Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Inharmonicity

Inharmonicity refers to the deviation of the frequencies of a sound's partials () from the ideal harmonic series, in which partials occur at exact integer multiples of the . This phenomenon arises primarily from the physical properties of vibrating objects, such as the stiffness in strings or the irregular shapes and materials in percussion instruments, which cause higher partials to shift upward in frequency relative to the fundamental. In , inharmonicity is quantified as a weighted measure of these deviations, often increasing with the order of the partials and influenced by factors like string tension, density, diameter, and elasticity (). While many string and wind instruments produce largely harmonic sounds that reinforce a clear sense of pitch, inharmonicity is more pronounced in instruments like pianos, bells, drums, and marimbas, where it contributes to distinctive timbres but can complicate pitch perception and tuning. For example, in piano strings, stiffness pulls higher partials sharp, leading to octave stretching in tuning to achieve consonant intervals, while in idiophones like bells, the partials' irregular spacing creates ambiguous or gong-like tones. Low levels of inharmonicity can enhance perceived warmth and liveliness in tones, but excessive amounts may result in harsh or out-of-tune qualities, affecting instrument design, synthesis techniques, and performance practices.

Fundamental Principles

Definition and Characteristics

Inharmonicity refers to the acoustic property in which , or partials, of a vibrating system deviate from exact integer multiples of the , producing a that departs from the ideal series. This deviation results in non- relationships among the components, distinguishing inharmonic sounds from purely harmonic ones where partials align precisely as harmonics. Harmonic sounds, such as those generated by an ideal flexible vibrating in transverse modes, feature partial frequencies that are strict multiples of the , yielding clear, timbres. In contrast, inharmonic sounds arise in systems like stiffened strings or rigid bars, where partials shift away from these multiples, creating complex spectral structures. Naturally occurring inharmonic timbres are evident in instruments such as bells and gongs, which produce rich, inharmonic that contribute to their distinctive . Key characteristics of inharmonicity include the "stretching" of partials, where higher become sharper—elevated above their positions—leading to a metallic or clangorous quality in the . This spectral stretching enhances the of the sound, often imparting a sense of or , and plays a crucial role in the perceptual identification of instruments by emphasizing unique deviations. Early recognition of inharmonicity dates to the , with observing its presence in tones in his seminal work On the Sensations of Tone (1863), where he described deviations in upper partials due to string elasticity.

Physical Mechanisms

In vibrating bodies such as strings and bars, the primary cause of inharmonicity arises from the of the , which superimposes a dispersive component onto the transverse driven by or . This elevates the frequencies of higher vibrational modes above their integer multiples of the , as the effective speed increases with due to the to . In contrast, flexible strings under pure exhibit non-dispersive propagation, yielding perfectly partials without such deviations. Material properties fundamentally influence the extent of inharmonicity, with quantifying the elastic that resists bending and thereby amplifies frequency shifts in higher modes. , through its effect on per unit length, influences the fundamental frequency and the balance between inertial and restorative forces, but the inharmonicity coefficient is independent of and primarily depends on relative to and . Thicker or stiffer configurations, like wound strings, intensify inharmonicity by increasing the ratio of bending rigidity to tensile forces. Boundary conditions further contribute to mode deviations by imposing constraints on displacement and curvature, such as fixed ends in strings or clamped supports in bars, which create non-uniform vibration profiles across the body. In rigid bodies like plates or shells, the multi-dimensional nature leads to interacting modes where flexural waves couple across the structure, inherently producing inharmonic spectra unlike the one-dimensional ideal string case. Experimental observations, often visualized through spectrograms, demonstrate these effects by showing the progressive stretching of partial frequencies in real vibrations relative to the undeviating lines of an harmonic series. Such analyses confirm that higher modes exhibit the most pronounced shifts, directly attributable to and boundary influences.

Theoretical Framework

Ideal Harmonic Series

The ideal harmonic series describes the frequencies of in a vibrating system as integer multiples of the , expressed as f_n = n f_1, where n = 1, 2, [3, \dots](/page/3_Dots) and f_1 is the . This results in consonance and beat-free intervals, as the aligned frequencies produce stable, non-interfering superpositions without perceptual roughness. The physical basis lies in wave mechanics for an ideal inextensible under pure , supporting standing waves with fixed nodes at both ends and uniform transverse displacement. The speed is given by v = \sqrt{T / \mu}, where T is and \mu is , yielding mode frequencies f_n = n v / (2L) for string length L. These modes form a perfect , enabling periodic vibrations that repeat exactly without distortion in the ideal case. Acoustically, the series generates clear, periodic waveforms decomposable via into sine components at harmonic frequencies, fostering rich timbres with minimal dissonance. It enables , tuning intervals to simple integer ratios like 3:2 for the , and supports as a practical approximation dividing the into equal logarithmic steps without requiring adjustments for inharmonicity. Representative examples include of sine waves at integer multiples of f_1, producing pure tones, or thin monofilament strings under tension, which closely approximate the ideal due to negligible effects. In practice, real systems deviate from this ideal primarily due to material , introducing slight shifts in higher modes.

Inharmonicity Coefficient and Equations

The inharmonicity coefficient B quantifies the relative influence of a string's bending stiffness compared to its tension, providing a dimensionless measure of how stiffness perturbs the ideal harmonic series. It is defined as B = \frac{\pi^2 E I}{T L^2}, where E is the Young's modulus of the string material, I is the second moment of area (moment of inertia) of the string's cross-section, T is the tension, and L is the vibrating length of the string. This coefficient arises in the analysis of stiff strings and scales with the string's stiffness properties while inversely depending on tension and length squared, making it larger for shorter, thicker strings under typical musical tensions. The effect of stiffness on the vibrational modes is captured by the approximate frequency equation for the n-th partial: f_n \approx n f_1 \sqrt{1 + B n^2}, where f_1 is the fundamental frequency given by f_1 = \frac{1}{2L} \sqrt{\frac{T}{\mu}} and \mu is the linear mass density. This formula reveals a quadratic stretching of higher partial frequencies relative to the ideal harmonics f_n = n f_1, with the deviation becoming more pronounced for larger n due to the n^2 term. The approximation holds for small values of B (typically B < 0.005 in musical instruments), where the stiffness contribution is perturbative compared to tension-dominated wave propagation. This frequency equation derives from the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory applied to a prestressed , which models the transverse y(x,t) via the fourth-order \mu \frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2} = T \frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial x^2} - E I \frac{\partial^4 y}{\partial x^4}, combining the classical under with a term. Assuming separable solutions y(x,t) = Y(x) e^{i \omega t} and applying pinned-end boundary conditions (Y(0) = Y(L) = 0, Y''(0) = Y''(L) = 0) yields a transcendental eigenvalue problem solved approximately for low , leading to the \omega_n^2 \approx (n \pi c / L)^2 (1 + B n^2), where c = \sqrt{T/\mu} is the wave speed; the small-B limit validates the frequency formula through . The form of the generalizes to other stiff structures such as bars and plates, where partial follow f_n \approx n f_1 \sqrt{1 + \beta n^2} and \beta incorporates geometry-specific factors from the conditions and cross-sectional (e.g., \beta is larger for cantilevered bars to constrained ends enhancing effects relative to or simply supported configurations). For instance, in piano strings, typical values yield B \approx 0.0003 for a mid-range like C1 (with L \approx 1.035 m, T \approx 825 N, E I \approx 0.028 N m²), resulting in the 10th partial being approximately 1.5% higher in frequency than its position, or about 26 cents . Such calculations highlight the coefficient's role in modeling subtle spectral deviations across instruments.

Impacts on Musical Instruments

Perceptual Effects on Sound Quality

Inharmonicity alters the of musical sounds by deviating partial frequencies from ideal ratios, resulting in a brighter, more complex that listeners perceive as clangorous or metallic, in contrast to the purer, flute-like of nearly sounds. This stretching introduces additional high-frequency energy and non-linear interactions among partials, enhancing perceived brightness and adding a sense of piquancy or glassy texture to the overall . For instance, the initial of a note exemplifies this effect, where inharmonic overtones contribute to a sharp, resonant character distinct from smoother timbres. In terms of , inharmonic partials disrupt the alignment of intended across simultaneously sounding notes, leading to beats that reduce perceived purity while imparting richness to the . These beats arise when partial frequencies fall within the of auditory , approximately 100-200 Hz wide depending on , causing masking and roughness that heighten dissonance if deviations exceed perceptual thresholds. However, controlled inharmonicity can enrich consonance by creating subtle interferences that add depth without overwhelming fusion, as partials outside the critical band contribute to a layered impression. Psychoacoustic research demonstrates that deviations from harmonicity of about 1-2% are generally tolerable before consonance degrades noticeably, with listeners detecting increased dissonance through heightened roughness. Sethares (2005) explores these thresholds in the context of timbre-dependent consonance, showing that inharmonic spectra invert traditional interval preferences, such as rendering a more than a when partials align with the instrument's stretched series, with mistuning detection around 15-23 cents. Supporting studies by Plomp and Levelt (1965) quantify dissonance peaks at roughly one-quarter of the , linking sensory roughness directly to inharmonic patterns. The perceptual impact of inharmonicity varies with , as the deviation scales with the square of the partial number (B n²), making low relatively unaffected with minimal , while high exhibit pronounced inharmonicity that amplifies timbral complexity across instrument registers. In string instruments, this frequency dependence results in bass registers sounding more and stable, whereas treble registers gain a sharper, more metallic edge due to greater partial . Culturally, inharmonicity is often valued in Western classical music for its contribution to the piano's distinctive resonance and expressive , enhancing emotional depth in compositions. In contrast, some non-Western traditions, such as certain ensembles, embrace inharmonic spectra to align with timbres, though broader preferences in other cultures emphasize harmonic purity for consonance and clarity. These perceptual differences highlight how inharmonicity shapes aesthetic ideals, with Western listeners acclimated to its richness in familiar instruments.

Tuning and Intonation Challenges

Inharmonicity in musical instruments, particularly stiff strings, causes partials to deviate upward from the ideal harmonic series by approximately 1-3%, necessitating adjustments in to achieve perceptual consonance among intervals. This deviation results in stretched partials that do not align perfectly with those of other notes, leading to rapid beating in compound intervals if tuned to without compensation. To counter this, sharpens higher notes relative to lower ones, aligning the stretched partials more closely with the perceived harmonics of adjacent tones and reducing dissonance. The concept was first systematically explored in the mid-20th century, with early measurements demonstrating that such adjustments produce a more pleasing sonic balance. A key aspect of stretched tuning is octave stretching, where the effective interval exceeds the theoretical 12 semitones, often reaching about 12.2 semitones in practice, to ensure that higher compound intervals beat slowly or not at all. This adjustment compensates for the increasing inharmonicity in upper partials, making the octave sound pure by matching specific coincident partials rather than relying solely on the 2:1 fundamental ratio. For instance, tuners aim for slow beats in intervals like the major third and sixth to verify the stretch, prioritizing auditory consonance over strict mathematical equality. In ensemble settings, inharmonic instruments like present intonation challenges when combined with more harmonic ones, such as the , whose strings exhibit minimal inharmonicity. The 's stretched scale forces compromises in , as string players must adjust their tendencies to match the piano's deviations, often resulting in subtle clashes in thirds and fifths across the ensemble. These issues require careful balancing during performance, with the piano serving as a fixed reference that other instruments accommodate to maintain overall coherence. The historical development of tuning practices to address inharmonicity began with 20th-century aural traditions, where tuners relied on listening to beat rates in intervals to apply stretch empirically. Pioneering studies, such as those quantifying the inharmonicity coefficient and its impact on stretch, provided a scientific basis for these methods, confirming deviations through . Today, these traditions are augmented by software tools that measure inharmonicity directly and generate customized curves, enabling more precise and repeatable results while preserving the perceptual goals of aural tuning. Tuning deviations are often set using partial coincidence techniques, such as comparing 4:2 octaves (where the fourth partial of the lower note aligns with the second of the upper) against 8:4 octaves (eighth to fourth partials) to gauge and adjust stretch progressively up the instrument. This method ensures that higher partial matches, which are more sensitive to inharmonicity, inform the overall intonation, promoting intervals without excessive beating.

Applications to Specific Instruments

Pianos

In pianos, inharmonicity arises primarily from the of the strings, which deviates the frequencies of higher partials from multiples of the . This effect is pronounced due to the use of copper-wound strings in the register, where the windings add for lower pitches while increasing , and short, thick plain wires in the , which are tensioned highly to fit within the instrument's compact . The inharmonicity coefficient B typically ranges from about 0.0001 in the to up to 0.002 in the lowest notes, leading to greater partial stretching in those regions. This inharmonicity contributes to the piano's distinctive timbre, including its warm attack and sustained resonance, as the progressively sharpened partials create a rich, blended spectrum that evolves during the note's decay. In the bass, higher partials can deviate by approximately 5-10% above their harmonic positions, diminishing toward the treble where fewer partials are audible. To achieve consonant intervals despite these deviations, piano tuning employs stretched octaves, where bass notes are tuned slightly flat relative to equal temperament and treble notes sharp, typically by a few cents, resulting in octave intervals exceeding 1200 cents. Electronic tuners incorporate algorithms based on measured B values to automate this process, such as Sanderson's mathematical model, which computes a customized tuning curve by solving for optimal partial alignments across the keyboard. Historically, 18th-century fortepianos featured thinner strings and lower tensions, resulting in minimal inharmonicity and a clearer, more harplike tone; modern grand pianos, developed in the , incorporate optimized string scaling—varying diameters and lengths—to balance power and controlled inharmonicity for a fuller . Experimental measurements by in 1964 demonstrated that inharmonicity, quantified via the coefficient B, increases with decreasing string length and varies with excitation conditions, such as strike position, influencing the prominence of specific partials in recorded tones.

Guitars

In guitar strings, both used in classical instruments and steel employed in acoustic and electric models, the inharmonicity coefficient B is notably low, owing to the relatively thin diameters, longer effective lengths when fretted, and moderate tensions compared to strings. This results in minimal deviation from ideal harmonic behavior. Wound bass strings, such as the low E and A on steel-string guitars, exhibit slightly higher B values due to their composite construction, which introduces additional from the wrapping, though still far below levels. Perceptually, this low inharmonicity imparts a subtle to the guitar's , particularly noticeable on higher frets where shorter vibrating lengths accentuate the effect; partial frequencies are stretched by approximately 0.1-1% relative to the fundamental, creating a gentle sharpening of that is less prominent than in pianos but contributes to the instrument's characteristic clarity. Listening tests confirm that these deviations are perceivable, especially for lower strings without strong transients, enhancing the overall tonal warmth without disrupting . In electric guitars, emphasizes these partials, making the inharmonicity a desirable asset for expressive , including subtle beats in sustained notes that add depth to melodies. To address intonation challenges from inharmonicity, guitar construction incorporates fret scaling—precisely positioned s to approximate —and saddle compensation, where the bridge is offset per to adjust effective length and minimize pitch discrepancies between open and fretted notes. Players further compensate dynamically through string bending, which temporarily alters tension to align harmonics for purer intervals during . In 12-string guitars, the doubled courses amplify these inharmonicity effects, intensifying the and potential beating in chords due to the combined vibrations of paired s. Psychoacoustic studies on tones highlight how inharmonicity contributes to the "growl" in overdriven sounds, where stretched partials interact with to produce rich, nonlinear timbres preferred by musicians.

Other String and Percussion Instruments

In string instruments beyond pianos and guitars, inharmonicity manifests due to string stiffness, particularly in thicker or wound strings, leading to stretched tuning adjustments similar to those in pianos. Harps, often strung with gut or in the lower register, exhibit moderate inharmonicity coefficients (B values around 0.0001 to 0.001), resulting in partials that deviate slightly from ideal harmonics and requiring scale for intervals. Double basses, with their long, thick wound strings, display higher inharmonicity in the low register, where the fundamental and lower partials are less affected but higher sharpen significantly; performers compensate through precise finger placement to adjust effective string length and intonation during play. Percussion instruments featuring rigid bodies introduce inharmonicity through modes rather than pure tension, defining their distinctive timbres. In marimbas and xylophones, wooden or synthetic bars are clamped at nodal points, producing vibrations with inharmonicity arising from the bar's and conditions; though makers tune by adjusting bar length, thickness, and undercutting to emphasize near-harmonic modes like the second and fourth for a clearer , untuned bars can show partial deviations of up to 20% or more. Bells, cast from or other metals, are highly inharmonic due to their complex geometry, with partial frequencies following non-integer ratios (e.g., at ~0.5f, strike at f, and tierce at ~1.7f relative to the perceived ); this clangorous quality stems from coupled radial and tangential modes, and involves selective or shaping to suppress dissonant partials. In these instruments, inharmonicity shapes and necessitates specific adjustments: for rigid bars, slots or invokes Chladni patterns to and enhance perceived , while in bells, it contributes to the instrument's resonant "" essential for blend. Historical examples like the feature low inharmonicity from thin brass strings (B < 0.0005), yielding a pure, harp-like with minimal stretching needed for . membranes exhibit inharmonicity from non-uniform tension and radial variations, producing overtones at ratios like 2.6:1 and 5.4:1 instead of integer harmonics, tuned by kettle adjustments to align the perceived pitch with the . Dulcimers, with their short, lightly tensioned wire strings, show negligible inharmonicity, allowing diatonic tunings without significant partial deviation. Rossing's analysis highlights how such deviations in untuned percussion bars can exceed 20%, underscoring the role of craftsmanship in achieving musical coherence.

Mode-Locking

Mode-locking is a phenomenon in inharmonic systems where the frequencies of inharmonic modes to rational ratios relative to a common under conditions of strong nonlinear coupling, thereby stabilizing vibrations that would otherwise be chaotic. This is particularly relevant in driven string systems, where the nonlinearity in the or allows modes to lock into a quasi-harmonic relationship despite their natural inharmonicity. The underlying mechanism relies on between modes mediated by nonlinearity, which becomes dominant at high amplitudes. In strings, for example, this is observed during loud playing (fortissimo), where the increased amplifies the geometric nonlinearity of the , coupling transverse and longitudinal and facilitating mode interactions that promote entrainment. Such is favored by nearly natural mode frequencies, large mode amplitudes, and significant nonlinearity in the . Acoustically, mode-locking reduces perceived dissonance by temporarily aligning partial frequencies closer to harmonic ratios, enhancing tonal clarity in otherwise inharmonic spectra. It also contributes to subtle modulations resembling , arising from the phase-locked dynamics that modulate the over time. These effects are evident in the stabilized of sustained notes in instruments with moderate inharmonicity. Experimental evidence for mode-locking stems from analyses of nonlinearly excited oscillators, including studies on hammer-string interactions in at high amplitudes, where measurements reveal partial alignment and reduced beating. Seminal work demonstrated that locking occurs when mode detuning is small compared to nonlinear coupling strength, with portraits confirming cycles in the locked state. This phenomenon explains vibrational stability in high-inharmonicity regimes, such as in piano bass strings or percussion like steel drums, though it is rarer in low-stiffness systems like guitars due to weaker nonlinearities.

Compensation and Synthesis Techniques

Measurement of inharmonicity in musical instruments typically involves spectrum analyzers to identify deviations in partial frequencies from ideal harmonics, allowing computation of the inharmonicity coefficient B through analysis of these offsets. (FFT)-based algorithms enable precise estimation of B by processing audio signals to extract partial frequencies and fit them to the inharmonicity model f_n = f_1 (1 + B n^2), where f_n is the n-th partial and f_1 is the fundamental. Tools like the Peterson AutoStrobe 490-ST tuner incorporate stretch tuning presets that account for instrument-specific inharmonicity, displaying real-time deviations in fundamentals and to guide adjustments. In instrument design, compensation for inharmonicity often focuses on physical modifications to minimize B. For pianos, string scaling employs shorter lengths in the treble register to reduce effects, thereby lowering B and achieving more partials compared to longer strings. In marimbas, bar tuning via undercutting—strategically removing material from the underside—shifts frequencies toward ratios, effectively reducing inharmonicity by altering the bar's vibrational modes. Digital synthesis techniques emulate or incorporate inharmonicity for realistic timbres. The Karplus-Strong algorithm, a plucked-string model, includes an inharmonicity via a stretch factor $1 + \beta n^2, where \beta scales partial frequencies to simulate stiffness-induced detuning, enhancing the plucked sound's authenticity. synthesis generates bell-like tones by producing inharmonic spectra through carrier-modulator interactions, where non-integer frequency ratios yield the metallic, non-harmonic partials characteristic of bells. Post-2010 developments in software leverage computational models to predict and apply stretch based on measured inharmonicity. Apps like PianoMeter sample piano notes to automatically compute B per and generate customized curves that compensate for it, improving intonation accuracy over manual methods. Virtual instruments in software synthesizers, such as those using digital waveguide models, emulate B by applying parametric inharmonicity to partials, as seen in simulations where B values are fitted to match real instrument spectra for perceptual realism. Despite these advances, compensation techniques have limitations; over-correction of inharmonicity can result in unnaturally pure tones that deviate from the instrument's intended timbral warmth, exceeding perceptual thresholds where deviations become audible as artifacts. Historically, piano tuning shifted from predominantly aural methods to electronic devices in the 1980s, with tools like early ETDs enabling precise inharmonicity measurements and stretch applications that standardized compensation beyond ear-based approximations.

References

  1. [1]
    Inharmonicity - Timbre and Orchestration Resource
    Jun 3, 2019 · Inharmonicity is a feature of timbre that is related to the frequency spectrum of a given sound. It is measured through an analysis of the ...
  2. [2]
    OVERTONES HARMONIC AND INHARMONIC - Bart Hopkin
    The listener's ear typically hears one of the frequencies present – usually the lowest one – as the defining frequency, giving the tone its perceived pitch. For ...
  3. [3]
    Inharmonicity - Wire-Strung Harp
    Mar 21, 2013 · Inharmonicity is the measure of the amount by which the upper partials of a string tone are sharp or 'out of tune'.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Musical String Inharmonicity - USC Dornsife
    Inharmonicity, in the case that this study addresses, is the behavior where harmonics are pulled higher than their ideal values, and the effect becomes more pro ...
  5. [5]
    None
    ### Summary of Harmonic and Inharmonic Sounds from the Document
  6. [6]
    Inharmonicity of Plain Wire Piano Strings - AIP Publishing
    Search Site. Citation. Robert W. Young; Inharmonicity of Plain Wire Piano Strings. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 May 1952; 24 (3): 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1121 ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Using Inharmonic Strings in Musical Instruments
    Mar 21, 2017 · When the string deviates from uniformity, the overtones depart from the harmonic relationship and the sound becomes inharmonic. There is only ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  8. [8]
    Normal Vibration Frequencies of a Stiff Piano String - AIP Publishing
    Search Site. Citation. Harvey Fletcher; Normal Vibration Frequencies of a Stiff Piano String. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 January 1964; 36 (1): 203–209. https://doi ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] The Physics of Musical Instruments - Computer Science Club
    Page 1. The Physics of Musical Instruments. Page 2. Page 3. Neville H. Fletcher. Thomas D. Rossing. The Physics of. Musical Instruments. With 408 Illustrations.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] The Theory of Sound
    Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the.
  11. [11]
    Structure-Borne Sound - SpringerLink
    In stockStructure-Borne Sound is a thorough introduction to structural vibrations with emphasis on audio frequencies and the associated radiation of sound.
  12. [12]
    Investigating the Inharmonicity of Piano Strings | Edinburgh Student ...
    Fletcher, H. 'Normal Vibration Frequencies of a Stiff Piano String' The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 36 1 (1964). Heetveld, V. and Rasch ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] THE IDEAL STRING
    The thicker the string, the more its higher harmonic frequencies are sharpened from the value you would expect from a harmonic series. Because of this, pianos ...
  14. [14]
    The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol. I Ch. 50: Harmonics - Caltech
    If the lengths are as two is to three, they correspond to the interval between C and G, which is called a fifth. These intervals are generally accepted as “ ...
  15. [15]
    Lab Activity 7 – The Physics of Music - Open Books
    The 'just intonation' or 'just temperament' tuning scheme, by contrast, exploits the idea of resonant frequencies, or harmonics which are integer multiples of a ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Piano strings with reduced inharmonicity - HAL
    µ0 and B = π2EI TL2 . The inharmonicity factor comes from √ 1 + Bn2. This equation shows the influence of string's stiffness on inharmonicity. A shorter string ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] The wave equation for stiff strings and piano tuning - UB
    For piano strings the value of the inharmonicity parameter B is about 10−3. This means that its spectral frequencies slightly deviate from the harmonic ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Tuning, Timbre, Spectrum, Scale
    The chords sounded smooth and nondissonant but strange and somewhat eerie. The effect was so different from the tempered scale that there was no tendency to.
  19. [19]
    Effect of inharmonicity on pitch perception and subjective tuning of ...
    Aug 24, 2022 · In the plain strings, the inharmonicity is lowest in the middle register and increases towards the highest register.
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Tonal Consonance and Critical Bandwidth
    From this survey, we may conclude that it is of inter- est to investigate more thoroughly the hypothesis thai tonal consonance, the peculiar character of ...
  21. [21]
    Separating the Cultural from the Universal in Harmony Perception
    Sep 12, 2021 · The division between consonance and dissonance, which is one of the cornerstones of Western music, has been studied scarcely across cultures.
  22. [22]
    String Inharmonicity and Piano Tuning - UC Press Journals
    Dec 1, 1985 · Young, R. W. Inharmonicity of plain wire piano strings. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1952, 24, 267-273. (Also in Piano ...
  23. [23]
    The perfect fifths tempered scale, a proposal or already a practice?
    Nov 1, 1998 · The perfect fifths tempered scale, a proposal or already a practice? Available ... An alternative tempered scale is proposed, the perfect fifths ...
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    (PDF) Investigating the Inharmonicity of Piano Strings - ResearchGate
    Oct 3, 2024 · In classical physics, ideal string vibrations are modelled using the harmonic series, yet real mode frequencies deviate from the integer set ...
  26. [26]
    Copper-wound vs. plain wire strings | South Jersey Piano
    May 6, 2017 · The lower notes use copper winding because the extra mass helps create lower pitches; without that extra mass, pianos would have to be 20-30 ...<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Piano bass strings with reduced inharmonicity: theory and experiments
    Jan 11, 2021 · The coefficient B is typically in the order of 10−4 for the strings of the middle of the instrument but in the order of 10−2 for the highest ...Missing: wire | Show results with:wire
  28. [28]
    Octave stretching and tuning a piano
    May 31, 2020 · When a piano is tuned, the octaves are slightly further apart than the 2:1 ratio they ought to have according to musical theory.Missing: Young 1954<|control11|><|separator|>
  29. [29]
    Octave Stretch Amount - Piano World Forum
    Nov 5, 2008 · They are stretched to compensate for the inharmonicity of the strings. The greater the inharmonicity, the more stretch that is needed to make ...
  30. [30]
    The mathematics of piano tuning - AIP Publishing
    Aug 13, 2005 · This paper presents a mathematical solution to the problem of tuning such instruments for typical classes of inharmonicity versus note‐number ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] The Invention and Evolution of the Piano | Acoustics Today
    The first change was to increase the string diameter as one moves from the treble into the bass. For the modern piano in Figure 2, the string diameter varies ...Missing: fortepianos | Show results with:fortepianos
  32. [32]
    The fortepiano: sound aesthetic for modern playing | OUPblog
    Jan 28, 2016 · A comparison between various physical traits of the modern Steinway D grand piano and the 1790 Walter five-octave fortepiano sheds light on the ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Inharmonicity of Sounds from Electric Guitars: Physical Flaw or ...
    Because of bending waves, strings of electric guitars produce (slightly) inharmonic spectra. One aim of the study was to find out - also in view of synthesized ...
  34. [34]
    (PDF) Perceptibility of Inharmonicity in the Acoustic Guitar
    Aug 7, 2025 · Audibility of inharmonicity in acoustic guitar tones was studied through formal listening experiments separately for steel- and nylon-stringed ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Intonation and Compensation of Fretted String Instruments
    Oct 28, 2016 · Experienced luthiers and guitar manufacturers usually cor- rect for these effects by introducing compensation, that is, they slightly increase ...
  36. [36]
    Classical guitar intonation and compensation: The well-tempered ...
    Jul 26, 2024 · These guitar intonation difficulties seem to preclude successful temperament, but remarkably, the instrument can be compensated by moving the ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] INHARMONICITY, NONLINEARITY, AND MUSIC - NH FLETCHER
    Indeed it is the nonlinear behaviour of the sound generator that makes the whole instrument function properly we might term it. "essentially nonlinear." Volume ...
  38. [38]
    On inharmonicity in bass guitar strings with application to tapered ...
    Mar 13, 2020 · Conversely, the inharmonicity is high (around 100 cents at the 10th partial) when that string is sounded when stopped at the 12th fret and very ...<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    3.3 Marimbas and xylophones - Euphonics
    Marimbas and xylophones have bars of wood or metal, supported at points, that produce a definite pitch when tapped. Marimba bars are made more harmonic by ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] PHY 103 Percussion: Bars and Bells
    Oct 27, 2015 · Percussion includes idiophones like bells, gongs, and struck instruments like xylophones and marimbas. Bars and tubes have complex vibrational ...
  41. [41]
    The design of a harmonic percussion ensemble (L) - AIP Publishing
    Jun 14, 2011 · The primary oscillators of tuned percussion instruments are rigid structures that exhibit bending waves. Unlike longitudinal vibrating systems ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] The Acoustics of Bells - campaners.com
    Analysis of the rich sound of a bell reveals many components, or partials, each with its own individual decay time, as shown in Figure 1. The most prominent.
  43. [43]
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Loopholes - The Inharmonicity of Strung Keyboard Instruments
    The partial frequencies of transverse vibration of a freely vibrating string do not form a true harmonic series. When referring to the strings on musical ...
  45. [45]
    Timpani “Harmonicity”
    A circular membrane vibrates in two dimensions so the motion of the various modes interact with each other and can cancel or reinforce the motion of other modes ...
  46. [46]
    Mode locking in nonlinearly excited inharmonic musical oscillators
    Dec 1, 1978 · Such mode locking is favored by nearly harmonic normal mode frequencies, by large mode amplitudes, and by large nonlinearity in the driving ...
  47. [47]
  48. [48]
    (PDF) Analyzing Timbres of Various Musical Instruments Using FFT ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · A spectral analysis of frequency can be conducted as a method of quantitatively describing timbral characteristics of a sound.
  49. [49]
    Fast automatic inharmonicity estimation algorithm - AIP Publishing
    Apr 6, 2007 · A new algorithm is presented for estimating the inharmonicity coefficient of slightly inharmonic stringed instrument sounds.Missing: analyzers | Show results with:analyzers
  50. [50]
    AutoStrobe 490-ST Mechanical Strobe Tuner with Stretch Tuning
    In stock Free deliveryThe AutoStrobe 490ST is one of the most powerful strobe tuners on the market, boasting an 8-octave range and accuracy within 1/1000 of a semitone (±0.1 cents).
  51. [51]
    Tuning a Marimba
    Apr 6, 2007 · The transverse modes of the marimba are tuned as even-numbered harmonics while the xylophone second transverse mode is tuned as an odd-numbered ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Extensions of the Karplus-Strong Plucked-String Algorithm
    The result- ing decay time is then a function of loss factor p and stretch factor S. Karplus and Strong (1983) de- scribe a method of decay stretching that uses ...
  53. [53]
    MSP Synthesis Tutorial 5: Frequency Modulation - Max Documentation
    In this tutorial, we'll look at using frequency modulation to generate more musical tones by applying the principle of FM to a synthesis algorithm that can ...
  54. [54]
    PianoMeter – Piano Tuner | Professional Piano Tuning App for ...
    PianoMeter shows you graphs of the actual inharmonicity data for the piano, and the actual “Railsback” tuning curve in an intuitive graphical format that gives ...Instructions & Support · Tuning Your Own Piano · Contact · FAQ
  55. [55]
    A digital waveguide-based approach for Clavinet modeling and ...
    May 13, 2013 · The estimate of the B coefficient for the whole keyboard is shown in Figure 6 and plotted against inharmonicity audibility thresholds as ...
  56. [56]
    Digital Signal Processing of the Inharmonic Complex Tone - MDPI
    In this paper, a set of digital signal processing procedures developed for the analysis of string instrument musical tones with prominent inharmonicity is ...Missing: analyzers | Show results with:analyzers<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Aural or Electronic Tuning Device (ETD)? - Richard's Piano Service
    Oct 29, 2015 · The truth is that an ETD that is set up and used properly, in conjunction with standard aural tuning, can produce 1st class results.