Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Sea state

Sea state refers to the general condition of the ocean's , characterized by the properties of wind-generated , including their height, , , and directional energy flux, encompassing both locally generated wind seas and swells from distant sources. It represents a statistical description of wave conditions at a specific location and time, evolving through nonlinear processes influenced by , , and currents. The primary components of sea state are wind waves, formed by local winds acting on the water surface, and swell, which consists of longer-period waves propagating from remote storm areas. Wind waves are typically shorter and steeper, while swells are more regular and can travel thousands of kilometers with minimal energy loss. Factors such as , duration, fetch (the distance over which wind blows), water depth, and atmospheric conditions like or currents further modulate these wave characteristics, leading to variations from calm, mirror-like surfaces to chaotic, foam-covered seas during storms. Sea state is quantitatively assessed using established scales that correlate wind force with wave conditions. The Beaufort Wind Force Scale, developed in 1805 and widely adopted internationally, describes sea state across 13 levels (0–12) based on observed and surface appearance, from calm (0: sea like a mirror, <1 knot wind) to hurricane force (12: air filled with foam and spray, >64 knots wind). Complementing this, the separately evaluates the state of the wind sea (0–9, from calm to phenomenal over 14 meters) and swell (0–9, based on height and length, from no swell to a heavy, rolling sea). These scales facilitate visual estimation by mariners and meteorologists, often without instruments, and are essential for forecasting and real-time observations. Understanding and monitoring sea state is critical for maritime safety, as rough conditions increase risks of vessel capsizing or structural damage; for ocean engineering, informing the design of ships, offshore platforms, and coastal defenses; and for environmental processes, including air-sea fluxes of momentum, heat, and gases like CO2, as well as , beach erosion, and dynamics. Modern measurements combine buoys, satellite altimetry for , and for directional spectra, supporting global climate models and operational forecasts.

Fundamentals

Definition

Sea state refers to the general condition of the on a large , such as an or , with respect to and swell at a given location and time. This condition is characterized by statistical properties of the , including their , , and directional , which reflect the dynamic interaction between forcing and response. A key distinction within sea state is between wind sea and swell. Wind sea comprises waves generated locally by the prevailing wind at or near the observation site, typically featuring shorter periods and irregular forms aligned with the wind direction. In contrast, swell consists of longer-period waves that have traveled far from their distant generation areas, often exhibiting more regular, parallel crests and reduced dependence on local winds. For practical reporting, sea state is assumed to remain relatively constant over short temporal intervals, such as 15 to 30 minutes, allowing observers to capture a representative snapshot amid ongoing variability. The term "sea state" has historical roots in traditions, where sailors systematically logged surface conditions in ship journals since at least the mid-19th century to assess risks and patterns. Quantitative parameters like and dominant period provide essential context for describing these conditions.

Key Parameters

The , denoted as H_s, serves as a primary indicator of sea roughness and is defined as the average height of the highest one-third of waves in a given sea state, often visually estimated by trained observers as the mean over a 10- to 20-minute . This parameter approximates the maximum expected wave height under Rayleigh-distributed wave heights and is calculated from the wave spectrum as H_s \approx 4 \sqrt{m_0}, where m_0 is the zeroth moment representing the total variance of the sea surface elevation. Spectral moments, such as m_0 = \int_0^\infty S(f) \, df where S(f) is the one-dimensional frequency spectrum, quantify the distribution of wave energy and provide a statistical foundation for deriving other parameters like wave variance. Wave period T, the time interval between successive wave crests, characterizes the temporal aspect of sea state and includes subtypes such as the peak period T_p, which corresponds to the dominant of maximum in the wave , and the mean period T_m, averaged over all in a record. For instance, T_p = 1 / f_p where f_p is the peak , typically ranging from 5 to 20 seconds in open ocean conditions depending on and duration. These periods influence speed and propagation, with longer periods indicating swell-dominated states versus shorter periods in developing wind seas. The wave spectrum describes the of across and , providing a comprehensive view of sea state complexity through the two-dimensional function E(f, \theta), where f is and \theta is . spreading, a feature, quantifies how is dispersed around the , often modeled with functions like \cos^{2s}(\theta - \theta_m) where s controls the spread (narrow for swell, broader for wind seas). This spreading affects and is derived from higher-order moments. Additional metrics include the mean wave direction \theta_m, the average propagation angle of wave energy computed as \theta_m = \atan2\left( \int \sin \theta \, E(f, \theta) \, df \, d\theta, \int \cos \theta \, E(f, \theta) \, df \, d\theta \right), which indicates the principal approach of waves. Wave steepness, expressed as H_s / L where L is the (approximately L = g T^2 / (2\pi) for deep water), measures the ratio of height to length and signals potential for wave breaking when exceeding about 1/7. Spectral width \epsilon, defined as \epsilon = \sqrt{1 - (m_2^2 / (m_0 m_4))} using moments m_2 and m_4, assesses the bandwidth of frequencies present, with values near 0 for monochromatic-like swell and approaching 1 for irregular wind-driven seas. These parameters, including H_s, are integral to systems like the WMO Sea State Code for standardized reporting.

Classification Systems

Douglas Sea State Scale

The Douglas Sea State Scale, also known as the international sea and swell scale, was devised in 1917 by English H. P. Douglas while serving as head of the Meteorological Service, and it was introduced more formally in 1921. This visual classification system was developed for maritime observers on ships to estimate sea roughness based on and general appearance, primarily targeting -generated waves (wind sea) rather than swell. It provides a standardized way to report conditions without instruments, aiding navigation and weather logging in the early . The ranges from 0 to 9, with each grade assigned descriptive terms, approximate average heights (, defined as the average of the highest one-third of ), and correlations to the Beaufort wind force for associated speeds. For instance, lower grades align with calm to light (Beaufort 0–3), while higher grades correspond to strong gales (Beaufort 8+) and beyond. The separates wind sea from swell, with swell assessed independently using similar degrees but focusing on (short <100 m, average 100–200 m, long >200 m) and categories (low <2 m, moderate 2–4 m, high >4 m).
Sea StateDescriptionAverage Wave Height (m)Typical Beaufort Correlation
0Calm (glassy)00 (Calm)
1Calm (rippled)0–0.100–1 (Light air)
2Smooth (wavelets)0.10–0.501–2 (Light breeze)
3Slight0.50–1.253–4 (Gentle–moderate breeze)
4Moderate1.25–2.505 (Fresh breeze)
5Rough2.50–4.006 (Strong breeze)
6Very rough4.00–6.007 (Near gale)
7High6.00–9.008 ()
8Very high9.00–14.009–10 (Strong–storm)
9Phenomenal>14.0011+ (Violent storm–hurricane)
Despite its utility, the Douglas Sea State Scale has limitations as a subjective visual method reliant on observer estimates of representative wave heights, such as the , which can vary with experience and conditions. It is best suited for describing wind sea and does not account for swell direction, wave periods, or detailed spectral characteristics, potentially leading to inconsistencies in mixed sea states. The scale was later adapted by the into its sea state code for standardized global reporting.

WMO Sea State Code

The (WMO) Sea State Code provides a standardized numerical system for describing and reporting conditions, primarily focusing on wind-generated waves known as "sea," while incorporating separate observations for swell. Adopted by the WMO in 1970, it builds on the for the wind component and extends reporting to include swell characteristics for more comprehensive global marine weather assessments. The core of the consists of values from 0 to 9, each corresponding to specific ranges and qualitative descriptors for the of sea in open water conditions. These codes prioritize descriptive terms but use height guidelines to aid observers in accounting for factors like local and currents. The WMO is based on the foundational Douglas Sea State Scale for these sea elements.
CodeDescriptive TermsHeight (meters)
0Calm (glassy)0
1Calm (rippled)0–0.1
2Smooth (wavelets)0.1–0.5
3Slight0.5–1.25
4Moderate1.25–2.5
5Rough2.5–4
6Very rough4–6
7High6–9
8Very high9–14
9Phenomenal>14
To address swell—waves generated by distant winds and distinguishable from local sea—the code includes supplementary details on direction (reported using 8 or 16 , such as N, NE, E) and length (categorized as short for less than 100 m, average for 100–200 m, or long for over 200 m). Swell height and period are also noted separately, often using similar numerical scales to the main sea state code. In practice, the is integrated into international reporting formats like (FM 12) for land and sea stations and SHIP (FM 13) codes for vessels, ensuring consistent transmission via maritime broadcasts. For instance, in SHIP reports, the wind sea state might be encoded as a group like 37005 (indicating 5), with swell appended in groups such as 3dw1dw1 (direction) followed by period and height details; a simplified notation could appear as 5.3 to denote sea state 5 with long swell from the northeast. These standardized elements facilitate uniform interpretation by meteorologists, navigators, and forecasters worldwide.

Measurement Methods

Visual Assessment

Visual assessment of sea state relies on trained human observers, such as ships' officers, who evaluate wave characteristics through direct from the vessel's or bridge. These observers estimate —the average of the highest one-third of —by visually gauging the vertical distance from trough to , often comparing to known references like the ship's or the for scale. This method separates local wind-generated sea from longer- swell originating from distant systems, reporting each component's , , and independently. Standard techniques involve timing the passage of successive wave crests to determine , typically by counting cycles over 10 to using a or floating markers like patches for reference. Observers also note surface features such as streaks along , which indicate moderate to strong , and breaking patterns like whitecaps or spilling , which align with descriptive criteria in the Douglas Sea State Scale or WMO Sea State Code for categorizing roughness. Heights are approximated in half-meter increments, focusing on well-formed waves visible from the ship's wave-facing side to minimize distortion from pitch and roll. Accuracy of these estimates varies with observer experience, environmental conditions, and observational setup, with experienced personnel achieving errors of about 10–30% in compared to measurements. Factors reducing precision include poor (especially at night), vessel motion that obscures the surface, and limited from or spray, leading to overall error margins of 20-30% for s in operational settings. Random errors dominate over systematic biases, particularly for swell periods, which are often underestimated due to emphasis on steeper, shorter . Historically, visual assessment was the primary method for sea state evaluation before widespread instrumental deployment in the mid-20th century, forming the basis of ship logs and voluntary observing programs like the WMO's Voluntary Observing Ships (VOS) scheme established in 1950. It remains essential today in remote oceanic areas lacking or as a during equipment failure, providing for immediate decisions. Training protocols for visual observers are standardized by international and national maritime authorities, emphasizing recognition of sea state descriptors through the WMO VOS program and resources from organizations like NOAA's . Programs conducted by Port Meteorological Officers include practical sessions on estimating heights and periods, coding observations per WMO formats, and applying the , ensuring consistency among ships' officers worldwide.

Instrumental and Remote Sensing

In-situ instruments, such as weather buoys, provide direct measurements of sea state parameters through sensors that capture wave motion. The (NOAA) deploys Datawell Waverider buoys equipped with accelerometers to measure heave , which quantifies vertical displacements, and GPS systems for tracking surface velocities and positions, enabling the derivation of full directional wave spectra. These buoys record data over extended periods to capture the complete wave energy spectrum, including as a primary output metric. Shipborne systems complement in-situ measurements by integrating with vessel operations for real-time monitoring. X-band radars, commonly mounted on ships, analyze radar echoes from the sea surface to estimate directional wave spectra, providing parameters like , period, and across a wide field of view. Ultrasonic gauges, another ship-based tool, emit sound pulses to measure water surface elevations with high , suitable for short-range wave profiling in varying sea conditions. Remote sensing techniques extend coverage to global scales using satellite-based platforms. Radar altimeters on the Jason series satellites, such as , determine by analyzing the shape and delay of radar echoes reflected from ocean waves, achieving accuracies within a few centimeters for sea surface heights. (SAR) systems image wave fields by capturing high-resolution backscattered signals from the sea surface, allowing retrieval of two-dimensional wave spectra and integral parameters like wave direction and steepness. Data from these instruments undergo standardized processing to yield reliable sea state information. transforms time-series measurements into frequency spectra, isolating wave components by energy distribution, with typical integration periods of 20-30 minutes to ensure statistical stability and capture dominant wave periods. Recent advancements include the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite, launched in December 2022, which employs wide-swath interferometric to map two-dimensional sea surface topography at approximately 20-meter resolution, enabling detailed observations of wave fields and their spatial variability over large ocean areas. As of 2025, SWOT continues to provide high-resolution data enhancing global sea state monitoring.

Applications

Marine Engineering

In , sea state data is essential for ensuring the structural integrity and operational reliability of vessels and installations, guiding the specification of design loads, assessments, and operability criteria based on wave characteristics such as (H_s) and spectral (T). Engineers rely on statistical representations of sea states to predict responses under varying environmental conditions, from routine operations to events, thereby optimizing safety margins and lifecycle costs. This involves integrating short-term and long-term wave statistics into design processes, as outlined in international standards that emphasize site-specific analyses. Short-term sea state statistics, particularly joint distributions of H_s and T, are used to define operability limits for marine operations, where conditions like H_s < 4 m often restrict activities such as crew transfers or equipment handling to minimize risks from wave-induced motions. These distributions are typically visualized in , which plot the probability of occurrence for combinations of H_s and T, enabling engineers to assess downtime and operational windows; for instance, the 19901-1 requires such diagrams for determining metocean conditions in offshore structure design, incorporating long-term wave data to represent realistic joint probabilities. This approach allows for probabilistic evaluation of short-term responses, ensuring that structures can withstand typical without excessive downtime. For long-term design, engineers estimate extreme sea states using distributions like the or three-parameter to predict 100-year return period waves, which inform ultimate limit state loads for structural sizing and safety factors. The , suited for unbounded maxima, models the tail of wave height data assuming exponential exceedances, while the provides flexibility for bounded extremes common in ocean environments, with shape parameters capturing site-specific variability. These methods are applied to hindcast or measured data to derive design wave heights, such as those exceeding typical annual maxima, ensuring platforms and vessels can survive rare events with low failure probabilities. Extreme value estimation often employs the peaks-over-threshold (POT) method, which fits a generalized Pareto distribution to wave heights exceeding a high threshold, yielding return periods via T_r = \frac{1}{N \cdot P_{\text{exceed}}}, where N is the number of independent events (e.g., storm clusters per year) and P_{\text{exceed}} is the exceedance probability derived from the fitted model. This semi-parametric technique improves accuracy over block maxima approaches by utilizing more data points in the tail, as demonstrated in applications to significant wave height records from coastal sites. The resulting estimates guide load calculations, with return values scaled for design lifetimes typically spanning 20–50 years. In ship design, sea state parameters directly influence stability assessments through roll and pitch responses, where higher H_s and directional waves amplify motion amplitudes via response amplitude operators (RAOs), potentially leading to reduced stability limits or increased risk of parametric rolling in following seas. For offshore platforms, irregular waves characterized by broad spectra cause cumulative fatigue damage in structural joints and moorings, with nonlinear kinematics exacerbating stress cycles; spectral fatigue analysis integrates sea state scatter data to predict damage accumulation over the structure's life, often revealing that moderate, frequent waves contribute more to total fatigue than rare extremes. Breakwater design incorporates sea state-derived wave loads, using H_s to compute design heights (e.g., H \approx 1.8 H_s) for quasi-static pressures and impulsive forces via formulas like Goda's, ensuring stability against sliding and overturning in specified return periods. Sea state significantly influences vessel handling during maritime operations, particularly in rough conditions where captains must adjust speed and course to mitigate risks. In sea states of Douglas scale 6 or higher—characterized by wave heights of 4 meters or more—vessels typically reduce speed to prevent excessive slamming, rolling, and loss of control, as wind and wave resistance naturally decreases propulsion efficiency. This reduction can halve the frequency of green water events on deck by reducing speed by 1-2 knots, which can halve the frequency of green water events on deck. Green water, where solid waves break over the deck, poses severe hazards including crew injuries, fatalities, and equipment damage, as seen in incidents where waves have washed personnel overboard or caused incapacitation despite personal protective equipment. Complex sea states with overlapping wind seas and swells further exacerbate handling challenges, increasing the likelihood of parametric rolling and stability loss that contribute to accidents. Safety protocols establish clear thresholds based on sea state to protect smaller vessels and coordinate rescues. International Maritime Organization (IMO) guidelines for high-speed and small commercial craft often design vessels for significant wave heights (Hs) up to 2 meters in inshore or restricted areas, with operational limits set accordingly beyond which small vessels face heightened capsizing or swamping risks. For search-and-rescue () operations, wave limits are critical; helicopters, commonly used in maritime , are restricted from overwater flights when Hs exceeds their certificated ditching performance (often 2-6 meters depending on model and region) due to ditching hazards and visibility issues, for example in the UK where offshore flights are prohibited if Hs >6 meters; while offshore operations may halt at 6 meters to ensure crew safety. Rough seas above these limits complicate by reducing visibility, hindering vessel approach, and increasing the probability of secondary incidents during recovery efforts. Forecasting plays a pivotal role in navigation safety, with models like those from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) providing sea state predictions that inform route planning and avoidance of hazardous areas. These coupled atmosphere-ocean-wave systems, such as the Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) with the WAve Model (WAM), deliver high-resolution data on wave spectra up to 10 days ahead, enabling captains to optimize paths for fuel efficiency and risk minimization in varying conditions. The 1998 Sydney to Hobart Yacht Race illustrates the consequences of forecasting shortfalls, where an underestimated east coast low produced Hs of 6-7 meters and maximum waves up to 12 meters, leading to six deaths, five sinkings, and over 60 retirements due to inadequate storm warnings. Regulatory frameworks mandate recording sea state to support incident investigations and compliance. Under SOLAS Chapter V, Regulation 28, ships on international voyages must maintain a deck documenting navigational activities, including observations such as sea state, to ensure and facilitate post-event . While Voyage Data Recorders (VDRs) capture parameters like position, speed, and audio, they do not directly log sea state; instead, visual assessments by the officer of the watch provide real-time inputs for entries and immediate handling decisions. These records are essential for verifying adherence to operational limits and improving future protocols.

Modern Developments

Satellite Observations

Satellite observations of sea state have revolutionized global monitoring by providing consistent, wide-swath coverage of (SWH) and related parameters, enabling the compilation of long-term datasets. The European Space Agency's (ESA) Initiative (CCI) Sea State project, with version 4 released as of 2025 spanning 2002 onward, has produced a multi-mission dataset by processing observations from missions including Jason-1, Jason-2, , Envisat, SARAL/AltiKa, and later inclusions like and CFOSAT for enhanced directional spectra, with validation against in-situ buoy measurements to ensure climate-quality records of SWH variability. This effort addressed gaps in historical data by applying advanced denoising and cross-calibration techniques, yielding bias errors below 10 cm and errors (RMSE) under 26 cm when compared to offshore buoys from networks like the National Data Buoy Center (NDBC). Key satellite missions have enhanced SWH accuracy and timeliness. The TOPEX/Poseidon mission (1992–2006) pioneered altimetric SWH retrievals with an accuracy of approximately 0.2 m, laying the foundation for subsequent Jason-series observations. CryoSat-2, operational since 2010, extends coverage to polar regions with SAR-mode altimetry achieving SWH precision around 0.07 m in moderate conditions (2 m SWH), though overall mission accuracy aligns with ~0.5 m for global applications. , launched in 2016, supports near-real-time (NRT) processing with RMSE values of 0.28–0.40 m against buoys, outperforming predecessors like Jason-2 in coastal and shallow waters while delivering SWH data within hours of acquisition. ESA CCI data products include along-track Level-2P (L2P) and Level-3 (L3) SWH measurements, as well as monthly gridded Level-4 (L4) fields at 1° × 1° resolution, providing global maps of mean SWH that highlight elevated values at mid-to-high latitudes. Later iterations incorporate mean wave period estimates, validated similarly against buoys to capture spectral characteristics. A notable 2025 milestone came from the / SWOT mission, which observed a record-breaking swell with maximum wave heights of 19.7–20.2 m during the North Pacific "," demonstrating its capacity for two-dimensional imaging of extreme events previously undetectable by altimeters. Despite these advances, challenges persist in polar regions, where extended polar nights and ice cover limit optical and observations, resulting in gaps during winter months and reduced revisit times for full coverage. for extreme events (>10 m SWH) remains problematic, as waveforms saturate in high seas, leading to underestimation biases up to 20% in coastal extremes and requiring model-assisted corrections.

Climate Change Impacts

Global observations indicate a gradual increase in (H_s), with trends of approximately 0.1 to 0.2 m per decade since 1985, derived from altimeter measurements compiled in the European Space Agency's Initiative (CCI) Sea State dataset. These changes are most pronounced in the , where extreme wave events have intensified, contributing to average height rises of about 20 cm over the past three decades. Such trends reflect broader alterations in ocean surface conditions, with data providing the primary evidence base for these long-term patterns. The underlying mechanisms driving these observed shifts involve enhanced storm intensity due to warmer atmospheric conditions, which increase moisture content and wind speeds, thereby generating stronger waves. Additionally, diminishing sea ice extent reduces wave , allowing winds to propagate over larger open water fetches and produce higher waves in polar regions. Changing large-scale wind patterns, influenced by shifts in , further amplify regional wave energy, particularly in extratropical latitudes. Future projections from IPCC assessments, including the Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, indicate increases in extreme H_s by 2100 under the high-emissions RCP8.5 scenario, with the strongest rises in the and parts of the tropical Pacific (high confidence). These projections are based on ensemble modeling that incorporates forcing and highlight amplified wave extremes in high-latitude and eastern tropical areas, with estimates of 5-15% increases in the . The implications of these changes include accelerated , as higher transport more and undermine shorelines, exacerbating habitat loss and . Altered shipping routes may become necessary to mitigate risks from more frequent severe conditions, potentially increasing operational costs and emissions in global maritime trade. Despite these insights, gaps persist in current understanding, such as insufficient sampling in tropical regions where data sparsity limits trend detection, and the reliance on improved coupled wave-climate models to resolve interactions between ocean , atmosphere, and ice dynamics.

References

  1. [1]
    Sea State - Global Climate Observing System (GCOS)
    Sea state is the characterization of wave and swell, typically in terms of height, wavelength, period, and directional wave energy flux.
  2. [2]
    About Sea State - ESA Climate Change Initiative
    Sea state is the statistical description of wind-generated ocean wave properties, including their heights, periods and directions.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Sea State, Wind, and Clouds - National Weather Service
    This guide uses sea state photos to estimate wind speed, cloud photos for cloud type, and a glossary. Wind speed is estimated by Beaufort Force. Cloud ...
  4. [4]
    Beaufort Scale - National Weather Service
    Beaufort Scale: Estimating Wind Speed and Sea State. Also, see estimating wind while on land. Printable Version .pdf
  5. [5]
    JetStream Max: Wind and Sea Scales - NOAA
    Sep 20, 2023 · The Douglas Sea Scale · Length of swell waves: Short 0 - 100 m. Average 100 - 200 m. Long over 200 m · Height of swell waves: Low 0 - 2 m
  6. [6]
    Observing Sea States - Frontiers
    Here we will define “sea state” rather narrowly as surface gravity waves ... “Field laboratory for ocean sea state investigation and experimentation ...
  7. [7]
    Statistical description of wave parameters - Coastal Wiki
    Oct 18, 2025 · The significant wave height, H_s, is the mean of the highest third of the waves; instead of H_s the notation H_{1/3} is also often used. H_s ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Guide to Wave Analysis and Forecasting
    significant height, period, direction and spreading can also be derived for discrete wind-sea and swell components. This is achieved by “partitioning” the ...
  9. [9]
    Definitions of variables - SWAN model
    HSIGN, Significant wave height, denoted as $H_s$ in meters, and defined as. $H_s = 4 \sqrt{\int \int E(\omega,. where $E(\omega,\theta)$ ...
  10. [10]
    Douglas Sea Scale | Encyclopedia.com
    The Douglas Sea Scale was devised by the English Admiral HP Douglas in 1917, while he was head of the British Meteorological Navy Service.Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  11. [11]
    Appendix VIII – Beaufort Wind and Douglas Sea Scales
    Jun 3, 2016 · The Douglas scale has two parts – sea state (ie waves) and swell. ... sea state, without a swell state, actually means! Reply. Sarah says ...
  12. [12]
    Sea State | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
    Sea State describes the general condition of the surface of the open sea. This is comprised of two core measurements, the wave height which is dependent on the ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] A Reproduced Copy - NASA Technical Reports Server
    Nov 1, 1972 · Douglas Sea Scale - See Table A2. 6. Douglas Swell Scale - See Table ... Similarly, visual observation is capable only of estimating a ...
  14. [14]
    Beaufort Scale - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Furthermore the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) produced a standard sea state code in 1970; this is reproduced in Table 4.8. In the context of this ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] MANUAL ON CODES, Volume I.1
    Aug 15, 2015 · Apart from these international codes, several sets of regional codes exist which are intended only for exchanges within a given WMO Region.
  16. [16]
    About WMO Code Table 3700
    Aug 26, 2014 · WMO Code Table 3700 describes sea states from calm (0m) to phenomenal (over 14m), with height values for well-developed wind waves.
  17. [17]
    Marine Frequently Asked Questions
    4. What is the Beaufort scale? What is Sea State? The sea state basically specifies wave height. Wave height depends on local winds but on ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] SHIP SURFACE OBSERVATION CODE, FM 13-IX SHIP - met.nps.edu
    Sep 3, 2007 · See the land station synoptic code for the code figures used to report height values. 3dw1dw1dw2dw2 - Swell Wave Direction Group. 3.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] National Weather Service Observing Handbook No.1 Marine ...
    Please follow the weather reporting schedule for ships as best you can (0000,. 0600, 1200, 1800 UTC from all areas; every 3-hours from the Great Lakes, from ...Missing: temporal | Show results with:temporal
  20. [20]
    The visual estimation of shore-breaking wave heights - ScienceDirect
    It can be shown that experienced observers are able to estimate mean height with only a 20% error. Also the moments of the breaking wave spectrum may be ...
  21. [21]
    Assessment of the reliability of wave observations from voluntary ...
    Jul 19, 2003 · This paper describes development and validation of a global climatology of basic wave parameters based on the voluntary observing ship (VOS) ...
  22. [22]
    How are spectral wave data derived from buoy motion measurements?
    The accelerometers or inclinometers on board the buoys measure the heave acceleration or the vertical displacement of the buoy hull during the wave acquisition ...Missing: sea GPS
  23. [23]
    Directional wave measurements, sea surface temperatures, and ...
    The foundation of this ongoing collection are high-resolution directional wave spectra and parameters measured by Datawell Waverider buoys deployed across US ...
  24. [24]
    Waves and currents by X-band radar - Coastal Wiki
    Jan 25, 2024 · This article describes how X-band radar can be used to obtain several sea state parameters. X-band radar is an example of a remote sensing technique.Introduction · Obtained sea state parameters · Output of X-band radar systems
  25. [25]
    Analysis of sea waves and wind from X-band radar - ScienceDirect
    Spectral analysis of the time series of radar images is performed to determine directional spectra of the ocean wave fields and also their spectral parameters.
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
    A global sea state dataset from spaceborne synthetic aperture radar ...
    Aug 7, 2020 · This dataset consists of integral sea state parameters of significant wave height (SWH) and mean wave period (zero-upcrossing mean wave period, MWP) data
  28. [28]
    Wave Parameter Handbook
    Aug 23, 2022 · Significant wave height , derived from the wave spectrum. The significant wave height is the mean of the highest one-third of wave heights. The ...Missing: key H_s sqrt m_0
  29. [29]
    NASA SWOT: Home
    SWOT: NASA's first global survey of Earth's surface water, providing data for clean air and water, extreme events, and long-term environmental changes.Mission · News & Events · Science · SWOT in Space and TimeMissing: 20m resolution
  30. [30]
    Mapping the surface wave field in two dimensions - US CLIVAR
    Oct 14, 2025 · These results demonstrate that SWOT's two-dimensional view of the ocean surface can bridge a long-standing observational gap in understanding ...Missing: 2022 20m
  31. [31]
    How to handle a vessel in rough seas - SAFETY4SEA
    May 16, 2019 · In addition, the ship's speed is usually decreased by wind and wave resistance. This phenomenon is particularly augmented in head seas. How to ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Marine Weather Ship Handling in Rough Sea
    ... seas being shipped can be reduced by half by reducing speed only to around 1 ~ 2 knots. Frequency reduction of shipping sea by speed reduction. Coaster.
  33. [33]
    Green water on deck causes fatality and injuries - SWZ|Maritime
    Jul 10, 2024 · Going forward with water on deck is always dangerous. In a new Nautical Institute Mars Report, a crew member was killed despite wearing the right PPE.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Global ship accidents and ocean swell-related sea states - NHESS
    treme slamming, bending and torsional stresses and/or green water on deck, all of which all can reduce a ship's stability and consequently cause stranding ...Missing: Douglas scale
  35. [35]
    [PDF] National Standard for Commercial Vessels PART C
    Oct 5, 2020 · D. C: Inshore. Not to operate in significant wave height greater than 2 m, nor wind force exceeding. 6 Beaufort. E. D: Sheltered waters. Not to ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Rules and Regulations - GovInfo
    Oct 5, 2012 · Installation of a Search and Rescue. (SAR) Automatic Flight Control ... (i) Sea State: Wave height of 2.5 meters (8.2 feet), considering ...<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Overwater Progress - Flight Safety Foundation
    Mar 31, 2015 · Since June 2014, the CAA has prohibited offshore flights if, during planning and pre-departure, the significant wave height is greater than 6 m ...
  38. [38]
    How do rough seas and bad weather affect man overboard rescue ...
    Mar 9, 2025 · Rough seas and bad weather significantly complicate man overboard rescue operations by increasing visibility limitations, making navigation and ...How does weather conditions affect search and rescue operations at ...How difficult is a rescue attempt in high seas? - QuoraMore results from www.quora.com
  39. [39]
    Marine | ECMWF
    All forecast systems at ECMWF are coupled to an ocean model. The ensemble and seasonal forecast systems use a coupled atmosphere-ocean model, which includes a ...Missing: route planning
  40. [40]
    Sydney to Hobart 1998 tragedy 20 years on — the east coast low ...
    Dec 25, 2018 · The 1998 Sydney to Hobart set sail into what would become a severe east coast low. In the ensuing days six sailors died, five yachts sank, more than 60 yachts ...
  41. [41]
    Regulation 28 - Records of navigational activities and daily reporting
    All ships engaged on international voyages shall keep on board a record of navigational activities and incidents which are of importance to safety of ...
  42. [42]
    Voyage Data Recorders - International Maritime Organization
    Passenger ships and ships other than passenger ships of 3000 gross tonnage and upwards constructed on or after 1 July 2002 must carry voyage data recorders ( ...
  43. [43]
    Sea State - ESA Climate Change Initiative
    The “sea state” is the statistical description of wind-generated ocean wave properties, including their heights, periods and directions.
  44. [44]
    The Sea State CCI dataset v1: towards a sea state climate data ...
    Sep 2, 2020 · This paper presents the implementation of the first release of the Sea State CCI dataset, the implementation and benefits of a high-level denoising method.
  45. [45]
    Poseidon altimeter: great results after six months in orbit
    sea surface measurements are accurate to within 3.5 cm,; wave height measurements are accurate to within 20 cm,; the backscattering coefficient is accurate to ...
  46. [46]
    The German Bight: A validation of CryoSat-2 altimeter data in SAR ...
    At 2 m waveheight, the SAR precision is 0.9 cm for SSH, 6.6 cm for SWH. and 5.8 cm/s for U10. The in situ analysis shows that SSH and U10 have comparable ...<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    Evaluation of the Significant Wave Height Data Quality for the ... - MDPI
    In this paper, Sentinel-3 and Jason-2 significant wave height (SWH) data are matched in both time and space with buoy data from the United States East and West ...
  48. [48]
    Global Ocean L 3 Significant Wave Height From Nrt Satellite ...
    Near-Real-Time mono-mission satellite-based along-track significant wave height. Only valid data are included, based on a rigorous editing combining various ...
  49. [49]
    Oct. 2025: Swot unveils how high ocean waves can be
    Once upon a time, physicists considered that wave heights in the open ocean could not exceed 15 m, and attributed sailors' much higher estimates to a ...Missing: rogue | Show results with:rogue
  50. [50]
  51. [51]
    Improving satellite-based monitoring of the polar regions - Frontiers
    Feb 16, 2023 · We present a comprehensive review of the current status of remotely sensed and in situ sea ice, ocean, and land parameters acquired over the Arctic and ...
  52. [52]
    Reliability of Extreme Significant Wave Height Estimation from ...
    Dec 21, 2020 · In this paper, the limitations of altimeter data to estimate coastal Hs extremes (<10 km from shore) are investigated using the European Space Agency Sea State ...
  53. [53]
    Global Wave Height Trends and Variability from New Multimission ...
    Apr 9, 2020 · In this paper, we examine the representation of mean significant wave height (Hs) in four recent Sea State Climate Data Records, including two ...
  54. [54]
    What does climate change mean for extreme waves? | PreventionWeb
    Jan 11, 2023 · Indeed, we have observed that average wave heights in the Southern Ocean have increased by around 20cm over the past 30 years. In the northern ...
  55. [55]
    A recent increase in global wave power as a consequence ... - Nature
    Jan 14, 2019 · Results indicate the upper-ocean warming, a consequence of anthropogenic global warming, is changing the global wave climate, making waves stronger.
  56. [56]
    Increasing Wave Energy Moves Arctic Continental Shelves Toward ...
    Aug 6, 2022 · In recent decades, declining Arctic sea ice has led to increasingly energetic waves that persist for longer periods throughout the year, thereby ...
  57. [57]
    140 Years of Global Ocean Wind-Wave Climate Derived from CMIP6 ...
    These are compelling datasets to evaluate surface wind speed and significant wave height climate trends (Young and Ribal 2019). However, the actual magnitude of ...6. Wind-Wave Climate... · 7. Global Wind-Wave Climate... · B. Significant Wave Height
  58. [58]
    Chapter 6: Extremes, Abrupt Changes and Managing Risks
    Anthropogenic climate change has increased observed precipitation (medium confidence), winds (low confidence), and extreme sea level events (high confidence) ...
  59. [59]
    Projected 21st century changes in extreme wind-wave events
    Jun 10, 2020 · For the Southern Ocean, the increase in the H s 100 is associated with an increase in the number of extreme storms. This is a consistent ...
  60. [60]
    Coastal erosion and climate change: A review on ... - PubMed Central
    We conduct a literature review to summarize the latest scientific understanding of the coastal-change processes under climate change.
  61. [61]
    Climate Change's Impact on Global Shipping Routes - AXA XL
    Apr 24, 2024 · Ports and coastal infrastructure are at heightened risk of flooding and damage, which can disrupt supply chains and cause delays. The alteration ...<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Global ocean wave fields show consistent regional trends ... - Nature
    Dec 21, 2022 · We find that about 30–40% of the global ocean experienced robust seasonal trends in mean and extreme wave height, period, and direction.