Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

The Daily Signal


The Daily Signal is an American conservative multimedia news organization founded on June 3, 2014, by The Heritage Foundation to deliver policy and political news, investigative reporting, commentary, and analysis reflecting core American principles such as limited government, individual liberty, and free enterprise. It operates through digital platforms including articles, podcasts, videos, and newsletters, emphasizing original journalism on topics often underrepresented in establishment media, such as federal overreach, cultural shifts, and national security. In June 2024, it transitioned to legal independence with its own board and leadership while maintaining an affiliate relationship with The Heritage Foundation for resources and alignment. The outlet has grown significantly, reaching its 100 millionth visitor by and continuing to expand its audience through subscriber-supported content of advertising constraints, allowing focus on in-depth coverage rather than click-driven . Its prioritizes high-quality, credible reporting to inform a society, filling voids in coverage by scrutinizing policies and ideologies with empirical scrutiny and first-principles analysis. Notable for investigative pieces exposing bureaucratic inefficiencies and cultural controversies, The Daily Signal has contributed to public discourse on issues like and fiscal responsibility, often citing data from primary sources over narrative-driven accounts. While praised by conservative audiences for its unapologetic defense of traditional values and alternative viewpoints, it faces criticism from left-leaning watchdogs for perceived partisan bias, rated as strongly conservative in story selection and analysis. This reflects broader tensions in ecosystems where outlets challenging dominant institutional narratives encounter reliability downgrades from evaluators influenced by priors, yet its output consistently draws on verifiable facts and policy expertise from affiliated roots.

Overview and Mission

Founding Principles and Objectives

The Daily Signal was established on June 3, 2014, by as a digital-first outlet to expand upon its existing Morning Bell newsletter and The Foundry blog, with the explicit goal of providing policy and political alongside commentary and analysis grounded in free-market and conservative principles. The initiative sought to address perceived deficiencies in by offering in-depth coverage of policy issues often under-reported or framed through non-conservative lenses, thereby equipping readers with information to support , individual liberties, and traditional American values. Core founding principles centered on delivering "accurate, fair, and unbiased" in its reporting segments, while clearly delineating pieces that draw from the expertise of over 100 policy analysts to articulate a conservative . This approach aimed to produce "straight-down-the-middle" news that avoids overt editorializing in factual accounts but integrates conservative analysis to counter what identified as dominant left-leaning narratives in established outlets. The objectives extended beyond mere information dissemination to actively shape public discourse and policy influence, including investigative work on government overreach, cultural shifts, and threats, all while bypassing constraints of ad-driven or traffic-obsessed models. By aligning with Heritage's broader mandate to defend constitutional liberties and founding principles against encroachments, The Daily Signal positioned itself as a tool for conservative , reaching millions to foster informed and electoral .

Relationship with The Heritage Foundation

The Daily Signal was established on June 3, 2014, by as a outlet to deliver conservative-leaning , , and commentary, evolving from the think tank's earlier Morning Bell email newsletter and The Foundry blog. Initially operating as a direct project of Heritage, it leveraged the foundation's resources, including staff and intellectual infrastructure, to produce content aligned with Heritage's emphasis on free enterprise, , and traditional values. For its first decade, The Daily Signal received full funding from , enabling expansion without external advertising or revenue dependencies, which allowed focus on investigative reporting and pieces reflective of Heritage's priorities. This positioned it as the media arm of the foundation, with shared personnel and collaborative efforts, such as joint announcements of new hires and coverage amplifying Heritage's research. On June 3, 2024, marking its tenth anniversary, The Daily Signal transitioned to legal independence as a separate nonprofit entity, while affirming continued alignment with 's mission and benefiting from its foundational support. Despite the , 's official materials continue to describe the broader "Heritage enterprise" as encompassing the foundation, for America, and The Daily Signal, indicating enduring operational and ideological ties. This structure has facilitated ongoing collaborations, including shared investigative initiatives like Freedom of Information Act requests, though the outlet now pursues diversified funding to sustain its autonomy.

Historical Development

Launch and Early Years (2014–2016)

The Daily Signal was launched on June 3, 2014, by as a outlet focused on providing original reporting, commentary, and analysis on , , and . It emerged as an expansion of the foundation's existing Morning Bell email and The Foundry , which had originated in 2008 to deliver daily insights on conservative priorities. The site's founding aimed to fill a perceived gap in by offering fact-based aligned with American founding principles, emphasizing underreported stories and implications without reliance on partisan spin. Initial content included articles on , such as state-level responses to the standards, reflecting Heritage's emphasis on and . Rob Bluey served as the founding , drawing on his prior experience at to integrate policy expertise with narrative-driven reporting, while co-founders Ken McIntyre and Katrina Trinko handled editorial strategy and reporter recruitment, hiring the first three full-time staff members. Trinko, as , prioritized stories that highlighted individual impacts of government actions, establishing a pattern of investigative pieces that combined on-the-ground interviews with data analysis. The outlet operated initially under 's umbrella, leveraging the think tank's resources for credibility while maintaining a digital-first format with multimedia elements like videos and podcasts to engage a broader audience seeking alternatives to establishment narratives. During 2015 and 2016, The Daily Signal gained traction through reporting that influenced policy debates and public discourse. Reporter Kelsey Harkness's coverage of the Justice Department's initiative, which targeted financial services to lawful businesses, contributed to the U.S. voting in February 2016 to terminate the program. Similarly, Melissa Quinn's July 2015 investigation into the civil seizure of $11,000 from prompted the government to return the funds with interest by December 2016. Other notable efforts included Jarrett Stepman's defense of the in a November 2016 , coinciding with rising public support as measured by Gallup polls, and Harkness's profiles of individuals affected by regulatory overreach, such as the Kleins, who faced a $135,000 fine in for declining a custom cake order, which factored into the 2016 electoral defeat of the enforcing official. These stories underscored the site's early commitment to accountability journalism, building readership through demonstrable real-world effects rather than click-driven .

Expansion and Key Milestones (2017–Present)

In 2017, The Daily Signal solidified its influence within conservative policy circles, with its reporting cited three times during a House Budget Committee hearing on the failures of Obamacare on February 16, 2017. publicly recognized it as a trusted source during a interview that year, and correspondent Fred Lucas became a regular presence in daily press briefings. This period marked an expansion in content, including increased for commentaries and documentaries, alongside original reporting on topics such as personal impacts of federal policies. The outlet experienced significant audience growth in subsequent years, ending 2021 with a 66% year-over-year increase in traffic, the largest among major conservative websites according to internal metrics shared by its parent organization. This surge reflected broader digital expansion into podcasts, with The Daily Signal Podcast becoming a daily offering featuring analysis and interviews, accumulating thousands of episodes by the mid-2020s. In August 2023, unique visitor traffic rose 332%, outpacing other conservative sites amid heightened political coverage. Further milestones included sustained investigative reporting and commentary that contributed to conservative discourse, such as detailed examinations of regulatory rollbacks and federal spending under the administration starting in 2017. By 2024, marking its 10th anniversary since launch, The Daily Signal maintained a focus on policy-oriented without major shifts in operational scale, prioritizing digital reach over outlets. Traffic analytics as of September 2025 continued to show steady engagement in and political segments.

Organizational Structure

Leadership and Key Personnel

Rob Bluey has served as president and executive editor of The Daily Signal since its inception in 2014, overseeing its expansion into multimedia content including podcasts and video reporting. Under his leadership, the outlet grew its audience and influence within conservative media circles. Katrina Trinko was appointed in August 2019, directing editorial content and co-hosting The Daily Signal Podcast. Prior to this role, Trinko worked as a reporter for and Channel. In February 2025, Keith Koffler was named managing editor, bringing over 25 years of experience in political journalism from outlets including White House Weekly and . Key personnel include Virginia Allen, senior news producer and podcast host, who covers policy issues such as and ; Fred Lucas, chief national affairs correspondent focusing on government ; and Tony Kinnett, a contributor specializing in investigations. The team comprises approximately 12 full-time staff, supplemented by fellows, interns, and contributors as of June 2024.

Operational Model and Funding

The Daily Signal functions as a nonprofit organization, producing daily online articles, podcasts, videos, and newsletters focused on , , and from a conservative perspective. It maintains a lean operational structure with approximately 12 full-time staff members, supplemented by two fellows, two interns, and freelance contributors, enabling agile content production without traditional print or broadcast infrastructure. Content distribution occurs primarily through its , subscriptions, platforms, and audio/video channels, with decisions on platform prioritization guided by a custom engagement index that tracks metrics like video views and comments across outlets. Organizationally, The Daily Signal governs itself through an independent , having transitioned from operating as a department within to a distinct entity while retaining close ties. This model emphasizes original reporting, commentary, and analysis, with no paid advertising on its site, allowing editorial focus without commercial pressures. Recent expansions include pursuing specialized press credentials, such as those for , to enhance access for investigative work. Funding for The Daily Signal derives entirely from The Heritage Foundation, a conservative that supports it through allocations from its broader revenue streams, including individual donations exceeding 500,000 contributors. Donations solicited specifically for The Daily Signal are tax-deductible and channeled via , reflecting its nonprofit status and reliance on philanthropic support rather than subscriptions or ads. 's financial statements confirm The Daily Signal's prior integration as a department, with ongoing funding ensuring operational independence in content while aligned with the foundation's mission.

Content and Formats

Core Offerings: News, Commentary, and Analysis

The Daily Signal delivers news reporting centered on U.S. policy, politics, and cultural issues, with a focus on events impacting conservative priorities such as fiscal responsibility, national security, and individual liberties. Articles often draw from primary documents, congressional records, and on-the-ground interviews to cover topics like regulatory changes or election developments, as seen in coverage of the January 2025 Special Counsel Weiss report on Hunter Biden investigations. This reporting emphasizes empirical details over narrative framing, distinguishing factual accounts from interpretive pieces through clear labeling. Commentary constitutes a core component, featuring opinion essays from experts and guest contributors that advocate for free-market solutions and critique progressive policies. For instance, pieces have analyzed alternatives to , arguing for maximization over activist agendas, as articulated by Strive Asset Management's Matt Cole in a January 2024 interview. These contributions explicitly identify as conservative viewpoints, avoiding claims of neutrality and prioritizing causal arguments against government intervention. Policy analysis forms another pillar, offering detailed breakdowns of legislation, economic indicators, and institutional trends using data from government sources and research. Examples include evaluations of federal education initiatives like , which highlighted increased centralization's risks to state autonomy as of August 2012, and recent assessments of college outcomes via Heritage's partnerships, such as the October 2025 College Pulse survey revealing gaps in societal preparation. Such pieces integrate quantitative metrics with reasoning on long-term consequences, often challenging mainstream academic consensus on topics like standardized testing reforms.

Multimedia and Digital Features

The Daily Signal maintains a robust presence through its , which integrates elements such as embedded videos, audio clips, and interactive to enhance and political reporting. The site emphasizes a visually rich format, allowing users to access original articles alongside supplementary media like short explainer videos on topics including border security and free speech issues. Central to its multimedia offerings is The Daily Signal Podcast, launched as a key audio feature providing concise daily news summaries in approximately 10 minutes, alongside in-depth interviews and analysis from contributors like . Episodes cover current events such as government shutdowns, immigration policy, and cultural debates, distributed across platforms including , Podbean, and , with over 2,700 episodes available as of October 2025. The podcast prioritizes original reporting and conservative commentary, often featuring guest experts on policy impacts. Video content forms another pillar, hosted primarily on the organization's YouTube channel, which delivers investigative reports, feature stories, and commentary segments. Notable series include Victor Davis Hanson's video essays on historical and contemporary issues, such as resistance to federal immigration law, with uploads continuing regularly into 2025. The channel also produces topical videos on events like changes at the U.S. southern border under different administrations and legal rulings involving digital content, tagged and archived on the website for easy access. Social media amplifies these features, with active accounts on X (formerly Twitter) under @DailySignal, Instagram reaching 142,000 followers, and LinkedIn for professional outreach. On X, the account grew 34% in followers over the 12 months preceding May 2025, sharing clips from podcasts and videos alongside links to full articles. These platforms facilitate real-time engagement, including promotions of multimedia content on issues like technology's societal effects and election coverage. Daily email newsletters serve as a digital aggregation tool, compiling top stories, podcast episodes, and video highlights for subscribers, reinforcing the outlet's commitment to accessible, -driven conservative analysis. This ecosystem positions The Daily Signal as a organization focused on , , and , with tools enabling broader beyond text-based reporting.

Editorial Focus and Coverage

Primary Topics: Policy, Politics, and Culture

The Daily Signal's reporting on policy emphasizes conservative principles such as limited government intervention, fiscal responsibility, and national security prioritization. Coverage frequently critiques expansive federal spending and regulatory overreach, as seen in analyses of the CHIPS Act as misguided public policy that distorts markets. On economic freedom, the outlet highlighted the United States' score falling to its lowest in 30 years in the 2024 Index, attributing declines to increased government control amid global trends. Immigration policy receives scrutiny for perceived lax enforcement, with reports detailing costs of Biden-Harris border approaches and calls to reform Temporary Protected Status programs originally intended for temporary humanitarian relief. National security pieces advocate refocusing the military on lethality over social initiatives, exemplified by endorsements of Pete Hegseth's vision to reverse "decades of social engineering" in the Pentagon. In politics, The Daily Signal tracks electoral dynamics, congressional actions, and conflicts with a focus on priorities and Democratic shortcomings. Articles on shutdowns, such as the 2025 episode—the second-longest in U.S. history—attribute prolonged closures to Democratic intransigence on funding issues like and pay. Coverage of GOP primaries, including Texas voters advancing school choice advocates in May 2024, underscores grassroots pressure for policy shifts. The outlet defends figures like against media-driven scandals, arguing they represent noise rather than substantive threats, while reporting on administration efforts such as aiding Afrikaner refugees amid Democratic opposition. Cultural coverage centers on preserving traditional institutions against progressive encroachments, including family structures, religious liberty, and educational integrity. Pro-life advocacy features prominently, with post-Roe v. Wade strategies outlined in 2022 for state-level protections and a 2025 agenda pushing defunding of organizations like amid record government abortion funding. Reports decry "" influences in sectors like charter schools and , documenting ideological captures that prioritize initiatives over core missions. stories expose anti-parent sentiments, such as a 2021 Utah teacher's rant against parental involvement, framing them as part of broader agendas undermining family authority. Religious freedom receives defense against secular pressures, aligning with priorities on and traditional values.

Approach to Reporting and Truth-Seeking

The Daily Signal prioritizes original reporting, , and commentary that emphasize and implications over narrative-driven interpretations. Founded as an extension of The Heritage Foundation's journalistic arm, the outlet commits to covering politics, , and culture through on-the-ground sourcing and data verification, often challenging accounts with primary documents and eyewitness interviews. This approach manifests in pursuits like obtaining press credentials in October 2025 to ensure direct access for reporting, underscoring a stated duty to "truthfully report" while maintaining accountability. To uphold accuracy, The Daily Signal operates a formal corrections policy, inviting submissions with specifics such as article title, publication date, error description, URL, and proposed fixes, which are reviewed and published as needed to address factual discrepancies. The publication distinguishes its news from opinion pieces, labeling commentary clearly while asserting internal standards that reject in favor of verifiable claims, as evidenced by low rates of failed fact checks in external audits. Independent assessor rates it as mostly factual, citing minimal instances of fabricated information or failed checks relative to output volume, though noting consistent right-leaning editorial positions. Skepticism toward institutional fact-checkers shapes its methodology, with editors critiquing entities like PolitiFact for disproportionate scrutiny of conservative figures—such as over 1,000 checks on Donald Trump versus fewer on Democratic counterparts—and framing them as partisan tools rather than impartial arbiters. This informs a reliance on first-hand evidence, government records, and statistical data to counter perceived biases in left-leaning media and academia, prioritizing causal analysis of policy outcomes over consensus views. Contrasting evaluations, such as Ad Fontes Media's "unreliable" reliability score, highlight methodological disputes, where conservative outlets like The Daily Signal often score lower due to ideological divergence rather than empirical failures.

Influence and Achievements

Policy Impact and Notable Stories

The Daily Signal's reporting on , a 2013 Department of Justice initiative that coerced banks into severing ties with lawful businesses labeled high-risk—such as firearms dealers and short-term lenders—drew attention to regulatory overreach affecting non-fraudulent operations. Coverage commencing in 2014 by reporter Kelsey Harkness documented victim testimonies and official accountability lapses, fostering bipartisan congressional pushback. This scrutiny preceded the U.S. ' passage on February 4, 2016, of an amendment to the appropriations bill, terminating the program by a 250-169 vote. In civil asset forfeiture abuses, the outlet's 2015 investigation into the February 2014 seizure of $11,000 from Charles Clarke—a college student traveling from Cincinnati—at an airport, despite no drugs detected or charges filed, exemplified equitable takings without due process. Federal agents, via TSA and DEA collaboration, initially forfeited the cash under suspicion of drug ties; sustained media exposure prompted administrative review, resulting in the government's return of the full amount plus interest in December 2016. Coverage of post-2016 election challenges to the mechanism emphasized its role in safeguarding against urban-majority dominance. Through op-eds by Jarrett Stepman on November 7, 2016, and a video by Genevieve Wood exceeding 1.5 million views, the reporting countered abolition efforts following Trump's Electoral College victory despite a popular vote loss. Public sentiment shifted accordingly, with Gallup polling in early December 2016 recording support rising to 47% from a prior 35%. Religious liberty narratives formed a core of influential stories, spotlighting state actions against faith-based refusals. Reporting on Aaron and Melissa Klein, Oregon bakers fined $135,000 in 2015 for declining a same-sex , revealed enforcement disparities under Labor Brad Avakian; this exposure aligned with Avakian's narrow defeat in the 2016 race, a rare gain in the state. Parallel accounts of Jack ' Masterpiece Cakeshop legal saga, culminating in a 2018 ruling affirming free exercise protections, and Coach Kennedy's 2015-initiated fight for post-game prayers, resolved by a 2022 Court decision in his favor, elevated First Amendment precedents through victim-centered journalism. Affordable Care Act implementation critiques featured personal hardships, such as Pamela Weldin's repeated insurance losses from 2013 onward and Scott Womack's business closures due to mandate costs in 2014, illustrating unintended economic disruptions and informing repeal advocacy. These efforts, alongside broader policy exposés on regulatory burdens, have sustained conservative reform pressures without direct causation to but with documented amplification of empirical grievances.

Role in Conservative Media Landscape

The Daily Signal serves as a prominent digital outlet within the conservative media ecosystem, emphasizing and investigative reporting tied to its parent organization, , which enables deeper dives into legislative and regulatory issues often overlooked by broader conservative broadcasters. Founded in 2014 to circumvent traditional media gatekeepers, it positions itself as a conduit for conservative viewpoints on , , and culture, delivering content that aligns with free-market principles, , and traditional values. This affiliation distinguishes it from independent conservative sites like Breitbart or , providing institutional backing for original reporting that influences think tank-driven advocacy and reaches over 400,000 subscribers as of 2020. In the broader conservative landscape, The Daily Signal contributes to a "counterrevolution" against legacy media dominance by prioritizing and accountability for elected officials, fostering an alternative narrative ecosystem that challenges perceived left-leaning biases in outlets like or . Its growth trajectory underscores this role: in 2021, it recorded the largest year-over-year traffic increase among the top 20 conservative websites tracked by media analysts, reflecting rising demand for substantive, right-leaning amid distrust in mainstream sources. Unlike cable-heavy players such as , which blend with programming, The Daily Signal focuses on written and features for a policy-savvy , including lawmakers and activists, thereby amplifying Heritage's in real-time . Critics from left-leaning perspectives argue it reinforces a , but empirically, its output has driven visibility for underreported stories, such as scrutiny, positioning it as a bridge between conservative circles and consumers in an increasingly fragmented . This niche enhances the ecosystem's resilience, offering reliable aggregation of right-leaning data and commentary that sustains ideological cohesion without relying on advertising models vulnerable to platform deboosting.

Reception and Criticisms

Positive Assessments and Audience Reach

The Daily Signal has garnered positive evaluations from select media watchdogs emphasizing its adherence to journalistic standards. , a rating service assessing online news , has affirmed that the outlet meets its criteria for and , distinguishing it from sources deemed unreliable. Media Bias/Fact Check has characterized its reporting as mostly factual, noting minimal instances of failed fact checks relative to its output volume, though acknowledging a consistent conservative slant. metrics underscore the outlet's reach within conservative circles. In 2021, it recorded a 66% year-over-year growth, outperforming other conservative sites in traffic gains. Following its 2024 independence from , The Daily Signal sustained expansion, with a 34% rise in X (formerly ) followers reported as of May 2025. Traffic analytics reveal a dedicated demographic: approximately 63% male visitors and a predominant age cohort of 65 and older, reflecting alignment with older conservative audiences. This sustained engagement positions it as a key player in right-leaning digital media, contributing to broader conservative ecosystem influence.

Left-Leaning Critiques and Debunkings

Left-leaning media watchdogs have characterized The Daily Signal as a outlet prioritizing conservative advocacy over neutral journalism. , a progressive organization monitoring conservative media, describes it as "an online platform for conservative political commentary" launched by in 2014, implying it functions more as an extension of ideological messaging than objective reporting. Similarly, rates it as exhibiting "strong right" bias and "unreliable, problematic" reliability, citing opinion-heavy content and selective sourcing that aligns with Heritage's policy goals. assigns a "right biased" label with "mixed" factual reporting, pointing to instances of loaded wording and story selection favoring conservative narratives, though acknowledging low rates of outright fabrication. Specific debunkings from left-leaning sources often target individual stories or contributors. For instance, Media Matters criticized a January 2015 Daily Signal report by on the attack, alleging it misrepresented the timing of a State Department official's warning to imply foreknowledge, when the cable was sent after the , 2012, incident; Attkisson's piece had framed it as a potential "bombshell" overlooked by outlets. Media Matters has repeatedly accused Attkisson, a frequent contributor, of promoting unsubstantiated claims, such as linking to or questioning official narratives on other scandals, portraying her work at The Daily Signal as part of a pattern of "" amplified by right-wing platforms. Critiques extend to coverage of social issues, where outlets like Media Matters contend The Daily Signal downplays or disputes data on LGBTQ youth . In response to a 2025 Department of Health and Human Services report citing elevated risks among youth, Media Matters highlighted the site's prior articles rejecting such statistics as "debunked" without empirical counter-evidence, framing this as denialism rooted in opposition to gender-affirming policies. These challenges, however, frequently reflect broader ideological clashes, with Media Matters itself drawing criticism for selective scrutiny of conservative sources amid documented left-leaning funding and focus. Empirical assessments of The Daily Signal's accuracy remain contested, as independent fact-checkers have issued few direct corrections compared to its output volume, suggesting critiques emphasize interpretive bias over verifiable falsehoods.

Controversies

Allegations of Partisanship and Bias

Media bias evaluators have characterized The Daily Signal as exhibiting strong right-wing , primarily due to its affiliation with the conservative and patterns of story selection that emphasize conservative policy perspectives. For instance, assigns it a "Right" rating of 7.7 on a , citing consistent favoritism toward right-leaning causes through editorial choices and political alignment, alongside a "Mixed" factual reporting score of 5.0 for deviations from mainstream on topics like anthropogenic . Similarly, rates its as "Strong Right" at 17.25 (on a -42 to +42 , where positive values indicate right-leaning), attributing this to opinion-heavy content and analysis from a conservative perspective, with examples including articles questioning official narratives on events like church shootings potentially involving individuals or compiling lists of policy "blunders" by Democratic figures. Critics from left-leaning perspectives have escalated these assessments to claims of outright , arguing that The Daily Signal masquerades as while advancing agendas, particularly on social issues. Assigned Media, for example, has accused it of publishing falsehoods in coverage of , such as linking ballot measures to an alleged "transgender agenda" and asserting that youth gender treatments invariably lead to —claims contested by medical advocates favoring such interventions—while relying on sources from groups like the without prominent disclosure. These critiques portray the outlet's reporting as selectively amplifying anti-LGBTQ+ narratives under the guise of parental rights advocacy, with initial fact-based elements giving way to interpretive bias. AllSides Media Bias Rating also places The Daily Signal in the "Right" category, based on community feedback and editorial reviews, though with noted low confidence pending further analysis, reflecting perceptions of partisan slant in its political news and commentary. Such evaluations often highlight in headlines and skepticism toward progressive policies, as seen in pieces critiquing alarmism or decisions through a conservative lens, which detractors view as evidence of systemic partisanship rather than balanced inquiry.

Responses and Empirical Defenses

The Daily Signal counters allegations of partisanship by emphasizing its commitment to original, fact-based that uncovers underreported stories, particularly those challenging narratives, rather than adhering to perceived neutrality. In response to claims of bias, the outlet highlights evaluations from independent raters, such as , which classifies its reporting as "Mostly Factual" based on minimal instances of failed fact checks and proper sourcing, while acknowledging a right-leaning slant through story selection. Empirical defenses include high marks from , a credibility assessor, which granted The Daily Signal green ratings on all eight key criteria for factual accuracy, transparency, and accountability, distinguishing it from outlets with systemic distortions. Supporters argue that lower reliability scores from raters like , which deem it "Unreliable, Problematic," reflect ideological disagreement rather than evidentiary flaws, given the latter's own left-leaning tendencies in source weighting. The outlet bolsters its position through self-conducted analyses exposing empirical imbalances in legacy media, such as a 2024 study documenting 78% negative coverage of and on ABC, CBS, and NBC evening news versus 82% positive for and during the election cycle, attributing discrepancies to selective omission rather than balanced inquiry. Similarly, critiques of fact-checking organizations like reveal over 1,000 checks on with a pattern of contextual omissions that inflate inaccuracies, positioning The Daily Signal's approach as a corrective to institutionalized left-wing skews in verification processes. These responses frame criticisms as attempts to delegitimize conservative scrutiny, substantiated by the outlet's track record of investigative pieces—such as probes into government overreach—that have prompted congressional hearings without subsequent retractions.