Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Sifa

Sifa, short for Sicherheitsfahrschaltung (safety driving circuit), is a designed for railway locomotives and traction vehicles to monitor the driver's alertness and automatically apply emergency brakes if the driver fails to respond to vigilance prompts. This system ensures operational safety by preventing accidents caused by driver incapacitation, such as loss of consciousness or inattention, particularly during solo operation of trains. Sifa was developed in in the early and became mandatory on leading vehicles under the Railway Construction and Operating Regulations of May 8, 1967. It remains a standard requirement for trams and standard rail lines in . Primarily used in German-influenced European railway networks, including , , and , it features variants such as time-time in and , time-distance in , and way-way in . Modern electronic implementations from manufacturers like DEUTA comply with standards including and UIC 641, incorporating components like foot switches, control units, and audible indicators. In the common time-time variant, the driver must periodically acknowledge the system, typically every 30 seconds; failure to do so triggers warnings followed by emergency braking if unacknowledged. The time-distance variant in incorporates both time and distance elements in its prompts. These systems have enhanced railway safety while offering durable designs for rail environments.

Overview

Definition

Sifa, an abbreviation for Sicherheitsfahrschaltung (Safety Driving Circuit), is a German-engineered installed on locomotives and control cars in railway networks. The primary role of Sifa is to monitor the alertness of the , thereby preventing accidents caused by driver incapacitation, such as from emergencies or . At its core, demands periodic or continuous acknowledgment from via a foot pedal, hand , or ; without such confirmation, it initiates an automatic emergency braking sequence to halt the . Distinguished from broader deadman systems that often require uninterrupted physical pressure, Sifa incorporates timed vigilance checks tailored to the operational needs of German-influenced railways.

Purpose

The primary purpose of Sifa is to monitor the alertness of train drivers and automatically initiate emergency braking if the driver fails to respond to periodic vigilance checks, thereby preventing accidents due to sudden incapacitation. This system ensures that the train comes to a complete stop in scenarios where the driver is unable to maintain control, directly addressing risks associated with human error or health emergencies during operation. Sifa complements broader safety protections, such as track-based signaling systems, by specifically targeting factors that could lead to loss of or , including drowsiness or medical incidents like heart attacks. By focusing on the driver's continuous responsiveness, it enhances overall system reliability without relying solely on external infrastructure, contributing to the prevention of collisions, derailments, and other high-consequence events. In terms of regulatory basis, Sifa is mandated under UIC Guideline 641 for single-driver train operations in and other European railways influenced by standards, ensuring compliance with requirements for driver vigilance devices. This mandate aligns with European railway directives that emphasize mechanisms to protect passengers, crew, and infrastructure. For instance, if a driver falls asleep or loses consciousness, the failure to acknowledge the vigilance prompt—typically via a foot pedal—triggers audible and visual warnings followed by full brake application, halting the train safely.

History

Origins in German Railways

The Sifa (Sicherheitsfahrschaltung) safety system was introduced in Switzerland in the 1920s, particularly to support one-man train operations following the widespread electrification of railways, with initial trials in 1927 on 30 SBB Ae 3/6 I locomotives. It was later adopted in Germany during the 1930s as a direct response to rising train accidents attributed to driver fatigue and sudden incapacitation. This period saw increased electrification of railways and longer operational hours, exacerbating risks of human error, prompting the Deutsche Reichsbahn to seek automated solutions for driver vigilance. Building on international trends in deadman's control devices—such as those requiring constant pressure to maintain operation—Sifa was adapted specifically for the Deutsche Reichsbahn's fleet of electric and . Unlike simpler deadman pedals that relied solely on continuous activation, Sifa incorporated periodic acknowledgment mechanisms to balance with , allowing for more practical single-person operations while addressing the limitations of manual oversight. Precursors to Sifa included manual vigilance checks, where drivers periodically signaled alertness through bells or tokens, a practice common in pre-electrification eras but prone to inconsistency and itself. Sifa automated these processes using electromechanical relays for reliability, marking a shift toward integrated onboard . A pivotal came with the first installations of Sifa on German mainline railways in the 1930s, driven by post-World War I reforms that centralized railway management under the and emphasized preventive measures following the 1920 nationalization. The RZM-Sifa variant, specified by the Reichsbahn-Zentral-Maschinenamt, represented this early implementation, enabling safer high-speed and freight services amid growing network demands.

Standardization and Variants

The Sifa system was made mandatory in by the Railway Construction and Operating Regulations of May 8, 1967, establishing uniform protocols across German railway networks. Technical specifications were later formalized in standards such as DIN VDE 0119-207-5 (first published 2004), which is part of the broader VDE series on vehicle and and defines requirements for driver's devices, including vigilance to prevent unauthorized train movement. In the post-World War II era, (German Democratic Republic) adapted Sifa for its railway system, leading to the development of the Sifa 86 variant in the . This version, used by the , incorporated random vigilance prompts to address vulnerabilities exposed by earlier accidents, such as collisions attributed to driver inattention or system bypasses during that decade. Key variants emerged to suit different operational needs. The Zeit-Weg-Sifa, which integrated time intervals with distance traveled for more adaptive monitoring, was implemented in German locomotives from the mid-1950s, particularly on freight lines to accommodate variable speeds and longer hauls, such as the BBC variant. The Zeit-Zeit-Sifa, a purely time-based system relying on periodic driver acknowledgments, evolved later as an evolution of basic vigilance controls for passenger and mixed services. Internationally, adaptations appeared in neighboring countries influenced by German railway practices. In Switzerland, the equivalent system was designated as "safety control" (Sicherheitssteuerung), reflecting localized terminology while retaining core Sifa principles during mid-20th-century infrastructure alignments.

Technical Operation

Core Mechanism

The core mechanism of Sifa operates as a vigilance monitoring system that requires the train driver to actively engage with a foot-operated pedal or a dashboard-mounted button to demonstrate ongoing attentiveness during train operation. In the standard configuration, the driver must maintain continuous depression of the pedal or button, but periodically release and re-depress it at regular intervals to reset the system's timer and confirm alertness. This cyclic interaction prevents the initiation of safety warnings and ensures the device detects potential driver incapacitation, such as from fatigue or medical emergencies. The exact intervals and escalation procedures vary by system variant. Upon failure to perform the required release and re-depression within the specified interval, the system escalates warnings progressively to prompt driver response. An initial optical signal, usually a steady warning light on the driver's console, activates after the timeout period to indicate the need for acknowledgment. If the driver does not re-engage the pedal or button within this phase, an acoustic alarm—typically a or intermittent tone—sounds a few seconds after the optical warning, further urging immediate action. Should the driver fail to acknowledge the acoustic alarm by releasing and re-depressing the device within an additional short timeframe of a few seconds, the system triggers an emergency response by applying full service brakes, bringing the to a complete stop to avert potential accidents. This automatic braking intervention halts movement until manually . The involves the driver releasing and re-depressing the pedal or to silence warnings and, in the case of braking activation, returning the driver's controller (e.g., the master switch) to a neutral position before resuming operation, thereby verifying restored vigilance.

System Variants

The Sifa system encompasses several operational variants tailored to different railway networks and vehicle types, each modifying the core vigilance mechanism to balance driver attentiveness with operational practicality. The Zeit-Zeit-Sifa, prevalent in , operates on a purely time-based cycle where the driver must continuously depress a foot or hand pedal for 30 seconds before briefly releasing it to reset the sequence. Failure to release triggers an optical warning signal after 30 seconds of uninterrupted pressure, followed by an acoustic alert 2.5 seconds later, and an emergency brake application after an additional 2.5 seconds if unacknowledged; the brake can only be released by repositioning the driver's controller to neutral and reactivating the pedal. In contrast, the Zeit-Weg-Sifa integrates both temporal and spatial elements, making it suitable for routes with variable speeds, such as those in . Here, the driver maintains pedal pressure, but the system monitors elapsed time alongside distance traveled since the last acknowledgment—typically issuing an optical warning after 30–60 seconds or 500–1600 meters (with specific modes like 50 meters in high-speed configurations), with an acoustic signal and potential brake initiation after further progression, such as another 200 meters (or 50 meters in certain modes), if ignored. This hybrid approach adjusts intervals dynamically based on vehicle movement, ensuring acknowledgments occur roughly every 60 seconds or 1 kilometer at typical speeds, thereby accommodating acceleration and deceleration without excessive interruptions. The Weg-Weg-Sifa, common in , is purely distance-based, requiring the driver to release the pedal every 900 meters. Failure to do so triggers an optical warning after 75 meters, followed by an acoustic alert and emergency braking if not acknowledged. The Sifa 86 variant, developed in the 1980s for the in , introduces enhanced unpredictability to prevent habitual or somnolent responses. It employs random timing for optical signals between 30 and 50 seconds, independent of prior actions, combined with distance-based checks—triggering after 400 meters at speeds below 100 km/h or 800 meters above that threshold. Acknowledgment requires a deliberate button press upon the optical cue, followed by an acoustic warning after 4 seconds and emergency braking after another 6 seconds if unmet; some implementations incorporate additional verification steps, though driver identification is not standard. Adaptations for urban rail, such as trams and U-Bahn systems, often employ vigilance-only modes that omit automatic full braking to suit frequent stops and low-speed operations. In these configurations, the system prompts periodic acknowledgments via but relies on manual intervention or partial power reduction rather than emergency stops, aligning with the controlled environments of city transit.

Implementation

Components and Installation

The primary components of a Sifa system include the foot pedal, which serves as the main driver interface for periodic acknowledgment of alertness, and a vigilance button or lever for alternative operation. Relay circuits handle signal processing to detect non-response, while the brake interface links directly to the train's pneumatic or electro-pneumatic braking system to apply emergency brakes if the driver fails to confirm vigilance. Control units, such as standalone modules (e.g., UDB1) or evaluation boards (e.g., UD19), manage the overall logic and integrate sound indicators for warnings. Electrically, Sifa systems are integrated into the locomotive's control circuits, powered by the train battery at a typical voltage of 24 V DC, with relays ensuring and preventing single-point failures. Wiring follows standardized connectors, such as 16-pole DIN 41622 interfaces, to link the components to the braking and power systems while maintaining per norms. Installation occurs in the driver's cab, where the foot pedal is floor-mounted for easy access, and buttons or levers are positioned on the , armrests, or control desk. The process involves securing the , cables to the valves and supply, and testing interconnections before commissioning, often in compliance with UIC guideline 641 for vigilance devices. Systems are retrofittable on older locomotives from the onward, as required by the Eisenbahn-Bau- und Betriebsordnung (EBO) § 28, which, under § 28, mandates Sifa equipment on locomotives and other leading vehicles operating with a single at speeds of 20 km/h or more, to enhance . Adaptations for accessibility include hand levers in place of pedals for modern ergonomic cabs and integration with seat switches to detect driver presence, allowing combined operation without constant manual input. These variants maintain the core principles while accommodating diverse cab layouts.

Testing and Maintenance

Pre-departure testing of the Sifa system is a mandatory procedural requirement to ensure operational reliability before each shift. The driver must activate the full cycle, including the initial warning signal, the subsequent alarm, and the automatic brake application, to verify the system's complete functionality from warnings to emergency braking. This test is conducted in each driver's cab at least once daily, in accordance with railway regulations such as the Eisenbahn-Bau- und Betriebsordnung (EBO). Maintenance of Sifa components follows scheduled inspections to maintain safety standards. Relays and pedals undergo annual inspections as part of routine vehicle upkeep, with fault logging facilitated by systems introduced in the for modern variants like Sifa 86. These diagnostics record errors for prompt analysis and repair, ensuring compliance with EBO § 32 requirements for periodic vehicle examinations. (Note: Used for variant history only, not as primary source) Fault handling procedures prioritize safety while minimizing disruptions. Automatic bypass of the Sifa is permitted only in depots for non-operational testing or repairs; during service, faults require manual activation of the Störschalter (fault switch), limiting speed to 50 km/h, notification of the operations center, and closure of the Sifa cutoff valve. Operational faults must be repaired within 24 hours to restore full functionality, per guidelines. Training for Sifa operation is integrated into driver certification programs, emphasizing quick response to alerts. Drivers receive certification through specialized sessions, including simulator-based training that simulates warning sequences and measures response times to ensure proficiency in acknowledging signals within the required intervals (typically 2-30 seconds depending on variant). This training is mandatory under Eisenbahn-Fahrzeugführerschein regulations and has incorporated simulators as a standard since updates in the 2020s.

Usage and Adoption

Geographical Scope

Sifa, or Sicherheits-Fahrsperre, is predominantly adopted in German-influenced European railway networks, with its primary geographical scope centered on , , and . In , the system is universally installed on mainline locomotives and multiple units operated by , serving as a mandatory vigilance device for both freight and passenger trains to prevent accidents due to driver inattention. This widespread implementation reflects Sifa's role as a foundational element in the country's extensive rail infrastructure, covering over 33,000 kilometers of track. In , Sifa is integrated into the of the (), where variants such as the way-way Sifa—requiring periodic pedal releases every 900 meters—are commonly employed on mainline services. Modern trains, including the and series, often incorporate the time-time Sifa model aligned with German standards, ensuring compatibility across cross-border operations. The system's adoption here dates back to the mid-20th century, supporting Austria's dense network of approximately 4,900 kilometers. Switzerland represents another key area of implementation, where Sifa operates under the designation "safety control system" on (SBB), introduced in the 1920s with modern vigilance features added since the 1950s, particularly on adhesion tracks and urban tramways. The time-distance variant is standard, triggering warnings after 3 seconds or 50 meters of non-response, followed by emergency braking after an additional 50 meters or equivalent time, and it is mandatory for ensuring operator alertness in the country's mountainous and high-density rail environment spanning about 5,300 kilometers. Historically, Sifa's spread extended to the former following 1945, as part of the post-war standardization of railway safety measures under the , integrating the system into rebuilt infrastructure influenced by pre-war German designs. Limited adoption occurred in neighboring Scandinavian countries, such as —where pedal positioning in the middle is required on certain locomotives—and the , where it activates at standstill upon direction selection—often via imported German equipment. Additionally, Sifa has been phased into select urban rail systems, including the , enhancing vigilance protocols on subway operations.

Integration with Other Systems

Sifa interfaces with Indusi/PZB systems by serving as a complementary vigilance device that monitors driver attentiveness alongside the intermittent speed supervision provided by PZB, ensuring emergency braking if the driver fails to acknowledge periodic prompts while PZB enforces signal-based restrictions. In railways, this combination allows Sifa to utilize PZB activation elements for acknowledgments, enhancing overall train protection without interfering with PZB's core functionality. Upgraded variants of Sifa demonstrate compatibility with continuous train control systems like LZB and ETCS Levels 1 and 2, where Sifa acts as a fallback vigilance linked to the automatic train protection features of these systems, with integrations becoming standard on high-speed lines since the early 2000s. For instance, modern locomotives equipped with LZB or ETCS retain Sifa to verify driver responsiveness, allowing seamless transitions between modes during operations on equipped routes. This linkage supports bidirectional data exchange for safety overrides, as seen in Deutsche Bahn's fleet upgrades. In urban rail applications, such as networks, Sifa is paired with deadman pedals or buttons that require continuous or rhythmic activation, triggering full braking if released due to driver incapacitation, thereby integrating vigilance directly into the traction control circuit. During (ATO) modes prevalent in these systems, Sifa can be overridden by the automation logic while still monitoring for manual interventions, ensuring compatibility with semi-automated urban signaling. Digital retrofits, such as the Sifa 86 variant, enable integration with advanced systems like CBTC by incorporating random-interval acknowledgments (every 40-50 seconds or 400-800 meters) and digital interfaces for real-time data sharing, facilitating upgrades on legacy lines transitioning to modern communications-based controls. These enhancements, often implemented via modular hardware from suppliers like DEUTA, allow Sifa to interface with CBTC's continuous positioning and speed enforcement without requiring full system replacement. Sifa continues to serve as a complementary vigilance system during ETCS transitions in , , and .

Comparisons and Impact

Comparison to Other Safety Devices

Sifa differs from the traditional dead man's pedal used in and railways, which requires continuous pressure on a foot pedal to prevent braking activation. In contrast, Sifa employs timed vigilance cycles, typically requiring the driver to briefly interrupt pressure on a pedal or every 30 seconds to reset the system, followed by an acoustic pre-alarm if not acknowledged, leading to automatic emergency braking. This periodic reset mechanism reduces driver fatigue compared to constant pressure but demands active, timed acknowledgments to confirm alertness. Compared to vigilance devices like the UK's (AWS), Sifa is strictly driver-focused, monitoring only the operator's responsiveness without integrating trackside signal information. , by contrast, uses track magnets to provide audible warnings (a bell for clear signals and a for caution or danger) approximately 180-230 meters before signals, requiring acknowledgment to avoid braking, thus combining signal advisory with vigilance elements. Sifa lacks such audio tones tied to signal aspects, relying solely on cab-based periodic checks of the driver's vigilance. Sifa also contrasts with overspeed prevention systems such as the UK's Train Protection and Warning System (TPWS) or similar on-train control systems (OTCS), which prioritize mitigating signals passed at danger (SPADs) and excessive speed through trackside loops that trigger automatic braking. TPWS employs an and Train Stop System (TSS) at signals to enforce speed limits and halt trains independently of driver input, often overriding manual controls. Sifa, however, centers on detecting driver incapacitation via cab-centric vigilance, without direct enforcement, though it is frequently combined with such systems for comprehensive protection. A unique aspect of Sifa variants is the acknowledgment pattern: standard Sifa uses predictable timed cycles, while the Sifa 86 variant introduces random intervals for acoustic prompts (typically 40-50 seconds, varied by a generator), requiring the driver to wait for and confirm the alarm rather than preemptively resetting. This differs from probabilistic systems in other regions, which may use irregular but non-prompt-based timings to test alertness.

Safety Effectiveness and Limitations

Sifa has demonstrated significant effectiveness in enhancing railway safety by monitoring driver vigilance and preventing accidents caused by inattention or incapacitation. The system requires drivers to periodically acknowledge their , triggering an and subsequent emergency braking if no response is received, thereby averting potential collisions in cases of or medical . The introduction of the Sifa 86 variant in the 1980s, developed by the GDR Reichsbahn, improved reliability and integration in locomotives. Despite its strengths, Sifa has inherent limitations that can affect its performance. Sifa alone does not provide speed supervision or continuous positioning, requiring integration with supplementary systems like the (ETCS) for high-speed operations. Looking ahead, Sifa remains a in legacy railway systems across German-influenced networks, but it is increasingly supplemented by AI-driven technologies for enhanced driver vigilance and predictive . Emerging applications, such as detection via cameras and sensors, aim to overcome Sifa's reactive nature by proactively alerting operators, ensuring continued evolution in without full replacement of established vigilance devices.

References

  1. [1]
    SIFA - Dead man's control system - ALTPRO
    SIFA is a Dead man's control system which is designed for all kinds of rail vehicles, to control the alertness of the locomotive driver.
  2. [2]
    Safety drive circuit - Dead-man's vigilance device
    The safety drive circuit, or Sifa for short, is a device that is installed on traction vehicles. It can bring a train to a halt by emergency braking.
  3. [3]
    Driver Monitoring Dead Man's Handle SIFA – DEUTA-WERKE GmbH
    DEUTA's type REDsafe electronic driver safety switch (SiFa) monitors the driver's ability to drive from within the train, separately from fixed or locally ...
  4. [4]
    Safety driving circuit (Sifa) or the dead man's handle
    The safety driving circuit (Sifa), also know as the dead man's handle, plays an important role here. We explain what they do in this piece.Missing: system | Show results with:system
  5. [5]
    [PDF] iTeh STANDARD PREVIEW (standards.iteh.ai)
    Sifa. Driver's vigilance control (German: “Sicherheitsfahrschaltung”). WRMS Wheel Rotation Monitoring System. SIST EN 15734-2:2011+A1:2022. iTeh STANDARD.
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
    Systeme zur Überwachung des Triebfahrzeugführers
    Nov 28, 2003 · Die Sicherheitsfahrschaltung (Sifa, auch Totmannschaltung) überprüft in regelmäßigen Abständen die Wachsamkeit des Triebfahrzeugführers. Sie ...
  8. [8]
    Sifa - Die Sicherheitsfahrschaltung
    Die Sicherheitsfahrschaltung oder auch kurz Sifa genannt, ist eine Einrichtung, welche eine auf Triebfahrzeugen eingebaut ist. Diese kann einen Zug per ...
  9. [9]
  10. [10]
    DIN VDE 0119-207-5 - 2016-06 - DIN Media
    This document applies for the vehicle function continuous automatic train-running control. Wear, failures and other damage influence the operational safety ...
  11. [11]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  12. [12]
    [PDF] LoksimEditor-Dokumentation v2.96 - VEB Verkehr
    Nov 19, 2020 · SIFA 86 zeit- oder wegabhängiger Sifa, nach 800 m oder 40 s optische Meldung, nach weiteren 4 s akustische Meldung, nach weiteren 6 s ...Missing: Beschreibung | Show results with:Beschreibung<|separator|>
  13. [13]
    SiFa Safety System with SIL Certificate – DEUTA-WERKE GmbH
    The standard SIL system is the on-board extension of track based safety systems such as intermittent automatic train control PZB, continuous automatic train ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Engineered solutions - Mors Smitt
    Deadman systems are defined by. UIC standard UIC-641. The deadman uses a timed cycle to repeatedly test the driver for allertness. Under normal circumstances ...
  15. [15]
    Railway Power Standard Introduction | Coil Technology Corporation
    Mar 8, 2019 · Standard voltage level for railway system are 24V, 28V, 36V, 48V, 72V, 96V and 110V. And the common voltage levels are 24V, 72V or 110V.Missing: Sifa | Show results with:Sifa
  16. [16]
    und Betriebsordnung (EBO) § 28 Ausrüstung und Anschriften
    Eisenbahn-Bau- und Betriebsordnung (EBO) § 28 Ausrüstung und Anschriften. (1) Triebfahrzeuge und andere führende Fahrzeuge müssen folgende Ausrüstung haben ...
  17. [17]
    § 32 EBO - Einzelnorm - Gesetze im Internet
    § 32 Abnahme und Untersuchung der Fahrzeuge. (1) Neue Fahrzeuge dürfen erst in Betrieb genommen werden, wenn sie abgenommen worden sind (§ 3 Abs. 2) ...Missing: Prüfung Sifa
  18. [18]
    Sicherheitsfahrschaltung - Wikipedia
    Die Sicherheitsfahrschaltung, kurz Sifa, – nicht zu verwechseln mit der Totmanneinrichtung – ist eine auf Triebfahrzeugen und Steuerwagen eingebaute ...Beschreibung ausgewählter... · RZM-Sifa · Zeit-Weg-Sifa Bauart BBC · Sifa 86
  19. [19]
    Sicherheitsfahrschaltung bei Bundesbahn-Loks: Wie sie Züge im ...
    In der Anfangszeit der Sifa musste der Lokführer während der Zugfahrt ständig einen von mehreren Tastern im Führerstand drücken, mit dem Fuß oder mit der Hand.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  20. [20]
    Verhalten bei gestörter Sifa | Triebfahrzeug Führerschein - Repetico
    Aug 23, 2021 · - Sifa - Störschalter einlegen. - Sifa - Absperrhahn schließen. - Betriebszentrale verständigen. - Fahrt mit höchsten 50 Km/h. Oder Weiterfahrt ...Missing: Einsatz | Show results with:Einsatz
  21. [21]
    SIFA / PZB / Zugfunk - AVG Bildung
    Ausbildungsinhalte PZB · Grundlagen der Sicherheitssysteme an Triebfahrzeugen · Bauformen, Aufbau und Wirkungsweise der Sicherheitsfahrschaltung · Bauformen, ...
  22. [22]
    Simulatortraining / Verleih - Bahnservice Baron GmbH
    Mit Blick auf die ab 01.01.2025 geltende Pflicht zum Einsatz von Simulatoren in der Ausbildung und Prüfung von Triebfahrzeugführern, bieten wir Ihnen eine ...
  23. [23]
    Sicherheitseinheit mit SIL-Zertifizierung – DEUTA-WERKE GmbH
    Sie fügt sich als Sicherheitsmodul in die Zugsicherung, z. B. in die PZB-Umgebung ein. Sicherheitsfahrschaltung (SIFA) und weitere Funktionen. Der ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Technische Regel (TR) Fahrdatenschreiber national
    Jan 18, 2024 · PZB/LZB ** * PZB: je nach Zugsicherungssystem mit AG gesondert ... Bedienung eines Sifa-Tasters. Keine Regist- rierung. ZSG. Typhon. T.
  25. [25]
    DEUTA Produkte für ETCS
    SiFa Safety System mit SIL Gutachten · Unterstützung / Beratung ... PZB · Rangierlok · Regionalfahrzeuge · Retrofit · Straßenbahnen · ATP · Visualisierung.
  26. [26]
    [PDF] BahnPraxis B - Unfallversicherung Bund und Bahn
    Die Punktförmige Zugbeeinflussung (PZB) mit der Funktionalität PZB 90 ist eine technische ... Zusammen mit der Sifa und dem Betriebs- rat nimmt der ...<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Fahrerüberwachung / Totmannschaltung / SIFA - Deuta Werke
    Die Sicherheitsfahrschaltungen oder auch Totmannschaltungen sind nach der UIC Richtlinie 641 V auf allen Fahrzeugen einzusetzen.Missing: S- Bahn Deutschland
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
    CBTC – DEUTA AMERICA Corp.
    The DEUTA products for metros with CBTC installation (Communication-Based Train Control) are geared towards specific train protection requirements.Missing: digital | Show results with:digital
  30. [30]
    DEUTA Produkte für Regionalfahrzeuge
    die DEUTA REDBOX Rekorder für Regionalfahrzeuge auf den Einsatz im Bereich PZB und ERTMS vorbereitet. ... SiFa Safety System mit SIL Gutachten ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Rolling Stock Deadman Pedal Overhaul and Calibration - TTM Rail
    Jun 20, 2024 · Force Adjustment: A deadman pedal requires the driver to keep a constant pressure on the pedal at all times. If the pedal forces are out of ...
  32. [32]
    Automatic Warning System (AWS) - Railway Signs and Signals
    The Automatic Warning System (AWS) is provided as a safeguard against a driver failing to respond to a signal or misreading its aspect.Missing: Sifa | Show results with:Sifa
  33. [33]
    Train Protection & Warning System
    ### Summary of TPWS Description, Functionality, and Difference from Driver Vigilance Systems
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Towards cooperative management of fatigue and vigilance in ...
    In France, the system known as VACMA ac- complishes that role [2], comparable to SIFA in Germany. [3], and similar systems are usually mandatory for trains.Missing: effectiveness | Show results with:effectiveness