Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Spatial frequency

Spatial frequency is a fundamental concept in and visual science that quantifies the rate at which a or varies across , typically measured in cycles per unit distance, such as cycles per millimeter or cycles per of . It represents the number of complete cycles (e.g., repetitions of a or grating pair) occurring within a given spatial interval, analogous to temporal frequency in time-domain signals but applied to two-dimensional images or scenes. Low spatial frequencies capture broad, coarse structures like overall shapes, while high spatial frequencies encode fine details such as edges and textures. In human , spatial frequency plays a central role in how the analyzes images, with the organized into selective channels that respond preferentially to specific bands, as demonstrated in foundational psychophysical experiments using sinusoidal gratings. These channels enable of visual information, where the sensitivity function—a measure of the minimum detectable at each —typically peaks at intermediate frequencies around 2–4 cycles per degree and declines sharply at higher frequencies, limiting to about 50–60 cycles per degree under optimal conditions. This -based underlies phenomena like the of patterns and the of low-frequency global with high-frequency local details in scene recognition. Beyond vision, spatial frequency is essential in image processing and , where decomposes images into frequency components to facilitate tasks like filtering, , and feature extraction. In biomedical applications, techniques such as spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) exploit these principles to non-invasively map tissue by modulating light patterns and analyzing their frequency-domain responses. Overall, the concept bridges , , and , influencing advancements in display technology, medical diagnostics, and for visual tasks.

Fundamentals

Definition and units

Spatial frequency is defined as the number of cycles, or complete repetitions, of a spatially periodic pattern occurring per unit distance, serving as the spatial analog to temporal frequency in time-varying signals. This measure quantifies the periodicity or repetition rate of variations in a signal or image across space, such as the alternating bright and dark bands in a sinusoidal grating. Physically, low spatial frequencies represent coarse, gradual changes or broad patterns, such as the overall of an object, while high spatial frequencies capture fine , sharp transitions, or rapid variations, like edges and textures. For instance, in an image, the low-frequency components convey the general structure, whereas high-frequency components encode intricate features that contribute to perceived . The standard units for spatial frequency are cycles per unit length, such as cycles per millimeter (cycles/) or cycles per meter (cycles/), depending on the scale of the application. In the context of human , it is often expressed in angular terms as cycles per (cpd) of , accounting for the observer's from the pattern. To convert linear spatial frequency to angular spatial frequency in cycles per , multiply the linear frequency by the viewing (in units matching the linear frequency's ) and by approximately 0.0175 (the radians per , π/180). A practical example is a grating pattern with five complete cycles (alternating dark and light bars) spanning 1 centimeter, yielding a spatial frequency of 5 cycles/. If viewed from 57 away—where 1 degree of visual angle corresponds to about 1 on the pattern—this equates to approximately 5 cpd. The concept of spatial frequency emerged in the mid-20th century within and gained prominence in the 1960s through applications in .

Mathematical representation

Spatial frequency in one dimension is fundamentally defined for a periodic signal s(x), where the spatial frequency f represents the number of cycles per unit distance and is given by f = \frac{1}{\lambda}, with \lambda denoting the spatial period or . This measure arises in the context of sinusoidal variations along a single spatial axis x. A pure sinusoidal signal can thus be expressed as s(x) = A \cos(2\pi f x + \phi), where A is the modulating the signal's intensity, and \phi is the shift determining the offset of the . For analytical purposes, particularly in , the equivalent complex exponential form e^{i 2\pi f x} serves as the , enabling the decomposition of arbitrary signals into sums of these harmonics. The concept of spatial frequency emerges directly from the Fourier transform, which projects the signal onto these exponential basis functions. The continuous Fourier transform of s(x) is defined by the integral S(f) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} s(x) e^{-i 2\pi f x} \, dx, where S(f) captures the amplitude and phase contributions at each frequency f, revealing how spatial frequency components contribute to the overall signal structure. This formulation underscores that spatial frequency quantifies the rate of oscillation in the spatial domain, analogous to temporal frequency in time-domain signals. In two dimensions, applicable to images or planar fields s(x, y), spatial frequency is characterized by orthogonal components f_x and f_y, representing cycles per unit length along the x- and y-axes, respectively. These components combine to yield the radial (or magnitude) frequency f = \sqrt{f_x^2 + f_y^2}, which indicates the overall oscillation rate, and the orientation angle \theta = \tan^{-1}(f_y / f_x), specifying the of the . A two-dimensional sinusoid then takes the form s(x, y) = A \cos(2\pi (f_x x + f_y y) + \phi), extending the one-dimensional representation to account for directional variations. For discrete signals, such as those in , spatial frequency is normalized in cycles per , reflecting the sampling grid's influence. The highest representable frequency, known as the Nyquist limit, is 0.5 cycles per , beyond which occurs due to . This limit ensures that each frequency component can be uniquely reconstructed, mirroring the continuous case but constrained by the .

Signal Processing Applications

Fourier transform in spatial domains

The spatial Fourier transform provides a mathematical framework for decomposing a two-dimensional spatial signal s(x,y) into its constituent frequency components in the S(f_x, f_y), where f_x and f_y represent spatial frequencies along the respective axes. The forward transform is given by the integral S(f_x, f_y) = \iint_{-\infty}^{\infty} s(x,y) \, e^{-i 2\pi (f_x x + f_y y)} \, dx \, dy, which converts the spatial domain representation into a complex-valued . The inverse transform reconstructs the original signal via s(x,y) = \iint_{-\infty}^{\infty} S(f_x, f_y) \, e^{i 2\pi (f_x x + f_y y)} \, df_x \, df_y, ensuring perfect reversibility under ideal conditions. This decomposition reveals the spatial frequency content, where low frequencies correspond to gradual variations and high frequencies to rapid changes in the signal. In the frequency domain, the magnitude |S(f_x, f_y)| quantifies the amplitude or energy at each spatial frequency pair (f_x, f_y), providing insight into the strength of periodic components, while the phase \arg(S(f_x, f_y)) encodes information about spatial shifts and alignments necessary for accurate reconstruction. Several properties of the Fourier transform are particularly relevant to spatial frequency analysis: linearity, which states that the transform of a linear combination of signals is the linear combination of their transforms, \mathcal{F}\{a s_1(x,y) + b s_2(x,y)\} = a S_1(f_x, f_y) + b S_2(f_x, f_y); the shift theorem, indicating that a spatial translation by (x_0, y_0) introduces a phase shift, \mathcal{F}\{s(x - x_0, y - y_0)\} = S(f_x, f_y) e^{-i 2\pi (f_x x_0 + f_y y_0)}; and the convolution theorem, where spatial convolution corresponds to multiplication in the frequency domain, \mathcal{F}\{s_1(x,y) * s_2(x,y)\} = S_1(f_x, f_y) \cdot S_2(f_x, f_y). These properties facilitate efficient analysis of spatial patterns without direct computation in the spatial domain. For digital images, which are discrete spatial signals, the continuous transform is approximated by the two-dimensional (DFT), defined as S(u,v) = \sum_{x=0}^{N-1} \sum_{y=0}^{M-1} s(x,y) \, e^{-i 2\pi (u x / N + v y / M)}, where u and v are discrete frequency indices, and the inverse DFT reconstructs the image with appropriate normalization. The (FFT) algorithm computes the DFT efficiently in O(NM \log (NM)) time for an N \times M image, making it practical for large-scale spatial frequency analysis. To prevent artifacts, where high spatial frequencies masquerade as lower ones, the sampling must satisfy the spatial Nyquist-Shannon theorem: the sampling rate in the spatial domain must exceed twice the maximum spatial frequency present in the signal. A practical example of this is applied to a , where the low-frequency components in the spectrum capture smooth tonal gradients and overall structure, such as broad sky areas, while high-frequency components represent fine details like edges and textures in foliage or fabric patterns. Isolating these components via the transform allows of how spatial frequencies contribute to perceived image content.

Spatial filtering techniques

Spatial filtering techniques in the frequency domain involve modifying the Fourier transform of an image or signal to selectively alter specific spatial frequencies, followed by an inverse transform to return to the spatial domain. The process begins by computing the 2D Fourier transform S(f_x, f_y) of the input signal s(x, y). This spectrum is then multiplied pointwise by a filter function H(f_x, f_y), yielding the filtered spectrum S'(f_x, f_y) = S(f_x, f_y) \cdot H(f_x, f_y). Finally, the inverse 2D Fourier transform of S'(f_x, f_y) produces the filtered output s'(x, y). This approach leverages the frequency representation to achieve effects that are computationally efficient for certain operations compared to direct spatial manipulation. A classic example is the ideal low-pass filter, defined as H(f) = 1 for |f| < f_c and H(f) = 0 otherwise, where f_c is the cutoff frequency. This filter attenuates high spatial frequencies, effectively removing fine details and noise while preserving the overall structure dominated by low frequencies. In practice, such abrupt cutoffs are rarely used due to their undesirable side effects, but they serve as a foundational model for understanding frequency attenuation. Filters are categorized by their frequency response. Low-pass filters, like the ideal or Butterworth variants, smooth images by suppressing high frequencies, which blurs edges and reduces but can obscure important details. High-pass filters, conversely, emphasize high frequencies to sharpen images and enhance edges, often amplifying in the process. Band-pass filters allow a specific range of frequencies to pass, useful for isolating textures or patterns, while notch filters target and remove narrow bands of unwanted periodic , such as interference patterns from electrical sources. These frequency domain operations have direct equivalents in the spatial domain via the , which states that multiplication in the corresponds to in the spatial domain. Thus, applying a H(f_x, f_y) is equivalent to convolving the input s(x, y) with the inverse of H(f_x, f_y), often implemented as a . For instance, a Gaussian in the corresponds to with a Gaussian in the spatial domain, providing a smooth transition that avoids sharp cutoffs. This duality allows practitioners to choose between domains based on computational needs, with preferred for large kernels. Key design considerations include the transition band, which defines how gradually the filter attenuates frequencies around the cutoff to minimize artifacts. Sharp transitions in ideal filters lead to , known as the , where overshoots and oscillations appear near discontinuities in the signal, reaching up to about 9% of the jump magnitude. To mitigate this, filters like Butterworth or Gaussian are designed with smoother roll-offs. Practical implementations are available in software libraries; for example, MATLAB's Image Processing Toolbox supports filtering via functions like fft2 and ifft2 combined with custom filter matrices, while OpenCV provides cv::dft for similar operations in C++ or . As an illustrative example, applying a to a noisy involves computing its , multiplying by a circular low-pass mask centered at the with f_c, and transforming the result. This preserves low-frequency components representing the image's broad shapes and textures while attenuating high-frequency noise, resulting in a cleaner version suitable for further analysis without excessive blurring of structural elements.

Visual Perception

Spatial-frequency theory

The spatial-frequency theory of posits that the decomposes complex images into a series of sinusoidal gratings, each characterized by specific spatial frequencies, amplitudes, and phases, processed through a linear systems approach. This framework originated in the application of to visual processing during the , where mathematical techniques for analyzing optical were developed to describe spatial filtering properties. By the , these concepts were extended to , with early studies examining the eye's resolution limits using sinusoidal stimuli. Seminal work by Campbell and Green in 1965 analyzed the of the through to gratings, laying groundwork for frequency-based models. The theory was formalized by Campbell and Robson in 1968, who proposed that the acts as a bank of independent, linearly operating mechanisms tuned to narrow bands of spatial frequencies, enabling the of any image into its Fourier components for analysis. Evidence for this Fourier-based decomposition comes from both psychophysical and electrophysiological studies demonstrating retinal and cortical processing as frequency-tuned filters. In psychophysics, measurements of contrast thresholds for sinusoidal gratings—expressed in cycles per degree (cpd) of visual angle—reveal band-pass characteristics, with peak sensitivity around 2-4 cpd and reduced sensitivity at very low or high frequencies. Key experiments on grating thresholds showed that visibility of complex patterns, such as square waves, is primarily determined by their fundamental Fourier component at low contrasts, supporting independent channel processing. Adaptation experiments further corroborated this, where prolonged exposure to a high-contrast grating at one spatial frequency (e.g., 5 cpd) selectively elevates detection thresholds for test gratings near that frequency, producing aftereffects like perceived distortions in spatial frequency, while sparing others. Electrophysiological evidence from visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in humans confirmed the existence of independent channels, as VEPs elicited by superimposed gratings of different frequencies or orientations showed additive responses only when channels were non-overlapping, with selectivity as narrow as 15 degrees in orientation. These findings indicate that early visual processing, from retina to cortex, functions like a multi-channel analyzer. Despite its foundational role, the theory's assumption of linearity in early visual processing holds primarily for low-contrast stimuli but breaks down at high contrasts due to compressive nonlinearities in cells and cortical neurons. For instance, at contrasts above 20-30%, responses saturate or show gain control, violating the essential to linear and leading to interactions between channels. This limitation highlights that while the theory excels in modeling detection and low-amplitude signals, higher-contrast scenes require extensions incorporating nonlinear or . The 1960s-1970s psychophysical applications built on these insights, integrating findings from and to refine models of vision.

Contrast sensitivity and channels

The contrast sensitivity function (CSF) describes the human visual system's ability to detect sinusoidal gratings of varying spatial frequencies as a function of the minimum contrast required for detection. It exhibits an inverted U-shaped curve, with peak sensitivity occurring at intermediate spatial frequencies of approximately 2-4 cycles per degree (cpd), and sensitivity declining at both low frequencies below 0.5 cpd and high frequencies up to the acuity limit of around 50 cpd. This function is typically measured using psychophysical methods, such as forced-choice detection tasks with gratings presented at different contrasts and frequencies. An approximate mathematical representation of the CSF is given by the equation S(f) = a f^b e^{-c f}, where S(f) is the sensitivity at spatial frequency f (in cpd), a scales the overall sensitivity, b determines the low-frequency rise, and c controls the high-frequency roll-off, thereby capturing the peak location and bandwidth of the function. This model aligns with empirical data showing band-pass characteristics in human vision under photopic conditions. Evidence for multiple independent spatial frequency channels in human vision comes from masking experiments, where a masking grating elevates detection thresholds for a test grating most strongly when their spatial frequencies are similar, indicating selective interference within channels. These channels include mechanisms tuned to low frequencies around 1 cpd and higher ones around 10 cpd, supporting parallel processing of different spatial scales. At the neural level, cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and primary visual cortex (V1) exhibit tuning to specific spatial frequencies and orientations, as demonstrated by recordings from simple cells in cat and monkey V1. The parvocellular pathway preferentially processes higher spatial frequencies and fine details, while the magnocellular pathway favors lower frequencies and motion, contributing to the channel architecture. Clinically, alterations in the CSF are observed in conditions such as , where deficits primarily affect higher spatial frequencies, reducing overall across the curve. Similarly, often leads to selective losses in , particularly at mid-to-high frequencies due to optic nerve demyelination. These impairments are assessed using tools like the Pelli-Robson chart, which measures letter recognition at progressively lower contrasts to quantify functional deficits.

Medical Imaging Applications

Spatial frequency in MRI

In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), spatial frequency is fundamentally represented in the k-space domain, where raw signal data is acquired as a function of spatial frequencies rather than directly as an image. K-space serves as the domain of the object's distribution, with each point in k-space encoding a specific combination of spatial frequency and phase information from the entire imaged volume. This formalism was introduced in the 1970s through early two-dimensional methods for NMR imaging, pioneered by , Welti, and in their seminal work on NMR Fourier zeugmatography. The coordinates in k-space, denoted as \mathbf{k}, are determined by the applied magnetic field gradients \mathbf{G}(t) during signal acquisition, according to the relation \mathbf{k} = \gamma \int \mathbf{G}(t) \, dt, where \gamma is the of the imaged (typically protons). This accumulates the accrued by at different spatial positions due to the gradient-induced shifts, effectively mapping the signal to specific spatial locations in . The central region of , corresponding to low spatial frequencies (small |\mathbf{k}|), primarily encodes low-frequency information that determines overall image contrast and coarse structure, while the peripheral regions (high spatial frequencies) capture fine details and edges, contributing to . Image reconstruction from k-space data relies on the inverse Fourier transform, yielding the spatial domain image \rho(\mathbf{r}) via \rho(\mathbf{r}) = \int \tilde{\rho}(\mathbf{k}) \, e^{i 2\pi \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}} \, d\mathbf{k}, where \tilde{\rho}(\mathbf{k}) is the complex signal in and \mathbf{r} is the position in the image space. This transform assumes complete sampling of k-space to satisfy the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem, which requires a minimum sampling density to avoid artifacts—wrap-around distortions where undersampled high-frequency components fold into the low-frequency domain, violating the and degrading image fidelity. To accelerate MRI scans while mitigating from , parallel imaging techniques exploit spatial profiles of multi-coil receiver arrays to reconstruct full from reduced data sets, often high-frequency peripheral regions. encoding (SENSE) unfolds aliased images in the spatial using coil maps, enabling acceleration factors up to the number of coils while preserving . GeneRalized Autocalibrating Partial Parallel Acquisition (), in contrast, synthesizes missing lines directly from acquired neighboring data via kernel-based interpolation calibrated from central low-frequency lines, reducing acquisition time without explicit mapping. Post-acquisition filtering in , such as , applies functions to taper the data edges, suppressing high-frequency noise and artifacts like Gibbs ringing—oscillatory overshoots near sharp intensity transitions caused by finite sampling. For instance, a Fermi or Hanning smooths the periphery, reducing ringing at the cost of slight blurring, thereby enhancing overall in clinical applications.

Spatial frequency in other modalities

In computed tomography (CT), spatial frequency is central to image reconstruction via filtered back-projection (FBP), where projections obtained through the are filtered and back-projected to form cross-sectional images. The ramp filter, defined in the frequency domain as proportional to |f|, compensates for the low-pass blurring effect of back-projection by amplifying higher spatial frequencies, thereby sharpening the reconstructed image. This filtering enhances edge details but can amplify at high frequencies if not apodized. Spatial resolution in CT is fundamentally limited by detector spacing, which determines the maximum recoverable frequency and prevents in the sampled projections. In ultrasound imaging, spatial frequency influences beamforming algorithms that focus to form images, as well as the generation of speckle patterns arising from of backscattered echoes across bands. Higher spatial frequencies correspond to finer axial and lateral , enabling detection of small structures, but these frequencies attenuate rapidly in due to and , limiting . To mitigate speckle noise—which obscures fine details— techniques average multiple low-correlation images; subdivides the transducer to combine sub-bands with shifted speckle patterns, while spatial uses steered beams from different angles. For imaging and related optical systems, the modulation transfer function () quantifies the system's ability to preserve spatial frequencies from object to , typically plotted as transfer versus cycles per millimeter. The decreases at higher frequencies due to from finite focal spot size, geometric unsharpness, or detector , resulting in loss of detail for small, high-contrast features like microcalcifications. Across these modalities, common challenges include frequency-dependent noise, where higher spatial frequencies exhibit elevated noise power spectra due to quantum mottle in X-ray or speckle variance in ultrasound, degrading signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for fine structures. Super-resolution techniques, such as patch-based reconstruction or deep learning networks, address this by extrapolating high-frequency components from low-resolution data, improving effective resolution without additional hardware, though they risk introducing artifacts if priors are mismatched to the modality. In comparison to MRI's direct gradient-encoded sampling of , CT reconstruction from indirect projection data via FBP is more susceptible to frequency in sparse sampling scenarios, such as low-dose protocols with fewer projections, leading to artifacts that mimic high-frequency distortions unless mitigated by iterative methods.

References

  1. [1]
    16 Fourier Analysis - Foundations of Computer Vision - MIT
    By analogy with temporal frequencies, which describe how quickly signals vary over time, a spatial frequency describes how quickly a signal varies over space.
  2. [2]
    Spatial Frequency
    "Spatial frequency" refers to the number of pairs of bars imaged within a given distance on the retina. One-third of a millimeter is a convenient unit of ...
  3. [3]
    The neural bases of spatial frequency processing during scene ...
    Theories on visual perception agree that scenes are processed in terms of spatial frequencies. Low spatial frequencies (LSF) carry coarse information whereas ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] CampbellRobson-JPhysiol1968.pdf
    The contrast-sensitivity function of the visual system falls off rapidly at spatial frequencies above 3 c/deg and it might therefore be expected that the ...
  5. [5]
    Perception Lecture Notes: Spatial Frequency Channels
    The highest spatial frequency you can see (the high frequency cutoff) determines your spatial acuity, i.e., the finest spatial patterns you can see. This acuity ...
  6. [6]
    Spatial frequency domain imaging in 2019: principles, applications ...
    This review is focused on the current status (year 2019) of a mesoscopic and macroscopic imaging technique called spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI)
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Psychophysics of Spatial-Frequency Channels - Columbia University
    First, the concepts of spatial-frequency analysis (that is, Fourier analysis) and of spatial-frequency channels are briefly introduced. More extensive ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] SPATIAL FILTERING - UCSB Physics
    The spatial frequency is the. number of cycles per unit length (as opposed to time), or equivalently, how often the. signal is repeated over a unit length.<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Anatomy of the Microscope - Modulation Transfer Function
    Sep 11, 2018 · The number of spacings per unit interval in a specimen is referred to as the spatial frequency, which is usually expressed in quantitative terms ...
  10. [10]
    Spatial Frequency - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    During the 1960s and 1970s, the concept was used increasingly to describe the response of optical systems (with both coherent and incoherent light), as well as ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Lecture 6: Contrast and Spatial Frequency
    Spatial frequency is cycles per degree of visual angle, measuring how rapidly a stimulus changes across space. Contrast sensitivity varies with spatial ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Relationship Between Temporal and Spatial Frequency in Radar ...
    Jul 7, 2007 · It is more common to consider the spatial frequency in units of radians/m, 2π/λ = 2πF/c; this is usually denoted with the symbol ky and called ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] EE 261 - The Fourier Transform and its Applications
    Page 1. Lecture Notes for. EE 261. The Fourier Transform and its Applications ... You can analyze the signal either in the time (or spatial) domain or in the ...
  14. [14]
    Fourier Transform -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    ... dx. (2) Here, F(k) = F_x[f(x)](k) (3) = int_(-infty)^inftyf(x)e^(-2piikx)dx (4) is called the forward (-i) Fourier transform, and f(x) = F_k^(-1)[F(k)](x) (5) =<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Lecture 2: 2D Fourier transforms and applications
    The magnitude of the vector (u, v) gives a frequency, and its direction gives an orientation. The function is a sinusoid with this frequency along the direction ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] a practical method for measuring the spatial frequency response of
    When the spatial frequen- cies are normalized, as illustrated in Fig. 1, the Nyquist limit is at 0.5 cycles/pixel. For conventional cameras, SFR measurement ...
  17. [17]
    Image Transforms - Fourier Transform
    The Fourier Transform decomposes an image into sine and cosine components, representing it in the frequency domain, where each point is a frequency.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Filtering in Frequency Domain - CSE IIT KGP
    Digital Image Processing, 3rd ed. www.ImageProcessingPlace.com. © 1992–2008 R. C. Gonzalez & R. E. Woods. Gonzalez & Woods. Chapter 4. Filtering in the ...
  19. [19]
    Periodic Noise Removing Filter - OpenCV Documentation
    Periodic noise can be reduced significantly via frequency domain filtering. On this page we use a notch reject filter with an appropriate radius to completely ...
  20. [20]
    Gibbs Effect - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The discontinuous nature of the ideal low pass filter causes ringing to occur in the filtered output. This phenomenon is known as the Gibbs effect.
  21. [21]
    Filter Image in Frequency Domain - MATLAB & Simulink - MathWorks
    This example shows how to apply Gaussian lowpass filter to an image using the 2-D FFT block.
  22. [22]
    Fourier Transform - OpenCV Documentation
    Fourier Transform is used to analyze the frequency characteristics of various filters. For images, 2D Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) is used to find the ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Spatial Frequency Analysis in the Visual System
    The spatial frequencies of these three sinusoids, in the units in which the receptive field dimensions are expressed, are labeled a,b,c in A. From Enroth-Cugell ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] application of fourier analysis to the visibility - Stanford University
    The contrast-sensitivity function of the visual system falls off rapidly at spatial frequencies above 3 c/deg and it might therefore be expected that the ...
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings - Campbell
    Contrast thresholds for the detection of gratings whose luminance profiles are sine, square, rectangular or saw-tooth waves can be simply related using Fourier ...
  27. [27]
    Bayesian Inference of Two-Dimensional Contrast Sensitivity ...
    The results showed that the two-dimensional Bayesian inference method significantly improved the accuracy and precision of the contrast sensitivity function.Bayesian Inference · Experimental Methods · ResultsMissing: af^ cf}
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
    NMR Fourier zeugmatography - ScienceDirect.com
    April 1975, Pages 69-83. Journal of Magnetic … NMR Fourier zeugmatography. Author links open overlay panel. Anil Kumar , Dieter Welti , Richard R Ernst. Show ...
  32. [32]
    k-space and MR signal - Questions and Answers ​in MRI
    Another way to think of k(t) is as the gyromagnetic ratio (γ) times the area under the gradient (G) curve at time (t). Even though we have assumed a linear ...
  33. [33]
    k-space - Questions and Answers ​in MRI
    At its core k-space can be defined in simple terms: k-space is an array of numbers representing spatial frequencies in the MR image. The common pictorial ...Missing: Kumar 1975
  34. [34]
    k-Space tutorial: an MRI educational tool for a better understanding ...
    The k-space represents the spatial frequency information in two or three dimensions of an object. The k-space is defined by the space covered by the phase and ...
  35. [35]
    Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA)
    In this study, a novel partially parallel acquisition (PPA) method is presented which can be used to accelerate image acquisition using an RF coil array for ...Abstract · THEORY · MATERIALS AND METHODS · DISCUSSION
  36. [36]
    Gibbs artifact? - Questions and Answers ​in MRI
    Gibbs artifacts (also known as truncation, ringing, or spectral leakage artifacts) typically appear as multiple fine parallel lines immediately adjacent to ...
  37. [37]
    Computed Tomography - Medical Imaging Systems - NCBI Bookshelf
    Due to the non-local property of the ramp filter, filtered back-projection reconstruction requires information of the whole projections for each point in the ...Missing: paper | Show results with:paper
  38. [38]
    Beamforming and Speckle Reduction Using Neural Networks - PMC
    Common beamforming techniques for speckle reduction include spatial and frequency compounding, in which the aperture or the bandwidth are subdivided, ...
  39. [39]
  40. [40]
    Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise ...
    The modulation transfer function (MTF) is the most widely accepted measure of the spatial resolution response of medical x-ray imaging detectors and has proved ...
  41. [41]
    Super-resolution techniques for biomedical applications and ... - NIH
    Patch-based approaches, such as patch-based super-resolution (PBSR), improve the spatial resolution of MS images by dividing both LR and HR images into ...
  42. [42]
    Sparse Reconstruction Techniques in MRI: Methods, Applications ...
    This review describes the basic ideas behind sparse reconstruction techniques, how they could be applied to improve MR imaging, and the open challenges to ...