Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Rotation government

A rotation government is a arrangement in parliamentary systems, most notably , in which the position of alternates between leaders of the major participating parties according to a predefined schedule, typically to resolve legislative deadlocks and enable governance without a single-party majority. Israel pioneered formal rotation governments in response to chronic political fragmentation, with the first implemented after the 1984 Knesset elections produced a near-tie between the (Labor predecessor) and blocs, leading to a national unity coalition where served as prime minister from 1984 to 1986, followed by until 1988, and a subsequent rotation until 1990. This mechanism, lacking constitutional basis until amendments in 2020, has been invoked sparingly to foster temporary stability amid that favors multiparty coalitions. The 1984–1990 governments achieved economic stabilization through measures and hyperinflation control, though internal rivalries hampered bold shifts beyond the initial Jordanian water deal. A more ideologically diverse iteration formed in 2021 after four inconclusive elections, uniting right-wing Yamina's Naftali Bennett (premier from June 2021 to June 2022) with Yesh Atid's Yair Lapid, alongside centrist, left-leaning, and Arab Islamist parties to oust Benjamin Netanyahu's long tenure; this coalition passed a landmark budget and advanced judicial reforms but collapsed in 2022 over internal disputes, reverting to deadlock. Rotation governments exemplify causal trade-offs in power-sharing: they avert immediate paralysis by incentivizing compromise but often breed inefficiencies from dual leadership, policy dilution, and premature dissolution, as evidenced by short average tenures compared to majority-led cabinets. While praised for inclusivity in fragmented democracies, critics highlight risks of accountability erosion, where rotating premiers prioritize coalition preservation over decisive action.

Definition and principles

Core concept and mechanisms

A rotation government is a form of executive in parliamentary systems where the position of or equivalent alternates between leaders of the participating parties according to a pre-agreed schedule, typically dividing the legislative term into equal or proportional segments. This arrangement emerges in contexts of electoral fragmentation, where no party achieves a legislative , compelling rivals to share power rather than risk or repeated elections. The prioritizes mutual concessions, with coalition pacts explicitly stipulating rotation dates, such as an initial nine-month term followed by a , to enforce balance and deter . At its foundation, the rotation principle seeks to distribute prestige and equitably, reducing the risk of one partner monopolizing policy direction while maintaining governmental functionality. During each rotation phase, the serving exercises standard constitutional powers, including cabinet appointments within agreed quotas and command over administrative apparatus, though overarching coalition guidelines often constrain discretion to preserve continuity. Additional safeguards, such as equal seat allocations or joint mechanisms on key decisions, are embedded in founding agreements to align incentives and mitigate intra-coalition disputes. Implementation relies on legally binding coalition protocols that detail transition procedures, including ceremonial handovers and interim continuity measures like deputy prime ministers assuming limited roles. These pacts may also incorporate performance benchmarks or dissolution triggers if rotations falter, as seen in agreements mandating policy adherence across tenures to avert fragmented governance. While effective for short-term stability in divided assemblies, the dual-leadership dynamic can engender administrative lags or policy inconsistencies at handover points, as each prime minister recalibrates priorities within coalition bounds.

Variations across systems

In , rotation governments are embedded in the constitutional framework through amendments to the : The Government, enacted in 2020, which formalizes the role of an alternate who assumes the premiership after a predetermined period, typically halfway through the term. This mechanism, first implemented informally in the 1984 coalition between Labor and , allows the alternate to exercise significant powers, including rights over certain decisions during the initial phase, creating a dual-headed executive structure until the switch. The rotation occurs without requiring a full resignation, ensuring continuity but potentially leading to divided authority. Ireland's rotation agreements, as seen in the 2020 and 2025 coalitions between and , operate through parliamentary procedure rather than constitutional mandate, necessitating the resignation of the and the entire government midway through the term—around 2.5 years into a five-year Dáil—followed by a vote to elect the successor. This process, which occurred on December 17, 2022, from to , emphasizes full transfer of authority without an overlapping alternate role, but it risks instability if coalition support wavers during the transition. In , rotation governments, such as the 2023 coalition between and the PP-DB alliance, feature shorter cycles of nine months per prime minister to foster frequent power-sharing amid fragmented parliaments, differing from the longer tenures in and . This arrangement, intended to resolve post-2020 political deadlocks, relies on coalition pacts without dedicated constitutional provisions for alternates, leading to quicker handovers but higher vulnerability to breakdowns, as evidenced by the 2024 collapse prompting snap elections. Across these systems, variations stem from institutional rigidity—constitutional in versus contractual elsewhere—and rotation frequency, which balances power equity against governance cohesion in multi-party parliaments.

Theoretical evaluation

Advantages for stability and power-sharing

Rotation governments enhance political stability by formalizing alternation in executive leadership among partners, which discourages premature dissolution and incentivizes sustained cooperation. This arrangement addresses commitment problems inherent in power-sharing deals, as parties invest in joint knowing they will assume primary responsibility in due course, thereby reducing opportunistic behavior and promoting endurance over electoral cycles. Empirical reviews of power-sharing institutions, including rotational elements, indicate generally positive outcomes for governmental longevity and conflict mitigation in divided polities. In practice, Israel's 1984 national unity government exemplifies these benefits: following inconclusive elections where neither the Alignment (Labor) nor Likud secured a majority, the parties agreed to rotate the premiership—Shimon Peres from September 1984 to October 1986, followed by Yitzhak Shamir—forming a broad coalition that governed until 1988 without collapse. This stability facilitated consensus on fiscal austerity, enabling the 1985 stabilization program that slashed monthly inflation from over 27% in mid-1985 to near zero by year-end, alongside GDP growth recovery and avoidance of default amid hyperinflation exceeding 400% annually prior. The rotation mitigated zero-sum rivalries between ideological blocs, ensuring diverse constituencies—spanning secular Zionists, religious nationalists, and socioeconomic interests—shared executive authority, which bolstered legislative support for reforms otherwise vulnerable to partisan sabotage. Power-sharing via rotation also counters elite entrenchment and regional or ethnic dominance, distributing prestige and patronage equitably to alleviate grievances that fuel instability. In consociational frameworks, such mechanisms sustain elite pacts by balancing veto powers with inclusive leadership, as seen in rotational presidencies that prevent power concentration in demographic majorities. For instance, Bulgaria's 2023 coalition between GERB-SDS and PP–DB incorporated a nine-month premiership rotation (Nikolay Denkov succeeded by Nikolay Gabriel), initially stabilizing governance after years of caretaker administrations and multiple elections since 2021, allowing progress on EU recovery funds and judicial reforms before subsequent disputes. Overall, these dynamics foster resilience against polarization, as shared executive tenures signal mutual restraint and collective ownership of outcomes.

Criticisms regarding efficiency and accountability

Critics contend that rotation governments foster by enforcing predetermined leadership handovers, which disrupt implementation and encourage short-term decision-making. Leaders anticipating rotation may defer major reforms or projects to avoid committing resources that successors could redirect, resulting in stalled initiatives and bureaucratic hesitation. Empirical analyses of rotational systems, such as the European Union's Council presidency, demonstrate that six-month rotations impede legislative continuity, as shifting national priorities fragment agenda-setting and delay consensus on complex dossiers. In national contexts like Israel's 2021 Bennett-Lapid , the rotation mechanism contributed to internal fractures, culminating in the government's collapse after just 14 months amid inability to sustain discipline on contentious . Accountability suffers under rotation agreements, as power-sharing dilutes clear lines of , allowing rotating executives to evade direct blame for adverse outcomes. Voters struggle to pinpoint culpable actors when policies span multiple tenures, fostering a of rather than individual ownership. In Bulgaria's 2023 rotating between GERB-SDS and PP-DB alliances, the mechanism's failure after less than a year—triggering yet another —highlighted how rotations exacerbate governance fragmentation and undermine public confidence in institutional reliability. Proposals for similar rotations in parliamentary have drawn rebukes for risking "diminished and " through incessant changes that obscure decision trails and weaken oversight. This diffusion is compounded in multi-party rotations, where vetoes amplify , as evidenced by Israel's recurring instability since the 1990s, where rotation pacts failed to resolve underlying factional rivalries and instead perpetuated cycles of short-lived administrations. Proponents of single-party majorities argue that rotations inherently prioritize elite bargaining over voter mandates, eroding democratic responsiveness. Data from fragmented systems show higher rates of government turnover— experienced five elections in four years leading to the 2021 rotation—correlating with reduced policy efficacy on economic stabilization and threats. While intended to mitigate dominance, rotations thus risk entrenching inefficiency by design, as causal incentives reward over execution, with further hampered by the absence of enduring to face electoral judgment.

Historical precedents

Ancient Greek influences and mythological references

In ancient , the democratic system incorporated rotation of political offices to distribute authority and avert oligarchic entrenchment, a practice rooted in —selection by lottery—and strict term limits. Most magistrates, excluding generals and certain financial overseers, served one-year terms without immediate re-eligibility, ensuring broad citizen involvement; noted in his that allotment by lot marked true by equalizing access, contrasting election's bias toward the elite. This mechanism, operational from ' reforms around 508 BCE, rotated power among approximately 30,000 eligible male citizens, fostering accountability through frequent turnover. The prytany system within the Council of 500 (Boulē) provided a structured example of rotational , dividing the council into ten tribal units that sequentially assumed executive duties for roughly 36 days each year. managed the assembly's agenda, finances, and diplomacy, with internal leadership rotating daily by lot among members; this prevented any subgroup's dominance and integrated ordinary citizens into administration from the late BCE onward. Such arrangements influenced later conceptions of power-sharing, emphasizing temporal limits to curb ambition, as evidenced in Plato's advocacy for rotational offices to balance expertise and . Greek mythological narratives rarely depict explicit rotational governance but recurrently illustrate power's cyclical volatility, potentially informing philosophical views on institutional rotation. Hesiod's (c. 700 BCE) outlines five descending ages—from golden harmony under to iron-age strife—symbolizing inevitable decline and renewal, a motif echoed in theories like ' anacyclosis (2nd century BCE), which described constitutions cycling through monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy unless mitigated by mixed systems. These tales of Titan-Olympian successions, where supplanted after divine generational conflict, underscored rule's impermanence, aligning with practical rotations that preempted tyrannical rather than endorsing perpetual hierarchy.

Modern examples

Bulgaria

In Bulgaria, a rotation government was established through a coalition agreement between the center-right Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria (GERB)–Union of Democratic Forces (UDF) alliance and the reformist We Continue the Change–Democratic Bulgaria (PP–DB) bloc following the April 2023 parliamentary elections, where GERB secured 69 seats and PP–DB obtained 64. The deal, announced on May 22, 2023, stipulated a rotating premiership every nine months over an 18-month period to promote power-sharing and address entrenched corruption amid prolonged political instability since 2020 protests and multiple prior elections. Nikolay Denkov of PP–DB assumed the role of prime minister first, with the 102nd cabinet receiving parliamentary approval on June 6, 2023, by a vote of 159–58. The mechanism involved holding the premiership and key ministries like foreign affairs initially, followed by a handover to 's nominee, Maria Gabriel, a former who had served as foreign minister under Denkov. This arrangement marked Bulgaria's first experiment with a formal rotating premiership, designed to balance influence between ideological rivals— representing established conservative interests and emphasizing anti-corruption reforms—while advancing EU integration goals such as Schengen accession and entry. Denkov tendered his on March 6, 2024, adhering to the nine-month , which triggered a constitutional process for to form the subsequent cabinet. However, negotiations faltered over disputes including the allocation of the foreign minister position—GERB sought to retain it under , while PP–DB demanded Denkov assume it as —and broader policy alignments, leading to decline the mandate on March 25, 2024. The collapse exposed underlying trust deficits and powers within the , resulting in a caretaker administration under President and snap elections on June 9, 2024, followed by another on October 27, 2024, perpetuating Bulgaria's cycle of fragmentation without restoring the rotation. Subsequent coalitions, such as the January 2025 "" involving –UDF, the (BSP), and others, have incorporated limited rotational elements, including proposals for alternating the chairmanship approved by BSP's National Council on October 26, 2025, to sustain minority governance amid ongoing instability. These adaptations reflect rotation's role as a pragmatic tool in Bulgaria's polarized , though empirical outcomes indicate challenges in enforcing and preventing breakdowns due to partisan vetoes.

Germany

In the aftermath of the on September 18, which resulted in a with the alliance securing 225 seats and the SPD obtaining 222, the SPD proposed a rotation government as a means to form a without immediately conceding the ship. Under this arrangement, incumbent SPD Gerhard Schröder would retain the office for an initial transitional period, after which CDU leader would assume the role midway through the four-year term, ostensibly to balance power between the nearly equal-sized partners. This marked an unprecedented suggestion for the federal level, where the vests the with significant authority and no prior rotation of the office had occurred. The proposal emerged amid prolonged coalition talks, as neither bloc could form a with smaller parties like the Greens or FDP, and it reflected the SPD's reluctance to relinquish despite the 's slight edge in popular vote (35.2% to SPD's 34.2%). Schröder's offer, floated publicly on , 2005, aimed to institutionalize alternation to foster and prevent dominance by one , drawing on principles occasionally applied in state-level or municipal coalitions for ministerial posts in evenly split alliances. However, rejected the idea, viewing it as undermining Merkel's mandate and complicating governance through divided authority. Negotiations concluded on October 10, 2005, with a standard agreement designating Merkel as from November 22, 2005, onward, lasting until 2009. At the subnational level, rotation mechanisms have been employed more routinely in coalitions where vote shares preclude outright dominance, such as alternating premier positions or rotating key cabinet roles to ensure proportionality. For instance, the Rotationsprinzip facilitates equitable burden-sharing in assemblies or executives, though specific federal precedents remain absent beyond the 2005 consideration. This approach underscores Germany's preference for stable majoritarian coalitions over rotational alternation at the apex of power, prioritizing continuity under the Basic Law's provision. No subsequent federal proposals for chancellorship rotation have gained traction, reflecting institutional resistance to diluting the chancellor's constructive authority.

Ireland

In the wake of the , which resulted in a with no party securing a in the 160-seat , (38 seats), (35 seats), and the (12 seats) negotiated a coalition agreement on 9 June 2020 to form a . This deal included an unprecedented provision for rotating the office of (prime minister) between the leaders of and to ensure balanced power-sharing between the historically adversarial centrist parties. of was appointed on 27 June 2020, with of serving as (deputy prime minister). The rotation mechanism required Martin to relinquish the premiership midway through the government's five-year term, with Varadkar assuming the role on 17 December 2022 following Martin's resignation and a Dáil vote electing Varadkar by 164–150. This handover preserved the coalition's cabinet composition, though it necessitated a formal re-nomination process under Article 28 of the Irish Constitution. Varadkar held the position until his unexpected resignation on 20 March 2024 amid internal party pressures, after which Simon Harris of Fine Gael was elected Taoiseach unopposed on 9 April 2024, maintaining continuity without altering the rotation principle. The arrangement contributed to governmental stability during the COVID-19 pandemic, enabling coordinated policy responses, though it drew criticism for potentially diluting leadership accountability. Following the 29 2024 general election, which again produced a fragmented Dáil with gaining 45 seats and 38, the parties reached a new deal on 14 2025 incorporating a second rotation of the role. Under this agreement, replicated from , Martin is scheduled to resume as on 24 2025, with Harris returning to the position in late 2027 to complete the term. The inclusion of TDs to secure a underscores the rotation's role in bridging ideological divides, though its long-term viability remains untested beyond these instances. Prior to , no such formal rotation had occurred in Irish history, marking these coalitions as a departure from single-party dominance or non-rotating alliances since the state's founding in 1922.

Israel

In June 2021, following four inconclusive elections between 2019 and 2021 that failed to produce a stable majority, leaders of the right-wing party and of the centrist party forged a coalition agreement with six other parties—spanning ideological spectrum from left-wing to conservative —to form 's thirty-sixth government and end Benjamin Netanyahu's tenure as . The pact explicitly included a rotation mechanism, with Bennett assuming the premiership first from June 13, 2021, to June 30, 2022, followed by Lapid serving the remainder of the term until October 2026 or earlier dissolution. This arrangement was formalized through Amendment No. 8 to : The Government, embedding the rotation in 13a to ensure automatic transition without requiring a new confidence vote, thereby minimizing disruption during the handover. The coalition, holding a slim 61-seat majority in the 120-seat , prioritized governance continuity amid economic recovery from the and security challenges, passing a 2021-2022 after decades without one in wartime conditions. However, internal fractures emerged, particularly over West Bank settlement legislation and ultra-Orthodox military exemptions, leading a defector to topple the government on June 28, 2022, via a dissolution bill; Lapid briefly served as caretaker until November 2022 elections returned Netanyahu to power. The 2021 rotation drew on Israel's prior experience with such mechanisms, notably the 1984-1990 national unity governments formed after electoral deadlock, where of the (Labor precursor) served as prime minister from September 1984 to October 1986, rotating with of until 1990 under a non-binding but adhered-to agreement that alternated leadership while maintaining coalition stability during economic and the . This earlier model demonstrated rotation's utility in power-sharing but also its vulnerabilities to policy gridlock, as evidenced by stalled peace initiatives and repeated coalition crises, informing the 2021 design's legal safeguards yet underscoring persistent challenges in Israel's fragmented .

Malaysia

In Malaysia, the , known as the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, is selected through a rotational system among the hereditary rulers of nine states: , , , , , , , , and . This rotates every five years, or upon the death, resignation, or incapacity of the incumbent, ensuring no single ruler holds the position indefinitely. The system originated from pre-colonial traditions of rotating leadership among sultanates but was constitutionalized in Article 32 of the Federal Constitution upon independence from on August 31, 1957, to balance royal influences and prevent dominance by any one state. The selection process is managed by the (Majlis Raja-Raja), comprising the nine sultans and four state governors, who vote confidentially to elect the Agong from a predetermined order, typically following the seniority of accession to their state thrones. Exceptions occur, as in 2019 when Sultan Abdullah of Pahang was chosen out of sequence due to the resignation of Sultan Muhammad V of Kelantan amid a personal scandal. The Agong serves as a symbolic and ceremonial figurehead with reserve powers, including appointing the who commands parliamentary confidence—powers exercised notably on March 1, 2020, when Sultan Muhammad II appointed as after determining he held majority support amid a crisis. The position also involves religious duties as the head of in six states and oversight of citizenship and Malay privileges under the Constitution's . While the rotational monarchy distributes prestige and influence among state rulers, executive authority resides with the and cabinet, elected via parliamentary democracy dominated historically by multi-ethnic coalitions like until the 2018 election shifted power to . The system has fostered stability by mitigating inter-sultanic rivalries but faced criticism for occasional royal interventions in politics, such as pardons or emergency declarations, which expanded during the under Abdullah, who approved a on January 15, 2021, suspending . As of October 2025, Ibrahim Iskandar of Johor holds the office, having been sworn in on January 31, 2024, following the end of Abdullah's term. This rotation underscores Malaysia's hybrid governance, blending federal parliamentary elements with preserved royal traditions.

North Macedonia

In the 2020 North Macedonian parliamentary elections held on July 15, no single party secured a , with the (SDSM) obtaining 49 seats and the (BDI/DUI), representing ethnic , securing 15 seats. To form a , SDSM leader negotiated a coalition with BDI leader , incorporating a rotation mechanism for the prime ministership to address ethnic Albanian demands for higher executive representation amid ongoing debates over power-sharing in the multi-ethnic state. Under the August 18, 2020, agreement, Zaev assumed the role initially, but committed to transferring the position mid-term to an ethnic nominee proposed by BDI, aiming to balance Macedonian-Slavic and Albanian interests while advancing integration goals. This arrangement reflected BDI's precondition for coalition participation, as both major Macedonian parties (SDSM and ) had rejected an immediate Albanian . The rotation was intended to foster inclusivity in a where ethnic comprise about 25% of the population, per constitutional power-sharing provisions from the 2001 Framework Agreement, though critics argued it prioritized ethnic quotas over merit-based governance. The planned rotation did not materialize as envisioned. Zaev resigned in January 2022 amid corruption scandals and low approval ratings, succeeded by SDSM's , who retained the position without handing it to BDI. The coalition persisted until the May 8, 2024, elections, where won decisively, forming a new government under on June 23, 2024, excluding BDI and ending the rotation pact. This episode highlighted rotation's role in temporary ethnic accommodations but also its vulnerability to domestic political shifts and leadership changes, with no subsequent implementations as of 2025.

Romania

In Romania, rotation governments have been implemented within grand coalitions since late 2021 as a mechanism for power-sharing between the National Liberal Party (PNL) and the (PSD), aimed at ensuring political stability amid frequent crises. The practice emerged in a November 2021 coalition agreement following the collapse of prior governments, establishing a rotation of the prime ministership between the center-right PNL and center-left , with the Democratic Alliance of Hungarians in Romania (UDMR) as a junior partner. of PNL served as prime minister from November 25, 2021, until the scheduled rotation on June 15, 2023, when of PSD assumed the role, extending the coalition's mandate through legislative elections. This arrangement persisted into 2025 despite a major political upheaval, including the annulment of the November 2024 due to alleged irregularities and a re-run in May 2025, which deepened fragmentation. On June 23, 2025, a renewed of , PNL, UDMR, and the (USR) formalized a new rotation protocol, appointing Ilie Bolojan of PNL as from June 2025 to April 2027, after which the position would transfer to a PSD nominee until the December 2028 parliamentary elections. The agreement emphasizes fiscal reforms, fund absorption, and defense spending alignment with , while allocating ministerial portfolios proportionally—PSD holding 9 of 20, PNL 8, and UDMR 3—to balance influence. Proponents argue the rotation fosters and prevents single-party dominance, as evidenced by the coalition's passage of a 2025 confidence vote with 280 of 329 parliamentary votes, enabling continuity in pro-EU policies. Critics, however, contend it dilutes by prioritizing elite pacts over electoral mandates, potentially entrenching risks in Romania's polarized system, where PSD and PNL have historically alternated power since the 1990s post-communist transition. The model's longevity depends on avoiding vetoes from the or , as seen in prior breakdowns.

Turkey

In 1996, following the December 1995 general elections where no party secured a parliamentary majority, the center-right Motherland Party (ANAP) led by Mesut Yılmaz and the True Path Party (DYP) led by Tansu Çiller formed a minority coalition government known as ANAYOL, explicitly designed to exclude the Islamist Welfare Party (Refah Partisi, RP) from power despite its plurality of seats. The agreement included a rotating premiership, with Yılmaz assuming the prime ministership first for an initial period intended to extend through 1996, followed by Çiller in 1997, as a mechanism to balance power between the rivals and ensure coalition stability over a proposed five-year term supported externally by smaller parties and the military. This arrangement reflected pragmatic power-sharing amid Turkey's fragmented politics, where ANAP held 132 seats and DYP 135 in the 550-seat Grand National Assembly, relying on ad hoc support to govern. The 53rd government was sworn in on March 6, 1996, with Yılmaz as , but lasted only until June 28, 1996, collapsing after Çiller withdrew DYP support amid investigations targeting Yılmaz and internal disputes over and the rotating mechanism's implementation. The short tenure prevented the full rotation, highlighting the fragility of such agreements in Turkey's volatile era, where personal rivalries and external pressures— including military concerns over Islamist influence—often undermined longevity. During its brief operation, the government prioritized secularist policies, economic stabilization efforts amid high exceeding 80% annually, and countering RP's agenda, but achieved limited legislative progress due to minority status. A subsequent coalition between and DYP, formed on June 28, 1996, incorporated a similar rotating premiership clause in its protocol, with of RP serving first as for two years, followed by Çiller, though this too did not materialize as the government was forced out in the 1997 "postmodern coup" after less than a year. These instances underscore rotation governments as temporary expedients in Turkey's pre-2002 , prone to breakdown from ideological tensions, corruption scandals, and institutional interventions rather than enduring power-sharing. In more recent politics, amid the June 2015 elections resulting in a , the pro-Kurdish Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP) co-chair proposed a rotating premiership in potential coalitions with the secular () to form a government excluding President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's Justice and Development Party (), emphasizing shared opposition to authoritarian consolidation. This overture, floated in June 2015 talks, envisioned alternating the premiership among allied parties but failed to gain traction, as prioritized separate negotiations and called snap elections in November 2015, securing a and rendering rotation moot. Such proposals highlight rotation as a recurring but unrealized concept in Turkey's shift toward presidentialism, formalized in the 2017 , which eliminated the premiership altogether and centralized executive authority under the president elected in 2018.

References

  1. [1]
    Rotation Government
    A Rotation Government is one in which a rotation (power-sharing) arrangement for the post of Prime Minister has been established between the leaders of the two ...
  2. [2]
    The Rotation Agreement — One State, Two Governments
    May 4, 2020 · The rotation mechanism agreed upon by the Likud and Blue and White creates a situation in which there are two separate governments, each led by ...
  3. [3]
    Despite Deep Loathing, These Israeli Leaders Were the Only Ones ...
    Aug 13, 2019 · But the first and last time Israel had a national unity government where the top seat rotated between two prime ministers was in 1984. Likud ...
  4. [4]
    Israel's new government makes history while facing many challenges
    Jul 15, 2021 · Israel's first political invention was the rotational government, introduced in 1984 when Yitzhak Shamir and Shimon Peres, following an ...
  5. [5]
    Rotation government - Wikipedia
    Israel was the first nation to appoint a rotation government in 1984, a formal constitutional mechanism for rotation government was introduced in 2020. As of ...Bulgaria · Ireland · Israel · Malaysia
  6. [6]
    Israel (10/07) - state.gov
    After several weeks of difficult negotiations, they agreed on a government of national unity, including the rotation of the office of Prime Minister and the ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Israel: 2021 parliamentary election and new coalition government
    Jun 14, 2021 · As part of a rotation arrangement under the terms of the coalition agreement, Yamina's Natfali Bennett will serve as Prime Minister until.
  8. [8]
    The Bennett-Lapid Duo: a Short-Lived Union - Institut Montaigne
    Jul 27, 2022 · Israel has resorted to a rotation system several times since the early 1980s as a response to the regime's high instability.
  9. [9]
    Israel's National Unity Governments: A Retrospective
    Jun 15, 2001 · Between 1949 and 1967, Israel witnessed thirteen separate governmental rotations, each coalition surviving for an average of seventeen months.
  10. [10]
    Israel's 35th Government: A Portrait - The Israel Democracy Institute
    May 17, 2020 · The 35th government includes 34 ministers- setting a new high record. Until now, the largest government was the second Netanyahu government, with 30 ministers ...
  11. [11]
    Bulgaria agrees government with rotating PMs to tackle corruption
    May 22, 2023 · A coalition of Bulgarian parties on Monday agreed to form a government tasked with uprooting corruption and led by two rotating prime ministers.
  12. [12]
    Ruling in turbulent times: government crises in Italy and Israel during ...
    The rotation government was based on the parity principle, whereby the two blocs would have an equal number of representatives and equal voting powers. It was ...
  13. [13]
    Government Coalitions: A Steering Mechanism in the Political System
    A. Coalition Agreements. A coalition agreement signed among Knesset parties defines the government's policy guidelines and operating principles, the allocation ...
  14. [14]
    Emergency Governments in Israel
    Oct 10, 2023 · The 1984 national unity government (rotation government): This unity government between Likud and Labor was established against the backdrop ...
  15. [15]
    Sharing Prime Ministerial Power in Hung Parliamentary Systems
    Jul 11, 2025 · Israel used the rotating prime minister arrangement in 1984 (Kenig, 2020) and Ireland did so after the 2020 election (Little, 2022: 422–423).<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Ireland's centrist parties reach coalition deal to retain power
    Jan 14, 2025 · Harris would regain the premiership again in late 2027, replicating a novel arrangement from 2020 that saw the Taoiseach position “rotate” ...
  17. [17]
    Five Facts to Know: The Rotation of the Taoiseach in Ireland
    Dec 16, 2022 · Rotation requires the resignation of the outgoing Taoiseach and his entire Cabinet. A new Taoiseach is then elected by TDs (MPs) who, in turn, ...
  18. [18]
    Bulgaria parties agree to form coalition govt in bid to end deadlock
    May 22, 2023 · ... agreed on Monday to form a coalition government with a rotating prime minister in a bid to end more than two years of policy deadlock.
  19. [19]
    A Rival in Need Is a Friend Indeed: Bulgaria's Experiment with a ...
    Jun 16, 2023 · A Rival in Need Is a Friend Indeed: Bulgaria's Experiment with a Rotating Prime Minister. Bulgaria's new government offers hope of a more pro- ...
  20. [20]
    No trust among leaders of Bulgaria's future coalition | Euractiv
    For the first time in the political history of Bulgaria, it was accepted that prime ministers should rotate every nine months. Prof. Nikolay Denkov from PP-DB ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Power-sharing, conflict resolution, and the logic of pre-emptive ... - LSE
    This article develops and tests a new theory, aiming to shed light on the mechanisms through which power-sharing bargains help to overcome the commitment ...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    What Do We Know about Power Sharing after 50 Years?
    Aug 2, 2022 · This review offers a synthesis of how power sharing is theorized, operationalized and studied. We demonstrate that power sharing has generally positive effects.Missing: advantages | Show results with:advantages
  23. [23]
    How Shimon Peres saved the Israeli economy - Brookings Institution
    As of today, Israel's unprecedented success in bringing down hyperinflation and stabilizing the economy in 1985 is often highlighted in university classrooms.Missing: benefits | Show results with:benefits
  24. [24]
    Israel's Stabilization Program of 1985, Or Some Simple Truths of ...
    from which the government benefits by being able to finance its expenditures by supplying the increase in the nominal quantity of money that the public.
  25. [25]
    The Balance of Political Power and Israel's Political Future
    One of the reasons why the 1984 national unity government lasted was because on these issues there is so little difference between the two major parties, a ...
  26. [26]
    Examining the Impact of Rotational Presidency on Peace, the ...
    Jan 1, 2022 · It means power is not restricted to a group based on its geographical, ethnic, linguistic, population, or religious affiliation/advantage.
  27. [27]
    Temporary stabilisation? Bulgaria's new government - OSW
    Jun 7, 2023 · The GERB-SDS/PP-DB coalition agreement envisages a rotating model of government in the coming 18 months. Nikolai Denkov is a 61-year-old ...
  28. [28]
    Democratic Decline and a New Political Crisis in Bulgaria
    Jun 14, 2024 · ... GERB-SDS entered a power-sharing agreement despite their differences in May 2023 that brought a degree of political stability. It was ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  29. [29]
    Political power-sharing, firm entry, and economic growth - VoxDev
    Nov 25, 2022 · Politicians who share power impose checks and balances on each other, improving local governance and leading to better economic outcomes.Missing: rotation advantages
  30. [30]
    The rotating Council presidency hinders legislative continuity in the ...
    Dec 11, 2013 · The Presidency of the Council of the European Union is held on a rotational basis by EU member states for six month terms.
  31. [31]
    The Israeli Government Falls: New Election and Implications for U.S. ...
    Jun 27, 2022 · Failing to pass the legislation would have caused legal chaos for Israeli settlers living in the West Bank, so Bennett concluded that dissolving ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  32. [32]
    Bulgarian cabinet rotation fails, snap election looms - Euractiv
    Bulgarian cabinet rotation fails, snap election looms. After less than a year with a regular government, Bulgaria is once again entering a spiral of political ...Missing: accountability | Show results with:accountability
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    Full article: Political instability in Israel over the last decades
    Dec 17, 2023 · This article reviews the deterioration of government stability in Israel since the late 1990s and in the last three years in particular and examines the causes ...
  35. [35]
    Knesset to consider cancelling rotation government option
    Aug 5, 2024 · The purpose of a "rotation government" is to create a "two-headed" government, with a prime minister and "alternate prime minister" who ...Missing: efficiency | Show results with:efficiency
  36. [36]
    And the lot fell on... sortition in Ancient Greek democratic theory ...
    Mar 31, 2016 · Sortition, the lot, was the peculiarly democratic way of selecting most office-holders and all juror-judges to serve in the People's jury-courts.
  37. [37]
    The Principle of Rotation - Equality by lot
    the rule, applied in all but a few cases, that no citizen should hold any one office more than once in his lifetime ...
  38. [38]
    Prytaneis - Oxford Reference
    The whole system of the prytaneis and their chairman, based on lot and rotation, was a means of involving ordinary citizens in public administration, and thus ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Political Office and the Rule of Law in Plato's Statesman
    This is the principle of rotation in political offices, well known from many Greek poleis: the tenure of officials should be limited and there should be ...
  40. [40]
    Bulgaria: Political rivals agree on coalition government to end ...
    The leaders of Bulgaria's two main rival ... rotating prime minister intended to end a long-running political ...
  41. [41]
    Bulgarian Parliament Approves Coalition Government After Five ...
    Jun 6, 2023 · Bulgaria's parliament on June 6 approved a coalition government led by Prime Minister Nikolay Denkov, giving the Balkan member of the EU and NATO a new ...Missing: rotating | Show results with:rotating
  42. [42]
    A Ray of Hope for Bulgaria - CEPA
    Jun 7, 2023 · Under the new rotating premiership, Gabriel, who is set to become Bulgaria's first female prime minister, will take over from the PP-DB's ...
  43. [43]
    Bulgaria parliament approves pro-European government, ending ...
    Jun 6, 2023 · Bulgaria has never before had a rotating premiership but the compromise was the only remaining option for a cabinet. The new government's ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Bulgaria PM Resigns Ahead of Planned Rotation, as Govt's ...
    Mar 6, 2024 · Outgoing PM Nikolay Denkov of We Continue the Change is to be succeeded by GERB's Mariya Gabriel, amid speculation that the shaky coalition ...
  45. [45]
    Bulgaria's prime minister resigns as planned, part of a power ...
    Mar 6, 2024 · Denkov, of the reformist coalition, is expected to be replaced by GERB's Maria Gabriel, a former European Commissioner, who previously served as ...Missing: outcome | Show results with:outcome
  46. [46]
    Bulgaria's government talks blow up as Mariya Gabriel withdraws ...
    Mar 25, 2024 · Bulgaria's government talks blow up as Mariya Gabriel withdraws bid to be PM. Weeks of tortuous negotiations have fallen apart. Copy Link ...Missing: outcome | Show results with:outcome
  47. [47]
    Bulgaria's PM resigns, as agreed, amid some coalition confusion
    Mar 5, 2024 · GERB insists that Gabriel should keep her position as foreign minister while she is prime minister and suggests rotation every 15 months instead ...
  48. [48]
    In Bulgaria yet another government crisis. Gabriel gives up - Eunews
    Mar 25, 2024 · The rotation between conservatives and liberals failed after the 9-month Denkov government. Now the risk of new early elections.
  49. [49]
    Bulgaria: Political Crisis With No End in Sight? - Wilson Center
    Dec 18, 2024 · Part of the agreement was a rotation of the prime ministership between the two parties, with a prime minister from PP-DB leading the country for ...
  50. [50]
  51. [51]
    Bulgaria: a 'grand coalition' government
    Jan 17, 2025 · On 16 January, Bulgaria's parliament approved a new government led by Rosen Zhelyazkov of the centre-right GERB party, which secured the most votes in the ...Missing: rotation | Show results with:rotation
  52. [52]
    Germany's SPD in job-rotation proposal - RTE
    Sep 24, 2005 · German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder's Social Democrats Party (SPD) has floated an unprecedented plan to rotate the top job following ...
  53. [53]
    Merkel to become German chancellor | Germany - The Guardian
    Oct 10, 2005 · Angela Merkel is set to become the new German chancellor after the country's two biggest parties today concluded a power-sharing agreement.Missing: rotation | Show results with:rotation
  54. [54]
    Rotationsprinzip - Wikipedia
    Als Rotationsprinzip oder Rotationsverfahren bezeichnet man jeden regelmäßigen Wechsel eines Versammlungsortes oder eines Amtsträgers (z.
  55. [55]
    Leo Varadkar returns as Ireland's taoiseach in rotation agreement
    Dec 17, 2022 · Leo Varadkar has become Ireland's taoiseach after swapping posts with Micheál Martin, who took over as tánaiste, or deputy prime minister.
  56. [56]
    Leo Varadkar becomes taoiseach as Micheál Martin steps down - BBC
    Dec 17, 2022 · The rotation of power between the Irish parties was laid down in the coalition agreement of June 2020. The deal brought together Mr Varadkar's ...
  57. [57]
    Micheál Martin becomes Irish prime minister for second time - Euractiv
    Jan 24, 2025 · The new coalition deal, like the old one, requires Martin to resign part-way through the government's term and to pass the baton to the Fine ...
  58. [58]
    Irish centre-right parties agree coalition government with independents
    Jan 15, 2025 · The coalition agreement still needs to be ratified by the Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael parties for the government to take office on 22 January.Missing: power | Show results with:power
  59. [59]
    Israel opposition parties agree to form new unity government - BBC
    Jun 3, 2021 · Under a rotation arrangement, the head of the right-wing Yamina party, Naftali Bennett, would serve as prime minister first before handing over ...
  60. [60]
    Report: Bennett, Lapid reach agreement on forming coalition to oust ...
    May 28, 2021 · Yamina leader Naftali Bennett has agreed to create a governing coalition with Yesh Atid head Yair Lapid, according to an unsourced TV report ...
  61. [61]
    Israel Moves Toward Coalition Deal That Could Sideline Netanyahu
    Jun 3, 2021 · Under the deal being discussed, Mr. Bennett would lead the government first, probably until the fall of 2023, while Mr. Lapid would most likely ...
  62. [62]
    Lapid, Bennett announce agreement to form new government, likely ...
    Jun 2, 2021 · Bennett and Lapid will head a government comprised of seven parties spanning the entire Israeli political spectrum from the left, center and ...
  63. [63]
    After all-day debate, Knesset cements Bennett-Lapid rotation in law
    Jul 27, 2021 · ... Government in Israel, which criticized the new government on Tuesday for wasting tax money on sweetheart jobs. It said each deputy minister ...
  64. [64]
    Explainer: Malaysia's unique rotational monarchy | Reuters
    Oct 27, 2023 · The heads of Malaysia's nine royal families, sultans of nine of its 13 states, take turns to be king for a five-year term. After independence ...
  65. [65]
    Malaysia welcomes new king in unique rotating monarchy | Reuters
    Jan 31, 2024 · Malaysia practices a unique rotational form of monarchy, in which the heads of the country's nine royal families take turns to be king for a ...
  66. [66]
    Malaysia swears in motorbike-riding billionaire as new king under ...
    Jan 31, 2024 · Nine ethnic Malay state rulers have taken turns as king for five-year terms since Malaysia gained independence from Britain in 1957.
  67. [67]
    The Multiparty System: Malaysia Country Study | Democracy Web
    Aug 19, 2024 · The Federation of Malaysia, consisting of two territories separated by the South China Sea, is a constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary ...<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    Malaysia's Evolving Monarchy: Adaptation and Expansion Amid ...
    Mar 17, 2025 · The monarchy in Malaysia has in recent years expanded its influence and agency. At the same time, expectations of the institution have also evolved.
  69. [69]
    North Macedonia's Pro-Western Parties Reach Coalition Deal
    Aug 18, 2020 · North Macedonia's pro-EU Social Democrats have struck a coalition agreement with the Balkan country's largest ethnic Albanian party nearly a month after ...Missing: rotation | Show results with:rotation
  70. [70]
    North Macedonia: How long before it can join the EU? - DW
    Aug 30, 2023 · These two polar opposites agreed to a system of rotating prime ministers to make the coalition possible. The role of North Macedonia in ...
  71. [71]
    North Macedonia Country Report 2024 - BTI Transformation Index
    North Macedonia launched its accession talks with the European Union on July 19, 2022, by holding the inaugural EU-Macedonian intergovernmental conference.Missing: rotation | Show results with:rotation
  72. [72]
    North Macedonia parliament approves a new nationalist-dominated ...
    Jun 23, 2024 · North Macedonia's lawmakers on Sunday approved a new nationalist-dominated government of Prime Minister Hristijan Mickoski, whose party won ...Missing: rotation | Show results with:rotation
  73. [73]
    North Macedonia's Parliament Elects New Right-Wing Government
    Jun 23, 2024 · North Macedonia's parliament on June 23 approved a new coalition government led by Hristijan Mickoski's right-wing nationalist VMRO-DPMNE party.Missing: rotation | Show results with:rotation
  74. [74]
    Romania prepares for “Mauritius” coalition - Euractiv
    Jun 18, 2025 · Romania's “Mauritius Coalition” nears final deal: Bolojan set to become PM in rotating government, but key power-sharing questions remain.
  75. [75]
    Romania's broad coalition government wins parliament confidence ...
    Jun 23, 2025 · The leaders of the four parties agreed to rotate prime ministers before a 2028 parliamentary election, with Bolojan swapping with a leftist ...
  76. [76]
    Ilie Bolojan set to be Romanian PM in new pro-European coalition
    Jun 20, 2025 · The center-right politician will serve as prime minister until 2027, when he likely surrenders the post to a social democrat.
  77. [77]
    Romanian lawmakers vote in favor of pro-EU coalition, aiming to ...
    Jun 23, 2025 · The prime ministerial position will be rotated in 2027 from Bolojan to a PSD premier as part of a power-sharing agreement. Ahead of the ...
  78. [78]
    New government in Romania: a grand coalition facing major ...
    Jun 24, 2025 · As part of the coalition agreement, the parties also agreed to a rotating premiership to be held in turn by representatives of the two largest ...
  79. [79]
    2 Turkish Parties Agree on Freezing Out the Islamic Forces
    Mar 4, 1996 · Turkey's months-long political stalemate ended yesterday with an agreement by two rival conservative parties to form a coalition Government ...
  80. [80]
    Two Turkish Parties Sign Coalition Deal - Los Angeles Times
    Under the agreement, acting Prime Minister Tansu Ciller of the True Path Party ceded the first year of a rotating premiership to her bitter rival, Motherland ...
  81. [81]
    NEW TURKISH GOVERNMENT FACES MUCH OPPOSITION - The ...
    The new government, which under a rotating premiership will be led by Yilmaz through 1996 and by outgoing prime minister and True Path Party chief Tansu Ciller ...
  82. [82]
    Turkish Chief Set for Deal to Bar Islamic Party - The New York Times
    Feb 28, 1996 · Ciller is prepared to agree to a rotating premiership and, stepping back from her earlier bargaining stance, to let Mr. Yilmaz take the ...
  83. [83]
    Turkey's Islamist Challenge - Middle East Forum
    In the end, the two pro-secular center-right parties agreed to form a minority coalition government based on the principle of rotating premiership and with the ...
  84. [84]
    Turkish parties unify against Islamic group Prime minister will cede ...
    Under the agreement, caretaker Prime Minister Tansu Ciller of the True Path Party ceded the first year of a rotating premiership to her bitter rival, Motherland ...
  85. [85]
    COALITION TO BLOCK ISLAMIC PARTY - Chicago Tribune
    Mar 4, 1996 · Prime Minister Tansu Ciller and Mesut Yilmaz overcame personal ... Yilmaz to take the first turn at a rotating premiership. Originally ...
  86. [86]
    TURKEY'S NEW LEADER SETS MIDDLE COURSE BETWEEN ...
    Jun 29, 1996 · Ciller is Erbakan's deputy and foreign minister under a four-year rotating premiership deal that has Erbakan taking the top job for the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  87. [87]
    TURKEY: Coalition protocol signed - MEED
    ... rotating premiership in the coalition's proposed fiveyear term. The coalition will end a political vacuum since the December general elections and excludes ...
  88. [88]
    Turkey's main opposition floats idea of "rotating" premiership | Reuters
    Turkey's main secularist opposition suggested rotating the post of prime ... Turkey's main opposition floats idea of "rotating" premiership. By Daren ...
  89. [89]
    Turkey's main opposition floats idea of 'rotating' premiership | The Star
    Turkey's main opposition floats idea of 'rotating' premiership. By Daren Butler · World. Friday, 19 Jun 2015. 8:45 PM MYT. Selahattin Demirtas (2nd R), co ...
  90. [90]
    Turkey's main opposition floats idea of 'rotating' premiership | Reuters
    Turkey's main secularist opposition suggested rotating the post of prime ... Turkey's main opposition floats idea of 'rotating' premiership. By Daren ...