Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Summary

A summary is a concise statement or account that presents the main points of a larger body of information, such as a text, speech, or discourse, without unnecessary details or elaboration.^[1] In writing and communication, it serves as an abstract, abridgment, or compendium designed to capture the essence of the original material in a shortened form, typically one-third to one-quarter of the original length, while preserving the author's intent and key ideas.^[2]^[3] The primary purpose of a summary is to condense complex information for easier comprehension, retention, and sharing, aiding readers in grasping core concepts without engaging the full source.^[2] It is widely used in academic settings to support research notes, annotated bibliographies, and literature reviews; in professional contexts for executive overviews of reports; and in everyday communication to highlight key outcomes from meetings or events.^[4]^[2] Unlike paraphrasing, which rewords specific sections while retaining length and detail, summarizing focuses on global main ideas in the summarizer's own words, often in third-person and objective tone to avoid personal bias.^[5]^[3] Summaries vary by context and intent, with common types including the objective summary, which neutrally condenses main points without evaluation to allow reader interpretation; the critical summary, which adds the summarizer's assessment of the original's strengths and weaknesses; and specialized forms such as the abstract for research papers (a 150-300 word overview of methods, results, and conclusions), the executive summary for business reports (highlighting recommendations and implications for decision-makers), the précis (a structured, analytical condensation mirroring the original's organization), and the synopsis (a narrative outline for books, films, or proposals).^[2]^[6]^[7] Effective summaries require identifying the thesis and supporting points, attributing the source accurately, and using transitions for cohesion, ensuring fidelity to the original while eliminating non-essential details.^[2]^[8]

Definition and Fundamentals

Core Definition

A summary is a concise restatement of the main ideas, arguments, or facts from a longer text, speech, or event, designed to capture the essence of the source material while omitting extraneous details.^[9] This process involves identifying and synthesizing the core content in one's own words, providing readers with a clear understanding of the original without requiring engagement with the full source.^[10] The primary goal is to convey the central message efficiently, making complex or lengthy information accessible.^[11] Key characteristics of an effective summary include brevity, typically reducing the original content to one-fifth to one-quarter (20-25%) of its length; objectivity, by avoiding personal opinions or interpretations; fidelity to the source, ensuring accurate representation without alteration; and a sharp focus on central themes rather than peripheral elements.^[12]^[13] These traits ensure the summary serves as a reliable proxy for the original, preserving its intellectual integrity while enhancing readability.^[14] Summaries differ from related forms such as paraphrases and abstracts in their emphasis on compression and scope. Unlike a paraphrase, which rewords specific passages or ideas at roughly the same level of detail without substantial shortening, a summary condenses broader content to highlight overarching points.^[15] An abstract, often employed in scholarly articles, represents a more formalized and structured summary that systematically covers the purpose, methods, findings, and implications of research, whereas a general summary prioritizes flexible condensation across diverse contexts.^[16]^[17] For example, summarizing a novel entails distilling its plot, key characters, and thematic elements into a brief narrative overview, in contrast to quoting dialogue, which reproduces exact wording without reduction.^[11] This approach allows readers to grasp the story's essence quickly, as seen in literary reviews where plot synopses enable informed decisions without spoiling intricate details.^[3]

Historical Development

The practice of summarization traces its ancient roots to Roman rhetoric, where brevity, or brevitas, emerged as a key stylistic principle emphasizing concise expression to convey essential ideas effectively. In Cicero's era (106–43 BCE), brevitas served as a counterpoint to the more expansive Greek ideal of copia, allowing orators to distill complex arguments into succinct forms that maintained persuasive power without unnecessary elaboration.^[18] During the medieval period, summarization evolved through the creation of florilegia, which were compilations of authoritative excerpts drawn from classical, patristic, and scriptural texts to preserve and synthesize key insights. These anthologies, often organized thematically, functioned as practical tools for scholars and clergy, condensing vast bodies of knowledge into accessible collections; a prominent example is the Manipulus florum (Handful of Flowers), compiled around 1306 by Thomas of Ireland at the Sorbonne, featuring over 180 surviving manuscripts and alphabetical indexing of 266 topics for efficient reference.^[19] In the 19th and early 20th centuries, advancements in journalism and library science further formalized summarization amid growing information demands. The Associated Press, established in 1846 by five New York newspapers, pioneered cooperative news gathering to expedite reports on the Mexican-American War via pony express routes, standardizing concise dispatches that enabled rapid, shared dissemination of essential facts across outlets.^[20] Concurrently, library science developed systematic indexing and abstracting practices, with figures like Charles Ammi Cutter advancing rules in the 1870s for subject-based condensation of texts to aid retrieval in expanding collections.^[21] Post-World War II, escalating information overload prompted formalized summarization techniques rooted in communication theory during the 1950s. Warren Weaver, collaborating with Claude Shannon, explored redundancy reduction in their 1949 work on the mathematical theory of communication, proposing that eliminating superfluous elements in messages could enhance clarity and efficiency in transmitting meaning amid noise.^[22] Cultural variations in summarization highlight distinct traditions: Eastern approaches, exemplified by the Confucian Analects (compiled circa 479–249 BCE), favored aphoristic compilations of oral teachings into brief, reflective passages that captured ethical principles like benevolence (ren) and reciprocity in a non-linear, dialogic form.^[23] In contrast, Western practices leaned toward linear narratives, as seen in rhetorical traditions from Cicero onward, prioritizing sequential condensation to build argumentative progression.^[18]

Techniques and Methods

Manual Summarization Approaches

Manual summarization refers to the human process of condensing source material into a shorter form while preserving essential meaning, relying on cognitive abilities such as comprehension, selection, and synthesis. This approach emphasizes deliberate reading, analysis, and rewriting to create coherent overviews suitable for educational, professional, or personal use. Unlike automated methods, it allows for nuanced interpretation tailored to the summarizer's purpose and audience.^[11] The step-by-step process for manual summarization begins with reading and analyzing the source text multiple times to identify main ideas: first scanning for the overall topic using elements like the abstract or headings, then reading carefully while highlighting key points and taking initial notes, and finally skimming to confirm understanding. Next, the text is broken down into sections based on its structure or themes, often by noting a word or phrase in the margin for each paragraph to capture core content. Key elements are then identified, focusing on the "5 Ws" framework—who, what, when, where, and why—along with how, to pinpoint essential details such as the thesis, topic sentences, findings, or arguments while omitting background or non-critical information. Non-essential details, like examples or tangential anecdotes, are eliminated to avoid dilution of the core message. The selected elements are synthesized into a coherent, shortened form by paraphrasing in the summarizer's own words, organizing logically without direct copying from the source. Finally, the draft is revised for clarity, accuracy, and completeness by checking against the original text to ensure fidelity and eliminate any biases or omissions.^[11]^[24] Cognitive techniques play a central role in manual summarization, aiding in the organization and connection of ideas. Outlining involves structuring the source material hierarchically, starting with main topics on the left and indenting supporting details to the right, which facilitates identifying relationships and prioritizing content for condensation. Mind mapping, a visual strategy, begins with a central topic and branches out to large ideas and details, enabling summarizers to synthesize connections visually before drafting a cohesive paragraph. The "5 Ws" framework serves as a structured prompt to extract and interconnect factual elements, ensuring comprehensive coverage without extraneous details. Inference is key in this process, as summarizers draw on implied connections between ideas to create fluid narratives, but must avoid introducing new content beyond the source to maintain objectivity.^[25]^[26]^[24]^[27] Manual summaries can be categorized by purpose and method. Indicative summaries provide an overview of the source's structure, themes, and arguments without delving into specifics, helping readers decide whether to engage further; they are ideal for less structured texts like essays or books. Informative summaries, in contrast, deliver detailed key points including objectives, methods, results, and conclusions, standing alone as a factual representation suitable for structured documents like research reports. Regarding approach, extractive summaries select and compile verbatim sentences or phrases from the original text to form the condensed version, preserving exact wording for precision. Abstractive summaries rephrase and integrate ideas in new sentences, mimicking human-like interpretation to produce more fluid and concise output while capturing the essence.^[28]^[29] Tools and aids enhance the efficiency of manual summarization, particularly note-taking systems adapted for this purpose. The Cornell method divides a page into sections—a narrow left column for cues or questions, a wide right column for detailed notes from the source, and a bottom section for a concise summary in the summarizer's own words—which reinforces understanding by prompting review and synthesis after initial capture. This system is particularly effective for academic texts, as the summary area condenses notes into key takeaways, facilitating quick revision and clarity checks.^[30]

Automated Summarization Processes

Automated summarization processes involve computational techniques that generate concise representations of longer texts by identifying or synthesizing key information. Early developments in this field trace back to rule-based systems in the 1950s and 1960s, where pioneers like Hans Peter Luhn introduced methods for automatic abstracting through keyword extraction and significance scoring of sentences based on word frequency and proximity.^[31] Luhn's approach, detailed in his 1958 paper, marked the inception of extractive summarization by selecting high-scoring excerpts from documents without altering the original wording, laying the groundwork for subsequent algorithmic advancements.^[32] By the early 2000s, graph-based methods emerged as a prominent extractive technique, exemplified by the TextRank algorithm, which models text as a graph where sentences are nodes connected by similarity edges, then ranks them using an adaptation of PageRank to prioritize central content.^[33] This unsupervised method excels in capturing semantic relationships without training data, often outperforming frequency-based alternatives in tasks like single-document summarization. In contrast, abstractive approaches generate novel sentences that paraphrase the source material, gaining traction post-2010 with neural sequence-to-sequence (seq2seq) models that employ encoder-decoder architectures, such as recurrent neural networks (RNNs) with attention mechanisms, to produce fluent summaries.^[34] These models, initially demonstrated on news articles, marked a shift from mere extraction to human-like synthesis, though early versions struggled with factual accuracy. Since 2023, large language models (LLMs) have become a cornerstone of abstractive summarization, enabling high-quality summaries through zero-shot or few-shot prompting without extensive task-specific fine-tuning. Models such as GPT-4 and Llama 3 can generate coherent, contextually aware summaries across diverse domains, often surpassing traditional seq2seq systems in fluency and relevance, though they require careful prompt engineering to mitigate issues like over-generalization. As of October 2025, LLM-based methods represent the state-of-the-art, integrating with hybrid approaches for improved efficiency.^[35] The typical workflow for automated summarization begins with input preprocessing, including tokenization to split text into words or subwords, and part-of-speech (POS) tagging to annotate grammatical roles, which aids in identifying salient structures like nouns and verbs. Subsequent steps involve content scoring or re-ranking—extractive methods compute sentence importance via metrics like centrality or TF-IDF, while abstractive ones encode the input into latent representations for decoding into new text. Output generation then assembles the summary, often with post-processing to ensure grammaticality and length constraints. Modern systems, particularly those leveraging transformer-based models like BERT, enhance context understanding by pretraining on vast corpora to better capture long-range dependencies during these phases.^[36] Extensions to multilingual and multimodal inputs have broadened applicability; for instance, multilingual models process texts in multiple languages by fine-tuning on parallel corpora, enabling cross-lingual summarization that preserves meaning across scripts.^[37] Multimodal summarization integrates text with images or videos, using vision-language models to align visual and textual features for cohesive outputs, such as summarizing presentations by combining transcribed speech with slide content.^[38] Despite progress, key challenges persist in maintaining coherence, where summaries must logically connect ideas without abrupt shifts, a issue exacerbated in abstractive systems that can produce disjointed narratives. Hallucinations—fabricated details not grounded in the source—pose another risk, particularly in large language models, leading to inaccuracies that undermine reliability; mitigation strategies include faithfulness constraints during training, yet rates remain notable in complex domains.^[39]

Applications Across Fields

In Academic and Educational Contexts

In academic and educational contexts, summaries serve as vital tools for fostering comprehension, retention, and critical thinking by distilling complex information into essential components. Students often use summaries to process lectures or readings, enabling them to focus on core concepts and prepare effectively for exams through active engagement with material. This practice is commonly embedded in study skills curricula to build foundational learning strategies that support long-term academic success.^[40] Within academic writing, summaries are integral to literature reviews, where they condense and synthesize key findings from multiple sources to contextualize new research and reveal scholarly patterns or gaps. Annotated bibliographies rely on concise summaries to outline a source's main arguments, scope, and relevance, aiding researchers in evaluating its utility without exhaustive reading. In theses and dissertations, summaries of prior research efficiently condense the existing body of knowledge, justifying the study's novelty by highlighting unresolved issues or evolving trends.^[41]^[42]^[43] Key educational practices incorporate summarization to reinforce these benefits, such as the SQ3R method—developed by Francis P. Robinson in 1946—which structures reading through Survey, Question, Read, Recite, and Review steps.^[44] In the Recite phase, learners verbally or in writing summarize sections to test understanding, while the Review phase involves creating overarching summaries to identify knowledge gaps and solidify retention. Peer review of student-generated summaries further enhances this process by providing targeted feedback on clarity, accuracy, and analytical depth, promoting collaborative improvement in writing and critical evaluation skills.^[45] Empirical evidence from cognitive psychology research since the 1970s underscores summarization's efficacy for improving recall and retention. Bretzing and Kulhavy's 1979 study demonstrated that summarizing during note-taking promotes deeper processing, yielding superior recall performance over verbatim transcription or superficial tasks. Subsequent experiments have shown that writing summaries enhances memory for key text elements, with one series of five studies finding consistent improvements in recognition and free recall.^[46]^[47] Teaching summarization strategies has also led to significant gains in comprehension, as evidenced by post-intervention improvements in narrative text processing among teacher candidates.^[48]

In Professional and Legal Settings

In professional settings, summaries play a crucial role in enhancing efficiency and supporting decision-making, particularly in business environments where time constraints demand quick comprehension of complex information. Executive summaries, often condensed to a single page, provide overviews of lengthy reports, such as distilling a 50-page business proposal into key points including objectives, findings, and recommendations, allowing top-level managers to make informed decisions without reading the full document.^[49]^[50] In meetings, summaries facilitate agenda recaps and post-meeting action items, ensuring participants grasp essential outcomes and responsibilities succinctly to drive follow-through.^[51] In journalism, summaries enable the rapid dissemination of information through formats like news briefs and wire service stories, adhering to guidelines that prioritize brevity for broad accessibility. The Associated Press (AP), a leading wire service, recommends keeping news stories between 300 and 500 words to suit mobile audiences and maintain reader engagement, often employing the inverted pyramid structure to front-load the most critical facts.^[52] These summaries also support fact-checking processes, where journalists verify key claims within condensed reports to uphold accuracy and credibility before publication.^[53] Legal summaries streamline the analysis and application of case law and proceedings, aiding practitioners in navigating vast judicial records. Case summaries, known as headnotes, appear at the beginning of reported court opinions and consist of brief statements outlining the key legal principles and holdings, enabling lawyers and judges to quickly identify relevant precedents without reviewing entire decisions.^[54] In procedural contexts, summary judgments under U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56 allow courts to resolve cases without full trials when no genuine disputes exist over material facts, providing concise overviews that expedite justice while preserving due process.^[55] Specific formats like BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) exemplify structured summarization in high-stakes professional communications, originating from military doctrine and extending to business applications. BLUF requires stating the main conclusion or recommendation at the outset, followed by supporting details, to ensure recipients immediately understand the core message amid urgent decision-making scenarios.^[56] This approach, emphasized in U.S. Army writing standards, promotes clarity and speed in reports and emails.^[57]

Challenges and Evaluations

Common Limitations

One prominent limitation in summarization is the loss of nuance, where essential contextual details are omitted, potentially leading to misinterpretation of the original material. For instance, summaries may exclude subtle qualifications or background information that alter the perceived meaning, resulting in distorted representations of complex narratives. This issue arises because condensation prioritizes brevity over completeness, often stripping away layers of implication that are critical for accurate understanding. Subjectivity in selection further compounds these challenges, as the choice of what constitutes the "main" points can reflect the author's biases, influencing the emphasis on certain elements over others. Human summarizers, in particular, introduce personal interpretations that vary across individuals, leading to divergent versions of the same content. Automated systems exacerbate this by inheriting biases from training data, which may privilege dominant perspectives and marginalize alternative viewpoints.^[58]^[59] Technical limitations manifest in over-simplification, especially for intricate topics like scientific research, where summaries frequently omit caveats, limitations, or methodological nuances, fostering unwarranted generalizations. In scientific contexts, this can mislead readers by presenting tentative findings as definitive, eroding trust in the summarized knowledge. Additionally, cultural and language barriers pose significant hurdles in translation-based summaries, as linguistic differences and idiomatic expressions often result in lost subtleties or altered connotations during cross-lingual adaptation. Low-resource languages suffer disproportionately, with models struggling to preserve cultural context due to inadequate training data.^[60] Psychological factors also play a role, as readers' preconceptions can skew their interpretation of summaries, projecting existing beliefs onto the condensed text and reinforcing confirmation biases. Length constraints inherent to summarization formats exacerbate incomplete coverage, forcing the exclusion of peripheral yet relevant details that might provide a fuller picture, thereby limiting the summary's utility for nuanced analysis.^[61] Historical examples illustrate these limitations' real-world impact, such as Western media coverage of the 1994 Rwandan Genocide, where reports often simplified the mass extermination of Tutsis as a "tribal civil war," omitting the organized, state-sponsored nature of the killings and contributing to international misinterpretation and delayed intervention. Similarly, oversimplified summaries of geopolitical incidents, like initial reporting on Middle Eastern conflicts, have reduced multifaceted tensions to binary narratives, fostering public misconceptions about underlying causes.^[62]^[63]

Assessment Criteria

Evaluating the quality of a summary involves assessing its ability to capture essential information from the source material while maintaining accuracy and clarity. Core metrics include coverage, which measures the inclusion of key points from the original text and is often quantified using recall-based approaches to determine how comprehensively the summary represents the source. Fidelity evaluates the accuracy of the summary without introducing distortions or hallucinations, typically measured through precision scores that gauge the relevance and truthfulness of included content relative to the source. Coherence assesses the logical flow and structural integrity of the summary, often evaluated qualitatively to ensure sentences connect meaningfully and form a cohesive whole.^[64]^[65]^[66] Evaluation methods combine human and automated techniques for robust assessment. Human judging remains a gold standard, where evaluators rate summaries on aspects like relevance using Likert scales, typically on a 1-5 or 1-7 point continuum to capture subjective quality perceptions. Automated metrics provide scalable alternatives; for extractive summaries, ROUGE calculates n-gram overlap between the summary and reference texts to approximate recall and precision, while BERTScore leverages contextual embeddings from BERT models to measure semantic similarity, offering better correlation with human judgments for abstractive summaries.^[67]^[64]^[68] Qualitative aspects further refine evaluation by focusing on user experience. Readability is gauged using the Flesch-Kincaid index, which computes a grade-level score based on sentence length and syllable count to ensure the summary is accessible and simple without oversimplifying content. Conciseness is determined by the ratio of the summary's length to the source text, ideally aiming for 10-30% compression to eliminate redundancy while retaining vital details. These criteria address common pitfalls such as omissions or verbosity by providing benchmarks for iterative improvement. In practice, standards from organizations like the American Psychological Association emphasize clear, concise paraphrasing in academic summaries, requiring faithful restatement of source ideas in the writer's own words with proper citation to maintain integrity and avoid plagiarism.^[69]

References

[1]
SUMMARY Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
The meaning of SUMMARY is comprehensive; especially : covering the main points succinctly. How to use summary in a sentence. Synonym Discussion of Summary.
[2]
None
### Summary of Key Information on Writing a Summary
[3]
Summarizing in writing
Aug 18, 2023 · A summary of a text is a short overview of the main ideas written in your own words. While paraphrasing involves expressing specific ideas ...
[4]
Writing a Summary – Writing Arguments in STEM
An academic summary provides an objective, condensed (shortened) description of the content of a piece of writing or presentation.
[5]
Quoting, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing - Purdue OWL
Summarizing involves putting the main idea(s) into your own words, including only the main point(s). Once again, it is necessary to attribute summarized ideas ...Paraphrasing · Signal and Lead-in Phrases · Sample Essay
[6]
https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/abstract
[7]
Planning and Writing a Grant Proposal: The Basics
Element, Details. Short Overview (a.k.a. "abstract" or "executive summary"), Here you present the most important elements of yourMissing: summaries: synopsis
[8]
Writing Summaries | Soka University of America
In a summary you are simply reporting the information that you have read to your reader without adding to or commenting on that information.
[9]
Summarizing - The University Writing Center
Summarizing is giving the gist of a chosen passage or work in your own words. An effective summary communicates the main points in a selection.
[10]
Summary writing in academic contexts: Implicating meaning in ...
Aug 10, 2025 · Summary writing is the process of recognizing what is most important in a text and transforming it into a brief statement in one's own words ( ...
[11]
How to Write a Summary | Guide & Examples - Scribbr
Nov 23, 2020 · Summarizing means giving a short overview of a source's main points in your own words. There are five key steps to writing a summary.When to write a summary · Step 2: Break the text down... · Step 4: Write the summary
[12]
[PDF] Chapter 4: Summarizing: The Author's Main Ideas
Having selected the material to include in your summary, you must then decide whether your summary will be informative or descriptive. Informative summaries ...
[13]
Appendix B: Writing a Summary – Technical Writing Essentials
An academic summary provides an objective, condensed (shortened) description of the content of a piece of writing or presentation.<|control11|><|separator|>
[14]
Paraphrase and Summary | Wingspan - KU Writing Center
A summary covers the main points of the writer's argument in your own words. Summaries are generally much shorter than the original source, since they do not ...
[15]
Paraphrase and Summary: University College Writing Handouts
To paraphrase means to restate someone else's ideas in your own language at roughly the same level of detail. To summarize means to reduce the most essential ...
[16]
What's the difference between an abstract and a summary? - Scribbr
An abstract is a type of summary, but summaries are also written elsewhere in academic writing—for example, in a literature review.
[17]
Main Differences Between a Summary and an Abstract
Mar 15, 2021 · An abstract is a short, descriptive paragraph overviewing your entire paper from introduction to the findings or future studies, a summary includes your entire ...
[18]
The Role of Brevitas in Ancient Roman Rhetoric - CGScholar
Thus, “brevitas” in Roman oratory was a rival stylistic objective to Greek “copia.” By Cicero's time, it is clear that even though the Greek influence of copia ...Missing: summarization roots
[19]
Manipulus florum, the Most Widely Used Medieval Florilegium or ...
Thomas's Manipulus florum was among the mostly widely used florilegia in the Middle Ages, and it remained extensively useful through at least the seventeenth ...
[20]
Our story | The Associated Press
In 1846, five New York City newspapers funded a pony express route through Alabama to bring news of the Mexican War north faster than the U.S. Post Office could ...
[21]
[PDF] History of American Library Science: Its Origins and Early ...
Jul 23, 2009 · Library science has its origins in early nineteenth century Germany, notably as bibliothekswissenschaft.Missing: 20th summarization
[22]
[PDF] The mathematics of communication
is closely linked with the concept of information by Warren Weaver. HOW do men communicate, one with another? The spoken word, either direct or by telephone ...
[23]
[PDF] The Analects of Confucius - IU ScholarWorks
The Analects of Confucius is an anthology of brief passages that present the words of. Confucius and his disciples, describe Confucius as a man, and recount ...
[24]
The Who, What, When, Where, Why of a Story
One of the best practices for writers is to follow "The 5Ws" guideline, by investigating the Who, What, Where, When and Why of a story.
[25]
Common Note-taking Methods - Chattanooga - UTC
The Cornell method provides a systematic format for condensing and organizing notes without laborious recopying. After writing the notes in the main space, use ...
[26]
5. Using Mind Mapping to Teach Summarizing Skills to MLs
Sep 17, 2016 · Mind mapping uses a central topic, large ideas, and details to guide students through summarizing, making the process more accessible.
[27]
[PDF] MIND MAPPING: AN INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY FOR LEARNING
For example, cognitive strategies include how an individual can make the process of learning more efficient and effective, i.e. – mind mapping and outlining.
[28]
Abstracts | Wingspan: Center for Learning and Writing Support
Abstracts fall into two categories: indicative and informative. The indicative abstract covers a less structured document (like a book, essay or editorial).Components Of An Abstract · The Abcs Of A Good Abstract · Sample Abstracts
[29]
(PDF) Extractive and Abstractive Text Summarization Techniques
Aug 7, 2025 · The extractive methods mine the essential text from the document whereas the abstractive methods summarize the document by rewriting. The ...
[30]
The Cornell Note Taking System - Learning Strategies Center
This page and our Canvas module will teach you about different note-taking systems and styles and help you determine what will work best for your situation.
[31]
The Automatic Creation of Literature Abstracts - IEEE Xplore
The Automatic Creation of Literature Abstracts ; Page(s): 159 - 165 ; Date of Publication: April 1958 ; ISSN Information: Print ISSN: 0018-8646. Electronic ISSN: ...
[32]
[PDF] The Automatic Creation of Literature Abstracts* - Courses
The abstracts described in this paper were prepared by first punching the documents on cards. Punctuation marks in the printed text not available on the ...
[33]
[PDF] TextRank: Bringing Order into Texts
Abstract. In this paper, we introduce TextRank – a graph-based ranking model for text processing, and show how this model can be successfully used in ...
[34]
[PDF] Abstractive Text Summarization using Sequence-to ... - ACL Anthology
In this work, we model abstractive text summarization using Attentional Encoder-. Decoder Recurrent Neural Networks, and.
[35]
Text Summarization with Pretrained Encoders - ACL Anthology
In this paper, we showcase how BERT can be usefully applied in text summarization and propose a general framework for both extractive and abstractive models.
[36]
[PDF] Large Scale Multi-Lingual Multi-Modal Summarization Dataset
May 2, 2023 · The dataset has five high-resource and seven low-resource languages, with a total of. 1.1 million instances, and is a rich source for text.
[37]
Summarization of Multimodal Presentations with Vision-Language ...
Apr 14, 2025 · In this work, we conduct fine-grained quantitative and qualitative analyses of automatic summarization of multimodal presentations using VLMs ...Missing: multilingual automated
[38]
Faithfulness in Abstractive Summarization: Progress and Challenges
Jan 31, 2024 · We introduce a novel contrastive approach for attributing errors that vastlyoutperforms prior work at tracing hallucinations in generated ...
[39]
What Is Summarizing? - Voyager Sopris Learning
Feb 11, 2025 · When students can summarize, they boost reading comprehension by identifying key points and expressing ideas in their own words.
[40]
Reading Strategies: The SQ3R Method - Academic Success Center
SQ3R is the most popular and influential active reading/study system. Designed in 1948 by Francis P. Robinson, SQ3R has stood the test of time.
[41]
Writing a Literature Review - Purdue OWL
Summarize and synthesize: Give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole; Analyze and interpret: Don't just ...
[42]
Literature Reviews - UNC Writing Center
The focus of a literature review, however, is to summarize and synthesize the arguments and ideas of others without adding new contributions. Why do we write ...
[43]
Annotated Bibliographies - Purdue OWL
Summarize: Some annotations merely summarize the source. What are the main arguments? What is the point of this book or article? What topics are covered? If ...Samples · Example · Paraphrasing
[44]
Teaching students to evaluate each other
Why use peer review? Peer assessment, or review, can improve overall learning by helping students become better readers, writers, and collaborators.
[45]
Notetaking and depth of processing - ScienceDirect.com
Four levels of notetaking (summary, paraphrase, verbatim, and letter search) were used to control depth of processing of a prose passage with 180 high school ...
[46]
Does Writing Summaries Improve Memory for Text? - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · In five experiments, we consistently found that items included in summaries were better remembered than items omitted from summaries.
[47]
[PDF] The Effect of Summarization Strategies Teaching on Strategy Usage ...
Studies show that students who are successful in reading comprehension are also successful in summarization [2, 3] and that teaching of summarization strategies ...
[48]
Executive Summary | UMGC Effective Writing Center
An executive summary is a brief document typically directed at top-level managers who sometimes make decisions based upon a reading of this summary alone.Missing: importance | Show results with:importance
[49]
The Report Abstract and Executive Summary - Purdue OWL
The abstract is an overview that provides the reader with the main points and results, though it is not merely a listing of what the report contains.
[50]
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/subject_specific_writing/writing_in_engineering/handbook_on_report_formats/abstracts_and_executive_summaries.html
[51]
New Associated Press guidelines: Keep it brief - The Washington Post
May 12, 2014 · To better serve mobile audiences, the wire service aims for brevity.
[52]
Introduction to Investigative Journalism: Fact-Checking
Nov 26, 2024 · Fact-checking takes apart the reporting to ensure it is solid, accurate, and fair, a critical task in newsrooms that was far more widespread ...
[53]
Overview and Frequently Asked Questions about Headnotes
Definition: Headnotes are summary statements of legal principles found in a court's opinion. They appear at the top of reported cases and follow the order of ...
[54]
Rule 56. Summary Judgment | Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Rule 56 is revised to improve the procedures for presenting and deciding summary-judgment motions and to make the procedures more consistent with those already ...
[55]
Leadership and Military Writing - Army University Press
The writing standard in the Army prioritizes placing the main point at the beginning of an essay (bottom line up front [BLUF]) for quick readability and rapid ...
[56]
[PDF] Effective Writing for Army Leaders
Sep 1, 2015 · pamphlet said Army writers should give the bottom line up front, or BLUF, because “the greatest weakness in ineffective writing is that it ...
[57]
[2106.10084] Subjective Bias in Abstractive Summarization - arXiv
Jun 18, 2021 · Subjective bias in summarization refers to differences in multiple expressions summarizing the same content, due to the subjectivity of the ...
[58]
On the subjectivity of human-authored summaries*
Apr 1, 2009 · We study the impact of various facets that cause subjectivity such as brevity, information content and information coverage on human-authored ...
[59]
(PDF) Generalization Bias in Large Language Model Summarization ...
However, when summarizing scientific texts, LLMs may omit details that limit the scope of research conclusions, leading to generalizations of results broader ...
[60]
(PDF) The Effects of Readers' Misconceptions on Comprehension of ...
Oct 9, 2025 · The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of readers' misconceptions on text comprehension.Missing: summaries | Show results with:summaries
[61]
[PDF] The Western Media and the Portrayal of the Rwandan Genocide
Oct 13, 2020 · The western media's treatment of the Rwandan Genocide is a clear example of inaccurate and incomplete news coverage. In one hundred days, an ...
[62]
Lack of Media Attention for MENA: Two sides of the Same Coin
Jul 18, 2024 · Furthermore, the coverage of the Middle East is often oversimplified and sensationalized, leading to a lack of nuance in the reporting. This ...
[63]
ROUGE: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries
ROUGE: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries. In Text Summarization Branches Out, pages 74–81, Barcelona, Spain. Association for Computational ...
[64]
Automatic evaluation of summary on fidelity, conciseness and ...
Nov 15, 2022 · 1) The Fidelity metric measures how well a summary conveys the core representation of its source text by mining the core representation of the ...
[65]
How to Find Strong Summary Coherence Measures? A Toolbox and ...
Sep 14, 2022 · While many different approaches have been suggested to model summary coherence, they are often evaluated using disparate datasets and metrics.
[66]
The use of rating and Likert scales in Natural Language Generation ...
Rating and Likert scales are widely used in evaluation experiments to measure the quality of Natural Language Generation (NLG) systems.
[67]
BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT - arXiv
Apr 21, 2019 · We propose BERTScore, an automatic evaluation metric for text generation. Analogously to common metrics, BERTScore computes a similarity score for each token.
[68]
Paraphrases
### Guidelines on Summarizing or Paraphrasing in APA Style for Academic Summaries