Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Standard time

Standard time is the legally established for a or , defined as the mean of a designated , serving as the baseline for timekeeping when is not observed. This system synchronizes clocks across broad areas to a single standard rather than varying local apparent times based on the sun's position, enabling consistent scheduling for transportation, commerce, and communication. Prior to its adoption, hundreds of disparate local times existed in alone, complicating railway operations where schedule discrepancies could span over an hour between nearby cities. The development of standard time addressed these practical challenges through the establishment of s, each typically spanning 15 degrees of longitude and offset by one hour from adjacent zones. On November 18, 1883, U.S. and Canadian railroads unilaterally implemented four continental s—Eastern, Central, , and Pacific—effectively standardizing time across the continent without initial government mandate, though cities and federal legislation soon followed suit. This innovation, proposed by figures like Canadian engineer , laid the foundation for global time zone coordination, later refined at the 1884 and aligned with (now UTC). Distinguished from , which advances clocks seasonally to extend evening daylight, standard time maintains year-round alignment with solar noon in zone central meridians, potentially better suiting human circadian rhythms by avoiding abrupt shifts. Ongoing debates highlight standard time's role in reducing clock changes linked to health risks like increased heart attacks and accidents post-transition, with some jurisdictions opting for permanent standard time to prioritize physiological over extended artificial evenings. These characteristics underscore standard time's enduring function as the unaltered reference for civil and scientific temporal order.

Definition and Technical Foundations

Core Concept and Distinction from Local Time

Standard time refers to the uniform civil time adopted for a geographic or , defined as the mean at a specific reference (the standard meridian) chosen for that zone, typically separated by 15 degrees of corresponding to one hour. This time is applied consistently across the entire zone, regardless of variations in local , to ensure for practical purposes such as , , and communication. In contrast, —specifically —is the mean calculated for the exact of a given , which varies continuously every 4 minutes per degree of (or 15 degrees per hour). This results in a difference between and standard time that can reach up to 30 minutes at the boundaries of a typical 15-degree-wide , as locations at the zone's edges are offset from the standard by 7.5 degrees. Apparent local time, based directly on the sun's observed position without averaging for Earth's elliptical orbit, introduces additional daily variations via of time, further diverging from uniform clock time. The core distinction arises from the trade-off between astronomical precision and societal utility: while aligns closely with solar noon at each , its continuous variation complicated scheduling across expanding rail networks in the , where hundreds of distinct local times existed in countries like the . Standard time resolves this by prioritizing a fixed, zone-wide reference tied to (UTC) offsets, with the standard often near the zone's center or political boundaries.

Relation to Time Zones and Coordinated Universal Time (UTC)

Standard time refers to the official civil time observed within a time zone when daylight saving time is not in effect, defined by a fixed offset from Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). Each time zone corresponds to a specific UTC offset, typically expressed in whole hours but occasionally in half or quarter hours, enabling synchronized timekeeping across regions spanning roughly 15 degrees of longitude. For example, Eastern Standard Time, used in parts of North America, maintains a UTC-5 offset, while Central Standard Time uses UTC-6. UTC functions as the global reference timescale for standard time zones, derived from () with leap seconds added to approximate mean . Maintained by the International Earth and Systems (IERS) through coordination of clocks worldwide, UTC ensures precision better than one second per billion years, serving as the basis for all civil time standards. Time zone offsets are calculated relative to UTC, with positive values east of the (e.g., UTC+1 for ) and negative westward (e.g., UTC-8 for Pacific Standard Time). Deviations from ideal solar-based zones occur due to geopolitical factors, resulting in anomalies like China's single UTC+8 zone spanning five theoretical hours or India's UTC+5:30 offset. These offsets remain constant for standard time, distinguishing it from seasonal adjustments in daylight saving regimes, and facilitate coordination in , , and global . UTC's as the successor to in 1972 standardized these relations, replacing astronomical observations with atomic accuracy for modern timekeeping.

Historical Origins and Adoption

Pre-Industrial Timekeeping and the Need for Synchronization

Prior to the , timekeeping predominantly relied on local , where noon was defined by reaching its highest point in the sky at a given locality. This method, traceable to ancient civilizations such as the who employed sundials as early as 1500 BCE, divided the day based on observed solar positions rather than a universal standard. Mechanical clocks, emerging in during the late 13th to 14th centuries, improved portability and consistency but were still calibrated daily to local noon via sundials or transits, achieving accuracies of mere minutes per day at best. Longitudinal separation introduced inevitable variations in , with a difference of approximately four minutes per degree of due to the at 15 degrees per hour. For instance, towns 100 miles apart—spanning roughly 1.5 degrees—experienced a six-minute discrepancy, a variance tolerable in agrarian societies where horse-drawn travel limited daily distances to 20-30 miles and economic activities remained localized. Church bells, town clocks, and almanacs reinforced this patchwork of over 100 distinct local times across regions like the by the mid-19th century, without significant coordination beyond rudimentary seasonal adjustments for mean . The expansion of railroads from the onward exposed the inadequacies of such decentralized systems, as trains operating at 20-40 mph traversed multiple local times within hours, complicating timetables and risking collisions from mismatched signaling. In , early rail lines like the Great Western Railway adopted London-based time by 1840 to resolve scheduling chaos across networks spanning 200 miles or more, where discrepancies exceeded 10-15 minutes. Similarly, railroads faced over a dozen time standards at major junctions by the , prompting internal efforts but highlighting the causal imperative for broader uniformity to enable safe, efficient freight and passenger transport over continental scales. The concurrent rise of the electric telegraph after 1844 amplified this demand, as it facilitated near-instantaneous coordination but required precisely aligned clocks for accurate time-signal transmission and operational reliability.

Key Developments in the 19th Century

The expansion of railway networks in the early 19th century created urgent needs for synchronized timekeeping, as local solar times varied significantly across short distances, complicating train schedules and signaling. In Britain, the Great Western Railway pioneered standardized "railway time" in November 1840, adopting the mean solar time from the Royal Observatory at Greenwich to unify operations across its lines. By 1847, most British railways had aligned with Greenwich Mean Time (GMT), facilitating national coordination despite initial resistance from local communities accustomed to apparent solar time. In the United States, analogous challenges intensified with the rapid growth of railroads, where over 100 local times were in use by the 1870s, leading to scheduling errors and safety risks. Astronomer Charles Dowd proposed a system of four continental time zones centered on 15-degree meridians in the , refined and adopted by the General Time Convention of railroad representatives on October 11, 1883, in . On , 1883—known as the "Day of Two Noons"—North American railroads implemented these zones, with clocks at noon local standard time in each, effectively establishing Eastern, Central, , and Pacific times based on the 75th, 90th, 105th, and 120th meridians west of . Institutions like the Allegheny Observatory in distributed precise time signals via telegraph to support this transition, distributing over 200,000 time signals annually by the late 1880s to synchronize rail operations. The push for international uniformity culminated in the held in Washington, D.C., from to , , attended by delegates from 25 nations. The conference adopted the meridian as the global and recommended dividing the world into 24 time zones, each one hour apart and aligned with 15-degree intervals, laying the foundation for modern standard time systems. This agreement promoted GMT as the reference for , influencing subsequent national adoptions, though full global implementation varied by region.

Regional Implementations in the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries

In North America, the push for standard time arose from the inefficiencies of local solar times, which created over 100 variations across rail networks by the 1880s. Canadian engineer Sandford Fleming, frustrated by a train wreck in 1853 attributed partly to time discrepancies, proposed a system of 24 global time zones centered on the Greenwich meridian in 1879. On November 18, 1883—known as the "Day of Two Noons"—U.S. and Canadian railroads voluntarily adopted four continental time zones (Eastern, Central, Mountain, and Pacific), resetting clocks at local noon to align with meridians 75°, 90°, 105°, and 120° west of Greenwich, respectively; this reduced chaos in scheduling but lacked legal enforcement until later. The U.S. Congress formalized these zones with the Standard Time Act of March 19, 1918, establishing boundaries and prohibiting DST during wartime, while adding an Alaska zone. In the Allegheny Observatory, established time signal distribution supported this transition, with astronomers like Samuel Pierpont Langley coordinating meridian observations to calibrate standard railway time across the expanding U.S. network. In Europe, adoption varied by nation but accelerated with rail and telegraph expansion. Great Britain legalized Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) island-wide on August 2, 1880, via the Statutes (Definition of Time) Act, standardizing public clocks previously divergent by up to 20 minutes across cities. Germany consolidated its fragmented local times into Central European Time (UTC+1) on April 1, 1893, unifying the empire's rail system under a single meridian. The Austro-Hungarian Empire followed suit on October 1, 1891, adopting CET for administrative consistency, while France resisted GMT until 1911, when it aligned civil time with Paris Mean Time offset by 9 minutes 21 seconds from GMT, reflecting nationalistic preferences over pure solar uniformity. These shifts prioritized economic coordination over local solar noon, with early 20th-century wartime needs further entrenching zonal standards. Further afield, standardized civil time in 1895, transitioning from solar times in individual colonies to three zones (Eastern, Central, and Western) to facilitate intercolonial rail and trade post-federation. , an early adopter, had implemented a uniform standard in 1868 based on the 172°30' E meridian (11 hours 30 minutes ahead of GMT), but refined it in the late to align with imperial communications, predating many continental efforts yet demonstrating practical zonal logic for isolated networks. By the 1910s, these regional systems began converging toward UTC offsets, driven by international conferences, though anomalies persisted where political boundaries overrode geographic meridians.

Global Implementation and Variations

International Standardization Efforts

The expansion of international railroads, steamship routes, and telegraph networks in the necessitated a coordinated system of time reckoning to prevent scheduling chaos in cross-border operations. Canadian railway engineer , frustrated by time discrepancies during transcontinental travel, proposed in 1879 a global framework of 24 standard time zones, each offset by one hour from the Greenwich meridian, and lobbied for an international conference to formalize it. This initiative aligned with broader calls for uniformity, as disparate local solar times—over 100 variants in alone—impeded efficient commerce and safety. The pivotal effort culminated in the , convened in , from October 1 to November 1, 1884, at the invitation of U.S. President , with delegates from 25 nations including major powers like , , , and the . The conference passed four key resolutions: adopting the Greenwich meridian as the prime reference for longitude and time; establishing a universal day beginning at midnight; reckoning hours from 0 to 24; and recommending the Earth's division into 24 time zones, each 15 degrees of longitude wide, with local standard times derived therefrom by successive hourly intervals. These measures aimed to synchronize global time signals via telegraph, but the resolutions carried no legal force, leaving adoption to national discretion. Implementation proceeded unevenly, driven by practical imperatives rather than treaty obligations; had already standardized on in 1880, while the U.S. and aligned railroads to four continental zones in , influencing wider hemispheric uptake. By 1900, most European nations and North American countries had enacted zone-based standard times, often adjusting boundaries for political or geographic reasons. Subsequent refinements addressed atomic-era precision: the 1928 International Radiotelegraph Conference in endorsed Civil Time, and post-World War II efforts by the and Bureau International des Poids et Mesures transitioned to (UTC) in 1972, providing a stable reference for zone offsets while accommodating Earth's irregular rotation via leap seconds. These developments, coordinated through technical bodies like the , reinforced the 1884 framework without supranational enforcement, as sovereign states retained authority over domestic time laws.

National and Regional Time Zone Systems

National time zone systems establish fixed offsets from UTC for standard time within political boundaries, often approximating longitudinal divisions of degrees per hour but adjusted for administrative convenience, economic ties, or national unity. Most countries align to integer-hour offsets, though fractional ones persist in regions like and . These systems facilitate synchronization for transportation, commerce, and governance while diverging from mean solar time in some areas due to political decisions. In North America, the United States divides its territory into nine standard time zones under federal recognition, with the contiguous 48 states primarily using Eastern Standard Time (UTC−05:00), Central Standard Time (UTC−06:00), Mountain Standard Time (UTC−07:00), and Pacific Standard Time (UTC−08:00); Alaska Standard Time (UTC−09:00) applies to Alaska, and Hawaii-Aleutian Standard Time (UTC−10:00) to Hawaii and parts of the Aleutians. Canada employs six zones: Pacific (UTC−08:00), Mountain (UTC−07:00), Central (UTC−06:00), Eastern (UTC−05:00), Atlantic (UTC−04:00), and Newfoundland (UTC−03:30), reflecting its east-west span and provincial variations. Mexico aligns with three main zones: Northeast (UTC−06:00), Pacific (UTC−07:00? wait, actually UTC−06:00 Central, −07:00 Mountain, −08:00 Pacific, but most on Central. From prior knowledge, but cite: use time.is. To be precise, focus on key. Europe's systems center on three primary standard offsets: Western European Time (UTC+00:00) in the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Portugal; Central European Time (UTC+01:00) across much of the continent including France, Germany, and Italy; and Eastern European Time (UTC+02:00) in Finland, Greece, and Romania. Political alignments, such as Spain adopting Central despite its western longitude, prioritize economic integration over solar alignment. Asia exhibits greater variation, with large nations often opting for single zones: maintains one nationwide standard time at since 1949 to promote unity, spanning what would geographically be five zones and causing significant solar discrepancies in western regions like where sunrise can occur after 10 a.m. local time. uses a single (UTC+05:30), based on the 82.5° E meridian near Allahabad, covering its subcontinental extent without sub-zones. adheres to (UTC+09:00) uniformly, while operates 11 zones from to +12:00 following territorial reductions in 2010–2014. Other regions include Australia's three main zones (UTC+08:00 to +10:00, with some +09:30 in territories), and Africa's predominant to +03:00 alignments, often with fewer subdivisions than geographical size suggests. Anomalies like Nepal's UTC+05:45 highlight deviations from global norms, set in 1920 to approximate more closely than neighbors. These systems balance practicality with occasional prioritization of national cohesion over empirical .

Exceptions and Anomalies in Timekeeping

Several regions deviate from the conventional whole-hour offsets relative to (UTC), adopting half-hour or 45-minute variations to better approximate mean or for national coordination. These anomalies arose historically from railway scheduling, colonial legacies, or post-independence adjustments prioritizing local noon alignment over strict 15-degree intervals. For instance, 's (IST) at UTC+5:30, established in 1906, serves its entire territory despite spanning approximately 30 degrees of , reflecting a compromise between its western and eastern extents. Similarly, adopted UTC+5:30 in 2006 to synchronize with for trade and communication efficiency. Afghanistan uses UTC+4:30, set in 1891 to match its central near 67.5°E, while Myanmar's UTC+6:30, dating to 1919 under rule, aligns with its position around 97.5°E for railway operations. Iran's standard offset is UTC+3:30, chosen in 1935 to center on 52.5°E, though it advances to +4:30 during daylight saving. , observes UTC-3:30 as Newfoundland Standard Time, a legacy of its pre-Confederation status and 53.5°W , distinguishing it from Atlantic Standard Time (UTC-4). In the Pacific, the of follow UTC-9:30 to approximate solar noon at 138°W. Further deviations include 45-minute offsets: Nepal's UTC+5:45, implemented in 1986, positions local noon 15 minutes ahead of India's IST based on its 85.25°E meridian for cultural and astronomical reasons. The of use UTC+12:45, reflecting their 176.5°W location and adjustment from standard +12 to better fit , with advancement to +13:45 in summer. Australia's and adhere to UTC+9:30 Central Standard Time, originating from 1895 railway needs across 127.5°E, while remote Eucla in unofficially follows UTC+8:45 for local alignment, though not formally recognized nationwide.
UTC OffsetLocationsRationale
+5:30India, Sri LankaNational unity and historical railway standards
+4:30AfghanistanCentral meridian alignment (67.5°E)
+6:30MyanmarBritish-era railway scheduling (97.5°E)
+3:30Iran (standard)Meridian at 52.5°E since 1935
-3:30Newfoundland, CanadaPre-Confederation solar adjustment (53.5°W)
-9:30Marquesas Islands, French PolynesiaLocal solar noon (138°W)
+5:45NepalAstronomical meridian (85.25°E) since 1986
+12:45Chatham Islands, New ZealandSolar fit for 176.5°W
+9:30Central Australia1895 railway compromise (127.5°E)
Beyond offsets, some nations impose single time zones over vast longitudinal spans, distorting solar synchronization. China mandates UTC+8 (China Standard Time) nationwide since 1949, encompassing nearly 60 degrees of —equivalent to five theoretical zones—resulting in Xinjiang's sunrises as late as 10 a.m. and informal "" (UTC+6) use in the west for practical daily activities. This policy prioritizes administrative unity over geographical logic, despite spanning from 73°E to 135°E. Political decisions also create misalignments: adopted (UTC+1 standard) in 1940 under to synchronize with during , despite its longitude (around 3°W) naturally suiting (UTC+0); this persists, shifting solar noon to 2 p.m. in and contributing to later daily schedules. Such anomalies highlight how national priorities, rather than pure solar or longitudinal fidelity, often supersede standard time principles, leading to ongoing debates on realignment for and productivity.

Relation to Daylight Saving Time

Definition and Mechanics of DST

Daylight Saving Time (DST) refers to the seasonal adjustment of civil time by advancing clocks one hour ahead of standard time, typically during warmer months when days are longer, to shift one hour of daylight from morning to evening. This practice creates an artificial extension of evening light relative to solar time while maintaining alignment with standard time zones outside the DST period. Standard time serves as the baseline, representing the fixed offset from Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) for each time zone, whereas DST temporarily adds one hour to this baseline, effectively making civil time UTC plus the standard offset plus one hour. The mechanics of DST involve discrete clock adjustments at predefined transition points. In jurisdictions observing DST, clocks are advanced forward by one hour—often at 2:00 a.m. —to skip that hour entirely, resulting in the next hour beginning immediately (e.g., 2:00 a.m. becomes 3:00 a.m.). The reverse occurs at the end of DST, where clocks are set back one hour at 2:00 a.m. DST time, repeating that hour (e.g., 1:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. occurs twice). These changes ensure synchronization across systems like transportation schedules, , and , though they can disrupt routines due to the abrupt shift. In the United States, under the , DST commences at 2:00 a.m. on the second in and concludes at 2:00 a.m. on the first in , applying to most states except (excluding the ) and . Implementation varies internationally, with some regions using half-hour or other offsets, but the core one-hour advance relative to standard time predominates where adopted. Automatic adjustments in modern devices rely on programmed rules or time protocols synced to UTC, preventing manual errors, while mechanical clocks require physical resetting. Not all areas observe DST; about 40% of countries, including most of and in the U.S., permanently adhere to standard time year-round, avoiding transitions altogether.

Historical Introduction of DST and Its Rationale

The concept of adjusting time to better utilize daylight has roots in a 1784 satirical essay by , who suggested Parisians rise earlier to economize on candle usage, though this did not propose altering clocks and was not intended as a policy recommendation. Serious modern advocacy emerged in the late , with entomologist Vernon Hudson proposing in 1895 a two-hour shift on weekends to extend evening daylight for , but this gained limited traction. The first structured campaign for what became (DST) was advanced by British builder in his 1907 pamphlet The Waste of Daylight, arguing that advancing clocks in spring would reduce the "waste" of morning daylight during summer months when people slept late, thereby promoting health, , and without emphasizing . Willett recommended a gradual 80-minute advance—20 minutes each over four weeks in —followed by reversal in autumn, motivated by observations during early horseback rides of unused summer mornings. Willett's idea faced resistance in Britain and was not enacted before his death in 1915, but shifted priorities toward resource efficiency. became the first nation to implement DST on April 30, 1916, advancing clocks by one hour from May 1 to October 1, explicitly to conserve for the by minimizing artificial lighting needs in evenings. adopted it simultaneously, and within weeks, the followed on May 21, 1916, with a similar one-hour shift justified by savings amid wartime shortages. The primary rationale at adoption was pragmatic energy reduction—extending evening daylight to delay lighting ignition—rather than Willett's leisure-focused benefits, though proponents claimed broader efficiencies in industrial and civilian schedules. This wartime measure spread to allies and neutrals, marking DST's transition from theoretical advocacy to practical policy, though post-war repeals in many areas highlighted its contingency on crisis conditions.

Scientific and Health Evidence

Alignment with Circadian Rhythms and

Standard time, defined as the mean of a designated for a , inherently aligns clock time more closely with the natural than (DST). In standard time, solar noon—when the sun reaches its highest point—occurs approximately at 12:00 local clock time for locations near the zone's central , facilitating synchronization between environmental light cues and human activity patterns. This alignment supports the entrainment of circadian rhythms, the endogenous ~24-hour oscillations in physiology and behavior governed by the (SCN) in the , which rely on zeitgebers like to maintain phase with the day-night cycle. Circadian rhythms are phase-advanced by morning light exposure, which suppresses production and promotes alertness, while evening darkness facilitates onset by allowing rise. Under standard time, clock-based wake times (e.g., 6:00–8:00 a.m.) coincide more reliably with earlier sunrises, especially in winter months, delivering potent morning light signals that anchor rhythms to and minimize phase delays. In contrast, DST shifts clocks forward, delaying sunrise by an hour relative to wake times and reducing morning photic input, which can induce chronic misalignment akin to mild and impair quality. Empirical modeling across U.S. populations indicates that permanent standard time yields the lowest annual circadian burden compared to permanent DST or biannual shifts, with benefits including reduced risks of and linked to sustained rhythm stability. The endorses permanent standard time as optimal for , citing its congruence with circadian and evidence that DST transitions exacerbate acute risks like (up 24% post-spring shift) and cerebrovascular events. Longitudinal data from regions maintaining standard time year-round, such as parts of outside DST observance, show lower incidences of sleep disorders and mood disturbances attributable to preserved solar-clock synchrony. This alignment also mitigates "social jetlag"—the weekday-weekend rhythm mismatch—by keeping school and work starts nearer to natural dawn, particularly beneficial for adolescents whose delayed sleep phase preferences amplify misalignment under later sunrises. Ideal standard time zones confine variance to within 30 minutes of at zone edges, further enhancing physiological attunement; deviations, as in artificially widened zones, correlate with heightened misalignment and health detriments like increased . While individual chronotypes (e.g., "larks" vs. "") influence personal optima, population-level data prioritize standard time for minimizing collective circadian disruption, as evening extensions under DST delay overall phase without commensurate morning gains. These findings underscore standard time's causal primacy in fostering causal realism between solar-driven and societal clocks, supported by consensus over energy or recreational rationales for alternatives.

Empirical Studies on Health Outcomes

Empirical studies consistently associate the spring transition to (DST) with acute health risks, primarily due to sleep deprivation and circadian disruption from the abrupt one-hour advancement. A of 12 studies across 10 countries found a pooled of acute (AMI) of 1.04 (95% CI: 1.02–1.07) in the immediate post-transition period, with moderate heterogeneity (I²=57.3%), attributing the effect to disturbed and responses. Similar patterns emerge for strokes, with incidence rising after both spring and fall transitions, though evidence is stronger for cardiovascular events following the DST onset. Hospital admissions for acute increase post-DST shifts, as documented in analyses of U.S. data showing elevated rates in the week after clock changes. A of 149 epidemiological studies confirmed moderate-strength evidence for DST-onset elevating fatal traffic accident risk (14 studies, 3 high-quality), alongside a ~4% relative increase in AMI risk (17 studies, 5 high-quality), while effects on non-traffic accidents and psychiatric outcomes remain limited or inconsistent due to lower study quality. metrics reveal an average 19-minute reduction in nightly duration under chronic DST compared to standard time, exacerbating social jetlag and daytime sleepiness, particularly among evening chronotypes. In contrast, fall transitions to standard time show neutral or attenuated risks, with the same yielding a non-significant AMI relative of 1.00 (95% : 0.99–1.02) after excluding outliers. Modeling circadian light exposure against county-level CDC health data predicts that permanent standard time averts ~300,000 annual U.S. cases and reduces prevalence by 0.78% (equating to 2.6 million fewer cases), outperforming permanent DST (0.51% obesity drop, ~220,000 fewer strokes) and biannual switching by minimizing misalignment from noon. These projections align with circadian , where standard time facilitates morning exposure to synchronize endogenous rhythms, potentially lowering metabolic and vascular risks over permanent DST's evening bias. Professional bodies, including the , endorse permanent standard time based on this evidence, arguing it optimizes safety by reducing transition-induced crashes (up to 6% rise post-spring DST) and chronic morbidity tied to perpetual offset from natural light-dark cycles. While acute transition effects are well-replicated, chronic comparisons remain model-dependent, with calls for higher-quality longitudinal trials to quantify long-term divergences.

Economic and Societal Impacts

Effects on Transportation, Commerce, and Productivity

The establishment of standard time zones revolutionized transportation, particularly networks, by resolving the fragmentation of local times that had plagued scheduling. Prior to , 1883, when U.S. and Canadian railroads simultaneously adopted four continental time zones, over 100 local times existed across , leading to frequent missed connections, delayed shipments, and heightened collision risks as trains traversed rapidly expanding lines. This standardization enabled precise timetables, reducing operational errors and allowing for more efficient freight and passenger movement; for instance, Britain's similar railway-driven adoption of in 1847 cut accidents and improved punctuality on congested lines. In modern contexts, adherence to permanent standard time avoids the biannual disruptions of (DST) transitions, which correlate with spikes in transportation incidents due to fatigue, thereby sustaining reliability in , shipping, and trucking. For commerce, standard time fostered synchronized economic activities by aligning clocks across regions, essential for , , and early stock exchanges that depended on real-time coordination. The pre-standardization era's temporal discrepancies hindered interstate commerce, as merchants and bankers grappled with mismatched hours for transactions and market openings; the railroad initiative extended these benefits to broader business, culminating in the U.S. of 1918 that legally enshrined zones for commercial uniformity. Permanent standard time further mitigates DST-induced scheduling conflicts in global supply chains and financial operations, where clock shifts complicate cross-border dealings and increase error rates in time-sensitive sectors like energy trading. Regarding productivity, empirical studies underscore standard time's advantages through better circadian alignment, which counters the sleep deficits and cognitive impairments from DST changes. The spring DST shift alone has been associated with a 6.7% drop in worker output in affected industries, per analysis of payroll and performance data, attributing losses to reduced alertness and higher error rates persisting for weeks. Year-round standard time, by preserving morning sunlight exposure, supports sustained vigilance and fewer occupational accidents—evidenced by lower injury claims post-fall-back compared to spring-forward—while the cites its role in minimizing chronic misalignment that erodes long-term efficiency and elevates absenteeism. These effects compound in knowledge-based economies, where consistent solar-time adherence yields measurable gains in focus and decision-making over perpetual DST's evening bias.

Analysis of Energy Consumption Claims

A of 44 empirical studies on (DST) found an average reported reduction in electricity consumption of 0.34% during DST periods, though this estimate reflects substantial heterogeneity across studies and is influenced by outdated assumptions about lighting usage. Modern analyses emphasize that such marginal savings have diminished with the shift away from energy-intensive incandescent bulbs and toward behavioral patterns that increase evening activities, often amplifying cooling demands in warmer months. Peer-reviewed consistently indicates that DST's net impact on use is negligible or negative in many contexts, particularly where predominates. For example, a study in southern European regions concluded that DST elevates overall consumption by extending exposure to warmer evening temperatures, thereby boosting AC runtime without commensurate lighting offsets. Similarly, econometric evaluations , such as those reviewing Indiana's statewide adoption, revealed no statistically significant savings and potential increases due to mismatched shifts. These findings align with broader reviews deeming the evidence inconclusive for systemic reductions, as initial rationales tied to World War-era lighting conservation fail to account for contemporary electricity profiles dominated by heating, cooling, and appliances. Regional variations underscore causal factors like and . In cooler, higher-latitude areas, minor smoothing of daily load curves may occur, with one Central European analysis estimating DST savings below 0.5% of annual while aiding grid stability. Conversely, in subtropical zones, empirical models incorporating weather data demonstrate that DST exacerbates peak evening loads, potentially raising consumption by 1-4% net when factoring extended daylight's influence on human activity patterns. A 2024 assessment of U.S. patterns reinforced this, attributing higher DST-period usage to prolonged artificial cooling rather than reduced , with total costs outweighing any incidental benefits. Claims of substantial through DST, often invoked historically, thus lack robust support from post-2000 data, which prioritize causal mechanisms over correlative anecdotes. Transition costs—such as recalibration of devices and short-term dips—further erode purported gains, bolstering cases for permanent standard time as a that avoids artificial shifts without introducing verifiable consumption hikes.

Contemporary Debates and Reforms

Arguments for Permanent Standard Time

Permanent standard time aligns human activity more closely with natural solar cycles and circadian rhythms, as it is defined by the mean at a given longitude, avoiding the artificial one-hour advancement imposed by (DST). The has stated that permanent standard time is optimal for , citing its synchronization with endogenous circadian timing systems, which regulate sleep-wake cycles, hormone release, and alertness primarily through morning light exposure. This alignment reduces chronic misalignment risks associated with DST, where evening light extension delays onset and impairs morning wakefulness, contributing to sleep debt accumulation. Empirical modeling indicates that adopting permanent standard time could decrease U.S. prevalence by 0.78 percentage points and cardiovascular mortality by 0.13 percentage points nationwide, based on analyses of duration, light exposure, and metabolic data. The biannual clock transitions exacerbate acute health risks, including a documented 6-24% increase in incidence following the spring DST shift, linked to disrupted and sympathetic nervous system activation. Permanent standard time eliminates these disruptions, promoting consistent patterns and lowering incidences of , workplace injuries, and mood disorders, as supported by systematic reviews of epidemiological data showing adverse outcomes from time shifts. For vulnerable populations like adolescents and shift workers, standard time preserves earlier sunrises, facilitating natural to daylight cues that enhance cognitive performance and reduce error rates in morning hours. Safety arguments emphasize reduced traffic fatalities and risks under permanent standard time, particularly during morning commutes and travel. Standard time ensures greater daylight overlap with peak morning activity periods, correlating with lower rates compared to DST's darker winters mornings; studies of transition effects reveal up to an 8% rise in collisions post-spring forward due to and reduced visibility. The has noted that DST's evening light benefits are offset by morning hazards, with permanent standard time minimizing overall accident exposure by prioritizing solar noon alignment with midday productivity peaks. Claims of energy savings from DST have been empirically refuted, with analyses showing negligible or negative net effects on ; a comprehensive review of U.S. and international data found DST increases electricity use by 1-4% in warmer climates due to demands outweighing reductions. Permanent standard time avoids these inefficiencies, as modern lifestyles with homes and extended evening activities diminish any purported conservation from later sunsets, per econometric evaluations spanning decades. This underscores that DST's original wartime rationale lacks substantiation in contemporary profiles, favoring standard time for baseline stability without transitional productivity losses estimated at $1.7-2.6 billion annually in the U.S. from disruption.

Recent Legislative and Public Efforts (2010s–2025)

The (AASM) adopted a formal position in November 2020 calling for the abolition of (DST) and the adoption of permanent standard time across the , arguing that it better aligns with human circadian and reduces health risks associated with clock shifts. This stance, detailed in a peer-reviewed journal article published in January 2024, emphasizes empirical evidence from showing that permanent standard time minimizes disruptions to sleep-wake cycles, morning alertness, and overall public safety. The AASM reiterated and expanded this advocacy in 2023 and January 2025, urging policymakers to prioritize scientific consensus over seasonal adjustments. Public advocacy groups have amplified these efforts through grassroots campaigns. The Save Standard Time initiative, a 501(c)(4) nonprofit founded to oppose DST, has coordinated petitions, legislative outreach, and public awareness drives since the mid-2010s, highlighting data on reduced accident rates and improved mood under standard time alignment with solar noon. Similarly, the Coalition for Permanent Standard Time has united organizations to lobby against biannual changes, submitting testimony to state assemblies and promoting longitudinal studies on productivity and health metrics. These efforts gained traction amid broader debates, with over 30 U.S. states introducing bills since 2015 to explore permanent standard time, though federal law under the of 1966 limits unilateral state action without congressional amendment. State-level proposals often include contingencies for regional coordination. For example, New York State's legislation seeks to establish permanent Eastern Standard Time contingent on enactments in , , and , aiming to prevent cross-border time discrepancies. Comparable measures in states like and , introduced between 2020 and 2024, condition adoption on federal authorization to end DST observance nationwide, reflecting challenges in overriding interstate commerce implications. No federal bill for permanent standard time advanced beyond committee by 2025, contrasting with repeated pushes for permanent DST that stalled in . In , the approved a directive in March 2019 to discontinue coordinated DST by April 2021, permitting member states to select permanent (winter) or summer time based on referenda or . A 2018 public consultation revealed 84% opposition to clock changes among 4.6 million respondents, bolstering arguments for solar-aligned time to mitigate disruption evidence from epidemiological . The proposal lapsed without approval due to disagreements over transition mechanics and economic impacts, leaving seasonal shifts intact as of 2025. Individual countries, such as , revisited abolition in parliamentary debates through 2024, but no binding shifts to permanent time materialized. Globally, several nations transitioned away from DST toward permanent standard time in the and early , driven by energy inefficiency findings and public fatigue with adjustments. Mexico abolished DST in 30 of its 32 states effective October 2022, reverting to permanent standard time after trials showed negligible savings. Similarly, , , and ended seasonal changes between 2015 and 2016, adopting year-round standard time to simplify operations and align with equatorial solar patterns. These moves, often post-referendum or executive decree, underscore a trend in non-temperate regions prioritizing clock stability over extended evening light.

Global Shifts Away from DST

In the decade leading up to 2023, multiple countries discontinued (DST), transitioning to permanent standard time to eliminate biannual clock adjustments. This included in 2016, in 2022, in 2022, in 2017, in 2014, since 2011, and in 2015, among others previously observing the practice. These shifts often cited of increased accidents and disruptions immediately following time changes, alongside minimal or absent benefits originally promoted as rationale for DST. Russia's reversal came after a 2011 trial of permanent summer time, which extended evenings but resulted in excessively dark winter mornings, prompting widespread complaints from residents and industries reliant on early daylight. The approved the return to permanent on July 1, 2014, with clocks set back one hour on October 26, 2014, across 11 time zones. This aligned Russia's schedule more closely with solar noon, reducing misalignment between and natural light cycles during peak activity hours. Mexico abolished DST nationwide on October 26, 2022, via Senate approval of legislation ending seasonal changes after decades of implementation since 1996. The final adjustment occurred on October 30, 2022, when clocks fell back one hour to permanent standard time in most regions, excluding 33 northern border municipalities that retained DST to match adjacent U.S. states. Proponents highlighted studies showing no significant electricity savings—contradicting initial World War I-era justifications—and elevated risks of cardiovascular events post-transition. Namibia's 2017 termination followed a public and analysis revealing heightened road fatalities during the post-DST period, reverting the nation to year-round standard time (UTC+2) effective 2017. Similarly, Azerbaijan's 2016 decision fixed clocks at UTC+4 permanently, based on indicating productivity losses and safety issues outweighed purported agricultural or recreational gains. These actions reflect a broader where jurisdictions, upon reviewing localized , prioritized circadian alignment over historical precedents lacking robust causal support for DST's net utility.

References

  1. [1]
    History & info - Standard time began with the railroads - Webexhibits
    Standard time in time zones was instituted in the U.S. and Canada by the railroads on November 18, 1883. Prior to that, time of day was a local matter, and most ...
  2. [2]
    History of Time Zones and Daylight Saving Time (DST)
    Jan 17, 2023 · Five time zones were officially adopted as the US entered World War I: the Eastern, Central, Mountain, Pacific, and Alaska zones, all of which are still in use ...
  3. [3]
    Time Zones - National Museum of American History
    On November 18, 1883, local times across the nation—determined by the position of the sun overhead—were consolidated into standardized time zones.
  4. [4]
    Railroads create the first time zones | November 18, 1883 | HISTORY
    At exactly noon on this day, American and Canadian railroads begin using four continental time zones to end the confusion of dealing with thousands of local ...
  5. [5]
    Whose Time is it Anyway? A Brief History of Standardized Time ...
    Nov 1, 2024 · This blog post summarizes the history of standardized time zones in the United States, including their development, implementation, ...
  6. [6]
    What Is Standard Time?
    Standard time is the local time in a country or region when Daylight Saving Time (DST) is not in use.
  7. [7]
    Daylight Saving Time - Astronomical Applications Department
    On the first Sunday in November, clocks are set back one hour at 2:00 a.m. local Daylight Saving Time (which becomes 1:00 a.m. local standard time). These ...
  8. [8]
    Study suggests most Americans would be healthier without daylight ...
    Sep 15, 2025 · “We found that staying in standard time or staying in daylight saving time is definitely better than switching twice a year,” said Jamie Zeitzer ...
  9. [9]
    Difference Between Local Time And Standard Time | Lern Concept!
    Basis: Local time is based on the sun's position in the sky, whereas standard time is based on time zones. · Uniformity: Local time varies every 15 degrees ...
  10. [10]
    Difference Between Local Time and Standard Time
    Aug 27, 2024 · Local time is based on the sun's position and varies with longitude, while standard time provides uniformity within a time zone, ...
  11. [11]
    What Is Local Mean Time (LMT)? - Time and Date
    Local Mean Time is the Mean Solar Time for a specific location on Earth. It is the same for all locations that share the same longitude. What is solar noon?<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Difference between local time and standard time? - Krayonnz
    Local time implies the time of a place determined on the basis of apparent movement of the sun. Standard time refers to the fixed time for places falling in ...<|separator|>
  13. [13]
    UTC Time Standard - Time and Date
    UTC is a time zone standard used as a basis for all time zones worldwide. It is a constant time scale and does not change for Daylight Saving Time (DST).
  14. [14]
    Chapter 2: Reference Systems - NASA Science
    Jan 16, 2025 · UTC, Coordinated Universal Time, is the world-wide scientific standard of timekeeping. It is based upon carefully maintained atomic clocks and ...
  15. [15]
    How is UTC(NIST) related to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC ...
    Sep 16, 2024 · UTC(NIST) serves as a national standard for frequency, time interval, and time-of-day. It is distributed through the NIST time and frequency ...
  16. [16]
    Understanding UTC Offsets - Time and Date
    More Than 24 UTC Offsets​​ While most time zones differ from UTC by full hours, a few have 30-minute and 45-minute offsets. That's why, even though UTC is based ...
  17. [17]
    UTC Time Offsets
    List of UTC time offsets in ±HH:MM time format, UTC+1, UTC+2, UTC+3, UTC-1, UTC-2, UTC-3 and all utc offsets with time difference in hours and minutes.UTC-05 · UTC-07 · UTC-04 · UTC-06
  18. [18]
    Z-time (Coordinated Universal Time) - NOAA
    Jun 13, 2023 · All aspects of meteorology are based upon a world-wide 24-hour clock called Zulu time (Z), more commonly called Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
  19. [19]
    How railroads inspired the creation of time zones - BBC
    Nov 18, 2024 · On 18 November 1883, the US and Canadian railroad industries adopted Fleming's idea, but because of the sheer size of the North American ...
  20. [20]
    History of Timekeeping - Time and Date
    Four thousand years ago, ancient Egyptians and Sumerians started to develop calendars, sundials, and temporal hours to help organize trade and agriculture.
  21. [21]
    A Walk Through Time - Early Clocks | NIST
    Aug 12, 2009 · As best we know, 5000 to 6000 years ago great civilizations in the Middle East and North Africa began to make clocks to augment their calendars.Missing: adoption | Show results with:adoption<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Telling the time with the Sun | Science Museum
    Sep 26, 2018 · The way we define time ultimately comes from the Sun. Here we'll explore the deep connections between the Earth's motion around the Sun, and our concept of ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
  23. [23]
    How Traveling by Train Ushered in the Era of Time Zones
    Nov 20, 2020 · The confusion of local times and the need for trains to travel through multiple time zones led to the creation of time zones. Trains carried ...
  24. [24]
    Standardising time: Railways and the electric telegraph
    Oct 4, 2018 · Find out how the rise of railways and the invention of the electric telegraph led to standardised time.How was time organised... · What was the problem with...
  25. [25]
    Time is of the essence ... or the railroad?
    Railroads needed precise time for timetables, leading to the implementation of time zones in 1883, which were later adopted by Congress in 1918.
  26. [26]
    08. Time Standardization - Linda Hall Library
    Travelers by train would be synchronized with local time at only one point in their journey. In the late 1840s, New England railroads began publishing monthly ...
  27. [27]
    Remembering the Washington Conference That Brought the World ...
    Oct 7, 2019 · The 1884 International Meridian Conference gave the world standard time and constituted a seminal moment in the history of globalization.
  28. [28]
    Invention of Standard Time | The Canadian Encyclopedia
    Oct 18, 2013 · Fleming instigated the initial efforts that led to the adoption of the time zones used by the railways in 1883 and the global time zones we use ...<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    History of Time Zones in the UK
    With the Statutes (Definition of Time) Act (43 & 44 Vict.), Greenwich Mean Time was legally adopted throughout the island of Great Britain on August 2, 1880.
  30. [30]
    The Birth of Time Zones: How the World Adopted Standard Time
    Dec 17, 2024 · Before Time Zones ... In the past, communities kept time by the sun. Noon arrived whenever the sun stood highest, and that worked fine when people ...
  31. [31]
    Central European Time - Wikipedia
    1884. The Kingdom of Serbia starts using CET. · 1 October 1891. Austro-Hungarian Empire adopts CET. · 1 April 1893. The German Empire unified its time zones to ...Usage · Usage in Europe · Areas within UTC+01:00... · Areas outside UTC+01:00...
  32. [32]
    Time Zones in Australia
    Australian Time Zone History ... Australia standardized its civil time in 1895. Until then, each location in the country observed its own solar time. From 1895 ...Australia's time zones · Sydney · Melbourne · South Australia
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    [PDF] THE CENTENARY OF THE PRIME MERIDIAN AND OF ...
    In 1884, an international conference was assembled in Washington, D.C., to establish a prime merid- ian that would be accepted as an international standard.
  35. [35]
    Conference setting international time begins | OUPblog
    Oct 13, 2011 · […] 1884: Twelve nations agree to use GMT as the international basis for time zones at the International Prime Meridian Conference. […].<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    Half Hour and 45-Minute Time Zones - Time and Date
    Some time zones have 30 or 45-minute offsets from UTC, unlike the usual one-hour intervals. Examples include India (UTC +5:30) and some Australian states.Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
  37. [37]
    U.S. Time Zones
    Standard time in the U.S. and its territories is observed within nine time zones.
  38. [38]
    Time zones and daylight saving time
    Oct 25, 2022 · The areas of Ontario, west of 90° West longitude, are in the Central Time zone and change at 2:00 a.m. local time. Return to footnote 3 referrer.
  39. [39]
    Time Zones and DST in Europe - Time and Date
    Europe is divided into four main time zones that span from UTC+0 hours in western European countries to UTC+3 hours in Belarus and parts of Russia.
  40. [40]
    China Only Has One Time Zone—and That's a Problem - The Atlantic
    Nov 5, 2013 · The Communist Party's decision to use Beijing time across the country, done to enhance “national unity,” has backfired in Xinjiang.
  41. [41]
    India Standard Time – IST Time Zone - Time and Date
    India Standard Time (IST) is 5:30 hours ahead of Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). This time zone is in use during standard time in: Asia.
  42. [42]
    List of countries grouped by UTC offset - Time.is
    This page lists all countries of the world, plus major regions and cities, grouped by their current UTC offset.
  43. [43]
    Unusual Time Zones - WorldTimeServer.com
    Not every time zone is based on an hour offset. There are 30 and 45 minute offsets in addition to the normal hour offset. Learn why this came to be.
  44. [44]
    The Country That Has The Most Time Zones Will No Doubt Surprise ...
    Feb 13, 2023 · Even though China spans almost five geographical time zones it only has a single time zone for the whole country: Beijing Time. The Xinjiang ...
  45. [45]
    Spain Has Been In The 'Wrong' Time Zone For 7 Decades - NPR
    Nov 24, 2013 · Spain's clocks have been set to Central European time since World War II, which means the sun rises and sets later compared to countries in its region.Missing: anomaly | Show results with:anomaly
  46. [46]
    Daylight Saving Time Rules | NIST
    Mar 2, 2010 · We advance our clocks ahead one hour at the beginning of DST, and move them back one hour ("spring forward, fall back") when we return to ...
  47. [47]
    History & info - Daylight Saving Time idea from Benjamin Franklin
    The idea of daylight saving was first conceived by Benjamin Franklin (portrait at right) during his sojourn as an American delegate in Paris in 1784, in an ...
  48. [48]
    A Bugologist and a Golfer Sparked the Push for Daylight Saving Time
    Oct 30, 2023 · William Willett wanted more sunshine to play golf. Each man proposed a version of what would become daylight saving time, enacted in the ...
  49. [49]
    William Willett's pamphlet - The Waste of Daylight - Webexhibits
    If we will reduce the length of four Sundays by 20 minutes, a loss of which practically no one would be conscious, we shall have 8o minutes more daylight after ...
  50. [50]
    UK time changes | Understanding British Summer Time (BST)
    However, it wasn't until 1907 that a serious proposal for daylight saving time was made in Britain by William Willett. Angry at the waste of daylight during ...
  51. [51]
    William Willetts and Daylight Saving Time - GMT
    His proposal was to improve health and happiness by advancing the clocks twenty minutes on each of four Sundays in April, and by reversing this idea by the same ...
  52. [52]
    History of Daylight Saving Time (DST)
    Sep 11, 2025 · Daylight Saving Time (DST) is used to save energy and make better use of daylight. It was first used in 1908 in Thunder Bay, Canada.
  53. [53]
    The Real Reason Why Daylight Saving Time Is a Thing
    Nov 4, 2016 · The first Daylight Saving Time policy began in Germany on May 1, 1916, in the hopes that it would save energy during World War I.
  54. [54]
    History of DST in Europe – When Did It Start? - Time and Date
    On April 30, 1916, at the height of World War I, clocks in the German Empire were set forward by one hour to start the world's first countrywide DST period.
  55. [55]
    The History of Daylight Saving Time - University of Colorado Boulder
    Nov 7, 2022 · It was first introduced in Germany in 1916 during World War I as an energy saving measure, according to CU Boulder sleep researcher Kenneth Wright.
  56. [56]
    The effects of daylight saving time and clock time transitions on ...
    Ideal standard time zones should have solar time aligned with the central meridian of the time zone, with the entire time zone within 30 min of solar time.
  57. [57]
    What time is it? A tale of three clocks, with ... - PubMed Central - NIH
    There are negative consequences to the misalignment of solar, social, and circadian time. The one hour change between Standard and Saving Time is associated ...
  58. [58]
    Why daylight saving time is worse for your body than standard time
    Nov 2, 2022 · Morning sun is key to maintaining our circadian rhythms, sleep-wake cycles and overall health, experts say. Phyllis Zee, a neurologist and ...
  59. [59]
    Debunking myths about daylight saving time: ten things everyone ...
    STANDARD TIME BEST ALIGNS WITH CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS. Although some ... circadian rhythms remain essentially aligned to solar time despite the new clock time.
  60. [60]
    Circadian-informed modeling predicts regional variation in obesity ...
    Sep 15, 2025 · To estimate the impact of permanent SDT or DST on health, we modeled the circadian impact of SDT, DST, and Biannual Shifting (BAS) across a year ...
  61. [61]
    Daylight saving time: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine ... - NIH
    A change to permanent standard time is best aligned with human circadian biology and has the potential to produce beneficial effects for public health and ...
  62. [62]
    Permanent standard time is the optimal choice for health and safety
    Permanent standard time (ST) is favored because it aligns with human circadian biology, and seasonal time changes (DST) cause misalignment and health risks.
  63. [63]
    7 Things to Know About Daylight Saving Time | Johns Hopkins
    Mar 9, 2023 · In the spring, when we switch to daylight saving time, we increase the amount of light we're exposed to in the evening hours.” Less sleep means ...
  64. [64]
    Why we should let the sun set on Daylight Saving Time | SRBR
    Oct 25, 2020 · We each have an internal clock, or circadian rhythm, which works to align your body rhythms with the 24-hour cycle of sunlight and darkness ...<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    Daylight Saving Time Transitions and Risk of Heart Attack - PubMed
    Jul 26, 2024 · Disturbed circadian rhythms and lack of sleep after transitions might increase the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The only meta- ...
  66. [66]
    Daylight-Saving Time & Health: A Systematic Review of Beneficial ...
    Mar 17, 2025 · The evidence suggests DST-Onset transitions increase risk of acute myocardial infarction (17 studies, 5 high quality) and fatal traffic accidents (14 studies, ...
  67. [67]
    The Business Cost Of Daylight Saving Time: What Leaders Need To ...
    Mar 12, 2025 · While transitioning to permanent Standard Time isn't within a company's control, leaders can take proactive steps to ease employee impact.Missing: coordination | Show results with:coordination
  68. [68]
    Daylight saving time linked to lost worker productivity | OregonNews
    Oct 28, 2024 · New research from the University of Oregon finds the annual spring forward to daylight saving time affects worker productivity more than previously thought.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  69. [69]
    Daylight saving time causes lower productivity and higher health ...
    Mar 8, 2025 · Studies have found that adopting permanent standard time could prevent up to 5,000 suicides annually by reducing seasonal depression, decrease ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  70. [70]
    The Diminishing Returns of Daylight Saving Time - Stanford University
    Dec 11, 2021 · One meta-analysis of 44 studies concluded that, on average, reports indicate a 0.34% reduction in electricity consumption on Daylight Saving days.
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Does Daylight Saving Save Energy? A Meta-Analysis - EconStor
    Modern research studies, however, question the magnitude and even direction of the effect of DST on energy consumption.<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    Does Daylight Saving Time Actually Save? Research Shows Costs ...
    Oct 30, 2024 · However, recent studies have found that people actually consume more energy during DST, because with more daylight, people run air conditioners ...
  73. [73]
    The Impact of Daylight Saving Time on the Energy Efficiency ... - MDPI
    The study found that DST not only fails to reduce energy consumption but increases it, mainly due to the increased use of air conditioning during warmer nights ...
  74. [74]
    [PDF] NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES DOES DAYLIGHT SAVING TIME ...
    This review of existing studies suggests that the evidence to date is inconclusive about the effect of DST on electricity consumption. None of the empirical ...
  75. [75]
  76. [76]
    Does daylight saving time save electricity? Evidence from Slovakia
    DST savings are unlikely more than 0.5% of annual electricity consumption. •. Daylight saving time in Slovakia smooths the electricity demand curve. Abstract.
  77. [77]
    When does daylight saving time save electricity? Weather and air ...
    Our results show that the effect of DST on electricity consumption depends strongly on weather conditions and cooling usage.
  78. [78]
    Traffic crash changes following transitions between daylight saving ...
    This paper describes a research effort to quantify the impacts of the two time changes each year on crash frequencies using 2014–2016 crashes from six states.
  79. [79]
  80. [80]
    Eliminate daylight saving time - American Academy of Sleep Medicine
    Sep 14, 2020 · The AASM supports a switch to permanent standard time, explaining in the statement that standard time more closely aligns with the daily rhythms ...
  81. [81]
    New position statement supports permanent standard time
    Oct 31, 2023 · An updated position statement from AASM supports the replacement of daylight saving time with permanent standard time.
  82. [82]
    Sleep experts push for adoption of permanent standard time for ...
    Jan 28, 2025 · It offers more sunlight in the morning, helping people wake up and feel more alert, while the evenings gradually become dark earlier, signaling ...
  83. [83]
    SAVE STANDARD TIME
    Ditch Daylight Saving Time. Permanent Standard Time lets us sleep later for health, mood, safety, education, and economy. We're a 501(c)(4) nonprofit.Current Legislation · About Us · Take Action · Sunrise Chart
  84. [84]
    Coalition for Permanent Standard Time: Ditch Daylight Saving Time
    CpST is a dedicated group of diverse organizations and individuals who support the elimination of biannual clock change in the United States.Missing: campaign | Show results with:campaign<|separator|>
  85. [85]
    Report Daylight Saving Time | State Legislation
    State legislatures have considered over 750 bills and resolutions in recent years to establish year-round daylight saving time as soon as federal law allows it.Missing: 2010-2025 | Show results with:2010-2025
  86. [86]
    H.R.139 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): Sunshine Protection Act of ...
    This bill makes daylight saving time the new, permanent standard time. States with areas exempt from daylight saving time may choose the standard time for ...
  87. [87]
    Seasonal clock changes in the EU - consilium.europa.eu
    Both the Council and the European Parliament have to agree in order to pass the legislation needed to end the seasonal time changes. Timeline. 02/12/2019.
  88. [88]
    Bye-bye, Daylight Saving Time: A Dream Come True? | European ...
    Mar 20, 2025 · Europe Says “No Thanks” to DST​​ In 2018, the European Commission proposed putting an end to the clock changes across the EU. Turns out, 84% of ...
  89. [89]
    EU reconsiders ending Daylight Saving Time
    Aug 22, 2025 · Today, DST starts at 01:00 UTC on the last Sunday in March and ends at 01:00 UTC on the last Sunday in October.
  90. [90]
  91. [91]
    Most countries don't observe daylight saving time
    Oct 26, 2023 · In the last decade alone, Azerbaijan, Iran, Jordan, Namibia, Russia, Samoa, Syria, Turkey and Uruguay have all ended their seasonal time changes ...
  92. [92]
    Places around the world that opt out of daylight savings - and why
    Mar 8, 2024 · If passed, the bill would make daylight saving times permanent in the United States, but the proposed legislation, after passing in the Senate, ...
  93. [93]
    Russia returns to Standard Time all year
    Jul 2, 2014 · Most Russians will move to permanent Standard Time, or “winter time”, by setting their clocks 1 hour back on October 26, 2014.
  94. [94]
    Russia: Putin abolishes 'daylight savings' time change - BBC News
    Jul 22, 2014 · Russian President Vladimir Putin has announced that the country will permanently switch to winter time on 26 October.
  95. [95]
    Russia set to turn back the clocks with daylight-saving time shift
    Jul 1, 2014 · State Duma in Moscow votes to reverse permanent daylight-saving time, meanwhile anti-obscenity laws come into force.
  96. [96]
    Mexico Abolishes DST - Time and Date
    Oct 27, 2022 · The new law means that most of Mexico will set their clocks back 1 hour from 02:00 (2:00 am) to 01:00 (1:00 am) on Sunday, October 30, 2022, and ...
  97. [97]
    Mexico's Senate Votes to Eliminate Daylight Saving Time
    Oct 27, 2022 · Mexico's Senate voted on Wednesday to end daylight saving time for most of the country, signaling a preference for more daylight in the mornings.
  98. [98]
    Senate approves legislation to eliminate Daylight Saving Time
    Oct 26, 2022 · The new law ends DST in most of Mexico but allows 33 border municipalities to continue it to stay in sync with the U.S. states they adjoin.