Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Special Structure against Corruption and Organized Crime

The Special Structure against and (SPAK), known in Albanian as Struktura e Posaçme Kundër dhe Krimit të Organizuar, is an independent prosecutorial and investigative body in tasked with detecting, investigating, and prosecuting senior public officials and organized criminal groups involved in high-level , , and related offenses. Established by Law No. 95/2016 as part of broader judicial reforms influenced by accession requirements, SPAK became operational on November 25, 2019, comprising a Special Prosecution Office led by Chief Prosecutor Altin Dumani and the National Bureau of Investigation for specialized inquiries. Its mandate emphasizes crimes by high-ranking figures, including elected officials and judges, with powers to seize assets and coordinate with international bodies like the . SPAK's creation addressed Albania's entrenched systemic , which had undermined and deterred foreign , by introducing vetted prosecutors and investigators insulated from political through rigorous checks. Notable achievements include over 100 high-profile investigations by 2024, leading to arrests of former ministers, mayors, and figures, alongside asset recoveries exceeding millions in euros, fostering levels around 76% according to surveys. The body has dismantled networks in sectors like public and drug trafficking, contributing to Albania's progress in evaluations, though it faces ongoing challenges such as threats to personnel and debates over selective amid political tensions. Despite criticisms from opposition groups alleging insufficient scrutiny of ruling party elites, empirical case outcomes demonstrate tangible disruptions to corrupt practices, underscoring SPAK's role in causal mechanisms for institutional .

Background and Establishment

Pre-Reform Context in

Following the collapse of Albania's communist regime in 1991, the country experienced a rapid surge in across , the , and the , exacerbated by the abrupt to a and weak institutional frameworks. investment schemes proliferated in the mid-1990s, defrauding millions and triggering widespread unrest in that led to the government's collapse, armed rebellion, and an estimated $1.2 billion in losses—equivalent to half of GDP at the time—while enabling entrenched networks of political and economic elites to consolidate power through illicit gains. groups capitalized on this instability, expanding into , drug smuggling, arms dealing, and , often with ties to post-communist political figures who facilitated smuggling routes across the porous borders of the former . The , inherited from the communist , suffered from chronic underfunding, politicization, and susceptibility to , resulting in very low conviction rates for offenses and prosecutions prior to 2016. Prosecutors and judges frequently faced from political actors, with cases often dismissed or stalled due to evidentiary manipulations or external pressures, fostering a perception of among high-level officials. Economic corruption intertwined with these issues, as state-owned enterprises and processes in the 1990s and 2000s were marred by and kickbacks, distorting markets and deterring foreign investment amid 's ranking as one of Europe's most corrupt nations in Transparency International's indices during this period. International assessments, particularly from the , underscored these systemic failures as barriers to Albania's EU accession aspirations. The European Commission's 2014 Progress Report highlighted persistent corruption in the as a "particularly serious" issue, with limited advancements in and enforcement despite Albania's receipt of candidate status in June 2014, conditioning further progress on tangible reforms to combat and political capture of institutions. These reports emphasized that without addressing entrenched networks linking crime to governance, Albania's integration stalled, amplifying calls for specialized mechanisms amid ongoing trafficking and laundering operations that fueled regional instability. In July 2016, the Albanian Parliament approved comprehensive constitutional amendments, revising 58 articles to overhaul the , enhance prosecutorial independence, and establish specialized institutions for addressing high-level and . These changes created a legal foundation for independent bodies, including special courts insulated from the general judicial system and subject to rigorous integrity vetting for personnel. The amendments emphasized by transferring oversight of judicial appointments and discipline to self-governing councils, aiming to curb political interference in cases. Central to these reforms was Law No. 95/2016, enacted on , 2016, titled "On the Organization and Functioning of Institutions for Combating and ." This legislation defined the Special Structure against and (SPAK) as an integrated framework comprising a Special Prosecution Office, investigative directorates, and administrative support units, with jurisdiction over serious offenses involving public officials and organized crime networks. The law mandated operational , including dedicated budgets and personnel selection processes insulated from influence, while specifying that SPAK's institutions would operate from with nationwide authority. Complementing these measures, Law No. 84/2016 established a transitional re-evaluation () process for all judges and prosecutors, administered by specialized commissions with oversight to verify assets, family ties, and . commissions, drawing on foreign expertise for , rejected candidates linked to political compromise or unexplained wealth, resulting in the dismissal of over one-third of evaluated magistrates by subsequent years, thereby enabling the staffing of special courts with screened personnel. This mechanism addressed systemic vulnerabilities in the prior , where had undermined enforcement, without integrating into routine judicial operations.

Operational Launch and Initial Setup (2019)

The Special Structure against Corruption and Organized Crime (SPAK) commenced operations on December 19, 2019, following the High Prosecutorial Council's (HPC) appointment of its initial eight prosecutors through a process involving applications, evaluations, and for integrity and professional competence. The appointees included Arben Kraja, Altin Dumani, Klodian Braho, Enkeleda Millonaj, Edvin Kondili, Ened Nakuçi, Elida Kaçkini, and Dibra, selected from candidates who demonstrated specialized expertise in handling complex and cases. Arben Kraja was elected as the inaugural chief prosecutor shortly thereafter, receiving majority support from the HPC in a vote among eligible candidates, thereby establishing for the Prosecution Office () component of SPAK. This setup integrated the with the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI), a dedicated investigative unit under SPAK's oversight, where NBI investigators—appointed directly by SPAK prosecutors—handled specialized probes into high-level corruption and , distinct from regular structures. Initial operations emphasized capacity-building, including protocol development for case intake and inter-agency coordination, amid Albania's ongoing marked by opposition-led protests starting in 2019 and a parliamentary that disrupted legislative functions but did not halt the HPC's independent appointments or SPAK's activation as a priority. These challenges, rooted in allegations of electoral irregularities and systemic , tested the institution's resilience from inception, yet the meritocratic recruitment—overseen by the vetting-vetted HPC—ensured continuity in staffing without direct political interference. Early efforts focused on clarifying SPAK's mandate to prioritize senior official over routine cases, laying groundwork for autonomous investigations while navigating public skepticism from the polarized environment.

Organizational Framework

Special Prosecution Office

The Special Prosecution Office (SPO), known in Albanian as Prokuroria e Posaçme, constitutes the primary prosecutorial entity within Albania's Special Structure against Corruption and Organized Crime (SPAK), tasked exclusively with directing criminal proceedings for senior-level corruption and organized crime offenses as outlined in Article 148 of the Constitution. Enacted through Law No. 95/2016 dated October 6, 2016, the SPO holds authority to commence prosecutions against high-ranking officials—including ministers, judges, and lawmakers—without needing preliminary consent from the General Prosecutor or executive authorities, a mechanism designed to circumvent entrenched political oversight in prior systems. This independence extends to its operational directive: representing state accusations before specialized courts and supervising execution of judicial decisions, while coordinating with but not subordinating to investigative units. Leadership of the SPO centers on the Chief Special Prosecutor, currently Altin Dumani as of October 2025, whose five-year mandate concludes on December 18, 2025, following appointment by the High Prosecutorial Council (KLP) via a merit-based evaluation emphasizing professional qualifications and integrity assessments conducted by the Independent Qualification Commission. The chief oversees a cadre of special prosecutors, numbering 20 as of late 2024 after expansion from 17, with selections limited to vetted candidates free of prior integrity violations or ties to disqualified judicial figures under Albania's post-2016 reforms. These prosecutors, supported by administrative sectors including a chancellor and case management units, undergo specialized training to handle emblematic prosecutions, with strategic plans targeting capacity building for at least 100 personnel by 2027. Autonomy features distinguish the SPO from Albania's general prosecution apparatus, including self-managed budgeting derived from dedicated state allocations—separate from the Prosecutorial Council's general funds—to prevent fiscal leverage by the , alongside annual reporting obligations directly to rather than the Prime Minister's office. Legal safeguards prohibit interference in case prioritization or dismissal of prosecutors mid-mandate absent KLP adjudication, fostering resilience against documented attempts at political pressure observed in Albania's pre-reform . This framework, bolstered by international monitoring from bodies like the and OSCE, positions the SPO to sustain prosecutions insulated from the systemic capture prevalent in legacy institutions.

Supporting Investigative and Judicial Bodies

The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI), known in Albanian as Byroja Kombëtare e Hetimit (BKH), operates as SPAK's specialized investigative unit, consisting of vetted personnel dedicated to evidence gathering in high-level corruption and matters. Established under the 2016 framework and fully operational by 2019, the NBI performs tasks such as , witness interviews, and recovery, functioning independently from Albania's standard policing structures to mitigate risks of interference. Its investigators, selected through rigorous vetting processes outlined in SPAK's enabling legislation, numbered around 28 out of 60 approved positions by August 2021, with ongoing recruitment to address capacity gaps. Specialized forensic support within SPAK's framework aids the NBI, including teams equipped for hard drive imaging and analysis, donated and trained via international assistance programs as of 2023. These units ensure evidence admissibility in judicial proceedings, coordinating with prosecutors to trace financial flows in cases involving and economic offenses without encroaching on . By the end of 2024, the NBI was filling 102 vacant roles to sustain investigative momentum amid a rising volume of complex cases. Inter-agency mechanisms facilitate upon NBI-identified leads, with prosecutors issuing provisional orders to preserve seized properties and prevent dissipation, as piloted in probes by 2024. International partnerships, including data-sharing protocols with , extend NBI operations transnationally; a notable example occurred in August 2025, when NBI efforts supported the dismantling of an n-led syndicate, yielding 10 arrests across . These protocols, aligned with unified financial investigation guidelines adopted in November 2024, streamline evidence handover to judicial bodies while upholding chain-of-custody standards.

Independence Mechanisms and Vetting Processes

The establishment of the Special Structure against Corruption and Organized Crime (SPAK) incorporated rigorous processes for its prosecutors and judges, drawing from Albania's judicial reforms to filter out individuals susceptible to political or criminal influence. All candidates underwent a transitional re-evaluation assessing assets, background , and professional proficiency, administered by an independent with operational support from and U.S. experts via programs like EURALIUS and OPDAT. This , monitored internationally through the Operation of the International Monitoring, resulted in approximately 40% of Albania's judges and prosecutors being dismissed nationwide, significantly narrowing the pool for SPAK appointments; by 2020, only about 50% of the required judicial positions for SPAK's courts had been filled with vetted personnel. Mandatory asset declarations form a core component of these mechanisms, requiring SPAK personnel and their close family members to disclose financial holdings, with ongoing verification by the High Inspectorate for the Declaration and Audit of Assets and Conflict of Interest (HIDAACI). Vetting includes lifestyle audits to cross-check declared assets against unexplained wealth or expenditures, supplemented by periodic monitoring of telecommunications and bank accounts to detect undue influences. Oversight of prosecutorial asset compliance falls under the High Council of Prosecution, which ensures adherence to ethical standards, while similar scrutiny applies to judges via the High Judicial Council. These checks have identified discrepancies in judicial candidates, leading to referrals for further investigation. To safeguard operational autonomy, SPAK prosecutors serve fixed nine-year, non-renewable terms, insulating them from electoral pressures and reappointment dependencies that plagued prior bodies often subject to political appointments. Dismissal requires a two-thirds vote by the High Judicial Council for judges or equivalent prosecutorial body, limited to proven misconduct under constitutional provisions like Article 135(4), a stark contrast to the vulnerability of predecessors in Albania's fragmented courts. Additional protections include enhanced for seven magistrates in 2024 amid influence attempts, underscoring SPAK's design to prioritize over institutional capture.

Judicial Components

Special Court of First Instance

The Special Court of First Instance for Corruption and Organized Crime constitutes the primary trial-level judicial authority within Albania's Special Structure against Corruption and Organized Crime (SPAK), tasked with adjudicating indictments issued by the Special Prosecution Office. Enacted through constitutional amendments and Law No. 95/2016 "On the Organization and Functioning of Institutions for Combating Corruption and Organized Crime," the court assumed operational responsibilities following the of judicial personnel and institutional setup in 2019. It possesses nationwide , independent from the general court system, to address systemic vulnerabilities in prosecuting elite-level offenses that prior structures had failed to handle effectively. The court's composition draws from a minimum of 16 judges, all subjected to rigorous vetting under Albania's 2016 judicial reforms to ensure integrity and impartiality against entrenched influences. Trials proceed before specialized three-judge panels, selected from this vetted cadre, which deliberate collegiately to mitigate risks of individual bias or coercion prevalent in standard first-instance courts. This structure contrasts with ordinary courts by prioritizing judges with demonstrated resistance to corruption pressures, as verified through asset declarations, lifestyle audits, and professional evaluations by the and . Jurisdiction encompasses corruption offenses involving public officials exceeding ALL 50,000 (approximately €450) in value, procurement-related corruption surpassing ALL 800,000 (approximately €7,500), activities, , and electoral violations, particularly those implicating high-ranking figures such as the , , or senior judges. Cases below these thresholds or lacking high-profile elements revert to general , enabling the Special Court to concentrate resources on impactful prosecutions. Procedural distinctions include enhanced coordination for and collaborator protection, where the court enforces measures like shielding and relocation requests initiated by the prosecution during trials, alongside streamlined evidentiary rules to counter intimidation tactics documented in Albanian networks. While not mandating fixed expedited timelines, the framework incentivizes efficiency to reduce backlog risks, differing from the protracted durations in non-specialized venues. By 2023, the court had issued decisions in a growing caseload, registering a 53% rise in guilty verdicts for relative to 2022, reflecting operational maturation. This trajectory continued into 2024-2025, with over 90 convictions in cases, handling more than 100 proceedings annually amid SPAK's expanded investigations into elite networks. Such outputs underscore the court's role in disrupting , though challenges persist in securing timely witness cooperation amid Albania's cultural reticence toward testimony against powerful actors.

Special Court of Appeals

The Special Court of Appeal for Corruption and functions as the second-instance judicial body within Albania's Special Structure against Corruption and (SPAK), exclusively handling appeals from rulings of the Special Court of First Instance in matters of high-level corruption and . Enacted through the 2016 constitutional and legal reforms and operational since early 2020 following the and appointment of judges, the court prioritizes review of legal interpretations, procedural compliance, and sentencing proportionality, explicitly prohibiting re-examination of evidentiary facts or trials to promote judicial finality and efficiency. Composed of 11 judges selected via competitive processes emphasizing and expertise, with 10 positions filled by late after mandatory vetting by independent , the adjudicates appeals in collegial panels, focusing on errors in application that could undermine validity or fairness. This insulates proceedings from external , as judges are insulated from political pressures through dedicated funding and security protocols aligned with standards. In practice, the has processed a growing caseload, issuing 24 final decisions in 2024 alone, often affirming first-instance outcomes to reinforce in cases involving senior officials. Empirical data from monitoring indicates the court's affirmation rates for convictions exceed those of 's general appellate system, with assessments noting sustained high uphold rates—approaching 80% in SPAK matters by 2024—attributable to the specialized bench's familiarity with complex typologies and evidentiary standards developed in first-instance proceedings. This pattern supports deterrence by minimizing successful reversals in emblematic cases, though occasional modifications occur for procedural lapses, ensuring causal links between detected misconduct and imposed penalties remain robust without undue leniency.

Operational Methods and Procedures

Case Selection and Prioritization

The Special Structure against Corruption and Organized Crime (SPAK) adopts a top-down approach to case selection, prioritizing investigations into high-level corruption and organized crime involving senior public officials, politicians, judges, and criminal organization leaders, as defined under Article 8 of Law No. 95/2016. This strategy targets offenses with substantial economic damage or elements of structured criminal activity that undermine public institutions and societal trust, excluding minor or low-value infractions to prevent resource dilution and ensure focus on systemic threats. Jurisdictional criteria emphasize cases qualifying under Article 75/a of the Criminal Procedure Code, particularly those affecting heads of central or independent state institutions as per Article 135, paragraph 2 of the Albanian Constitution, with referrals from general prosecution offices assessed for takeover by SPAK. Amendments in March 2021 introduced monetary thresholds to refine scope, requiring passive corruption offenses to involve at least ALL 5,000 (approximately €45) in bribes and active corruption at least ALL 10,000 (approximately €90), thereby aligning jurisdiction with impactful rather than petty crimes while detaching from broader constitutional phrasing. To optimize efficiency, SPAK employs data-driven through risk-based assessments outlined in its 2024-2027 Strategic Plan, evaluating potential societal and economic impacts to sequence high-priority matters ahead of others, ensuring limited prosecutorial and investigative capacities address the most influential networks first. Low-level cases falling outside these parameters—such as routine or non-organized offenses—are explicitly deferred to general prosecution offices under Article 29, paragraph 3 of the law, safeguarding SPAK from overload and maintaining its mandate for elite-level accountability.

Investigative Techniques and Powers

The Special Prosecution Office (SPO) within SPAK, supported by the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI), employs expanded techniques, including and electronic monitoring, to gather evidence on and networks. These measures require prior judicial from the Special Structure for Investigation or the Special Court against Corruption and Organized Crime, ensuring oversight to prevent abuse; for instance, wiretap approvals are issued by prosecutors and reviewed by the Special Court of First Instance. In practice, SPAK has utilized such in high-profile probes, such as monitoring judicial figures for 15 days in early 2025 without initiating formal charges at the outset, highlighting the preliminary nature of these tools for evidence building. Proactive investigative methods, including undercover operations, are integral for infiltrating groups, allowing NBI agents to collect real-time intelligence on illicit activities like and trafficking. SPAK's strategic emphasis on these approaches has led to an increase in proactive investigations, as noted in the European Commission's 2025 assessment, distinguishing them from reactive case responses. Forensic accounting forms a core technique for tracing illicit financial flows, with SPO prosecutors and NBI specialists analyzing complex asset trails, bank records, and corporate structures to uncover and laundering schemes. This expertise has been bolstered through institutional capacity-building, focusing on financial and asset-related probes as outlined in SPAK's 2024-2027 Strategic Plan. International mutual legal assistance is routinely leveraged to extend investigations beyond Albania's borders, facilitating asset recovery and evidence sharing with foreign counterparts; for example, SPAK has formalized cooperation agreements with prosecution offices in countries including the , , and since 2024, enabling joint operations against . Recent advancements incorporate data analytics and AI-driven pattern detection to identify indicators in large datasets, supported by OSCE programs; a five-day in 2025 enhanced SPAK's analytical capacities for in financial crimes, complemented by donated IT equipment for a dedicated . These tools aid in preempting through predictive modeling, though their application remains under judicial scrutiny to align with evidentiary standards.

Prosecution and Trial Processes

The Special Prosecution Office () of SPAK concludes the investigative phase by filing an with the Special Court of First Instance when evidence establishes that a qualifying or offense has occurred and identifies the perpetrators. This threshold, aligned with Albania's Code, demands concrete indications of criminality sufficient to warrant trial, excluding mere suspicion. In practice, SPO prosecutors have submitted dozens of such indictments annually; for instance, in 2020, 53 corruption-related cases involving approximately 100 defendants were forwarded for adjudication. Plea agreements, introduced in Albania's framework to expedite resolutions, permit defendants to admit guilt in exchange for reduced penalties or dropped charges, subject to approval. Within SPAK proceedings, these are permissible for eligible offenses but undergo stringent to verify absence of , particularly given the high stakes and power imbalances in cases involving public officials. Such aims to maintain procedural , as abbreviated trials via pleas have been applied in select high-profile matters, though full evidentiary hearings remain the norm for complex allegations. Trials in the Special Court emphasize adversarial presentation of , with hearings conducted to foster and oversight. access is facilitated for , as evidenced by extensive coverage of SPAK cases, balanced by closures or redactions to protect victim privacy, witness safety, or under Code provisions. Sentencing, upon conviction beyond , follows penalties—typically imprisonment from three to eight years for active or passive —integrated with mandatory and restitution orders to rectify financial harms and deter . Courts have prioritized such recoveries, as seen in seizures from convicted officials including former judges and prosecutors.

Key Cases and Outcomes

Prominent Investigations and Arrests

In 2023, SPAK charged former with , , and misuse of office in connection with the incinerators concession scandal, involving allegations of rigged contracts for facilities. This probe targeted high-level involvement in public procurement irregularities, marking an early focus on executive branch figures. Subsequent waves from 2020 to 2022 involved arrests of multiple mayors and local officials accused of graft in urban development projects, including tender manipulations and undeclared assets linked to construction permits. By 2024, investigations escalated with the October 21 arrest of former President on charges of , passive , and failure to declare assets, stemming from probes into financial dealings during his tenure. In the same year, SPAK issued security measures against 33 former senior officials for offenses, including former ministers and municipal leaders implicated in abuse of office and schemes. These actions contributed to a cumulative total of 629 security measures applied across investigations by the end of 2024. Probes intensified in 2025, with the of Mayor and his wife on suspicions of and tied to municipal contracts and asset concealment. Drug trafficking networks linked to public officials faced heightened scrutiny, as seen in July operations dismantling international rings, yielding s of over a dozen suspects and identification of additional traffickers with ties to Albanian functionaries. August actions further targeted Albanian-led groups in , issuing 16 warrants for distribution involving domestic operatives.

Convictions, Acquittals, and Asset Recoveries

The Special Structure against Corruption and Organized Crime (SPAK) has secured convictions in 88 out of 134 defendants sent to trial, yielding a 66% as of early 2025, primarily in and matters handled by specialized courts. This includes 174 convictions for offenses in 2023 alone, a marked increase from prior years, with final convictions in high-level cases rising compared to 2022. High-profile examples encompass the of former General Prosecutor Adriatik Llalla on multiple counts related to abuse of office and property concealment. Acquittals and non-convictions account for the remaining 34% of outcomes, often stemming from insufficient in intricate financial or networked schemes, which exposes constraints in forensic tracing and witness reliability amid entrenched criminal structures. analyses note the slower resolution of select high-profile prosecutions, where evidentiary shortcomings have led to dismissals, though specific tallies remain limited in public reporting. Asset seizures and confiscations by SPAK totaled €182 million over its first five years through mid-2025, with €65.5 million secured in 2024—a 60% rise from the previous year—encompassing , bank accounts, businesses, and cryptocurrencies derived from illicit activities. Confiscated properties, including those from former senior judges and prosecutors, have been returned to state control under anti-mafia provisions, enabling reallocation for public purposes and curtailing the economic leverage of convicted elites.

Achievements and Measurable Impacts

Corruption Perception Index Improvements

Albania's score on Transparency International's (CPI) rose from 36 in 2018 to 42 in 2024, reflecting a perception of reduced public-sector and improving its global ranking from 99th to 80th out of 180 countries. This five-point score increase from 2023 to 2024 marked Albania's largest annual gain in over a decade, amid broader regional stagnation or decline in the index. The CPI aggregates expert assessments and business surveys on bribery, diversion of public funds, and enforcement efficacy, with higher scores indicating lower perceived . The timing of this progress aligns with the 2019 launch of the Special Structure against Corruption and (SPAK), which has secured convictions against former ministers, members, and mayors for graft-related offenses. attributes part of the score uplift to SPAK's role in building public confidence through targeted prosecutions of elite figures, previously shielded from accountability, thereby signaling stronger deterrence against impunity. SPAK's 2024 annual report highlights over 50 high-level cases concluded since inception, correlating with the index gains as perceptions shifted due to visible enforcement outcomes. While direct causation remains inferred from temporal and expert analysis rather than isolated econometric modeling, the CPI methodology emphasizes sustained and sanctioning as key drivers of perceptual shifts, areas where SPAK's operations have demonstrably advanced Albania's standing relative to pre-2019 baselines. Independent assessments, including those from anti-corruption monitors, reinforce that such institutional reforms have incrementally lowered tolerance for systemic in , though challenges persist in petty domains.

Public Trust Metrics and Societal Effects

Public opinion polls in 2025 indicate that 76% of trust SPAK, the highest approval rating among all state institutions in the country. This figure reflects growing confidence in SPAK's and , particularly following its investigations into high-level involving politicians, judges, and business figures since its in 2019. Earlier surveys, such as those from early 2025, showed lower but rising trust levels around 52%, with subsequent increases tied to prominent arrests and convictions. The elevated public trust in SPAK has manifested in societal effects beyond direct measures, including a perceived deterrent influence on elite behavior. High-profile takedowns have prompted greater self-compliance among officials and business leaders, evidenced by increased voluntary disclosures and cooperation in ongoing probes, as SPAK's strategic focus on influential networks has raised accountability expectations. This shift contributes to broader perceptions of fairness in , potentially diminishing long-term emigration drivers rooted in institutional distrust, though continues to experience net outflows exceeding 50,000 citizens annually. SPAK's credibility has also spilled over into the , correlating with heightened amid improved rule-of-law signals. Inflows reached €398 million in the second quarter of 2025 alone, supporting economic stability through sectors like and , where reduced risks enhance investor confidence. These developments underscore SPAK's role in fostering a more predictable , distinct from overall economic policies.

Contributions to EU Accession Efforts

The Specialised Structure against Corruption and Organised Crime (SPAK) has played a pivotal role in advancing Albania's fulfillment of rule-of-law benchmarks, particularly those concerning the fight against high-level as a prerequisite for accession negotiations. Established in 2019 as part of broader judicial reforms, SPAK's operational independence and early investigative outcomes were cited in the Commission's assessments leading to the formal opening of accession talks in July 2022, which required demonstrable progress on mechanisms aligned with the political criteria. The Commission's 2022 report specifically acknowledged SPAK's initial handling of complex cases involving senior officials, marking a shift toward credible enforcement that bolstered 's case for negotiation clusters on fundamentals, including and . By 2024, SPAK's contributions extended to meeting targeted milestones, with the Commission's Enlargement Report highlighting enhancements in financial investigation capacities and the systematic application of asset seizures in probes, such as those linked to the incinerator scandal. These developments aligned with EU demands under the for stable institutions guaranteeing the , enabling to satisfy over half of the reforms tied to the EU's Western Balkans Growth Plan and unlocking €100 million in disbursements by October 2025. The 2025 Report further affirmed SPAK's consolidation of results against high-level graft, crediting it with establishing a track record essential for progressing negotiation chapters on and internal affairs. Despite these advancements, evaluations underscore challenges in maintaining momentum, including vulnerabilities to political interference that could precipitate rule-of-law reversals if SPAK's autonomy erodes. The Commission's reports emphasize that sustained gains depend on uninterrupted and resistance to pressures, as incomplete of strategies risks stalling further benchmark fulfillment and funding releases. SPAK's ongoing alignment with recommendations, as self-reported in its 2024 annual review, remains critical to mitigating these risks and supporting 's trajectory toward potential membership by 2030.

Criticisms and Challenges

Allegations of Political Selectivity

Opposition figures, particularly from the , have accused SPAK of selective targeting, claiming the agency disproportionately investigates and indicts non-ruling party affiliates while shielding loyalists. For instance, former , leader of the , was indicted on charges related to a property deal during his 2005-2013 tenure, with critics alleging the probe serves to neutralize political rivals ahead of elections. Similarly, former President faced arrest in October 2024 on allegations, prompting claims from opposition lawmakers that SPAK operates under influence to sideline adversaries. These assertions are countered by evidence of SPAK's investigations into high-profile members, demonstrating cross-party scrutiny. In July 2025, SPAK indicted former Socialist MP Jurgis Cyrbja for sharing police intelligence with figures in exchange for electoral support, marking a rare probe into ruling coalition ties. Mayor , a prominent Socialist, was indicted in a case involving urban development contracts, alongside MP Klotilda Bushka for alleged interference. Former faced charges in 2023 for and linked to waste incineration concessions, with assets seized. SPAK's 2024 highlights ongoing prosecutions against criminal organizations with political connections, including those aiding campaigns, underscoring efforts to address favoritism claims through empirical case progression rather than exemption. Quantitative analysis of indictments reveals no systemic disparity favoring the , as SPAK has pursued over a dozen high-level cases spanning both major parties since 2020, with conviction rates holding steady across affiliations—approximately 65% for corruption offenses in 2023-2024—based on prosecutorial closure data. SPAK Chief Altin Dumani has publicly rejected politicization charges, emphasizing that investigations follow evidence from independent referrals, including from partners, and noting resistance from entrenched interests on all sides. While opposition-aligned sources amplify selectivity narratives, international observers like attribute SPAK's actions to institutional , citing the agency's indictments of "bigwigs" irrespective of alignment as evidence against bias.

Concerns Over Judicial Overreach and Rights Violations

Critics have highlighted extended pre-trial detentions in SPAK cases as a potential infringement on personal liberty, with durations often spanning several months and contributing to pretrial detainees accounting for percent of Albania's prison population as of November 2022. The Office expressed concern in April 2024 over the high volume of such detainees, recommending immediate measures to alleviate and protect rights during investigations. Albanian law caps at three years but permits extensions in intricate and probes to avert flight risks or evidence interference, though delays in investigations have prolonged holds in practice. The has adjudicated specific SPAK-related detentions, finding violations of Article 5 of the in cases like that of Thoma Gëllçi, where the court deemed the detention unjustified and exposing flaws in Albanian practices as of February 2025. Similar critiques emerged in other instances, including an eight-month hold ruled non-compliant with Convention standards. Domestic courts have frequently upheld these measures, citing the complexity of high-level cases involving asset tracing and international elements. Concerns over witness handling include allegations of coercion risks in aggressive probes, though Albania's witness protection program—conducting 24 operations in 2021—aims to shield testimonies from retaliation in contexts. SPAK's low rates, with convictions reaching 87.1 percent in 2023 assessments, indicate procedural robustness in many instances, as few detentions are overturned post-trial. These tactics reflect a deliberate pivot from prior leniency, under which corruption probes often dissolved due to suspect interference or , enabling escapes from in systemic graft networks. While overreach risks persist in balancing urgency against rights, the necessity arises from evidence that milder approaches historically permitted tampering and flight in entrenched .

Resource Constraints and Internal Issues

SPAK operates under persistent budget limitations that restrict its capacity to expand operations and address escalating demands. In its 2024-2027 Strategic Plan, the agency highlights the need for enhanced budgetary funding to strengthen investigative and prosecutorial capabilities, noting that current allocations hinder scaling efforts amid complex caseloads. In July 2025, SPAK formally requested an additional 2.5 million euros from the state budget, primarily for personnel costs including the of more magistrates and investigators, as well as sustaining case systems. These constraints have limited the agency's growth, despite approvals for medium-term funding requests justified by operational necessities. Human resource shortages compound these fiscal hurdles, with the Strategic Plan identifying personnel deficits and high turnover as direct impediments to continuity and efficiency. Threats to SPAK , including physical attacks and verbal targeting prosecutors, judges, and their families, have elevated risks and contributed to staff attrition. In response, the agency allocated 649 million in November 2024 for a comprehensive "defense umbrella" to bolster protections, underscoring how such perils disrupt operational stability without fully mitigating turnover impacts. Case backlogs represent a core operational bottleneck exacerbated by resource scarcity. The Strategic Plan describes the accumulation of deferred cases as a major challenge driven by overwhelming workloads and insufficient staffing, with targets set to alleviate delays by 2027 through capacity enhancements. Limited human resources have resulted in protracted investigations and prosecutions, as high caseloads—starting from 588 proceedings and 746 investigated persons in 2020—continue to strain the system without proportional personnel growth. Internal integrity mechanisms, including scheduled audits and robust protocols outlined in the Strategic Plan, aim to preempt and resolve any graft risks within the agency. These measures focus on to safeguard , though public reports emphasize proactive prevention over disclosed incidents of internal .

International Context and Support

Models from Croatia and Romania

The Special Structure against Corruption and Organized Crime (SPAK) in Albania was explicitly modeled on Croatia's Office for the Suppression of Corruption and Organized Crime (USKOK) and Romania's National Anticorruption Directorate (DNA), incorporating elements of their operational frameworks while adapting to Albania's post-communist judicial challenges and EU accession requirements. Established in 2019 as part of broader judicial reforms, SPAK adopted DNA's top-down prosecutorial strategy, which emphasized aggressive investigations into high-level corruption, leading to comparable boosts in conviction rates for senior officials—SPAK secured over 50 convictions of former ministers, deputies, and judges by 2024, mirroring DNA's earlier successes in targeting political elites during its peak from 2013 to 2017. Unlike USKOK, which relies on integrated but less rigorous internal vetting within Croatia's state attorney's office, SPAK benefits from Albania's independent vetting mechanism for prosecutors and judges, implemented via the High Judicial Council and external evaluators since 2017, ensuring higher scrutiny of personnel integrity and reducing risks of internal capture—USKOK has faced persistent criticisms for uneven application in politically sensitive cases despite its effectiveness in asset seizures. SPAK's hybrid approach, blending DNA's prosecutorial autonomy with USKOK's focus on organized crime linkages, has enabled faster case processing; assessments indicate SPAK resolves investigations and trials in 12-24 months on average for priority cases, outperforming DNA's later slowdowns and USKOK's procedural delays in complex networks. A key lesson integrated into SPAK's design stems from DNA's post-2018 erosion, when political interference by the government led to the dismissal of chief in July 2018, followed by legislative changes diluting investigative powers and a drop in high-profile indictments—DNA's fell from over 70% pre-2018 to below 50% by 2020 amid scandals and exodus. countered this by embedding constitutional safeguards, such as fixed five-year terms for SPAK leadership non-renewable by parliament and direct reporting to the , preserving amid domestic political pressures. This adaptation has sustained SPAK's operational momentum, as evidenced by sustained levels above 70% in 2024 surveys, contrasting with declining confidence in DNA post-politicization.

EU, OSCE, and U.S. Involvement

The has provided substantial financial and technical assistance to Albania's justice reform efforts, including the establishment and operations of the Special Structure against Corruption and Organized Crime (SPAK), as part of broader conditionality linked to EU accession progress. Since 2016, the EU has allocated approximately €79 million specifically for justice reform implementation, encompassing training programs, infrastructure development, and processes for judicial personnel, with disbursements tied to verifiable in areas such as high-level prosecutions and . This support, channeled through instruments like the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA), emphasizes performance benchmarks, including SPAK's role in addressing systemic , though EU monitoring has highlighted persistent challenges in enforcement despite incremental advancements. The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) has focused on capacity-building initiatives for SPAK, particularly in specialized areas like . In April 2025, the OSCE Presence in donated IT equipment and facilitated expert training to enhance SPAK's newly formed on electoral crimes, aimed at preventing and investigating vote-buying, illicit financing, and influences in elections. These programs build on ongoing OSCE efforts to strengthen prosecutorial skills in handling complex cases involving political-criminal nexus, with activities coordinated to align with 's electoral calendar, such as preparations for the May 2025 parliamentary elections. The , through the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL), has offered targeted support for SPAK's investigative capabilities since its inception in 2019. INL assistance included and expertise for SPAK's creation, training for the National Bureau of Investigation in advanced techniques like , and donations of equipment such as workstations for analysis. In January 2025, a group of Albanian investigators from SPAK and related bodies completed a U.S.-facilitated study tour focused on probes. However, U.S. faced temporary suspensions in early 2025 amid concerns over institutional independence, prompting SPAK to reaffirm its reliance on domestic resources while maintaining operational continuity. Joint monitoring by these entities has affirmed SPAK's tangible outputs, such as increased case referrals and asset seizures, while critiquing gaps in broader systemic impact and over-dependence on external aid. The European Commission's 2024 Report noted SPAK's progress in high-profile prosecutions as a key positive development, contributing to Albania's five-point improvement in the , yet urged sustained reforms to mitigate risks of political interference. OSCE and U.S. assessments similarly praise specialized task forces but stress the need for enduring domestic ownership to avoid aid-driven distortions in enforcement priorities.

Comparative Effectiveness Assessments

SPAK's asset recovery performance, measured by seized and confiscated values per investigated case, has exceeded that of Romania's National Anticorruption Directorate (DNA) from 2020 to 2024, with SPAK achieving approximately 65.5 million euros in such recoveries in 2024 alone amid a focused caseload of high-profile corruption probes. In contrast, Romania's DNA, operating in a larger economy with higher case volumes, reported lower per-case yields despite substantial aggregate confiscations, reflecting SPAK's emphasis on rapid asset freezes in judicial and political scandals. Assessments of disruption indicate SPAK trails Croatia's Office for the Suppression of Corruption and (USKOK), which has secured conviction rates exceeding 90% in corruption-linked network cases and dismantled extensive transnational operations through sustained prosecutions. USKOK's broader jurisdictional scope and integration with specialized courts have enabled greater systemic disruption, including in cross-border trafficking, compared to SPAK's more nascent efforts, which prioritized domestic elite over expansive crime group takedowns in the same period. Independent evaluations, such as those from the U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, assign SPAK higher marks for long-term sustainability owing to its constitutional entrenchment, which shields it from executive interference more effectively than Romania's DNA, where political reshuffles have periodically undermined prosecutorial independence. This structural resilience supports SPAK's operational continuity, though comparators emphasize that Albania's smaller population and economy inflate per-capita metrics, potentially overstating impact relative to peers handling proportionally larger threats. Such caveats underscore the need for scaled adjustments in cross-national benchmarks.

Strategic Outlook

2024-2027 Strategic Plan Priorities

The 2024-2027 Strategic Plan for the Special Structure against Corruption and Organized Crime (SPAK), approved by leadership order No. 818 on September 3, 2024, prioritizes intensified investigations into high-level , , , electoral crimes, and . This forward-looking framework emphasizes proactive expansions in probing financial flows linked to illicit activities, including schemes tied to criminal networks, and -related offenses to disrupt underlying support structures. Electoral integrity receives dedicated focus through strategies to prevent and investigate vote manipulation, asset misuse in campaigns, and related corrupt practices, aligning with preparations for national elections. Capacity building targets include upgrading technological infrastructure by integrating advanced investigative software and tools to enhance evidence collection, , and cybersecurity, thereby addressing operational bottlenecks in complex cases. The plan anticipates scaling human resources and training programs to handle expanded probes, with an emphasis on specialized skills for financial forensics and cross-border cooperation. These measures aim to double investigative throughput without compromising procedural integrity. Performance metrics center on efficiency benchmarks, such as accelerating case progression from initiation to , to foster deterrence and public trust, though specific resolution rates remain tied to evolving risk assessments rather than fixed quotas. Overall, the strategy positions SPAK to adapt to emerging threats like hybrid financial crimes while supporting Albania's judicial reforms.

Electoral Crime and Emerging Threats

In anticipation of the May 11, 2025, parliamentary elections, SPAK implemented a dedicated strategy to investigate and prevent electoral crimes, including vote-buying, of voters, and misuse of public funds for campaigning. This involved forming specialized task forces in coordination with the Central Election Commission and the Prosecutor General's Office to monitor high-risk areas and disqualify candidates linked to corruption. Building on prior efforts, such as investigations during the elections that exposed organized crime's influence on candidate selection and led to enhanced scrutiny by observers, these measures aimed to disrupt patterns of clan-mediated coercion and financial inducements at polling stations. SPAK has increasingly addressed emerging threats from cyber-enabled , targeting networks exploiting encrypted platforms like SKY ECC for coordinating and investment fraud schemes originating in . These operations revealed connections to broader , including and boiler-room scams defrauding European victims of millions, often intertwined with political influence peddling. Complementing this, efforts against clan-based have focused on dismantling family-led groups, such as the Copja in drug trafficking and contract killings, and the Pashja brothers' importing from , which extend influence into electoral processes through local intimidation. Preventive initiatives, including expanded hotlines and online platforms, have bolstered proactive responses, with SPAK reporting substantial increases in investigated cases—up to 80% in some categories—stemming from citizen tips during 2024. These mechanisms prioritize and rapid verification to counter emerging hybrid threats, such as digital campaigns amplifying clan pressures during election cycles, ensuring sustained pressure on in high-stakes political contests.

Long-Term Sustainability Questions

The long-term viability of SPAK faces risks of erosion following potential accession, a pattern observed in prior Eastern European enlargements where initial momentum waned. In countries like and , indicators stagnated or regressed post-accession, with perception scores declining after 2004 due to reduced external pressure and domestic political incentives shifting toward short-term gains over sustained enforcement. Albania's trajectory could mirror this if accession, anticipated by 2030, leads to complacency, as monitoring diminishes and national elites prioritize over institutional safeguards, potentially allowing informal networks to undermine SPAK's . Public tolerance for petty corruption persists, complicating institutional efforts and signaling the need for broader societal transformation. Surveys and reports from 2025 indicate that while high-profile prosecutions garner support, low-level graft—such as bribery in public services—remains normalized, with noting it as a "major problem" amid uneven enforcement and cultural acceptance rooted in post-communist legacies. The European Commission's 2025 Rule of Law Report highlights implementation gaps in awareness campaigns, underscoring that without addressing these attitudes, SPAK's deterrence may falter against entrenched practices. To mitigate capture by future governments, experts recommend embedding legislative firewalls, including constitutional protections for SPAK's budget and prosecutorial autonomy, insulated from parliamentary overrides. The has urged to avoid measures like amnesties that could dilute , drawing from and Croatian models where specialized bodies endured via statutory and veto-proof funding mechanisms. advocates for multi-stakeholder oversight boards with input to enforce these, preventing politicization observed in cases elsewhere in the region. Such reforms would require cross-party consensus to outlast electoral cycles, ensuring SPAK's operational continuity amid 's volatile politics.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] LAW No. 95/2016, dated 6.10.20161 ON THE ORGANIZATION AND ...
    The Special Anti-Corruption and Organized Crime Structure may be abbreviated as “SPAK.” 8. "Criminal offences which is important to and closely related to ...
  2. [2]
    Special Structure against Corruption and Organized Crime - Wikipedia
    Special Structure against Corruption and Organized Crime ... corruption and organized crime at the highest levels of government and society in Albania.
  3. [3]
    EPPO signs working arrangement with Special Anti-Corruption and ...
    Jun 29, 2023 · The EPPO and SPAK have agreed to facilitate judicial cooperation in criminal matters and exchange information between both parties in corruption ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Albania's Special Courts against Corruption and Organised Crime
    1. The Croatian Office for the Suppression of Organised Crime and Corruption (USKOK) and the Romanian. National Anticorruption Directorate (DNA) served as ...
  5. [5]
    Albania's new anti-corruption unit is taking down bigwigs
    Aug 7, 2025 · The Special Structure against Corruption and Organised Crime (SPAK) began work in 2019. Opinion polls show 76% of Albanians trust it, making ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] table of contents - SPAK
    The 16th meeting of the EU-Albania Subcommittee on Justice, Freedom and Security 7, held on 11 and 12 February 2025, underlined the role of SPAK in Albania's ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Albania's Special Courts against Corruption and Organised Crime
    The Special Courts against Corruption were established following a comprehensive reform of the Albanian Constitution in 2016. The most unusual feature of ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] A Disastrously Successful Judicial Reform - New Lines Institute
    May 12, 2025 · But then SPAK failed at what matters most: facing real power and investigating those in the highest ofÏces. In recent years, Albania has been ...
  9. [9]
    SPAK in Albania - Bold Reforms or Political Spectacle?
    Nov 4, 2024 · Created under European Union pressure, SPAK was designed to bring high-level officials and powerful crime networks to justice. This task ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  10. [10]
    [PDF] The journey of SPAK - Research Article
    Jan 1, 2025 · Corruption and organized crime have been two major challenges in Albania, which have slowed down the socio-economic development and the ...
  11. [11]
    The Rise and Fall of the Pyramid Schemes in Albania in - IMF eLibrary
    Jan 1, 2000 · Albania now seems to have put the pyramid scheme crisis largely behind itself. Other problems—political conflict in Albania, corruption in ...
  12. [12]
    269. Organized Crime in the Balkans | Wilson Center
    With the fall of the Communist regimes in 1989, and with it, the fall of ... trafficking in women, contraband, and even counterfeiting and money laundering.<|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Albania country risk report | GAN Integrity
    The necessary anti-corruption legal framework is in place, but enforcement is poor and conviction rates are very low. Active and passive bribery, as well as the ...
  14. [14]
    Albania - Transparency.org
    Since 2016, when Albania was ranked 83rd in Transparency International's Corruption ... judiciary is considered as one of the areas with high level of corruption.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] REPORT by Nils Muižnieks Commissioner for Human Rights of the ...
    Jan 16, 2014 · In its 2013 progress report on Albania, the European Commission (EC) noted that corruption in the judiciary remains a particularly serious ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] P8_TA(2015)0181 - 2014 Progress Report on Albania - EUR-Lex
    Sep 21, 2016 · ... progress in the independence of the judiciary and the fight against corruption and organised crime is essential for the EU integration.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Albania - state.gov
    In July 2016, Albania's parliament unanimously passed 58 new or amended articles to the constitution to improve the courts and prosecution, address corruption, ...
  18. [18]
    Albania's Special Courts against Corruption and Organised Crime
    Jan 20, 2022 · The Special Courts against Corruption were established following a comprehensive reform of the Albanian Constitution in 2016.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] albania - Venice Commission of the Council of Europe
    Nov 26, 2021 · Final Opinion on the revised draft constitutional amendments on the Judiciary (15 January 2016) of Albania, adopted by the Venice Commission ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    [PDF] LAW - SPAK
    1.To define the rules for the organization and functioning of the Special Prosecution. Office against Corruption and Organized Crime and the Independent ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Judicial Reform in Albania In 2016, Albania adopted a set of legal ...
    A central focus of these reforms was a new vetting process, which would enable the Albanian government to review the qualifications and honesty of sitting ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] strategic plan 2024-2027 - SPAK
    The Plan is centered on strengthening the fight against corruption, organized crime, money laundering, electoral crimes, and terrorism, with a focus on ...
  23. [23]
    Albania's first anti-corruption prosecutors to be appointed Monday
    Euronews Albania sources from the Council, confirmed that Altin Dumani, Edvin Kondili, and Arben Kraja are among the Judges interested for the position. The Law ...
  24. [24]
    KLP Confirms: SPAK Prosecutors to be Nominated before End of ...
    The KLP will promote Altin Dumani, Arben Kraja, Klodian Braho, Enkeleda Millonaj, Edvin Kondili, Ened Nakuçi, Elida Kaçkini, and Behar Dibra as the first ...
  25. [25]
    Arben Kraja Elected Chair of Special Anti-Corruption Prosecution
    Arben Kraja received 6 of the 11 votes of KLP members; Altin Dumani 4, and Edvin Kondili 1. Prosecutor Kraja will have a three-year term as Chair of SPAK, ...Missing: first chief
  26. [26]
    As part of Albania's judicial reform process, a special institution ...
    The Special Anti-Corruption and Organized Crime Structure, which investigates high-level cases of corruption and organized crime, was created as part of the ...<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Key findings of the 2019 Report on Albania - European Union
    May 28, 2019 · The establishment of the High Prosecutorial Council (HPC) allowed the launch of the establishment of specialised anti-corruption bodies (Special ...
  28. [28]
    Prokuroria e Posaçme - spak.gov.al
    Prokuroria e Posaçme ushtron ndjekjen penale dhe përfaqëson akuzën në emër të shtetit para Gjykatave të posaçme, merr masa dhe mbikëqyr ekzekutimin e vendimeve ...Missing: Albania prosecutors<|separator|>
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
    [PDF] The Journey of Albania's Justice Reform: Progress Amidst Ongoing ...
    The same year, the Corruption Perceptions Index ranked Albania as one of the most corrupt countries in Europe. Areas of particular concern were party financing, ...
  32. [32]
    Albania's National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) – Three Lessons for ...
    May 2, 2018 · The NBI is a part of the Special Anti-Corruption Structure (SPAK) together with the Special Prosecutor Office responsible to investigate and ...Missing: integration | Show results with:integration
  33. [33]
    Albania: ICITAP-Facilitated Donation of Digital Forensic ...
    Dec 27, 2023 · This assessment will focus on the SPAK digital forensic team, who provide services to the NBI and SPO to include imaging hard drives, cell ...
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Albania 2024 Report - Enlargement and Eastern Neighbourhood
    Oct 30, 2024 · SPAK, comprising the Special Prosecution Office (SPO), the National Bureau of Investigation. (NBI) and the anti-corruption and organised ...
  36. [36]
    Internationally active Albanian organised crime network busted
    Aug 12, 2025 · Albania: Special Prosecution Office for Anticorruption and Organised Crime (SPAK); National Bureau of Investigation (Byroja Kombëtare e Hetimit); ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] 2025 Rule of Law Report - European Commission
    Jul 8, 2025 · The Code of Criminal Procedure lacks provisions granting competence to Special. Courts for Anti-Corruption and Organised Crime over matters ...
  38. [38]
    Commentary: Albania -how one of the most corrupt countries in ...
    Sep 19, 2023 · Albania ranks as one of the most corrupt states in Europe in the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index, and is also one of the ...Missing: 2000s | Show results with:2000s
  39. [39]
    None
    ### Summary of SPAK's Independence, Vetting Processes, Judicial Reforms, Asset Checks, International Monitoring, and Protections for Personnel in Albania (2025 Rule of Law Report)
  40. [40]
  41. [41]
  42. [42]
    SPAK placed Constitutional Court judge under surveillance without ...
    Mar 6, 2025 · The Special Anti-Corruption Structure (SPAK) authorized the surveillance of Constitutional Court judge Genti Ibrahimi for 15 days, starting from February 10, ...
  43. [43]
    “Increased investigations and proactive methods”/ EC report on ...
    Jul 8, 2025 · The report emphasizes that SPAK has increased the number of investigations and is using proactive methods.Missing: techniques | Show results with:techniques
  44. [44]
    SPAK Engagement with Brazilian Counterparts Yield Stronger Ties ...
    Nov 5, 2024 · SPAK Engagement with Brazilian Counterparts Yield Stronger Ties, Greater Exchange of Information in Fight Against Organized Crime. Tirana, ...Missing: integration National
  45. [45]
    Albania and Spain strengthen their fight against organized crime
    Apr 22, 2024 · The prosecutors' offices of both States have committed to establishing a closer and more effective partnership between the two institutions.Missing: forensic accounting
  46. [46]
    OSCE Presence organizes advanced risk assessment training for ...
    Apr 14, 2025 · From 7 to 11 April 2025, the OSCE Presence in Albania held an intensive training programme focused on strengthening the analytical ...
  47. [47]
    OSCE Presence supports SPAK Task Force to prevent and ...
    Apr 9, 2025 · The mobile units will cover all 12 regions of Albania and will be composed of SPAK prosecutors, National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) ...Missing: integration | Show results with:integration
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Criminal-Procedure-Code-Albania.pdf
    ... Criminal Code, the prosecution may start only by indictment brought by the injured, who may withdraw the same at any stage of the proceedings. 2. The ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] the western balkans trial monitoring report - OSCE
    Mar 21, 2024 · This report is an important step in a sustained effort by the. OSCE, together with international and local partners, to support the independence ...
  50. [50]
    Anti-Bribery and Corruption Laws in Albania| CMS Expert Guide
    Jan 25, 2024 · Active corruption: imprisonment for up to three or five years; Passive corruption: imprisonment for up to four or eight years. Defences. Are ...
  51. [51]
    Arben Ahmetaj Case: Deputy PM involved in… - Transparency.org
    In 2023, Arben Ahmetaj, former deputy prime minister of Albania, was charged by the special prosecution office (SPAK) with corruption, money laundering and ...
  52. [52]
    SPAK continues with the arrest of officials for corruption in Albania
    SPAK's strikes against corruption and abuse of office began on July 6, when Tushe and 10 employees of this municipality were arrested, followed by the arrest on ...
  53. [53]
    SPAK/Dumani annual report: Seizures reached 65.5 million euros, a ...
    Oct 14, 2025 · Dumani said that during 2024, the number of prosecutors increased from 17 to 20, the number of cases under investigation increased by 8% and the ...
  54. [54]
    SPAK balance for 2024: 629 security measures for 2024, 5.1% for ...
    Feb 24, 2025 · SPAK balance for 2024: 629 security measures for 2024, 5.1% for corruption offences! From Edel Strazimiri.
  55. [55]
    Influential Tirana mayor arrested on suspicion of corruption and ...
    Feb 12, 2025 · Albania's Special Court Against Corruption and Organised Crime (SPAK) has ordered the arrest of Erion Veliaj, the influential mayor of ...Missing: urban | Show results with:urban
  56. [56]
    SPAK strikes international drug network/ Over 6 tons of drugs worth ...
    Jul 26, 2025 · Following the investigations, during July 2025, 6 (six) other persons were identified and included in the proceedings: AH, KH, EN, EA, PD and I.
  57. [57]
    SPAK strikes Albanian cocaine network in Europe, 16 arrest warrants
    Aug 8, 2025 · SPAK strikes Albanian cocaine network in Europe, 16 arrest warrants · The investigations, launched on the basis of encrypted communications data ...
  58. [58]
    Performance of Special Institutions and the Consolidation of the ...
    Feb 11, 2025 · Challenges in identifying corrupt assets abroad: High-level corruption often involves transferring and concealing assets outside Albania, making ...
  59. [59]
    progress and challenges in combating corruption and organized crime
    Sep 25, 2024 · Convictions of high-level officials increased by 8.5% in 2023, compared to just 0.5% in 2021. The Special Court of First Instance concluded 75% ...
  60. [60]
    EC Reports on Western Balkans: Fighting corruption remains one of ...
    Oct 31, 2024 · ... convicted by SPAK courts ... The number of final convictions in high-level corruption cases in 2023 increased compared to previous years.
  61. [61]
    Albanian Prosecutor Reveals Money Laundering Networks and ...
    Mar 26, 2025 · SPAK is a specialised institution within the Albanian judiciary system responsible for investigating and prosecuting cases of corruption, ...Missing: forensic accounting<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Mandija: effective organisation and operation of SPAK in Albania ...
    Sep 22, 2022 · Asset recovery legislation in Albania is regulated by the special anti-mafia law as well as the Criminal Code and the Code of Criminal ...
  63. [63]
    Albania Corruption Index - Trading Economics
    Albania scored 42 points out of 100 on the 2024 Corruption Perceptions Index reported by Transparency International. Corruption Index in Albania averaged 32.25 ...
  64. [64]
    Albania Corruption Rank - Trading Economics
    Corruption Rank in Albania averaged 98.67 from 1999 until 2024, reaching an all time high of 126.00 in 2005 and a record low of 80.00 in 2024.
  65. [65]
    Corruption Perceptions Index 2024 - Transparency.org
    The Corruption Perceptions Index 2024 ranks 180 countries by their perceived levels of public sector corruption. Find out the scores and read our analysis.CPI 2024 for the Americas · CPI 2024: Highlights and... · CPI 2024 for Asia Pacific
  66. [66]
    CPI 2024 for Eastern Europe & Central Asia:… - Transparency.org
    Feb 11, 2025 · In Albania, specialised anti-corruption prosecution and courts (SPAK) have earned citizens' trust after convicting former ministers, members of ...
  67. [67]
    2024 Corruption Perceptions Index:… - Transparency.org
    Feb 11, 2025 · In Albania (42), specialised anti-corruption prosecution and courts (SPAK) have convicted former ministers, members of Parliament and mayors, a ...
  68. [68]
    Trust in SPAK Increases, 52.1% of Citizens Have Confidence in the ...
    Mar 5, 2025 · Barometer – Euronews Albania has conducted its second electoral survey, following the January 2025 measurement. The same methodology and ...
  69. [69]
    Albania's Vanishing Electorate: Emigration, Not a Boycott, Powered ...
    May 11, 2025 · Estimates suggest that Albania is now losing more than 50,000 citizens per year, a dramatic acceleration of outflows that began in the early ...
  70. [70]
    Foreign Investment in Albania Reaches €398 Million in Q2 2025
    According to data published by the Bank of Albania, inflows of foreign direct investment (FDI) reached €398 million in the second quarter of 2025.
  71. [71]
    [PDF] 2025 Albania Investment Climate Statement - State Department
    At the end of 2024, the United. States' stock FDI in Albania, according to the Bank of Albania, reached $382 million, up from $300 million at the end of 2023 ( ...<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Albania 2022 Report - European Union
    Oct 12, 2022 · Special Appeal Court against Organised Crime and Corruption, sentenced the former Director. General to two years in prison. He was also ...
  73. [73]
  74. [74]
    Opposition Leaders' Arrests May Signal Demise of Albania's Old ...
    Oct 25, 2024 · The chairman of the main opposition Democratic Party was indicted for corruption by the Special Anti-Corruption Structure, SPAK, on October 16.
  75. [75]
    Former Albanian PM Indicted for Corruption | OCCRP
    Sep 14, 2024 · Albanian prosecutors indicted former prime minister and leader of the opposition Sali Berisha for corruption regarding a property deal.
  76. [76]
    Albania's former president arrested on corruption allegations
    Oct 21, 2024 · Last month, the leader of the Democratic Party, Sali Berisha, was indicted on corruption charges for actions he took as prime minister. Berisha ...
  77. [77]
    Albanian Prosecution Accuses Former Ruling Party MP of ...
    Jul 15, 2025 · Special prosecutors conclude investigation into Jurgis Cyrbja, accusing the former Socialist MP of sharing state information with organised ...
  78. [78]
    Tirana Mayor Indicted in Corruption Probe
    Among those indicted is Socialist Party MP Klotilda Bushka, head of the parliamentary legal affairs committee, who is accused of interfering ...
  79. [79]
    Albania's Latest Scandal Puts Rama's Legacy on the Line - Bloomberg
    Mar 1, 2025 · SPAK chief Altin Dumani rejected claims of political motivation, saying those acting in accord with the constitution “have nothing to fear.” ...Missing: selectivity | Show results with:selectivity
  80. [80]
    2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Albania
    The GDP reported that as of November, pretrial detainees accounted for 52 percent of the total prison population. e. Denial of Fair Public Trial. Although the ...
  81. [81]
    Albania: High number of pre-trial detainees, access to healthcare ...
    Apr 23, 2024 · “The high number of pre-trial detainees is concerning. Steps must be taken without delay to reduce the prison population in Albania, as a means ...
  82. [82]
    2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Albania
    The country endorsed the Terezin Declaration in 2009 and the Guidelines and Best Practices in 2010. It does not have any restitution or compensation laws ...
  83. [83]
    Strasbourg ruling throws cold water on SPAK's pre-trial detention ...
    Feb 25, 2025 · The Strasbourg-based court found that Albania had violated the European Convention on Human Rights in its detention of Thoma Gëllçi.
  84. [84]
    Erion Veliaj June 24, 2025 - Kasowitz
    Jun 24, 2025 · Finally, during pre-trial detention hearings, the court repeatedly maintained that, in denying the offences, Mr Veliaj has “failed to show ...
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Albania: Actors of Protection - Ecoi.net
    Dec 2, 2022 · witness protection programme had worked satisfactorily, with 24 witness protection operations performed in 2021, compared to 19 in 202047.
  86. [86]
    [PDF] Measuring Effectiveness, Monitoring Progress and Enhancing ...
    Organised crime cases. ▫ Geographical area of operation. In 2023, the Special Court of First Instance for Corruption and Organized Crime in Albania issued ...
  87. [87]
    Albania: The State Of Corruption - Democratic Erosion Consortium
    Nov 22, 2020 · The state of Albania has struggled with corruption for a majority of its modern history. The corruption in Albania has gotten to the point ...
  88. [88]
    SPAK requests an additional 2.5 million euros from the state budget
    Jul 29, 2025 · The request for additional funds in the personnel expenses item in the amount of 221.5 million lek is needed for the staff of magistrates, ...
  89. [89]
    Albania: Nations in Transit 2024 Country Report | Freedom House
    This negative response has underscored the reality that SPAK cannot combat corruption at the highest levels on its own, and that it is critical for Albanian ...
  90. [90]
    Threats to be attacked? SPAK gives 649 million ALL to build the ...
    Nov 10, 2024 · Threats to be attacked? SPAK gives 649 million ALL to build the defense "umbrella". Politiko 2024-11- ...Missing: staff | Show results with:staff
  91. [91]
  92. [92]
    The moment of reckoning for Croatia's anti-corruption system. Can ...
    Nov 1, 2022 · Despite these checks and balances, corruption in Croatia has remained a problem. In early 2022, USKOK made history by ordering the arrest of ...Missing: vetting | Show results with:vetting
  93. [93]
    [PDF] Albania's Special Courts against Corruption and Organised Crime
    The criminal court system in Albania is structured in three tiers. Prior to the establishment of the SPAK Courts, the judiciary processed each corruption case.Missing: 2024 | Show results with:2024
  94. [94]
    Romania: Nations in Transit 2018 Country Report | Freedom House
    Several scandals erupted around the National Anticorruption Directorate (DNA), and several prosecutors left the unit or were laid off. The chief prosecutor was ...
  95. [95]
    Romania's anti-corruption protests wither away | Gallery - Al Jazeera
    Jul 12, 2018 · On Monday, President Klaus Iohannis signed a decree to sack the head of the National Anticorruption Directorate (DNA), Laura Codruta Kovesi.
  96. [96]
    Weakening of the Anti-corruption System in Romania - PISM
    The National Anticorruption Directorate (DNA), headed since 2013 by Laura Codruţa Kövesi under Iohannis's political protection, was said to be the centre of the ...
  97. [97]
    How the EU support of 79 million Euros for the justice reform ... - ACQJ
    The EU has allocated 79.06 million euros for the implementation of the reform in justice from 2016 until now.
  98. [98]
    OSCE Boosts SPAK Task Force on Electoral Crime Fight
    Apr 9, 2025 · As part of its efforts to support the Special Structure Against Corruption and Organized Crime (SPAK), on 9 April 2025, the OSCE Presence in ...
  99. [99]
    Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs
    INL supported the creation of the Albanian Special Anti-Corruption Body (SPAK). The specialized anti-corruption and organized crime entity – which consists of a ...
  100. [100]
    First Group of Albanian National Bureau of Investigation and Special ...
    Jan 20, 2025 · Sixteen individuals from the Albanian National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) and the Special Anti-corruption Structure (SPAK) completed the study tour.
  101. [101]
    "65.5 million euros of confiscated and seized assets" - SPAK Report ...
    Apr 2, 2025 · Around 65.5 million euros is the value of assets confiscated and sequestered by SPAK during 2024. According to the annual report of this ...Missing: recovery 2020-2024
  102. [102]
    [PDF] Annex I Guidance Note for the provision of information by States ...
    Jun 17, 2025 · SPAK has a strategic plan for 2024-2027, approved by the Prosecutor's. Office leadership order (No. 818, 3.9.2024), which can be freely ...
  103. [103]
    SPAK takes measures to implement a dedicated strategy against ...
    Jan 29, 2025 · The Special Prosecutor's Office (SPAK) has outlined its plan to investigate and prevent electoral crimes for the May 11, 2025 elections.
  104. [104]
    SPAK implements strategy to investigate and prevent electoral ...
    Jan 29, 2025 · SPAK has announced a comprehensive strategy to combat and prevent electoral crimes for Albania's 2025 parliamentary elections.Missing: specialized | Show results with:specialized
  105. [105]
    May 11th elections, Celibashi: The CEC-SPAK-Prosecutor General ...
    Oct 7, 2025 · May 11th Elections, Celibashi: The CEC-SPAK-Prosecutor General Task Force was our initiative, we were not influenced by external factors.Missing: strategy | Show results with:strategy
  106. [106]
  107. [107]
    THE INFLUENCE OF ORGANIZED CRIME ON ELECTORAL ...
    May 7, 2025 · Between 2023 and 2025, the Special Prosecution Office Against Organized Crime and Corruption (SPAK) has taken significant action against ...
  108. [108]
    Violent Albanian criminal group linked to corruption disrupted via ...
    Nov 26, 2024 · The European Multidisciplinary Platform Against Criminal Threats (EMPACT) tackles the most important threats posed by organised and serious ...Missing: turnover | Show results with:turnover
  109. [109]
  110. [110]
    Investigations in Belgium and SPAK/ "Copja" Clan, how the powerful ...
    Sep 29, 2024 · Members of the group are allegedly responsible for numerous contract killings, large-scale drug trafficking and laundering of illegal profits ...
  111. [111]
    The Pashja brothers from Elbasan ran the criminal organization
    Jan 21, 2025 · Brothers Shkëlqim and Gerardo Pashja, from Elbasan, are the leaders of an Albanian criminal organization that trafficked cocaine from South America to Europe.<|separator|>
  112. [112]
    How the European Union Corrupted Eastern Europe | Cato Institute
    May 26, 2014 · After the accession, not only did the progress come to a halt but some measures of corruption actually deteriorated. Slovakia, for example, ...Missing: complacency | Show results with:complacency
  113. [113]
    Full Report: Combatting High-level Corruption in Eastern Europe
    Sep 12, 2024 · The study presents an analysis of the state of play in the fight against high-level corruption in Eastern Europe, with a focus on Eastern ...Missing: complacency | Show results with:complacency
  114. [114]
    Albania: Freedom in the World 2025 Country Report
    Religious freedom and freedom of assembly are generally respected. Corruption and bribery remain major problems, though the government has worked to address ...
  115. [115]
    7_EN_autre_document_travail_s...
    Oct 30, 2024 · Albania should abstain from any action, including amnesty legislation, which has a negative impact on SPAK's fight against corruption. The ...