Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Solar cycle

The solar cycle is a nearly periodic fluctuation in the Sun's magnetic activity, spanning approximately 11 years, characterized by cyclic variations in the number, size, and latitude distribution of s, as well as associated phenomena such as solar flares, prominences, and coronal mass ejections. This cycle arises from the solar dynamo mechanism, wherein and convection in the Sun's tachocline and amplify and regenerate the through the interaction of flows with existing fields, leading to periodic field reversals. Discovered in 1843 by German astronomer Samuel Heinrich Schwabe through systematic observations of sunspot occurrences from 1826 onward, the cycle's existence was confirmed and quantified by Rudolf Wolf, who established a sunspot number index dating back to 1755. Over two 11-year Schwabe cycles, the Sun's global reverses, completing a 22-year Hale cycle. Peaks of activity, known as solar maxima, correlate with heightened events that can disrupt Earth's operations, power grids, and radio communications due to geomagnetic storms induced by interactions with the . While total varies by about 0.1% across the cycle, exerting a minor influence on global temperatures of roughly 0.1°C, this effect is dwarfed by other climatic forcings in contemporary observations. , which began in December 2019, reached its maximum phase in 2024, exceeding initial predictions in sunspot productivity.

Fundamentals

Definition and Characteristics

The solar cycle is an approximately 11-year periodic variation in the Sun's magnetic activity, marked by fluctuations in the number of s and other phenomena tied to the solar . This cycle arises from the dynamo process in the Sun's convective zone, where and twist and amplify the lines, leading to their emergence as sunspots on the . Sunspots appear as darker, cooler regions due to suppressed by intense magnetic fields, typically occurring in pairs with opposite polarities that follow hemispheric patterns and Spörer's law of migration toward the . Key characteristics include a progression from , with minimal activity and a weak, dipole-like , to , where counts peak and the global undergoes a reversal. The reversal occurs near maximum, with polar fields weakening and then rebuilding in opposite polarity over the subsequent cycle, forming the basis of the 22-year Hale cycle for full polarity return. Associated activity includes faculae, prominences, and flares, which correlate with numbers and contribute to total variations of about 0.1%. Cycle lengths vary between 9 and 14 years, and peak strengths differ markedly, influencing the and .

Periodicity and Variability

The solar cycle manifests as a quasi-periodic oscillation in solar magnetic activity, primarily tracked through sunspot numbers, with an average duration of approximately 11 years from one minimum to the next. This periodicity, known as the Schwabe cycle, arises from the underlying dynamo processes in the Sun's , where and convection generate and reverse the solar magnetic field. Historical records from 1755 onward, compiled by observers like , confirm this average length, with the cycle defined by the rise from sunspot minimum to maximum and subsequent decline. Individual cycle lengths exhibit variability, typically ranging from 9 to 14 years, influenced by stochastic elements in the solar dynamo. For instance, during the (1645–1715), a period of suppressed activity, cycle durations extended to about 14 years, as inferred from proxy records like variations in tree rings. Longer-term modulations, such as the Gleissberg cycle of roughly 80–100 years, superimpose on the 11-year cycle, causing clusters of shorter or longer cycles. Amplitude variability is equally pronounced, with sunspot maxima differing by factors of up to 3–4 across cycles; weak cycles like those during the (1790–1830) featured maxima below 50 smoothed sunspot numbers, while strong cycles, such as Cycle 19 (1954–1964), exceeded 200. Grand minima, characterized by prolonged near-absence of sunspots over multiple cycles, represent extremes of this variability, occurring irregularly every few centuries and linked to dynamo transitions. Such episodes, including the Spörer Minimum (1460–1550), highlight the non-stationary nature of solar activity, with proxy data extending evidence back millennia. The full magnetic polarity reversal spans about 22 years (Hale cycle), doubling the Schwabe period and underscoring the cycle's dipolar structure.

Observational History

Pre-Telescopic and Early Records

and astronomers maintained the most extensive pre-telescopic records of sunspots, which were visible to the only during episodes of high activity when exceptionally large spots or atmospheric reduced . The earliest plausible such dates to around 800 BCE in astronomical texts, with more consistent records emerging from the onward, including a description in the circa 140 BCE. Over 240 sunspot sightings were cataloged across from 165 BCE to 1918 CE, though pre-1600 CE records number around 100, predominantly from official chronicles. These accounts, often embedded in astrological or omen contexts, exhibit gaps corresponding to low-activity intervals and thus bias reconstructions toward maxima. In the (960–1279 ), the official chronicle Songshi documents 38 candidate events, with notable clusters between 1100 and 1205 aligning with inferred high solar activity, as corroborated by auroral records at low latitudes indicating geomagnetic storms. annals similarly report sightings, such as in 1064 , supplementing data for cross-verification. sources yield fewer entries, including a debated 939 observation, while European and Indian records remain sparse and unreliable prior to telescopes, with potential Mesoamerican codices proposed but unconfirmed. Such observations enabled retrospective identification of long-term cycles, including a ~250-year in visibility, but lacked quantitative consistency for precise cycle delineation. Telescopic observations commenced shortly after the instrument's invention in 1608, revolutionizing solar monitoring by revealing smaller sunspots routinely. English astronomer Thomas Harriot recorded the first such sighting on December 8, 1610 (Julian calendar), sketching three dark spots on the solar disk from notes predating Galileo's work. Galileo Galilei independently observed sunspots starting in 1611, publishing projected drawings in Letters on Sunspots (1613) to argue their solar origin against planetary transit hypotheses. Jesuit astronomer Christoph Scheiner, using systematic daily viewing from 1611, compiled extensive records and affirmed sunspots as photospheric features in Rosa Ursina sive Sol (1630), including heliographic coordinates for dozens of groups. Seventeenth-century European observers, including Johannes Fabricius (first publication 1611), William Crabtree, and Gottfried Kirch, contributed irregular series amid debates over instrumentation and spot morphology, with totals exceeding 500 documented days by 1700 despite coverage gaps from weather and priorities. These early telescopic efforts, though non-uniform and prone to projection distortions, provided the initial dataset revealing sunspot grouping and ephemeral nature, foreshadowing the ~11-year cycle formalized later.

Modern Systematic Observations

Systematic telescopic observations of sunspots intensified in the early 19th century, with Samuel Heinrich Schwabe conducting nearly continuous daily counts from 1826 to 1843, initially motivated by the search for intra-Mercurial planets. In 1843, Schwabe identified an approximate 10-year periodicity in sunspot numbers, marking the first recognition of the solar cycle's recurrence based on empirical data spanning 17 years. Rudolf Wolf, director of the Zurich Observatory, initiated a more formalized approach in 1848 by aggregating observations from multiple astronomers to compute a standardized relative sunspot number, defined as R = k(10g + s), where g is the number of sunspot groups, s is the number of individual spots, and k is an observer-specific correction factor calibrated against a reference observer. Wolf reconstructed the series backward to 1618 using historical records, though reliability increases from February 1755, the start of Solar Cycle 1, with daily observations becoming consistent after 1849. This enabled quantitative tracking of cycle and , revealing variations such as the weaker around 1800. Following Wolf's death in 1893, his successor Alfred Wolfer maintained the series at until 1945, after which it transferred to the Swiss Federal Observatory in and then to the Royal Observatory of in in 1981, where the Solar Influences Data Analysis Center (SIDC) now produces the International Number as the official record. The SIDC applies rigorous calibration to ensure homogeneity across observers and has undertaken revisions, such as the 2015 update incorporating backbone corrections from reference stations to address inconsistencies in earlier data. This continuous series, spanning over 270 years, forms the primary empirical basis for solar cycle monitoring, with monthly means smoothed over months to delineate cycle progression.

Cycle Progression

Historical Cycles Overview

Telescopic observations of sunspots began in the early 17th century, enabling the identification of periodic solar activity variations, though systematic cycle numbering commenced with Solar Cycle 1, which attained its minimum sunspot number in February 1755. Prior to reliable records, the Maunder Minimum from approximately 1645 to 1715 marked a prolonged epoch of diminished solar activity, during which sunspot occurrences were exceedingly scarce despite consistent astronomical scrutiny, contrasting sharply with typical 11-year Schwabe cycles. The Dalton Minimum, occurring roughly from 1790 to 1830 and encompassing Solar Cycles 5 through 7, represented another interval of subdued activity, characterized by smoothed maximum sunspot numbers of 82 in February 1805, 81.2 in May 1816, and 119.2 in November 1829. Following these weaker phases, solar cycles exhibited a secular rise in amplitude, peaking during the Modern Maximum in the mid-20th century, exemplified by Cycle 19's record smoothed maximum of 285 sunspots in March 1958. Cycle strengths have since waned, with Cycle 23 reaching 180.3 in November 2001 and Cycle 24 a modest 116.4 in April 2014, signaling a possible transition away from the elevated activity of prior decades. Overall, historical cycles display considerable variability in both duration—typically 9 to 14 years from minimum to minimum—and peak intensity, as quantified by the international sunspot number derived from global observations standardized by the Solar Influences Data Analysis Center.
CycleMaximum DateMaximum SSN
11761-06144.1
21769-09193
31778-05264.2
41788-02235.3
51805-0282
61816-0581.2
71829-11119.2
81837-03244.9
91848-02219.9
101860-02186.2
111870-08234
121883-12124.4
131894-01146.5
141906-02107.1
151917-08175.7
161928-04130.2
171937-04198.6
181947-05218.7
191958-03285
201968-11156.6
211979-12232.9
221989-11212.5
232001-11180.3
242014-04116.4
This table summarizes the smoothed maxima for Cycles 1–24 based on 13-month averaging of monthly numbers.

Cycle 24 Details

Solar Cycle 24 began in December 2008, succeeding a deep and extended minimum with a smoothed number of 2.2. The cycle displayed a double-peaked structure in its maximum phase, featuring an initial rise in activity peaking around February 2012, followed by a secondary peak driven by in 2014, when the 13-month smoothed international number reached 81.8. This maximum value represented the lowest since Solar Cycle 14 in the late . The cycle concluded in December 2019, spanning roughly 11 years and ranking among the longer recent cycles. Overall activity remained subdued, with total numbers approximately half those of Cycle 23, which peaked at 180.8 in 2001. This weakness manifested in reduced , including fewer X-class flares—around 60 events compared to over 200 in Cycle 23—and lower rates of coronal mass ejections, contributing to diminished geomagnetic disturbances. The diminished amplitude is attributed to anomalously weak polar at the conclusion of Cycle 23, which limited the generation of the toroidal magnetic field responsible for formation via the solar dynamo process. Despite the low baseline, isolated intense events occurred, such as the X5.4 in 2012 and multiple X-class eruptions in 2017 from lingering active regions. Observations indicate that while Cycle 24 produced fewer high-energy structures, the geoeffectiveness of individual coronal mass ejections remained comparable to prior cycles when they did occur.

Cycle 25 Status and Developments

Solar Cycle 25 commenced in December 2019, marked by a smoothed sunspot number minimum of 1.8, similar to the low activity at the end of Cycle 24. Initial forecasts from the NOAA/NASA/ISES Solar Cycle 25 Prediction Panel anticipated a relatively weak cycle, comparable in strength to Cycle 24, with a maximum smoothed sunspot number of 115 expected in July 2025, plus or minus eight months. These predictions were based on statistical models incorporating historical data, geomagnetic precursors, and dynamo simulations, though early observations suggested potential for higher activity than modeled. Contrary to predictions, solar activity intensified more rapidly, surpassing forecast levels by mid-2023 and indicating a stronger cycle. Provisional data from the Solar Influences Data Analysis Center (SIDC) and analysis in peer-reviewed literature confirm a smoothed maximum of approximately 160.8–160.9 sunspot number in October 2024, representing the cycle's peak several months ahead of the projected timeline. This elevated peak, about 40% higher than anticipated, correlated with increased occurrences of solar flares, coronal mass ejections, and geomagnetic storms, enhancing impacts such as auroral displays and disruptions to satellite operations and power grids. As of October 2025, Cycle 25 has entered a declining phase, with monthly numbers trending downward since September 2024 and provisional August 2025 values notably lower than the prior year, signaling the post-maximum descent toward the next minimum around 2030. Ongoing monitoring by NOAA's Prediction Center and continues to refine extended forecasts, incorporating real-time observations to assess residual high-activity periods that may persist for up to a year post-peak due to the cycle's inherent variability. The cycle's unexpected vigor has prompted revisions in dynamo models, highlighting limitations in precursor-based predictions and underscoring the interior's complex magnetic dynamics.

Associated Solar Phenomena

Sunspots and Magnetic Active Regions

Sunspots are transient, dark patches on the Sun's , typically spanning diameters from 10,000 to 100,000 kilometers, where intense inhibit , cooling the to 3,500–4,500 K relative to the photosphere's average 5,800 K. These regions exhibit strong, predominantly vertical reaching up to 3,000 gauss in the umbral cores, with organized according to Hale's law: sunspots emerge in pairs, with the leading spot in each pair exhibiting opposite to the trailing spot within the same solar hemisphere, and overall reversing between consecutive 11-year cycles to form a 22-year Hale magnetic cycle. Magnetic active regions () represent broader concentrations of on the solar surface, often encompassing multiple groups amid facular enhancements, where tangled and emerging flux tubes from the underlying drive dynamic evolution. ARs form through the buoyant rise of toroidal magnetic flux bundles generated by the solar dynamo in the tachocline, piercing the as arched bipolar structures that fragment into pores and mature s over days to weeks. The total unsigned in ARs correlates with area but exhibits cycle-dependent discrepancies, such as systematically higher flux relative to area in cycle 23 compared to cycle 24, reflecting variations in and emergence rates. Within the solar cycle, and AR abundance peaks during , serving as primary proxies for overall magnetic activity, with smoothed numbers rising from near-zero at minimum to maxima exceeding 100–200 (e.g., 156.6 in cycle 23's 2001 peak) before declining, modulated by and meridional flows that shear and transport flux poleward. AR lifetimes range from days for ephemeral regions to months for major complexes, during which flux cancellation and dispersal contribute to the reversal of polar fields, linking local active phenomena to global feedback. Observations from instruments like SDO/HMI reveal that pre-emergence subsurface bipoles persist for hours to days, influencing AR complexity and subsequent eruptive potential.

Faculae, Plage, and Network

Faculae are bright, magnetically concentrated regions in the solar photosphere, appearing as small white patches that are hotter and more luminous than the surrounding quiet-Sun , with temperatures elevated by approximately 100-200 K. These features are particularly prominent near the solar limb, where reduced limb darkening enhances their visibility, and they often form extended networks around active regions. Plage, observed as bright patches in the via spectral lines such as Ca II K or H-alpha, overlie photospheric faculae and exhibit stronger magnetic fields, typically in compact active-region configurations with flux densities exceeding 100 G. The magnetic network comprises diffuse, intergranular magnetic elements at supergranule boundaries, manifesting as weaker, extended bright structures with flux densities around 10-50 G, distinguishing it from denser plage by lower concentration and persistence. These phenomena vary systematically with the solar , with facular, plage, and network coverage increasing from to maximum, peaking in anti-phase with numbers in terms of relative contribution to but with absolute areas rising alongside overall activity. Observations from the Royal Greenwich Observatory, spanning 1874 to 1976, quantified white-light facular areas, revealing a cycle modulation where facular excess brightening dominates sunspot-induced dimming, resulting in a net total increase of about 0.1% at maximum. Plage areas, tracked via Ca II K spectroheliograms, show similar cyclic enhancement, with compact plage tied to ephemeral active regions and extended network to quieter magnetism, both contributing to and bolometric output variations. Polar faculae, a subset appearing at high latitudes, exhibit distinct cycle phasing that precedes sunspot maxima and aids in predicting cycle amplitudes, as their numbers decline post-maximum toward minimum. Empirical models of solar irradiance variability attribute over 90% of cycle-scale fluctuations to contrasts between dark sunspots/penumbrae and bright faculae/plage/, with the facular-to-sunspot area ratio decreasing at higher activity levels, implying saturation effects in strong cycles. Space-based measurements, such as those from the Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment (SORCE), confirm that and plage emissions drive short-wavelength irradiance rises, while photospheric faculae influence broadband output, underscoring their role in heliospheric modulation without invoking unsubstantiated dynamo asymmetries. Long-term reconstructions using sunspot and facular proxies extend these patterns back centuries, highlighting consistent cycle dominance over noise.

Flares, Coronal Mass Ejections, and Eruptions

Solar flares represent sudden, intense releases of across the spectrum, primarily driven by events in the solar corona above active regions with strong . Their occurrence rate and energy output peak during the phase of the 11-year cycle, correlating strongly with numbers and magnetic complexity, as heightened dynamo activity fosters more frequent reconnection instabilities. Flares are classified by the GOES satellite's measurement of peak soft flux in the 1-8 Å band, ranging from A-class (weakest, <10^{-7} W/) to X-class (strongest, >10^{-4} W/), with subclasses indicating intensity (e.g., X1 to X20+). During solar maxima, such as in Cycle 23 (peaking ~2001-2002), multiple X-class flares occurred monthly, whereas at minima like 2008-2009, significant flares dropped to near zero, reflecting reduced active region emergence. Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are massive expulsions of magnetized from the solar corona, typically involving 10^{15}-10^{16} g of material ejected at speeds of 250-3000 km/s, often twisting the . Detection via coronagraphs like /LASCO since 1996 reveals a clear cycle modulation: approximately one CME per week at versus 2-3 per day at maximum, with rates exceeding 6 per day during peak activity periods. This ~10-fold increase aligns with enhanced emergence, as interplanetary CMEs (ICMEs) in the rise from ~0.3 per at minimum to ~3 at maximum. About half of CMEs originate from filament or prominence eruptions, with the rest linked to flare-related processes or stealth ejections lacking obvious surface signatures. Solar eruptions, encompassing filament destabilization and coronal cavity ejections, serve as key precursors to many CMEs, where sheared in prominences—dense, cool threads suspended against gravity by Lorentz forces—undergo partial or full eruptions. Prominence eruption rates follow the solar cycle, with quiescent, long-lived structures dominating at minimum (when are dipole-like and stable) and more dynamic, eruptive events rising toward maximum due to increased flux cancellation and reconnection opportunities. Observations indicate spatial-temporal associations between eruptions and CMEs strengthen at maximum, though variability persists; for instance, failed eruptions (confined ejections) were noted near Cycle 24 maximum in 2013-2014, highlighting the role of overlying coronal fields in constraining escape. These phenomena collectively drive hazards, with cycle-phase forecasting aiding predictions of geomagnetic storms from Earth-directed events.

Empirical Patterns

Intra-Cycle Effects

Solar activity within each approximately 11-year cycle follows an asymmetric temporal pattern, with numbers rising from minimum to maximum over an average of 4 years before declining over 7 years. This rise-decline disparity contributes to the overall cycle shape observed in long-term records. A key empirical relation governing intra-cycle dynamics is the Waldmeier effect, which quantifies the inverse relationship between cycle and peak number: stronger cycles ascend more rapidly due to enhanced processes amplifying emergence early in the cycle. Observations across multiple cycles confirm this, with rise rates correlating positively with maximum smoothed numbers at coefficients around -0.7 for versus . Sunspot emergence adheres to Spörer's law, wherein active regions first appear at heliographic latitudes of 30°–40° near cycle minimum, then drift equatorward at rates of about 0.5° per month, reaching low latitudes by maximum phase. This latitudinal migration, visualized in butterfly diagrams, reflects the subsurface propagation of the toroidal magnetic field component in models. Hemispheric asymmetries manifest as phase offsets in peak activity, typically 1–2 years between north and south, with no fixed dominance but periodic enhancements in asymmetry spectra at ~8.5 years. Such intra-cycle imbalances, persisting below 20% in relative numbers for most cycles, arise from variations in meridional circulation or noise rather than deterministic symmetries.

Multi-Cycle Modulations

Solar cycles display significant variations in , , and across multiple successive cycles, ranging from near-spotless grand minima to highly active grand maxima. Reconstructions from cosmogenic isotopes such as and over the epoch reveal that grand minima, characterized by numbers of 10–20, occur approximately 1/6 of the time, while grand maxima with numbers exceeding 60 comprise about 1/10 of periods; moderate activity levels hover around 40 ± 10. Cycle lengths average 10.8 ± 1.4 years in these long-term reconstructions, compared to 11.0 ± 1.1 years from direct telescopic observations since 1610. These modulations arise from stochastic fluctuations in the solar dynamo, including variations in bipolar magnetic region tilt and eruption rates, modulated by nonlinear effects such as flux transport and latitude quenching. A prominent feature of multi-cycle modulation is the Gleissberg cycle, a centennial-scale oscillation with periods of 80–100 years that primarily affects the amplitude of the 11-year Schwabe cycle. This modulation is evident in sunspot records from 1700 onward, geomagnetic activity indices like the aa index since 1868, and proxies spanning over 9,400 years, confirming its persistence across millennia. Minima in the Gleissberg cycle coincide with extended solar minima (XSMs), such as those from 1810–1830 and 1900–1910, marked by sunspot numbers below 70 and prolonged cycle durations. Recent observations align with a Gleissberg minimum, including the extended minimum of 2006–2011 during the transition from Solar Cycle 23 to 24, where the solar dipole magnetic field weakened to 0.5 gauss in 2009 from 1.3 gauss in 1986, with increased dominance of fields. Longer modulations, such as the Suess/ cycle of 200–210 years, may cluster grand minima occurrences. These patterns underscore the Sun's operating with overlaid timescales beyond the primary 11-year rhythm, influencing heliospheric and terrestrial environments over decades to centuries.

Longer-Term and Hypothetical Cycles

Solar activity exhibits modulations on timescales longer than the 11-year Schwabe cycle, including the Gleissberg cycle with periods of 60–120 years, which influences number variations and has been identified in wavelet analyses of data spanning 5000 BC to 1995 AD. The Suess cycle, lasting approximately 200–210 years, contributes significantly to multi-century fluctuations in solar output, as detected in reconstructions of numbers and cosmogenic isotopes. These cycles interact to produce sequences of grand minima, periods of anomalously low activity such as the (1645–1715), where numbers approached zero for decades. Proxy records from cosmogenic isotopes like (¹⁴C) in tree rings and (¹⁰Be) in ice cores enable reconstructions of solar activity over millennia, revealing grand maxima like the Medieval Grand Maximum (around 1100–1250 AD) with elevated activity levels. Such datasets show that grand minima and maxima cluster in time, modulated by the interplay of Gleissberg and Suess cycles, with the latter driving deeper suppressions. Over the , these longer-term variations correlate with changes in total , though modulated by elements rather than strict periodicity, as solar cycles lack long-term phase locking. The Hallstatt cycle, with a period of about 2,300–2,400 years, represents a millennial-scale evident in ¹⁴C and ¹⁰Be records, potentially linking to climatic shifts like glacier advances in . Reconstructions indicate its presence in solar activity proxies over the past 11,000 years, though its amplitude varies and it may arise from processes or external forcings. Hypothetical cycles longer than the period include a proposed ~6,000-year periodicity in reconstructions, incorporating known shorter cycles but requiring further validation from multi-proxy data. Some analyses of records suggest millennial cycles around 2,750 years possibly aligning with or extending the Hallstatt cycle, interpreted tentatively as solar in origin but influenced by terrestrial factors. These longer proposals remain speculative, as evidence from direct solar observations is absent, and attributions rely on indirect proxies prone to non-solar influences like geomagnetic field changes.

Underlying Physics

Solar Dynamo Theory

The solar dynamo theory posits that the Sun's global arises from magnetohydrodynamic processes within its interior, converting from and into magnetic energy to sustain cyclic activity over approximately 11 years. This mechanism operates primarily in the , where radial shear from faster equatorial rotation (about 25% higher than at poles) stretches and amplifies poloidal magnetic fields into components via the ω-effect. Concurrently, the α-effect, driven by helical motions in stratified , regenerates poloidal fields from toroidal ones, closing the loop in a . Prominent formulations include the Babcock-Leighton mechanism, originally proposed in 1961, which attributes poloidal field generation to the surface decay and dispersal of tilted bipolar sunspot regions, with leading polarity flux transported poleward by diffusion and meridional flows. Flux-transport dynamo models extend this by incorporating meridional circulation (peaking at 10–20 m/s equatorward near the surface) to advect toroidal flux downward at low latitudes, yielding equatorward migration of activity belts matching the observed Spörer butterfly diagram. These kinematic models reproduce solar-like cycle strengths (toroidal field ~10^4 G) and Hale's polarity rules when calibrated against helioseismic data on rotation profiles, including the tachocline shear layer at the convection zone base (~0.7 R_⊙). Despite successes in simulating cycle periodicity and hemispheric field reversals every ~11 years (22-year full magnetic ), challenges persist, such as explaining the precise dynamo saturation via nonlinear back-reaction on flows, the origin of Joy's law tilt angles (~2–5° per degree latitude), and predictive discrepancies during grand minima like the Maunder period (1645–1715), where models require stochastic flux emergence reductions by factors of 2–3. Global 3D magnetohydrodynamic simulations, constrained by helioseismology, indicate that near-surface may contribute significantly to the ω-effect alongside tachocline , but full consistency with observed active persistence and cycle memory remains elusive. Ongoing refinements, including data-driven flux-transport models, highlight the theory's robustness yet underscore the need for resolved small-scale contributions to large-scale field evolution.

Magnetic Field Dynamics and Evolution

The solar magnetic field undergoes a systematic over the 11-year , characterized by the between a predominantly dipolar at minimum and a more complex, multipolar state at maximum. At minimum, the field approximates a strong with opposite polarities at the north and south poles, exhibiting relatively ordered open field lines. As the progresses toward maximum, shears the poloidal field into components, leading to increased fragmentation and "randomization" of the field structure, with mixed-polarity open flux migrating poleward. This culminates in a of the global during the maximum phase, typically occurring asynchronously between hemispheres, as observed in 24 where the northern preceded the southern by several months. The process weakens the to near-zero strength before it rebuilds with reversed polarity in the subsequent , driven by the accumulation of remnant flux from decayed active regions. Small-scale magnetic dynamics manifest primarily through the and evolution of bipolar active regions, governed by empirical s that constrain models. Hale's dictates that pairs exhibit opposite polarities within each pair, with the leading (closer to the ) being the same in a given but reversing between consecutive cycles, reflecting the underlying field's cyclic sign change. Complementing this, Joy's describes the systematic tilt of these regions, where the axis connecting the leading and following spots deviates equatorward by approximately 2–5 degrees per degree of heliographic latitude, increasing with latitude and contributing to the poleward transport of following- flux. Upon , flux tubes rise buoyantly from the tachocline, undergoing Coriolis-induced twist and separation, with leading fragments decaying faster near the while trailing migrates poleward via meridional flows, effectively reversing the polar fields over the cycle. These dynamics are intrinsically linked to the Babcock-Leighton mechanism, wherein decaying s produce net trailing-polarity that diffuses and is advected to high latitudes, regenerating the poloidal field while the toroidal field builds subsurface through the omega effect of . Observational data from vector magnetograms reveal that cancellation and reconnection during active region concentrate unsigned , enhancing small-scale fields that peak at maximum, while the large-scale dipole lags and reaches minimum strength near maximum sunspot number. Over multiple s, secular variations in polar field strength, such as the weaker reversal in 24 compared to 23, influence amplitude, with empirical models linking polar field at minimum to the ensuing 's peak activity. This evolution underscores the Sun's as a nonlinear oscillator, where between large- and small-scale fields sustains the against dissipative losses.

Heliospheric and Space Effects

Solar Wind and Heliosphere Modulation

The solar wind, consisting primarily of protons and electrons streaming radially outward from the Sun at speeds averaging 400 km/s, undergoes systematic variations in its key parameters—speed, density, temperature, and embedded interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) strength—across the 11-year solar cycle. During solar minimum phases, fast solar wind streams exceeding 600 km/s, sourced from large, unipolar polar coronal holes, become prevalent, particularly at high heliographic latitudes, while slow wind parcels below 400 km/s dominate near the ecliptic. Conversely, solar maximum conditions feature a higher proportion of slow, dense wind from pseudostreamers and equatorial active regions, interspersed with transient enhancements from coronal mass ejections (CMEs), leading to elevated overall mass flux and turbulence. The IMF magnitude correlates positively with sunspot number, intensifying by up to a factor of 2–3 toward cycle maximum, which amplifies magnetic fluctuations and sector boundary crossings. These parameter shifts follow log-normal statistical distributions that evolve predictably with cycle phase, as evidenced by analyses of spacecraft data from Cycles 20–24. These solar wind modulations propagate outward, shaping the heliosphere—the plasma-dominated region extending roughly 100–120 AU, bounded by the heliopause where solar wind ram pressure balances interstellar medium (ISM) pressure. The heliospheric current sheet (HCS), a thin, rotating magnetic boundary embedded in the wind, warps into a complex, ballerina-skirt-like structure at solar maximum due to the Sun's increasingly tilted dipole axis (up to 75° by cycle peak), extending the sheet's influence to higher latitudes and increasing its total area by factors of 2–4 compared to the flattened configuration at minimum. Dynamic pressure variations, driven by fluctuating solar wind density and velocity (changing by ~50% over the cycle), cause modest heliopause displacements of 5–10 AU, with the heliosphere expanding slightly during high-speed wind epochs and compressing under denser, slower flows or CME-driven pulses. Ulysses spacecraft observations from 1990–2008 confirmed latitudinal asymmetries, revealing stronger polar wind pressures during minimum (enhancing high-latitude flux tubes) and more isotropic, disturbed flows at maximum, which alter global magnetic topology and particle drift paths. In the outer heliosphere, Voyager probes have detected cycle-linked changes persisting to ~90 AU, including recurrent high-speed stream interactions that evolve into merged interaction regions, with plasma densities dropping by 20–30% and temperatures scaling as R^{-0.5} (where R is heliocentric distance) amid cycle-driven flux variations. The Sun's varying magnetic flux modulates the heliosphere's shielding against ISM particles, with cycle maxima enhancing draping of interstellar magnetic fields around the boundary and minima allowing greater ISM penetration via weaker compression. Such structural dynamics, observed consistently across Cycles 22–24, underscore the heliosphere's responsiveness to solar dynamo outputs, though quantitative models indicate size fluctuations remain small (~10% radial variation) relative to asymmetric distortions. Recent data from Solar Cycle 25's rising phase suggest continued alignment with prior patterns, albeit with subdued intensities akin to the weak Cycle 24 maximum.

Galactic Cosmic Ray Flux Variations

Galactic cosmic rays (GCRs), consisting primarily of high-energy protons and heavier nuclei from extragalactic sources, experience significant flux variations at due to modulation by the , which is shaped by solar activity over the 11-year solar cycle. During periods of , the intensified speed—often exceeding 500 km/s—and the amplified interplanetary strength, reaching up to 10 nT or more, along with the warped , create a more effective barrier that scatters and drifts charged GCR particles, reducing their observed intensity by 20-30% for rigidities above 1 GV compared to levels. This modulation arises from four primary processes: convection by the , diffusion against magnetic irregularities, adiabatic energy losses during outward propagation, and drift effects influenced by the large-scale heliospheric polarity, with the overall effect being a time-dependent reduction in GCR flux inversely correlated with number and other solar activity indices. Ground-based neutron monitors, which detect secondary particles produced by GCR interactions in Earth's atmosphere, provide long-term records confirming this anti-phase relationship; for instance, data from the global neutron monitor network spanning solar cycles 20-24 (1964-2019) show peak GCR intensities during minima, such as the record-high levels observed in the prolonged minimum between cycles 23 and 24 (around 2009), when fluxes exceeded prior minima by up to 10% due to anomalously weak and reduced heliospheric . measurements from instruments like the Cosmic Ray Isotope Spectrometer (CRIS) on NASA's () corroborate these trends, revealing spectral hardening at higher rigidities (>10 GV) where modulation amplitude diminishes to ~10%, as lighter elements like and heavier nuclei exhibit flux variations of 15-25% over a full cycle. In (2008-2019), weaker overall activity led to less pronounced modulation compared to cycle 23, with GCR recovery phases lagging solar activity declines by 6-12 months, highlighting cycle-to-cycle asymmetries driven by differences in polar field reversals and tilt angle maxima. Longer-term analyses using proxy data, such as cosmogenic isotopes like in ice cores, extend these observations backward, indicating that GCR flux enhancements during grand solar minima (e.g., , 1645-1715) could exceed modern cycle variations by factors of 2-3, though such inferences rely on assumptions about geomagnetic field stability and transport models. Recent empirical models parameterize modulation strength via the open solar and tilt angle, predicting flux recoveries in cycle 25's declining phase (post-2025) that align with neutron monitor count rates increasing toward observed 2020 minimum levels. These variations not only inform heliospheric physics but also underscore the Sun's role in shielding from ~90% of potentially hazardous GCRs during active phases, with implications for in and .

Space Weather Impacts

Effects on Spacecraft and Infrastructure

Solar activity during the peaks of the solar cycle, particularly solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs), exposes to high-energy particles and that can damage electronics, degrade solar panels, and disrupt onboard systems. Increased solar emissions heat and expand the , elevating atmospheric density at low-Earth orbit altitudes and accelerating through enhanced drag, which can reduce lifetimes from approximately 30 years under conditions to as little as 3 years at 500 km altitude during . For instance, in August 2023, a caused atmospheric expansion that affected satellites in parking orbits, necessitating adjustments to their electric propulsion systems. Geomagnetic storms triggered by CMEs interacting with Earth's induce (GICs) in long conductive infrastructure such as lines, pipelines, and railways, potentially saturating transformers and leading to overheating or failure. These currents arise from rapid changes in the geomagnetic field, which drive voltage surges that can cause reactive power absorption and system instability, as observed during severe events where pulses of propagate along power grids. Historical precedents include the , which caused a affecting 6 million in Quebec by tripping protective relays and damaging transformers due to GICs. During Solar Cycle 25, which reached its maximum phase in 2024–2025 with heightened flare and CME frequency, space weather events have amplified risks to both satellites and ground infrastructure, including disruptions to signals and increased for astronauts. The May 2024 geomagnetic storm, the strongest in two decades, highlighted these vulnerabilities by intensifying auroral activity while posing threats to satellite operations and electrical grids through elevated particle fluxes and field disturbances. Mitigation strategies, such as orbit-raising maneuvers for satellites and grid monitoring for GICs, are employed, but extreme events could still result in widespread outages and hardware losses, underscoring the need for resilient design in space-dependent technologies.

Geomagnetic Storms and Auroral Enhancements

Geomagnetic storms arise from the interaction of solar ejecta, such as coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and high-speed streams, with Earth's , with their occurrence and severity correlating positively with solar cycle phase and intensity. During , when numbers peak, the frequency of moderate-to-intense storms (defined by Kp index ≥5) increases markedly due to heightened solar active region complexity and CME production. The planetary Kp index, scaling from 0 to 9, quantifies these disturbances globally; extreme events (Kp=9, G5 scale) occur roughly 4 times per 11-year cycle, concentrated near maximum, while severe storms (Kp=8) number about 100 per cycle. exemplified reduced geoeffectiveness despite typical sunspot progression, with fewer intense storms linked to weaker interplanetary strengths in CMEs. Auroral enhancements accompany geomagnetic storms as magnetospheric reconnection accelerates charged particles, precipitating them into the atmosphere to excite oxygen and , producing visible emissions primarily in , visible, and infrared spectra. Storm-induced field-aligned currents expand the auroral oval equatorward, enabling displays at subauroral latitudes; visibility correlates with solar cycle maxima, where larger CMEs drive stronger disturbances. The 1859 , peaking September 1–2 during solar cycle 10's rising phase toward maximum, generated auroras as far south as and , with intensities rivaling daylight and associated telegraph disruptions from . In , declared at maximum in October 2024, geomagnetic storms have intensified auroral activity, including a G5-level event in May 2024 that produced visible auroras across continental and due to multiple CME impacts. Such episodes underscore causal links: southward interplanetary components in enhance reconnection efficiency, amplifying particle flux and auroral power, though cycle-to-cycle variations in solar wind parameters can modulate outcomes independently of sunspot counts.

Earth's Atmospheric Responses

Total and Spectral Irradiance Changes

The total solar irradiance (TSI), defined as the total emitted by per unit area at 1 , varies by approximately 0.1% over the course of an 11-year solar cycle, equating to a peak-to-trough of about 1.3 W/m² relative to a mean value of 1366 W/m². This modulation stems from the inverse relationship between sunspot coverage, which temporarily blocks photospheric emission and reduces irradiance, and the compensating brightening from facular networks and network elements, which dominate during phases. observations from instruments such as the Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor (ACRIM) series and the Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment (SORCE) have confirmed this cyclic pattern across multiple cycles, with TSI peaking near sunspot maximum and declining toward minimum, as evidenced in data from solar cycles 21 through 24. Solar spectral (SSI), the distribution of TSI across wavelengths, exhibits markedly asymmetric variations, with relative changes increasing toward shorter wavelengths due to the heightened of chromospheric and region emissions to magnetic activity. In the (UV) spectrum, particularly far-UV wavelengths below 200 , fluctuations reach 6-10% or higher from minimum to maximum, driven by enhanced emission from plages and flares during high activity periods. Mid-UV bands (200-400 ) show variations of 1-3%, while the visible (400-700 ) and near- (>700 ) regions experience smaller amplitudes, typically under 0.1%, reflecting the relative stability of the photospheric continuum. Measurements from the Spectral Monitor (SIM) on SORCE and the Total and Spectral Sensor (TSIS-1) on the have refined these profiles, revealing, for instance, up to 6% lower during solar minimum compared to prior models, alongside subtle visible enhancements of ~0.5% at cycle peaks. These irradiance changes are reconstructed for historical cycles using proxy data like sunspot numbers and magnesium II core-to-wing ratios, which correlate strongly with UV proxies, enabling extensions back to the early while aligning with direct records since the late . Recent analyses from cycles 23 and 24 indicate consistent magnitudes, though with minor cycle-to-cycle differences attributable to varying contrasts and coverage. Empirical models, such as those integrating spectral with sunspot indices, further validate that net TSI increases lag sunspot peaks by 1-2 years, underscoring the delayed dominance of facular contributions.

Stratospheric and Ionospheric Influences

The 11-year solar cycle modulates ionospheric electron density primarily through variations in solar extreme ultraviolet (EUV) and X-ray emissions, which drive photoionization in the E- and F-regions. Peak electron density in the F2 layer (NmF2) typically increases by a factor of 2 to 3 from solar minimum to maximum, with values ranging from approximately 2–5 × 10¹¹ electrons m⁻³ at minimum to 5–15 × 10¹¹ electrons m⁻³ at maximum, depending on latitude and local time; this correlates linearly with proxies like the F10.7 cm solar radio flux index, which rises from ~70 to ~200 solar flux units over the cycle. These density fluctuations enhance total electron content (TEC) by up to 50–100% at solar maximum, impacting GPS signal delays, radio scintillation, and over-the-horizon communications, with stronger effects at low latitudes due to equatorial electrodynamics. In the , solar cycle-driven increases in irradiance boost , elevating column ozone by 1–2% in the lower stratosphere (10–30 hPa) and up to 6–10% in the upper stratosphere (1–5 hPa) during compared to minimum. This enhanced ozone absorption of UV radiation induces radiative heating, warming the upper stratosphere by 2–3 K at solar maximum, with weaker but detectable increases of 0.5–1 K propagating downward to the lower stratosphere via dynamical adjustments. The resulting and altered meridional temperature gradients strengthen the stratospheric during solar maximum winters, potentially delaying or reducing the incidence of major sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs), which disrupt vortex stability through planetary wave amplification; observational analyses indicate SSWs occur earlier and with modulated frequency in conditions, though model simulations show mixed dynamical feedbacks influenced by (QBO) phase. These stratospheric changes couple downward to influence tropospheric circulation patterns, such as the Northern Annular Mode, though the signal attenuates below 100 hPa due to internal atmospheric variability. The hypothesized link between solar cycles and cloud formation primarily involves galactic cosmic rays (GCRs), whose flux at inversely correlates with solar activity: during solar maxima, enhanced and heliospheric reduce GCR penetration, while minima allow greater influx. This modulation is proposed to affect atmospheric , which may enhance and thus low-level formation, potentially amplifying solar forcing through changes. Henrik Svensmark's theory, first evidenced by correlations between GCR flux and global from International Satellite Climatology Project (ISCCP) data spanning 1983–1995, suggests that a 1.2% variation in low clouds over an 11-year cycle could explain observed temperature fluctuations. Supporting satellite observations, including from the (MODIS), indicate anti-correlations between solar activity proxies like numbers and low amounts, with in mid-latitude regions. Laboratory experiments provide mechanistic support but highlight limitations. The CLOUD chamber simulations, conducted from 2009 onward, demonstrate that GCR-induced ions can increase nucleation rates of sulfuric acid by factors of 2–10 under controlled conditions mimicking the , facilitating formation. However, field measurements and modeling, such as those analyzing new particle formation events in from 2000–2006, conclude that GCR contributions to production remain minor compared to other precursors like iodine oxides, comprising less than 10% of boundary-layer events. Critiques note that while correlations persist in long-term proxies like records over millennia, causal attribution is weakened by confounding factors including volcanic and El Niño-Southern Oscillation variability, with effect sizes estimated at 0.1–0.5 W/m² —small relative to greenhouse gases but non-negligible for decadal climate noise. Peer-reviewed analyses from Danish Meteorological Institute datasets (1984–2009) affirm a detectable GCR-cloud signal in liquid water path anomalies, though attribution to solar cycles requires isolating from anthropogenic trends. Precipitation responses to solar cycles exhibit regional patterns, often tied to shifts rather than direct modulation. In , , spectral analysis of daily extreme rainfall (1951–2020) reveals 11-year periodicities aligning with cycles, with high solar activity correlating to intensified extremes via enhanced tropospheric heating and instability, supported by exceeding 95% confidence. Similarly, Saudi Arabian rainfall records (1965–2019) show inverse correlations with solar indices during winter, attributed to ultraviolet-driven stratospheric ozone changes influencing jet streams and moisture convergence. high-speed streams, peaking near solar maxima, have been linked to heavy rainfall and flash floods in (1998–2018), with 70% of events following such streams within 1–2 days, possibly through magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling that perturbs tropospheric dynamics. These effects appear more pronounced in low-latitude s post-8000 years BP, where oxygen isotope proxies indicate solar-forced variability exceeding internal climate modes. Overall, while empirical correlations exist, quantification remains challenging due to sparse decadal signals amid dominant ocean-atmosphere interactions, with no on global-scale .

Terrestrial Outcomes

Climate Correlations and Causal Debates

Observational records indicate correlations between solar activity minima and periods of cooler global temperatures. During the (1645–1715), sunspot numbers approached zero, coinciding with the coldest phase of the , characterized by average temperature anomalies of approximately -0.5°C relative to the 20th-century mean, including harsh winters in and . Similarly, the (1790–1830) aligned with cooler conditions, with tree-ring and ice-core proxies showing temperature reductions of 0.2–0.4°C in the . These historical patterns suggest a linkage, though volcanic activity and ocean circulation changes contributed concurrently. In the instrumental era, surface air temperatures have exhibited periodic alignments with solar cycles, particularly from the late 19th to mid-20th century, where decadal temperature variations tracked numbers and reconstructed total (TSI) with coefficients around 0.6–0.8 in some regional datasets. For instance, the rise in solar activity during Solar Cycles 15–19 (1910s–) paralleled a trend of about 0.4°C, while post-1980 divergences emerged as temperatures continued rising amid stable or declining solar maxima. reconstructions, including isotopes from tree rings, further support multi-centennial solar-climate synchrony, with grand solar minima associating with cooling episodes over the . Recent analyses, however, highlight phase reversals in correlations around , potentially linked to amplified effects overriding solar signals. Causal mechanisms beyond direct TSI forcing—estimated at 0.1–0.2 W/m² variation over an 11-year , yielding a response of ~0.1°C—are debated, with indirect pathways proposed to explain amplified effects. radiation fluctuations (up to 6% cycle variability) influence stratospheric production and dynamics, potentially propagating equatorward to alter tropospheric circulation and regional . The Svensmark posits that reduced during minima allows increased galactic flux (varying 15–20% per ), enhancing atmospheric ionization and , which seeds low-level clouds covering 3–4% more of the globe and reflects ~1–2 W/m² additional , contributing to cooling. Empirical support includes observed cosmic ray-cloud cover anticorrelations during recent cycles, though laboratory experiments on ion-induced remain inconclusive. Debates center on the magnitude and sufficiency of forcing relative to influences. Mainstream assessments attribute <10% of 20th-century warming to solar variability, citing TSI reconstructions showing no net increase since the 1950s while temperatures rose 0.8°C, implying dominant roles. Critics argue underestimation of indirect mechanisms or uncertainties in TSI, with some reconstructions suggesting higher historical variability (up to 4 W/m² during grand minima) and estimates incorporating solar cycles yielding equilibrium climate sensitivity values of 1.5–2.5°C per CO2 doubling, lower than IPCC central estimates. Meta-analyses question the statistical robustness of solar-climate attributions in prior studies, noting potential in analyses. Ongoing emphasizes empirical testing of via coupled models, with unresolved questions on efficacy amid conflicting satellite cloud data.

Biological Rhythms and Organism Responses

Solar cycles, through variations in and associated geomagnetic disturbances, have been linked in observational studies to perturbations in across organisms, though causal mechanisms remain debated and primarily correlational. High solar activity phases, characterized by increased numbers and solar flares, generate coronal mass ejections that induce geomagnetic storms, which can disrupt and physiological synchronization in sensitive . These effects are most pronounced during solar maxima, occurring approximately every 11 years, with evidence suggesting influences on infradian (longer than daily) and circadian processes via altered electromagnetic fields and modulation. In humans, geomagnetic disturbances tied to solar activity correlate with disruptions to circadian rhythms, including reduced synthesis—a key regulator of sleep-wake cycles—and elevated levels, potentially exacerbating responses. Studies report a 30% decrease in during high solar activity in astronauts and associations with increased cardiovascular mortality, such as a 5% rise observed over 29 years in cohorts. Additionally, 10–11-year sunspot cycles align with periodic fluctuations in physiological metrics like and , as well as pathophysiological outcomes including cervical epithelial pathologies, based on analyses of over 1.1 million Pap smears from 1983–2003 showing peaks 1–3 years post-solar maxima. Approximately 10–15% of individuals exhibit heightened sensitivity, influenced by factors like and status, though reproducibility challenges and confounding variables such as seasonal light exposure limit causal inferences. Migratory animals, particularly birds relying on geomagnetic cues for , experience behavioral disruptions during intense events linked to solar cycles. Research indicates fewer nocturnal migrants during strong geomagnetic storms, with birds facing navigational difficulties or migration pauses, as evidenced by showing reduced flight activity and increased . Solar maxima exacerbate these effects by intensifying auroral activity and field fluctuations, potentially scrambling cryptochrome-based magnetosensing in like songbirds and seabirds. Whale strandings have also been anecdotally tied to solar storms, though empirical links emphasize disorientation over long-term shifts. Evidence for plants is sparser and less conclusive, with some studies suggesting geomagnetic variations from solar activity may influence unexplained biological rhythms, such as growth oscillations not fully accounted for by light or temperature. Daily-scale solar fluctuations have been hypothesized to affect photosynthetic efficiency and developmental timing, but mechanisms—possibly involving electromagnetic sensitivity in cellular processes—remain poorly understood and require further experimentation beyond correlative data. Overall, while short-term geomagnetic perturbations dominate observed responses, long-term solar cycle entrainment of organismal rhythms lacks robust demonstration, highlighting the need for controlled studies to disentangle solar influences from terrestrial confounders.

Technological Disruptions and Historical Events

Solar activity during the solar cycle, particularly intense solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs), generates geomagnetic storms that induce currents in conductive infrastructure, leading to disruptions in power grids, operations, and communication systems. These (GICs) can overload transformers and cause voltage instability, while high-energy particles damage and increase atmospheric drag on low-Earth orbit . Radio communications suffer from ionospheric and blackouts, especially on high-frequency bands, with global navigation systems like GPS experiencing signal degradation. The most severe recorded event, the of September 1–2, 1859, during , produced auroras visible as far south as the and disrupted telegraph networks across and . Operators reported sparks flying from equipment, paper igniting, and shocks to personnel, with some systems operating without batteries due to induced currents from the geomagnetic disturbance estimated at a Dst index of -1760 nT. Modern modeling suggests a similar event today could cause trillions in economic damage through widespread blackouts lasting weeks or months, satellite failures, and supply chain interruptions. On March 13, 1989, a triggered by a CME from a during caused a nine-hour blackout of the power grid, affecting six million people in , , due to GICs tripping circuit breakers and damaging transformers. The storm's intensity, with a Dst index of -589 nT, also induced currents up to 100 amperes in power lines, highlighting vulnerabilities in long transmission lines at high latitudes. The October–November 2003 "Halloween" storms, peaking during solar cycle 23, damaged over half of NASA's Earth-orbiting satellites, including the loss of the spacecraft's communications temporarily, and caused GPS errors leading to rerouting of transatlantic flights to avoid polar . Power systems in experienced voltage dips, but no major blackouts occurred due to preemptive measures. In May 2024, during solar cycle 25's ascent toward maximum, a G5-level —the strongest since 2003—resulted in the loss of over 40 satellites due to enhanced atmospheric drag and minor GPS disruptions, though ground-based power grids reported no widespread failures thanks to monitoring and . These events underscore the increasing risk to modern technology, with satellites and grids more extensive and interconnected than in prior cycles, amplifying potential cascading failures.

Prediction Challenges

Forecasting Methods and Models

Solar cycle forecasting primarily employs three categories of methods: precursor techniques, physics-based models, and data-driven extrapolation approaches. Precursor methods utilize early-cycle observables, such as polar strengths at or geomagnetic activity indices, to estimate the amplitude and timing of the subsequent cycle's maximum. For instance, the polar precursor method correlates the unsigned polar at minimum with the upcoming cycle's number peak, yielding predictions for Cycle 25 around 110-120 smoothed numbers. These methods assume that the polar fields, remnants of the previous cycle's , seed the next cycle's activity via and meridional flow. Physics-based models simulate the solar process, incorporating equations for generation, , and within the . Flux-transport models, such as those based on the Babcock-Leighton mechanism, integrate surface flux emergence with subsurface meridional circulation to predict evolution; applications to Cycle 25 have forecasted peaks between 100 and 140 numbers, depending on parameterized and flow speeds. These models provide causal insights but require tuning to observational constraints like helioseismology-derived flows, and their long-term predictions remain sensitive to uncertain parameters such as turbulent . Data-driven techniques, including , neural networks, and algorithms like (LSTM) networks, fit historical or proxy records to future cycles. methods decompose into periodic components via or transforms, while recent models trained on multi-century data have predicted Cycle 25 up to 171, though with wide . NOAA's Prediction Center employs hybrid empirical models for operational forecasts, updating Cycle 25 projections dynamically as data accumulates; initial 2019 estimates of a 115 number underestimated the observed activity, which exceeded 150 by mid-2025. Such methods excel in capturing non-linear patterns but risk without physical grounding, and their reliability diminishes for unprecedented cycle behaviors.

Accuracy Assessments and Limitations

Predictions of solar cycle amplitude and timing have historically shown limited accuracy, with most methods underestimating the strength of recent cycles. For (2008–2019), analyses of over 100 forecasts indicated that the majority failed to accurately predict the peak number, which reached approximately 81 in smoothed numbers, lower than Cycle 23 but still deviating from expectations based on precursor methods and models. Similarly, for Cycle 25 (ongoing as of 2025), initial predictions from panels like NOAA's anticipated a peak number of 101–125 around mid-2025, but observations confirmed a stronger maximum of about 160.8 in October 2024, with many models underestimating amplitude by 20–50%. Timing forecasts have fared slightly better, often capturing peaks within 6–12 months, though retrospective adjustments reveal persistent errors in techniques like curve-fitting. Precursor methods, relying on polar field strengths or geomagnetic indices 1–2 years before minimum, have demonstrated moderate success for short-term amplitude estimates but degrade over multiple cycles due to unmodeled nonlinearities in the . Model-based approaches, such as mean-field dynamo simulations, incorporate physical processes like but suffer from parameter uncertainties, yielding root-mean-square errors in peak predictions exceeding 30% when validated against cycles 21–24. Extrapolation and methods, trained on records spanning 400 years, achieve better near-term fits but exhibit and fail to capture grand minima or fluctuations beyond 30–40 years. Key limitations stem from the solar cycle's quasi-periodic yet chaotic nature, driven by turbulent convection in the Sun's interior, which resists deterministic forecasting beyond decadal scales. Observational data shortages—reliable sunspot records only since 1610 and proxy data like cosmogenic isotopes prone to contamination—exacerbate errors in model calibration, particularly for hemispheric asymmetries. Dynamo models remain incomplete, omitting full 3D magnetohydrodynamics or meridional flows, leading to validation challenges on the 11-year timescale where iterative testing is infeasible. Emerging techniques like recurrent neural networks show promise in hindcasting but lack robustness against regime shifts, as evidenced by Cycle 25's unexpected vigor. Overall, no method consistently outperforms empirical baselines for long-range predictions, underscoring the need for integrated physics-data assimilation frameworks.

Speculative Factors

Planetary Influences: Data and Critiques

The hypothesis that planetary gravitational influence solar activity posits that alignments of major planets, particularly , , and , perturb the Sun's internal through tidal forcing, potentially synchronizing the ~11-year with their orbital periods. Proponents argue that the recurrence of Venus-Earth-Jupiter syzygies every 11.07 years closely matches the solar length of 11.1 years on average, with tidal peaks correlating to maxima in historical from 1755 to 2015. This alignment's tidal torque is claimed to modulate convective motions in the tachocline, the shear layer at the base of the , thereby influencing generation. Some models suggest amplification via enhanced hydrogen-burning rates in the , where tidal could increase efficiency by up to 1-2% during alignments, indirectly affecting surface activity. Empirical support includes power spectrum analyses showing solar proxies like ^{10}Be and ^{14}C records aligning with planetary harmonics over centuries, as well as barycentric motion correlations with decadal solar variability when including a hypothetical Planet 9. Simulations of nonlinear models perturbed by planetary have reproduced modulations, with evident in phase-locked behaviors. Critiques emphasize the negligible magnitude of planetary tides relative to internal solar dynamics. The tidal acceleration induced by , the dominant contributor, reaches only ~10^{-7} m/s² at the Sun's surface—three orders of magnitude weaker than solar gravity and dwarfed by convective velocities exceeding 100 m/s in the interior—rendering direct perturbation implausible without unproven amplification mechanisms. Statistical analyses of data from 1700-2010 reveal no robust phase synchronization with planetary positions after accounting for noise and in solar records, with proposed correlations often failing under rigorous testing for spurious periodicity. models driven solely by tidal inputs fail to replicate observed cycle amplitudes or grand minima like the Maunder (1645-1715), which align better with alpha-quenching effects than planetary forcing. Critics, including analyses of Abreu et al.'s tidal hypothesis, argue that cherry-picked alignments overlook counterexamples, such as mismatched timings during solar cycles 19-24, and that core amplification via lacks empirical validation, as flux data show no corresponding variations. Mainstream attributes cycle primacy to internal magnetohydrodynamic processes, viewing planetary effects as at best marginal modulators lacking causal primacy. Ongoing debates highlight the need for high-resolution helioseismology to detect subsurface tidal signatures, though none have been confirmed to date.

Alternative Hypotheses and Open Questions

One to the dominant solar model posits that planetary gravitational modulate solar activity by perturbing in the tachocline or amplifying effects via Rossby waves on the solar surface. This theory suggests correlations between planetary orbital alignments—such as Jupiter-Venus-Earth configurations—and solar cycle phases, with torques potentially synchronizing oscillations or triggering activity bursts. Proponents argue for amplification mechanisms, including enhanced burning in or resonant responses in convective flows, supported by statistical matches between planetary harmonics and records over centuries. Critics contend that planetary energies are orders of magnitude too weak—around 10^{-7} of —to directly drive the , requiring unverified nonlinear amplifications that remain speculative. Empirical tests show mixed correlations, with some alignments preceding solar maxima by days but lacking causal causation after accounting for noise. Recent simulations indicate external planetary forcing could suppress activity during certain alignments, as in models where curbs cycle peaks, but these do not explain the 11-year periodicity without invoking tuning. Other fringe alternatives, such as "outburst" models treating cycles as intermittent magnetic ejections rather than coherent oscillations, have been proposed but lack broad empirical support beyond fitting select data subsets. These challenge the deterministic alpha-omega framework by emphasizing chaotic flux emergence, yet they fail to reproduce observed polar field reversals consistently. Key open questions persist in , including the precise dynamo operating region—whether confined to the , the tachocline interface, or distributed—and the roles of meridional circulation and in generating the 11-year cycle. Unresolved issues encompass the causes of inter-cycle variations in length (9-14 years) and amplitude, hemispheric asymmetries in emergence, and the transition mechanisms to grand minima like the Maunder event (1645-1715), where activity dropped over 70% despite dynamo persistence. Predictability remains limited to one cycle ahead due to nonlinear feedbacks and sensitivities, with models underestimating extremes like the (cycles 19-23, peaking 1957-2002). The fundamental origin of the sun's global seed and its interface with heliospheric modulation also evade full explanation, complicating forecasts.

References

  1. [1]
    What's the Big Deal about Solar Cycles? | NESDIS - NOAA
    Sep 15, 2020 · The solar cycle is a nearly periodic change in the Sun's activity between the time where we can observe the most and least number of sunspots, and generally ...Missing: astronomy | Show results with:astronomy
  2. [2]
    NASA The Solar Dynamo
    Magnetic fields within the Sun are stretched out and wound around the Sun by differential rotation - the change in rotation rate as a function of latitude and ...
  3. [3]
    Solar Cycle Observations | Space Science Reviews
    Oct 17, 2023 · 1 Introduction. In the mid 1800s, Schwabe (1844) discovered the solar cycle by observing that sunspot numbers rise and fall over the course of ...
  4. [4]
    The heliospheric Hale cycle over the last 300 years and its ...
    Sep 9, 2015 · A Hale cycle, one complete magnetic cycle of the Sun, spans two complete Schwabe cycles (also referred to as sunspot and, more generally, solar ...
  5. [5]
    Climate Change: Incoming Sunlight | NOAA Climate.gov
    During strong solar cycles, the Sun's total average brightness varies by up to 1 Watt per square meter; this variation affects global average temperature by 0. ...
  6. [6]
    NASA, NOAA: Sun Reaches Maximum Phase in 11-Year Solar Cycle
    on Earth, that'd be like the North and South poles ...
  7. [7]
    What Is the Solar Cycle? - NASA Space Place
    The solar cycle is the cycle that the Sun's magnetic field goes through approximately every 11 years. Our Sun is a huge ball of electrically-charged hot gas.
  8. [8]
    The Solar Cycle - NASA SVS
    Oct 27, 2011 · The Solar Cycle ... The number of sunspots increases and decreases over time in a regular, approximately 11-year cycle, called the sunspot cycle.
  9. [9]
    Sun's magnetic field - NASA Solar Physics
    Sunspots are places where very intense magnetic lines of force break through the Sun's surface. The sunspot cycle results from the recycling of magnetic fields ...
  10. [10]
    Sunspots - UCAR Center for Science Education
    Sunspots are dark, planet-sized regions that appear on the surface of the Sun, created by regions of powerful magnetic fields.
  11. [11]
    The Solar Cycle - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
    Sunspot groups observed each year from 1826 to 1843 by Heinrich Schwabe (1844). These data led Schwabe to his discovery of the sunspot cycle. Wolf's relative ...<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Long-Term Modulation of Solar Cycles | Space Science Reviews
    Mar 17, 2023 · Solar activity has a cyclic nature with the ≈11-year Schwabe cycle dominating its variability on the interannual timescale.
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
    Level and length of cyclic solar activity during the Maunder minimum ...
    These studies have suggested that the length of the solar cycle was increased to about 14 years during the MM, to about 13 years in the beginning of the Spörer ...
  15. [15]
    Modern Grand Solar Minimum will lead to terrestrial cooling - PMC
    Aug 4, 2020 · The signs of solar activity are seen in cyclic 11-year variations of a number of sunspots on the solar surface using averaged monthly sunspot ...Missing: variability | Show results with:variability
  16. [16]
    Origin of Grand Minima in Sunspot Cycles | Phys. Rev. Lett.
    Oct 25, 2012 · Defining a grand minimum as an absence of sunspots for at least 20 years (the same definition as used by Usoskin et al.Missing: variability | Show results with:variability
  17. [17]
    Connection between solar activity cycles and grand minima ...
    We found that the grand minima sequence is produced by the coupling between Gleissberg and Suess cycles, the latter being responsible for the most intense and ...
  18. [18]
    Termination of Solar Cycles and Correlated Tropospheric Variability
    Feb 24, 2021 · Recent research has demonstrated the significance of the underlying 22 years magnetic polarity cycle in establishing the shorter sunspot cycle.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] The Historical Sunspot Record
    This is the earliest known detailed recording of solar observations in the 1600's and predates Galileo by more than a Page from Harriot's Notebook year. Thomas ...
  20. [20]
    Solar Physics Historical Timeline (1223 BC - 200 BC)
    800 BC: The first plausible recorded sunspot observation. The two oldest record of a sunspot observation are found in the Book of Changes, probably the oldest ...
  21. [21]
    A 250‐year cycle in naked‐eye observations of sunspots
    Oct 31, 2002 · In sum, there are 240 records of different sunspots, with the first dating from 165 BC and the last from 1918 AD. One clearly notices gaps of ...
  22. [22]
    Historical sunspot records | Living Reviews in Solar Physics
    Feb 26, 2020 · Telescopic observations of sunspots very likely started in 1610 and were carried out by several observers in 1611. We describe the observations ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Historical Sunspot Observations: A Review - arXiv
    Early observations of sunspot were realised by the naked eye. Possible utilization of these records for studying the long-term change in the Sun is ...
  24. [24]
    Records of sunspot and aurora during CE 960–1279 in the Chinese ...
    May 29, 2015 · Telescopic sunspot observations have been recorded since the era of Galileo about 400 years ago. The sunspot number is considered to be the ...
  25. [25]
    A New Perspective on Solar Activity of the Early Telescopic Era
    Mar 15, 2022 · His book, Rosa Ursina, is the reference work regarding the study of the earliest sunspot records. The sunspot observations compiled by Scheiner ...Abstract · Introduction · Scheiner, Rosa Ursina, and... · Analysis and Discussion of...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Historical sunspot observations: A review - ScienceDirect.com
    Early observations of sunspots were made by the naked eye. We discuss here the possibilities to use these records to study the long-term change in the Sun.
  27. [27]
    Samuel Heinrich Schwabe (1789–1875) | High Altitude Observatory
    In 1843 Schwabe still had not discovered any new planets, but instead, his 17 years of nearly continuous sunspot observations revealed a 10-year periodicity in ...
  28. [28]
    The solar cycle - Physics Today
    Nearly 140 years have elapsed since the German apothecary and amateur astronomer Samuel Heinrich Schwabe reported discovery of the solar cycle. “From my earlier ...
  29. [29]
    Sunspot Numbers | NCEI - NOAA
    Johann Rudolf Wolf (1816-1893). ... In 1848 Rudolf Wolf devised a daily method of estimating solar activity by counting the number of individual spots and groups ...
  30. [30]
    Rudolf Wolf (1816–1893) | High Altitude Observatory
    During this program Wolf defined his now famous relative sunspot number. By 1868, Wolf had a reliable sunspot number reconstruction back to 1745. He then ...
  31. [31]
    SILSO | SIDC - Solar Influences Data Analysis Center
    World Data Center for the production, preservation and dissemination of the international sunspot number SILSOSunspot Number · Sunspot Number graphics · Daily and monthly sunspot... · EISN
  32. [32]
    Solar Cycles Min/Max | SIDC
    Dates of the minima and maxima of past solar cycles, with the corresponding sunspot number, based on the 13-month smoothed monthly sunspot number time series.
  33. [33]
    The Maunder minimum (1645–1715) was indeed a grand minimum
    We conclude that solar activity was indeed at an exceptionally low level during the Maunder minimum. Although the exact level is still unclear, it was ...
  34. [34]
    2014 : maximum year for solar cycle 24 | SIDC
    The maximum of solar cycle 24 was reached in April 2014, with a maximum of the 13-month smoothed sunspot number at 81.8.
  35. [35]
    Double Peaks of the Solar Cycle: An Explanation from a Dynamo ...
    Oct 5, 2018 · When fluctuations in the polar field occur outside the solar maximum, we observe their effects as spikes or dips in the following sunspot cycle.Abstract · Introduction · Confirmation of Double Peaks... · Theoretical Results
  36. [36]
    Sunspot Cycle Predictions - NASA Solar Physics
    The current prediction for Sunspot Cycle 24 gives a smoothed sunspot number V2.0 maximum of about 101 in late 2013. The smoothed sunspot number V2.0 reached ...
  37. [37]
    Lessons learned from predictions of Solar Cycle 24
    Dec 7, 2020 · This new version of the sunspot number, S = 10N g + N s , has been served by SILSO since July 2015 and the original sunspot number was ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] A Comprehensive Study of Solar Cycles 23 Vs. 24 And Their Effect ...
    Feb 2, 2025 · Solar cycle 23 produced more X-class flares than cycle 24. ◦ The peak flare activity in cycle 23 was significantly higher, reflecting stronger ...
  39. [39]
    Geomagnetic storms of cycle 24 and their solar sources
    May 19, 2017 · Geomagnetic activity is also low in cycle 24. We show that this low geomagnetic activity is caused by the weak dawn-to-dusk solar wind electric ...
  40. [40]
    The cause of the weak solar cycle 24 - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · Simulation of the evolution of the solar surface field shows that the weak polar fields and thus the weakness of the present cycle 24 are mainly ...
  41. [41]
    On the Occurrence of Different Classes of Solar Flares during the ...
    Our findings show that the cycle 23 has observed the highest occurrences of M-class and X-class flares, whereas cycle 24 has pointed out a predominance of B- ...
  42. [42]
    Properties and geoeffectiveness of magnetic clouds during solar ...
    Oct 5, 2015 · ... weak solar cycle 24 affected the geoeffectiveness of MCs. For ... cycles, respectively) despite the weakness of cycle 24 in terms of SSN.
  43. [43]
    Solar Cycle Progression - Space Weather Prediction Center - NOAA
    The observed and predicted Solar Cycle is depicted in Sunspot Number in the top graph and F10.7cm Radio Flux in the bottom graph.
  44. [44]
    Solar Cycle 25 Forecast Update - Space Weather Prediction Center
    Dec 9, 2019 · The forecast consensus: a peak in July, 2025 (+/- 8 months), with a smoothed sunspot number (SSN) of 115. The panel agreed that Cycle 25 will be ...
  45. [45]
    Solar Cycle Prediction at NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center
    Jun 11, 2025 · Predictions for the maximum SSN V2 of Solar Cycle 25 considered by the NOAA/NASA/ISES Solar Cycle 25 Prediction Panel.
  46. [46]
    SC25 Tracking - STCE
    The monthly sunspot number reached a maximum of 216.0 in August, which is the highest since September 2001 (238.2). The latest provisional SILSO monthly sunspot ...
  47. [47]
    A Weak-moderate Solar Cycle 25 is Confirmed - IOPscience
    Solar Cycle 25 appears to have reached its maximum in 2024 October, with a smoothed sunspot number peak of 160.8. This suggests that the cycle is already in ...
  48. [48]
    Solen - Solar Terrestrial Activity Report
    All 365 day smoothed sunspot numbers peaked on October 11-12, 2024, very likely making this the peak of SC25 (365 day smoothed peaks: STAR 1K: 236.1, STAR 2K: ...
  49. [49]
    Solar Cycle Progression and Forecast - NASA
    The estimation technique is used to predict the remaining of the current cycle, but it is not able to predict the next solar cycle at this time. However, for ...
  50. [50]
    Sunspots and Solar Flares | NASA Space Place
    The magnetic field lines near sunspots often tangle, cross, and reorganize. This can cause a sudden explosion of energy called a solar flare. Solar flares ...
  51. [51]
    Observations key to understanding solar cycles: a review - Frontiers
    Feb 14, 2024 · This led to the recognition of the Sun's 22-year magnetic cycle consisting of two 11-year sunspot cycles (Hale et al., 1919; Hale and Nicholson, ...
  52. [52]
    Be a Solar Active Region Spotter! - NASA Science
    Mar 21, 2023 · “Active regions” are large concentrations of magnetic field on the Sun, home to dramatic phenomena such as solar flares that can affect the ...
  53. [53]
    Emergence of Magnetic Flux Generated in a Solar Convective ...
    We present a realistic numerical model of sunspot and active region formation based on the emergence of flux bundles generated in a solar convective dynamo.
  54. [54]
    Magnetic fluxes of solar active regions of different magneto ...
    Nov 17, 2022 · While during cycle 24 the magnetic flux follows the sunspot area very well, in cycle 23 the flux curve is systematically above the area curve.Missing: peer | Show results with:peer
  55. [55]
    Evolution of the magnetic field and flows of solar active regions with ...
    Dec 6, 2023 · Our aim is to characterise the surface magnetic field and flows for a sample of active regions with persistent magnetic bipoles prior to emergence.
  56. [56]
    Magnetic Fields in Solar Active Regions - NASA ADS
    The tangled fields of the solar subsurface occasio— nally burst through the photosphere to form sunspots, plages, filaments, and all the delights of the corona: ...
  57. [57]
    Faculae - NASA Solar Physics
    During a sunspot cycle the faculae actually win out over the sunspots and make the Sun appear slightly (about 0.1%) brighter at sunspot maximum that at sunspot ...
  58. [58]
    Faculae and Sunspots at Solar Maximum and Solar Minimum
    Jan 18, 2022 · Faculae are extended regions that tend to form around sunspots and are hotter, and brighter, than the photosphere.
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Solar Irradiance Variability: Modeling the Measurements
    Spectral irradiance during the solar cycle varies ~50% less at wavelengths between 300 and 400 nm and more at visible and near‐infrared wavelengths in the ...
  60. [60]
    A comparison between solar plage and network properties
    MHD simulations show that the amount of thick flux tubes in plage regions is small, while flux tubes in the faculae network expand more quickly than those in ...
  61. [61]
    How faculae and network relate to sunspots, and the implications for ...
    We aim to extend and improve on earlier studies that established that the facular-to-sunspot-area ratio diminishes with total sunspot coverage.
  62. [62]
    Solar Photosphere - National Centers for Environmental Information
    Solar White Light Faculae are areas of bright plages on the solar disk. These were routinely measured at the Royal Greenwich Observatory in the UK from 1874 ...
  63. [63]
    Prediction of the amplitude of solar cycle 25 using polar faculae ...
    Jan 22, 2021 · Polar faculae (PF) usually appear as isolated bright point-like features near the solar poles, at latitudes of about 60° and higher. They have ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] solar cycle modulation of total irradiance: an empirical model from ...
    Evidence acquired during the past decade indicates that over time scales of the solar cycle, enhanced emission from bright solar faculae cause significant.
  65. [65]
    Scientists Develop New Model to Estimate Solar Irradiance Variation ...
    Jan 31, 2023 · This study gives scientists an unprecedented look at how solar irradiance varied over a long time scale – and how it may have influenced Earth's climate events.
  66. [66]
    Solar Storms and Flares - NASA Science
    Solar flares are classified according to their intensity, or energy output. · Flare classes A through M are divided further using numbers 1 through 9, with 9 ...Missing: NOAA | Show results with:NOAA
  67. [67]
    Solar Flares (Radio Blackouts) - Space Weather Prediction Center
    Solar flare intensities cover a large range and are classified in terms of peak emission in the 0.1 – 0.8 nm spectral band (soft x-rays) of the NOAA/GOES XRS.
  68. [68]
    GOES X-ray Flux | NOAA / NWS Space Weather Prediction Center
    The GOES X-ray plots shown here are used to track solar activity and solar flares. Large solar X-ray flares can change the Earth's ionosphere.
  69. [69]
    Coronal mass ejections (or CMEs) - NASA/Marshall Solar Physics
    The frequency of CMEs varies with the sunspot cycle. At solar minimum we observe about one CME a week. Near solar maximum we observe an average of 2 to 3 CMEs ...Missing: rate | Show results with:rate
  70. [70]
    Coronal mass ejections - Space Technology 5
    At solar minimum we observe about one a week. Near solar maximum we observe an average of two to three CMEs per day. CMEs disrupt the flow of the solar wind ...
  71. [71]
    Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections in the Near-Earth Solar Wind ...
    The ICME rate increases by about an order of magnitude from solar minimum to solar maximum (when the rate is approximately 3 ICMEs/solar rotation period).
  72. [72]
    Questions and Answers - NASA
    Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) were originally thought to be driven by solar flares. It is now known that many CMEs occur without any observable flare associated ...
  73. [73]
    Relationship between prominence eruptions and coronal mass ...
    May 30, 2025 · Our study reveals that the spatial and temporal relationships between PEs and CMEs vary over the solar cycle. During solar minima, CMEs tend to ...
  74. [74]
    Failed prominence eruptions near 24 cycle maximum
    ABSTRACT. We analyse 16 failed filament eruptions observed near 24 solar cycle maximum from 2013 May to 2014 July. No significant rotation of filament spin.
  75. [75]
    [PDF] Coronal Mass Ejections: a Summary of Recent Results - CDAW
    solar activity index. Figure 10 shows that the daily CME rate averaged over Carrington rotation periods ranges from <0.5 (solar minimum) to > 6 (solar maximum).
  76. [76]
    The Butterfly Diagram | High Altitude Observatory
    Apr 18, 1995 · A two-dimensional image of average sunspot coverage as a function of heliospheric latitude (vertical axis) and time (horizontal axis).
  77. [77]
    Waldmeier Effect in Stellar Cycles - IOPscience
    Nov 29, 2019 · The stronger cycles rise faster than the weaker ones. This is popularly known as the Waldmeier Effect, which has been known for more than 100 yr.
  78. [78]
    The Waldmeier Effect in Sunspot Cycles - SpringerLink
    We discuss two aspects of the Waldmeier Effect, namely (1) the rise times of sunspot cycles are anti-correlated to their strengths (WE1) and (2) the rates of ...
  79. [79]
    Gustav Spörer (1822–1895) | High Altitude Observatory
    The gradual equatorward drift of sunspots in the course of the sunspot cycle (now often called Spörer's Law). With his reputation now established, Spörer ...
  80. [80]
    Origin of the hemispheric asymmetry of solar activity
    The frequency spectrum of the hemispheric asymmetry of solar activity shows enhanced power for the period ranges around 8.5 years and between 30 and 50 years.
  81. [81]
    Predicting the amplitude and hemispheric asymmetry of solar cycle ...
    Nov 14, 2016 · Key Points · Cycle 25 will be similar in size to cycle 24 · Cycle 25 will have a more active Southern Hemisphere · Stochastic variations in the ...
  82. [82]
    The Centennial Gleissberg Cycle and its association with extended ...
    Aug 4, 2014 · The solar cycle exhibits an amplitude and possibly frequency modulation on the centennial time scale (Figure 1). The frequency (phase) ...<|separator|>
  83. [83]
    Gleissberg cycle of solar activity over the last 7000 years
    In this paper, the wavelet technique is employed to investigate the Gleissberg cycle in solar variations during 5000 BC–1995 AD. Analysis shows time-variable ...
  84. [84]
    Connection between solar activity cycles and grand minima ...
    We found that the grand minima sequence is produced by the coupling between Gleissberg and Suess cycles, the latter being responsible for the most intense and ...
  85. [85]
    Grand solar minima and maxima deduced from >10>Be and >14>C
    Conclusions. We present the first reconstruction of the occurrence of grand solar maxima and minima during the Holocene based on simultaneous changes in records ...
  86. [86]
    [2302.14845] Long-term modulation of solar cycles - arXiv
    Feb 28, 2023 · It is shown that the solar cycles contain an important random component and have no clock-like phase locking implying a lack of long-term memory ...
  87. [87]
    Millennial Cycles in Greenland and Antarctic Ice Core Records ...
    Apr 10, 2025 · We suggest that the shorter ∼2.75 kyr cycle may match the Hallstatt cycle, which is currently interpreted as a hypothetical solar cycle but ...
  88. [88]
    Can origin of the 2400-year cycle of solar activity be caused by solar ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · In this regard, Charvátová (2000) was the first in suggesting that the observed 2100-2500 year oscillation could be caused by the solar inertial ...
  89. [89]
    Evidence of 6 000Year Periodicity in Reconstructed Sunspot Numbers
    Aug 10, 2025 · Well-known solar periodicities in TSI contain the Hallstatt (2300 yr), Eddy (1000 yr), Suess (210 yr) and Gleissberg cycle (70-100 yr) as also ...
  90. [90]
    [PDF] Millennial Cycles in Greenland and Antarctic Ice Core Records
    Apr 10, 2025 · We suggest that the shorter ∼2.75 kyr cycle may match the Hallstatt cycle, which is currently interpreted as a hypothetical solar cycle but ...
  91. [91]
    [PDF] A reconstruction of radiocarbon production and total solar irradiance ...
    The 10Be and 14C proxy records yield in gen- eral consistent reconstructions of isotope production and so- lar activity with correlations exceeding 0.8 (Bard et ...
  92. [92]
  93. [93]
    [PDF] Solar Dynamo Theory - Leif Svalgaard's Research Page
    Jun 4, 2014 · Solar dynamo theory explains how the Sun's magnetic field originates through a hydromagnetic dynamo process in its interior, driving solar ...Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
  94. [94]
    Fundamentals of Dynamo Theory (Chapter 1) - Lectures on Solar ...
    INTRODUCTION. Cosmic Dynamos. Many stars, planets and galaxies possess magnetic fields whose origins are not easily explained. Even the 'solid' planets ...
  95. [95]
    An update of Leighton's solar dynamo model
    In 1969, Leighton developed a quasi-1D mathematical model of the solar dynamo, building upon the phenomenological scenario of Babcock published in 1961. ... flux ...
  96. [96]
    BABCOCK–LEIGHTON SOLAR DYNAMO - IOP Science
    These models are traditionally known as flux transport dynamo models as the equatorward propagations of the butterfly wings in these models are produced due ...
  97. [97]
    A Babcock-Leighton Flux Transport Dynamo with Solar-like ...
    We investigate the properties of a kinematic flux transport solar dynamo model. The model is characterized by a solar-like internal differential rotation ...
  98. [98]
    [0906.4748] Outstanding Issues in Solar Dynamo Theory - arXiv
    Jun 25, 2009 · I highlight some of the outstanding issues in solar dynamo theory related to the the nature of the dynamo \alpha-effect, magnetic buoyancy and the origin of ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
  99. [99]
    Evolution of Solar and Stellar Dynamo Theory
    Jun 28, 2023 · We review the evolution and current state of dynamo theory and modelling, with emphasis on the solar dynamo.
  100. [100]
    Recent Developments in the Babcock-Leighton Solar Dynamo Theory
    Jan 15, 2024 · The Babcock-Leighton dynamo models have been a promising tool for explaining various aspects of solar and stellar magnetic cycles.
  101. [101]
    Solar Magnetic Field - from Solar Minimum to Solar Maximum
    Jun 11, 2025 · In this visualization we observe the evolution of the Sun's magnetic field from solar minimum (where there are few sunspots and the polar fields are grouped ...
  102. [102]
    [PDF] The reversal of the Sun's magnetic field in cycle 24 - arXiv
    Due to the preferred orientation of active regions relative to the equator (Joy's law), the following polarity magnetic field of dissipating active regions is ...
  103. [103]
    [PDF] Solar Cycle #24 and The Solar Dynamo - ISSFD
    Babcock described the magnetic dynamo as a basic oscillation of the Sun, wherein the polar fields of the Sun are wrapped up by differential rotation in the ...
  104. [104]
    Average motion of emerging solar active region polarities - II. Joy's law
    We conclude that Joy's law is caused by an inherent north-south separation speed present when the flux first reaches the surface, and that the scatter in the ...
  105. [105]
    NASA SVS - the Solar Magnetic Field from Solar Minimum to Pole Flip
    Oct 15, 2024 · Solar Cycle 25 has begun. The Solar Cycle 25 Prediction Panel announced solar minimum occurred in December 2019, marking the transition into ...
  106. [106]
    [PDF] The Solar Cycle
    Sep 20, 2013 · In 1919 Hale (along with Ellerman, Nicholson, and Joy) found that the magnetic field in sunspots followed a definite law, “Hale's Law” such.
  107. [107]
    The Solar Clock - Russell - 2019 - AGU Journals - Wiley
    Sep 6, 2019 · These empirical results support the notion of a regular deep solar dynamo that produces magnetic flux on a nearly constant cycle (clock), while ...
  108. [108]
    Statistical analysis and forecasting of solar wind parameters across ...
    Aug 22, 2024 · This study investigated the statistical properties of solar wind parameters spanning Solar Cycles 20–24, elucidating periodicities that closely aligned with ...
  109. [109]
    Sources of solar wind over the solar activity cycle - PMC
    Over the solar cycle, with different kinds of solar wind prevailing, the element abundances change from solar maximum to solar minimum: if we focus on the fast ...Space Missions In The... · Slow Wind Sources · Fast Wind Sources
  110. [110]
    Modeling the Solar Wind during Different Phases of the Last Solar ...
    Apr 5, 2023 · We describe our first attempt to systematically simulate the solar wind during different phases of the last solar cycle with the Alfvén Wave ...
  111. [111]
    The solar cycle variation in the solar wind and the modulation of ...
    Evidence for a solar cycle variation in the interplanetary plasma is presented based on direct observations of the solar wind by the Pioneer and Vela ...Missing: parameters | Show results with:parameters
  112. [112]
    Solar Wind Variation with the Cycle - Astrophysics Data System
    The statistical distributions of the solar wind parameters are varying during solar cycle while remaining close to the log-normal laws with remarkable ...Missing: modulation | Show results with:modulation
  113. [113]
    Solar cycle variation in the heliosphere - AGU Publications - Wiley
    Aug 1, 1996 · The structure of the heliosphere varies dramatically over the course of a solar cycle. Much of this variation can be related to the changes ...
  114. [114]
    Ulysses observations of very different heliospheric structure during ...
    May 9, 2006 · This study examines the most recent observations from the solar wind experiment (SWOOPS) on the Ulysses spacecraft.
  115. [115]
    [PDF] MIT Open Access Articles The Solar Wind in the Outer Heliosphere
    Solar cycle effects are important; the solar wind pressure changes by a factor of 2 over a solar cycle and the structure of the solar wind is modified by ...
  116. [116]
    Solar cycle dependence of the solar wind dynamics: Pioneer ...
    Nov 1, 1996 · Significant differences between Pioneer and Voyager observations were found in solar wind structure between 1 and 6 AU.
  117. [117]
    Pioneer and Voyager observations of large-scale spatial and ...
    We examine the spatial and temporal variation of average solar wind parameters and fluxes. Our obsevations suggest that the global structure of the outer ...
  118. [118]
    Long-term solar activity and its implications to the heliosphere ...
    Jun 5, 2013 · The Sun's magnetic variability also modulates the particulate and magnetic fluxes in the heliosphere, which determine the interplanetary ...
  119. [119]
    The Structure of the Global Heliosphere as Seen by In-Situ Ions from ...
    Apr 19, 2022 · Solar cycle effects are described in Sect. 6 and the results concerning the shape of the global heliosphere are presented in Sect. 7. We ...
  120. [120]
    Solar wind parameters in rising phase of solar cycle 25
    In this paper, we analyze solar wind measurements at the rising phase of SC 25 and compare them with similar data from the previous cycles.
  121. [121]
    Variations of the Galactic Cosmic Rays in the Recent Solar Cycles
    Jun 9, 2021 · In this paper, we study the Galactic cosmic-ray (GCR) variations over the solar cycles 23 and 24, with measurements from NASA's Advanced Composition Explorer.Abstract · Introduction · Data Description · Results and Discussions
  122. [122]
  123. [123]
    Long‐Term and Solar Cycle Variation of Galactic Cosmic Rays ...
    Jan 19, 2019 · The Sun modulates the flux of galactic cosmic rays (GCR) reaching the Earth's orbit. GCR flux has been measured by ground-based neutron monitors ...
  124. [124]
    Modulation of galactic cosmic rays during the unusual solar ...
    Mar 11, 2014 · The recent solar minimum is an unusual solar minimum The intensity of GCR was the highest ever recorded We find the causes for the record ...Missing: maximum | Show results with:maximum
  125. [125]
    Solar Modulation of Cosmic Nuclei over a Solar Cycle: Results from ...
    Feb 3, 2025 · We report the properties of precision time structures of cosmic nuclei He, Li, Be, B, C, N, and O fluxes over an 11-year solar cycle from ...
  126. [126]
    Cosmic Ray Modulation Across Solar Cycles 23 and 24
    This study investigates cosmic ray modulation across solar cycles 23 and 24, finding phase-dependent discrepancies and stronger coupling during declining solar ...
  127. [127]
    Tracing ancient solar cycles with tree rings and radiocarbon in ... - NIH
    Jan 6, 2025 · Changes in the intensity of galactic cosmic rays on Earth are strongly coupled with the 11-year solar cycle as observed in sunspots caused by ...
  128. [128]
    An empirical model of heliospheric cosmic ray modulation on long ...
    Mar 4, 2016 · We develop a semi-empirical model describing the heliospheric modulation of GCRs in terms of heliospheric parameters such as the open solar magnetic flux.
  129. [129]
    Evidence From Galactic Cosmic Rays That the Sun Has Likely ...
    Dec 16, 2021 · Trends observed in the modulation of galactic cosmic rays suggest that the Sun might be in a secular minimum The next two cycles will ...
  130. [130]
    It's Always Sunny in Space (and That's a Problem for Satellite Teams)
    Jul 2, 2024 · Strong solar storms can impact satellite orbits, instrument health, and data transmission. NASA Earth science satellite teams work to mitigate these challenges.
  131. [131]
    Satellite Mega Constellations Face Challenges from Solar Activity
    May 30, 2025 · Solar flares, coronal mass ejections, and other solar phenomena can disrupt satellite electronics, alter orbital paths, and even cause premature ...
  132. [132]
    Solar cycle effects on the upper atmosphere - AIAA ARC
    A fairly typical satellite initially at 500 km would have a lifetime of about 30 years under typical solar cycle minimum conditions and only about 3 years under ...
  133. [133]
    Deciphering Solar Cycle Influence on Long-Term Orbital ... - arXiv
    May 26, 2025 · Increased solar emissions during active phases heat and expand the thermosphere, thereby raising atmospheric density at orbital altitudes and ...
  134. [134]
    Here comes the sun and, for satellite operators, it's not alright
    Aug 15, 2023 · A solar storm increased the density of the atmosphere where the satellites were placed in a parking orbit, and their electric propulsion systems ...
  135. [135]
    Should you be worried about solar storms? | The Planetary Society
    Mar 26, 2024 · As the Earth's magnetic field changes in response to a solar storm, it can cause huge currents in power lines that blow out transformers and ...
  136. [136]
    Protecting the grid from solar storms
    Apr 7, 2023 · GICs resulting from severe geomagnetic disturbances can saturate transformers and cause negative impacts including reactive power absorption and ...<|separator|>
  137. [137]
    Transpower continues to protect power system as solar storm ...
    May 11, 2024 · In a severe geomagnetic storm, the CME can interact with the Earth's magnetic field, disrupting it and sending pulses of electric current down ...
  138. [138]
    [PDF] Geomagnetic Storms and Their Impacts on the US Power Grid
    This report describes the threat of geomagnetic storms on the Earth caused by solar activity and further discusses their impacts (past and future) on the ...
  139. [139]
    Disturbances in the US electric grid associated with geomagnetic ...
    Explosions powered by the Sun's magnetic field (''flares'' and. ''coronal mass ejections'' or CMEs) are among the principal causes of ''space weather'' (see, ...
  140. [140]
    Solar Cycle 25 Reaches Maximum | APPEL Knowledge Services
    Oct 30, 2024 · Solar Cycle 25—by far the most thoroughly observed solar cycle in history—has reached its maximum phase, NASA and the National Oceanic and ...
  141. [141]
    What NASA Is Learning from the Biggest Geomagnetic Storm in 20 ...
    May 9, 2025 · Driven by solar eruptions, geomagnetic storms can decimate satellites, overload electrical grids, and expose astronauts to dangerous radiation.
  142. [142]
    Solar Storm Mitigation - Homeland Security
    Aug 1, 2024 · Solar storms are a naturally occurring phenomenon where the sun releases solar flares, energetic particles and/or coronal mass ejections (CMEs).
  143. [143]
    The solar cycle, a heartbeat of stellar energy - ESA
    When this 'space weather' hits Earth, it can affect telecommunication, navigation and weather services, and even disrupt power grids. The magnetic field flips ...
  144. [144]
    Geomagnetic Storm Occurrence and Their Relation With Solar Cycle ...
    Aug 18, 2021 · The occurrence of geomagnetic storms depends on the strength of the 11 yr solar cycle (SC), and the different phases in it.Abstract · Introduction · Analysis and Results · Discussion and Conclusions
  145. [145]
    Solar wind drivers of geomagnetic storms during more than four ...
    May 17, 2012 · The solar wind structures driving geomagnetic storms (based on the Kp index) over four solar cycles have been identified, and the varying ...
  146. [146]
    NOAA Space Weather Scales
    G 5, Extreme · Kp = 9, 4 per cycle (4 days per cycle) ; G 4, Severe · Kp = 8, including a 9-, 100 per cycle (60 days per cycle) ; G 3, Strong · Kp = 7, 200 per cycleMissing: variation | Show results with:variation
  147. [147]
    [PDF] What Is Unusual About the Third Largest Geomagnetic Storm of ...
    During the weak solar cycle 24, the frequency and intensity of geomagnetic storms is unusually low ... correlation with the solar wind electric field VBz ...<|separator|>
  148. [148]
    Aurora Tutorial | NOAA / NWS Space Weather Prediction Center
    During the 4-5 years near solar maximum, there are more solar active regions, larger solar flares, and larger and faster CMEs.Missing: enhancements | Show results with:enhancements
  149. [149]
    What is the Solar Maximum? | The Aurora Zone
    During any given Solar Cycle, the number of sunspots rises to a maximum (Solar Maximum) and falls to a minimum (Solar Minimum).
  150. [150]
    What Was the Carrington Event? | NESDIS - NOAA
    Sunspots and graph of the sun. Solar activity is on an 11-year cycle. During solar maximum, there are the most sunspots and the most solar storms—that is, the ...
  151. [151]
    NASA, NOAA Announce That the Sun Has Reached the Solar ...
    Oct 15, 2024 · On October 3, 2024, the Sun emitted a strong solar flare. As of this date, this solar flare is the largest of Solar Cycle 25 and is classified ...
  152. [152]
    Detailed understanding of reduced geoeffectiveness of solar cycle ...
    May 8, 2025 · While solar cycle 23 exhibited a strong correlation between SSN and geomagnetic storm frequency, this relationship weakened significantly in ...
  153. [153]
    [PDF] Solar Irradiance Changes and the Sunspot Cycle
    The total variation in solar irradiance is about 1.3 watts per square meter during one sunspot cycle. This is a small change compared to the 100s of watts ...
  154. [154]
    Solar Irradiance Science | Earth - NASA
    The high-quality solar irradiance data from the space era provide the key record to study the Sun-Climate connection and its underlying coupling processes.Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
  155. [155]
    Solar Variability and Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) - NASA SVS
    Feb 19, 2009 · Variations in TSI are due to a balance between decreases caused by sunspots and increases caused by faculae, which are the bright areas that ...
  156. [156]
    Total Solar Irradiance (TSI)
    The variations on solar rotational and active region time scales are clearly seen. ... during the declining phase of solar cycle 21. From the peak of solar cycle ...
  157. [157]
    About Solar Irradiance | Earth - NASA
    What is the solar cycle? The sun goes through periodic variations or cycles of high and low activity that repeat approximately every 11 years. Solar minimum ...Missing: variability | Show results with:variability
  158. [158]
    Solar Ultraviolet (UV) Spectral Irradiance Data | NCEI - NOAA
    As the SORCE (Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment satellite) mission states, far UV irradiance from the Sun varies by as much as 10 percent during the Sun's ...
  159. [159]
    Solar UV Variations During the Decline of Cycle 23
    Satellite measurements of solar UV variability for solar cycles 21, 22, and 23 show consistent solar cycle irradiance changes at key wavelengths (e.g. 205 nm, ...
  160. [160]
    How Does the Sun's Spectrum Vary? in - AMS Journals
    In the visible and near-infrared spectrum, the percentage irradiance changes during the solar cycle are an order of magnitude smaller than in the UV spectrum ...
  161. [161]
    Advancements in solar spectral irradiance measurements by the ...
    Apr 12, 2024 · The TSIS-1 SIM SSI spectrum shows lower IR irradiance (up to 6% at 2400 nm) and small visible increases (~0.5%) from some previous reference solar spectra.
  162. [162]
    Solar activity variations of the ionospheric peak electron density - 2006
    Aug 31, 2006 · The slope of NmF2 with P in the linear segment further shows similar annual variations as the background electron densities at moderate solar ...
  163. [163]
    Long-term relationships of ionospheric electron density with solar ...
    Aug 30, 2024 · Hence, we compare the long-term variation of the solar radio flux index F10.7 with the variation of ionospheric variables like NmF2, foF2 ...
  164. [164]
    Variations of the ionosphere and related solar fluxes during solar ...
    The ionospheric electron content (IEC) and peak electron density (NmF2) data collected at low- and mid-latitudes during 1980–1991 and values of solar EUV (50– ...
  165. [165]
    Solar cycle variations of stratospheric ozone and temperature ... - ACP
    Mar 28, 2007 · The results from three 45-year simulations of a coupled chemistry climate model are analysed for solar cycle influences on ozone and temperature ...
  166. [166]
    Stratospheric Temperature and Radiative Forcing Response to 11 ...
    The 11-yr solar cycle temperature response to spectrally resolved solar irradiance changes and associated ozone changes is calculated using a fixed dynamical ...
  167. [167]
    Stratospheric Response to the 11-Yr Solar Cycle - AMS Journals
    This study examines observed changes in BPWs during the northern winter resulting from enhanced solar forcing and the consequent effect on the seasonal ...
  168. [168]
    A Possible Transfer Mechanism for the 11-Year Solar Cycle to the ...
    A frequency modulation of sudden warming events is noted, with warmings occurring earlier in solar minimum periods than in solar maximum periods. The observed ...
  169. [169]
    Influences of Solar Forcing at Ultraviolet and Longer Wavelengths ...
    Mar 18, 2020 · Cyclic solar forcing induces clear stratospheric responses, but weak surface climate responses in the GISS E2-R climate model Constant solar ...
  170. [170]
    Solar influences on cosmic rays and cloud formation: A ...
    Svensmark and Friis-Christensen [1997] proposed a “cosmic ray-cloud cover” hypothesis that cosmic ray flux, modulated by solar activity, may modify global ...
  171. [171]
    Atmospheric ionization and cloud radiative forcing | Scientific Reports
    Oct 11, 2021 · Atmospheric ionization produced by cosmic rays has been suspected to influence aerosols and clouds, but its actual importance has been questioned.
  172. [172]
    A cosmic ray-climate link and cloud observations
    Nov 21, 2012 · This work examines evidence of a cosmic ray cloud link from a range of sources, including satellite-based cloud measurements and long-term ground-based ...
  173. [173]
    Evidence that cosmic rays seed clouds - Physics World
    May 13, 2011 · According to Svensmark, cosmic rays seed low-lying clouds that reflect some of the Sun's radiation back into space, and the number of cosmic ...
  174. [174]
    [PDF] no connection between galactic cosmic rays and new particle ... - ACP
    Feb 18, 2010 · Our main conclusion is that galactic cosmic rays appear to play a minor role for at- mospheric aerosol formation events, and so for the ...
  175. [175]
    Cosmic rays and climate - ScienceDirect.com
    The theoretical basis for connecting cosmic ray ionization to cloud formation is, well, “theoretical”. The proposed mechanism involves atmospheric ionization. ...
  176. [176]
    Cosmic rays and global warming - Europhysics News
    Positive evidence for an effect of cosmic rays on clouds was first presented by Friis-Christensen and Svensmark and later by Marsh and Svensmark and Palle-Bago ...
  177. [177]
    (PDF) The Role of Solar Activity in Shaping Precipitation Extremes
    Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet. ... This study suggests a physical link between solar activity and extreme precipitation ...
  178. [178]
    Investigation of a Possible Link between Solar Activity and Climate ...
    The relationship between solar activity and rainfall patterns is still unclear in different regions of the world, including Saudi Arabia. Therefore, we wondered ...
  179. [179]
    Heavy rainfall, floods, and flash floods influenced by high-speed ...
    Aug 27, 2021 · Heavy rainfall events causing floods and flash floods are examined in the context of solar wind coupling to the magnetosphere–ionosphere–atmosphere system.
  180. [180]
    Is there a link between Earth's magnetic field and low-latitude ...
    Jun 2, 2017 · This may indicate that the low-latitude monsoon precipitation responded more directly to changes in solar activity after ca. 8000 yr B.P. ...
  181. [181]
    Editorial: Impact of solar activities on weather and climate - Frontiers
    The Sun drives the atmospheric dynamics of our planet and plays a role in shaping weather and climate patterns on Earth. While the exact mechanism of solar ...
  182. [182]
    The Maunder minimum and the Little Ice Age: an update from recent ...
    Dec 4, 2017 · The Maunder minimum (MM) is a grand solar minimum (AD 1645-1715), often assumed to be related to the Little Ice Age (LIA), though not directly ...
  183. [183]
    Estimating the Sun's radiative output during the Maunder Minimum
    The coincidence between the Maunder Minimum of solar magnetic activity from 1645 to 1715 and the coldest temperatures of the Little Ice Age raises the question ...
  184. [184]
    Evaluating sun–climate relationships since the Little Ice Age
    Over a period of ∼350 years, surface temperatures increased in the range of 0.7–1°C (Fig. 2a) and solar activity increased from levels in the Spörer and Maunder ...
  185. [185]
    Synchronized Northern Hemisphere climate change and solar ...
    The Maunder Minimum (AD 1645–1715) is a useful period to investigate possible sun–climate linkages as sunspots became exceedingly rare.
  186. [186]
    Solar Cycle Variability and Global Climate Change
    Past studies show a strong correlation between solar variability and surface-air temperature of the earth. Data suggest that solar variability affects the ...
  187. [187]
    [PDF] Solar influences on Climate - Imperial College London
    Second, changes in the Earth's orbit around the Sun over tens and hundreds of thousands of years directly affect the amount of radiant energy hitting the Earth ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  188. [188]
    (PDF) Solar Changes and the Climate - ResearchGate
    PDF | The sun affects our climate in direct and indirect ways. The sun changes in it's activity on timescales that vary from 11, 22, 80, and 180 years.
  189. [189]
    Solar influences on the Earth's atmosphere: solved and unsolved ...
    Dec 21, 2023 · The bright faculae and network outnumber and outlast the dark ... solar microwave emissions, plage areas, cosmogenic isotopes, etc.
  190. [190]
    Solar forcing of the terrestrial atmosphere - ScienceDirect.com
    We review the main mechanisms by which solar variability may impact the terrestrial atmosphere on time scales ranging from days to millennia. This includes ...
  191. [191]
    Changes in the Total Solar Irradiance and climatic effects
    Jul 22, 2021 · This implies that the sunspot cycles with average periods of 11 years are not resolved, however, the data have enough time resolution to ...
  192. [192]
    Variation of cosmic ray flux and global cloud coverage—a missing ...
    We find that the observed variation of 3–4% of the global cloud cover during the recent solar cycle is strongly correlated with the cosmic ray flux.
  193. [193]
    Cosmic Rays, Clouds, and Climate | Space Science Reviews
    Svensmark, H., and Friis-Christensen, E.: 1997, 'Variation of Cosmic Ray Flux and Global Cloud Coverage – A Missing Link in Solar-Climate Relationships', J. Atm ...
  194. [194]
    Cosmic rays, clouds, and climate - DTU Orbit
    A correlation between a global average of low cloud cover and the flux of cosmic rays incident in the atmosphere has been observed during the last solar ...
  195. [195]
    Couldn't the Sun be the cause of global warming? | NOAA Climate.gov
    Oct 29, 2020 · Observations of sunspots and other indicators of solar activity indicate no changes that could have caused global warming over the past half ...
  196. [196]
    Solar cycle as a distinct line of evidence constraining Earth's ...
    Dec 19, 2023 · The effects of solar variability on Earth's climate: A workshop report. (The National Academies Press, 2012). Morice, C. P. et al. An ...
  197. [197]
    [PDF] The Unreliability of Current Global Temperature and Solar Activity ...
    Dec 11, 2024 · We hope that the evidence in this report will demonstrate to the reader that the IPCC's statements on the detection and attribution of climate ...
  198. [198]
    A Meta‐Analysis of Studies Attributing Significance to Solar Irradiance
    Jan 17, 2023 · We show that the relationship between solar irradiance and climate, as identified by REDFIT analyses, may not be as robust as previous work might suggest.
  199. [199]
    Exploring relations between solar activity, cosmic rays, clouds and ...
    Aug 15, 2024 · Investigating the solar-cosmic ray-cloud relations by using datasets from MODIS showed that there was no evidence for a solar-cloud link (Laken ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  200. [200]
    6.11.2.2 Cosmic rays and clouds - IPCC
    Svensmark and Friis-Christensen (1997) demonstrated a high degree of correlation between total cloud cover, from the ISCCP C2 data set, and cosmic ray flux ...
  201. [201]
    Influence of electromagnetic fields on the circadian rhythm
    Cyclic solar disturbances, including sunspots and seasonal weakening of the geomagnetic field, can affect human health, possibly by disrupting the circadian ...
  202. [202]
    Sunspot Dynamics Are Reflected in Human Physiology and ... - NIH
    It is conceivable that solar storm–induced weather cycles could cyclically impact both human physiology and the likelihood of human infection, such as ...Missing: intra- | Show results with:intra-
  203. [203]
    Linkages Between Geomagnetic Activity and Blood Pressure - PMC
    Sep 20, 2023 · This review aims to critically examine and present evidence for and against potential linkages between geomagnetic activity and its effects on blood pressure ( ...
  204. [204]
    Space weather disrupts nocturnal bird migration - PubMed Central
    Oct 9, 2023 · Our results suggest that fewer birds migrate during strong geomagnetic disturbances and that migrating birds may experience more difficulty navigating.
  205. [205]
    Geomagnetic disturbance associated with increased vagrancy in ...
    Jan 9, 2023 · Our results suggest that the combination of high solar activity and geomagnetic disturbance leads to either a pause in migration or a switch to ...
  206. [206]
    Do geomagnetic variations affect plant function? - ScienceDirect.com
    The present review examines the possibility that three classes of unexplained biological rhythms in plants may relate to the sensitivity of plants to variations ...
  207. [207]
    Unknown effects of daily‐scale solar activity on the plant growth ...
    Jun 14, 2022 · The influence of solar activity on plant growth has been studied for over 100 years, however, this phenomenon is still poorly understood on a daily scale.
  208. [208]
    Effects of light, electromagnetic fields and water on biological rhythms
    Biological rhythms involve changes in living organisms that vary as a function of daylight, seasons, and the solar cycle. The most studied biological rhythm is ...
  209. [209]
    Electric Power Transmission - Space Weather Prediction Center
    Assessing the impact of geomagnetic storms on the electrical power grid involves a number of considerations. The path for current flow that responds to the ...
  210. [210]
    5 Geomagnetic Storms That Reshaped Society - USGS.gov
    Jul 9, 2024 · Geomagnetic storms can damage Earth-orbiting satellites, interfere with radio communication, cause blackouts, and damage high-voltage transformers.
  211. [211]
    Space weather effects on technology
    During geomagnetic storms and the associated ionospheric disturbances, scintillation activity may affect certain applications of navigational aids such as the ...
  212. [212]
    Near Miss: The Solar Superstorm of July 2012 - NASA Science
    Jul 22, 2014 · A direct hit by an extreme CME such as the one that missed Earth in July 2012 could cause widespread power blackouts, disabling everything that plugs into a ...
  213. [213]
    A 21st Century View of the March 1989 Magnetic Storm - Boteler
    Oct 10, 2019 · On 13 March 1989, the largest magnetic storm of the last century caused widespread effects on power systems including a blackout of the Hydro-Québec system.
  214. [214]
    Solar storms hit tech equipment, and other technology news
    May 17, 2024 · The strongest geomagnetic storm in 20 years hit Earth on 11 May, causing disruptions to power grids, broadband technology and GPS satellites in space.
  215. [215]
    How Geomagnetic Storm Effects Impact Technology
    Oct 10, 2024 · The solar storm could impact satellite systems, but also increases chances of seeing the northern lights.
  216. [216]
    [PDF] Solar Cycle Precursors and the Outlook for Cycle 25 - AGU Journals
    This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination ...
  217. [217]
    Solar cycle prediction - ADS
    A review of solar cycle prediction methods and their performance is given, including early forecasts for Cycle 25.Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
  218. [218]
    [PDF] Solar Cycle Predictions - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
    Models of the dynamo are validated by their ability to predict solar activity over short and long timescales. Predictions of the magnitude and timing of Solar ...
  219. [219]
    Solar cycle prediction using a combinatorial deep learning model
    There are three main types of solar cycle prediction methods: precursor, model-based, and extrapolation method (Petrovay 2020). Precursor methods are to predict ...Missing: peer- reviewed
  220. [220]
    Forecasting long-term sunspot numbers using the LSTM-WGAN model
    Feb 12, 2025 · Peer review · Research integrity ... Prediction of solar cycle 25 using deep learning based long short-term memory forecasting technique.
  221. [221]
    Solar Cycles: Can they be Predicted? - IOPscience
    Of more than 100 predictions for cycle 25, most underestimated the amplitude (peak sunspot number). Fewer predictions were made for the timing of solar maximum.
  222. [222]
    Predictions of solar activity cycles 25 and 26 using non-linear ...
    May 16, 2023 · This study presents new prediction models of the 11-yr solar activity cycles (SC) 25 and 26 based on multiple activity indicator parameters.
  223. [223]
    Solar Cycle Prediction | Living Reviews in Solar Physics
    A review of solar cycle prediction methods and their performance is given, including forecasts for cycle 24. The review focuses on those aspects of the sol.
  224. [224]
    Further evidence on the predictability of long-term solar activity
    Solar activity does not show evidence of long cycles and is fundamentally stochastic. •. Solar activity is predictable only over 30–40 years. After four decades ...
  225. [225]
    Effects of observational data shortage on accuracy of global solar ...
    In this paper, we present an investigation of the effects of short observational data series on the accuracy of solar cycle prediction.
  226. [226]
    [PDF] Early Estimation of Solar Activity Cycle:Potential Capability and Limits
    The main reasons for these forecasting uncertainties are imperfect dynamo models and deficiency of the necessary observational data.
  227. [227]
    [2502.00978] Solar Cycles: Can They Be Predicted? - arXiv
    Feb 3, 2025 · Reasons for inaccurate prediction are suggested, and perspectives are given on how future studies might improve upon the extant literature.<|separator|>
  228. [228]
    The Planetary Theory of Solar Activity Variability: A Review - Frontiers
    These authors claimed that their analyzed records do not show any evidence of a planetary influence but they did not realize that their found oscillations ...
  229. [229]
    Rethinking the sun's cycles: New physical model reinforces ...
    May 27, 2024 · Study corroborates the influence of planetary tidal forces on solar activity. May 28, 2019. Solar activity likely to peak next year, new study ...
  230. [230]
    Is there a planetary influence on solar activity?
    Based on these observations we put forward the idea that the long-term solar magnetic activity is modulated by planetary effects.
  231. [231]
    Influence of the planets may subdue solar activity - Phys.org
    Aug 12, 2025 · In a new study published in Solar Physics, they have now demonstrated that this external synchronization automatically curbs solar activity. At ...
  232. [232]
    Some unresolved problems in the solar dynamo
    Jun 15, 2022 · The problems are important for understanding solar activity as well as activity of stars similar to some extent to the Sun. Downloads ...
  233. [233]
    Unsolved questions and future prospects for understanding the Sun
    What is the origin of the Sun's magnetic field and activity cycle? • What is going on in solar flares? And how can the weather in space be predicted? • Why is ...