Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Seed predation

Seed predation is the consumption of seeds by animals, encompassing both partial and total destruction that renders seeds inviable for germination, thereby functioning as an antagonistic plant-animal interaction that significantly constrains plant reproductive success and population dynamics.^[1] This process involves a diverse array of predators, including invertebrates such as insects and ants, and vertebrates like rodents and birds, which target seeds as nutrient-rich but ephemeral resources.^[2] Seed predation is broadly categorized into two types: predispersal, which occurs on the parent plant before seeds are released and is predominantly driven by specialist insects (e.g., species from orders Diptera, Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, and Hymenoptera), and postdispersal, which happens after seed release and involves generalist herbivores that remove or destroy seeds on the ground.^[1] Predation rates can reach up to 100% in some systems, severely depleting seed pools and limiting seedling recruitment, while in others, behaviors like seed caching by rodents or ants may facilitate dispersal to suitable microhabitats, potentially benefiting a portion of seeds.^[1] Ecologically, seed predation shapes plant communities by influencing species diversity, with frequency-dependent predation on common seeds promoting coexistence, and by driving evolutionary adaptations such as mast seeding—synchronized large-scale fruiting events in species like oaks and beeches to overwhelm predators—or the evolution of seed defenses and size traits.^[2] Globally, predation intensity escalates from the Arctic to the equator (increasing by approximately 2.6% per 10° of latitude) and from high to low elevations (0.4% per 100 m decline), largely due to invertebrate activity in warmer, less seasonal environments that amplify biotic interactions.^[3] Seed size emerges as a critical predictor of vulnerability, particularly to small mammals, where intermediate-sized seeds face the highest removal rates consistent with optimal foraging theory, thereby modulating recruitment success and reinforcing life-history trade-offs in plant communities across ecosystems.^[4]

Seeds as Targets

Seed Structure and Nutritional Value

Seeds are fertilized, mature ovules that develop into embryonic plants enclosed within a protective outer layer known as the seed coat or testa, which safeguards the internal structures during dormancy and dispersal. The embryo itself consists of a rudimentary root (radicle), shoot (plumule), and one or more cotyledons, which serve as the primary storage sites for nutrients in many species. These cotyledons, or in some cases the endosperm—a specialized nutritive tissue—contain reserves of carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, and essential minerals that support the embryo's growth until it can photosynthesize independently.^[5]^[6] The nutritional composition of seeds renders them highly appealing as a food resource, providing dense concentrations of energy in the form of lipids and carbohydrates that exceed those found in other plant parts like roots, stems, or leaves. For instance, lipid-rich seeds such as those of sunflowers (Helianthus annuus) can contain up to 40% oil by weight, primarily unsaturated fatty acids that offer readily available calories for consumers. In contrast, starch-heavy cereal grains like wheat or maize derive 70-83% of their caloric content from complex carbohydrates, making them a staple energy source across ecosystems. This high energetic value positions seeds as a critical component in food webs, supporting diverse granivorous animals from insects to rodents and birds.^[7]^[8] Seeds exhibit considerable variability in structure across plant species, influencing their physical properties and potential interactions with consumers. Differences in size and shape range from minute, dust-like orchid seeds to large, robust acorns, while dormancy mechanisms vary between orthodox seeds—which tolerate desiccation and low temperatures for long-term storage—and recalcitrant seeds, which remain hydrated and metabolically active, limiting their viability post-harvest. These structural traits, including the seed coat's thickness and texture, can affect handling time for predators, though some coats also incorporate basic barriers to penetration.^[9]^[10]

Defensive Adaptations

Plants have evolved a suite of defensive adaptations to protect their seeds from predation, primarily categorized as physical, chemical, and temporal strategies. These mechanisms counter the nutritional appeal of seeds, which are rich in carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids, thereby reducing predation rates and enhancing reproductive success.^[11] Physical defenses often involve structural barriers that impede access by predators. The seed coat, or testa, composed of lignified sclerenchyma cells, provides mechanical resistance to penetration by insect mandibles or rodent teeth. In legumes, for instance, seed coat thickness and hardness deter small mammal predation. Pods of Acacia species exhibit similar protective qualities, where rigid, fibrous structures resist chewing by rodents, thereby lowering pre-dispersal seed loss. Additional physical traits, such as spines or dense hairs on fruits, further discourage handling and consumption by vertebrates and invertebrates.^[12]^[13]^[14] Chemical defenses rely on secondary metabolites that deter feeding through toxicity or nutritional inhibition. Cyanogenic glycosides, such as linamarin in seeds of wild lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus), release hydrogen cyanide upon tissue damage, poisoning herbivores. Tannins in acorns of oak species (Quercus spp.) bind to proteins in the digestive tract of predators like squirrels and weevils, causing astringency and impaired nutrient absorption, which correlates with lower predation rates in high-tannin varieties. These compounds are particularly effective against both pre- and post-dispersal predators, though their efficacy varies with predator tolerance.^[15]^[16] Temporal defenses exploit variability in seed production timing to overwhelm predators. Mast seeding, the synchronous production of large seed crops at irregular intervals, satiates predators during mast years, reducing the proportion of seeds consumed per capita. In oaks (Quercus robur), mast events can significantly reduce seed predation by rodents. Bamboo species (e.g., Phyllostachys spp.) employ similar strategies during infrequent gregarious flowering, flooding the environment with seeds and minimizing per-seed loss to rodents and birds. This pulsed reproduction imposes energetic costs on plants but enhances overall fitness under high predation pressure.^[17] These defensive adaptations have evolutionary origins tied to intense herbivory and seed predation pressures, with genetic underpinnings shaping their diversity. Traits like hard seed coats and toxin production arose through selection favoring resistance to ancestral predators, often involving clustered genes for biosynthetic pathways, as seen in cyanogenic glycoside loci in legumes. Fossil and phylogenetic evidence indicates that such defenses diversified in response to coevolving herbivores during the Mesozoic radiation of angiosperms, balancing protection against the trade-offs of resource allocation.^[11]^[18]^[19]

Processes of Seed Predation

Pre-Dispersal Predation

Pre-dispersal seed predation refers to the consumption of seeds by herbivores while they remain attached to the parent plant, typically occurring on inflorescences or within developing fruits before dehiscence or natural drop.^[20] This phase exposes seeds to specialized predators that exploit the stationary position of the crop, often synchronizing their life cycles with the plant's reproductive phenology to access nutrient-rich, immature seeds.^[20] Common predators include insects such as bruchid beetles in legume pods and weevils in grain crops, which dominate due to their ability to oviposit directly into fruits.^[20] Birds, like crossbills targeting conifer cones or finches feeding on cereal grains, also contribute significantly, while mammals such as squirrels or monkeys are less frequent owing to physical access challenges from the parent plant.^[20]^[21] Mechanisms involve insects laying eggs on or into developing ovaries, with larvae burrowing and feeding internally on endosperm, often destroying multiple seeds per pod through direct consumption or secondary fungal infection.^[20] Birds and occasional mammals nibble or extract seeds externally, grinding or crushing them.^[20] Predation rates can exceed 50%, reaching up to 90% in some legume crops like those attacked by bruchid beetles, and 80% in pine seeds by crossbills.^[20]^[22] Plants face heightened vulnerabilities when seeds are clustered in fruits or inflorescences, facilitating predator detection and access, while high humidity in tropical environments promotes insect proliferation and oviposition success.^[23] Physical barriers like thick pericarps can limit access, though many species lack robust defenses at this stage.^[23] In Amazonian tropical forests, pre-dispersal losses often range from 20% to 50%, as seen in Tachigalia versicolor pods destroyed by bruchid beetles or Astrocaryum mexicanum seeds consumed by squirrels, underscoring the role of rodents and insects in crop depletion.^[20]

Post-Dispersal Predation

Post-dispersal seed predation refers to the consumption of seeds by granivores after they have been released from the parent plant and fallen into the soil, litter, or soil seed bank, often involving direct burial or caching behaviors that expose seeds to ground-dwelling predators.^[20] This phase contrasts briefly with pre-dispersal risks by subjecting mobile seeds to a broader array of taxa on the forest floor or grassland surface.^[20] Such predation significantly limits plant recruitment and influences community structure across ecosystems like temperate woodlands, grasslands, and arid regions.^[20] Primary predators in post-dispersal scenarios include rodents such as mice and squirrels, which hoard seeds; ants, particularly in arid and tropical areas; granivorous birds like finches; and invertebrates such as carabid beetles.^[20] Rodents dominate in temperate grasslands and woodlands, where species like voles and deer mice target fallen seeds.^[20] Ants, such as Solenopsis gayi in alpine environments, efficiently remove small seeds from litter layers, while birds like the rufous-collared sparrow (Zonotrichia capensis) forage on exposed surfaces.^[24] Invertebrates contribute through nocturnal scavenging in soil.^[20] Foraging behaviors often rely on olfaction, with rodents detecting buried acorns or grains via scent cues even at depths of several centimeters.^[20] Scatter-hoarding by squirrels and chipmunks involves partial consumption during caching, where uneaten seeds may survive but face repeated pilferage risks.^[20] Ants exhibit trail-based collection, rapidly depleting surface seeds, while birds use visual cues to target larger items in open microhabitats.^[24] Several factors influence post-dispersal predation rates, including seed density, where low densities trigger Allee effects and reduced predation efficiency due to search costs for predators.^[20] Microhabitat plays a key role, with higher removal rates under parent trees or in shaded litter compared to open areas, as cover facilitates predator access.^[20] Seasonality drives peaks in autumn for temperate zones, aligning with seed fall and rodent population cycles, though summer rates remain elevated in some systems.^[20] Quantitative studies illustrate substantial losses, with post-dispersal predation removing 30-70% of seeds in temperate grasslands, as observed for thistle species (Cirsium spp.) where voles and mice accounted for much of the depletion.^[20] In agricultural contexts, voles and other rodents predating wheat seeds in winter fields show predation rates approximately 1.7 times higher than for weeds (67% vs. 40%), emphasizing rodents' impact on crop recruitment.^[25] In alpine settings, mean removal across nine plant species reached 25% over 20 days, with birds causing up to 77% loss for certain shrubs.^[24]

Process Comparisons

Pre-dispersal seed predation typically exhibits higher intensity in concentrated attacks on the parent plant, often involving fewer predator taxa primarily composed of specialized insects, whereas post-dispersal predation operates on a broader spatial scale with greater stochasticity arising from variable seed dispersal patterns and encounters with diverse generalist predators such as rodents, ants, and birds.^[20]^[26] This contrast in predator diversity stems from pre-dispersal seeds being more accessible to obligate herbivores synchronized with plant phenology, while post-dispersal seeds face opportunistic foraging across heterogeneous environments, leading to unpredictable removal rates influenced by microhabitat and weather.^[20] In terms of detection and escape, pre-dispersal seeds benefit from protective plant architecture, such as enclosures within fruits or inflorescences, which reduces visibility and access but renders their locations predictable for specialized predators; conversely, post-dispersal seeds gain from potential hiding in soil or litter, enhancing escape from detection, though aggregation from clumped dispersal increases risks of mass exploitation by generalists.^[20]^[27] These dynamics highlight a trade-off where maternal protection in pre-dispersal phases limits broad exposure but invites targeted assaults, while post-dispersal scattering promotes evasion at the cost of higher encounter probabilities in favorable predator patches. Evolutionary pressures differ markedly, with pre-dispersal predation selecting for robust fruit enclosures and chemical defenses to deter insect specialists, fostering traits like thicker pericarp or synchronized maturation to minimize losses; post-dispersal pressures, in turn, drive adaptations for camouflage, such as seed mimicry of debris or tactics promoting burial and secondary dispersal to evade vertebrate foragers.^[20]^[26] Defensive adaptations, briefly, modulate both processes by integrating maternal safeguards that carry over to influence post-dispersal viability. Empirical contrasts from meta-analyses indicate pre-dispersal losses averaging around 47% across systems, often lower in managed crops due to reduced specialist access (approaching 40% in some agricultural contexts), compared to post-dispersal rates of approximately 61% in natural ecosystems, reflecting greater cumulative impacts from diverse predators.^[20]^[27] Recent research integrates these processes with climate change, showing warmer conditions can enhance post-dispersal seed removal by insects through elevated seed mass (by ~5%), making them more attractive to predators, as shown in experimental warming studies (as of 2023) on invasive thistles, potentially exacerbating losses in warming regimes.^[28]

Seed Predation Versus Seed Dispersal

Antagonistic Versus Mutualistic Interactions

Seed predation represents an antagonistic interaction between plants and animals, where the consumer, such as a granivore, fully consumes the seed, leading to its destruction and providing no reproductive benefit to the parent plant.^[29] In contrast, seed dispersal constitutes a mutualistic interaction, wherein animals transport intact, viable seeds to new locations, enhancing the plant's chances of germination and establishment away from the parent; this includes endozoochory, where seeds pass through an animal's digestive tract and are excreted, or epizoochory, where seeds adhere externally to an animal's body for transport.^[30] These distinctions highlight how the same animal species can shift roles depending on behavior, such as during pre- or post-dispersal phases, but the outcome determines whether the interaction harms or aids plant reproduction.^[31] A classic example of antagonism occurs in granivory by rodents, such as yellow-pine chipmunks (Tamias amoenus), which consume pine nuts (Pinus spp.), preventing seed viability and directly reducing plant recruitment. Similarly, other small mammals like squirrels may pilfer and eat cached seeds, exacerbating seed loss in high-density scenarios. On the mutualistic side, frugivorous birds exemplify beneficial dispersal; for instance, thrushes (Turdus spp.) consume mistletoe (Viscum album) berries, digest the pulp, and defecate sticky, viable seeds onto potential host branches, facilitating the parasite's spread and establishment.^[32] Ambiguous cases arise in partial caching behaviors, where interactions blend antagonism and mutualism; for example, scatter-hoarding squirrels may cache many seeds for later consumption, but pilferage by conspecifics or other rodents can result in some seeds being eaten while others remain uneaten and germinate, creating a continuum of outcomes. Early studies in the 1970s, notably the Janzen-Connell hypothesis proposed by Daniel Janzen (1970) and Joseph Connell (1971), emphasized these distinctions by demonstrating how density-dependent seed predation near parent trees limits recruitment, thereby promoting species diversity, while effective dispersal mitigates such antagonistic pressures.^[33]

Evolutionary Trade-Offs

Plants evolve under selective pressures that create inherent trade-offs between defending seeds against predation and facilitating dispersal to suitable habitats. Strong investments in physical defenses, such as thickened seed coats or chemical toxins, effectively deter predators but can reduce the appeal of fruits to mutualistic dispersers, limiting gene flow and colonization potential. For instance, in species producing fleshy fruits, the nutritional allure that attracts avian or mammalian dispersers simultaneously invites pre-dispersal herbivores, increasing the risk of seed loss before maturation. This balance is evident in Solanum species, where high levels of glycoalkaloids in fruits deter both seed predators (e.g., rodents) and potential dispersers (e.g., birds), supporting the hypothesis that such defenses serve as a general barrier rather than targeted toxicity.^[34] These trade-offs have driven coevolutionary arms races between plants and seed predators over geological timescales. Predators adapt morphological traits to overcome plant defenses, such as the evolution of deeper, stronger beaks in Darwin's finches (Geospiza spp.) to crack the resilient spines and hard coats of Tribulus cistoides seeds on the Galápagos Islands, exerting selective pressure on the plant to reinforce its protective structures. In response, plants counter with escalated defenses; for example, nightshade (Solanum) species have evolved elevated glycoalkaloid concentrations (e.g., α-solasonine and α-solamargine) in fruits and seeds, which impose fitness costs on herbivores while potentially constraining disperser interactions. Fossil evidence underscores the antiquity of these dynamics, with arthropod-induced predation scars and borings documented on Carboniferous seeds (ca. 320–300 million years ago) from Gondwanan deposits, indicating that seed predation pressures have shaped plant evolution since the Paleozoic era.^[35]^[34]^[36] Genetic studies reveal the mechanistic underpinnings of these trade-offs through pleiotropy and linkage among loci controlling defense and dispersal traits. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping in wild tomato relatives (Solanum pimpinellifolium) has identified shared genetic elements influencing fruit size, color (key for disperser attraction), and secondary metabolite production for herbivore resistance, demonstrating how mutations in pleiotropic genes can simultaneously enhance defense but reduce dispersal efficacy.^[37] Recent genomic advances, including 2020s CRISPR/Cas9 editing of defense loci in wild tomatoes, have targeted susceptibility genes to boost resistance against insect herbivores without fully eliminating trade-offs with growth or fruit traits, highlighting the polygenic complexity of these interactions.^[38] Contemporary environmental changes, particularly climate-driven shifts, are reshaping these evolutionary trade-offs. Rising temperatures and altered precipitation patterns intensify the dispersal-predation balance by favoring species with dormant seeds over long-distance dispersers in alpine environments, as seen in Tibetan Plateau analyses where warmer conditions amplify negative associations between dispersal structures and dormancy. Defaunation from climate stressors further disrupts mutualistic dispersal, forcing plants to rely more on abiotic mechanisms or heightened defenses, potentially accelerating local extinctions in predator-vulnerable lineages. These dynamics underscore ongoing evolutionary pressures, with genomic tools offering pathways to mitigate trade-offs in crop wild relatives.^[39]

Ecological and Demographic Impacts

Effects on Plant Reproduction and Populations

Seed predation directly reduces plant reproductive success by lowering the number of viable seeds available for germination and establishment, often resulting in substantially decreased recruitment rates. In many annual plant species, predators can remove 60-90% of potential seedlings, severely limiting population renewal where seed production is the primary means of reproduction. For instance, in Astragalus species, pre-dispersal insect predation has been documented to destroy up to 93% of seeds in some populations, directly translating to fewer emerging seedlings and reduced fitness.^[40]^[41] This impact is particularly pronounced in habitats with high predator densities, where even moderate predation rates can prevent the establishment of new individuals, altering the trajectory of plant life cycles.^[42] Demographic models, such as matrix population models, illustrate how seed predation influences overall population growth rates (λ) by affecting key vital rates like seed survival and recruitment. In these models, predation often emerges as a high-elasticity factor, meaning small changes in predation intensity can have outsized effects on λ; for example, in perennial plants under high predation scenarios, λ can drop below 1, indicating population decline. A study on the rare annual Clarkia xantiana ssp. parviflora using matrix models showed that without protection from seed predators, the deterministic λ fell below replacement levels (<1), highlighting predation's role in driving populations toward extinction. For perennial forbs like Lupinus constancei, post-dispersal predation by rodents reduced λ by up to 0.70 in sensitive contexts, underscoring its demographic importance. Elasticity analyses further reveal that seed survival rates, directly impacted by predation, frequently contribute more to population stability than other stages like adult survival.^[43]^[44]^[40] Density-dependent effects of seed predation, as described by the Janzen-Connell hypothesis, prevent local dominance by conspecifics through elevated losses near parent plants, promoting spatial diversity in plant populations. Under this mechanism, seeds experience higher predation rates in high-density areas close to adults due to concentrated predator activity or specialized enemies, with losses increasing proximally to parent trees—often 2-10 times higher than at greater distances. This pattern reduces seedling establishment under conspecifics, inhibiting monopoly of resources and facilitating coexistence in diverse communities, though its strength varies with predator specialization and dispersal. Seminal work by Janzen (1970) and Connell (1971) established this framework, showing how distance- and density-dependence in predation regulates population structure.^[45]^[40] Plants can partially compensate for seed losses through evolved strategies like increased fecundity, particularly via mast seeding, where synchronized overproduction in intermittent years satiates predators and boosts net recruitment. In mast years, plants produce far more seeds than average, reducing per-seed predation risk by overwhelming predator capacity—often resulting in 5-50 times higher survival rates compared to non-mast years—thus offsetting chronic losses and stabilizing long-term population dynamics. This overproduction allows populations to maintain viability despite baseline predation removing 50-80% of seeds in low-production years, as seen in species like oaks and beeches. Seed banks also serve as a buffer, with dormant seeds persisting for years to recruit when predation pressure eases.^[40]^[46] In agricultural contexts, seed predation by pre-dispersal insects contributes to crop yield reductions, with global estimates for losses due to plant pests and diseases indicating 20-40% according to FAO data. These impacts are especially severe in staple crops like cereals and legumes, where insect herbivores target developing seeds, leading to diminished harvests and economic costs exceeding $220 billion annually. Management strategies, such as integrated pest control, aim to mitigate these demographic hits to crop populations, preserving reproductive output equivalent to wild plant fitness.^[47]^[48]

Broader Ecosystem Roles

Seed predation serves as a critical basal resource in trophic linkages, supporting populations of granivores such as rodents and birds by providing pulsed food supplies during mast seeding events. These episodic booms in seed production can lead to irruptions in granivore populations, as seen in primeval forests where mast pulses shape interactions among fluctuating rodent communities, enhancing overall food web dynamics. For instance, in European beech forests, synchronized seed crops satiate predators, allowing temporary population surges that cascade through higher trophic levels, including predators of rodents.^[49]^[50]^[17] Beyond direct consumer support, seed predation promotes biodiversity maintenance by regulating plant densities and preventing dominance by single species. In savanna ecosystems, such as Neotropical grasslands, high rates of post-dispersal seed predation by rodents and ants limit recruitment of encroaching woody plants, thereby sustaining herbaceous diversity and averting monocultures that could reduce habitat heterogeneity. This density-dependent regulation fosters coexistence among plant species, as evidenced in oak savannas where seed limitation constrains local diversity in undisturbed areas, allowing rarer species to persist.^[51]^[52]^[53] Predated seeds also contribute to nutrient cycling by decomposing into soil organic matter, particularly through uneaten fragments that enrich microbial communities and facilitate element transformations. In forest understories, partially consumed seeds from granivory add labile carbon and nutrients to the litter layer, stimulating bacterial and fungal activity that accelerates nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization. This process enhances soil fertility, as soil biota driven by organic inputs from such litter regulate broader biogeochemical cycles essential for ecosystem productivity.^[1]^[54]^[55] Human-induced habitat fragmentation and climate change further amplify seed predation's ecosystem roles, often intensifying pressures through edge effects and invasive species range shifts. In deforested tropical landscapes, forest edges experience elevated seed removal by generalist predators like squirrels and insects due to increased accessibility and altered microclimates, disrupting natural regeneration patterns. Similarly, warming temperatures are projected to expand the elevational range of invasive ship rats (Rattus rattus), enabling greater seed predation on montane islands and exacerbating impacts on endemic flora.^[56]^[57]^[58] Recent 2020s research highlights seed predation's underappreciated role in restored ecosystems and rewilding initiatives, where it aids in structuring recovering communities. In restored habitats on a tropical island, restoration efforts have boosted insect seed-predator networks by up to 50% in species richness, promoting balanced plant recruitment and preventing weed dominance in rewilding projects. These findings underscore the need to integrate granivore dynamics into restoration planning to enhance long-term biodiversity outcomes.^[59]^[1]

References

[1]
Seed Predation - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Seed predation is the least studied plant-animal interaction in the context of restoration, with one trophic rewilding and four habitat restoration studies, ...
[2]
(PDF) Seed Predation by Animals - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · Seed predation, the partial or total consumption of seeds also called ... in predation rate. This region contains a 3.6 Mb chromosomal ...References (229) · Recommended Publications · Cloning Capacity Helps...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[3]
Seed predation increases from the Arctic to the Equator and from ...
Feb 20, 2019 · Seed predation increased by 2.6% for every 10° of latitude closer to the Equator and by 0.4% for every 100 m decline in elevation, independent ...
[4]
Seed size predicts global effects of small mammal seed predation ...
We argue that seed predation by generalist consumers, which is pervasive in temperate communities, should be better incorporated into plant community theory.
[5]
Seeds: Definition and Structure (With Diagram) - Biology Discussion
A true seed is defined as a fertilized mature ovule that possesses embryonic plant, stored material, and a protective coat or coats.
[6]
Chapter 14: The Development of Seeds – Inanimate Life
A seed consists of three components: an embryonic sporophyte plant, a tissue that provides nutrition to that embryo, and a 'seed coat', the container tissue in ...
[7]
Sunflower seeds - Feedipedia
Jul 28, 2021 · Oil type seeds contain 40% oil and represent 80-95% of sunflower seed production. The hulls (20% of the seed) are black and tend to adhere to ...
[8]
(PDF) Nutritional aspects of cereals - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · Cereals are staple foods, and are important sources of nutrients in both developed and developing countries. Cereals and cereal products are an ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[9]
Seed Moisture: Recalcitrant vs. Orthodox Seeds - Chin - ACSESS
Jan 1, 1989 · Recalcitrant and orthodox seeds differ greatly in their ecology and morphology. Recalcitrant seeds are primarily from perennial trees in the ...
[10]
Orthodox, Intermediate, and Recalcitrant Seed - Center for Plant ...
Orthodox seeds can be stored at freezing temperatures. Recalcitrant seeds cannot be stored conventionally. Intermediate seeds need liquid nitrogen storage and ...
[11]
Evolutionary ecology of plant defences against herbivores - Johnson
Mar 16, 2011 · Plants have evolved a diverse arsenal of direct and indirect defences to reduce herbivory and the impacts of damage on plant performance.
[12]
Physical Seed Dormancy in Legumes: Molecular Advances ... - NIH
May 27, 2024 · Morphological observations indicate that seed hardness is related to the structure of the palisade and epidermal layers [19]. The epidermal ...
[13]
Studies on physico-chemical and cooking characteristics of rice ...
The average value of native hardness (98.73 N) was exhibited to be lesser than mung bean but more than but cowpea (Henshaw 2008, Kaur et al. 2015). The native ...
[14]
Investment in Seed Physical Defence Is Associated with Species ...
Physical defences are provided by the thickness and fracture resistance of enclosing structures that protect against penetration by insect predators [16], or ...
[15]
Role of cyanogenic glycosides in the seeds of wild lima bean ...
Cyanogenic glycosides present in the seeds of wild lima bean plants are associated with seedling defense but do not affect seed germination and seedling growth.
[16]
Acorn Crop, Seed Size and Chemical Defenses Determine the ...
Aug 12, 2021 · Oak species that produce acorns with high tannin concentrations usually show lower levels of seed predation by acorn weevils [20,45,46], or ...
[17]
Global patterns in the predator satiation effect of masting - NIH
Mar 7, 2022 · It proposes that masting benefits plant reproduction by reducing the proportion of seed crop that is consumed by predators. This hypothesis is ...
[18]
Tissue and toxin-specific divergent evolution in plant defense ...
Plant resistance to herbivory can evolve thanks to the concerted expression of defense traits shaped by selection (Damian et al., 2020; Simms, 1990). Therefore ...
[19]
The Evolutionary Ecology of Plant Chemical Defenses
Nov 2, 2023 · Here, we summarize current trends in the study of plant–herbivore interactions and how they shape the evolution of plant chemical defenses, host ...
[20]
None
### Summary of Pre-Dispersal Seed Predation from Hulme & Benkman (Chapter 5)
[21]
[PDF] Seed predation on the ground or in the tree? Size-related ...
However, pre-dispersal seed. Page 3. predation in elm trees has not been quantified and, thus, a variety of unknown guilds of avian seed predators may be ...Missing: cereal | Show results with:cereal
[22]
Pre-dispersal seed predation in Central American Acacia farnesiana
Aug 9, 2025 · ... Seed predation rates by bruchid beetles show a high variability among host species and regions, ranging from 3% to 90% on different ...Missing: soybeans | Show results with:soybeans
[23]
[PDF] Vulnerability of north Queensland rainforest plants to predispersal ...
Mar 10, 2000 · This study focussed on predispersal seed predation by insects in the tropical rainforests of north. Queensland, on the Atherton Tablelands. The ...
[24]
A Multi-species Assessment of Post-dispersal Seed Predation in the ...
Conclusions Post-dispersal seed removal is shown to be an important cause of decreased potential plant species recruitment into alpine ecosystems. The ...
[25]
Rodents, not birds, dominate predation-related ecosystem services ...
Sep 5, 2018 · We studied the activity and contribution of birds and mammals to intermediate ecosystem services (predation of weed seeds or invertebrate pests) ...
[26]
Ecological and evolutionary consequences of spatial and temporal ...
Pre-dispersal seed predation may have important effects on population dynamics and trait evolution in plants. In this review, we first present a conceptual ...
[27]
Modelling the quantitative effects of pre‐ and post‐dispersal seed ...
Sep 14, 2006 · On average, approximately 20% of seeds in the cohort were consumed by pre-dispersal seed predators, approximately 25% of seeds by post-dispersal ...
[28]
Climate warming increases insect‐driven seed removal of two ...
Dec 1, 2023 · “Post-Dispersal Seed Predation: Consequences for Plant Demography and Evolution.” Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 1 ...Missing: warmer | Show results with:warmer
[29]
Quantifying the mutualism-antagonism continuum for seed removal ...
Seed removal was beneficial when less than 63.7% of seeds were predated, and antagonistic when more than 72.0% of seeds were predated.
[30]
Seed dispersal | Description, Importance, Types, Animals, Wind ...
Endozoochory, in which animals consume seeds or fruits that are then passed in their feces, is of major importance as a means of dispersal. Indeed, frugivory ...
[31]
Antagonistic and mutualistic interactions alter seed dispersal of ...
Mar 11, 2021 · Here we show that changes in mutualistic and antagonistic interactions affect seed dispersal at forest edges and that not all forest edges are the same, with ...Missing: destruction | Show results with:destruction
[32]
Substrate type affects caching and pilferage of pine seeds by ...
As chipmunks are important dispersers of seeds, changes in their foraging patterns or competitive interactions after fire could significantly affect pine ...
[33]
Mistletoe seed dispersal | David M Watson, ecologist
Sep 14, 2014 · We suggest the main agents of mistletoe dispersal in many areas are generalist foragers, thier broader diet and longer gut passage rate.
[34]
do tree squirrels engage in behavioural deception? - ScienceDirect
These caching frequencies (of about 50%) were comparable to those reported for red oak acorns in previous studies (Hadj-Chikh et al., 1996, Steele et al., 2001 ...
[35]
At 50, Janzen–Connell Has Come of Age | BioScience
Oct 7, 2020 · His main emphasis was seed predation. The mortality agents were mostly bruchid beetles that incubate their larvae inside seeds with lethal ...
[36]
(PDF) Why are Some Fruits Toxic? Glycoalkaloids in Solanum and ...
Aug 9, 2025 · Both seed predators and seed dispersers preferred the low-glycoalkaloid S. americanum fruits and were deterred by glycoalkaloid levels typical ...
[37]
The ecology and evolution of seed predation by Darwin's finches on ...
Predator–prey interactions play a key role in the evolution of species traits through antagonistic coevolutionary arms races.
[38]
Arthropod and Pathogen Damage on Fossil and Modern Plants
Jan 23, 2023 · First evidence of seed predation by arthropods from Gondwana and its early Paleozoic history (Rio Bonito Formation, Paraná Basin, Brazil).
[39]
Genome Editing for Resistance to Insect Pests: An Emerging Tool for ...
Aug 11, 2020 · (1) The CRISPR/Cas9 system has been demonstrated to create a simple RNA-programmable method to mediate genome editing in plant cells (10) and ...Genome Editing For... · 2. Genome Editing Tools And... · 3.1. Genome Editing In...
[40]
Climate and plant traits alter the relationship between seed ...
A no-significant negative association between dispersal and dormancy was found, but the significance and magnitude of the trade-off depended on plant traits and ...
[41]
[PDF] Seed Predators and Plant Population Dynamics - CABI Digital Library
Brody, A.K. and Mitchell, R.J. (1997) Effects of experimental manipulation of inflorescence size on pollination and pre-dispersal seed predation in the ...
[42]
Coexistence of annual plants: Generalist seed predation weakens ...
Jan 1, 2009 · We investigate the effect of seed predation on the coexistence of competing annual plants. We demonstrate a role for predation that is ...
[43]
Post-dispersal seed predation: consequences for plant demography ...
Post-dispersal seed predation can considerably impact plant populations, especially in limited microsites, and may influence seed characteristics and ...
[44]
Seed predation has the potential to drive a rare plant to extinction
Oct 7, 2016 · Pre-dispersal seed predation is sometimes considered unlikely to dramatically affect plant population growth because plants are generally ...
[45]
Environmental context influences both the intensity of seed ...
Feb 1, 2014 · We conclude that in our study system environmental context influences the effects of seed predation on plant fitness and population dynamics.Missing: diversity | Show results with:diversity
[46]
Testing predictions of the Janzen–Connell hypothesis: a meta ...
Jun 23, 2014 · Within a species, the strength of density- and distance-dependent effects may also vary with local population density as a result of predator ...
[47]
Seed predation selects for reproductive variability and synchrony in ...
Aug 3, 2020 · We found that seed predation selected for mast seeding only in species with evidence of population-level predator satiation (i.e all but Q.Missing: compensation fecundity<|control11|><|separator|>
[48]
About FAO's work on plant Production and Protection
Every year, up to 40 percent of global crop production is lost due to plant pests and diseases. Each year, these losses cost the global economy over USD 220 ...Missing: pre- dispersal
[49]
Global Burden of Crop Loss - CABI.org
So, what's the problem Every year, up to 40% of crops are lost before they are harvested due to pests. Despite its impact on food security and economies, pre- ...Missing: FAO | Show results with:FAO
[50]
(PDF) Mast Pulses Shape Trophic Interactions between Fluctuating ...
Aug 6, 2025 · This study provides unique data on the functional response of key pulse consumers in forest food webs, and contributes to our understanding of rodent ...Missing: linkages irruptions
[51]
[PDF] How do vertebrates respond to mast seeding? - Harvard Forest
Sep 20, 2015 · One interpretation of this pat- tern is that mast-seeding mostly affects trophic chains that start with granivorous rodents.Missing: linkages irruptions
[52]
Seed predators limit plant recruitment in Neotropical savannas
Aug 7, 2025 · We found that seed predation rates are consistently high across a diversity of local habitat types, with important inter-habitat variation in ...
[53]
Savanna Rodents' Selective Removal of an Encroaching Plant's ...
Seed predation by rodents may serve to slow the encroachment of woody plants in grasslands and savannas. Our goals for this study were to determine if rodents ...Missing: maintenance regulation
[54]
Seed limitation and the regulation of community structure in oak ...
Nov 21, 2003 · Our results suggest that seed limitation is an important factor constraining local diversity within the least disturbed and most diverse plant ...
[55]
Soil health in agricultural systems - PMC - PubMed Central
Soil organic matter contributes to nutrient cycling and soil structure maintenance. Sequestration of C in soil also plays some role in regulating the ...
[56]
Understanding soil health and biota for farms and gardens
Soil organic matter influences nutrient retention in soils. Organic matter cycling by soil microorganisms transforms organically bound nutrients into forms ...
[57]
Effect of forest fragmentation on fruit and seed predation of the ...
Our study shows that forest fragmentation significantly affects predation patterns of squirrels and cotton-staining bugs. Reduction of natural seed predators in ...
[58]
Implications of Habitat Loss on Seed Predation and Early ...
The loss of forest cover antagonistically affected the patterns of seed predation by vertebrates and invertebrates; predation by invertebrates was higher in ...
[59]
Rats, elevation and implications of climate change
Jul 27, 2017 · A temperature-induced increase in ship rat elevational distribution may negatively impact native species that have persisted at higher elevations.July 27, 2017 Kate Guthrie · Ship Rats Are Known To Be... · TimeframesMissing: shifts invasive
[60]
Insect seed‐predator networks respond positively to restoration on a ...
Sep 18, 2024 · Thus, pre-dispersal seed predation can have important consequences for plant diversity and community composition (Harper, 1977). These effects, ...