Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Solyndra

Solyndra, Inc. was a Fremont, California-based manufacturer of thin-film photovoltaic solar panels using copper indium gallium diselenide (CIGS) technology applied to cylindrical glass tubes designed for commercial rooftops, founded in 2005 by Chris Gronet, a former executive. The company received a $535 million from the U.S. Department of Energy in September 2009—the first under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act's Section 1705 program—to finance a Fab 2 manufacturing facility, but filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on August 31, 2011, after burning through over $1 billion in funding amid a collapse in silicon prices and surging low-cost imports from , leaving taxpayers with a $528 million loss. The venture exemplified risks in government-backed bets on unproven technologies, as Solyndra's high-cost, niche panels failed to achieve against commoditized alternatives, despite initial promise in a polysilicon-shortage . Congressional probes revealed DOE officials overlooked financial red flags and shifts, with internal projections showing losses by mid-2010 yet continued disbursements totaling $527 million before default; the episode fueled scrutiny of political influences, including executive ties to Obama donors and a May 2010 presidential touting job creation. Post-bankruptcy, assets fetched minimal recovery—primarily from infusions and patent sales—while FBI raids and reports highlighted potential misleading statements to secure the guarantee, underscoring causal pitfalls of subsidies distorting competitive signals in capital-intensive sectors.

Founding and Technology

Company Inception

Solyndra Inc. was founded in 2005 by Dr. Christian Gronet, a semiconductor engineer with a doctorate in materials science from Stanford University. Gronet, who had previously served as general manager of the rapid thermal processing product group at Applied Materials after the acquisition of his startup G-Squared Semiconductor, identified an opportunity to apply thin-film deposition techniques to solar photovoltaics. The company was initially incorporated as Gronet Technologies, focusing on developing cylindrical solar panels to address limitations of flat-panel designs, such as reduced efficiency from dirt accumulation and suboptimal light capture in diffuse conditions. In 2006, the firm was renamed Solyndra and established its headquarters in . The proprietary technology centered on hermetically sealed glass tubes coated with (CIGS) thin-film photovoltaic material, enabling omnidirectional sunlight absorption and simplified rooftop mounting without racking systems. This design drew from research at the and aimed to lower manufacturing and installation costs relative to panels. Solyndra secured its first funding of $10.6 million between February and October 2006 from investors including CMEA Capital and . Pilot production of the cylindrical panels began in 2007, marking the transition from research to initial commercialization efforts.

Core Technology and Innovations

Solyndra's core technology centered on thin-film photovoltaic cells employing (CIGS) as the absorber material, deposited onto cylindrical glass substrates to form tubular s. Each typically comprised multiple elongated tubes, with a single panel containing up to 40 such units, enabling a 360-degree light-capturing surface that functioned as a self-tracking system without mechanical components. This design aimed to optimize diffuse and low-angle sunlight incidence, particularly on commercial flat roofs, where traditional flat panels require racking and precise south-facing alignment. Key innovations included the proprietary manufacturing process for hermetically sealing CIGS layers on tubular glass, which minimized material usage to approximately 1% of the thickness required for wafers while achieving efficiencies competitive with early thin-film technologies. The cylindrical reduced soiling from dust, snow, and bird droppings due to reduced horizontal surfaces, and enhanced wind resistance up to 130 mph without anchoring or bolting, facilitating rapid installation—claimed to be faster than conventional panels. Solyndra held over 120 patents globally, many focused on patterned layer formation, encapsulation, and scalable deposition techniques for these structures, developed under founder Chris Gronet's approach to elongate CIGS into non-planar geometries. Modules were rated for 25+ years of , with lightweight construction (under 3 pounds per ) suited for roof load constraints.

Technical Viability Assessments

Solyndra's cylindrical CIGS thin-film modules featured photovoltaic material deposited on inner glass tubes, surrounded by an outer tube with an optical concentrator to enhance light capture across 360 degrees, enabling higher performance in diffuse and low-angle sunlight conditions compared to traditional flat panels. The design aimed for manufacturing advantages through continuous inline deposition processes and installation benefits, such as no roof penetration and resistance to 130-mph winds, potentially yielding 7% higher daily output than panels at a 15-degree tilt. Prior to the 2009 , the agency's environmental assessment evaluated the technology as innovative, projecting commercial viability through scaled production of these cells to expand deployment. Operational efficiencies for Solyndra's CIGS modules reached 11-12% in production, lagging behind contemporary panels at 15-20% and competitors like First Solar's CdTe thin-film at up to 17.3%. While lab-scale CIGS efficiencies approached 20%, factory yields suffered from the complexities of uniform thin-film deposition on curved cylindrical substrates, requiring specialized vacuum equipment that elevated capital and operational costs beyond $3 per watt—far exceeding panel prices, which fell to around $1.20 per watt by due to polysilicon price drops from $450/kg to $50/kg. of panels, involving mounting 40 individual tubes per unit, further compounded handling, shipping, and challenges, reducing photovoltaic utilization relative to flat panels' full coverage. Long-term technical concerns included CIGS reliance on scarce indium, constraining material supply and raising doubts about sustained high-volume production without cost-prohibitive substitutions or recycling. Ray-tracing models and experimental validations confirmed the cylindrical geometry's optical efficacy for broad-spectrum light absorption, aligning closely with real-world outputs under varied solar conditions. However, these strengths proved insufficient against the design's inherent manufacturing hurdles, as the niche advantages in non-optimal lighting and installation did not offset the elevated per-watt costs, rendering the technology non-competitive at commercial scales despite initial engineering promise.

Government Funding and Support

DOE Loan Guarantee Program Context

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Loan Guarantee Program, formally authorized under Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005), empowers the Secretary of Energy to issue federal loan guarantees for eligible energy projects employing innovative technologies. These guarantees back up to 80% of a project's total cost, mitigating lender risk for high-capital, technology-driven ventures that might otherwise struggle to secure private financing due to unproven commercial viability or perceived technological uncertainties. Eligible categories include renewable energy systems, advanced nuclear facilities, carbon capture and sequestration, and other innovations aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions, enhancing energy independence, or improving efficiency. The program's structure requires borrowers to pay fees covering the government's estimated credit subsidy cost—the projected net loss from defaults—though Congress can appropriate funds to offset this, effectively subsidizing riskier projects. Administered by the DOE's Loan Programs Office (LPO), created to oversee Title XVII and related authorities, the program evaluates applications through a rigorous process assessing technical feasibility, market potential, financial projections, and environmental impacts. From inception through 2008, activity remained limited, with no major guarantees issued, primarily due to insufficient congressional appropriations for credit subsidy costs; the Bush administration issued regulations in 2007 but deferred substantive commitments pending funding. This early stasis reflected broader debates over federal intervention in private markets, where proponents argued guarantees bridged the "valley of death" between research and commercialization for capital-intensive clean energy innovations, while skeptics highlighted risks of taxpayer exposure to uncompetitive technologies and potential for inefficient capital allocation. The program's scope expanded significantly with the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), which appropriated approximately $2.5 billion specifically for guarantees targeting manufacturing and deployment under a temporary Section 406 initiative, layered atop Title XVII. This infusion enabled the to commit its first substantial guarantees starting in 2009, prioritizing projects aligned with national goals for job creation, , and emissions reductions amid the global . By design, the initiative favored technologies not yet dominant in markets, such as thin-film , to accelerate , though it introduced heightened scrutiny over selection criteria and default probabilities given the reliance on federal backstopping for ventures private investors deemed too speculative. Pre-2009 evaluations had underscored the need for conservative risk modeling, as historical federal programs elsewhere showed elevated default rates for subsidized high-tech bets.

Application and Approval Process

Solyndra submitted a pre-application to the Loan Guarantee Program on December 28, 2006, seeking support under Section 1703 of the for its Fab 1 facility. Following initial financial and technical reviews from April to June 2007, the DOE invited Solyndra, along with 15 other applicants, to submit a full application on October 4, 2007. The company filed its full application on May 6, 2008, shifting focus to funding for Fab 2, a planned expansion to produce thin-film cylindrical solar panels at scale. The approval process involved extensive , including , technical assessments, and . DOE engaged external consultants such as RW Beck for an independent engineering report (September 30 to November 17, 2008) and a market consultant's report (November 25, 2008), alongside legal counsel from LLP starting in December 2008. A September 4, 2008, internal memo identified Solyndra as an "earliest mover" and targeted a conditional commitment by January 16, 2009. However, on January 9, 2009, the DOE Credit Committee remanded the application for additional analysis, prompting further scrutiny before resetting targets for March 2009 approval. The process accelerated after the Obama administration took office on January 20, 2009, and enacted Section 1705 via the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act on February 17, 2009, which expanded eligibility for projects. The Credit Committee approved the transaction on March 12, 2009, followed by a recommendation from the Credit Review Board on March 17, 2009. DOE issued a conditional commitment on March 20, 2009, contingent on final , raises by Solyndra, and documentation completion from March to August 2009. The $535 million was formally issued on September 3, 2009, with announcing the finalization the next day to support Fab 2 construction.

Political Connections and Influences

Solyndra's major investors included the George Kaiser Family Foundation, led by Oklahoma oil billionaire , who raised over $1 million for Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign as a bundler. visited the at least 16 times between March and October 2009, including meetings with senior advisors like , during the period when Solyndra's $535 million loan guarantee application was under review. Emails released by congressional investigators revealed discussed Solyndra's financing needs with officials and Energy Department personnel, urging support for the project as a means to stimulate economic recovery. The loan guarantee received conditional approval from the Department of Energy on March 20, 2009, and final commitment on September 24, 2009, amid internal DOE resistance to perceived political pressure from the White House to expedite the process. William Miller, a DOE loan officer involved in the review, objected to interventions by Obama political appointees, noting in emails that such involvement undermined the merit-based evaluation. Although administration officials, including Energy Secretary Steven Chu, maintained that the decision was based solely on technical merits and denied political interference, subsequent House Energy and Commerce Committee probes highlighted White House coordination with Solyndra executives to align the loan with administration priorities for green jobs creation. President Obama promoted Solyndra as a flagship of his clean energy initiative, visiting the company's factory on May 3, 2010, where he praised it for creating jobs without taxpayer subsidies—despite the federal backing—and touted it as evidence of successful innovation under the stimulus . This high-profile endorsement occurred even as internal documents later showed company officials anticipating financial distress, raising questions about whether political optics influenced the haste in approving and publicizing the amid competitive pressures in the solar market. Congressional Republicans criticized the infusion of into the DOE's loan , arguing it prioritized donor-linked projects over rigorous .

Operations and Expansion

Facility Construction and Production

Solyndra's initial manufacturing operations utilized Fab 1, a pilot-scale facility in Fremont, California, where production of its proprietary cylindrical thin-film solar panels commenced in 2007, with first commercial shipments occurring in July 2008. The company's primary expansion focused on Fab 2, a larger facility adjacent to Interstate 880 in Fremont, with groundbreaking held on September 4, 2009, shortly after the U.S. Department of Energy finalized its $535 million loan guarantee. Construction of the 280,000-square-foot manufacturing plant, plus an adjoining office building on a 30-acre site, proceeded rapidly, targeting completion by July 15, 2010, at a total estimated cost of $733 million, encompassing land, building, and specialized equipment for automated panel assembly. Fab 2 was engineered for an annual production capacity of 500 megawatts of solar modules, enabling scalability beyond Fab 1's limited output. Initial output from the facility's first phase began in the fourth quarter of 2010, with full commercial production ramping up in January 2011. By mid-2011, however, Solyndra mothballed Fab 1 and deferred further Fab 2 expansion amid intensifying market competition and declining panel prices, constraining overall output below projected levels.

Employment and Output Milestones

Solyndra began production of its cylindrical thin-film solar panels at Fab 1 in , in 2007, marking the company's initial output milestone following the facility's completion. By the time of its 2009 registration statement, Fab 1 had generated less than 30 megawatts (MW) of cumulative output, reflecting early-stage challenges in the novel manufacturing process. The company targeted an annualized production of 110 MW for Fab 1 by the fourth fiscal quarter of 2009, though actual performance lagged these projections. Employment expanded alongside production efforts, reaching 801 workers as of February 6, 2010, primarily supporting Fab 1 operations and preparations for . Output grew modestly thereafter, with total annual production increasing from 30 MW in 2009 to 67 MW in 2010, more than doubling amid efforts to refine and . for Fab 2 occurred in September 2009, intended to boost capacity significantly, but the facility's full-scale production was delayed, with initial plans for 285–300 MW total capacity by 2013 later curtailed due to market pressures. Facing competitive declines in silicon prices, Solyndra announced layoffs of nearly 180 full- and part-time employees in November 2010, alongside mothballing Fab 1 and postponing Fab 2 expansion. peaked at 1,100 workers by February 28, 2011, before the company ceased operations in August 2011, resulting in the dismissal of over 1,100 staff and filing. These events underscored the firm's inability to sustain output growth against falling panel prices, with no further production milestones achieved post-2010.

Market Entry and Initial Sales

Solyndra began commercial shipments of its proprietary cylindrical (CIGS) thin-film panels in 2008, targeting applications such as commercial rooftops where the tubular design eliminated the need for traditional racking systems. The company announced $1.2 billion in sales orders that year, signaling early market traction amid growing demand for photovoltaic installations. Fiscal year 2008 revenue totaled $6 million, marking the onset of commercial sales from initial production runs at its facility. Revenue surged to $100 million in 2009, driven by expanded output and fulfillment of early contracts. This growth corresponded to panel sales volume of 30 megawatts in the ended January 2, 2010, up significantly from prior periods. For the nine months ended October 3, 2009, Solyndra reported $58.8 million in revenue, compared to $6.0 million for the full fiscal year ended January 3, 2009, underscoring rapid scaling of . Initial entry focused on utility-scale and commercial projects , leveraging the panels' and tubes for in diffuse light conditions. By 2010, annual revenue reached $140 million, reflecting continued order bookings despite emerging competitive pressures from lower-cost panels. However, Solyndra's early sales momentum relied on justified by installation advantages, with gross margins challenged by high costs during the ramp-up phase.

Financial Decline and Bankruptcy

Competitive Market Pressures

Solyndra's thin-film CIGS technology was developed to circumvent high polysilicon costs associated with conventional (c-Si) modules, but a rapid decline in those input prices undermined its competitive edge. Polysilicon spot prices, which peaked at approximately $460 per in amid supply shortages, fell to about $51.50 per by August 2011 as global production capacity expanded significantly. This drop reduced the material cost for c-Si modules to roughly $0.33 per watt at $50 per , eroding the relative advantage of Solyndra's silicon-free approach. Concurrently, photovoltaic module prices collapsed due to oversupply and intensified , with average prices falling from over $3.50 per watt in 2007 to $1.15–$1.20 per watt by August 2011. Solyndra's modules, however, were priced at $3.24 per watt during 2009–2010, with projected costs exceeding $6 per watt and targets of $2.00–$2.35 per watt that remained uncompetitive against market rates. The company's cylindrical panel design, intended for lower installation costs, failed to offset these disadvantages as flat-panel c-Si products—holding 74% of the in 2010—dominated due to . A surge in production capacity, particularly from and , exacerbated these pressures by flooding the and driving further price erosion. manufacturing capacity reached 27 gigawatts in 2010, with firms benefiting from state subsidies that enabled below-cost sales and gains. This influx of low-priced c-Si modules, combined with Solyndra's higher production expenses and slower scaling, rendered the firm unable to achieve viable margins, contributing directly to its operational unsustainability by mid-2011.

Cash Flow Issues and Restructuring

By early 2010, approximately six months after the Department of Energy closed in September 2009, Solyndra faced escalating deficits driven by operating losses exceeding $200 million annually and a monthly surpassing $10 million, as ramp-up at its Fab 2 facility outpaced generation amid declining polysilicon prices and intensifying competition from lower-cost manufacturers. In February 2011, Solyndra executed an out-of-court , securing $75 million in fresh private investment from existing backers including Argonaut Ventures and Madrone Partners, while subordinating the 's $535 million to these new funds in a repayment , a move that prioritized private creditors over taxpayers despite initial loan terms prohibiting such subordination without DOE approval. This arrangement provided short-term liquidity but failed to resolve underlying viability concerns, as internal financial models revealed persistent negative cash flows projected through 2012, dependent on unmet revenue targets. Cash shortages intensified by mid-2011, with Solyndra's board warning of potential shutdown absent further intervention; in August 2011, the company and investors proposed a second involving additional equity infusions and debt modifications, but the rejected it on , citing inability to verify long-term prospects and concerns over escalating taxpayer exposure. Operations ceased the following day, culminating in Chapter 11 filing on September 6, 2011, with assets of $856 million against $1.1 billion in liabilities, underscoring the 's inadequacy against structural market pressures.

Chapter 11 Filing and Shutdown

On August 31, 2011, Solyndra suspended all manufacturing operations at its facility, resulting in the immediate layoff of approximately 1,100 employees, which represented nearly the entire workforce. The company stated that the shutdown stemmed from its inability to obtain the additional private financing needed to continue operations amid plummeting prices and intensified competition from lower-cost manufacturers. Following the operational halt, Solyndra filed a voluntary petition for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on September 6, 2011, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, case number 11-12799. The filing sought to facilitate an orderly restructuring or potential sale of assets while protecting the company from creditors, including the U.S. Department of Energy, to which Solyndra had defaulted on a $535 million after disbursing about $528 million. Under Chapter 11, the company initially operated as a debtor-in-possession, preserving certain and inventory for possible reorganization, though market realities limited viable paths forward. The proceedings triggered the cessation of all activities, with the Fremont fab standing idle as administrative efforts focused on asset preservation and creditor negotiations. notifications complied with the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification () Act requirements, though the abrupt scale amplified economic impacts in the local community, including severance obligations estimated in the tens of millions. By late 2011, the case shifted toward elements, with court approvals for selling non-core assets like equipment and to recover partial value for stakeholders, underscoring the failure of prior restructuring attempts.

Investigations and Controversies

Congressional Inquiries

The House Committee on Energy and Commerce, through its Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, initiated a probe into the $535 million to Solyndra following the company's Chapter 11 filing on August 31, 2011. The investigation examined the approval process, potential political influences from the Obama administration, and broader issues with the DOE's 1705 program under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Republicans on the committee alleged that DOE officials overlooked financial risks and accelerated the loan to align with political timelines, including a September 2009 groundbreaking attended by President Obama, while Democrats defended the process as based on expert technical and market evaluations. On September 14, 2011, the subcommittee held a hearing titled "Solyndra and the ," featuring from officials and experts who highlighted ignored warnings about Solyndra's viability amid falling silicon prices and Chinese competition. Subcommittee Chairman questioned whether involvement, including emails from administration aides pressing for faster approval, constituted improper interference. The hearing revealed that Solyndra's initial application was rejected in 2007 for insufficient equity but revived in 2009 after investor commitments, with proceeding despite internal doubts about the company's thin-film technology's cost-competitiveness. A subsequent hearing on , 2011, titled "From Loan Guarantee to to FBI Raid: What Are the Real Lessons of Solyndra's Collapse?", saw Solyndra CEO Brian Harrison and CFO W. Bill Stover invoke their Fifth Amendment rights against , declining to answer questions on the company's finances, job projections, and representations to . Investigators presented evidence that Solyndra had assured and as late as July 2011 that it was "on track" for success, despite deteriorating cash flows and market share losses. Energy Secretary testified before the full Energy and Commerce Committee on October 5, 2011, in a hearing titled "The Solyndra Failure: Views from Department of Energy Secretary ," maintaining that the loan was approved after rigorous and that Solyndra's failure stemmed from unforeseen global oversupply rather than flawed oversight. acknowledged "regrets" over the outcome but rejected claims of political pressure, noting the program's overall portfolio had disbursed guarantees to companies totaling over $14.5 billion with only a few defaults. The committee subpoenaed and documents, uncovering communications suggesting administration efforts to restructure Solyndra's debt privately to avoid political embarrassment ahead of the 2012 election. The probe culminated in an August 2012 committee report detailing systemic shortcomings, including overreliance on optimistic projections, inadequate risk modeling for , and insufficient monitoring post-disbursement. Findings emphasized that Solyndra's technology, while innovative for rooftop installations, proved uncompetitive against conventional panels, whose prices dropped 90% from 2009 to 2011 due to manufacturing surges. These revelations prompted the passage of the No More Solyndras Act in September 2012, which sought to impose stricter reviews and on future guarantees, though it stalled in the .

DOE Oversight Failures

The Department of Energy () exhibited multiple shortcomings in its oversight of the $535 million issued to Solyndra on September 4, 2009, including rushed that overlooked unresolved financial and market risks, such as incomplete third-party market analyses and acceptance of overly optimistic profit margins of 48-54 percent against industry norms of around 33 percent. Internal Credit Review Board approval on March 17, 2009, proceeded despite outstanding issues, with Treasury's consultation compressed to a single day on March 19, 2009, yielding minimal revisions, in violation of procedural norms under the Act of 2005. The Office of Management and Budget's review was similarly expedited to nine days from August 25 to September 1, 2009, under pressure to align with a , limiting substantive scrutiny of asset valuations like Fab 2, which DOE undervalued at $60 million compared to OMB's $87 million estimate. Post-approval monitoring was inadequate, with lacking a dedicated portfolio management lead until August 2010 and failing to implement robust tracking systems, as highlighted by (GAO) assessments of the Program's fragmented data assembly processes that delayed oversight by months. Despite Solyndra's on March 16, 2010, raising "substantial doubt" about its viability and net losses exceeding $232 million in 2009, continued disbursing funds—reaching $408 million by September 2010—and downgraded the risk rating only to B- in September 2010 and CCC on October 15, 2010, without halting further advances or demanding corrective actions. The found that verification during missed red flags, such as Solyndra's misrepresented $1.4 billion in sales contracts and undisclosed price concessions to customers, which undermined market viability assessments. In response to Solyndra's escalating cash shortages in 2010, delayed decisive intervention, including requesting postponement of layoffs announcements until after the November 3, 2010, midterm elections, and pursued a second despite evident liquidity crises. Restructuring efforts compounded oversight lapses; on February 22, 2011, Secretary approved via action memo the subordination of $75 million in taxpayer-backed debt to $150 million in private investment, bypassing full Credit Review Board input and ignoring OMB analyses showing no recovery advantage over liquidation (projected at 20-22 percent versus 's flawed 61 percent estimate). A subsequent $385 million subordination on August 30, 2011, further prioritized private interests without Department of Justice consultation, despite recommendations, contributing to over $500 million in ultimate taxpayer losses upon Solyndra's August 31, 2011, filing. These deviations from standard procedures, as noted in reviews, reflected broader program weaknesses in risk mitigation and consistent policy adherence.

Allegations of Misrepresentation

In a special report issued on August 24, 2015, by the Department of Energy's Office of Inspector General (DOE-OIG), investigators concluded that Solyndra executives engaged in a "pattern of false and misleading assertions" and omissions of key information during their efforts to secure and maintain the $535 million approved in September . The probe, spanning four years and examining internal communications, financial documents, and interactions with federal officials, found that company leaders provided inaccurate statements about sales performance, customer contracts, and financial projections to portray an overly optimistic viability. For instance, in a 2009 submission, Solyndra claimed $2.2 billion in firm contracts for sales, which investigators determined was overstated by including speculative or non-binding commitments without of underlying risks. The report highlighted specific instances of misrepresentation in and reporting, including the substitution of revised projections that masked deteriorating outlooks; one internal sent to showed missed targets, but accompanying narratives downplayed variances without full context. Solyndra's 2009 to , which touted growth from $6 million in 2008 to $140 million, omitted qualifiers about the non-recurring nature of certain deals and dependency on volatile subsidies or incentives. These assertions extended to congressional briefings in June 2011, where executives reiterated robust demand despite internal acknowledgments of cash shortages and production delays. While the OIG report did not recommend criminal prosecutions, citing challenges in proving intent amid market disruptions like low-cost imports that eroded Solyndra's competitive edge by 2010, it criticized the company's certifications as "inaccurate and misleading" regarding known adverse conditions. Solyndra officials, in response, attributed the findings to aggressive but lawful business forecasting rather than deliberate , arguing that polysilicon price drops—unforeseen in initial models—were the primary causal factor in , not fabricated data. Independent analyses, such as those from the House and Commerce Committee in 2012, corroborated elements of the OIG's critique by revealing emails where staff noted Solyndra's "rosy" projections contradicted third-party audits warning of scalability issues as early as 2008. The allegations underscored tensions in public-private partnerships, where optimistic representations may have influenced 's risk assessments despite internal flags.

Aftermath and Policy Lessons

Asset Liquidation and Taxpayer Losses

Solyndra filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on September 6, 2011, initiating efforts to sell its assets as a going concern to avoid full liquidation. Despite court approval for an auction of the business on October 27, 2011, no qualified bids emerged, leading to the piecemeal sale of equipment, inventory, and facilities. Non-core assets, including office furniture, computers, and wiring, were auctioned in late October and November 2011, generating $6.2 million. The company's Fremont, California factory, a key asset, was marketed for sale but fetched limited proceeds amid ongoing liquidation starting in early 2012 after failed whole-business deals. A February restructuring, approved by the Department of Energy (), subordinated the government's senior loan position to new private investments of up to $75 million, prioritizing private creditors in recovery. This adjustment, intended to inject cash and sustain operations, reduced the DOE's ultimate recovery when liquidation occurred. Solyndra's total debts exceeded $783 million at , with assets valued far lower due to market declines in solar technology. The DOE's $535 million , with approximately $527 million disbursed, resulted in taxpayer losses of about $503 million after recoveries totaling roughly $24 million from asset sales and other proceedings. Alternative estimates place recoveries at up to $28 million, still leaving a net loss exceeding $500 million. These figures exclude additional costs, such as unrecovered interest and administrative fees, and highlight the fiscal impact of the loan program's risk exposure without corresponding safeguards against creditor priority shifts.

Program-Wide Repercussions

The Solyndra bankruptcy on August 31, 2011, triggered widespread congressional investigations into the Department of Energy's (DOE) Section 1705 loan guarantee program, established under the to support projects with up to $22.5 billion in credit subsidy appropriations. committees, including Energy and Commerce and Oversight and Reform, conducted multiple hearings starting in September 2011, focusing on the program's rushed approvals, inadequate credit reviews, and potential political influences in prioritizing high-risk ventures like Solyndra, the first recipient of a $535 million guarantee in September 2009. These probes revealed that DOE overrode internal warnings about Solyndra's viability amid falling prices and , extending to the program's broader of 31 guarantees totaling $15.7 billion. The inquiries highlighted systemic oversight lapses, with the DOE issuing a 2015 special report documenting misrepresentations in Solyndra's financial projections and DOE's failure to enforce rigorous across the program. By 2012, at least three Section 1705 had defaulted, including Solyndra's near-total $528 million loss to taxpayers, contributing to estimated program-wide defaults exceeding $700 million after recoveries. This prompted legislative responses, such as the House-passed "No More Solyndras Act" (H.R. 6213) in 2012, which sought to bar new DOE guarantees after December 31, 2011, and impose stricter credit risk premiums to align with private-sector standards. Program-wide, the fallout eroded confidence in government-backed financing for , amplifying critiques of subsidized "picking winners" in competitive and influencing subsequent protocols under Title XVII, including enhanced independent credit assessments and reduced reliance on temporary authorities like Section 1705, which expired on September 30, 2011. audits post-Solyndra recommended improved monitoring of portfolio risks, leading to 's adoption of more conservative in later iterations, though defaults in related programs (e.g., Abound Solar's $400 million guarantee) underscored persistent challenges in forecasting technological and market disruptions.

Critiques of Government Intervention in Energy Markets

The failure of Solyndra, which received a $535 million loan guarantee from the Department of Energy in September 2009 before declaring bankruptcy in August 2011, has been cited by critics as a prime example of the pitfalls of government intervention in energy markets through subsidized financing. This intervention distorted market signals by providing access to capital on terms unavailable in private markets, encouraging investment in technologies like Solyndra's copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) thin-film panels that proved uncompetitive against plummeting prices for conventional crystalline silicon panels driven by global supply increases. The resulting taxpayer loss of approximately $528 million underscored the inefficiency of bureaucratic due diligence compared to private investors, who had declined to fund the company despite its innovative claims. Critics argue that such programs exemplify government's inherent disadvantage in "picking winners and losers," as political considerations often override economic viability assessments. A 2012 House Republican report described Solyndra's collapse as a "" of political pressures influencing Department of Energy decisions, including rushed approvals and restructured deals that prioritized job creation optics over fiscal prudence. Economists from institutions like the Manhattan Institute contend that government backing reduces the discipline of , fostering where firms pursue unproven technologies without bearing full downside risks, ultimately misallocating resources away from more efficient private-sector innovations. Broader critiques highlight cronyism in energy policy, where loan guarantees serve as tools for rewarding political allies rather than advancing technological progress. Analyses from the Cato Institute portray Solyndra as emblematic of central planning failures, noting that federal officials overlooked warnings about the company's cash burn and competitive threats, leading to interventions that propped up a firm unable to adapt to market dynamics. Even as the overall DOE loan program reportedly achieved profitability by 2014 through successes in other projects, detractors emphasize that individual debacles like Solyndra impose deadweight losses on taxpayers and erode trust in government-led industrial policy, advocating instead for neutral tax and regulatory frameworks that allow competitive markets to allocate capital based on consumer demand and profitability.

References

  1. [1]
    Solyndra: Energy superstar's rapid rise and fall - SFGATE
    Sep 18, 2011 · Solyndra started life in 2005 with an insight - and a different name. Company founder Chris Gronet had noticed that traditional, flat solar ...
  2. [2]
    Why Solyndra Was A Failure - Manhattan Institute
    Sep 25, 2011 · The company, founded in 2005, had used $460 million of these loans by January to build a second factory, even though it still had excess ...Missing: DOE date
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Special Report - Department of Energy
    Aug 24, 2015 · Loan Guarantee to Solyndra, Inc. (OIG Case No. 11-0078-I) ... execute the $535 million loan guarantee. In our view, the investigative ...
  4. [4]
    Assessing the Department of Energy Loan Guarantee Program
    In 2009, renewable energy company Solyndra received $535 million through the federally backed 1705 loan guarantee program of the Department of Energy (DOE).
  5. [5]
    Controversial U.S. energy loan program has wiped out losses
    Nov 13, 2014 · The government has not recovered any funds from Solyndra. It's $528 million loan makes up most of the program's losses. The government recovered ...
  6. [6]
    Missed warning signs: A Solyndra timeline - Center for Public Integrity
    Jan 28, 2022 · Aug. 31, 2011: Solyndra shuts its doors, fires more than 1,100 full and part-time workers and announces it is filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.Missing: technology | Show results with:technology
  7. [7]
    Special Report: 11-0078-I | Department of Energy
    Aug 24, 2015 · This Special Report outlines the results of a 4-year investigation into concerns that Solyndra, Inc., (Solyndra) may have provided the Department of Energy ...Missing: date
  8. [8]
    The man behind Solyndra's rise and fall: Chris Gronet
    Nov 26, 2011 · Gronet founded Solyndra in 2005 and personally pushed for ... Solyndra first applied for an Energy Department loan guarantee in late 2006.
  9. [9]
    Solyndra: Advanced by Bush for 2 Years (Solyndra Timeline)
    Sep 15, 2011 · February 2006 – October 2006: In February, Solyndra raises its first round of venture financing worth $10.6 million from CMEA Capital, Redpoint ...
  10. [10]
    Solyndra's Cylindrical Innovation - SPIE
    Apr 1, 2009 · The CIGS-based thin-film PV panels from the California startup, each consisting of 40 cylindrical, or tubular, modules, are mounted horizontally ...
  11. [11]
    Can Solyndra's Breakthrough Solar Technology Outlive the ...
    Sep 20, 2011 · Solyndra's cylindrical modules could also be installed faster than flat panels and were highly resistant to wind. Dirt and snow can build up on ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
  12. [12]
    Solyndra Cylindrical Module
    Solyndra's cylindrical module uses CIGS tech, has 195 cells, a 360-degree surface, and a self-tracking design, and is designed to produce electricity for 25+ ...Missing: core innovations
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Solyndra 2011 Case Study - Ikhlaq Sidhu
    Sep 14, 2011 · Thin film technologies use approximately 1% of the thickness of active photovoltaic material compared to typical silicon wafers used in ...
  14. [14]
    https://batteryhookup.com/products/210w-solyndra-solar-panel
  15. [15]
    Solyndra Patents Key Insights & Stats
    Solyndra has a total of 124 patents globally, out of which 37 have been granted. Of these 124 patents, more than 9% patents are active.Missing: details | Show results with:details
  16. [16]
    Learning from Solyndra (CHAPTER 2) - Nanotechnology and ...
    Gronet used CIGS but in an unusual “elongated” or cylindrical form. Our assessment of the initial technology is that Chris Gronet had developed a useful ...<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    Technology / Products - Solyndra
    Solyndra uses CIGS modules, a cylindrical design, and is lightweight. It has a 360-degree surface, can be placed in any orientation, and is designed for 25+ ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
  18. [18]
    Solyndra: Its technology and why it failed - EDN Network
    Nov 21, 2011 · Solyndra and First Solar panels are both based upon non-silicon thin-film processes. Solyndra used copper-indium-gallium-diselenide (CIGS).
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Environmental Assessment FOR DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LOAN
    Sep 12, 2008 · The Solyndra project would bring these photovoltaic panels to market and into use, making renewable, solar-generated electricity more available ...
  20. [20]
    Market Dynamics That May Have Contributed to Solyndra's Bankruptcy
    Oct 25, 2011 · However, the current operational efficiency of Solyndra's CIGS technology is approximately 11% to 12% compared to c-Si efficiencies of ...
  21. [21]
    How Solyndra's Failure Promises a Brighter Future for Solar Power
    Oct 12, 2011 · The bankruptcy of photovoltaic panel-maker Solyndra is actually good news for the U.S. solar industry.Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
  22. [22]
    A review of solar photovoltaic technologies - ScienceDirect.com
    Their limited supply and high demand in electronics may impact the long-term viability of CIGS technology. Additionally, the mining and processing of these ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Cylindrical and Flat Solar Collector Geometries - Sol Ideas
    Nov 13, 2012 · Comparison of Solyndra cylindrical tube panel: experiment and ray trace model – good agreement. Variations due to solar source assumptions, such ...
  24. [24]
    Loan Guarantees for Clean Energy Projects - Federal Register
    May 30, 2023 · Title XVII, as amended, provides the Secretary the authority to issue loan guarantees for certain eligible projects, including innovative clean ...Inflation Reduction Act · Section 1703 Clean Energy... · Approach to Title XVII...
  25. [25]
    Loan Guarantee Program Title XVII of EP Act 2005
    Aug 1, 2024 · The U.S. Department of Energy is authorized to issue loan guarantees pursuant to Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005.
  26. [26]
    DOE Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program Overview - Holland & Knight
    Jul 31, 2015 · Under Title XVII program authority, DOE can guarantee loans for up to 80 percent of total project costs for eligible proposals. As a condition ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] DOE Loan Guarantee Program - EPA
    Under Title XVII, ten discrete categories of projects can be eligible for loan guarantees, including: 1. Renewable energy systems;. 2. Advanced fossil energy ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Leveraging the DOE Loan Program - Congress.gov
    The DOE Title XVII loan guarantee program is primarily a self-pay program, but also operates with a limited amount of appropriated credit subsidy for renewable ...
  29. [29]
    Loan Programs Office | Department of Energy
    The Energy Dominance Financing Program (Section 1706 or EDF Program) guarantees loans to projects that add energy to the grid or enhance reliability. The ...Getting to Know the Loan... · LPO News · Application Process · LPO Directors
  30. [30]
    Loan Guarantees for Projects That Employ Innovative Technologies
    Dec 15, 2016 · (For additional background on DOE's experience in implementing the loan guarantee program and the history of its implementing regulations, ...
  31. [31]
    Examining the Department of Energy's Loan Guarantee Program
    Critics have suggested political favoritism in loan guarantee awards and have questioned the government's proper role in supporting renewable energy companies ...
  32. [32]
    Loan Guarantees for Clean Energy Technologies: Goals, Concerns ...
    Jan 17, 2012 · In 2011, the high-profile bankruptcy, and subsequent loan default, of Solyndra resulted in a congressional investigation and subjected DOE's ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    History - Department of Energy
    DOE published the updated Loan Guarantee Solicitation Announcement for Tribal Energy Development Projects, administered through the Tribal Energy Finance ...
  34. [34]
    Risky Business: The DOE Loan Guarantee Program
    Mar 6, 2017 · The fundamental problem is that the loan guarantee program makes it more difficult for new ideas to emerge since it further entrenches ...Missing: Criticisms | Show results with:Criticisms
  35. [35]
    https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/Solar%20Background%20Document%201.pdf
  36. [36]
    Vice President Biden Announces Finalized $535 Million Loan ...
    Sep 4, 2009 · The Department of Energy has finalized a $535 million loan guarantee for Solyndra, Inc., which manufactures innovative cylindrical solar photovoltaic panels.
  37. [37]
    Obama: Solyndra Got Loan 'On the Merits' - ABC News
    Oct 6, 2011 · President Obama said Thursday that his administration has loaned billions to start-up high tech firms like the now-bankrupt solar firm Solyndra based not on ...Missing: connections | Show results with:connections
  38. [38]
    Obama donor discussed Solyndra with White House - CBS News
    Nov 10, 2011 · Emails released by House committee appear to contradict admin's line that George Kaiser never discussed solar company at WH.<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Obama donor weighed asking White House to save Solyndra ...
    “I question your assumption that the WH is the path to pursue,” Kaiser wrote in one email. “I would see an appeal as only a last resort, and even then, ...
  40. [40]
    DOE bristled at Solyndra push - Politico
    Oct 13, 2011 · William Miller, a DOE veteran who handled the California solar company's $535 million loan guarantee, took issue with the Obama political ...Missing: connections | Show results with:connections
  41. [41]
    Officials: No political influence in Solyndra loan - CNN
    Nov 16, 2011 · Chu and other administration officials have denied exerting any political influence in the Solyndra decision. They note the loan program began ...
  42. [42]
    Obama administration agreed to Solyndra loan days after insiders ...
    Sep 14, 2011 · Among questions now: Did the White House unduly influence the process? Did the Energy Department rush its first commitment, ignoring warning ...
  43. [43]
    In Rush to Assist a Solar Company, US Missed Signs
    Sep 22, 2011 · The start-up business had received a $535 million federal loan guarantee, offered in part to reassert American dominance in solar technology ...
  44. [44]
    Solyndra: Politics infused Obama energy programs
    Dec 14, 2011 · Since the failure of Solyndra, Obama's entire $80 billion clean-technology program has begun to look like a political liability for an administration.
  45. [45]
    Solyndra starts 2nd solar panel plant construction | Reuters
    Sep 4, 2009 · FREMONT, Calif., Sept 4 (Reuters) - California solar company Solyndra Inc said on Friday that it started construction on its second solar ...
  46. [46]
    Report: White House 'Tried To Rush' Decision On Solar Firm Loan
    Sep 14, 2011 · Biden participated via satellite feed in Solyndra's Sept. 4, 2009, groundbreaking and "announced the Department of Energy has finalized a $535 ...
  47. [47]
    Solyndra's $733 Million Plant Had Whistling Robots, Spa Showers
    Sep 28, 2011 · The glass-and-metal building that Solyndra LLC began erecting alongside Interstate 880 in Fremont, California, in September 2009 was ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  48. [48]
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303768104577460821995749942
  49. [49]
    Polished Concrete Installed at California Solar Panel Plant
    Solyndra broke ground for its second solar panel manufacturing plant, Fab 2, on Sept. 4, 2009, with a target completion date of July 15, 2010. The new ...
  50. [50]
    Solyndra starts 2nd solar panel plant construction | Reuters
    Sep 4, 2009 · Solyndra starts construction at second solar panel plant · California-based facility to produce 500 megawatts/year.
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Agenda item 4.b.5 - State Treasurer's Office
    Nov 17, 2010 · Solyndra expects the first production output from the first phase of Fab 2 to occur in the fourth quarter of 2010 with full project completion ...
  52. [52]
    Solar-Panel Maker to Close a Factory and Delay Expansion
    Nov 3, 2010 · When Solyndra filed for an initial public stock offering in December, it estimated it would have a total production capacity of 610 megawatts by ...
  53. [53]
    Registration Statement on Form S-1 - SEC.gov
    We are in the process of expanding our production capacity at Fab 1 and expect to reach an annualized production run rate of 110 MW by the fourth fiscal quarter ...
  54. [54]
    SOLYNDRA, INC. (--) IPO - NASDAQ.com
    Proposed Symbol, --. Company Name, SOLYNDRA, INC. Exchange, Nasdaq National Market. Share Price, --. Employees, 801 (as of 02/06/2010). Status, Withdrawn.<|control11|><|separator|>
  55. [55]
    [PDF] 2010 Solar Technologies Market Report - Publications
    ... MW of production in 2010. In. 2010, Solyndra more than doubled production, increasing output from 30 MW in 2009 to 67. MW in 2010. Figures 2.5 and 2.6 ...
  56. [56]
    Special Report: Singed by Solyndra - Reuters
    Oct 24, 2011 · At first things seemed to be going well. In 2008, Solyndra started shipping its tubular panels and announced it had $1.2 billion in orders.
  57. [57]
    Solar company that Obama visited will shut down | Reuters
    Aug 31, 2011 · Solyndra was the first company to receive a loan guarantee ... Solyndra had revenue of $140 million in 2010 and had said it planned ...
  58. [58]
    Solyndra: Pay Some Investors Before Taxpayers In Solar Flame Out
    Sep 6, 2011 · The company entered the New Year with a net loss from 2010 of about $329 million on revenues of $142 million. As of Tuesday, Solyndra, which had ...
  59. [59]
    The Impact of China's Production Surge on Innovation in the Global ...
    Oct 5, 2020 · China's subsidy-aided rise to dominance in PV manufacturing has driven prices way down, but at the cost of undermining promising alternative technological ...
  60. [60]
    Chinese competition sank govt-backed Abound Solar-executives
    Jul 18, 2012 · Price of solar panels fell as Chinese cos flooded market; Government stopped funding Abound's loan in August 2011; DOE officials, past and ...<|separator|>
  61. [61]
    Chu says Solyndra was victim of collapsing solar panel prices
    Nov 18, 2011 · ... burning through cash at the rate of $10 million per month. “DOE was receiving financial reports showing that Solyndra was bleeding cash ...
  62. [62]
    Lessons From Solyndra - Econlib
    Feb 6, 2012 · In early September 2009, after the relevant parties had signed off, the DOE officially approved the loan guarantee to Solyndra. Three days later ...Missing: factory | Show results with:factory
  63. [63]
    [PDF] the solyndra failure: views from department of energy secretary chu ...
    Nov 17, 2011 · FRED UPTON, Michigan. Chairman. JOE BARTON, Texas. Chairman Emeritus. CLIFF STEARNS, Florida. ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky. JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois.
  64. [64]
    [PDF] The Solyndra Failurex
    Aug 2, 2012 · entitled, “From DOE Loan Guarantee to Bankruptcy to FBI Raid: What Solyndra's. Executives Knew.” The Committee invited Solyndra's two top ...
  65. [65]
    Solyndra bankruptcy exit plan OKd - SFGATE
    Oct 22, 2012 · In February 2011, Solyndra was forced to restructure its debt to obtain a fresh infusion of funds from existing investors, including ...Missing: attempts | Show results with:attempts<|control11|><|separator|>
  66. [66]
    U.S. Rejected Solyndra Restructuring Before Shutdown, Memo Says
    Sep 12, 2011 · The Energy Department rejected Solyndra LLC's request to restructure a U.S. loan deal, a day before the solar-panel maker shut down, ...Missing: issues | Show results with:issues
  67. [67]
    Solyndra gave bright forecasts as it ran out of cash | Reuters
    Sep 23, 2011 · "Solyndra's revenues grew from $6 million in 2008 to $100 million in 2009 to $140 million in 2010. For 2011, revenues are projected to nearly ...
  68. [68]
    Solyndra shutters doors, filing Chapter 11 - Renewable Energy World
    Aug 31, 2011 · August 31, 2011 – Solyndra says it has suspended manufacturing operations (including 1100 layoffs effective immediately) and will file Chapter ...
  69. [69]
    Solyndra, Solar Firm Aided by Federal Loans, Shuts Doors
    Aug 31, 2011 · More than 1,000 employees were laid off. ... In January, it announced that it was closing that factory and moving manufacturing to China.
  70. [70]
    Fremont's Solyndra, Solar Tech Firm, Shuts Down and Lays ... - KQED
    Aug 31, 2011 · Solyndra says it is laying off 1100 workers immediately as it's shutting down and filing for bankruptcy "while it evaluates options, ...Missing: employee layoffs
  71. [71]
    Solyndra, LLC, 11-12799 – CourtListener.com
    Sep 6, 2011 · Last Updated: Oct. 28, 2024, 7:58 a.m. ; Citation: Solyndra, LLC, 11-12799, (Bankr. D. Del.) ; Date Filed: Sept. 6, 2011 ; Date Terminated: Aug. 1, ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  72. [72]
    Untitled
    On September 6, 2011, Solyndra, a solar system manufacturing company, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. In September 2009, Solyndra received a ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  73. [73]
    [PDF] OIG-12-048: Consultation on Solyndra Loan ... - Treasury OIG
    recently, Solyndra filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in September. 2011. Prior to filing for bankruptcy, approximately $528 million of the $535 million in ...
  74. [74]
    Solyndra Files Bankruptcy in Delaware After Shutting Down ...
    Like Evergreen, Solyndra suffered from a worldwide drop in solar panel prices. This post will look at Solyndra's business, why it filed for bankruptcy, as ...Missing: module decline
  75. [75]
    Fremont solar tech firm Solyndra to shut down, lay off hundreds of ...
    Aug 13, 2016 · The shutdown marks a high-profile collapse of a company that received more than $1.6 billion in federal and private funding in recent years. “ ...
  76. [76]
    https://www.mercurynews.com/2011/08/31/fremont-solar-tech-firm-solyndra-to-shut-down-lay-off-hundreds-of-workers/
  77. [77]
    - SOLYNDRA AND THE DOE LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM
    Now, in fact, January 5, 2009, email to a DOE official, John Scott of Solyndra, said, ``We think that a public announcement would acknowledge the hard work ...
  78. [78]
    Political Divide At Congressional Hearing On Solyndra - NPR
    Sep 14, 2011 · At the hearing, Republicans raised questions over whether the administration rushed the loan process for political or private reasons, while ...Missing: inquiries | Show results with:inquiries
  79. [79]
    White House 'rushed' loan to solar firm Solyndra - BBC News
    Sep 15, 2011 · House Republicans say the Obama administration could have rushed approval for political reasons on a federal loan to a failed solar panel ...
  80. [80]
    Solyndra Officials Take Fifth at House Hearing - The New York Times
    Sep 23, 2011 · The committee is examining how the company failed after getting $528 million in government loans. The case is an acute embarrassment for the ...Missing: congressional inquiries
  81. [81]
    [PDF] from doe loan guarantee to bankruptcy to fbi raid: what solyndra's ...
    Sep 23, 2011 · FRED UPTON, Michigan. Chairman. JOE BARTON, Texas. Chairman Emeritus. CLIFF STEARNS, Florida. ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky. JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois.
  82. [82]
    Solyndra told Congress it was 'on track' for success
    Jul 3, 2019 · Solyndra declared bankruptcy on August 31. Congressional investigators have also released a copy of a Sept. 10, 2011 email from an attorney for ...
  83. [83]
    VIEWS FROM DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SECRETARY CHU
    [House Hearing, 112 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] THE SOLYNDRA FAILURE: VIEWS FROM DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SECRETARY CHU ...
  84. [84]
    IMPACT: House committee slaps OMB with subpoena over loan ...
    Jan 7, 2022 · The company said politics played no role in its award, and Energy Department officials said each loan guarantee was awarded after careful review ...
  85. [85]
    H. Rept. 112-652 - NO MORE SOLYNDRAS ACT - Congress.gov
    In fact, the Bush DOE presciently raised doubts about Solyndra's financial condition and whether its solar panel designs gave the company any real advantage ...
  86. [86]
    House passes 'No More Solyndras' - POLITICO
    Sep 14, 2012 · House Republicans approved legislation Friday aimed at reining in the Energy Department's loan guarantee program, bringing the GOP's ...
  87. [87]
    [PDF] GAO-12-157, DOE Loan Guarantees: Further Actions Are Needed to ...
    Mar 12, 2012 · declared bankruptcy—Solyndra, Inc., with a $535 million loan guarantee for manufacturing cylindrical solar cells, and Beacon Power ...
  88. [88]
    Report: Solyndra misrepresented facts to get loan guarantee
    Aug 26, 2015 · A four-year investigation has concluded that officials of the solar company Solyndra misrepresented facts and omitted key information in their efforts to get a ...
  89. [89]
    Solyndra lied to get loan guarantee, investigators say - The Hill
    Aug 26, 2015 · The deceptions included an overstated 2009 report from the company claiming to have $2.2 billion in firm contracts for solar panel sales.
  90. [90]
    Solyndra misled government to get $535M solar project loan: report
    Aug 26, 2015 · In one case, Solyndra substituted a new financial plan that showed it making projections, but the original numbers had been doctored.
  91. [91]
    OIG: Solyndra Misled DOE to Get Solar Loan Guarantees
    Aug 27, 2015 · The new report reveals that the OIG launched its investigation in 2010 after discovering an apparent inconsistency between Solyndra's loan ...
  92. [92]
    https://www.powermag.com/oig-solyndra-misled-doe-to-get-solar-loan-guarantees/
  93. [93]
    Report: Solyndra misrepresented facts to get loan guarantee
    Aug 26, 2015 · Ehrlich said the real cause of Solyndra's failure had nothing to do with fraud but was caused by the unexpected dumping of solar panels ...
  94. [94]
    Top leaders of Solyndra solar panel company repeatedly misled ...
    Aug 26, 2015 · Solyndra's leaders engaged in a “pattern of false and misleading assertions,” a lengthy investigation uncovered.Missing: misrepresentation | Show results with:misrepresentation
  95. [95]
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/federal-eye/wp/2015/08/26/top-leaders-of-solyndra-solar-panel-company-repeatedly-misled-federal-officials-investigation-finds/
  96. [96]
    Solyndra cleared for October 27 bankruptcy auction | Reuters
    Sep 27, 2011 · U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Mary Walrath in Delaware approved the plan for an October 27 auction of the business, citing the support for the plan by ...Missing: liquidation details
  97. [97]
    Solyndra Gets $6.2 Million From Auction of Non-Core Assets
    Nov 7, 2011 · Potential buyers have until Nov. 16 to bid. The solar-panel maker filed for Chapter 11 reorganization on Sept. 6 and was raided two days ...
  98. [98]
    Solyndra Factory To Be Auctioned Off; Debt Holders (Including Us ...
    Sep 28, 2012 · Bloomberg: Solyndra has been liquidating its assets since February after failing to negotiate a deal with a buyer willing to restart ...Missing: details | Show results with:details<|separator|>
  99. [99]
    House Panel Examines Details of Solyndra Deal
    Oct 14, 2011 · This year, with the company running out of cash, the government allowed it to borrow an additional $75 million from private investors that had ...
  100. [100]
    Failed Solyndra owes $783.8m - - Global Corporate Venturing
    Sep 7, 2011 · The company was looking for a buyer to acquire most of Solyndra's assets, according to the filing sourced from Chapter 11 library, but it might ...
  101. [101]
    https://globalventuring.com/blog/2011/09/07/failed-solyndra-owes-783-8m/
  102. [102]
    Government loses $139M on loan to electric car maker - NBC News
    Nov 22, 2013 · The government lost $528 million in the Solyndra collapse ... The Energy Department said it had recovered about $28 million before ...<|separator|>
  103. [103]
    From Bad to Worse: U.S. Taxpayers Keep Losing Money on Solyndra
    Oct 25, 2012 · At best, taxpayers will recoup at most $27 million of the original $535 loan guarantee to Solyndra.
  104. [104]
    Solar Projects: DOE Section 1705 Loan Guarantees - Congress.gov
    Oct 25, 2011 · Since Solyndra, a solar system manufacturing company that received a $535 million loan guarantee from the Department of Energy (DOE), filed for ...
  105. [105]
    [PDF] GAO-14-645T, DOE LOAN PROGRAMS: DOE Has Made More Than ...
    May 30, 2014 · DOE has about $28.7 billion in remaining loan guarantee authority for the section 1703 program, about $3.8 billion of which DOE conditionally ...
  106. [106]
    [PDF] Success or Failure?
    May 16, 2012 · In hindsight the DOE loan guarantee program made mistakes – it made several loans it should not have made and it probably did not make some ...Missing: Criticisms | Show results with:Criticisms
  107. [107]
    After Solyndra Loss, U.S. Energy Loan Program Turning A Profit : NPR
    Nov 13, 2014 · In 2011, solar panel company Solyndra defaulted on a $535 million loan guaranteed by the Department of Energy. The agency had a few other high- ...Missing: taxpayer | Show results with:taxpayer
  108. [108]
    DOE energy loan program turns profitable, goes $30 million in the ...
    Nov 14, 2014 · The program lost 2.28% of its total committed money, primarily due to the $528 million lost when Solyndra went belly-up. The program allows DOE ...
  109. [109]
    Solyndra: A Case Study in Green Energy, Cronyism, and the Failure ...
    Aug 27, 2015 · “Employees acknowledged that they felt tremendous pressure, in general, to process loan guarantee applications,” the report said. “They ...
  110. [110]
    GOP probe: Solyndra a 'cautionary tale' - The Hill
    Aug 2, 2012 · A House GOP report capping a probe of the Obama administration's backing for Solyndra ... pick the winners and losers in a particular marketplace.
  111. [111]
    Solyndra: Crooked Politics or Just Bad Economics? - Cato Institute
    Nov 17, 2011 · The White House and the Energy Department say the influence of political donors such as Oklahoma oil billionaire George Kaiser, whose venture- ...
  112. [112]
    This Is What Crony Capitalism Looks Like | Mercatus Center
    It misdirects resources, impedes genuine economic progress, breeds corruption, and undermines the legitimacy of both the government and the private sector.".Missing: analyses | Show results with:analyses