Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Secretariat Building, Chandigarh

The Secretariat Building is a monumental administrative structure within the Capitol Complex of Chandigarh, India, designed by architect Le Corbusier in the early 1950s to serve as the civil secretariat for the governments of Punjab and Haryana. Constructed primarily from reinforced concrete in a brutalist style, it features an elongated horizontal slab form measuring 254 meters in length and 42 meters in height, positioned to define the western boundary of the complex while incorporating brise-soleil sun-shading louvers for climatic adaptation. Completed in the late 1950s, the building exemplifies Le Corbusier's vision for functional monumentality in post-independence urban planning, prioritizing efficiency, natural ventilation, and symbolic scale over ornamental excess. As a core component of the Capitol Complex—alongside the High Court and Palace of Assembly—it contributes to the UNESCO World Heritage Site "The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier, an Outstanding Contribution to the Modern Movement," recognized in 2016 for advancing purism, brutalism, and sculptural form in global architecture.

History

Planning and Commissioning

Following the in 1947, which left without its historic capital of in Pakistani territory, the Indian government under Prime Minister sought to establish a new capital city to serve the state's administrative needs and symbolize post-independence progress. In 1950, Nehru commissioned Swiss-French architect to develop the master plan for Chandigarh, initially building on an earlier proposal by Albert Mayer but ultimately leading to a comprehensive redesign. This initiative positioned Chandigarh as a modernist experiment in , with the Capitol Complex—encompassing the Secretariat, , and —as its symbolic core. Le Corbusier, collaborating with his cousin Pierre Jeanneret and a team of Indian architects, finalized the master plan in early 1951, emphasizing a sectoral grid system and monumental public structures to foster democratic governance. The Secretariat was conceived specifically as the administrative nerve center, housing extensive office spaces for bureaucratic operations while integrating with the complex's other edifices to project state authority and efficiency. Tenders for construction of the Capitol Complex components, including the Secretariat, were prepared and issued starting in 1951, aligning with Nehru's directive for functional, forward-looking architecture free from colonial legacies. Le Corbusier's approach drew from decades of "patient research" into modernist principles, including Purism's emphasis on geometric purity and emerging Brutalist forms, to create buildings that embodied national sovereignty and rational order rather than ornamental tradition. Nehru envisioned the Secretariat and its counterparts not merely as utilitarian structures but as icons of India's democratic aspirations, rejecting eclectic styles in favor of bold, to inspire civic . This commissioning reflected a deliberate break from pre-independence urban patterns, prioritizing causal functionality in administration over historical mimicry.

Construction and Completion

Construction of the Secretariat Building began in the early 1950s, shortly after was commissioned in 1951 to lead the architectural team for 's development, including the Capitol Complex. The project's execution relied on construction techniques adapted to the site's flat terrain, employing local Indian laborers supervised by international experts from 's atelier, such as , who served as chief architect until 1965. This approach addressed logistical challenges of scaling modernist design in a post-independence context with limited industrial infrastructure, prioritizing functional assembly over ornate detailing. Key milestones included the laying of the city's foundation stone on April 2, 1952, by Prime Minister , which encompassed initial groundwork for the Capitol Complex structures like the . Engineering efforts focused on erecting the building's signature horizontal slab form, measuring 254 meters in length and 42 meters in height, with integrated brise-soleil screens along the facade to mitigate solar heat gain through passive shading. The structure comprises six eight-story blocks linked by expansion joints for seismic resilience, incorporating internal ramps and courtyards to facilitate vertical and horizontal circulation without elevators in early phases. Structural completion progressed amid practical hurdles inherent to large-scale pours of exposed in a developing region, though specific records of material shortages during this period are sparse. The building achieved operational readiness by the late , with formal inauguration in 1958, enabling immediate occupancy for administrative functions and demonstrating the feasibility of Le Corbusier's modular grid system under on-site adaptations. Post-completion assessments highlighted the edifice's role in defining the complex's northern edge, providing empirical validation of its load-bearing capacity and climatic responsiveness through observed reductions in internal temperatures via the shading louvers.

Initial Operations and Partition Impacts

The Secretariat Building initiated operations in 1953 as the central administrative facility for the Punjab state government, housing key offices including those of the Chief Secretary and supporting the consolidation of state governance in the new capital of Chandigarh. This activation aligned with the broader establishment of Chandigarh following India's 1947 partition, which had disrupted Punjab's prior administrative infrastructure centered in Lahore, necessitating a fresh hub for bureaucratic coordination and policy execution. The Punjab Reorganisation Act of September 18, 1966, divided the state into Punjab and the new state of Haryana, designating Chandigarh as a Union Territory and joint capital for both, which directly impacted the Secretariat's usage. The building's spaces were subsequently partitioned to accommodate separate secretariats for Punjab and Haryana, enabling concurrent operations without fundamental alterations to its structural layout or core functional design. This adaptation maintained administrative continuity amid the political bifurcation but introduced logistical divisions, such as allocated wings and floors for each state's departments, to manage overlapping demands on the shared facility.

Architectural Design

Structural Form and Scale

The Secretariat Building adopts a horizontal slab typology, extending 254 meters in length and rising 42 meters in height, composed of six eight-story blocks connected by expansion joints to accommodate thermal movement. This elongated form delineates the northeastern boundary of the Capitol Complex, leveraging Le Corbusier's system—a proportional framework derived from human dimensions and the golden section—to ensure harmonic scaling and visual legibility across its facade. Elevated on , the structure frees the ground plane for circulation and shaded space, integrating with the site's while aligning axially with the complex's geometric layout to emphasize monumental administrative presence. The design prioritizes vertical density to house over 6,000 personnel efficiently, countering through compact, multi-level organization that facilitates internal flows without excessive horizontal expansion. This configuration reflects Le Corbusier's emphasis on proportional efficiency, where scale derives from functional demands rather than ornamental excess, enabling the building to serve as a centralized hub for governmental operations.

Innovative Elements and Functionalism

The Secretariat Building incorporates brise-soleil facades consisting of deep concrete louvers to mitigate solar heat gain in Punjab's subtropical climate, blocking direct sunlight while allowing diffused natural light to enter interiors. This shading strategy, adapted by Le Corbusier for tropical conditions, reduces reliance on mechanical cooling systems by enhancing passive thermal control. Complementary features, such as the building's elongated narrow plan, promote cross-ventilation, drawing cooler air through offices to maintain occupant comfort without extensive artificial means. Internally, the emphasizes functional efficiency through large open-plan office spaces linked by extended corridors, facilitating administrative workflows and hierarchical oversight in a fluid manner. Curving ramps serve as primary vertical circulation elements, replacing traditional stairs to enable smooth, continuous movement across the six eight-story blocks divided by expansion joints. This approach aligns with Le Corbusier's modernist ethos of treating buildings as optimized machines for human activity, extending principles from residential to bureaucratic operations by prioritizing lighting, airflow, and unobstructed paths over ornamental excess.

Materials and Brutalist Aesthetic

The Secretariat Building exemplifies through its extensive use of exposed béton brut, or raw , poured with board-marked to achieve a textured, unadorned surface. This technique, pioneered by , leaves the concrete's formwork impressions visible, emphasizing the material's honesty and structural expression without additional finishes. The concrete mixture incorporated local aggregates and techniques adapted to the site's resources, combined with reinforced elements to support the building's elongated, 250-meter-long form rising to 13 stories. Le Corbusier intended this raw aesthetic to evoke monumental permanence and durability, with the exposed surfaces designed for natural that would enhance rather than detract from the structure's integrity over time. principles underpin this choice, as in-situ pouring minimizes joints and ensures monolithic strength, though the alkaline of reacting with siliceous aggregates in humid subtropical climates like Chandigarh's can initiate expansive alkali-silica reactions if aggregates prove reactive. Despite these potential vulnerabilities, the prioritized low-maintenance longevity, aligning with Brutalism's ethos of functional robustness. Aesthetically, the béton brut's rugged contrasts sharply with ornate traditional motifs, asserting a modernist vision of progress through stark, geometric forms that prioritize utility and scale over decoration. This deliberate rejection of historical ornamentation underscores Le Corbusier's aim to symbolize a new era of rational, industrialized governance in post-independence .

Administrative Functions

Governmental Usage

The Secretariat Building houses the civil secretariats of both and , serving as the primary administrative for their in Chandigarh's Sector 1 Capitol Complex. The structure accommodates the Chief Secretary's offices and various departmental wings for each state, enabling coordinated policy implementation despite the division of facilities post-1966 state reorganization. Daily operations involve staff across multiple floors managing core executive tasks, including oversight of ministries such as , home affairs, and , where officials process fiscal policies, protocols, and developmental schemes. This includes handling inter-state coordination unique to Chandigarh's status as a shared , with designated zones ensuring operational separation while supporting joint administrative needs like budget execution and legislative support. The shared usage underscores Chandigarh's role in India's , where the building's facilitates efficient for two states from a single , including recent shifts toward digital file management to streamline case processing and reduce physical documentation. Secure areas within the premises protect sensitive documents related to state security and policy deliberations, reflecting practical adaptations to dual occupancy.

Adaptations for Dual-State Operations

Following the Punjab Reorganisation Act of 1966, which bifurcated into and effective November 1, 1966, the Secretariat Building was repurposed to function as the joint administrative headquarters for both states' civil secretariats. Originally designed by for a unified administration with open, fluid spatial organization, the structure underwent internal divisions to allocate roughly equal halves for each state's offices, including segregated workspaces for chief ministers, ministers, and senior bureaucrats. This adaptation compromised the building's intended monumental horizontality and interconnectivity, introducing physical barriers that fragmented the original functional flow without major external alterations like new entrances, as confirmed by heritage assessments prioritizing preservation of the facade. Bureaucratic expansion since the 1970s necessitated incremental modifications, such as internal partitions, supplementary cabins, and retrofitted units, often installed ad hoc to meet growing staffing demands— and together employ thousands of officials in the shared facility. These changes, driven by the realities of dual rather than architectural intent, have resulted in documented encroachments and space encumbrances, with violations including unauthorized extensions that reduce usable open areas and strain the building's load-bearing concrete frame. Government audits and restoration plans, such as those initiated in 2019 by the Administration, reveal persistent underutilization of core spaces due to these accretions, prompting efforts to revert to Le Corbusier's blueprint while accommodating ongoing needs. The shared operational model has engendered logistical inefficiencies inherent to partitioned , including duplicated administrative protocols and coordination frictions between machineries housed in proximate yet segregated zones. This setup, a byproduct of the political compromise designating as a temporary joint capital, has fueled recurrent disputes over and space scarcity, culminating in Haryana's push for a separate and complex to alleviate and enable independent expansions. Such adaptations underscore the causal mismatch between the building's modernist singular-purpose design and India's federal reconfiguration, where divided authority amplifies administrative redundancies without unified oversight, as evidenced by stalled joint projects and litigation over shared facilities.

Cultural and Historical Significance

Integration in Capitol Complex

The Secretariat Building constitutes the executive component in the Capitol Complex's triad of primary structures, alongside the judicial and legislative , collectively embodying the separation of governmental powers as conceptualized by . This ensemble, planned without rigid on a cross-axis layout, prioritizes monumental scale and intervisibility to evoke democratic equilibrium and civic authority. As the complex's largest edifice, the Secretariat's elongated horizontal form—measuring 254 meters in length—establishes the northern perimeter, delineating the site's boundaries while enabling coordinated access and oversight across the ensemble. Its positioning facilitates panoramic sightlines toward symbolic elements like the , which Le Corbusier's sketches integrated to underscore hierarchical yet harmonious governance through axial vistas and spatial rhythm. This synergistic arrangement reinforces the complex's role as a unified emblem of post-independence India's administrative ideals, with the Secretariat's mass anchoring the northern edge against the Shivalik Hills backdrop.

UNESCO Designation and Global Recognition

The Secretariat Building is integral to the Capitol Complex in , inscribed on the World Heritage List on July 17, 2016, as part of the transnational serial property "The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier, an Outstanding Contribution to the Modern Movement," encompassing 17 sites across seven countries. This designation recognizes the complex's embodiment of Le Corbusier's architectural innovations, including the integration of executive functions within a monumental ensemble that symbolizes post-independence India's aspirations for modernity and governance. The property spans 98.4838 hectares, with a of 1,409.384 hectares, underscoring its planned spatial hierarchy against the Shivalik Hills backdrop. UNESCO evaluated the site under criteria (i), (ii), and (vi): as a of human creative genius through its sculptural Brutalist forms; for bearing testimony to an important interchange of human values via the fusion of Western with local imperatives; and for its direct association with 20th-century architectural ideas that influenced global trends in public building design post-World War II. The committee emphasized the Capitol Complex's role in pioneering Brutalism's raw concrete aesthetic and volumetric expression, adapting European principles to subtropical conditions with features like sun-shading brise-soleils, thereby marking a shift toward contextual in non-Western settings. This formal status affirms the building's canonical position in architectural history, distinct from Le Corbusier's earlier Purist works, as a harbinger of sculptural and functionalist paradigms that informed subsequent international projects. The inscription has amplified global scholarly and , positioning as an exemplar of mid-20th-century planned and elevating the Secretariat's visibility in academic discourse on adaptive . Tourism to the Capitol Complex surged following the designation, with recording a 25% rise in foreign visitors by 2019, enhancing the city's profile as a living testament to Le Corbusier's urban vision amid India's era.

Preservation and Maintenance

Deterioration Challenges

Signs of physical deterioration in the Secretariat Building's exposed surfaces emerged prominently by the early , including spalling at structural elements such as the main . Superficial cracks and spalling were documented across the Capitol Complex, encompassing the , attributed to weathering and inadequate protection of the raw facade. These issues reflect the building's vulnerability since its completion in the late 1950s, with early manifestations linked to environmental exposure without routine mitigation. Environmental factors in Chandigarh's subtropical monsoon climate have accelerated degradation, with high humidity, heavy rainfall, and temperature fluctuations promoting moisture ingress through into the porous . This leads to of the surface, reducing alkalinity and facilitating rusting of embedded , as water penetrates the exposed finish designed for minimal surface treatment. Untreated sections exhibited up to 2.40% water absorption over four years in controlled tests, exacerbating surface and bio-deterioration from airborne pollutants and microbial growth. Human factors, particularly inconsistent maintenance by state agencies, have compounded these challenges, with a 2011 assessment estimating the Capitol Complex—including the —had exhausted 60% of its intended lifespan at just 58 years due to neglect. The original Brutalist specification of unsealed, in-situ poured , reliant on high-quality initial execution but unadapted to India's variable upkeep standards, created a causal pathway: episodic monsoonal wetting without drying interventions allows sustained moisture retention, initiating that expands and spalls overlying . Leakages and vegetation growth on facades further indicate systemic oversight, prioritizing functionality over preventive sealing despite identified risks.

Restoration Efforts and Government Responses

In response to concerns raised in UNESCO's State of Conservation reports, the Chandigarh Administration initiated removal of unauthorized accretions from the Secretariat Building between 2018 and 2020, including the majority of aluminum partitions that had obstructed balconies, as outlined in the Site Management Plan. These efforts aimed to restore the building's original modernist design but remained incomplete, with ongoing work flagged as unfinished despite a ₹1.18 payment to consultants in 2019 for conservation tasks that were contractually due within three years. Bureaucratic delays contributed to partial successes, as a 2025 highlighted unfruitful expenditure amid protracted timelines exceeding six years. Post-2016 interventions included partial facade preservation, with the administration approving tenders for restoring exposed elements to recapture the building's original aesthetic following similar work on adjacent structures. However, comprehensive holistic development plans for the Complex, mandated by directives in 2023 and revised through 2025, faced suspensions by due to potential impacts on integrity, limiting expansions like additional courtrooms while incorporating applications for protection. These court-driven initiatives sought to address deterioration but were hampered by administrative foot-dragging, as noted in rebukes for inadequate progress on proposals. Space constraints within the aging structure prompted partial relocation of UT Secretariat offices to a newly constructed building by 2025, leaving sections of the original premises underutilized and exacerbating maintenance challenges through divided oversight. Government responses, including orders to explore reallocating vacant floors, underscored persistent vulnerabilities, though implementation lagged amid heritage preservation mandates.

Controversies and Criticisms

Architectural and Ideological Debates

The Secretariat Building's design embodies Le Corbusier's modernist principles, featuring elements such as deep brise-soleil louvers to mitigate solar heat gain and to facilitate natural ventilation, aimed at achieving functional efficiency in Chandigarh's subtropical climate. These strategies, including brise-vent structures on the roof for air regulation, supported the building's large-scale administrative operations upon in 1953, with its modular grid and open office layouts enabling adaptable workspaces that have endured for over seven decades. Proponents argue this rationalist approach demonstrated superior for governmental functions compared to fragmented traditional forms, as evidenced by the structure's ongoing utility without fundamental redesign. Critics, particularly post-colonial theorists, contend that the building's stark concrete monumentality and top-down rationalism disregarded indigenous , such as shaded courtyards and thick walls that provide inherent for cooling in hot climates. This imposition of Eurocentric modernism is seen as elitist, prioritizing abstract symbolism over contextual adaptation, resulting in an "alien" aesthetic disconnected from Indian and necessitating later additions like that compromised original brise-soleil efficacy. Studies on thermal performance in indicate that traditional buildings often outperform modern concrete-heavy designs in passive , challenging claims of inherent superiority in Le Corbusier's approach. The ideological tension pits Le Corbusier's universalist —intended to symbolize post-independence progress—against organic traditionalism rooted in local environmental responses. Initially lauded in the 1950s by figures like as a break from colonial legacies, embodying India's modernist aspirations, reception shifted by the toward backlash over cultural disconnect and impracticality in daily use. Yet, the building's empirical resilience, maintaining core operations amid evolving needs, underscores the causal effectiveness of its engineered durability over purely contextual critiques.

Bureaucratic Neglect and Unauthorized Modifications

In September 2023, the suspended three major projects within the , including the construction of martyrs' monuments, tapestries, and additional courtrooms, citing threats to the site's outstanding and authenticity due to incompatible interventions. These suspensions stemmed from the and governments' holistic development plans, which prioritized state-specific commemorative and functional expansions over heritage preservation guidelines, illustrating how electoral incentives for visible infrastructure often override long-term stewardship. Administrative expansions in the Secretariat Building, driven by post-independence growth in bureaucratic staffing and the city's role as a shared capital for and , have led to persistent accretions such as unauthorized partitions and additions, exacerbating structural decay documented as early as when neglect was estimated to have shortened the complex's lifespan by 60%. disputes over have compounded this , with dual-state operations fostering inefficiencies like delayed maintenance and ad-hoc modifications to accommodate expanded personnel, contrasting sharply with Le Corbusier's original modular precision designed for controlled administrative scale. In early 2025, the Punjab and Haryana High Court faced legal challenges over proposed verandah constructions and eco-parking alterations within the complex, including a temporary Supreme Court stay in January on a High Court directive for a new verandah outside the Chief Justice's courtroom, amid concerns that such changes risked UNESCO delisting by altering the site's visual and spatial integrity. Although the Supreme Court later upheld aligned modifications in May 2025 as non-violative, the episode highlighted ongoing tensions between functional space demands from bureaucratic bloat and the imperative to preserve unaltered modernist forms, with critics attributing delays to inter-state political wrangling rather than proactive heritage management. This pattern of reactive judicial interventions underscores systemic governance shortfalls, where immediate operational needs eclipse the causal discipline required for sustaining engineered legacies against entropy.

References

  1. [1]
    AD Classics: Chandigarh Secretariat / Le Corbusier - ArchDaily
    Sep 26, 2011 · The Secretariat building is a long, horizontal concrete slab form, 254 meters long and 42 meters high, and marks the edge of the Capitol Complex ...
  2. [2]
    Secretariat Building in Chandigarh by Le Corbusier - ArchEyes
    Jan 28, 2025 · Le Corbusier was commissioned to design the master plan, including the Capitol Complex, which houses the Secretariat, the High Court, and the ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  3. [3]
    Contact Us | Chief Secretary Office, Government of Haryana, India
    Chief Secretary. 4th Floor, Haryana Civil Secretariat, Sector-1, Chandigarh. Phone no :0172-2740118. Email - cs@hry.nic.in.<|separator|>
  4. [4]
    WORKING - Chandigarh Administration
    The Secretariat building is a long, horizontal concrete slab form, 254 meters long and 42 meters high, which marks the edge of the Capitol Complex on the left ...
  5. [5]
    Secretariat Building - The Skyscraper Center
    The Secretariat Building in Chandigarh, India, is 42m tall with 11 floors, completed in 1959, and is an office building. It is located in Sector 1, Capital ...
  6. [6]
    The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier, an Outstanding Contribution ...
    The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier marks the birth of three major trends in modern architecture: Purism, Brutalism and sculptural architecture. The global ...Gallery · Maps · Documents · Indicators
  7. [7]
    AD Classics: Master Plan for Chandigarh / Le Corbusier - ArchDaily
    Oct 6, 2018 · Completed in 1951 in Chandigarh, India. On August 15, 1947, on the eve of India's independence from the United Kingdom, came a directive ...
  8. [8]
    The Politics of the Open Hand: Notes on Le Corbusier and Nehru at ...
    Apr 22, 2021 · Two master plans of Chandigarh: Alfred Mayer's plan of 1950 and Le Corbusier's modified plan of 1951. (Drawing by Narindar Lamba.) Figure ...
  9. [9]
    Le Corbusier at Chandigarh · The Open Hand
    Apr 22, 2021 · In 1950 Corbusier was offered the design of the Capitol buildings on a plan designed by Albert Mayer, and early in 1951 he had redesigned the ...
  10. [10]
    HISTORICAL BACKGROUND | Chandigarh, The official website of ...
    The Master Plan was developed by Le Corbusier who also designed the Capital Complex and established the architectural control & design of the main building of ...Missing: Secretariat | Show results with:Secretariat
  11. [11]
    GENERAL INFORMATION | Chandigarh, The official website of the ...
    Le Corbusier conceived the master plan of Chandigarh as analogous to human body, with a clearly defined head (the Capitol Complex, Sector 1), heart (the City ...
  12. [12]
    1957-1960 - Fondation Le Corbusier
    1958 · Inauguration of the Chandigarh Secrétariat · Production of Pavillon Philips and Poème électronique in collaboration with Edgard Varèse · Poème électronique ...
  13. [13]
    AFTER LE CORBUSIER - Chandigarh Administration
    The reorganization of the State pf Punjab in 1966 resulted in Chandigarh being declared a Union Territory besides serving as Capital of Punjab and the newly ...
  14. [14]
    Here is why Haryana, Punjab are wrestling for control over ...
    Apr 5, 2022 · When Haryana was carved out of Punjab in 1966, both states claimed Chandigarh as their capital. Indira Gandhi gave it UT status as a temporary ...
  15. [15]
    Secretariat building, chandigarh | PPTX - Slideshare
    It is composed of six eight-story blocks separated by expansion joints and measures 254 meters long and 42 meters high. It houses ministerial chambers and ...
  16. [16]
    (PDF) Le Corbusier's Solar Shading Strategy for Tropical Environment
    Aug 6, 2025 · Incorporation of Brise Soleil as a solar shading technique in buildings will certainly reduce our dependency on artificial means for thermal ...
  17. [17]
    Le Corbusier Designs and Builds Chandigarh | Research Starters
    Le Corbusier's involvement in designing and building Chandigarh marked a significant chapter in modern architecture and urban planning.
  18. [18]
    Concrete Dreams, Political Realities: Chandigarh's Capitol Complex ...
    In 2016, it became a UNESCO World Heritage Site comprised of three buildings: the Palace of Assembly, the Secretariat Building and the High Court, as well as ...
  19. [19]
    Complexe du Capitole - Le Corbusier - World Heritage
    The Secretariat, Chandigarh, 1953. Facade perspective. Plan FLC 2698. Complexe du Capitole. The Secretariat, Chandigarh, 1953. Block of ...Missing: initial operations<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Le Corbusier Pierre Jeanneret Chandigarh India
    The use of béton brut (raw concrete) was not just an aesthetic choice but also practical, given the local climate and resources. Buildings like the Secretariat, ...<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Alkali-Aggregate Reactivity (AAR) Facts Book
    Alkali-aggregate reaction (AAR) is a reaction in concrete between the alkali hydroxides, which originate mainly from the portland cement, and certain types ...Missing: Secretariat Chandigarh
  22. [22]
    Chandigarh, Le Corbusier and the plasticity of the raw concrete
    This series of constructions led him to conclude that, « Rustic materials are in no way an obstacle to the manifestation of a clear plan and modern aesthetics.
  23. [23]
    Chief Secretary, Haryana
    Chief Secretary 4th Floor, Haryana Civil Secretariat, Sector-1, Chandigarh. ... Contents owned, maintained and updated by the respective branches of Chief ...Contact UsTelephone NumbersGovernment of HaryanaLATEST NEWS AND UPDATESNotifications & Orders
  24. [24]
    Contact Us - Punjab Development Commission
    Phone : 0172 - 2666019 ; Email : info.pdc@punjab.gov.in ; Address: Room No.37, 4th Floor, Punjab Civil Secretariat, Sector - 1, Chandigarh - 160001 ...
  25. [25]
    ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE | Chandigarh, The official website ...
    Secretaries · Abhijit Vijay Chaudhari, IAS Secretary. 5th Floor, Chandigarh Secretariat, Sector 9. Tel. +91 172 2749132 splsecy-admr[AT] chd [dot] gov [dot] in
  26. [26]
    https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/chandigarh-news/chandigarh-physical-files-to-be-discontinued-full-transition-to-e-office-from-november-1-101761252328348.html
  27. [27]
    Capitol Complex - Sahapedia
    After the creation of the new state of Haryana out of the former Punjab in 1966, the Secretariat and the Assembly were divided in half to cater to both the ...Missing: adaptations | Show results with:adaptations
  28. [28]
    UT secretariat buildings to get back original look - The Tribune
    Aug 19, 2019 · After restoring the assembly buildings of Punjab and Haryana, the Chandigarh Administration has decided to restore the original look of Punjab ...
  29. [29]
    Rampant violations at Secretariat building - The Tribune
    May 17, 2017 · Encroachments and violations at the Secretariat building of Punjab and Haryana are posing threats to the world heritage status of the Capitol Complex.Missing: inefficiencies shared
  30. [30]
    55 years a couple, Haryana took first step towards separate ...
    Since then, the Union Territory of Chandigarh has remained the joint capital of the two states, while Punjab and Haryana also share a civil secretariat building ...
  31. [31]
    Punjab and Haryana's claim over Chandigarh: A decades-old ...
    Nov 18, 2024 · The Chandigarh dispute between Punjab and Haryana has once again escalated. Haryana has recently requested land in Chandigarh to construct a new Vidhan Sabha ...
  32. [32]
    Haryana CM Saini Calls for Unity in Building New Assembly as ...
    Nov 20, 2024 · Calling the construction of a new Vidhan Sabha building in Chandigarh a serious issue, Haryana chief minister Nayab Singh Saini on Tuesday asked all political ...Missing: inefficiencies | Show results with:inefficiencies
  33. [33]
    The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier, an Outstanding Contribution ...
    Chandigarh ; Date of Inscription: 2016 ; Criteria: (i) (ii) (vi) ; Property: 98.4838 ha ; Buffer zone: 1,409.384 ha ; Dossier: 1321rev.
  34. [34]
    25% increase in foreign tourists in Chandigarh since UNESCO ...
    Nov 3, 2019 · The City Beautiful has seen a 25% increase in foreign tourists since it got UNESCO world heritage status for its Capitol Complex buildings in 2016.
  35. [35]
    Geoff Rich - The Churchill Fellowship
    decay, with weak concrete, inadequate cover to reinforcement, concrete ... Concrete of Secretariat building, Chandigarh. ... ingress, efflorescence, and decay,.
  36. [36]
    Neglect causes Capitol Complex to complete 60% life - Times of India
    May 26, 2011 · The buildings in Chandigarh that are more than 50 years old and are showing signs of deterioration no longer do justice to the vision and ...Missing: inefficiencies | Show results with:inefficiencies
  37. [37]
    Conserving Le Corbusier's heritage comes into focus - Times of India
    Mar 23, 2004 · ... deterioration of exposed concrete edifices in the Capitol complex ... Spalling (falling of concrete) is showing at assembly in Capitol ...Missing: Secretariat efflorescence
  38. [38]
    Surface Treatment of the Secretariat Building, Chandigarh, India ...
    Aug 5, 2025 · The exterior surface of the building has deteriorated due to weathering effects. The aim of the present study was to assess efficacy of selected ...Missing: efflorescence | Show results with:efflorescence
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Status Report - Chandigarh Capitol Complex 24 Dec 2018[1]
    Nov 11, 2018 · The following summary is based upon the report prepared by Dr. J. D. Sharma, PhD Metallurgy, Faculty,. Materials and Mett. Engg. Dept, PEC ...
  40. [40]
    https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/chandigarh/unfruitful-expenditure-consultant-paid-rs-1-18-cr-in-2019-for-capitol-complexs-restoration-work-still-unfinished-10323274/
  41. [41]
    https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/chandigarh-news/audit-flags-1-18-crore-wasteful-expenditure-in-capitol-complex-project-101761337908457-amp.html
  42. [42]
    UNESCO committee suspends 3 major multi-crore projects of ...
    Sep 18, 2023 · It has been almost six years that the Chandigarh Administration has been restoring the Capitol Complex. Tenders upto Rs 26 crore were floated ...
  43. [43]
    How much did you spend on new Chandigarh secretariat: HC pulls ...
    Feb 28, 2024 · The bench said that the administration is unnecessarily dragging its feet, in spite of scathing observations made by this court on December 20, ...
  44. [44]
    HC tells Chandigarh administration to explore possibility of allotting ...
    Aug 20, 2025 · “We have been informed that the offices of secretariat of UT Chandigarh have been shifted to a newly constructed building, leaving the erstwhile ...
  45. [45]
    HC directs Chandigarh administration to address space shortage ...
    Aug 20, 2025 · HC directs Chandigarh administration to address space shortage, related issues ... Allotment of an alternative site for the construction of a new ...
  46. [46]
    What Le Corbusier got wrong (and right) in his design of Chandigarh
    Mar 15, 2022 · Leave alone radiating outwards, Corbusier's ideas have failed to inspire the design of the city's own airport terminal, a typically bland ...
  47. [47]
    Le Corbusier's Chandigarh: Bold Vision or a Modernist Failure?
    May 13, 2024 · Impressive as it was, the main problem with Chandigarh was its lack of 'Indian-ness' and Corbusier's imposition of Eurocentric ideals on a ...
  48. [48]
    (PDF) Comparison of Thermal Comfort of Old Indigenous Houses ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · Based on this analysis, it is concluded that the internal thermal performance of the old residential buildings are better than those of the new ...
  49. [49]
    The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier, an Outstanding Contribution ...
    Annexes relating to the Capitol Complex of Chandigarh (India) include an update on the state of conservation of the component, utilising indicators originally ...
  50. [50]
    Chandigarh: Two Capitol Complex projects get thumbs down from ...
    Feb 5, 2025 · This follows a significant blow dealt to the administration in September 2023 by the World Heritage Committee of UNESCO, which had suspended ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] City Development Plan Chandigarh - chandigarhenvis.gov.in
    An integrated system of seven roads was designed to ensure efficient traffic circulation. Le-Corbusier reffered to these as 7 Vs (from the French word 'voie').
  52. [52]
    Legal battle hots up after stay on building HC verandah - The Tribune
    Jan 13, 2025 · The Supreme Court has stepped in to stay an order, directing the construction of another verandah outside the Chief Justice's courtroom in the Punjab and ...Missing: unauthorized modifications
  53. [53]
    UNESCO Can Revoke Chandigarh Capitol Complex's ... - CitiTimes
    Jan 13, 2025 · UNESCO can revoke the Chandigarh Capitol Complex's World Heritage status if the Chandigarh Administration makes significant unauthorized ...Missing: 2023 martyrs
  54. [54]
    SC says HC order justified, paves way for construction of verandah
    May 29, 2025 · The Supreme Court (SC) has held that decision of the high court in directing construction of the verandah is absolutely justified and would not violate the ...Missing: restoration | Show results with:restoration
  55. [55]
    SC upholds P&H HC's directives for verandah construction and ...
    May 30, 2025 · Construction in alignment with pre-existing design, no violation of UNESCO guidelines; SC upholds P&H HC's directives for verandah ...Missing: stay | Show results with:stay
  56. [56]
    France calls out Chandigarh administration for negligence of ...
    Dec 3, 2023 · The Chandigarh administration seems to have missed the memo on creating an “inventory” for the world heritage Le Corbusier furniture.