Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Smoke testing

Smoke testing is a preliminary testing practice used to verify the basic functionality and stability of a system or build, determining if it is suitable for more comprehensive testing or use. In software development, it checks core features and critical paths of a new build to identify major issues early, preventing wasted effort on unstable code. Also known as build verification testing or confidence testing, the term originates from practices in hardware engineering and plumbing, where failures might produce visible smoke (e.g., powering on a circuit board or testing pipes for leaks); in software, it metaphorically ensures the build "doesn't smoke" by confirming it runs without immediate crashes.^[1]^[2]^[3] Typically performed after a development team delivers a new build or integrates changes, smoke testing in software is conducted by quality assurance (QA) teams using a predefined set of high-level test cases that cover essential functionalities, such as login processes, navigation, or key user workflows.^[4] It can be executed manually, through automated scripts for efficiency in repetitive checks, or via a hybrid approach combining both methods to balance speed and thoroughness.^[4] For instance, in an e-commerce application, smoke tests might validate that users can access the homepage, add items to a cart, and proceed to checkout without errors.^[4] The primary benefits of smoke testing include early detection of severe defects, rapid feedback to developers for quick fixes, and resource optimization by avoiding detailed testing on broken builds.^[1] It is recommended as a standard practice in software development lifecycles, including by experts like Steve McConnell in Code Complete, who was a former editor-in-chief of IEEE Software magazine.^[1] However, it is not exhaustive, as it deliberately limits coverage to broad, shallow checks rather than deep validation, distinguishing it from more targeted sanity testing.^[2]

Overview and Etymology

Definition

Smoke testing is a preliminary, shallow, and broad verification method applied to systems in software, hardware, mechanical, and plumbing contexts to confirm that fundamental components function without immediate or catastrophic failure, thereby avoiding the waste of resources on deeper testing of fundamentally broken builds.^[1] This approach ensures early detection of major issues, allowing teams to proceed only if basic stability is established.^[5] Key characteristics of smoke testing include its rapid execution, often completing in minutes to hours, and its focus exclusively on critical paths and essential features rather than exhaustive coverage.^[4] The test is considered successful if no metaphorical "smoke"—indicating severe failure—emerges, such as system crashes, non-responsive interfaces, or visible damage. In software development, for instance, it typically involves verifying that an application launches successfully and that core functionalities, like user login or primary navigation, respond as expected.^[1] In mechanical and plumbing applications, actual non-toxic smoke is introduced into pipes or drainage systems to detect leaks or breaches by observing where the smoke escapes.^[6] For electrical and hardware testing, it entails powering on the device to check for immediate burnout, overheating, or smoke emission from components.^[2] The practice of smoke testing in hardware contexts, including electrical systems, was documented in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, drawing from earlier mechanical traditions, and was adapted to software engineering in the late 20th century to support efficient build validation in agile development cycles.^[7]

Origins of the Term

The term "smoke testing" originated in the mechanical engineering field during the late 19th century, specifically in plumbing and pipe system inspections. As early as 1886, it referred to a method of introducing smoke into drains, sewers, or ducts to visualize leaks, cracks, or improper connections, allowing inspectors to identify issues without invasive disassembly. This practice, documented in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, drew from earlier mechanical testing traditions.^[7] In the 20th century, the term took on a metaphorical meaning in electronics and hardware testing, where engineers would power on newly assembled circuit boards or devices to check for basic functionality. If no smoke emerged—indicating overheating, short circuits, or component failure—the build was deemed stable enough for further development, avoiding catastrophic damage. This "smoke test" evolved from the literal risk of failure producing visible smoke, serving as a quick sanity check to confirm the system did not immediately self-destruct under initial power. Early electrical examples include a 1892 usage for determining machine capacity and a 1910 reference in engineering journals.^[7]^[2] The adoption of "smoke testing" into software development occurred in the late 20th century, primarily through hardware engineers transitioning to software roles, who applied the hardware metaphor to preliminary build verification. By the early 2000s, it gained prominence in the field, as highlighted in Cem Kaner, James Bach, and Bret Pettichord's 2001 book Lessons Learned in Software Testing, which described it as a foundational check for software stability akin to electrical testing. During this period, the practice integrated into emerging agile methodologies and DevOps workflows, where automated smoke tests became part of continuous integration pipelines to enable frequent, low-risk releases and align with the Pareto principle—often catching approximately 80% of critical build issues through just 20% of test effort.^[8]^[9]

Smoke Testing in Software Development

Purpose and Benefits

Smoke testing serves as a preliminary verification step in software development to ensure that a new build is fundamentally stable and suitable for more extensive testing, integration, or deployment. By focusing on core functionalities, it acts as a gatekeeper in continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, preventing unstable code from advancing and thereby safeguarding subsequent development efforts.^[10]^[1]^[11] The primary benefits of smoke testing include reducing wasted resources on defective builds, accelerating release cycles through rapid validation, and enhancing team efficiency with immediate feedback on build viability. It catches critical defects early, minimizing the time and cost associated with debugging and rework, as issues identified at this stage are far less expensive to resolve than those discovered later in the process. For instance, automated smoke tests can execute in 15-30 minutes while covering essential paths, representing a focused subset of the overall test suite to provide quick confidence without exhaustive coverage. This practice not only streamlines workflows but also boosts developer morale by avoiding prolonged investigations into fundamentally broken software.^[12]^[13]^[11] In specific scenarios, smoke testing is commonly applied immediately after code commits to verify integration success in CI/CD environments, following major system integrations to confirm overall stability, and during agile sprints to high-level validate user stories before deeper acceptance testing.^[12]^[14]^[11]

Process and Implementation

The process of smoke testing in software development begins with identifying critical paths in the application, such as login procedures, main navigation flows, and core user interactions, to ensure focus on high-risk areas that could indicate broader build instability.^[15]^[16] Next, teams create a minimal set of test cases, typically 5-10 scenarios, that verify these paths without delving into detailed validations; for instance, checking if a user can successfully log in and access the dashboard.^[15]^[17] These tests are then executed on the new build, either manually by testers or via scripts, to confirm basic functionality and determine if the build is stable enough for further testing.^[18]^[16] Upon completion, results are reported as pass or fail, with any issues logged in detail, including screenshots or error messages; if the build fails, the process iterates by notifying developers for fixes before retesting.^[15]^[17] This approach serves as early defect detection to prevent wasted effort on unstable software.^[18] Implementation tips emphasize prioritizing tests based on risk, starting with user-facing features like payment processing or search functionality to maximize impact.^[16]^[17] Smoke tests should be integrated into continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines to run automatically after every build, ensuring rapid feedback; the entire process typically lasts 15-60 minutes to maintain efficiency without delaying development cycles.^[18]^[15] Smoke testing can be conducted manually, which is suitable for exploratory checks where human judgment assesses visual or ad-hoc behaviors, or scripted for greater repeatability and speed in regression-prone environments.^[17]^[16] A scripted example might involve verifying that an e-commerce site allows a user to add an item to the cart without crashing, using simple assertions on page loads and API responses.^[17]^[15] Best practices include maintaining a dedicated smoke test suite document that outlines test cases, environments, and expected outcomes for team consistency.^[17] Tests should run after every build in continuous integration setups to catch issues early, with clear failure criteria defined as any breakdown in core functions, such as failed navigation or authentication errors, triggering immediate investigation.^[18]^[16]

Automation and Tools

Automating smoke testing in software development allows for frequent execution within continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, such as after every code commit, to quickly identify major integration issues and ensure build stability without extensive manual effort.^[14] This approach leverages scripts to provide consistent, rapid validation of core functionalities, reducing the time from development to deployment and minimizing the risk of releasing faulty builds.^[8] By integrating automation early in the pipeline, teams achieve faster feedback loops, enabling developers to address critical failures immediately rather than later in the process.^[19] Popular tools for automating smoke tests include Selenium, which is widely used for web UI smoke testing to simulate user interactions and verify basic navigation and rendering.^[20] For Java-based applications, JUnit and TestNG frameworks facilitate unit-level smoke tests by structuring assertions around key methods and dependencies.^[20] Pipeline integration is commonly handled by Jenkins or GitHub Actions, which orchestrate test runs post-build and report results in real-time.^[11] For mobile applications, Appium enables cross-platform smoke testing by automating interactions on iOS and Android devices, focusing on essential app launches and flows.^[11] Implementation typically involves creating targeted scripts that check core APIs and endpoints, such as verifying HTTP 200 status responses for primary routes to confirm server availability and basic connectivity.^[14] For instance, a Python script using the pytest framework can automate checks for HTTP status responses and expected content, ensuring the application's basic endpoints function before deeper testing proceeds.^[14] These scripts are kept lightweight, often comprising a small set of high-level tests that run in minutes, and are triggered automatically in CI/CD environments to validate deployments without requiring human intervention.^[21] Automated smoke testing faces challenges like flakiness in UI automation, often caused by timing issues or environmental inconsistencies, which can be mitigated through retry mechanisms and stable test environments to improve reliability.^[22] Maintenance overhead is another concern, addressed by maintaining a small, focused test suite to focus only on critical paths and reduce update efforts as the application evolves.^[23] Post-2020 trends in smoke testing automation include AI-assisted test generation, as seen in tools like Testim.io, which use machine learning to dynamically create and stabilize smoke test suites, adapting to UI changes and reducing manual scripting.^[24] As of 2025, agentic AI has emerged as a key advancement, enabling autonomous test creation and execution for more adaptive smoke testing in CI/CD pipelines.^[25] Cloud-based execution platforms, such as Sauce Labs, have gained prominence for enabling parallel runs across diverse devices and browsers, supporting scalable smoke testing in distributed CI/CD setups without local infrastructure.^[26] Smoke testing differs from sanity testing in scope, timing, and objectives. Smoke testing is a broad, preliminary check conducted early in the development cycle to verify the overall stability of a new build at a high level, ensuring that the system launches and basic functionalities operate without major crashes.^[27] In contrast, sanity testing is narrower and typically performed after smoke testing or following a specific code change, focusing on validating whether particular fixes or recent modifications work as intended without retesting the entire application.^[28] For example, while smoke testing might confirm that an entire web application loads and navigates to key pages, sanity testing could target just one resolved bug, such as a login form validation.^[29] Compared to regression testing, smoke testing is shallow and executed frequently after each build to quickly identify if the software is stable enough for further testing.^[30] Regression testing, however, is more comprehensive and in-depth, aimed at confirming that recent changes or updates have not adversely affected existing functionalities across the system.^[31] It is typically run later in the cycle, often after integration or feature additions, to ensure backward compatibility and prevent defects from re-emerging.^[32] Smoke tests thus serve as a rapid gatekeeper, while regression tests provide thorough validation of ongoing reliability.^[33] Smoke testing also contrasts with unit testing in terms of granularity and integration level. Unit testing involves isolated examination of individual components or modules in a controlled environment, often by developers, to verify that each functions correctly on its own without dependencies.^[34] Smoke testing, by comparison, operates at the system or integration level, combining these units to assess end-to-end basic workflows and overall build integrity.^[18] It does not delve into internal logic but confirms that the assembled application behaves as expected at a superficial level.^[35] There are notable overlaps and sequences in how these testing types interact within a development pipeline. Smoke testing may incorporate elements of unit tests to evaluate integrated components but emphasizes end-to-end basics rather than isolation.^[36] According to the ISTQB glossary, a smoke test is a test suite that covers the main functionality of a component or system, to determine whether it works properly before more extensive planned testing begins; note that ISTQB lists "sanity test" as a synonym, though in practice smoke and sanity testing are often distinguished by their broad versus focused scopes.^[37] In practice, smoke testing often precedes sanity, regression, and deeper integration efforts, forming an initial filter in continuous integration environments.^[38] A practical decision framework for applying smoke testing revolves around its role in answering "Does it work at all?" for a build. If smoke tests pass, teams can confidently proceed to sanity checks for specific updates, regression suites for change impacts, or unit validations for component details; failure prompts immediate fixes without advancing to costlier tests.^[39] This approach minimizes wasted effort in agile and DevOps workflows by prioritizing early detection of showstopper issues.^[40]

Smoke Testing in Other Fields

Mechanical and Plumbing Applications

In mechanical and plumbing contexts, smoke testing employs non-toxic, artificially generated smoke—typically produced by theatrical fog machines, chemical smoke generators, or specialized blowers—to pressurize enclosed systems and reveal leaks, cracks, or faulty connections in pipes, sewers, ventilation ducts, and related infrastructure.^[41] This visual method highlights escape points where smoke emerges, enabling precise identification of defects without invasive disassembly.^[42] The technique has been a standard practice in building and infrastructure inspections since the mid-19th century, with origins in early efforts to test sanitary plumbing systems for integrity—predating similar uses in electrical testing.^[43] The process begins by sealing access points, such as manholes or duct ends, and introducing smoke under controlled low pressure via a blower unit connected to the system inlet.^[42] Technicians then monitor for smoke exiting at unintended locations, such as joints, vents, or ground surfaces, to map defect locations; for optimal results, all drain traps must be filled with water to prevent indoor smoke entry.^[44] Safety protocols emphasize using inert, non-toxic smoke formulations to avoid health hazards or residue buildup, with testing conducted in well-ventilated areas and under mild pressure (typically 0.5–2 inches of water column) to mimic operational conditions without risking system damage.^[41] Key applications include municipal sewer systems, where smoke testing detects inflow and infiltration (I/I) sources—such as cracked laterals or illicit connections—that contribute to overflows and environmental contamination, aligning with EPA recommendations for capacity management under the Clean Water Act.^[42] In HVAC systems, it identifies air leaks in ductwork to ensure energy efficiency and proper airflow, as outlined in SMACNA's HVAC Air Duct Leakage Test Manual, which endorses smoke visualization as a supplementary diagnostic after pressure testing.^[45] Automotive exhaust testing uses similar smoke introduction at the tailpipe to locate leaks that could release harmful gases into the cabin or environment, a routine diagnostic in repair shops to comply with emissions standards.^[46] Equipment typically consists of portable smoke blowers (e.g., models like the Superior 5E for plumbing), smoke candles or fluid reservoirs for generation, and fans to propagate the smoke evenly; these tools produce dense, visible vapor lasting 5–10 minutes per test cycle.^[47] Post-2010 advancements have integrated smoke testing with closed-circuit television (CCTV) inspections, allowing real-time correlation of visual smoke escape with internal pipe imaging for more accurate leak mapping in sewers and ducts, enhancing efficiency in large-scale municipal projects.^[48] Regulations, such as EPA guidelines for sanitary sewer evaluation, mandate non-toxic materials and documentation of findings to support inflow reduction programs,^[42] while organizations like NASSCO provide specification guidelines for standardized smoke testing protocols in gravity sewer assessments.^[49]

Electrical and Hardware Testing

In electrical and hardware testing, smoke testing refers to an initial power-up procedure applied to circuits, printed circuit boards (PCBs), or assembled devices to verify basic electrical integrity and detect immediate faults such as shorts, overloads, or misconnections that could lead to overheating, smoke emission, or fire.^[50]^[2] This preliminary check ensures the hardware is stable enough for further rigorous evaluation, preventing escalation of defects that might damage components irreparably. Note that while the term's metaphorical use in software derives from this hardware practice, the literal smoke testing in plumbing predates electrical applications. The process typically begins with a visual and continuity inspection using a multimeter to confirm connections and polarity before applying power. Low voltage is then introduced gradually—often starting at a fraction of the rated supply—to power the device under test (DUT), while monitoring current draw, voltage rails, and temperature for anomalies like excessive heat or sparks. In manufacturing settings, such as PCB assembly lines, this is performed in a controlled environment with current-limiting power supplies to cap draw at safe levels, allowing quick shutdown if issues arise; successful passage indicates no catastrophic failures, enabling progression to functional tests.^[51]^[52] This practice became commonplace in electronics laboratories with the rise of integrated circuits and complex PCB designs in the mid-to-late 20th century, where powering untested boards risked literal smoke from faulty solder joints or component failures; it later influenced the adoption of the term in software testing for analogous quick verifications.^[2] Smoke testing finds applications in prototype validation to confirm design viability before full production, quality control during consumer electronics assembly—such as verifying smartphone circuit boards for power stability—and high-reliability sectors like aerospace hardware, where it ensures no immediate electrical hazards in avionics systems prior to environmental stress testing.^[51]^[53] Essential tools include multimeters for voltage and resistance checks, oscilloscopes to observe signal integrity on power rails, and power supplies with built-in current limits for safe energization. Safety protocols adhere to standards like IPC-6012, which specifies performance qualifications for rigid PCBs including electrical continuity and insulation resistance to minimize risks during initial powering.^[51] In the 2020s, thermal imaging cameras have become integral, enabling non-contact detection of hot spots—such as those from partial shorts—before visible smoke occurs, with resolutions identifying temperature differentials as low as 0.1°C across the board.^[54] Despite precautions, risks remain, including actual component burnout from undetected faults, earning the procedure its humorous moniker as a "smoke test" to underscore the potential for visible failure indicators like wisps of smoke from overheated traces. Mitigation involves using simulated loads or dummy components to replicate operational conditions without full power demands, along with fuses and rapid disconnect switches to isolate issues promptly.^[53]^[50]

References

[1]
What is Smoke Testing? | Definition from TechTarget
Mar 7, 2023 · Smoke testing tests the basic functionalities and core features of software in development. An example of a smoke test could be the testing of a ...
[2]
The origin of Smoke Testing and the confusion it can cause
Sep 18, 2019 · The term “smoke testing” originated from hardware development. If you power on a circuit board for the first time and you see smoke rising, you know it's ...
[3]
What is Smoke Testing? - BrowserStack
Smoke Testing is a software testing technique that basically determines whether a new build delivered by the Development team is bug-free or not.
[4]
Smoke Testing of Cloud Systems - IEEE Xplore
Smoke testing can be used to design test suites that can be quickly executed to check if a system under test is operational before running any other test suite.Missing: engineering | Show results with:engineering
[5]
Smoke Testing - Easton Utilities
Smoke testing is performed periodically to help identify areas where unauthorized water is entering the sanitary sewer system. Unauthorized water can cause ...
[6]
Empirical evaluation of the fault-detection effectiveness of smoke ...
Our results show that: (1) short GUI smoke tests with certain test oracles are effective at detecting a large number of faults; (2) there are classes of faults ...Missing: engineering | Show results with:engineering
[7]
Is the source of the phrase "smoke test" electronic hardware testing?
Oct 13, 2022 · Software/electronics smoke testing is a term which appeared independently from plumbing smoke testing. Instead, it seems to originate from the ...
[8]
The Ultimate Guide to Smoke Testing - Global App Testing
"Smoke testing" refers to broad but shallow functional testing for the main functionality of a product. It is a software testing method designed to assess the ...
[9]
7 Benefits of Smoke Testing You Can't Do Without - Spiceworks
Nov 25, 2022 · ... smoke testing suite allows them to find and repair as many as 80% of the defects they encounter. The 80/20 rule of Pareto is well-aligned ...
[10]
A Comprehensive Guide to Smoke Testing in Software Development
May 28, 2024 · Smoke testing is a type of software testing you conduct after new builds or code changes to evaluate basic functionality and stability.
[11]
Smoke Testing Guide: Process, Tools & Best Practices - TestingXperts
Aug 5, 2025 · In Agile or DevOps environments, smoke testing is often automated and integrated into CI tools. This ensures every build is vetted before ...
[12]
https://www.launchdarkly.com/blog/comprehensive-guide-smoke-testing-software-development/
[13]
What Is a Smoke Test in Software – Meaning, Process & Benefits
Oct 28, 2025 · Smoke testing is a technology to gauge if your software's primary functions are correct. The essence of smoke testing is simple: it allows ...Smoke Testing Vs Sanity... · Understanding A Uat Smoke... · What Is A Smoke Test In...
[14]
Smoke testing in CI/CD pipelines - CircleCI
Jun 13, 2025 · Smoke tests are great for exposing unexpected build errors, connection errors, and for validating a server's expected response after a new release is deployed ...Missing: benefits agile sprints
[15]
What Is Smoke Testing in Software Development | Amplitude
Smoke testing serves the same purpose in software development. It catches major problems early, so teams don't waste time running more detailed functional ...Missing: 70-90% bugs
[16]
Smoke Testing: How to, Examples and Best Practices - Testlio
Jun 7, 2024 · Smoke testing can save significant time and cost by catching critical defects early on. The earlier a defect is found, the cheaper it is to ...Missing: 70-90% | Show results with:70-90%
[17]
Smoke Testing 101: Best Practices and Examples - AltexSoft
Sep 12, 2025 · Smoke testing should be done as the first step of the QA process, before moving on to more detailed tests like regression or functional testing.
[18]
The different types of software testing - Atlassian
7. Smoke testing. Smoke tests are basic tests that check the basic functionality of an application. They are meant to be quick to execute, and their goal ...
[19]
Smoke Testing Keeps Your Delivery Pipeline Safe and Sound
Jan 9, 2025 · Smoke testing is a technique for discovering major software flaws using CI/CD pipelines. It consists of very shallow but broad tests that verify the crucial ...Missing: rationale | Show results with:rationale
[20]
All About Automated Smoke Testing | BrowserStack
Oct 30, 2025 · JUnit is a widely adopted Java testing framework, often used for unit and smoke testing. It provides a structured way to create and manage test ...
[21]
Guide to Automated Smoke Testing - BugBug.io
Nov 2, 2025 · Automated smoke testing becomes part of the continuous integration (CI) process, where each new build automatically undergoes a series of tests.Missing: rationale | Show results with:rationale
[22]
Flaky Tests in Software Testing: How to Identify, Fix, and Prevent Them
Sep 29, 2025 · Complicates test maintenance: Flaky tests complicate test suite maintenance by making it challenging to distinguish between a new bug and ...
[23]
Common Pitfalls in Automated Testing and How to Avoid Them
May 1, 2025 · The challenges faced in automation testing—over-automation, neglected maintenance, flaky scripts, skill gaps, unclear goals, silos, and ...1. Automating Everything... · Writing Tests Without Clear... · 7. Expecting Instant Results
[24]
Testing made simpler through AI innovation - Testim
Move faster and make testing easier with generative AI. Create test automatically from a natural language description with Agentic Test Automation. Stabilize ...Missing: assisted smoke 2020
[25]
AI Testing Tools: 3 That You Should Get to Know - Testim Blog
Feb 3, 2025 · This post introduced three AI testing tools that you should get to know: Testim, Sauce Labs, and Applitools.Missing: assisted smoke 2020
[26]
Sanity Testing Vs. Smoke Testing – Difference Between Them
Nov 21, 2024 · Smoke Testing verifies the critical functionalities of the system whereas Sanity Testing verifies the new functionality like bug fixes. Smoke ...
[27]
Smoke Testing and Sanity Testing Difference with Examples
Dec 14, 2021 · A Smoke check is designed to touch every part of the application in a cursory way. It's is shallow and wide. A Sanity check is used to determine ...
[28]
Sanity Testing Vs Smoke Testing - Software Engineering
Jul 11, 2025 · Smoke testing is a shallow check of the entire application, while sanity testing is a more detailed check of specific functionality or components of the ...
[29]
Smoke Testing vs. Regression Testing: Key Differences - Ranorex
Jun 29, 2023 · Smoke testing happens at the beginning of testing, while regression testing occurs every time there's a major change or update. Once an ...
[30]
Difference between Smoke Testing and Regression Testing
Jul 15, 2025 · Smoke testing is the surface level testing to verify stability of system. Regression testing is the deep level testing to verify the rationality of system.
[31]
Comparing Smoke Tests to Regression Tests | Blog - Harness
Feb 15, 2024 · Smoke testing offers a quick check on software stability, while regression testing ensures updates don't break existing features.
[32]
Smoke vs Regression Testing: Key Differences | PractiTest
Smoke tests run early and quickly, often using a small set of test cases. Regression tests are more detailed and are run after every major change. Both ...
[33]
What are the differences between unit tests, integration tests, smoke ...
Feb 6, 2009 · Smoke testing predates electronics by a century and comes from plumbing, when a system of pipes were filled by an actual smoke and then ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[34]
Different types of testing explained - DEV Community
Dec 6, 2018 · The term smoke test seems to be a holdover from plumbing. If you could see smoke or steam coming out of a pipe, it was leaky and needed to be ...
[35]
Do you know the different types of testing? | SSW.Rules
Smoke tests can be useful right after a new build is made to decide whether or not you can run deeper (and more expensive) tests, or right after a deployment to ...1. Smoke Testing · 2. Unit Testing · 6. End-To-End Testing<|control11|><|separator|>
[36]
https://www.ssw.com.au/rules/different-types-of-testing/
[37]
The Smoke, Sanity, and Regression Testing Triad - CloudBees
Smoke testing verifies build stability, sanity testing confirms recent changes function as expected, and regression testing ensures existing features remain ...
[38]
Smoke Testing vs Regression Testing - In-depth Comparison
Sep 20, 2024 · While smoke testing gives a quick "is it broken?" check, regression testing digs deeper to ensure that new changes haven't broken anything that used to work.
[39]
https://www.globalapptesting.com/blog/smoke-testing-vs-regression-testing
[40]
https://www.testlio.com/blog/smoke-testing-and-regression-testing/
[41]
[PDF] Preventing Stormwater Contamination from Sanitary Sewage
Smoke testing involves injecting a non-toxic vapor (smoke) into the manholes and following its path of travel in the mains and laterals. ▫ Dye testing. Dye ...
[42]
What is Smoke Testing? - TestLodge Blog
Sep 5, 2022 · There are a couple of possible origin stories; the first comes from the hardware industry. The idea is that when you'd fire up a new machine for ...
[43]
https://www.practitest.com/resource-center/article/what-is-smoke-testing/
[44]
[PDF] Duct and System Air Leakage - ASHRAE Connecticut Chapter!
Dec 12, 2024 · • Perform Smoke Test or use Leak Detection Products. • Depressurize, Repair any leaks detected and allow sealant to cure. • Begin decreasing ...
[45]
https://ctashrae.org/downloads/Meeting_Presentations/241212___smacna_duct_leakage_salt_presentation.pdf
[46]
https://orionmotortech.com/blogs/auto-blog/how-to-find-an-exhaust-leak
[47]
Sewer Leak Detection Specialists in Greater Vancouver - AnyLeak.ca
Using cutting-edge technology such as acoustic sensors, CCTV camera inspections, smoke testing, and thermal imaging, we help municipalities, businesses, and ...
[48]
How to Test a Circuit Board (PCB): Methods, Tools, and Best Practices
May 30, 2025 · PCB testing involves verifying both the structural integrity and functional performance of a board. In simpler terms, it checks whether the ...
[49]
The Definitive Guide to PCB Bring-Up
Dec 6, 2023 · The following article describes the board bring-up process once you have an assembled PCB in hand. You will need the following tools to complete this process.
[50]
PCBA Testing Overview - FixturFab
Nov 1, 2024 · The Printed Circuit Board Assembly (PCBA) process has multiple types of testing such as AOI, AOX, ICT, Smoke Testing, Black Box Testing, and ...
[51]
PCB Debugging: Tips, Tools, and Tricks - Altium Resources
Apr 5, 2020 · We've got some tips to help you get started and the important tools you'll need to identify problems in your board.Pcb Debugging Starts By... · Testing Opens And Shorts... · Near-Field And...
[52]
Identifying Thermal Hotspots in PCB Development - Optris
Infrared cameras enable full-surface thermal visualization of powered PCB prototypes, allowing engineers to detect and address hotspots early.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s