Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Signaller

A signaller (or signaler in American English) is a specialist in the armed forces responsible for military communications, including the transmission, reception, and maintenance of signals to support command, control, and operations across land, sea, and air domains.^[1] In the British Army, this role is primarily fulfilled by personnel of the Royal Corps of Signals, who deliver secure and reliable telecommunications networks, information systems, and electronic warfare capabilities in environments ranging from battlefields to humanitarian missions.^[2]^[3] The Royal Corps of Signals originated in 1870 with a telegraph troop formed within the Royal Engineers for battlefield communications, such as during the Anglo-Zulu War.^[2] It became an independent corps in 1920, receiving the "Royal" title, and grew substantially during the World Wars, reaching over 150,000 personnel by 1945 to support operations in North Africa and Europe.^[2] In modern contexts, signallers contribute to IT infrastructure, cyber defense, and network operations that safeguard allied information while countering adversaries.^[3] British Army signallers receive specialized training in telecommunications, electronic warfare, spectrum management, cybersecurity, and rapid network deployment, serving in units from armored brigades to the 18 (UKSF) Signals Regiment supporting special forces.^[2]^[3] This expertise ensures operational connectivity and security, underscoring the signaller's essential role in military effectiveness.

Role and Duties

Core Responsibilities

Signallers in the British Army's Royal Corps of Signals are primarily responsible for delivering secure communications and information systems to support command and control in military operations.^[2] These include establishing and maintaining telecommunications networks, such as radio systems, satellite links, and fiber optic connections, to enable the transmission of orders, intelligence, and status reports across units.^[3] A key duty involves deploying and sustaining communication infrastructure under challenging conditions, including setting up tactical networks in combat zones or humanitarian missions, and repairing equipment to ensure reliable connectivity.^[2] Signallers also conduct electronic warfare, protecting allied data through cybersecurity measures while disrupting enemy communications and networks.^[4] Coordination between military units depends on signallers to provide real-time information exchange, such as relaying operational updates or coordinates, facilitating synchronized actions for commanders and frontline forces.^[2] In cases of primary signal disruption, signallers employ redundant systems like backup satellite communications or portable radio setups to maintain continuity, drawing on historical manual methods only in extreme scenarios where electronic means are unavailable.^[3] Secure communications are maintained through advanced digital encryption and coding techniques to prevent interception, evolving from historical ciphers to contemporary cybersecurity protocols that safeguard transmissions across electronic networks.^[2]

Required Skills and Training

Signallers require technical expertise in operating radio systems, network management, and electronic warfare equipment, alongside knowledge of cybersecurity and spectrum management to counter threats and ensure signal integrity.^[3] Physical endurance supports fieldwork in adverse environments, while mental attributes like attention to detail and rapid decision-making are vital for high-pressure operations.^[5] Training begins with basic military preparation, followed by Phase 2 specialist courses at the 11 Royal School of Signals in Blandford Forum, covering communication theory, equipment operation, signal security, and encryption fundamentals.^[6] These programs, often structured as apprenticeships lasting several months, build hands-on skills for network deployment and maintenance.^[3] Certification involves completing trade-specific training, with ongoing development through simulations, exercises, and advanced courses to adapt to emerging technologies like cyber defense.^[6] Training has evolved from early 20th-century manual techniques to modern computer-based and virtual reality simulations for realistic scenario practice as of 2025.^[7]

Historical Context

Early Development

The origins of the signaller role in military contexts date to ancient civilizations, where non-electronic methods such as smoke signals, drums, and couriers facilitated battlefield coordination and long-distance warnings. In ancient China, smoke signals were employed along the Great Wall starting around 900 BC to alert guards of enemy incursions, with the number of smoke plumes indicating the size of the approaching force—allowing rapid mobilization across vast distances.^[8] Drums and gongs further directed troop movements in Chinese armies, providing audible commands during engagements.^[9] Similarly, in ancient Rome, couriers known as the cursus publicus formed a state-run relay system for urgent dispatches, enabling messages to travel up to 50 miles per day via horse changes at waystations, while the tuba—a straight military trumpet—signaled commands like advances, retreats, or changes in formation to maintain order amid the chaos of battle.^[10]^[11] During the medieval period, European armies advanced these techniques with the widespread use of flags for unit identification and beacons for rapid alerts, particularly evident in conflicts like the Hundred Years' War (1337–1453). Flags and banners served as visual rallying points, helping commanders coordinate infantry and cavalry formations while distinguishing allies from foes on smoke-obscured fields; for instance, English longbowmen and French knights relied on heraldic standards to regroup during intense clashes such as Agincourt in 1415.^[12] Beacons, lit on hilltops or towers, transmitted warnings of invasions across regions, as seen in Anglo-Saxon and later Norman defenses where chains of signal fires could notify distant garrisons within hours, a practice that persisted into the Hundred Years' War for mobilizing feudal levies against cross-Channel threats.^[13] These visual and pyrotechnic systems emphasized the signaller's emerging importance in pre-modern warfare, bridging the gap between ad hoc messengers and structured communication roles. The 19th century marked significant innovations in visual signaling, with semaphore telegraphs adopted by Napoleonic forces to transmit coded messages over line-of-sight distances using pivoted arms on towers, allowing Paris to Lille communications in minutes—a system that enabled rapid strategic coordination during Napoleonic campaigns.^[14] Heliographs, utilizing mirrors to flash Morse-like signals via sunlight, were introduced in colonial campaigns, such as British operations in India and Africa from the 1870s, achieving typical ranges of 30 to 50 miles in clear conditions with a 5-inch mirror, though extendable to over 100 miles under ideal visibility.^[15] The role began to formalize with dedicated units; in the British Army, Royal Engineers like Lieutenant Charles Pasley developed early semaphore systems in 1804 during the Napoleonic Wars, laying groundwork for specialized telegraph troops by the mid-century.^[16] A pivotal event was the Crimean War (1853–1856), which saw the first widespread wartime use of electric telegraphy, connecting British headquarters in the field to London via undersea cables and land lines spanning over 1,400 miles, drastically reducing command delays from days to hours and influencing real-time tactical decisions during the Siege of Sevastopol.^[17] This shift from purely visual methods to wired systems highlighted the evolving demands on signallers, paving the way for more integrated communication doctrines in subsequent eras. In the British Army, these advancements led to the formation of a dedicated telegraph troop within the Royal Engineers in 1870, initially for battlefield communications during conflicts like the Anglo-Zulu War, marking the direct origins of modern signaller roles.^[2]

World Wars Era

During World War I, signallers played a pivotal role in adapting communication technologies to the static conditions of trench warfare, marking a shift toward wireless systems for greater mobility. The introduction of portable wireless sets, such as the British Trench Set (a 50-watt spark transmitter introduced in 1915), enabled frontline troops to transmit messages without relying solely on vulnerable landlines, facilitating coordination in the confined spaces of the trenches.^[18] However, these early wireless innovations faced significant challenges from electromagnetic interference and enemy interception, as signals could be easily overheard; this prompted the development and use of directional antennas to focus transmissions and reduce detectability.^[19]^[20] In major engagements like the Battle of the Somme in 1916, signallers were essential for directing artillery fire, often using buried telephone cables laid up to six feet underground to protect against shell damage and maintain reliable links between observation posts and gun batteries. These buried lines allowed for near-instantaneous communication down to the brigade level, drastically cutting response times for artillery adjustments from the hours required by messengers or visual signals to mere minutes, thereby enhancing battlefield effectiveness despite the chaos of bombardment.^[21] World War II further advanced signaller roles through encrypted wireless communications, exemplified by the German Enigma machine, which used rotating rotors to encipher messages for secure transmission across fronts; Allied codebreakers, including those at Bletchley Park, cracked Enigma variants starting in the early 1940s, providing critical intelligence advantages. Portable radios like the German FuG series (e.g., FuG 5 transceivers) equipped tanks with short-range VHF capabilities, enabling real-time coordination during armored maneuvers such as Blitzkrieg operations. Signallers faced exceptionally high risks due to their exposed positions while repairing lines or operating transmitters, often under targeted enemy fire; casualty rates among them were notably elevated, with communication units suffering losses relative to other support roles.^[22] The experiences of these wars established foundational practices in signals intelligence (SIGINT), including standardized interception and decryption protocols that influenced post-war organizational structures like the U.S. National Security Agency. These legacies subtly informed modern digital encryption techniques by emphasizing secure, directional signaling principles.

Organization by Military Branch

Air Forces

In air forces, signallers specialize in managing communications within high-altitude, high-speed environments, where rapid data exchange is critical for mission success and safety. These personnel, often serving as aircrew or ground-based operators, handle the transmission and reception of signals between aircraft, control centers, and allied units, adapting core responsibilities like signal encryption and relay to counter aerial threats such as jamming and interception.^[23] Airborne signaling forms a cornerstone of their duties, involving the operation of VHF radios to facilitate pilot-to-ground control interactions, including precise vectoring of aircraft during intercepts to guide fighters toward targets or threats. This coordination ensures seamless air defense responses, with signallers relaying positional data and instructions in real-time to maintain operational tempo amid dynamic battlefield conditions. Additionally, they integrate radar and Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) systems, monitoring transponder responses to distinguish friendly aircraft and avert friendly fire incidents during complex air operations.^[24]^[25] In unique operations, such as the 1991 Desert Storm air campaign, robust communication networks supported the coordination of coalition air strikes and the execution of over 116,000 sorties.^[26] Equipment employed includes encrypted UHF links, which provide secure, line-of-sight connectivity for stealth missions, allowing low-probability-of-intercept transmissions vital for covert operations. However, these systems remain vulnerable to electronic warfare, prompting the adoption of frequency-hopping techniques like the U.S. Air Force's HAVE QUICK system, developed in the late 1970s and early 1980s to evade jamming by rapidly switching frequencies during transmissions.^[27]

Naval Forces

In naval contexts, signallers ensure effective maritime communication essential for fleet coordination and submarine operations, often under conditions requiring radio silence to avoid detection. Ship-to-ship signaling traditionally employs visual methods such as Aldis lamps for flashing Morse code and semaphore flags for manual arm positions representing letters and numbers, enabling secure exchanges without radio emissions. These techniques became standard in the 19th century and remain viable for emergency or stealthy communications today.^[28]^[29] Submarine signallers manage specialized underwater messaging systems, including the deployment of communication buoys that provide VLF, HF, UHF, IFF, and ECM links while the vessel remains submerged beyond 300 feet, preserving operational secrecy. Complementing this, Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) radio waves penetrate seawater to deliver one-way, short phonetic messages to deeply submerged submarines at extremely low data rates of approximately 0.03 bits per second on a 76 Hz carrier.^[30]^[31] During fleet operations, signallers relay critical navigation orders via flag hoists, facilitating tactical maneuvers in battles such as Midway in 1942, where visual signals coordinated carrier task forces amid intense combat. In anti-submarine warfare, they process hydrophone data to detect and locate enemy vessels, enabling precise coordination of depth charge deployments for effective countermeasures.^[32]^[33] Modern naval signallers integrate satellite systems like Inmarsat, established in 1979 and operational by 1982, to provide global voice, data, and positioning services that enhance fleet-wide connectivity over vast oceanic ranges.^[34]

Land Forces

In land forces, signallers are responsible for establishing and maintaining tactical communication networks in dynamic, terrestrial environments, adapting core duties such as message relay and equipment operation to the challenges of mobility and terrain obstacles. Field deployment involves signallers setting up portable tactical networks using man-pack radios to enable real-time coordination among ground units. A key example is the AN/PRC-77, a VHF FM transceiver introduced in 1968 and widely used during the Vietnam War, which provided short-range, two-way voice communication over 30-76 MHz frequencies while carried by individual soldiers.^[35]^[36] To overcome signal degradation in rugged terrain, signallers establish battlefield relay stations that extend communication range by amplifying and retransmitting signals. During the Normandy invasion in 1944, U.S. Army Signal Corps personnel routinely installed radio relay channels parallel to wire lines between army groups and divisions, ensuring continuous connectivity amid bocage hedgerows and urban obstacles that limited direct radio propagation.^[37] These relays were vital for coordinating advances, with equipment like microwave and VHF systems deployed to bridge gaps up to several miles. Signallers integrate closely with infantry platoons, often embedding with forward elements to provide immediate communication for critical actions. This includes using burst transmission techniques, where compressed data packets are sent in short, high-speed bursts to minimize detection and interference, enabling rapid requests for fire support such as artillery or close air support.^[38] In platoon operations, signallers manage these transmissions via man-portable devices, ensuring fire support coordinates are relayed securely to battalion fire direction centers within seconds.^[39] Logistics for land-based communications emphasize the management of wire lines and field telephones, particularly in static defenses where reliability trumps mobility. During World War II, the U.S. Army Signal Corps produced and deployed extensive quantities of field telephones and millions of miles of communication wire to support operations across theaters, including Europe. Daily maintenance routines, including inspections for breaks and splicing repairs, were essential to counter vulnerabilities like enemy sabotage, vehicle damage, or environmental wear, with signal units following standardized procedures to restore circuits quickly.^[37] In static setups, field telephones connected command posts and observation points, forming resilient local networks that handled thousands of calls daily in key hubs like Paris. To mitigate casualties from communication failures, post-World War II doctrines incorporated redundant systems, combining wire, radio, and relay backups to prevent blackouts during operations. This approach, emphasized in U.S. Army signal procedures, paralleled wire with radio relays to maintain connectivity even if primary lines were severed, significantly enhancing overall network resilience in ground maneuvers.^[37]

National Implementations

Australia

The Royal Australian Corps of Signals (RACS), a combat support corps within the Australian Army, was formed on 1 January 1925 as the Australian Corps of Signals, evolving from earlier signalling units dating back to 1906, and granted the "Royal" prefix in 1948.^[40] The corps currently comprises approximately 3,000 trained personnel, including around 300 officers and 2,300 other ranks, responsible for delivering communications, information systems, and electronic warfare capabilities across the Australian Defence Force.^[41]^[40] During World War II, RACS personnel expanded to over 24,000 members and provided critical support in the Pacific Theater, operating jungle-adapted radios such as the No. 19 set to maintain command and control amid dense terrain and harsh conditions.^[40] In more recent operations, RACS signallers contributed to the 1999 International Force East Timor (INTERFET) mission, deploying satellite communications and interception capabilities to enable secure coordination during the peacekeeping deployment.^[42]^[40] Training for RACS personnel is primarily conducted at the Defence Force School of Signals located at Simpson Barracks in Watsonia, Victoria, where programs emphasize skills in amphibious signaling and joint operations with allied forces, including exercises like Talisman Sabre that integrate radio reconnaissance and insertion techniques.^[43]^[44] RACS employs advanced equipment such as high-frequency (HF) radios from manufacturers like Barrett Communications for encrypted voice transmission, specifically adapted for long-range operations across Australia's vast outback environments, alongside satellite links and fibre optic systems.^[45]^[46] A distinctive adaptation of RACS capabilities involves disaster response signaling, particularly following the 2009 Victorian bushfires, where Australian Defence Force communications integrated military networks with civilian systems to restore connectivity in affected regions and support relief efforts.^[47]

Canada

The Royal Canadian Corps of Signals (RCCS) was established on October 24, 1903, as the Canadian Signal Corps (Militia) to handle land communications and signaling duties within the Canadian militia.^[48] This unit evolved to support army operations through World War I, the interwar period, World War II, and the Korean War. In 1968, following the Canadian Forces Reorganization Act, the RCCS was integrated into the newly formed Communications and Electronics Branch (C&E Branch), which unified communicators from the army, navy, and air force under a single tri-service structure.^[49] The C&E Branch, with its army component designated as the Royal Canadian Corps of Signals since its 2013 reinstatement, continues to provide essential communication and information systems support to the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF).^[48] Signallers from the RCCS played a pivotal role in the Korean War (1950–1953), where they maintained critical brigade-level communications, including the operation of radio networks that ensured coordination among infantry units during battles like Kapyong.^[50] Their efforts involved deploying mobile radio equipment to support mobile operations in rugged terrain. In more recent multinational operations, such as the CAF mission in Afghanistan (2001–2014), signallers managed secure digital communications, including the integration of laptop-based systems to receive and process real-time feeds from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for tactical decision-making.^[51] These capabilities were vital for joint operations with NATO allies, emphasizing interoperability in high-threat environments. Training for signallers occurs primarily at the Canadian Forces School of Communications and Electronics (CFSCE) in Kingston, Ontario, where personnel receive instruction in basic, intermediate, and advanced communications skills, including the setup and maintenance of voice and data networks.^[52] Specialized modules address cold-weather signaling techniques, preparing operators for Arctic patrols and northern operations, such as those under Operation Nanook, where reliable communications are essential amid extreme conditions like sub-zero temperatures and limited visibility.^[53] Current equipment includes the Harris Falcon III series of tactical radios, such as the AN/PRC-152A handheld and AN/PRC-117G manpack models, which operate across VHF and UHF frequencies for secure voice and data transmission.^[54] These radios adhere to NATO standards, featuring software-defined architecture with plugins for enhanced interoperability during multinational exercises and deployments.^[55] A distinctive feature of Canadian signallers is the incorporation of bilingual (English/French) protocols in domestic operations, reflecting the CAF's official bilingualism policy to ensure effective communication in linguistically diverse regions like Quebec.^[56] Since 2010, training has placed increased emphasis on cyber defense, with the C&E Branch leading instruction for cyber operators to counter network threats, aligning with Canada's National Cyber Security Strategy and the establishment of dedicated cyber units.^[57] This focus supports northern sovereignty missions and NATO commitments, where signallers integrate cyber resilience into traditional signaling roles.

United Kingdom

The Royal Corps of Signals was established on 28 June 1920 through a Royal Warrant signed by Winston Churchill, then Secretary of State for War, drawing from the signals companies of the Royal Engineers to form a dedicated corps for military communications.^[58] This creation marked a pivotal evolution in the British Army's structure, building on an imperial legacy of signaling innovations from the Victorian era while adapting to the demands of modern warfare and colonial operations across the British Empire.^[2] Today, the Corps maintains a strength of over 8,000 regular personnel, supporting networked command and control in joint and multinational environments. During the Second World War, Royal Signals units played a critical role in North African desert campaigns, employing Wireless Set No. 19 transceivers to enable mobile communications for armored formations like the 8th Army amid vast, challenging terrains.^[59] In the 1982 Falklands War, the Corps provided essential communications support using Clansman radios, facilitating rapid "island-hopping" advances by British forces through improvised training and deployment of the system en route to the theater.^[60] Training for Royal Signals personnel is centralized at Blandford Camp in Dorset, the Royal School of Signals' primary facility, where recruits undergo combined arms instruction in communications, information systems, and fieldcraft. Since 2015, curricula have incorporated dedicated modules on cyber warfare, reflecting the Corps' shift toward defending digital networks and integrating offensive cyber capabilities into operational doctrine.^[4] The Corps operates the Bowman Combat Service Support system as its core tactical communications infrastructure, introduced in the early 2000s to replace legacy VHF networks with a secure, networked battlespace enabling real-time data sharing across infantry, armor, and logistics units.^[61] A distinctive aspect of the Royal Corps of Signals is its close integration with Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) for signals intelligence, where Corps specialists receive specialized training in electronic warfare to intercept and analyze enemy emissions, enhancing tactical decision-making in contested electromagnetic environments.

United States

The U.S. Army Signal Corps, the cornerstone of American military communications, was established on June 21, 1860, when Congress authorized the appointment of a signal officer to develop signaling methods for the Army.^[62] Initially focused on visual and telegraphic systems during the Civil War, the Corps evolved into a comprehensive branch responsible for all Army information systems, addressing critical gaps in secure, reliable signaling for a global superpower. Post-World War II, as the U.S. military restructured with the creation of the independent Air Force in 1947 and enhanced joint doctrines under the 1986 Goldwater-Nichols Act, the Signal Corps expanded its scope to support integrated communications across all branches, facilitating unified command and control in multinational operations. Key operational milestones highlight the Corps' adaptability in diverse theaters. During the Vietnam War, signallers deployed the AN/VRC-12 series of vehicular VHF-FM radios, which enabled synthesized frequency hopping and manpack portability essential for maintaining connectivity amid dense jungle terrain and mobile warfare, significantly boosting tactical responsiveness.^[63] In the Iraq War (2003–2011), Blue Force Tracking (BFT) systems integrated GPS with secure data links, allowing real-time visualization of friendly positions on digital maps shared via military networks, which reduced friendly fire incidents and enhanced battlefield coordination for over 1,200 deployed units.^[64] Training for signallers occurs primarily at the U.S. Army Cyber Center of Excellence at Fort Gordon, Georgia, where the Signal School delivers specialized instruction. Basic and advanced individual training for roles like satellite communication systems operators spans 25 weeks, covering installation, operation, and maintenance of global networks, while officer and warrant officer pipelines, including functional area certifications, can extend to 18 months incorporating satellite communications, cybersecurity, and AI-assisted network management for predictive analytics and automated threat detection.^[65] Equipment advancements underscore the Corps' technological edge, with software-defined radios such as the Handheld, Manpack, and Small Form Fit (HMS) family, introduced post-2012, serving as flagship platforms. These enable multi-band, waveform-agile operations across VHF, UHF, and satellite frequencies, allowing seamless interoperability with legacy and allied systems while supporting encrypted voice, data, and video for joint forces.^[66] The U.S. boasts the world's largest dedicated signaller network, exceeding 20,000 Army personnel focused on joint integration, leveraging SIPRNet—the Department of Defense's global classified intranet—for secure, high-speed data exchange among land, air, naval, and partner forces. Signallers draw briefly on adaptations from air and naval branches, such as airborne relay systems, to ensure end-to-end connectivity in multi-domain operations.

Modern Developments

Technological Advancements

The post-Cold War era marked a pivotal digital shift in military communications technology, with the introduction of software-defined radios (SDRs) in the late 1990s revolutionizing signaller capabilities. Unlike traditional hardware-dependent radios, SDRs enabled dynamic frequency allocation and waveform reconfiguration through software, allowing operators to adapt to evolving threats and spectrum conditions without physical hardware modifications. This flexibility was driven by defense industry needs for enhanced interoperability and reduced logistical burdens in tactical environments.^[67]^[68] Satellite and network technologies further advanced secure global communications, exemplified by the U.S. MILSTAR satellite system launched in 1994. Designed for jam-resistant operations, MILSTAR provided highly secure, worldwide links using extremely high frequency (EHF) bands, supporting data rates up to 1.5 Mbps across low- and medium-data-rate payloads. These capabilities ensured resilient transmission of voice, data, and imagery even under electronic warfare conditions, forming a foundational backbone for modern signaller networks in the U.S. military.^[69]^[70]^[71] Cyber integration expanded tactical networking with the adoption of IP-based systems like the U.S. Army's Warfighter Information Network-Tactical (WIN-T), fielded starting in 2004. WIN-T delivered a high-capacity, satellite-supported infrastructure for real-time voice, data, and video feeds, enabling seamless information sharing across echelons and reducing dependency on legacy circuits. This shift to packet-switched protocols enhanced bandwidth efficiency and supported multimedia applications critical for joint operations.^[72]^[73] Artificial intelligence began augmenting signaller functions through automated processing for threat detection, with trials during the U.S. Army's Project Convergence exercise in 2020. These applications promised to offload manual analysis from signallers, improving detection accuracy and response times in multidomain scenarios.^[74] A key milestone in this evolution was the military's transition from analog to Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) systems initiated around 2010, which streamlined communications by integrating voice traffic into IP networks. This change significantly reduced latency and jitter through quality-of-service mechanisms, enhancing real-time coordination while cutting infrastructure costs and enabling unified voice-data convergence. In the UK, the British Army has advanced tactical communications through systems like FALCON, a deployable broadband network for voice, data, and video.^[75]^[76]^[77]

Current Challenges and Adaptations

Signallers face escalating cyber vulnerabilities in modern operations, particularly from electronic attacks such as GPS spoofing, which have been prominently observed in the Russia-Ukraine conflict since 2022. In this theater, Russian forces have employed spoofing techniques to transmit fake GPS signals, misleading Ukrainian drones and navigation systems by inducing erroneous coordinate acceptance, thereby disrupting unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) missions and broader command-and-control functions.^[78]^[79] To counter such threats, military entities are piloting quantum-resistant encryption protocols, with NATO incorporating these into 5G drills to safeguard communications against future quantum computing decryption risks.^[80] The U.S. Department of Defense has advanced this through CNSA 2.0 standards, mandating quantum-safe algorithms for national security systems to ensure long-term resilience.^[81] Spectrum congestion poses another critical challenge, especially in urban warfare environments where proliferating civilian and military emitters overload frequency bands, complicating reliable signal transmission. This issue has intensified since 2015, with U.S. forces reporting over 260 satellite communication jamming incidents that year alone, highlighting the contested electromagnetic spectrum as a battlespace domain.^[82] Cognitive radios address this by dynamically detecting available channels and auto-selecting optimal bands through spectrum sensing and dynamic spectrum access, enabling adaptive waveform adjustments to evade interference in dense operational areas.^[83]^[84] Manpower strains further compound these difficulties, as the increasing technical complexity of communication systems exacerbates shortages in skilled signaller personnel across militaries. In the U.S., this has prompted doctrinal shifts toward hybrid human-AI teams in the 2020s, where AI augments decision-making and network management to alleviate workload burdens and enhance efficiency in multi-domain operations.^[85]^[86] Adaptations emphasize resilient mesh networks to support drone swarms, providing decentralized connectivity that maintains operations even under partial disruptions. These networks were tested in NATO's 2023 Counter Unmanned Aircraft System Technical Interoperability Exercise, integrating unmanned systems for enhanced tactical coordination.^[87] A global trend involves transitioning to military-grade 5G variants, which deliver ultra-low latency for real-time data exchange, with initial deployments accelerating in 2025 across U.S. and Nordic forces to bolster command agility. In the UK, the British Army partnered with Motorola Solutions and Nokia in 2025 to develop tactical 5G networks for secure battlefield communications.^[88]^[89]^[90]

References

[1]
Royal Corps of Signals | National Army Museum
Their roles expanded to involve not only operating signals equipment, but also maintaining telephone lines and other communications infrastructure, often under ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[2]
Join The Royal Signals - IT and cyber leaders | Army Jobs
Join the Royal Signals and play a key role in British Army communications. Benefit from expert training, a strong community, and a dynamic army lifestyle.Officer · Electronic Warfare & Signals... · Communications Engineer
[3]
Australian signallers in World War I - Anzac Portal - DVA
Dec 18, 2019 · Being a signaller (sapper) was dangerous work. Laying and repairing telephone lines between HQ and the front line troops.Missing: duties | Show results with:duties
[4]
The History of Cryptography: Timeline & Overview - Entrust
Pre-20th century cryptography The system depended on using the correct diameter for decoding. Ancient Rome (~100 B.C.): Julius Caesar used a simple shift ...Key Takeaways · Pre-20th Century... · Quantum Cryptography And The...Missing: signal | Show results with:signal<|control11|><|separator|>
[5]
Signal Operations Support Specialist 25U - US Army
As a Signal Operations Support Specialist, you'll provide technical support and expertise in the operation and maintenance of communication systems.
[6]
Electronic Warfare & Signals Intelligence - Royal Signals - Army Jobs
You will be taught basic principles and skills, such as siting, operating and talking on military radios, radio logs, map marking, working at heights, health ...
[7]
Morse Code Explained | Military.com
Jun 28, 2023 · Morse code is a communication system using short and long tones (dots and dashes) to represent letters of the alphabet.
[8]
21 Signal Regiment | The British Army
Our Skills As STRIKE Signallers, soldiers of 21 Signal Regiment must be robust, resilient and adaptable. To ensure this support is effectively delivered the ...
[9]
25U Signal Support Systems Specialist - Army National Guard
Mechanical and electrical principles; Preventive maintenance procedures; Line installation and wiring techniques; Communication security policies and procedures.
[10]
Royal Signals soldiers complete 40-mile challenge in searing ...
Jun 7, 2023 · Army Signallers have battled through scorching temperatures to successfully complete a mind-and-muscle sapping 40-mile endurance competition ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[11]
A Career as a Royal Signals Officer - Army Jobs
You will learn the fundamentals of satellite communication, radio propagation and computer network theory.Missing: skills | Show results with:skills
[12]
Signal Course Information - U.S. Army Cyber Center of Excellence
The official website for the U.S. Army Cyber Center of Excellence (CCoE)Missing: pipeline boot camp theory
[13]
11 (Royal School of Signals) Signal Regiment | The British Army
11 (Royal School of Signals) Signal Regiment is the training unit for all Royal Signals soldiers and officers. Signals personnel will also return periodically ...
[14]
25U -Signal Support Systems Specialist
Job training for a signal support systems specialist requires 10 weeks of Basic Combat Training and 18 weeks of Advanced Individual Training with on-the-job ...Missing: modern | Show results with:modern
[15]
History of Military gaming | Article | The United States Army
Aug 27, 2008 · Beginning with "Air Defense Simulation" in 1948 and the "Carmonette" series of simulations in 1953, these systems eliminated much of the manual ...
[16]
A history of United States military simulation | Request PDF
VR-based simulation environments emerge as a promising alternative to mitigate these limitations, offering a platform complementary to existing training ...Missing: signaller | Show results with:signaller
[17]
China Great Wall Beacon Towers: Defensive System, Legend
The towers had been used as warning signals against enemy attacks and to summon help. Fires or lanterns were used at night and smoke signals during the day.Constructional Structure · Defense System · A Legend About Beacon TowerMissing: Rome | Show results with:Rome
[18]
[PDF] Clandestine Communication in Historic China
The early military and historical writings claim that China's armies were already being expertly directed by signal flags, drums, and gongs in legendary ...Missing: signaling | Show results with:signaling
[19]
Cursus Publicus: The Ingenious Postal System of the Roman Empire
Nov 10, 2023 · The Cursus Publicus, known in English as the "Public Way" or "Imperial Post," became the foremost system of Roman government-run courier and transportation ...
[20]
[PDF] 'brass instruments' in the Roman army R Cross Macquarie University
The Roman army used the tuba, cornu, bucina, and lituus for communication, strategic and tactical maneuvers, and direct commands.
[21]
The Fabric of War - Cambridge University Press & Assessment
The Fabric of War traces the rich history of flags and banners in Renaissance Europe through a critical analysis of the cultural, ideological, material, and ...
[22]
[PDF] 10 Signalling Intent: Beacons, Lookouts and Military Communications
Beacons and lookouts were key for local and regional communication in Anglo-Saxon England, with beacons possibly used as signal-fires and lookouts as 'sea ...
[23]
Napoleon's Secret Weapon - People @EECS
Expansion within France continues until 1853, when it is finally replaced by electric telegraph. Traffic averaged a few hundred messages per year.
[24]
Heliograph - Royal Signals - Index
In the Waziri expedition, 1881, communication was maintained direct for a distance of 70 miles with a 5-in, heliograph. In the Boer War, 1899-1902, the system ...
[25]
Telegraph. - Royal Signals - Index
This Datasheet is the Forth in a Series that covers the pre-Royal Signals period of the British Army (and Naval) Signalling.
[26]
The Crimean War as a technological enterprise - PMC
Like the railway, the electric telegraph as a possible aid to the war effort received intense attention in Britain in the late autumn of 1854. In mid December, ...
[27]
Wireless Equipment, Trench Set W/T 50 Watt, British
Used by British Army on Western Front to complement line communications. Object Details. Category: Equipment; Related period: First World War (production), ...
[28]
Wireless in WWI - South African Military History Society
The BF Set. Among the first wireless sets to be used in the trenches by the British Army was one known officially as the Trench Set, Spark, 50W, but they ...<|separator|>
[29]
[PDF] Electronic Warfare - The Early Years Part 1
Following the end of World War I, the Services continued to conduct experiments to improve high frequency communications between ground stations. Preliminary ...
[30]
'The Most Aggravating Thing:' Communications And Limitations On ...
Nov 13, 2013 · Each cable was buried at least six feet to prevent all but the heaviest German shells from severing them. In the conditions of the Somme, where ...
[31]
Communications on the Western Front | NZ History
May 3, 2016 · The Somme battles reinforced the need to bury communications cables many feet underground to protect them from artillery bombardment.Missing: reduce response
[32]
How Alan Turing Cracked The Enigma Code | Imperial War Museums
The main focus of Turing's work at Bletchley was in cracking the 'Enigma' code. The Enigma was a type of enciphering machine used by the German armed forces to ...
[33]
Wireless Communications of the German Army in World War II
Fug 1: Also known as Torn. · FuG 2: A high-band HF/low-band VHF receiver. · FuG 3: A low-band VHF receiver. · FuG 4: A medium-wave receiver used in command tanks.Missing: coordination | Show results with:coordination
[34]
Signallers - Spartacus Educational
As this usually happened during heavy bombardment, the casualty-rate amongst signallers was fairly high. On 10th August 1916, Second Lieutenant A.A. Milne ...
[35]
US signals intelligence in the Cold War - Wikipedia
Postwar changes in SIGINT, EW and ELINT Under the US Marines, the 1st Composite Radio Company was activated on 8 September 1959, continuing the World War II ...
[36]
Weapon Systems Operator - Aircrew Linguist - RAF Recruitment
The role has its origins as an Air Signaller on Lancaster bombers in World War Two. Your role will include: Being a key part of an operational mission crew.
[37]
Air-Ground Communication | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
Air-ground communication is two-way, using voice (radio telephony), data (ADS-B), and visual (Morse code, light signals) methods.
[38]
Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) - Collins Aerospace
It enables military and civilian air traffic control interrogation systems to identify aircraft, vehicles or forces as friendly and to determine their threat.
[39]
A Strike by Stealth | Air & Space Forces Magazine
The “execute” order for Operation Desert Storm had gone out to the coalition air forces. H-hour was 3:00 a.m., Baghdad time, January 17, 1991. Deep in Saudi ...
[40]
This Week In AFLCMC History - November 7 - 13, 2022
Nov 7, 2022 · HAVE QUICK is the codename for a frequency-hopping radio, like the HAVE QUICK radio pictured here, that the U.S. Air Force has utilized since ...
[41]
[PDF] Semaphore!
Semaphore flag communication was adopted and widely used in the maritime world in the 19th century. It is still used during underway replenishment at sea.
[42]
Ship to Shore Movement - Naval History and Heritage Command
Oct 31, 2017 · 2 sets semaphore flags. 3 flashlights. 12 batteries, BA-30, spares for flashlights. 2 signal lamps, Aldis, EL-084, or multipurpose signaling.
[43]
[PDF] A Submarine Communication Buoy System - DTIC
The system includes a towable buoy, cable, winch-nest, and controls. It provides vlf, hf, uhf, IFF, and ECM services, and a flashing marker light.
[44]
[PDF] ELF Communications Development - MIT Lincoln Laboratory
At a low data rate (0.03 bps) and with a test transmitter that radiated less than 1 W, a binary minimum shift- keying bandspread technique on a. 76 Hz carrier ...Missing: baud | Show results with:baud
[45]
'Flags' at Midway | Naval History Magazine - June 2002 Vol. 16 ...
Jun 4, 2002 · The prelude of the Yorktown's last battle came on 27 May 1942, when she limped into Pearl Harbor, a stream of leaking oil spreading miles behind ...
[46]
[PDF] Underwater Sound - DTIC
This paper gives an account of some aspects of the development of underwater aco\lstics from the very active period during World War I up to the beginning of ...
[47]
[PDF] INMARSAT Communications System - DTIC
This study describes the history of satellite communications, major components, and especially the Inmarsat system, including its technology and problems.
[48]
PRC-77 - Crypto Museum
Mar 11, 2018 · The PRC-77 is a portable military VHF/FM transceiver for the 30 to 86 MHz band, introduced in 1968, and used in the Vietnam War.
[49]
AN/PRC-77 - RadioNerds
Jul 31, 2016 · AN/PRC-77 is a man-pack, portable, frequency-modulated (fm) receiver-transmitter used to provide short-range, two-way, radio-telephone voice communication.
[50]
About - PRC-77
The PRC-77 was a rugged, reliable, portable radio used in Vietnam, designed by RCA. It was the best tactical manpack radio of its time, though now obsolete.
[51]
[PDF] Radio Relay, the War's Great Development in Signal Communications
It became routine procedure early in the Normandy operations to install radio relay channels paralleling wire channels between Army Group and Armies and ...
[52]
Calling Down the Sea Dragon Thunder | Proceedings
Sensors, in the form of infantry squads, will burst-transmit information and requests for fire directly and simultaneously to the firing agency and the command ...
[53]
[PDF] Fire Support and Field Artillery Operations
Aug 12, 2024
[54]
History – The Signaller | RASIGS
In 1885 a “signalling corps”, composed of 1 officer and 12 other ranks, existed in South Australia and remained active until 1901.
[55]
100 years of The Royal Australian Corps of Signals | Defence
Feb 14, 2025 · ... Royal Australian Corps of Signals ... Today, the Corps has a workforce of approximately 3,000 trained personnel, with an average of 300 personnel ...
[56]
Defence Signals Directorate: Timor Leste, 1999 - Nautilus Institute
Jun 14, 2009 · This system intercepted radio communications among ABRI and militia units in East Timor, between ABRI officers in the field and the East Timor ...Missing: Corps | Show results with:Corps
[57]
Simpson Barracks - Defence
A Forces Command training base supporting Defence Force School of Signals (tri-service technicians and operators of information, communication, and electronic ...
[58]
Video - Radio Recon Amphibious Assault - DVIDS
May 20, 2022 · ... Australian soldiers with 7th Signal Regiment participate in Radio Reconnaissance Operators Course (RROC) amphibious insertion exercise ...
[59]
Royal Australian Corps of Signals
The role of the Royal Australian Corps of Signals (RA Sigs) is to provide communications, information systems, and electronic warfare support to the Australian ...Missing: duties | Show results with:duties
[60]
Babcock to deliver Australia's Defence High Frequency ...
Oct 21, 2022 · Babcock to deliver Australia's Defence High Frequency Communications System next-generation upgrade. The Australian Defence Force's Defence High ...
[61]
Australian peacekeepers in East Timor (Timor Leste) from 1999 to ...
Aug 28, 2025 · The Australian Government sent about 5,500 service people to East Timor as part of its contribution to INTERFET. This was the largest deployment ...
[62]
Victorian bushfires: January to February 2009 - Disaster Assist
Sep 22, 2024 · 173 people lost their lives during the fires, which directly impacted 51 townships, destroying over 2000 homes, along with many businesses, schools and ...Missing: Corps Signals
[63]
History - CMCEN
His proposal was accepted and on 24 October 1903, General Order 167 authorized the formation of the “Canadian Signal Corps (Militia)” – the first independent ...
[64]
Organizational Corps - www.canadiansoldiers.com
The Royal Canadian Corps of Signals. Amalgamated with equivalent Navy and Air Force services and redesignated Communications and Electronics Branch 24 Oct 1968.<|control11|><|separator|>
[65]
Honours and Awards - Korean War - RCSigs.ca
Captain Connell has carried out the duties of Signal Officer to 25 Canadian Infantry Brigade since April 1952. He has organized the brigade communications ...
[66]
Signallers: Mission Critical | Canadian Army Today
Apr 1, 2018 · It is super diverse. As signallers we have the opportunity to work at a tactical level in austere conditions in the field, and we also have ...
[67]
Other Canadian Armed Forces training establishments - Canada.ca
Jan 27, 2023 · The Canadian Forces School of Communications and Electronics (CFSCE) provides basic, intermediate, and advanced training to military personnel ...
[68]
Arctic Security – CAF Operations and Exercises - Canada.ca
Aug 22, 2023 · The Canadian Armed Forces maintains a year-round presence in the Arctic through operations, exercises, and training activities.Missing: Electronics Kingston
[69]
Canadian military orders Falcon III tactical radios from Harris
Nov 19, 2014 · Harris has received a contract to supply Falcon III tactical radios systems to the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF).
[70]
Tactical VHF/UHF Radios | L3Harris® Fast. Forward.
The technologies of two Falcon III® AN/PRC-152A radios in one avionics-ruggedized solution. Optimized SWaP, dual wideband channels, interoperability.Missing: Canadian Armed NATO
[71]
Bilingualism in the CAF: Legal, Historical, and Operational ...
Jun 22, 2018 · Bilingualism in the CAF today stems from a long rich history, retains important cultural significance, and provides members with key operational advantages.Missing: protocols signals domestic
[72]
[PDF] Building Cyber Operations in the Canadian Armed Forces - Canada.ca
Canadian Corps of Signals appears to have been assigned the lead for training new Cyber. Operators. The trade is open to members of the Air Force, Army, and ...
[73]
Formation of the Corps | Royal Signals Museum
The Corps of Signals was formed on the 28th June 1920 when a Royal Warrant was signed by the Secretary of State for War, the Right Honourable Winston S ...
[74]
History of Royal Signals in 100 Objects
The No 19 Wireless Set was developed primarily to fulfil the communications requirements of highly mobile Armoured Fighting Vehicles in World War Two. It ...
[75]
Falklands War | Royal Signals Museum
... Clansman radios and train them on the journey south. Then, during the war, 5th Infantry Brigade HQ and Signal Squadron needed to readjust when their OC was ...
[76]
Communication and surveillance | The British Army
Equipment. Communication and Surveillance. The British Army has the most powerful information and communication systems available.
[77]
https://www.baesystems.com/en/product/falcon
[78]
Vietnam Recordings Reveal CECOM's Soldier Support History
ECOM Commander, Maj. Gen. Frank W. Moorman, ordered the new,. transistorized FM radios of the AN/VRC-12/PRC-25 families shipped to Vietnam ...
[79]
Army fields next-generation blue force tracking system | Article
Jul 15, 2011 · The Army has fielded its next-generation friendly force tracking system to five operational brigade combat teams, equipping Soldiers with a faster satellite ...
[80]
US Army Supercharges Training and Cyber Defense With AI Tools
Aug 28, 2025 · The US Army is embedding AI across its training and defense systems, betting that it can help shape outcomes as decisively as tanks or ...Missing: Signal Corps Gordon
[81]
Software Defined Radio - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
In the late 1990s SDR started to spread from the military domain to the commercial sector, with the pace of penetration into this market considerably ...
[82]
Software Defined Radio (SDR): Technology, Applications, and ...
Aug 11, 2025 · SDR systems enable military units to switch seamlessly between different communication protocols and frequency bands, providing secure, jam ...
[83]
Milstar Satellite Communications System - Space Force
The payloads increased data over 32 channels. The higher data rates provide the user the ability to transmit large amounts of data in a short period of time.Missing: exact | Show results with:exact
[84]
Milstar 2 Military Communications Satellite - GlobalSecurity.org
Jan 7, 2021 · The MDR payload can transmit 4,800 bps to 1.544 Mbps of data over 32 channels. The higher data rates provide the user the ability to transmit ...
[85]
Building bandwidth in space - Defense One
Mar 3, 2009 · First launched in 1994, the Milstar constellation has five satellites ... jam-resistant communications with speeds as fast as 1.5 megabits/sec.
[86]
The Army's Warfighter Information Network-Tactical (WIN-T) Program
Oct 10, 2017 · It provides a full range of at-the-halt data, voice, and video communications. The Army began fielding WIN-T Increment 1 in 2004 and completed ...Missing: adoption 2003 IP- based networks feeds<|separator|>
[87]
Warfighter Information Network-Tactical (WIN-T)
The ITN enables soldiers to: Stream real-time video over the network; View a topographical map of friendly forces; Send texts requesting medical assistance ...Missing: 2003 IP- networks feeds
[88]
Inside the Army's futuristic test of its battlefield artificial intelligence in ...
Sep 25, 2020 · At Project Convergence, U.S. Army Futures Command tested a number of emerging AI capabilities, including Prometheus, Dead Center, ...Missing: signal | Show results with:signal
[89]
Army embarks on ambitious voice-over-IP initiative - Defense One
Sep 15, 2010 · The Army has launched a program to replace older phone equipment with digital voice-over-IP technology by 2024.
[90]
[PDF] Operational Benefit of Implementing VoIP in a Tactical Environment
Although, employing QoS controls can greatly reduce latency and jitter on a network there is a trade off in service. The US Navy would benefit by adopting a ...
[91]
(PDF) The Rise of GPS Spoofing Attacks on Drones in the Russia ...
Jul 11, 2025 · This study presents a novel method for the detection and attribution of GPS spoofing attacks against UAVs for military purposes.<|separator|>
[92]
The Role of the Space Domain in the Russia-Ukraine War
Feb 23, 2024 · Russian attempts at jamming, spoofing, or hacking satellite networks supporting the Ukrainian Armed Forces have been a feature of the war since ...
[93]
NATO eyes 'quantum-resistant' encryption in 5G drill - C4ISRNet
Oct 31, 2023 · Scientists have warned for some time of the threat posed by quantum computers to crack common encryption algorithms that protect military ...
[94]
Quantum-Proof with CNSA 2.0 - Encryption Consulting
Jul 24, 2025 · CNSA 2.0 secures National Security Systems with quantum-resistant algorithms, ensuring compliance, resilience, and future-proof encryption.<|separator|>
[95]
Modern Electromagnetic Spectrum Battlefield - NDU Press
Nov 18, 2021 · The multiplication of civil and military systems using the electromagnetic spectrum leads to an increasingly congested environment and is the ...
[96]
Spectrum Contested Environments - Marine Corps Association
Mar 23, 2020 · An example of Russian military cyber warfare ... Cognitive radios using DSA technology also offer a solution to the problem of spectrum ...
[97]
SDR in Military: Cognitive Radio for Electronic Warfare
Jul 14, 2025 · In a military context, cognitive radios can dynamically switch frequencies to avoid jamming or interception by hostile forces. They can also ...
[98]
[PDF] Actions Needed to Improve DOD's Workforce Management - GAO
Dec 14, 2023 · It is no secret that. America's military rivals are integrating AI concepts and platforms to challenge the. United States' decades-long ...Missing: doctrine 2020s<|separator|>
[99]
Air Force Releases New Doctrine Note on Artificial Intelligence to ...
Apr 10, 2025 · The US Air Force has published a new Air Force Doctrine resource for Airmen navigating the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence.Missing: communications manpower shortages 2020s
[100]
NATO tests counter-drone technologies during exercise
Sep 22, 2023 · NATO's Counter Unmanned Aircraft System Technical Interoperability Exercise (C-UAS TIE23) brought together military, scientific and industry ...Missing: mesh swarms
[101]
[PDF] DoD Private 5G Deployment Strategy
Nov 14, 2024 · This strategy focuses on the deployment of private 5G networks on military installations and recommends the use of Open Radio Access Network ( ...
[102]
Nordic nations introduce advanced 5G military applications. If the ...
May 23, 2025 · 5G technology is characterized by high speed, low latency, and massive connectivity. Key military 5G applications include enhanced Command ...