Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Stretched tuning

Stretched tuning is a specialized intonation method used primarily in the tuning of acoustic pianos, where the intervals—especially octaves—are deliberately widened beyond the equal temperament scale to counteract the inharmonicity of the instrument's strings. This practice results in bass notes being tuned slightly flat (up to about 30 cents) and treble notes sharp (up to about 30 cents), creating a characteristic curvature in the tuning that improves overall consonance and tonal balance. The primary cause of stretched tuning is the arising from the stiffness of strings, which causes their partial tones () to deviate upward from the ideal harmonic series, with lower strings exhibiting greater inharmonicity due to their thickness and windings. Skilled piano technicians follow an empirical pattern known as the Railsback curve, which quantifies this stretch as the average deviation from observed in professionally tuned instruments, typically peaking at the keyboard's extremes to minimize dissonance between overlapping partials. Perceptually, stretched tuning aligns the piano's sound with human auditory preferences by compensating for the elevated perception of inharmonic tones, as demonstrated in experiments with tuners and musicians where subjective enlargement mirrors the Railsback pattern. This approach enhances the instrument's richness across its wide frequency range—from about 27.5 Hz in the to 4186 Hz in the —ensuring that chords and melodies sound more harmonious despite the theoretical deviations from pure intervals.

Overview

Definition and Purpose

Stretched tuning is a specialized adjustment applied to pianos, where the frequencies of notes deviate systematically from the pure scale to create wider octaves throughout the relative to the ideal 2:1 frequency ratio, with greater stretch in the lower and upper registers compared to the middle. In practice, this involves tuning notes progressively flatter and notes progressively sharper, with the deviation accumulating across the to form a characteristic curve known as the Railsback curve. This method ensures that the overall scale spans a broader range than in strict , typically resulting in deviations of up to approximately 30 cents at the extremes of a standard 88-key , such as at the lowest (A0) and highest (C8) notes. The primary purpose of stretched tuning is to compensate for the inharmonicity inherent in strings, caused by their stiffness, which causes higher partials () to deviate upward from ideal ratios. By adjusting note pitches accordingly, stretched tuning aligns the perceived pitches of these partials more closely with listener expectations, reducing dissonance in chords and intervals—particularly in the , where inharmonicity is most pronounced due to thicker strings, and in the , where thinner strings exhibit subtler but cumulative effects. This compensation enhances consonance by minimizing beating between mistuned partials from different notes, leading to a more unified texture across the instrument's wide range. Acoustically, stretched tuning produces a brighter and more even tonal balance, as the adjustments counteract the dulling effect of in the bass and the overly piercing quality in the , resulting in a sound that is widely preferred by musicians and listeners over uncompensated . Experimental studies confirm that tuners and listeners subjectively favor these stretched profiles, as they yield tuning curves that better match psychoacoustic perceptions of purity and stability. For instance, in professional , this approach ensures that simultaneous tones, such as or common chords, exhibit reduced sensory dissonance, contributing to the instrument's characteristic warmth and clarity.

Historical Development

The practice of stretched tuning emerged alongside the development of the modern piano in the late 18th and 19th centuries, as instrument makers like introduced heavier wire strings and iron frames to achieve greater volume and . These innovations, particularly Steinway's patented overstrung scale design in 1859, increased string tension and stiffness, causing octaves to sound impure when tuned strictly to , prompting tuners to empirically adjust intervals by ear for better consonance. Prior to 1800, harpsichords employed lighter, thinner strings with significantly lower , requiring minimal stretching to achieve satisfactory intonation compared to the heavier wires in pianos that amplified discrepancies. In 19th-century , professional tuners routinely noted and compensated for these "out-of-tune" during aural sessions, a technique passed down through apprenticeships without formal documentation until the . The first systematic analysis came in 1938, when physicist O. L. Railsback measured the tuning profiles of multiple aurally tuned grand pianos and identified a consistent deviation pattern—now known as the Railsback curve—where bass notes were tuned flatter and treble notes sharper than to align perceived pitches. This empirical practice was further validated in 1961 through listening tests by Daniel W. Martin and W. Dixon Ward, who demonstrated that listeners preferred the stretched scale over pure for piano music, attributing the effect to the instrument's acoustic properties. Theoretical understanding advanced in the mid-20th century, notably through physicist Feynman's correspondence with his piano tuner around the , where he derived the impact of string stiffness on partial frequencies, explaining why stretched octaves mitigate for a more harmonious sound. By the mid-20th century, stretched tuning had become the professional standard for concert s, with electronic tuning devices emerging in the 1970s and 1980s—such as the Accu-Tuner developed by Albert Sanderson in the 1970s and refined thereafter—enabling precise modeling of stretch curves based on individual piano characteristics.

Physical Principles

Ideal Harmonic Series in Strings

In an ideal flexible fixed at both ends, transverse propagate along the length, reflecting at the boundaries to form standing when the wavelength satisfies the condition for . These standing exhibit , with the vibrating in transverse modes where the displacement follows sinusoidal patterns. The lowest resonant mode, known as the fundamental, has a frequency f, while higher modes occur at multiples $2f, 3f, \ldots, collectively forming the harmonic series of the . This behavior is described by the one-dimensional \frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2} = v^2 \frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2}, where y(x,t) is the transverse , v = \sqrt{T/\mu} is the wave speed, T is the , and \mu is the linear mass density. The consists of partial tones—or —that align precisely at these integer multiples of the , producing a rich, coherent spectrum. This perfect alignment enables the formation of pure musical intervals based on simple frequency ratios, such as the (2:1, corresponding to the second ) and the (3:2, involving the fundamental and third ), which underpin and provide the theoretical foundation for temperament systems like that approximate these ratios. The is determined by the string's physical properties through the equation f = \frac{1}{2L} \sqrt{\frac{T}{\mu}}, where L is the between fixed ends, T is the , and \mu is the linear mass density; the n-th then vibrates at n f for positive integers n. patterns for each feature (points of zero displacement) at the fixed ends and additional interior , with antinodes (points of maximum displacement) midway between them—for instance, the has one antinode at the center, the second has two antinodes separated by a central , and higher add more nodal divisions along the . This ideal model assumes the string has zero stiffness, a condition that does not apply to the rigid wires in pianos, resulting in real-world deviations from the perfect alignment.

Inharmonicity Due to String Stiffness

Piano strings are constructed from thick wires under high tension to achieve the required range and volume, but this design introduces significant that deviates from the flexible model. The causes the string to support in addition to transverse , resulting in higher partial frequencies that exceed multiples of the . In physical terms, the lower partials—such as the , second, and third—are close to their ideal positions, but deviations grow rapidly with higher modes; for instance, the 10th partial in strings can be around 8-10% sharper than expected (approximately 100 cents). Typical values of the coefficient B range from about $10^{-4} in the to $10^{-2} in the , with deviations noticeable in strings due to their length, thickness, and wrapping, which increases while affecting . The inharmonicity is quantified by the coefficient B = \frac{\pi^2 E I}{T L^2}, where E is of the wire material, I is the second of area (related to the string's cross-section), T is the , and L is the vibrating . The frequency of the n-th partial is then given by f_n = n f_1 \sqrt{1 + B n^2}, where f_1 is the ; for small B n^2, this approximates to f_n \approx n f_1 (1 + \frac{1}{2} B n^2), showing the upward stretch of partials. This imparts a distinctive "clangorous" to notes, characterized by the presence of sharpened upper partials that enrich the sound but also introduce beats when multiple notes are played if tuned to pure intervals based on fundamentals alone. The phenomenon is prominent across registers but requires compensation in , with octaves often stretched by up to 5-10 cents to achieve intervals.

Theoretical Analysis

Impact on Intervals and Octaves

In , inharmonicity primarily distorts by causing deviations from the ideal frequency of 2:1, which corresponds to exactly cents in . Due to stiffness, the partials of piano notes stretch progressively higher than harmonic multiples of the , with the effect being more pronounced in lower registers where inharmonicity coefficients are larger. When the fundamentals of an octave pair are tuned to a precise 2:1 , the resulting sounds flat in the because the second partial of the lower note is sharpened relative to the upper note's fundamental, creating a perceptual narrowness that reduces consonance. Conversely, in the , the same pure tuning sounds sharp, as the lower note's highly stretched partials make the interval feel overly wide, emphasizing dissonance from misaligned . This distortion extends to other intervals, notably fifths, where inharmonicity accelerates beating rates in the bass through partial mismatches, such as the third partial of the lower note clashing against the second partial of the upper note. In the treble, fifths may exhibit slower beats but still suffer from incomplete partial coalescence, leading to less stable consonance. Perceptually, human hearing assesses interval purity based on the degree of partial alignment and minimal beating; uncompensated inharmonicity thus renders treble intervals dull and lacking , as the sharpened partials fail to blend smoothly, while bass intervals become harsh and metallic, evoking gong-like timbres from excessive stretching. A representative example occurs in a chord (C-E-G), where the fifth partial of the root C—nominally approximating a G two octaves higher—clashes with the third partial of the G note due to their differing degrees of stretch, producing audible roughness unless the upper notes are raised relative to the fundamental. Stretched tuning addresses these issues by systematically widening octaves and adjusting intervals to average the perceptual errors across registers, thereby promoting uniform consonance and a balanced sonic character throughout the instrument.

Mathematical Formulation of Stretch

The stretch curve in represents the deviation in cents from (ET), with the magnitude of deviation generally increasing towards the and extremes to compensate for . This curve ensures that intervals, particularly octaves, sound pure when accounting for the sharpened partials in strings. It is often modeled as a of the note number n (using numbering, where = 69), capturing the asymmetric profile with negative deviations in the and positive in the . A key approximation for the octave stretch δ(n) in cents is given by \delta(n) = \alpha n^2 + \beta n, where α and β are coefficients fitted to measurements, typically yielding small negative deviations near the end and positive near the , with near-zero in the octave around n ≈ 60. The total stretch for a note with frequency f is derived as the cumulative of local contributions along the , ensuring progressive adjustment from the reference . An inharmonicity-based formulation provides a physics-derived alternative, where the effective frequency f_eff of a note is adjusted to account for stiffness effects: f_\text{eff} = f \left(1 + B \left(\log_2 \frac{f}{f_0}\right)^2 \right), with B as the inharmonicity coefficient (dependent on string properties like Young's modulus E, tension τ, length L, and radius R) and f_0 a reference frequency. This leads to a scaling factor for tuning the fundamental frequency, where the partial frequencies are modeled as f_n = n f \sqrt{1 + B n^2}, and B \approx \pi^2 E R^4 / (4 \tau L^2). The resulting stretch curve aligns the perceived pitch by matching key partials across intervals, such as the fundamental of the upper note to the second partial of the lower note. Calculation methods for the stretch curve include empirical approaches, such as the Sanderson-Baron stretch developed by technicians for consistent aural results, which uses predefined deviation tables based on instrument measurements. Physics-based methods, in contrast, input material parameters like to compute B across strings and integrate the local stretch δ \approx (1200 / \ln 2) \cdot (B_\text{lower} / 2) for each . For an average concert grand , this yields approximately -15 cents at A0 and +20 cents at C8 relative to , establishing the scale of compensation needed for perceptual consonance.

Practical Implementation

Tuning Procedures for Pianos

Professional piano tuners apply stretched through a systematic aural process that compensates for by progressively widening from the center outward. The standard sequence begins with establishing the temperament octave, typically from to , tuned in using intervals like fifths, fourths, and thirds to ensure balanced beating rates across the circle of fifths. Once the central octave is set, tuning expands upward and downward: the section (e.g., to C8) uses progressively stretched checked against compound intervals like 10ths and double for minimal beating, while the bass (e.g., C1 to ) employs widened 4:2 and 6:3 partial matches to align fundamentals with overtones. This outward progression ensures the overall scale deviates from by about 20-40 cents in the extremes, creating a cohesive despite effects. In the aural , tuners first and tune unisons to purity by eliminating visible motion differences, then adjust octaves by using beat-rate windows—specific patterns of slow-to-fast beating in intervals like major thirds, sixths, and tenths. For instance, in the mid-range, pure fifths and fourths are verified for consistent beats (e.g., major sixth equaling major tenth slightly slower than ), transitioning in the to partial-based checks like 4:2 octaves where the second partial of the lower note aligns with the first of the upper. stretching relies on 10:5 and 12:6 intervals to avoid harshness, with adjustments made iteratively by listening to chord progressions and arpeggios for evenness. This ear-based approach, exemplified in methods like Go APE or Sanderson/Brown, prioritizes perceptual consonance over mathematical precision. Regional and instrumental variations influence the degree of stretch: concert grands often receive more treble stretch—up to 30 cents wider octaves—for a brighter, more projecting sound in large halls, while uprights often use milder overall stretch despite their higher inherent from shorter strings, resulting in a warmer tone suited to home environments. Tuners also adapt the amount to venue acoustics, applying subtler stretch in resonant spaces to prevent over-brightness and more in dry rooms for added liveliness. Common checks include verifying fifths and fourths for near-purity in the (e.g., slow, even beats in the octave), then shifting to partial alignments in the (e.g., 2:1 octave purity via beating fundamentals) and (e.g., minimal beats in double s and 17ths). These tests ensure smooth interval progression, with final validation through playing scales and chords to confirm no drifted notes disrupt the tuning's homogeneity. A complete stretched tuning typically takes 1-2 hours, depending on the piano's condition and the tuner's experience.

Measurement and Adjustment Techniques

Electronic tuners, such as the Peterson AutoStrobe 490-ST, employ strobe displays to visualize cents deviations from target pitches, incorporating preset stretch curves for various sizes that can be fine-tuned via an adjustable factor. Similarly, the Sanderson Accu-Tuner uses mathematical formulas developed by Sanderson to compute stretch amounts, measuring and delivering tuning guidance with exceptional precision. Software applications like TuneLab and PianoMeter facilitate real-time stretch calculation by capturing audio samples to analyze partial deviations, deriving inharmonicity constants from the piano's acoustic output rather than direct physical measurements of length or . These programs generate customized curves, blending data from multiple notes across the to account for the instrument's unique profile. The adjustment process begins with measuring key partials using built-in spectrum analyzers in these devices, which identify frequency offsets to quantify ; tuners then incrementally adjust the pins to align notes with the computed stretch targets, often verifying through zero-beat matching for selected . This methodical approach ensures sound despite effects. Advanced techniques use analysis for comprehensive partial evaluation, enabling tuners to isolate and quantify higher harmonics' deviations for more accurate inharmonicity modeling. Such methods also support customizing stretch parameters to suit specific characteristics, including variations due to age-related changes or post-regulation adjustments, by modifying ratios or curve scaling in the software. Since the , the adoption of these digital tools has standardized stretched tuning practices, achieving accuracies within 0.1 cents.

Extensions and Variations

Application to Electric Pianos and Tines

In electric pianos such as the , metal tines function as beams that vibrate when struck, producing a series of inharmonic at non-integer multiples of the , particularly prominent during the initial attack phase to create a characteristic bell-like . This arises from the tine's asymmetric design and material properties, differing from the stiffness-induced deviations in acoustic strings but leading to similar considerations for to perceived across the . Factory tuning for Rhodes models adheres to at A=440 Hz, achieved by comparing each note to its below and adjusting a tuning spring on the tine until no beats are heard, without inherent stretch. However, technicians often apply a mild stretched —typically 1-2 cents in the upper register and flat in the —using provided schedules to enhance tonal brilliance, match the electromagnetic pickup's response for a warmer overall , and avoid a "tinny" quality in the , as seen in Rhodes implementations from the onward. In that era, professional tuners frequently refined these adjustments by ear, leveraging the tines' quick-decaying inharmonics to achieve the desired "bell-like" highs that complemented and fusion ensembles. For electric pianos, which employ struck metal reeds rather than tines, the vibration produces a more series overall compared to tines, with less pronounced. Stretch can be applied subtly to compensate for any non- elements, often via adjustments at the reed tips during factory or processes, though it remains milder than in tine-based instruments due to the reeds' vibrational characteristics. In modern digital emulations of these electric pianos within digital audio workstations (DAWs), some factory presets and plugins incorporate mild stretch to mimic the acoustic-inspired warmth of models, with options for user adjustment to align with pickup simulations. This approach differs from acoustic pianos, where higher string stiffness demands more aggressive stretch; tines and reeds exhibit subtler effects, allowing as a viable baseline while stretch enhances compatibility and tonal depth.

Comparisons with Other Temperaments

Stretched tuning deviates from equal temperament (ET) by enlarging octaves slightly beyond the 2:1 frequency ratio, resulting in deviations typically ranging from 10 to 30 cents wider at the extremes compared to ET's uniform semitones. ET provides a logarithmic purity where each semitone is exactly 100 cents, serving as the standard baseline for versatile key transposition in keyboard instruments. However, stretched tuning compensates for piano string inharmonicity by improving the alignment of partials between notes, reducing perceived dissonance even though it introduces a total deviation of approximately 0.5% in the overall frequency span across the keyboard. Listening tests from 1961 demonstrated that participants preferred stretched tunings for solo piano performances over pure ET, rating them as sounding more consonant and in tune. Compared to , which achieves pure through simple whole-number frequency ratios (e.g., for perfect fifths), stretched tuning sacrifices some interval purity but gains 's flexibility for across all keys without retuning. excels in static consonance within a single key but becomes progressively dissonant when transposing, making it impractical for the piano's broad . Stretched tuning, built on , incorporates acoustic adjustments to mitigate while preserving this versatility, allowing pianists to perform complex works seamlessly across keys. Early instruments like harpsichords exhibit lower than modern due to thinner, often strings, reducing the need for stretch in historical temperaments such as Werckmeister and meantone, which temper intervals unevenly to favor consonance in common keys. These systems differ from stretched tuning's uniform base with endpoint adjustments. In contrast, modern synthesizers and digital often include options to toggle stretched tuning on or off, enabling users to emulate acoustic piano or adhere strictly to for ensemble compatibility. The primary trade-off of stretched tuning is its enhancement of solo piano timbre through better partial alignment, which creates a richer, more blended , versus challenges in mixed ensembles where it may clash with ET-tuned instruments like guitars or winds. For instance, a stretched piano octave might beat against a guitar's precise ET intervals, requiring careful blending or retuning for orchestral settings. Despite this, stretched tuning remains the standard for concert grands, prioritizing the instrument's inherent acoustic character over absolute interval equality.

References

  1. [1]
    The Piano - HyperPhysics
    The extreme upper end of the piano is tuned up to 30 cents sharp in a practice that is called "stretched" tuning.Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  2. [2]
    Explaining the Railsback stretch in terms of the inharmonicity of ...
    Oct 23, 2015 · It is well known that the notes of a well tuned piano do not follow an ideal equal tempered scale. Instead, the octaves are “stretched”; that is ...
  3. [3]
    Effect of inharmonicity on pitch perception and subjective tuning of ...
    Aug 24, 2022 · In well-tuned upward and grand pianos, the tuning is stretched without exception. This means that intervals, including octaves, are not the same ...
  4. [4]
    On the Use of Stretched Scales - jstor
    ends: +/- 30 cents at C8 and C1, respectively. Figure 1 of Ref.1 is ... The generally accepted interpretation of this stretched tuning of pianos is ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    String Inharmonicity and Piano Tuning - UC Press Journals
    Dec 1, 1985 · Inharmonicity is a well-known property of stiff strings such as those used in the modern piano. Effects on piano tuning (e.g., the stretched
  6. [6]
    (PDF) Explaining the Railsback stretch in terms of the inharmonicity ...
    May 28, 2025 · The results agree with the well known “Railsback stretch,” the average tuning curve produced by skilled piano technicians.
  7. [7]
    Piano Design Timeline: Key Milestones
    Mar 3, 2025 · In 1859, Steinway & Sons introduced a major advancement in piano design with their overstrung scale, patented as #26532 by Henry Steinway Jr. on ...<|separator|>
  8. [8]
    Estimation of harpsichord inharmonicity and temperament from ...
    Jan 13, 2012 · They concluded that the inharmonicity normally present in piano tones is audible, particularly at lower pitches, but that it nears the threshold ...
  9. [9]
    History of Piano Tuning by Gill Green MA
    Piano tuning was a recognised job in the piano factories by the beginning of the 19th century, and two of Broadwood's journeymen fought a duel on Primrose Hill ...
  10. [10]
    Subjective Evaluation of Musical Scale Temperament in Pianos
    It is known that standard procedures used by piano tuners result in a “stretched” scale (i.e., upper tones higher and lower tones lower than the equally ...Missing: study | Show results with:study
  11. [11]
    Stiff-string theory: Richard Feynman on piano tuning - Physics Today
    Dec 1, 2009 · In a letter to his piano tuner, the great theoretical physicist talks about how the nonzero stiffness of piano strings affects tuning, ...Missing: lectures | Show results with:lectures
  12. [12]
    More Inventronics' History - Accu-Tuner
    Al first tried to design a mathematically correct tuning and discovered it sounded horrible, this was the beginning of Inventronics developing a large piano ...<|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Standing Waves on a String - HyperPhysics Concepts
    An ideal vibrating string will vibrate with its fundamental frequency and all harmonics of that frequency. The position of nodes and antinodes is just the ...
  14. [14]
    PPLATO | FLAP | PHYS 5.6: Introducing waves - Physics@Brock
    For perfectly flexible strings, the phase speed of transverse waves depends ... The fundamental and first two harmonics of a string are shown in Figure 11.
  15. [15]
    Pythagorean Intervals - UConn Physics
    The Perfect Fourth is defined by a ratio of 4/3. To summarize: Ratios of 1/2 and 2/1 give octaves. Ratios of 2/3, 3/2 give fifths. Ratios of 3/4, 4/3 give ...
  16. [16]
    Strings, standing waves and harmonics - UNSW
    All of the modes (and the sounds they produce) are called the harmonics of the string. The frequencies f, 2f, 3f, 4f etc are called the harmonic series. This ...
  17. [17]
    Standing waves review (article) - Khan Academy
    Figure 2: For the fundamental frequency of a standing wave between two fixed ends, the wavelength is double the length of the string. Each successive harmonic ...Missing: ideal flexible transverse
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Musical String Inharmonicity - USC Dornsife
    So, if the string had no stiffness, E would equal zero, there would be no extra term in this modified wave equation, and there would be no inharmo- nicity in ...
  19. [19]
    Stiff Piano Strings
    The main effect of string stiffness is to stretch the partial overtone series, so that piano tones are not precisely harmonic.
  20. [20]
    Inharmonicity of Plain Wire Piano Strings - AIP Publishing
    It is shown from the theory of stiff strings that the basic inharmonicity cents (hundredths of a semitone) is given by 3.4×10 13 n 2 d 2 /v 0 2 l 4 ⁠, where n ...
  21. [21]
    Piano bass strings with reduced inharmonicity: theory and experiments
    Jan 11, 2021 · The mean value for B is now 1.85e-4 (Fig. 7). The inharmonicity curve tends to join that of the string without mass for high order harmonics ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Piano strings with reduced inharmonicity - HAL
    This equation shows the influence of string's stiffness on inharmonicity. A shorter string with small tension and high stiffness has a higher B, and therefore ...
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    [PDF] A parametric model and estimation techniques for the inharmonicity ...
    Mar 5, 2020 · More specifically, the variations of the string inharmonicity and tuning are modelled along the whole pitch range and estimated from monophonic.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Chapter 4: Tuning - Pianos Inside Out
    High inharmonicity can make low bass notes sound downright gong-like. The tonal effect of inharmonicity changes during the ... Use octave-stretch test intervals ...
  26. [26]
    A parametric model and estimation techniques for the inharmonicity ...
    May 6, 2013 · A parametric model of piano tuning has been proposed in this paper. It takes into account a model on the whole compass for the inharmonicity ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Journal - PIANOTECHNICIANS - How to Tune Pianos
    Many aural tuners know that octaves must be stretched for the piano to sound good. However, some aural tuners tune without this knowledge; they just tune the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Aural Tuning Strategy: Sanderson/Brown - Grandwork Tools
    Jan 18, 2020 · First, adjust overall pitch as needed ahead of time. If flat or sharp, aim one third as far in the other direction (a Sanderson Accu-fork makes ...Missing: Baron formula
  29. [29]
    What is happening when we use stretch tuning? - Piano World Forum
    Jan 28, 2017 · This essentially stretches the tuning sharp from middle C to the highest C on the piano, ¬between 20 to 30 cents even as much as 40 cents (40% ...Octave Stretch AmountWhat is stretching?More results from forum.pianoworld.com
  30. [30]
    Concert Grand V Home Upright Tuning - Piano World Forum
    Dec 2, 2018 · Home upright pianos does not need that kind of stretching. IMO tuning the last octave as 2:1 single octaves might be better for those pianos.The optimal stretch - Piano World ForumBest tuning and stretch for a "typical" upright - [TuneLab]More results from forum.pianoworld.comMissing: variations | Show results with:variations
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    Piano 101: How Often Will My Piano Need to Be Tuned?
    May 25, 2023 · Usually, piano tuning takes between an hour and a half to three hours to complete. But every piano is unique. If your piano is older, hasn't ...
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    The Most Accurate Electronic Tuning Device - Accu-Tuner
    Nov 4, 2016 · Accu-Tuner uses formulas by Al Sanderson, proven by Steve Fairchild, and is claimed to provide better tuning in less time than competitors.
  35. [35]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  36. [36]
    Instruction and Support - PianoMeter
    The inharmonicity is a function of the length and stiffness of piano strings. Shorter and thicker strings have high inharmonicity, while longer or thinner ...
  37. [37]
    Automatic Tuning of High Piano Tones - MDPI
    Mar 13, 2020 · Automatic tuning of high piano tones involves matching the first partial frequency of the upper tone with the second partial of the lower tone ...
  38. [38]
    Peterson AutoStrobe 490ST Piano Stretch Tuner - Amazon.com
    0.1 Cent Accuracy; Preset and Programmable Stretch Files for Various Piano Sizes from Spinet to Concert Grand; Preset and Programmable Temperament Files ...Missing: electronic Sanderson
  39. [39]
  40. [40]
    [PDF] The Electromagnetically Sustained Rhodes Piano by Gregory Shear
    In contrast, the tine is a cantilever beam and vibrates with decidedly inharmonic overtones at non-integer multiples of the fundamental [4]. Energy at these ...
  41. [41]
    Chapter Five: Tuning the Rhodes Piano - FenderRhodes.com
    "Stretch Tuning", as described here, means the deliberate and precise raising or lowering in pitch of a given range of tones along the scale by one or more " ...
  42. [42]
    Stretch Tuning. How? Which Tuner? - The Electric Piano Forum
    Mar 12, 2014 · Acoustic piano strings are stretched in order to balance the inharmonicity produced by the physical properties of a vibrating string. Wurlitzer ...
  43. [43]
  44. [44]
    Tuning and temperament | Pitch, Intervals & Scales - Britannica
    In equal temperament, all intervals are made up of semitone units, each of which is set exactly at a 12th of an octave, or 100 cents. A fifth is built of seven ...
  45. [45]
    The Pythagorean comma and preference for a stretched octave
    Apr 30, 2021 · Empirical studies suggest that listeners prefer a stretched octave, that is, an octave interval slightly larger than 2:1.