Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Single source of truth

A single source of truth (SSOT) is a data management principle and architectural approach in information systems where critical data elements are stored and maintained in only one authoritative location, eliminating duplication and ensuring that all users and processes reference the same verified information for consistency and accuracy. This concept emerged from the evolution of computing, starting with data confined to single machines in the early days of IT, progressing to distributed databases and siloed systems across organizational functions like HR, finance, and sales, which created multiple "versions of truth" and necessitated centralized governance to support reliable decision-making. The importance of SSOT lies in its ability to combat data silos and inconsistencies that arise from disparate systems, such as spreadsheets, legacy databases, and cloud applications, which can lead to costly errors—estimated at $14.2 million annually per organization due to poor data quality according to a 2013 Gartner report.^[1] By aggregating and standardizing data into a unified repository, SSOT enables holistic insights, fosters data-driven decisions, and provides a competitive edge in data-intensive environments. Key benefits include enhanced confidence in data reliability, which reduces risks from inaccuracies; support for business growth through trusted analytics that identify opportunities; improved regulatory compliance, such as with mandates like Australia's Single Touch Payroll; and protection of organizational reputation by minimizing public-facing inconsistencies. Implementation of SSOT typically involves technologies like enterprise service buses (ESBs) for real-time data synchronization across systems or master data management (MDM) platforms that serve as central hubs for core entities such as customer or product records.^[2] Notable examples include Google's aggregation of restaurant data from multiple sources into a single user-facing view for ratings and hours, and Salesforce's Customer 360, which unifies customer data across the numerous applications (often over 900 per organization) used in enterprises to deliver a unified customer profile.^[2] Beyond data, SSOT principles extend to knowledge management, where tools like collaborative platforms centralize team documentation to prevent version conflicts and streamline workflows.^[3] Challenges in achieving true SSOT include overcoming legacy system integration and ensuring ongoing data governance, but its adoption has become essential in modern enterprises to harness the value of big data effectively.

Definition and Scenarios

Core Definition

The single source of truth (SSOT) is the practice of structuring information models and associated data schemas such that every data element is mastered in one place only, in one way only, and edited in one place only.^[4] This approach ensures data consistency and eliminates redundancy by centralizing authority over each piece of information, preventing discrepancies that arise from multiple storage or editing locations.^[2] Often used interchangeably with the term single point of truth (SPOT), SSOT emphasizes a unified reference point for all stakeholders in an organization.^[5] The foundational concept of SSOT traces its origins to early database theory in the 1970s, particularly through the relational model proposed by E.F. Codd in 1970.^[6] Codd's work aimed to organize data in tables with defined relationships to avoid duplication and maintain integrity in large shared data banks, laying the groundwork for systems where information is stored once and referenced as needed. By the 1980s, this evolved into formal database design principles that prioritized a singular authoritative source for data elements. Core mechanisms for achieving SSOT include database normalization techniques, which systematically reduce redundancy and dependency issues. Codd introduced first normal form (1NF) in 1970 to eliminate repeating groups and ensure atomic values, followed by second normal form (2NF) and third normal form (3NF) in 1971 to address partial and transitive dependencies, respectively.^[7] These forms structure data into interrelated tables where updates propagate consistently, embodying the SSOT principle by ensuring no data element is stored or modified redundantly. In non-relational contexts, such as content management and hypertext systems, transclusion serves as a key mechanism for SSOT by embedding references to source content without duplication.^[8] This technique, integral to standards like the Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA), allows modular reuse while maintaining a single editable master source, thereby preserving consistency across derived documents.^[9]

Implementation Scenarios

In practical implementations of a single source of truth (SSOT), data management strategies vary based on how the authoritative master data source interacts with downstream systems, ensuring consistency while accommodating performance and scalability needs. Three primary scenarios outline these operational flows: direct access to the master, read-only replicas synchronized from the master, and replicated copies with reconciliation mechanisms. The first scenario involves direct reads and updates exclusively from the master data source, without creating any copies or replicas across systems. This approach is common in monolithic applications or tightly integrated environments where all operations—such as queries, modifications, and validations—occur at the central repository, minimizing synchronization overhead and ensuring immediate consistency. For instance, in a centralized database serving a single application, users and processes interact solely with this master to avoid divergence. The second scenario employs read-only copies derived from the master, where updates propagate unidirectionally from the source to these optimized replicas. A prominent example is the Command Query Responsibility Segregation (CQRS) pattern, in which commands modify the master data store while queries retrieve from denormalized, query-optimized copies that are asynchronously updated to reflect changes. In CQRS, this separation ensures the SSOT remains at the master, as all authoritative updates originate there, preventing inconsistencies in high-throughput systems like e-commerce platforms. Master Data Management (MDM) tools often support this scenario by governing the propagation of changes to replicas. The third scenario utilizes copies that undergo periodic reconciliation to align with the master, suitable for distributed or loosely coupled architectures. In version control systems like Git, repositories maintain local copies that reconcile with a central master through commits, pulls, and merges, resolving conflicts to uphold a unified truth. Similarly, blockchain networks implement this via consensus mechanisms, where nodes hold replicated ledgers that periodically validate and reconcile transactions against the canonical chain, as seen in systems like Bitcoin. Violations of SSOT principles frequently arise in multi-system environments, such as integrations between Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) platforms, where disparate updates create data silos and inconsistencies. For example, if sales data in an ERP system is not synchronized as the master for CRM records, duplicate entries or outdated information can emerge, leading to operational discrepancies.

Advantages and Challenges

Key Benefits

Adopting a single source of truth (SSOT) fundamentally prevents data inconsistencies and duplication by centralizing information into a unified, authoritative repository, which simplifies version control and minimizes errors in organizational decision-making.^[10] This approach eliminates silos where disparate datasets lead to conflicting versions, ensuring that all stakeholders reference the same accurate data, thereby reducing the risk of misguided strategies based on outdated or contradictory inputs.^[11] SSOT enhances data governance by establishing a trusted foundation for data management, which accelerates analytics processes and supports regulatory compliance, such as the accuracy and traceability requirements under GDPR for personal data handling.^[12] With a governed SSOT, organizations can enforce standardized data quality protocols, enabling quicker access to reliable insights for analysis while meeting legal standards that demand precise and verifiable information.^[13] For instance, this governance structure facilitates compliance with GDPR's emphasis on data minimization and accuracy, reducing the administrative burden of audits and potential fines.^[14] Strategically, SSOT delivers cost savings through diminished maintenance overhead for multiple redundant data sources and fosters enhanced collaboration by providing a shared, accessible data environment across teams.^[15] Organizations report reductions in operational expenses, such as a 27% cut in market research spending by avoiding duplication and streamlining knowledge access.^[16] This unified access promotes cross-functional teamwork, as departments like finance and marketing can align on consistent metrics without reconciliation efforts, ultimately driving more cohesive business outcomes.^[17] In business intelligence, SSOT enables real-time reporting without the delays associated with reconciling multiple data sources, a capability increasingly realized in modern cloud platforms since 2020.^[18] Platforms like Snowflake and Databricks leverage SSOT to deliver fresh, governed data directly to BI tools, allowing analysts to generate instantaneous dashboards and forecasts that reflect current realities.^[19] This integration with data warehousing further amplifies reporting efficiency by maintaining a consistent truth layer for historical and operational queries.^[11]

Potential Limitations

Implementing a single source of truth (SSOT) in environments with legacy systems often proves challenging, as these systems frequently require data copies for operational continuity, resulting in eventual consistency rather than strict real-time synchronization. In traditional product lifecycle management (PLM) setups, for instance, the assumption of a single centralized database for all modifications becomes untenable when integrating older infrastructures that cannot support immediate updates, leading to discrepancies across distributed copies.^[20] Similarly, disparate legacy data sources introduce integration hurdles, where disparate formats and silos necessitate replication to avoid disrupting existing workflows, thereby undermining the core principle of a unified truth.^[21] Performance bottlenecks represent another significant barrier to SSOT adoption, particularly in large-scale environments where a single access point can become overwhelmed by concurrent queries, causing high latency and degraded response times. For example, in microservices architectures, multiple applications querying the same SSOT can lead to resource exhaustion and slow data retrieval, especially under high loads that amplify network and processing delays. Data warehousing efforts aimed at SSOT further exacerbate this issue, as extensive joins and aggregations in centralized repositories can introduce bottlenecks during peak usage, impacting overall system efficiency.^[22] Organizational resistance frequently hampers SSOT initiatives, stemming from siloed teams that prioritize local autonomy over centralized governance, necessitating profound cultural shifts to foster collaboration. Such silos, reinforced by departmental structures and communication barriers, create reluctance to relinquish control over data ownership, leading to inconsistent adoption across the enterprise.^[23] Addressing this requires intentional efforts to build trust and shared goals, as institutional factors like bureaucracy often perpetuate isolation and hinder information flow.^[24]

Ontological Considerations

Data Modeling Interactions

In data modeling, the single source of truth (SSOT) principle interacts with ontological structures by mandating a unified canonical model for representing entities, thereby preventing divergent interpretations of the same underlying facts across systems. This approach leverages formal ontology languages such as OWL (Web Ontology Language) and RDF (Resource Description Framework) to define entities in a consistent, machine-readable manner. For instance, OWL ontologies specify classes, properties, and relationships in a way that ensures any entity—such as a product or customer—has one authoritative description, avoiding duplication or inconsistency that could arise from ad-hoc modeling in disparate databases.^[25] A core aspect of this interaction is the normalization of ontologies, which systematically eliminates redundancy by enforcing a standardized structure for knowledge representation. Semantic Web standards developed by the W3C after 2004, including OWL 2 released in 2012, provide the foundational mechanisms for such normalization, such as axiomatic definitions and inference rules that consolidate equivalent representations into a single form. This process mirrors database normalization but extends it to semantic layers, where RDF graphs are canonicalized to ensure isomorphic structures yield identical interpretations, reducing the risk of semantic drift in complex models.^[25]^[26] In enterprise data models, SSOT specifically mitigates challenges posed by polyglot persistence, a strategy where multiple storage technologies (e.g., relational, document, and graph databases) are employed for different data types, often leading to conflicting representations of shared entities. By enforcing a single ontological model, SSOT aligns these polyglot systems under one truth, as seen in model-driven architectures that maintain a central UML or RDF-based schema as the authoritative source.^[27]^[28]

Contextual Reconciliation

In the realm of single source of truth (SSOT) systems, contextual reconciliation refers to the process of resolving discrepancies arising from differing interpretations of data across varied contexts, such as regional, cultural, or domain-specific variations, to maintain a unified master representation. This is particularly critical in global enterprises where data variances—such as differing currency conversions, measurement units, or pricing models—can lead to inconsistencies if not systematically mapped. For instance, reconciliation methods often employ rule-based mappings or AI-mediated conversion functions to align multiple contextual truths with a central ontology. The Context Interchange (COIN) framework, extended by ECOIN, exemplifies this by using declarative context specifications and mediators to automatically detect and resolve semantic conflicts, such as varying definitions of "price" in airfare systems (e.g., final round-trip costs versus nominal one-way fares). In practice, global firms like those in finance or logistics apply these techniques to harmonize regional data, ensuring that subsidiary reports from Europe and Asia feed into a consistent enterprise-wide SSOT without manual intervention.^[29] Ontological challenges in SSOT further complicate contextual reconciliation, as "truth" can vary philosophically or legally across domains, requiring careful mediation to avoid conflicts. For example, theological or interpretive differences in truth—such as competing views on data provenance in knowledge representation—mirror broader ontological conflicts where equational definitions diverge (e.g., "profits after taxes" calculated differently based on jurisdictional accounting standards). A prominent case arises in legal contexts, where definitions of customer identity differ under privacy regulations like the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and California's Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Under GDPR, personal data encompasses any information relating to an identifiable natural person, emphasizing broad identifiability including indirect means like IP addresses. In contrast, CCPA defines personal information broadly for California residents and their households, encompassing information that identifies, relates to, describes, is capable of being associated with, or could reasonably be linked, directly or indirectly, with a particular consumer or household, with opt-out rights rather than explicit consent as the primary mechanism. These variances pose ontological hurdles for SSOT in multinational operations, where a unified customer profile must reconcile GDPR's focus on natural persons with CCPA's inclusion of household-level data to ensure compliance without fragmenting the truth source.^[29]^[30]^[31] Advancements in AI-driven reconciliation tools have addressed these challenges by leveraging knowledge graphs (KGs) integrated with large language models (LLMs) to enable dynamic SSOT maintenance, a development particularly evident in 2025 enterprise applications. Knowledge graphs serve as a structured layer to ground LLMs, reducing hallucinations and facilitating real-time reconciliation of contextual variances through entity resolution and relationship mapping. For example, hybrid KG-LLM approaches, such as those in KG-RAG frameworks, fuse disparate data sources into a verifiable truth layer, allowing enterprises to dynamically update customer identities across legal contexts without rigid schemas. In business intelligence, this fusion powers contextual querying, where LLMs reason over KG paths to reconcile regional variances, such as adapting privacy-compliant identity profiles for global marketing campaigns. These tools outperform traditional methods by incorporating temporal and multi-hop reasoning, ensuring SSOT evolves with new data while preserving ontological integrity. Data warehouses can provide aggregated views to support such reconciliation, though the core dynamics rely on these AI integrations.^[32]^[33]^[34]

Implementation Techniques

Master Data Management

Master Data Management (MDM) serves as a centralized approach to establishing a single source of truth (SSOT) for an organization's core business entities, such as customer profiles, product catalogs, and supplier information. It functions as a hub that integrates data from disparate sources, creating and maintaining authoritative records that are syndicated across systems to ensure consistency and accuracy. This process typically involves hubs, which store and manage the master data, or registries, which maintain references to data locations without central storage, allowing updates to propagate reliably throughout the enterprise.^[35]^[36]^[37] Implementation of MDM can vary between single-domain and multi-domain strategies, depending on organizational needs. Single-domain MDM focuses on mastering one specific entity type, such as customers, using dedicated tools and processes tailored to that domain's requirements. In contrast, multi-domain MDM platforms handle multiple entity types—like customers, products, and locations—within a unified system, enabling cross-domain relationships and efficiencies in governance. Key tools include Informatica MDM, which supports cloud-based integration and AI-driven matching, and IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management, which emphasizes probabilistic matching for reconciling data across sources. The core process encompasses data stewardship, where designated roles oversee quality, governance, and compliance, alongside matching algorithms that employ deterministic methods for exact matches and fuzzy logic for handling variations like typos or abbreviations.^[38]^[39]^[40]^[41]^[42]^[43] Central to MDM's role in SSOT is the creation of "golden records," which represent the single, authoritative version of master data consolidated from multiple inputs, eliminating discrepancies and ensuring all systems reference the same trusted information. This approach significantly mitigates data silos and redundancies, with organizations reporting up to a 20% improvement in data accuracy through MDM adoption. For instance, golden records for customer data can integrate details from CRM, ERP, and external sources, providing a unified view that supports decision-making and operational efficiency.^[44]^[45]

Event Sourcing

Event sourcing is a foundational pattern for implementing a single source of truth (SSOT) in which the authoritative record of an application's state resides in an append-only event store containing a sequence of immutable events. Each event captures a discrete change, such as "OrderPlaced" or "PaymentProcessed," and is timestamped and stored chronologically without alteration. This event log serves as the definitive SSOT, from which the current or historical state can be reconstructed by replaying the events in order.^[46]^[47] Unlike traditional CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) models, which directly mutate database records and often overwrite prior states, event sourcing preserves the full history of changes, enabling temporal queries, debugging, and compliance through complete traceability. In CRUD systems, the database reflects only the latest state, potentially discarding context needed for audits or "what-if" analyses, whereas event sourcing treats events as the immutable facts driving all derivations.^[46]^[47] Architecturally, event sourcing leverages event streams to provide robust auditing—every action leaves an indelible trace—and enhances scalability by decoupling state storage from query optimization, allowing events to be processed asynchronously across distributed nodes. Frameworks such as the Axon Framework, which gained prominence in the post-2010 era for building event-driven applications, offer built-in support for event persistence, projection building, and aggregate management in Java environments. Similarly, Apache Kafka functions as a scalable event store in streaming pipelines, maintaining a unified SSOT across microservices by treating event topics as durable logs for replication and fault tolerance.^[48]^[49] The state at any point in time t is derived by sequentially applying events to an initial state, formalized as:

S_t = \foldl(\initial_state, events_1 \dots events_t)

Here, \foldl denotes the left fold (or reduce) operation, which iterates over the event sequence from left to right, accumulating updates. To derive this, start with S_0 = \initial_state (often an empty or seed value representing no prior activity). For each event e_i where i = 1 to t, compute S_i = apply(e_i, S_{i-1}), with apply being the domain-specific function that mutates the state based on the event's payload (e.g., adding an item to an order). This iterative application ensures S_t encapsulates all historical decisions without data loss, providing a verifiable path from origin to current reality. Event sourcing is frequently paired with Command Query Responsibility Segregation (CQRS) to further optimize read operations via materialized views.^[46] By 2025, event sourcing has increasingly integrated with serverless architectures in microservices ecosystems, using platforms like AWS Step Functions to orchestrate event flows and DynamoDB for append-only storage, thereby reducing operational overhead while maintaining SSOT resilience in dynamic, auto-scaling environments.^[50]

Data Warehousing

In data warehousing, the single source of truth (SSOT) manifests as a centralized repository that integrates and aggregates data extracted from disparate operational sources through extract, transform, load (ETL) or extract, load, transform (ELT) processes, providing a reliable foundation for business intelligence, reporting, and analytics without supporting direct transactional updates.^[51]^[52] This approach ensures that downstream applications and decision-makers rely on a unified, cleansed dataset rather than fragmented or inconsistent views from source systems, thereby minimizing discrepancies in analytical outcomes.^[53] Key features of data warehousing as an SSOT include dimensional modeling techniques, such as the star schema, which organizes data into central fact tables surrounded by descriptive dimension tables to facilitate efficient querying and analysis.^[54] Modern cloud-based tools like Snowflake and Google BigQuery enable scalable implementation of these models, while conformed dimensions—shared attributes with consistent definitions across multiple fact tables—promote uniformity and interoperability in reporting.^[55]^[56] Ontologies can support dimension conformance by semantically aligning attributes from varied sources.^[57] The concept of data warehousing evolved from Bill Inmon's foundational work in the 1990s, where he defined it as a subject-oriented, integrated, time-variant, and non-volatile collection of data for decision support.^[58] By 2025, advancements like lakehouse architectures, exemplified by Databricks, have extended this paradigm by combining traditional warehousing with raw data lakes, creating hybrid SSOT environments that handle both structured analytics and unstructured data processing in a single platform.^[59] The process of establishing and maintaining a data warehouse as SSOT involves ETL or ELT pipelines that systematically ingest data from multiple sources, apply transformations for standardization, and perform quality checks—such as validation for completeness, accuracy, and referential integrity—to uphold data trustworthiness before loading.^[60]^[61] These pipelines ensure that the warehouse remains a dependable analytical asset, with ongoing monitoring to detect and resolve anomalies that could undermine its role as the authoritative truth.^[62]

References

[1]
What is a Single Source of Truth (SSOT) | MuleSoft
A single source of truth (SSOT) is the practice of aggregating the data from many systems within an organization to a single location.
[2]
Building a true Single Source of Truth (SSoT) for your team - Atlassian
A single source of truth (SSoT) guarantees that everyone in an organization has access to the same information. Learn how to build one in Confluence.
[3]
Single source of truth (SSOT) - ALMBoK.com
Aug 17, 2023 · Single source of truth (SSOT) is the practice of structuring information models and associated data schema such that every data element is ...
[4]
Single Source of Truth - What it is and Why You Want it Yesterday
Single source of truth (SSOT) is a concept used to ensure that everyone in an organization bases business decisions on the same data.
[5]
A relational model of data for large shared data banks
A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Author: E. F. Codd ... Published: 01 June 1970 Publication History. 5,614citation65,972Downloads.
[6]
Normalized data base structure: a brief tutorial - ACM Digital Library
This paper illustrates the removal of repeating groups, hierarchic and plex structures, and cross-referencing structures.
[7]
OASIS Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) TC | OASIS
### Summary on Single Sourcing, Transclusion, and Single Source of Truth in DITA
[8]
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=dita
[9]
What is a System of Record? | IBM
Oct 24, 2025 · The golden record allows everyone to work from a shared “single source of truth” (SSOT), which helps eliminate silos and discrepancies.
[10]
What is a Data Warehouse? A Complete Guide - Snowflake
By serving as a single source of truth, data warehouses can eliminate data silos, ensure data consistency across departments, enable historical analysis, ...
[11]
What is Data Governance? - IBM
A properly governed data system can provide a single source of truth across an entire organization. Decision-making can be improved when all parties are working ...
[12]
Master Data Management (for regulatory product data submissions)
The main purpose of this data management discipline is to create a single trusted golden source for data ensuring the accuracy, traceability and accountability ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[13]
Create a holistic approach to data protection - IBM
Having a unified privacy framework provides a metadata-driven approach and single trusted source of truth that has been fundamental in reducing IBM's exposure ...
[14]
Industrial DataOps and Unified Namespace | Deloitte US
It establishes a single source of truth for real-time data, enabling precise and accessible information across different business sectors. In UNS, each ...
[15]
The Total Economic Impact™ Of Market Logic DeepSights - Forrester
... single source of truth. The composite is able to cut its market research expenditure by 27% by avoiding duplication and making knowledge more accessible.
[16]
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Advantages & Disadvantages
This expanded collaboration can increase decision-making, while being a single source of truth for all data entry.Missing: maintenance | Show results with:maintenance
[17]
Honeydew Revolutionizes Business Intelligence with Investment ...
May 27, 2025 · Create a single source of truth for all critical business ... business users real-time access to governed metrics without duplicating data.
[18]
What is a data lakehouse? | Databricks on Google Cloud
Oct 1, 2025 · A data lakehouse can help establish a single source of truth, eliminate redundant costs, and ensure data freshness. ... business intelligence and ...
[19]
PLM Evolution: Single Source of Truth, and Eventual Consistency
Mar 18, 2025 · Traditional PLM systems were built on the assumption that SSOT means having a single database where all product data is stored and modified.Missing: legacy | Show results with:legacy
[20]
What Is a Single Source of Truth (SSOT) & How to Build One? - Airbyte
Jul 21, 2025 · A Single Source of Truth (SSOT) is the practice of consolidating data from various sources into a centralized repository.<|control11|><|separator|>
[21]
Building a Single Source of Truth (SSOT): 8 Best Practices for Data ...
Mar 28, 2024 · ... Single Source of Truth (SSOT) becomes paramount. Navigating the ... performance of data integrations and quickly identifying bottlenecks or errors ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[22]
Organizational silos: 4 common issues and how to prevent them
Jan 26, 2025 · Organizational silos are teams of people who are isolated from other parts of your business due to a minimized flow of information.
[23]
Breaking Down Silos in the Workplace: A Framework to Foster ... - NIH
Organizational silos may restrict information, resources, and stymie progress and innovation. This analysis presents a framework to mitigate silos and overcome ...
[24]
[PDF] Challenges of Trustworthy Federated Learning - arXiv
Jul 21, 2025 · Federated Learning's challenges arise from its distributed nature, impacting oversight, transparency, robustness, and fairness, making it ...
[25]
OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Structural Specification and ... - W3C
Dec 11, 2012 · OWL 2 is an ontology language for the Semantic Web with formally defined meaning, providing classes, properties, individuals, and data values.
[26]
[PDF] Canonical Forms for Isomorphic and Equivalent RDF Graphs
An RDF graph G is simple-equivalent with an RDF graph H, denoted G ≡ H, if and only if every model of G is a model of H and every model of H is a model of. G ( ...
[27]
Polyglot Persistence - Martin Fowler
Nov 16, 2011 · A shift to polyglot persistence 1 - where any decent sized enterprise will have a variety of different data storage technologies for different kinds of data.
[28]
OGC Testbed-17: Model-Driven Standards Engineering Report
One of the most important goals of MDA is to maintain a single source of truth for a system (a standard in this context). In an MDA approach, there is a single ...
[29]
[PDF] Information Integration Using Contextual Knowledge and Ontology ...
Jan 8, 2003 · The second challenge, data interpretation, deals with the existence of heterogeneous contexts, whereby each source of information and potential ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[30]
[PDF] GDPR VS CCPA - Ropes & Gray LLP
The GDPR applies to the “personal data” of a “data subject, which is any identified or identifiable natural person (i.e., real person, not a corporation or ...
[31]
GDPR vs CCPA: A thorough breakdown of data protection laws
Both GDPR and CCPA broadly define personal data/information but differ in scope; GDPR covers all data linked to an identifiable person, while CCPA is specific ...Missing: truth | Show results with:truth<|control11|><|separator|>
[32]
[PDF] Large Language Models Meet Knowledge Graphs for Question ...
The knowledge aggregation module and graph reason- ing are introduced for joint reasoning between the graph and LLMs (Jain and Lapata, 2024) to address the ...Missing: reconciliation | Show results with:reconciliation
[33]
Knowledge Graphs: A Single Source of Truth for the Enterprise
Oct 5, 2020 · Knowledge graphs possess the power to deliver a single source of truth by linking together any assortment of data sources required, ...
[34]
How Enterprise AI, powered by Knowledge Graphs, is redefining ...
Oct 7, 2025 · This article reveals how Knowledge Graphs and LLMs redefine business intelligence, safeguarding institutional wisdom and breaking data silos.
[35]
What is Master Data Management (MDM)? - Informatica
Master data management (MDM) involves creating a single master record for each person, place, or thing in a business, from across internal and external data ...
[36]
What is Master Data Management? - IBM
MDM helps to create a "golden record," a single source of truth that integrates data from various sources, affirming that everyone in the organization works ...
[37]
What is master data management? Ensuring a single source of truth
May 31, 2021 · MDM seeks to create a single version of truth across all copies of master data to ensure data values are aligned. In doing so, MDM provides an “ ...
[38]
Multidomain MDM vs. Multiple Domain MDM - Stibo Systems
Mar 31, 2022 · Not all “multidomain” master data management (MDM) solutions are the same. Here are the differences and why you need to know.
[39]
Multidomain MDM Vs Single Domain MDM - Why Your Approach To ...
Apr 16, 2021 · Multidomain MDM and single domain MDM are two major approaches to Master Data Management (MDM), which are evaluated in this article.
[40]
Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions and Tools - Informatica
MDM is consolidating and maintaining a single, high-quality record for customers, products, etc. by integrating data from various sources.Customer 360 · Product 360 · Reference 360 · Supplier 360Missing: IBM InfoSphere
[41]
IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management
IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management provides comprehensive matching for reconciling data, delivering accurate, near real-time views and consolidating data ...Missing: Informatica | Show results with:Informatica
[42]
Informatica MDM Matching High Level Overview
Jul 24, 2019 · Informatica MDM uses deterministic matching to match exact attributes of records and/or fuzzy matching to compare similar attributes of records ...
[43]
What is Master Data Management: Successes, Strategies, and the ...
Feb 16, 2024 · Data stewardship and ownership are critical for MDM success. Data stewards play a key role in managing and maintaining master data, resolving ...
[44]
What Is a Golden Record in MDM? - Profisee
Aug 26, 2025 · A golden record in MDM is a complete and accurate version of a data point stored where it can be accessed by the entire business.
[45]
Master Data Management Statistics: What You Need to Know
According to Gartner, companies using MDM software have seen up to a 20% increase in data accuracy and a 15% improvement in organizational efficiency.
[46]
Event Sourcing
### Summary of Event Sourcing from https://martinfowler.com/eaaDev/EventSourcing.html
[47]
Event sourcing pattern - AWS Prescriptive Guidance
The event store acts as a historical record of all actions and state changes, and serves as a valuable single source of truth.
[48]
https://axoniq.io/concepts/event-sourcing
[49]
Messaging as the Single Source of Truth | Confluent
Aug 2, 2017 · This post discusses Event Sourcing in the context of Apache Kafka, examining the need for a single source of truth that spans entire service estates.
[50]
Event Sourcing Design Pattern - Serverless Land
Event Sourcing pattern ensures that all changes to application state are stored as a sequence of events.
[51]
What Is a Data Warehouse? | Oracle
Jun 8, 2023 · Because of these capabilities, a data warehouse can be considered an organization's “single source of truth.” Learn about Autonomous Database ...Oracle ASEAN · Oracle India · Oracle Canada · Oracle Europe
[52]
What is a Single Source of Truth (SSOT)? - Astera Software
Mar 4, 2025 · A single source of truth (SSOT) is the concept of achieving a centralized repository of accurate and up-to-date data within an organization.<|control11|><|separator|>
[53]
Understand star schema and the importance for Power BI
Star schema is a mature modeling approach widely adopted by relational data warehouses. It requires modelers to classify their model tables as either dimension ...Dimensional Modeling · Data reduction techniques · One-to-one relationships
[54]
Conformed Dimensions | Kimball Dimensional Modeling Techniques
Dimension tables conform when attributes in separate dimension tables have the same column names and domain contents.
[55]
What is a conformed dimension? | Definition from TechTarget
Jul 21, 2023 · In data warehousing, a conformed dimension is a dimension that has the same meaning to every fact with which it relates.
[56]
Incorporation of Ontologies in Data Warehouse/Business ...
Ontologies are mainly defined using the Ontology Web Language standard to support multiple DW/BI tasks, such as Dimensional Modeling, Requirement Analysis, ...
[57]
A Short History of Data Warehousing - Dataversity
Aug 23, 2012 · Later in the 1990s, Inmon developed the concept of the Corporate Information Factory, an enterprise level view of an organization's data of ...
[58]
What is a data lakehouse? | Databricks on AWS
Oct 1, 2025 · A data lakehouse can help establish a single source of truth, eliminate redundant costs, and ensure data freshness. Data lakehouses often use a ...What is a data lakehouse used... · How does the Databricks... · Data serving
[59]
What Is ELT (Extract, Load, Transform)? - Snowflake
ELT and AI AI and gen AI are also being used within the ELT process itself to enhance tasks like data quality checks, schema mapping and code generation, ...The Etl Process · Elt Vs. Etl · What Are Etl Tools?<|control11|><|separator|>
[60]
ETL Data Quality Testing: Tips for Cleaner Pipelines - Airbyte
Sep 2, 2025 · This article comprehensively covers ETL data quality testing, its importance, common issues, and the procedure to maintain high-quality data.
[61]
7 Data Quality Checks In ETL Every Data Engineer Should Know
Jan 25, 2023 · The seven data quality checks in ETL are: NULL values, volume, numeric distribution, uniqueness, referential integrity, string patterns, and ...