Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Sinc filter

In , a sinc filter is an ideal characterized by an given by the normalized , defined as \operatorname{sinc}(x) = \frac{\sin(\pi x)}{\pi x} for x \neq 0 and \operatorname{sinc}(0) = 1. This filter possesses a rectangular that passes all frequencies below the (typically the ) without attenuation while completely rejecting higher frequencies, enabling perfect reconstruction of bandlimited signals from their discrete samples as described by the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem. Due to its infinite extent in the and non-causal nature, the sinc filter is theoretically optimal but impractical for direct implementation, often requiring approximations such as truncation or windowing to manage computational demands. The sinc filter's properties stem from the duality between the time and domains via the : its rectangular spectrum in yields the sinc in time, making it symmetric around zero with a central flanked by decaying side lobes. This structure ensures zero inter-sample interference for bandlimited signals sampled at or above the , but the infinite series of lobes introduces challenges like () in finite approximations. In practice, sinc-based filters are foundational in applications such as during sampling, digital-to-analog conversion in audio systems, and image resampling in , where they minimize distortion while preserving signal fidelity. Historically, the sinc filter's significance emerged from early 20th-century work on sampling theory, with formalization by in 1949, and it remains a for in fields like and biomedical signal analysis. Modern extensions include adaptive sinc for nonuniform sampling scenarios, enhancing robustness in real-world systems with irregular .

Mathematical Foundations

Sinc Function Definition

The , fundamental in and , is defined in its normalized form as \sinc(x) = \frac{\sin(\pi x)}{\pi x} for x \neq 0, with the value at x = 0 taken as the \sinc(0) = 1 by , since \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin(\pi x)}{\pi x} = 1. This normalization ensures that the function integrates to over line, making it particularly suitable for applications in and filtering. The unnormalized sinc function is given by \frac{\sin(x)}{x} for x \neq 0 and 1 at x = 0, related to the normalized version by a scaling factor: \sinc(x) = \frac{1}{\pi} \cdot \frac{\sin(\pi x)}{x}. Key properties of the normalized sinc function include its even symmetry, \sinc(-x) = \sinc(x), which follows from the odd nature of the sine function combined with the linear denominator. It has zeros at all non-zero integers, x = n for integer n \neq 0, where \sin(\pi n) = 0. Additionally, the over the entire real line is \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \sinc(x) \, dx = 1, a property that underscores its role as an interpolating in the sampling . In the context of transforms, the normalized forms a duality pair with the , defined as \rect(f) = 1 for |f| < 1/2 and 0 otherwise. Specifically, the transform of \sinc(t) is \rect(f), and vice versa: \mathcal{F}\{\sinc(t)\} = \rect(f). This pair highlights the time-frequency duality central to bandlimited signal reconstruction.

Time- and Frequency-Domain Representations

The time-domain impulse response of a sinc-in-time filter, which models an ideal low-pass filter, is given by h(t) = 2B \ sinc(2Bt), where B is the cutoff frequency in hertz and the normalized sinc function is defined as \sinc(x) = \frac{\sin(\pi x)}{\pi x} for x \neq 0 and \sinc(0) = 1. This form arises from the inverse Fourier transform of a rectangular frequency response, ensuring unity gain within the passband. The corresponding frequency-domain transfer function is H(f) = \rect\left( \frac{f}{2B} \right), where the rect function equals 1 for |f| < B and 0 otherwise. To derive this pair, consider the inverse continuous-time Fourier transform of the ideal low-pass response: h(t) = \int_{-B}^{B} 1 \cdot e^{j 2 \pi f t} \, df = \left[ \frac{e^{j 2 \pi f t}}{j 2 \pi t} \right]_{-B}^{B} = \frac{e^{j 2 \pi B t} - e^{-j 2 \pi B t}}{j 2 \pi t} = \frac{\sin(2 \pi B t)}{\pi t}. Normalizing by the bandwidth yields h(t) = 2B \cdot \frac{\sin(2 \pi B t)}{2 \pi B t} = 2B \ sinc(2 B t), with the scaling factor $2B preserving unity gain across the passband. Dually, a sinc-in-frequency filter has a rectangular impulse response h(t) = \frac{1}{T} \rect\left( \frac{t}{T} \right), where T is the duration of the rectangular pulse, and the frequency response is H(f) = \sinc(f T). This pair follows from the Fourier transform duality: the transform of the rect function in time is a sinc in frequency, with the $1/T scaling ensuring the frequency response integrates to unity at DC for normalized energy preservation. In filter contexts, this duality highlights how time-limited responses produce frequency-domain sinc shapes, often used in applications requiring compact impulse responses.

Sinc-in-Time Filters

Ideal Low-Pass Brick-Wall Characteristics

The ideal low-pass sinc filter exhibits a brick-wall frequency response, characterized by a perfectly flat passband with unity gain for frequencies |f| < B, where B is the cutoff frequency, and complete attenuation (zero gain) for |f| > B, with no ripple in either band. This rectangular magnitude response can be expressed as H(f) = \rect\left(\frac{f}{2B}\right), where the rect function equals 1 for |x| ≤ 1/2 and 0 otherwise, ensuring an infinitely sharp transition at the cutoff frequency B with zero transition bandwidth. The filter maintains a response, given by θ(f) = -2π f t_d, where t_d is a constant delay, resulting in a constant group delay of t_d across the . This linear phase preserves the shape of bandlimited signals without , as the delay is uniform for all frequencies within the . In the context of the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem, the sinc filter serves as the ideal for bandlimited signals, interpolating discrete samples to recover the continuous-time perfectly when sampled at a rate greater than 2B. This role underscores its theoretical optimality in eliminating spectral replicas while retaining all information below the .

Non-Causality and Unrealizability

The ideal sinc-in-time low-pass filter possesses an impulse response defined as
h(t) = 2B \operatorname{sinc}(2Bt),
where B denotes the cutoff frequency and \operatorname{sinc}(x) = \sin(\pi x)/(\pi x) is the normalized sinc function. This response extends symmetrically around t = 0, with nonzero values for t < 0, rendering the filter inherently non-causal. In physical systems, causality is essential, as outputs must depend solely on current and past inputs; the negative-time portion of h(t) implies anticipation of future signal values, which is impossible without infinite delay or predictive capabilities beyond real-time processing.
Compounding this issue is the infinite temporal support of h(t), which remains nonzero for all finite t \neq 0, decaying asymptotically as $1/|t|. Implementing such a filter would necessitate an infinite delay line or unbounded computational resources to convolve the input signal with the entire response, far exceeding the finite memory and processing limits of practical hardware. This infinite extent violates the bandwidth-time product constraint, where the product BT for the ideal case equals infinity, as the effective duration is unbounded while the bandwidth B is finite—contrasting sharply with realizable filters that maintain finite BT values to fit hardware constraints. Attempts to approximate the ideal filter by truncating h(t) to a finite length introduce significant distortions, most notably the . This manifests as overshoot and ringing in the , particularly near the , where ripples can reach up to 9% of the passband edge amplitude, degrading the filter's sharp transition and introducing unwanted variations or insufficient attenuation. Such artifacts arise from the abrupt discontinuity in the truncated time-domain response, which convolves with the ideal rectangular to produce oscillatory , underscoring the fundamental unrealizability of the sinc filter in exact form.

Stability Properties

The bounded-input bounded-output (BIBO) stability of a continuous-time linear time-invariant (LTI) system requires that every bounded input signal produces a bounded output signal. For such systems, this condition is equivalent to the absolute integrability of the impulse response h(t), meaning \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |h(t)| \, dt < \infty. In the case of the low-pass sinc-in-time filter, the is given by the normalized h(t) = \operatorname{sinc}(t) = \frac{\sin(\pi t)}{\pi t} (with h(0) = 1). This filter fails the criterion because \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |\operatorname{sinc}(t)| \, dt = \infty. The divergence arises from the infinite number of lobes in |\operatorname{sinc}(t)|, where the area of the n-th lobe (for large |n|) is approximately \frac{2}{ \pi |n| }; summing these areas yields a divergent series \sum \frac{1}{|n|}. Consequently, a bounded input can produce an unbounded output, rendering the sinc filter BIBO unstable. Although not BIBO stable, the sinc function possesses stability properties, as it is square-integrable with \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \operatorname{sinc}^2(t) \, dt = 1. This follows from Plancherel's theorem, which equates the energy in the to that in the : the of \operatorname{sinc}(t) is the rect function with unit energy over |f| < 1/2. The distinction highlights that L1 integrability (required for BIBO) is stricter than integrability (related to energy preservation). In implementations, the extent of the sinc response necessitates , resulting in finite-length approximations. These truncated versions satisfy the BIBO condition since their s have finite L1 norm, but they deviate from the by introducing and transition-band errors.

Sinc-in-Frequency Filters

Rectangular Impulse Response

The sinc-in-frequency filter is characterized by a rectangular in the , which forms the basis for its () implementation as a simple averaging operation. In the continuous-time domain, the is defined as h(t) = \begin{cases} \frac{1}{T} & |t| < \frac{T}{2} \\ 0 & \text{otherwise}, \end{cases} where T represents the duration of the rectangular window, ensuring a uniform value over the finite interval centered at the origin. This form corresponds to a scaled rectangular function, where the scaling by $1/T normalizes the integral of h(t) to unity, yielding a DC gain of 1 in the frequency domain at zero frequency. In the discrete-time domain, the takes the form of a rectangular , typically expressed as h = \frac{1}{N} for n = 0, 1, \dots, N-1, where N is the . For symmetric implementations with an odd M = 2L + 1, it can be centered as h = \frac{1}{M} for k = -L to L. The \sum h = 1 maintains unity gain, making the suitable for applications requiring preservation of low-frequency components. This rectangular impulse response enables a causal and realizable structure, often implemented as a filter that computes the output as the average of the current and previous N-1 input samples. The low-pass filtering effect arises from the integration-like averaging over the finite window, which attenuates higher frequencies by smoothing variations in the input signal while preserving the mean value.

Sinc Frequency Response Properties

The of a sinc-in-frequency in the continuous is given by H(f) = \operatorname{sinc}(fT), where T is the duration of the underlying rectangular and \operatorname{sinc}(x) = \frac{\sin(\pi x)}{\pi x}. This form arises as the of a rectangular pulse of width T, centered at the . The of |H(f)| is centered at f = 0, with the first nulls occurring at f = \pm 1/T, establishing a 3 that is inversely proportional to T, the effective window length in time. In the discrete-time domain, the is the (DTFT) of an N- rectangular , expressed as H(\omega) = \frac{1}{N} \frac{\sin(N \omega / 2)}{\sin(\omega / 2)} e^{-j \omega (N-1)/2}, where \omega = 2\pi f / f_s is the normalized and f_s is the sampling . This exhibits a periodic structure, repeating every $2\pi radians (or every f_s in ), due to the inherent periodicity of the DTFT. The nulls appear at frequencies f = k f_s / N for integer k \neq 0, with the width between the first nulls scaling inversely with N. The sidelobe structure features oscillating lobes that decay gradually outward from the main lobe, with the first sidelobe approximately 13 below the peak for the uniform rectangular case. These sidelobes fall off at a rate of 6 per octave, resulting in poor stopband and a gradual that limits the filter's effectiveness for applications demanding sharp frequency selectivity.

Practical Approximations

Windowing Techniques

Practical approximations of the ideal sinc-in-time filter begin with truncation of its infinite impulse response to a finite duration, defined as h_{\text{trunc}}(t) = h(t) for |t| < L/2 and 0 otherwise, where h(t) is the ideal and L is the truncation length. This abrupt cutoff introduces significant ripples in the due to the , resulting in approximately 9% overshoot near the transition band edges. To mitigate these artifacts, the truncated sinc is multiplied by a w(t), yielding the windowed h_w(t) = \sinc(t) \, w(t), which tapers the edges smoothly and reduces sidelobe levels. In the , this corresponds to the of the ideal rectangular response with the of w(t), broadening the while suppressing to trade off transition sharpness for lower . Windows can reduce the peak ripple from ~9% in the rectangular case to less than 1%, depending on the choice and length. Common window functions include the rectangular window, which provides no tapering and thus exhibits the highest ripple (9% Gibbs overshoot) but the sharpest transition; the Hann window, a raised cosine form w(t) = 0.5 \left(1 - \cos(2\pi t / L)\right) for |t| < L/2, offering moderate sidelobe suppression (-44 dB) with a wider main lobe; and the Kaiser window, parameterized by \beta as w(t) = \frac{I_0\left(\beta \sqrt{1 - (2t/L)^2}\right)}{I_0(\beta)} for |t| < L/2, where I_0 is the modified Bessel function of the first kind, allowing adjustable control over ripple (e.g., β ≈ 5.5 yields ~0.1% ripple and -50 dB stopband attenuation). The Hamming and Blackman windows are also frequently used: Hamming w(t) = 0.54 - 0.46 \cos(2\pi t / L) achieves ~0.2% ripple and -53 dB attenuation with faster roll-off, while Blackman w(t) = 0.42 - 0.5 \cos(2\pi t / L) + 0.08 \cos(4\pi t / L) provides superior suppression (~0.02% ripple, -74 dB) at the cost of slower transition. Design trade-offs involve balancing window length L, type, and performance: longer windows narrow the transition bandwidth and enhance approximation fidelity but increase computational demands proportional to L; conversely, shorter windows reduce complexity while widening the transition and potentially elevating if the window is suboptimal. For instance, the transition bandwidth approximates $4\pi / L radians for many windows, emphasizing the need for empirical selection based on application-specific and requirements.

Implementations in Digital Systems

In digital systems, the ideal sinc-in-time filter is realized as a discrete-time (FIR) filter by truncating the to a finite length of N taps, yielding h = \frac{2B}{f_s} \mathrm{sinc}\left( \frac{2B n}{f_s} \right) for n = - (N-1)/2 to (N-1)/2, where B is the and f_s is the sampling rate (assuming the normalized \mathrm{sinc}(x) = \sin(\pi x)/(\pi x)). This truncation approximates the ideal low-pass response but introduces ripple, often mitigated by windowing techniques applied prior to implementation. The truncated sinc FIR filter can be implemented via direct-form convolution, where each output sample requires O(N) multiplications and additions, making it suitable for moderate N but computationally intensive for long filters. For efficiency with large N, fast Fourier transform (FFT)-based methods such as overlap-add or overlap-save convolution are employed, segmenting the input into blocks, performing pointwise multiplication in the frequency domain, and reconstructing the output, reducing complexity to approximately O(\log N) per sample for sufficiently long signals. Cascaded integrator-comb (CIC) filters serve as computationally efficient approximants to sinc filters, particularly for multirate processing like and , consisting of N cascaded stages followed by comb stages with decimation factor R. The is given by H(z) = \left[ \frac{1 - z^{-R M}}{1 - z^{-1}} \right]^N, where M denotes the number of sections per stage, enabling multiplierless operation using only adders and delays. The approximates a raised-cosine form, specifically \left| H(e^{j 2\pi f / f_s}) \right| = \left[ \frac{\sin(\pi f R M / f_s)}{R M \sin(\pi f / f_s)} \right]^N, which resembles [\mathrm{sinc}(f / (R M))]^N for low normalized frequencies f, providing low-pass characteristics with nulls at multiples of the folding frequency. Introduced by Hogenauer, CIC filters are ideal for high-speed hardware due to their simplicity and low resource usage compared to full FIR sinc realizations. In sigma-delta analog-to-digital converters (ADCs), sinc filters are commonly used to process from the modulator, reducing the output rate from the high modulator frequency f_\mathrm{MOD} to the rate f_\mathrm{DR} by the oversampling ratio \mathrm{OSR} = f_\mathrm{MOD} / f_\mathrm{DR}, while suppressing quantization noise. These filters, often implemented as cascaded sinc stages (e.g., sinc³ or sinc⁵) for steeper , settle rapidly—such as in three samples for a sinc³—making them suitable for multiplexed applications with notches at line frequencies like 50/60 Hz. For multirate systems involving sinc-based filters, polyphase reduces by partitioning the filter into R subfilters operating at the lower output rate, avoiding unnecessary computations on discarded samples during , thus achieving O(N/R) operations per output sample. This structure is particularly beneficial for efficient hardware or software realizations of truncated sinc filters in / chains.

Applications and Historical Development

Key Applications in Signal Processing

Sinc filters and their windowed approximations play a crucial role in digital-to-analog converters (DACs), where they enable bandlimited to reconstruct smooth analog signals from discrete samples in audio and image processing applications. By approximating the ideal low-pass response required by the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem, windowed sinc filters minimize imaging artifacts while preserving signal fidelity, particularly in systems using . This approach ensures that the reconstructed waveform closely matches the original continuous-time signal, avoiding distortion in bandwidth-limited domains. In analog-to-digital converters (ADCs), sinc decimators are integral to architectures, such as sigma-delta converters, where they suppress high-frequency and prevent during downsampling. These filters exploit the sinc function's nulls at integer multiples of the sampling frequency to attenuate out-of-band components effectively, improving in applications like software radio receivers. The efficiency of cascaded sinc structures allows for low-complexity implementation in hardware-constrained environments. Multirate benefits from sinc-based polyphase filters for efficient and downsampling, enabling rate conversion without or imaging through noble identities that redistribute computations across polyphase branches. This structure reduces the overall filter length and processing load, making it suitable for systems requiring precise control over transition bands. In two-dimensional image processing, sinc filters extend to separable 2D forms for tasks like resizing and sharpening, approximating the ideal to interpolate pixels while maintaining sharpness and reducing ringing artifacts compared to simpler methods like . Windowed variants, such as Lanczos kernels, are particularly effective for high-quality in and . Finite impulse response (FIR) filters based on sinc designs are employed in communications systems for channel equalization, where they approximate flat frequency responses to compensate for dispersive effects in channels. These equalizers mitigate by convolving received signals with sinc-derived taps, enhancing bit error rates in frequency-selective environments. Modern applications leverage sinc filters in (SDR) platforms for flexible digital filtering and , allowing adaptive adjustment in receivers without hardware reconfiguration. In biomedical signal processing, sinc-based interfaces denoise physiological signals, such as electrocardiograms, by rejecting interference while preserving low-frequency content essential for diagnostics. Recent advancements include optimized windowed-sinc filters for phase-preserving in data processing, improving efficiency in ocean acoustic monitoring as of 2022. Despite their optimality for bandlimited signals, sinc filters incur high computational costs due to long impulse responses, often requiring hundreds of taps for sharp cutoffs, which can limit real-time performance on resource-constrained devices. In such scenarios, (IIR) filters may serve as alternatives, offering similar frequency selectivity with fewer coefficients at the expense of potential instability.

Origins and Evolution

The origins of the sinc filter trace back to early 20th-century work in interpolation theory, particularly Edmund Taylor Whittaker's 1915 paper on cardinal series expansions, where he introduced the use of the (then termed the cardinal sine) as a basis for interpolating bandlimited functions from discrete samples. Whittaker demonstrated that the enables perfect reconstruction of continuous signals under certain constraints, laying the mathematical groundwork for what would later become central to sampling and filtering concepts. Building on this foundation, developments in the and advanced the theoretical underpinnings, culminating in Claude Shannon's formalization of the sampling theorem in 1949, which established the as the interpolator for reconstructing bandlimited signals from uniform samples at the . Shannon's seminal paper, "Communication in the Presence of Noise," proved that a bandlimited signal could be uniquely recovered using a , provided the sampling exceeds twice the highest component, thus positioning the sinc as the cornerstone of low-pass filtering in communication systems. In the 1960s, the emergence of digital signal processing (DSP) brought sinc-based ideals into practical filter design, as evidenced by early courses at MIT taught by Ben Gold in 1965 and 1967, with contributions from Alan V. Oppenheim. Oppenheim and Ronald W. Schafer advanced the field through research and teaching starting in the late 1960s, including Oppenheim's DSP course launched in 1969, emphasizing discrete-time implementations of sinc filters for applications like linear prediction and spectral analysis. Their work integrated sinc concepts into the nascent field of digital filter theory, highlighting its role in approximating ideal brick-wall responses despite computational limitations of the era. The 1970s and 1980s saw sinc filters transition to practical use through windowing techniques and (FFT) advancements, enabling efficient computation of finite-length approximations; a key milestone was James F. 's 1974 introduction of the Kaiser window, which optimized sinc truncation by balancing sidelobe suppression and mainlobe width for superior filter performance. Concurrently, E. Crochiere and Lawrence R. Rabiner's influential 1981 tutorial review and 1983 book on multirate signal processing detailed windowed sinc designs for and , demonstrating their efficiency in reducing while minimizing computational overhead in polyphase structures. From the 1990s onward, sinc filters found widespread integration in oversampled analog-to-digital converters, particularly as decimators in sigma-delta modulators, where their simple recursive structures provided effective noise shaping and anti-aliasing in commercial ADC chips from manufacturers like Analog Devices and Texas Instruments. For instance, multistage sinc decimators became standard in high-resolution audio and instrumentation ADCs, leveraging the filter's inherent stability to handle high oversampling ratios without introducing phase distortion. Key milestones in sinc filter evolution include Shannon's 1949 paper, which mathematically solidified its role in sampling theory, and Kaiser's 1974 developments in windowing methods, which made non-causal sinc approximations viable for DSP implementations.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Lecture 6 Basic Signal Processing
    Thus, a sinc function is a low- pass filter. This property should be intuitively true, since averaging an input image over a region should blur it and remove ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Sinc Interpolation of Nonuniform Samples
    The recon- struction is done through sinc interpolation1 corresponding to the impulse response of a linear time-invariant ideal lowpass filter. In a variety of ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Chapter 9 Basic Signal Processing - cs.Princeton
    Referring to Figure 9.12, notice that the sinc function goes to zero at higher frequencies. Thus, a sinc function is a low-pass filter. This property should be ...Missing: textbook | Show results with:textbook
  4. [4]
    [PDF] EE 261 - The Fourier Transform and its Applications
    ... Function Times a Distribution Makes Sense ... sinc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 320. 7.13 Filters Finis ...
  5. [5]
    The Sinc Function
    The sinc function is defined as: sinc(a) = sin(πa)/(πa), however, it is common to see the vague statement: "the sinc function is of the general form: sin(x)/x." ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Table of Fourier Transform Pairs - Purdue Engineering
    10. The rectangular pulse and the normalized sinc function. 11. Dual of rule 10. The rectangular function is an idealized low-pass filter, and the sinc ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  7. [7]
    The Ideal Lowpass Filter
    An ideal lowpass may be characterized by a gain of 1 for all frequencies below some cut-off frequency $ f_c$ in Hz, and a gain of 0 for all higher frequencies.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Fourier Transform Pairs
    The sinc function is widely used in DSP because it is the Fourier transform pair of a very simple waveform, the rectangular pulse. For example, the sinc.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Ideal Lowpass Filter • Optimal Least Squares in Time Domain
    Jun 27, 2020 · For the Ideal Lowpass Filter: • Start with the ideal impulse response (e.g., sinc function):. • h(t) = sin(πt/T)/(πt/T). • Infinite duration.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Discrete-Time Signal Processing Alan V. Oppenheim Ronald W ...
    quencies, corresponding to ideal frequency-selective filters. The frequency response of an ideal lowpass filter is shown in Figure 17(a). Because of the ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Communication In The Presence Of Noise - Proceedings of the IEEE
    Thus there is a one-to-one correspondence between the points of a square and the points of a line. SHANNON: COMMUNICATION IN THE PRESENCE OF NOISE. 451. Page 6 ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Windowed-Sinc Filters
    Taking the Inverse Fourier Transform of this ideal frequency response produces the ideal filter kernel (impulse response) shown in (b). As previously discussed.
  13. [13]
    How to Create a Simple Low-Pass Filter - TomRoelandts.com
    Apr 15, 2014 · The problem with the sinc filter is that it has an infinite length, in the sense that its values do not drop to zero. This means that the delay ...Sinc Filter · Transition Bandwidth · Python Code
  14. [14]
    Time-Bandwidth Product - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The time-bandwidth product is therefore always infinite, unless time duration and bandwidth duration of a signal are defined in a way that their product is ...Signal Processing And... · 2.5 Signal Processing In The... · 2.5. 3 Wavelet Analysis
  15. [15]
    [PDF] WINDOWS 1. Ideal impulse response truncation (IRT) 2. IRT example
    Ideal impulse response truncation (IRT). 2. IRT example: Ideal low-pass. 3. IRT: Frequency domain effect. 4. Gibbs phenomenon. 5. FIR filter design by windows.
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Review: Fourier Transforms and Sampling Theorem
    the integral of |h(t)| is not finite. In practice, signals are lowpass filtered before ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] EE 261 The Fourier Transform and its Applications Fall 2007 ...
    (30 points) Evaluating integrals with the help of Fourier transforms Evaluate the following integrals using Parseval's Theorem and one other method.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Mixed-Signal and DSP Design Techniques, Digital Filters
    An ideal lowpass filter frequency response is shown in Figure 6.19A. The corresponding impulse response in the time domain is shown in Figure 6.19B, and.
  20. [20]
    The Rectangular Window - Stanford CCRMA
    More generally, we may plot both the magnitude and phase of the window versus frequency, as shown in Figures 3.4 and 3.5 below. In audio work, we more typically ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] On the Use of Windows for Harmonic Analysis
    Jan 1, 1978 · One indicator of how well a window suppresses leakage is the peak sidelobe level (relative to the main lobe): another is the asymptotic rate of ...
  22. [22]
    Gibbs Effect
    As more sinusoids are added, the width of the overshoot decreases; however, the amplitude of the overshoot remains about the same, roughly 9 percent. With ...
  23. [23]
    Strategy of the Windowed-Sinc
    Convolving an input signal with this filter kernel provides a perfect low-pass filter. The problem is, the sinc function continues to both negative and positive ...
  24. [24]
    Designing the Filter
    Since the time required for a convolution is proportional to the length of the signals, Eq. 16-3 expresses a trade-off between computation time (the value of M) ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Lecture 6 - FIR Filter Design Methods - Colorado State University
    Multiply hc(t) by continuous-time window function w(t) defined to be non-zero over a restricted range. ✦ f(t) = hc(t) · w(t). ✦ Derive a discrete-time impulse ...
  26. [26]
    Chapter 16: Windowed-Sinc Filters
    When carried out by standard convolution, windowed-sinc filters are easy to program, but slow to execute. Chapter 18 shows how the FFT can be used to ...
  27. [27]
    An economical class of digital filters for decimation and interpolation
    **Summary of https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1163535:**
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Digital Filter Types in Delta-Sigma ADCs (Rev. A) - Texas Instruments
    The sinc filter is ideal for this, too. Sinc filters offer much faster settling times relative to other digital filters with more finely tuned frequency.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Multirate digital filters, filter banks, polyphase networks, and ...
    The concept of multilevel polyphase decomposition is also introduced here as a tool for efficient implementation of fractional decimation filters. Several.
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
    An efficient decimation sinc-filter design for software radio applications
    A method to design and implement a very efficient decimation filter for a sigma-delta converter is proposed.
  32. [32]
    A Biomedical Sensor Interface With a sinc Filter and Interference ...
    Feb 24, 2011 · It exploits oversampling and mixed-signal feedback to reduce system area and power, while making the system more robust to interferers.
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Multirate Digital Signal Processing - UTK-EECS
    The basic decimator model is a lowpass filter followed by a downsampler. One inefficiency is that the filtering computations are done at the higher sampling ...
  34. [34]
    Oral-History:Alan Oppenheim
    Jan 26, 2021 · Schafer, 1975 ... Jim got into signal processing through that route and worked for quite a bit of time on digital filter design issues.
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Algorithm Kings - Digital Signals and Processing Group
    At MIT in 1965 and again in 1967, Ben Gold taught a course on digital signal processing focusing largely on z transform meth- ods, digital filter design, and.