Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Succession to Muhammad

The succession to Muhammad refers to the political and religious that arose upon the death of the Prophet Muhammad in on June 8, 632 CE, when no explicit successor had been named, prompting his senior companions to convene urgently at the hall to elect , his close companion and father-in-law, as the first caliph (khalifa, or successor) to lead the Muslim ummah and suppress emerging (Ridda) amid tribal revolts. This consultative process (), prioritizing communal consensus and immediate stability over familial inheritance, was endorsed by most companions including ibn al-Khattab and ibn Affan, enabling to unify Arabia through military campaigns against rebels and laying the groundwork for Islamic expansion. However, a faction advocating for ibn Abi Talib—Muhammad's cousin, son-in-law, and early convert—viewed the election as a usurpation, citing events like the declaration as evidence of Ali's designation, which fueled enduring disputes over legitimate authority, , and interpretive traditions that crystallized into the Sunni-Shia divide, with Sunnis upholding the caliphal line of , , , and , while Shias emphasize Ali's primordial right and his descendants' infallible guidance. The resolution's causal impact extended beyond leadership to doctrinal schisms, influencing , , and sectarian conflicts that persist, underscoring how pragmatic electoral decisions amid power vacuums can entrench irreconcilable claims to sacred legitimacy.

Historical Context

Death of Muhammad in 632 CE

returned to from his in late March 632 CE, after which he began exhibiting symptoms of a severe illness, including intense headaches, high fever, and pain in his shoulders and head. The ailment persisted for approximately two weeks, during which he initially continued leading prayers at the despite worsening condition, before delegating the task to around eleven days into the illness. On the final days, Muhammad's fever intensified, leading to fainting spells and delirium, though he delivered brief addresses to his companions emphasizing and adherence to the and his example. He reportedly expressed satisfaction with his fate, stating words to the effect of joining the highest in Paradise, and affirmed that no prophet dies until seeing his place in Paradise. died on Monday, 12 11 , corresponding to June 8, 632 CE, at the age of 63, in the chamber of his wife in . Traditional accounts attribute the death primarily to natural causes from the feverish illness, though some hadiths reference lingering effects from a poisoning attempt at in 628 CE, which himself mentioned as potentially contributing but not the immediate cause. Following his death, he was washed and shrouded by family members including Ali ibn Abi Talib and buried that same night in Aisha's chamber, adjacent to the , in line with his reported instructions to bury prophets where they die. The absence of any explicit designation of a successor in his final moments or will precipitated immediate disputes among the community regarding leadership.

Pre-Islamic and Early Islamic Leadership Models

In , society was fundamentally tribal, with the qabila (tribe) serving as the primary social and political unit, subdivided into clans (batn) and sub-clans for mutual protection and resource sharing. Leadership within tribes was typically held by a shaykh ( or chief), whose authority derived from personal attributes such as wisdom, generosity, bravery, and mediation skills rather than rigid hereditary succession. These leaders were not elected through formal processes but emerged by gaining the of tribal elders and warriors, often within prominent families, though challenges or selections based on merit could displace less capable heirs; for instance, a shaykh's son might inherit if deemed worthy, but incompetence could lead to replacement by a more suitable relative or peer. In settled areas like , among the tribe, authority was diffused among a council of nobles (mala') who deliberated on major decisions, reflecting a consultative without a singular monarch, as centralized kingship () was rare and confined to peripheral kingdoms like those in . This decentralized model prioritized tribal loyalty () and survival amid feuds, with no overarching state apparatus. The advent of Islam under Muhammad (c. 570–632 CE) introduced a novel leadership paradigm that centralized authority while adapting pre-Islamic elements. As prophet and statesman, Muhammad held supreme religious and temporal power in Medina after the Hijra in 622 CE, unifying disparate tribes through divine revelation and covenants like the Constitution of Medina, which established a federated community (ummah) transcending blood ties. Unlike tribal shaykhs, his legitimacy stemmed from prophethood, rendering succession unaddressed in core texts; he appointed commanders for military raids (ghazawat) and governors for allied tribes based on loyalty and competence, such as entrusting key roles to early converts like Abu Bakr for prayer leadership during illness in 632 CE. Consultation (shura) was integral, as Muhammad sought advice from companions (sahaba) on matters like warfare—evident in debates before the Battle of Badr (624 CE) or Uhud (625 CE)—yet final authority rested with him as recipient of Quranic guidance, fostering a meritocratic yet hierarchical model distinct from tribal consensus alone. This early Islamic framework lacked explicit mechanisms for post-prophetic transition, contrasting sharply with pre-Islamic practices where devolved organically within groups or through acclaim. Muhammad's unification efforts subdued tribal , appointing capable non-relatives to positions and emphasizing () over lineage, as in selecting Bilal—a former slave—for the call to prayer. However, the absence of designated heirs—unlike prophetic precedents in Jewish or Christian traditions—left a vacuum upon his death, amplifying reliance on emergent amid lingering tribal instincts. Historical accounts, such as those in al-Tabari's chronicles, indicate Muhammad's model prioritized functional governance over dynastic continuity, setting the stage for interpretive disputes.

Immediate Succession Events

The Saqifa Assembly

The Saqifa Assembly occurred on June 8, 632 CE, immediately after the death of earlier that day in , as a hasty gathering convened by the Ansar (Medinan supporters of ) at the saqifa, or roofed courtyard, of the Banu Sa'ida clan to address the leadership vacuum amid fears of tribal fragmentation. The primary participants were members of the Ansar tribes, particularly the Khazraj led by Sa'd ibn Ubada, who was proposed as a potential leader or co-ruler, reflecting the Ansar's desire to retain political authority in following their key role in supporting the early Muslim community. Upon learning of the meeting, a small group of (Meccan emigrants), including , ibn al-Khattab, and , intervened to assert primacy in leadership, arguing that the Arabs would only follow rulers from 's tribe due to its prestige and proximity to the . Debates ensued, with Umar emphasizing unity under Abu Bakr, whom he nominated, while Abu Bakr invoked Quranic verses on consultation and referenced the Quraysh's entitlement to rule, ultimately swaying the majority despite initial resistance from some Ansar who favored dual leadership or Sa'd ibn Ubada, who reportedly abstained or was sidelined due to illness. The assembly concluded with pledges of allegiance () to as the first caliph, marking the establishment of the system through consultative election rather than familial , though the exclusion of Muhammad's kin, including ibn Abi Talib who was occupied with the Prophet's funeral rites, has fueled historical contention. Early accounts, such as those preserved in al-Tabari's , detail these proceedings through chains of transmission from eyewitnesses like , but variations exist across Sunni and Shia narrations, with the former viewing it as pragmatic consensus and the latter as a rushed usurpation bypassing divine designation claims for Ali. This event's opacity stems from its impromptu nature and reliance on oral reports compiled decades later, underscoring challenges in reconstructing early Islamic political history without contemporary written records.

Election and Pledge to Abu Bakr

Following the assembly at Saqifa Bani Sa'ida on 8 June 632 CE, the day of Muhammad's death, Abu Bakr was selected as the successor by key companions including Umar ibn al-Khattab and Abu Ubaidah ibn al-Jarrah, amid arguments favoring Quraysh leadership over the Ansar's candidate Sa'd ibn Ubada. This selection drew on Abu Bakr's prior roles, such as leading prayers during Muhammad's final illness, positioning him as a continuity figure for the community. Historical accounts in al-Tabari's chronicle detail how Umar immediately pledged allegiance (bay'ah) to Abu Bakr at Saqifa, urging others to follow to prevent division. Abu Bakr, Umar, and Abu Ubaidah then proceeded to the in to formalize the election through public from the broader Muslim populace, including emigrants and Ansar . Addressing the congregation, Abu Bakr invoked Quranic authority on leadership from and stressed communal unity against emerging threats, leading most present to offer handshakes or verbal oaths of loyalty, establishing his . Ya'qubi's history notes that the majority accepted Abu Bakr amicably post-Saqifa, with the pledge extending to suppress rival claims and stabilize governance. The process, rooted in pre-Islamic Arabian tribal customs adapted to Islamic context, symbolized contractual obedience and was completed swiftly to address immediate crises like the . While primary Sunni sources like portray broad consensus, Shia traditions highlight coercion or exclusion of figures like ibn Abi Talib, whose delayed allegiance—reportedly after six months—reflects interpretive disputes over legitimacy, though empirical accounts confirm the pledge's role in unifying Medina's factions under by mid-632 CE. This event marked the inception of the , prioritizing consultative election over hereditary or designated succession.

Ali ibn Abi Talib's Response and Delay in Allegiance

Ali ibn Abi Talib, preoccupied with washing and shrouding the body of Muhammad on the day of his death in June 632 CE, did not participate in the Saqifa assembly and learned of Abu Bakr's election only afterward. He promptly protested the proceedings, asserting that proper consultation with the Banu Hashim clan and the Prophet's family (Ahl al-Bayt) had been bypassed, as succession in Muhammad's absence warranted their involvement given his close kinship and designated roles. Ali visited Abu Bakr to voice these concerns, emphasizing that the Muhajirun should not monopolize leadership without broader consensus, though Abu Bakr defended the urgency to prevent tribal discord among the Ansar. Ali withheld his pledge of allegiance (bay'ah) to Abu Bakr initially, viewing the caliphate as rightfully his based on Muhammad's prior indications, such as at , though this interpretation remains sectarian. His wife, , supported this stance, publicly denouncing the exclusion and disputing Abu Bakr's seizure of as inheritance, which she claimed as her rightful share from the ; this led to reported tensions, including her of Abu Bakr until her death approximately six months later in late 632 or early 633 CE. Some accounts describe coercive pressure on Ali's household, such as demands for under threat, but these are primarily from Shia traditions and contested in Sunni as unsubstantiated or exaggerated. The duration of Ali's delay varies across sources: certain Sunni narrations, drawing from early companions like , claim he pledged within one or two days to affirm unity, while others, including hadiths in , indicate a prolonged refusal of up to six months, coinciding with Fatima's passing and subsequent isolation of Ali's supporters. Upon eventual pledging—publicly announced by from the after —Ali cited motivations of preserving Muslim cohesion amid apostasy threats (), though Shia sources portray it as pragmatic concession to avoid civil strife rather than full endorsement. This episode underscores early fractures, with Sunni accounts emphasizing voluntary reconciliation and Shia emphasizing unresolved usurpation, reflecting biases in respective collections compiled over a century later.

Scriptural and Traditional Evidence

References in the Quran

The Quran does not explicitly designate a successor to by name or provide detailed instructions for political leadership after his death in 632 CE, leaving the matter open to and contributing to subsequent divisions in the Muslim . This absence of specificity contrasts with the Quran's clear finality of 's prophethood in Surah Al-Ahzab 33:40, which states he is the "," implying no further prophetic succession but not addressing caliphal or communal authority. Scholarly analyses note that this textual silence necessitated reliance on extra-Quranic traditions, such as and historical events, for resolving leadership questions. Verses frequently cited in discussions of include Surah An-Nisa 4:59, which commands believers to "obey and obey the and those in among you," with "those in authority" (uli al-amr) interpreted variably: Sunni scholars often view it as applying to elected or consensus-based rulers, while Shia exegetes link it to divinely appointed imams from Muhammad's household. Another is Surah Al-Ma'idah 5:55, the "Verse of Wilaya," stating that "your ally is none but and [therefore] His and those who have believed—those who establish prayer and give zakah, and they bow [in worship]," which Shia tradition attributes to Ali ibn Abi Talib's charitable act during prayer, signifying his guardianship role, though Sunni commentaries treat it as general guidance for pious believers without naming individuals. Additional verses invoked include Al-Ahzab 33:33, addressing the purification of Muhammad's household (), and Ash-Shura 42:23, urging affection for his kin as a reward for prophethood, which some interpret as endorsing familial leadership continuity, analogous to prior prophets like , whose brother served as a successor figure in Ta-Ha 20:29-32 and Al-A'raf 7:142. However, these passages emphasize spiritual purity, kinship ties, and obedience without prescribing a mechanism for post-prophetic , such as election via (consultation) referenced in Ash-Shura 42:38. Exegetes across traditions agree the prioritizes adherence to over personal nomination, but partisan readings project sectarian preferences onto ambiguous phrasing, with no verse resolving the caliphate's form definitively.

Key Hadiths and Their Chains of Transmission

Several hadiths are central to discussions of succession to Muhammad, transmitted through chains of narration (isnad) evaluated for based on narrator reliability, continuity, and absence of defects. Sunni scholars, drawing from collections like and , generally authenticate hadiths supporting consultative election, while Shia sources emphasize those indicating designation of ibn Abi Talib, often deeming them mutawatir (mass-transmitted). Authenticity assessments vary by sect due to differing criteria for narrator trustworthiness, with Sunni methodology prioritizing unbroken chains of upright transmitters and Shia incorporating imam-centric transmissions. The of , reported during Muhammad's return from the in March 632 CE, states: "For whoever I am his (master/guardian), is his ." It appears in Sunni sources such as Musnad Ahmad (with over 20 chains) and , graded hasan sahih by , tracing through companions like Zayd ibn Arqam and Burayda ibn al-Husayb. Shia traditions cite up to 110 companion narrators and deem it mutawatir, with chains in al-Kafi via . Sunnis interpret as denoting friendship or protection, not political succession, while Shias view it as explicit appointment, linked to Quran 5:3's revelation on perfection of religion. The al-Manzilah, conveyed to during the Tabuk expedition in 630 CE, declares: "You are to me as was to , except that there is no prophet after me." Recorded in (narrated via with a chain including al-Zuhri) and (via multiple companions like al-Bara' ibn Azib), it is classified sahih by consensus for its robust isnad free of interruption or criticized narrators. Sunnis see it affirming Ali's high status and deputyship in Muhammad's absence, akin to Aaron's role, but not perpetual succession; Shias argue the Aaronic parallel implies viceregency (wilaya) post-Muhammad, absent the prophetic exception. The , stated as: "The will remain among the until they hand it over to twelve caliphs, all of whom are successful," is documented in (Book 20, Hadith 4478-4480, via Jabir ibn Samura with chains through al-Qasim ibn Muhammad) and (via similar paths). Graded sahih, its isnad meets Sunni criteria of trustworthy transmitters like those from the Tabi'in. Sunnis apply it to righteous rulers including the and select Umayyads up to the 12th; Shias identify the twelve as infallible Imams starting with , arguing the "success" (nasirun) clause excludes flawed caliphs. The al-Thaqalayn warns: "I am leaving among you two weighty things: the Book of Allah and my ; if you hold fast to them, you will never go astray." Found in (via Zayd ibn Arqam, chain including al-Husayn ibn Abd al-Rahman) and Sunan al-Tirmidhi, it is sahih with multiple corroborating paths. Sunnis construe it as general adherence to and Prophet's family for guidance, not mandate; Shias pair it with Ghadir to mandate following and Imams as interpreters, viewing chains through Imams as preserving esoteric meanings.

Analogies to Prior Prophets

In Islamic tradition, a prominent analogy invoked in succession debates compares the relationship between Muhammad and Ali ibn Abi Talib to that of Moses and his brother Aaron, as articulated in the Hadith al-Manzilah (Hadith of the Position). This narration, recorded in canonical collections such as Sahih al-Bukhari (no. 3706) and Sahih Muslim (no. 2404), describes an event during the Tabuk expedition in October 630 CE, when Muhammad appointed Ali as his deputy in Medina amid Ali's reluctance due to potential criticism from the community. Muhammad reassured him: "Are you not pleased to be to me as Aaron was to Moses, except that there is no prophethood after me?" The hadith's isnad (chain of transmission) traces reliably to companions like Abu Sa'id al-Khudri, affirming its authenticity across Sunni and Shia sources, though interpretations diverge sharply. The Quranic precedent for this analogy lies in ' explicit designation of as his deputy (khalifah) during his 40-day absence on , as stated: "O , take my place among them and act rightly and do not follow the way of the corrupters" ( 7:142). 's role encompassed religious and communal leadership, restraining the from and maintaining order, per narratives in Quran 20:29-35 and 20:90-94. Shia exegetes, drawing from early Imami traditions, argue this establishes a prophetic model of divinely sanctioned through familial deputyship, positioning —designated in analogous terms—as Muhammad's inheritor of authority (), absent only the prophetic mantle. Sunni commentators, including figures like in his , counter that predeceased (per 29:28 in Abrahamic lore integrated into Islamic ) and thus did not inherit permanent leadership; instead, ibn Nun succeeded post-mortem through communal affirmation and divine favor, without explicit designation, paralleling Abu Bakr's election via consultation (). This view emphasizes that prophetic successions varied, often concluding with non-familial figures like or the apostles' diffuse authority after , without mandating hereditary or explicit appointment. Other analogies from prior prophets highlight variability rather than uniformity in succession models. For instance, explicitly named as successor amid rival claims (Quran 38:20, 27:16), underscoring divine designation in some cases, while Abraham's leadership passed through without formal election (Quran 2:124-129). These examples, cited in hadith compilations like Musnad Ahmad, illustrate that prophets' legacies transitioned via , merit, or consensus, but Muhammad's finality as the seal of prophets (Quran 33:40) precluded identical replication, fueling debates over whether his ummah required analogous mechanisms. Early sources like al-Tabari's (d. 923 CE) document these prophetic precedents in caliphal disputes, though their Abbasid-era compilation reflects pro-establishment biases favoring consultative models over designation.

Sectarian Interpretations

Sunni Views on Election and Consensus

Sunni doctrine posits that the succession to Muhammad was entrusted to the Muslim community's consultation (shura) and consensus (ijma'), as the Prophet did not explicitly designate a successor in a manner binding upon the ummah. This view emphasizes the elective nature of the caliphate, where leadership is conferred through the pledge of allegiance (bay'ah) by qualified representatives of the community, prioritizing individuals of piety, companionship with the Prophet, and administrative competence. Abu Bakr's selection at the Saqifa assembly on 8 June 632 CE, shortly after Muhammad's death, exemplifies this process: amid concerns over potential apostasy and tribal rivalries, key Muhajirun figures including Abu Bakr, Umar ibn al-Khattab, and Abu Ubaydah ibn al-Jarrah advocated for Abu Bakr's leadership due to his early conversion to Islam in 610 CE, participation in key battles, and role in preserving the Quran's compilation. The legitimacy of this election, according to Sunni scholars, derives from the subsequent widespread by the Medinan residents and later by over 33,000 companions upon Abu Bakr's public address at the , reflecting communal agreement rather than coercion. Even ibn Abi Talib, after an initial delay focused on burial preparations, extended to approximately six months later, as reported in authentic collections, thereby solidifying the consensus and averting schism. This event established the model, where caliphs like were nominated and affirmed through similar consultative mechanisms, underscoring that the is a trusteeship (imamah) for implementing , not a hereditary or divinely appointed office independent of community validation. Classical Sunni jurists, drawing from sources like al-Tabari's history and hadith in Sahih al-Bukhari, argue that ijma' on Abu Bakr's caliphate confirms its divine sanction indirectly, as the Prophet had instructed adherence to the "rightly-guided" successors in hadiths such as "Hold fast to my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the Rightly-Guided Caliphs after me." This framework contrasts with hereditary claims by privileging merit and election, though later dynasties adapted it amid practical necessities, maintaining the theoretical ideal of shura for legitimacy.

Shia Views on Divine Designation

Shia doctrine holds that the succession to Muhammad was determined by divine designation (nass), an explicit appointment from God conveyed through the Prophet, rather than human election or consensus. This belief underpins the Imamate, wherein Ali ibn Abi Talib and his descendants from the Prophet's family (Ahl al-Bayt) were selected as infallible spiritual and temporal leaders to preserve Islamic guidance post-Prophethood. Shias argue that such designation ensures continuity of divine authority, citing Quranic verses like 5:55 ("Your ally is none but Allah and [therefore] His Messenger and those who have believed") interpreted as referring to Ali, alongside prophetic traditions. The pivotal event exemplifying this designation occurred at on 18 10 AH (March 632 CE), during the Prophet's return from the . Halting a large caravan at the pond of Khumm, raised 's hand before approximately 100,000 companions and declared: "For whomsoever I am his mawla, is his mawla." Shias interpret mawla here as master, guardian, and successor, denoting 's immediate leadership role, reinforced by the Prophet's prayer: "O God, support those who support him and oppose those who oppose him." This utterance, narrated through multiple chains in Shia compilations like Al-Kafi by al-Kulayni (d. 941 CE), is viewed as fulfilling divine imperative from 5:67 ("O Messenger, proclaim what has been revealed to you from your Lord"), which Shias link directly to the Ghadir declaration. Supporting this view, Shias reference earlier instances of designation, such as the of Position (Hadith al-Manzila) during the Tabuk expedition in 9 AH, where equated Ali's authority to his own: "You are to me as was to , except there is no after me." Additional evidences include the al-Thaqalayn, instructing adherence to the and Ahl al-Bayt, with Ali as the first after the Prophet. These traditions, preserved in Shia sources with chains tracing to companions like Zayd ibn Arqam and Burayda al-Aslami, are deemed mutawatir (mass-transmitted) by Shia scholars, ensuring reliability despite sectarian divergences in interpretation. While Sunni sources record the Ghadir event, Shias contend their emphasis on wilaya (guardianship) aligns with the full contextual import, dismissing alternative readings as post-hoc rationalizations. Shias commemorate the Ghadir declaration annually as , underscoring its enduring doctrinal weight. This event, corroborated historically across traditions, forms the core of Shia claims against the proceedings, positing that bypassing divine nass precipitated the ummah's division. Critics from other sects challenge the succession inference, yet Shia exegeses, such as Allama al-Amini's 11-volume Al-Ghadir (d. 1975), compile over 100 companions' narrations affirming the appointment's intent. Empirical assessment reveals the hadith's widespread attestation, though interpretive disputes persist due to varying connotations in usage.

Ibadi and Other Minority Perspectives

Ibadis, a moderate offshoot of the early Kharijite movement concentrated in Oman and North African regions like Algeria's M'zab Valley, advocate for the election of an imam through shura (consultation) among qualified believers selected for piety, knowledge, and moral integrity, rejecting both hereditary succession and claims of explicit divine designation by Muhammad. This principle aligns with their acceptance of Abu Bakr's election at Saqifa in 632 CE as a legitimate communal choice to maintain unity and implement justice, followed by Umar's caliphate from 634 to 644 CE, which they praise for its expansions and adherence to egalitarian governance without favoritism. Ibadis qualify their endorsement of ibn Affan's (644–656 ), affirming the initial six years as valid due to continuity with prior practices but denouncing the subsequent phase for alleged , tribal favoritism toward the Banu Umayya, and that deviated from Quranic injunctions against , prompting early Ibadi precursors to dissociate (wala' wa bara'ah). On 's tenure (656–661 ), Ibadis initially backed his leadership against Uthman’s assassins and Muawiya's rebellion, viewing it as a of merit-based rule; however, they condemn his agreement to at Siffin in 657 as a capitulation that delayed judgment by (hukm bi ma anzala ), marking his shift to the status of a flawed ( baghi) rather than fully righteous, which solidified Ibadi separation from both Umayyad and later Alid loyalists. Among other minority sects, Zaydis—prevalent in and tracing to Zayd ibn Ali's uprising in 740 CE—differ from Twelver Shia by accepting and Umar's caliphates as de facto necessities for stability while insisting 's implicit designation by at events like entitled him to precedence, rejecting Uthman's rule outright for injustice and requiring subsequent imams from 's descendants to actively contest tyranny rather than await . Ismailis, branching from Sevener Shia after disputing Musa al-Kazim's succession in 762 CE, uphold continuous nass (esoteric designation) from through , interpreting 's authority as perpetuated in hidden knowledge (ilm) held by living imams, thus viewing early caliphs beyond as usurpers of spiritual guardianship. These perspectives underscore a spectrum of elective, meritocratic, and semi-hereditary models marginalized amid Sunni-Shia dominance, often emphasizing practical over doctrinal absolutism.

Scholarly Analysis and Historiography

Reliability of Early Sources

The principal sources documenting the succession to Muhammad following his death on June 8, 632 CE, consist of compilations and biographical histories assembled in the 8th to 10th centuries CE, relying on oral transmissions from purported eyewitnesses. , completed around 846 CE by Muhammad ibn Ismail al-Bukhari (d. 870 CE), records narrations of the Bani Sa'ida assembly where was selected caliph, with chains (isnads) linking back to companions like and . , finalized circa 875 CE by (d. 875 CE), similarly transmits reports on the event, emphasizing consensus among . These collections, however, postdate the events by 200–250 years, during which traditions circulated orally before systematic recording accelerated under caliph (r. 717–720 CE). Shia-oriented sources, such as al-Kulayni's (compiled c. 922–941 CE), prioritize on (March 632 CE) as evidence of Ali's designation, drawing from imami chains that diverge from Sunni canons in narrator selection and grading. Methodological scrutiny reveals vulnerabilities in these traditions: the isnad system, designed to authenticate via continuous narrator links, often exhibits "common links"—points where multiple chains converge on a single 8th-century transmitter, suggesting invention or standardization at that stage rather than preservation from the . Joseph Schacht's analysis of hadith evolution posits that politically charged reports, including those justifying caliphal legitimacy, were frequently back-projected to companions to align with Umayyad or Abbasid governance needs, with fabrication evident in contradictory variants and anachronistic legal allusions. Non-Muslim sources from the , such as the (c. 634 ) and Armenian of (c. 660s ), reference Muhammad's leadership and the ensuing Arab expansions under figures identified as and but provide no granular details on mechanisms like deliberations or Ghadir declarations, implying these intra-community dynamics were either unremarkable externally or unrecorded contemporaneously. Revisionist scholarship, exemplified by , privileges such "secular" administrative records (e.g., papyri and denoting early caliphal ) over religious-tribal narratives, which she views as retroactively constructed amid Abbasid-era sectarian consolidation, rendering them unreliable for causal reconstruction of 632 events. Wilferd Madelung's examination of al-Tabari's Ta'rikh al-rusul wa-l-muluk (completed 915 ) uncovers residual pro-Ali undercurrents in Sunni-transmitted reports—such as companions' initial reluctance to pledge to —suppressed in canonical but indicative of an original contestation overshadowed by later consensus-building. Empirical gaps persist: no 7th-century Islamic inscriptions or documents detail the transition, and variant accounts (e.g., Ansar claims at ) show inconsistencies attributable to partisan redaction. Thus, while attesting a leadership vacuum and rapid stabilization under , the sources' late provenance, evidential fabrication risks, and lack of cross-verification limit their utility for precise historical causality, favoring interpretive caution over dogmatic acceptance.

Modern Critical Evaluations

Modern historians approach the succession to Muhammad with toward traditional Islamic sources, compiled over a century after the events (circa 632 CE), which reflect Abbasid-era political agendas and sectarian divisions rather than contemporaneous records. These sources, including sira and collections, lack external corroboration from non-Muslim accounts, leading scholars to prioritize causal factors like tribal alliances and immediate threats of () over theological claims. Revisionist critiques, such as those by , highlight how early narratives were shaped by later needs to legitimize caliphal authority, rendering claims of divine designation unverifiable empirically. Wilferd Madelung's 1997 analysis posits that Ali ibn Abi Talib held the strongest claim, interpreting events like the declaration (March 632 CE) as Muhammad's implicit endorsement of Ali's leadership, and portraying the assembly—where was elected within hours of Muhammad's death—as an exclusionary maneuver by elites to sideline . Madelung draws on sources like Abu Mikhnaf's accounts to argue 's selection prioritized tribal consensus over prophetic intent, potentially averting chaos but undermining familial succession. However, critics note Madelung's selective emphasis on pro-Alid traditions, which originate from Shia-leaning transmitters and lack chains verifiable to the , while downplaying Sunni reports of community-wide acclamation for 's experience in Medina's governance. Fred Donner emphasizes the pragmatic nature of Abu Bakr's election (June 632 CE), viewing it as a response to amid disintegrating alliances post-, with no evidence of preordained in the ecumenical "believers'" fostered. Donner's sees the caliphate's emergence as evolutionary, driven by military necessities against rebel tribes rather than doctrinal mandates, aligning with Hugh Kennedy's assessment that reflected ad hoc consensus among ansar and to preserve unity. , while likely historical as a halting speech en route from , is evaluated as exhortation for Ali's support in expeditions, not unambiguous , given its non-reiteration in and immediate post-death disputes. Broader evaluations critique sectarian for retrojecting later Sunni-Shia binaries onto 632 CE, where empirical data—such as Bakr's swift consolidation and Ali's eventual pledge—indicate fluid loyalties over rigid ideologies. Scholars like Donner argue this ambiguity fueled long-term schisms, but initial choices were causally tied to survival, not bias-free revelation. While Madelung revives pro-Ali arguments, mainstream consensus holds that Muhammad's silence on succession reflects intentional deference to consultation (), substantiated by the absence of explicit Quranic or prophetic directives amid his final illness.

Debates on Event Historicity

Modern historians debate the historicity of key events in Muhammad's succession, such as the assembly at Bani Sa'ida and the declaration at , due to the absence of contemporary written records and reliance on oral traditions compiled 150–250 years later. Primary sources like the sira of (d. 767 CE) and the histories of (d. 923 CE) provide detailed narratives, but these were shaped by Abbasid-era politics favoring certain lineages, raising questions about embellishment or suppression of dissenting accounts. Revisionist scholars, including , argue that pro-Abu Bakr traditions exhibit inconsistencies, such as varying reports on attendance and oaths of allegiance, suggesting later harmonization to legitimize the amid tribal rivalries. The event, described as an impromptu gathering on 8 June 632 CE where was selected amid Ansar-Muhajirun tensions, is broadly accepted as historical by both Muslim and non-Muslim scholars, but its portrayal as a consensual is contested. Madelung contends that Sunni sources minimize and exclusion of ibn Abi Talib's faction, who were occupied with Muhammad's burial, and notes contradictions in accounts of ibn al-Khattab's role, implying a rushed power grab to preempt threats rather than ideological consensus. , drawing from earlier isnads, portrays Saqifa as illegitimate, but critical analysis highlights mutual biases: Sunni compilers under Umayyad influence downplayed Hashimite claims, while Shia traditions amplified opposition. Empirical scrutiny reveals no archaeological or non-Islamic corroboration, underscoring oral transmission's vulnerability to factional memory. In contrast, the incident on 18 March 632 CE, where reportedly declared "For whomever I am his , is his ," enjoys wider attestation across Sunni and Shia sources, with over 110 companions cited as narrators, lending credence to its occurrence during the return from the . However, debates center on interpretation: Shia view it as explicit designation of as successor, while Sunni sources contextualize as "ally" or "friend," not caliphal authority, amid reports of subsequent clarifications. Scholars like Ignaz Goldziher (d. 1921) questioned authenticity due to weak chains in some variants, but recent analyses affirm the event's kernel while attributing interpretive layers to post-succession polemics. Western historiography, wary of theological retrojection, posits Ghadir as a morale-boosting against Yemenite complaints rather than , given 's failure to reiterate it publicly before his death on 8 June 632 CE. Overall, while broad outlines of these events align with causal sequences—tribal dynamics post-Muhammad's driving rapid stabilization—fine-grained details remain unverifiable, with undermined by Abbasid redaction favoring anti-Alid narratives. and others argue early community unity implies fluid leadership emergence over fabricated drama, but lack of seventh-century papyri or chronicles limits , privileging probabilistic reconstruction over dogmatic acceptance.

Long-Term Consequences

Rashidun Caliphate and Early Conflicts

The was established immediately following Muhammad's death on 8 June 632 CE, when , a close companion, was elected as the first caliph by a assembly of Medinan leaders at Saqifah to avert potential anarchy amid competing claims, including from ibn Abi Talib's supporters. This selection, based on consultation () rather than explicit designation by Muhammad, resolved immediate leadership vacuum but sowed seeds of division, as Shia traditions later emphasized Ali's prior designation at . Abu Bakr's brief tenure (632–634 CE) focused on consolidating authority through the (632–633 CE), where tribes in Arabia renounced , withheld , or followed false prophets like , prompting military campaigns led by commanders such as that reimposed central control and unified the peninsula by mid-633 CE. Under Abu Bakr's successor ibn al-Khattab (r. 634–644 CE), appointed via direct nomination to maintain stability, the expanded rapidly through conquests against the Sassanid and Byzantine empires, capturing , , , , and parts of Persia by 644 CE, with over 4,000 cities reportedly taken, transforming the nascent state into a vast empire. ibn (r. 644–656 CE), selected by a council convened by Umar, continued expansions into and further east while standardizing the 's codex to resolve variant recitations, but faced accusations of for appointing Umayyad kin to governorships, exacerbating tribal and regional grievances from garrisons in , , and . These tensions, rooted in opaque succession processes lacking Muhammad's clear guidance, culminated in rebels besieging Uthman in ; he was assassinated on 17 June 656 CE while reciting , an event that ignited the . Ali ibn Abi Talib's (656–661 CE), affirmed by Medinan pledge after Uthman's death, inherited a fractured , with demands for justice against the assassins clashing against his reluctance to preemptively punish amid unclear culpability. Early opposition from , , and —former companions who accused Ali of leniency—led to the on 7 December 656 CE near , where Ali's forces prevailed, killing Talha and Zubayr and capturing , who was respectfully returned to . Muawiya ibn Abi Sufyan, Uthman's Umayyad of , withheld allegiance pending retribution for the murder, escalating to the in July 657 CE along the , a protracted stalemate ending in arbitration that weakened Ali's position and fostered the Kharijite splinter, highlighting how unresolved succession legitimacy fueled civil strife over authority and retribution. These conflicts, documented in later historiographies like al-Tabari's, reflect causal tensions from ad hoc caliphal selections versus claims of divine appointment, with Sunni sources emphasizing consensus and Shia narratives prioritizing Ali's primacy, though empirical unification under demonstrably preserved the community's cohesion against fragmentation.

Origins and Evolution of the Sunni-Shia Divide

The Sunni-Shia divide originated in the following the death of on 8 June 632 CE in . A hasty assembly at the of Banu Sa'ida convened among and Ansar leaders, excluding and his kin who were occupied with the Prophet's burial, resulting in the election of as caliph based on communal consensus (ijma'). This event marked the initial political schism, with 's supporters prioritizing elective leadership from the to maintain unity amid the , while 's partisans (shi'at Ali) contended for hereditary within the Prophet's family, referencing 's declaration at earlier that year on 18 (March 632 CE), where he stated, "For whoever I am his , is his ," interpreted by Shias as implicit designation of but by Sunnis as endorsement of 's spiritual authority without political . Initially more political than theological, the rift deepened during Ali's delayed pledge of allegiance to and persisted through the caliphates of (r. 634–644 CE) and (r. 644–656 CE), whose perceived fueled unrest leading to his assassination. Ali's subsequent caliphate (656–661 CE) faced civil wars, including the (656 CE) against and others, and the (657 CE) against Muawiya ibn Abi Sufyan, culminating in Ali's assassination by a Kharijite in 661 CE. Muawiya's establishment of the and hereditary rule to his son Yazid (r. 680–683 CE) rejected the earlier consultative model, prompting Husayn ibn Ali's refusal of allegiance and his march from to in 680 CE. The on 10 61 (10 October 680 ) represented a pivotal evolution, where Husayn, his family, and 72 companions were massacred by Umayyad forces after being denied water, transforming the divide into a foundational of Shia martyrdom and to illegitimate rule. This event, commemorated annually as , crystallized Shia identity around the as divinely guided succession through Ali's lineage, contrasting Sunni emphasis on the caliphs and community consensus, with the solidifying theologically by the 8th–9th centuries amid Abbasid-era doctrinal developments. Sunnis, comprising the majority, upheld the first four caliphs' legitimacy, while Shias viewed post-Ali rulers as usurpers, though early sources like those compiled in the 8th–10th centuries reflect partisan biases requiring cross-verification for historicity.

References

  1. [1]
    Muhammad's Successors | World Civilization - Lumen Learning
    The minority Islamic branch that believes Muhammad appointed his cousin Ali as his successor and that the caliph should be decided based on this family lineage.
  2. [2]
    Introduction - The Succession to Muhammad
    No event in history has divided Islam more profoundly and durably than the succession to Muḥammad. The right to occupy the Prophet's place at the head of ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] SUNNI AND SHI'A ISLAM: DIFFERENCES AND RELATIONSHIPS
    Sunni and Shi'a differences have their origin in a dispute about who should lead after the death of the Prophet Muhammad. His followers disagreed over issues of ...
  4. [4]
    (PDF) Sunni-Shia Division in Islam: Its Origin, Development, Political ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · The central division between Sunni and Shia Islam arose from disputes over the rightful successor to Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) (Iqbal, 2020) .
  5. [5]
    The Last Days - Islamic History
    Prophet Muhammad [saw] was suffering from headaches that sometimes became unbearable and a high fever. He was leading the prayers in al-Masjid al-Nabawi during ...
  6. [6]
    How Did Prophet Muhammad Die? | IQRA Network
    Sep 9, 2023 · Despite intense headaches and fever, he led prayers for around eleven days. His ailment persisted for about two weeks. Final Week. Amidst ...
  7. [7]
    Death of the Messenger of Allah, The - SunnahOnline.com
    On Wednesday, five days before he died the Prophet's temperature rose so high signalling the severness of his disease. He fainted and suffered from pain.
  8. [8]
    https://www.al-islam.org/restatement-history-islam-and-muslims-sayyid-ali-asghar-razwy/death-muhammad-messenger-god
  9. [9]
    What Is the Date of Prophet Muhammad's Birth and Death?
    Jan 5, 2014 · The most well-known view is that the death of the Prophet occurred on 12th Rabee' al-Awwal 11 AH. Similar Topics. Answer. Table Of Contents.
  10. [10]
    Birth and Death Date of Prophet Muhammad - ITQAN Academy
    Aug 24, 2025 · He died on the 12th of Rabi al-Awwal, 11 AH (632 CE) in the city of Medina. This means that both his birth and death dates fall on the same ...
  11. [11]
    The Prophet Muhammad and the Origins of Islam
    After the Prophet's Death: Emergence of Shi'i and Sunni Sects of Islam When Muhammad died in 632, he had not named a successor. One faction, the Shi'a ...Missing: circumstances | Show results with:circumstances
  12. [12]
    Social Structure of Pre-Islamic Arabs
    The basic pre-Islam Arab social structure was tribal. It simply means individuals were identified by the tribe they belonged to.
  13. [13]
    Pre-Islamic Tribe Management
    Apr 29, 2025 · As the shaykh was not selected but rather gained leadership by convincing others, the rules of succession regarding the shaykh's office in pre- ...
  14. [14]
    Governing Structures in Pre-Islamic Arabia
    Jul 12, 2025 · Yasir Qadhi says, “The people of Mecca did not have one ruler. Instead, they deferred to a council of senior figures. Their rule can be ...
  15. [15]
    Chiefdom, Vassalage and Empire: The Political Structures of Arabia ...
    Politically, pre-Islamic Arabia could be divided into three major power zones: the southern part, consisting of Ma`in, Saba', Hadramawt and Qataban. The central ...
  16. [16]
    Arabia before Islam | A Restatement of the History of Islam and ...
    The most remarkable feature of the political life of Arabia before Islam was the total absence of political organization in any form.
  17. [17]
    An Analysis of the Leadership Model of the Prophet Muhammad
    Jun 28, 2021 · This study examines the empirical reality of situational leadership practices in Islam by analyzing the leadership model adopted by the Prophet Muhammad.
  18. [18]
    Islamic concepts of leadership | Islamic World Class Notes - Fiveable
    Prophetic model of leadership · Muhammad's leadership style combined spiritual guidance with practical governance · Emphasized consultation (shura) with ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Islamic Leadership: Prophet Muhammad as a Role Model for being ...
    Aug 20, 2023 · Furthermore, this paper will compare the role of Rasulullah (PBUH) as a leader of Muslims through the concepts of charismatic leadership, ...
  20. [20]
    Leadership succession in early Islam: Exploring the nature and role ...
    The central section of this article focuses on the leadership of Muhammad and his immediate successors, up to about the year 680. Finally, the discussion ...
  21. [21]
    Islamic Leadership Models--Lessons from early Islam - Academia.edu
    Successful leadership traits included meritocracy, honesty, tolerance, and compassion during early Islamic conquests. The article critiques misconceptions ...
  22. [22]
    Impact of the Events of Saqifa on the Formation of Differences ...
    During the events of Saqifa the successor to the Prophet was chosen, which played a significant role in the division of the Muslim community. We analyzed how ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  23. [23]
    (PDF) Impact of the Events of Saqifa on the Formation of Differences ...
    Jun 21, 2023 · This essay presents an analysis of one such event and its impact on the differences in the sources of Sunni and Shia Islamic traditions.
  24. [24]
    A comparison of four medieval Muslim historians' narratives of Saqīfa
    Mar 11, 2020 · Through a comparative analysis I examine the narrative representation of Saqīfa in four primary historical texts, the differences in the ...
  25. [25]
    Politics | History of Islam
    Ya'qubi reports that the majority had accepted Abu Bakr as caliph. The matter settled amicably. Tabari shows Ali, Zubayr, Talha and Abdullah bin Mas'ud (' ...
  26. [26]
    Islamic History of Khalifa Abu Bakr - Alim.org
    Abu Bakr became the Caliph on the 8th of June 632 C.E. and he died on 23rd August 634 C.E. The period of his caliphate covers two years, two months and fifteen ...
  27. [27]
    Political Development - I | History of Islam
    Just after the death of Prophet Muhammad, in the fall of 632 CE, the Azd tribe of Oman rebelled under their leader Laqit bin Malik (Laqīt bin Mālik dhu-at ...Missing: Bani | Show results with:Bani
  28. [28]
    What is the Bay'ah? | Islamic Civilization
    Dec 3, 2022 · After the death of the Prophet ﷺ, the senior sahaba gathered and elected Abu Bakr as the first Khaleefah, by giving him the bay'ah. Abu Bakr ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Abu Bakr: the Successor of the Messenger of God and the caliphate ...
    The fundamental account about the assembly at the Saqifat Bam. Saida, in which the succession of Abu Bakr to Muhammad was decided, goes back to (Abd Allah ...
  30. [30]
    Ali Ibn Abi Talib and Allegiance | Al-Islam.org
    After six months, when Janabe Zahra (s.a.) expired and the people stopped honouring Hazrat Ali (a.s.) as before, he paid allegiance to Abu Bakr. History however ...
  31. [31]
    Incident of Saqifa - wikishia
    Feb 1, 2025 · The Event of Saqifa and its details are recorded in the sources of Islamic history, such as Tarikh al-Tabari and Tarikh al-Ya'qubi. There are ...Missing: assembly primary
  32. [32]
    Oath of allegiance (bay'ah) of 'Ali ibn Abi Taalib to Abu Bakr as ...
    Dec 21, 2014 · Then he went to Abu Bakr and swore allegiance to him, and the people came to 'Ali and said: You have done the right thing, you have done well.
  33. [33]
    Chapter 2: Saqifa, The First Manifestations - Al-Islam.org
    The Saqifa, after which the event is named, was an old assembly hall in Medina where the people used to discuss and resolve their crucial problems. It was there ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  34. [34]
    Did Imam Ali Give Allegiance to Abu Bakr? - Islamic Insights
    and Read SAHIH BUKHARI : IMAM ALI(A.S) and BANI HASHIM CLAN did not pledge allegiance to Abu bakr untill the 6 months after the demise of Holy Prophet (S.A.W.W) ...
  35. [35]
    Ali Pledging Allegiance to Abu Bakr - Mahajjah
    Narrations That Establish the Bay'ah. 'Ali radiya Llahu 'anhu had pledged allegiance to Abu Bakr radiya Llahu 'anhu after the demise of Rasulullah salla Llahu ' ...
  36. [36]
    Ali ibn Abi Talib pledged allegiance willingly and out of conviction
    Nov 30, 2020 · However it was said that Ali delayed his oath of allegiance for six months; it was also said that in fact he swore allegiance to him on the ...
  37. [37]
    Succession Following the Death of the Islamic Prophet Muhammad
    Dec 12, 2024 · Following Muhammad's death in 632 CE, the Muslim community convened at the Saqifa of the Banu Sa'ida clan in Medina to select a new leader.Missing: Bani | Show results with:Bani
  38. [38]
    Authenticating Hadith and the History of Hadith Criticism
    Jun 24, 2021 · Equipping existing hadiths with one's own isnāds or constructing entirely new chains of transmission was known as 'stealing hadiths (sariqat ...
  39. [39]
    Authentic, Weak and Fabricated Hadiths: What Are the Criteria?
    Aug 31, 2022 · In order for a hadith to be authentic, the isnad has to meet the following criteria: 1- The chain of narrators must be unbroken; 2- None of the transmitters ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Ghadir in Sunni Interpretations Viewpoint
    "This day I have perfected your religion for you, completed My Favor upon you, and have chosen. Islam as your religion (16)". Revelation of this verse in Ghadir ...
  41. [41]
    Ghadir Khum Part 2 | A Shi'ite Encyclopedia - Al-Islam.org
    ... Ghadir Khum, for it has been narrated with as much as 150 authentic chains of transmitters by the Sunnis alone. (Please see Part III for the evidences in ...
  42. [42]
    Hadith al-Manzila - wikishia
    Dec 27, 2023 · This hadith introduces the position of Imam 'Ali (a), with regards to the Prophet (s) and his primacy over other companions.
  43. [43]
    Sahih Muslim 1821d - The Book on Government - كتاب الإمارة
    I heard the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) say: Islam will continue to be triumphant until there have been twelve Caliphs. Then the Prophet (ﷺ) said something which ...
  44. [44]
    The hadeeth “There will appear among you twelve imams coming ...
    Mar 4, 2014 · This hadeeth means is giving glad tidings of the coming of twelve righteous caliphs who will support the truth and treat the people with justice.Missing: isnad | Show results with:isnad
  45. [45]
    Chapter 4: The Great Event Of Ghadir Khumm In Sunni Sources
    Hadith Of Ghadir Is Mutawatir (Widely-Transmitted). According to many Sunni scholars, the hadith of Ghadir has been quoted through many chains of narration and ...<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Hadith on Prophets: Ali is to Muhammad as Aaron to Moses
    Nov 22, 2012 · Ali said, “You leave me behind with the women and children?” The Prophet said, “Are you not pleased in the same position for me as Aaron was to ...Missing: analogy succession
  47. [47]
    35. The Hadith of the Analogy "You Are to Me Like Aaron to Moses"
    'Ali was to the Holy Prophet like Aaron to Moses and that he had all offices of Aaron except the prophethood.
  48. [48]
    Saqifah Bani Sa'idah - Mahajjah
    The claims such historians make are founded upon accounts that are not only fabricated, but also contradict Sa'd's radiya Llahu 'anhu past and lifelong ...
  49. [49]
    The obligation of establishing a caliphate - Al Hakam
    Apr 28, 2025 · Based on these sources, Islamic scholars throughout the ages have agreed that it is imperative to establish a caliphate. Allegiance must ...Missing: doctrine | Show results with:doctrine
  50. [50]
    Event of Ghadir Khumm in the Qur'an, Hadith, History - Al-Islam.org
    The following is a description of the historic event of Ghadir Khumm. Click on the book icons below to see the detailed references backing up each key element ...
  51. [51]
    Imam Ali declared the Successor of Prophet Muhammad in Sunni ...
    Jul 7, 2015 · Shi'a Muslims recognize Imam 'Ali ibn Abi Talib as the temporal, religious and spiritual successor, inheritor, and legatee (wasi) of the Prophet Muhammad.<|separator|>
  52. [52]
    Orientalists and the Event of Ghadir Khumm - Al-Islam.org
    In this brief survey, I have shown that the event of Ghadir Khum is a historical fact which cannot be rejected, and that in studying Shi'ism, the pre-commitment ...
  53. [53]
    Did Prophet Muhammad Appoint a Successor? - ISLAMIC BELIEFS
    Mar 15, 2021 · Surely, he did appoint a successor and that was none other than Imam Ali (as). The Shia' provide three different proofs for this belief.
  54. [54]
    The Successor Of The Prophet | A Brief History of Muhammad, The ...
    Surely, he did appoint a successor and he was none other than Ali (peace be upon him). The Shia provides three different proofs for this belief.
  55. [55]
    Looking At The Hadith Of Ghadir - The Event Of Ghadir 6/8
    So brothers and sisters, there are just numerous, numerous ahadith narrated by hundreds of authentic sources and scholars about 'Eid al-Ghadeer. In fact, even ...
  56. [56]
    Ghadir Khumm: An Orientalist Perspective - Islamic History
    Nov 3, 2021 · The h̩adīth of al-Ghadir Khumm is highly significant in Shī'ī historiography and theology. According to Lalani and Jafri this incident was an ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Developing Tolerance and Conservatism: A Study of Ibadi Oman
    The Shi'ites refuse to recognize Abu. Bakr's ascension to the caliphate because they believe 'Ali should have been the rightful heir to the Prophet due to their ...
  58. [58]
    (PDF) The role of Ibadi Islam in the shaping of Omani national identity
    ... Abu Bakr (632-634), 'Umar ibn al-Khattab (634-644), 'Uthman ibn 'Affan ... The Ibadi perspective on the caliphate of 'Uthman is divided into two phases ...
  59. [59]
    Ibāḍism: History, Doctrines, and Recent Scholarship - Compass Hub
    Sep 3, 2015 · The roots of Ibāḍism go back to those who were discontented with the rule of the third caliph of Islam, 'Uthmān ibn 'Affān (23–35/644–656 CE), ...<|separator|>
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Some Zaydī Views on the Companions of the Prophet Author(s)
    More radical Zaydis take a different point of view. They claim that although the designation of 'Ali as Muhammad's successor was implicit, its contents and.
  61. [61]
    Ismaili Imamat - AKDN
    The Ismaili Imamat is a supra-national entity, representing the succession of Imams since the time of the Prophet Muhammad.
  62. [62]
    https://islamic-awareness.org/hadith/hadith.html
  63. [63]
    [PDF] The Methodology of Compilation of Sahih Al Bukhari and Sahih ...
    Jul 1, 2020 · Imam Muslim has differed from Bukhari in his methodology and criteria for the collection of hadith. He spent many years in the collection and ...<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Islamic Law: The Impact of Joseph Schacht - Soeren Kern
    Jan 1, 1978 · First, he thinks that even the fabricated ahadith represent the developing usage of the Muslim community, and thus have some relevance for ...
  65. [65]
    “Common Links” as the Creators of Hadith: A Case Study of a Syrian ...
    Oct 27, 2022 · Since Goldziher's time, a succession of scholars—including Joseph Schacht, Gautier Juynboll, Harald Motzki, and Gregor Schoeler—have ...
  66. [66]
    Patricia Crone and the “secular tradition” of early Islamic ...
    Sep 21, 2022 · For this reason, the “secular tradition” is substantially more reliable than the other traditions within early Islamic historiography, which ...
  67. [67]
    Some non-Islamic sources about Islam in the first 50 years - Reddit
    Jun 14, 2021 · Here I compile many of the sources that refer to the rise of Islam, the Arabian armies, and Muhammad, which were composed within about 50 years of the death of ...Reliability of Hadiths compared to apostolic succession or New ...Is recovering the historical Ali possible? : r/AcademicQuran - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
  68. [68]
    [PDF] The Succession to Muhammad - Almuslih
    Much of the basic western research on the history of the early succession to Muhammad was carried out and published by a few scholars in the early decades of ...
  69. [69]
    The Nature of Early Islamic Sources and the Debate Over their ... - jstor
    A coherent reading of these sources is impossible without cross referencing sources such as the Koran, the Hadith, exegeses of the Koran and biographies of the ...
  70. [70]
    The Succession to Muhammad
    In a comprehensive study of early Islamic history, Wilferd Madelung examines the conflict which developed after Muhammad's death for the leadership of the ...
  71. [71]
    Muhammad and the Believers: At the Origins of Islam
    In Muhammad and the Believers, the eminent historian Fred Donner offers a lucid and original vision of how Islam first evolved. ... Donner's overarching thesis in ...
  72. [72]
    Analysis of Wilferd Madelung's book “The Succession to Muhammad”
    Aug 2, 2012 · To start off, Madelung relied on Abu Mikhnaf, Al-Mufeed, and Nasr bin Muzahim extensively. He also said that Al-Waqidi is the more reliable ...Missing: evaluations | Show results with:evaluations<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    The Succession to Muhammad: A Study of the Early Caliphate. By ...
    >The Succession to Muhammad: A Study of the Early Caliphate.... ... £45.00. Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 September 2009. Hugh Kennedy ...
  74. [74]
    [PDF] The successor of the Prophet. - DiVA portal
    Jan 10, 2018 · The main purpose of this thesis is to understand the complex issue in regards to who should've succeeded the Prophet Muhammed after his passing ...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] The Succession to Muhammad
    The outcome of the war, which marked the demise of the reign of the Early Companions, led to the establishment of dynastic despotism under the Umayyad caliphate ...
  76. [76]
    Ghadir Khumm - Islamic Studies - Oxford Bibliographies
    May 25, 2011 · Ghadir Khumm is well known in the history of Islam as the site where Muhammad pronounced a significant declaration in favor of ʿAli b. Abi Talib, his cousin ...
  77. [77]
    10 - The Rashidun, Umayyad (661–750) and Abbasid (750–1258 ...
    Jan 6, 2025 · No formal legislation or religious guidance had been left for political succession prior to Muhammad's death in 632, making the succession to ...
  78. [78]
    The Ridda Wars (632-633 CE): Arabia's Apostasy Wars Explained
    May 16, 2023 · Following Prophet Muhammed's death, tribes across Arabia rejected Islam and the authority of Abu Bakr, the new caliph. The so-called Ridda Wars ensued.
  79. [79]
    What were the Ridda wars​? Causes and Consequences Explained
    Jun 17, 2025 · The apostasy of several Arab tribes after the death of the Prophet ﷺ. · The rejection by some tribes of the leadership of Abu Bakr Al-Siddiq in ...
  80. [80]
    Umar bin al-Khattab, the Second Khalifa of the Muslims - Al-Islam.org
    Umar's caliphate is notable for its many conquests. His generals conquered Iraq, Iran, Azerbaijan, Kirman, Seistan, Khurasan, Syria, Jordan, Palestine and Egypt ...
  81. [81]
    The Inspiring Story of Umar ibn al Khattab - Studio Arabiya
    Jul 14, 2025 · According to historical accounts, more than 4,050 cities were captured during Umar's military conquests. Conquest of the Eastern Roman Empire ...
  82. [82]
    [PDF] THE ERA OF THE RIGHTLY GUIDED CALIPHS (PERSONALITY OF ...
    The succession system in the Rashidun period was studied with a focus on the process of selecting a caliph, consultation mechanisms, and the factors influencing ...
  83. [83]
    Uthman, the Third Khalifa of the Muslims - Al-Islam.org
    Uthman bin Affan, the Third Khalifa of the Muslims, 644-656. Uthman bin ... Causes of the Assassination of Uthman. Uthman was khalifa for twelve years ...
  84. [84]
    Islamic History of Khalifa Ali ibn Abi Talib | The Battle of the Camel
    The Fourth Caliph Ali Biography. The Battle of the Camel. Alim provides the exclusive site for the history, facts and biography of Hazrat Ali ibn Abi Talib.<|separator|>
  85. [85]
    The Battle Of The Camel | The Life of Ali Ibn Abi Talib - Al-Islam.org
    The War of the Camel was waged by persons who breached their homage to Imam Ali ('a) and contravened the covenant they had made with Almighty Allah.
  86. [86]
    The Era of the Rightly Guided Caliphs (Personality ... - ResearchGate
    Aug 8, 2025 · The succession system in the Rashidun period was studied with a focus on the process of selecting a caliph, consultation mechanisms, and the ...
  87. [87]
    Tradition vs Charisma: The Sunni-Shi'i Divide in the Muslim World
    Nov 17, 2007 · Sunnis believe that Muhammad (570-632 CE) was the last divinely inspired individual and that the khalifas or caliphs, literally the successors ...
  88. [88]
    Chronology: A History of the Shiite-Sunni Split - NPR
    Feb 12, 2007 · The division of Islam into Sunni and Shiite branches goes far back in Muslim history to the aftermath of the death of the Prophet Muhammad.
  89. [89]
    Islam's Sunni-Shia Divide, Explained - History.com
    Jul 31, 2019 · The roots of the Sunni-Shia divide can be traced all the way back to the seventh century, soon after the death of the prophet Muhammad in A.D. ...
  90. [90]
    Sunni versus Shia: Origin Story of the Divide - World History Edu
    Jan 1, 2025 · The Sunni-Shia divide in Islam is rooted in a succession dispute after the Prophet Muhammad's death in 632 CE.
  91. [91]
    Who are the Shia? ~ Battle of Karbala | Wide Angle - PBS
    Mar 26, 2007 · The Shia rose in the city of al-Kufah (south of Karbala, in present-day Iraq) and, in 680 AD, invited Ali's son Hussein to join them and be their leader.
  92. [92]
    https://brill.com/view/journals/ihiw/6/3/article-p300_4.xml
  93. [93]
    (PDF) Joseph Campbell, Shiʿism, and the Karbala Narrative
    Dec 5, 2022 · Using Campbell's definitions of myth, it shows how the Karbala narrative functions as mythos rather than as history, although usually understood ...<|separator|>