Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Route availability

Route Availability (RA) is a standardized classification system employed in the railway network of to evaluate the compatibility of with specific routes, primarily based on the load-carrying capacity of such as bridges and structures. The system assigns RA numbers ranging from 1 to 10 to both vehicles and routes, with higher numbers denoting greater capacities—for instance, RA 1 supports up to 27.9 tonnes per axle for two-axle vehicles, while RA 10 accommodates up to 50.8 tonnes. The primary purpose of the RA system is to ensure safe and efficient operations by preventing overloading of underline bridges and other structural elements, thereby minimizing the risk of damage or failure. Vehicle classification follows rules outlined in the GERT8006, which considers factors like maximum axle weight, gross laden weight, axle spacing, and load distribution to determine an RA rating. Routes, in turn, are graded section by section in the National Electronic Sectional Appendix, specifying the maximum RA number permissible for each segment of track. In practice, RA ratings directly influence train routing and speed restrictions; for example, freight services are typically limited to RA 8 at speeds up to 75 mph, while RA 9 and 10 operations are capped at 60 mph (or 50 mph in certain regions) to account for structural constraints. Operations exceeding a route's RA limit require special dispensations, such as the submission of form RT3973 for heavy axle weight approvals, which may include temporary speed reductions or monitoring conditions valid for up to 24 months. This framework, managed by and supported by the Rail Safety and Standards Board (RSSB), integrates with broader infrastructure standards like RIS-8706-INS to promote and asset longevity across the network.

Introduction

Definition

Route Availability (RA) is a numerical grading employed on the railway network of to evaluate the structural capacity of elements, including the permanent way, bridges, embankments, and tunnels, in relation to the axle loads and configurations of rail vehicles. This ensures safe and efficient operation by matching vehicle weights to the load-bearing capabilities of the underlying structures. The scale ranges from 1 to 10, with lower numbers indicating more restricted and vehicles suitable for lighter loads, and higher numbers denoting greater capacity for heavier loads; for instance, RA 10 accommodates up to approximately 25.4 tonnes per axle for typical four-axle . RA ratings are assigned to both routes, based on the weakest structural element along the line, and to individual locomotives and , derived from their gross laden weight and axle spacing per the standards in GERT8006. The core compatibility principle requires that the RA of a train—determined by the highest-rated vehicle in the consist—does not exceed the RA of the route, thereby restricting trains to paths with equal or higher RA numbers to prevent overload damage. Enforcement of RA compliance is managed by through operational standards, including the National Electronic Sectional Appendix, which details route-specific RA limits; mismatches may necessitate speed restrictions, such as a maximum of 60 for RA 9 or 10 vehicles on certain routes unless exemptions are granted, or require special authorizations like dispensations for heavy axle weight services limited to 24 months.

Purpose and Importance

The primary purpose of the Route Availability (RA) system is to classify railway routes in the UK according to the load-carrying capability of their infrastructure, particularly bridges and tracks, thereby ensuring that rail vehicles do not exceed the structural limits and cause damage. By assessing vehicle axle loads and weight distribution against route capacities, the system prevents overloading that could compromise the integrity of aging or weaker structures, promoting the longevity of the national rail network. In operational scheduling, the RA system enables efficient routing of heavier freight trains on upgraded main lines while safeguarding lighter branch lines from excessive loads, optimizing capacity for diverse traffic types. This facilitates standardized designs that achieve broader route access without frequent modifications, streamlining across operators. Economically, it reduces long-term maintenance costs by minimizing wear from overloads, allowing to allocate resources more effectively toward renewals and enhancements. Safety is a core imperative, as RA mismatches can necessitate temporary exemptions such as reduced speed limits over weak bridges to mitigate risks of structural failure during passage.

Classification System

Route Availability Numbers

The Route Availability (RA) system in British railways classifies infrastructure and vehicles on a numerical scale from 1 to 10, where each number represents the maximum axle load capacity in tonnes that a route can safely accommodate, ensuring compatibility between rolling stock and structures such as bridges. This scale originated from historical classifications but has been standardized under Network Rail using detailed engineering assessments outlined in GERT8006. RA 1 denotes the lowest capacity for very light loads, such as industrial shuttles or passenger stock with axle loads below 14 tonnes, while RA 10 supports the heaviest standard freight with up to 25.4 tonnes per axle. The progression across the scale reflects increasing structural robustness: lower numbers (RA 1–3) apply to fragile infrastructure on preserved railways, rural branches, or lightly used lines where axle loads are limited to prevent damage to older bridges and track formations. Higher numbers (RA 7–10) are assigned to reinforced main lines capable of handling intensive freight and passenger services with heavier axle loads. For instance, RA 8–10 are prevalent on electrified main lines like the , enabling operations of modern heavy-haul locomotives and wagons. The specific axle load limits for each RA level under current Network Rail standards are as follows:
RAMaximum Axle Load (tonnes)
113.95
215.20
316.50
417.75
519.05
620.30
721.55
822.85
924.10
1025.40
These thresholds are derived from assessments of distribution and are cross-referenced with spacing in vehicle ratings. RA charts and documentation often incorporate diagrammatic profiles to visualize load envelopes for vehicles, with historical precedents using color-coding (e.g., for RA 2 equivalents on Great Western Railway routes) to denote restrictions on maps and locomotive cabsides. Modern applications rely on digital tools and the National Electronic Sectional Appendix for precise route mappings.

Axle Load and Spacing Criteria

The axle load limits form the core of Route Availability (RA) classifications, ensuring that vehicle weights do not exceed the structural capacity of routes, particularly bridges and earthworks. These limits increase progressively across RA levels, starting from 13.95 tonnes for RA1, which accommodates light passenger , to 25.4 tonnes for RA10, enabling heavy freight operations such as 100-tonne wagons. RA numbers are determined by comparing the vehicle's bending moments and shears—calculated from s and spacings—to standardized diagrams for various bridge spans in GERT8006. This scaling is determined through assessments of static and dynamic loads on infrastructure. Wheel spacing and bogie design criteria complement axle load limits by requiring minimum distances between axles to distribute forces evenly and mitigate risks like dynamic on bridges. configurations are evaluated to ensure load transfer aligns with , preventing uneven wear or instability, with these parameters integrated into vehicle certification processes under national technical rules. Kinematic envelope considerations address how vehicle dimensions, including length and height, interact with RA ratings to avoid derailments or excessive structural stress. The defines the swept volume of the vehicle under motion, accounting for suspension movements and cant deficiencies; higher RA levels demand tighter compliance to limit lateral and vertical excursions that could amplify loads on curves or bridges. This ensures overall vehicle-route beyond mere weight. These criteria are standardized across the rail network, drawing from Technical Specifications for (TSI) but adapted post-Brexit through National Technical Specification Notices (NTSNs) effective in 2025. Adaptations include provisions for dynamic load allowances to account for , braking, and irregularities, maintaining while prioritizing national infrastructure resilience. Dynamic effects are considered separately in route assessments, particularly at higher speeds, per RIS-8706-INS.

Route Assessment

Calculation Methods for Lines

The determination of a route's rating involves a systematic to ensure safe load distribution across the entire . The begins with a comprehensive survey of key elements, including components, bridges, and earthworks, to evaluate their structural integrity and capacity under varying loads. Inspections typically include visual assessments, non-destructive testing, and load trials to identify potential weaknesses such as , , or in bridges and embankments. Following the survey, finite element analysis (FEA) is employed to model load distribution and stress concentrations, particularly for complex structures like bridges where dynamic effects from passage must be simulated. This step-by-step assessment adheres to standards such as GERT8006, which defines load models for each category, allowing engineers to simulate vehicle configurations and determine if the infrastructure can withstand the associated axle loads and spacings without exceeding safety limits. Track strength is evaluated separately using geotechnical surveys for earthworks stability, ensuring the overall route can support the proposed loads without risk of deformation or failure. The route RA is primarily determined as the minimum RA value of the underline bridges and structures along the path, as specified section by section in the National Electronic Sectional Appendix (NESA). For bridges, the individual RA is derived from load-span ratios and capacity assessments against standardized RA load envelopes in GERT8006, ensuring compatibility with vehicle axle loads up to the supported category (e.g., higher RA values permit heavier loads like 25 tonnes per axle for RA10). Track and earthworks are assessed separately but contribute to overall route capacity considerations beyond RA. Upgrades to improve route RA, such as bridge strengthening or track reinforcement, are managed through Network Rail's Governance for Railway Investment Projects (GRIP) process, a structured framework dividing projects into eight stages from feasibility to handover. GRIP ensures cost-effective interventions, with simulations run using specialized software like Bridge Management Systems (BMS) to predict post-upgrade performance and validate RA enhancements. These tools integrate historical data and predictive modeling to optimize resource allocation. Routes undergo periodic RA reassessments every 5-10 years, aligned with control periods and detailed bridge examinations typically every six years, or immediately following incidents like floods or collisions that could compromise capacity. In 2025, incorporated climate resilience factors into these reviews, particularly for flood-prone routes, by updating assessments to account for increased scour risks and erosion under projections, as outlined in the Fourth Report. This enhances long-term RA amid rising climate impacts.

Factors Influencing Route RA

Bridge and tunnel limitations play a significant role in determining a route's Route Availability (RA) classification, primarily due to their load-bearing capacities and structural integrity. Many railway bridges, particularly those from the constructed with or early , are limited to lower RA ratings because excels in compression but is weak in tension, restricting their ability to handle heavier axle loads and dynamic forces from modern trains. Tunnels impose additional restrictions, especially in older where limited clearance affects and vehicle height; while primarily impacting , this can indirectly influence vehicle design choices including weight. Track and formation factors, including ballast quality and subgrade soil stability, directly influence overall route capacity by affecting how dynamic loads are distributed and absorbed, though assessed separately from RA. Poor quality, such as degraded or fouled stone, reduces track stability and increases settlement under repeated loading, potentially necessitating restrictions on axle weights. Subgrade instability, particularly in areas with soft or variable soils, exacerbates this by allowing uneven settlement, which amplifies dynamic forces on the infrastructure. Curvature in the track further impacts load distribution, as sharper curves generate higher lateral and vertical loads on the rails and substructure, requiring reduced axle weights to maintain safety and longevity. Geographical influences, such as hilly terrains and urban environments, also shape RA classifications by imposing operational limits. In hilly areas, steep gradients reduce between wheels and rails, necessitating lower weights to ensure can maintain traction without slipping, especially under heavy loads. sections face overhead constraints from low bridges, buildings, and other , which limit vehicle profiles and options, often capping RA to accommodate these spatial restrictions while preserving historical structures. Upgrade projects demonstrate how addressing these factors can elevate RA ratings. For example, the electrification program in the 2010s involved modifications to 179 bridges and renewing ballast to accommodate bi-mode trains and overhead electrification, enabling higher-capacity services by the early 2020s. Such interventions, including subgrade improvements and material replacements, are essential for modernizing routes while respecting legacy constraints.

Vehicle Assessment

Determining Locomotive RA

The Route Availability (RA) number for a or other rail is determined through a structured of its static , primarily focusing on individual loads and their spacings, to evaluate compatibility with underline capacities across the network. This process begins with static weighing of the on certified weighbridges to measure the nominal load on each under unloaded and fully laden conditions, as required by RSSB guidance for ensuring accurate load data. Dynamic effects, such as those from speed and response, are accounted for indirectly through amplification factors in the overall RA model, but the core relies on static measurements to avoid overcomplication in routine . The calculation of a vehicle's RA number follows the methodology outlined in RSSB standard GERT8006, which models the vehicle's weight as an equivalent number of RA1 loading units (each representing a baseline of approximately 13.96 tonnes spaced at defined intervals). Axle loads and inter-axle distances are input into the RSSB Route Availability , which computes the maximum RA level the vehicle can safely traverse without exceeding structural limits for that rating. In practice, this often approximates to identifying the highest RA where the maximum individual axle load falls within predefined thresholds (for simplified single-axle models), derived from the floor of the ratio between the measured axle load and the RA-specific limit tonnes, ensuring conservative assignment to prevent overload risks. For instance, approximate maximum single-axle load ranges for higher RA levels are as follows, though full multi-axle distribution must be considered via the calculator:
RA LevelSingle Axle Load Range (tonnes)
20.32 to 21.58
21.59 to 22.85
22.86 to 24.12
Design aspects of the , including systems and profiles, play a supporting role in RA determination by influencing load distribution across during weighing; primary suspensions help equalize loads to minimize the maximum value, potentially allowing a higher total vehicle weight within the same RA band. coefficients, while critical for traction performance, are not directly factored into RA but can indirectly affect dynamic load variations in testing. Electric frequently achieve higher RA ratings compared to equivalent diesel models due to more uniform from components like transformers and motors, enabling greater overall mass without spiking individual loads. For multi-axle vehicles like multiple units, RA accounts for load distribution across bogies; passenger stock with axle loads under 14 tonnes is typically RA1. Certification of a locomotive's RA is managed under RSSB oversight through compliance with GERT8006 and related standards, with vehicle manufacturers or operators submitting weighed data and design specifications for approval during . The assigned RA forms part of the vehicle's technical file, ensuring it can only operate on routes rated at or above that number to maintain structural integrity.

Examples of RA Ratings

The British Rail Class 66 diesel-electric freight exemplifies a modern heavy-duty vehicle with a Route Availability (RA) rating of 7 and an of 21 tonnes, enabling its widespread use on mixed freight services across much of the network, including intermodal and bulk haulage routes. This rating allows the Class 66 to operate on lines rated RA7 or higher without restrictions, supporting its role in efficient freight operations since its introduction in 1998. In contrast, the Class 800 bi-mode , designed for high-speed intercity services, has low axle loads around 14.5-15 tonnes per motor car (vehicle RA ~1-2), optimizing it for principal main lines such as the and (typically RA8+). This configuration balances performance and infrastructure compatibility, permitting operations at up to 125 mph on electrified sections while switching to on non-electrified segments. Heritage examples highlight lower RA ratings for specialized duties; the Class 01 diesel shunter, with an RA 1 and axle loads under 10 tonnes, was built for light shunting in confined yards and tight curves, reflecting its wheel arrangement for minimal infrastructure impact. Similarly, the Deltic Class 55 , rated RA 5 with an of approximately 17.5 tonnes, was engineered for high-speed express passenger services on the , delivering 3,300 horsepower while adhering to moderate load limits. For wagons and multiple units, typical electric multiple units like the Class 350 Desiro have low axle loads around 11-14 tonnes average (vehicle RA ~1), suitable for regional commuter routes on electrified lines rated RA6+ without exceeding common infrastructure constraints. The overall RA of a train consist is determined by the highest-rated component, such as a hauling wagons, ensuring the entire formation complies with the route's limits to prevent overload on bridges and track. On preserved railways, RA exemptions often involve operational mitigations like speed ; for instance, RA 7 locomotives may run on RA 5 lines at reduced speeds (e.g., below 25 ) to minimize and comply with heritage infrastructure standards under Railway Safety Regulations exemptions. This approach, guided by heritage-specific requirements, enables safe guest appearances while protecting aging structures.

History

Origins and Development

The initiated early efforts to grade routes for heavier locomotives in , particularly to accommodate the introduction of its class Pacifics, which featured increased s for high-speed express services on the . These informal assessments evolved into a formal route availability system by 1940 in the LNER's southern area, classifying both routes and locomotives based on weight per foot of length, maximum axle loading, and bending moments on bridges, with categories ranging from RA1 (most restrictive) to RA8. This approach addressed the limitations of lighter routes unable to support the A4's 22-ton , ensuring safe operation while maximizing the use of newly designed heavy Pacifics. Prior to nationalization, other major railways employed distinct pre-RA systems for route restrictions. The Great Western Railway (GWR) adopted a colored disc method around 1905, fully implemented by 1919, where locomotives displayed cabside discs indicating axle weight classes that corresponded to colored zones on route maps. For instance, the GWR's King class 4-6-0 locomotives, with a maximum axle weight of 22 tons 10 cwt (approximately 22.9 tonnes), were classified as double red—the most restrictive category—limiting them to just 14% of the network, primarily main lines like London to Plymouth, until 1948. The 1948 nationalization under significantly influenced route availability by formalizing a unified 1-10 scale, primarily drawing from the 's established framework and incorporating elements from the other "" railways (, GWR, LMS, and ). This standardization aimed to streamline operations across the inherited regional networks, assigning RA numbers to locomotives like the A4 class (RA8) based on axle loads and route compatibility. Early implementation faced challenges from inconsistent regional applications, as the Western Region retained GWR's colored disc system through the steam era, while the London Midland and Southern Regions relied on ad hoc timetables or booklets without formal schemes. These discrepancies hindered freight efficiency, prompting unification efforts in the 1950s that integrated RA classifications into working timetables, such as those issued by the Eastern Region in 1958, to better support heavier wagon loads and locomotive interchanges.

Evolution Under British Rail and Network Rail

Following the nationalization of the railways in 1948 under , the Route Availability (RA) system underwent significant expansion to accommodate growing freight demands, particularly during the containerization boom of the 1960s and 1970s. This period saw the introduction of higher RA categories, culminating in RA10, which supported 25-ton axle loads for heavy wagons used in intermodal and bulk traffic, enabling more efficient routing on upgraded lines. In the 1970s, standardized diesel locomotives for freight, with models like the Class 56 designed for heavy haulage and assigned an RA7 rating based on its approximately 21-tonne , allowing operation on a wide range of routes while respecting bridge capacities. The privatization of in the 1990s transferred infrastructure management to in 1994, which maintained the RA framework but faced challenges in updating assessments amid sector fragmentation. Railtrack's collapse led to the establishment of in 2002 as a not-for-profit entity responsible for the network, marking a shift toward more integrated RA management. Under , RA data evolved through digital tools, including the National Electronic Sectional Appendix for network capability details and the Register of Infrastructure for exports, alongside Route Specifications maps delineating RA groupings by section. In the , post-2008 enhancements focused on sustainability, with freight growth in sectors like supported by targeted route improvements, though specific RA upgrades were often handled via temporary Heavy Weight dispensations rather than permanent reclassifications. By 2025, integrations with (ETCS) signaling advanced through programs like the East Coast Digital Programme and , where ETCS Level 2 overlays incorporate RA considerations for vehicle compatibility, though alignment between European speed categories and RA has drawn criticism for added complexity in high-speed contexts. Critics have noted the RA system's limitations for modern , prompting hybrid assessments that combine traditional RA with advanced monitoring like the Train Equipment Management System to address dynamic load and speed interactions beyond static axle-based evaluations.

References

  1. [1]
    The Route Availability System - RSSB
    Jun 4, 2024 · The route availability (RA) system is a method for assessing the compatibility of rail vehicles with bridges.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Network Rail Infrastructure Limited - Network Statement 2025
    Nov 1, 2023 · In Great Britain, the rules for determining the Route Availability (RA) number of a vehicle are set out in GERT8006 (Route Availability.
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
    National Electronic Sectional Appendix - Network Rail
    The National Electronic Sectional Appendix contains detailed information useful to operators about network capability, as well as other data.<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    GCTT0138 Iss 1 - Route Availability System - RSSB
    Describes the system to be adopted for classifying routes according to the load carrying capability of the infrastructure.
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Routeing of rail freight forecasts
    Freight flows are divided into 12 corridors where choices are potentially available and diversionary routes relevant. The corridor analysis is presented in ...Missing: British definition
  7. [7]
    Speed restrictions - Network Rail
    Speed restrictions are sometimes necessary, but we know they are frustrating. Find out why we need to use them.
  8. [8]
    East Coast Digital Programme - Network Rail
    Asset management · Asset ... We expect the first trains to operate on the East Coast Main Line using this digital signalling technology by the end of 2025.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Route Availability Number for Assessment of Compatibility between ...
    Jun 1, 2024 · This document sets out requirements for the derivation and use of the Route Availability number for the assessment of compatibility between the ...
  10. [10]
    Historical Route Availability Classification on British railways
    This page is intended to provide a basic introduction to the route availability classification in use on the British railway systems in the steam era.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  11. [11]
    GERT8006 Iss 4 - Route Availability Number for Assessment ... - RSSB
    This document sets out requirements for the derivation and use of the Route Availability number for the assessment of compatibility between the static load ...
  12. [12]
    scot-rail.co.uk » Route Availability
    Feb 18, 2013 · The Route Availability (RA) system is a measure of a railway vehicle's axle load. The higher the axle load of a vehicle, the higher the RA number on a scale ...
  13. [13]
    Track used on British railway lines - IGG.org
    Track rated at RA1-6 is the most common and can carry up to 20.3 tonnes per axle, RA7-9 allows axle weights of up to 24.1 tonnes and RA10 can carry up to 25.4 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
    BS7608 Changes: Fatigue Design/Assessment of Steel Products - TWI
    The standard will improve quality and safety for users by reducing the risk of fatigue failure of engineering structures. Details are given of the most ...
  15. [15]
    Vehicle Track Interface Seminar 2025 - Rail Engineer
    Apr 29, 2025 · ... axle weight, up to a maximum of 25.1 tonnes (RA 9) and 25.4 tonnes (RA10) on RA8 routes normally limited to 22.8 tonnes. Sometimes, there is ...
  16. [16]
    Structure Gauge and Kinematic Envelope |
    This space is referred to as the “kinematic envelope“. The area designates the limits within which the train can move laterally and vertically along the route.Missing: considerations UK
  17. [17]
    Rail interoperability: National Technical Specification Notices (NTSNs)
    Jun 12, 2025 · UK railway technical standards, known as NTSNs, have replaced EU technical specifications for interoperability (TSIs).Missing: post- Brexit dynamic load
  18. [18]
    Calculation of dynamic impact loads for railway bridges using a ...
    Aug 5, 2025 · This paper introduces railway bridge assessment in the UK and the concept of dynamic impact loads. The dynamic impact loads demonstrated in ...
  19. [19]
    (PDF) Probabilistic Framework for Future Load Carrying Capacity ...
    Aug 20, 2025 · ... highest train RA number. satisfying the prescribed confidence level can be identified for. each age- and speed-dependent fragility function ...
  20. [20]
    Probabilistic Framework for Future Load Carrying Capacity ...
    Aug 19, 2025 · In this paper, a probabilistic assessment framework for estimating the future route availability (RA) number of aging metallic railway bridges ...
  21. [21]
    Route Availability Calculator - RSSB
    Jul 30, 2024 · The Route Availability Calculator assists users in determining the compatibility of rail vehicles with bridges by calculating the RA number for rail vehicles.Missing: lines Network
  22. [22]
    GRIP (Governance for Railway Investment Projects) process explained
    Apr 1, 2019 · GRIP divides a project into eight distinct stages. The overall approach is product, rather than process, driven and, within each stage, an agreed set of ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Catalogue of Network Rail Standards
    Mar 4, 2023 · This is the Catalogue of Network Rail Standards, issue 127, published under license from Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd.
  24. [24]
    Fine upstanding member - Rail Engineer
    Jul 29, 2015 · Level 0 requires the engineer to input parameters into a pre-designed spreadsheet which outputs the structure's Route Availability (RA) rating.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Network Rail Fourth Adaption Report – December 2024
    Dec 4, 2024 · This report reviews Network Rail's climate change risks, adaptation plans, and progress since 2021, focusing on making the railway more ...
  26. [26]
    Route Availability - 2D53
    In this system, each class of locomotive is allocated into a route availability group (between 1 and 10), based primarily on the weight per axle.
  27. [27]
    Railway iron bridges railway history - Key Model World
    Dec 20, 2023 · The deficiencies of cast iron as a material for building railway bridges meant that its period of predominance was relatively short.
  28. [28]
    Railway track substructure: Recent research and future directions
    However, track settlement is almost never uniform, owing to minor differences in track, ballast and subgrade condition; the presence of essentially fixed points ...
  29. [29]
    Railway ballast performance: Recent advances in the understanding ...
    This paper seeks to develop new understandings of ballast behaviour and identify opportunities for future research directions.Missing: curvature route
  30. [30]
    'Toolbox of solutions' needed to electrify UK railways while ...
    Jul 20, 2021 · Electrifying railway lines while ensuring Victorian assets are protected requires a “toolbox of solutions” according to Network Rail head of ...
  31. [31]
    New standards form our ongoing response to Victorian infrastructure
    Jan 18, 2023 · Most of the rail network is on routes laid down by the Victorians which has limited space for AC electrification.Missing: rating | Show results with:rating
  32. [32]
    Great Western Main Line electrification programme - Key Model World
    Jul 30, 2024 · It would encompass 247 miles of electrified line and involve changes to 179 bridges, 17 tunnels and 33 stations and was expected to cost £800m.Missing: RA | Show results with:RA
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Loads and Dynamic Effects Background document D4.3 - DiVA portal
    Nov 30, 2007 · Table 3.6 Route Availability Classification for Bridges ... 20 units of Type RA1 loading is equivalent to Route Availability RA10 without.
  34. [34]
    Rolling Stock Wheelsets - Rail Engineer
    Aug 24, 2022 · Wheelsets support the vehicle mass, steer the vehicle along the track, roll with minimum resistance, transmit all braking and traction forces.Missing: locomotive | Show results with:locomotive
  35. [35]
    Fifteenth anniversary of the Class 66 | Locomotives - Rail Magazine
    Apr 17, 2013 · The company wanted a more modern version of the Class 59, capable of hauling freight trains at 75mph, fitting into the Route Availability 7 ...
  36. [36]
  37. [37]
    [PDF] COMILLAS PONTIFICAL UNIVERSITY ICAI SCHOOL OF ...
    Jul 7, 2017 · A route availability (RA) study is also performed in primary and secondary routes so as to locate critica) areas in the network that may affect ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Class 800 Series (800-810) - Hitachi Rail
    Class 800 Series (800-810). There are currently 182 intercity trains in service, running the length and breadth of the UK, from Penzance to the Highlands, ...
  39. [39]
    Class 01 D2956 - ELR Diesel Group
    With 0-4-0 wheel arrangement and wheelbase of just 6' 0" giving the loco a 'Go anywhere' BR Route Availability of 1, it is still a very useful machine for the ...
  40. [40]
    British Rail Class 55 – Deltic - NWMES
    Axle load class, Route availability 5. Withdrawn, 1980–1982. Preserved, 55022 (D9000), 55002 (D9002), 55009 (D9009), 55015 (D9015), 55016 (D9016) and 55019 ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] LNW Route Specification 2017 - Network Rail
    Route availability. RA8. Network Rail will improve Route Availability as appropriate when opportunities present themselves in future renewal workbanks ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  42. [42]
    [PDF] SMS Guidance for Minor and Heritage Railways | ORR
    Aug 1, 2023 · This guidance has been written to assist in the interpretation of ROGS and to ensure that the SMS in use by a minor or heritage railway is ...Missing: RA derating
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Speed restrictions, maximum safe speed and automatic train ...
    In this article, the authors consider the main reasons why speeds may need to be limited during operation and the methods used to determine permissible speeds ...
  44. [44]
  45. [45]
    The Gresley A4 Pacifics - LNER Info
    The Gresley A4 Pacifics were famous LNER locomotives with a streamlined design, known for speed and luxury, and a symbol of 1930s speed.
  46. [46]
    Route Availability and ER (Great Eastern) Working Timetables
    This was called Route Availability (RA) and was in general use on the LNER by late 1947. In general terms the system was based on the maximum axle loading and ...
  47. [47]
    Going Loco - July 2020 | Didcot Railway Centre
    Jul 31, 2020 · Double Red - 22 tons 10 cwt. This was only the King Class. This limited these engines to just 14% of the GWR network. This explains why there ...
  48. [48]
    Operating Equipment & Practices - Section of the GWR route map ...
    On the Great Western Railway an Engine Map is used to indicate which of four different classes of engines may work on the respective sections of line.Missing: UK | Show results with:UK
  49. [49]
    What's up with RA10? - RailUK Forums
    Jun 20, 2019 · RA10 is needed for 100-ton bogie wagons (ie 25 ton axle load) to run. My best guess is that maintaining lines to that standard is expensive, and only sustained ...Missing: British | Show results with:British
  50. [50]
    Large diesel locomotive of 56 , 58 , 60 - RMweb
    May 15, 2016 · Each route or branch has a route availability and so do locos. It is to do with axle weight so a loco with a higher RA than the branch or ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Railways: Railtrack, 1994-2002 - UK Parliament
    Mar 24, 2010 · Railtrack was set up on 1 April 1994 under the Railways Act 1993 to manage the rail infrastructure (track, stations, etc.).
  52. [52]
    [PDF] A Short Guide to Network Rail - National Audit Office
    Jul 9, 2014 · Is responsible for day-to-day running of the railway – including maintenance, signalling and small renewal projects (which are less than £ ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] The evolution of Network Rail and the consequences for regulation
    Nov 16, 2017 · At its centre is Network Rail; a publicly-owned company created from the assets of its privatised predecessor Railtrack plc in 2002. Network ...<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Updated impacts of changes in track access charges on the ... - ORR
    Increased ICCs are likely to result in a switch of some biomass from the routes involving long rail journeys (Liverpool and Tyne) to the routes involving short ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Rail freight forecasts scenarios for 2023-24
    high quality paths along preferred routes will be available, and the unconstrained growth forecast in ... Drax has converted 2 of its 6 units to biomass along ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Our approach to digital signalling in CP7 | Network Rail
    Mar 31, 2024 · Route Services is delivering a workstream developing training capability in the maintenance, renewal, operation and enhancement of ETCS ...
  57. [57]
    ETCS Implementation issues - Rail Engineer
    Oct 28, 2025 · Rail Engineer has devoted many column inches to ETCS but mostly about its cost and deployment issues. ETCS is much more than a signalling ...