Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Slater & Gordon


Slater & Gordon Lawyers is an consumer founded in March 1935 in by William Slater, a former Labor Party Attorney-General, and Hugh Gordon, a solicitor, to provide legal services to trade unions and working people.
The firm expanded nationally, introducing Australia's first "no win, no fee" arrangements in 1986, and achieved milestones such as securing landmark compensation in the 1964 HMAS Voyager collision case. In 2007, it became the world's first publicly listed law practice on the (ASX), enabling acquisitions including firm Russell Jones & Walker in 2012, but aggressive growth and overvaluation of work-in-progress led to a sharp share price decline from around $8 in 2015 to mere cents by 2017, prompting a writedown of hundreds of millions and the separation of its operations. Delisted from the ASX in 2023 following a takeover by Allegro Funds, the firm continues to handle , class actions—like the $70 million detention settlement in 2016 and $49.7 million Bellamy's investor claim in 2019—and compensation cases across .

Founding and Early History

Establishment and Founders

Slater & Gordon traces its origins to the legal practice established by William (Bill) Slater in Melbourne, Victoria, around 1924. In March 1935, following the economic challenges of the Great Depression, Slater brought his brother-in-law, Hugh Lyons Gordon, into partnership, formally naming the firm Slater & Gordon. The partnership began operations in a modest room within the Australian Railways Union's Unity Hall Building, with an initial emphasis on serving trade unions such as the Australian Railways Union and the Australian Workers' Union, focusing on workplace entitlements, compensation claims, and workers' rights advocacy. William Slater (1890–1960), born in Wangaratta, Victoria, left school at age 12 and worked various jobs before enlisting in World War I from 1916 to 1917; he was elected to the Victorian Parliament in 1917 and admitted as a barrister and solicitor on 1 March 1922. As a prominent Labor politician, Slater served as Attorney-General and Solicitor-General of Victoria multiple times, becoming the youngest person appointed to that role in Australian history at age 35, and later as Speaker of the Victorian Legislative Assembly. Hugh Lyons Gordon (1909–1943), born in Irymple to horticulturalist parents, earned a Bachelor of Laws from the University of Melbourne and provided renewed vigor to the firm through his legal expertise. The firm's early years solidified its reputation for social justice-oriented practice amid labor movements. Gordon enlisted in the Royal Australian Air Force during and was on 14 June 1943, aged 34, during his 30th mission when his bomber was shot down over the . Slater honored his partner's memory by retaining the firm name, perpetuating its foundational commitment to union representation and employee protections.

Initial Growth and Practice Focus

Slater & Gordon's initial practice centered on representing trade unions and injured workers, with a primary emphasis on workplace entitlements and compensation claims. Established in March 1935 in by William Slater and Hugh Gordon, the firm began by servicing the Australian Railways Union and soon extended to other organizations, such as the Australian Workers' Union, amid the economic challenges of the . This union-focused approach laid the foundation for its reputation in advocating for working-class rights, including early efforts in before formal legislative expansions. Early growth was spurred by legislative changes and rising industrial claims, particularly after the enactment of the Victorian Workers Compensation Act in April 1946, which enabled the firm to represent previously unprotected workers, including miners at the colliery. In October 1942, the partnership briefly expanded to include Ted , renaming the firm Slater, Gordon and , reflecting increasing demand for labor services. By the mid-1960s, geographic expansion began with the opening of a office in 1966 to address surging workplace injury cases in Victoria's coal and power industries. The firm's practice areas solidified around and compensation law, evolving from referrals to broader plaintiff-side representation in industrial disputes. Staff numbers grew to 125 by , coinciding with the establishment of a Footscray office to better serve Melbourne's working-class suburbs. This period also marked the onset of involvement, leading to interstate offices in and in 1986 for handling multi-jurisdictional cases, such as the Wittenoom claims, while maintaining a core commitment to accessible legal services for s and individuals.

Public Listing and International Expansion

2007 IPO and Structural Changes

In May 2007, Slater & Gordon executed an (IPO) on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), becoming the world's first publicly traded law firm. The IPO prospectus, lodged with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission on 13, 2007, sought to raise approximately A$35 million through the issuance of new shares, with the offer opening on 11. The firm projected fiscal year 2007 revenue of A$58.7 million and net profit after tax of A$9.1 million, reflecting its focus on and litigation amid a consolidating Australian legal market. Shares debuted at A$1.00 on May 21, 2007, under the ticker SGH, and surged 40% on the first trading day, valuing the firm at around A$100 million initially. This listing capitalized on regulatory reforms from the early that permitted incorporated legal practices and external ownership, diverging from traditional models restricted by conduct rules in many jurisdictions. The transition shifted ownership from a concentrated group of partners to dispersed public shareholders, diluting equity stakes held by founders and introducing institutional investors. Structurally, the IPO necessitated reorganization from a private entity—previously operating as an —to a fully listed subject to ASX continuous disclosure requirements, enhanced standards, and independent board oversight. This included professionalizing with non-legal executives, segmenting operations by and for , and aligning incentives toward metrics like revenue from "no win, no fee" cases rather than partner billings. The change facilitated capital access for , marking a pivot to a consolidation-driven model in fragmented practice areas such as compensation . However, it also imposed public market pressures, including quarterly reporting and expectations for returns, which contrasted with the autonomy of traditional partnerships.

UK Acquisition Strategy and Integration Challenges

Slater & Gordon initiated its UK expansion in April 2012 by acquiring Russell Jones & Walker, a London-based firm specializing in and clinical , marking the company's first foray following its 2007 IPO. This move was driven by the 's liberalization of legal services through alternative business structures () under the Legal Services Act 2007, enabling scaled operations in consumer law segments like (PI), where the market remained fragmented with numerous small firms. The strategy emphasized aggressive acquisitions to consolidate , leveraging Slater & Gordon's Australian model of high-volume, fixed-fee PI claims and class actions to exploit referral networks and . Subsequent deals accelerated this approach, with three UK acquisitions completed in the 2013 financial year at a total cost of A$74 million, projected to be earnings-per-share accretive from year one. Notable among these was the October 2013 purchase of John Pickering & Partners, a Liverpool-based PI specialist, followed by the acquisition of Pannone LLP's personal legal services division for US$53 million. In February 2015, the firm announced a double acquisition, including Walker Smith Way with forecasted annual revenue of £10.3 million and four transferring offices, expanding headcount by approximately 200 and adding five sites overall. This spree aimed to position Slater & Gordon as a top-tier UK player in PI and group actions, with dual branding retained initially to preserve referral pipelines from insurers and brokers. The strategy peaked with the March 2015 acquisition of Quindell plc's PI division for £637 million (approximately A$1.2 billion), intended to catapult the firm into a market-leading position with an estimated 10-15% share in certain PI segments. However, proved arduous, involving the merger of disparate IT systems across multiple acquired entities, which delayed operational efficiencies and contributed to fragmented case management. Computer integration issues persisted, complicating and workflow standardization, while redundancies affected hundreds of staff amid overlapping roles from rapid consolidation. Cultural and operational clashes exacerbated these hurdles, as acquired UK firms' boutique practices resisted alignment with Slater & Gordon's centralized model, leading to low staff morale and high turnover. The Quindell deal, in particular, exposed over-reliance on high-value PI claims vulnerable to post-acquisition regulatory scrutiny, with insurers alleging in volumes of transferred cases, further straining during . By early , these challenges prompted office closures and a shift toward consolidation over further buys, underscoring the risks of acquisitive growth without robust post-merger harmonization.

Financial Turbulence and Restructuring

2015-2016 Write-Downs and Losses

In the second half of fiscal year 2015 (July to December 2015), Slater and Gordon recorded a net loss of A$958.3 million, primarily driven by impairment charges on its operations. The bulk of these write-downs, totaling approximately A$876.4 million, stemmed from impairments and adjustments to work-in-progress valuations in the segment, which had been expanded through acquisitions including the April 2015 purchase of Quindell's professional services division for £637 million (equivalent to about A$1.3 billion at the time). This acquisition, intended to bolster and insurance claims handling, quickly revealed overvaluations, with Quindell's assets requiring an A$814 million write-down due to underperformance and integration shortfalls. The arm's financial strain was evident in its standalone results, reporting a £251.2 million after-tax loss for the year ended 30 June 2015, largely from a £269 million . Regulatory scrutiny intensified, as Australia's corporate (ASIC) raised concerns over the firm's practices for work-in-progress and prior-year profits, which were later restated to show a A$20 million overstatement in 2015 . These issues compounded operational challenges, including slower-than-expected case settlements and higher-than-anticipated costs in the , leading to a sharp decline in investor confidence and a 95% drop in share price over approximately 11 months ending March 2016. For the full 2016 (ended 30 June 2016), the firm reported a statutory net loss exceeding A$1 billion, reflecting ongoing impairments and a narrower but still significant A$59.3 million loss in the second half, excluding the prior period's one-off charges. The business alone posted a pre-tax loss of £37 million for the 2015-2016 period, exacerbating the group's debt burden and prompting capital raises and efforts. These losses highlighted the risks of aggressive into volume-driven legal services, where acquisition synergies failed to materialize amid regulatory changes and competitive pressures in both and the .

UK Business Separation and Debt Resolution

In August 2017, Slater & Gordon announced a major restructuring plan to separate its operations from the Australian parent company amid ongoing financial losses primarily attributable to the UK division, which had seen decline by 31.4% in the 2016/17 . The , encompassing subsidiaries and over 3,000 employees across 20 offices, was transferred to a new holding company ( HoldCo) wholly owned by senior lenders in a debt-for-equity swap, severing ties with the listed Australian entity and allowing shareholders to lose their interest in UK operations. As part of the deal, senior lenders committed an additional A$50 million to an existing A$40 million facility, split between the Australian and entities, to support ongoing operations during the transition. The restructuring was formalized through two inter-conditional schemes of arrangement approved by the on December 14, 2017, and effective December 22, 2017, which facilitated the resolution by releasing, , and restating existing obligations. Pre-restructure gross exceeded A$761 million, including A$780.9 million reported as of June 30, 2017; post-restructure, the business received a new super senior secured three-year facility equivalent to up to A$25 million in sterling and a £250 million five-year interest-free convertible note facility, while senior lenders acquired 100% of UK HoldCo. For the Australian operations, the schemes established new facilities including a A$65 million three-year super senior secured loan and a A$60 million five-year equivalent, alongside a similar £250 million convertible note, with lenders taking approximately 95% . A complementary settled claims for A$36.5 million, averting and enabling recapitalization. The separation, effective for UK operations from December 15, 2017, redirected management focus to the business, which reported a net profit after of A$145.6 million on discontinued operations in the subsequent fiscal year, reflecting improved financial stability post-debt reset. Full operational disentanglement between the and entities took approximately 18 months to complete. The process, managed by lenders including Anchorage Capital, positioned the entity under independent creditor control while resolving Slater & Gordon's overarching through reduced and segregated funding structures.

Core Operations and Legal Practice

Australian Domestic Operations

Slater & Gordon's Australian domestic operations center on providing consumer legal services, with a principal emphasis on compensation and matters following the 2017 separation of its business. The firm, headquartered in , maintains a nationwide infrastructure supporting no-win, no-fee arrangements to facilitate access to legal representation for individuals and groups. Core practice areas include compensation, covering , accidents, , such as , and medical claims arising from diagnostic errors or treatment failures. The firm also handles superannuation and disputes, often involving institutional misconduct, alongside employment law services tailored to workplace rights and union affiliations. Class actions represent a significant component, targeting corporate and governmental entities in cases like privacy data breaches— with 26 such incidents affecting in 2023—and superannuation product failures, leveraging the firm's expertise in group litigation to pursue collective redress. Additional services extend to commercial litigation, complementing the consumer focus with broader . The operational network comprises over 40 offices across , exceeding that of any other domestic and enabling localized client engagement in major cities and regional areas. As of reporting, the firm employs 977 staff, with 75.4% women and a leadership team reflecting 62.5% female representation, supporting scalable delivery in high-volume practice areas. Complementary offerings, such as free services for clients navigating trauma from or , underscore a holistic approach integrated into domestic workflows.

Key Practice Areas and Class Action Involvement

Slater & Gordon's core practice areas in center on consumer-facing legal services, with a primary emphasis on personal injury law, which includes claims, accident compensation, cases, and asbestos-related disease litigation. The firm also handles superannuation and insurance disputes, assisting clients with denied claims, total and permanent disability benefits, and income protection matters. These areas leverage a "no win, no fee" model to broaden access, supported by in-house and services to address client needs beyond litigation. Class actions represent a cornerstone of the firm's operations, positioning Slater & Gordon as a leading firm in for group litigation spanning and claims, consumer and violations, medical , financial products, environmental harms, abuses, and disputes. The firm pioneered many early class actions in the country, achieving landmark outcomes such as the $200 million in the Centro class action and the $70 million resolution in the Manus Island detention center case, recognized as one of Australia's largest such settlements. This practice involves representing large claimant groups on a basis, mitigating individual risks while funding complex investigations through third-party litigation financiers when necessary. Ongoing investigations include matters like unlawful strip searches by NSW Police and superannuation product failures at ANZ and OnePath. The firm's expertise draws on over 80 years of operational , though group proceedings surged post-2007 IPO amid regulatory expansions enabling such suits, enabling efficient handling of high-volume, resource-intensive cases via specialized teams and nationwide . Critics, including regulatory inquiries, have noted the model's reliance on fees and funding, which can amplify firm revenues from settlements—such as the $12.8 million approved in a 2024 fee case—but also raise questions about alignment with claimant interests versus profitability.

Notable Cases and Outcomes

Successful Class Actions

Slater & Gordon has secured multiple successful settlements in , primarily involving disputes, superannuation overcharging, and failures, with total recoveries exceeding hundreds of millions of dollars for group members. These outcomes often stem from allegations of misleading conduct or non-disclosure under Australian corporations law, resulting in court-approved distributions after rigorous scrutiny of settlement fairness. In the Centro class action, commenced in , Slater & Gordon represented approximately 5,000 retail investors alleging that Centro Properties Group and its auditor PricewaterhouseCoopers failed to disclose $3 billion in reclassified debt, misleading the market ahead of the 2007 global . The Federal Court approved a $50 million settlement in May 2012, marking one of the earliest major shareholder recoveries in and providing compensation to affected "mum and dad" investors without admission of liability by defendants. The firm achieved a $100 million in the EDI class action, initiated around 2007, on behalf of shareholders claiming misleading profit forecasts and non-disclosures related to contract issues and impairments. Approved in 2008, this recovery, funded in part by third-party litigation financier IMF Bentham, represented a landmark for infrastructure-related investor claims. Other key successes include the Provident Capital , settled for $28.5 million in October 2018 by the of , compensating debenture holders for losses tied to the collapse of the unlisted investment product amid allegations against the . In the Murray Goulburn proceedings, a $42 million settlement (including interest and costs) was approved in 2019 for unitholders affected by the dairy cooperative's 2016 profit downgrade and unit price suspension, addressing claims of inadequate disclosures. More recently, Slater & Gordon secured a $29.5 million settlement in the BT Superannuation class action against Westpac and BT Financial Group, approved on a no-admissions basis for group members alleging excessive fees for no service in superannuation products from 2008 onward. These cases underscore the firm's role in redistributing funds to retail investors and consumers, though recoveries are typically net of legal costs and funding commissions, with courts emphasizing arm's-length evaluations to ensure adequacy.

High-Profile Representations and Criticisms

Slater & Gordon has handled several landmark representations, including the 1964 HMAS Voyager collision case, where the firm successfully secured compensation for victims of the naval disaster involving the collision between HMAS Voyager and HMAS Melbourne, marking an early high-profile win in maritime negligence claims. In the 1990s, the firm represented villagers in the Ok Tedi mining pollution against , alleging environmental damage from the Ok Tedi Mine's discharge into the Fly River system, which resulted in a mediated settlement including a moratorium on disposal and commitments. More recently, the firm led the for detainees at the Regional Processing Centre, securing interim settlements and advancing claims of mistreatment and inadequate conditions in what became Australia's largest . In contemporary high-profile matters, Slater & Gordon initiated class actions against and following major data breaches in 2022 and 2023, respectively, representing thousands of affected customers alleging failures in data protection and notification. The firm also pursued the first successful court award for damages in 2024, establishing precedent for non-employer liability in exposure cases. Criticisms of these representations have centered on fee structures and case management practices. In claims, particularly in the UK, former clients in 224 test cases challenged deductions from settlements for success fees and after-the-event insurance premiums, arguing lack of ; however, the ruled in May 2025 that the firm had adequately disclosed terms during initial calls, dismissing most claims. In a 2025 medical case, the firm faced wasted costs orders after advancing claims against a spinal without sufficient evidential basis, with an dismissed by Mr Justice Turner, highlighting scrutiny over claim viability assessments. Additionally, in the acquired Quindell portfolio, systemic failures in client file handling led to a £82,000 fine from the UK's in 2023 for inadequate and breaches affecting representations. These incidents have fueled broader debates on plaintiff firms' aggressive intake and funding models, though the firm maintains such practices enable access to for claimants otherwise unable to litigate.

Controversies and Criticisms

Financial Mismanagement and Investor Impacts

Slater & Gordon's acquisition of Quindell's UK legal services division for approximately £640 million in May 2015 exemplified key elements of financial mismanagement, as the firm overvalued the target amid inadequate due diligence despite expending £31.7 million on scrutiny of its accounts. Subsequent revelations indicated Quindell had overstated revenues through aggressive accounting practices, prompting investigations by the UK's Serious Fraud Office and leading Slater & Gordon to initiate a $1.1 billion lawsuit against the seller for alleged fraud in management representations. The fallout materialized rapidly, with Slater & Gordon recording a $1 billion net loss for the 2015-2016 , primarily from writedowns on the assets exceeding $950 million, which eroded the firm's and necessitated . Investor impacts were severe: the share price plummeted from a peak of A$8.07 in April 2015 to A$0.11 by March 2017, wiping out over 98% of from a prior A$2.75 billion capitalization and inflicting substantial losses on shareholders who had invested during the expansion hype. Regulatory scrutiny underscored potential governance lapses, as the Australian Securities and Investments (ASIC) launched probes in 2015 into errors in UK financial reporting that overstated asset values, followed by a 2016 investigation into possible falsification of accounts related to the acquisition. These inquiries, including examinations of internal emails revealing concerns over misleading market disclosures, highlighted systemic issues in financial oversight and risk assessment at the executive level. Aggrieved investors pursued recourse through class actions, including a A$250 million claim filed in 2016 alleging misleading conduct regarding the Quindell deal's viability, which further pressured the firm's liquidity amid operational cuts like 640 job losses in the UK business. While Slater & Gordon eventually restructured by divesting the UK operations to address debts exceeding A$700 million, the episode eroded trust in its management model, with critics attributing the crisis to overambitious growth strategies prioritizing acquisitions over prudent valuation.

Internal Employment and Governance Issues

In February 2025, Slater & Gordon experienced a significant internal when an unauthorized was distributed to all staff, purportedly from outgoing interim chief people officer Mari Ruiz-Matthyssen. The email disclosed confidential details including employee salaries, rankings, and pointed personal criticisms of executives and staff, referencing individual health issues, political views, and interpersonal shortcomings. The firm immediately disavowed the message, attributing it to a "rogue" or "" actor, with Ruiz-Matthyssen denying authorship and claiming ignorance of the email's existence. The incident triggered widespread staff outrage and eroded trust in leadership, prompting immediate implementation of a formal process for addressing pay parity concerns and a confidential for complaints. A forensic was launched, with the email's distribution—sent in 10 identical bursts over 16 minutes—suggesting an intent to bypass IT safeguards, and the matter was reportedly escalated to . Employees expressed fears over reputational damage from the exposed criticisms, particularly in , and broader dissatisfaction with management practices under ownership. Governance repercussions followed, including high turnover in human resources leadership; the firm lost its third chief people officer in just over a year by September 2025, amid ongoing back-office turmoil and declining employee satisfaction metrics. In August 2025, the board announced a leadership transition, with James —who joined in 2017—and two non-executive directors departing upon completion of their terms, explicitly linked to stabilizing the firm post-scandal. The firm initiated searches for a new and directors to oversee recovery, highlighting vulnerabilities in and executive oversight exposed by the breach.

Broader Critiques of Litigation Model

Critics of Slater & Gordon's litigation model, which pioneered no-win-no-fee arrangements and scaled through public listing and third-party funding, argue that it prioritizes volume-driven growth over sustainable profitability, leading to inherent financial instability. The firm's reliance on valuing work-in-progress (WIP) assets—future fees from ongoing cases—proved particularly vulnerable, as delays in converting these to cash triggered massive write-downs, exemplified by a $425.1 million net loss for the six months ending December 31, 2016. This approach, combined with debt-fueled acquisitions lacking synergies, was deemed "questionable" by Morningstar analyst James in 2017, who forecasted an "inevitable" decline following the expansion due to unproven consolidation benefits in the legal sector. In class actions, the model amplifies risks through fees and litigation funders, where lawyers and funders capture substantial portions of settlements—often 20-30% or more—while individual plaintiffs receive modest distributions, raising concerns over misaligned incentives. For example, a Court approval of a 27.5% for Slater & Gordon in a against G8 Education highlighted ongoing debates, with opponents warning that such arrangements encourage "fishing expeditions" and pressure defendants into costly settlements without admissions of liability, distorting . Broader critiques extend to the fostering a U.S.-style litigious environment that elevates defense costs, potentially stifling business investment; empirical data from class action outcomes show defendants incurring $5-20 million in expenses per case, often passed to consumers via higher prices or premiums. The structure exacerbates these flaws by subjecting speculative WIP forecasts to market scrutiny, as analyses in 2016 exposed overvaluations, precipitating a share price collapse from over $7 to pennies. While proponents, including Slater & Gordon, cite enhanced access to justice against powerful entities, detractors like legal economists contend the model generates , with firms pursuing marginal claims for aggregated fees rather than merit, evidenced by the firm's own entanglement in a $250 million shareholder over misleading WIP disclosures. The 2025 rejection of solicitors' contingency fees in federal s further underscores judicial wariness of conflicts arising from profit-driven representation, limiting scalability without funder involvement.

Recent Developments and Current Status

Post-Restructuring Recovery Efforts

Following the creditors' approved on December 22, 2017, Slater & Gordon recapitalized its , slashing debt levels and severing operational links with its UK division to concentrate resources on personal injury and class action practices. This structural shift enabled cash preservation amid prior impairments exceeding $500 million from overprovisioning in litigation matters, allowing the firm to prioritize revenue-generating cases over expansive international growth. Recovery hinged on monetizing class action portfolios, yielding settlements including $49.5 million from in November 2019 and $95 million from Spotless Group in May 2020, which bolstered liquidity and offset ongoing operational costs. Concurrently, the firm intensified pursuits in superannuation and securities litigation, filing actions against entities such as in October 2021 and Beach Energy in November 2021 for alleged misleading disclosures. These efforts narrowed half-year losses to $20.6 million by December 2017 from prior peaks, signaling a trajectory toward sustainability through disciplined case selection rather than volume-driven expansion. By early 2023, accumulated progress in litigation outcomes and cost controls positioned the firm for , with Funds acquiring it via an off-market valued at approximately $77.6 million, leading to delisting from the ASX on , 2023. , noted for distressed asset turnarounds, retained core to execute further efficiencies, including potential refinements in fee structures and overhead reduction, unencumbered by quarterly reporting demands. This transition marked a pivotal phase in recovery, transitioning from public market volatility to oversight focused on long-term profitability in niche litigation.

Ongoing Operations and 2024-2025 Events

In 2024, Slater & Gordon reported an operating profit from continuing operations of £8.9 million, marking a 225% increase from £2.7 million in 2023, despite a decline in revenue attributable to disciplined cost management and a strategic shift toward complex, high-value legal work. The firm raised £30 million through a share issue to support ongoing initiatives, including technology consolidation and office rationalization, such as the relocation to The Plaza in Liverpool to enhance efficiency and sustainability. In Australia, the company generated approximately A$253.9 million in revenue for fiscal year 2025 with around 870 employees, maintaining operations in class actions, personal injury claims, and employment law. The firm continued to expand its portfolio, commencing proceedings in May 2024 against Insurance Australia Limited and subsidiaries over alleged "loyalty tax" practices in pricing. In October 2024, it advanced the ANZ and OnePath Superannuation , with a settlement approval hearing scheduled for December 4, 2025, in the . Additional investigations and filings included a April 2025 against Paladin Energy for alleged misleading conduct regarding production forecasts, an August 2025 probe into Suncorp's practices, and an ongoing investigation into unlawful NSW Police strip searches. In July 2025, Slater & Gordon announced the elimination of 150 positions across its operations as part of cost-control measures amid financial restructuring under ownership by Funds since April 2023. A significant internal unfolded in February 2025 when an email impersonation attack leaked payroll data, including salaries and performance rankings for over 900 staff, leading to widespread internal circulation, external forwarding, and subsequent privacy concerns. The incident prompted an internal investigation, the departure of interim Chief People Officer Mari Ruiz-Matthyssen, and a May 2025 lawsuit by her against the firm for allegedly her in the fallout. This event compounded ongoing payroll challenges, including reported underpayments and claims, highlighting governance strains in employee relations.

Key Personnel

Founders and Early Leaders

Slater and Gordon was established in March 1935 as a partnership between William "Bill" Slater and Hugh Lyons Gordon, initially operating from a small room in the Australian Railway Union's Unity Hall Building in to provide legal services primarily to trade unions and workers seeking workplace entitlements. William Slater (c. 20 May 1890 – 19 June 1960), a solicitor and prominent politician born in , , had been admitted to practice as a and solicitor on 1 March 1922 after leaving school at age 12 to support his family and pursuing self-study and qualification. He served multiple terms in the Victorian Parliament from 1917 to 1960, including as Attorney-General (the youngest in Australian state history at age 35) and later as Speaker, while using the firm to advance labor interests amid the Great Depression's aftermath. Hugh Lyons Gordon (5 June 1909 – 14 June 1943), Slater's brother-in-law and a and solicitor from Irymple, , graduated with a from the before entering the partnership to revitalize Slater's practice. Gordon enlisted in the Royal Australian Air Force in March 1941 and was killed in action over the at age 34, after which Slater retained the firm's name in his memory despite the partnership's dissolution. Following the founders' era, early leadership transitioned to figures like Ted Hill, who joined briefly in the late , rejoined as a on 28 1942, and departed in April 1948 to pursue activities. Geoffrey Llewellyn Jones joined as a staff solicitor in February 1946, assumed the role of general manager in 1948, and served until retirement on 30 June 1984, helping stabilize operations amid post-war growth in representation. These individuals maintained the firm's focus on labor advocacy, laying groundwork for its expansion into and class actions.

Notable Past and Present Employees

served as an industrial lawyer at Slater & Gordon from 1986 to 1995, specializing in employment and union matters, and was elevated to partner during her tenure. joined the firm as a solicitor in 1997, became a partner in the unit by 2000, and remained until 2008, where he represented unions in workplace disputes and litigation. Geoffrey Eames commenced his articles of clerkship at the firm in 1967, gaining experience in labor law under senior partners before admission to the bar in 1969; he later pursued a distinguished judicial career, including appointment as a justice of the . Among current employees, prominent figures include partners leading high-profile class actions, such as those in consumer and matters, though the firm maintains a lower public profile for ongoing personnel beyond executive leadership. The firm's historical ties to Labor-affiliated lawyers have produced several who advanced to political or judicial roles, reflecting its early focus on workers' and causes.

References

  1. [1]
    Our history | Slater and Gordon
    Slater and Gordon Lawyers have filed a class action against oil and gas company Beach Energy on behalf of investors who bought shares over an eight-month period ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  2. [2]
    Stock market crash: how Slater and Gordon became a casualty of ...
    Aug 9, 2017 · The law firm had an illustrious heritage as a protector of working people and boasted Julia Gillard among its former staff.
  3. [3]
    Slater and Gordon's UK business to split from Australian parent
    Aug 30, 2017 · Slater and Gordon's troubled UK business is to be divided from its Australian parent into a holding company owned by the indebted firm's ...Missing: delisting | Show results with:delisting
  4. [4]
    'We don't belong on the ASX' – Slater & Gordon backs $150m bid
    Feb 24, 2023 · The law firm has backed the offer from Allegro Funds, bringing an end to a tumultuous 15 years on the ASX.
  5. [5]
    Slaters officially delists - Lawyers Weekly
    May 1, 2023 · Its delisting followed the exercising of a right to compulsorily acquire the remaining shares in Slaters by Australian PE firm Allegro funds, ...Missing: 2007 | Show results with:2007
  6. [6]
    What's in a name: the story behind Slater and Gordon
    Feb 3, 2020 · The firm was named Slater and Gordon after Bill Slater and Hugh Gordon, and the name was kept in memory of Hugh Gordon after his death.
  7. [7]
    William (Bill) Slater - Australian Dictionary of Biography
    In 1924 Slater became attorney-general and solicitor-general in the short-lived (July-November) Prendergast Labor government. He held the same portfolios ...
  8. [8]
    William Slater - Parliament of Victoria
    Member of Victorian Parliament between 1917 and 1960. Born: 20 January 1890 (Wangaratta, Victoria). Died: 19 June 1960 (South Melbourne, Victoria).
  9. [9]
    A Tale of Two Law Firm IPOs - Yahoo Finance
    Sep 10, 2017 · When Slater and Gordon became the world's first publicly-listed law firm in 2007, it was supposed to herald a new era of law firm ownership.Missing: ASX | Show results with:ASX
  10. [10]
    Ethics | Canadian Lawyer
    Aug 7, 2007 · Slater & Gordon, a middle-rank Australian law firm specializing in personal injury litigation, became a public company on May 21. It is now ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] For personal use only - ASX
    "IPO Prospectus" means the prospectus lodged by the Company with ASIC on 13 April 2007 relating to an initial public offering of Ordinary Shares. "Issue ...
  12. [12]
    Slater and Gordon seeks $35m in IPO - The Sydney Morning Herald
    Apr 2, 2007 · Slater & Gordon is forecasting revenue of $58.7 million for fiscal 2007 and a net profit after tax of $9.1 million. The offer opens on April ...
  13. [13]
    Sowing the seeds of Slater & Gordon's market demise - AFR
    Jun 30, 2017 · Slater & Gordon, founded in 1935 to protect Victorian workers, was blazing a trail by becoming the first in the world to publicly list on the ...
  14. [14]
    Ethical Values in the Marketplace
    Founded in 1935 by William Slater and his brother-in-law Hugh Gordon, Slater & Gordon focused on unions, injured workers, and worker's compensation.Missing: initial growth early
  15. [15]
    What We Need To Learn from Slater & Gordon (Perspective)
    Aug 26, 2016 · Slater & Gordon was a renowned plaintiff-side personal injury firm based in Melbourne when, in 2007, it took advantage of changes to Australia's ...
  16. [16]
    Creating the First Public Law Firm: The IPO of Slater & Gordon Limited
    Slater & Gordon (S&G), a midsized Australian law firm with a high-growth consolidation strategy, had an initial public offering (IPO) scheduled for May 2007.Missing: history practice focus
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Slater & Gordon Limited Annual Report 2007-2008
    Jul 6, 2006 · Foundation Shares prior to listing on the ASX on 21 May 2007 were converted into ordinary shares. Prior to the conversion the Foundation ...Missing: delisting | Show results with:delisting
  18. [18]
    Law firm faces class action over Slater & Gordon acquisition advice
    Sep 18, 2019 · A strategy of non-stop acquisitions. In April 2012, Slater & Gordon acquired its first UK law firm, Russell Jones & Walker. This was followed ...<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    The Icarus syndrome – the highs and lows of Slater and Gordon
    Feb 13, 2018 · Everything was going well when the world's first listed law firm, Slater and Gordon, announced another blockbuster UK buyout in early 2015.
  20. [20]
    Aggressive UK acquisition strategy drives Slater & Gordon
    Nov 11, 2013 · This has created a huge opportunity for Slater & Gordon, which with its access to capital since its Initial Public Offering (IPO) in 2007 and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Slater & Gordon (UK) LLP has acquired Pannone LLP | Deals
    Slater & Gordon (UK) LLP (Slater & Gordon) has acquired the personal legal services business of Pannone LLP for US$53 million. The transaction has been approved ...
  22. [22]
    Slater & Gordon announces latest UK acquisition - but it's not who ...
    Oct 24, 2013 · The alternative business structure told its annual general meeting in Australia today that it is to acquire John Pickering & Partners, a leading ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  23. [23]
    Slater and Gordon reveals double UK acquisition | News | Law Gazette
    Feb 9, 2015 · The announcement will see Slater and Gordon's UK headcount grow by around 200, with an extra five offices. Both firms will be dual branded for ...
  24. [24]
    Slater & Gordon makes $947M offer to acquire major UK personal ...
    Mar 30, 2015 · Slater & Gordon is to pay 637 million pounds (about $947 million in US dollars) for the personal injury practice of Quindell.Missing: strategy | Show results with:strategy
  25. [25]
    Slater & Gordon acquisition 'transformative' - AFR
    Mar 30, 2015 · "It's a very big acquisition and integration of both systems and people, so it does come down to backing management to execute the strategy," ...
  26. [26]
    Slater and Gordon plans UK closures after £493m losses | News
    Feb 28, 2016 · Australia-listed firm Slater and Gordon is planning a major programme of office closures as part of a reorganisation of the UK business ...
  27. [27]
    Slater & Gordon focuses on "consolidation" after acquisitions spree
    Feb 13, 2014 · Slater & Gordon (S&G) is to concentrate on improving the performance of its UK operations, after an acquisitions spree that it claims has given it a 5% share ...
  28. [28]
    Slater and Gordon posts $958m loss on massive UK write-downs
    Feb 28, 2016 · Law firm Slater and Gordon has posted a $958.3 million loss for the second half of 2015, hit by underperformance and write-downs in its UK ...
  29. [29]
    How Slater & Gordon's lawyers lost $958 million
    Feb 29, 2016 · The firm laid bare the full financial catastrophe on Monday reporting a first half loss of $958 million relating mostly to impairment charges on ...
  30. [30]
    Slater and Gordon could be on the brink after reporting huge losses ...
    Feb 29, 2016 · A major part of the firm's problems stem from its April 2015 purchase of U.K.-based insurance claims processor Quindell's legal services arm ...
  31. [31]
    Slater and Gordon crashes to a $1b loss - ABC News
    Aug 29, 2016 · Slater and Gordon profit in 2015 accounts $20 million overstated; Law firm wrote down Quindell business that it bought in April 2015 by $814m.Missing: write- | Show results with:write-
  32. [32]
    Slater and Gordon UK arm reports £251.2m loss - Law.com
    Apr 14, 2016 · A massive write down of the value of its business has seen Slater and Gordon's UK arm report an after-tax loss of £251.2m in the year to 30 ...
  33. [33]
    ASIC emails reveal Slater & Gordon accounting concerns - AFR
    Aug 29, 2016 · "It may mislead the market." The secret ASIC emails that raised concerns about Slater & Gordon's accounting methods.<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    Slater and Gordon Share Price Plummets - Ison Harrison Solicitors
    Mar 1, 2016 · The company lost around 60% of its share value alone, between opening trading on Monday 29 February to midday 1 March 2016. Geoff Bowd, the ...
  35. [35]
    Slater and Gordon warns of billion-dollar trading loss | News
    Aug 24, 2016 · The net loss for the second half of the year is expected to be limited to A$59.3m, compared with A$958.3m for the first half, which included a ...
  36. [36]
    Slater and Gordon UK legal business loses £37m | News
    Aug 30, 2016 · Slater and Gordon Lawyers UK lost around £37m before tax last year, in addition to massive losses already posted in relation to the acquisition of Quindell.
  37. [37]
    Slater and Gordon splits off UK operation | News | Law Gazette
    Aug 31, 2017 · Senior lenders today committed to add to the existing A$40m debt facility announced in May with another A$50m (£30.1m), split between the two ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Slater and Gordon Limited (S&G) – Restructure 2017 - GLAS
    Key to the restructuring plan was the separation of S&G's Australian and UK businesses and the restatement of facilities for those businesses to reflect new ...
  39. [39]
    https://www.openbriefing.com/AsxDownload.aspx?pdfUrl=Report%252FComNews%252F20171222%252F01937177.pdf
  40. [40]
    [PDF] SLATER & GORDON LIMITED - Open Briefing
    Feb 27, 2018 · a) Separation of all UK operations and UK subsidiaries from the Group effective from 15 December 2017. (including Slater and Gordon (UK) 1 Ltd), ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] SLATER & GORDON LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT 2018
    Aug 29, 2018 · On 22. December 2017, the Company completed a major restructure with the approval and implementation of two schemes of arrangements. The Senior ...
  42. [42]
    Slater & Gordon: It will take 18 months to complete separation of UK ...
    Nov 30, 2017 · It will take around 18 months to completely separate Slater & Gordon's (S&G) Australian and UK operations, the law firm revealed this week as it ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Australian Law Firm | Slater and Gordon
    Slater and Gordon was founded in Australia in 1935. The company has grown from quite humble beginnings servicing the needs of unions and working people. We have ...Our history · No Win No Fee Lawyers · Legal costs · Board and Management
  44. [44]
    Slater and Gordon: Personal Injury | Compensation Lawyers
    Slater and Gordon are a leading compensation and class action law firm, focussed on helping you access justice and compensation. Contact us today.Current Class Actions · The Firm · Contact us · I'm interested in a Class Action
  45. [45]
    https://www.slatergordon.com.au/union-member-services
  46. [46]
    Slater and Gordon Lawyers | LinkedIn
    Slater and Gordon Lawyers is a leading consumer law firm in Australia. We employ over 800 people in 40 locations across Australia.
  47. [47]
    WGEA statement | Slater and Gordon
    At Slater and Gordon, 75.4% of our 977 employees are women, 62.5% of our Executive Leadership Team are women and women account for 62% of employees.
  48. [48]
    https://www.slatergordon.com.au/the-firm/our-commitment-to-you/social-work-services
  49. [49]
    Class Action Lawyers | Slater and Gordon
    We run a wide range of class actions, including shareholder and investor claims, commercial and consumer law claims, personal injury claims, and human rights ...
  50. [50]
    Class actions funding | Slater and Gordon
    If you are not a representative plaintiff, you will not face any risk of having to pay the defendants' legal costs if the case is unsuccessful. 'No Win - No Fee ...
  51. [51]
    Current Class Actions | Slater and Gordon
    NSW Unlawful Strip Searches Investigation. Slater and Gordon announced a class action investigation into unlawful strip searches conducted by the NSW Police on ...ANZ and OnePath Super... · Past Class Actions · Ansell Limited Class Action
  52. [52]
    $$12.8M payday for Slater & Gordon as judge blesses first class ...
    Aug 28, 2024 · A judge has signed off on the first-ever settlement allowing a law firm to earn a contingency fee, approving a $12.8 million cut for Slater ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Inquiry into Class Action Proceedings and Third Party Litigation ...
    Slater and Gordon Lawyers is a leading consumer and class action plaintiff law firm, with a decades- long history of obtaining redress for claimants in disputes ...
  54. [54]
    Past Class Actions | Slater and Gordon
    In the biggest shareholder class action settlement in Australian history, Slater and Gordon won compensation for about 5,000 mainly 'mum and dad' retail ...
  55. [55]
    https://www.slatergordon.com.au/class-actions/past-class-actions/centro-shareholder-actions
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Securities Class Actions - Chubb
    Slater & Gordon. Downer EDI. 2007. 2008. 18.25 million. 100 million. Slater & Gordon. IMF Bentham. Limited. Village Life. 2008. 2009. 3 million. 30 million.
  57. [57]
    Slater and Gordon, Westpac reach $29.5m settlement in BT class ...
    which has been reached on a “no admissions” basis, with both BT and Westpac Life denying any liability — is for $29.5 million ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  58. [58]
    https://www.slatergordon.com.au/class-actions/past-class-actions/murray-goulburn
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Making the disreputable respectable: Slater & Gordon history
    Melbourne law firm Slater & Gordon. The history of the firm and its many cases is told in a new book by his- torian Michael Cannon. The Journal spoke to Mr ...
  60. [60]
    Ex-exec in law firm rogue email crisis says clue to sender is obvious
    Feb 24, 2025 · Slater and Gordon is involved in almost two dozen high-profile class actions, including cases against Optus and Medibank for data breaches.
  61. [61]
    Slater & Gordon makes history in Queensland mesothelioma trial
    Aug 7, 2024 · This case marked the first successful award of damages for mesothelioma in a Queensland Court.
  62. [62]
    Slater and Gordon beats off costs challenge from 224 ex-clients
    May 20, 2025 · Slater and Gordon has won a significant victory in a challenge from hundreds of former clients who argued they did not give informed consent to deductions from ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  63. [63]
    Slater and Gordon Win Major Legal Battle Over Personal Injury Cost ...
    May 21, 2025 · The case, Richardson & Ors v Slater & Gordon UK Limited, involved 224 claimants, with 10 selected as test cases. The central argument was ...
  64. [64]
    Mr Justice Turner dismisses the appeal by Slater & Gordon of Stage ...
    Oct 3, 2025 · The basis of the application was that Slater & Gordon advanced the claim against a spinal surgeon employed by the Second Defendant without ...
  65. [65]
    Slater & Gordon accepts £82k fine for Quindell system failures
    Jan 3, 2023 · Slater & Gordon has accepted a fine of nearly £82000 for historic shortcomings in the legal services business it acquired from Quindell.
  66. [66]
    Attacks on Australia's class action regime are unjust
    Aug 7, 2018 · Slater and Gordon has responded to criticisms of Australia's class actions regime with a detailed, data-driven assessment of the operation ...
  67. [67]
    Slater and Gordon spent £31.7m scrutinising Quindell figures
    Oct 19, 2017 · The firm alleges that a 'fraudulent misrepresentation' by Quindell led Slater and Gordon to purchase the legal services division for £637m in ...
  68. [68]
    Slater and Gordon sues for $1.1b over claimed fraud over Quindell buy
    May 11, 2017 · Slater and Gordon sues for $1.1b over claimed fraud over Quindell buy ... The disastrous £673 million acquisition of Quindell in 2016 ...
  69. [69]
    Slater and Gordon's Quindell deal: 'a country club built on quicksand'
    Aug 28, 2015 · The Quindell deal may not be responsible for all of Slater & Gordon's problems, but the listed Australian law firm must demonstrate that the ...
  70. [70]
    Watchstone denies Slater and Gordon's accusations of fraud during ...
    Oct 13, 2017 · Watchstone denies Slater and Gordon's accusations of fraud during ill-fated Quindell deal ... financial and external pressures that had ...Missing: mismanagement | Show results with:mismanagement<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    Slater & Gordon shares fall as $250 million class action looms
    Oct 12, 2016 · Slater and Gordon posted a $1 billion annual loss for 2015/16, largely due to writedowns on its UK business. The embattled law firm's shares, ...Missing: collapse | Show results with:collapse
  72. [72]
    Why the Slater & Gordon Limited share price was slammed another ...
    Mar 1, 2016 · Down from a high of $8.07 in April 2015, shares of Slater & Gordon have collapsed more than 95%, giving the company a market value less than ...Missing: losses | Show results with:losses
  73. [73]
    Law firm Slater and Gordon faces class action from shareholders ...
    Dec 22, 2015 · Rival law firm Maurice Blackburn Lawyers opens registrations to shareholders aggrieved over the company's performance and share price losses.Missing: victories | Show results with:victories
  74. [74]
    Slater and Gordon shares crash to 11c - ABC News
    Mar 22, 2017 · Slater and Gordon shareholders are losing hope of recovering money from their investments in the struggling law firm.
  75. [75]
    New Slater & Gordon investigation unsurprising given long history of ...
    Dec 21, 2016 · In February of this year the company agreed to write-downs of WIP and goodwill in the "hundreds of millions" as it announced that ASIC was no ...Missing: annual | Show results with:annual
  76. [76]
    ASIC probes Slater and Gordon again | SBS News
    Dec 21, 2016 · The corporate watchdog has asked law firm Slater and Gordon to provide past financial records to determine if they were falsified.Missing: mismanagement | Show results with:mismanagement
  77. [77]
    Slater & Gordon targeted by aggrieved investors for potential class ...
    Feb 29, 2016 · Australian law firm has struggled after clampdown on UK whiplash claims and purchase of scandal-hit insurer Quindell.Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  78. [78]
    Slater & Gordon cuts 640 jobs after Quindell acquisition
    Oct 10, 2016 · Quindell reportedly overstated its profits prior to the purchase which led to an investigation by the Serious Fraud Office. Slater & Gordon ...
  79. [79]
    Ambition before fall as law firm Slater & Gordon faces possible class ...
    Apr 29, 2016 · ASIC's confirmation its investigation had closed following the write-downs helped stem the share rout. But by then so much damage had been done ...Missing: mismanagement | Show results with:mismanagement
  80. [80]
    'What email?': Inside Slater and Gordon's workplace meltdown - AFR
    Mar 1, 2025 · It detailed highly personal criticisms of key executives at the firm and complained that the firm's owner, private equity outfit Allegro Funds, ...
  81. [81]
    Staff outrage at Slater + Gordon law firm over email leak of salaries ...
    Feb 25, 2025 · A top law firm in Victoria has been left scrambling in the wake of a rogue all-staff email that detailed the pay of its entire workforce and lambasted key ...
  82. [82]
    Slater + Gordon's Internal Email Catastrophe - LawFuel -
    Mar 26, 2025 · Slater + Gordon is currently experiencing precisely that scenario, with a forensically investigated email blast that's now landed on Victoria ...
  83. [83]
    The Slater & Gordon Horror Show – Politics, Pay Sheets, and ...
    Sep 6, 2025 · Contextual Highlights: Don't forget last year's underpayment scandal—over 100 staff underpaid ~$300,000; the whistle-blower dismissed, now suing ...Missing: achievements controversies
  84. [84]
    Third HR exec resigns from law firm plagued by scandal - AFR
    Sep 4, 2025 · Plaintiff law firm Slater and Gordon has lost its third chief people officer in little over a year, continuing the turmoil in its back office ...
  85. [85]
    Slater and Gordon to refresh board in wake of email scandal - AFR
    Aug 26, 2025 · Three directors will step down from the board, having finished their terms during a troubling time for the private-equity-owned law firm.
  86. [86]
    Slater and Gordon starts board leadership transition - Lawyers Weekly
    Aug 27, 2025 · Together, we've navigated a period of major change – returning the firm to financial stability and putting in place the foundations for ongoing ...
  87. [87]
    Slater and Gordon to appoint new board chair as James MacKenzie ...
    Aug 26, 2025 · Slater and Gordon is set to appoint a new board chair as current chair James MacKenzie AO steps down. MacKenzie joined the board in 2017.
  88. [88]
    Slater and Gordon suffering repercussions of 'questionable ...
    Feb 28, 2017 · Slater and Gordon suffering repercussions of 'questionable' business model. The decline of Slater and Gordon was “inevitable” after the firm ...
  89. [89]
    Contingency fee rates may rise in wake of Slater & Gordon win
    Aug 29, 2024 · A ruling this week that kept intact a contingency fee rate of 27.5 per cent sought by Slater & Gordon to run a shareholder class action against G8 EducationMissing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  90. [90]
    "The Increasing Role of Class Actions: Developments in Litigation ...
    Given that the costs of running a class action tend to range between $5m to $20m, this is a financial risk which few individuals can assume. ... Kaitlin Ferris is ...
  91. [91]
    Class Actions in Australia – A Quarter Century Later - Gen Re
    Jun 14, 2018 · The class action regime has faced criticism, which includes that it not only promotes a U.S.-style litigation in Australia that stymies ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  92. [92]
    High Court rejects solicitors' contingency fees in class actions
    Aug 13, 2025 · High Court rules no solicitors' CFOs in Federal Court class actions, but CFOs for funders remain. See what this means for funding ...<|separator|>
  93. [93]
    Slater and Gordon on the long road to recovery
    Aug 30, 2018 · Slater and Gordon (ASX: SGH) continues to cut its losses on the long road to recovery from the $1 billion hit it sustained at the hands of a ...
  94. [94]
    Allegro Funds Pty Ltd completed the acquisition of Slater and ...
    Oct 4, 2023 · Allegro Funds Pty Ltd agreed to acquire Slater and Gordon Limited (ASX:SGH) for AUD 77.6 million on February 24, 2023.Missing: delisted | Show results with:delisted
  95. [95]
    Corrs advises Allegro Funds on Slater & Gordon off-market takeover
    May 5, 2023 · The offer successfully closed and Slater & Gordon was delisted in late April. Allegro is Australia's most-awarded team in the turnaround, ...
  96. [96]
    We have published our 2024 Annual Report - Slater and Gordon
    Jul 31, 2025 · Whilst revenue declined compared to 2023, operating profit increased by 225% versus prior year to £8.9m. This was driven by a targeted shift in ...
  97. [97]
    Slater And Gordon Swings To Profit Despite Revenue Drop - Law360
    Jul 30, 2025 · The latest results also show that the group recorded a pre-tax profit of £5.9 million, after it had lost £2.9 million in 2023. It posted an ...
  98. [98]
    Slater and Gordon raises £30m in share issue as underlying profits ...
    Jul 29, 2025 · Slater and Gordon has reported an upturn in trading performance and raised £30 million in new money from its investment fund owners.
  99. [99]
    Slater & Gordon Ltd - Company Profile Report | IBISWorld
    Slater & Gordon is a legal practice that operates in Australia. The company provides specialist legal and complementary services.<|separator|>
  100. [100]
    Loyalty Tax Class Action | Slater and Gordon
    On 28 May 2024, Slater and Gordon commenced a group proceeding (class action) against Insurance Australia Limited (IAL) and Insurance Manufacturers of ...
  101. [101]
    ANZ and OnePath Super Class Action - Slater and Gordon
    The Settlement Approval Hearing is at 10.15am on 4 December 2025 at the Federal Court in Melbourne. In October 2024, Slater and Gordon, acting on behalf of ...Missing: news | Show results with:news
  102. [102]
    Paladin Energy shares drop as Slater and Gordon files class action
    Apr 16, 2025 · Law firm Slater and Gordon has filed a class action against Paladin Energy, alleging the ASX-listed uranium miner engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct.<|control11|><|separator|>
  103. [103]
    Law firm investigates 'loyalty tax' class action against Suncorp
    Aug 28, 2025 · Slater & Gordon is investigating the case against Queensland-based Suncorp and subsidiary AAI on behalf of policyholders who held insurance with ...
  104. [104]
    Law firm Slater and Gordon axes 150 jobs as it returns to profit
    Jul 30, 2025 · The Manchester-headquartered business has reported a pre-tax profit of £5.9m for 2024, according to new accounts filed with Companies House.Missing: Limited | Show results with:Limited
  105. [105]
    What the Slater and Gordon data breach taught us - Aintree Group
    Jun 6, 2025 · In February 2025, Slater & Gordon faced a significant privacy violation when confidential payroll data was leaked. According to the ...<|separator|>
  106. [106]
    Executive sues Slaters over fallout from scandalous email
    May 16, 2025 · Slater & Gordon's former chief people officer accused the firm of leaving her to become the “public face” of an email breach that exposed personal information ...
  107. [107]
    Slater and Gordon chair breaks silence on email crisis - AFR
    Aug 29, 2025 · The email was forwarded more than two dozen times externally and 275 times internally in the hour before the firm locked down its messaging ...
  108. [108]
    Slater & Gordon's payroll crisis offers a cautionary tale
    May 30, 2025 · From a payroll best practice standpoint, this highlights several critical issues: Inadequate vetting: Hiring payroll staff without proper ...
  109. [109]
    Slater and Gordon email scandal: Top law firm rocked by all-staff ...
    Feb 23, 2025 · Among Slater and Gordon's notable alumni are former Prime Minister Julia Gillard, who ascended to partner during her decade-long stint as an ...
  110. [110]
    Mr Adam Bandt - Parliament of Australia
    Solicitor and Partner at Slater and Gordon from 1997 to 2008. Barrister from 2008 to 2010. Electorate. Name: Melbourne; Location: The Division of Melbourne ...
  111. [111]
    Adam Bandt - The Wheeler Centre
    For many years he worked at the labour law firm Slater & Gordon, where he became a partner in the industrial and public interest unit, the same job former Prime ...
  112. [112]
    Why the McCabe case has sparked fierce legal debate - The Age
    Dec 14, 2002 · Justice Eames, 57, is the newest and youngest of the court's 11 justices. He started his career at Slater and Gordon, the firm that represented ...