta \lambda is the observed shift in wavelength toward longer values (redder) and \lambda is the emitted rest wavelength of a spectral line.^[13] In cosmology, the measured redshift of distant objects primarily combines two effects: a cosmological component from the expansion of space and a Doppler component from relative motions.^[13] The cosmological redshift stems from the uniform expansion of the universe, which stretches the wavelength of light as it propagates. This is expressed as $1 + z = \frac{1}{a(t)}, where a(t) is the cosmic scale factor normalized to 1 at the present epoch, with the value at emission determining the stretch.^[14] For low redshifts (z \ll 1), this approximates the Doppler-like form z \approx \frac{v}{[c](/page/Speed_of_light)}, where v is the recession speed and c is the speed of light, but the underlying mechanism is spatial expansion rather than motion through space. The Doppler component, in contrast, arises from peculiar velocities \vec{v}_\mathrm{pec} relative to the cosmic rest frame, given approximately by z_\mathrm{Doppler} \approx \frac{v_{\parallel}}{[c](/page/Speed_of_light)} for non-relativistic speeds along the line of sight (v_{\parallel}).^[13] In the ideal case of pure Hubble flow—where peculiar velocities are negligible—distances to galaxies are inferred directly from their redshifts via Hubble's law: cz = H_0 d, with H_0 the present-day Hubble constant and d the proper distance.^[15] This relation posits that recession velocity increases linearly with distance, reflecting the homogeneous expansion of space. Edwin Hubble established this empirical law in 1929 by measuring redshifts for 24 extra-galactic nebulae and correlating them with distance estimates from apparent brightness, finding a proportionality constant of approximately 500 km/s per megaparsec and interpreting it as evidence for cosmic expansion.^[15] This redshift-to-distance mapping assumes no deviations from uniform expansion, but peculiar velocities introduce perturbations that distort the inferred positions. Along the line of sight, these velocities shift the apparent position in redshift space by \delta s \approx \frac{v_\mathrm{pec}}{a H}, where a is the scale factor and H the Hubble parameter at the object's redshift, leading to errors in mapping the large-scale structure.^[16] Such local motions, typically on the order of hundreds of km/s, become negligible at large distances where the Hubble flow dominates.

Peculiar Velocities and Their Impact

Peculiar velocities represent deviations from the uniform Hubble expansion, arising primarily from gravitational instabilities that amplify primordial density perturbations in the early universe. These instabilities cause matter to clump, generating local gravitational potentials that accelerate galaxies away from the mean flow. In the linear regime of structure growth, the peculiar velocity \mathbf{v} at a comoving position \mathbf{x} is related to the density contrast \delta by \mathbf{v} \approx -f H \nabla^{-1} \delta, or approximately v \sim f H \delta x in magnitude, where f = d \ln D / d \ln a is the linear growth rate, H is the Hubble parameter, and D(a) is the growth factor. This relation stems from the gravitational response to over- and under-densities, with velocities growing proportionally to the expansion rate in a matter-dominated universe.^[17]^[18] These peculiar velocities distort the mapping between real-space positions and those inferred from redshift observations, introducing redshift-space distortions. Specifically, the observed comoving position \mathbf{s}_\mathrm{obs} in redshift space is shifted from the true real-space position \mathbf{s}_\mathrm{real} by the line-of-sight component of the peculiar velocity:

\mathbf{s}_\mathrm{obs} = \mathbf{s}_\mathrm{real} + \frac{v_\parallel}{a H} \hat{\mathbf{z}},

where v_\parallel = \mathbf{v} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{z}} is the radial peculiar velocity, a is the scale factor, and \hat{\mathbf{z}} is the unit vector along the line of sight. This displacement elongates structures along the line of sight in overdense regions (where infall dominates) and compresses them in voids, creating an anisotropic apparent distribution of galaxies that differs from the isotropic real-space clustering. The effect scales with the velocity amplitude, which is typically on the order of a few hundred km/s for nearby galaxies, comparable to the Hubble flow contribution at low redshifts.^[19]^[6] The correlation between peculiar velocities and density fields is encapsulated in the continuity equation, which in linear perturbation theory links the density contrast to the velocity divergence:

\delta = -\frac{\nabla \cdot \mathbf{v}}{f a H}.

This equation arises from the conservation of mass in an expanding universe perturbed by gravitational forces, implying that mass conservation drives coherent inflows toward overdensities and outflows from underdensities. The relation highlights how velocity fields trace the underlying matter distribution, with the factor f quantifying the sensitivity to cosmological parameters like the matter density \Omega_m. On large scales, where linear theory holds, this correlation enables the use of velocities to infer growth history without direct density measurements.^[20] Direct measurements of peculiar velocities provide empirical constraints on these effects, primarily through distance indicators that separate velocity contributions from the Hubble flow. The Tully-Fisher relation, which correlates a spiral galaxy's infrared luminosity with its neutral hydrogen rotation width, yields distances independent of redshift; comparing these to redshift-inferred distances estimates v_\mathrm{pec} with typical uncertainties of 15-20% for samples out to 100 Mpc. Similarly, Type Ia supernovae serve as standard candles due to their consistent peak luminosity, allowing precise distance determinations; peculiar velocities are then derived from residuals between observed redshifts and supernova distances, achieving accuracies around 5-10% for nearby events. These methods have mapped bulk flows and dipole anisotropies, confirming velocity amplitudes consistent with \LambdaCDM predictions on scales of 50-100 h^{-1} Mpc.^[21]^[22]

Linear Regime

Kaiser Formalism

The Kaiser formalism establishes the foundational linear theory for redshift-space distortions, describing how coherent peculiar velocities on large scales distort the observed clustering of galaxies or other tracers relative to their real-space distribution. Developed in the context of the Zel'dovich approximation, which models particle displacements as linear functions of the initial density field, this framework predicts that velocity flows aligned with overdensities enhance the apparent structure along the line of sight.^[23] In linear perturbation theory, the Fourier-space density contrast in redshift space, \delta^s(\mathbf{k}, \mu), is related to the real-space density contrast \delta^r(\mathbf{k}) by the multiplicative factor that accounts for the velocity contribution:

\delta^s(\mathbf{k}, \mu) = (1 + \beta \mu^2) \delta^r(\mathbf{k}),

where \mu = \cos\theta is the cosine of the angle between the wavevector \mathbf{k} and the line of sight, and \beta = f/b is the distortion parameter. Here, f represents the logarithmic growth rate of density perturbations, approximately f \approx \Omega_m^{0.55} in a \LambdaCDM cosmology, and b is the linear bias factor measuring how strongly the tracer density traces the underlying matter density. This relation emerges from the continuity equation, where the redshift-space position includes a perturbation from the peculiar velocity component along the line of sight, s_z = x_z + v_z / (a H), with v_z the velocity, a the scale factor, and H the Hubble parameter. In Fourier space, the velocity term contributes a factor of -\mu^2 f \delta^r(\mathbf{k}) to the density, yielding the full expression under the assumption of irrotational flow.^[23] The formalism operates under key assumptions, including the plane-parallel approximation, which posits that the observer's line of sight remains effectively constant across the survey volume, simplifying the geometry for distant sources. It applies in the linear regime on scales larger than approximately 100 h^{-1} Mpc, where gravitational instability produces coherent, large-scale flows without significant shell-crossing or virialization effects. Additionally, it assumes unbiased tracers (b = 1) that faithfully follow the matter density field without intrinsic anisotropies. These conditions ensure that distortions arise solely from the mapping of real positions to observed redshifts via the Hubble flow plus peculiar velocities.^[23] The resulting prediction is an anisotropy in the clustering statistics: for \beta > 0, power is amplified along the line of sight (\mu \approx 1), producing a "squashing" effect that elongates structures perpendicular to the observer while compressing them parallel, in contrast to the isotropic real-space distribution. This manifests as a quadrupole anisotropy in the two-point statistics, with the power enhanced by up to a factor of (1 + \beta)^2 parallel to the line of sight and unchanged in the perpendicular direction (\mu=0). The average monopole power is enhanced by a factor of $1 + \frac{2}{3}\beta + \frac{1}{5}\beta^2. Originally derived by Kaiser in 1987 using the Zel'dovich approximation to compute the Jacobian of the real-to-redshift space transformation, this linear model has become a cornerstone for interpreting large-scale structure surveys.^[23]

Redshift-Space Power Spectrum

In the linear theory of structure formation, the redshift-space power spectrum P^s(\mathbf{k}) for a sample of galaxies is expressed as an anisotropic function of the wavevector \mathbf{k}, incorporating the effects of peculiar velocities through the Kaiser distortion factor derived in the previous section. Specifically, it takes the form

P^s(k, \mu) = b^2 P_m(k) (1 + \beta \mu^2)^2,

where k = |\mathbf{k}| is the magnitude of the wavevector, \mu = k_\parallel / k is the cosine of the angle between \mathbf{k} and the line of sight, b is the linear galaxy bias parameter, P_m(k) is the real-space matter power spectrum, and \beta = f/b with f being the logarithmic growth rate of structure.^[23] This expression quantifies the enhancement of power along the line of sight (\mu \approx 1) due to coherent infall into overdensities, leading to a characteristic anisotropy that scales with \beta, typically on the order of 0.3–1 for luminous red galaxies at low redshifts.^[23] To characterize this anisotropy, the redshift-space power spectrum is decomposed into multipoles using Legendre polynomials L_\ell(\mu), which form an orthogonal basis for expanding functions of \mu. The multipole moments are defined as

P_\ell(k) = \frac{2\ell + 1}{2} \int_{-1}^{1} d\mu \, P^s(k, \mu) L_\ell(\mu).

In the linear regime, the odd multipoles vanish due to parity symmetry, leaving the monopole (\ell = 0), quadrupole (\ell = 2), and hexadecapole (\ell = 4) as the dominant terms that encode the distortion information; higher even multipoles are suppressed.^[24] These multipoles provide a compact summary of the anisotropy, with the quadrupole particularly sensitive to \beta, enabling measurements from galaxy surveys like the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS). The bias b enters quadratically in the overall normalization, scaling the amplitude relative to the underlying matter power spectrum P_m(k), which is shaped by primordial fluctuations and gravitational evolution.^[23] An additional source of anisotropy arises from the Alcock-Paczynski effect, which distorts the inferred scales due to uncertainties in the cosmological distance measures. This is parameterized by scaling factors \alpha_\perp = D_M(z)/D_{M,\rm fid}(z) and \alpha_\parallel = H_{\rm fid}(z)/H(z), where D_M is the comoving angular diameter distance and subscript "fid" denotes the fiducial cosmology. In the power spectrum, this effect rescales the arguments as P^s_{\rm obs}(k_\perp, k_\parallel) = P^s_{\rm true}(k_\perp / \alpha_\perp, k_\parallel / \alpha_\parallel) \alpha_\perp^2 \alpha_\parallel, affecting both components and including a volume factor.^[25] For \LambdaCDM cosmologies, the \alpha parameters are close to unity at low redshifts but evolve with z, providing a probe of the expansion history when combined with redshift-space measurements.^[25]

Non-Linear Regime

Fingers-of-God Effect

The Fingers-of-God effect refers to the elongation of virialized structures, such as galaxy clusters and groups, along the line of sight in redshift space due to random internal peculiar velocities. These velocities, arising from virial motions within dark matter halos, introduce additional Doppler shifts that smear the true positions of galaxies radially, creating apparent finger-like extensions pointing toward the observer. The typical one-dimensional velocity dispersion in such halos is σ ≈ 300 km/s, which corresponds to a radial smearing on scales of several megaparsecs at low redshifts. This non-linear distortion dominates on small scales and opposes the large-scale compression from coherent infall motions described by the Kaiser effect. On scales below ~20 h⁻¹ Mpc, the random velocities overwhelm the Hubble flow, elongating overdense regions and suppressing power in the parallel direction compared to the perpendicular one. Above this scale, the linear regime takes precedence, but the Fingers-of-God effect must still be accounted for in analyses to avoid biasing cosmological inferences. In theoretical modeling, the effect is commonly incorporated via a Gaussian damping term applied to the real-space power spectrum to capture the velocity dispersion's impact. The redshift-space power spectrum is thus modified as

P^s(k, \mu) = P^r(k) \exp\left(-k^2 \mu^2 \sigma_v^2\right),

where P^r(k) is the real-space power spectrum, \mu = \cos\theta is the angle to the line of sight, and \sigma_v is the pairwise velocity dispersion along the line of sight (often taken as \sigma_v \approx 300–$400 km/s depending on halo mass). This dispersion model provides a simple phenomenological description suitable for intermediate scales. Observationally, the Fingers-of-God effect appears as enhanced small-scale power in the redshift-space two-point correlation function \xi^s(s_\perp, s_\parallel), where structures show greater elongation along the parallel separation s_\parallel than expected from real-space clustering. This signature is evident in early redshift surveys, manifesting as radially stretched clusters that require careful modeling to recover unbiased estimates of the underlying density field.

Dynamical Coherence and Shell-Crossing

In the context of redshift-space distortions (RSD), dynamical coherence describes the scale at which peculiar velocities of galaxies remain aligned with the large-scale density field, reflecting coherent infall toward overdensities as predicted by linear perturbation theory. This coherence holds on scales larger than approximately 50 h^{-1} Mpc, where velocities enhance the anisotropic clustering signal through the Kaiser effect, but transitions to incoherent, random motions on smaller scales due to non-linear gravitational collapse. Below this threshold, typically around 30–50 h^{-1} Mpc, the breakdown of velocity coherence introduces intermediate-scale distortions that deviate from linear predictions, marking the onset of significant non-linear effects in the observed galaxy distribution.^[26] Shell-crossing represents a key non-linear process where particle trajectories in the cosmological density field intersect, forming caustics—thin sheets of infinite density in the single-stream approximation—beyond the dynamical coherence scale. This occurs as matter collapses under gravity, with streams of particles overtaking one another, resulting in multi-valued velocity fields along lines of sight and a breakdown of the invertible mapping from real to redshift space. In redshift space, shell-crossing amplifies the complexity of velocity distortions, contributing to the suppression of power on quasi-linear scales by introducing non-perturbative corrections that alter the pairwise velocity statistics.^[27] To model these effects, Lagrangian perturbation theory (LPT) extends the linear Zel'dovich approximation by incorporating higher-order displacements while accounting for shell-crossing through phase-space considerations, allowing predictions of the density and velocity fields post-collapse without assuming single-stream flow.^[28] Complementarily, N-body simulations resolve shell-crossing dynamically by tracking individual particle orbits, providing accurate representations of the multi-stream regime and enabling calibration of perturbative models for RSD analyses.^[29] The primary impact of dynamical coherence breakdown and shell-crossing manifests as a suppression of the quadrupole moment in the redshift-space power spectrum on intermediate scales of 10–50 h^{-1} Mpc, where linear Kaiser enhancement gives way to damping from incoherent velocities and caustic formations. This requires advanced RSD models, such as the resummed perturbation theory framework of Taruya et al. (2010), which incorporates higher-order velocity corrections and non-linear damping terms to accurately reproduce observed anisotropies in galaxy surveys.^[30]

Observational Probes

Galaxy Redshift Surveys

Galaxy redshift surveys form the cornerstone of observational studies of redshift-space distortions (RSD), providing dense three-dimensional maps of galaxy positions inferred from spectroscopic redshifts, which combine comoving distances with peculiar velocity contributions along the line of sight. These surveys target large samples of galaxies to trace the underlying matter distribution on scales where linear and non-linear RSD effects manifest, enabling measurements of anisotropic clustering patterns such as the Kaiser enhancement on large scales. Early and ongoing efforts have progressively increased in volume and precision, from hemispheric coverage in the 2000s to nearly all-sky mapping in the 2020s, with datasets comprising millions of galaxies essential for robust statistical detection of distortions. Pioneering surveys in the early 2000s provided the first compelling evidence for RSD. The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS), conducted from 1997 to 2002 using the Anglo-Australian Telescope, measured redshifts for approximately 250,000 galaxies brighter than b_J = 19.45 mag over about 2,000 square degrees in the southern sky, confirming the Kaiser effect through highly significant detection of redshift-space anisotropy indicative of coherent large-scale infall velocities. Complementing this, the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), initiated in 2000 and ongoing, targeted the northern sky with its main galaxy sample, obtaining redshifts for over 900,000 galaxies by Data Release 7 (2008) with a median redshift of z ≈ 0.1 and a Petrosian r-band limit of r ≤ 17.77 mag, revealing squashing of the correlation function along the line of sight consistent with RSD predictions. The Six-degree Field Galaxy Survey (6dFGS), spanning 2001 to 2006 on the UK Schmidt Telescope, focused on the southern hemisphere (|b| > 10°), yielding 110,256 new extragalactic redshifts in a catalog of 125,071 galaxies selected to b_J ≤ 18.0 mag, providing uniform coverage to complement SDSS and early constraints on RSD via power spectrum analysis. Subsequent surveys in the 2010s emphasized higher redshifts and baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) targets while advancing RSD probes. The Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS), part of SDSS-III from 2009 to 2014, measured redshifts for 1.5 million luminous red galaxies (LRGs) up to z ≈ 0.7 over 10,000 square degrees, with a focus on BAO but yielding precise RSD measurements through anisotropic clustering of these volume-limited samples. Its extension, the extended BOSS (eBOSS) in SDSS-IV (2014–2019), added over 300,000 LRGs at 0.6 < z < 1.0 and emission-line galaxies (ELGs) at z ≈ 0.8–1.1, expanding the effective volume to probe RSD at intermediate redshifts where non-linear effects become prominent. The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), mounted on the Mayall 4-m Telescope and operational since 2021, targets an unprecedented 40 million galaxies and quasars over five years across nearly the full sky, including bright galaxies at z < 1.2 and LRGs/ELGs up to z ≈ 1.6, to map galaxy distributions with percent-level precision for RSD studies. As of October 2025, DESI has measured redshifts for over 30 million galaxies and quasars in its Data Release 2 (DR2), with DR2 including over 4.7 million unique galaxy and quasar redshifts used for full-shape galaxy clustering measurements, enabling precise RSD analyses.^[31]^[32] Spectroscopic redshifts in these surveys are obtained using multi-object fiber-fed spectrographs, where robotic positioners assign optical fibers (typically 1–2 arcseconds in diameter) to pre-selected targets on photographic plates or focal planes, capturing spectra for redshift determination via cross-correlation with templates or line fitting. A key challenge is fiber collisions, where targets separated by less than ~55–92 arcseconds (depending on the instrument) cannot be simultaneously observed in one exposure, resulting in ~5–10% incompleteness for close pairs in dense regions like SDSS and BOSS, which artificially suppresses small-scale clustering signals and requires correction methods like nearest-neighbor reassignment or angular pair weighting. To mitigate biases in RSD measurements, samples are selected with luminosity thresholds to ensure flux-limited completeness—e.g., SDSS's r ≤ 17.77 mag corresponds to M_r ≤ -20.5 at z=0.1—and volume-limited subsamples are drawn within narrow redshift shells (e.g., 0.01 < z < 0.03 for 6dFGS) where all galaxies above a fixed absolute magnitude are included, minimizing evolutionary and Malmquist effects. These techniques, applied to representative examples like SDSS's main sample yielding ~90 galaxies per square degree, enable unbiased mapping of distortions for subsequent power spectrum analyses.

Correlation Function and Power Spectrum Analysis

The two-point correlation function in redshift space, denoted as \xi^s(\sigma, \pi), quantifies the excess probability of finding galaxy pairs separated by a perpendicular distance \sigma (transverse to the line of sight) and a parallel distance \pi (along the line of sight), relative to a random distribution. This anisotropic form arises due to redshift-space distortions, allowing the separation of real-space clustering from velocity-induced effects. The coordinates \sigma and \pi are defined in a frame where the line of sight is the reference direction for each pair, enabling the mapping of distortions through the elongation or compression in the \pi direction.^[24] To analyze the anisotropy, the correlation function is often decomposed into multipoles, such as the monopole \xi_0(s), quadrupole \xi_2(s), and higher moments, where s = \sqrt{\sigma^2 + \pi^2} is the total separation and the multipoles are obtained by integrating over the angle \mu = \pi / s:

\xi_\ell(s) = \frac{2\ell + 1}{2} \int_{-1}^{1} d\mu \, \xi^s(s, \mu) \, L_\ell(\mu),

with L_\ell(\mu) as the Legendre polynomial of order \ell. The quadrupole \xi_2(s) particularly captures the linear Kaiser effect, showing a characteristic squashing on large scales (s \gtrsim 20 h^{-1} Mpc). This decomposition facilitates fitting theoretical models to data, isolating distortion signatures. Estimators like the Landy-Szalay estimator are commonly used to compute \xi^s(\sigma, \pi) from galaxy surveys, minimizing variance by comparing observed pairs to random catalogs while accounting for survey geometry:

\xi(\sigma, \pi) = \frac{ \left( \frac{N_R}{N_D} \right)^2 DD - 2 \frac{N_R}{N_D} DR + RR }{RR},

where DD, DR, and RR denote the normalized data-data, data-random, and random-random pair counts, respectively, and N_D and N_R are the numbers of data and random points.^[33]^[24] For power spectrum analysis, fast Fourier transform (FFT)-based methods estimate the redshift-space power spectrum P^s(k, \mu), where k is the wavenumber and \mu is the cosine of the angle to the line of sight. The Yamamoto estimator extends the Feldman-Kaiser-Peacock (FKP) approach to handle redshift-space distortions and irregular survey volumes, providing an optimal quadratic estimator that weights pairs by their density to reduce variance:

\hat{P}(\mathbf{k}) = \frac{V}{N} \sum_{\mathbf{k}'} \frac{|\tilde{n}(\mathbf{k} - \mathbf{k}')|^2}{|\tilde{n}(\mathbf{k}')|^2} \left[ \tilde{\delta}_g(\mathbf{k}) \tilde{\delta}_g^*(\mathbf{k}') - \frac{1}{n} \right],

with \tilde{\delta}_g as the Fourier transform of the galaxy density contrast, \tilde{n} the survey window, V the volume, and n the mean density. Corrections for the survey window function, including convolution effects from masking and radial selection, are applied via mode-counting or pseudo-C_\ell methods to deconvolve the observed spectrum and recover the underlying P^s(k, \mu). Multipoles P_\ell(k) are then extracted analogously to the correlation function case.^[34] Anisotropy parameters, such as the distortion factor \beta = f/b (where f is the growth rate and b the bias), are measured by fitting the observed \xi^s(\sigma, \pi) or P^s(k, \mu) to linear models. In the correlation function, this involves parameterizing the anisotropy as \xi(s_\perp, s_\parallel) = \xi^r(s) \left[1 + \beta \frac{3\mu^2 - 1}{2} + \cdots \right], where \xi^r(s) is the real-space correlation and \mu = s_\parallel / s, with the quadrupole term dominating on large scales. Fitting proceeds via \chi^2 minimization to multipoles, yielding \beta values like $0.55 \pm 0.04 from early surveys. Similar fits apply to power spectrum multipoles, referencing the theoretical redshift-space form for model comparison.^[35]^[24] Debiasing techniques address systematics in these measurements. Shot noise, arising from Poisson sampling, is subtracted as a constant $1/\bar{n} in power spectrum estimates and implicitly handled in correlation estimators via random subtraction; for dense tracers, it is negligible on large scales but modeled for sparse samples. The integral constraint biases the correlation function low due to finite survey volume, requiring an additive correction \mathcal{I} = \int \xi^r(\mathbf{r}) W(\mathbf{r}) d\mathbf{r}, where W is the window, often approximated as $0.01–$0.02 for large surveys and subtracted from the monopole. Redshift errors, from spectroscopic uncertainties (\sigma_z \sim 0.0005(1+z)), smear structures along \pi, broadening the correlation function; this is mitigated by convolving models with a Gaussian error kernel or using velocity dispersion fits in the estimator. These corrections ensure unbiased extraction of distortion parameters.^[36]^[37]

Applications in Cosmology

Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in Redshift Space

Baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) provide a standard ruler in cosmology, imprinted as a characteristic comoving scale of approximately 150 Mpc in real space from the sound horizon at the epoch of recombination. In redshift space, this scale becomes anisotropic due to the Alcock–Paczyński effect, which distorts distances inferred from redshifts assuming a fiducial cosmology, and Kaiser redshift-space distortions arising from galaxy peculiar velocities that elongate structures along the line of sight.^[23] These effects modify the observed position of the BAO feature, enabling probes of cosmic expansion that are sensitive to both transverse and radial directions. The synergy between redshift-space distortions (RSD) and BAO allows for anisotropic measurements that separately constrain the angular diameter distance D_A(z) and the Hubble parameter H(z). This is parameterized by the scaling factors \alpha_\perp \propto D_A(z) r_s / D_{A,\rm fid}(z) r_{s,\rm fid} in the perpendicular direction and \alpha_\parallel \propto H_{\rm fid}(z) r_{s,\rm fid} / H(z) r_s in the parallel direction, where r_s is the sound horizon scale and the subscript "fid" denotes fiducial model values. By fitting these parameters to the observed anisotropic clustering, RSD enhances the precision of distance-redshift relations, breaking degeneracies inherent in isotropic BAO analyses and providing scale-dependent anisotropy that refines expansion history measurements. Accurate modeling of BAO in redshift space requires a full anisotropic covariance matrix that accounts for RSD-induced damping from peculiar velocities, which broadens the BAO peak and introduces correlations between multipoles of the power spectrum or correlation function.^[30] These models incorporate linear Kaiser distortions while including nonlinear corrections to velocity fields, ensuring robust fits to the observed clustering without biasing the BAO position. The distortions primarily originate from the linear Kaiser formalism, which predicts coherent boosts along the line of sight on large scales. Observational results from surveys like BOSS and DESI demonstrate the power of RSD-enhanced BAO, achieving constraints on the matter density evolution \Omega_m(z) at approximately 1% precision in key redshift bins. For instance, BOSS data yield aggregate expansion history measurements with 0.70% precision at z < 1, where RSD reduces errors by incorporating velocity information to tighten parameter bounds.^[38] Similarly, DESI Year-1 BAO analyses provide near-percent-level precision on distance scales, with RSD contributing to error reductions of up to 20-30% in \Omega_m(z) constraints compared to isotropic cases alone.^[39] Subsequent DESI DR2 analyses (released October 2025) further improve BAO precision to an aggregate of ~0.28% for distance measurements across redshift bins, maintaining consistency with prior results.^[40] These advancements highlight RSD's role in elevating BAO as a precise probe of cosmic acceleration.

Constraints on Growth Rate and Gravity Theories

Redshift-space distortions (RSD) provide a powerful probe of the linear growth rate of cosmic structure, parameterized by the combination f(z) \sigma_8(z), where f(z) is the logarithmic derivative of the linear growth factor D(z) with respect to the scale factor, f(z) = \mathrm{d} \ln D / \mathrm{d} \ln a, and \sigma_8(z) is the root-mean-square amplitude of matter fluctuations on $8\, h^{-1} Mpc scales smoothed with a top-hat filter.^[41] In the \LambdaCDM model, f(z) is well-approximated by f(z) \approx \Omega_m(z)^{0.55}, where \Omega_m(z) is the matter density parameter at redshift z, offering a prediction that can be tested against observations. Measurements of f(z) \sigma_8(z) from RSD are particularly sensitive because the distortion parameter \beta(z) = f(z)/b(z), with b(z) the linear galaxy bias, modulates the anisotropy in the observed clustering, allowing reconstruction of the growth history through the evolution of \beta(z).^[42] The redshift evolution of \beta(z) enables stringent tests of the growth rate's consistency with \LambdaCDM predictions, as deviations in f(z) would alter the observed multipoles of the power spectrum or correlation function. For instance, combined analyses of galaxy clustering data trace f(z) \sigma_8(z) across $0 < z < 1, revealing no significant evolution anomalies when accounting for observational systematics. Accurate modeling of non-linear effects is essential for these evolution tests to ensure unbiased recovery of linear growth parameters.^[43] RSD also facilitate tests of modified gravity theories by parameterizing deviations from general relativity (GR) on cosmological scales, such as the effective gravitational strength \mu(k,a), which modifies the Poisson equation relating density perturbations to the gravitational potential, alongside related parameters like \Sigma(k,a) for lensing effects. These parametrizations, often expanded as \mu(k,a) = 1 + \mu_0 f(a) with f(a) = (a-1)/(1+z_\mathrm{fid}), allow scale- and time-dependent deviations, where GR corresponds to \mu_0 = 0. RSD multipoles are sensitive to \mu(k,a) through changes in the growth rate and velocity fields, enabling comparisons between GR and alternatives like f(R) or scalar-tensor theories via full-shape analyses of the anisotropic power spectrum.^[44] Key observational results from major surveys demonstrate the precision achievable with RSD. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-IV/eBOSS) final analysis yields f \sigma_8(0.51) = 0.507 \pm 0.064 in the redshift bin $0.43 < z < 0.70, consistent with \LambdaCDM expectations for \Omega_m \approx 0.31.^[43] More recent Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) year-1 data, combining full-shape galaxy clustering with prior surveys, achieve 4.7% precision on the RSD signal amplitude, equivalent to f \sigma_8(z), across $0.1 < z < 2.1, further tightening constraints to levels comparable to \sim 2\% in low-redshift bins when combined with SDSS results.^[32] Combined SDSS/DESI analyses are consistent with \LambdaCDM predictions for f \sigma_8(z=0.5) \approx 0.45-0.50. These measurements are in excellent agreement with GR, with combined SDSS/DESI analyses yielding constraints consistent with general relativity (GR) within approximately 20%, with no significant deviations detected.^[44]

Challenges and Prospects

Modeling Uncertainties

Modeling uncertainties in redshift-space distortions (RSD) arise primarily from the scale- and redshift-dependent evolution of galaxy bias, denoted as b(k, z), which introduces ambiguities in extracting the distortion parameter \beta = f/b, where f is the linear growth rate. This scale dependence becomes prominent on quasi-linear scales (k \gtrsim 0.1 \, h \, \mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}), where bias deviates from a constant value due to the influence of local physics in galaxy formation, leading to biased estimates of f if not properly accounted for in perturbation theory models. Simulations demonstrate that ignoring this evolution can bias \beta recovery, particularly in luminous red galaxy samples.^[45]^[46] Inaccuracies in modeling the velocity field further compound these issues, stemming from incomplete treatments of higher-order perturbations and wide-angle effects. Higher-order terms in perturbation theory, such as those beyond second order, capture non-linear velocity contributions but introduce residual uncertainties in the predicted redshift-space power spectrum on scales k < 0.2 \, h \, \mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}, as velocity fields develop multi-streaming that linear models cannot fully resolve. Wide-angle effects, arising from the finite survey geometry and observer position, distort the plane-parallel approximation, adding systematic errors to the multipole moments of the correlation function, with impacts scaling as $1/r where r is the separation. These limitations are evident in hybrid models that combine perturbation theory with simulations, revealing residuals in velocity reconstructions that propagate to f\sigma_8 estimates.^[47]^[48] Observational systematics, including redshift failures affecting 1-5% of targets in spectroscopic surveys, photometric redshift errors, and foreground contaminations, exacerbate modeling challenges in RSD analyses. Redshift failures, often due to fiber collisions or low signal-to-noise spectra, preferentially occur in dense regions, biasing clustering measurements and introducing artificial anisotropies equivalent to 2-3% errors in \beta. Photometric errors in photo-z surveys broaden the redshift distribution, smearing RSD signals and increasing uncertainties in cross-correlations by up to 10% at z > 1. Foregrounds from imaging systematics, such as dust extinction or stellar contamination, can mimic RSD patterns on large scales, requiring careful mitigation to avoid 5% biases in power spectrum estimates. Non-linear effects like shell-crossing contribute to these velocity field uncertainties but are not fully captured in current models.^[49]^[50]^[51] As of 2025, perturbation theory uncertainties in RSD modeling limit the precision on f\sigma_8 to approximately 5%, as demonstrated by analyses of the first year of Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) data, where combined measurements achieve 4.7% accuracy but residual modeling errors prevent sub-3% levels without advanced non-perturbative approaches. This precision threshold reflects the cumulative impact of bias evolution and velocity inaccuracies, constraining cosmological inferences on growth rate and gravity.^[52]

Future Surveys and Improvements

Next-generation spectroscopic surveys are poised to dramatically enhance the precision of redshift-space distortion (RSD) measurements by expanding sample sizes and improving redshift accuracy. The Euclid mission, launched in July 2023, will spectroscopically observe approximately 30 million galaxies up to redshift z \approx 1.8 over 15,000 square degrees, enabling high-fidelity RSD analyses through galaxy clustering in redshift space.^[53] The Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, scheduled for launch in 2027, will complement this with its High Latitude Survey, combining weak lensing and RSD probes via emission-line galaxy redshifts (e.g., H\alpha) for over 2000 square degrees, targeting z < 2 to constrain growth-rate parameters.^[54] Looking further ahead, the Maunakea Spectroscopic Explorer (MSE), an 11.25-meter telescope with a 1.5 square degree field of view expected in the 2040s, will deliver millions of high-precision radial velocities for galaxies and quasars, facilitating joint density-velocity power spectrum measurements to probe RSD on large scales.^[55] These surveys will incorporate key improvements to mitigate current limitations in RSD data quality and volume. Wider field coverage and deeper spectroscopy will reduce cosmic variance and shot noise, with MSE's 3200-fiber multiplex enabling surveys of up to 10 million objects per year across optical to near-infrared wavelengths.^[56] Multi-tracer techniques, correlating multiple galaxy populations (e.g., galaxies and quasars) with differing biases, will suppress sample variance and enhance signal-to-noise for RSD parameters like the growth rate f\sigma_8, as demonstrated in perturbation theory frameworks.^[57] Additionally, machine learning approaches are emerging to infer peculiar velocities from photometric data or augment field-level modeling of the Lyman-\alpha forest in redshift space, improving non-linear RSD predictions without full simulations.^[58] Theoretical advances are addressing non-linear modeling challenges to fully exploit these datasets. Full N-body emulators, which combine dark matter simulations with Lagrangian perturbation theory, enable accurate predictions of biased tracer power spectra in redshift space down to small scales (k \approx 0.3 h/Mpc), outperforming traditional methods for high-precision fits.^[59] Resummed perturbation theory extensions, incorporating infrared resummation for large-scale damping effects, further refine one-loop models of the redshift-space power spectrum and bispectrum, validated against N-body simulations for Euclid-like surveys.^[60] These hybrid approaches will reduce modeling uncertainties in RSD analyses by factors of 2–5 compared to current standards. By the 2040s, these combined efforts aim for sub-percent precision in f\sigma_8 measurements (e.g., \sim0.5% at z < 1), enabling robust tests of the dark energy equation of state w and deviations from general relativity through multi-probe consistency checks.^[61] Such accuracy will distinguish dynamical dark energy models from \LambdaCDM at the 2–3\sigma level, leveraging RSD's sensitivity to structure growth.^[62]

References

[1]
Clustering in real space and in redshift space
**Extracted Abstract and Key Points from Kaiser (1987) Paper**
[2]
[PDF] Redshift Space Distortions Overview
Redshift Space Distortions. Overview. It is important to realize that our “third dimension” in cos- mology is not radial distance but redshift.
[3]
real and redshift space clustering
Redshift space distortions can be measured to constrain cosmological parameters, and they can also be integrated over to recover the underlying real space ...
[4]
None
Summary of each segment:
[5]
https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/227/1/1/1539023
[6]
Redshift-space distortions | Philosophical Transactions of the Royal ...
Dec 28, 2011 · We review RSD theory and show how ubiquitous RSDs actually are, and then consider a number of potential systematic effects, shamelessly ...
[7]
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977ApJ...212L...3S/abstract
[8]
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2011.0370
[9]
SYSTEMATIC EFFECTS ON DETERMINATION OF THE GROWTH ...
We investigate systematic effects on determination of the linear growth factor f from a measurement of redshift-space distortions.<|separator|>
[10]
The Redshift Dependence of the Alcock–Paczynski Effect
Apr 19, 2019 · This effect, known as redshift space distortions (RSD), is usually much more significant than the AP distortion, and is notoriously ...
[11]
Large-scale redshift space distortions in modified gravity theories
Nov 22, 2018 · Measurements of redshift space distortions (RSD) provide a means to test models of gravity on large-scales. We use mock galaxy catalogues ...Missing: σ8 Ωm
[12]
The Las Campanas Redshift Survey - NASA ADS
(1996c) examines redshift-space distortions in the clustering of LCRS galaxies, derives the velocity dispersion of galaxy pairs, and estimates the value of ...
[13]
Three Redshifts: Doppler, Cosmological, and Gravitational
May 1, 2021 · Redshift is an interesting topic, used to describe many physical processes such as the Doppler effect or the expansion of the universe.
[14]
Testing the mapping between redshift and cosmic scale factor - arXiv
Feb 6, 2016 · Abstract:The canonical redshift-scale factor relation, 1/a=1+z, is a key element in the standard LambdaCDM model of the big bang cosmology.Missing: review | Show results with:review
[15]
A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae | PNAS
### Key Findings from Hubble's 1929 Paper
[16]
[PDF] Testing Cosmological Structure Formation using Redshift-Space ...
Nov 11, 2008 · The redshift-space position of a galaxy differs from its real-space position due to its peculiar velocity,. 1 The fits are quite sensitive to ...<|separator|>
[17]
The Density and Peculiar Velocity Fields of Nearby Galaxies
(33) reveals the physical content of this first-order expansion: linear perturbation theory states that peculiar velocities are proportional to gravitational ...
[18]
[PDF] Chapter 4: Linear Perturbation Theory
May 4, 2009 · From the proportionality between peculiar velocity and peculiar gravity we can infer the linear growth rate for peculiar velocities, v = 2f.
[19]
Clustering in real space and in redshift space
Kaiser structure will introduce a distortion in this mapping. In this paper we will explore several aspects of this distortion. Perhaps the most obvious ...Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
[20]
Cosmological Velocity-Density Relation in the Quasi-linear Regime
Consideration is given to the exact solution of the continuity equation and to the exact solution of the dynamical Euler-Poisson equation, which turns out to ...Missing: correlation | Show results with:correlation
[21]
Estimation of peculiar velocity from the inverse Tully–Fisher relation
ABSTRACT. We present a method for deriving a smoothed estimate of the peculiar velocity field of a set of spiral galaxies with measured circular velocities.
[22]
[2509.20235] $S_8$ from Tully-Fisher, fundamental plane ... - arXiv
Sep 24, 2025 · These results demonstrate that peculiar velocity surveys provide a robust, consistent measurement of S_8, and support concordance with the ...
[23]
Clustering in real space and in redshift space
**Summary of Abstract and Introduction from MNRAS, 1987**
[24]
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJ...385L...5H/abstract
[25]
Fourier Analysis of Redshift Space Distortions and the ...
Light solid contours show the linear-theory power spectrum, Ps(k, ~)=(1 + f3~j2)2pR(k), for j3= 1/2 and the F = 0.25 real-space spectrum P'~(k). Heavy solid ...
[26]
Modelling redshift space distortions in hierarchical cosmologies
In the linear regime, the matter power spectrum in redshift space is a function of the power spectrum in real space and the parameter β=f/b, where f is the ...
[27]
Impact of shell crossing and scope of perturbative approaches, in ...
We find that the potential of perturbative schemes is greater at higher redshift for a ΛCDM cosmology. For the real-space power spectrum, one can go up to order ...
[28]
Gravitational Instability in Redshift-Space - IOP Science
The large-scale FOG effect has been recently connected to redshift-space shell-crossing due to coherent infall by Hui, Kofman & Shandarin (1998). All of these ...
[29]
Lagrangian Cosmological Perturbation Theory at Shell Crossing
Using a Lagrangian treatment of cosmological gravitational dynamics, we examine the convergence properties of a high-order perturbative expansion in the ...Missing: RSD | Show results with:RSD
[30]
[1009.0106] Impact of shell crossing and scope of perturbative ...
Sep 1, 2010 · We study the effect of nonperturbative corrections associated with the behavior of particles after shell crossing on the matter power spectrum.
[31]
[1006.0699] Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in 2D: Modeling Redshift ...
Jun 3, 2010 · We find that the existing phenomenological models of redshift distortion produce a systematic error on measurements of the angular diameter ...
[32]
https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12021
[33]
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...412...64L/abstract
[34]
Estimating β from redshift-space distortions in the 2dF galaxy survey
The result is that we are only able to constrain β to a 1σ accuracy of 25 per cent (β = 0.55±0.14 for the cosmological model considered). We explore one ...
[35]
Primordial non-Gaussianity with angular correlation function
One of the focuses of the work is the integral constraint (IC). This condition appears when estimating the mean number density of galaxies from the data and is ...INTRODUCTION · THEORY · IC AND FNL · SIMULATIONS
[36]
[astro-ph/0208139] Optimal Weighting Scheme in Redshift-space ...
Aug 6, 2002 · We develop a useful formula for power spectrum analysis for high and intermediate redshift galaxy samples, as an extension of the work by ...
[37]
Final BAO and RSD Measurements - SDSS
The aggregate precision of the expansion history measurements is 0.70% at redshifts z < 1 and 1.19% at redshifts z > 1, while the aggregate precision of the ...
[38]
DESI 2024: Constraints on Physics-Focused Aspects of Dark Energy ...
May 22, 2024 · Baryon acoustic oscillation data from the first year of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) provide near percent-level precision of ...
[39]
[astro-ph/0507263] Cosmic Growth History and Expansion ... - arXiv
Jul 11, 2005 · The cosmic expansion history tests the dynamics of the global evolution of the universe and its energy density contents.Missing: Omega_m 0.55
[40]
clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation ...
The cut-sky mocks are at z = 0.5. The vertical coloured lines indicate the differences in fσ8 when each pair of methods is applied to the DR12 combined sample, ...
[41]
https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0507263
[42]
Modified Gravity Constraints from the Full Shape Modeling of Clustering Measurements from DESI 2024
### Summary of Modified Gravity Constraints from DESI 2024
[43]
[2411.12021] DESI 2024 V: Full-Shape Galaxy Clustering ... - arXiv
Nov 18, 2024 · We present the measurements and cosmological implications of the galaxy two-point clustering using over 4.7 million unique galaxy and quasar redshifts.
[44]
Modelling non-linear redshift-space distortions in the galaxy ...
In that case, it is convenient to replace the growth rate f in the models with a 'effective' growth rate (or distortion parameter) β = f/bL, which accounts for ...
[45]
the effect of redshift-space distortions and bias and cosmological ...
Jul 24, 2025 · Using both MultiDark-Patchy and EZmock galaxy catalogs, we assess the scale-dependent impact of redshift-space distortions on D_2 and bias ...
[46]
[1801.04950] Hybrid modeling of redshift space distortions - arXiv
Jan 15, 2018 · The observed power spectrum in redshift space appears distorted due to the peculiar motion of galaxies, known as redshift-space distortions ( ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[47]
Wide-angle effects for peculiar velocities - Oxford Academic
ABSTRACT. The line-of-sight peculiar velocities of galaxies contribute to their observed redshifts, breaking the translational invariance of galaxy cluster.
[48]
Target Selection and Validation of DESI Luminous Red Galaxies
Jan 18, 2023 · ... redshift failure rate for each fiber using observations during the Main Survey. The per-fiber LRG failure rate is shown in Figure 14 (left ...
[49]
[PDF] Download PDF - eScholarship
May 14, 2025 · ... failed-redshift systematics (see section 4.1). The LSS catalogue of ELGs is used to quantify the clustering impact of the redshift failure.
[50]
[PDF] Galaxy clustering and systematics treatment for lens galaxy samples
May 27, 2021 · In this work we present the galaxy clustering measurements of the two DES lens galaxy sam- ples: a magnitude-limited sample optimized for ...
[51]
[PDF] DESI 2024 V - HAL
Nov 2, 2025 · Regarding σ8, we find both SDSS and DESI ... [96] DESI collaboration, DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon.
[52]
Euclid: Forecasts from redshift-space distortions and the Alcock ...
In particular, we study the imprints of dynamic (redshift-space) and geometric (Alcock–Paczynski) distortions of average void shapes and their constraining ...
[53]
Cosmology with the Roman Space Telescope – multiprobe strategies
Jul 1, 2021 · We simulate the scientific performance of the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope High Latitude Survey (HLS) on dark energy and modified gravity.
[54]
[PDF] The Detailed Science Case for the Maunakea Spectroscopic Explorer
May 27, 2016 · ... (RSD) and joint density-velocity (VEL) power spectra. Results for sky coverage of 10000 deg2 (marginalization over the other parameters and ...
[55]
The Maunakea Spectroscopic Explorer: Thousands of Fibers, Infinite ...
Jul 15, 2023 · This 12.5-meter telescope, with its 1.5 square degree field-of-view, will observe 18,000-20,000 astronomical targets in every pointing from 0.36 ...Missing: RSD velocities
[56]
Optimal weights for measuring redshift space distortions in ...
A promising way of taking advantage of the presence of multiple tracers was proposed in McDonald & Seljak (2009). The method, however, has not yet been ...
[57]
Field-level Lyman-α forest modeling in redshift space via augmented ...
We present an improved analytical model to predict the Lyα forest at the field level in redshift space from the dark matter field.
[58]
[PDF] body–perturbation theory model - UC Berkeley
Jun 2, 2021 · We implement a model for the two-point statistics of biased tracers that combines dark matter dynamics from N-body simulations.Missing: advances | Show results with:advances
[59]
A perturbation theory based model at one-loop order | Phys. Rev. D
Aug 31, 2017 · In this section, we begin by writing down the exact expressions of power spectrum and bispectrum for the matter density field in redshift space.
[60]
Cosmological Fisher forecasts for next-generation spectroscopic ...
For BAO and RSD parameters, these surveys may achieve precision at sub-per cent level (<0.5 per cent), representing an improvement of factor 10 w.r.t. the ...<|separator|>
[61]
[PDF] A Spectroscopic Road Map for Cosmic Frontier: DESI, DESI-II, Stage-5
Sep 8, 2022 · Therefore the high-precision measurements of the power spectrum by future high-redshift surveys are an ideal way to detect the presence of ...