Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Silbury Hill

Silbury Hill is a monumental artificial located near in , , recognized as the largest prehistoric in . Standing 39.3 metres high with a of 167.6 metres at its and a flat approximately 30 metres across, it was constructed primarily from over 350,000 cubic metres of chalk, along with clay, gravel, soil, turf, and sarsen stones, quarried from surrounding ditches. places its construction in the later period, beginning around 2400 cal BC and spanning approximately 10–100 years in multiple phases. The mound's stepped, conical form rises west of the River Kennet and south of Avebury village, forming a key element of the broader prehistoric ritual landscape that includes the Avebury henge and stone circles, designated as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1986. Its construction demanded enormous communal effort, estimated at millions of man-hours, reflecting advanced social organization among Neolithic communities in southern Britain. Despite extensive archaeological investigations—from early 17th-century probes to modern conservation projects in 2007–2008—no burials, temples, or clear artifacts have been discovered to explain its purpose, though some flint and antler tools have been found, and it is interpreted as having ceremonial or ritual significance within the regional monumental complex. The site is also designated a Site of Special Scientific Interest for its grassland habitats and is managed by English Heritage, with public access restricted to protect its structure.

Location and Context

Geographical Setting

Silbury Hill is situated near in , , at coordinates 51°24′57″N 1°51′27″W, approximately 1 mile (1.4 km) south of village. It forms a key component of the , and Associated Sites , which encompasses a vast prehistoric landscape spanning multiple monuments and ceremonial complexes. The mound rises prominently from the flat of the Kennet Valley, a low-lying area hemmed in by the rolling hills of the Marlborough Downs to the south and east. It occupies a natural of protruding from the southern valley slope, with the River Kennet flowing nearby to the north, contributing to the site's strategic placement within this undulating terrain. The hill was constructed directly on alluvial clay deposits overlying , integrating it seamlessly into the local geology while elevating it above the surrounding valley floor. In its context, the area around Silbury Hill featured a diverse of wetlands, meandering rivers, and expansive uplands, shaped by clearance and early that altered local . Today, the site remains enveloped in open grazing land, with the road passing immediately adjacent to its base and the West Kennet Avenue—a prehistoric processional route—extending northward toward , preserving its prominence amid modern agricultural use.

Cultural and Archaeological Significance

Silbury Hill forms an integral part of the monument complex at in , , constructed during a period of intense ceremonial activity in the era around 2400–2300 BC. It is closely associated with the and s, linked through the nearby West Kennet Avenue—a processional route of paired standing stones extending approximately 1.5 miles from the toward the monument on Overton Hill, with Silbury Hill located near the southern section of the avenue, close to its crossing of the River Kennet. This integration underscores its role within a densely interwoven of prehistoric earthworks and megaliths, reflecting coordinated communal endeavors across the region. As the largest artificial prehistoric mound in , standing at 39.3 metres high and comprising around half a million tonnes of chalk and earth, Silbury Hill exemplifies the scale of collective labor, estimated to have required approximately four million person-hours over several generations. Its construction symbolizes profound social organization and shared ritual practices, with materials likely sourced from surrounding territories to foster communal participation. Furthermore, it connects to the wider ritual landscape of , situated about 20 miles north of , forming part of an extensive network of monuments that spans chalk downlands and demonstrates evolving prehistoric traditions over millennia. In recognition of its exceptional contribution to understanding Neolithic monumental architecture, Silbury Hill was inscribed in 1986 as a component of the "Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites" World Heritage Site by UNESCO, celebrated for its outstanding universal value in illustrating advanced earthen engineering and ceremonial complexity from circa 3700 to 1600 BC. This designation highlights the site's embodiment of prehistoric ingenuity and its enduring testimony to the cultural achievements of early British societies.

Physical Structure

Dimensions and Composition

Silbury Hill measures 39.3 meters (129 feet) in height, making it the tallest prehistoric artificial mound in . Its base has a diameter of 167.6 meters (550 feet) and covers an area of approximately 2 hectares (5 acres), with the flat summit spanning about 30 meters in diameter. The overall volume of material in the mound is estimated at over 350,000 cubic metres. The has a conical shape with stepped sides, forming a tiered profile that suggests deliberate layering during accumulation. Originally, the sides were steeper, but centuries of and grass coverage have softened the contours, giving it a more rounded appearance today. The surrounding , from which much of the material was sourced, enhances the mound's prominent silhouette against the landscape. Silbury Hill's composition consists primarily of chalk rubble, dug and compacted into layers that form the bulk of its . This is interspersed with deposits of clay, , turf, and scattered stones, creating a heterogeneous core that fills voids and provides stability. The uppermost layers include organic-rich soils and turves, now overlaid by a natural grass covering that protects the underlying materials.

Construction Techniques and Phases

Silbury Hill's construction has been radiocarbon dated to the later period, beginning around 2400–2300 cal BC and spanning approximately 100–200 years based on calibrated dates from organic materials in the 's layers. The monument was built in multiple phases, beginning with a small about 0.8 meters high and 10 meters in diameter, composed of flint and silty dumped in a central location. Subsequent phases involved the addition of an organic of turf and topsoil, reaching up to 1.1 meters high and 22 meters across, followed by interleaved organic layers and banks that gradually enlarged the structure to its final form. Archaeological evidence from tunnel excavations reveals a deliberate technique, with alternating deposits of , clay, and silty loams applied in at least 15 distinct episodes to ensure stability and outward migration of the mound's profile. Materials were sourced from nearby dry valleys and the surrounding , quarried using deer picks and animal shoulder blades as shovels, supplemented by flint tools for finer work. The quarried and were transported in woven baskets by hand, deposited in basket-load increments to build up the layers, with occasional use of timber revetments and boulders for support during enlargement. The scale of the project required substantial communal organization, with estimates suggesting 500 to 700 workers contributed over generations, equivalent to about 4 million man-hours of labor to move roughly 500,000 tonnes of material. Evidence of stakeholes and deliberate pit fillings indicates coordinated efforts to demarcate boundaries and incorporate elements during construction, reflecting a sustained social commitment across phases.

Historical Investigations

Early Explorations (17th–19th Centuries)

The earliest recorded interest in Silbury Hill dates to the , when documented the mound during his surveys of in the 1660s, describing it in his unfinished Monumenta Britannica as a likely construction, possibly a sepulchral monument or beacon. Aubrey's observations, based on visual inspection rather than excavation, highlighted the hill's imposing form and prompted later curiosity, though he also noted local linking it to magical or legendary builders without further analysis. In the 18th century, interest intensified with more invasive probes. In 1776, Colonel Edward Drax, funded by Hugh Percy, the 2nd , directed a team of miners to sink an 8-foot-square vertical shaft from the summit to the center of the hill, reaching a depth of about 100 feet. The excavation revealed alternating layers of , clay, , and turf, indicating deliberate construction, but uncovered no artifacts, burials, or other significant finds, leading Drax to speculate on its purpose as a ceremonial or defensive structure. Around 1810, Sir Richard Colt Hoare, in his surveys for The Ancient History of (published 1812), observed the hill's profile and surrounding landscape, noting its isolation and suggesting possible prehistoric origins while comparing it to other earthworks, though without conducting digs himself. The 19th century saw continued antiquarian efforts, with Dean John Merewether leading a major excavation in 1849 under the auspices of the Archaeological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. Merewether oversaw the digging of a horizontal tunnel from the base, extending 95 feet toward the center and nearly intersecting Drax's earlier shaft, which exposed a gravel core and organic materials like decayed moss and turf but no human remains or artifacts. The absence of Roman-era finds in both the tunnel and re-examined upper layers led Merewether to conclude the mound predated Roman occupation, supporting an early prehistoric date, though he refrained from detailed theorizing and simply documented the stratified construction in his published diary. These efforts, while destructive to the structure, provided initial insights into its composition without resolving its purpose.

Modern Excavations (20th–21st Centuries)

In the mid-20th century, Professor Richard Atkinson conducted the first major systematic excavation of Silbury Hill between 1968 and 1970, sponsored by the and broadcast live, which involved digging a horizontal tunnel into the mound's core. This work revealed the mound's complex layered construction, consisting of alternating deposits of , clay, , and turf, built in at least three distinct phases using antler picks and other tools for shaping materials. Atkinson's findings established that the structure was erected rapidly around 2400 BC without a central chamber, contrasting with earlier amateur probes from the 17th to 19th centuries. By the early , concerns over structural instability led to advanced non-invasive assessments, including geophysical surveys in 2000 following a partial summit collapse that exposed voids from inadequately backfilled 18th- and 19th-century tunnels. These surveys, employing and other techniques, mapped internal cavities and unstable areas within the mound, highlighting the risks posed by prior interventions. A more severe summit collapse occurred in 2007, attributed to the degradation of an 18th-century vertical shaft sunk by Colonel Drax in , which had allowed water infiltration and erosion of the core. In response, launched a comprehensive project from 2007 to 2008, involving limited excavation to reopen and record Atkinson's , seal all known voids with over 1,400 tonnes of , and analyze structural elements such as fragmented stones incorporated into the mound's layers. This intervention used minimal disturbance methods, including endoscopic cameras and environmental sampling, to preserve the site's integrity while confirming the prehistoric use of durable sarsen fragments for stabilization. Since the 2010s, archaeological approaches have shifted decisively toward non-invasive technologies to avoid further damage, with seismic surveys and employed for ongoing structural monitoring in the 2020s. No major new excavations have occurred, but laboratory analyses of archived materials from prior digs continue, emphasizing long-term preservation over intrusive . This methodological reflects broader trends in prehistoric , prioritizing geophysical imaging and to study monuments like Silbury Hill without compromising their fabric.

Artifacts and Comparative Analysis

Key Discoveries

Excavations at Silbury Hill have revealed a variety of artifacts associated with its construction, including numerous antler picks used for digging chalk, wooden stakes likely employed in marking or supporting layers, and scattered bone fragments from animals incorporated into the mound's fill. These tools and remains indicate intensive labor involving local materials, with antler picks showing signs of heavy use during the primary building phase around 2400 BC. In the 2007 conservation project, which addressed structural instability from prior tunnels, archaeologists uncovered sarsen blocks arranged in a layer near the base, flint arrowheads, and organic remains such as animal bones suggesting feasting activities on site. The blocks, sourced locally, formed part of an early platform or , while the arrowheads and bones were found in the upper fills, providing of later activity. and analyses from these layers confirmed the presence of and arable environments at the time, with no signs of extensive contemporary woodland nearby. Structural investigations have demonstrated that Silbury Hill was built in multiple episodes, with of organic materials indicating at least three main phases between 2470 and 2350 BC, separated by deliberate voids and infills rather than continuous accumulation. Unlike typical barrows, no central burial chamber or were found, despite extensive tunneling; instead, the core consists of layered rubble packed around a , with voids up to 6 meters deep identified in the 2007 surveys. These voids were backfilled during with 1,465 tonnes of to stabilize the structure. No human remains associated with the construction have been identified, though later discoveries, such as human bones on the summit from 18th-century accounts, suggest post-prehistoric use. Pollen analysis from core samples and excavation contexts has shown evidence of woodland clearance in the surrounding area prior to and during mound construction, with shifts from mixed oak-hazel forest to open by the .

Comparable Prehistoric Mounds

Silbury Hill stands out among Neolithic monuments due to its massive scale and solid, non-burial construction, but it shares contextual similarities with other prehistoric mounds in and that reflect communal labor and ritual significance. In Britain, the , located just 1.5 kilometers from Silbury Hill within the complex, exemplifies a smaller, elongated burial-focused monument typical of early practices. Constructed around 3650 BC and measuring 100 meters long, 25 meters wide, and 3.2 meters high, it served as a chambered containing remains of at least 46 individuals, contrasting with Silbury's later date (circa 2400 BC) and lack of internal chambers or burials. Its position offers direct views of Silbury Hill, highlighting their integration into a shared ceremonial landscape. Another British parallel is the , situated about 8 kilometers east of Silbury and dated to the mid-third millennium BC, making it contemporaneous with Silbury's construction. At 19 meters high, it is the second-largest mound in but significantly smaller in volume than Silbury's 39-meter height and approximately 167-meter base diameter, and like many barrows, it may have had ritual rather than funerary functions, though excavations remain limited. Further north, Maeshowe in Orkney represents a chambered cairn of comparable monumental effort, built around 2800 BC with a 35-meter diameter and 7.3-meter height, enclosing a sophisticated passage grave used for burials and possibly rituals. While smaller and structurally distinct from Silbury's solid chalk form, it underscores the widespread Neolithic investment in large-scale earthworks across Britain for symbolic purposes. Across Europe, parallels include the tumuli at Carnac in Brittany, France, where Neolithic mounds like the Tumulus of Saint-Michel (circa 4000 BC) form part of extensive linear alignments and ritual complexes, reaching up to 12 meters high but emphasizing elongated, passage-grave designs over Silbury's conical solidity. In Germany, Bronze Age barrows such as those in the Harz Mountains or Lower Saxony typically measure 5-10 meters high and served as individual or small-group burials, lacking Silbury's unprecedented scale and integration into a broader henge landscape. These continental examples highlight regional variations in mound-building, often tied to funerary rites, unlike Silbury's enigmatic, non-sepulchral character. In contrast to Egyptian pyramids of the same era, such as the of (circa 2650 BC, originally 62 meters tall), Silbury Hill is smaller in height but required comparable labor—estimated at millions of person-days—but differs fundamentally in material (chalk and earth versus cut stone) and function, as no evidence suggests Silbury as a royal tomb, positioning it more as a communal centerpiece within its setting.

Purpose and Interpretations

Folklore and Traditional Beliefs

Local folklore surrounding Silbury Hill dates back to , with legends attributing its construction to forces or heroic figures. One prominent tale describes the as the place of Sil (or Zel), a mythical ruler interred upright on his horse, clad in golden armor, with the hill raised around him in a single night by his grieving subjects. This narrative, recorded by 18th-century antiquarian , portrays the king as a giant-like whose pointed skyward, symbolizing eternal vigilance. Another medieval involves the , who carried a massive load of earth intended to bury the nearby town of but dropped it upon hearing the priest's church bells, forming the hill in an instant as he fled. By the 18th and 19th centuries, these stories evolved to incorporate and elements, reflecting interests in ancient . Antiquarians like Stukeley linked the hill to rituals, envisioning it as part of a sacred landscape tied to prehistoric priests, a view that persisted in local tales of hidden druidic treasures or enchanted sites guarded by . These traditions reinforced beliefs in buried riches like the golden statue of King Sil that tempted fortune-seekers. These traditions have endured into modern times, influencing literature and contemporary spiritual practices. In 19th-century , such as works published in the Wiltshire Archaeological Magazine, the hill evoked themes of ancient mystery and nostalgic grandeur, inspiring poets to romanticize it as a barrow of forgotten . Today, neo-pagan groups view Silbury Hill as a sacred site within the complex, often incorporating it into rituals that honor prehistoric earth energies, though access restrictions limit physical interactions.

Archaeological Theories

Archaeological theories propose that Silbury Hill served as a monumental of communal power and social cohesion, constructed through a massive effort estimated at around 4 million work hours by hundreds or thousands of people over generations, reflecting the organizational capabilities of society in the Avebury region. This interpretation emphasizes its role in demonstrating technological and labor prowess rather than practical utility, as its scale—equivalent in volume to some —far exceeds any defensive or observational needs. Similarly, some hypotheses link it to ancestor veneration within the broader ritual landscape, where it may have symbolized continuity with the dead, though no human burials have been discovered despite extensive excavations, distinguishing it from nearby long barrows like West Kennet. Evidence from alignments suggests a possible function in solstice or seasonal rituals, with Silbury Hill positioned to integrate visually with Avebury's stone circles and avenues, potentially marking celestial events such as sunsets or lunar observations in a conflated lunar-solar framework. This theory draws on archaeoastronomical analysis combined with phenomenology, highlighting how the mound's placement enhances experiential symbolism during key times of year, though direct proof remains elusive. Alternative ideas include its use as a territorial marker, visible from distant prehistoric sites to assert regional dominance, or as a locale for feasting, inferred from animal bone deposits (particularly pig remains) in nearby enclosures indicating large-scale communal gatherings. However, the absence of burials or firmly rules out interpretations as a , with organic remains like moss and turf layers instead pointing to symbolic or ceremonial deposition during construction phases. Debates persist due to the site's inaccessibility for further invasive study, with post-2007 conservation efforts and radiocarbon redating confirming a relatively rapid build around 2400 BC but offering no definitive function. Recent emphasis since has shifted toward viewing Silbury as an integral element of a symbolic ritual landscape, interconnecting with earlier monuments like Windmill Hill and later ones like the palisades, fostering interpretations of dynamic social and cosmological narratives rather than isolated utility. As of 2025, no exists, with theories balancing material evidence against the mound's enigmatic integration into worldview.

Conservation and Management

Site of Special Scientific Interest

Silbury Hill was designated as a (SSSI) on 31 October 1986 under the unit number 1002057, encompassing 2.3 hectares of the mound to safeguard its ecological and geological features. This protection highlights the site's role in conserving nationally important chalk downland habitats within the broader . The SSSI's primary biological interest lies in its species-rich chalk grassland, which thrives on the steep slopes of the artificial mound and supports a diverse array of flora adapted to soils. Notable include horseshoe vetch (Hippocrepis comosa), a low-growing characteristic of unimproved grasslands, alongside salad burnet () and devil's-bit scabious (Succisa pratensis), contributing to the habitat's biodiversity value. Geologically, the site exposes sections through deposits, including layered chalk rubble and turf stacks from the mound's prehistoric construction, offering insights into earthwork techniques and the underlying Kennet Valley geology. Management of the SSSI focuses on sustaining the through controlled by , which prevents overgrowth of coarser and maintains open conditions for rare plants. Ongoing addresses risks from and visitor proximity, ensuring the preservation of both ecological integrity and geological exposures without compromising the site's attributes.

Modern Protection Efforts

Silbury Hill has been under the guardianship of since 2000, when the organization assumed responsibility for its care as part of the complex within the Stonehenge, and Associated Sites . To ensure safety following structural concerns, including a significant in 2000 that exposed voids from earlier excavations, public access has been restricted to the base perimeter path, with climbing the mound actively discouraged through fencing and signage to prevent further and damage. A major intervention occurred between 2007 and 2008, when English Heritage, in collaboration with engineering firm Skanska, undertook a comprehensive stabilization project costing £1.66 million to address the 2000 summit crater and internal voids caused by historical tunnels. The works involved reopening and recording the 1968 Atkinson tunnel using high-resolution photography and remote filming, followed by refilling voids and the 85-meter tunnel with 1,465 tonnes of chalk to restore structural integrity, alongside limited summit excavations that yielded environmental samples and artifacts for analysis. This effort not only repaired immediate damage but also advanced understanding of the mound's construction phases. In 2025, reopened its upgraded Fort Cumberland Laboratories, enhancing facilities for analyzing stored samples from the 2007–2008 project, including the installation of a and energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM-EDS) to examine thin layers for and preservation insights. Ongoing challenges include from increased and foot , managed through restrictions, turf reseeding, and hardened pathways, while monitoring addresses flood risks via warning systems and regular site surveys. These strategies are integrated into the broader management framework, coordinated by the Stonehenge and Avebury Partnership Panel, which emphasizes landscape-scale protection, mitigation along the road, and to sustain the monument's integrity.

References

  1. [1]
    Silbury Hill, Avebury | English Heritage
    ### Summary of Silbury Hill
  2. [2]
    Silbury Hill: a monumental Neolithic mound west of the River Kennet ...
    A monumental Neolithic mound west of the River Kennet and south of Avebury village. Listed on the National Heritage List for England.
  3. [3]
    Research on Silbury Hill | English Heritage
    Radiocarbon dating of the archaeological material has also made it possible to put specific dates to the various episodes of construction. The results of ...
  4. [4]
    The world recreated: redating Silbury Hill in its monumental landscape
    Jan 2, 2015 · Presenting a new edition of thirty radiocarbon dates ... Fort Cumberland, Portsmouth: English Heritage Research and Standards Department ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Silbury Hill - Wiltshire, England - Sacred Destinations
    Coordinates: 51.415703° N, 1.857505° W. Address: A4 between Beckhampton ... Map of Silbury Hill, Wiltshire. Below is a location map and aerial view of ...
  6. [6]
    Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites
    At Avebury, the massive Henge, containing the largest prehistoric stone circle in the world, and Silbury Hill, the largest prehistoric mound in Europe, ...
  7. [7]
    History of Silbury Hill | English Heritage
    Silbury Hill is the largest artificial prehistoric mound in Europe. Probably built over a short period between about 2470 and 2350 BC.Missing: Valley Marlborough Downs<|control11|><|separator|>
  8. [8]
    Aerial view showing geomorphological location of Silbury Hill ...
    Silbury Hill is constructed on a spur of chalk protruding from the southern slope of the Kennet valley (Fig. 1). The edge of the valley and toe of the slope ...
  9. [9]
    The many faces of Silbury Hill - Current Archaeology
    Aug 8, 2014 · As the monument rests directly on clay soil, the turf must have been carefully stripped away before construction began. The bare soil was then ...
  10. [10]
    An Environmental History of the Upper Kennet Valley, Wiltshire, for ...
    Feb 18, 2014 · In the lower part of the study area at West Overton there was also an earlier Holocene land surface but there were locally streams and swamps, ...
  11. [11]
    Directions to Silbury Hill, Avebury | English Heritage
    1 mile west of West Kennett on A4 SAT NAV Postcode : SN8 1QH Latitude : 51.416476 Longtitude : -1.855662 Bus Access Stagecoach in Swindon service 49 passes ...Missing: coordinates | Show results with:coordinates
  12. [12]
    West Kennet Avenue, Avebury - English Heritage
    West Kennet Avenue is a 1 1/2 mile avenue of prehistoric stones, a ritual link, and part of the Avebury World Heritage Site, open during daylight hours.Missing: connected | Show results with:connected
  13. [13]
    Description of Silbury Hill | English Heritage
    Silbury Hill stands over 30 metres high and 160 metres wide. It is not entirely circular, but has a series of straight construction lines at the bottom.Missing: height diameter volume
  14. [14]
    Geoarchaeological Analysis from Silbury Hill Excavations 2007/2008
    Jul 21, 2011 · The archaeological recording carried out at Silbury Hill during the repair works in 2007/8 is reported in Leary (2009).
  15. [15]
    The Evolution of Silbury Hill: The Prehistoric Phases - ResearchGate
    Feb 1, 2017 · The prehistoric sequence recorded during the English Heritage archaeological investigations is described here, providing a fresh interpretation ...Missing: composition scholarly
  16. [16]
    Prehistoric Silbury Hill 'was built in layers' - BBC News
    Oct 26, 2010 · English Heritage archaeologists believe Silbury Hill in Wiltshire was built quickly in a series of layers.
  17. [17]
    A Reanalysis of the Antler Assemblage Excavated from Silbury Hill ...
    Jul 21, 2011 · This report presents a reanalysis of the antler assemblage recovered from Silbury Hill during excavations between 1968 and 1970.
  18. [18]
    None
    ### Summary of Construction Details for Silbury Hill
  19. [19]
    Silbury Hill - The Pegasus Archive
    This completed the Silbury I phase, and the construction of Silbury II proceeded without any noticeable delay. Chalk blocks were cut and dressed over the mound, ...
  20. [20]
    Reconstruction illustration depicting a section of the vertical shaft ...
    Reconstruction illustration depicting a section of the vertical shaft excavated into Silbury Hill in 1776, under the supervision of Colonel Edward Drax.
  21. [21]
    The Ancient History of Wiltshire - Sir Richard Colt Hoare
    Title, The Ancient History of Wiltshire, Volume 2. Classical county histories · The Ancient History of Wiltshire, Sir Richard Colt Hoare, ISBN 0854096191, ...
  22. [22]
    Diary of a Dean: Being an Account of the Examination of Silbury Hill ...
    Diary of a Dean: Being an Account of the Examination of Silbury Hill, and of Various Barrows and Other Earthworks on the Downs of North Wilts, ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] RESEARCH NEWS - Historic England
    Silbury Hill has been dug into from the 18th century, if not before. In 1776 a shaft was sunk from the top of the hill by Colonel Drax, and in 1849 Dean ...
  24. [24]
    Silbury Hill's Anglo-Saxon makeover - BBC News
    Oct 30, 2010 · ... excavation of a tunnel dug between 1968 and 1970 by the archaeologist Richard Atkinson. The Atkinson dig was followed in a series of ...
  25. [25]
    Mysteries remain sealed inside Silbury Hill | Art and design
    Oct 25, 2007 · The dank chill tunnel slopes down through 4,400 years of history into the heart of a mystery. The ground is slippery underfoot with sodden chalk ...
  26. [26]
    Silbury Hill: A last look inside - Current Archaeology
    Jan 17, 2008 · English Heritage gets stuck in ... The most recent work started in May 2007 with the opening of the original tunnels. The portal of the original ...
  27. [27]
    Silbury Hill. The largest prehistoric mound in Europe. - ResearchGate
    Dec 3, 2016 · Silbury Hill, the largest prehistoric mound in Europe, has long been an enigma. Set within the chalk downlands of the Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage ...
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Summary - DOI
    Pollen analysis suggests that at a regional scale primary woodland had been superseded by secondary woodland in the past; and the wider environment of the ...Missing: human skull clearance
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Part 2: Period-based Assessments
    aeological analysis from Silbury Hill excavations. 2007/2008. Environmental ... Silbury Hill, Wiltshire: pollen studies undertaken as part of the 2007 ...
  31. [31]
    History of West Kennet Long Barrow | English Heritage
    ### Summary of West Kennet Long Barrow
  32. [32]
    Marlborough mound mystery solved – after 4400 years - The Guardian
    May 31, 2011 · Marlborough, at two-thirds the height of Silbury, now becomes the second largest prehistoric mound in Britain; it may yet be confirmed as the ...
  33. [33]
    The Carnac Landscape - Oxford Academic - Oxford University Press
    Abstract. This chapter examines the landscape of the small coastal town of Carnac in southern Brittany, the largest burial mound in western France.
  34. [34]
    Devil Folklore | Historic England
    According to folklore the hill is said to have been dropped by the Devil who was carrying earth to bury the whole village of Avebury. The priest of Avebury ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  35. [35]
    Avebury And The Ridgeway | Order Of Bards, Ovates & Druids
    Feb 11, 2020 · Both John Aubrey in the 17th century and William Stukeley in the 18th century made Avebury their study and their careful plans preserved the ...
  36. [36]
    Silbury Hill and West Kennet Long Barrow - TimeTravel-Britain.com
    Just south of Avebury, and generally considered part of the overall Avebury temple "complex," stands Silbury Hill. In a county full of prehistoric "mosts," ...
  37. [37]
    Virginia Zimmerman, “On Accidental Archaeology” | BRANCH
    Her poem on Silbury Hill was published in the Wiltshire Archaeological Magazine in 1854 but was then forgotten until it was uncovered in 1969. In the poem, ...Missing: 19th | Show results with:19th
  38. [38]
    Giant Mound Is Like an Underground Stonehenge
    Feb 12, 2008 · Silbury Hill ... And it is not, despite the folklore, a dumping ground for the devil's dirt, forced to drop there by the magic of priests.Missing: medieval Zel
  39. [39]
    Entering, and returning from, the underworld: reconstituting Silbury ...
    May 6, 2009 · Entering, and returning from, the underworld: reconstituting Silbury Hill by combining a quantified landscape phenomenology with ...
  40. [40]
    Exploring Avebury - Bradshaw Foundation
    The world's biggest stone circle is just one element of a Neolithic 'monumental landscape' that ranges over many miles of rolling downland.Missing: wetlands | Show results with:wetlands
  41. [41]
    (PDF) Silbury Hill: a monument in motion - ResearchGate
    Sep 14, 2016 · Introduction. On the 29 May 2000 a hole 2.25m wide and 13m deep appeared on the top of Silbury Hill, the. enormous earthen mound situated in ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Part One - Stonehenge & Avebury World Heritage Site
    The Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site was inscribed in 1986. Located in the county of Wiltshire, it is in two parts, some 40km apart ...
  43. [43]
    Geoarchaeological studies associated with remedial measures at ...
    Silbury Hill, near Marlborough, Wiltshire, UK, is one of the largest prehistoric mounds in Europe, characterised by uncertain structure and unusual burial ...Missing: geophysical | Show results with:geophysical
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Part Two - Key management issues and opportunities
    the Silbury Hill SSSI can still be grazed to maintain the notified chalk ... match livestock to grazing, could be explored.92. 8.4.10 Whilst it is ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Management Plan 2015 Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites ...
    ... area focused on the great Henge and Stone Circles and includes Silbury Hill, the largest prehistoric man-made mound in Europe. Other key monuments include ...
  46. [46]
    Work to stabilise Silbury Hill completed | The Wiltshire Gazette and ...
    May 6, 2008 · Dr Amanda Chadburn, Inspector of Ancient Monuments at English Heritage said: "Silbury Hill ... Horseshoe Vetch." The iconic artificial Neolithic ...
  47. [47]
    Historic England's Science Facility Reopens After Major Refit
    Jun 10, 2025 · Projects have included the re-excavation of Silbury Hill, conserving artefacts from the 18th-century Dutch warship the Rooswijk, and the ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] climate change risk assessment
    Recent heavy and prolonged precipitation has led to flooding in Avebury village and around Silbury Hill. This could potentially threaten the current museum ...