Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Sulindac

Sulindac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) of the indene acetic acid class, developed by Merck & Co. and marketed under the brand name Clinoril for the symptomatic relief of pain and inflammation associated with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and acute subacromial bursitis or supraspinatus tendinitis. As a prodrug, sulindac is administered as an inactive sulfoxide that undergoes hepatic bioactivation to its active sulfide metabolite, which inhibits cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes, thereby reducing prostaglandin synthesis responsible for inflammation and pain. This pharmacokinetic profile contributes to its enterohepatic recirculation and potentially lower renal toxicity compared to some other NSAIDs, though it shares common class risks including gastrointestinal ulceration and cardiovascular events. Notably, sulindac has been studied for chemopreventive effects in colorectal neoplasia, with evidence from clinical trials indicating polyp reduction in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients upon treatment cessation and recurrence, though it is not approved for this indication. Approved by the FDA in the late 1970s, sulindac remains available by prescription for short-term and chronic use in arthritis management, balancing efficacy against NSAID-related adverse effects.

Pharmacology

Mechanism of action

Sulindac is a that requires metabolic activation in the liver via reduction of its group to form the sulindac , which is responsible for its pharmacological effects. This occurs primarily through cytosolic enzymes, rendering sulindac itself pharmacologically inactive until converted. An alternative oxidation pathway produces sulindac sulfone, which lacks significant inhibitory activity. The primary of sulindac sulfide involves reversible, nonselective inhibition of both cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and (COX-2) enzymes, thereby suppressing the synthesis of and thromboxanes from . This reduction in levels mediates the drug's , , and properties by decreasing of peripheral nociceptors and inhibiting at sites of tissue injury. COX-1 inhibition contributes to effects on and platelet aggregation, while COX-2 inhibition predominates in inducible inflammatory responses. Although the precise molecular interactions are not fully elucidated, sulindac sulfide binds to the active sites of enzymes, preventing substrate access and downstream production, consistent with the general class of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Unlike irreversible inhibitors such as aspirin, sulindac's effects are reversible, allowing recovery of enzyme function upon drug clearance. Experimental studies indicate that sulindac sulfide exhibits greater potency against COX-1 compared to COX-2, though clinical efficacy reflects combined inhibition.

Pharmacokinetics

Sulindac, an inactive , is rapidly absorbed from the after , achieving approximately 90% unaffected by antacids containing aluminum and magnesium hydroxides. The extent of absorption is comparable between tablet and solution formulations. Sulindac exhibits high , exceeding 93% for the parent compound and reaching 98% for the active , primarily to . It distributes widely, including penetration of the blood-brain and placental barriers. Metabolism occurs primarily in the liver via the moiety, involving reversible reduction to the pharmacologically active sulindac (responsible for inhibition and effects) and irreversible oxidation to the inactive sulindac . The undergoes enterohepatic recirculation, contributing to prolonged . Elimination follows , with approximately 50% of the dose excreted in urine (mainly as conjugated ) and 25% in (as or forms). The mean is 7.8 hours for sulindac and 16.4 hours for the ; renal clearance averages 68 /min in healthy adults. In special populations, warrant caution: hepatic impairment may necessitate dose reduction due to altered , while renal insufficiency ( <60 mL/min/1.73 m²) requires monitoring or avoidance, as sulindac disposition remains altered despite studied parameters in end-stage disease. No significant pharmacokinetic differences due to race or age have been identified, though pediatric data are lacking.

Medical uses

Approved indications

Sulindac, a (NSAID), is approved by the () for acute or long-term symptomatic relief of , (excluding patients classified as Functional Class IV by the American Rheumatism Association, indicating severe incapacity), , acute painful shoulder (specifically acute or supraspinatus tendinitis), and acute gouty . These approvals emphasize its role in reducing pain, inflammation, and associated symptoms rather than altering disease progression. In , sulindac addresses pain and stiffness from degradation, typically used when other analgesics prove insufficient. For , efficacy is supported by clinical trials showing improvements in tenderness and swelling, though long-term use requires monitoring due to potential cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risks inherent to NSAIDs. approval targets spinal and sacroiliac inflammation, with dosing aimed at maintaining mobility. Acute indications include gouty arthritis, where sulindac mitigates severe joint flares from uric acid crystal deposition, often as an alternative to other anti-inflammatories. Similarly, for acute shoulder conditions like or supraspinatus tendinitis, it provides short-term relief of localized pain and inflammation, with recommendations to limit duration to minimize adverse effects. All uses mandate the lowest effective dose for the shortest period to balance benefits against risks such as gastrointestinal ulceration or renal impairment.

Off-label and investigational uses

Sulindac has been used off-label for the management of colorectal polyps in patients with (), a genetic condition predisposing individuals to numerous tous polyps and high risk of . In a 1993 randomized trial involving patients post-colectomy, sulindac at 400 mg daily reduced the mean number of rectal polyps from 18.5 to 8.5 after one year and the size from 3.3 mm to 2.2 mm, though effects were incomplete and polyps recurred upon discontinuation. Long-term administration (up to 9 years) at 150-200 mg twice daily has demonstrated sustained reduction in polyp number and prevention of higher-grade recurrence in retained rectal segments, with endoscopic recommended due to incomplete . Combination therapy with sulindac and resulted in a 69% reduction in burden after 6 months in patients, outperforming in a phase II trial. However, a phase III trial combining sulindac with did not show superior prevention of disease progression compared to either agent alone. Investigational applications of sulindac extend to cancer chemoprevention and treatment, leveraging its non-cyclooxygenase-dependent mechanisms such as induction of and inhibition of . In preclinical models, sulindac metabolite has inhibited growth of colon cancer cells independent of inhibition and enhanced oxidative stress-induced killing in colon and cells. For , sulindac derivatives induced in cell lines via COX-independent pathways. A phase II trial explored sulindac in (AML), hypothesizing inhibition could target leukemic stem cells, though results remain unpublished as of 2025. Sulindac combined with was investigated for desmoid tumors in FAP patients, aiming to block tumor growth enzymes. Recent studies suggest potential synergy with chemotherapeutics in models, reducing proliferation and invasion. Despite promising preclinical data, clinical efficacy for these indications requires further validation through randomized trials, given sulindac's primary approval for inflammatory conditions and associated cardiovascular risks.

Safety and adverse effects

Common adverse effects

Gastrointestinal disturbances represent the most frequent adverse effects associated with sulindac use, occurring in up to 10% of patients for specifically, with other symptoms such as dyspepsia, , , , , anorexia, and reported in 3-9% of cases. These effects are milder and less frequent compared to aspirin in clinical trials for and , though they remain a primary reason for discontinuation in some patients. Central nervous system effects, including , , and nervousness, occur in 3-9% of users, while dermatologic reactions such as and pruritus are similarly prevalent at 3-9%. and are also noted as common, though specific incidence rates vary across studies. Sulindac's nature, requiring hepatic bioactivation, may contribute to a relatively lower overall gastrointestinal profile versus other nonsteroidal drugs, but empirical data from controlled trials confirm these symptoms as dose-dependent and more pronounced with long-term use. Administration with or can mitigate some gastrointestinal symptoms, though efficacy data indicate persistence in a subset of patients.

Serious adverse effects

Sulindac, like other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), is associated with an increased risk of serious gastrointestinal adverse events, including ulceration, , and of the , , or proximal large bowel, which can occur at any time during treatment with or without warning symptoms and may be fatal. These complications have been estimated to affect approximately 1% of patients receiving chronic NSAID therapy, with elderly individuals, those with a history of , and users of or facing heightened vulnerability. The concurrent use of sulindac with anticoagulants such as synergistically elevates the risk of severe . Cardiovascular risks constitute another boxed warning for sulindac, encompassing serious thrombotic events such as and , which can prove fatal; this risk may emerge early in treatment and increases with higher doses and prolonged duration. Patients with preexisting or risk factors, including and , experience amplified susceptibility. Renal effects include potential , , and papillary , particularly in patients with compromised renal function, volume depletion, or those on diuretics or inhibitors; sulindac is contraindicated in advanced renal disease. Hepatotoxicity manifests as borderline elevations in liver enzymes in up to 15% of patients, with rare but severe reactions including , fulminant , liver , and hepatic failure, sometimes fatal, occurring during therapy. Sulindac ranks among NSAIDs more frequently linked to clinically apparent . Additional serious reactions encompass hypersensitivity syndromes such as anaphylactoid responses, and dermatologic emergencies including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, , and exfoliative . Hematologic complications, including and , have been reported rarely.

Risk mitigation and monitoring

To mitigate cardiovascular risks associated with sulindac, clinicians recommend prescribing the lowest effective dose for the shortest duration necessary, as prolonged use elevates the incidence of thrombotic events such as myocardial infarction and stroke. Patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease, hypertension, or risk factors like smoking should undergo regular blood pressure monitoring, with sulindac avoided perioperatively in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. For gastrointestinal risks, including , , and —which occur more frequently in elderly patients or those with prior ulcer history—strategies include co-administration of inhibitors in high-risk individuals and vigilant symptom surveillance for , , or . Discontinuation is advised upon suspicion of severe events, with monitoring to detect from occult bleeding. Renal function requires baseline and periodic assessment via serum creatinine and levels, particularly in patients with , , , or concurrent diuretic/ use, as sulindac can precipitate acute or papillary . Dose reduction or avoidance is indicated if estimated falls below 30 mL/min/1.73 m², with prompt discontinuation upon evidence of decompensation. Hepatic monitoring involves initial and interval liver function tests (e.g., , ), with sulindac halted if elevations persist or develops, given reports of idiosyncratic . In long-term therapy, comprehensive chemistry profiles, including electrolytes and hematologic parameters, aid in early detection of multisystem effects. Overall patient response, efficacy, and adverse events should be evaluated regularly to guide adjustments or cessation.

Contraindications, precautions, and interactions

Contraindications

Sulindac is contraindicated in patients with known to sulindac or any of its excipients. It is also prohibited in individuals who have previously experienced attacks, urticaria, or other allergic-type reactions after taking aspirin or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), due to the risk of and potentially life-threatening anaphylactoid responses. The drug is further contraindicated for perioperative pain management in the setting of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, as NSAIDs like sulindac increase the incidence of myocardial infarction and stroke in this context, based on clinical trial data showing heightened cardiovascular thrombotic risks. While not universally listed as an absolute contraindication in U.S. prescribing information, sulindac use is avoided in patients with active peptic ulceration or inflammatory gastrointestinal disease in some regulatory contexts, owing to exacerbated bleeding risks from NSAID-induced inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis.

Drug interactions

Sulindac, a (NSAID), exhibits pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions with numerous medications, primarily due to its inhibition of enzymes, effects on renal synthesis, and potential for gastrointestinal mucosal damage. Concomitant use with other NSAIDs or aspirin increases the risk of gastrointestinal ulceration and bleeding, as sulindac does not provide gastroprotective benefits against these agents and may exacerbate their ulcerogenic potential. Anticoagulants such as require monitoring during sulindac therapy, as NSAIDs can potentiate effects through platelet inhibition and reduced clotting factor synthesis, elevating bleeding risk. Similarly, thrombolytic agents like may have heightened bleeding risks when combined with sulindac. Sulindac can attenuate the antihypertensive effects of (ACE) inhibitors and antagonists by interfering with renal prostaglandin-mediated , potentially leading to elevated ; concurrent use necessitates monitoring. Diuretics, including and types, experience reduced natriuretic and antihypertensive efficacy with sulindac due to similar prostaglandin suppression, which may precipitate renal impairment, particularly in volume-depleted patients. Methotrexate toxicity increases with sulindac co-administration, as NSAIDs displace methotrexate from plasma proteins and reduce its renal clearance, heightening risks of bone marrow suppression and other adverse effects; dosage adjustments and monitoring are advised. Lithium levels may rise with sulindac, owing to decreased renal lithium excretion via prostaglandin inhibition, requiring serum level surveillance to avoid toxicity. Cyclosporine combined with sulindac elevates risk through additive renal vasoconstriction and reduced glomerular filtration, mandating renal function assessment. concentrations warrant monitoring, as sulindac may impair its clearance. consumption heightens gastrointestinal bleeding potential with sulindac by further compromising mucosal integrity. Overall, 391 drugs interact with sulindac, underscoring the need for individualized .

History and development

Discovery and approval

Sulindac, chemically designated as (Z)-5-fluoro-2-methyl-1-[[p-(methylsulfinyl)phenyl]methylene]-1H-indene-3-acetic acid, was developed by Merck & Co., Inc. as a in the arylalkanoic acid class of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The compound's name derives from its structural features: sul(finyl), ind(ene), and ac(etic acid). Merck patented sulindac in 1969, positioning it as an alternative to earlier NSAIDs like indomethacin, with preclinical emphasis on its metabolic activation to an active form via liver enzymes, potentially reducing gastrointestinal toxicity compared to direct-acting congeners. The U.S. (FDA) approved sulindac on September 27, 1978, under the brand name Clinoril, initially for acute and long-term management of , , , and acute painful shoulder (acute /supraspinatus tendinitis). This approval followed clinical trials demonstrating its , , and efficacy, comparable to aspirin or indomethacin but with a responsible for inhibition. Subsequent international approvals expanded its availability, though Merck later suspended production of certain formulations in 1994 due to manufacturing issues.

Patent expiration and generics

The primary United States patent for sulindac, US Patent 3,654,349 issued to Merck & Co. on April 4, 1972, provided protection for the compound's composition and expired in 1989 under the pre-1995 patent term of 17 years from issuance. No significant patent term extensions were granted for the original drug substance, as sulindac received FDA approval in 1978 under the brand name Clinoril prior to the modern Hatch-Waxman framework that formalized such extensions. Following patent expiry, the FDA approved the first (ANDA) for generic sulindac on April 3, 1990, to Laboratories (ANDA 071891). Additional ANDAs were subsequently approved, including those from Pharma on March 25, 1991 (ANDA 072711 for 150 mg and 200 mg tablets). These approvals enabled market entry of lower-cost generics, with multiple manufacturers such as Pharmaceuticals, Rising Pharmaceuticals, and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries offering equivalents by the early . Generic sulindac's availability reduced wholesale acquisition costs to approximately $0.10–$0.20 per 200 mg tablet by the , compared to higher pricing prior to . Merck discontinued Clinoril in the United States around 2011 due to declining demand amid generic dominance, though generic versions remained accessible for conditions like and . As of 2023, sulindac generics continue to be listed in FDA-approved products, with no active patents blocking further .

Major litigation cases

In 2007, Karen L. Bartlett filed a against Mutual Pharmaceutical Company in the United States District Court for the District of after developing Stevens-Johnson syndrome and following ingestion of generic sulindac prescribed for shoulder pain in 2004. The suit alleged design defect under law, claiming the drug's risks outweighed benefits and that Mutual should have altered its , strengthened warnings, or withdrawn it from the market, despite requirements mandating identical labeling and inactive ingredients to the branded version, Clinoril. A found Mutual liable in 2010, awarding Bartlett approximately $21 million in compensatory damages. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the verdict in May 2012, rejecting Mutual's preemption defense and holding that state design-defect claims were not impliedly preempted by federal drug regulations, as manufacturers could theoretically stop selling the product to avoid liability. The court emphasized that sulindac's , sulfide sulindac, contributed to the severe adverse reaction, and noted prior FDA-approved warnings for rare but serious skin reactions, though Bartlett's experts argued the drug's overall risk profile warranted stricter measures. Mutual had dispensed the generic equivalent without independent testing beyond to Clinoril, as required under the Hatch-Waxman Act. No other major or cases specifically involving sulindac have resulted in landmark lower-court rulings comparable to , though routine generic entry disputes occurred post-patent expiration without notable litigation outcomes. The U.S. had approved sulindac in 1978 after reviewing its safety profile, including dermatologic risks, and disputed claims of inherent unsafety in amicus briefs during appeals.

Supreme Court rulings and implications

In Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett, 570 U.S. 472 (2013), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed liability for generic versions of sulindac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug marketed under the brand name Clinoril by Merck. Karen Bartlett, the petitioner, was prescribed sulindac in 2004 for shoulder pain; her pharmacist dispensed Mutual Pharmaceutical's generic equivalent. Bartlett subsequently developed Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis, severe skin reactions causing extensive tissue damage and permanent disfigurement, including loss of vision in one eye and facial scarring. She filed suit in New Hampshire state court, alleging design defect under state tort law, claiming the drug's risks outweighed its benefits given inadequate warnings and the absence of safer alternatives. A jury found Mutual liable and awarded Bartlett approximately $21 million in damages, which the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld. The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision authored by Justice Alito on June 24, 2013, reversed the lower courts, holding that federal law under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act preempts state-law design-defect claims against generic drug manufacturers. The Court reasoned that generic manufacturers must match the brand-name drug's active ingredient, dosage, and labeling exactly, as required by FDA regulations for bioequivalence and abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs), leaving them unable to unilaterally alter the drug's composition or warnings without violating federal standards. This impossibility precluded compliance with conflicting state duties to redesign or strengthen warnings, extending preemption principles from failure-to-warn claims in PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing (2011) to design defects. The majority rejected arguments for a risk-utility balancing test under state law, emphasizing that sulindac's chemical simplicity made redesign infeasible without creating a new drug subject to full FDA approval. The ruling has significant implications for sulindac litigation and the pharmaceutical industry. It immunizes generic sulindac producers from state for defects, limiting patient remedies primarily to defects or failure-to-warn claims against brand-name manufacturers like Merck, even post-patent expiration. Critics, including the dissent by Sotomayor (joined by Ginsburg, Breyer, and Kagan), argued the decision undermines state by shielding generics—which comprise over 80% of U.S. prescriptions—from accountability for known risks like Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, potentially discouraging FDA-mandated safety updates. Proponents viewed it as promoting affordable generics by avoiding duplicative , though it has prompted calls for congressional , such as enhanced FDA oversight or allowing generic label changes. No subsequent cases have directly revisited sulindac-specific preemption, but the decision reinforces federal dominance in drug regulation, influencing outcomes in analogous NSAID injury suits.

Ongoing research

Chemopreventive applications

Sulindac has demonstrated efficacy in reducing burden as an adjunctive chemopreventive agent, particularly in patients with () who have undergone with ileorectal . In a long-term study of patients treated with sulindac for an average of 63 months post-, number decreased significantly, with prevention of higher-grade recurrence in the retained rectal segment. Similarly, a randomized trial combining sulindac with in patients resulted in a 69% reduction in burden compared to , highlighting synergistic effects through inhibition and blockade. However, sulindac alone at standard doses failed to prevent initial development in genotypically confirmed patients without prior s, indicating limitations in primary prophylaxis. For sporadic colorectal adenomas, sulindac in combination with difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) has shown promise in preventing recurrence. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial reported that low-dose DFMO plus sulindac reduced adenoma recurrence by approximately 40% over three years in patients with prior adenomas, outperforming either agent alone in some metrics, though with increased gastrointestinal adverse events. A 2024 meta-analysis confirmed DFMO-sulindac's superior efficacy over sulindac monotherapy for colorectal adenoma prevention but noted higher risks of side effects, suggesting careful patient selection. Intermittent dosing regimens of sulindac have also been explored to minimize toxicity while maintaining polyp regression in preclinical models, with potential translation to human sporadic adenoma prevention. Ongoing investigations extend sulindac's chemopreventive potential beyond colorectal applications. A phase II trial is evaluating sulindac for preventing progression from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) to , leveraging its anti-inflammatory and apoptotic effects in high-risk pancreatic lesions. Combinations like plus sulindac in advanced did not significantly outperform monotherapy in halting disease progression, per a 2020 randomized trial, underscoring the need for refined regimens. Preliminary data from derivatives of sulindac suggest enhanced targeting of pathways for interception, though clinical validation remains pending as of 2023. These efforts prioritize sulindac's non-cyclooxygenase mechanisms, such as Wnt/β-catenin suppression, to improve tolerability in long-term prevention strategies.

Other therapeutic potentials

Sulindac has demonstrated preclinical potential in mitigating lung inflammation associated with through mechanisms independent of inhibition. In mouse models of , sulindac reduced neutrophil influx and inflammatory cytokine levels in fluid, suggesting utility in dampening excessive pulmonary inflammation without exacerbating the underlying defect in CFTR function. These effects were observed at doses comparable to those used clinically for purposes, indicating possible repurposing for lung disease management, though human trials remain lacking. In neurodegenerative contexts, sulindac and its active metabolite sulindac sulfide have exhibited promise in Alzheimer's disease models by modulating amyloid-beta (Aβ) pathology. Sulindac sulfide acts as a noncompetitive γ-secretase modulator, selectively reducing the production of neurotoxic Aβ42 peptides while sparing total Aβ levels, as evidenced in cell cultures and APP transgenic mouse brains where acute administration lowered brain Aβ42 by up to 50%. Additionally, chronic sulindac treatment in aged rats improved spatial memory performance in the Morris water maze and upregulated NMDA receptor subunits NR1 and NR2B in hippocampal regions, countering age-related declines. Structural studies further reveal that sulindac sulfide intercalates into Aβ fibrils, promoting formation of larger, less neurotoxic oligomeric aggregates rather than disrupting fibril architecture entirely. Epidemiological data support broader NSAID class effects in delaying Alzheimer's onset, with long-term use associated with reduced incidence, though sulindac-specific clinical evidence is limited to preclinical and associative findings. Emerging research also explores sulindac derivatives for hypoxic inflammatory conditions, such as ischemia-reperfusion , where sulindac-NO hybrids exhibit synergistic effects by enhancing bioavailability and mitigating tissue damage in hypoxic models. These applications remain investigational, with no approved indications beyond standard NSAID uses, and further clinical validation is required to assess efficacy and safety profiles.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] CLINORIL® - accessdata.fda.gov
    CLINORIL® (Sulindac). CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY. Pharmacodynamics. CLINORIL is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that exhibits anti-inflammatory, ...
  2. [2]
    Sulindac - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    Feb 15, 2024 · Sulindac is classified as a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), exhibiting anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties.
  3. [3]
    Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Sulindac. A Dynamic Old Drug - PubMed
    Sulindac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) of the indene acetic acid class. The absorption of sulindac is rapid when given orally.
  4. [4]
    Sulindac. A potentially renal-sparing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory ...
    Dec 3, 1982 · The data presented suggest that sulindac has less potential for renal toxicity and may be the preferred NSAID for use in patients with impaired ...
  5. [5]
    Sulindac - LiverTox - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    Jul 20, 2025 · Sulindac is a commonly used nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) that is available by prescription only and used predominantly to ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Sulindac - IARC Publications
    When treatment with sulindac was stopped, the polyps reappeared; when treatment was resumed, the polyps regressed again (Chameau.
  7. [7]
    Sulindac plus a phospholipid is effective for polyp reduction and ...
    Sep 10, 2020 · Sulindac has been shown to inhibit β-catenin expression in the histologically normal appearing colon tissue of patients with the hereditary ...
  8. [8]
    Sulindac - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Sulindac, an orally active NSAID, was developed by Merck & Co and received FDA approval in 1978 for the treatment of RA. This compound functions as both a COX ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  9. [9]
    Sulindac: Uses, Interactions, Mechanism of Action | DrugBank Online
    Sulindac is an NSAID used to treat osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, acute subacromial bursitis or supraspinatus tendinitis, ...Identification · Pharmacology · Interactions · References
  10. [10]
    Sulindac | C20H17FO3S | CID 1548887 - PubChem - NIH
    Sulindac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) of the arylalkanoic acid class that is marketed by Merck under the brand name Clinoril. Like other ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  11. [11]
    assay and role of the methionine sulfoxide reductase system - PubMed
    Sulindac is a pro-drug, containing a methyl sulfoxide group, that must be reduced to sulindac sulfide to be active as a COX inhibitor.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] CLINORIL® - accessdata.fda.gov
    Sulindac pharmacokinetics have been investigated in patients with renal insufficiency. The disposition of sulindac was studied in end-stage renal disease ...
  13. [13]
    Sulindac: Package Insert / Prescribing Information - Drugs.com
    Jul 27, 2025 · Sulindac tablets are a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that exhibits anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic activities in animal models.
  14. [14]
    Sulindac: MedlinePlus Drug Information
    Mar 15, 2021 · It is also used to relieve gouty arthritis (attacks of severe joint pain and swelling caused by a build-up of certain substances in the joints) ...
  15. [15]
    Treatment of Colonic and Rectal Adenomas with Sulindac in ...
    May 6, 1993 · Sulindac reduces the number and size of colorectal adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, but its effect is incomplete.
  16. [16]
    Long-term treatment with sulindac in familial adenomatous polyposis
    Long-term use of sulindac seems to be effective in reducing polyp number and preventing recurrence of higher-grade adenomas in the retained rectal segment of ...
  17. [17]
    Association of Sulindac and Erlotinib vs Placebo With Colorectal ...
    May 1, 2018 · We showed that combination treatment with sulindac and erlotinib compared with placebo resulted in significantly lower colorectal polyp burden after 6 months ...
  18. [18]
    Eflornithine plus Sulindac for Prevention of Progression in Familial ...
    Sep 9, 2020 · The incidence of disease progression was not significantly lower with the combination of eflornithine and sulindac than with either drug alone.
  19. [19]
    Sulindac sulfide inhibits colon cancer cell growth and ... - NIH
    Dec 16, 2015 · Sulindac, a COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitor, has been extensively investigated as a potent chemotherapeutic drug for treatment of colon and other ...Missing: investigational | Show results with:investigational
  20. [20]
    Sulindac Enhances the Killing of Cancer Cells Exposed to Oxidative ...
    Jun 5, 2009 · Pretreatment of human colon and lung cancer cells with sulindac enhances killing by an oxidizing agent such as tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) ...Missing: investigational | Show results with:investigational
  21. [21]
    Sulindac derivatives inhibit growth and induce apoptosis in human ...
    Sulindac derivatives can cause growth inhibition and induce apoptosis in human prostate cancer cells by a COX-1 and -2 independent mechanism.Missing: investigational | Show results with:investigational
  22. [22]
    Study Details | NCT01843179 | Sulindac for Patients With AML
    For this study, the investigators are using a COX inhibitor called sulindac, which has been FDA approved and used to treat pain and inflammation for many years, ...
  23. [23]
    Sulindac and Tamoxifen in Treating Patients With Desmoid Tumor
    Sulindac may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking the enzymes necessary for cancer cell growth. Hormone therapy using tamoxifen may fight cancer by ...
  24. [24]
    Sulindac exhibits anti-proliferative and anti-invasive effects in ...
    Aug 28, 2024 · The combination of sulindac and chemotherapeutic agents or immunoreagents produces synergic effects on cell proliferation and tumor growth in ...Missing: investigational | Show results with:investigational<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    Sulindac Prescription & Dosage Information - MPR - eMPR.com
    Half-life: 7.8 hours. Sulindac Interactions. Interactions. Increased risk of GI toxicity with aspirin, other NSAIDs, alcohol, smoking. Probenecid increases ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Reference ID - accessdata.fda.gov
    WARNING: CARDIOVASCULAR and GASTROINTESTINAL RISKS. See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. ... No pharmacokinetic interaction was detected ...
  27. [27]
    SULINDAC tablet - DailyMed - NIH
    NSAIDs, including sulindac, can cause serious skin adverse reactions such as exfoliative dermatitis, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), and toxic epidermal ...
  28. [28]
    Sulindac | Side Effects, Dosage, Uses, and More - Healthline
    Dangerous stomach problems warning: Taking sulindac increases your risk of stomach bleeding, ulcers, or small holes in the lining of your digestive system, ...
  29. [29]
    Clinoril (Sulindac): Side Effects, Uses, Dosage, Interactions, Warnings
    CLINORIL (sulindac) should be used with caution in patients with fluid retention or heart failure. Gastrointestinal Effects – Risk of Ulceration, Bleeding, and ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] product monograph including patient medication information
    Aug 10, 2022 · TEVA-SULINDAC (sulindac tablets) is indicated for: • The relief of signs and symptoms related to osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis,.
  31. [31]
    Clinoril, Sulin (sulindac) dosing, indications, interactions, adverse ...
    Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (Off-label). 150-200 mg PO q12hr. Renal Impairment. Severe renal impairment: Not recommended; administer lower dose and monitor ...<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Lithium and sulindac Interactions Checker - Drugs.com
    A Moderate Drug Interaction exists between lithium and sulindac. View detailed information regarding this drug interaction.
  33. [33]
    Sulindac (Clinoril): Uses, Side Effects, Interactions ... - WebMD
    May 20, 2024 · How does sulindac work (mechanism of action)? Sulindac works by blocking certain substances in the body that cause pain, inflammation, and ...
  34. [34]
    Sulindac Interactions Checker - Drugs.com
    Sulindac disease interactions · asthma · fluid retention · GI toxicity · rash · renal toxicities · thrombosis · anemia · hepatotoxicity · hyperkalemia ...
  35. [35]
    Sulindac Unveiled: A Detailed Overview of its Revolutionary R&D ...
    Sep 17, 2023 · Developed by Merck & Co., Inc., it has been on the market since 1978 and holds orphan drug status. Its approval in multiple countries highlights ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  36. [36]
    sulindac - Drug Central
    FDA-approved. EMA-approved. PMDA-approved. Target Card Uniprot Example: P23975. sulindac Veterinary Use | Indications/Contra | FAERs-F | FAERs-M | Orange Bk ...
  37. [37]
    MERCK SUSPENDS PRODUCTION OF CLINORIL (SULINDAC)
    Oct 3, 1994 · The company reported Sept. 29 that it voluntarily has ceased production of Clinoril 150 mg and 200 mg tablets using methods approved in May 1993 ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    US3654349A - Substituted indenyl acetic acids - Google Patents
    More specifi cally, this invention relates to substituted indenyl acetic acids, amides, esters and non-toxic pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof. Still ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Rapid acting combination of sodium sulindac and a base
    Mar 16, 1988 · © Date of filing: 18.08.87. © Applicant: MERCK &CO. INC. 126 ... European Patent Department Merck &Co.,. Inc. Terlings Park Eastwick ...
  40. [40]
  41. [41]
  42. [42]
  43. [43]
    Bartlett v. Mut. Pharm. Co., Inc., No. 10-2277 (1st Cir. 2012)
    Plaintiff's doctor prescribed, for shoulder pain, sulindac, a non-steroid anti-inflammatory, under the brand-name Clinoril; her pharmacist dispensed generic ...
  44. [44]
    MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL CO. v. BARTLETT | Supreme Court
    Jun 24, 2013 · When Clinoril's patent expired, the FDA approved several generic sulindacs, including one manufactured by Mutual Pharmaceutical. 678 F. 3d 30, ...
  45. [45]
    Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett | 570 U.S. 472 (2013)
    Jun 24, 2013 · When Clinoril's patent expired, the FDA approved several generic sulindacs, including one manufactured by Mutual Pharmaceutical. 678 F. 3d 30, ...
  46. [46]
    Gregory S. Bartlett, Plaintiff, v. URL (2012) - FindLaw Caselaw
    May 2, 2012 · This products liability case arises out of severe and permanent injuries sustained by plaintiff Karen Bartlett after taking sulindac, a generic ...
  47. [47]
    Justices to Take Up Case on Generic Drug Makers' Liability
    Mar 4, 2013 · Sulindac is the scientific name for Clinoril, a drug similar to ibuprofen that was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1978 and is ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett - Oyez
    Mar 19, 2013 · The Court held that state law design-defect claims regarding the adequacy of a drug's warnings are pre-empted by federal law.Missing: rulings | Show results with:rulings
  49. [49]
    Supreme Court Blocks Generic Drug Lawsuits - C&EN
    Jun 26, 2013 · In a major victory for the pharmaceutical industry, a divided Supreme Court ruled on June 24 that generic drug makers cannot be held liable ...
  50. [50]
    Long-term treatment with sulindac in familial adenomatous polyposis
    Long-term use of sulindac seems to be effective in reducing polyp number and preventing recurrence of higher-grade adenomas in the retained rectal segment of ...
  51. [51]
    Association of Sulindac and Erlotinib vs Placebo With Colorectal ...
    Feb 8, 2018 · Treatment with sulindac and erlotinib was associated with a 69% reduction in colorectal polyp burden in patients with FAP.
  52. [52]
    Primary Chemoprevention of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis with ...
    In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, standard doses of sulindac did not prevent polyps in subjects who were genotypically affected with ...
  53. [53]
    Clinical Prevention of Recurrence of Colorectal Adenomas by the ...
    The dose of sulindac used in the present study was only one half that used in a previous study that showed efficacy in treatment of colonic and rectal ...<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Preventive effects of chemical drugs on recurrence of colorectal ...
    Jan 1, 2024 · Conclusion: DFMO + Sulindac is more effective in reducing the recurrence of CRAs but has a high risk of adverse events. Considering drug safety, ...
  55. [55]
    Intermittent Dosing with Sulindac Provides Effective Colorectal ...
    Sulindac is an NSAID that can provide effective chemoprevention for colorectal cancer. In this study, alternative dosing regimens of sulindac were evaluated ...
  56. [56]
    Sulindac in Preventing Progression to Pancreatic Cancer in Patients ...
    This phase II trial studies the effect of sulindac in preventing progression to pancreatic cancer in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms ...
  57. [57]
    Novel sulindac derivatives for colorectal cancer chemoprevention ...
    This review delves into the scientific literature supporting PDE5 and/or PDE10 as potential targets for CRC chemoprevention or interception.<|control11|><|separator|>
  58. [58]
    Sulindac Selectively Inhibits Colon Tumor Cell Growth by Activating ...
    Numerous investigators have reported that sulindac and other NSAIDs can inhibit Wnt/β-catenin signaling and have concluded that this effect is important for ...Abstract · Introduction · Results · Discussion
  59. [59]
    New use for an old drug: COX‐independent anti‐inflammatory ...
    Overall, sulindac decrease lung inflammation by a mechanism independent of cycolooxygenase. This drug could be beneficially employed in CF. Abbreviations. CF.
  60. [60]
    New use for an old drug: COX-independent anti-inflammatory effects ...
    Overall, sulindac decrease lung inflammation by a mechanism independent of cycolooxygenase. This drug could be beneficially employed in CF.
  61. [61]
    Sulindac Sulfide Is a Noncompetitive γ-Secretase Inhibitor That ...
    Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been known to reduce risk for Alzheimer's disease. In addition to the anti-inflammatory effects of NSAIDs ...
  62. [62]
    Sulindac improves memory and increases NMDA receptor subunits ...
    Sulindac treatment also attenuated an age-related decrease in the NR1 and NR2B NMDA receptor subunits and prevented an age-related increase in the pro- ...
  63. [63]
    Structural Mechanism of the Interaction of Alzheimer Disease Aβ ...
    We find that sulindac sulfide does not induce drastic architectural changes in the fibrillar structure but intercalates between the two β-strands of the amyloid ...Experimental Procedures · Results · Discussion
  64. [64]
    Protective effects of NSAIDs on the development of Alzheimer disease
    May 5, 2008 · Long-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use was protective against Alzheimer disease. Findings were clearest for ibuprofen.
  65. [65]
    Discovery of the synergy between sulindac and NO expands the ...
    Dec 15, 2024 · Developed a novel sulindac derivative, NsNO8/SuNO, mitigating hypoxic inflammatory injury via sulindac-NO synergism.