Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Samir Amin

Samir Amin (3 September 1931 – 12 August 2018) was an Egyptian-French Marxist economist and author specializing in the analysis of global capitalism, imperialism, and unequal development.^[1]^[2] Born in Cairo to an Egyptian father and a French mother, both physicians, Amin grew up in Port Said and pursued studies in economics and political science in Paris, where he earned advanced degrees.^[3]^[4] His career included advisory roles in economic planning for the Egyptian government under Gamal Abdel Nasser and the Malian government under Modibo Keita, as well as positions at the United Nations and as director of the Third World Forum in Dakar, Senegal.^[5]^[6] Amin's seminal contributions to dependency theory emphasized how peripheral economies are structurally subordinated to core capitalist centers through mechanisms like unequal exchange and the law of worldwide value, arguing that delinking from global capitalism was essential for autonomous development in the Global South.^[7]^[8] Key works such as Accumulation on a World Scale (1970) and Unequal Development (1973) critiqued the integration of Third World economies into the imperialist system, while his introduction of the term "Eurocentrism" in 1988 highlighted ideological biases in Western historical narratives that obscure non-European modes of production, such as the tributary system.^[5]^[9] Though influential among anti-imperialist scholars and movements in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, Amin's advocacy for delinking and a "Fifth International" of popular forces drew limited empirical validation, as peripheral states pursuing such strategies often faced economic isolation without achieving sustained industrialization or delinkage from global markets.^[10]^[11]

Early Life and Education

Family Background and Upbringing

Samir Amin was born on 3 September 1931 in Cairo, Egypt, to an Egyptian father and a French mother, both medical doctors by profession.^[12]^[13]^[14] His father's Egyptian heritage rooted the family in local professional circles, while his mother's French background introduced early cross-cultural elements, including exposure to European intellectual traditions.^[15]^[16] Amin's upbringing occurred primarily in Port Said, a northern Egyptian port city with significant international trade and colonial influences during the interwar period.^[17]^[15]^[13] This environment, shaped by the Suez Canal's strategic role under British control until 1956, likely fostered his later interest in global economic dependencies, though direct causal links remain interpretive.^[18] He received early education in French-medium schools, such as the Lycée Français, which emphasized bilingual proficiency and aligned with his mother's cultural origins.^[19] The familial emphasis on medicine and professional achievement provided a stable, middle-class foundation, contrasting with the broader socioeconomic challenges in colonial Egypt, including rural poverty and urban industrialization debates of the 1930s–1940s.^[15]^[20] This setting, without evident financial hardship, enabled Amin's transition to higher studies abroad, though his emerging political awareness drew from observing Egypt's nationalist movements rather than personal deprivation.^[16]

Formal Education and Influences

Amin moved to Paris in 1947 at the age of 16 to pursue higher education within France's academic system.^[21] He completed a diploma in political science at the Institut d'Études Politiques de Paris (Sciences Po) in 1952.^[22] This was followed by graduation in statistics from the Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE) in 1956 and in economics in 1957, culminating in a PhD in economic sciences from the University of Paris that same year.^[23]^[19] His formal training emphasized quantitative methods and economic theory, reflecting the interdisciplinary rigor of French institutions during the postwar period, where statistics and planning were prioritized amid decolonization debates.^[1] These studies equipped him with tools for analyzing development disparities, though Amin later critiqued mainstream economic models for overlooking imperialist structures. Intellectually, Amin's time in Paris exposed him to Marxist frameworks, which he encountered through academic discourse and extracurricular engagement. He joined the French Communist Party as a student, immersing himself in anti-colonial activism and critiques of capitalism that informed his lifelong emphasis on peripheral economies' subordination to core powers.^[13] This period marked his shift from Egyptian nationalism toward a global historical materialism, influenced by the era's intellectual currents including dependency theory precursors, though he diverged from orthodox Marxism by stressing autonomous delinking strategies for the Global South.^[5]

Professional Trajectory

Development Planning in Africa

Following his doctoral studies in Paris, Amin joined Egypt's national planning agency in 1957, where he contributed to early post-independence economic strategies until 1960, when political persecution of communists under the Nasser regime compelled his departure.^[21] He then relocated to Mali, serving from 1960 to 1963 as an advisor attached to the Ministry of Planning in the newly independent state, where he assisted in formulating development policies amid challenges of resource scarcity and infrastructural deficits.^[21] In the mid-1960s, Amin expanded his practical involvement in West African economic planning under United Nations auspices, with a particular focus on Mali, emphasizing state-led industrialization and agricultural modernization to counter peripheral dependency.^[24] His efforts gained recognition for rigorous application of Marxist analytical frameworks to local contexts, prioritizing internal accumulation over export-oriented models that perpetuated unequal exchange with core economies.^[25] Appointed director of the United Nations African Institute for Economic Development and Planning (IDEP) in Dakar, Senegal, in 1970—a role he held until 1980—Amin oversaw training programs for over hundreds of post-colonial African planners, bureaucrats, and policymakers, instilling approaches centered on sovereign control of resources and delinking from global capitalist circuits to enable autonomous national projects.^[24]^[1] Under his leadership, IDEP critiqued import-substitution industrialization's limitations in Africa, advocating instead for popular mobilization and peasant-based agriculture as foundations for socialist-oriented development, though these ideas often clashed with prevailing comprador elites and international financial institutions.^[25] This period solidified Amin's influence on continental planning discourses, fostering networks that extended to founding institutions like the Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa (CODESRIA) in 1973, where he served as inaugural executive secretary until 1975.^[1]

Academic and Institutional Roles

Amin served as a full professor of economics in France beginning in 1966, maintaining this position while engaging in international development work.^[19] He lectured extensively at universities across Africa and Europe, including the Cheikh Anta Diop University in Dakar, Senegal, where he influenced generations of students on topics of dependency and underdevelopment.^[26] From 1970 to 1980, Amin directed the United Nations African Institute for Economic Development and Planning (IDEP) in Dakar, an institution focused on training African policymakers in economic planning and fostering self-reliant development strategies.^[19] Under his leadership, IDEP emphasized critiques of peripheral capitalism and promoted autocentric accumulation models tailored to African contexts.^[16] His tenure at IDEP bridged academic theory with practical policy advisory roles in Senegal and other African nations, though he later critiqued the limitations of such international bureaucracies in challenging global imperialism.^[5] Amin also contributed to institutional frameworks for social science research in Africa, including early involvement with the Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa (CODESRIA), where he helped shape its agenda toward radical economic analysis from 1973 onward.^[26]^[5] These roles underscored his commitment to integrating Marxist historical materialism into institutional training, prioritizing empirical studies of core-periphery relations over mainstream neoliberal paradigms prevalent in global academia.^[21]

Founding and Leading Think Tanks

In 1973, Samir Amin became the founding executive secretary of the Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa (CODESRIA), a Dakar-based organization established to foster independent social science research across the continent, independent of state or donor influence.^[27]^[28] He held this position until 1975, during which CODESRIA organized its first general assembly in 1973 and began publishing the CODESRIA Bulletin, emphasizing pan-African intellectual autonomy amid post-colonial challenges.^[27] Amin co-founded the Third World Forum (Forum tiers-monde, FTM) in Dakar in 1975, an independent research and advocacy network focused on analyzing global capitalist inequalities and promoting Southern perspectives on development.^[18] Following his departure from the United Nations' Institut Africain de Développement Économique et de Planification (IDEP) in 1980, he assumed directorship of the FTM, a role he maintained for over three decades until his death in 2018, during which the forum hosted annual symposia, published journals like Review of African Political Economy contributions, and critiqued neoliberal policies through empirical studies of peripheral economies.^[7]^[18] In 1997, Amin co-founded the World Forum for Alternatives (WFA), an international network linking think tanks from Asia, Africa, Latin America, and Europe to counter dominant globalization narratives and advocate for systemic alternatives to capitalism.^[29] He chaired the WFA, which organized assemblies in Cairo and Dakar, producing reports on delinking strategies and imperialism, drawing on data from over 40 member organizations to challenge Eurocentric economic models.^[30] These initiatives reflected Amin's commitment to institution-building outside Western-dominated frameworks, prioritizing empirical analysis of core-periphery dynamics over ideological conformity.^[7]

Theoretical Foundations

Global Historical Materialism

Samir Amin's global historical materialism reframes Marxist historical materialism as a framework for analyzing the evolution of human societies on a worldwide scale, emphasizing the expansion of capitalism as a unified world system rather than discrete national or regional trajectories. Developed through works such as Accumulation on a World Scale (1974) and Unequal Development (1976), this approach posits that capitalism's dynamics are inherently global, integrating peripheries into the system through unequal exchange and subordination from its inception, rather than as later appendages to European development.^[11]^[21] Central to Amin's theory is a critique of Eurocentrism in classical Marxism, particularly Marx's five-stage model of historical progression (primitive communism, slavery, feudalism, capitalism, socialism), which Amin viewed as implicitly deriving universal laws from Europe's experience. Instead, he proposed a tripartite global historical schema: an initial phase of communal societies, followed by the "tributary mode of production" spanning approximately 300 BCE to 1500 CE, characterized by centralized ideological and political structures in core regions like China, India, and the Hellenistic world, with decentralized peripheries including Europe, sub-Saharan Africa, and Japan. Capitalism emerged not from the stagnation of these Asian cores but from the flexible, market-driven dispossession in peripheral Europe, enabling its outward expansion and polarization of the world into autocentric centers and extraverted peripheries.^[31]^[11] In this global perspective, historical materialism takes precedence over narrower economic laws like the law of value, which Amin argued explains mechanisms of exploitation—such as "imperialist rent" extracted via undervalued peripheral labor—but fails to account for the system's origins, class struggles, or imperial alliances. He described imperialism as the fusion of capital's reproductive imperatives with social, national, and political strategies, perpetuating a "world-scale apartheid" between monopoly-finance capitals in the North and disarticulated economies in the South. Primitive accumulation, far from a historical prelude, operates as a permanent feature sustaining unequal development, where peripheries accumulate outwardly for export rather than internally for self-sustaining growth.^[21]^[11] Amin's framework underscores causal processes of polarization, quantifying post-colonial exploitation—for instance, estimating that the Global North appropriated approximately $62 trillion from the Global South between 1960 and 2018 through mechanisms like super-exploitation. It rejects unilinear development paths, insisting that peripheries cannot replicate core trajectories without delinking from the capitalist world system's imperatives, thereby prioritizing multipolar, socialist-oriented transitions over Eurocentric teleology. This global lens integrates elements of dependency theory and world-systems analysis while rooting them in dialectical materialism, viewing history as driven by contradictions resolvable only through collective, internationalist agency.^[11]^[31]^[21]

Law of Worldwide Value

Samir Amin developed the Law of Worldwide Value as a framework extending Karl Marx's labor theory of value to the global capitalist system, positing that value production and realization occur on a worldwide scale rather than within isolated national economies.^[32] This law asserts that the international division of labor under capitalism generates a unified global value system dominated by the imperialist centers (core countries), where productivity levels and organic compositions of capital set the benchmarks for commodity prices.^[21] In peripheral economies, lower wages—stemming from abundant surplus labor populations—enable higher rates of surplus value extraction per unit of labor compared to the centers, but global market prices undervalue peripheral outputs, enforcing a systematic transfer of surplus value northward.^[7] Central to Amin's analysis is the mechanism of unequal exchange, whereby peripheral producers receive less value in return for their exports than the labor embodied in them warrants, as prices are calibrated to the centers' higher technological efficiencies and wage norms.^[33] This disparity arises because peripheral commodities, often primary goods or low-value-added manufactures, compete in markets where exchange values reflect average worldwide conditions skewed toward the core's advanced capital intensity. Amin quantified this through the concept of "imperialist rent," a superprofit accruing to the centers equivalent to the excess surplus value siphoned from the peripheries, which sustains higher real wages, expanded reproduction, and monopolistic dominance in the North without eroding profitability.^[34] Empirical illustrations in Amin's work highlight how, for instance, post-colonial African economies in the 1960s–1970s exported raw materials at prices divorced from their full labor content, subsidizing industrial accumulation in Europe and North America.^[32] Amin contended that this worldwide law of value impedes autonomous development in the peripheries by locking them into extroverted accumulation patterns, where growth depends on integration into global circuits rather than internal demand or technological sovereignty.^[7] Unlike classical Marxist national applications, Amin's global extension critiques the illusion of equal exchange under free trade, revealing capitalism's inherent polarization: centers polarize internally toward oligopolies while extracting value externally to offset declining profit rates.^[21] He projected that without delinking from this value regime—via strategies prioritizing domestic markets and selective autarky—peripheral stagnation would persist, as evidenced by persistent trade imbalances where, by the 2000s, developing countries supplied over 60% of global raw material exports yet captured minimal value-added shares.^[33] This theory, detailed in Amin's 1978 monograph (revised 2010), underscores causal links between global value hierarchies and imperialism, challenging neoclassical equilibrium models that abstract from power asymmetries.^[34]

Analyses of Capitalism and Imperialism

Monopoly Capitalism and Core-Periphery Dynamics

Samir Amin analyzed monopoly capitalism as a structural phase of global capitalism, extending beyond Lenin's depiction of imperialism as a highest stage to viewing it as an inherent, enduring feature inscribed in capitalism's expansionary logic. In this framework, monopolies enable the centers—primarily the Triad of the United States, Europe, and Japan—to dominate high-productivity sectors while consigning peripheries to low-value extraction, perpetuating underdevelopment through mechanisms like unequal exchange. Productivity gains in the core (averaging 4.5% annually) outpace wage increases (around 2.5%), generating surplus that requires absorption, partly via expanded non-productive consumption (reaching 50% of GDP by the early 2000s) and transfers from the periphery.^[35] Central to Amin's theory are the five monopolies wielded collectively by the Triad: technological superiority (fueled by military R&D), control over natural resources, financial dominance, media and communication networks, and military power including weapons of mass destruction. These monopolies facilitate super-profits, or imperialist rent, extracted from peripheries comprising 80% of the global population but generating only marginalized shares of world surplus value. For instance, peripheral wages stagnate (near 0% growth in some models) relative to core levels, enabling value transfers equivalent to 17% of global GDP or 25% of core GDP, subsidizing Northern consumption and investment while blocking Southern industrialization.^[36]^[35] Core-periphery dynamics, in Amin's view, arise from capitalism's polarizing tendencies, where integration into the world market distorts peripheral social formations, fostering dependent capitalism rather than balanced growth. Peripheries export raw materials or low-wage manufactures at undervalued prices due to productivity-wage disparities, importing core technologies and finished goods at inflated costs, thus transferring surplus northward via unequal exchange. This process, quantified as imperialist rent, reinforces disequilibrium: centers absorb global surplus through monopoly rents, while peripheries face deindustrialization and pauperization, as seen in cases like African land grabs for export crops or Mexican labor remittances funding U.S. deficits. Amin argued this polarization intensified post-1970s globalization, with monopolies preventing catch-up development absent deliberate delinking.^[35]^[36]

Imperialism in the Modern Era

Samir Amin characterized imperialism in the post-World War II era, particularly from the 1970s onward, as evolving into a system of generalized-monopoly capitalism, where global monopolies dominate productive systems through control over technology, natural resources, finance, media, and weapons of mass destruction.^[37] This stage supplanted earlier national imperialisms with a collective imperialism exercised by the triad of the United States, Europe, and Japan, which coordinates to preserve its dominance over peripheries via neoliberal globalization and financialization.^[37] ^[38] Unlike classical imperialism focused on territorial conquest, modern variants prioritize extracting monopoly rent and imperialist rent from the South, marginalizing populations while siphoning resources and labor to sustain accumulation in the core.^[37] Central to this dynamic is the triad's imposition of unequal exchange, where peripheries produce goods at undervalued rates due to limited technological access, enabling core monopolies to capture surplus value through patents, branding, and financial mechanisms.^[36] For instance, in global value chains, firms like Apple appropriate up to 90% of value from products assembled in the South, concentrating profits in design and marketing phases controlled by Northern capital.^[36] Amin argued that institutions such as the World Trade Organization and World Bank enforce this by privatizing essential services like water and health, deepening dependency and debt entrapment in the peripheries.^[36] Financialization, accelerating since the 1980s, amplifies this by channeling surplus from production to speculative circuits, rendering the system obsolescent and prone to crises that further pauperize the global South.^[37] Geopolitically, contemporary imperialism deploys aggressive strategies, including U.S.-led military interventions in Iraq (2003) and Syria, framed as democracy promotion but aimed at destabilizing sovereign states to secure resource access and prevent autonomous development.^[38] Amin emphasized that such actions serve not national rivalries but the unified interests of triad monopoly capital, as seen in the erosion of post-colonial independence where local elites—replaced by comprador "profiteers"—align with foreign monopolies, fostering lumpen-development characterized by social disintegration, informal survival economies, and rural pauperization.^[37] ^[38] In emergent cases like China and Vietnam, partial delinking from this system allowed industrial growth, yet Amin viewed global rivalries, such as U.S.-China tensions, as struggles over economic territory within the imperialist framework rather than its transcendence.^[36] This structure perpetuates polarization, with the triad resisting Southern challenges through ideological hegemony and military primacy, ensuring peripheries remain sources of cheap inputs rather than equal partners.^[37] Amin contended that true counter-strategies require recognizing imperialism's systemic nature, beyond inter-state conflicts, to mobilize for delinking and autocentric accumulation in the South.^[36]

Development Strategies

Delinking from the World Capitalist System

Samir Amin conceptualized delinking as the strategic refusal by peripheral nations to subordinate their development agendas to the dominant logic of the world capitalist system, enabling them to prioritize internal dynamics over externally imposed imperatives. This approach, articulated in works such as his 1984 note on the concept and expanded in his 1990 book Delinking: Towards a Polycentric World, posits that genuine emancipation from underdevelopment requires breaking the cycle of extraverted accumulation, where peripheral economies export raw materials and import manufactured goods under unequal terms dictated by core countries.^[39]^[40] Amin argued that integration into global markets, even through import-substitution or export-oriented policies, reinforces dependency by aligning local production with the worldwide law of value, which systematically devalues peripheral labor and resources.^[41]^[42] Central to Amin's rationale is the recognition that peripheral capitalism, unlike core accumulation, cannot generate sustained internal expansion without delinking, as it remains trapped in mono-cultural exports and financial subordination, exacerbating polarization between centers of high productivity and marginalized peripheries. He contended that adjustment to world market fluctuations—such as those seen in the debt crises of the 1980s—merely deepens pauperization, with Third World countries unable to raise living standards or industrialize meaningfully while submitting to these external pressures.^[43]^[40] Delinking, therefore, demands a political rupture involving state-led reconfiguration of trade, investment, and technology transfers to serve national priorities, including agrarian reforms and popular mobilization to counter elite comprador interests.^[44] Amin clarified that delinking eschews autarky, instead advocating submission of external relations to internal requirements—the inverse of adapting domestically to global dictates—fostering autocentric models geared toward diversified production for endogenous markets. This selective disengagement aims at constructing a polycentric global order, where multiple poles challenge the unipolar dominance of Western capital, as evidenced in Amin's analysis of potential transitions in regions like East Asia, though he stressed its universal applicability to any periphery seeking sovereignty.^[41] Implementation hinges on ideological commitment to delink from imperialism's value extraction, with success predicated on building democratic popular alliances rather than relying on technocratic reforms alone.^[5]^[45]

Autocentric Development Models

Samir Amin defined autocentric accumulation as a pattern of economic expansion rooted in the internal dynamics of a social formation, where the production of consumer goods is linked to that of capital goods, fostering self-sustained reproduction of capital through domestic market deepening and local productive forces.^[46] This model, detailed in his 1976 book Unequal Development, prioritizes endogenous growth with external trade subordinated to internal requirements, enabling high internal exchange density and integrated sectoral development between industry and agriculture.^[46] Unlike autarky, autocentric development permits selective external engagement but rejects subordination to global capitalist imperatives, as Amin emphasized: "Autocentric accumulation does not mean autarchy... external trade is here subordinated to the requirements of autocentric accumulation."^[46] In contrast to peripheral accumulation—prevalent in Third World economies—Amin argued that autocentric models destroy pre-capitalist modes of production entirely, commodify labor power with rising real wages to sustain mass consumption, and centralize surplus reinvestment under national monetary and credit controls tailored to local needs.^[46] Peripheral formations, by comparison, exhibit disarticulation, with export-oriented sectors (e.g., raw materials comprising 75% of Third World exports from modern enterprises in 1966) generating surpluses largely transferred abroad via unequal exchange, estimated at $22 billion annually to centers in that era.^[46] Historical autocentric examples include 19th-century England during the Industrial Revolution and Japan's Meiji-era industrialization (1877–1914), where internal markets expanded alongside state-directed integration of productive forces.^[46] For peripheral countries to transition, Amin prescribed delinking from the world system's extraverted logic, involving state-led strategies such as land reform, nationalization of banks and key industries (e.g., Egypt's 1952 agrarian reform and 1956–1961 nationalizations), protective tariffs, and planned prioritization of mass consumer goods using modern techniques.^[46] This requires isolating local price systems from global distortions, redirecting credit toward structural transformations like proletarianization and domestic surplus retention, and pursuing a socialist orientation to surpass capitalist models, as "the periphery cannot just overtake the capitalist model; it is obliged to surpass it."^[46] Such measures aim to homogenize productivity, reduce foreign capital dominance (which exported 20–30% of rewards in pre-1952 Egypt), and build cohesive national states less beholden to comprador elites.^[46] Amin's framework posits that autocentric development stabilizes surplus value extraction internally while challenging the falling tendency of the profit rate through balanced reinvestment, differing from peripheral reliance on super-exploitation and luxury-oriented demand among marginalized masses.^[46] Implementation demands popular-democratic mobilization to enforce these shifts, rejecting profitability criteria in favor of maximizing social labor time across sectors.^[46]

Critiques of Ideology and History

Eurocentrism and Its Structural Role

Samir Amin identified Eurocentrism as a paradigm that constructs a fictitious universal history centered on Europe, portraying its development from ancient Greece through the Renaissance and Enlightenment as the inevitable path to modernity and capitalism.^[47] This narrative, he contended, systematically excludes the autonomous histories of non-European societies, which operated under tributary modes of production characterized by centralized states and ritualized economies rather than market-driven individualism.^[47] Amin argued that such exclusion serves to naturalize Europe's ascendancy, ignoring how capitalist accumulation in the core relied on the forced integration and underdevelopment of peripheral regions via colonialism and unequal exchange.^[11] In Amin's analysis, Eurocentrism's structural role extends beyond mere historiography to underpin the ideological reproduction of global capitalism's core-periphery dynamics.^[7] By framing European exceptionalism—rooted in supposed cultural traits like rationalism and secularism—as the engine of progress, it disguises the violent disarticulation of peripheral economies, where surplus extraction sustained metropolitan growth without reciprocal development.^[8] Amin emphasized that this prejudice is not accidental but inherent to capital's logic, as it rationalizes imperialism as a civilizing mission while perpetuating polarization: the core's overaccumulation contrasted with the periphery's stagnation.^[7] He rejected culturalist explanations that attribute these disparities to inherent non-European backwardness, instead tracing them to the worldwide expansion of value production post-16th century, which homogenized economies unevenly.^[47] Amin further posited that Eurocentrism infiltrates social theory by conflating capitalism's parochial features with universal human tendencies, such as in economistic models that universalize abstract labor without accounting for historical specificity.^[48] This structural embedding, he claimed, sustains hegemony by rendering alternatives—rooted in polycentric global histories—invisible, thereby blocking delinking strategies essential for peripheral autonomy.^[11] Empirical evidence from Amin's framework highlights how 19th-century European industrialization, often mythologized as endogenous, depended on colonial markets and resources, with Britain's cotton industry, for instance, reliant on slave-produced inputs from the Americas, illustrating the periphery-core linkage Eurocentrism obscures.^[47]

Rejection of Culturalist Explanations

Samir Amin critiqued culturalism as a theoretical framework that posits the permanence of distinct "cultures" (capital C), each with inherent originality unfolding through endogenous processes, thereby essentializing differences and obscuring material dynamics.^[49] In his 1988 book Eurocentrism, he argued that culturalism combines universalist pretensions—claiming a singular human history—with particularist defenses of Western superiority, rendering non-European trajectories as deviations or failures rather than alternative paths shaped by economic forces.^[49] This approach, Amin contended, depoliticizes global inequalities by attributing them to immutable cultural traits instead of structural exploitation within capitalism.^[11] Amin's rejection stemmed from a commitment to historical materialism, which prioritizes transformations in modes of production and class relations over cultural determinism.^[21] He viewed culturalist explanations of underdevelopment—such as notions of "cultural backwardness" in peripheral societies—as ideological veils that naturalize unequal exchange and imperialist domination, ignoring how integration into the world market as producers of low-value commodities perpetuates poverty.^[50] For instance, in analyzing Africa's stagnation, Amin dismissed attributions to traditional cultural resistance to modernity, emphasizing instead the distortion of local economies by colonial legacies and core-periphery dynamics that extract surplus value without fostering industrialization.^[51] This stance extended to contemporary ideologies like Samuel Huntington's "clash of civilizations" thesis, which Amin, in a 1996 essay republished in 2024, described as a culturalist complement to imperialism, framing conflicts as eternal cultural antagonisms rather than struggles over resources and hegemony.^[52] He insisted that such narratives serve capitalist expansion by diverting attention from class-based resistance and the potential for delinking from global value chains.^[52] Amin's critique thus positioned culturalism not as neutral scholarship but as a mechanism reinforcing Eurocentric historiography, which retroactively constructs Europe's "rational" culture as the engine of progress while consigning others to stasis.^[49] Empirical evidence from unequal development patterns, such as the persistent terms-of-trade decline for primary exporters since the 19th century, supported his materialist alternative over cultural essentialism.^[21]

Political Positions

Engagement with Political Islam

Samir Amin critiqued political Islam as a reactionary ideology that primarily operates on the cultural terrain, substituting identity-based "belongingness" for genuine class-based social confrontations between popular classes and dominant elites.^[53] In his 2007 article "Political Islam in the Service of Imperialism," Amin argued that this cultural focus allows Islamist movements to evade structural economic critiques, thereby aligning with dependent peripheral capitalism and the interests of global imperialism rather than challenging them.^[53] He contended that organizations like the Muslim Brotherhood function not as authentic opposition but as organic components of the ruling power systems in many Arab states, perpetuating neoliberal policies under a religious veneer.^[54] Amin's analysis framed political Islam as a post-colonial phenomenon exploited by imperial powers to fragment progressive, secular nationalist movements and prevent the emergence of socialist alternatives in the Global South.^[51] He rejected notions of Islamism as an anti-imperialist force, asserting instead that it accommodates capitalist globalization by promoting conservative social hierarchies and individualism masked as communal piety, often with tacit support from Western interventions.^[53] For instance, during the Arab Spring uprisings around 2011, Amin warned that electoral victories by Islamist parties, such as in Egypt and Tunisia, represented temporary consolidations of the status quo rather than transformative change, as they avoided delinking from the world capitalist system.^[54] From a historical materialist perspective, Amin dismissed Islamist dogmas as secondary to their socioeconomic role, viewing militant groups not as theological innovators but as tools that reinforce peripheral accumulation by disaccumulation, ultimately serving to divide the working classes along confessional lines.^[53] He advocated for secular, popular democratic fronts to counter this, emphasizing that true emancipation required autocentric development and class alliances over cultural revivalism.^[13] Amin's uncompromising rejection extended to moderate variants, which he saw as failing to dissociate from terrorist fringes and complicit in maintaining comprador elites.^[55]

Support for Revolutionary Regimes in Cambodia

Samir Amin viewed the Khmer Rouge regime in Democratic Kampuchea (1975–1979) as a pioneering effort to implement radical delinking from global imperialism, aligning with his broader theories on autocentric development and resistance to peripheral capitalism. He praised the regime's policies of forced agrarian collectivization, urban evacuation, and economic self-reliance as necessary steps to dismantle comprador elites and feudal structures, thereby forging a classless peasant-based society independent of foreign influence.^[56] In his October 1981 article "The Struggle for National Independence and Socialism in Kampuchea," Amin argued that the revolution had achieved "a radical break with the imperialist system," crediting Pol Pot and his comrades with successfully eliminating old feudal and comprador classes through these measures. He framed the regime's approach as a bold socialist transition in a peripheral economy, superior in its anti-imperialist resolve to more compromised models like those in China or Vietnam, and dismissed contemporary reports of mass violence as distortions propagated by imperialist and Soviet-aligned forces to undermine genuine Third World revolutions. While acknowledging "excesses" and "sacrifices" in the process, Amin attributed them primarily to external aggressions, such as U.S. bombing campaigns from 1969–1973 (which killed an estimated 150,000–500,000 civilians) and subsequent Vietnamese intervention, rather than to systemic errors in Khmer Rouge voluntarism or ideology.^[56] Amin's endorsement extended to public forums; at a 1981 conference in Tokyo titled "The Lesson of Cambodia," he described Pol Pot's work as "one of the major successes of the struggle for socialism in our era," emphasizing its exemplary delinking despite the regime's overthrow by Vietnam in January 1979. Khmer Rouge leaders, including Khieu Samphan, drew intellectual inspiration from Amin's underdevelopment theories, adapting concepts of peripheral disarticulation to justify Cambodia's isolationist policies aimed at eradicating urban "parasitic" elements and foreign dependencies. This alignment reflected Amin's prioritization of anti-imperialist rupture over incremental reforms, even as empirical evidence of demographic collapse— including up to 25% of the population perishing from starvation, overwork, and executions—emerged from refugee accounts and early investigations.^[57]^[58]

Visions for Global Order

Samir Amin advocated for a polycentric world order as a structural alternative to the monopolistic capitalism centered in the global North, arguing that peripheral nations must delink from unequal integration into the world economy to foster autonomous development paths.^[59] In his 1990 book Delinking: Towards a Polycentric World, Amin posited that continued adjustment to global capitalist dynamics perpetuates underdevelopment in the Third World, necessitating a reconfiguration of economic rationality based on national and popular foundations rather than the imposed law of value from the centers of accumulation.^[39] This delinking involves prioritizing internal markets, resource mobilization, and social priorities over export-led growth, enabling the South to challenge the hierarchical division of labor.^[60] Amin's vision extended to a multipolar international system, where emerging powers in the South form alliances to counter U.S.-led unipolarity, emphasizing South-South cooperation as a pathway to renegotiate global relations.^[41] He critiqued globalization as an extension of imperialist control, proposing instead a "de-globalization" that reconstructs international exchanges on egalitarian terms, potentially leading to socialist transformations in multiple poles.^[61] Regarding the 1974 New International Economic Order (NIEO) initiative, Amin viewed its calls for resource sovereignty and trade reforms as insufficient without delinking, as they failed to dismantle the core-periphery asymmetry inherent in capitalism; nonetheless, he saw the NIEO's demands as a starting point for broader structural upheaval.^[62] ^[63] Ultimately, Amin's global order prioritized the convergence of progressive forces across regions toward a post-capitalist framework, warning that without active delinking and popular mobilization, multipolarity risks reproducing capitalist inequalities rather than transcending them.^[7] He stressed the role of ideological struggle to prevent peripheral states from mimicking Northern models, advocating for autocentric strategies that integrate economic planning with democratic control to build resilient, diversified economies.^[64] This polycentric approach, in Amin's framework, demands vigilance against comprador elites and external pressures, positioning delinking not as isolation but as a strategic reconfiguration for global emancipation.^[65]

Criticisms and Empirical Challenges

Flaws in Marxist Economic Assumptions

Critics of Samir Amin's economic framework, which builds on Marxist foundations, highlight flaws in core assumptions such as the labor theory of value (LTV) and the primacy of class struggle in accumulation processes. The LTV posits that commodity values derive primarily from socially necessary labor time, underpinning Amin's analysis of unequal exchange where peripheral economies export low-value goods due to suppressed wages and import high-value ones, perpetuating underdevelopment.^[21] However, empirical observations demonstrate that market prices often deviate significantly from labor inputs, as seen in the diamond-water paradox where scarce but labor-intensive water has low exchange value compared to labor-sparse diamonds, supporting subjective theories of value based on marginal utility rather than embedded labor alone. This undermines Amin's extension of LTV to global imperialism, where he argued peripheral stagnation stems from distorted value transfers, ignoring how innovation and scarcity drive pricing independently of labor quantities.^[66] Amin's reliance on Marxist dialectics, emphasizing inevitable contradictions leading to proletarian-led transformation, falters empirically in peripheral contexts. He assumed extroverted accumulation—tied to core demands—prevents autocentric growth, necessitating delinking to foster internal markets and class-based mobilization.^[21] Yet, post-1980s data reveal that integration into global trade, contrary to delinking prescriptions, correlated with rapid poverty reduction: the global extreme poverty rate fell from 42% in 1981 to 8.6% in 2018, driven by export-led strategies in East Asia and elsewhere, without the predicted deepening polarization. Countries like South Korea and Taiwan transitioned from periphery to high-income status by leveraging foreign investment and markets, achieving average annual GDP growth exceeding 7% from 1960 to 1990, challenging the Marxist view that capitalist integration inherently blocks endogenous development. Furthermore, Marxist assumptions of surplus value extraction as the engine of crisis overlook incentive structures and information problems in non-market systems, issues Amin downplayed in advocating state-led delinking. Historical attempts at similar models, such as Tanzania's Ujamaa villages (1967–1976), resulted in agricultural output stagnation and GDP per capita decline, with collectivization disrupting price signals and private initiative.^[67] Ludwig von Mises' economic calculation argument—that central planning cannot rationally allocate resources without market prices—finds validation in the Soviet Union's eventual collapse in 1991, where misallocation led to chronic shortages despite abundant labor, contradicting expectations of superior socialist efficiency. Amin's framework, by prioritizing class antagonism over these microeconomic realities, failed to anticipate how hybrid market reforms in China post-1978—yielding 10% annual GDP growth through 2010—outpaced pure delinking paths, suggesting causal realism favors decentralized incentives over rigid Marxist teleology. These flaws extend to Amin's modification of Marxist value laws for the periphery, where he posited distorted accumulation due to low organic composition of capital. Critics note this abandons orthodox LTV equalization of profit rates under competition, introducing ad hoc assumptions about monopoly preventing rational pricing, which lacks empirical rigor as peripheral firms increasingly compete globally via technology transfers.^[66] Dependency theory's broader Marxist inflection, including Amin's contributions, has been faulted for overemphasizing external exploitation while underweighting internal governance failures, such as corruption and institutional weakness, which econometric studies link more strongly to underdevelopment than trade imbalances alone.^[68] Thus, while Amin innovated on Marx, the underlying assumptions proved vulnerable to evidence of market-driven convergence and planning's practical limits.

Failures of Delinking in Practice

Attempts to implement delinking and autocentric development in peripheral economies have frequently resulted in economic stagnation, inefficiency, and crises, undermining the strategy's viability despite its theoretical appeal. In Tanzania, Julius Nyerere's Ujamaa policy from 1967 emphasized self-reliance through villagization, forcibly relocating millions into communal villages to foster internal markets and reduce import dependence. However, this approach disrupted agricultural production, leading to food shortages and a severe foreign exchange crisis by the late 1970s, as imports of essential inputs like fertilizers and spare parts became unsustainable. Real GDP per capita declined sharply, with average annual growth falling to around 1% during the 1970s and early 1980s, exacerbated by bureaucratic inefficiencies and lack of market incentives that stifled productivity.^[69]^[70] The Lagos Plan of Action (LPA), adopted by the Organization of African Unity in 1980, represented a continental push for self-reliant industrialization and reduced external dependence, aligning with delinking principles by prioritizing intra-African trade and resource mobilization. Yet, it failed to achieve its targets due to insufficient political commitment, weak institutional capacity, and overriding debt burdens that compelled many governments toward externally imposed structural adjustment programs by the mid-1980s. Implementation lagged, with intra-African trade remaining below 10% of total commerce, and economic performance deteriorated amid falling commodity prices and fiscal mismanagement, confirming empirical barriers to autocentric isolation from global circuits.^[71]^[72] In Latin America, import substitution industrialization (ISI) policies from the 1950s to 1970s pursued partial delinking by protecting domestic industries from foreign competition to build internal accumulation. Initial growth in manufacturing occurred, but systemic flaws emerged: overvalued currencies discouraged exports, fostering inefficiency and rent-seeking, while balance-of-payments deficits ballooned, culminating in the 1980s debt crisis with regional GDP contracting by 10% from 1982-1983. Countries like Argentina experienced hyperinflation exceeding 5,000% annually by 1989, attributable to unsustainable subsidies and lack of technological dynamism without global integration. These outcomes highlight how delinking efforts often amplified internal distortions, such as corruption and capital flight, rather than resolving peripheral vulnerabilities.^[73]^[74]^[75] Common factors in these failures include inadequate institutional reforms to enforce popular mobilization, as Amin advocated, and the difficulty of sustaining technological progress in isolation, leading critics to argue that selective global engagement—evident in East Asian successes—outperformed rigid delinking. Empirical evidence from these cases underscores that without robust internal markets and governance, delinking devolved into autarky-like stagnation, prompting shifts toward export-oriented reforms that, despite inequalities, delivered higher growth rates post-crisis.^[76]^[77]

Controversial Defenses of Atrocities

Samir Amin defended the Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia, which under Pol Pot seized power on April 17, 1975, and implemented policies resulting in the Cambodian genocide, with death toll estimates ranging from 1.5 to 3 million people—about 20-25% of the population—primarily through execution, starvation, disease, and forced labor in agrarian communes.^[78]^[79] In his 1977 analysis, Amin portrayed the Cambodian revolution as a radical experiment in "delinking" from imperialist structures, attributing its excesses to "voluntarist" overreach rather than core ideological flaws, while praising its aim to dismantle urban capitalist influences and achieve autarkic socialism.^[80] Even after reports of widespread atrocities emerged in the late 1970s, Amin continued to endorse aspects of the regime's project into the 1980s, describing the Khmer Rouge era at a 1981 Tokyo conference as "one of the major successes of the struggle for socialism in our era" and an exemplary break from peripheral capitalism.^[81] This position aligned with his broader advocacy for third-world revolutions prioritizing systemic rupture over gradualism, framing Cambodian policies as necessary countermeasures to neocolonial dependencies, despite empirical evidence from refugee accounts and defectors documenting systematic purges of intellectuals, ethnic minorities, and perceived class enemies.^[82] Amin's defenses extended implicitly to suggesting analogous radicalism for Africa, where he argued that delinking required measures as decisive as those in Cambodia to overcome comprador elites and global integration, effectively endorsing a "Khmer Rouge option" for structural transformation amid the continent's underdevelopment.^[57] Critics, including historians analyzing declassified documents and tribunal evidence, have highlighted how such views overlooked verifiable causal links between regime ideology and mass killings, prioritizing theoretical anti-imperialism over documented human costs exceeding 2 million by conservative demographic reconstructions.^[83]^[82]

Legacy and Influence

Impact on Dependency Theory and Third Worldism

Samir Amin advanced dependency theory by extending Marxist analysis to the global scale, emphasizing how capitalist accumulation in the core perpetuates underdevelopment in the periphery through unequal exchange and superexploitation of labor. In Accumulation on a World Scale (1970), he argued that the "law of worldwide value" governs the international division of labor, where peripheral economies export low-value commodities while importing high-value goods, resulting in a net transfer of surplus to the center.^[84] This framework, building on earlier works like Paul Baran's The Political Economy of Growth (1957), posited that integration into the world market hinders autonomous industrialization in the Global South, as local production remains oriented toward raw material extraction rather than self-sustaining growth.^[21] Amin's 1977 book Imperialism and Unequal Development further detailed how wage-productivity disparities enable imperial rent extraction, challenging diffusionist models that attributed underdevelopment to internal deficiencies rather than systemic exploitation. Amin's critique of Eurocentrism, articulated in his 1989 book of the same name, reinforced dependency theory by historicizing capitalism's uneven expansion, rejecting narratives of universal progress and highlighting ideological biases in Western social sciences that obscure peripheral realities.^[85] He demonstrated that development and underdevelopment are dialectically linked, with the former reliant on the latter's stagnation, as evidenced by persistent global inequalities where, between 1960 and 2018, approximately $62 trillion in value was appropriated from the South via unequal terms of trade.^[11] This structuralist approach influenced subsequent scholars in Latin America and Africa, shifting focus from neoclassical reforms to radical reconfiguration of international economic relations. In the realm of Third Worldism, Amin's advocacy for "delinking" provided a strategic blueprint for peripheral nations to assert sovereignty against imperialist integration, prioritizing national accumulation over submission to global market imperatives. Delinking, as theorized in his writings from the 1980s onward, entails refusing extroverted growth models that enrich comprador classes while impoverishing broader populations, instead fostering autocentric development through state-led investment in infrastructure and South-South alliances.^[11] Drawing from mid-20th-century anti-colonial movements like the 1955 Bandung Conference, Amin envisioned Third World unity as a counter-hegemonic force, capable of challenging U.S.-dominated oligopolies by delinking up to 70% of economic activity from capitalist logic to enable endogenous transformation.^[21] His ideas resonated in radical circles, inspiring critiques of neoliberal globalization and calls for polycentric world orders, though they emphasized proletarian internationalism over romanticized nationalism to avoid pitfalls of bourgeois-led projects.^[11]

Posthumous Publications and Recent Evaluations

Following Amin's death on August 12, 2018, two major volumes were published posthumously in 2019. Only People Make Their Own History: From the Struggle for Liberation to a New Revolutionary Project, edited by A. M. Kaloo and issued by the International Development Economics Associates (IDEAs), collects ten essays from the final decade of Amin's life, addressing themes of imperialism, the crisis of capitalism, and the necessity for popular revolutionary movements to transcend national boundaries.^[86]^[87] The Long Revolution of the Global South: Toward a New Anti-Imperialist International, the second installment of his memoirs and published by Monthly Review Press, extends his autobiographical reflections on anti-imperialist organizing, advocating for a polycentric world order led by Southern alliances against Northern hegemony.^[88]^[89] These works have been reviewed in outlets affiliated with Marxist and dependency scholarship, with Science & Society praising their synthesis of Amin's lifelong critique of Eurocentrism and monopoly capital while noting their reliance on historical materialism over empirical case studies.^[89] Scholarly evaluations since 2020 have underscored Amin's continued relevance in analyzing uneven global development, though often from perspectives aligned with anti-imperialist frameworks. A 2021 analysis in Review of African Political Economy affirmed the applicability of his delinking strategy to post-neoliberal dependencies, arguing it offers tools for resisting financialized extraction in Africa and Latin America despite practical implementation hurdles in states like Algeria and Tanzania.^[7] In 2022, an Aeon essay positioned Amin's economic theories—emphasizing peripheral accumulation and law of worldwide value—as foundational for substantive decolonization, critiquing cultural decoloniality for overlooking structural capitalist integration.^[11] By 2024, commemorations in Global South advocacy circles, such as those from Brazil's Landless Workers' Movement, lauded Amin's six-decade output as a bulwark against neoliberal dissolution of sovereignty, citing his warnings on fascism's resurgence via oligarchic polarization.^[90] A January 2025 peer-reviewed reflection in Development in Practice applied Amin's framework to the 50th anniversary of the New International Economic Order, faulting its dilution into market-led reforms for perpetuating core-periphery imbalances, while crediting Amin's polycentrism for anticipating multipolar shifts like BRICS expansion.^[62] These assessments, predominantly from progressive economic networks, attribute to Amin a catalytic role in Third Worldist thought but rarely engage counterarguments on delinking's autarkic risks or overemphasis on class abstraction versus institutional data.^[10]

References

[1]
In Memoriam: Samir Amin – IDEAs
Sep 1, 2018 · Samir Amin, the renowned Marxist thinker and economist, passed away on August 13 in Paris. Born in Cairo on September 3, 1931, to an Egyptian ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
[2]
Death of a Marxist: Egyptian economist Samir Amin ... - MR Online
Aug 15, 2018 · On Sunday, August 12, Samir Amin died. With him went a generation of Egyptian Marxists who came of age in the time of Nasserism and departed ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
[3]
Samir Amin, The Man of The South - Afriland First Group
Sep 10, 2019 · Samir Amin was born on 3 September 1931 in Cairo to an Egyptian father and to a French mother. He spent his childhood and early years in Port ...
[4]
Egyptian-French economist Samir Amin dies - Voices against the tide
Aug 13, 2018 · Amin was born in Cairo to a French mother and an Egyptian father, both doctors. He spent his childhood and adolescence in Port-Saïd (Egypt) ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
[5]
Samir Amin – a Marxist with blood in his veins - ROAPE
Mar 18, 2021 · Amin has introduced or contributed to many concepts: 'tributary mode of production', 'eurocentrism', 'unequal exchange', 'law of worldwide value ...
[6]
Theoretical contributions of Samir Amin (1931-2018)
Sep 24, 2018 · Amin was a leading proponent of dependency analysis and world systems theory, which gained prominence during the 1970s among left organisations ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
[7]
Full article: Samir Amin and beyond: the enduring relevance of ...
Mar 11, 2021 · ... contributions to dependency theory especially rich. His ability to show how development and underdevelopment are inextricably intertwined ...
[8]
Enduring Relevance: Samir Amin's radical political economy
Apr 11, 2021 · ... contributions to dependency theory especially rich. While Amin developed many concrete concepts and shed light on many concrete issues, it ...
[9]
[PDF] Dependency Theory - Institute for New Economic Thinking
May 23, 2017 · Samir Amin's prolific contributions, mainly drawing on African and comparative historical experiences, brought the core concerns of the ...<|separator|>
[10]
Rethinking Samir Amin's legacy and the case for a political ...
Aug 21, 2019 · A case is made here for the desirability and viability of the late Samir Amin's call for a new International.Missing: controversies criticisms
[11]
If you want decolonisation go to the economics of Samir Amin - Aeon
Apr 15, 2022 · Thinking about the structure of the global economy was in fact what led Amin to make important contributions to dependency theory, which is a ...
[12]
Samir Amin, The Man of The South - Afriland First Group
Sep 10, 2019 · Samir Amin was born on 3 September 1931 in Cairo to an Egyptian father and to a French mother. He spent his childhood and early years in Port ...Missing: upbringing | Show results with:upbringing
[13]
A Tribute to Samir Amin, Egyptian Economist - Al-Fanar Media
Sep 27, 2018 · His father was Egyptian and his mother French; both parents were doctors. After a childhood in Port Said, he went to Paris to study political ...
[14]
Samir Amin (1931-2018): A titan has gone home to rest
Aug 23, 2018 · Born to an Egyptian father and French mother on 3 September 1931 in Cairo, Egypt, Samir Amin's convictions owe much to the context of his ...Missing: family background upbringing
[15]
Amin, Samir | Encyclopedia.com
Samir Amin was born in Cairo, the son of two doctors, his father Egyptian and his mother French. He lived in Port Said in northern Egypt and attended the ...
[16]
Remembering Samir Amin: A Marxist of the south - Liberation School
Aug 12, 2019 · With the passing of the great anti-imperialist and Marxist intellectual Samir Amin on August 12 of last year, the international communist ...
[17]
Samir Amin intro - AwaaZ Magazine
Samir Amin was born in Cairo as son of an Egyptian father and a French mother (both medical doctors). He spent his childhood and youth in Port Said.Missing: early life family background upbringing
[18]
Samir Amin (1931-2018) – a Great Imperialism Scholar and Anti ...
Aug 22, 2023 · Samir Amin launches some harsh accusations against our society in The Global North, also speaking provocatively about a 'one-party system'. Is ...Missing: controversies criticisms
[19]
A Brief Biography of Samir Amin | Monthly Review
Sep 4, 1992 · Abstract. Samir Amin was born in Cairo in 1931 and was educated at the Lycee Francais there. He gained a Ph.D. in Political Economy in Paris ...Missing: parents | Show results with:parents
[20]
World Acclaimed Marxist Thinker Samir Amin Dies - Jadaliyya
Aug 14, 2018 · Amin was born in Egypt in 1931 to an Egyptian father and French mother and spent his youth in Port Said. After studying in Egypt, he continued ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
[21]
Samir Amin at 80: An Introduction and Tribute - Monthly Review
In Amin's analysis, then, the law of value and historical materialism do not have equal standing—if only because the former offers the world no way out, while ...Missing: controversies criticisms
[22]
Samir Amin was a great thinker and inspired many scholars in the ...
Aug 23, 2018 · From 1947 to 1957 he studied in Paris, gaining a diploma in political science (1952) before graduating in statistics (1956) and economics (1957 ...Missing: formal degrees
[23]
Samir Amin – Brief profile - Global University For Sustainability
Granted a PhD degree in Economic Sciences by the University of Paris (1957) and the degree of the National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies, France ...Missing: formal | Show results with:formal
[24]
Samir Amin (1931-2018): Africa's pioneering Marxist political ...
Amin soon won credibility for his tireless economic planning in West Africa, especially Mali, under United Nations auspices. By 1970 he was chosen director ...
[25]
Revolutionary Change in Africa: an Interview with Samir Amin
Mar 16, 2017 · In this interview Amin reflects on a life spent at the cutting edge of radical theory and practice, African politics and the legacy of the Russian revolution.
[26]
Pr. Samir Amin (1973-1975) - CODESRIA
Samir Amin decided later to dedicate himself to academic career. He taught for many years in several universities, including the University Cheikh Anta Diop ...Missing: early | Show results with:early
[27]
Africa has lost a giant: Professor Samir Amin - TrustAfrica
Aug 12, 2018 · He was then the Director of IDEP, a UNECA affiliate institute based in Dakar. He became the first executive secretary of CODESRIA, a ...
[28]
Bye, Samir, it's still media clergy
Aug 20, 2018 · Samir Amin is the founding executive secretary (1973-1975) of Africa's top social sciences think-tank, the Dakar-based Council for the ...
[29]
Samir Amin - The new social movements - euromed.org
Jan 7, 2006 · In 1997 we created the World Forum for Alternatives which was composed of organizations from Asia, Africa, Latin America, and Europe . In 1999 ...Missing: founded | Show results with:founded
[30]
Samir Amin, a marxist theoretician - Marx21
Nov 13, 2018 · In addition to the Third World Forum he led in Dakar, Samir Amin chaired the World Forum of Alternatives, a network of think tanks from ...
[31]
Global History: A View from the South | Socialism & Democracy
Using historical materialism as his framework, Amin challenges Marx's and Marxist Eurocentric approaches to world history. Instead of Marx's five stages of ...
[32]
Book Review: Samir Amin's The Law of Worldwide Value - MLToday
Mar 22, 2012 · Despite Amin's intelligent efforts to apply those insights to today's global economy, The Law of Worldwide Value falls short.
[33]
Samir Amin on value in a divided world
Jan 16, 2019 · The difference between value and price assumes great significance in the concept of “imperialist rent”, with which Amin explains the economic ...
[34]
The Law of Worldwide Value - Monthly Review Press
Dec 1, 2010 · Amin sees the present crisis as a moment in the second long crisis of the capitalist system, dating from the early 1970s (the first long crisis, ...
[35]
The Surplus in Monopoly Capitalism and the Imperialist Rent
Samir Amin is director of the Third World Forum in Dakar, Senegal. His books include The Liberal Virus, The World We Wish to See, and The Law of Worldwide Value ...
[36]
Interpreting contemporary imperialism: lessons from Samir Amin
Mar 18, 2021 · He saw this as characterised by the five monopolies which reproduce global capitalism. These are: the monopoly of technology generated by the ...Missing: dynamics | Show results with:dynamics
[37]
The New Imperialist Structure - Monthly Review
Whereas generalized monopoly capitalism is truly monstrous, the ... See Samir Amin, “Révolution ou Decadence? La Crise du Système Impérialiste ...
[38]
Contemporary Imperialism - Monthly Review
The Aggressive Geostrategy of Contemporary Imperialism. The Collective ... Samir Amin, Empire of Chaos (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1992) ...
[39]
None
Error: Could not load webpage.<|separator|>
[40]
Delinking: Towards a Polycentric World: Samir Amin: Zed Books
Free delivery over $35Apr 1, 1990 · Samir Amin confronts in Delinking. He argues that Third World countries cannot hope to raise living standards if they continue to adjust their development ...
[41]
Samir Amin, Delinking, and Navigating the Path in a Multipolar World
Nov 13, 2024 · Amin's notion of delinking has often been misconstrued as an argument for economic autarky, something he strongly rejected. Rather, delinking is ...
[42]
Towards a New Development Theory for the Global South
Jan 14, 2025 · ... periphery had to 'delink' from the core. Delinking, Amin wrote in 1987, is 'the refusal to submit national-development strategy to the ...
[43]
A Brief Reading on Samir Amin's Delinking, by Adel Samara
Jan 19, 2020 · Delinking is a rejection of subjugation to the logic of the world capitalist system and the imperative passive adaptation with the conditions of integration ...
[44]
Full article: Sweeping the world clean of capitalism: Samir Amin ...
Aug 21, 2019 · This paper will attempt to rethink Samir Amin's concept of delinking in terms of selective delinking and selective engagement.
[45]
The hidden legacy of Samir Amin: delinking's ecological foundation ...
Delinking was not autarky, but a condition for 'autocentric' peripheral development. Delinking was a political choice to change who made domestic decisions and ...
[46]
[PDF] Unequal Development - South African History Online
Page 1. Unequal. Development. An Essay on the. Social Formations of·. Peripheral Capitalism by Samir Amin. Translated by Brian Pearce.
[47]
Eurocentrism - Monthly Review Press
Rejecting the dominant Eurocentric view of world history, which narrowly and incorrectly posits a progression from the Greek and Roman classical world to ...
[48]
Reviewed by Joshua Moufawad-Paul - Marx & Philosophy Society
Nov 29, 2010 · The strength of Amin's theory of eurocentrism lies in his ability to demonstrate that 'Europe' is a culturalist construction that masquerades as universal.
[49]
[PDF] Samir Amin, Eurocentrism, 2nd ed. - Contrapoder
In this work, I propose a critique of what can be called "culturalism." I define culturalism as an apparently coherent and holistic theory based on the ...
[50]
The geography of lies: Samir Amin and the assassination of ...
Sep 8, 2025 · It traded in gunboats for think tanks, missionaries for media campaigns, and colonial governors for Harvard fellows. But the function ...<|separator|>
[51]
Analyzing Political Islam: A Critique of Traditional Historical ...
Mar 21, 2009 · ... Samir Amin offered his traditional historical materialist analysis ... against culturalism of militant Islam in Muslim-majority states?
[52]
Imperialism and Culturalism Complement Each Other - MR Online
Nov 26, 2024 · In this republished essay from 1996, Samir Amin gives his view of Samuel Huntington's theory of “clash of civilizations.
[53]
Political Islam in the Service of Imperialism - Monthly Review
The exclusive emphasis on culture allows political Islam to eliminate from every sphere of life the real social confrontations between the popular classes and ...
[54]
[PDF] The Arab revolutions: a year after
A second streak in this discourse argues further that “there is no risk from this victory of political Islam, because it is temporary, for the authority ...
[55]
Samir Amin (1931 – 2018) – from the Critique of Capitalist ...
Aug 15, 2018 · Amin opposed the Muslim Brotherhood root and branch, “We should not just look at the Muslim Brotherhood as a political Islamist power but as a ...<|separator|>
[56]
The Struggle for National Independence and Socialism in ...
The Struggle for National Independence and Socialism in Kampuchea by Samir Amin, October 1981 ... Letter by Natasha Issa Shivji to Samir Amin, Dar es Salaam, 13 ...
[57]
Opinion: Scholars failed to tell the truth about Khmer Rouge
Apr 3, 2025 · ... Samir Amin described the Khmer Rouge period as “one of the major successes of the struggle for socialism in our era.” Not only did Amin ...
[58]
[PDF] Theses on the Kampuchean Revolution, 1975-78
Khien Samphan, who was influenced by the similar views of his Egyptian colleague Samir Amin (who is now Director of the African Institute of. Economic ...
[59]
Delinking: Towards a Polycentric World: Samir Amin: Zed Books
Free delivery over $35Apr 1, 1990 · Delinking, he shows, is not about absolute autarchy, but a neutralizing of the effects of external economic interactions on internal choices.Missing: autocentric | Show results with:autocentric
[60]
Delinking: Towards a Polycentric World by Samir Amin | Goodreads
Rating 4.2 (25) He argues that Third World countries cannot hope to raise living standards if they continue to adjust their development strategies.Missing: autocentric | Show results with:autocentric
[61]
Globalization and its Alternative: An Interview with Samir Amin (Part 1)
Jan 27, 2019 · The interview, titled “Globalisation and Its Alternative”, lays out Samir Amin’s assessment of the concept of globalisation as well as his concept of ‘de- ...
[62]
New International Economic Order at 50: a reflection on the vision ...
This article critically analyses its significance, achievements, and setbacks from the perspective of Samir Amin.
[63]
After the New International Economic Order :
After the New International Economic Order : the future of international economic relations / Samir Amin. Amin, Samir 1983
[64]
Self-Reliance and the New International Economic Order
Jul 1, 1977 · Self-Reliance and the New International Economic Order. Authors. Samir Amin ... international division of labor shaped during the last century.
[65]
[PDF] Globalisation and Its Alternative:
During this period, monopoly capital was national in character. There was British imperialism, US imperialism, German imperialism,. Japanese imperialism, and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[66]
Samir Amin and the Theory of Imperialism: A Critical Analysis
This paper attempts to provide, from a Marxist perspective, a critical understanding of Amin's theory of imperialism. The paper is broken down into two ...
[67]
Dependency Theory: A Critique - jstor
It is our argument that the major contribution of dependency theory can be enhanced, and the problems eliminated, through its careful integration with. Marxian ...
[68]
Dependency theory: strengths, weaknesses, and its relevance today
Dec 15, 2023 · ... Issues of theory in dependency and Marxism', Latin. American ... dependency theory, post-Keynesian economics, and Marxism. Next, we ...<|separator|>
[69]
[PDF] Is Tanzania a Success Story? A Long Term Analysis
What recent studies have failed to do, however, is to deal with the donors' role in the economy's collapse in the mid 1970s and first half of the 1980s, and ...
[70]
Economic Collapse and Recovery in Tanzania - Oxford Academic
Foreign exchange scarcity was at the core of the Tanzanian crisis: without foreign currency it was impossible to import spare parts, petroleum, fertilizers, ...
[71]
[PDF] A View from Africa - IMF eLibrary
Studies of this question have analyzed in depth the reasons for the failure of development strategies in Africa. ... the Lagos Plan of Action." The report falls ...
[72]
PDF view of the file 9781848599611-5-en.pdf
However, the plan failed to deliver on many of its targets and outcomes, since most African countries were focused on the Structural Adjustment Programmes at ...
[73]
[PDF] The Rise and Fall of Import Substitution Douglas A. Irwin Working ...
They also failed to go beyond broad generalities in discussing policy goals and policy instruments, and never undertook much effort to uncover evidence about ...
[74]
[PDF] Why have all development strategies failed in Latin America?
As the failure of the ISI strategy became more evident, there was a change in the conventional wisdom about what the developing countries should do in order ...
[75]
Failed Protectionism: What Latin America Can Teach Us
Apr 14, 2025 · The region's failed experiment with import substitution industrialization (ISI) ... Unlike Latin America's ISI failures, East Asian ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
[76]
Why Did the Ujamaa Village Policy Fail? – Towards a Global Analysis
Nov 11, 2008 · Why Did the Ujamaa Village Policy Fail? – Towards a Global Analysis - Volume 18 Issue 3. ... , 'Agrarian Crisis and Economic Liberalisation in ...<|separator|>
[77]
The rise and fall of import substitution - ScienceDirect.com
... import substitution or explore its potential failures. In prominent lectures ... ECLA and the Theory of Import Substituting Industrialization in Latin America.
[78]
UCLA demographer produces best estimate yet of Cambodia's ...
Apr 16, 2015 · The death toll in Cambodia under Khmer Rouge leader Pol Pot ... genocide. For decades, researchers have sought to pinpoint the death ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
[79]
Cambodia | Holocaust and Genocide Studies | College of Liberal Arts
The Cambodian Genocide was an explosion of mass violence that saw between 1.5 and 3 million people killed at the hands of the Khmer Rouge, a communist ...
[80]
To Samir Amin, a personal tribute - Pambazuka News
Aug 28, 2018 · With Samir Amin's analysis, I immediately saw the sources of Khmer Rouge's monumental difficulties and tragic errors of voluntarism. I could ...
[81]
Commentary: Scholars failed to tell the truth about the genocidal ...
... Samir Amin described the Khmer Rouge period as “one of the major successes of the struggle for socialism in our era.” Not only did Amin ... As if Africa had not ...
[82]
Full article: The rational kernel within Samir Amin's mythological shell
Aug 21, 2019 · Samir Amin was an animated spirit throughout his rich life. The essay he published just a month before his death calls for a new beginning of ...
[83]
Quantifying the Uncertainty of the Death Toll During the Pol Pot ...
Jul 28, 2016 · The Boundaries of Genocide: Quantifying the Uncertainty of the Death Toll During the Pol Pot Regime (1975-1979). Patrick Heuveline ...
[84]
https://monthlyreview.org/product/accumulation_on_a_world_scale/
[85]
https://monthlyreview.org/product/eurocentrism/
[86]
Review: Only People Make Their Own History by Samir Amin (2019)
Mar 14, 2019 · Only People Make Their Own History is the first ever posthumous publication of Amin's work.
[87]
"One of the great organic intellectuals of our time"-Countercurrents ...
Only People Make Their Own History is the first ever posthumous publication of Amin's work. It includes ten of Amin's most important essays published in the ...<|separator|>
[88]
Tribute to Samir Amin: The Return of Fascism and the Challenge of ...
Apr 30, 2020 · A second volume of his memoirs, The Long Revolution of the Global South: Toward a New Anti-imperialist International, was published posthumously ...
[89]
Science & Society reviews two books by the late Samir Amin
Science & Society reviews two books by the late Samir Amin: "The Long Revolution" & "Only People Make Their Own History" - Monthly Review.Missing: 2018 | Show results with:2018
[90]
Samir Amin: 93 Years of a Global South Voice - MST
Sep 12, 2024 · Samir Amin (1931-2018) was one of the greatest intellectuals of the 20th century. For over sixty years, he maintained a political activism that left us with an ...