Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

STS-51-F

STS-51-F, also known as , was the nineteenth flight of NASA's and the eighth mission for the orbiter . Launched on July 29, 1985, at 5:00 p.m. EDT from Launch Pad 39A at in , the mission carried a crew of seven astronauts to deploy the European-built module in the payload bay for a series of multidisciplinary scientific experiments focused on astronomy, astrophysics, plasma physics, atmospheric science, solar physics, and life sciences. It is historically notable as the only Space Shuttle mission to execute an abort-to-orbit (ATO) procedure following a premature shutdown of one main engine during ascent, yet the crew successfully adapted and accomplished most primary objectives during the 7-day, 22-hour, 45-minute, and 26-second flight, which concluded with a landing at in California on August 6, 1985, at 12:45 p.m. PDT. The crew was commanded by veteran astronaut C. Gordon Fullerton, with Roy D. Bridges Jr. serving as pilot; mission specialists included F. Story Musgrave, Karl G. Henize, and Anthony W. England, while payload specialists Loren W. Acton (from Lockheed Palo Alto Research Laboratories) and John-David F. Bartoe (from the U.S. Air Force) oversaw the operations. This was a dedicated mission and the first to operate on a two-shift, around-the-clock schedule, utilizing three instrument-pointing pallets configured for observations outside the Earth's atmosphere, including and of celestial objects. Key experiments verified systems performance, measured the spacecraft environment, and advanced understanding of solar magnetic fields, behaviors, and biological adaptations in microgravity, despite challenges like the need for in-flight software adjustments to the Instrument Pointing System. The mission's defining incident occurred approximately 5 minutes and 43 seconds after liftoff, when a faulty temperature sensor on the number-one main triggered its shutdown, reducing and necessitating the ATO to achieve a lower-than-planned initial of 108 by 143 nautical miles using the remaining two engines and an additional burn of approximately 4,400 pounds of propellant from the (OMS). Ground teams rapidly replanned the timeline to accommodate the lower , enabling the crew to conduct 13 major experiments that yielded valuable data on , atmospheric , and even a lighthearted comparison of carbonated beverages in space (the "" test). Overall, STS-51-F demonstrated the program's resilience and advanced collaboration in space-based research, paving the way for future astronomical observations from .

Mission Background

Designation and Objectives

STS-51-F was the 19th flight of NASA's and the eighth flight for the orbiter , designated as part of the long-duration mission series to support multidisciplinary scientific research in . The mission, also known as 2, utilized a pallet-only configuration of the 's facility to accommodate experiments requiring precise pointing and space exposure. The primary objectives centered on verifying the performance of Spacelab systems integrated with the orbiter, measuring the induced space environment, and conducting experiments across astronomy, plasma physics, life sciences, high-energy astrophysics, solar physics, and atmospheric physics. Key goals included the inaugural flight test of the Instrument Pointing System (IPS), a three-axis stabilized platform developed by the European Space Agency for sub-arcsecond pointing accuracy to support astronomical observations. Another critical element was the deployment and retrieval of the Plasma Diagnostics Package (PDP), which investigated plasma interactions with the orbiter and shuttle bay environment during free-flight operations. The mission was planned for 7 days to allow comprehensive data collection from these unique experiments. Secondary objectives encompassed middeck experiments to explore microgravity effects, such as the Carbonated Beverage Dispenser Evaluation (CBDE), which tested the packaging and dispensing of carbonated beverages to assess fluid behavior and crew consumption in weightlessness. Despite an in-flight abort-to-orbit that reduced the achievable altitude, most primary and secondary objectives were successfully met, though some astronomical experiments were impacted by the lower orbit, with the mission concluding after 7 days, 22 hours, 45 minutes, and 26 seconds.

Historical Context

STS-51-F, designated as the Spacelab 2 mission, marked the third dedicated flight of the Spacelab laboratory chronologically, following STS-9 in 1983 and STS-51-B earlier in 1985, underscoring NASA's commitment to advancing microgravity research through international partnerships with the European Space Agency (ESA), which developed the reusable Spacelab components. This mission built on the foundational Spacelab operations established during STS-9 in 1983 and the life sciences focus of STS-51-B, emphasizing astrophysics, plasma physics, and technology demonstrations to expand the shuttle's role as a versatile orbital platform. The mission's astronomical experiments also served as a precursor to Hubble Space Telescope operations, testing key observation techniques from orbit. Originally targeted for launch on July 12, 1985, STS-51-F faced delays due to technical challenges with the Instrument Pointing System required for the unpressurized pallet configuration, which necessitated extensive ground testing and integration adjustments. These issues, combined with scheduling constraints in the , pushed the mission to July, occurring approximately 84 days after 's return from on May 6, 1985—a relatively rapid turnaround that highlighted the orbiter's increasing operational reliability. The program had matured significantly since in April 1984, when successfully performed the first in-orbit satellite repair, boosting confidence in extended capabilities for complex payloads like . A distinctive feature of STS-51-F was its implementation of dual crew shifts—Red and Blue teams—enabling around-the-clock science operations for the first time, which addressed the operational constraints of shorter prior missions and maximized the seven-day flight's productivity despite an in-flight Abort to Orbit. Pre-launch preparations were further impacted by external factors, including weather considerations that influenced the final selection on July 29, 1985, after a July 12 pad abort due to a coolant valve malfunction.

Crew

Composition and Roles

The STS-51-F crew consisted of seven members, including a commander, pilot, three mission specialists, and two payload specialists, selected for their expertise in piloting, engineering, science, and astrophysics to support the Spacelab 2 mission objectives. Commander C. Gordon Fullerton, aged 48 and a Colonel in the U.S. Air Force, was a veteran NASA astronaut since 1969 with a background in mechanical engineering from the California Institute of Technology and extensive experience as an Air Force test pilot. He had previously served as pilot on STS-3, accumulating 192 hours in space, and was responsible for overall mission command and flight operations. Pilot Roy D. Bridges Jr., aged 42 and also a in the U.S. , was on his first ; he held degrees from the U.S. Academy and , with a career as a fighter and since joining in 1980. Bridges assisted Fullerton in spacecraft piloting, navigation, and operations. Mission Specialist Karl G. Henize, aged 58 and holding a Ph.D. in astronomy from the , was a scientist-astronaut selected in 1967 with prior support roles on Apollo and missions; he had over 1,900 hours of flying time. Henize, an astronomer, managed systems and conducted astronomical observations. Mission Specialist F. Story Musgrave, aged 49 and an M.D. with degrees in and , was a veteran of STS-6 with more than 13,200 hours of flying experience; he served as , overseeing systems and supporting experiment operations. Mission Specialist Anthony W. England, aged 43 and holding a Ph.D. in from , specialized in Earth and planetary sciences with over 2,000 hours of flying time; he focused on conducting experiments such as the Infrared Imaging System (IRT) and other geophysical payloads. Payload Specialist Loren W. Acton, aged 49 and a Ph.D. in from the , from Lockheed Palo Alto Research Laboratories, as a for the 2 mission; as a and co-investigator for the Solar Optical Universal Polarimeter (), he was responsible for solar observation experiments aboard 2. Payload Specialist John-David F. Bartoe, aged 40 and holding a Ph.D. in physics from , was an astrophysicist from the Naval Research Laboratory and co-investigator for the High-Resolution Telescope/Spectrograph (HRTS) and Solar Ultraviolet Spectral Irradiance Monitor (SUSIM); he handled astrophysics experiments and payload operations. Fullerton and Bridges primarily managed flight operations from the forward flight deck, while Henize and Musgrave oversaw module systems and integration. , Bartoe, and Acton concentrated on executing scientific experiments, including the IRT for infrared mapping and IPS (Instrument Pointing System) for precise observations. Crew seating assignments for launch and entry positioned Fullerton in seat 1 (commander, forward left), Bridges in seat 2 (pilot, forward right), Henize in seat 3 (mission specialist, aft left), Musgrave in seat 4 (mission specialist, aft right), England in seat 5 (middeck forward left), Acton in seat 6 (middeck forward right), and Bartoe in seat 7 (middeck aft).
SeatPositionCrew MemberRole
1Forward Left (Commander)C. Gordon FullertonCommander
2Forward Right (Pilot)Roy D. Bridges Jr.Pilot
3Aft Left (MS)Karl G. HenizeMission Specialist
4Aft Right (MS)F. Story MusgraveMission Specialist
5Middeck Forward LeftAnthony W. EnglandMission Specialist
6Middeck Forward RightLoren W. ActonPayload Specialist
7Middeck AftJohn-David F. BartoePayload Specialist

Training and Shift Teams

The crew of STS-51-F underwent a comprehensive training regimen that encompassed both mission-dependent and mission-independent components to prepare for the complex operations of Spacelab 2. Mission-dependent training focused on payload-specific procedures, including hands-on sessions with principal investigators in their laboratories for experiment operations, as well as simulations using high-fidelity mockups of the Spacelab module and aft flight deck at the Johnson Space Center (JSC). This preparation emphasized integration testing at the Kennedy Space Center and familiarization with flight hardware to ensure seamless execution of astronomical and plasma physics experiments. Mission-independent training covered essential skills such as living conditions in orbit, medical procedures, emergency response, and survival training, conducted primarily at JSC and the Kennedy Space Center. Payload specialists received specialized instruction tailored to their roles; for instance, Loren Acton, as , participated in sessions on and instrument operations provided by relevant principal investigators. All four payload specialist candidates, including Acton and John-David Bartoe, completed these dual training types to build proficiency in handling unique mission elements like the Infrared Telescope (IRT) cooldown procedures, which required precise gravity-gradient attitudes for superfluid helium management. Rehearsals for the Diagnostics Package (PDP) deployment using the Remote Manipulator System were also integral, simulating the satellite's release on flight day 3 for and subsequent retrieval. across the crew addressed potential abort scenarios, ensuring versatility in high-stress situations through integrated simulations that verified experiment compatibility and from the Payload Operations Control Center. To support the mission's extended science operations, the crew adopted an innovative dual-shift system with Red and Blue teams alternating 12-hour schedules, enabling 24-hour monitoring and maximizing experiment uptime. The Red Team consisted of Pilot Roy D. Bridges Jr., Mission Specialist 1 Karl G. Henize, and Payload Specialist 1 Loren W. Acton, while the Blue Team included Mission Specialist 2 F. Story Musgrave, Mission Specialist 3 Anthony W. England, and Payload Specialist 2 John-David F. Bartoe; Commander C. Gordon Fullerton worked across both shifts as needed to coordinate activities. This structure facilitated continuous payload oversight, with built-in overlap periods for detailed handovers to maintain operational continuity and address any real-time issues during the 126-orbit mission. The shift teams' design drew from prior Spacelab missions, adapting to the pallet-only configuration's demands for round-the-clock data collection in X-ray, ultraviolet, and infrared spectra.

Spacecraft and Payloads

Orbiter Configuration

The (OV-099) served as the orbiter for STS-51-F, marking its eighth flight following refurbishment after the previous , . The refurbishment process included standard inspections, tile repairs, and system upgrades to prepare for the 2 payload integration. The vehicle's external tank was ET-19, a lightweight configuration (LWT-12) designed for improved performance during ascent, which functioned nominally without any launch commit criteria violations. The solid rocket boosters were designated BI-017, refurbished units that provided the initial thrust, with separation occurring within one second of predictions despite a pre-launch yaw gyro failure on the left SRB. Key propulsion and control systems included three Space Shuttle Main Engines (SSMEs): serial number 2023 in the number 1 position (its third flight), 2020 in the number 2 position (fourth flight), and 2021 in the number 3 position (fourth flight). The (OMS) pods—left pod 01 on its seventh flight and right pod 04 on its second—enabled seven orbital insertion burns to achieve a nominal 207 circular orbit, adjusted for the mission's abort-to-orbit profile. The (RCS) thrusters supported attitude control throughout the flight, with forward RCS pod FRC 9 on its eighth use, ensuring precise orientation for payload operations. Integration of the tunnel adapter allowed access from the orbiter's aft flight deck to the payload bay's pallet-only configuration. To accommodate the long-duration science mission, the orbiter underwent modifications for enhanced power distribution and thermal management, including a dedicated cooling loop to handle the increased heat loads from experiments. Electrical power systems were upgraded to verify with the , supporting continuous operations over the eight-day flight. The middeck was configured with additional berthing facilities and storage to support the two-shift rotation, facilitating 24-hour experiment monitoring without compromising comfort or safety. Safety enhancements focused on abort modes, with pre-flight testing validating the Abort-to-Orbit (ATO) capability, which was successfully executed during ascent when SSME number 1 shut down at T+343 seconds due to a anomaly. This demonstrated the orbiter's redundant systems, allowing the mission to proceed at a slightly lower altitude while maintaining full operational integrity.

Spacelab 2 Module

The Spacelab 2 payload for STS-51-F featured an unpressurized configuration comprising the support module and three pallets integrated into the orbiter's payload bay, marking a departure from the pressurized long module used in prior missions. Built by the (ESA), the Igloo served as an unpressurized cylindrical enclosure housing control electronics, power distribution, and support subsystems for the pallet-mounted experiments, with dimensions of approximately 3 m in height and 1.5 m in diameter. Each pallet measured approximately 3.05 m (10 ft) in length by 3.96 m (13 ft) in width, allowing direct exposure of instruments to the . This setup represented the first operational use of the Instrument Pointing System (IPS), a gyro-stabilized platform mounted on the second pallet that provided arcsecond-level pointing accuracy for celestial observations, independent of orbiter attitude maneuvers. Among the core astronomical instruments was the Infrared Telescope (IRT), a 15-cm aperture Ritchey-Chrétien telescope cooled to about 4 via a superfluid , enabling background-limited observations of diffuse and point sources across the 2 to 120 μm spectral range. The High Resolution Shuttle Glow Spectrograph (HRSGS) complemented this by capturing high-resolution spectra (down to 0.2 nm) of the orbiter-induced atmospheric glow in the 180-400 nm band, investigating chemical reactions between the spacecraft surface and residual atmosphere. The Solar UV Visibility Experiment (SUVE) utilized a spectrometer to assess irradiance transmission through Earth's upper atmosphere, focusing on wavelengths critical for studies. Additional payloads encompassed the Plasma Diagnostics Package (PDP), a free-flying instrument suite equipped with Langmuir probes, retarding potential analyzers, and mass spectrometers for in-situ plasma diagnostics and wave-particle interactions in the . The Carbonated Beverage Dispenser Experiment (CBDE) evaluated microgravity effects on carbonated drink containment and dispensing using a modified zero-gravity . Several Get Away Special (GAS) canisters carried student and small experiments. Integration of the 2 payload with the orbiter involved allocating up to 7.5 kW of electrical power from the orbiter's system to support instrument operations and cryocoolers, while and command interfaces connected directly to the orbiter's general-purpose computers via the payload interrogator for and ground communication. The overall payload mass totaled approximately 14,500 kg, optimized for the mission's 7-day duration and diverse scientific objectives.

Launch Preparations

Vehicle Integration

The vehicle integration for STS-51-F commenced in the (OPF) at , where the orbiter , landed from its previous mission on May 6, 1985, underwent post-flight maintenance, inspections, and reconfiguration for the upcoming flight. The primary focus during this phase was the installation of the payload, a pallet-only configuration consisting of three pallets and an igloo module housing support equipment. On June 8, 1985, the integrated payload was transferred to the OPF and installed in 's payload bay, marking a key step in preparing the spacecraft for the mission's scientific objectives. This process highlighted the collaborative efforts between and the (ESA), as was an ESA-developed system requiring joint verification to ensure seamless interface with the U.S. orbiter. Following installation, a series of rigorous testing phases verified the payload's compatibility and the overall vehicle's readiness. On June 12, 1985, Spacelab-orbiter interface tests were conducted in the OPF to confirm electrical, data, and mechanical connections. The next day, June 13, 1985, end-to-end testing linked the payload with ground control systems at the Payload Operations Control Center in , simulating mission operations. Standard ground verification activities included vibration testing to simulate launch acoustics, leak checks on propulsion and payload systems, and fit verifications to ensure all components aligned without interference. Notably, the Infrared Telescope (IRT) experiment's helium cryocooler underwent dedicated ground thermal performance evaluation tests to assess its cooling efficiency for infrared observations, confirming operational readiness prior to flight. These tests prioritized structural integrity and environmental resilience, drawing on established protocols for shuttle payloads. Challenger was then transferred to the (VAB) in late June 1985 for mating with the External Tank (ET) and Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBs). The stacking process involved hoisting the orbiter atop the ET, followed by attachment of the SRBs, with additional leak checks and alignment verifications to secure the stack. This phase addressed minor ongoing refinements to SRB field joint seals, informed by certification reviews from prior missions, including an updated SRB Board meeting on June 21, 1985, as part of the Flight Readiness Review process. No major delays arose from these activities for STS-51-F, though the international coordination for components occasionally required iterative adjustments to timelines and interfaces. The completed shuttle stack was rolled out to Launch Complex 39A on June 29, 1985, positioning the vehicle for final preparations. Post-rollout activities included pad interface tests and system checks, interrupted by holds for inclement weather and technical evaluations, which contributed to the overall schedule compression leading into the .

Countdown Timeline

The for STS-51-F's initial launch attempt targeted liftoff on July 12, 1985, at 19:30 UTC from Launch Complex 39A. The final phases advanced nominally through early holds, including propellant loading and systems checks following vehicle integration. During the planned T-3 hour hold, the seven-member crew ingressed the orbiter , completing suiting and boarding without incident. Post-hold activities included chilldown of the three Space Shuttle Main Engines (SSMEs) using to maintain thermal conditioning and loading of hypergolic propellants into the and tanks, with all parameters within limits. At T-5 minutes, the auxiliary power units were activated to power hydraulic systems, and the proceeded to T-31 seconds, when transferred from ground launch sequencer to onboard computers. Main engine ignition began at T-6.6 seconds, but at T-3 seconds, a malfunction in the high-pressure fuel-side of the number two SSME—failing to transition from 100% to 70% open—triggered a Redundant Set Launch Sequencer abort, shutting down all three engines and halting the launch. Following the abort, the vehicle underwent safing procedures, including detanking of propellants, and Challenger was rolled back to the Orbiter Processing Facility on July 13 for diagnostics and replacement of the faulty coolant valve. Processing and verification tests were completed by July 22, when the orbiter was remated to the External Tank and Solid Rocket Boosters in the Vehicle Assembly Building and rolled out to the pad. The countdown for the second launch attempt began at T-43 hours on July 27, 1985, targeting July 29 at 19:23 UTC (3:23 p.m. EDT). The sequence progressed smoothly through the T-3 hour hold for crew ingress and meteorological evaluations, with the astronauts boarding Challenger amid clear weather conditions. Subsequent pre-liftoff preparations, encompassing SSME chilldown and hypergolic propellant loading, reported no significant anomalies, and systems remained green through T-5 minutes. A 1 hour 37 minute hold was imposed at T-3 minutes to address an erroneous command during the table maintenance block update to the backup flight system computers; the issue was resolved by verifying and retransmitting the uplink data. The countdown then resumed without further delays, confirming all go parameters prior to engine start.

Launch Sequence

Scrub and Delays

The first launch attempt for STS-51-F occurred on July 12, 1985, at 3:30 p.m. EDT from Launch Complex 39A, but the countdown was halted at T-3 seconds after main engine ignition. The abort was triggered by a malfunction in the chamber coolant valve of Space Shuttle Main Engine No. 2, which failed to close properly from 100 percent open to the required 70 percent position for startup. This violation of flight rules, detected by the redundant set launch sequencer, risked inadequate cooling of the engine chamber and potential overheating during ascent. Ground crews immediately initiated safing procedures, including shutdown of the main engines and detanking of the external tank, completing the process without damage to the orbiter, external tank, or solid rocket boosters. The crew was demated from approximately 90 minutes after the abort and returned to crew quarters before resuming training simulations. The faulty main engine was replaced with a spare unit, requiring extensive inspections and verification to ensure system integrity. The scrub resulted in a 17-day delay to the next attempt, allowing time for engine replacement and additional payload verifications on , including checks on experiment pallets and instrument alignments. This incident underscored ongoing challenges with main reliability in the early program, though no broader vehicle damage occurred. The mission timeline had already been affected by cumulative delays stemming from external tank and production and integration issues earlier in 1985, which compressed the overall manifest following . These factors contributed to the initial targeting of rather than an earlier slot. The final countdown resumed on July 29, 1985, following a 1 hour, 37 minute hold to resolve a table maintenance block update uplink problem.

Liftoff and Abort Event

The Space Shuttle Challenger lifted off from Launch Pad 39A at Kennedy Space Center on July 29, 1985, at 21:00:00 UTC, marking the start of the STS-51-F mission. The ascent proceeded nominally in the initial phases, with solid rocket booster (SRB) ignition occurring at T+0 seconds and SRB separation at approximately T+2:05, consistent with pre-flight predictions. External tank (ET) systems performed as expected during this period, with no anomalies reported in propellant flow or structural integrity up to that point. At T+5:43 (343 seconds), an occurred when Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) #1—the center engine—shut down prematurely due to erroneous high readings from its high-pressure fuel (HPFTP) discharge temperature s. Specifically, one failed at T+3:41, followed by the second at T+5:43, triggering the redundant shutdown logic despite the actual temperatures remaining within safe limits. This sensor malfunction led to an automatic Abort-to-Orbit (ATO) mode being initiated, the only in-flight abort in the history of the . The ATO sequence allowed Challenger to continue ascent using the remaining two SSMEs, achieving an initial orbit of approximately 265 by 200 kilometers (143.1 by 108.0 nautical miles) at a 49.57-degree inclination. Main engine cutoff (MECO) occurred at T+8:22, followed by ET separation, and the crew then performed an Orbital Maneuvering System (OMS) burn lasting 106 seconds to circularize the orbit at around 330 kilometers altitude. No risks to crew safety arose from the event, as the abort profile ensured a stable orbital insertion. Commander C. Gordon Fullerton and Pilot Roy D. Bridges Jr. responded effectively by manually confirming the ATO via the cockpit selector and button activation, overriding any potential automated hesitations to execute the procedure seamlessly. Their actions, combined with ground control guidance, enabled rapid transition to orbital operations without further complications.

Orbital Operations

Flight Adjustments

Following the Abort to Orbit (ATO) maneuver, Challenger achieved an initial elliptical with an apogee of 265 km and a perigee of 200 km at an inclination of 49.5°. This lower-than-planned trajectory resulted from the premature shutdown of the orbiter's center main engine during ascent, necessitating immediate orbital adjustments to ensure viability. The crew executed the first (OMS) burn approximately 2 minutes after main engine cutoff, lasting 106 seconds and consuming 4,134 pounds of propellant, to establish the preliminary orbit. Subsequent OMS burns, including three additional maneuvers over the next few hours, raised the perigee progressively. These adjustments stabilized the vehicle dynamics, with (RCS) thrusters used for fine attitude tuning to support module activation on the mission's second day. Mission planners adjusted the planned 7-day timeline, extending it by 24 hours to accommodate the abort while conserving resources impacted by the abort; for instance, Infrared Telescope (IRT) observation windows were reduced to account for the altered orbital parameters and delayed cryocooler power-up due to thermal stabilization concerns in the lower initial orbit. The final operational orbit was established at 312 km by 321 km, enabling the full range of astronomical and plasma physics experiments aboard Spacelab 2.

Experiment Execution

Following the abort-to-orbit event, the crew initiated activation approximately 15 hours after launch on Flight Day 1, opening the payload bay doors and deploying the for initial checkout and solar observations. The Diagnostics Package (PDP) was deployed on Flight Day 3 for about seven hours of free-flyer operations before retrieval later that day, with additional proximity operations extending into Flight Day 4 to study interactions with the orbiter's plasma environment. From Flight Days 2 through 5, the Telescope (IRT) conducted observations of planets and stars, including , , and galactic sources, while pointing accuracy tests verified stability for and instruments, achieving sub-arcsecond precision in most cases. Operations proceeded on a 24-hour schedule with alternating Red and Blue teams, each working 12-hour shifts and conducting handovers to ensure continuous experiment monitoring; the Blue team, including mission specialists and Musgrave along with Bartoe, primarily handled life sciences tasks such as the Continuous Blood Draw Experiment (CBDE) for monitoring crew physiological responses. Musgrave and oversaw sample collections and data logging for experiments like the absorption study and plant growth unit, integrating these with broader payload activities during their shifts. Key highlights included the inaugural use of the IPS for ultraviolet astronomy, enabling high-resolution observations with the University of Wisconsin's Ultraviolet Spectrometer and Polarimeter, which captured data on solar chromospheric structures. On Flight Day 4, the crew released grid spheres from a Get Away Special canister as part of a student-designed experiment to study reentry aerodynamics and atmospheric density, with the spheres tracked via ground radar for several days. Overall, the experiments accumulated approximately 120 hours of runtime across the 127 orbits, supporting multidisciplinary investigations in astronomy, plasma physics, and life sciences. Despite the mission's adjustments due to the ascent abort, challenges arose, including intermittent IRT door mechanism issues that delayed some observations by up to two hours per session, and cooldown delays for the superfluid helium experiment caused by the unexpected orbital insertion altitude. These factors contributed to objectives being met at a rate of at least 50%, with many experiments achieving 90-100% success, all primary verification goals met but some secondary astronomical targets partially deferred.

Landing Sequence

Deorbit Preparation

On flight day 8, the crew of STS-51-F initiated payload safing procedures to prepare the Spacelab module and attached experiments for re-entry, including power-down sequences for non-essential systems. The remaining Spacelab experiments were fully powered down to prevent any thermal or electrical issues during atmospheric descent. The Plasma Diagnostics Package (PDP), which had been deployed and retrieved earlier in the mission, was securely stowed in the payload bay. These configurations ensured the integrity of the scientific payload after completing observations in astronomy, plasma physics, and atmospheric science. The crew also reconfigured the orbiter for deorbit and entry, stowing loose items and conducting pre-burn systems checks. Payload specialists, such as Loren Acton, transitioned from the working area to flight seats on the middeck to assume entry positions alongside the core flight crew. The vehicle was in a near-circular at approximately 320 km (170 nmi) altitude, achieved after several orbital adjustment burns necessitated by the earlier Abort-To-Orbit during ascent. The ATO had placed in a lower-than-planned initial , requiring additional maneuvering and ultimately extending the duration by about one day to maximize science return; this adjustment compressed the timeline for final experiments, including limited operations with the High Resolution Gamma Ray and Spallation Spectrometer (HRGSS). Weather conditions at the primary landing site, , were closely monitored, with crosswinds assessed to remain within acceptable limits for runway 23. Contingency planning included a potential divert to if winds exceeded thresholds, but conditions supported the nominal Edwards landing. The deorbit burn, using the (OMS) engines, was executed on August 6, 1985, from the 320 km orbit, lasting 172 seconds and targeting Edwards AFB for touchdown later that day.

Re-entry and Touchdown

The Space Shuttle Challenger initiated atmospheric re-entry following the deorbit burn, crossing entry interface at an altitude of approximately 400,000 feet (122 kilometers) about 30 minutes prior to touchdown. Peak heating occurred during this phase as the orbiter descended at speeds reaching 25, subjecting the thermal protection system to extreme temperatures exceeding 3,000 degrees (1,650 degrees ). The flight transitioned to the Terminal Area Energy Management (TAEM) phase at around 83,000 feet (25 kilometers), where the crew monitored the automated systems for the approach to . The approach and landing were manually conducted by C. Gordon Fullerton, aligning for Runway 23 at under clear skies and light winds. Touchdown occurred at 19:45:26 UTC on August 6, 1985, with a landing speed of 215 (346 kilometers per hour) after a mission duration of 7 days, 22 hours, 45 minutes, and 26 seconds. The main landing gear touched down first, followed by the nose gear 9 seconds later, initiating deceleration via wheel brakes and the deployment of the nose skid to manage rollout. Post-touchdown, the orbiter decelerated to a after a rollout of 8,569 feet (2,612 meters) in 55 seconds. T-38 chase aircraft confirmed the parameters and orbiter condition, marking the successful conclusion of the mission without significant anomalies during re-entry or touchdown.

Post-Mission Analysis

Technical Review

Following the successful landing of STS-51-F on August 6, 1985, at , NASA's technical review centered on the in-flight Abort to Orbit (ATO) event and the overall condition of the flight . The investigation into the ATO, which occurred at T+345.3 seconds after liftoff, determined that Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) number 1 shut down prematurely due to a false high-temperature reading from its Channel A high-pressure fuel (HPFTP) discharge . This erroneous signal, caused by a failure rather than any actual such as a crack, triggered the automatic shutdown to protect the engine, while SSMEs 2 and 3 continued nominal operation. Post-flight disassembly and analysis of SSME-1 confirmed no physical damage to the blades or other components, validating the as the sole point of failure. No anomalies were identified in the External Tank (ET) insulation, structure, or separation systems, nor in the Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBs), which performed within specifications throughout ascent and separation. A comprehensive failure tree analysis traced the root cause to a calibration drift in the resistance temperature detector (RTD) sensors monitoring HPFTP discharge temperature, with the critical error manifesting at approximately T+345 seconds during mainstage burn. This event highlighted vulnerabilities in sensor redundancy, as a secondary Channel B sensor had already failed earlier at T+221 seconds, leaving the system reliant on the faulty primary channel. In response, implemented upgrades to the SSME temperature , including improved materials and protocols for enhanced reliability and to prevent false exceedances in future missions. These modifications were incorporated into subsequent Block I SSME configurations, ensuring dual-channel validation before shutdown commands. The review also confirmed that the ATO maneuver itself was executed flawlessly, with the crew and ground control adhering to procedures that stabilized the vehicle in a stable 49.6-degree inclination at approximately 170 nautical miles altitude. Assessment of the Orbiter post-landing revealed minimal impact damage to its thermal protection system (), with a total of 553 sites documented during the detailed inspection—226 of which were 1 inch or larger in diameter—but no tiles were missing or required replacement prior to re-entry. The reinforced carbon-carbon leading edges and high-temperature reusable surface insulation tiles sustained only superficial impacts, primarily from ascent , allowing for a nominal without concerns. The Spacelab-2 module emerged intact, with its igloo-pallet structure and all scientific instruments operational except for the initial inoperability of the Solar Optical Universal Polarimeter (), which was resolved mid-mission through crew intervention. Additionally, the Diagnostics Package (), deployed on flight day 2 to study interactions in low-Earth , was retrieved successfully on flight day 3 after nominal operations, with no degradation to its instrumentation. Debriefing sessions at involving the crew, engineers, and mission managers evaluated the ATO performance and overall vehicle dynamics, affirming that Challenger's subsystems— including , , and —demonstrated excellent reliability throughout the 7-day, 22-hour mission. The review concluded that the orbiter was in high readiness for turnaround and the subsequent flight (STS-51-I), with only routine maintenance needed and no major refurbishments impacting the manifest. This assessment underscored the robustness of the system's design margins, even under anomalous conditions, while the sensor upgrades addressed the identified gap in SSME health monitoring to bolster future operational safety.

Scientific Outcomes

The Infrared Telescope (IRT), mounted on the Instrument Pointing System, conducted observations of the at 2 and 7 microns, revealing a broader structural extent than detected at longer wavelengths, and identified new sources within the . These results provided valuable insights into diffuse celestial emissions, though elevated background noise from shuttle exhaust gases exceeded expectations, complicating low-surface-brightness detections. Cooldown issues with the helium-cooled system resulted in approximately 20% operational downtime, limiting extended observations of select stellar and planetary targets such as and . The Plasma Diagnostics Package (PDP) yielded extensive data on shuttle-induced plasma perturbations, measuring ion and electron densities in the orbiter's wake that were up to two orders of magnitude lower than theoretical predictions from the International Reference model, thereby validating and refining computational models of spacecraft-ionosphere interactions. Key findings included the detection of a cloud with densities around 10⁹ H₂O molecules/cm³ at 50 meters from the , alongside dominant H₂O⁺ ions forming ring distributions via charge exchange, and O⁺ streaming from the ram direction up to 400 meters upstream. These measurements, taken during free-flyer deployments and wake transits, also captured electrostatic noise (1-5 mV/m) correlated with thruster firings and neutral gas rates of about 2.5 × 10²² s⁻¹. Other experiments contributed notable results despite the mission's abbreviated duration following the ascent abort. The in Bubbles and Drops Experiment (CBDE) observed unexpected anomalies in bubble formation and dynamics under microgravity, where bubbles exhibited irregular coalescence and migration patterns deviating from pre-flight simulations, informing fluid behavior in low-gravity environments. The (IPS) demonstrated pointing accuracy and stability within design specifications of approximately 1-2 arcseconds, supporting successful and astrophysical observations after initial alignment challenges were resolved. Additionally, solar physicist Loren Acton's oversight of the Spectrometer/ (UVSP) and Irradiance Monitor (SUSIM) produced high-resolution UV spectra (120-400 nm) that advanced understanding of atmospheric variability and its influence on Earth's upper atmosphere . The collective scientific outcomes from STS-51-F spurred over 50 peer-reviewed publications in , , and domains, with broader contributions exceeding 2,400 refereed papers that enhanced models of galactic emissions, wake phenomena, and solar-terrestrial interactions. Although the abort-to-orbit maneuver shortened the mission by one day, reducing opportunities for deep-space targets, the acquired datasets addressed key gaps in astronomy and ionospheric perturbation studies, laying groundwork for subsequent shuttle-based observations.

Legacy

Engineering Lessons

The Abort to Orbit (ATO) mode was successfully validated during STS-51-F when the center Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) prematurely shut down 5 minutes and 43 seconds after launch due to erroneous readings from two redundant temperature sensors on the high-pressure fuel turbopump's turbine discharge. This failure, the only in-flight SSME shutdown in the shuttle program, allowed the vehicle to reach a stable lower-than-planned of approximately 108 by 143 nautical miles at 49.5-degree inclination using the remaining two engines, later raised to 170 nautical miles, confirming the ATO's effectiveness for contingency operations while exposing critical vulnerabilities in sensor design and single-point failure modes. Although the mission proceeded with adjusted objectives, the incident underscored the risks of fragile Resistance Temperature Detectors (RTDs) in harsh environments, prompting immediate post-flight reviews that influenced subsequent hardware enhancements. In response to the sensor malfunction, implemented software modifications to SSME controllers for improved fault detection, including logic requiring cross-verification of sensor data before shutdown initiation, which was incorporated in subsequent missions to enhance without full hardware replacement. Longer-term, these lessons contributed to the Block I SSME upgrade in 1995, replacing RTDs with more robust thermocouples to prevent similar cascading failures, thereby increasing overall engine reliability for high-thrust operations. System-level improvements from the mission included refined protocols for thermal management, as the pallet-only configuration tested superfluid helium cryocoolers that maintained instrument temperatures near despite orbital perturbations, leading to enhanced cooling guidelines for subsequent payloads. These tests validated low-temperature operations for sensitive detectors, directly informing the thermal isolation designs in the Hubble Space Telescope's instruments. Additionally, the European Space Agency's Instrument Pointing System (), flown for the first time on STS-51-F, underwent in-orbit refinements to its three-axis stabilization algorithms, achieving sub-arcsecond pointing accuracy that served as a precursor for Hubble's fine guidance systems by demonstrating stable platform control in microgravity. At the program level, the mission's use of a seven-person divided into red and blue shift teams for 24-hour operations reinforced the efficacy of rotating schedules in sustaining productivity during multi-week flights, providing operational templates for assembly missions that required similar crew endurance strategies.

Astronomical Contributions

The Telescope (IRT) experiment aboard STS-51-F represented a pioneering effort in space-based astronomy, as it was the first cryogenically cooled telescope deployed from the . Equipped with a 15.2 cm Herschelian design cooled by superfluid to approximately 8 , the IRT operated across wavelengths from 1.7 to 118 μm, enabling sensitive mapping of low-surface-brightness celestial sources without atmospheric distortion. Despite operational challenges, including thermal interference from the Orbiter that affected some data quality, the instrument successfully surveyed over 60% of the and cataloged observations of numerous celestial objects, including detailed 2.4 μm maps of the region and extended plane segments from longitude l = -10° to 110°. These results complemented the Astronomical Satellite () all-sky survey by providing deeper, targeted views of galactic structures, advancing understanding of dust distribution and star-forming regions. In addition to infrared advancements, STS-51-F's observations significantly contributed to . Payload specialists Loren Acton and John-David Bartoe operated instruments such as the Solar Optical Universal Polarimeter () and ultraviolet spectrometers, capturing high-resolution imagery and spectra of solar fine structures, including chromospheric networks and coronal features. This data, obtained above Earth's absorbing atmosphere, refined models of solar atmospheric dynamics and ultraviolet irradiance variations, offering insights into magnetic activity and energy transfer processes in the Sun's transition region. Karl G. Henize, a renowned with expertise in galactic studies, supported the astrophysical payload operations, including the IRT, and his involvement helped integrate solar and datasets to enhance broader galactic efforts during post-mission . The scientific output from STS-51-F has endured through extensive publications and archival resources. The mission generated over 100 peer-reviewed papers detailing astronomical findings, with key contributions appearing in journals like Astrophysical Letters and Communications and , covering topics from galactic to UV . Data from the IRT and UV instruments are preserved in NASA's Technical Reports Server and other archives, facilitating their use in 1990s research on source catalogs and modeling, while serving as technological precursors for advanced observatories.

Mission Insignia

Design Elements

The STS-51-F mission patch is a circular emblem featuring the silhouette of the ascending through space, set against a black background representing the . At the center, the design highlights the Challenger's payload bay containing the 2 module, emphasizing the mission's astronomical focus. Key graphical elements include the constellations and , rendered in white to depict their relative positions to the sun during the flight, along with nineteen individual stars symbolizing the program's nineteenth mission. The patch incorporates a classic aesthetic with bold contrasts: the in white outline, stellar features in white tones, and the dark void of providing depth. Designed by Houston-based artist Skip Bradley in collaboration with crew input, it adheres to the standard style of embroidered cloth . These patches measure approximately 4 inches in diameter and were produced as fully embroidered items with merrowed edges for durability. Crew members wore them on flight suits and personal gear during the mission, while additional units were distributed to NASA personnel, international partners, and mission contributors following the flight's completion.

Symbolism and Usage

The STS-51-F mission patch embodies the scientific ambitions of 2 through its central imagery of the ascending amid celestial elements, symbolizing the pursuit of knowledge in solar and stellar astronomy. The constellations and , positioned relative to as viewed during the flight, denote the specific astronomical targets, while the nineteen individual stars honor the mission as the 19th flight. The inclusion of the Spacelab module, developed by the European Space Agency (ESA) in collaboration with NASA, highlights the international partnership that made the mission possible. As the official NASA emblem for STS-51-F, the patch appeared prominently in mission press kits, official videos, and documentation to identify and promote the flight's objectives. Crew members wore it on their flight suits throughout the mission, signifying team unity and mission identity in line with longstanding NASA tradition. Post-mission, embroidered replicas were distributed as awards to contributors, recognizing their roles in the successful abort-to-orbit launch and scientific achievements. The patch also played a cultural role in public outreach, featured in NASA publications to showcase advancements in space science and international cooperation. By 2025, high-resolution digital versions have been archived in NASA's online collections, preserving the for educational and historical access.

References

  1. [1]
    STS-51F - NASA
    STS-51F was the 19th flight of NASA's Space Shuttle program and the eighth flight of Space Shuttle Challenger.
  2. [2]
    This Month in NASA History: STS-51-F | APPEL Knowledge Services
    Jul 12, 2022 · When the Space Shuttle Challenger roared off Launch Pad 39A on Monday, July 29, 1985, it was a hot and sunny afternoon at Kennedy Space Center.
  3. [3]
    None
    ### Summary of STS-51-F Mission Objectives and Details
  4. [4]
    IPS (Instrument Pointing System) - eoPortal
    Jun 1, 2012 · IPS was flown on three Shuttle flights (all were Spacelab pallet-only payloads):. 1) STS-51-F mission (July 29 - Aug. 6, 1985), also known ...
  5. [5]
    Coca-Cola Can, STS 51-F | National Air and Space Museum
    In 1984, researchers for Coca Cola had an idea about dispensing carbonated beverages in space to give astronauts more choices to drink.Missing: CBDE | Show results with:CBDE
  6. [6]
    [PDF] N8 7 - 221 04
    (Spacelab 3 was actually the second flight of the laboratory because of delays in the development of a pointing system for the. Spacelab 2 mission.) The NASA ...
  7. [7]
    STS-51F Fact Sheet | Spaceline
    The main mission objective was to verify performance of Spacelab systems and determine interface capability with the Shuttle. Spacelab-2 experiments were ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] STS-51F | spacepresskit
    Jul 12, 1985 · Mission Objectives: To verify the ESA-built Spacelab pallet configuration and conduct application, science, and technology investigations ...
  9. [9]
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    Spaceflight mission report: STS-51F - Spacefacts
    Jun 23, 2023 · The main mission objective was to verify performance of Spacelab systems, determine the interface capability of the orbiter, and measure the environment ...Missing: designation | Show results with:designation<|control11|><|separator|>
  12. [12]
    v1ch6 - NASA
    On June 25, 1985, the left nozzle joint of STS 51-B (launched April 29) was disassembled and inspected after it had been shipped back to Thiokol. What Thiokol ...
  13. [13]
    [XML] STS 51F/Spacelab 2 - NASA - NSSDCA - Spacecraft - Details
    Spacelab 2, a NASA developed payload, had a configuration that included an igloo attached to a lead pallet, with the Instrument Pointing Subsystem (IPS) mounted ...
  14. [14]
    Small helium-cooled infrared telescope experiment for Spacelab-2 ...
    Mar 1, 1990 · The Infrared Telescope (IRT) experiment, flown on Spacelab-2, was used to make infrared measurements between 2 and 120 microns.
  15. [15]
    A high resolution ultraviolet Shuttle glow spectrograph
    It is intended for study of shuttle surface glow in the 180-400 nm near- and middle-ultraviolet wavelength range, with a spectral resolution of 0.2 nm. It will ...Missing: 2 | Show results with:2
  16. [16]
    SpaceLab 2 - NASA/Marshall Solar Physics
    Spacelab 2, launched on the Space Shuttle Challenger on July 29, 1985, carried several solar instruments ... STS 51-F (KSC) · NRL HRTS Instrument · NRL SUSIM ...
  17. [17]
    Infrared telescope (IRT) system cryogenic performance
    Jan 1, 1985 · Thermal performance evaluation tests on the Small Helium Cooled Infrared Telescope (IRT), prior to flight on Spacelab 2 in 1985, ...Missing: STS- 51- F cryocooler ground
  18. [18]
    v2apph - NASA
    STS 51-F (flight 19) was launched on duly 29, 1985, and experienced no O-ring erosion; however, there was a blow hole through the putty in the right-hand ...
  19. [19]
    STS-51F
    A major objective of the mission was to verify the performance of the Spacelab systems with the orbiter as well as to measure the environment created by the ...
  20. [20]
    'I Didn't Touch a Thing': Remembering Challenger's Pad Abort, OTD ...
    Jul 12, 2020 · Aboard Challenger for what should have been her eighth voyage was a seven-man crew tasked with a week-long mission to conduct a full plate of ...
  21. [21]
    v2appj - NASA
    STS 51-L was planned for a duration of 6 day, with the I US/TDRS deployed on day 1, the SPARTAN deployed on day 3, and the SPARTAN retrieved on day 5. The STS ...
  22. [22]
    Challenger STS 51-F (Spacelab 2) / Per ardua ad astra
    Jan 31, 2012 · PAO: Nine minutes Mission Elapsed time, altitude 58.3 nautical miles, distance downrange 789 nautical miles… velocity now 21,969 feet per second ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] (SOUP) - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
    Dec 11, 1989 · SOUP flew on the Spacelab. 2 shuttle mission. (STS. 51-F) from. July. 29 to August. 6,. 1985. It shared the solar observing time with. 3 other.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Rogers Commission Report 1 - Office of Safety and Mission Assurance
    Jun 6, 1986 · Following the suggestion of the Commission,. NASA established several teams of persons not involved in the mission 51-L launch process to ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Space Shuttle Main Engine — The Relentless Pursuit of Improvement
    The SSME was the only reusable large liquid rocket engine, using liquid hydrogen, reaching 6000F, with 37 million horsepower, and 1 million seconds of ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Spacelab Science Results Study Final Report Executive Summary
    Aug 18, 1999 · The astrophysical instruments on Spacelab. 2 probed the universe in the infrared, X-ray, and cosmic radiation spectral regions. For the first of ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Spacelab Science Results Study Final Report Volume I, External ...
    Aug 18, 1999 · For the first of these, Spacelab. 2 carried a small, helium-cooled infrared telescope. (IRT). It was designed to observe diffuse, extended.
  28. [28]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of the PDP results from STS-51-F Spacelab 2, consolidating all provided segments into a comprehensive response. To retain maximum detail, I’ve organized key information into tables where appropriate (e.g., for measurements, experiments, and sequences) and provided a narrative overview for contextual and qualitative data. The response avoids any thinking tokens and focuses solely on presenting the information as requested.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] 19860003891.pdf - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
    Oct 15, 1985 · The Instrument Pointing System (IPS) was developed at Dornier Systems under contract ... accuracy of 1.0 are sec and a stability of 0.1 arc sec.
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Space Shuttle Abort Evolution
    Sep 29, 2011 · This was the only intact abort performed in the program on STS-51F following an erroneous engine shutdown from a faulty sensor reading.
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Report - Investigation of the Challenger Accident - GovInfo
    pied with the failure of the SSME temperature sensors (a failure which had led to premature shutdown of a main engine on flight. STS 51-F and caused the ...
  32. [32]
    Instrument Pointing System in use on Spacelab flight - ESA
    The IPS has flown three times: Spacelab-2/STS-51F in July-August 1985; Astro-1/STS-35 in December 1990; Astro-2/STS-67 in March 1995. Shown is Spacelab-2, when ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Shuttle Payload Bay Thermal Environments
    It is anticipated that this report will prove to be useful to the. STS user community in developing realistic thermal environment design andtest requirements ...
  34. [34]
    Infrared telescope on Spacelab 2
    The infrared telescope (IRT) on Spacelab 2 which will be the first cryogenically cooled telescope operated from the Orbiter is discussed.
  35. [35]
    Preliminary results of the Spacelab-2 infrared telescope survey of ...
    These results are in qualitative agreement with earlier balloon-borne observations which showed the overall 2.4μm emission to be more widely distributed ...Missing: 200 Jupiter Venus
  36. [36]
    Timeline - Institute for Computational Cosmology
    1985: During July and August of 1985, an infrared telescope is flown onboard the Space Shuttle's Spacelab 2 to complement observations made by the IRAS mission.Missing: IRT | Show results with:IRT
  37. [37]
    Solar ultraviolet irradiance variations: A review - AGU Journals - Wiley
    Jan 20, 1987 · Solar ultraviolet irradiance variations over both short and long time scales are reviewed, with emphasis on their connection to solar magnetic activity.
  38. [38]
    Obituary: Karl Gordon Henize, 1926-1993 - Astrophysics Data System
    ... Astronomy research. When Karl's turn came to fly, it was on STS 51-F, or Spacelab-2, which carried a collection of solar telescopes. Getting to orbit proved ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Spacelab Science Results Study - CORE
    ... 2. SPACELAB SCIENCE RESULTS STUDY: MICROGRAVITY. PHYSICAL SCIENCES ... STS-51F/Spacelab 2. 1985. 4. 3. 7. STS-51B/Spacelab 3. 1985. 74. 78. 152. STS-61A ...
  40. [40]
    STS-51F - NASA
    STS 51-F crewmembers depart the Kennedy Space Center's operations and ... The main purpose of this mission was... Shuttle Challenger launch on a week-long mission.Missing: report | Show results with:report
  41. [41]
    ESA - Building and flying Spacelab - European Space Agency
    ESA and NASA join forces to land Europe's rover on Mars. ESA and NASA are consolidating their cooperation on the ExoMars Rosalind Franklin mission with an ...
  42. [42]
    North Carolina company designs every NASA space mission patch
    Feb 24, 2023 · ... mission patch. The coaster-sized piece of embroidery adorns the crew's flight suits, each unique to the mission at hand, and has a decades ...<|control11|><|separator|>