Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Tenaculum

A is a classified as a type of , consisting of a slender sharp-pointed attached to a handle, designed to grasp and hold tissues or structures such as blood vessels during procedures. The term derives from the Latin tenāculum, meaning "holder" or "instrument for gripping," reflecting its function in providing traction and stabilization. Primarily utilized in gynecological and obstetric surgeries, it is frequently applied to seize the for procedures like , insertion, or , enabling precise manipulation while minimizing slippage. Its design, often featuring one or two sharp teeth, ensures secure grip on slippery tissues, though this can cause localized pain, prompting ongoing research into less invasive alternatives despite its longstanding efficacy. Introduced in modern form by French gynecologist Pozzi in the late , inspired by bullet extractors, the tenaculum has remained a staple for over 130 years due to its simplicity and reliability in surgical settings.

Design and Functionality

Physical Structure

The tenaculum is a specialized surgical forceps designed for grasping and stabilizing delicate tissues, featuring two slender, elongated blades hinged at a central pivot point to allow controlled opening and closing of the jaws. The distal tips of the blades terminate in sharp, inward-pointing hooks or prongs, typically one to multiple teeth, which penetrate superficially into tissue to provide a secure hold without excessive slippage. This configuration enables precise traction, particularly on structures like the cervix, while minimizing surrounding damage. Constructed primarily from high-grade , the instrument offers corrosion resistance, durability, and compatibility with sterilization protocols essential for reusable medical devices. Handles are ergonomically shaped with finger rings for operator control, often incorporating a lock to maintain jaw closure during procedures. Standard lengths range from approximately 6.5 to 11 inches (16.5 to 28 cm), with the shaft's slim profile—usually 2-3 mm in diameter—facilitating access to deep pelvic cavities.

Types and Variations

Tenaculums are classified primarily by the configuration of their grasping tips, which typically feature one or more sharp hooks or teeth for retention, with variations in , , and to accommodate specific procedural demands. Straight models predominate for direct access, while curved variants facilitate manipulation in confined spaces such as the . Lengths commonly range from 7 inches (18 cm) for procedures to 10 inches (25 cm) for deeper uterine manipulations. Single-tooth tenaculums, exemplified by the Duplay design, incorporate a solitary sharp prong on each jaw for minimal tissue trauma and precise anchoring, often used in delicate gynecological interventions. Double-tooth configurations, such as those in or Pozzi forceps, provide enhanced grip through paired interlocking hooks, suitable for stabilizing the during insertions or biopsies. Multi-tooth vulsellum variants, including the Schroeder tenaculum with its robust pronged jaws, offer superior traction on fibrous tissues, as seen in hysterectomies or tumor resections. Additional adaptations include locking ratchets for sustained hold without continuous pressure and non-conductive coatings on models like the Schroeder single-tooth variant, preventing electrical conduction during electrosurgical procedures. construction ensures durability and sterilizability across all types, with some featuring serrated edges for varied tissue adherence. These named variations, originating from historical surgeons, reflect incremental refinements in jaw geometry and rather than fundamentally distinct functions.

Clinical Applications

Gynecological Procedures

The tenaculum, typically a single-toothed , is routinely used in gynecological procedures to grasp the anterior lip of the , providing stabilization and traction to straighten the uterocervical angle and facilitate instrumentation of the . This manipulation aligns the with the uterine fundus, minimizing procedural complications such as . In , the tenaculum is applied after speculum placement and cervical cleaning; it pierces the ectocervix to secure a firm hold, enabling the provider to exert downward traction that exposes and straightens the endometrial canal for safe IUD advancement. Studies confirm its necessity in this context, as omitting it increases the risk of fundal misplacement or uterine wall perforation during and insertion. The single-tooth design ensures precise grip without excessive tissue trauma, though alternatives like atraumatic clamps have been evaluated for reduced bleeding in randomized trials. For , the tenaculum stabilizes the by pulling it toward the introitus, countering uterine anteflexion and allowing gradual dilation of the cervical os with before . This traction maintains cervical position throughout, supporting evacuation of uterine contents in diagnostic or therapeutic settings, such as evaluation. In endometrial biopsy, the instrument is placed on the anterior cervical lip to rectify the uterocervical angle, permitting accurate passage of the biopsy device into the endometrial cavity for tissue sampling. It is also employed in hysteroscopy to manipulate the cervix, preventing distention medium reflux and enabling visualization of the uterine interior. Additional applications include cervical conization and colposcopy-directed biopsies, where cervical traction aids in exposing lesions for excision or sampling.

Non-Gynecological Uses

The tenaculum forceps finds application in for grasping and securing blood vessels or arteries to control bleeding or enable , thereby minimizing intraoperative hemorrhage across various procedures. In orthopedic interventions, specialized large tenaculum clamps serve as tools for stabilizing and repositioning fragments in complex pelvic ring injuries, offering controlled traction in multiple planes to achieve anatomical alignment prior to fixation. A 2019 described successful use of this technique in a patient with unstable pelvic fractures, highlighting its efficacy in providing provisional stability without additional incisions. Within , tenaculum facilitate the extraction of rectal foreign bodies under endoscopic visualization, enabling precise manipulation and retrieval while minimizing trauma to surrounding mucosa. A study reported its safe application in such cases, with successful removal achieved endoscopically in patients avoiding more invasive .

Historical Development

Origins and Early Use

The term tenaculum originates from the Latin tenāculum, denoting a gripping instrument derived from tenēre ("to hold"), with the English usage first appearing in contexts between 1685 and 1695. Archaeological evidence indicates that tenacula, typically bronze tools featuring pronged or hooked ends for tissue manipulation, were employed in ancient as early as the AD, serving functions such as retracting or securing vessels during procedures. These instruments, often paired with handles for precise control, represented basic -like devices amid a broader array of surgical tools, though their application was general rather than specialized to specific anatomical regions. In early surgical practice, tenacula facilitated hemorrhage control by grasping blood vessels, as documented in accounts of 18th- and early 19th-century operations, including those during the , where they were used alongside ligatures to twist and secure arteries post-amputation. Their design emphasized secure hold without slippage, evolving from blunt hooks to more refined prongs, but remained rudimentary until advancements in and procedural specificity. While forceps precursors existed in ancient and medicine for tasks like tooth extraction, the tenaculum's hooked variant distinguished it for delicate traction in open wounds or dissections. The adaptation of the tenaculum for gynecological purposes emerged in the late , with French physician inventing the modern tenaculum forceps in 1889, drawing inspiration from bullet-extraction tools prevalent in warfare. Pozzi's design, featuring inward-curving pointed tips, enabled stable grasping of the to facilitate uterine access during examinations and interventions, premiering at the 1889 Paris World Fair as a means to minimize invasiveness in treating uterine conditions. This marked its transition from general surgical utility to targeted obstetric-gynecological use, supplanting less reliable alternatives and establishing it as a staple for procedures requiring stabilization.

Modern Adaptations

In contemporary gynecology, adaptations to the traditional emphasize disposability to mitigate risks associated with reusable instruments. Single-use variants, such as the Pozzi uterine , are constructed from medical-grade polymers with tips, ensuring sterility and eliminating cross-contamination in outpatient settings like (IUD) insertions. These disposable models maintain the core hook design but incorporate pre-sterilized packaging for immediate procedural readiness, with lengths typically around 10 inches (25 cm) to facilitate precise stabilization. Similarly, Schroeder in sterile disposable form feature 1x1 prong tips and are favored for their cost-effectiveness and compliance with modern control standards in high-volume clinics. Efforts to reduce have led to atraumatic modifications, including with multiple small teeth or smoother jaw profiles instead of a single sharp hook, as seen in vulsellum-style adaptations. A comparing an atraumatic vulsellum to the single-tooth tenaculum during IUD insertion reported no significant difference in patient-reported pain scores (mean 33/100 for both), though the atraumatic version trended toward less bleeding in some cases. Ergonomic enhancements, such as refined ring handles on models like the Pozzi tenaculum, improve control and reduce hand fatigue during prolonged procedures, with overall lengths standardized at 9-10 inches (23-25 cm) for optimal maneuverability. More radical functional adaptations replace mechanical gripping with vacuum suction mechanisms to minimize puncture. The Carevix device, developed by Aspivix and granted in Europe by 2023, employs soft-suction technology to stabilize the atraumatically, with clinical data indicating up to 50% lower pain scores and reduced bleeding compared to traditional tenaculums in transcervical procedures. Independent studies on similar suction-based stabilizers, such as the Bioceptive retractor, confirm feasibility and a trend toward decreased pain during IUD placement, though varies by parity.00453-9/fulltext) These innovations, supported by patents like US20200229832A1 for traction-optimized designs, reflect a shift toward -centered modifications while preserving the tenaculum's role in providing countertraction.

Associated Risks and Pain

Pain Mechanisms and Evidence

The pain induced by tenaculum application stems from the instrument's sharp, hooked prongs penetrating the ectocervical , causing localized mechanical trauma, tissue deformation, and potential microvascular disruption that stimulates cutaneous and deep nociceptors in the cervical . This manifests as sharp, localized discomfort at the site of grasp, distinct from the cramping associated with subsequent uterine manipulation, and is exacerbated by the cervix's dense sensory innervation via somatic branches of the and visceral afferents from the uterovaginal plexus. Clinical trials consistently quantify this pain as moderate, with median visual analog scale (VAS) scores ranging from 32 mm (IQR 19-54) using cough-assisted placement to 44 mm (IQR 21-63) with slow closure during office or (IUD) insertion. Evidence from randomized controlled trials demonstrates that pain intensity correlates with the degree of tenaculum closure and factors such as nulliparity or history, with nulligravid women reporting higher VAS scores during tenaculum placement compared to multiparous individuals. Local anesthetics provide targeted relief, as intracervical blocks with 2% lidocaine (3.6 mL) reduce tenaculum-related by 20-30% versus or topical agents, indicating a predominantly peripheral amenable to blockade rather than central sensitization alone. In contrast, non-traumatic alternatives like suction-based traction devices yield lower scores and minimal , highlighting the tenaculum's traumatic design as a primary causal factor. Comparative studies further isolate the tenaculum's contribution, showing that omitting it in feasible procedures—such as endometrial with stabilization—results in significantly reduced overall perception, with patients rating discomfort 1-2 points lower on VAS scales without compromising procedural success rates. techniques, which synchronize prong closure with expiratory , lower by engaging descending inhibitory pathways or reducing cervical , as evidenced by a 12 mm VAS reduction in head-to-head trials. These findings, drawn from over a dozen randomized trials, affirm the instrument's reliable but inherently painful mechanism, with no high-quality supporting negligible discomfort claims despite occasional procedural variability.

Complications and Mitigation

The primary complications associated with tenaculum use stem from its design, which involves sharp hooks or teeth that penetrate tissue to provide traction, leading to localized . during placement is reported in the majority of cases, often described as sharp or cramping, with studies indicating mean pain scores on visual analog scales ranging from 3.5 to 5.5 out of 10 in gynecological procedures like intrauterine device insertion. occurs frequently due to vessel puncture, requiring in up to 20% of applications in comparative trials, particularly with single-tooth variants. Cervical lacerations arise from excessive traction or slippage, with incidence rates estimated at 1-2% in dilatation and procedures, potentially necessitating suturing. Vasovagal reactions, manifesting as , , and syncope, are triggered by cervical manipulation in susceptible patients, occurring in approximately 1-5% of office-based hysteros copies or biopsies. Rarer adverse events include from breached mucosa, uterine perforation if traction misaligns instruments (incidence <0.1% in skilled hands), and chronic scarring leading to in repeated uses. These risks are empirically higher in nulliparous women or those with , where tissue friability exacerbates penetration depth. Mitigation begins with procedural techniques: applying the tenaculum perpendicular to the ectocervix at the 6 o'clock position minimizes slippage and limits penetration to superficial layers, reducing laceration risk by up to 50% in observational data. Pretreatment with intracervical or paracervical lidocaine injection (1-2% solution, 4-10 mL) significantly lowers pain scores by 1-2 points on analog scales compared to no , as demonstrated in randomized trials, without increasing rates. selection and with anxiolytics or NSAIDs can preempt vasovagal episodes, while real-time monitoring of addresses them promptly. Emerging atraumatic alternatives, such as suction-based stabilizers, have shown in pilot studies to eliminate bleeding in 90% of cases and reduce pain by 40-60% versus traditional tenacula, with rates under 1% including minor bruising. Omitting the tenaculum entirely is feasible in select endometrial sampling procedures, yielding lower pain without compromising sample adequacy, though it limits traction in anteverted uteri. Operator experience correlates inversely with complications, with training emphasizing gentle traction forces below 5 Newtons to avoid tissue avulsion. Post-procedure observation for hemorrhage and antibiotics for high-risk patients further attenuate secondary infections.

Alternatives and Future Directions

Current Alternatives

Suction-based cervical stabilizers represent a primary non-traumatic alternative to the tenaculum for stabilizing the during (IUD) insertion and similar procedures. Devices such as the Carevix employ soft to adhere to the ectocervix, avoiding penetration and associated or lacerations. A 2023 involving 110 nulliparous women reported median scores of 20 mm (visual analog scale) with the stabilizer versus 40 mm with tenaculum (p < 0.001), alongside no device-related adverse events. Similarly, the Bioceptive cervical retractor, cleared by the FDA, dilates the endocervical canal while providing atraumatic traction, facilitating procedures without hooks or teeth. Alternative grasping instruments include the and forceps, which feature broader jaws or finer teeth compared to the single-tooth tenaculum. A randomized of 48 women undergoing IUD placement found no significant pain difference between Allis clamp and tenaculum (mean scores 4.4 vs. 4.6 on a 10-point scale), though procedural ease favored the tenaculum. Another study comparing Littlewoods to single-tooth tenaculum in community settings noted comparable pain but improved provider satisfaction with the former due to reduced slippage. Instrument-free techniques, such as the , enable transient cervical stabilization via patient-generated intra-abdominal pressure, potentially eliminating the need for mechanical grasping in select IUD insertions. A feasibility study of 50 women demonstrated successful placement in 84% of cases without tenaculum, with lower reported pain (median 3/10) versus historical tenaculum cohorts, though failure rates increased in those with . In laparoscopic gynecological surgery, integrated uterine manipulators like the ClearView device provide multi-axis positioning and without requiring a separate tenaculum for traction, enhancing operative efficiency in procedures such as hysterectomies. These alternatives prioritize reduced , though their adoption varies by procedure complexity and familiarity, with devices showing promise for outpatient settings.

Innovations and Research

Atraumatic alternatives to the traditional sharp-toothed tenaculum have emerged, including suction-based traction s like the Carevix® developed by Aspivix. This uses a soft mechanism to stabilize the without puncturing tissue, aiming to reduce and during procedures such as (IUD) insertion. In the ADVANCE Women randomized multicenter trial, published in Contraception in March 2023, Carevix® achieved a 73% reduction in median scores (from 52 mm to 14 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale) compared to standard tenaculum use among 84 participants undergoing IUD placement.00066-5/fulltext) The same study reported lower rates (9% vs. 42%) and no device-related adverse events, supporting its safety profile in outpatient settings.00066-5/fulltext) Earlier feasibility on similar vacuum tenaculums, detailed in a 2021 Frontiers in Medicine of 30 women, confirmed effective atraumatic cervical manipulation for and IUD insertion, with mean pain scores of 2.6/10 during traction and no mucosal trauma observed via post-procedure . These innovations address longstanding limitations of conventional tenaculums, which rely on mechanical hooks that can cause and vasovagal responses, as evidenced by procedural pain reports exceeding 50 mm on visual analog scales in multiple gynecological contexts. Pharmacological research has advanced pain control specifically for tenaculum application. A 2013 randomized trial in Contraception involving 120 women found that intracervical injection of 2 mL 1% lidocaine immediately before tenaculum placement reduced mean scores by 1.5 points (on a 10-point scale) compared to topical 2% lidocaine gel, with the injection method deemed superior despite requiring an additional step. More recent multicenter trials, such as a 2024 double-blind study in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, evaluated mepivacaine instillation for IUD procedures including tenaculum use, showing significant reductions in nulliparous participants versus placebo.00624-0/fulltext) The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' 2025 clinical consensus endorses paracervical blocks (e.g., 10 mL 2% lidocaine with epinephrine) and topical agents for mitigating tenaculum-related , based on aggregated evidence from randomized studies demonstrating 20-50% score reductions. Ongoing investigations prioritize device refinements and comparative efficacy, with European expansions of suction technologies like Carevix® underway as of 2025, including and distributions following positive trial outcomes. These efforts reflect a shift toward patient-centered designs, though broader adoption awaits larger-scale validations beyond industry-sponsored trials.

References

  1. [1]
    TENACULUM Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
    The meaning of TENACULUM is a slender sharp-pointed hook attached to a ... Etymology. borrowed from Medieval Latin tenāculum (usually in plural tenācula) ...
  2. [2]
    Tenaculum - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The single-toothed tenaculum is used for stabilization and traction, and allows descent of the uterus within the speculum.
  3. [3]
    Hysteroscopy - StatPearls - NCBI - NIH
    Apr 6, 2025 · Hysteroscopy involves inserting a rigid or flexible hysteroscope through the cervical canal into the uterus and then using distending media to allow for ...
  4. [4]
    A NEW TENACULUM FORCEPS. - JAMA Network
    The instrument was a delicately made straight tenaculum forceps, similar to the Croenlein forceps, with five interdigitating teeth; two on one jaw, three on the ...
  5. [5]
    Tenaculum: For Over 100 Years Women Have Endured Pain in ...
    Oct 28, 2020 · The tenaculum is a medical instrument that has been commonly used in gynecology for over a century. Every year, about 80 million women around the world suffer ...
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
    Forceps,uterine,Duplay,280mm,cvd - UNICEF Supply Catalogue
    Uterine traction forceps, vulsellum / tenaculum, double curved. Hard ratchet, lockable. Length: 28 cm. Material: Martensitic steel (quenched, magnetic steel).
  8. [8]
    Barrett Uterine Tenaculum Forceps 7" | GerMedUSA Inc
    Free deliveryBarrett Uterine Tenaculum Forceps are multifaceted finger-ring and ratcheted instruments commonly used in OB/GYN procedures requiring the manipulation of uterus ...
  9. [9]
    Tenaculums, Vulsellums - Teleflex Incorporated - Surgical Catalog
    The catalog lists tenaculums like ADAIR, SCHROEDER, and BRAUN, and vulsellums like JACOBS, SCHROEDER, and TEALE, with various sizes and features.
  10. [10]
    TENACULUM & VULSELLUM - FORCEPS - OB & GYN
    5-day delivery 30-day returnsAvailable tenaculum forceps include Adair, Barrett, Braun, Duplay, Pozzi, and Schroeder. Vulsellum forceps include Billroth, Gordon, Henrotin ...
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    Forceps & Tenacula Archives - Hayden Medical
    Multiple Sizes and Jaw Variations: Available in various sizes to accommodate different anatomical structures and procedures. Some feature locking mechanisms ...
  13. [13]
    Intrauterine Device Placement and Removal - StatPearls - NCBI - NIH
    Feb 14, 2025 · Using a sterile single-tooth tenaculum, grasp the anterior lip of the cervix and apply gentle traction to straighten the cervical canal and ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Common Office Gyn Procedures: Tips, Tricks and Pain Control
    YES, you must use a tenaculum! Teneculum straightens out the endometrial canal. Without it, increased chance of perforation or of placing IUD below the fundus.
  15. [15]
    allis clamp versus single-tooth tenaculum, a randomized control trial
    Objective: To evaluate whether the use of an atraumatic Allis clamp will result in less bleeding than the standard single-tooth tenaculum for cervical ...
  16. [16]
    Dilation and Curettage - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    May 7, 2023 · A tenaculum is used to grasp the anterior lip of the cervix and pull towards the introitus with the non-dominant hand. The traction will ...
  17. [17]
    Endometrial Biopsy - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    Sep 4, 2023 · A tenaculum is placed on the anterior lip of the cervix and allows the provider to straighten the uterocervical angle. The uterine sound is then ...
  18. [18]
    Preventing cervical reflux of the distention medium during ... - PubMed
    A new tenaculum was developed to minimize reflux yet be easily applied to the cervix. The tenaculum offers certain advantages over other cervical sealing ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Tenaculum: Gynecology, Forceps, Use, Pain & Alternatives
    May 15, 2024 · A tenaculum is a type of forceps that healthcare providers use to grasp or grip tissue. It's common for gynecologists to use one to hold your cervix while ...
  20. [20]
    Use of a Large Tenaculum Clamp as a Reduction ... - PubMed
    Jan 16, 2019 · We present a surgical technique that utilizes a large tenaculum bone clamp to provide an efficacious reduction in several planes.
  21. [21]
    Removal of Rectal Foreign Bodies Using Tenaculum Forceps Under ...
    Oct 15, 2015 · The use of tenaculum forceps under endoscopic guidance may be a useful method for removal of rectal foreign bodies.
  22. [22]
    TENACULUM Definition & Meaning - Dictionary.com
    Word History and Origins. Origin of tenaculum. 1685–95; < Latin tenāculum instrument for gripping, equivalent to ten ( ēre ) to hold + -ā- (from v. stems ...
  23. [23]
    tenaculum | British Museum
    Bronze surgical instrument: tenaculum; handle moulded, with two slits in it; long prongs. Bronze bleeding cup.
  24. [24]
    tenaculum | British Museum
    Description: Bronze surgical instrument: tenaculum; diverging prongs; ends of handle moulded (found in terracotta dish 1866,0101328).
  25. [25]
    surgical instruments of the Royal Navy during the Napoleonic War
    Haemorrhage during amputation was arrested by grasping the vessel with the hook-like tenaculum (Figure 1G, left) or forceps (Figure 1G, right) and throwing a ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    The A to Z of Medical Forceps - American Surgical Company
    Apr 19, 2023 · Forceps were first used by ancient Egyptian physicians to extract teeth and remove debris from wounds. The Greeks and Romans also used forceps ...
  27. [27]
    The Medical Instrument Behind 135 Years of Women's Pain
    May 24, 2024 · Samuel Pozzi's tenaculum forceps, inspired by a bullet extractor, have been the bane of cervical exams since 1889.
  28. [28]
    Single-Use Pozzi Uterine Tenaculum Forceps - Beauty Teck
    Samuel Jean Pozzi, a leading figure in late-19th-century gynecology, designed the tenaculum after studying tools used in military surgery. His goal was to ...<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    Sterile Disposable Tenaculum Forceps 10" | Linen Plus
    With a length of 10 inches, these forceps provide optimal reach and control, allowing healthcare professionals to perform procedures with precision and ease.
  30. [30]
    Econo Sterile Schroeder Tenaculum Forceps - Medline
    Free delivery over $50 90-day returnsDisposable forceps with straight, 1 x 1 prongs tip · Stainless-steel construction for years of demanding use.
  31. [31]
    Effect of an atraumatic vulsellum versus a single-tooth tenaculum on ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · Alternatives to the Pozzi tenaculum include the curved Teale vulsellum with multiple small teeth that are not intended to puncture the cervical ...
  32. [32]
    New Data on Atraumatic Tenaculum Pain Scores - Clinician.com
    Jan 1, 2016 · In this randomized, controlled trial, there was no difference in pain scores between the standard single-tooth tenaculum (mean 33/100) and the atraumatic ...Missing: adaptations | Show results with:adaptations
  33. [33]
    Pozzi Tenaculum Forceps - 25 cm (9 7/8") - American Medicals
    In stock $18.45 delivery 30-day returnsErgonomic Ring Handles: Offers a comfortable, secure grip, allowing for precise maneuverability and reduced hand fatigue. Applications: Gynecological and ...
  34. [34]
    Aspivix - Re-imagining Gynecology
    “The IUD is considered the most cost-effective contraceptive, but many women experience pain and bleeding during insertion related to the tenaculum, a forceps- ...Tenaculum · First Successful IUD and... · About us · For Healthcare Professionals
  35. [35]
    A modern approach to women's healthcare | Aspivix Project - CORDIS
    Jul 1, 2022 · European researchers have invented a new medical device to replace conventional forceps used routinely in gynaecological procedures for the past 100 years.
  36. [36]
    Safety and efficacy of a suction cervical stabilizer for intrauterine ...
    Basically, use of the suction cervical stabilizer rendered the procedure less painful than use of tenaculum in all women, whatever their parous state. The study ...Missing: modern | Show results with:modern<|control11|><|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Atraumatic tenaculum for facilitation of transcervical procedures
    A tenaculum is a medical device that functions to aid a surgeon in gaining transcervical access to the uterine cavity. Gynecologic procedures such as IUD ...
  38. [38]
    Safety and Efficacy of an Atraumatic Uterine Cervical Traction Device
    Dec 23, 2021 · The suction-based atraumatic tenaculum can be used to manipulate the cervix during IUD insertion with satisfactory efficacy and safety.
  39. [39]
    Best practices for reducing pain associated with intrauterine device ...
    This article aims to provide practical, evidence-based, and expert-informed guidelines for managing pain during intrauterine device placement.
  40. [40]
    Pain perception with cervical tenaculum placement during ... - PubMed
    Pain with tenaculum use is significantly associated with anxiety. Clinical trial registration: NCT02969421.
  41. [41]
    Intracervical block for levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system ...
    A 3.6-mL 2% lidocaine intracervical block decreased pain at tenaculum placement and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion among nulligravidas.
  42. [42]
    Comparison of interventions for pain control with tenaculum placement
    Dec 10, 2013 · Conclusion: Mean pain with tenaculum placement is lower after receiving a lidocaine injection than after receiving a topical lidocaine gel.
  43. [43]
    Clinical Challenges of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods
    A meta-analysis of various analgesic measures concluded that lidocaine paracervical block reduces pain scores associated with tenaculum placement and IUD ...Intrauterine Devices · Implant · Uterine Perforation
  44. [44]
    Safety and Efficacy of an Atraumatic Uterine Cervical Traction Device
    Dec 23, 2021 · The suction-based atraumatic tenaculum can be used to manipulate the cervix during IUD insertion with satisfactory efficacy and safety.
  45. [45]
    The necessity of using tenaculum for endometrial sampling ...
    Conclusion: Endometrial sampling procedure without tenaculum is feasible and yields less pain perception than with tenaculum.
  46. [46]
    Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion - PMC
    Lidocaine 2% gel had no effect on pain during IUC insertion (three trials) or pain with tenaculum (type of forceps) placement (two trials). Other types of ...
  47. [47]
    Pain Management for In-Office Uterine and Cervical Procedures
    May 15, 2025 · Topical anesthetic agents may be effective at reducing pain from cervical manipulation with tenaculum use. However, intrauterine pain with use ...
  48. [48]
    Allis Compared With Tenaculum for Stabilization of the... - LWW
    May 4, 2015 · Our primary aim was to compare pain perception immediately after IUD placement using an Allis clamp compared with a single-tooth tenaculum.Missing: nociception | Show results with:nociception
  49. [49]
    Dilatation and Curettage | GLOWM
    Listed in order of frequency, three immediate complications can occur. Laceration of the Cervix by the Tenaculum. Cervical laceration occurs when the resistance ...<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    Endometrial Biopsy: Tips and Pitfalls - AAFP
    May 1, 2020 · Rare complications include excessive bleeding, tenaculum-associated cervical tears, vasovagal reaction, uterine or cervical perforation, and ...
  51. [51]
    Tackling the difficult IUD insertion - Contemporary OB/GYN
    Jun 21, 2018 · During manipulation of the cervix, some patients may experience vasovagal reactions, characterized by nausea, diaphoresis, hypotension, ...
  52. [52]
    A novel atraumatic alternative to the cervical tenaculum
    Outcomes: The Bioceptive® suction cervical retractor demonstrated a trend toward lower pain scores than the single-tooth tenaculum and is a viable, atraumatic ...
  53. [53]
    Differing Approaches to Pain Management for Intrauterine Device ...
    Mar 8, 2024 · This cream reportedly aids in the most painful part of the procedure: hysterometer insertion, IUD insertion, and tenaculum use [9,17]. Similarly ...Missing: modifications modern
  54. [54]
    Could the Valsalva manoeuvre be an alternative to the tenaculum ...
    Jun 11, 2021 · This study investigated whether the Valsalva manoeuvre (VM) could be an alternative to use of the tenaculum for intrauterine device (IUD) insertion.
  55. [55]
    Comparison of the ClearView uterine manipulator with the Cohen ...
    The ClearView instrument provides a greater range of motion, does not require an assistant to maintain uterine position, and allows manipulation without a ...
  56. [56]
    Safety and Efficacy of an Atraumatic Uterine Cervical Traction Device
    Dec 22, 2021 · A novel investigational cervical vacuum tenaculum, enables atraumatic traction of the cervix using a semi-circular suction pad, designed to ...
  57. [57]
    ASPIVIX Expands European Presence with Distribution Partnerships ...
    Jul 2, 2025 · Clinical evidence from the ADVANCE Women Study, a randomized multicenter trial, demonstrated that Carevix achieved a 73% reduction in pain and ...