Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Teapot effect

The teapot effect is a fluid dynamics phenomenon in which a liquid poured from a container with a spout, such as a teapot, adheres to the underside of the spout and dribbles down the exterior surface instead of detaching cleanly into the receiving vessel, particularly at low flow rates.^[1] This effect, first systematically described by physicist Markus Reiner in 1956, arises primarily from the interplay of capillary forces, surface tension, and contact angle hysteresis at the liquid-solid-air interface along the spout's lip.^[2] At sufficiently high pouring speeds, inertial forces dominate, allowing the liquid stream to detach smoothly, but below a critical flow rate—dependent on factors like spout geometry, liquid viscosity, and surface wettability—the liquid wets the spout edge, forming droplets that redirect the flow outward. Early explanations, such as Joseph B. Keller's 1986 model attributing the dribbling to a low-pressure zone created by airflow along the curved spout surface, provided initial insights but overlooked key capillary dynamics.^[3] Subsequent research in the 1990s refined this understanding, incorporating sheet-forming flows, wetting hysteresis, and the role of the meniscus shape in promoting deflection of the liquid sheet.^[4] A 2009 study demonstrated that inertial effects in the flow regime could mitigate the issue by promoting detachment.^[5] More recent theoretical and experimental work from 2021, using high-speed imaging and numerical simulations, established a comprehensive model linking the critical flow rate to spout diameter, lip curvature, and the liquid's contact angle, enabling predictions of dribbling thresholds for various conditions.^[6] The phenomenon extends beyond teapots to industrial applications like coating processes and inkjet printing, where controlling wetting and flow detachment is crucial.^[7] Further experiments in 2023 confirmed mitigation strategies using hydrophobic spout surfaces.^[8] Practical mitigations include pouring faster to exceed the critical velocity or designing spouts with hydrophobic coatings to reduce adhesion.^[9]

Description and Observation

Phenomenon Overview

The teapot effect is a fluid dynamics phenomenon that arises when a liquid is poured from a container featuring a narrow spout, causing the liquid to adhere to the underside of the spout and dribble back along its exterior surface rather than detaching cleanly to form a steady stream.^[10] This adhesion results in an inefficient pour, often leading to spills outside the intended target.^[11] Visually, the effect is characterized by the formation of a thin liquid film along the spout due to surface wetting, which promotes a retrograde flow directed opposite to the primary pouring motion.^[5] The liquid clings to the spout's convex edge before attempting to separate, but instead follows the surface downward.^[11] The phenomenon typically manifests at low pouring speeds below a critical velocity and is particularly evident with low-viscosity liquids, such as water or tea, on wettable surfaces with sharp edges.^[10] It occurs primarily due to capillary adhesion and surface tension at the spout's edge, with gravity assisting the downward flow along the wetted surface, while contact angle hysteresis maintains attachment, preventing smooth detachment.^[4]^[10] The effect has been observed even in low-gravity environments, such as aboard the International Space Station, indicating that gravity plays a secondary role.^[5]

Everyday Manifestations

The teapot effect manifests in everyday pouring scenarios, such as when dispensing tea from a ceramic teapot, where the liquid stream adheres to the outer edge of the spout and dribbles downward rather than detaching cleanly into a cup.^[12] This common occurrence often results in stains on tablecloths or counters, as observed in household settings like restaurants serving hot beverages.^[12] Similar dribbling is reported with coffee pots and bottles containing water or wine, especially when the pour is initiated slowly.^[13] The phenomenon is more evident with hydrophilic materials like glass or earthenware spouts, to which water-based fluids readily adhere, compared to less wettable surfaces.^[14]^[15] Non-viscous liquids, such as tea or plain water, exacerbate the issue, while oily or viscous fluids tend to separate more readily from the spout.^[14]^[13] These variations contribute to frequent spills in routine tasks, a frustration anecdotally documented since the mid-20th century in domestic and casual dining contexts.^[16] The effect appears across scales in fluid handling, from household items to industrial processes.^[17]

History and Research

Initial Discovery

The teapot effect, the tendency of a liquid stream to cling to the underside of a pouring spout rather than detaching cleanly, was first formally described and named in 1956 by Markus Reiner, an Israeli physicist and engineer. In his article published in Physics Today, Reiner detailed the phenomenon based on everyday observations of tea pouring from a teapot, where the jet often adheres to the spout's edge, leading to unwanted dribbling. He coined the term "teapot effect" to highlight this common yet frustrating fluid behavior, emphasizing its occurrence at low flow rates.^[18] Markus Reiner (1886–1976), born in Czernowitz (now Chernivtsi, Ukraine) in the Austro-Hungarian Empire to Jewish parents, studied civil engineering and served as an officer in the Austrian army during World War I. He emigrated to Mandatory Palestine in 1922, where he worked as a civil and structural engineer for the British Mandate's Public Works Department in Jerusalem for 25 years. Between 1931 and 1933, Reiner spent time in the United States as a research professor at Lafayette College, collaborating with Eugene C. Bingham to establish rheology—the scientific study of fluid flow and deformation—as a distinct branch of physics. This foundational work in rheology informed Reiner's later investigations into practical fluid phenomena like the teapot effect.^[19] Although the teapot effect had been an informal nuisance in pottery, kitchenware, and daily liquid handling for centuries, it remained unexamined scientifically until the mid-20th century, coinciding with post-World War II advances in fluid dynamics research. Reiner's 1956 analysis provided the initial qualitative insights, experimentally demonstrating that the effect is not caused by surface tension or liquid adhesion to the spout, as commonly assumed by contemporaries. Instead, he attributed it to Bernoulli's principle, where variations in fluid speed create pressure differences that cause the stream to curve and stick to the surface, though he offered no complete mathematical model at the time.^[18]

Modern Theoretical Advances

Following the initial qualitative description by Markus Reiner in 1956, research on the teapot effect progressed through partial theoretical models, starting with Joseph B. Keller's 1957 analysis in the Journal of Applied Physics, which modeled the effect using Bernoulli's principle and airflow-induced low-pressure zones along the spout. Subsequent studies in the 1980s and 1990s, including Keller's own 1986 work on pouring flows incorporating gravity, examined pressure differences and dynamics. Meanwhile, S.F. Kistler and L.E. Scriven developed detailed models of sheet-forming flows in 1994, incorporating wetting hysteresis and deflection at the spout edge to explain dribbling under low-flow conditions. These efforts highlighted capillary and viscous interactions but often neglected significant inertial contributions, limiting their predictive power across varying flow regimes.^[1]^[20]^[21] A major advance came in 2021 with a comprehensive theoretical framework developed by Bernhard Scheichl and colleagues at TU Wien and University College London, published in the Journal of Fluid Mechanics. This model integrates inertia, viscosity, and capillary forces through asymptotic analysis at high Reynolds numbers, using dimensionless parameters like the Reynolds, Weber, and Froude numbers to predict the onset of flow detachment. Unlike prior partial theories, it accounts for the full multi-scale viscous-inviscid interactions near the spout lip, demonstrating that dribbling occurs when the flow speed falls below a critical threshold where capillary ripples and wetting dominate. The theory confirms the effect's universality, applicable to diverse liquids and spout geometries, as inertial effects were previously underrepresented in low-speed approximations.^[22] Experimental validations supporting this modern theory include high-speed imaging of liquid films on wedge-shaped edges, revealing detachment failures at pouring speeds below approximately 0.5 m/s for water-like fluids with low viscosity. Numerical simulations aligned with these observations, showing film adherence and downstream capillary wave formation that redirects flow along the underside. These results fill key gaps from earlier models by quantifying the transition to inertial dominance, enabling precise predictions of the critical velocity without relying solely on empirical adjustments.^[8]

Underlying Physics

Key Fluid Dynamics Principles

The teapot effect arises from the interplay of competing forces acting on the liquid as it exits the spout. Gravity primarily drives the downward trajectory of the poured liquid, promoting detachment from the spout's lip, while viscous drag within the fluid layer resists rapid changes in flow direction, and adhesion forces between the liquid and the spout surface hinder separation. These adhesion forces, rooted in molecular interactions, become prominent when the liquid wets the spout material, pulling a portion of the flow backward along the underside instead of allowing clean detachment.^[5] In typical pouring scenarios, the flow remains in the laminar regime at low to moderate speeds, where smooth, layered motion enables the formation of a thin liquid film clinging to the spout due to insufficient inertial momentum to overcome adhesion. As pouring speed increases, inertial forces within the laminar flow strengthen, providing sufficient momentum to overcome adhesion and promote clean detachment of the liquid stream. This is evident in everyday observations, such as when accelerating the pour reduces dribbling.^[22]^[23] Wetting dynamics further dictate the strength of adhesion, governed by the contact angle formed between the liquid, the spout surface, and air. For hydrophilic materials like glass or ceramic, where water exhibits a contact angle less than 90° (typically around 20°–30°), the liquid spreads readily, enhancing sticking and prolonging film formation along the spout. Contact angle hysteresis, the difference between advancing and receding angles, further promotes sticking by pinning the contact line on the spout surface, resisting detachment until sufficient inertial forces are applied. In contrast, hydrophobic surfaces with angles exceeding 90° weaken adhesion, facilitating smoother detachment.^[5]^[22]^[23] The onset of instability, manifesting as the characteristic dribble, stems from retrograde flow induced by pressure gradients within the meniscus at the spout lip. As the liquid approaches the edge, the curved meniscus creates a localized low-pressure region, drawing fluid backward against the primary forward momentum and sustaining the adherent film until inertial forces dominate. This pressure imbalance, amplified by surface curvature, marks the critical threshold below which the effect persists.^[22]^[5]

Surface Tension and Flow Instability

The teapot effect arises primarily from the action of surface tension, which forms a curved meniscus at the spout's exit during pouring. This curvature generates a Laplace pressure difference across the interface, where the pressure within the liquid is lower than the surrounding atmospheric pressure due to the concave shape of the meniscus for wetting liquids like water or tea. As a result, this pressure imbalance draws the liquid back toward the spout's inner surface, promoting adhesion and redirecting the flow along the exterior rather than allowing clean detachment. A key manifestation of this mechanism is the formation of a thin liquid film that coats the underside of the spout. When the flow rate is low, the wetting liquid does not fully break away from the surface at the lip, leading to incomplete detachment and the persistence of a residual film. Surface tension then drives capillary forces that cause this film to climb against gravity along the curved underside, exacerbating the dribbling by sustaining the adhered flow path. The instabilities in this process differ from standard jet breakup dynamics. While a free liquid jet might undergo Rayleigh-Plateau instability, leading to varicose perturbations and eventual pinching, the confined geometry of the spout prevents such axisymmetric breakup; instead, the film develops planar capillary ripples akin to Rayleigh modes on its free surface, which propagate upstream and contribute to irregular detachment at low flow speeds.^[22] Several factors modulate the severity of these surface tension-driven instabilities. Reducing surface tension, as achieved by adding surfactants to the liquid, weakens the Laplace pressure and capillary adhesion, thereby diminishing the effect and allowing smoother detachment even at lower pouring rates. Additionally, the shape of the spout lip plays a crucial role; a sharp or wedge-like edge promotes wetting and hinders clean separation by localizing the meniscus curvature, whereas smoother or more obtuse geometries facilitate earlier break-off of the flow.^[24]^[22]

Mathematical Modeling

Continuity Equation

The continuity equation expresses the principle of mass conservation in fluid flows and is fundamental to modeling the teapot effect, where liquid emerges from a spout without mass sources or sinks. In general form, it is given by

\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot (\rho \mathbf{v}) = 0,

where \rho is the fluid density and \mathbf{v} is the velocity vector.^[25] For typical teapot liquids like water or tea, which are incompressible (\rho constant) and exhibit steady flow during pouring, the equation simplifies to the divergence-free condition

\nabla \cdot \mathbf{v} = 0.

This implies that the volume flow rate Q remains constant along streamlines.^[25] In the context of the teapot effect, the continuity equation ensures that the volume flow rate is conserved as liquid travels through the spout toward the lip. The spout geometry, often narrowing at the lip, reduces the cross-sectional area A, thereby accelerating the flow velocity v to maintain constant Q = A v. For instance, in a cylindrical spout segment where the radius decreases from R_1 to R_2 < R_1, the velocity increases by the factor (R_1 / R_2)^2, as derived from integrating \nabla \cdot \mathbf{v} = 0 over the cross-section assuming uniform velocity profiles.^[26] This acceleration creates velocity gradients across the emerging liquid sheet or jet, particularly near the curved lip where the flow thins into a film. The role of the continuity equation in the teapot effect highlights how spout geometry induces these velocity gradients without violating mass conservation, promoting film thinning that destabilizes the flow under surface tension influences. In dribbling scenarios, backflow or recirculation near the lip appears to contradict uniform stream assumptions, but the equation underscores that any observed separation stems from geometric constraints rather than mass loss. The equation itself derives from the Navier-Stokes momentum equations by applying the Reynolds transport theorem to a control volume, enforcing zero net mass flux across boundaries in the absence of sources or sinks.^[25] This framework links to pressure variations along the spout, as explored in energy-based analyses.

Bernoulli Equation

The Bernoulli equation provides a fundamental framework for understanding the pressure-velocity dynamics in the teapot effect, where the balance between inertial forces and capillary pressures determines whether the liquid flow detaches smoothly from the spout or reverses direction. Along a streamline in an inviscid, steady fluid flow, the equation states:

P + \frac{1}{2} \rho v^2 + \rho g h = \text{constant},

where P is the pressure, \rho is the fluid density, v is the flow velocity, g is gravitational acceleration, and h is the height. In the context of pouring from a teapot spout, the height term \rho g h is typically negligible due to the small vertical scale compared to the spout dimensions, simplifying the relation to focus on pressure and dynamic contributions.^[27] At the meniscus near the spout lip, the flow accelerates around the edge, leading to a local pressure decrease per Bernoulli's principle compared to the main jet. This low pressure at the lip (below atmospheric), combined with the capillary pressure jump across the curved meniscus interface (given by the Young-Laplace equation \Delta P = 2\sigma \cos \theta / r_m, where \sigma is surface tension, \theta is the contact angle, and r_m is the meniscus radius), promotes adhesion of the liquid to the surface, directing it retrograde along the spout's underside against the initial pouring momentum. The Bernoulli relation highlights how this reversal arises from the mismatch between the low-pressure region at the lip and the atmospheric pressure outside, effectively adhering the liquid to the spout.^[27]^[28] The equation plays a critical role in identifying a velocity threshold beyond which the inertial dynamic pressure term \frac{1}{2} \rho v^2 overcomes the low-pressure and capillary effects, allowing clean detachment and suppressing dribbling. Below a critical velocity of approximately 0.1-0.2 m/s (for water-like liquids in standard teapots, depending on spout geometry and wettability), the capillary effects dominate, promoting the retrograde flow characteristic of the teapot effect; above this threshold, the flow separates ballistically into the desired parabolic trajectory. This threshold marks the transition where inertial forces prevent the pressure imbalance from adhering the stream. The scaling for the critical velocity, akin to the Taylor-Culick velocity for film retraction, is v_\text{crit} \approx \sqrt{2\sigma / (\rho r)} \approx 0.38 m/s for water (\rho = 1000 kg/m³, \sigma \approx 0.072 N/m) and a typical lip radius r \approx 1 mm, though experimental values are lower due to film thickness and hysteresis effects.^[29]^[8] A sketch of the derivation begins with Euler's equation for inviscid flow along a streamline, \frac{\partial \mathbf{v}}{\partial t} + (\mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla) \mathbf{v} = -\frac{1}{\rho} \nabla P + \mathbf{g}, which integrates to the Bernoulli form under steady conditions and negligible viscosity. Viscous corrections, such as boundary layer effects near the spout, modify the pressure distribution but are secondary for high-Reynolds-number pours and not derived here; the inviscid approximation suffices for the core dynamics.^[27]^[28]

Advanced Modeling

Modern theoretical advances integrate the continuity and Bernoulli equations into full Navier-Stokes simulations, incorporating wetting hysteresis, contact angle dynamics, and meniscus evolution to predict dribbling thresholds. A 2021 study used high-speed imaging and numerical methods to link the critical flow rate to spout diameter, lip curvature, and liquid contact angle via dimensionless numbers like the Weber number (We = ρ v² L / σ, where L is characteristic length). These models confirm that below We ≈ 1-2, hysteresis promotes deflection, while higher We enables detachment, extending applicability to microgravity and industrial flows.^[4]^[5]

Practical Implications

Design Challenges

The teapot effect poses significant challenges in container design, particularly with spouts that feature rounded or curved lips, which promote wetting and contact angle hysteresis at the liquid-solid-air interface, leading to adhesion and dribbling.^[23] These spout geometries are often retained in traditional teapots for aesthetic appeal, such as elegant, slender profiles that enhance visual symmetry, despite contributing to the instability at low flow rates where surface-attached layers fail to detach cleanly.^[23] This stems from low-speed flow instabilities that cause the liquid to cling to the spout's underside, complicating precise pouring in both domestic and engineered vessels.^[23] In industrial contexts, the teapot effect manifests in fuel nozzles, where low-velocity gas or liquid streams adhere to external surfaces, leading to inefficient combustion or spray patterns in burner systems.^[30] Chemical dispensers encounter similar issues, as dribbling can cause uneven coating in paint applications or contamination in precise fluid delivery, while medical syringes and diagnostic devices suffer from waste and inaccurate dosing, particularly in low-flow scenarios for viscous fluids.^[23] These applications demand spout geometries that minimize separation delays, yet sharp curvatures inherent to compact designs often amplify the problem, resulting in operational inefficiencies. Material properties further intensify design hurdles, with hydrophilic surfaces—common in porcelain teapots—promoting strong capillary adhesion due to low contact angles around 20°, which sustains dribbling even at moderate velocities.^[23] In contrast, plastic components with hydrophobic coatings can reduce this adhesion, but achieving uniform wettability remains challenging without compromising durability or aesthetics in everyday products.^[23] For instance, unglazed or standard-glazed porcelain exacerbates the effect compared to engineered plastics treated for higher contact angles, forcing designers to balance functionality against material costs and manufacturing constraints. The practical and economic repercussions include heightened cleaning requirements to prevent residue buildup from dribbled liquids, which increases maintenance time in both household and industrial settings.^[23] The effect was first systematically documented in the mid-1950s.^[31] In engineering, addressing the effect via advanced coatings like superhydrophobic treatments adds material and application costs.^[23] The phenomenon also has implications for low-gravity environments, such as the International Space Station, where experiments confirm the effect persists, highlighting the need for wettability controls in space fluid systems independent of gravity.^[5]

Mitigation Techniques

One effective pouring strategy to mitigate the teapot effect involves increasing the pouring speed to enhance inertial forces over capillary adhesion, allowing the liquid stream to detach cleanly from the spout without adhering to the outer surface.^[8] Spout modifications, such as designing the spout with a thin, sharp-ended lip, help reduce the surface area for wetting and promote stream detachment.^[32] Drip-free teapots featuring protruding rims, which redirect residual flow away from the body, emerged as commercial designs in the early 2000s following engineering innovations.^[33] Material and coating solutions focus on altering surface wettability to counteract adhesion driven by surface tension. Hydrophobic treatments that raise the contact angle above 90° significantly reduce wetting on the spout, enabling smoother flow without dribbling; these are commonly applied in modern laboratory equipment for precise liquid dispensing.^[5] Superhydrophobic coatings, achieving contact angles over 150°, further eliminate the effect entirely by repelling liquid from the spout's exterior, as demonstrated in experimental setups using soot-based treatments.^[5] Drip catchers provide a passive remedy by capturing and redirecting any residual dribbles at the spout base through small grooves or channels. Patented designs from the 1990s onward, such as V-shaped channels integrated into the spout, effectively channel drips back into the container or away from the surface.^[34] Advanced mitigation leverages computational simulations to optimize spout geometry, informing designs with reduced flow instabilities. Recent numerical models, including those comparing hydrophilic and superhydrophobic surfaces, have shown spouts achieving drip-free pouring at lower velocities through minimized capillary adhesion.^[8]

References

[1]
Teapot Effect | Journal of Applied Physics - AIP Publishing
When tea is poured from a teapot it often runs along the under side of the spout rather than falling into the cup. Recent experiments have shown that this ...
[2]
https://physicstoday.aip.org/features/the-teapot-effect-a-problem
[3]
The teapot effect: sheet-forming flows with deflection, wetting and ...
Apr 26, 2006 · The branchings, turning points, and isolas of families of solutions in parameter space explain abrupt flow transitions observed experimentally, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[4]
[0910.3306] Beating the teapot effect - arXiv
Oct 17, 2009 · We investigate the dripping of liquids around solid surfaces in the regime of inertial flows, a situation commonly encountered with the so-called teapot effect.Missing: scientific | Show results with:scientific
[5]
Fluid Property Effects on the Splashing in Teapot Effect
Aug 27, 2018 · This study disclosed that the parameters of surface tension, viscosity, and additive molecules of liquid significantly affected the jet splashing in teapot ...Missing: scientific paper
[6]
Solving the Teapot Effect - FYFD
The teapot effect is when liquid dribbles down the spout. Droplets form under the lip, and at low flow rates, they can redirect the stream, causing a mess.
[7]
Why teapots always drip - Phys.org
Nov 8, 2021 · If a liquid is poured out of a teapot too slowly, then the flow of liquid sometimes does not detach itself from the teapot, finding its way into the cup, but ...Missing: dynamics | Show results with:dynamics
[8]
Developed liquid film passing a smoothed and wedge-shaped trailing edge: small-scale analysis and the ‘teapot effect’ at large Reynolds numbers | Journal of Fluid Mechanics | Cambridge Core
### Abstract
[9]
Ever Wonder About the Teapot Effect? - Science World
Oct 18, 2015 · The Teapot Effect is the dribbling of tea when pouring. Theories include internal vortices and atmospheric pressure. Pouring quickly can help ...
[10]
Everyday science: Why a teapot drips - U-Today
Sep 11, 2019 · You will spill a lot more when the spout is made of a material that the water can easily cling to. Unsurprisingly, two examples are glass and earthenware.Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
[11]
Why we always spill tea - IoP - University of Amsterdam
May 9, 2019 · Pouring liquids is difficult because they tend to cling to the bottle or the teapot spout rather than flowing directly into your cup or glass. A ...
[12]
Why Teapots Always Drip – Scientists Finally Explain the “Teapot ...
Jan 9, 2022 · If a liquid is poured out of a teapot too slowly, then the flow of liquid sometimes does not detach itself from the teapot, finding its way into the cup.
[13]
https://iop.uva.nl/content/news/2019/05/why-we-always-spill-tea.html
[14]
(PDF) Investigation of the Teapot Effect - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · In this study, this event, which is called the teapot effect, is investigated experimentally and numerically using a porcelain teapot.
[15]
Solving Teapot Effect - Phys.org
Nov 2, 2009 · A number of factors are known to affect how much the teapot dribbles, such as the diameter of the spout, the teapot material, and speed of flow, ...
[16]
Markus Reiner - Jewish Virtual Library
Reiner, Markus (1886–1976), Israeli engineer. Born in Czernovtsy, Reiner served as an officer in the Austrian army during World War I.Missing: background | Show results with:background
[17]
Teapot Effect - ADS - Astrophysics Data System
Teapot Effect. Keller, Joseph B. Abstract. When tea is poured from a teapot it often runs along the under side of the spout rather than falling into the cup.
[18]
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3060089
[19]
[PDF] Investigation of the Teapot Effect
Aug 11, 2023 · The capillary adhesive force of the spout surface is the dominant parameter for the teapot effect. Pressure has a second-order effect due to the ...Missing: fuel dispenser
[20]
https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pof/article/29/12/3958/682/Pouring-flows
[21]
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112094004027
[22]
[PDF] The Continuity Equation: Conservation of Mass for a Fluid Element
Consider a fluid element with constant mass δm and volume δV moving in a velocity field as shown above. The streamlines are converging and the fluid element ...Missing: dynamics | Show results with:dynamics
[23]
[PDF] The fluid dynamics of chocolate fountains - Adam Townsend
Mar 2, 2012 · The continuity equation (3.4) tells us how these characteristic ... The physics responsible for the teapot effect is however relevant to.
[24]
[PDF] arXiv:1507.05931v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 21 Jul 2015
Jul 21, 2015 · (a) Water flow trickling around the curved (hydrophilic) solid surface, known as the 'teapot effect'; (b) The water repellence of the solid (or ...
[25]
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/2-25-advanced-fluid-mechanics-fall-2013/5f1e3b9efcffd44a65f3812887ff30e1_MIT2_25F13_The_cont_equa.pdf
[26]
Separation of sheet flow on the surface of a circular cylinder
Aug 28, 2009 · The shape of a spout of a pot is very important for the liquid to flow smoothly from the pot. This is known as the “teapot effect.Missing: fuel dispenser
[27]
[PDF] Measurement of Flame Speeds by a Nozzle Burner Method 1
The flow of gas through the nozzle, especially at low velocities, mlty be subject to the "teapot effect!' [5], in which the effluent gas clings to and flows ...<|separator|>
[28]
[PDF] teapot effect
Still greater supply of water, and therefore increase of the velocity of the flow, results in the ballistic curve which we all expected and which is desired ...
[29]
Physicists say they've finally solved the teapot effect—for real this time
Nov 10, 2021 · Here's the basic working explanation. At higher flow rates, the layer of fluid that is closest to the teapot's spout detaches so it flows ...
[30]
Drip free tea now a reality - ABC galileo/newsanalysis - ABC News
Apr 30, 2002 · The age-old problem of dripping teapots has finally been solved by a young English inventor. Product design engineer Ms Damini Kumar, a guest ...Missing: rims history
[31]
US5169040A - Dripless spout having a V-shaped channel
This particular spout 10 is intended for mounting on a liquid dispensing vessel, such as a tea pot or coffee pot 12, as illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3 of the ...