Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

RogerEbert.com

RogerEbert.com is an American online publication dedicated to film criticism, reviews, and essays, co-founded in 2002 by Pulitzer Prize-winning critic and his wife in collaboration with the . The site emerged from Ebert's decades-long career as a film reviewer for the Sun-Times, where he gained prominence for his accessible yet insightful analyses and the iconic thumbs-up/thumbs-down rating system popularized through his television partnership with . Following Roger Ebert's death from cancer in 2013, assumed leadership as CEO of Ebert Digital LLC, the site's publisher, ensuring continuity of its mission to provide thoughtful, independent commentary on cinema. Under Ebert's oversight, the platform has evolved into a digital hub featuring contributions from a team of editors including Brian Tallerico and others such as and Nick Allen, who uphold standards of rigorous critique amid shifting media landscapes. Notable for its emphasis on narrative depth and cultural context over superficial star ratings, RogerEbert.com has maintained influence by archiving Ebert's vast oeuvre while fostering new voices in film discourse. While praised for preserving a legacy of substantive criticism, the site has drawn occasional critique for perceived ideological tilts in contemporary reviews, reflecting broader debates on evolving tastes in cultural commentary.

History

Founding and Early Development (2002–2013)

RogerEbert.com was co-founded in 2002 by film critic and his wife as a digital platform in collaboration with the , the newspaper for which Ebert had written film reviews since 1967. The site was initially underwritten by the Sun-Times and launched to archive Ebert's extensive body of work, including thousands of reviews, essays, and interviews accumulated over decades, thereby preserving and expanding access to his criticism beyond print. Jim Emerson served as the founding editor, overseeing early and contributing through features like the "Scanners" blog, which analyzed film techniques and cultural impacts. During its initial years, the platform evolved from a static archive into an interactive hub for discourse, incorporating Ebert's personal —launched around 2004—where he shared unfiltered thoughts , personal experiences, and industry trends, amassing a dedicated readership. Ebert hand-selected international contributors to diversify perspectives, fostering original essays, interviews, and reviews that complemented his own four-star . This expansion aligned with Ebert's diagnosis of in 2002, prompting a shift toward digital output as a means to sustain his voice amid health challenges; by 2006, following surgeries that removed his ability to speak, he intensified his online engagement, posting frequently and using text-to-speech for video content. The site's growth through reflected Ebert's adaptability to web technologies, including early experiments with and reader comments, which he credited for enriching his work and democratizing criticism. Traffic and influence surged as Ebert's print column diminished due to illness, positioning RogerEbert.com as a primary outlet for his output—evidenced by over 300 "" essays compiled online by his death on April 4, . This period solidified the platform's role in bridging traditional with emerging digital formats, though it remained tied to the Sun-Times partnership until independence shortly after Ebert's passing.

Transition Following Roger Ebert's Death (2013–Present)

Following Roger Ebert's death on April 4, 2013, his widow assumed leadership of the site as CEO and publisher of Ebert Digital LLC, the entity Ebert had established to independently operate RogerEbert.com prior to his passing. In a statement released the following day, affirmed the commitment to sustaining Ebert's vision of thoughtful , emphasizing continuity in publishing new reviews alongside his archived work. The transition proceeded without interruption to site operations, as Ebert had already planned the shift to Ebert Digital to separate it from prior affiliations with the . On June 4, 2013, Chaz Ebert announced Matt Zoller Seitz, a Pulitzer-nominated critic previously associated with outlets like New York Magazine and Time Out New York, as the site's new editor-in-chief to guide editorial direction. Zoller Seitz's role focused on expanding in-depth analysis and video essays while preserving Ebert's emphasis on accessible yet substantive discourse about cinema. Over time, his position evolved to editor-at-large, with Brian Tallerico serving as managing editor to oversee daily content curation by a team including senior editor Nick Allen, literary editor Matt Fagerholm, and contributing editor Nell Minow. Subsequent developments included a 2020 redesign enhancing , search optimization, and mobile responsiveness under Ebert's oversight, followed by further updates in 2023 introducing the "Collections" feature for themed content aggregation and revived reader engagement sections like "Letters to the Editors." In 2022, staff promotions underscored internal growth, with Allen elevated to senior editor and Fagerholm to literary editor to bolster coverage of literature and festivals. The launch of Ebert Prime, a subscription tier providing ad-free access and exclusive interviews, supported financial sustainability while maintaining free core reviews. Throughout, the platform has balanced new critiques from its editorial team with commemorative features of Ebert's oeuvre, such as anniversary retrospectives, ensuring his influence persists amid evolving digital media landscapes.

Operations and Ownership

Management Structure

Chaz Ebert, widow of founder , has served as CEO of Ebert Digital LLC—the entity publishing RogerEbert.com—since the site's relaunch following Roger's death on April 4, 2013, and oversees its strategic direction while maintaining fidelity to his original vision of accessible . As of The Ebert Company Ltd. and Ebert Productions, she also manages broader Ebert-related enterprises, including film production and the festival, which integrate with the site's operations. Daily editorial management falls under Brian Tallerico, appointed Managing Editor, who handles content curation, review assignments, and coverage of films, television, and across major studios and independents. Supporting Tallerico is a core team comprising Matt , who contributes in-depth analyses and was the site's inaugural from June 4, 2013, until transitioning to his current role; Associate Editor Robert Daniels; and Assistant Editor Clint Worthington. Additional specialized roles include Senior Editor Nick Allen, Literary Editor Matt Fagerholm, and Contributing Editor , forming a flat yet collaborative structure focused on aggregating reviews, essays, and archival content without a rigid corporate hierarchy beyond Ebert Digital's oversight. Operational support involves external collaborators such as web developer Table XI, IT consultant Myrin New, and Ebert Company executive Sonia Evans, ensuring technical sustainability and alignment with Roger's emphasis on user-friendly design and comprehensive movie discourse. This lean management model prioritizes and contributor-driven output over expansive bureaucracy, with no publicly detailed board or shareholder structure beyond Chaz Ebert's controlling interest in Ebert Digital.

Business Model and Sustainability

RogerEbert.com is owned and operated by Ebert Digital LLC, with , Roger Ebert's widow, serving as the primary steward since the site's relaunch in 2013 following his death. The entity's board includes investors such as and Frank Sennett, providing strategic oversight without public disclosure of equity stakes or direct funding contributions. The site's core business model relies on free access to reviews, articles, and archives, monetized primarily through display advertising placed alongside content. This approach avoids a full paywall for essential material, preserving broad accessibility while generating revenue from traffic driven by Roger Ebert's enduring brand. Supplementary income includes the Ebert Prime subscription tier, launched as an enhanced membership offering ad-free browsing, exclusive videos, rare footage, and perks such as discounted tickets to the Ebertfest film festival, priced to appeal to dedicated cinephiles without gating primary content. Early experiments under Roger Ebert, such as a $5 annual "Ebert Club" for premium newsletters, informed this hybrid freemium structure but were not scaled into mandatory subscriptions. Estimated annual revenue stands at approximately $7 million, supporting a staff of around 33 employees focused on editorial and operational roles. Additional streams derive from event sponsorships at , which attracts filmmakers and industry figures for panel discussions and screenings, though these represent ancillary rather than primary funding. Sustainability has been maintained through diversified revenue and the site's cultural cachet, with no publicly reported financial crises or layoffs since 2013. The model benefits from low overhead relative to legacy media— eliminates printing and costs—while stability from search engines and loyal readership offsets ad fluctuations. However, dependence on advertising exposes it to broader pressures, such as declining rates and competition from aggregator sites, though the niche focus on in-depth criticism has preserved viability absent aggressive pivots to or sponsored reviews.

Content and Features

Review Archiving and Formats

RogerEbert.com maintains a comprehensive archive of reviews authored by during his tenure at the from 1967 to 2013, encompassing over 8,000 entries digitized for online accessibility and searchability by title, reviewer, genre, and . These archived reviews preserve Ebert's original textual analyses, often supplemented with such as release dates and cast information, allowing users to filter results for high-rated films or specific eras. The platform also incorporates archival content from Ebert's television collaborations, including searchable video clips of debates from Siskel & Ebert and its successors, enabling visitors to view full episodes or segments dating back decades. Reviews on the site adhere to a standardized format featuring a prominent ranging from 0 to 4 stars, typically assigned in half-star increments to denote the film's artistic and entertainment value relative to its ambitions and execution. This numerical score appears alongside the review title and critic's , with textual content structured as an essay-style that begins with an overall verdict, followed by plot-agnostic insights into themes, performances, and technical elements before delving into specifics that may include spoilers. Ebert emphasized conveying the viewer's likely experience without pandering to hype, a principle reflected in the archived prose's focus on humanistic and populist criteria over abstract formalism. Contemporary reviews by site contributors, such as Brian Tallerico or , replicate this format for consistency, integrating the star rating with multimedia elements like trailers, stills, and hyperlinks to related content, while older entries remain unadorned to retain their print-era authenticity. The absence of half-star ratings in some early reviews stems from Ebert's evolving methodology, though the site standardizes presentation without altering original assessments. Special collections, like the "Great Movies" series, repurpose archived reviews into curated essays with elevated ratings (3.5–4 ), highlighting canonical works without separate formatting overlays. This dual approach ensures archival integrity alongside modern , though critics have noted the star system's subjectivity in distinguishing marginal differences, as Ebert himself defended it for accommodating audience expectations over rigid precision.

Signature Columns and Lists

The Great Movies series, a hallmark of Roger Ebert's critical output, comprises in-depth essays on films Ebert regarded as exceptional, emphasizing their artistic merit, thematic depth, and cultural significance. Initiated during his tenure at the and expanded online via RogerEbert.com, the series features essays on classics spanning genres and eras, such as (1941), (1942), and 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968). Ebert compiled these into four volumes between 2002 and 2010, each containing approximately 100 essays, serving as a curated canon rather than a ranked list, with selections reflecting his personal criteria for enduring cinematic achievement rather than consensus polls. The online archive preserves these pieces, allowing users to browse by genre, such as (over 290 entries) or foreign films (over 150), underscoring Ebert's advocacy for thoughtful analysis over superficial review. Ebert's annual top ten lists represent another enduring feature, published yearly from 1967 until 2012, three months before his death. These lists ranked the best films Ebert viewed that year, often including surprises like foreign or independent works alongside mainstream releases; for instance, his 1967 list topped with and included 15 titles due to an abundant year, while 2012 favored amid health challenges. Unlike aggregate rankings, Ebert's selections prioritized films that resonated personally, sometimes extending to decade retrospectives, such as the 1990s list highlighting and . Post-2013, RogerEbert.com has adapted this tradition with collective staff lists of top films, as in the 2024 edition featuring The Brutalist and Nickel Boys, maintaining the site's emphasis on curatorial insight. Recurring columns further defined the site's voice, notably the Movie Answer Man, a reader Q&A format where Ebert addressed trivia, technical queries, and interpretive debates, such as seatbelt usage in films or plot ambiguities in Boogie Nights (1997). Running from the 1990s into the 2000s, it was compiled into the 1997 book Questions for the Movie Answer Man, fostering direct engagement and demystifying cinema. Complementing this, Roger Ebert's Journal offered personal essays on film, culture, and life, evolving into an interactive blog that drew thousands of comments per entry by the late 2000s, exemplified by reflections on critics like Gene Siskel or broader topics like electoral politics in media. These columns, archived on the site, prioritized Ebert's unfiltered reasoning over institutional narratives, though their subjective nature invited debate on selections' representativeness. Under editor Matt Zoller Seitz, similar essayistic columns continue, blending memoir and critique, as in Seitz's "Thumbnails" series on film style and history.

Coverage of Events and Media

RogerEbert.com maintains a dedicated "Festivals & Awards" section that features on-site dispatches, film reviews, previews, and analytical pieces from major international film festivals, emphasizing premieres, trends, and cultural significance. Coverage spans events such as the Cannes Film Festival, where the site publishes daily reports, video dispatches, and critiques of competition films like Exit 8 and Leave One Day during the 2025 edition held May 13–24. Similarly, the Sundance Film Festival receives detailed programming announcements, premiere reviews, and thematic overviews, including assessments of films like Sabar Bonda (Cactus Pears) and Twinless in January 2025, often highlighting independent cinema's role in awards trajectories. The site extends its festival reporting to regional and specialized gatherings, such as the (TIFF), with correspondent perspectives on selections like Dust Bunny and The Furious in September 2025, noting logistical and programming crossroads. For the , coverage in August 2025 included lineup previews featuring works by directors like and . Other events covered encompass the (NYFF), focusing on thematic elements like film and in its 63rd edition in September 2025; the (KVIFF), with reviews of relational dramas in July 2025; and niche festivals like Bentonville, which aligns with advocacy for representation through the . In terms of awards media, RogerEbert.com tracks the Oscars by analyzing festival-to-nomination pipelines, such as Sundance films' historical Oscar outcomes and overlooked titles from Cannes-influenced races in 2024–2025. The site also documents its affiliated , compiling historical highlights of screenings and discussions since its inception, underscoring a commitment to accessible discourse. This coverage prioritizes critical evaluation over promotional hype, often critiquing festival dynamics like premiere overload or sustainability.

Contributors

Core Editorial Staff

Brian Tallerico serves as the of RogerEbert.com, overseeing daily operations, , and contributions across , television, Blu-ray releases, and video games. He marked his tenth anniversary with the site in March 2024, having joined around 2014, and also freelances for outlets including , , and . Tallerico holds the position of president of the , reflecting his influence within professional criticism circles. Matt Zoller Seitz functions as Editor-at-Large, contributing in-depth reviews and essays while maintaining primary roles as a television critic for New York Magazine and Vulture.com. Originally appointed Editor-in-Chief in June 2013 following Roger Ebert's passing, Seitz transitioned to his current title by at least 2023, continuing to author video essays on film history and style. A Pulitzer Prize finalist in criticism, Seitz's work emphasizes analytical depth in both cinema and television. Robert Daniels joined as Associate Editor in September 2023, focusing on reviews and festival coverage for RogerEbert.com alongside contributions to and . A member of the , Daniels brings expertise in contemporary and events to the team's editorial output. Clint Worthington was appointed Assistant Editor in May 2024, supporting review processes and content management while founding and editing The Spool, a site, and writing for Consequence and . As a member of both the and , Worthington aids in broadening the site's coverage of genre and mainstream releases. Nell Minow holds the role of Contributing Editor, providing specialized with an emphasis on family-oriented and mainstream titles. Promoted to this position in March 2022, her contributions align with the site's tradition of accessible, value-driven reviews. The team collectively upholds Roger Ebert's legacy through rigorous, audience-focused editorial standards, though individual roles have evolved with promotions and departures, such as the 2022 elevations of former Senior Editor Nick Allen and Literary Editor Matt Fagerholm prior to their later exits.

Guest and Regular Critics

Brian Tallerico serves as Managing Editor and one of the site's primary critics, having contributed over 1,056 reviews covering films, television, and video games; he also holds the position of president of the Chicago Film Critics Association. Matt Zoller Seitz, Editor-at-Large, has authored 737 reviews, with expertise extending to television criticism for outlets like New York Magazine and authorship of books on film and TV directors. Other regular critics include Glenn Kenny (726 reviews), Simon Abrams (632 reviews), Sheila O'Malley (610 reviews), and Christy Lemire (591 reviews), who collectively handle ongoing coverage of new releases, festivals, and archival analyses while upholding the site's emphasis on thoughtful, substantive critique. Robert Daniels, an Associate Editor, focuses on independent films and festivals, contributing to the site's Chicago-centric perspective. The roster of regular critics expanded post-2013 to sustain daily operations after Roger Ebert's death, with figures like providing specialized columns such as "Movie Mom" on content and ethical considerations in media. These contributors often participate in annual "best of" lists, as seen in compilations of individual top tens for years like 2018, reflecting diverse tastes within a unified framework. Guest contributions supplement the regulars, typically from freelancers, industry professionals, or emerging critics via programs like the Fellowship. Recipients such as Carlos Aguilar (2014 fellow) and Brandon Towns (2018 fellow) have published reviews and essays, fostering new voices in criticism; other occasional writers include Monica Castillo and Tomris Laffly, who provide targeted pieces on niche topics or underrepresented . While not forming a formal guest critic cadre, these inputs allow for varied perspectives without altering the site's core standards, as evidenced by sporadic filmmaker or actor essays integrated into review sections.

Reception and Cultural Impact

Praise for Accessibility and Influence

RogerEbert.com has been commended for upholding Roger Ebert's legacy of accessible , characterized by direct, entertaining that elucidates sophisticated cinematic concepts for non-specialist audiences. This approach, which Ebert pioneered to expand beyond niche publications, enables the site to offer reviews that resonate with general readers while preserving analytical depth. The platform's user-friendly redesign in enhanced its accessibility through faster loading times, improved search functionality, and optimized navigation, facilitating easy access to an extensive exceeding 10,000 reviews dating back to 1967. These features democratize engagement with film history, allowing users to explore Ebert's insights without barriers typical of print-era . In terms of influence, RogerEbert.com functions as a cornerstone of digital discourse, amplifying diverse voices through its network of contributors and far-flung correspondents, thereby shaping public appreciation for and foreign . Critics like Scott Foundas have highlighted its enduring role in sustaining passionate, community-driven analysis amid evolving media landscapes. The site's star ratings and detailed essays continue to guide viewer decisions and foster broader cultural conversations about 's societal impact.

Criticisms of Editorial Direction

Critics have argued that RogerEbert.com's editorial direction, particularly under editor Brian Tallerico since the mid-2010s, has veered toward prioritizing progressive ideological lenses—such as and themes—over Roger Ebert's foundational emphasis on narrative craft, director intent, and broad accessibility. This shift, observed after Ebert's on April 4, 2013, is said to manifest in reviews that penalize films for perceived cultural missteps rather than evaluating artistic execution, leading to accusations of conformity to media biases common in circles. A notable example is the site's 2/4-star review of Sound of Freedom (2023), a based on real-life efforts to combat child , where critic Nick Allen critiqued its "clear line between " as overly simplistic and tied it to rhetoric blurring ideological lines, despite the film's basis in documented events and its strong emotional resonance with audiences. This assessment contributed to a stark divergence, with the film earning a 57% critics' score on against a 99% audience score, fueling claims that the review reflected an editorial reluctance to endorse content associated with conservative figures or narratives challenging prevailing cultural orthodoxies. Similar patterns appear in other critiques, such as Orrin Konheim's analysis, which points to Nick Allen's review of and the Legend of the Ten Rings () as injecting unsubstantiated ideological interpretations—misrepresenting studio comments on representation to align with narratives—over substantive . Konheim, identifying as a , contends this "preaching" style across reviews erodes critical depth and reader trust, evidenced by contentious comment sections and audience-critic score gaps, diverging from Ebert's populist, merit-driven ethos. Such observations underscore broader concerns that the site's direction mirrors systemic progressive tilts in media institutions, potentially undermining its claim to objective inheritance of Ebert's legacy.

Controversies

Debates Over Political Bias in Reviews

Critics from conservative perspectives have accused RogerEbert.com of displaying a left-leaning bias in its evaluations of films promoting conservative viewpoints, pointing to consistently low ratings for politically charged documentaries and narratives that challenge progressive orthodoxies. For instance, Dinesh D'Souza's 2018 film Death of a Nation, which draws parallels between Abraham Lincoln and Donald Trump to argue against Democratic historical narratives, received a zero-star rating from site contributor Peter Sobczynski, who dismissed it as "pure garbage" and a symptom of conservatism's shift from substantive ideas to conspiracy-laden propaganda. Such reviews are cited by detractors as evidence of ideological filtering, where artistic critiques serve as vehicles for political condemnation, particularly given the film's factual basis in historical events like Lincoln's opposition to Democrats. Similar contention surrounded the 2023 release , a thriller based on real events involving child rescue operations, which achieved commercial success among conservative audiences but earned only two stars from reviewer Nick Allen. Allen praised the film's stark moral dichotomy between good and evil but faulted its reliance on simplified narratives amid broader debates over trafficking statistics and associated conspiracy theories, a framing echoed in mainstream media linkages to despite the filmmakers' denials. Conservative outlets and commentators, including those highlighting the film's basis in Operations Underground Railroad founder Tim Ballard's documented efforts, have lambasted such middling assessments as downplaying of trafficking epidemics in favor of cultural skepticism toward faith-based or anti-elite messaging. Defenders of the site, including its archival content from , counter that reviews prioritize cinematic execution—dialogue, pacing, and originality—over thematic alignment, with Ebert himself asserting a "profoundly conservative" approach to appreciation that resists politicized interpretations. Ebert frequently addressed allegations in posts, rejecting claims that negative verdicts on films like Team America: World Police stemmed from liberal aversion rather than satirical excesses. Nonetheless, observers note the absence of openly conservative staff critics on RogerEbert.com, contrasting with Ebert's era, as contributing to perceptions of homogeneity in an industry where left-leaning viewpoints predominate among professionals, potentially skewing evaluations of ideologically divergent works without overt admission. These debates underscore broader tensions in , where subjective quality assessments intersect with cultural divides, though no comprehensive empirical analysis has quantified systematic disparities in scoring across political spectra.

Legacy Preservation Disputes

Chaz Hammelsmith Ebert assumed control of RogerEbert.com following Roger Ebert's death on April 4, 2013, relaunching it under Ebert Digital LLC with a focus on maintaining his archived reviews, essays, and blog posts alongside new content from successor critics. This effort has preserved digital access to over 10,000 of Ebert's film reviews dating back to 1967, as well as his personal writings on topics ranging from cinema to mortality, ensuring his voice remains publicly available without alteration to original texts. Debates have emerged among film enthusiasts regarding whether the site's expansion with contemporary reviewers upholds or dilutes Ebert's distinctive analytical approach, characterized by accessible prose, emphasis on emotional resonance, and avoidance of overly academic jargon. Online commentary shortly after his passing criticized specific post-Ebert reviews for perceived inconsistencies in tone or rigor, with some arguing that aggregating new opinions under the site's banner risks conflating them with Ebert's authoritative perspective, potentially eroding the purity of his preserved corpus. Ebert himself had earlier lamented the inadequate preservation of early Siskel & Ebert television episodes, noting in a 2007 reflection that tapes from 1975 to 1985 were largely erased for reuse or lost due to production practices of the era, limiting archival access to those segments of his legacy. Subsequent institutional efforts, such as the Archives' collection of Ebert's personal papers and artifacts acquired post-2013, have addressed gaps in physical preservation, though no formal disputes over access or ownership have been documented. These initiatives underscore a commitment to safeguarding his contributions amid evolving landscapes, without reported conflicts among stakeholders.

References

  1. [1]
    Introducing the Editors of RogerEbert.com | Features | Roger Ebert
    Mar 28, 2022 · It was initially co-founded by me and my late husband, Roger Ebert, in 2002, as a joint collaboration with the Chicago Sun-Times, for whom Roger ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  2. [2]
    Roger Ebert - Wikipedia
    Roger Joseph Ebert was an American film critic, film historian, journalist, essayist, screenwriter and author. He wrote for the Chicago Sun-Times from 1967 ...RogerEbert.com · Chaz Ebert · Gene Siskel · Richard Roeper
  3. [3]
    About the site - Roger Ebert
    Ever since the passing of the site's co-founder and namesake, Pulitzer Prize-winning film critic Roger Ebert, in 2013, it has been run by his wife, Chaz Ebert.
  4. [4]
    Contributors - Roger Ebert
    Brian Tallerico is the Managing Editor of RogerEbert.com, and also covers television, film, Blu-ray, and video games. He is also a writer for Vulture, The AV ...
  5. [5]
    Critiquing some of RogerEbert.com's more woke reviews
    Sep 7, 2021 · This is a cursory listing of ways in which the website RogerEbert.com primarily preaches one school of thought through their reviews.
  6. [6]
    The sins of the critics | Scanners - Roger Ebert
    Dec 14, 2012 · Jim Emerson is the founding editor of RogerEbert.com and has written lots of things in lots of places over lots of years. Mostly involving ...
  7. [7]
    Confessions of a blogger | Roger Ebert
    Dec 14, 2012 · I started this blog in May, and it has enriched my life. I have been astonished by the high quality of the comments received. I have also been educated, amused ...
  8. [8]
    Roger Ebert as a Builder of an Empire - The New York Times
    Apr 7, 2013 · When illness wiped out his voice, he took to the Web, developing a manic and persistent presence on RogerEbert.com, and when it became clear ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  9. [9]
    A Leave of Presence - Roger Ebert
    Apr 5, 2013 · Roger Ebert was the film critic of the Chicago Sun-Times from 1967 until his death in 2013. In 1975, he won the Pulitzer Prize for distinguished ...Missing: online timeline
  10. [10]
    A statement from Chaz Ebert | Chaz's Journal
    Apr 5, 2013 · Chaz is the CEO of several Ebert enterprises, including the President of The Ebert Company Ltd, and of Ebert Digital LLC, Publisher of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Chaz Ebert biography & movie reviews
    Chaz is the CEO of several Ebert enterprises, including the President of The Ebert Company Ltd, and of Ebert Digital LLC, Publisher of RogerEbert.com.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  12. [12]
    Meet the new editor of RogerEbert.com: Matt Zoller Seitz
    Jun 4, 2013 · He is a TV and film critic who also writes for New York Magazine and Vulture.com. He acted as interim section editor for Time Out New York.
  13. [13]
    Matt Zoller Seitz Named Editor of RogerEbert.com
    Jun 4, 2013 · Matt Zoller Seitz has been named the new editor-in-chief of RogerEbert.com. The announcement was made by Chaz Ebert, widow of famed film critic ...
  14. [14]
    Greetings! | MZS - Roger Ebert
    Jun 3, 2013 · Greetings! My name is Matt Zoller Seitz. I'm the new editor of RogerEbert.com. With the blessing and generosity of RogerEbert.com's ...
  15. [15]
    Matt Zoller Seitz biography & movie reviews - Roger Ebert
    Seitz is the founder and original editor of the influential film blog The House Next Door, now a part of Slant Magazine, and the co-founder and original ...
  16. [16]
    Welcome to the Newly Redesigned RogerEbert.com | Chaz's Journal
    Aug 22, 2020 · Chaz is the CEO of several Ebert enterprises, including the President of The Ebert ... “Roger Ebert Loved Movies” In Memoriam 1942 - 2013. Photo ...
  17. [17]
    RogerEbert.com Announces Editor-in-Chief and Advisory Board ...
    Jun 4, 2013 · RogerEbert.com has selected Matt Zoller Seitz, a Pulitzer-nominated film and television critic, as the new editor-in-chief.Missing: tenure | Show results with:tenure
  18. [18]
    My career in retailing | Roger Ebert
    Dec 14, 2012 · It relies either on the resources of its creator, a fee of some sort, or on an external advertisement source for its funding. If it offers ...
  19. [19]
    I wonder if this will work - Roger Ebert
    Dec 14, 2012 · I learn from Wikipedia: By 2001, the website had made a profit of $6.5 million the previous year and was estimated to be worth 30 million ...
  20. [20]
    Ebert Prime
    Ebert Prime is a VIP membership offering an ad-free experience, exclusive videos, free movies, and discounted Ebertfest tickets.Missing: paywall | Show results with:paywall
  21. [21]
    An invitation from The Ebert Club - Roger Ebert
    Dec 19, 2012 · My main site and all its movie reviews, and my blog of course, are free: No paywall. But the site doesn't pay for itself. With your membership ...
  22. [22]
    Ebert Digital LLC Information - RocketReach
    What is the annual revenue of Ebert Digital LLC? The Ebert Digital LLC annual revenue was $7 million in 2025. How many people are employed at Ebert ...Missing: financials | Show results with:financials
  23. [23]
    Become a Sponsor - Ebertfest
    2025 Sponsorship Opportunities. Be part of a beloved festival that has hosted such guests as Guillermo del Toro, Oliver Stone, Richard Linklater, Tilda Swinton ...Missing: monetization | Show results with:monetization
  24. [24]
    Roger's little rule book | Roger Ebert
    Dec 14, 2012 · No commercial endorsements. This used to be a given in journalism ethics. A critic must be especially vigilant. If you express approval of a ...Missing: sponsorships | Show results with:sponsorships
  25. [25]
    Reviews | Roger Ebert
    All Movie Reviews · Chainsaw Man – The Movie: Reze Arc · Regretting You · Last Days (2025) · Queens of the Dead · Springsteen: Deliver Me from Nowhere · Bugonia.TV/Streaming · The Life of Chuck · Materialists · 28 Years Later
  26. [26]
    Siskel & Ebert & Roeper archived - Roger Ebert
    Dec 19, 2012 · An online archive exists with all of those reviews. Starting Thursday, Aug. 2, visitors will be able to search for and watch all of those past debates.
  27. [27]
    "You give out too many stars" | Roger Ebert
    Dec 14, 2012 · And the star system works for people who have read your reviews for a long time, in that I can typically guess within half a star where you ...
  28. [28]
    Great Movies - Roger Ebert
    Great Movies · Drama (294) · Foreign (150) · Romance (79) · Comedy (76) · Thriller (70) · Crime (61) · Action (53) · Indie (49).“Spirited Away” in 2002 · The Pledge · Ballad of Narayama · Mulholland Dr.Missing: key 2002-2013
  29. [29]
    The Great Movies: Ebert, Roger: 9780767910385 - Amazon.com
    The Great Movies includes: All About Eve • Bonnie and Clyde • Casablanca • Citizen Kane • The Godfather • Jaws • La Dolce Vita • Metropolis • On the Waterfront ...
  30. [30]
    Roger's Top Ten Lists: An Introduction | Chaz's Journal | Roger Ebert
    Dec 30, 2015 · Roger capped off each year by revealing his picks for the best movies he had seen over the previous twelve months. Several of them proved to be classics.Missing: signature columns<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    https://www.rogerebert.com/features/the-best-films-of-2024
  32. [32]
    The Best Films of 2024 | Features - Roger Ebert
    Dec 10, 2024 · The best films of 2024 feel more difficult to summarize than most. There's a remarkable diversity of tone, genre, and voice in the 20 films featured below.Missing: annual | Show results with:annual
  33. [33]
    Movie Answer Man - Roger Ebert
    Movie Answer Man. Movie Answer Man. Holding off on showing the monster. Roger Ebert. December 14, 2012. Do we NEED to see “Tintin” in 3D? Roger Ebert.Missing: column | Show results with:column
  34. [34]
    Remembering Gene | Roger Ebert
    Dec 14, 2012 · Gene died ten years ago on February 20, 1999. He is in my mind almost every day. I don't want to rehearse the old stories about how we had a love/hate ...<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    The longest thread evolves | Roger Ebert
    Dec 14, 2012 · A week or so ago I began to receive feedback that posts weren't being displayed on my entry “Win Ben Stein's Mind,” from Dec. 3, 2008.
  36. [36]
    MZS - Roger Ebert
    Matt Zoller Seitz is the Editor at Large of RogerEbert.com, TV critic for New York Magazine, the creator of many video essays about film history and style, ...<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Festivals & Awards - Roger Ebert
    A Canadian correspondent closes out our 2025 TIFF coverage with his perspective on a fest at crossroads, especially when it comes to how it handles ...
  38. [38]
    Cannes 2025: Table of Contents | Festivals & Awards - Roger Ebert
    May 25, 2025 · Report from Cannes with a series of video reports and daily reviews and dispatches. Full Reviews Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning by Brian Tallerico
  39. [39]
    Sundance 2025: Sabar Bonda (Cactus Pears), DJ Ahmet, André Is ...
    Feb 1, 2025 · A sensual, tender queer romance, writer/director Rohan Kanawade's semi-autobiographical feature debut “Sabar Bonda (Cactus Pears)” sees love grow from death.
  40. [40]
    Sundance 2025: Twinless, Ricky, Jimpa | Festivals & Awards
    Jan 25, 2025 · Robert Daniels is Associate Editor at RogerEbert.com, and has written for the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, Reverse Shot, Screen Daily, ...
  41. [41]
    TIFF 2025: Dust Bunny, The Furious, Normal | Festivals & Awards
    Sep 12, 2025 · On three Midnight Madness films: The film directorial debut of Bryan Fuller, a new gun fu classic, and more Bob Odenkirk action.
  42. [42]
    Venice Film Festival 2025: Ghost Elephants, Jay Kelly, Bugonia ...
    Aug 29, 2025 · Venice Film Festival 2025: Ghost Elephants, Jay Kelly, Bugonia, Cover-Up, After the Hunt. Glenn Kenny. August 29, 2025. 8 min read ...Missing: media | Show results with:media
  43. [43]
    NYFF 2025: The 63rd New York Film Festival Centers Film and Poetry
    Sep 26, 2025 · A preview of this year's event with critical thoughts on Late Fame, Peter Hujar's Day, and The Mastermind.
  44. [44]
    KVIFF 2025: Sand City, The Visitor, Better Go Mad in the Wild
    Jul 15, 2025 · Three films from the fest that reflect on the relationships between people, places, and meaning.
  45. [45]
    A Dispatch From the Bentonville Film Festival - Roger Ebert
    Jul 1, 2025 · The Bentonville Film Festival (BFF) reflects the advocacy of the Geena Davis Institute, which the actress founded two decades ago as a research-based ...Missing: coverage | Show results with:coverage
  46. [46]
    Oscars: Sundancing Into Awards History Or Obscurity - Roger Ebert
    Jan 28, 2014 · Eirk Childress looks at the track record of films from the Sundance Film Festival going to the Oscars.
  47. [47]
    A Salute to the Movies That Got Overlooked During Oscar Season
    Feb 26, 2025 · The 2024 Cannes Film Festival factored heavily into this year's Oscar race—Best Picture nominees “Anora,” “Emilia Pérez” and “The Substance ...Missing: reporting | Show results with:reporting
  48. [48]
    Ebertfest Film Festival Over the Years - Roger Ebert
    Feb 28, 2024 · A compilation of articles spotlighting memorable screenings at Ebertfest over the years.
  49. [49]
    So many films, so little time | Festivals & Awards | Roger Ebert
    Dec 14, 2012 · Toronto is so much larger than that: 271 features, 352 films including shorts, 85 percent world premieres, 91 percent North American premieres.
  50. [50]
    Celebrating the Tenth Anniversary of Our Managing Editor Brian ...
    Mar 2, 2024 · In celebration of our Managing Editor Brian Tallerico's tenth anniversary at RogerEbert.com, we are highlighting fifty of his essential articles that he's ...
  51. [51]
    Brian Tallerico biography & movie reviews - Roger Ebert
    Brian Tallerico, the Managing Editor of RogerEbert.com, has covered television, film, video games, Blu-ray/DVD, interviews, and entertainment news for over two ...Missing: structure leadership team
  52. [52]
    Robert Daniels, Our New Associate Editor of RogerEbert.com
    Sep 28, 2023 · He will be joining our editorial staff comprised of Managing Editor Brian Tallerico, Senior Editor Nick Allen, Editor-at-Large Matt Zoller Seitz ...<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    https://www.rogerebert.com/features/rogerebertcom-announces-assistant-editor-weekly-critic-and-social-media-manager
  54. [54]
    RogerEbert.com Announces Assistant Editor, Weekly Critic, and ...
    May 10, 2024 · Clint Worthington as an Assistant Editor, Peyton Robinson as a Weekly Critic, and Marya E. Gates as a Social Media Manager.
  55. [55]
    The Individual Top Tens of 2018 | Features | Roger Ebert
    Dec 13, 2018 · The Individual Top Tens of 2018 · 1. “Annihilation” · 2. “Madeline's Madeline” · 3. “First Reformed” · 4. “The Ballad of Buster Scruggs” · 5. “Roma”
  56. [56]
    Celebrating Roger Ebert's Great Movies - Rotten Tomatoes
    Roger Ebert had a list of his favorite movies that he called Great Films -- we present them here in alphabetical order!
  57. [57]
    Why 'Life Itself' (about Roger Ebert) is one of my favourite ...
    May 21, 2021 · In 1975, Ebert whose non-snobbish and direct style of writing made film criticism accessible to all who loved the movies, became the first film ...
  58. [58]
    Roger Ebert Reveals Cancer Recurrence, Announces Work Downshift
    Apr 3, 2013 · Those digital projects include relaunching RogerEbert.com, which will house the more than 10,000 reviews he's written, dating back to 1967 ...
  59. [59]
    Variety's Scott Foundas Remembers Roger Ebert: A Mentor to the End
    Apr 5, 2013 · ... RogerEbert.com and its army of regular contributors and “far-flung correspondents.” As long as there are movies, and people who feel ...
  60. [60]
    RogerEbert.com | Moviepedia | Fandom
    RogerEbert.com was launched in 2002 to digitally archive his reviews, essays, and interviews, making them accessible to a wider audience. In addition to his own ...
  61. [61]
    Roger Ebert is Everywhere: The Writers Remember His Legacy
    Apr 1, 2015 · It is a constant consideration—how the work we do now maintains that legacy. And so not a day goes by that I don't think about Roger's impact, ...
  62. [62]
    Sound of Freedom movie review (2023) - Roger Ebert
    Rating 2/4 · Review by Nick AllenJul 7, 2023 · This movie shows a clear line between good and evil contrasted against a world where rhetoric, narratives and ideology blur it. I don't know if ...
  63. [63]
    Sound of Freedom - Rotten Tomatoes
    Critic's Name Dan K. ... The concept of the movie made me very emotional. It exposed a very tragic crime that exists in the world. Overall it's hard to watch, so ...
  64. [64]
    Death of a Nation movie review (2018) | Roger Ebert
    Rating 0/4 · Review by Peter SobczynskiAug 2, 2018 · As a film, it is pure garbage from first frame to last, though as a document chronicling the devolution of conservatism from a movement of ideas and substance.
  65. [65]
    Film critics increasingly bias their work through a political left lens
    Dec 14, 2018 · The vast majority of film reporters and critics alike lean to the left, some dramatically so. “Vice” director McKay routinely injects his progressive politics ...
  66. [66]
    FLASHBACK: Siskel & Ebert Warned Us About PC Culture ...
    Feb 19, 2021 · It's worth noting that RogerEbert.com currently lacks a single, openly conservative film critic on its staff. Christian Toto Follow on ...
  67. [67]
    Christian thriller 'Sound of Freedom' faces criticism for stoking ... - NPR
    Jul 20, 2023 · Sound of Freedom is a surprise box office hit. But the Christian thriller is also fueling controversy over conspiracy theories and its depiction of human ...
  68. [68]
    The Perverted Critics of Sound of Freedom - Catholic Answers
    Jul 12, 2023 · In this episode Trent looks at criticism of the recent film Sound of Freedom and shows how our culture is threatened when powerful, subtle truths threaten ...
  69. [69]
    Why I'm so conservative | Roger Ebert
    Dec 14, 2012 · I am profoundly conservative. No, not in my politics. In my thinking about the movies, and particularly about how best to experience them.
  70. [70]
    Politics, celebs and movie critics | Scanners - Roger Ebert
    Dec 19, 2012 · A film critic can and should evaluate anything and everything in the movie -- the acting, the script, the production values, the mise-en-scene, the music, the ...
  71. [71]
    Chaz Ebert's Biography - The HistoryMakers
    In 2002, Ebert launched rogerebert.com, an online magazine of film reviews by Roger Ebert and other critics. After her husband's death in 2013, Ebert revamped ...Missing: lawsuit | Show results with:lawsuit
  72. [72]
    I feel like rogerebert.com is doing a disservice to his legacy ... - Reddit
    Apr 23, 2013 · It seems to me you just don't like the review because it trashes a film you liked. It's not disrespectful, Ebert loved vitriolic criticism as much as anyone, ...
  73. [73]
    Roger Ebert – Home – University of Illinois Archives – U of I Library
    This exhibit reflects the ways in which the University of Illinois Archives and Library preserve and help to tell Roger Ebert's story. The documents come ...