Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Simon Cameron


Simon Cameron (March 8, 1799 – June 26, 1889) was an American businessman, banker, and politician who served as the 21st United States Secretary of War under President Abraham Lincoln from March 1861 to January 1862 and as a United States Senator from Pennsylvania for three non-consecutive terms (1845–1849, 1857–1861, and 1867–1877).
Born in Maytown, Pennsylvania, to Scotch-Irish immigrant parents, Cameron apprenticed as a printer in his youth before entering finance as a clerk and eventually founding a successful banking house in Harrisburg; he later expanded into railroads and other enterprises, amassing considerable wealth that funded his political ambitions.
Initially aligned with the Democratic Party, Cameron shifted to the Republicans amid sectional tensions over slavery, playing a pivotal role in securing Lincoln's 1860 presidential nomination through Pennsylvania's delegation at the Republican convention.
His tenure as Secretary of War involved rapid expansion of Union military procurement amid the Civil War's outbreak, but it was marred by widespread allegations of graft, inefficiency, and favoritism in awarding contracts to allies, culminating in a congressional censure and his replacement by Edwin M. Stanton in early 1862.
Returning to the Senate, Cameron wielded influence through a patronage-based political machine in Pennsylvania that dominated state Republican affairs, often prioritizing loyalty and deal-making over policy reform, and he retired in 1877 after grooming his son J. Donald Cameron as successor.

Early Life and Business Beginnings

Childhood and Family Background

Simon Cameron was born on March 8, 1799, in Maytown, a small community in , then part of Donegal Township. He was the third of eight children born to Charles Cameron, a struggling of Scottish descent whose family had emigrated from generations earlier, and his wife Pfoutz Cameron. The Cameron household endured persistent economic hardship, with Charles supporting the large family through intermittent tailoring and farming work amid rural Pennsylvania's limited opportunities in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Cameron's formal education was minimal, consisting of basic instruction in reading and before economic pressures intervened; much of his literacy developed through self-directed effort. At around age nine, following his father's death in January 1811—which left the family in debt and scattered the children to board with relatives or others—Cameron was apprenticed to a printer in , initially performing menial tasks like "" before gaining exposure to and editorial work. This early immersion in the printing trade provided incidental access to newspapers, books, and commercial networks, marking the onset of his self-reliant path amid the family's dissolution. By age 14, Cameron had achieved sufficient independence to leave the apprenticeship and seek clerking roles in local stores, leveraging nascent skills in and record-keeping honed from household necessities.

Entry into Business and Finance

In 1826, Cameron initiated construction of a section of the along the , capitalizing on the state's early efforts to enhance transportation and commerce. This venture marked his entry into large-scale projects amid Pennsylvania's push for canals and waterways in the . By the early 1830s, Cameron shifted focus to , founding the Bank of Middletown in 1832 and serving as its commissioner and inaugural cashier, a role he held until 1850. The bank, located near Harrisburg, provided capital for regional enterprises and reflected his acumen in leveraging local deposits for expansion during a period of economic volatility. He also acquired interests in banks in both Middletown and Harrisburg, diversifying his financial holdings to mitigate risks in the emerging banking sector. Cameron's investments extended to railroads as Pennsylvania transitioned from canals to rail in the 1830s and 1840s. He played a key role in developing the Lancaster and Harrisburg Railroad and founded the , of which he became president, linking central to and facilitating freight and passenger growth. These projects, funded partly through his banking resources, underscored his strategic positioning in the state's infrastructure boom, yielding substantial returns from contracts and operations without reliance on direct government subsidies. Additionally, he engaged in iron production, including investments in facilities like the Lochiel Iron Works, which supported industrial demands tied to transportation development. Through these interconnected pursuits in banking, canals, railroads, and , Cameron amassed significant wealth by the mid-1840s, demonstrating pragmatic of opportunities and demands. His approach emphasized scalable ventures in Pennsylvania's economic expansion, prioritizing financial leverage over speculative excess.

Initial Political Involvement

Newspaper and State Roles

In the 1820s, Simon Cameron leveraged his experience as a printer's apprentice to enter politics via , acquiring and editing a Harrisburg that served as a platform for advancing Jacksonian Democratic principles, including support for Andrew Jackson's presidential campaigns and policies favoring limited federal government and . This reflected the era's press landscape, where newspapers functioned less as neutral reporters and more as advocacy organs to cultivate political loyalty and influence among readers and party operatives. Cameron's administrative roles deepened his state-level clout. Appointed of in 1830 by George A. , he oversaw organization amid growing state infrastructure demands, earning the enduring nickname "General." From 1833 to 1838, he served as under Democratic administrations, managing fiscal operations including allocations for the Pennsylvania Canal system, which faced legislative audits over fund disbursements and contracting amid economic pressures from the Panic of 1837. These positions, secured through party patronage, allowed Cameron to forge alliances with business interests in banking and transportation while navigating accusations of favoritism in public expenditures, though no formal charges resulted. By the late 1850s, amid national debates over slavery's expansion, Cameron diverged from orthodox Democrats, embracing anti-slavery positions aligned with northern economic priorities like free labor to sustain industrial and rail growth, briefly affiliating with the Party before joining the Republicans in 1856. This pragmatic evolution, rooted in Pennsylvania's manufacturing base rather than ideological , underscored his use of media and state offices to adapt to shifting coalitions for sustained influence.

First U.S. Senate Term (1845–1849)

Cameron was elected to the United States Senate on March 13, 1845, by the Democratic-controlled Pennsylvania General Assembly to fill the vacancy created by James Buchanan's resignation upon becoming President James K. Polk's Secretary of State. As a Democrat representing Pennsylvania's industrial interests, he aligned with Polk's expansionist agenda, including support for the annexation of Texas and the ensuing Mexican-American War, which commenced in May 1846 following disputes over the Texas border. In the , Cameron chaired the Committee on Patents and the and the Committee on Public Buildings during the 29th Congress (1845–1847), and later the Committee on the District of Columbia (29th–30th Congresses) and the Committee on Printing (30th Congress, 1847–1849). His legislative record emphasized pragmatic , particularly on trade policy; he opposed the Walker Tariff of 1846, which substantially reduced duties from the protective levels of the Tariff of 1842, prioritizing Pennsylvania's manufacturing sector over Polk's revenue-focused reductions. Regarding territorial expansion, Cameron backed efforts to limit slavery's extension into new lands acquired from , voting in favor of versions of the introduced in the , an early signal of his divergence from strict pro-Southern Democratic orthodoxy on the issue. Cameron's term concluded on March 3, 1849, without renomination amid intensifying factional strife within Pennsylvania's —exacerbated by rivalries between pro-Buchanan and anti-administration groups—and the Party's push to claim the seat following their state legislative gains. He received no votes in the January 1849 legislative balloting, prompting a return to private enterprises in banking, railroads, and , where he continued building his influence ahead of future political opportunities.

Mid-Career Maneuvers

Treasury Secretary Nomination and Rejection

In early 1857, following James Buchanan's inauguration as president, Simon Cameron positioned himself as a frontrunner for the position of Secretary of the Treasury, leveraging his influence in Democratic politics and prior service. However, prospective support faltered amid renewed scrutiny from rivals over alleged financial irregularities during his tenure as around 1833, including unproven claims of improper handling of public funds tied to his banking interests. No formal charges were ever brought, and Cameron defended his record with legislative certificates affirming proper accounting, yet the controversy—exacerbated by the 1838–1839 Winnebago Indian claims scandal, where he faced accusations of fraudulently substituting $60,000 in Middletown Bank notes for specie payments—fueled opposition from figures like W. Forney. The impasse highlighted fractures within the , as Cameron's opportunism clashed with Buchanan's preference for loyalists untainted by factionalism; Buchanan, a former Cameron ally turned critic, opted instead for of , avoiding a confirmation battle that could have derailed his administration's start. Cameron's exclusion, cleared of wrongdoing in prior probes like the judicial review by Judge Fleming affirming his integrity in the Winnebago matter, nonetheless burnished his image as a resilient deal-maker adept at pivoting amid adversity. This episode underscored his pattern of navigating scandals through personal networks rather than ideological purity, setting the stage for his subsequent realignment toward emerging anti-slavery factions by reinforcing perceptions of pragmatic self-interest over party orthodoxy.

Political Realignment and Second Senate Term (1857–1861)

Cameron's departure from the occurred in 1854 amid opposition to the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which permitted 's expansion into territories previously designated as free under the of 1820. This shift reflected broader economic interests, where industrialists and free laborers sought to bar from western territories to preserve competitive wages and markets unthreatened by coerced southern labor. Joining the emerging coalition, Cameron aligned with its free-soil principles, emphasizing territorial restriction of without advocating immediate abolition in existing states. In January 1857, the Pennsylvania General Assembly elected Cameron to the U.S. Senate as a Republican, securing a narrow legislative majority over Democratic rival William Bigler despite charges of bribery and procedural irregularities in the vote canvassing. Democrats protested his seating, filing petitions on March 6, 1857, alleging corrupt influence had swayed key legislators. A Senate committee investigated, finding insufficient evidence of bribery but noting minor violations; it recommended seating Cameron based on his majority election by the state's constitutional process. On March 13, 1857, the Senate affirmed his legitimacy by a vote of 44 to 16, prioritizing the electorate's expressed will over disputed tactics. During his term, Cameron supported measures advancing free labor, including repeated homestead bills that proposed granting 160-acre parcels to settlers in public lands, countering southern resistance to such "squatter sovereignty" expansions. He opposed the pro-slavery for in 1857–1858, rejecting its fraudulent ratification process and the subsequent English Bill compromise that would have admitted as a slave with delayed popular review. In Senate debates, Cameron argued against endorsing flawed territorial frameworks that undermined free-soil settlement, aligning with moderate s wary of both southern and radical . These positions helped him cultivate ties with anti-Seward factions in the party, fostering pragmatic coalitions in and nationally.

Involvement in the 1860 Republican Convention

Simon Cameron served as the leader of Pennsylvania's to the , held in , , from May 16 to 18. As a U.S. senator, Cameron commanded the votes of the state's 52 delegates, representing the second-most populous state in the Union and wielding significant leverage in the multi-ballot contest for the presidential . On the first ballot, the delegation 50 votes for Cameron himself as a favorite-son candidate, contributing to his total of 50.5 votes nationwide, while four Pennsylvania delegates supported ; William H. led with 173.5 votes, and 233 were needed for . Facing a , Cameron directed the delegation to shift its support to on the second ballot, where delivered 48 votes to him, reducing Cameron's remaining support to just two and elevating Lincoln's total from 102 to 181 votes, though Seward still edged ahead at 184.5. This maneuver reflected Cameron's pragmatic assessment that Lincoln offered better electability in key states like and , balancing moderate and radical factions against Seward's perceived extremism, which risked alienating voters in the October state elections. By the third ballot, with Cameron's votes withdrawn, Lincoln secured the nomination with 233.5 votes after minor additional shifts. Cameron's bargaining with Lincoln's managers, including a commitment to Pennsylvania's influence in the incoming administration, facilitated the switch and underscored his focus on securing the state's political machine's position over advancing his own unsuccessful presidential bid. This deal prioritized causal factors like regional unity and winnability in the general election, enabling Lincoln's nomination without fracturing the party along ideological lines. The outcome empirically strengthened prospects, as Pennsylvania's endorsement proved crucial to Lincoln's subsequent victory in the Keystone State, carrying it by a of 60,000 votes out of over 500,000 cast.

Secretary of War During the

Appointment by

Simon Cameron's appointment as Secretary of War stemmed from a political bargain forged at the in , where he controlled Pennsylvania's delegation as a favorite-son candidate. Initially supporting , Cameron redirected the state's 52 votes to on the convention's fourth ballot, tipping the balance toward Lincoln's nomination after promises of a post to secure Pennsylvania's pivotal electoral support in the general election. This reflected Lincoln's strategy of coalition-building amid factional rivalries, prioritizing state loyalty in the face of impending over personal preferences. Lincoln met with Cameron in on February 28 and March 1, 1861, before formally him to the War Department on March 5, the day after his own . The confirmed the despite widespread criticism of Cameron's reputation for machine and alleged , which drew objections from figures including and , who viewed him as unfit for high office. justified the choice by emphasizing Cameron's organizational acumen from decades in railroading and banking, assets deemed essential for logistical startup in a without established , rather than prior command experience which Cameron lacked. The appointment underscored pragmatic realism in cabinet formation, rewarding key allies to unify the party and states like , whose industrial base would prove critical for mobilization. In a special message to on May 26, 1862, defended Cameron's initial handling of war preparations against , highlighting effective early procurement and recruitment efforts that laid groundwork amid the Confederacy's aggression. This endorsement affirmed the administration's initial confidence in Cameron's role before subsequent challenges emerged.

Organizational Achievements and War Mobilization

Under Cameron's direction as Secretary of War, the underwent unprecedented expansion in the war's opening months, transitioning from a peacetime of about 16,000 soldiers to authorizing and mustering hundreds of thousands of volunteers following Lincoln's April 1861 calls for 75,000 then 500,000 troops. By September 1861, this effort had integrated substantial state-raised units into federal service, with Cameron coordinating points at cities like , , and Elmira for organization and equipping. He initiated federal oversight of , including early control of railroads and telegraphs to facilitate troop movements and communications, recruiting Pennsylvania Railroad executive to establish a dedicated transportation and telegraph bureau in May 1861. To address initial supply shortages, Cameron expanded the Quartermaster Department, directing it to procure and distribute uniforms, transportation, and other non-combat essentials for both federal and state militia units, while establishing depots to centralize amid decentralized state efforts. This included authorizing production runs for state militias and coordinating with governors to outfit troops before full federal systems matured, helping sustain field operations despite early chaos from Bull Run and rapid influxes. On arms procurement, facing acute rifle and musket shortages, Cameron facilitated state-federal collaboration, enabling governors to purchase abroad and domestically while the Ordnance Bureau ramped up contracts, contributing to increased output from U.S. armories and private firms by late 1861. In his December 1, 1861, , Cameron advocated employing freed slaves in military roles, recommending their organization into regiments as engineers, laborers, or armed combatants to bolster strength, a position that presaged later policies but drew immediate suppression from to avoid alienating border states. This reflected Cameron's push for pragmatic manpower solutions amid mobilization strains, though the report's full text on this was excised before congressional submission.

Procurement Practices and Patronage

Cameron's procurement methods emphasized expediency in the face of urgent military needs after the April 12, 1861, Confederate attack on , relying on political appointees to bypass slow peacetime bureaucracies. He delegated significant authority for arms and supply purchases to allies such as Alexander Cummings, a newspaper editor and Democratic supporter, who was tasked with securing weapons from private vendors when federal arsenals proved inadequate. This approach incorporated practices, appointing loyalists to key and contracting roles to ensure rapid execution amid the Union's initial mobilization of over 75,000 volunteers by May 1861. Contracts for transportation and logistics were frequently directed to entities connected to Cameron's pre-war business networks, including the Northern Central Railroad, of which he had served as president and held financial interests; this line received priority for hauling troops and supplies from Harrisburg northward, while competitors like the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad obtained no such federal awards during his tenure. Such allocations reflected the era's reliance on established private infrastructure for emergency scaling, as the War Department lacked its own extensive rail or supply chains. Expenditures escalated dramatically under these practices; in fiscal year 1861 alone, the department disbursed roughly $100 million for supplies and soldier sustenance, part of broader appropriations that reached hundreds of millions by year's end to equip expanding armies. No contemporary records indicate direct personal financial gain to Cameron from these transactions, though favoritism toward associated firms drew scrutiny. In December 1861, the Joint Congressional Committee on the Conduct of the War initiated probes into War Department operations, including vendor contracts and irregularities, with inquiries centering on specific suppliers rather than Cameron's personal conduct. These investigations highlighted the decentralized, patronage-driven model as a response to wartime haste, though they documented instances of overpricing and poor-quality goods from awarded firms.

Resignation and Immediate Aftermath

Simon Cameron submitted his as Secretary of War on January 11, 1862, amid investigations into War Department procurement irregularities and cabinet disagreements over emancipation policy and patronage distribution. President Lincoln accepted the resignation the same day, first with a brief note acknowledging prior discussions of Cameron's private affairs, followed by a public letter praising his "eminent ability and singular success" in army mobilization to temper criticism. Lincoln nominated Edwin M. Stanton, a former Buchanan administration who had served as Cameron's legal advisor, to succeed him on January 13, 1862; Stanton was confirmed by the on January 15 and assumed immediately, bringing rigorous oversight to departmental operations. Concurrently, nominated Cameron as Minister to on January 13, a move confirmed by the on March 12, 1862, offering a diplomatic distant from scrutiny. The triggered swift political repercussions, including a House of Representatives on April 30, 1862, condemning Cameron's delegation of contract authority to private agents as "highly injurious to the " and contrary to congressional intent. This action, passed 75 to 45, underscored national distrust but did not dismantle Cameron's entrenched machine, which sustained his regional clout through loyal operatives and patronage networks despite temporary exile.

Post-War Diplomatic and Political Roles

Minister to (1862–1863)

President nominated Simon Cameron as Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary to on January 17, 1862, shortly after Cameron's resignation as Secretary of War, with confirmation following soon thereafter. Cameron delayed his departure from the until May 1862 to avoid winter travel in , arriving in St. Petersburg and presenting his credentials on June 25, 1862, succeeding Cassius M. Clay. His mission coincided with the early phases of the , during which he aimed to encourage neutrality favorable to the or potential material support, though these efforts yielded no substantive commitments or aid from the . On the day of his credentials presentation, Cameron met with Tsar Alexander II, conveying American appreciation for Russia's 1861 emancipation of serfs and drawing parallels to the Union's antislavery objectives amid the ongoing conflict. The discussion highlighted shared reformist themes but did not lead to policy alignments or joint actions. Beyond this audience, Cameron's tenure involved routine diplomatic maintenance, with no major treaties negotiated and relations proceeding without entanglement in American belligerent affairs; Russia upheld strict neutrality throughout the war, occasionally expressing sympathy for the Union but providing no direct assistance during his posting. Cameron's service lasted less than a year, marked by extensive personal travel across rather than sustained engagement in St. Petersburg. He departed in 1862 to accompany his , whose health necessitated return to the , after William Seward denied his request for a to influence Pennsylvania's midterm elections. The mission formally terminated in February 1863, reflecting Cameron's dissatisfaction with diplomatic isolation from domestic political opportunities.

Return to the Senate: Third Term (1867–1873)

The Pennsylvania General Assembly elected Simon Cameron to a third term in the United States Senate on January 15, 1867, with 81 votes against 47 for incumbent Edgar A. Cowan, reflecting strict party-line adherence amid Republican dominance in the legislature. Cameron was sworn into office on March 4, 1867, resuming his role in a body deeply divided over Reconstruction policies following the Civil War. Throughout his term, Cameron aligned closely with President and the Republican majority, supporting congressional efforts to reshape the South through military and constitutional amendments. He voted to convict during the 1868 impeachment trial, endorsing charges that the president violated the Tenure of Office Act by dismissing Secretary of War , a position shared by most Republicans seeking to assert legislative control over executive appointments. This stance underscored Cameron's backing of radical measures, including the of 1867, which divided former Confederate states into five military districts and mandated new state constitutions guaranteeing black male and ratification of the as prerequisites for readmission to the Union. Cameron advocated readmitting Southern states only after stringent safeguards, such as loyalty oaths for officeholders and protections against disenfranchisement of freedmen, balancing punitive oversight with pragmatic reintegration to stabilize . He served on the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations from 1867, becoming its chairman on March 10, 1871, where he addressed international disputes including lingering Civil War-related claims against . His committee leadership involved reviewing treaties and nominations, maintaining a focus on U.S. interests amid European powers' postwar maneuvering, though specific actions like initial opposition to certain treaty provisions highlighted his cautious approach to foreign entanglements. This period solidified Cameron's role as a loyalist, countering emerging intraparty challenges from Liberal Republicans critical of expansive federal intervention.

Fourth Term and Resignation (1873–1877)

Cameron was reelected to the by the in January 1873, beginning his fourth term on March 4, 1873, and extending his service until his resignation four years later. In the 1876 presidential election, Cameron supported candidate against Democrat amid widespread disputes over electoral votes in several Southern states. As a key figure in Pennsylvania's organization, Cameron's backing helped maintain party unity and contributed to strategies that culminated in the , where Hayes secured the presidency in exchange for concessions including the end of federal in the . Following Hayes's March 4, 1877, inauguration and his decision not to retain James Donald Cameron—Simon's son and outgoing Secretary of War under President Grant—Simon Cameron resigned his Senate seat on March 12, 1877. The Pennsylvania legislature immediately elected J. Donald Cameron to the vacancy, executing a deliberate succession that preserved the family's political dominance in the state. This maneuver also reflected Cameron's partial dissatisfaction with Hayes's emerging Southern policy, though it capped his long career by prioritizing dynastic continuity over personal tenure.

Building the Pennsylvania Political Machine

Strategies and Key Allies

Cameron's core strategy centered on securing legislative control to distribute , rewarding allies with state appointments, judgeships, and federal positions funneled through 's congressional delegation after his 1867 return. This system, rebuilt from a cadre of prewar contacts, emphasized binding local leaders in counties like and to deliver votes in exchange for offices, sustaining machine loyalty without relying on ideological appeals alone. By the late , this web enabled dominance over the state organization, funding operations through assessments on officeholders—typically 2-5% of salaries—and reciprocal business favors. In party conventions, Cameron's operatives packed delegations by influencing primary-like county meetings, ensuring machine candidates outnumbered reformers; this tactical edge defeated rivals, as seen in the 1867 U.S. Senate election where Cameron secured the legislature's vote on January 15 over Andrew G. Curtin's faction after protracted deadlocks and bargaining with holdout assemblymen. Such maneuvers responded to post-Civil War challenges, including immigrant influxes in and , by organizing door-to-door canvassing and drives tied to job promises, locking in Republican majorities that averaged 50,000-vote gubernatorial wins from 1868 onward. Key allies included Matthew Stanley Quay, who aligned with Cameron by 1867 as a Beaver County operative, rising to handle convention logistics and election-day operations by the , preserving the machine's structure after Cameron's semi-retirement. Henry W. Oliver, a steel and rail magnate, bolstered western support with campaign funds and worker mobilization, culminating in Cameron's unsuccessful 1873 push to elect him to the before independent bolting forced a compromise. These partnerships with industrialists integrated economic leverage, supplying resources for delegate hotels and transport during conventions, which cemented the machine's hold on Pennsylvania's GOP for decades.

Influence on State and National Politics

Cameron's solidified dominance in , delivering the state's electoral votes to GOP presidential nominees from in 1860 through in 1880, with margins including 52.1% for Lincoln in 1860, 56.0% in 1864, 52.8% for in 1868, 53.7% in 1872, 50.9% for in 1876, and 50.3% for Garfield in 1880. This control countered entrenched Democratic influences in industrial and urban areas, sustaining legislative majorities that elected U.S. senators and governors, such as in 1860 and in 1868. The machine's structure, reliant on distribution and local cadre loyalty, ensured turnout and vote coordination across the state's 27 electoral votes in 1860—the second-largest bloc after New York's—making a linchpin for national victories. At the national level, the machine's leverage extended through 's delegation at conventions, brokering support for key nominees including in 1868, whose nomination benefited from coordinated state backing amid factional rivalries. Cameron's organization modeled patronage-driven bossism for other states, emphasizing disciplined voting blocs over overt scandal while channeling funds from allied business interests—such as railroads and banking—to underwrite campaigns and offset Democratic organizational efforts. This approach secured GOP presidential successes by prioritizing electoral reliability in swing states like , where the machine's outcomes directly contributed to Union-aligned majorities during .

Controversies and Corruption Allegations

Early Scandals: Winnebago Affair and Others

In 1838, Simon Cameron was appointed by President as one of two federal commissioners, alongside James , to investigate and settle claims by the Winnebago Indians under the terms of the 1837 treaty that ceded their lands in . The commission's duties involved classifying individual claims for annuities and reimbursements, totaling approximately $270,000 in payments, but allegations quickly arose that Cameron and engaged in irregularities by arbitrarily downgrading higher-value claims, favoring certain claimants, and settling balances through promissory notes drawn on Cameron's own Harrisburg bank, which yielded interest benefits to his institution. These practices prompted contemporary criticisms, including a decrying "frauds practised by the first commission" and partisan Democratic attacks portraying Cameron as exploiting Native American vulnerabilities for personal gain, earning him the mocking epithet "The Great Winnebago Chief." A committee examined the matter around the time of Cameron's 1845 election to fill James Buchanan's vacated seat, identifying procedural irregularities in claim adjustments and payments but finding insufficient evidence for criminal , resulting in no or disqualification. Historians have since characterized the accusations as unsubstantiated maneuvers by and rival Democratic factions amid Pennsylvania's fluid party alignments, with no legal penalties imposed on Cameron, who proceeded to serve his term unhindered. Earlier, during Cameron's tenure as state treasurer from 1831 to 1835, probes by legislative committees alleged shortages in state funds under his oversight, attributed to lax and investments in depreciated bonds. These claims, totaling around $20,000 in discrepancies, were resolved through Cameron posting personal bonds and subsequent audits confirming repayment without establishing personal , though opponents leveraged the episode to question his fiscal integrity in broadsides. No prosecutions followed, and the incidents reflected broader banking instability rather than proven malfeasance, as evidenced by the absence of judicial findings against him. Such pre-Civil War scandals, while damaging Cameron's reputation temporarily and fueling attacks during his 1844 bid, demonstrated a of allegations dismissed without , often amplified by Democratic rivals in 's competitive .

War Department Investigations

In July 1861, shortly after the onset of the Civil War, the U.S. House of Representatives established the Select Committee on Government Contracts, chaired by Elihu B. Washburne, to probe War Department procurement practices amid reports of irregularities. The committee's investigations revealed widespread vendor frauds, including the supply of diseased and aged horses, rotten blankets, tainted pork, defective uniforms that disintegrated in rain, discarded Austrian muskets, and ammunition adulterated with sawdust instead of gunpowder. Specific cases highlighted overcharges, such as the resale of condemned Hall carbines—purchased by the government for $3.50 each and later repurchased at up to $22 each—and contracts awarded to intermediaries like Alexander B. Cummings, who expended approximately $21,000 on non-essential items including straw hats, linen pantaloons, Scotch ale, herring, pickles, and 75,000 pairs of overpriced shoes. The committee's 1,109-page documented Cameron's direct involvement in authorizing 1,839,000 of 1,903,000 arms contracts between August 1861 and January 1862, often bypassing competitive bidding in favor of politically connected vendors, including railroad associates. While these practices reflected patronage networks and expedited wartime purchasing justified by the urgency following , critics attributed systemic overcharges and poor-quality goods to Cameron's lax oversight, though no evidence emerged of direct personal by him. On April 30, 1862, the House passed a bipartisan censuring Cameron by an 80-45 vote (with 49 members absent), condemning his administrative acts as "highly injurious to the ," particularly for entrusting funds to unreliable agents like Cummings and approving contracts tainted by favoritism. President responded on May 26, 1862, with a message to assuming shared responsibility for the department's emergency measures, arguing that the post-Sumter crisis necessitated rapid acquisitions without standard procedures and affirming Cameron's good intentions absent proof of . Following Cameron's replacement by Edwin M. Stanton in January 1862, Stanton's audits identified pervasive contractual flaws across the department—rather than isolated graft tied solely to Cameron—leading to the cancellation of dubious agreements and savings of $17 million for the federal government. subsequently mandated competitive bidding to curb future abuses.

Historical Debates and Modern Reassessments

In the late nineteenth century, contemporary newspapers and political opponents frequently depicted Simon Cameron as the archetype of the spoilsman, a ruthless manipulator who exemplified the era's patronage-driven politics through alleged , favoritism in contracts, and personal enrichment via public office. These portrayals, often amplified by Democratic rivals and reform-minded s, stemmed from partisan contests, such as the 1857 election where charges were raised but not substantiated by the investigating committee. No formal convictions resulted from these accusations, which critics used to assail Cameron's influence in Pennsylvania's organization. Modern biographical reassessments, particularly Paul Kahan's analysis, reframe Cameron's career within the normative practices of and Civil War-era , arguing that while scandals shadowed him, empirical evidence of personal corruption remains absent despite extensive scrutiny. Kahan contends that Cameron's distribution of appointments and contracts aligned with standard machine-building tactics essential for party cohesion, rather than deviating into provable graft, and that earlier historians overstated his by conflating political with criminality. This contextual approach highlights how systems, ubiquitous across parties, enabled rapid mobilization of resources and loyalty in pivotal states like , prioritizing functional outcomes over moralistic indictments. Causal examinations in recent scholarship attribute many allegations to strategic attacks by competitors—Democrats seeking to erode Republican dominance and anti-machine factions within the GOP aiming to dismantle Cameron's network—rather than verifiable malfeasance, with his organization's role in sustaining Union war efforts, including troop recruitment and supply logistics, providing a counterweight to unproven claims. These works challenge persistent narratives, sometimes rooted in progressive-era reform biases that broadly stigmatized Republican bosses as corrupt enablers of inequality, by emphasizing archival reviews showing Cameron's methods as adaptive to the decentralized, loyalty-dependent federal structure of the 1860s. Such reassessments underscore patronage's instrumental value in forging stable coalitions amid national crisis, subordinating individualized scandal-mongering to systemic realism.

Retirement, Death, and Personal Life

Final Years and Family

Following his resignation from the on March 12, 1877, Simon Cameron retired primarily to his estate at Donegal Springs in , while maintaining his residence in Harrisburg. His substantial wealth, derived from investments in banking, railroads, canals, and iron , afforded him a comfortable unburdened by financial concerns. Cameron had married Margaretta Brua on March 9, 1822; the couple raised several children, among them James Donald Cameron, whom Simon actively groomed for political succession by securing appointments and influence within Pennsylvania's machine. Other notable offspring included William Brua Cameron and Rachel Jane Cameron Burnside, though family scandals were minimal and largely overshadowed by Simon's public career. By the 1880s, Cameron's physical activities had notably declined owing to advanced age, limiting his engagements to occasional oversight of family interests rather than active involvement. His familial role emphasized patriarchal guidance, particularly in positioning to inherit his senatorial seat in 1877 and later the Secretary of War position under President Grant.

Death and Succession by Son

Simon Cameron died on June 26, 1889, at his Donegal Springs estate in , at the age of 90. His remains were transported by special train to Harrisburg for burial in Harrisburg Cemetery. Cameron's son, James Donald Cameron, had assumed his father's U.S. Senate seat in 1877 upon Simon's resignation and held it until 1897, thereby extending the family's control over Pennsylvania's political organization. This continuity preserved the machine's influence, as evidenced by J. Donald Cameron's repeated reelections and leadership in state affairs through the 1890s. The elder Cameron's estate, including properties and assets accumulated from banking, railroads, and politics, passed to J. Donald Cameron without recorded legal challenges to the will.

Legacy and Historical Assessment

Contributions to the Union Cause

Prior to the Civil War, Simon Cameron played a pivotal role in the Republican Party's 1860 presidential nomination process. As leader of Pennsylvania's delegation at the Chicago convention, Cameron initially positioned himself as a candidate but shifted support to Abraham Lincoln after negotiations secured his influence, tipping the balance on subsequent ballots to nominate the electable Illinoisan over rivals like William Seward. This kingmaking ensured a unified Republican ticket capable of winning the general election, preserving national momentum against secessionist threats. Appointed Secretary of War in March 1861, Cameron oversaw the 's initial military mobilization amid crisis. Following the Confederate attack on on April 12, 1861, he authorized the call-up of 75,000 three-month volunteers on April 15, rapidly expanding the regular army of approximately 16,000 into a force numbering over 186,000 by July. After the Union defeat at First Bull Run in July, he further requisitioned 500,000 three-year enlistees, establishing the framework for sustained and that sustained operations through 1861 chaos. Cameron's tenure advanced radical war measures, including early advocacy for arming . In his December 1861 annual report, he recommended employing contrabands as laborers and soldiers, authorizing General Thomas W. Sherman to organize black recruits in October and endorsing as a strategic imperative to bolster manpower. These positions prefigured the enlistment of 180,000 black troops by war's end, contributing causally to victories like those at Port Hudson and Milliken's Bend by expanding the army's effective strength. In Pennsylvania, Cameron's political organization maintained state loyalty, channeling its industrial capacity—producing nearly one-third of Union iron and critical coal for naval steamers—directly into materiel supply chains that equipped field armies. Postwar, as senator from 1867, he aligned with Radical Republicans to back Reconstruction legislation, including the Tenure of Office Act, securing Republican dominance in Southern readmission and preventing Democratic resurgence that could have undermined Union gains. His orchestration of a 1865 Harrisburg review honoring United States Colored Troops further symbolized commitment to integrated victory fruits.

Criticisms and Defenses

Criticisms of Simon Cameron centered on his extensive use of and perceived political , which rivals like Pennsylvania Governor Andrew G. Curtin portrayed as self-serving machine politics that prioritized personal networks over merit. Democrats frequently smeared him as emblematic of corruption, amplifying unproven rumors of financial impropriety to undermine his influence in state and national affairs. Even among Republicans, radical faction members expressed distrust toward Cameron's conservative leanings on issues like early in his career, viewing his pragmatic alliances as unreliable amid ideological divides. Defenses of Cameron emphasized the absence of formal convictions or substantiated of despite intense , attributing allegations to attacks rather than verifiable misconduct. President repeatedly endorsed him, appointing Cameron as Secretary of War in and later nominating him to the in after his , signaling in his administrative capabilities during wartime exigencies when rapid demanded flexible systems. Republican pragmatists argued that Cameron's methods, while excessive, sustained recruitment and supply chains effectively, contrasting with the inefficiencies of less politically adept alternatives. Modern historical reassessments contextualize Cameron's as a standard, if aggressive, feature of 19th-century party-building, where lack of proven graft and positive outcomes like Pennsylvania's steady mobilization outweigh rival-driven narratives of . Biographers note that while contemporaries labeled him a "wire-puller," his role in stabilizing political coalitions during the era demonstrated pragmatic efficacy absent in more ideologically rigid figures. ' initial wariness gave way to his later alignment with their efforts, underscoring defenses rooted in results over rhetoric.

Enduring Impact on American Politics

Cameron's machine exemplified a hierarchical organizational model that fortified GOP control in industrial states, enabling sustained dominance over Democratic urban ethnic coalitions through disciplined voter mobilization and . In , the epicenter of Northern manufacturing, this structure delivered reliable majorities from the onward, contributing to the party's national ascendancy by securing pivotal electoral votes in a state comprising over 10% of the U.S. population by 1870. The network central to Cameron's system, distributing thousands of federal and state positions, entrenched favoritism but concurrently curbed factional infighting by aligning incentives under a single leadership cadre, yielding greater electoral predictability than the decentralized chaos of pre-Civil War parties. Pennsylvania's post-1865 hegemony, unbroken for over seven decades, illustrates this stabilizing effect empirically, as the machine's control minimized intraparty revolts and maximized turnout in industrial counties. Succession to figures like extended the machine's influence, rendering a where organized partisan competition mirrored broader trends, though Progressive-era civil service expansions after 1883 eroded patronage's potency by the , fragmenting control. Cameron's framework nonetheless anticipated modern national party apparatuses by validating centralized coordination for enduring competitiveness amid industrialization.

References

  1. [1]
    CAMERON, Simon - Bioguide Search
    "The Deal for Philadelphia: Simon Cameron and the Genesis of a Political Machine, 1867-1872.'' Journal of the Lancaster County Historical Society 77 (Hilarymas ...
  2. [2]
    Biographical Directory of the U.S. Congress - Retro Member details
    Biography. CAMERON, SIMON, (Father of James Donald Cameron), a Senator from ... Cameron papers in the Historical Society of Dauphin County, Harrisburg, PA.
  3. [3]
    Simon Cameron | Pennsylvania Center for the Book
    Simon Cameron was born on March 8, 1799, in Maytown, Pennsylvania. After his father's premature death, Cameron was largely left to fend for himself.Missing: "historical | Show results with:"historical
  4. [4]
    Simon Cameron (1861–1862) - Miller Center
    Cameron served one year in the position before corruption and inefficiency in the department led to his removal from the cabinet. Lincoln then posted Cameron to ...
  5. [5]
    Cabinet and Vice Presidents: Simon Cameron (1799-1889)
    Always a master of political manipulation and patronage, Cameron set up the strong Pennsylvania Republican political machine—which was continued by his son, ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  6. [6]
    Simon Cameron, Lincoln's Scandalous Secretary of War", by Paul ...
    Sep 29, 2022 · Cameron occupied the post for less than a year, but he left his mark. Unsurprisingly, there were charges of corruption, as Cameron funneled ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Simon Cameron, ante-bellum years - Internet Archive
    American politics. To comprehend intellegently and appreciate fully the char- acter of Cameron ... Historical Society of Pennsylvania. James Buchanan Papers, ...
  8. [8]
    Cameron, Simon, 1799-1889 | BYU Library - Special Collections
    Simon Cameron (1799-1889) was an American ... He founded the Bank of Middletown in 1832. In ... Harrisburg Republican; commis. to settle claims of ...
  9. [9]
    Simon Cameron House and Bank, Middletown Borough, Dauphin ...
    Simon Cameron was the founder of the bank as well as the cashier. In 1833, Cameron built the structure adjoining the bank at 30 East Main Street. This ...
  10. [10]
    404 Not Found
    Insufficient relevant content. The URL (https://explorepahistory.com/hmarker.php?markerId=1-A-2BE.html) returns a "404 Not Found" error, indicating no accessible content is available to extract details about Simon Cameron's business career in the 1820s-1840s, including banking in Harrisburg, investments in railroads, banks, ironworks, or real estate.
  11. [11]
    https://explorepahistory.com/hmarker.php?markerId=1-A-3AD.html
  12. [12]
    Simon Cameron
    During the early 1820s, his family's financial misfortunes forced Cameron to work in printing and editing, an occupation that was closely tied to politics.Missing: house | Show results with:house
  13. [13]
    The Election Case of Simon Cameron of Pennsylvania (1857)
    Cameron's controversial past and his separation from the Democrats guaranteed a challenge to his election. On March 6, 1857, two days after Cameron took his ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  14. [14]
    Simon Cameron, Lincoln's Secretary of War: A Political Biography ...
    Charles Cameron, remembered for his "democratic style of speech," with two of his sons, William and James, is buried at Lewisburg. His inscription reads: ...
  15. [15]
    The Motivation of the Wilmot Proviso - jstor
    inspire David Wilmot to offer the Wilmot Proviso in 1846."' Anecdotes of ... 18 Simon Cameron to Buclianan, October 20, 1846, Going, op. cit., 153. 19 ...
  16. [16]
    Simon Cameron: The Controversial Builder of the Pennsylvania ...
    As a Democrat, Simon Cameron was a bit of a maverick as he supported a number of key planks of the Whig Party, and as a result he was able to lead a coalition ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Pennsylvania and J^incolrfs cRise to the Presidency - Journals
    slavery" Kansas-Nebraska Act, Pennsylvania was chiefly alarmed over the power wielded by the Roman Catholics and immigrants and was more interested in ...<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Simon Cameron | American Politician, Civil War, Unionist - Britannica
    He administered the War Department with such favouritism that Lincoln replaced him with Edwin M. Stanton (Jan. 11, 1862), and he was censured for his conduct by ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  19. [19]
    Republican Party Platform (1860) - Teaching American History
    Other contenders included John McLean of Ohio, Simon Cameron of Pennsylvania, Salmon P. ... Congress of the complete and satisfactory Homestead Measure which has ...
  20. [20]
    Cameron, Simon | House Divided - Dickinson College
    "Simon Cameron's Political Exile as United States Minister to Russia." Journal of the Lancaster County Historical Society 72, no. 4 (1968): 189-228. view ...
  21. [21]
    Simon Cameron, Lincoln's Secretary of War: A Political Biography
    The bill providing for the organization of Kansas and Nebraska territories did not establish slavery in these regions, but neither did it prohibit its entrance ...
  22. [22]
    The Cabinet: Simon Cameron (1799-1889) - Mr. Lincoln and Friends -
    Cameron used his presidential connections to build his patronage base in Pennsylvania. It was not easy given the many competing influences and feuds in the ...Missing: Reporter | Show results with:Reporter
  23. [23]
    Overstating Lincoln's Convention Comeback - FactCheck.org
    Apr 12, 2016 · Abraham Lincoln started with the second most delegates at the 1860 Republican convention ... Simon Cameron of Pennsylvania with 50.5 delegates; ...
  24. [24]
    How Lincoln Won the 1860 Republican Nomination
    One of the most interesting American political stories involves the nomination of Abraham Lincoln to be the Republican party's candidate for President of ...
  25. [25]
    Abraham Lincoln and Pennsylvania
    Although Cameron had his sights fixed on nomination as secretary of the Treasury, Mr. Lincoln did not. Secretary of the Navy Gideon Welles recalled: “At no time ...
  26. [26]
    A Message to Congress from President Lincoln.; The Vote of ...
    Lincoln, in message to Congress, reviews his actions when war began; deprecates censure of Cameron as being solely responsible for Government contracts ...Missing: March | Show results with:March
  27. [27]
    [PDF] FOR many years, Simon Cameron has been considered a perfect
    A major element in making Cameron almost the epitome of this unattractive crowd was his behavior as Lincoln's first Secretary of. War. Every historian and Civil ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Civil War Muster Rolls - New York State Military Museum
    The rendezvous for your State will be at New York, Albany and Elmira. I have the honor to be, very respectfully, Your obedient servant, Simon Cameron, Secretary ...
  29. [29]
    Wired for Success: The U.S. Telegraph Corps - HistoryNet
    Oct 26, 2021 · That same month Secretary of War Simon Cameron recruited Thomas Scott, the vice president of the Pennsylvania Railroad, to organize a U.S. ...
  30. [30]
    Supplying the Armies - Essential Civil War Curriculum
    Quartermaster Departments (QMDs) were economic giants tasked with procuring, transporting, and distributing everything the soldiers needed except weapons, food, ...
  31. [31]
    Civil War Ordnance Bureaus
    The Commissary General was responsible for providing food while the Quartermaster General supplied such items as clothing, shoes, wagons, tents, and horse ...
  32. [32]
    Annual Report of Secretary of War Simon Cameron, December 1 ...
    Excerpt from Union Secretary of War Simon Cameron's Annual Report, relating to slavery and fugitive slaves, December 1861.Missing: achievements Civil
  33. [33]
    Lincoln's Corrupt War Department - AMERICAN HERITAGE
    Apprised of certain irregularities in War Department spending, Congress in July, 1861, twice demanded that Cameron provide specific information on all ...
  34. [34]
    The Days of Shoddy: Worst Manufacturers of the Civil War
    Eventually, much of the corruption ended after the removal of Cameron and the subsequent appointment of Edwin M. Stanton as secretary of war. Stricter ...
  35. [35]
    Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War - Ohio Civil War
    The Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War was a Congressional committee ... War Simon Cameron about the defeat at Ball's Bluff. Not to be outdone ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Recapturing War Profits -- A Civil War Experience
    Whether the first Secretary of War, Simon Cameron, was personally honest ... summary of the early Civil War purchasing scandals and some of the methods used.
  37. [37]
    Secretary of War Simon Cameron resigns and is appointed minister ...
    Secretary of War Simon Cameron resigns and is appointed minister to Russia ... In the same letter accepting his resignation, Lincoln appointed him as ambassador ...
  38. [38]
    https://quod.lib.umich.edu/l/lincoln/lincoln5/1:214?rgn=div1;view=fulltext;q1=african
  39. [39]
    Cabinet and Vice Presidents: Edwin M. Stanton (1814-1869)
    Edwin M. Stanton was a pro-Breckinridge Democrat who was Attorney General under President James Buchanan (1860-61) and Secretary of War under Abraham Lincoln ...
  40. [40]
    “I Have the Honor to Tender the Resignation . . .” | National Archives
    Sep 26, 2024 · “With feelings of deep regret, I respectfully tender the resignation of my commission in the Army of the United States.” He does not provide a ...
  41. [41]
    U.S. House censures former Secretary of War Simon Cameron for ...
    04/30/1862. Congress censured Secretary of War Simon Cameron on April 30, 1862 for administrative acts that were “highly injurious to the public service.
  42. [42]
    [PDF] SIMON CAMERON'S RISE TO POWER 1860-1867 - Journals
    Although he said little about slavery, sectionalism, or war, he actively sought to make himself the state convention's nominee for two reasons: "first, it would ...Missing: shift 1850s
  43. [43]
    Simon Cameron - People - Department History - Office of the Historian
    Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary (Russia) Appointed: January 17, 1862. Presentation of Credentials: June 25, 1862. Termination of Mission ...
  44. [44]
    Morris | Lessons Learned: The Influence on Lincoln of Alexander II's ...
    Apr 11, 2023 · Simon Cameron, upon becoming the new Russian Minister after his ... met with the Tsar on June 25, 1862. Cameron's prepared notes ...
  45. [45]
    https://shop.historynet.com/blogs/new-the-latest-from-historynet-com/the-time-the-us-actually-welcomed-a-russian-blockade-during-the-civil-war
  46. [46]
    Simon Cameron - Papers Of Abraham Lincoln
    He secured a contract with the Pennsylvania state government to build canals in the state in 1826, but lost the contract due to his Democratic partisanship. In ...Missing: Treasurer 1833-1838 funds
  47. [47]
    A tale of 2 impeachment trial tickets at the York Co. History Center
    Apr 15, 2019 · Buckalew, who voted “not guilty,” and Republican Simon Cameron, voting “guilty.” A ticket to the Clinton impeachment trial. The Clinton case ...
  48. [48]
    TO AMEND THE REPORT RELATING TO THE IMPEACHMENT OF ...
    Roll Call Votes; Senate Vote #194 in 1868 (40th Congress). TO AMEND THE REPORT RELATING TO THE IMPEACHMENT OF ANDREW JOHNSON, PRESIDENT ... Cameron, Simon. Nay ...
  49. [49]
    MIDDLE STATES.; Hon. Simon Cameron Elected Senator from ...
    Both Houses of the Legislature met at 3 o'clock, and proceeded to the election of a United States Senator. In the Senate, Hon. SIMON CAMERON received 19 ...
  50. [50]
    Terre Haute Daily Gazette 29 July 1872 - Hoosier State Chronicles
    When that treaty was first introduced it was strongly opposed by Simon Cameron, a member of the Committee on Foreign Relations. Subse quently, there were ...
  51. [51]
    Rutherford B. Hayes: Domestic Affairs - Miller Center
    They believed that repealing the election laws would bring them the presidency in 1880. In the ensuing "Battle of the Riders," Hayes relished the thought of ...Missing: Tenure | Show results with:Tenure
  52. [52]
    The First Days of the Hayes Administration: Inauguration to Easter ...
    Senator Simon Cameron resigned[,] being very old 78 yrs and also not fully in accord with the Southern policy. His son J. Don[ald] Cameron[,] late Sec'y of ...
  53. [53]
    SIMON CAMERON RESIGNS. — Daily Alta California 13 March 1877
    SIMON CAMERON RESIGNS. The old man of Pennsylvania, Senator Simon Cameron, who has been accused of. carrying the State of Pennsylvania in his pooket, ...
  54. [54]
    James D. Cameron (1876–1877) - Miller Center
    Following his graduation from Princeton University in 1852, Cameron returned to his hometown, where he began work at a bank founded by his father, Simon Cameron ...<|separator|>
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Simon Cameron Papers [finding aid]. Manuscript Division, Library of ...
    Appointed state printer, Pennsylvania. 1826. Adjutant general, Pennsylvania. 1838. Appointed commissioner to settle accounts of Winnebago Indians. Simon Cameron ...
  56. [56]
    A Practical Politician: The Boss Tactics of Matthew Stanley Quay - jstor
    Quay emerged from the shadow of Simon and Don Cameron to restore the state. Republican party to power and preserve the machine's dynasty. At the time, Quay also ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] BLAINE AND THE CAMERONS - Journals
    ful political dynasty" that Simon Cameron founded: In regular succession, Simon Cameron, Donald Cameron, Mat- thew S. Quay, and Boies Penrose served their ...
  58. [58]
    https://journals.psu.edu/phj/article/download/24329/24098/24168
  59. [59]
    The Lowest Ebb - AMERICAN HERITAGE
    In moral obtuseness and brass they were fitting contemporaries of such politicians as Ben Butler, Roscoe Conkling, Simon Cameron, and James G. ... Ulysses S.
  60. [60]
    https://www.americanheritage.com/lowest-ebb
  61. [61]
    [PDF] The Simon Cameron Indian Commission of 1838 - CORE
    When we are disgusted with frauds in the execntion o! government offices, as exposed in the recent investigation in the post office department, ...
  62. [62]
    Catalog Record: The Simon Cameron Indian commission of 1838
    An account of "the frauds practised by the first commission appointed to carry out the provisions of the Winnebago treaty of 1837." Cover title. Physical ...Missing: investigation | Show results with:investigation
  63. [63]
    Simon Cameron's Rise to Power 1860-1867 - Journals
    The Great Winnebago Chieftan: Simon Cameron's Rise to Power 1860-1867. Authors: John D. Stewart. Issue: Pennsylvania History vol. 39, no. 1, January 1972.<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    The Civil War's War on Fraud - The New York Times Web Archive
    Mar 7, 2013 · Cameron was assailed for awarding rich contracts to close allies in the railroad industry, much to the delight of his congressional critics.
  65. [65]
    Simon Cameron, Lincoln's Scandalous Secretary of War on JSTOR
    Cameron's ouster from the cabinet was the nadir of his long political career, and in December 1862 Cameron complained, “A man out of office in Washington is ...
  66. [66]
    Amiable Scoundrel - University of Nebraska Press
    Simon Cameron, Lincoln's Scandalous Secretary of War. by Paul Kahan. Published by: Potomac Books. 384 Pages, 1 photograph, 4 illustrations, index. Hardcover ...
  67. [67]
    Simon Cameron, Lincoln's Scandalous Secretary of War - Journals
    Feb 22, 2023 · Almost from the beginning of his public life he was tainted by the aura of corruption, though the corruption was never proved. A long ...Missing: state treasurer
  68. [68]
    Simon Cameron (1799-1889) - The Latin Library
    Cameron was born in Maytown, Pennsylvania. He was orphaned at nine and later apprenticed to a printer before entering the field of journalism. He was editor of ...Missing: childhood Charles
  69. [69]
    CAMERON, James Donald - Bioguide Search
    CAMERON, James Donald, (Son of Simon Cameron), a Senator from Pennsylvania; born in Middletown, Dauphin County, Pa., May 14, 1833; graduated from Princeton ...Missing: children JD
  70. [70]
    Simon Cameron (1799 - 1889) - Genealogy - Geni
    Cameron was born in Maytown, Pennsylvania, to Charles Cameron and Marth Pfoutz. He was orphaned at nine and later apprenticed to a printer, Andrew Kennedy, ...Missing: background childhood
  71. [71]
    Simon Cameron (1799-1889) - Find a Grave Memorial
    Birth: 8 Mar 1799. Maytown, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, USA ; Death: 26 Jun 1889 (aged 90). Maytown, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, USA ; Burial. Harrisburg ...Missing: background childhood
  72. [72]
    https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/2876/simon-cameron
  73. [73]
    History of Cameron Estate Inn Bed and Breakfast Lancaster PA
    In Simon's will in 1889 he bequeathed two thousand dollars to Donegal Church, the income of which should be expended for the care and planting of trees and for ...Missing: value | Show results with:value
  74. [74]
    https://cameronestateinn.com/cameron-estate-inn-history/
  75. [75]
    Cameron's Report - mrlincolnandfreedom.org
    He advocated the emancipation of the slaves in the rebel States, the conversion to the use of the National Government of all property, whether slave or ...
  76. [76]
    Abraham Lincoln and the Recruitment of Black Soldiers
    The American political and military establishment decreed in 1861 that the war would be fought by white men. ... Simon Cameron, Secretary of War, was less subtle.
  77. [77]
    Pennsylvania's Simon Cameron Staged Honorific Tribute of Black ...
    Cameron was dismissed from Lincoln's Cabinet for distributing a report that called for arming freed African-Americans slaves and leading them in battle against ...
  78. [78]
    In the U.S., people power dismantled political machines
    Dec 4, 2018 · Starting around 1900, however, people power started to take apart political machines such as Tammany Hall. Nationwide, a progressive era began.<|separator|>