Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Sublingual administration

Sublingual administration is a route of in which a is placed under the , where it dissolves in and is absorbed directly into the bloodstream through the highly vascularized sublingual mucosa. This method enables rapid onset of therapeutic effects by bypassing the and hepatic first-pass , which can degrade or inactivate many drugs. Sublingual delivery gained early prominence in the late with for relief and further expanded in the mid-20th century starting in the 1950s with the use of steroids such as methyltestosterone. Key advantages include enhanced for lipophilic, low-molecular-weight drugs, ease of without water, and suitability for patients with swallowing difficulties, such as children or the elderly. Absorption occurs primarily via passive across the thin epithelial layer, influenced by factors like drug in and . Common applications encompass emergency treatments and chronic conditions, with notable examples including for acute , for opioid dependence, for cancer pain, and for . While effective, limitations such as restricted surface area for dosing and potential taste or irritation issues constrain its use to potent, fast-acting medications rather than sustained-release therapies.

Overview

Definition and Principle

Sublingual administration is a route of in which a is placed under the , allowing it to be absorbed directly through the highly permeable into the systemic bloodstream. This method leverages the anatomical advantages of the sublingual region to achieve rapid onset of action without requiring swallowing. The underlying principle involves the dissolution of the drug in , followed by passive across the sublingual into the underlying capillaries. The sublingual veins drain directly into the , thereby circumventing the hepatic first-pass that occurs with traditional oral . This venous pathway ensures that the drug enters the systemic circulation more efficiently, avoiding significant degradation in the . Key anatomical features of the sublingual mucosa contribute to its suitability for , including its high vascularity, which provides a rich network of blood vessels for rapid uptake. The is notably thin, with a thickness of 100–200 micrometers, enabling easier permeation by lipophilic or small-molecule drugs. Additionally, the neutral of the sublingual environment, ranging from approximately 6.2 to 7.4, supports drug stability and favorable for .

Historical Development

The practice of sublingual administration traces its roots to ancient systems, where herbal remedies were placed under the tongue for rapid absorption and therapeutic effects. In , a Greco-Arabic system with origins dating back over 2,000 years, sublingual delivery was employed for managing acute conditions such as cardiac emergencies and through dissolvable tablets or pills held beneath the tongue. Similar approaches appear in broader ancient practices, including the placement of herbal substances in the oral cavity in Ayurvedic and to bypass digestive barriers and achieve swift systemic action, though documentation is often embedded in oral traditions rather than written records. The modern pharmaceutical adoption of sublingual administration began in the 19th century with the treatment of angina pectoris. In 1867, Scottish physician Thomas Lauder Brunton introduced amyl nitrite inhalation as a vasodilator to alleviate chest pain, marking an early recognition of the route's potential for rapid onset in acute cardiovascular conditions. This was followed in 1879 by English pharmacologist William Murrell, who popularized sublingual nitroglycerin—administered as drops under the tongue—for angina relief, demonstrating its efficacy in dilating coronary vessels and establishing it as a cornerstone of emergency therapy. Murrell's work, building on Brunton's, highlighted the route's ability to avoid first-pass metabolism, influencing subsequent developments in cardiovascular pharmacology. Key advancements in the early included the formulation of stable sublingual tablets, which improved dosing precision and portability compared to liquid forms, enabling widespread clinical use by the . Expansion into hormone therapies occurred in the mid-20th century, with sublingual progesterone tablets emerging in the and to enhance for gynecological applications, reflecting growing interest in mucosal routes for labile compounds. The 1970s saw become available worldwide as a sublingual , with approvals for opioid dependence following in the late 1990s (e.g., high-dose formulations in ) and 2002 in the , offering partial agonist effects with reduced abuse potential. Regulatory milestones in the 2000s advanced sublingual applications beyond small molecules, with the U.S. FDA approving the first sublingual tablets for allergens, such as grass pollen extracts in 2014, enabling disease-modifying treatment for through standardized mucosal delivery. By 2025, sublingual delivery has expanded to include generics and novel formulations for peptides and vaccines, building on earlier immunotherapy approvals. These developments underscore the route's evolution from empirical remedies to precision-engineered therapies.

Methods and Forms

Administration Techniques

Sublingual administration begins with thorough to prevent , followed by moistening the with a sip of if the medication form requires it for easier . The patient should then place the —whether a tablet, , or spray—directly under the , as far back as possible without chewing, swallowing, or moving it, to allow contact with the mucosal surface. The should remain closed to avoid dislodging the dose. Patients are advised to sit upright or tilt the head slightly back during to minimize the risk of premature and enhance absorption by gravity. In emergency situations, such as an attack, the patient should sit down immediately upon feeling symptoms to prevent or fainting while placing the dose under the . This positioning helps maintain the medication in place and supports safe delivery, particularly when rapid onset is critical. The medication is typically held under the for 30 seconds to 5 minutes, depending on the specific product, until it fully dissolves; patients should avoid eating, drinking, or smoking for at least 5-10 minutes afterward to prevent with . Proper may be indicated by a mild tingling or burning sensation under the , which is a normal sign of mucosal contact for some drugs like . Monitoring involves observing for complete dissolution and noting any immediate effects, with patients instructed to seek medical help if symptoms persist beyond the expected relief time. For pediatric patients, techniques may involve using flavored formulations to improve , with caregivers assisting by gently holding the child's closed until ; administration should be supervised to ensure the dose remains sublingual rather than swallowed. In elderly individuals, who may have reduced production or dexterity issues, moistening the beforehand and allowing extra time for can aid effectiveness, especially for those with difficulties. These adjustments prioritize ease and safety without altering the core . Common errors include swallowing the medication prematurely, which reduces by routing it through the , or chewing it, which can lead to uneven or . Moving the dose around the or talking during may also displace it, diminishing ; to avoid these, patients should be trained to keep the still and follow product-specific demonstrations provided by healthcare providers.

Available Dosage Forms

Sublingual drugs are commonly formulated as , which are compressed designed to disintegrate rapidly in the oral cavity for quick drug release. typically consist of the mixed with excipients such as or cellulose derivatives, compressed into small, flat shapes that dissolve under the within 1-5 minutes. For instance, tablets achieve in 1-3 minutes due to their fast disintegration. Lozenges, often flavored and shaped similarly, incorporate mucoadhesive polymers like Carbopol to promote adherence and controlled dissolution, though they may dissolve more slowly than tablets for sustained exposure. Films and strips represent another solid format, comprising thin, flexible sheets of water-soluble polymers such as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) that disintegrate in 30 seconds to 5 minutes. These forms allow for precise dosing through uniform drug distribution across the film surface, typically accommodating 1-30 mg of per strip. Their ease of administration without water or chewing makes them particularly advantageous for pediatric patients, reducing risks of and improving . Liquid formulations include drops and sprays, delivered via droppers for adjustable volumes or metered spray devices for consistent . Drops are aqueous or alcohol-based solutions placed directly under the , while sprays use propellants like for fine mist dispersion, enabling rapid mucosal contact without the need for disintegration. These are frequently employed for allergens in sublingual , where small volumes of extract are administered daily. Powders and gels are less prevalent sublingual formats, with powders consisting of micronized particles often blended with mucoadhesives for better retention and controlled release upon contact with . Gels, as semi-solids, utilize viscous polymers like Carbopol 934 or to form structures that provide sustained , achieving near-complete release over 30 minutes while adhering to the mucosa. Key formulation factors across these dosage forms include excipients such as sweeteners (e.g., ) and buffers to improve , mask bitterness, and maintain stability for mucosal compatibility. Manufacturing emphasizes rapid disintegration, ideally under 30 seconds for optimal patient experience, achieved through techniques like lyophilization or superdisintegrants, ensuring the form disperses quickly in minimal .

Pharmacology

Absorption and Bioavailability

Sublingual absorption primarily occurs through passive across the of the sublingual , where drugs partition into and permeate the non-keratinized mucosal membrane driven by concentration gradients. This process favors lipophilic molecules that can traverse the transcellular route, with optimal permeability achieved for compounds exhibiting moderate ( values of 1-3) and low molecular weight (ideally <500 ), as higher molecular weights hinder through the tight junctions or aqueous pores. Hydrophilic drugs may utilize paracellular pathways, though this is less efficient due to the 's thickness (100-200 μm). Bioavailability (F) following sublingual administration is quantified as F = (_sublingual / AUC_IV) × 100%, where represents the area under the concentration-time curve for sublingual and intravenous routes, respectively, typically ranging from 30-90% for suitable candidates compared to <20% for some drugs via the oral route due to first-pass avoidance. This enhanced systemic exposure results from direct entry into the venous drainage of the sublingual mucosa, which feeds into the and , bypassing hepatic . Several physiological factors influence sublingual absorption efficiency. Salivary flow rate, normally 0.3-0.4 mL/min unstimulated, can increase to 1-2 mL/min or higher with mechanical or gustatory , promoting dissolution and contact time with the mucosa. The salivary (typically 6.2-7.6) favors absorption of the unionized form, as this neutral to slightly alkaline environment minimizes ionization for weak bases and acids, enhancing solubility. Variations in sublingual flow, which is rich due to high (up to 1 mL/min/g ), further accelerate uptake but can be altered by vasoconstrictors or disease states. The pharmacokinetic profile of sublingual administration features rapid onset, with peak plasma concentrations often reached in 5-15 minutes, attributed to the thin epithelium and direct systemic access. This leads to a shorter effective duration compared to oral routes, as drugs exhibit quicker distribution and potential for faster elimination without enterohepatic recirculation. Drug suitability for sublingual delivery requires low doses (<10 mg) to fit the limited mucosal surface area (~26 cm²) and chemical stability in saliva to prevent degradation by enzymes like amylase.

Advantages and Limitations

Sublingual administration offers several key advantages, particularly for drugs requiring rapid systemic effects. The route enables quick due to the thin (100–200 μm) and rich vascular supply of the sublingual mucosa, allowing drugs like to provide relief within 2–5 minutes. It also bypasses hepatic first-pass , resulting in higher for drugs prone to liver clearance, such as or , compared to oral . As a non-invasive method, it serves as an alternative to injections, enhancing patient compliance, especially in where needle aversion is common, and in individuals with difficulties. Despite these benefits, sublingual administration has notable limitations. The small mucosal surface area (approximately 26 cm²) restricts it to low-dose formulations, typically up to 10 mg, making it unsuitable for high-dose or large-molecule drugs like peptides and proteins. Bitter or unpleasant tastes from many formulations can cause patient discomfort and reduce adherence, while absorption variability arises from factors such as salivary flow, changes, food intake, or mucosal conditions. Additionally, it is ineffective for irritant substances or hydrophilic compounds due to poor permeability across the mucosal barrier. The safety profile of sublingual administration is generally favorable, with low risk of overdose owing to controlled rates, though potential for local irritation or allergic reactions exists, particularly in patients with oral ulcers or . Contraindications include active mucosal lesions, where could exacerbate irritation. Compared to other routes, sublingual delivery provides faster effects than by avoiding gastrointestinal degradation and first-pass effects, yet it is slower and less precise than intravenous delivery while remaining non-invasive. Versus the buccal route, sublingual offers quicker venous drainage to the due to its thinner , leading to more rapid systemic . Recent advancements as of 2025 have addressed some limitations through taste-masking technologies in fast-dissolving films and the use of permeation enhancers like nanoparticles and mucoadhesive polymers, which improve retention, stability, and bioavailability for challenging drugs.

Clinical Applications

Psychoactive Substances

Sublingual administration is employed for several psychoactive substances, particularly in the management of opioid dependence and emerging psychiatric therapies, due to its ability to provide rapid onset and improved bioavailability compared to oral routes. Buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist, is commonly delivered sublingually via films like Suboxone for treating opioid use disorder, with bioavailability ranging from 30% to 50%, allowing effective dosing while minimizing diversion risks through the inclusion of naloxone. In therapeutic psychiatry, sublingual delivery of psychedelics such as LSD in blotter form and psilocybin (typically oral, with emerging sublingual psilocin formulations) microdoses facilitates controlled absorption for conditions like anxiety and depression, with studies demonstrating pharmacokinetic profiles that support microdosing regimens without full hallucinogenic effects. The mechanism underlying sublingual psychoactive delivery involves direct through the into the systemic circulation via the , bypassing hepatic first-pass and enabling quicker crossing of the blood-brain barrier for rapid effects. This route avoids extensive liver , which can reduce required doses by up to 50% for certain lipophilic psychoactives like , where oral drops below 10%. Consequently, onset of effects occurs within minutes, contrasting with the delayed of swallowed formulations. In clinical applications, sublingual serves as an effective alternative to for addiction , offering flexible office-based prescribing and reduced clinic visit requirements while maintaining comparable retention rates in . For mood disorders, sublingual lozenges are under investigation in trials for and anxiety, with onset of antidepressant effects reported in 5 to 10 minutes due to mucosal , providing faster than traditional oral antidepressants. These uses highlight sublingual routes' role in both for substance use disorders and acute interventions in psychiatric care. Challenges in sublingual psychoactive administration include taste aversion, which can lead to non-adherence during long-term use of formulations like films, prompting patients to swallow rather than dissolve them properly. Regulatory hurdles persist for psychedelics, with MDMA-assisted therapy receiving FDA breakthrough designation in 2017 for , though a 2024 rejection of its necessitated additional phase 3 trials, delaying widespread adoption of sublingual or oral analogs. Efficacy studies indicate higher adherence with sublingual opioids compared to oral forms, with retention rates in reaching 70% to 90% at six months, attributed to the faster onset of therapeutic effects that enhances patient satisfaction in supervised settings, though this can also increase misuse potential due to quicker .

Allergens and Immunotherapy

Sublingual (SLIT) utilizes standardized extracts of common environmental allergens, such as grass pollen and house dust mites, to desensitize patients with or through daily sublingual administration. This approach gradually builds over a typical of 3-5 years, allowing patients to sustained symptom even after discontinuation. The mechanism of SLIT involves a localized in the , where exposure promotes the induction of regulatory T-cells (Tregs) that secrete immunosuppressive cytokines like IL-10, thereby suppressing Th2-driven and reducing IgE-mediated reactions. Meta-analyses confirm SLIT's , demonstrating significant reductions in symptom scores and use, with response rates achieving up to 70% symptom improvement in patients across multiple trials. Standard SLIT protocols begin with low initial doses, often 100-300 index of reactivity (IR) units, followed by a gradual escalation over days to weeks to reach a maintenance dose, which is then administered daily for the full treatment course. Available forms include liquid drops or dissolvable tablets; for instance, Grazax, a grass pollen SLIT tablet containing 75000 SQ-T Timothy grass extract, was approved in Europe in 2006 for treating grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Key benefits of SLIT include the convenience of home administration, which minimizes clinic visits compared to subcutaneous alternatives, and a substantially lower of severe adverse events, with extremely rare in SLIT (fewer than 1 case per 100 million doses) versus higher rates of systemic reactions (up to 0.8%, including rare ) in subcutaneous . Recent developments as of 2025 include expanded pediatric approvals for SLIT products, such as the FDA extension of Odactra ( SLIT tablet) to children aged 5-11 years (approved February 2025), enabling earlier intervention from around age 5; ongoing trials are also exploring multi-allergen SLIT formulations to address polysensitization, though efficacy for combined extracts remains under evaluation due to mucosal absorption limits.

Therapeutic Peptides and Proteins

Therapeutic peptides and proteins, typically exceeding 1000 in molecular weight, face substantial barriers to sublingual administration due to their large size, hydrophilicity, and susceptibility to enzymatic by salivary proteases. These properties hinder passive across the sublingual and necessitate formulation strategies like permeation enhancers, like , which improve mucoadhesion and transiently open tight junctions to enhance paracellular transport. A representative example is , a synthetic analog used in , available as a sublingual lyophilisate with an absolute of approximately 0.25%, outperforming traditional oral tablets (0.08-0.16%) but remaining lower than intranasal routes (3-10%). Experimental sublingual insulin formulations, such as nanoparticle-loaded films with enhancers like , have demonstrated pharmacological availability exceeding 100% and over 80% in preclinical models, though human clinical data remain limited. Advances in engineering, including cyclization to reduce enzymatic cleavage at termini and to shield hydrophilic regions and prolong mucosal residence, have bolstered stability for sublingual delivery. For instance, ongoing developments for GLP-1 receptor agonists like include sublingual thin films and formulations in early clinical stages, aiming for phase II evaluation by 2026, with preclinical data showing 6-7% in human volunteers for similar peptide systems. Small peptides delivered sublingually exhibit comparable to subcutaneous injection, often within 15-30 minutes, while larger proteins lag due to slower . Patient adherence favors these non-injectable options for conditions, reducing needle and injection-site reactions. Despite these progresses, sublingual and protein therapeutics remain an emerging field with less than 5% compared to injectable biologics, primarily due to inconsistent (often <10%) and the need for optimized dosing to account for inter-subject variability in mucosal permeability.

Vaccines and Other Uses

Sublingual vaccines target infectious diseases by inducing mucosal immunity through antigen uptake primarily by M-cells in the , which facilitate transport to underlying lymphoid tissues for immune activation. This process stimulates the production of secretory IgA antibodies at mucosal sites, providing localized protection against pathogens entering via respiratory or gastrointestinal routes, while also eliciting systemic responses including IgG and T-cell immunity. Adjuvants such as the B subunit enhance uptake and by promoting maturation and release, improving overall efficacy without significant toxicity in preclinical models. Promising candidates include sublingual formulations for , where plant-based or recombinant subunit have demonstrated robust mucosal IgA responses and protection in murine challenge models, though human trials remain preclinical. For , phase I and II trials of inactivated or live-attenuated sublingual , such as quadrivalent formulations with novel adjuvants like ND002, have shown safety and , with rates of approximately 60-70% for hemagglutinin-specific antibodies in healthy adults, comparable to intramuscular routes but with added mucosal benefits; as of , phase II trials continue to evaluate efficacy. These trials highlight sublingual delivery's potential for annual prophylaxis, inducing both local IgA in respiratory mucosa and systemic neutralizing antibodies. Recent advancements include sublingual boosters evaluated in 2023-2025 studies, such as protein-based formulations with receptor-binding domain and poly(I:C) , which elicited strong secretory IgA in and serum IgG in non-human , supporting mucosal barrier enhancement against variants. For pediatric applications, oral rotavirus vaccines administered as drops have shown high efficacy in preventing severe , with two-dose regimens achieving over 85% protection in infants starting at 6 weeks of age. Overall, sublingual vaccines demonstrate efficacy comparable to oral routes in mucosal protection but often yield superior systemic responses due to direct lymphatic drainage, though multi-dose regimens face adherence challenges in outpatient settings. Beyond vaccines, sublingual administration is utilized for various therapeutic applications, including antiemetics like , which is delivered via orally disintegrating tablets to rapidly alleviate and associated with , , or , achieving peak plasma levels within 30 minutes for quick onset. In hormone replacement therapy, sublingual effectively manages menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes and vaginal by providing bioidentical with high , bypassing first-pass to maintain steady levels and reduce vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women.

References

  1. [1]
    Sublingual and Buccal Delivery: A Historical and Scientific Prescriptive
    Aug 20, 2025 · In this review, our intention was to shed some light on the history of sublingual and buccal delivery over the past 75 years.
  2. [2]
    Drug Absorption - Clinical Pharmacology - Merck Manuals
    A drug placed between the gums and cheek (buccal administration) or under the tongue (sublingual administration) is retained longer, enhancing absorption. The ...
  3. [3]
    Medication Routes of Administration - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    A sublingual or buccal route is another form of the enteral route of medication administration that offers the benefit of bypassing the first-pass effect.
  4. [4]
    Sublingual drug delivery - PubMed
    The sublingual route is one of the early modes of administration for systemic drug delivery. This route avoids first-pass metabolism and affords quick drug ...Missing: definition mechanism
  5. [5]
    Advances in Nanoparticulate Drug Delivery Approaches for ... - NIH
    For sublingual and buccal administration, this means that drugs with a high pKa value are preferred due to the relatively neutral pH of the saliva.Table 1 · Nanoparticulate Drug... · Sublingual And Buccal...
  6. [6]
    (PDF) Sublingual route of drug administration in unani medicine
    Sep 4, 2019 · The sublingual tablet or pill is one of the dosage forms used for the management of various emergency conditions like ischaemic heart diseases, hypertension, ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Advancement In Buccal And Sublingual Drug Delivery - IJCRT.org
    Aug 8, 2024 · 1.2 Historical Background The use of buccal and sublingual routes can be traced back to ancient medicine, where substances were placed in ...
  8. [8]
    Nitrates and Nitrites in the Treatment of Ischemic Cardiac Disease
    Sir Thomas Lauder Brunton first used amyl nitrite in the treatment of angina pectoris in 1867 [3]. Asa medical student, Brunton had became aware of prior ...
  9. [9]
    William Murrell and nitroglycerin - Hektoen International
    Dec 7, 2023 · Born in London in 1853, William Murrell was the first to use nitroglycerin in the treatment of angina pectoris.Missing: sublingual | Show results with:sublingual
  10. [10]
    Nitroglycerin | Circulation - American Heart Association Journals
    Newer drugs quickly replace older remedies. This has not been the case with nitroglycerin, now in continuous medical use for more than a century.
  11. [11]
    Efficacy of Grass Pollen Allergen Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablets ...
    On April 1, 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced approval of the 5–grass pollen sublingual tablet (Oralair; Stallergenes), followed by ...
  12. [12]
    Psychedelic Medicine Company Approved To Study Sublingual ...
    May 20, 2021 · Cybin will launch a phase two clinical trial on its sublingual formulation of psilocybin, the psychedelic compound found in “magic mushrooms”, for patients ...
  13. [13]
    Apomorphine Sublingual: MedlinePlus Drug Information
    Sep 15, 2025 · Drink water to moisten your mouth. · Open the pouch using the wing tabs. · Hold apomorphine sublingual film between your fingers by the outside ...Missing: procedure | Show results with:procedure
  14. [14]
    [PDF] SUBOXONE sublingual film - accessdata.fda.gov
    SUBOXONE sublingual film should NOT be chewed, swallowed, or moved after placement. Proper administration technique should be demonstrated to the patient.Missing: procedure instructions
  15. [15]
    About Sublingual and Buccal Medication Administration - Healthline
    Jun 6, 2017 · Sublingual administration involves placing a drug under your tongue to dissolve and absorb into your blood through the tissue there.
  16. [16]
    Sublingual Administration Guide: Examples and Definition - GoodRx
    ### General Best Practices for Sublingual Administration
  17. [17]
  18. [18]
    Acceptability of a Sublingual Drug Formulation for Respiratory Tract ...
    Feb 23, 2021 · 50-mg PMBL sublingual tablets were classified as “positively accepted” in children aged 3 to 5 years on all three days of evaluation.
  19. [19]
    Considerations in Developing Sublingual Tablets—An Overview
    Nov 2, 2014 · Sublingual administration of furosemide was shown to offer a therapeutic advantage over the oral route of administration (14). Oromucosal ...
  20. [20]
    Sublingual and Buccal Delivery: A Historical and Scientific Prescriptive
    The various dosage forms—solid (e.g., tablets, films, and lozenges), liquid (e.g., sprays and oral drops), and semi-solid (e.g., gels)—are formulated to ...
  21. [21]
    Nitroglycerin - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    Nitroglycerin is a vasodilatory drug used primarily to provide relief from anginal chest pain. It is currently FDA approved for the acute relief of an attack.Missing: early | Show results with:early
  22. [22]
    Orally dissolving strips: A new approach to oral drug delivery system
    ADVANTAGES OF FAST DISSOLVING FILMS[9] · Convenient dosing. · No water needed. · No risk of chocking. · Taste masking. · Enhanced stability. · Improved patient ...
  23. [23]
    Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - Cleveland Clinic
    Nov 14, 2023 · Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is an allergy treatment that works by dissolving tablets or liquid under your tongue every day.
  24. [24]
    Development of Sedative Dexmedetomidine Sublingual In Situ Gels
    Jan 18, 2022 · In this study, DEX sublingual in situ gels were developed and assessed for their pH, gelling capacity, viscosity, mucoadhesion and in vitro drug release.
  25. [25]
    Fast disintegrating tablets: Opportunity in drug delivery system - NIH
    The time for disintegration of ODTs is generally <1 minute and actual disintegration time that patient can experience ranges from 5 to 30 seconds. The standard ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Transmucosal drug administration as an alternative route in ...
    Nov 1, 2020 · The pH of the saliva plays an important role in keeping a balanced microbiota, and is maintained at around 5.5–7 [83]. Like other mucosal ...
  27. [27]
    Sublingual permeability of model drugs in New Zealand White Rabbits
    Jan 5, 2025 · AUCIV and AUCsublingual are the areas under the curve following intravenous administration and sublingual administration, respectively. Dose ...<|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Microenvironmental pH Modification in Buccal/Sublingual Dosage ...
    Feb 14, 2023 · This review aims to provide a short introduction to the pH M modification concept in buccal/sublingual dosage forms, the properties of saliva related to pH M ...
  29. [29]
    Bioavailability of sublingual buprenorphine - PubMed - NIH
    Study results indicate that bioavailability of sublingual buprenorphine is approximately 30%. Sublingual exposure times between 3 and 5 minutes produce ...
  30. [30]
    Unusual Route of Buprenorphine Administration - PubMed Central
    It has been reported that sublingual buprenorphine hydrochloride tablets have remarkable bioavailability (30%–50% of the intravenous route) and a prolonged ...
  31. [31]
    Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sublingual microdosed ...
    Apr 18, 2025 · We demonstrate that a one-compartment model was found to best describe the pharmacokinetics of microdosed sublingual LSD, consistent with ...Missing: blotter | Show results with:blotter
  32. [32]
    New company to put psilocybin on dissolvable sublingual strips to ...
    Aug 13, 2020 · A 25mg psilocybin pill has become the unofficial standard for a therapeutic dose in clinical research and has been shown to be effective in ...
  33. [33]
    sublingual drug delivery: an indication of potential alternative route
    Nov 17, 2017 · Drugs that are given sublingually reach directly in to the systemic circulation through the ventral surface of the tongue and floor of the mouth ...Missing: ancient herbal<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    Buprenorphine: clinical pharmacokinetics in the treatment of opioid ...
    Buprenorphine undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism and therefore has very low oral bioavailability; however, its bioavailability sublingually is extensive ...
  35. [35]
    Buprenorphine vs methadone treatment: A review of evidence in ...
    In this article we compare the advantages and disadvantages of the use methadone and buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid addiction from both a developed ...<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    Safety, effectiveness and tolerability of sublingual ketamine in ... - NIH
    Sep 28, 2022 · This study demonstrates that SL ketamine is a novel, safe, and effective treatment for TRD and treatment-resistant anxiety.Missing: onset | Show results with:onset
  37. [37]
    Guidelines for ketamine use in clinical psychiatry practice - PMC
    May 10, 2024 · This review of the evidence supports the rapid-onset efficacy (within 1–2 days) of esketamine and ketamine in TRD, which is best established for ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Buprenorphine/naloxone (oromucosal route, sublingual route)
    Buprenorphine and naloxone sublingual tablet is used to treat opioid (narcotic) dependence or addiction.Missing: aversion | Show results with:aversion
  39. [39]
    MDMA and MDMA-Assisted Therapy | American Journal of Psychiatry
    Dec 20, 2024 · A considerable body of preliminary evidence suggests that MDMA-AT delivered in a controlled clinical setting is a safe and efficacious treatment for PTSD.
  40. [40]
    Retention and dropout from sublingual and extended-release ...
    Feb 27, 2025 · This study evaluates retention and dropout probabilities between sublingual buprenorphine (SL-BUP) and extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP)
  41. [41]
    Sublingual Immunotherapy - Allergy Drops - Johns Hopkins Medicine
    Sublingual immunotherapy can help address a variety of airborne allergens, including pet dander, tree and grass pollen, and molds. What is sublingual ...
  42. [42]
    Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis - PubMed
    There were six trials of SLIT for house dust mite allergy, five for grass pollen, five for parietaria, two for olive and one each for, ragweed, cat, tree and ...
  43. [43]
    Duration of Allergen Immunotherapy for Long-Term Efficacy in ... - NIH
    Aug 31, 2018 · These three studies provide robust evidence for induction of lasting tolerance after 3 years of grass pollen SLIT [9, 17, 18, 30–33].
  44. [44]
    Sublingual Immunotherapy Chicago | SLIT Chicago
    For most patients, SLIT treatment lasts between 3-5 years. SLIT takes so long to ensure patients achieve optimal allergy relief. After establishing the correct ...
  45. [45]
    How Sublingual Allergen Administration Heals Allergic Diseases ...
    Feb 2, 2021 · A decrease in the IgE/IgG4 ratio was observed following SLIT, which was correlated with the suppression of allergen-induced skin reactions and/ ...
  46. [46]
    Sublingual immunotherapy induces IL-10–producing T regulatory ...
    Conclusion. SLIT induces regulatory T-cell suppression through IL-10 during the early phase and specific nonreactivity and immune deviation of allergen-specific ...
  47. [47]
    Update on Immune Mechanisms Associated with Sublingual ...
    The induction of CD4+ regulatory T cells and blocking anti-inflammatory IgGs or IgAs are considered important for tolerance induction after SLIT. Specific ...Antigen-Presenting Cells · Lymphoid Cells · Oral Lymphoid Organs
  48. [48]
    Efficacy and safety of Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis
    Sep 11, 2025 · Current evidence demonstrates that Sublingual Immunotherapy exhibits favorable efficacy in improving symptom scores and medication use for ...<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    An Alternative Treatment for Allergies at Their Root Causes
    Oct 10, 2025 · Several studies confirm that SLIT can significantly reduce allergy symptoms, from 30-70% within 6-12 months, and provide long-term results after ...<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    Choosing the optimal dose in sublingual immunotherapy - NIH
    Dec 23, 2015 · The approved titration of OA varies with country and/or patient age, but typically involves a 3-day dose-escalation from 100 to 300 IR per day, ...
  51. [51]
    Choosing the optimal dose in sublingual immunotherapy
    Dec 23, 2015 · The conventional dosing scheme for 300 IR SLIT drops (Staloral®) consists of two phases: a titration phase with an escalation of the dose and a ...
  52. [52]
    ALK announces FDA approval for Merck's grass sublingual allergy ...
    Apr 14, 2014 · GRAZAX® was approved in Europe in 2006 and is currently marketed in 16 European countries. GRAZAX® is licensed to Merck (known as MSD outside ...
  53. [53]
    GRAZAX®: a sublingual immunotherapy vaccine for Hay fever ... - NIH
    GRAZAX is the first global allergy vaccine developed in compliance with the new legal environment and is thus a reference for developing new allergy vaccines.
  54. [54]
    Anaphylaxis is rare with sublingual immunotherapy tablets
    Nov 14, 2023 · Thus, the overall proportion of treatment-related anaphylaxis was 0.02% (2 cases/8200 subjects) with SLIT-tablet and 0.01% (1 case/7033 subjects) ...
  55. [55]
    Efficacy and safety of sublingual versus subcutaneous ... - Frontiers
    Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for house dust mites does not prevent new allergen sensitization and bronchial hyper-responsiveness in allergic rhinitis ...
  56. [56]
    Allergen immunotherapy: an updated review of safety - PMC - NIH
    The risk of systemic reactions with subcutaneous immunotherapy remains quite low, but near-fatal and fatal anaphylaxis does occur, requiring physicians to ...Missing: 0.8%
  57. [57]
    FDA OKs Dust Mite Allergy Drug for Young Kids - MedPage Today
    Feb 28, 2025 · The FDA expanded the approval of a sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT; Odactra) for treating house dust mite allergies in young children.
  58. [58]
    FDA expands label for Odactra dust mite allergen tablet to children 5 ...
    Feb 28, 2025 · The expanded indication now includes children aged 5 through 11 years, in addition to patients aged 12 to 65 years.Missing: multi- | Show results with:multi-<|control11|><|separator|>
  59. [59]
    The KAAACI Guidelines for Sublingual Immunotherapy
    Oct 25, 2023 · SLIT using multi-allergen extracts may not be effective due to the limited capacity for absorption of the sublingual mucosa, which is ...
  60. [60]
    Oral delivery of protein and peptide drugs: from non-specific ...
    This review summarizes the main challenges for oral protein and peptide drugs delivery and highlights the advanced formulation strategies to improve their oral ...
  61. [61]
  62. [62]
    Desmopressin 120 micrograms Sublingual Tablets - (emc) | 14855
    The overall mean systemic bioavailability of desmopressin administered sublingually at doses of 200, 400 and 800 micrograms is 0.25% with a 95% confidence ...Missing: absolute | Show results with:absolute
  63. [63]
    Insulin-loaded alginic acid nanoparticles for sublingual delivery
    Jun 5, 2014 · Sublingually delivered NPs with nicotinamide exhibited high pharmacological availability (>100%) and bioavailability (>80%) at a dose of 5 IU/kg ...Missing: trials | Show results with:trials
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Product information for AusPAR - Nocdurna - Desmopressin - Ferring
    Nov 27, 2017 · Absorption. The overall mean absolute bioavailability of desmopressin administered sublingually in doses of 200, 400 and 800 micrograms is 0.25% ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  65. [65]
    Galmed Signed Term Sheet for the Development of Novel ...
    Apr 28, 2025 · Sublingual administration offers a potential alternative to both the approved injectable semaglutide (Ozempic and Wegovy) and the oral form ( ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Recent insights, challenges and emerging trends in sublingual drug ...
    The article illustrates marketed products and current clinical applications, offers insights into future prospects for sublingual delivery, and serves as a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  67. [67]
    Basics and recent advances in peptide and protein drug delivery - NIH
    This review discusses oral and transdermal peptide drug delivery, focusing on barriers and solutions to absorption and stability issues.
  68. [68]
    Biopharmaceutics and clinical outcomes of emerging dosage forms ...
    The bioavailability of insulin from the transdermal patches was found to be in the domain of 21.5% based on serum level and 39.5% based on the pharmacodynamic ...Missing: sublingual | Show results with:sublingual
  69. [69]
    Challenges and opportunities in delivering oral peptides and proteins
    Jul 17, 2023 · Areas covered: This review describes the barriers to oral delivery of peptides and complex proteins, current oral delivery strategies utilized ...
  70. [70]
    Buccal and Sublingual Vaccines: A Review on Oral Mucosal ...
    Oct 14, 2021 · This turns out to be an important advantage in terms of the safety of the sublingual route over other conventionally used routes. In addition, ...2. Mucosal Immune System · 3.2. Microneedle Array · 3.3. Mucosal Adjuvants<|control11|><|separator|>
  71. [71]
    Sublingual Delivery of Vaccines for the Induction of Mucosal Immunity
    In these studies, sublingual immunization has been shown to be safe and highly effective in generating robust immune responses against the administered antigen.
  72. [72]
    Recent Advancements in Non-Invasive Vaccination Strategies - MDPI
    This adhesion prolongs the retention of antigens at their site of administration, increases the chances of uptake by mucosal immune cells like M cells and ...
  73. [73]
    Study Details | NCT02955030 - ClinicalTrials.gov
    The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a sublingual administration of NSV0001 in healthy male volunteers. Detailed ...
  74. [74]
    SARS-CoV-2 sublingual vaccine with RBD antigen and poly(I:C ...
    These indicated that the sublingual vaccine stimulated mucosal immune response to produce antigen-specific secretory IgA antibodies in pituita and/or saliva.
  75. [75]
    Rotavirus Vaccination - CDC
    Jul 19, 2024 · Both available rotavirus vaccines are given by putting drops in the infant's mouth. Your child's doctor can help you choose which rotavirus ...
  76. [76]
    Recent Advancements in Non-Invasive Vaccination Strategies - PMC
    Sep 16, 2025 · This review aims to comprehensively discuss recent advancements in oral, intranasal, microneedle, buccal, sublingual, and vaginal vaccinations ...
  77. [77]
    Ondansetron (oral route, oromucosal route) - Side effects & dosage
    Ondansetron is used to prevent nausea and vomiting that is caused by cancer medicines (chemotherapy) or radiation therapy.
  78. [78]
    The effectiveness of sublingual and topical compounded ... - PubMed
    Compounded sublingual bioidentical hormone replacement therapy is effective in reducing vasomotor, mood, and quality-of-life symptoms experienced in post- ...