Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Statue of Peace

The Statue of Peace is a bronze sculpture portraying a barefoot young girl in traditional Korean hanbok, seated on a chair with clenched fists and an empty chair beside her, symbolizing women subjected to sexual servitude in Japanese military "comfort stations" during World War II.^[1]^[2] Created by South Korean artists Kim Seo-kyung and Kim Eun-sung, the original was unveiled on December 14, 2011, across from the Japanese Embassy in Seoul to mark the 1,000th weekly protest by surviving "comfort women" advocates.^[3]^[4] Replicas have since appeared in locations including Australia, the United States, and Europe, often prompting diplomatic friction.^[5] The statue serves as a focal point for campaigns demanding Japanese acknowledgment and reparations for the estimated tens of thousands of women, predominantly Korean, coerced into brothels for Imperial Japanese Army personnel from the 1930s to 1945, though the extent of direct military abductions remains disputed in historical records.^[6]^[7] Japan maintains that private recruiters handled much of the procurement, with comfort stations established to curb unregulated prostitution and prevent wartime rapes, and points to prior treaties like the 1965 normalization agreement as settling claims, while multiple apologies—such as the 1993 Kono Statement—have addressed coercive elements.^[7] South Korean activists and governments, however, reject these as insufficient, viewing the statues as enduring symbols of unresolved injustice, leading to protests, vandalism attempts by Japanese nationalists, and installation bans or removals abroad amid bilateral tensions.^[8]^[9] The proliferation of such monuments has exacerbated strains in Japan-South Korea relations, occasionally derailing security cooperation and trade pacts, as seen in the 2015 comfort women agreement's partial repudiation.^[10]^[1]

Description and Symbolism

Physical Design and Features

The Statue of Peace is a life-size bronze sculpture depicting a seated young girl in traditional Korean hanbok attire, barefoot, with short cropped hair and clenched fists resting in her lap.^[11] The figure sits on a chair, positioned next to an empty chair that forms an integral part of the design.^[3] Her expression is solemn and tense, with tightened lips and a forward gaze, emphasizing emotional restraint and resolve.^[12] Crafted by South Korean artists Kim Seo-kyung and Kim Eun-sung, the statue's minimalist form relies on bronze for durability and patina, enhancing its somber aesthetic.^[13] Replicas maintain these core features, though some installations incorporate variations such as a small bird on the girl's shoulder, intended to evoke Korean cultural motifs.^[14] The overall composition, approximately matching adult human proportions in a seated pose, prioritizes symbolic directness over ornate detail.^[4]

Intended Symbolism and Interpretations

The Statue of Peace depicts a seated young girl in hanbok, with short hair, bare feet, and clenched fists, intended by its creators to embody the victims of sexual slavery under the Japanese Imperial Army during World War II, particularly Korean women euphemistically termed "comfort women."^[2] The figure's defiant posture and vacant gaze symbolize lost innocence, enduring trauma, and a demand for unresolved justice, with the accompanying empty chair representing absent fellow victims or the ongoing absence of official atonement.^[6] Erected initially in Seoul on December 14, 2011, by civic groups including the Korean Council for Justice and Remembrance, the statue serves as a public memorial urging the Japanese government to formally apologize and provide reparations for alleged wartime atrocities.^[4] Supporters interpret the statue as a universal emblem against human trafficking and military sexual violence, emphasizing its role in fostering remembrance and preventing recurrence of such abuses in conflicts worldwide.^[15] In contexts like the Berlin installation on September 28, 2020, advocates framed it as a transnational symbol transcending Korean-Japanese bilateral tensions, highlighting sexual violence as a crime against humanity applicable to events from the Yugoslav wars to contemporary armed conflicts.^[14] The shadow cast by the figure has been cited to represent the persistent psychological and social hardships faced by survivors, reinforcing themes of resilience amid victimhood.^[6] Critics, including Japanese officials and historians, view the statue's symbolism as selectively nationalistic, prioritizing a narrative of mass abduction and enslavement that overlooks evidence of brothel operations managed through civilian recruiters and instances of voluntary participation driven by economic incentives during wartime poverty.^[7] Organizations like the Japanese government have protested installations abroad, arguing the depiction fosters anti-Japanese sentiment rather than genuine reconciliation, with the statue's proliferation—over 70 replicas by 2023—seen as a tool for perpetuating historical grievances over promoting peace.^[7] Korean nationalist interpretations often emphasize ethnic victimhood, potentially amplifying unverified claims from survivor testimonies while downplaying Japanese military records indicating regulated comfort stations aimed at reducing frontline rapes, thus complicating the statue's "peace" moniker as more confrontational than conciliatory.^[14]^[7]

Historical Context of Comfort Women

World War II Background

The Imperial Japanese Army's expansionist campaigns in Asia during the 1930s created conditions for the establishment of a formalized system of military brothels, known as ianjō or comfort stations, to address soldiers' sexual needs amid prolonged occupations. Following the invasion of Manchuria in September 1931 and subsequent clashes in Shanghai in early 1932, Japanese military authorities set up the first documented comfort stations in occupied Chinese territories, such as Shanghai, to regulate prostitution, reduce the spread of venereal diseases, and prevent unauthorized rapes that could inflame local resistance and complicate control over populations.^[16] ^[17] These facilities were operated under military oversight, with fees collected to fund operations and provide a controlled outlet for troops, reflecting pragmatic concerns over discipline and health in expeditionary forces far from home.^[18] The system's scope intensified with the escalation of the Second Sino-Japanese War after the Marco Polo Bridge Incident on July 7, 1937, which marked the onset of full-scale conflict with China and led to widespread occupations where comfort stations proliferated in major cities and frontline areas.^[19] Japanese military documents from the period indicate direct involvement in site selection, staffing, and logistics, often repurposing existing brothels or constructing new ones guarded by soldiers to ensure exclusivity for military personnel.^[18] Incidents of mass sexual violence, such as those reported during the capture of Nanjing in December 1937, prompted further institutionalization of the stations as a means to channel soldiers' impulses and maintain order, though enforcement varied by command.^[20] Japan's entry into the broader Pacific War via the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, extended the network to Southeast Asia, the Dutch East Indies, and Pacific islands, where stations were rapidly established in tandem with conquests to support garrisons isolated from supply lines.^[21] By this phase, the infrastructure included transport of women via military channels and fixed facilities with medical checks, underscoring the army's administrative role in sustaining troop morale amid grueling campaigns against Allied forces.^[22] The system's operations persisted until Japan's surrender on September 2, 1945, leaving a legacy tied to the empire's wartime logistics rather than ad hoc arrangements seen in other contemporary armies.^[18]

Recruitment and Operations

Recruitment for the Japanese military's comfort women system commenced in 1932 following the establishment of the first stations in Shanghai, targeting primarily impoverished or socially vulnerable women from Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and later China and Southeast Asia. Japanese authorities, including the Home Ministry's Police Bureau and military quartermasters, issued directives to prefectural governors and colonial governments to facilitate procurement through existing licensed prostitution channels and private brokers.^[23] These brokers, often affiliated with semi-official entities like the Taiwan Colonization Company, advanced loans to station proprietors to secure women via indenture contracts, promising wages and living expenses that frequently trapped recruits in debt bondage.^[23] Deception was a prevalent method, with recruiters luring women—many teenagers from rural areas—with offers of factory, nursing, or laundry jobs, only to transport them to brothels upon arrival, as evidenced by survivor testimonies compiled in Chinese provincial archives and Tokyo Tribunal records from 1948.^[24] In Korea, where the majority originated, recruitment exploited economic desperation amid colonial poverty and famine, with some families selling daughters or women signing contracts knowingly for prostitution due to lack of alternatives; however, no surviving Korean-specific contracts exist, and military documents like General Okamura Yasuji's 1932 telegram requesting "comfort women units" from Nagasaki indicate coordinated state involvement beyond private initiative.^[24] ^[25] Direct abductions by soldiers occurred sporadically, particularly in China, such as the seizure of over 70 women in Shanxi Province and 30 in Hainan, per wartime diaries and local records.^[24] The debate over voluntariness hinges on interpreting these contracts: some analyses posit they mirrored prewar Asian indentured prostitution systems, where economic incentives drove participation without overt military force, but counter-evidence from recruitment logs and eyewitness accounts highlights widespread coercion through false promises and physical restraint, complicating claims of free choice.^[25] Comfort stations functioned as militarized brothels integrated into logistical supply chains, with over 400 documented in China by 1942 across urban and rural sites near garrisons to regulate soldier access and mitigate rape incidents and venereal disease outbreaks.^[23] Management combined military oversight—via army or navy quartermasters enforcing hygiene inspections, rotation schedules, and access quotas—with civilian operators handling daily fees (tiered by rank, e.g., officers paying higher rates) and procurement, as outlined in regulations like the 1943 Mandalay Garrison orders prioritizing troops while restricting civilian use after curfew.^[23] Women endured regimented operations: mandatory medical exams, confinement to prevent desertion, and servicing dozens of men daily under armed guard, with rations and nominal pay often deducted for "debts," per station ledgers and confessions from Japanese war criminals.^[24] Funding derived from military budgets, such as the 532,000 yen allocated by Unit 7990 in Manchuria (1944–1945), underscoring the system's status as an auxiliary wartime institution rather than purely private enterprise.^[24] While designed to boost morale, operational records reveal inefficiencies, including disease spikes despite controls, and reliance on continuous recruitment to sustain numbers amid high turnover from illness and attrition.^[23]

Post-War Testimonies and Evidence

Survivor testimonies regarding the comfort women system emerged sporadically in the immediate post-war period, primarily from European women in occupied territories like the Dutch East Indies, where stigma was less prohibitive than in Asian societies. Dutch and Indonesian women reported forced recruitment into military brothels during Japanese occupation, with accounts documented in Allied investigations and leading to convictions of Japanese officers for organized prostitution in tribunals such as those held in Batavia (now Jakarta) in 1948.^[26] These early European testimonies described abductions from internment camps, confinement in designated stations, and systematic sexual exploitation to service Japanese troops, corroborated by witness statements from multiple victims and local records.^[27] In contrast, testimonies from Korean and other Asian survivors remained largely private for decades due to cultural taboos, familial shame, and fear of reprisal, with systematic public disclosure accelerating only in the late 1980s and early 1990s amid activist campaigns. The first prominent Korean testimony came in 1991 from Kim Hak-sun, who recounted being deceived by recruiters at age 17 in 1939, transported to China, and compelled to service up to 20-30 soldiers daily under threat of violence.^[28] Subsequent interviews by organizations like the Korean Council collected similar narratives from dozens of survivors, detailing fraudulent job offers, kidnappings, physical beatings, and confinement in guarded facilities where escape was prevented by military oversight.^[29] These oral accounts gained evidentiary weight from declassified Japanese military documents uncovered in 1991-1992 by historian Yoshiaki Yoshimi in the Defense Agency archives, revealing orders from as early as 1932 for the establishment of "comfort stations" to regulate prostitution, prevent random rapes, and curb venereal disease among troops.^[28] The documents, including directives from the Chinese Expeditionary Force in 1938 specifying recruitment methods and station management by military police, confirmed the Imperial Japanese Army's administrative role in operating over 100 such facilities across Asia by 1945, with women sourced primarily from Korea, China, and occupied territories.^[30] Former Japanese soldiers' memoirs and interrogations, such as those compiled in post-war studies, further substantiated the stations' operations, describing quotas, medical inspections, and payments to women, though disputing direct military coercion in recruitment.^[31] Psychiatric evaluations of survivors in the 1990s and 2000s, drawing on these testimonies, documented long-term trauma including PTSD, dissociation, and somatic disorders consistent with prolonged sexual violence and captivity.^[32] However, the delayed timing of most Asian testimonies—often 40-50 years after events—has prompted scrutiny over memory reliability, with some inconsistencies noted in details like dates and locations amid coaching by advocacy groups.^[33] Independent corroboration from Allied intelligence reports during the war and Japanese admissions, such as the 1993 Kono Statement acknowledging military involvement in coercive recruitment practices, bolsters the core claims of organized exploitation.^[34]

Debates on Historical Accuracy

Claims of Forced Military Slavery

The claims of forced military slavery in the context of the "comfort women" system assert that the Imperial Japanese Armed Forces systematically recruited and confined women from Korea, China, and other regions into sexual servitude within military-operated brothels, known as "comfort stations," spanning roughly 1932 to 1945. Proponents, including survivor advocacy groups and historians such as Yoshimi Yoshiaki, argue this constituted state-sponsored enslavement, with women subjected to deception—such as false promises of factory or nursing jobs—abduction, and physical coercion to service soldiers, often up to dozens per day, under armed guard to prevent escape.^[20]^[35] These allegations draw on post-war testimonies, estimating 50,000 to 200,000 victims, predominantly Korean under colonial rule, and portray the system as a deliberate policy to regulate prostitution, curb irregular rapes, and bolster troop discipline amid expansionist campaigns in Asia.^[36] Public disclosure of these claims intensified with Korean survivor Kim Hak-sun's testimony on August 14, 1991, the first to detail her alleged abduction at age 17 from Seoul, transport to a Chinese comfort station, and subjection to repeated rapes and beatings for non-compliance, conditions she described as inescapable slavery.^[37]^[38] Subsequent accounts from other women echoed patterns of familial or broker-mediated coercion, exacerbated by wartime poverty and Japanese colonial authority in Korea, alongside evidence from European cases, such as Dutch women forcibly prostituted in Java as documented in 1948 Batavia Military Tribunal records, where military officials were convicted of instituting sexual slavery.^[39] Activist organizations like the Korean Council for the Women Drafted for Military Sexual Slavery have amplified these narratives, interpreting sparse wartime directives—such as a 1938 Japanese army order to establish comfort facilities—as proof of centralized enforcement.^[40] The Japanese government's August 4, 1993, Kono Statement provided a measure of corroboration, acknowledging military involvement in comfort station operations and stating that "in many cases [women] were recruited against their own will, through coaxing coercion etc.," with victims enduring "a coercive atmosphere" and limited escape options, based on interviews and reviewed documents.^[41] Subsequent reports, including the 1996 UN Special Rapporteur investigation by Radhika Coomaraswamy, classified the system as "military sexual slavery" involving institutionalized rape and trafficking.^[42] However, these claims' evidentiary foundation—largely testimonial and emerging decades post-war amid Korean nationalist campaigns—has faced scrutiny for inconsistencies, such as evolving details in some accounts and limited contemporaneous primary documents directly evidencing mass military abductions of Korean women, with critics attributing narrative amplification to politically motivated sources influenced by anti-Japanese sentiment in academia and NGOs rather than exhaustive archival rigor.^[25]^[43]

Evidence of Voluntary Participation and Brothel Management

Historical documents indicate that recruitment for comfort stations often involved private brokers or civilian agents who advertised jobs in factories, cafes, or entertainment venues, with many Korean women responding to promises of high wages amid economic hardship in the 1930s and early 1940s.^[44] These agents, frequently Korean or Japanese civilians rather than military personnel, facilitated contracts resembling indentured servitude common in pre-war licensed prostitution districts like those in Korea's yangban system or Japan's yukaku brothels, where women received advance payments against future earnings to offset recruitment costs and travel.^[45] J. Mark Ramseyer, analyzing economic incentives and archival records of prostitution contracts, argues that such arrangements were voluntary in the sense of mutual agreement under duress of poverty, with women retaining rights to terminate after repaying debts, though enforcement varied by location and operator.^[44] Evidence from comfort station operations shows systematic payments to women, documented in ledgers and testimonies where earnings were divided—typically 50% to the woman after house fees—with portions saved in military-managed accounts or paid out monthly, enabling some to amass savings equivalent to several years' wages in civilian jobs.^[46] For instance, records from stations in Burma and Java reveal women receiving bonuses for high volume and medical exams to curb venereal diseases, mirroring regulated brothel practices rather than unpaid slavery.^[31] Brothel management was largely civilian-led, with madams overseeing daily schedules, client quotas (often 20-30 soldiers per day), and amenities like food and lodging provided by operators who profited from fees, while the Japanese military supplied security, utilities, and oversight to prevent unregulated rape and maintain troop discipline.^[17] Diaries and operational manuals from station managers, such as those preserved in Japanese archives, detail profit-driven administration: women were selected for attractiveness, given numbered tickets for clients, and allowed limited freedoms like shopping or correspondence, with rare documented escapes punished contractually rather than militarily. Early stations, established in Shanghai by 1932, relied on voluntary Japanese prostitutes transitioning from domestic brothels, expanding to Korean recruits via similar commercial networks as military campaigns grew, without evidence of wholesale forced roundups by Japanese forces in Korea.^[20] Critics of the forced slavery narrative, including Ramseyer, note the absence of mass conscription orders in declassified military documents, attributing discrepancies in testimonies to post-war embellishments influenced by nationalist movements, though individual cases of deception or coercion by recruiters persist.^[47]

Disputed Numbers and Testimonial Reliability

Estimates of the total number of women involved in the Japanese military's comfort station system during World War II vary significantly, with scholarly analyses based on military documents suggesting figures between 20,000 and 90,000 overall, while activist claims, particularly from South Korean sources, assert up to 200,000 Korean women alone.^[48] Japanese government and military records, such as a 1942 War Ministry report, document approximately 400 comfort stations across Asia, with capacities implying far fewer women than the higher estimates; for instance, historian Ikuhiko Hata calculated around 20,000 based on a 1:150 ratio to military personnel and replacement rates derived from logistical documents.^[48] In contrast, the 1993 Kono Statement and subsequent UN reports referenced up to 200,000 without direct documentary corroboration, relying instead on extrapolated testimonies, a figure critiqued for lacking empirical support from primary sources like station rosters or recruitment logs.^[48]^[49] The low number of verified survivors underscores the dispute: as of 2016, only 239 women had registered with the South Korean government as victims, despite claims of tens of thousands of Korean participants, raising questions about the scale inferred from anecdotal reports.^[50] Japanese archival evidence, including interrogation reports of captured Korean women in Burma, describes many as licensed prostitutes transported for economic reasons rather than mass abductions, with no indications of the systematic forced recruitment alleged in higher estimates.^[51] Testimonies from alleged victims form the primary basis for higher numbers and coercion claims, but their reliability has been challenged due to inconsistencies, late emergence, and political influences. Many accounts surfaced in the 1990s amid anti-Japan activism in South Korea, often after decades of silence, with details varying across retellings—such as discrepancies in ages (claims of girls as young as 10 conflicting with document-based recruitments of adults), locations, and methods of involvement.^[52] Notable fabrications include the 1980s testimony of Yoshida Seiji, who claimed direct military abductions on Jeju Island; investigations found no corroborating evidence, leading Asahi Shimbun to retract related articles in 2014 and apologize for propagating unverified claims that fueled the narrative of widespread forced slavery.^[52] Some survivors, including Japanese women, described voluntary entry into brothels for pay, with contracts specifying terms akin to licensed prostitution, as analyzed by legal historian J. Mark Ramseyer, who argued that economic incentives and advance payments indicate consensual arrangements rather than slavery, though critics contend this overlooks potential deception or duress.^[53]^[47] While some testimonies align with documented comfort station operations, the absence of contemporaneous victim records—relying instead on post-war memories susceptible to conflation with general wartime hardships or nationalist agendas—limits their evidentiary weight, particularly given institutional biases in academia and media that have amplified uncritical acceptance of activist-driven accounts over archival scrutiny.^[54] Peer-reviewed analyses emphasize that without forensic or documentary cross-verification, such as mass grave evidence or abduction logs, the testimonies' role in inflating numbers reflects causal influences like post-colonial grievance politics more than unassailable historical fact.^[52]

Creation and Installation in Glendale

Advocacy and Funding

The Peace Monument in Glendale, California, a replica of the Statue of Peace commemorating alleged victims of Japanese military sexual slavery during World War II, was advocated primarily by the Korean American Forum of California (KAFC), a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting awareness of historical grievances involving Korea. KAFC coordinated the effort to install the statue in Glendale Central Park, selecting the design originally created by South Korean artist Kim Seo-kyung and Kim Eun-sung and unveiled in Seoul on December 14, 2011, opposite the Japanese Embassy.^[55] The group framed the monument as a symbol of peace and remembrance for "comfort women," emphasizing the need for public education on the issue amid ongoing international disputes.^[56] KAFC's advocacy included lobbying Glendale city officials and community outreach, with spokespeople like Phyllis Kim highlighting the statue's role in honoring survivors and countering historical denialism.^[55] Funding for the approximately $30,000 bronze sculpture was secured through grassroots donations from Korean American community groups and individuals, without reliance on public taxpayer funds.^[57] KAFC spearheaded the private fundraising campaign starting around 2012, pooling contributions to cover fabrication, transportation from South Korea, and installation costs.^[55] This model of community-driven financing mirrored the original Seoul statue's support from private donors in South Korea, reflecting a broader transnational push by diaspora networks to erect similar monuments globally.^[58] Proponents within KAFC described the donations as voluntary acts of solidarity, enabling the project's completion despite opposition from Japanese American organizations concerned about its interpretive stance on wartime history.^[56]

City Approval Process

The proposal for the Statue of Peace, also known as the Peace Monument, in Glendale, California, originated from local Korean American advocacy groups seeking to commemorate women claimed to have been victimized as "comfort women" during World War II.^[59] The initiative was advanced by the Global Association for PeaceWind, a nonprofit organization, which secured private funding exceeding $30,000 for the bronze sculpture and coordinated with city officials for placement on public land in Central Park.^[60] The group submitted plans to the Glendale City Council, requesting approval for installation near the public library as a symbol of historical remembrance, with the process involving standard reviews for public art placements under municipal guidelines for parks and monuments.^[61] On July 9, 2013, the Glendale City Council held a public meeting to deliberate the proposal, during which supporters argued it honored victims of wartime sexual violence, while opponents, including representatives from the Japanese American community, raised concerns about historical accuracy, potential diplomatic tensions with Japan, and the use of public space for a politically charged installation.^[59] ^[61] The council voted 4-1 to approve the monument's placement, with Mayor Dave Weaver casting the sole dissenting vote, citing risks of international controversy and questions over the statue's interpretive claims about history.^[60] The approval authorized the private installation without direct city expenditure, subject to compliance with zoning and maintenance agreements, and cleared the path for unveiling less than three weeks later on July 30, 2013.^[62] This expedited process reflected the council's discretion over public art donations but drew criticism for insufficient scrutiny of the underlying historical narrative amid vocal protests from Japanese officials and local residents.^[63]

Unveiling and Initial Reception

The Peace Monument of Glendale, a bronze statue depicting a young woman in traditional Korean attire seated barefoot with clenched fists beside an empty chair, was unveiled on July 30, 2013, in Central Park adjacent to the Glendale Central Library.^[64]^[62] The 1,100-pound sculpture, funded privately by Korean-American donors through the Korea-Glendale Sister City Association at a cost exceeding $100,000, served as the first such memorial in the United States commemorating women claimed to have been coerced into sexual servitude by the Imperial Japanese Army during World War II.^[64]^[65] The unveiling ceremony drew hundreds of attendees, including Glendale city officials, Korean-American community members, and survivors such as 88-year-old Kim Bok-dong, who shared her personal account of abduction at age 14 and subsequent exploitation in military brothels across Burma, Singapore, and Indonesia.^[66]^[67] Mayor Ara Najarian dedicated the monument as a tribute to "innocent victims of all wars," emphasizing human rights and historical remembrance without specifying nationalities beyond the inscription's reference to over 200,000 Asian and Dutch women.^[64]^[65] U.S. Representative Mike Honda, a co-sponsor of related congressional resolutions, addressed the crowd via video, praising the installation as a step toward justice and accountability.^[65] Initial reception among supporters highlighted themes of redress and awareness, with Korean advocacy groups viewing the event as a milestone in global recognition of the issue, akin to prior U.S. House Resolution 121 passed in 2007 urging Japanese acknowledgment and apology.^[68]^[65] However, the ceremony occurred amid preexisting friction, as Japanese-American organizations and Glendale residents had voiced opposition during the approval process, arguing the statue distorted history by implying state-sponsored slavery without evidence of military coercion and risked straining U.S.-Japan relations.^[56]^[65] Protests by groups like the Global Alliance for Historical Truth, including petitions with thousands of signatures from Japanese-Americans, labeled the monument politically motivated propaganda rather than neutral commemoration, citing documented voluntary recruitment and private brothel operations in wartime records.^[56] City officials proceeded despite these concerns, framing the decision as upholding free speech and private donation rights on public land.^[64]

Legal and Local Controversies

Lawsuits to Remove the Statue

In July 2014, shortly after the statue's installation in Glendale's Central Park, a lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California by plaintiffs including Michiko Gingery, a Japanese-born Glendale resident, the Global Alliance for Historical Truth-US (GAHT-US), and other individuals challenging the City of Glendale's decision to permit the monument.^[69]^[70] The plaintiffs argued that the statue's placement interfered with the federal government's exclusive authority over foreign affairs, as it effectively took a position on the historical controversy surrounding "comfort women" that conflicted with U.S. diplomatic relations with Japan, and thus was preempted by federal law; they also claimed it constituted viewpoint discrimination under the First Amendment by endorsing a specific narrative on public property.^[71]^[72] On August 11, 2014, U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson dismissed the complaint with prejudice, ruling that the plaintiffs had failed to plausibly allege federal preemption, as the monument addressed a matter of local historical commemoration rather than directly conducting foreign policy, and that no First Amendment violation occurred since the city's approval process was content-neutral.^[69]^[73] The plaintiffs appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which on August 4, 2016, affirmed the dismissal in a unanimous decision, holding that Glendale's actions did not encroach on federal prerogatives and that the monument did not establish an impermissible viewpoint on private land leased for public display.^[74]^[75] The plaintiffs petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for certiorari, which on March 27, 2017, declined to hear the case, letting the lower courts' rulings stand and effectively upholding the statue's presence.^[76] In 2018, a separate effort by Japanese American residents and conservative groups sought removal through renewed litigation, but a federal judge dismissed it shortly thereafter, citing the precedents from the prior case.^[77] No successful lawsuits have resulted in the statue's removal as of 2025.^[78]

Opposition from Japanese-American and Local Groups

Japanese-American residents, including lead plaintiff Michiko Shiota Gingery, filed a federal lawsuit in January 2014 against the City of Glendale, seeking the statue's removal on grounds that its installation in a public park violated their First Amendment rights by compelling endorsement of a controversial historical narrative and fostering community division.^[69]^[70] The plaintiffs, described as Japanese and Japanese-American locals, contended the monument promoted anti-Japanese sentiment and interfered with U.S.-Japan relations, with Gingery specifically citing personal distress that deterred her from visiting Central Park.^[77]^[74] The suit was dismissed by a district court in August 2014, upheld by the Ninth Circuit in August 2016, and declined for review by the U.S. Supreme Court in March 2017.^[73]^[75]^[79] Local opposition emerged during the approval process, with Glendale city officials receiving approximately 350 emails against the statue, predominantly from Japanese individuals expressing concerns over its potential to inflame historical tensions.^[61] Around 100 protesters attended the July 9, 2013, city council meeting, voicing objections that the installation would import international discord into a municipal park and undermine community harmony.^[61]^[56] Councilmember Dave Weaver cast the sole opposing vote, arguing the monument risked damaging foreign relations without sufficient local benefit.^[80] Subsequent reports noted thousands of additional objections, reflecting unease among some residents about reopening World War II-era wounds in a diverse suburb.^[73]

Court Rulings and Supreme Court Involvement

In August 2014, U.S. District Judge Fernando M. Gonzalez dismissed a federal lawsuit filed by Glendale residents Edwin Shymansky, Michael Gingery, and others against the City of Glendale, seeking removal of the Peace Monument on grounds that it interfered with U.S. foreign policy toward Japan and violated the First Amendment by constituting government endorsement of a partisan message.^[69] The court ruled that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the monument's installation as private donors placed it on city property under a revocable permit, and no evidence showed a "clear conflict" between local action and federal foreign affairs powers.^[81] Plaintiffs appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which on August 4, 2016, affirmed the district court's dismissal in Gingery v. City of Glendale.^[82] The Ninth Circuit held that while plaintiffs had standing due to alleged injury from restricted use of Central Park, their claims failed because the monument did not preempt federal law, and Glendale's approval did not imply official endorsement sufficient to violate free speech principles, as it functioned as private expression on public land.^[75] The ruling emphasized that municipalities retain discretion over public spaces absent direct federal preemption.^[83] On March 27, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the plaintiffs' petition for writ of certiorari, declining to hear the case and effectively upholding the lower courts' decisions allowing the statue to remain.^[76] This conclusion ended a multi-year legal challenge originating from the statue's July 30, 2013, installation, with no further federal judicial intervention.^[84]

International Diplomatic Reactions

Japanese Government Protests

The Japanese government voiced strong objections to the planned installation of the Statue of Peace in Glendale, California, beginning in early 2014, prior to its unveiling on July 11, 2014. Through diplomatic channels, including communications with U.S. officials and Glendale city authorities, Tokyo urged rejection of the monument, contending that it distorted historical facts by implying systematic state-sponsored sexual slavery without acknowledging Japan's prior apologies, such as the 1993 Kono Statement, and evidence that recruitment often involved private brokers rather than direct military coercion.^[34]^[85] Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga stated in a February 21, 2014, press conference that Japan was "communicating with the U.S. Government and local government concerned" about the statue, emphasizing Tokyo's remorse for wartime human rights violations while highlighting the need for balanced historical representation.^[85] Japanese lawmakers and officials escalated protests by submitting petitions to Glendale's mayor. In February 2014, a group of Japanese Diet members, led by figures associated with historical revisionist views, petitioned U.S. congressional representatives and local officials to block the statue, arguing it inflamed anti-Japanese sentiment and undermined bilateral ties resolved through prior agreements.^[86] The Japanese Consulate General in Los Angeles also lobbied the Glendale City Council directly, warning that the installation would exacerbate diplomatic tensions with South Korea and misrepresent the comfort women issue, which Japan maintains was addressed via financial compensations and official regrets in the post-war period.^[87] Following the statue's erection, Japan supported legal efforts to remove it. Japanese-American residents filed lawsuits against Glendale in 2014, claiming the public monument violated the U.S. Constitution's foreign affairs doctrine by endorsing a foreign policy stance; Tokyo endorsed these actions indirectly through statements affirming the plaintiffs' right to challenge what it viewed as biased symbolism.^[88] In a notable escalation, the Japanese government filed an amicus curiae brief with the U.S. Supreme Court on March 10, 2017, backing the removal during an appeal of lower court rulings upholding the statue, asserting that it interfered with U.S.-Japan relations and perpetuated unverified claims about the scale and nature of wartime brothels, estimated by Japanese historical analyses at involving far fewer coerced participants than activist figures of 200,000.^[89] This intervention drew protests from comfort women advocates but underscored Japan's position that such monuments prioritized victim narratives over evidentiary disputes, including coerced testimonies later questioned for inconsistencies.^[90] Despite these efforts, the Supreme Court declined to hear the case in October 2017, leaving the statue intact.^[88]

Impact on Japan-South Korea Relations

The installation and persistence of the Statue of Peace in Seoul since December 2011, along with replicas such as the one unveiled in Busan on January 3, 2017, have exacerbated historical grievances over the comfort women issue, undermining diplomatic efforts to normalize Japan-South Korea relations.^[10]^[91] Despite the December 28, 2015, agreement in which Japan issued an official apology, acknowledged coercive recruitment, and committed ¥1 billion (approximately $8.3 million) to a foundation supporting surviving victims, South Korean activist groups rejected the deal as insufficient, viewing the statues as symbols of unresolved accountability.^[34]^[92] The Busan statue, placed directly in front of the Japanese consulate, violated the agreement's spirit, which included South Korea's pledge to refrain from elevating the issue internationally and to address statues through consultations.^[10] In response to the Busan installation, Japan took immediate diplomatic measures, including summoning the South Korean ambassador on January 6, 2017, and recalling its own envoy from Seoul for consultations—the first such recall since 2005.^[91] These actions led to the suspension of high-level bilateral dialogues, the cancellation of planned foreign ministerial meetings, and a broader chill in ties, with Japan halting contributions to a joint fund for historical research and expressing concerns over potential threats to visa-free travel agreements.^[10] The incident amplified mutual distrust, as Japanese officials argued the statues politicized a resolved matter—citing prior apologies like the 1993 Kono Statement and multiple compensation funds—while South Korean progressives framed them as evidence of Japan's evasion of full moral responsibility, fueling domestic protests and electoral rhetoric.^[34]^[6] The statues' role in perpetuating the dispute has contributed to cyclical tensions, hindering cooperation on shared security threats like North Korea and economic interdependence, where bilateral trade exceeded $75 billion annually by 2016.^[93] For instance, the unresolved symbolism stalled progress under subsequent South Korean administrations, with the Moon Jae-in government (2017–2022) dissolving the 2015 foundation in 2020 amid victim dissatisfaction, further eroding trust.^[34] Even as relations thawed under President Yoon Suk-yeol from 2023, with resumed military intelligence sharing and shuttle diplomacy, the enduring presence of statues—guarded by weekly vigils in Seoul—serves as a flashpoint, reinforcing nationalist narratives on both sides and complicating alliance dynamics within the U.S.-led framework.^[94] This dynamic illustrates how grassroots memorials, while commemorating individual suffering, have imposed tangible diplomatic costs, prioritizing symbolic redress over pragmatic reconciliation.^[90]

Responses from Other Nations

In the United States, the federal government, including the State Department, has maintained no official position on comfort women statues installed in cities like Glendale, California, where one was unveiled on July 30, 2014, despite petitions urging removal on foreign policy grounds.^[95] Local authorities approved such memorials, and U.S. courts consistently rejected challenges, with a federal district court dismissing a lawsuit in August 2014 and the Supreme Court declining certiorari in March 2017, effectively allowing the statues to remain as matters of municipal discretion rather than national diplomacy.^[69]^[76] Australian federal authorities have not issued diplomatic statements on comfort women statues, such as the one placed outside a church in Melbourne in 2016, where local disputes arose primarily from Japanese-Australian community complaints under racial vilification laws rather than governmental intervention.^[96]^[97] A more recent effort for a Chinese comfort women statue, announced in 2025, faced installation delays due to site rejections but encountered objections mainly from the Japanese consulate-general, with no recorded opposition or endorsement from Canberra.^[98] In Germany, local officials in Berlin's Mitte district responded to Japanese diplomatic appeals by revoking the permit for a Statue of Peace installed on September 29, 2020, shortly after its unveiling, citing risks of public hostility; an administrative court granted a temporary reprieve, extended for two years in November 2022, but as of October 2024, the permit expired amid plans for removal influenced by bilateral discussions, including Berlin Mayor Kai Wegner's comments during a Japan visit and District Mayor Stefanie Remlinger's alignment with public art policies.^[9] This case highlights how Japanese pressure, raised by officials like Foreign Minister Motegi Toshimitsu with counterpart Heiko Maas, prompted concrete administrative action in Europe, contrasting with more passive local handling elsewhere.^[9] China has bolstered the comfort women narrative through state-supported museums in Nanjing and Shanghai Normal University, alongside lawsuits like the May 2024 Shanxi province case by descendants of victims against the Japanese government, implicitly endorsing international memorials as extensions of historical accountability demands, though direct statements on foreign statues remain limited.^[99]^[100] In Hong Kong, authorities affirmed in July 2017 no intent to remove existing statues, framing them as legitimate wartime commemorations.^[101] Other European bodies, including the EU, have not coordinated responses, leaving decisions to municipalities, as seen in Freiburg's 2019 rescission of a proposed memorial amid similar sensitivities.^[102]

Global Spread and Replicas

Inspirations and Installations Worldwide

The Statue of Peace, originally installed in Seoul on December 14, 2011, has inspired replicas and similar memorials in various countries outside South Korea, often erected by Korean diaspora communities or human rights groups to highlight the experiences of women subjected to sexual slavery by the Japanese military during World War II.^[103] These installations, typically bronze figures depicting a seated girl in traditional attire with clenched fists, number at least 16 overseas as of recent counts, with additional memorials in over a dozen locations.^[103] In the United States, the first major city installation occurred in San Francisco on September 22, 2017, marking the initial public Statue of Peace in a prominent American urban center.^[2] By March 2020, sixteen memorials honoring comfort women had been established across the U.S., including sites in Philadelphia, where the statue was approved by the Arts Commission for installation in a public park, and near Washington, D.C., where a replica found placement in 2019 after prolonged efforts.^[104]^[105] Other U.S. examples include installations in cities like Bergen County, New Jersey, and Atlanta, Georgia, often funded through private donations and local Korean-American advocacy.^[104] Europe has seen several placements, with a notable example in Melbourne, Australia, outside the Korean Society of Victoria, serving as a focal point for remembrance activities. In Germany, a Statue of Peace was erected in Berlin's Mitte district in September 2020 by the Korea Verband group, despite legal challenges, while another found a permanent home at the Bonn Women's Museum on June 30, 2025, the world's first museum dedicated to women's art and history.^[106] Italy installed its version on the island of Sardinia in June 2024, described as the 14th such statue outside Korea.^[107] Additional global sites include Shanghai, China, where a memorial statue exists, reflecting broader Asian interest in the issue.^[108] These worldwide installations, frequently modeled after the Seoul original sculpted by artists Kim Seo-kyung and Kim Eun-sung, aim to foster global awareness but have commonly sparked local debates over historical representation and diplomatic sensitivities.^[58]

Removals and Relocations Due to Pressure

![Friedensstatue (3D view)](./assets/Friedensstatue_F%C3%BCr_den_Frieden!_Gegen_sexualisierte_Gewalt! In October 2025, the Friedensstatue ("Statue of Peace") in Berlin's Mitte district, installed in September 2020 to commemorate victims of Japanese military sexual slavery during World War II, was physically removed on October 17 following a higher administrative court ruling upholding the district's order.^[109]^[9] The removal came after sustained diplomatic pressure from the Japanese government, including protests from officials and a direct request from Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in 2023 to eliminate such monuments abroad as they hindered bilateral relations.^[110] The Mitte district office argued the statue's placement violated urban planning laws and lacked proper permits, though critics attributed the action primarily to foreign policy sensitivities rather than procedural issues alone.^[9] The statue was placed in storage, with proposals for relocation to a site on Unionstrasse 8, though no timeline has been confirmed.^[109] Earlier, in March 2023, the University of Kassel in Germany quietly dismantled a bronze statue depicting a comfort woman, erected in 2017 as a symbol of resistance against wartime sexual violence.^[111] The removal occurred without prior public announcement or consultation with donors, prompting accusations from activists that it yielded to pressure from Japanese diplomatic channels and local conservative groups opposing the monument's historical narrative.^[111] University officials cited logistical reasons, including space constraints and maintenance costs, but the abrupt action aligned with broader patterns of contention over similar installations in Europe, where Japanese embassy interventions have influenced public commemorations.^[111] In the Philippines, a comfort women memorial unveiled in Manila's Baywalk area in early 2025 vanished shortly after installation, with observers linking the disappearance to intensified Japanese diplomatic efforts amid strengthening economic ties between Tokyo and Manila.^[112] A similar incident occurred in 2018, when a newly dedicated marker for Filipino comfort women victims was removed overnight from its site, just days after its erection, despite local support; Philippine authorities provided no official explanation, but the timing coincided with Japanese government objections to such symbols as politically motivated distortions of history.^[113]^[114] These cases illustrate how diplomatic pressure, often channeled through bilateral negotiations and quiet lobbying, has led to the curtailment of public memorials, prioritizing relational harmony over historical advocacy in host nations economically dependent on Japan.^[109]

Recent Developments (2023-2025)

In June 2024, Italy installed its first Statue of Peace in Stintino, Sardinia, on public grounds approximately 200 meters from city hall facing the beach, marking the 14th such monument outside South Korea.^[115] The unveiling ceremony occurred on June 22 despite Japanese government efforts to postpone it through diplomatic requests and media reports highlighting opposition.^[116] ^[117] Local mayor Rita L. Vallebella described the statue as a symbol against crimes toward women, with inscriptions calling for Japanese acknowledgment of wartime atrocities.^[118] The Berlin Statue of Peace, erected in 2020 under a temporary permit by the Korea Verband group, faced escalating removal pressures in 2025 after the permit expired on September 28, 2024.^[119] The Mitte district office ordered its removal in September 2025, citing diplomatic friction with Japan and the statue's status as non-permanent public art limited to two years.^[120] ^[121] On October 14, a Berlin administrative court rejected the group's appeal for an injunction, ruling that no sufficient legal grounds existed for retention on public land.^[120] ^[119] The statue was physically removed from its location in Berlin's Mitte district on October 17, 2025, concluding a multi-year standoff initiated by demands from the Japanese embassy.^[109] ^[122] Korean civic groups rallied over 300 participants and gathered thousands of petition signatures to oppose the move, arguing it hindered educational activities, but the court upheld the district's authority over public space usage.^[119] ^[123] In July 2025, multiple UN human rights mechanisms urged Japan to pursue truth, reparations, and memorialization for comfort women victims, referencing survivor testimonies and linking to ongoing disputes like the Berlin case.^[123] No major new installations or removals were reported in 2023, though global tensions persisted amid criticisms of such monuments as conveying disputed historical narratives.^[124]

Vandalism and Ongoing Challenges

Incidents of Defacement

The Statue of Peace, along with its replicas worldwide, has faced multiple acts of vandalism, often involving graffiti, physical damage, or symbolic defacement, typically attributed to opposition against the statue's portrayal of Japanese wartime actions. These incidents highlight ongoing tensions surrounding the comfort women narrative.^[125] In Glendale, California, the Korean Comfort Women Peace Monument in Central Park has been repeatedly targeted. On July 25, 2019, the statue was smeared with an unknown brown substance, prompting a police investigation into the defacement.^[126] Earlier occurrences had also involved vandalism, though specific details on prior counts were not quantified by authorities at the time.^[126] On September 18, 2019, a woman wearing a hoodie used a black marker to scrawl on the statue and overturned nearby flower pots; security footage captured the act, leading to the arrest of Jackie Rita Williams, 65, a local resident charged with vandalism.^[127]^[128] In Seoul, South Korea, the original Statue of Peace near the former Japanese Embassy was physically damaged on May 20, 2020, when a man in his 20s struck it, causing visible harm to the bronze figure symbolizing wartime sexual slavery victims.^[125] A separate 2012 incident involved Japanese politician Junichi Suzuki, who attached a wooden stake to a replica in the same location as a form of protest; as of March 2025, his trial for property damage remained delayed after 13 years, reflecting protracted legal disputes over the act's intent and the statue's status.^[129] More recently, in October 2024, American YouTuber Ramsey Khalid Ismael (known as Johnny Somali) kissed the statue in a provocative manner, drawing public backlash and physical assault against him, though the act itself did not cause structural damage.^[130] In San Francisco, California, a comfort women statue installed in 2017 endured at least four vandalism episodes by September 2018, including deep scratches interpreted by activists as intentional hate crimes rather than random damage.^[131] Such recurring attacks underscore the statues' role as flashpoints, with perpetrators rarely identified publicly beyond arrests in select cases like Glendale's.^[132]

Security Measures and Maintenance Costs

The Statue of Peace in Glendale, California, has been repeatedly vandalized, including an incident on July 25, 2019, when an unknown brown substance was smeared on the monument, and another on September 16, 2019, involving black marker defacement captured by a city-installed security camera.^[126]^[127] These events prompted the deployment of surveillance equipment to monitor the site and aid in identifying perpetrators, with Glendale police filing charges against suspects linked to the attacks.^[133] In Seoul, where the original statue stands before the former Japanese Embassy site, vandalism attempts—such as a 2022 incident involving stakes driven near the base by a Japanese far-right activist—have necessitated police intervention and heightened vigilance during protests, though permanent fencing or dedicated guards are not standard.^[134]^[135] Maintenance efforts following defacement typically involve immediate cleaning by community volunteers or local activists, as seen in Glendale where Korean American residents, including an 80-year-old local, scrubbed the statue after the 2019 substance attack without reported city-funded repairs.^[126] No public records detail quantified annual maintenance budgets for these monuments, which are often funded through private donations from activist groups like the Wednesday Demonstration organizers in Seoul or Korean American civic organizations in the U.S., reflecting the grassroots nature of their upkeep amid diplomatic sensitivities.^[127] Such ad hoc responses underscore the ongoing financial and logistical burdens on supporters, exacerbated by the statues' polarizing status, though exact costs remain undocumented in available reports.

Criticisms and Defenses

Arguments Against the Statue's Narrative

Historians and researchers have argued that the Statue of Peace promotes a simplified and one-sided portrayal of the "comfort women" system, emphasizing mass abductions by the Japanese military while downplaying evidence of private recruitment and contractual arrangements. Japanese government investigations, including those following the 1993 Kono Statement, found documentation confirming the military's role in establishing and managing comfort stations to regulate prostitution and curb venereal diseases among troops, but no central archives proving systematic, widespread kidnappings by soldiers.^[34] Instead, primary sources indicate that most Korean women were recruited through civilian brokers—often Korean intermediaries—who used deception, economic promises, or coercion at the local level, with advances paid as in standard prostitution contracts of the era.^[44] Legal scholar J. Mark Ramseyer has contended, based on surviving contracts from the period, that many women entered multi-year agreements voluntarily for high wages—equivalent to several times a typical factory salary—allowing them to accumulate savings and return home, akin to karayuki-san (overseas Japanese prostitutes) who operated under similar terms before the war. This contract-based framework, he argues, provided credible commitments enforceable by brothel owners and local authorities, contradicting the statue's depiction of uniform enslavement without agency. Critics of the dominant narrative, including Japanese researchers, note that the statue's young, barefoot figure in hanbok evokes virginal innocence, yet records show many recruits were adults in their 20s with prior sex work experience, and stations included women from Japan, China, and elsewhere, not solely Korean victims.^[7] Inconsistencies in survivor testimonies further undermine the statues' absolutist victimhood framing, as seen in cases like Kim Bok-dong, whose accounts varied on details such as her age at recruitment (claimed as 14, 15, or 16 across interviews) and the absence of direct military involvement, instead implicating a village leader and a civilian Japanese man.^[7] South Korean scholars like Kim Byung-heon have highlighted how post-war narratives, amplified by activist groups, retrofitted earlier silence or voluntary elements into abduction stories, often ignoring the 1965 Japan-ROK normalization treaty, which settled compensation claims including for wartime laborers and victims.^[136] This selective emphasis, they argue, serves domestic political ends, perpetuating anti-Japanese sentiment amid Korea's own historical involvement in recruitment via local elites, rather than reflecting the nuanced, economically driven migrations common in impoverished colonial contexts.^[137] The narrative's rigidity overlooks broader causal factors, such as pre-war prostitution networks in Korea and Japan, where poverty drove women into licensed sex work; Japanese colonial records document over 50,000 licensed prostitutes in Korea alone by the 1930s, many transitioning to wartime stations under private management.^[34] While coercion and harsh conditions are acknowledged in declassified military directives—e.g., orders to avoid "undesirable" recruitment methods—the absence of mass abduction evidence, coupled with post-1945 Allied trials yielding few convictions for forced prostitution (focusing instead on individual rapes), suggests the system's primary mechanism was regulated supply to meet demand, not state-orchestrated slavery.^[44] Proponents of this critique, drawing from first-hand diaries and economic analyses, maintain that privileging outlier abduction claims—often from politically motivated testimonies—distorts historical realism, as mainstream academic acceptance of the victim archetype in Western and Korean institutions may stem from ideological aversion to questioning progressive-aligned narratives.^[25]

Supporter Perspectives and Human Rights Framing

Supporters, primarily Korean civil society organizations such as the Korean Council for the Women Drafted for Military Sexual Slavery by Japan, view the Statue of Peace as an essential symbol for upholding the human rights of victims subjected to organized sexual enslavement by the Imperial Japanese military between 1932 and 1945.^[138] They contend that the monument counters attempts to obscure historical facts, insisting that Japan's official acknowledgments, including the 1993 Kono Statement and subsequent agreements, fail to deliver full legal reparations or unconditional apologies, thereby necessitating public memorials to enforce victim-centered justice.^[14] These advocates frame the statues not merely as Korean-specific remembrances but as universal condemnations of wartime sexual violence, equating the "comfort women" system—estimated to have coerced between 20,000 and 410,000 women across Asia into military brothels—to other systematic human rights abuses like those during the Holocaust or Rwandan genocide.^[139] By erecting replicas in cities such as Berlin (2017) and Melbourne (2017), supporters aim to globalize awareness, arguing that such installations transcend nationalism to advocate for protections against sexual exploitation in conflict zones worldwide, regardless of victims' ethnicity or nationality.^[90] Diaspora and student-led groups, including the U.S.-based Students Against Denying the Truth (STAND), emphasize the statues' educational role in fostering intergenerational empathy and accountability, portraying them as tools for dismantling silence around gender-based violence and pressuring states to prioritize survivor testimonies over diplomatic expediency.^[140] This human rights lens, they assert, aligns with international norms under frameworks like the UN's conventions on genocide and slavery, though critics within academic discourse note that activist sources often amplify victim numbers and coercion evidence drawing from survivor accounts rather than exhaustive archival verification.^[14]

Effects on Historical Reconciliation Efforts

The erection of the Statue of Peace in Seoul on December 14, 2011, outside the Japanese Embassy, immediately escalated tensions in Japan-South Korea diplomatic relations, as Japan viewed the permanent installation as a provocative symbol that glorified a contested historical narrative and impeded mutual acknowledgment of wartime responsibilities.^[10] The statue's presence contributed to the politicization of the comfort women issue, transforming bilateral discussions from state-level apologies and compensations into public confrontations, with Japanese officials repeatedly protesting its defamatory implications against the Imperial Japanese Army.^[34] Central to reconciliation efforts was the December 28, 2015, agreement between Japan and South Korea, under which Japan provided 1 billion yen (approximately 8.3 million USD) to a South Korean foundation for victim support, accompanied by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's expression of "pain" and "sorrow" over the issue, with both sides declaring it "resolved finally and irreversibly."^[34] In exchange, South Korea committed to refraining from criticizing Japan internationally and to "efforts to resolve" the statue's placement before the embassy, recognizing it as an obstacle to healing.^[141] However, the statue remained in place, and subsequent installations in cities like Busan (2015) and Glendale, California (2013), prompted Japanese diplomatic protests, boycotts of Korean tourism, and the suspension of high-level talks, as Tokyo argued that the memorials violated the agreement's spirit by perpetuating demands for further atonement.^[10]^[142] The agreement's collapse accelerated under South Korea's Moon Jae-in administration, which in January 2018 dissolved the reconciliation foundation and reclassified the deal as non-binding, citing victim dissatisfaction and the unresolved symbolism of the statues, which Korean activists framed as essential reminders of unaddressed justice rather than barriers to closure.^[143] This reversal fueled Japanese skepticism toward future pacts, with Foreign Minister Taro Kono stating in 2018 that the statues undermined trust built through prior concessions, including the 1965 normalization treaty's reparations and multiple official apologies.^[34] Empirical indicators of strained reconciliation include a 2019 Gallup Korea poll showing only 28% of South Koreans viewing Japan positively, partly attributed to comfort women memorials, alongside economic retaliations like Japan's 2019 export controls on materials to Korean firms, linked by analysts to historical disputes amplified by such symbols.^[142] Proponents of the statues, including Korean NGOs, contend they foster genuine reconciliation by pressuring Japan toward fuller accountability, yet critics, including Japanese historians and diplomats, argue they entrench a victim-perpetrator binary that ignores evidentiary complexities—such as voluntary elements in some recruitments documented in wartime records—thus prioritizing activist narratives over diplomatic pragmatism and verifiable historical closure.^[141]^[143] By 2023, under President Yoon Suk-yeol, South Korea reaffirmed the 2015 deal's validity and pursued alternative victim compensations without additional Japanese funds, but the enduring statues continued to symbolize incomplete trust, as evidenced by Japan's persistent calls for their relocation during bilateral summits.^[34] This dynamic has arguably prolonged cycles of recrimination, diverting focus from cooperative frameworks like the 2023 Camp David trilateral with the U.S. toward symbolic standoffs.^[142]

Legacy and Broader Impact

Influence on Public Memory

The Statue of Peace, erected in Seoul on December 14, 2011, has profoundly shaped South Korean public memory of the comfort women issue by serving as a persistent visual anchor for collective remembrance, with weekly Wednesday demonstrations held at the site drawing thousands over the years to demand Japanese acknowledgment and reparations.^[4] This enduring presence in public space reinforces a national narrative framing the women as emblematic victims of systematic Imperial Japanese military coercion during World War II, embedding the story in civic rituals and education that emphasize unresolved injustice over historical nuances such as recruitment via private brokers or voluntary enlistments documented in wartime records.^[6] ^[34] Transnationally, the replication of the statue in over 20 locations—including Glendale, California (2013); Berlin, Germany (2017); and Melbourne, Australia—has disseminated this memory to diaspora communities and international audiences, often portraying the events as a universal human rights atrocity tied to wartime sexual violence rather than a bilateral Korea-Japan dispute.^[144] These installations activate local activism, as seen in Sydney where community events around the statue foster "decolonial" interpretations that prioritize survivor testimonies and symbolic solidarity, influencing perceptions among younger generations unfamiliar with primary historical sources.^[145] However, empirical evidence from diplomatic fallout, such as the 2017 statue installation in Busan sparking a bilateral crisis that halted high-level talks, indicates the memorials exacerbate divisions, with Japanese analyses citing a lack of corroboration for mass abductions in official archives, thus entrenching polarized memories that impede empirical reconciliation efforts.^[91] ^[146] In terms of broader perceptual shifts, surveys and reports reflect heightened awareness in host countries— for instance, U.S. installations have correlated with increased media coverage and public discourse on Asian wartime atrocities—but also local backlash, as in Osaka's 2019 petition drive against a sister statue, where residents viewed it as imported political symbolism distorting neutral historical inquiry.^[103] This dynamic underscores how the statues prioritize emotive, testimonial-based memory over archival verification, potentially sidelining evidence from Allied investigations post-1945 that identified comfort stations as regulated brothels rather than exclusive slave camps, thereby sustaining a selective collective memory attuned to advocacy goals.^[34] ^[147]

Role in Transnational Activism

The Statue of Peace has facilitated transnational activism by enabling Korean diaspora groups and allied human rights organizations to extend the "comfort women" redress campaign globally, using monument installations as symbols of victim solidarity and calls for Japanese accountability. Originating from the 2011 Seoul statue commemorating the 1,000th Wednesday Demonstration, over 80 similar statues have been erected worldwide by 2023, often through grassroots efforts by local Korean communities and NGOs like Project Sonyeo, which emphasize wartime sexual violence awareness.^[148]^[2] These monuments serve as venues for protests, vigils, and educational programs, linking local activism to international human rights frameworks. In the United States, statues such as the 2014 Glendale, California installation—organized by Korean American advocates—have supported legislative pushes, including U.S. House resolutions condemning the Imperial Japanese Army's practices and urging reparations, reflecting intergenerational mobilization by groups like student organizations at Yale.^[149]^[140] In Australia, the 2017 Melbourne statue outside the Korean Society of Victoria embodies transgenerational truth-telling, framing the issue within decolonial narratives of gender-based wartime violence.^[6] European examples underscore the statues' role in bridging national and global interpretations; the 2017 Berlin installation, backed by Korean expatriates, sparked debates over nationalist versus universal human rights readings, garnering civil society endorsements despite diplomatic pressures.^[15]^[14] In Germany, activism persisted, leading to a permanent Bonn statue unveiled in 2023 amid chants of "Frieden" (peace), highlighting sustained transnational efforts to memorialize victims independently of bilateral agreements.^[106] Overall, these initiatives have amplified demands for historical reckoning through public memory tools, though they often intensify Japan-South Korea tensions by prioritizing victim narratives over resolved treaties like the 1965 normalization accord.^[144]

References

[1]
Statue of Peace in Seoul - South Korea - - Contested Histories
Jan 11, 2022 · The Statue of Peace in Seoul, South Korea, is among the most iconic and contested statues dedicated to 'comfort women', a euphemism for women who were sexually ...
[2]
Statue of Peace | Project Sonyeo
The Statue of Peace symbolizes women who were forced into sexual slavery. The statue is about the women who have publicly shared their experiences and ...
[3]
Imaging "Comfort Women": Girl Statue of Peace (2011 ... - DukeSpace
1931-1945). Created by artists Kim Seo-kyung and Kim Eun-sung, the Girl Statue is a life-size, bronze, freestanding sculpture of an empty chair next to a ...
[4]
[PDF] South Korea: Statue of Peace in Seoul - - Contested Histories
On December 14, 2011, a life-size bronze statue of a seated young girl was installed across the street from the Japanese Embassy in Seoul, South Korea.
[5]
2 Statues of Peace in Europe remember sexual slavery victims
Aug 23, 2024 · In 2011, the first Statue of Peace was installed in Seoul. Created by artists Kim Seo-kyung and Kim Eun-sung, the sculpture carried high ...
[6]
Memorials' politics: Exploring the material rhetoric of the Statue of ...
Jun 22, 2021 · Installed in 2011 to commemorate so-called “comfort women”—the former sex slaves forced to work in brothels during Korea's occupation by the ...
[7]
The Truth About Comfort Women Statues: Setting the Record Straight
Aug 31, 2023 · They symbolize Korean women who were allegedly abducted and sexually enslaved by the Japanese military as comfort women during the Pacific War.
[8]
South Korean and Japanese Diplomatic Crisis over Comfort Women ...
The statue depicts a 'comfort woman,' a reference to the thousands of women, many Korean, who were forced into sexual slavery by the Japanese Imperial ...<|separator|>
[9]
Berlin's Peace Statue Faces Removal Amid Japanese Pressure
Oct 21, 2024 · The statue, which commemorates the “comfort women” of World War II, has embroiled the local government in a minor diplomatic controversy.
[10]
Comfort women: How the statue of a young girl caused a diplomatic ...
Feb 5, 2017 · This statue has sparked international incidents, threatened trade deals, and exposed deep and bitter rifts between Japan and South Korea that go back more than ...
[11]
'Comfort Woman' Memorial Statues, A Thorn In Japan's Side, Now ...
Nov 13, 2017 · She has short, cropped hair and wears a hanbok, a traditional Korean dress. She's barefoot. Next to her is an empty chair. She's known as the ...
[12]
The Politics of the “Comfort Women” statue - mundane militarisms
Made by Kim Seo-Kyung and Kim Eun Sung, it is a piece of artwork that portrays a young girl wearing a hanbok (traditional Korean clothing) sitting on a bench.<|separator|>
[13]
[PDF] PHOTO ESSAY: Two Fates of the Statue of Peace
Created in 2011 by South Korean artists. Kim Seo-kyung and Kim Eun-sung, the statue commemorates the “comfort women” who were forced into sexual slavery by the ...Missing: material | Show results with:material
[14]
The Statue of Peace in Berlin: How the Nationalist Reading of ...
Feb 15, 2022 · This article examines how the conflict between a national and a transnational understanding of the “comfort women” experience played out in Berlin.
[15]
The many meanings of the 'Statue of Peace' in Berlin - Korea.net
The girl in the statue wears traditional Korean clothing but the empty seat next to her can be interpreted as a space to imagine fellow victims from other ...Missing: barefoot hanbok
[16]
The Brutal History of Japan's 'Comfort Women'
Feb 20, 2018 · Between 1932 and 1945, Japan forced women from Korea, China and other occupied countries to become military sex slaves.
[17]
Legalization and Justification · Narratives of World War II in the Pacific
During World War Two, the Japanese government and army saw it fit to establish stations that would bring a source of comfort for their military across the ...
[18]
On the Issue of "Comfort Women" | Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan
Aug 4, 1993 · During Prime Minister Miyazawa's visit to the Republic of Korea in January 1992, the issue was brought up in the meeting between the Prime ...
[19]
WHY FAILING TO DETER 1930S IMPERIAL JAPAN STILL MATTERS
Aug 2, 2024 · On July 7, 1937, units of Imperial Japan's Kwantung Army conducted a military exercise along China's northern border near the Marco Polo Bridge.Missing: ianjo | Show results with:ianjo<|separator|>
[20]
Teaching about the Comfort Women during World War II and the ...
“Comfort women” refers to the system of sexual slavery created and controlled by the Imperial Japanese government between 1932 and 1945.
[21]
Japan's Quest for Power and World War II in Asia
Many of the young soldiers mobilized into the Japanese army by the early 1930s came from the rural areas, where the effects of the depression were devastating ...
[22]
UCLA CKS - Comfort Women Resource Center
The Japanese military “comfort women” system is one of the largest known institutions of state-sponsored human trafficking and sexual slavery in the 20th ...
[23]
Government, the Military and Business in Japan's Wartime Comfort ...
Jan 2, 2007 · This article deals with the Japanese Imperial Government's and Military's involvement in the wartime military comfort woman system (1931-1945)
[24]
Reconstructing the History of the “Comfort Women” System
Mar 1, 2021 · Key words: comfort women; China; sex slaves; Japanese military; comfort stations; historical memory. Translator's Introduction. Professor Su ...
[25]
Seeking the True Story of the Comfort Women | The New Yorker
Feb 25, 2021 · Ramseyer had made his views clear in “Contracting for Sex in the Pacific War,” an article published online, in December, by the peer-reviewed ...<|separator|>
[26]
Researching the Indonesian so called 'Comfort Women' during the ...
Oct 24, 2017 · Researching the Indonesian so called 'Comfort Women' during the Japanese Occupation of the Netherlands East Indies: Between the Archives and ...
[27]
TS-18. Jan Ruff O'Herne, An Australian survivor from Dutch East Indies
The UCLA Center for the Study of International Migration seeks to foster research and instruction on international migration.Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
[28]
[PDF] The "Comfort Women" Controversy: History and Testimony
Jul 6, 2005 · Hearing her story on. Japanese television, historian Yoshimi Yoshiaki went straight to the archives of the Self-. Defense Agency (Boeicho), ...
[29]
[PDF] Listen to the Voices of the Women
Dec 5, 2022 · Their testimonies describe fraudulent offers of employment, kidnappings, beatings, torture, trafficking, and ultimately, sexual slavery.<|separator|>
[30]
Who were the Comfort Women?-The Establishment of Comfort ...
The comfort stations were first established at the request of the Japanese military authorities, as part of war efforts in China. According to military ...
[31]
Contracting for sex in the Pacific War - ScienceDirect.com
The women and brothels concluded indenture contracts that coupled (i) a large advance with one- or two-year maximum terms, with (ii) an ability for the women ...
[32]
Psychiatric Sequelae of Former “Comfort Women,” Survivors of ... - NIH
Apr 18, 2018 · This article reviews all the studies that have investigated the psychiatric or psychosocial sequelae of the survivors of the Japanese military sexual slavery.Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
[33]
[PDF] Comfort women: The unrelenting oppression during and after WWII
the government and its soldiers. 5 Yuki Tanaka, Japan's Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery and Prostitution During WWII and the US. Occupation (New York: ...
[34]
Japan's Efforts on the Issue of Comfort Women
The Government of Japan has made every effort as mentioned above. (2) Furthermore, as a result of great diplomatic efforts, the Governments of Japan and the ROK ...
[35]
A Guide to Understanding the History of the 'Comfort Women' Issue
Sep 16, 2022 · The historical sexual slavery system that operated in the 1930s and 1940s occurred throughout the entirety of the Japanese empire, beginning in ...<|separator|>
[36]
https://international.ucla.edu/cks/care/overview/251594
[37]
TS-2. Hak-sun Kim, a Korean survivor who first broke silence ...
On August 14, 1991, Kim publicly testified about her enslavement by the Japanese military during the war, opening the door for many other survivors to come out ...
[38]
Overlooked No More: Kim Hak-soon, Who Broke the Silence for ...
Oct 21, 2021 · Her public testimony about the horrors of sexual slavery that Japan had engineered for its World War II military encouraged other survivors ...
[39]
Comfort Women: Japan's Brutal Regime of Enforced Prostitution in ...
... system of rape by the Imperial Japanese Forces. Thousands of women, from ... comfort system across Asia. In February 1993 a group of Japanese scholars ...
[40]
Comfort Women: A Bibliography - Asian Studies - Research Guides
Oct 9, 2025 · Contains the testimony of Jo Yoon-ok, who was a comfort woman of the Japanese Army. It is a historical biography that was completed through ...
[41]
Statement by the Chief Cabinet Secretary
Aug 4, 1993 · The Government of Japan has been conducting a study on the issue of wartime comfort women since December 1991. I wish to announce the findings as a result of ...Missing: English | Show results with:English
[42]
[PDF] Statement by the Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono on the result ...
Feb 5, 2015 · Statement by the Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei. Kono on the result of the study on the issue of. "comfort women". August 4, 1993. The Government ...
[43]
Japan's 'Comfort Women': It's time for the truth (in the ordinary ...
The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus is a peer-reviewed publication, providing critical analysis of the forces shaping the Asia-Pacific and the world ...
[44]
Comfort Women: The Economics of the Contracts and the Politics of ...
Apr 16, 2021 · Ramseyer, J. Mark, Comfort Women: The Economics of the Contracts and the Politics of the Dispute (February 3, 2020). Available at SSRN ...
[45]
Contracting for sex in the Pacific War - Harvard Law School
The protracted political dispute between South Korea and Japan over the wartime brothels called "comfort stations" obscures the contractual dynamics involved.
[46]
Harvard Professor's Paper on the Comfort Women Issue Survives
Feb 8, 2023 · Those sources, Professor Ramseyer argues, make it clear that Korean and Japanese comfort women worked under contracts with their brothels during ...<|separator|>
[47]
Diary of a Japanese Military Comfort Station Manager - Wikipedia
According to An Byeong-jik, the diary provides clear evidence that the military ... ^ Jump up to: "Korean's war brothel diaries offer new details". The ...Background · Contents of the diary · Reception and debate · Release details
[48]
Contracting for Sex in the Pacific War: A Response to My Critics
Jan 31, 2022 · The claim is false: Korean women were not programmatically and forcibly conscripted by Japanese soldiers in Korea into comfort station work.
[49]
Number of Comfort Stations and Comfort Women
Comfort Stations spread all over Asia. In a report of the head of Reward Section of the War Ministry dated September 3, 1942, we can read such passage: ...<|separator|>
[50]
[PDF] Fact Sheet on Japanese Military “Comfort Women” - Japan Focus
May 11, 2015 · "Comfort women" is a historical term referring to women who were forced to provide sexual service to Japanese soldiers at military brothels.
[51]
No comfort in the truth: It's the episode of history Japan would rather ...
Apr 9, 2018 · As of 2016, 239 women had registered with the South Korean government as victims of Japanese military sexual slavery. Nine of them, now aged ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
[52]
US-11 Japanese Prisoner of War Interrogation Report No. 49
120 report[US-2].This report summarizes the interrogations of 20 former Korean “comfort women” who were captured as POWs in Myitkyina area, northern Burma ( ...<|separator|>
[53]
[PDF] Inconsistencies in the Korean Comfort Women Narrative
Mar 7, 2019 · Asahi Shimbun to withdraw a series of articles on the comfort women that was based on the false testimony of Seiji. Yoshida, who was ...Missing: fabrications | Show results with:fabrications
[54]
Full article: Silenced narratives of 'comfort women': Japanese ...
Apr 28, 2025 · The narratives of Japanese comfort women as gendered imperial subjects reveal that militarism and nationalism work hand in hand to mercilessly ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
[55]
What the World Owes the Comfort Women | SpringerLink
Feb 11, 2021 · As prime minister in 2006–07, Abe denied that the comfort women had suffered “coercion in any narrow sense”—something that his own party had ...Missing: motivation | Show results with:motivation
[56]
The Continuing Battle Over Glendale's 'Comfort Women' Statue | LAist
Feb 21, 2014 · Phyllis Kim, spokeswoman for the Korean American Forum of California, which helped pay for the $30,000 metal sculpture, said her group would not ...Missing: advocacy | Show results with:advocacy
[57]
Statue Brings Friction Over WWII Comfort Women To California - NPR
Jul 29, 2013 · A sculpture memorializing the East Asian women forced to provide sex to Japanese soldiers during World War II is causing a stir in Glendale, ...
[58]
Glendale to dedicate controversial "comfort women" statue Tuesday
Jul 30, 2013 · The $30,000 for the statue was raised by Korean community groups, which have vowed to erect similar monuments in other cities. An effort to ...Missing: advocacy | Show results with:advocacy
[59]
Sites of Contention: Statue of Peace and Korean Comfort Women ...
Dec 16, 2019 · Funded by private donations, this peace monument was first installed in front of the Japanese Embassy in Seoul in 2011, and has since been ...
[60]
Glendale Approves Comfort Women Memorial - Rafu Shimpo
Jul 15, 2013 · The Glendale City Council on July 9 approved plans for a monument dedicated to Korean “comfort women” to be located in Central Park.
[61]
Glendale approves 'comfort woman' statue despite opposition - ABC13
Jul 11, 2013 · Despite the opposition, the city council voted 4-1 for the monument. Mayor Dave Weaver was the only dissenting vote. The $30,000 statue, paid ...
[62]
Glendale approves Korean 'comfort woman' statue despite protest
Jul 9, 2013 · Despite significant opposition both overseas and locally, the City Council Tuesday approved a 1,110-pound monument honoring Korean women ...Missing: process | Show results with:process
[63]
The History of the Memorial - Peace Monument of Glendale
The Peace Monument of Glendale was unveiled on July 30th of 2013, in Central Park near the Glendale Public Library.
[64]
[PDF] COMFORT WOMEN MONUMENT UNVEILED IN GLENDALE
Aug 2, 2013 · Over strong objections from Japan and local Japanese residents, the City Council approved the monument on July 9. International interest in ...
[65]
Glendale unveils 'comfort women' statue, honors 'innocent victims'
Jul 30, 2013 · Glendale unveils 'comfort women' statue, honors 'innocent victims'. Glendale officials dedicate a controversial "comfort women" memorial.Missing: date | Show results with:date
[66]
Comfort Women Monument Unveiled in Glendale - Rafu Shimpo
Aug 2, 2013 · Mike Honda of San Jose, who was not present at Tuesday's ceremony but addressed participants via video during a reception before the ceremony.Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
[67]
Glendale Statue Remembers Korean “Comfort Women” in WWII
Jul 30, 2013 · A statue unveiled Tuesday in Glendale honors the thousands of Korean women who historians say were forced to be sex sales for Japanese soldiers ...Missing: reception | Show results with:reception
[68]
Comfort woman attends monument unveiling in U.S.
Jul 31, 2013 · Kim Bok-dong, a 88-year-old Korean woman who was held as a sex slave by the Japanese Imperial Army during World War II, attended a ceremony to unveil a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[69]
Unveiling of 'comfort women' memorial in Glendale, Calif.
Hundreds of people gathered at Glendale Central Park near Los Angeles on July 30 to witness the unveiling of the first “comfort women” ...
[70]
Federal judge upholds 'comfort women' statue in Glendale park
Aug 11, 2014 · A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed against Glendale that sought the removal of a controversial statue installed in a city park to honor women ...
[71]
Gingery et al. v. City of Glendale
While maintaining that they were not arguing over historical accuracy of the comfort women story, plaintiffs alleged that Glendale's decision to enact the ...
[72]
GAHT US v. City of Glendale, a municipal corporation, Defendant ...
The district court concluded that Plaintiffs had failed to state a claim that Glendale's installation of the Comfort Women monument is preempted under the ...
[73]
Opposition to Comfort Women Memorials in the United States
Feb 28, 2019 · ... Statue of Peace” that Glendale erected in the city's Central Park. In a talk that GAHT founder Koichi Mera delivered to foreign press ...Missing: donors | Show results with:donors
[74]
Federal court judge dismisses lawsuit against Glendale's Comfort ...
Aug 28, 2017 · The city received thousands of e-mails and objections from some Japanese-Americans who said during council meetings that comfort women did not ...
[75]
9th Cir. Lets 'Comfort Women' Statue Stand
(CN) - The Ninth Circuit on Thursday affirmed dismissal of a lawsuit demanding that Glendale dismantle a public monument to South Korean "comfort women" forced ...
[76]
Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Glendale's 'Comfort Women' Statue
Aug 14, 2016 · The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit on Aug. 4 upheld a lower court's ruling against a lawsuit seeking removal of the “comfort women” ...<|separator|>
[77]
Supreme Court Declines Case Over Lawsuit to Remove 'Comfort ...
Mar 31, 2017 · The Supreme Court on Monday denied the review of a case seeking the removal of a “comfort women” memorial in a Southern California city.
[78]
Glendale's monument to comfort women comes under attack — again
Jul 30, 2018 · A few weeks after a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit seeking the bronze statue's removal by a conservative group of residents of Japanese ...
[79]
Remembering 'Grandma Lee,' who defended Glendale's monument ...
May 17, 2025 · In Glendale today, Korean American groups pay tribute to one of the last survivors of Japan's wartime sexual slavery.
[80]
U.S. top court dismisses appeal over 'comfort women' statue in Calif
The U.S. Supreme Court on March 27 rejected an appeal filed by Japanese Americans seeking removal of a statue in ...<|separator|>
[81]
Japanese councilman opposes Glendale's comfort women memorial
Nov 18, 2013 · Opponents are angered by the statue even as many former comfort women have publicly shared disturbing stories of their servitude. The Japanese ...
[82]
Gingery v. City of Glendale | B264209 | Cal. Ct. App. | Judgment | Law
The trial court found: "Plaintiffs' Complaint provides no well-pleaded allegations of the required 'clear conflict' between the federal government's foreign ...
[83]
Gingery v. City of Glendale, No. 14-56440 (9th Cir. 2016) - Justia Law
Aug 4, 2016 · The City of Glendale installed a public monument in 2013 commemorating the “Comfort Women,” an unknown number of women that South Korea ...
[84]
Court rules in favor of memorial to comfort women - Los Angeles Times
Aug 4, 2016 · An appellant court ruling on Thursday upheld the dismissal of a case against a memorial statue in Glendale dedicated to as many as 200000 ...
[85]
City News | City of Glendale, CA
Mar 29, 2017 · Substantively, the court ruled that the plaintiffs could not articulate a clear conflict between the City's approval of the monument and the ...Missing: rulings | Show results with:rulings<|separator|>
[86]
Press Conference by the Chief Cabinet Secretary Friday, February ...
Feb 21, 2014 · REPORTER: I would like to ask a question in relation to developments concerning the statue of a comfort woman in Glendale. Local Japanese- ...
[87]
Japan MPs Send 'Comfort Women' Memorial Petition to ... - World
Feb 25, 2014 · Supporters of the memorials say as many as 200,000 women from Korea and other Asian countries were forced to work as so-called comfort women.
[88]
Japan protests over US 'comfort women' statue - Al Jazeera
Jan 16, 2014 · Now the Japanese government is protesting against the new statue and calling for it to be removed. Al Jazeera's Rob Reynolds reports from ...Missing: statements | Show results with:statements
[89]
Diplomatic Bluebook ｜ The Issue of Comfort Women
1. The comfort woman statue installed in the City of Glendale, California, is subject to a lawsuit filed against the City of Glendale by Japanese residents of ...
[90]
Advocates Protest After Japan Files Court Brief Supporting Removal ...
Mar 13, 2017 · Demonstrators protest at a statue honoring World War II-era "comfort women" after the government of Japan filed an amicus brief with the Supreme ...
[91]
'Comfort women must fall'? Japanese governmental responses to ...
Dec 9, 2021 · This article discusses four cases around the world in which Japanese government officials have demanded the removal of comfort women statues: 1) ...
[92]
'Comfort Woman' Statue Sparks Diplomatic Row Between Japan ...
Jan 6, 2017 · The statue in front of the Japanese Consulate, commemorating the plight of Korean women forced by the Japanese to work as sex slaves during ...
[93]
Comfort women deal with Japan ignored victims, says S Korea - BBC
Dec 27, 2017 · South Korea in turn said it would look into removing the statues symbolising comfort women set up by activists outside Japan's embassy in Seoul ...
[94]
Visualising Korea: The Politics of the Statue of Peace
Nov 8, 2020 · The Japanese imperial army's system of military sexual servitude/military prostitution has long influenced the relationship between Japan ...
[95]
Five Insights into the 'Comfort Women' Protest Movement in South ...
Mar 30, 2021 · Protesters demand that Japan express a sincere apology for past atrocities during Japanese colonial rule, including for the 'comfort women'.
[96]
[PDF] US Comfort Women Memorials: Vehicles for Understanding Change
New Jersey, the State Department has not taken an official position on domestic comfort women memorials, even when pressed to do so. When a petition was ...
[97]
The big row over a small Australian statue - BBC News
Dec 20, 2016 · How a mild-looking sculpture outside an Australian church is fuelling international tension.
[98]
Race complaint lodged over 'comfort women' statue in Australian ...
Dec 15, 2016 · A Japanese community group in Australia has lodged a legal complaint under racial vilification laws objecting to a statue commemorating ...Missing: Melbourne | Show results with:Melbourne
[99]
Australia's first Chinese WWII comfort women statue ... - ABC News
Aug 31, 2025 · In a statement, the consulate-general in Melbourne said the comfort women issue had been legally settled and Japan's government had taken ...
[100]
Commemorating the peace or remembering the war? - Inside Story
Sep 5, 2025 · Memorials to the violence against “comfort women” risk being hijacked by competitive victimhood.
[101]
The message behind China's high-profile “comfort women” lawsuit ...
May 30, 2024 · The children of 18 deceased former Chinese comfort women filed a historic lawsuit against Tokyo in the high court of China's Shanxi province.
[102]
No plans to remove 'comfort women' statues in Hong Kong | AP News
Jul 13, 2017 · Hong Kong's government says police have no plans to remove a pair of statues depicting World War II Japanese army sex slaves known as ...
[103]
Telling the Story of the Comfort Women - E-International Relations
Mar 18, 2019 · The decision by Freiburg to rescind its plan for a comfort women memorial suggests that, like their American counterparts, European political ...
[104]
Comfort Statues Worldwide Fuels Local Social Friction
against the erection of statues and the Moon Jae In regime policies toward Japan — ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[105]
Map of "Comfort Women" Memorials in the United States
As of March 2020, there are sixteen memorials honoring “comfort women” in the United States. See below for their locations and installation dates.Missing: worldwide | Show results with:worldwide
[106]
'Statue of Peace' finally gets nesting spot near Washington - Korea.net
Oct 28, 2019 · The Statue of Peace, a replica of a girl who symbolizes women forced into sexual slavery for the Japanese imperial army, has finally found a ...
[107]
Statue of Peace finds permanent home in Bonn - The Korea Herald
Jun 30, 2025 · The statue has now found a permanent home at the Bonn Women's Museum, the world's first museum dedicated to women's art and history, established in 1981.
[108]
'Comfort women' statue to go up on Italian shore, the 14th outside of ...
Jun 20, 2024 · The Italian island of Sardinia, which sits in the Mediterranean, is installing its own Statue of Peace dedicated to victims of Japan's “comfort women” system ...Missing: worldwide | Show results with:worldwide
[109]
'Comfort women' statues around the world | CNN
Jan 12, 2017 · Other memorials to "comfort women" also exist around the world, including this statue in Shanghai, China.Missing: worldwide | Show results with:worldwide
[110]
https://justiceforcomfortwomen.org/2024/08/28/berlin-borough-orders-removal-of-comfort-women-statue-following-pressure-from-japan/
[111]
Berlin borough orders removal of 'comfort women' statue following ...
Aug 28, 2024 · The office's push for the statue's removal comes amid widespread pressure from Japan to remove the statue, with even the Japanese prime minister ...
[112]
German university quietly removes “comfort women” statue amid ...
Mar 13, 2023 · The University of Kassel in central Germany on Thursday suddenly removed a statue dedicated to victims of Imperial Japan's sexual slavery system.
[113]
Removal of Comfort Woman Statue in Manila Baywalk - Facebook
Apr 9, 2025 · However, the statue's sudden disappearance drew criticism, with many attributing its removal to diplomatic pressure from Japan. Despite ...<|separator|>
[114]
r/japan on Reddit: New 'comfort women' memorial removed from ...
Apr 28, 2018 · A new memorial dedicated to the Philippines "Comfort women" forced into Japan's military brothels before and during World War II was removed Friday night.Berlin borough orders removal of 'comfort women' statue following ...German university quietly removes “comfort women” statue amid ...More results from www.reddit.comMissing: relocations | Show results with:relocations
[115]
CWJC Statement Concerning the Removal of the “Comfort Women ...
May 5, 2018 · By removing the statue, they denied the history of over 1000 Filipina women who were wrenched from their homes during the Japanese occupation ...Missing: Melbourne | Show results with:Melbourne
[116]
Italy's first 'Statue of Peace' boosts universal women's rights : Korea.net
Jun 24, 2024 · A ceremony was held in Stintino, a city on the Italian resort island of Sardinia, to unveil the European country's first Statue of Peace.
[117]
Statue of Peace unveiled in Italy despite opposition from Japanese ...
Jun 24, 2024 · The Italian island of Sardinia erected a Statue of Peace dedicated to victims of Japan's system of sexual slavery on Saturday (local time).
[118]
A "Statue of Peace" has been installed at a seaside resort on ...
Jun 23, 2024 · Japan obstructed the installation of the statue by asking Stintino City to postpone the unveiling ceremony and reporting negative media reports.
[119]
'Comfort women' statue to go up on Italian shore, the 14th outside of ...
Jun 27, 2024 · The Italian island of Sardinia, which sits in the Mediterranean, is installing its own Statue of Peace dedicated to victims of Japan's “comfort women” system ...Missing: developments | Show results with:developments
[120]
Berlin court upholds order to remove 'comfort women' statue
Oct 15, 2025 · The permit has since expired, and the Berlin Mitte District Office ordered its removal, citing concerns of diplomatic friction with Japan. Korea ...Missing: developments 2023 2024
[121]
Court rejects appeal to keep 'comfort women' statue in Berlin
Oct 14, 2025 · A court in Germany has ordered the removal of a statue of a girl symbolizing those referred to as wartime comfort women in the capital, ...Missing: developments | Show results with:developments
[122]
S. Korea group's "comfort women" statue removed in Berlin after ...
Oct 18, 2025 · A statue symbolizing women forced to work in Japanese military brothels during World War II was removed from public land in Berlin's Mitte ...
[123]
German Authorities Remove Comfort Women Statue | Nippon.com
Oct 17, 2025 · The district had initially allowed the statue to be installed but decided to remove it, as it remained in place beyond the one-year period ...
[124]
Update on Berlin Statue of Peace & UN Human Rights Bodies ...
Sep 16, 2025 · UN Human Rights Bodies Demand Resolution of the “Comfort Women” Issue (July 2025). In July 2025, multiple UN Human Rights mechanisms formally ...
[125]
With Comfort Women Installations, Germany, UK are Hosting Anti ...
Jul 18, 2025 · The Japanese government should strongly urge relevant agencies in those countries to remove the comfort women panels and statues.Missing: nations | Show results with:nations
[126]
Statue of Peace vandalized - The Korea Herald
May 20, 2020 · Statue of Peace vandalized ... The Statue of Peace, a symbol of Japan's World War II-era atrocities and sexual slavery, was damaged Wednesday by a ...Missing: incidents | Show results with:incidents
[127]
Glendale's comfort-women statue vandalized with unknown brown ...
Jul 25, 2019 · It's unknown who vandalized the statue ... She said it's not the first time the statue has been targeted by vandals, although a specific number of ...
[128]
Security Camera Captures 'Comfort Women' Statue Vandal in ...
Sep 18, 2019 · Anyone with information about the vandalism was urged to call the Glendale Police Department at 818-548-4911. Copyright City News Service. This ...
[129]
Woman charged with vandalism of California "comfort woman" statue
Oct 2, 2019 · Jackie Rita Williams, 65, a resident of Glendale in Southern California, allegedly defaced the Korean Comfort Women Monument located in Glendale's Central Park ...
[130]
13 Years On, Trial of Japanese Politician for Defacing 'Comfort ...
Mar 13, 2025 · The case stems from a June 2012 incident when Suzuki allegedly attached a stake to the Peace Statue in front of the former Japanese Embassy in ...
[131]
YouTuber Johnny Somali Kisses 'Comfort Women' Statue, Gets ...
Oct 30, 2024 · YouTuber Johnny Somali Kisses 'Comfort Women' Statue, Gets Attacked In Seoul ... Statue of Peace. The public has reacted negatively to Somali's ...
[132]
Activists criticize vandalism of "comfort women" statue in San ...
Sep 9, 2018 · "The deep scratches and the four separate incidents of vandalism look to me very intentional. It looks to me like a hate crime, not like some ...
[133]
Glendale 'Comfort Women' Monument Vandalized — Again
again.
[134]
City News | City of Glendale, CA
Sep 17, 2019 · On September 16, 2019, the Korean Comfort Women Peace Monument located on the Glendale Central Park grounds was vandalized.
[135]
'Comfort Women Statue Stake Vandalism' Japanese Far-Right ...
'Comfort Women Statue Stake Vandalism' Japanese Far-Right Figure Absent Again.. Statue of a Girl in front of the Former Japanese Embassy, Jongno-gu, Seoul ...<|separator|>
[136]
Abe's self-inflicted statue wounds fester in Seoul - The Japan Times
Apr 15, 2017 · Close to my hotel is the infamous comfort women statue, which I don ... fence that encloses the construction site, fronted by a phalanx of police ...
[137]
The debate over South Korea's 'comfort women' | Features - Al Jazeera
Jan 30, 2017 · Within South Korea, there is a strong consensus of victimhood and a narrative that thousands of women and girls were tricked or kidnapped by the ...
[138]
Graduate Thesis Or Dissertation | Narratives of Violence
Jul 3, 2023 · ... Japanese empire and the victimization of the Korean people. However, these narratives exclude the history of Korean complicity with the ...
[139]
The Korean Council - About us - 정의기억연대
From the perspective of peace and women's rights, We will take the lead in solving·remembering the Japanese military sexual slavery issue, violation of women's ...
[140]
https://globalist.yale.edu/in-the-magazine/passing-down-the-heart-of-the-survivors-stands-activism-to-commemorate-the-comfort-women-issues-at-yale/
[141]
STAND's Activism to Commemorate the 'Comfort Women' Issues at ...
Jun 6, 2020 · Mr. Park thinks it important to build the Statue of Peace in the US and discuss the complicate history among the US, ROK, and Japan. We should ...Missing: supporters | Show results with:supporters
[142]
The Japan-Korea Comfort Women Deal: Proper Implementation Is ...
Feb 1, 2016 · The first is the comfort women statue. Constructed by civil society groups, the Seoul government has limited leverage to deal with it. The ...
[143]
Japan, South Korea Must Address Mounting 'Debt' of Historical ...
Feb 1, 2023 · Japan's desire for the removal of the comfort women statue in front of the Japanese Embassy in Seoul was a main sticking point in the 2015 ...Missing: effects | Show results with:effects
[144]
Not “Final and Irreversible”: Explaining South Korea's January 2018 ...
Feb 1, 2018 · In sum, South Korea's nuanced change of stance regarding the “Comfort Women” agreement of December 2015 reflects the reality that the agreement ...
[145]
Introduction: The “Comfort Women” as Public History - Japan Focus
Mar 1, 2021 · This refined understanding of coercion, and with it the complication of the distinction between comfort women and “regular” prostitutes, has, in ...Missing: motivation | Show results with:motivation
[146]
Activating Sydney's Comfort Women statue for decolonial memory
Jun 13, 2024 · In the second half, we explore not simply what the Statue of Peace means, but what it can do when it is activated by the local community. To ...
[147]
[PDF] Thoughts on the “Comfort Women Statue” in Berlin
In September 2020, the Korea Verband, a group of Korean Germans, erected a “Comfort Women Statue,” also known as the “Peace Statue,” in central Berlin's ...
[148]
Asia's global memory wars and solidarity across borders: diaspora ...
Mar 1, 2021 · The salience of the 'comfort women' cause in discourses of national identity within South Korea itself during the 1990s amplified the resonance ...
[149]
Why the “Statue of Peace” Exhibition Is an Act of Practice: The ...
Japan's Statue of Peace Exhibitions Repeatedly Thwarted by Disruptions and Threats. In Japan, the “Statue of Peace” has become the target of intense hatred.
[150]
Remembering the "Comfort Women" Intergenerational Asian ...
Apr 26, 2023 · Active opposition groups to “comfort women” memorials in the U.S. have included ultranationalist individuals from the Japanese government, ...