Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

San Francisco Transbay Terminal

The San Francisco Transbay Terminal was a major regional transportation facility in San Francisco, , that operated from 1939 until its closure in 2010. Designed by architect Timothy L. Pflueger in the Art Moderne style, the terminal initially functioned as the western endpoint for electric trains traversing the , serving peak commuter volumes of up to 17,000 passengers every 20 minutes and handling over 26 million riders annually at its height during . Following the termination of rail operations in 1958 due to competition from automobiles and emerging highway infrastructure, the terminal was repurposed as a bus depot, accommodating services from operators such as , Golden Gate Transit, and for and commuters. Its design capacity supported up to 35 million passengers per year, reflecting prewar optimism in mass transit amid dense urban travel demands, though actual usage declined with postwar suburban sprawl and the advent of in the 1970s. The terminal's demolition began in August 2010 to clear the site for the contemporary , highlighting the shift from mid-20th-century rail-bus hybrids to modern multimodal hubs integrated with high-speed rail plans like California HSR. Despite its functional obsolescence, the structure exemplified streamlined architectural efficiency tailored to industrial-era commuting patterns.

Original Terminal (1939–2010)

Design and Construction

The original San Francisco Transbay Terminal was designed by architect Timothy L. Pflueger as an intermodal facility to serve commuter rail traffic crossing the San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge, connecting San Francisco to the East Bay and beyond. In the Art Moderne style, the structure featured streamlined forms emphasizing functionality and modern efficiency, reflecting the era's shift toward automobile and rail integration. The terminal was constructed by the California Toll Bridge Authority at First and Mission streets, funded through Bay Bridge toll revenues of 50 cents per automobile, and opened on January 14, 1939. Engineering integrated the terminal with the Bay Bridge's lower deck rail lines, including loop ramps for direct train access without street-level crossings, accommodating operations by the and other carriers. The design supported high-capacity service, rated for 35 million annual passengers with a peak 20-minute throughput of 17,000 commuters via 10-car trains dispatched every 63.5 seconds. aligned with the bridge's completion, enabling electric-powered trains to terminate in rather than at slips. Pflueger collaborated with Arthur Brown Jr. and John Donovan on aspects of the modern design, prioritizing durable materials suited for heavy transit use, though specific building elements like framing and reinforcements were standard for the period's seismic considerations in the Bay Area. The facility's layout included a central for flow, with provisions for future expansion, though service ceased in 1958, leading to its conversion for buses. Post-World War II, it handled up to 26 million passengers yearly before decline.

Rail Service and Operations

The original Transbay Terminal facilitated electric rail service across the , commencing operations on January 15, 1939, as its primary western terminus. Constructed with 11 stub-end tracks accommodating bi-level boarding platforms, the facility supported peak throughput of 17,000 passengers every 20 minutes, targeting an annual capacity of 35 million riders. Trains accessed the terminal via dedicated lower-deck trackage on the bridge, transitioning from electrified third-rail segments in the to overhead wires approaching . Service was dominated by the Transit Company, which routed lines A, B, C, E, F, and G from hubs including Oakland, , and directly into the terminal. Initially supplemented by and Interurban Electric Railway trains from northern and Vallejo areas, these ancillary operators ceased passenger service by late 1941 amid financial losses and shifting ridership to automobiles. trains, comprising steel cars with capacities of 100–150 passengers each, operated at frequencies up to every 5–10 minutes during rush hours, peaking at over 200,000 daily boardings across the system before 1958. World War II gas rationing temporarily boosted demand, with daily transbay rail usage exceeding 40,000 by 1944, but postwar highway expansions and private vehicle adoption—facilitated by federal interstate funding—eroded viability. Maintenance costs for aging infrastructure and bridge trackage further strained operations, prompting the 's parent, , to prioritize buses. Rail service concluded on April 20, 1958, with all Key System electric trains replaced by diesel buses using the bridge's upper deck. Track removal followed promptly, converting the terminal to bus-only use without provisions for rail resumption.

Conversion to Bus-Only Service

The San Francisco Transbay Terminal's transition to bus-only service followed the discontinuation of interurban rail operations by the on April 20, 1958, after the lower deck of the was reconfigured exclusively for automobile traffic, eliminating rail tracks. This shift reflected broader postwar preferences for highway expansion over rail transit, leading to the formation of to replace Key System bus and rail services with diesel buses. In , the terminal was fully converted to accommodate bus operations, with its 21 rail platforms repurposed into bus bays to handle regional services crossing the Bay Bridge. became the primary operator, utilizing the facility for routes from Alameda and Contra Costa counties, while other agencies including Golden Gate Transit and also integrated services, connecting passengers to points north and south. The upper decks were adapted for bus loading and unloading, supporting peak-hour commuter flows that exceeded 50,000 daily passengers by the 1960s. This conversion marked the end of the terminal's role, as Peninsula rail services via Southern Pacific had never utilized the facility, terminating instead at stations like Third and Townsend. The change facilitated seamless bus transfers but highlighted the infrastructure's underutilization of its original rail capacity, contributing to long-term debates on transit efficiency amid growing automobile dependency.

Decline, Closure, and Demolition

Following the discontinuation of rail service in 1958 by Southern Pacific, which ended the trains due to rising automobile usage after , the Transbay Terminal transitioned to bus-only operations, marking the onset of its decline. Peak ridership of 26 million passengers annually at the war's end plummeted as gas rationing lifted and personal vehicles proliferated, reducing the facility's relevance. By the late , the terminal had deteriorated into a rudimentary bus depot, with boarded-up businesses, vanishing amenities, and inadequate maintenance exacerbating its obsolescence. The inflicted heavy damage on the terminal and surrounding infrastructure, heightening seismic vulnerabilities in the 1939 structure that predated modern building codes. Assessments determined that retrofitting the aging facility to withstand a maximum credible earthquake was impractical, especially given its inability to support planned underground rail extensions for . These factors, combined with failure to meet contemporary seismic standards and insufficient capacity for projected transit demand, rendered the terminal unsuitable for continued use. The terminal closed on August 7, 2010, coinciding with the opening of a temporary to handle bus services during . Demolition commenced on December 3, 2010, using wrecking balls to dismantle the 71-year-old structure, clearing the site for the new transit center. Full was completed by September 7, 2011, eliminating the seismically deficient building and enabling construction of a modern replacement.

Replacement Project Planning and Temporary Facilities

Initial Planning and Funding Challenges

The earthquake on October 17, 1989, severely damaged the original Transbay Terminal, prompting initial assessments for seismic retrofitting and revitalization to meet modern accessibility and safety standards, but comprehensive replacement planning faced immediate setbacks due to the absence of a viable funding mechanism. Throughout the 1990s, efforts to advance a downtown extension and terminal rebuild stalled repeatedly, as proposals—including one from Mayor for a scaled-down facility—lacked dedicated financial backing, leaving the project in limbo despite growing recognition of the terminal's obsolescence after rail services ended in 1958. In November 1999, San Francisco voters approved Proposition H, which mandated the extension of service to a new or rebuilt Transbay Terminal site, providing a policy foundation but not immediate capital; this measure aimed to integrate with bus operations but highlighted ongoing fiscal hurdles, as required novel financing like the sale of surplus state properties and from surrounding redevelopment. To address coordination among disparate agencies, the Transbay Joint Powers Authority (TJPA) was established on April 4, 2001, comprising representatives from the City and County of , Alameda Contra Costa Transit District (), and the Corridor Joint Powers Board, tasked with overseeing planning, design, , and of the multi-modal center. Early funding remained precarious, with the TJPA securing an initial $9.375 million from federal sources to initiate studies, but broader capital for the estimated $1.6 billion Phase 1—encompassing the transit center replacement—depended on delayed federal appropriations and state land sales projected to yield around $429 million by 2010. Progress was further impeded by the need for extensive environmental impact reviews, culminating in the Federal Transit Administration's Record of Decision on February 8, 2005, following the Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report; only then did the project receive $55 million in federal funding via the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act (SAFETEA-LU). These delays underscored systemic challenges in aligning local, state, and federal commitments for large-scale infrastructure, where fragmented authority and reliance on earmarks protracted the path from concept to groundbreaking.

Temporary Transbay Terminal Operations

The Temporary Transbay Terminal opened in August 2010 to replace the original facility after its closure on August 7, 2010, providing interim accommodations for transbay bus passengers amid the of the old terminal and construction of the permanent . Situated on the downtown block bounded by Main, , Beale, and streets, the modular structure featured open-air bus bays, basic passenger shelters, ticketing areas, and restrooms designed for efficient bus turnaround without extensive amenities. Operations centered on regional bus services crossing the and other routes, handling peak commuter flows during weekday mornings and evenings. The terminal supported multiple operators, including for routes, Golden Gate Transit for North Bay connections, for Peninsula services, WestCAT Lynx for select express lines, (Muni) for local extensions, and for intercity travel. Buses accessed the site via dedicated ramps from nearby streets, with coordination managed by the Transbay Joint Powers Authority to minimize disruptions despite the facility's exposed design and limited capacity compared to predecessors. The terminal operated continuously without major service interruptions until August 12, 2018, when transbay buses shifted to the newly opened . However, following the discovery of structural fissures that shuttered the new center in September 2018, bus operations briefly resumed at the temporary site, with Muni and regional carriers rerouting services there until repairs allowed full resumption at the permanent facility in 2019. This extension underscored the temporary terminal's role as a reliable contingency amid the replacement project's challenges.

Transition and Demolition Aftermath

Transit operations at the original Transbay Terminal concluded on August 7, 2010, with all bus services transitioning to the newly opened Temporary Transbay Terminal located adjacent to the site. This shift accommodated operators including , Golden Gate Transit, , and Muni, maintaining regional connectivity without interruption despite the temporary facility's more rudimentary design featuring open-air boarding areas. Demolition of ancillary structures, such as Bay Bridge ramps, commenced on August 14, 2010, followed by the systematic dismantling of the terminal building itself. The demolition process, managed by the Transbay Joint Powers Authority (TJPA), spanned from late 2010 through September 2011, involving nearly 55,000 labor hours and resulting in no lost-time safety incidents. Over 7,500 tons of and 92,000 cubic yards of were recycled from the site, equivalent to filling 28 Olympic-sized swimming pools with the concrete alone, supporting environmental goals in the project. The effort stayed on schedule and within budget, clearing the 19-acre parcel for foundational work on the replacement . In the aftermath, the vacated site enabled immediate site preparation activities, including utility relocations and groundwork for new high-rise developments under the Transbay Redevelopment Plan, generating construction jobs in the Bay Area. Transit volumes initially held steady via the temporary terminal, though its limited capacity—handling up to 1,500 buses daily—prompted calls for expansions to address peak-hour crowding. No significant long-term disruptions to regional bus services were reported, as the temporary setup preserved essential east-west links across the Bay Bridge until the permanent center's completion. The also facilitated archaeological surveys, uncovering artifacts from the site's pre-terminal history, which were documented prior to full excavation.

Salesforce Transit Center Construction and Opening

Design Features and Engineering

The , designed by Pelli Clarke Pelli Architects with Adamson Associates as architect of record, incorporates a multi-level structure exceeding 1,000,000 square feet, featuring an elevated two-block-long bus deck that supports regional and intercity bus operations while permitting street traffic to pass underneath, thereby reconnecting divided neighborhoods. The design centers on a grand oval atrium, or Grand Hall, rising 70 feet high, illuminated by a signature central light column that funnels natural daylight to subterranean levels through glazed shafts, reducing reliance on artificial lighting. The rooftop, elevated 70 feet above the street, hosts a 5.4-acre public park spanning 1,400 feet, equipped with walking trails, an amphitheater, botanical gardens, and play areas, functioning dually as a recreational space and a for filtration and urban heat mitigation. Structurally, the center employs a space-frame canopy composed of approximately 800 undulating, perforated aluminum panels in a pattern, fabricated from pearlescent white metal to evoke a , cloud-like appearance while providing shade and aesthetic complexity enhanced by an LED art installation. Structural engineers and integrated cast steel nodes—totaling around 3.5 million pounds across 75 unique geometries, each weighing 4,400 to 44,600 pounds—into the architecturally exposed perimeter framing and column, serving critical roles in both gravity load support and seismic force resistance tailored to San Francisco's earthquake-prone environment. The bus deck and overall frame utilize natural ventilation systems to manage bus exhaust and passive climate control, minimizing energy use. Sustainability features underpin the engineering, achieving Gold certification through innovations such as the rooftop park's native plantings and efficient that halve potable water consumption, integrated drainage for rainwater reuse, and light columns that optimize daylight penetration to cut electricity demands for interior lighting. The facility accommodates 11 transit systems with direct freeway ramps for efficient bus access, designed to handle up to 100,000 daily passengers. These elements combine to create a resilient, hub that prioritizes environmental efficiency and structural integrity.

Construction Timeline and Cost Overruns

Construction of the Salesforce Transit Center's Phase 1, encompassing the bus terminal and foundational "train box" for future rail extensions, commenced in 2010 after of the original began in the same year, with the latter phase concluding on and within budget after substantial materials including 7,500 tons of . The project spanned approximately eight years, marked by sequential advancements such as the initial concrete pour for the permanent foundation on September 5, 2013, and the assembly of the steel superstructure starting in 2014.
MilestoneDate
Demolition of original terminal begins2010
First pour for September 5, 2013
superstructure assembly startsNovember 2014
Substantial completion2018
Grand opening and initial bus serviceAugust 12, 2018
The timeline encountered delays, with the opening slipping from earlier projections to mid-2018, partly due to complexities in integrating the multi-level structure and rooftop park, the latter of which faced deferral amid escalating expenses. Originally budgeted at $1.6 billion, the project's costs surged to approximately $2.26 billion by completion, representing an overrun exceeding 40 percent and prompting supplemental funding from taxpayers in 2016 after the Transbay Joint Powers Authority exhausted reserves. Incremental increases included a escalation reported by 2013, attributed to scope expansions and unforeseen site conditions, followed by further rises to $2.1 billion by 2015. A primary , Webcor/Obayashi, later filed a $150 million claim against the authority in 2018, alleging design and planning deficiencies that inflated construction expenses. These overruns exemplify broader challenges in large-scale , where initial estimates often underestimate risks from regulatory hurdles, labor, and material volatility, though the authority maintained that core demolition and structural phases adhered to timelines despite financial strains.

Opening, Early Operations, and Safety Issues

The commenced public operations on August 11, 2018, featuring a ceremonial ribbon-cutting event and neighborhood , with full regional bus services initiating the following day, August 12. This marked the transition from the Temporary Transbay Terminal, which had handled bus operations since 2010. (Muni) routes, including the 5 Fulton, 5R Limited, 7 Haight-Noriega, and 38 Geary lines, had begun utilizing the center's surface-level bus plaza as early as , 2018, ahead of the main facility's debut. The opening facilitated intercity and commuter bus services from operators such as , , WestCAT, and , concentrating regional transit in a single modern hub designed for up to 100,000 daily passengers. Concurrently, the 5.4-acre rooftop park opened to visitors, offering landscaped green space atop the structure. Early operations emphasized seamless , with the center's 14 bus bays on the elevated deck handling peak-hour demands and integrating with Muni's street-level plaza for local routes. Initial ridership focused on weekday commuters from agencies like , which launched full service post-opening, while and other intercity providers shifted from prior facilities. The facility's design, including automated people-mover elements and direct preparedness, supported efficient passenger flow, though actual usage in the initial months reflected pre-pandemic patterns without the anticipated volume surge. Safety concerns emerged abruptly on September 25, 2018—less than seven weeks after the full opening—when workers identified fissures in two tapered girders supporting the bus deck on the third floor. The cracks, spanning several inches, prompted an immediate shutdown of the entire facility to assess structural integrity, displacing all bus operations back to temporary sites and closing the rooftop park. analyses determined the failures resulted from a of factors, termed a "," involving design vulnerabilities, fabrication inconsistencies in and bolting, and construction-related stress concentrations that exceeded tolerances under operational loads. Stabilization efforts included installing a four-level system and hydraulic jacks to offload weight from the compromised beams, preventing further propagation while forensic reviews proceeded. Repairs, encompassing reinforcement, , and partial of affected elements, extended over nine months, with the Grand Hall and rooftop park reopening on July 1, 2019, after independent validations confirmed restored capacity. Bus deck operations resumed progressively in August 2019, starting with local Muni services and followed by regional carriers like , though full pre-closure throughput was not immediately recovered due to ongoing monitoring. The incident highlighted lapses in quality oversight during fabrication by contractors, prompting enhanced protocols but incurring no reported injuries or immediate public risk, as the cracks were detected during routine maintenance.

Controversies and Criticisms

Budget and Management Failures

The Transbay Transit Center project, managed by the Transbay Joint Powers Authority (TJPA), suffered substantial budget escalations, with Phase 1 costs rising from an initial $1.6 billion estimate in the mid-2000s to $2.259 billion by 2017, necessitating a as expenditures nearly doubled since 2008. A 2013 assessment identified a $300 million overrun, equivalent to nearly 19% above projections at that stage, driven partly by escalating material and labor prices amid a regional building boom. By completion, the facility's total cost reached approximately $2.2 billion, 50% higher than original forecasts, with Phase 2 extensions adding another $3.9 billion in projected outlays. These overruns stemmed from a combination of external market pressures and internal project deficiencies, including intense competition for skilled labor and resources in 's development surge, as well as design and planning errors that inflated expenses. A review highlighted $1.1 billion in cost increases for the Transbay Terminal prior to the implementation of enhanced oversight measures, underscoring initial lapses in fiscal controls typical of large initiatives. The TJPA's failure to anticipate and mitigate these risks contributed to repeated funding shortfalls, prompting to inject additional capital in 2016 to avert project halt. Management shortcomings exacerbated the financial strain, as evidenced by contractor lawsuits against the TJPA alleging and delays attributable to flawed designs from the authority's own team, which reportedly cost the builder $150 million in overruns. Post-opening in August 2018, the discovery of cracked steel girders led to a full shutdown within weeks, attributed to brittle fractures from inadequate fabrication, installation, and —issues the TJPA board acknowledged required a comprehensive structural reevaluation. These events prompted the city to withhold funding amid mounting mismanagement allegations, reflecting broader deficiencies in TJPA oversight and coordination that delayed timelines and amplified expenses. The episode fits a pattern of projects plagued by similar execution failures, where optimistic initial bids fail to account for real-world complexities.

Usage Shortfalls and Economic Impact

The Salesforce Transit Center has experienced significant ridership shortfalls since its 2018 opening, operating well below initial projections that anticipated up to 100,000 daily passengers across bus, rail, and future high-speed services. Pre-pandemic data from February 2020 showed approximately 17,000 daily boardings and alightings at the center, but by February 2023, this figure had fallen to around 4,000, reflecting a decline of over 75% even after accounting for route adjustments. Overall daily passenger volumes, which reached about 30,000 before , have not recovered proportionally, with foot traffic in the facility at roughly 58% of January 2020 levels during early 2023. These shortfalls stem from persistent downtown office vacancies—only 36% of pre-pandemic workers had returned by 2023—exacerbated by trends, tech sector layoffs at firms like and , and the absence of direct rail connections, as terminates 1.5 miles south at Fourth and King streets. The center's underutilization has amplified economic pressures, with Phase 1 construction costs totaling $2.2 billion funded largely through bonds backed by regional toll revenues and redevelopment taxes, yet generating insufficient fare and lease income to cover ongoing operations without subsidies. Annual operating expenses are partially offset by allocations from Regional Measure 2 and 3 toll surcharges—totaling millions annually—but shortfalls persist, requiring additional contributions from operator leases, sponsorships, and funds, as the facility's bus deck and grand hall remain underused relative to capacity. While the project catalyzed private in the Transbay , including high-rise offices and that have boosted local tax increments, critics highlight opportunity costs: the hub functions primarily as an underpatronized bus transfer point amid competition from and ferries, delaying returns on investment until costly extensions like the $8.25 billion materialize, which face their own ridership projection downgrades amid broader recovery lags. The Transbay Joint Powers Authority (TJPA), responsible for overseeing the replacement of the original Transbay Terminal with the , faced multiple s stemming from construction defects and contractual disagreements. In October 2018, the general contractor Webcor/Obayashi (WOJV) filed a $150 million breach-of-contract against TJPA in , alleging that design flaws, late design deliveries, and planning errors by TJPA caused significant delays and cost overruns during the project's eight-year construction phase from 2010 to 2018. TJPA countered that WOJV bore responsibility for the issues, including inadequate oversight, while a steel fabricator involved in the project separately sued WOJV, claiming the contractor inflated budgets and timelines. These disputes contributed to the center's temporary closure in September 2018 after cracks were discovered in 66 transversely post-tensioned concrete beams, prompting investigations into engineering failures and further litigation over repair costs exceeding initial projections. By August 2024, the protracted legal battles over construction-related claims were resolved through settlements, marking the end of major outstanding cases. Adjacent development disputes exacerbated tensions, particularly involving the Millennium Tower, a 58-story skyscraper whose foundations sank over 18 inches since 2009 due to inadequate piling into bedrock. Homeowners sued Millennium Partners and Transbay TJPA in 2016, asserting that TJPA's excavation and dewatering during Transit Center construction from 2010 onward compressed underlying soils and accelerated sinking by an additional 2 to 10 inches. A September 2018 court ruling ordered TJPA to cover portions of the developers' defense costs, estimated in the millions, though TJPA contested the obligation as unwarranted taxpayer liability for private negligence; a tentative settlement was reached in August 2019. This litigation highlighted causal links between transit infrastructure work and unintended impacts on nearby private developments, with TJPA arguing the tower's initial design flaws predated their activities. Politically, the project encountered friction over funding mechanisms and site decisions, including a 2014 standoff between officials and developers of high-rise towers in the Transbay District. Developers, granted height variances in exchange for contributing to transit infrastructure via fees, challenged a proposed special tax levy on new buildings exceeding 250 feet, arguing it violated prior agreements and could exceed $100 million per tower, potentially stalling financing and construction amid the recovery from the . The dispute threatened to disrupt $1.6 billion in planned transit fees earmarked for the center and rail extensions, with developers enlisting political allies to lobby against the levy, which city supervisors ultimately adjusted but not without prolonged negotiations. Earlier, in 2010, site selection uncertainties—stemming from lawsuits alleging violations of the for insufficient evaluation of alternative locations—jeopardized $400 million in federal stimulus funds, amid state-level interventions like then-Governor Jerry Brown's conditional withholding of support tied to unrelated Bay Bridge disputes. Cost overruns and operational failures intensified political scrutiny, leading to funding suspensions. In October 2018, the San Francisco County Transportation Authority unanimously withheld $9.7 million in sales tax revenue allocated for the Downtown Rail Extension (DTX), citing TJPA's mismanagement of the $2.2 billion center, including unrepaired beam cracks and unresolved lawsuits, as justification for pausing further commitments until accountability was demonstrated. Supervisors expressed concerns over escalating taxpayer exposure, with total project costs ballooning from an initial $4.5 billion program estimate in 2006 due to delays and defects, prompting calls for audits and leadership changes within TJPA. These actions reflected broader tensions between local oversight bodies wary of fiscal waste and state-federal transit authorities advocating continued investment despite evident execution shortfalls.

Future Extensions and Developments

Downtown Rail Extension (The Portal)

The Portal, formally known as the (DTX), is a planned infrastructure project to extend service approximately 2.2 miles from its current northern terminus at Fourth and King Streets to the via a 1.3-mile under downtown . The extension incorporates cut-and-cover and mined tunneling techniques, including a new underground station at Fourth and Townsend Streets with two tracks and center/side platforms, and fit-out of the Transit Center's existing train box for six tracks and three center platforms. Managed by the Transbay Joint Powers Authority (TJPA) in coordination with the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board and , it aims to enable seamless integration of with future , providing one-seat rides from downtown to in under three hours and connecting to 11 regional . As of late 2024, the project reached 30% design completion and advanced to the Federal Transit Administration's Capital Investment Grants Engineering phase following approval in April 2024. Environmental reviews under the (NEPA) and (CEQA) were cleared prior to this, with the project development phase concluding in December 2021. TJPA targeted initiation by 2035, dependent on securing full , including a anticipated Full Funding Grant Agreement around 2025. In May 2024, TJPA announced a $3.4 billion federal commitment to support advancement. Cost estimates escalated to $8.25 billion by 2023, encompassing infrastructure, stations, and integration works, exceeding initial projections and surpassing the $2.2 billion cost of the Transit Center's first phase. Funding challenges intensified in August 2025 when the withdrew a $24.6 million Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements (CRISI) grant allocated for final design of track and systems, as part of broader federal reviews and terminations of rail funding under the administration. This setback, detailed in TJPA board reports, highlights ongoing fiscal risks amid regional commitments like San Francisco's Proposition K allocations for engineering activities. Proponents, including local officials, maintain the extension is vital for reducing commute times by nearly an hour daily and bolstering downtown connectivity, despite these hurdles.

Integration with High-Speed Rail

The is designated as the northern terminus for Phase 1 of California's system, which aims to connect to and other major cities along the state's mega-regions. This integration requires the completion of , also known as the , a project that will extend electrified rail tracks from 's current terminus at 4th and King Streets through a 1.3-mile (2.1 km) underground tunnel to the Transit Center's below-grade train box. The extension incorporates a new underground station at 4th and Townsend Streets, featuring concourse and platform levels, to facilitate seamless service for both commuter trains and operations. The Transit Center's design includes two subterranean levels reserved for rail, equipped with three island platforms serving six tracks to accommodate up to four high-speed trains and six trains per peak hour, though operational reviews have noted potential capacity constraints without optimized track usage by both services. Upon completion, this setup will enable passengers to transfer directly to the Transit Center's bus bays, (BART), Muni light rail, and other regional networks, enhancing multimodal connectivity in downtown . The project employs cut-and-cover and mined tunneling methods for the extension, with environmental clearance secured by the Transbay Joint Powers Authority. In May 2024, the committed $3.38 billion toward The Portal's estimated $8-10 billion total cost, securing over two-thirds of funding and advancing the project to the engineering phase under the Capital Investment Grants program. Construction timelines remain tied to the broader rollout, with initial Central Valley segments targeted for operational service by 2030-2033, followed by Bay Area extensions; full integration into the Transit Center is projected for the subsequent decade, contingent on funding finalization and coordination with electrification. The extension is expected to reduce daily commute times by nearly an hour for Peninsula riders while supporting 's goal of under-three-hour travel between and , though the overall project faces scrutiny over historical delays in California's rail initiatives.

Ongoing Infrastructure Improvements

As of October 2025, infrastructure improvements in the vicinity of the focus on enhancing pedestrian safety, , and streetscape elements in the surrounding Transbay district. The Transbay Block 3 Park and Streetscape Improvement project, managed by , is actively underway in Phase 1, which targets streetscape infrastructure. This includes the installation of wider , ADA-compliant curb ramps, raised crosswalks, electrical upgrades for traffic signals and streetlights, and water line connections on between Beale and Clementina. Recent activities encompass sidewalk pours on East Clementina (completed September 18, 2025), concrete roadway finishing (completed September 25, 2025), and ongoing work on sidewalks, curb ramps, and crosswalks along Beale and s as of October 21, 2025, with water line backfilling and repaving scheduled for October 29–31, 2025. Phase 1 is projected to conclude in summer 2026, contributing to a new public park space integrated with the broader Transbay redevelopment. Complementing these efforts, the SFMTA's Transbay Howard Streetscape Improvement Project aims to upgrade Howard Street from 4th to the Embarcadero with a bi-directional parking-protected , safety features, greening elements, and transit enhancements, building on a prior quick-build initiative. Approved by the SFMTA Board on April 16, 2024, the project addressed safety concerns evidenced by over 90 collisions between 2016 and 2020, including 44% -involved and one fatality in 2019. Bidding commenced in May 2025, with construction anticipated from 2026 to 2028. These projects support the Transit Center's role as a hub by improving adjacent connectivity and , though the center itself has no major structural repairs reported since the 2018–2019 rooftop beam remediation. Ongoing operations and minor maintenance are funded through mechanisms like the Transbay assessment, established to cover long-term upkeep.

References

  1. [1]
    Salesforce Transit Center | SFMTA
    The original Transbay Terminal at First and Mission streets, opened in 1939 and was a regional transit hub for over 60 years. It was closed in 2010 to make way ...
  2. [2]
    1939 Terminal | Transbay Joint Powers Authority
    The former Transbay Terminal was built in 1939 and designed to handle as many as 35 million people annually with a peak 20-minute rate of 17,000 commuters.
  3. [3]
    The Transformation of Transbay - Urban Land Magazine
    Sep 21, 2015 · Designed in the art moderne style by the local firm Pflueger and Brown, the Transbay Transit Terminal would soon eclipse San Francisco's Ferry ...
  4. [4]
    Construction of San Francisco's Transbay Transit Center To Begin ...
    Mar 7, 2011 · Designed by noted San Francisco architect Timothy Pflueger and completed in 1939 as the terminal for commuter trains that once crossed the ...Missing: style | Show results with:style
  5. [5]
    [PDF] FACT SHEET - Transbay Joint Powers Authority
    San Francisco's former Transbay Terminal was built in 1939 at First and ... In its heyday at the end of World War II, the Key. System served 26 million ...
  6. [6]
    Tales of the Old Transbay Terminal - SFMTA
    Aug 9, 2018 · Opened in 1939 to much fanfare, the original facility served as a rail terminal for public transit service to and from the East Bay and beyond ...
  7. [7]
    The Transbay Terminal Will be Missed - Timothy Pflueger Blog
    Jul 30, 2010 · Too many have judged the 1939 building's architectural merits by its current grimy appearance: its central hall cut up to accommodate bus ...
  8. [8]
    SF's Salesforce Park/Transbay Transit Center: A history over the years
    May 3, 2019 · August 7, 2010: Demolition of the old Transbay Terminal begins. AC Transit, Golden Gate Transit, Greyhound, Muni, SamTrans, and Westcat Lynx ...
  9. [9]
    Terminal Days - Kenneth Caldwell
    Aug 2, 2010 · The art moderne structure by Timothy Pflueger has outlived its usefulness. In the last year, I have been taking the bus home some days, and I've ...Missing: style | Show results with:style
  10. [10]
    Transbay Terminal - FoundSF
    Oct 8, 2009 · The Transbay Terminal, built in 1939 at 1st and Mission, was for commuter rail, later becoming a bus-only facility. It is now being demolished.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Short History of the Transbay Transit Terminal and the Relocation of ...
    SFBATTA became effective January 1, 1975. Its pur- pose was to "develop a regional transit terminal in the City and County of San Francisco on or immediately ...
  12. [12]
    Is the Transbay Terminal worth saving? - Timothy Pflueger Blog
    Dec 16, 2009 · The Transbay Terminal's spare modern design was by architects Tim Plfueger, Arthur Brown Jr. and John Donovan, the team which also worked ...
  13. [13]
    Timeline | Transbay Joint Powers Authority
    The Transbay Terminal is built in 1939 to accommodate rail service over the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. In its heyday, more than 26 million people used ...
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
    Transbay Terminal - BayRail Alliance
    Built in 1939, the Transbay Terminal and integral ramps connecting it to the Bay Bridge originally were constructed to serve as the terminal of the San ...
  16. [16]
    An historic look back at the original Transbay Terminal
    Sep 7, 2018 · The Key System ended train service across the bridge to the terminal in April 1958, switching to bus service. · Key System tracks at the Transbay ...
  17. [17]
    Transbay Terminal thrown under the bus - SFGATE
    Aug 16, 2010 · Over the years, the terminal declined into little more than a big bus stop, as businesses boarded up and amenities disappeared. The 71-year-old ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
  18. [18]
    Transbay - Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure
    ... Transbay Terminal, which were heavily damaged by the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, and surrounding properties. Transbay ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT
    Mar 6, 2003 · The Structural Analysis Report considered whether the existing Transbay. Terminal, retrofitted to withstand a maximum credible earthquake event, ...
  20. [20]
    The end of an era: farewell to the Transbay Terminal
    Jul 30, 2010 · The old building must be demolished, the TJPA says, because the current terminal fails to meet seismic safety standards and can no longer ...
  21. [21]
    Demolition of San Francisco s Old Transbay Terminal to Begin Aug. 7
    Jul 30, 2010 · The official opening date of the Transbay Temporary Terminal and the closing of the existing Transbay Terminal will occur on Aug. 7, and at the same time work ...
  22. [22]
    Demolition of Transbay Terminal - SFGATE
    Dec 3, 2010 · After 71 years, construction crews work to demolish the Transbay Transit Terminal in San Francisco this week.
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    Project Profile: Transbay Transit Center
    TJPA was created in 2001 as a collaboration of Bay Area government and transportation agencies to design, build, operate, and maintain the new Transbay Transit ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Joint Powers Agreement creating the TJPA
    The Authority shall receive an initial aggregate amount of $9.375 million from federal funding sources; thereafter, the Authority shall receive such other ...
  26. [26]
    Value Capture Case Studies: San Francisco's Transbay Transit Center
    Jan 27, 2012 · In 1959 the terminal was converted to a bus-only facility, and in 1989 it was severely damaged during the Loma Prieta Earthquake, resulting in ...
  27. [27]
    Terminal Archives - San Francisco - Transbay Joint Powers Authority
    The following are memories collected from visitors during the Transbay Terminal Historical Tours on July 31, 2010. We love hearing your stories, so if you ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Transbay Temporary Terminal
    The Temporary Terminal will serve as a temporary facility for existing Transbay Terminal bus operations, allowing demolition of the existing terminal and ...
  29. [29]
    Salesforce Transit Center & Fremont Underpass Closure Updates
    Because of an emergency, Muni service to the Salesforce Transit Center is being rerouted to the Temporary Transbay Terminal.Missing: operations summary
  30. [30]
    Temporary Transbay Terminal opens Aug. 7 - San Francisco Public ...
    Jul 22, 2010 · Demolition will begin on Aug. 14 with the removal of ramps coming from the Bay Bridge that connect buses to the old terminal but are currently ...<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    Building The Center | Transbay Joint Powers Authority
    One of the most visible sustainable features is the 5.4-acre rooftop public park, a living roof on the Transit Center that reduces the urban heat island effect ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] DELIVERING ON THE VISION - Transbay Joint Powers Authority
    *JOBS CREATED IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA. FROM DEMOLITION OF THE OLD TRANSBAY TERMINAL,. CONSTRUCTION OF THE TEMPORARY TERMINAL,. TRANSIT CENTER, AND BUS ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Archaeology and the Transbay Transit Center Program
    Terminal Construction. Excavation for construction of the Transbay. Terminal in. 1937. Construction As-Built. Plan from the. Transbay Terminal in. 1938. Page 13 ...
  34. [34]
    Salesforce Transit Center | Pelli Clarke & Partners
    The Salesforce Transit Center is a modern, light-filled public space connecting transit systems, with a 5.4-acre rooftop park and a light column.
  35. [35]
    Salesforce Transit Center / Pelli Clarke & Partners - ArchDaily
    “Light Columns” — bring sunshine deep into ...
  36. [36]
    Salesforce Transit Center - Cast Connex
    The cast steel nodes are critical elements of both the gravity and seismic force resisting systems of the transit center and are of critical significance for ...
  37. [37]
    S.F.'s long-awaited Salesforce Transit Center sets opening date for ...
    Jul 10, 2018 · Service will begin on Aug. 12, a Sunday, for buses traveling between the East Bay and what officially will be named Salesforce Transit Center.
  38. [38]
    Transbay Transit Center $300M Over Budget, Rooftop Park Waylaid
    Overruns have added $300 million to the cost of constructing San Francisco's $1.9 billion Transbay Transit Center, and unless the City can raise $24 million ...
  39. [39]
    Transbay Transit Center - San Francisco - SFist
    The estimated date for "substantial completion" of the Transbay Salesforce Transit Center building has slipped to mid-March of next year, and the rooftop ...
  40. [40]
    How the Transbay Transit Center is reshaping San Francisco
    Sep 15, 2017 · At the time of the 2010 groundbreaking, the authority estimated the cost of the project's two phases at $4.2 billion, and said train service ...
  41. [41]
    SF to bail out Transbay project after costs nearly double
    Apr 28, 2016 · Phase 2, which too has had cost increases, is estimated to total $3.9 billion and be completed by 2024. The City's bailout out plan of Phase 1 ...
  42. [42]
    Transbay Transit Center Budget Balloons Past $2 Billion - SocketSite
    Originally expected to cost $1.6 billion, the budget to build San Francisco's Transbay Transit Center was raised to $2.1 billion two months ago.
  43. [43]
    Builder sues over $2 billion San Francisco transit center
    Oct 18, 2018 · It alleges design and planning mistakes sent construction soaring and led to overruns that cost the company $150 million. The Transbay Joint ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  44. [44]
    Why is it so hard for the Bay Area to build megaprojects? - Curbed SF
    Jan 16, 2020 · Cost estimates for the Salesforce Transit Center increased from an initial rate of $1.6 billion to about $2.2 billion. These fungible numbers ...
  45. [45]
    Celebration for SF's Salesforce Transit Center Set for August 11
    Aug 3, 2018 · The Salesforce Transit Center is set to officially open to the public at noon on Saturday, August 11, 2018, with a neighborhood block party, ...
  46. [46]
    Salesforce Transit Center Opens - WSP
    Aug 10, 2018 · The $2.4 billion complex will be introduced to the public during a grand opening block party on Saturday Aug. 11, when the community will get ...Missing: date | Show results with:date<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    Salesforce Transit Center Welcomes Muni Service This Week - SFMTA
    Jun 11, 2018 · The Salesforce Transit Center is opening for Muni service on Saturday, June 16! While the full Transit Center, including the Grand Hall entrance and rooftop ...
  48. [48]
    Sneak Peek at the Salesforce Transit Center - Streetsblog SF
    Aug 8, 2018 · AC Transit, Greyhound, Muni, WestCAT, Lynx, Amtrak, and Paratransit will have a new home starting Sunday when the $2.26 billion "Salesforce ...
  49. [49]
    Salesforce Park and Transbay Transit Center opening in August
    Jul 13, 2018 · Regular service in the new structure will kick off on August 12, with rooftop park, connector bridge, shopping, gondola, and of course Muni bus ...
  50. [50]
    Salesforce Transit Center: A.C. Transit Service Begins
    Aug 13, 2018 · The Salesforce Transit Center opened in a rolling fashion, first with an official ribbon cutting on Friday, August 10, 2018, then a public ...
  51. [51]
    San Francisco's New $2 Billion Transit Center Is Shut Down Over ...
    Sep 26, 2018 · San Francisco officials have temporarily shut down the city's huge new transit center after a crack was spotted in a steel beam in the ceiling. ...
  52. [52]
    TIMELINE: A look at the Salesforce Transit Center closure in San ...
    Aug 12, 2019 · The Temporary Transbay Terminal, located on Howard Street between Beale and Main Street, is now closed and fenced off. It's been one year since ...
  53. [53]
    'Perfect Storm' Caused Fractures at Salesforce Transit Center
    Dec 26, 2018 · The problematic twin tapered girders forced the closing of the transit hub in late September, less than six weeks after it opened in mid-August.
  54. [54]
    Shoring of cracked girders complete at troubled Salesforce Transit ...
    Oct 2, 2018 · The four-level shoring system is designed to take the weight off the two cracked beams so technicians can continue working to determine the ...
  55. [55]
    Salesforce Transit Center structurally sound, set to reopen
    Jun 11, 2019 · Deemed fully restored following significant fissures found last fall, the $2.2 billion bus hub and rooftop park in San Francisco will open ...Missing: problems | Show results with:problems
  56. [56]
    Buses are back! After almost a year, Salesforce Transit Center ...
    Aug 11, 2019 · Buses are back on the third-floor deck of San Francisco's Salesforce Transit Center. Monday will be AC Transit's first-weekday commute service ...
  57. [57]
    Transbay project in $300 million hole - SFGATE
    Jul 25, 2013 · The demolition of the Transbay Terminal at Mission and 1st Streets in downtown San Francisco, Calif., continues on Friday Jan. 7, 2011.
  58. [58]
    Parties involved in $2.2 billion construction project face liability ...
    Jan 7, 2019 · The transit center, which opened Aug. 12, was already marred by rising costs, 50 percent higher than original projections, and a project ...<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    San Francisco's Transbay Terminal running out of funds for ...
    Apr 12, 2016 · The cost of the Transbay Terminal project was supposed to cost roughly $1.6 billion, but that has since ballooned to $2.3 billion and now ...Missing: replacement obstacles
  60. [60]
    Report 2018-104 - California State Auditor -
    For example, San Francisco's Transbay Terminal experienced cost increases of $1.1 billion before instituting additional oversight through a cost review ...
  61. [61]
    Contractor sues Transbay Transit Center authority for $150 million
    Oct 18, 2018 · Webcor claims breach of contract, points the finger at Transbay Joint Powers over delays and cost overruns.
  62. [62]
    Salesforce Transit Center's inspection missed flaws that led to ...
    Mar 20, 2019 · An official for the new $2.2 billion transit hub pointed the finger at a "failure of quality control in the construction process."Missing: budget | Show results with:budget
  63. [63]
    Transbay Authority orders full structural review of failing transit center
    Nov 15, 2018 · The long-awaited tower by Pelli Clarke & Partners above Boston's South Station is an engineering success but an aesthetic let down. October 2 ...
  64. [64]
  65. [65]
    Why is everything late, over-budget, and broken in San Francisco?
    Aug 12, 2019 · Why is everything late, over-budget, and broken in San Francisco? · FYI, Salesforce does not own Salesforce Transit Center, park · Central Subway ...
  66. [66]
    S.F.'s empty $2.2B transit center echoes city's declining downtown
    Apr 25, 2023 · As is all too common, the initial construction was marked by delays and cost overruns, which is why the board agreed to a 25-year deal to ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  67. [67]
    Buildings that elevate cities: Salesforce Transit Center | Modus | RICS
    Apr 6, 2023 · Before COVID-19, the Transit Centre had 30,000 passengers each day; today they only say numbers are slowly building. “The New York Times ...Missing: ridership | Show results with:ridership
  68. [68]
    [PDF] June 13, 2024 TRANSBAY JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY BRIEF ...
    Jun 13, 2024 · The balance of operating expenses not covered by the RM-2 and RM-3 operating allocations will be covered by a combination of lease, sponsorship, ...
  69. [69]
    The $8.25 Billion San Francisco Train that Couldn't (or at least ...
    Oct 15, 2025 · The California High-Speed Rail Authority's ridership projection is now half of what it was in 2022, partly because the proposed segment will be ...Missing: shortfalls | Show results with:shortfalls
  70. [70]
    Salesforce Transit Center GC sues owner for $150M
    Oct 22, 2018 · 16 filed a $150 million lawsuit against the owner, the Transbay Joint Powers Authority, in San Francisco Superior Court alleging breach of ...
  71. [71]
    Webcor/Obayashi Sues San Francisco Transit Terminal Owner
    Oct 18, 2018 · The lawsuit, which requests a jury trial, alleges TJPA caused significant delays and additional costs related to the late delivery of the design ...
  72. [72]
    Transbay Executive Outlines Failures That May Have Led To SF ...
    Mar 14, 2019 · It was September of last year when a crack developed in two massive steel beams, triggering the shutdown of the building. Since then the focus ...Missing: original Francisco
  73. [73]
    Multiyear legal saga over Salesforce Transit Center construction is ...
    Aug 28, 2024 · The last legal disputes over the construction of the Salesforce Transit Center have been resolved, concluding a yearslong legal battle over ...
  74. [74]
    San Francisco Judge Orders Transbay Transit Center to Pay for ...
    Sep 21, 2018 · But Transbay argued to Karnow that deal was fraudulent because Millennium hid the full extent of the sinking and negligently designed a building ...Missing: Terminal disputes
  75. [75]
    Settlement tentatively reached in lawsuit involving Millennium Tower ...
    Aug 28, 2019 · Additionally, the suit alleged that further sinking was caused after construction began on the neighboring Salesforce Transit Center.
  76. [76]
    San Francisco Transbay Transit Center Cost $2 Billion, Has Problems
    Dec 28, 2018 · In the eight years since breaking ground, the center has been embroiled in a number of legal battles, including a longstanding feud with ...<|separator|>
  77. [77]
    How Transbay Transit Center deal's collapse would alter S.F.
    Sep 25, 2014 · Construction continues on the Transbay Transit Center in San Francisco, even as a legal fight brews over how much in taxes developers should pay ...
  78. [78]
    Transbay Terminal Dispute Between City, Developers Could Drag Out
    Sep 24, 2014 · The builders are threatening lawsuits, something that could tie up the project's funding for years. Developers even brought in heavy hitter and ...
  79. [79]
    San Francisco Officials on Collision Course With Developers Over Tax
    Sep 23, 2014 · Firms building high-rises near new transit center say city's planned special levy is excessive.
  80. [80]
    State ruling fails to clear terminal location - SFGATE
    Jan 8, 2010 · The Transbay Joint Powers Authority is fearful the uncertainty could undermine its bid for $400 million in federal stimulus funds to help build ...<|separator|>
  81. [81]
    Transbay terminal controversy intensifies - San Mateo Daily Journal
    The lawsuit alleges that planners' purported failure to consider all possible sites violated the California Environmental Quality Act. Recommended for you.
  82. [82]
    City suspends $9.7M of Salesforce Transit Center funding, testing ...
    Oct 25, 2018 · The joint venture, which built the transit center, is suing the authority for $150 million after claiming the agency breached its agreement.
  83. [83]
    trouble for Transbay as city halts funds, steel testing results delayed
    Oct 23, 2018 · The San Francisco County Transportation Authority voted unanimously Tuesday to freeze $9.7 million in sales tax funding for the next phase ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
  84. [84]
    Lawsuits, Delays, and Political Drama as Salesforce Transit Center ...
    Oct 25, 2018 · The suit covers the $2.2 billion center's construction phase and makes no mention of the current problems facing the facility....But the action ...
  85. [85]
    About The Portal | Transbay Joint Powers Authority
    The Portal, also known as the Downtown Rail Extension project, will extend Caltrain service from Fourth and King Streets and deliver the California High-Speed ...
  86. [86]
    [PDF] Transbay Downtown Rail Extension Project
    Service on the project is planned to operate from 4:30 am to 1:30 am on weekdays, and from 6:00 am to 1:30 am on weekends with trains every 10 to 15 minutes ...
  87. [87]
    The Portal - SFCTA
    The Portal project (also known as the Downtown Rail Extension) will extend Caltrain and future California High-Speed Rail service from the existing 4th and ...
  88. [88]
    The Portal | Transbay Joint Powers Authority
    The TJPA has completed the 30% design of The Portal, which has an anticipated revenue service date of 2035, funding dependent. Advancing in the Federal Transit ...About The Portal · Project Schedule · Environmental Review · Construction Updates
  89. [89]
    TJPA CELEBRATES $3.4 BILLION FEDERAL COMMITMENT FOR ...
    May 20, 2024 · The Portal, also known as the Downtown Rail Extension project, will extend Caltrain's rail system to the multimodal Salesforce Transit Center in downtown San ...
  90. [90]
    [PDF] staff report for calendar item no.: 9 - Transbay Joint Powers Authority
    On August 26, 2025, FRA notified TJPA that it had withdrawn its award of CRISI funding for. The Portal's Final Design for Track and Rail Systems Project.
  91. [91]
    [PDF] bd121024 resolution no. 25-26 - SFCTA
    Jan 22, 2025 · 5. TJPA. The Portal Project. Engineering Phase. Activities. $ 9,000,000. The Portal/DTX project will extend Caltrain 1.3 miles from its current ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  92. [92]
    Why downtown San Francisco rail extension key to city future | Forum
    Aug 12, 2025 · The Portal is a gateway to San Francisco's future. By Adam Van de Water and Rafael Mandelman | Special to The Examiner; Aug 11, 2025; Aug 11 ...
  93. [93]
    San Francisco - California High-Speed Rail Authority - CA.gov
    In 2022, the Authority's Board of Directors enviornmentally cleared the station at 4th and King streets to serve as the interim terminal station for high-speed ...
  94. [94]
    Salesforce Transit Center, San Francisco - Railway Technology
    Oct 23, 2018 · The $4.2bn project, which will serve 45 million passengers annually, is owned by Transbay Joint Power Authority (TJPA), a consortium of the Bay ...
  95. [95]
    [PDF] Peer Review Panel Report on Findings Review of Three Operations ...
    Jan 25, 2018 · The Salesforce Transit Center capacity plan of four high-speed trains and six Caltrain trains cannot be assured unless both services can use all ...
  96. [96]
    Northern California - California High-Speed Rail Authority - CA.gov
    By 2030-2033, at the earliest. Bay Area riders can take the Amtrak San Joaquin from Oakland or the Altamont Corridor Express service from San Jose and other ...
  97. [97]
    Transbay Block 3 Park and Streetscape Improvement | Public Works
    Sign up to receive future construction updates here. October 21, 2025: Sidewalk, Curb Ramp and Crosswalk Work Taking Place on Beale and Main Streets, ...
  98. [98]
    Transbay Howard Streetscape Improvement Project - SFMTA
    The project aims to improve safety and travel on Howard St. with a protected bike lane, permanent streetscape updates, and traffic signal changes.
  99. [99]
    [PDF] Transbay Transit Center
    The Resolution is the final step in the process to establish the CBD, which will provide ongoing funding for operation and maintenance of the Transbay Transit ...Missing: issues | Show results with:issues