Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Tidal acceleration

Tidal acceleration refers to the secular changes in the orbital and rotational dynamics of a planet-satellite system arising from tidal friction, where differential gravitational forces create tidal bulges that, due to the planet's faster rotation, lag behind the line connecting the two bodies, generating torques that transfer angular momentum from the planet's rotation to the satellite's orbit.^[1] In the Earth-Moon system, this process primarily results from the Moon's gravitational influence on Earth's oceans and solid body, dissipating energy through friction and heat.^[2] The primary effects include a deceleration of Earth's rotation, which lengthens the day by approximately 2.3 milliseconds per century, and an acceleration of the Moon's orbital motion, causing it to recede from Earth at a rate of about 3.8 centimeters per year.^[3] These changes are driven by tidal dissipation, with the majority originating from terrestrial sources such as ocean tides, leading to a lunar mean motion deceleration of -25.97 ± 0.05 arcseconds per century squared and an increase in the Earth-Moon distance that has already expanded the lunar semimajor axis by roughly 38.3 millimeters annually.^[3] Over geological timescales, this has resulted in shorter days in the past—for instance, Earth's day was about 21.9 hours 620 million years ago—and the Moon's orbit was correspondingly closer.^[2] In addition to the dominant Earth-Moon interaction, tidal acceleration influences other systems, such as causing most moons in the solar system to become tidally locked, where their rotation periods match their orbital periods, as seen with the Moon relative to Earth.^[4] Long-term projections suggest that continued tidal evolution could lead to mutual tidal locking of Earth and the Moon in approximately 50 billion years, synchronizing Earth's rotation with the lunar month.^[4] Observations from lunar laser ranging confirm these rates with high precision, aligning geophysical models of tidal dissipation within 1% accuracy.^[3]

Basic Principles

Definition and Mechanism

Tidal acceleration refers to the long-term, secular increase in a satellite's orbital angular momentum resulting from tidal friction between the orbiting body and its primary, which causes the satellite's orbit to expand gradually while slowing the primary's rotation.^[5] This process arises primarily from dissipative effects in the primary's deformable layers, such as oceans or solid mantle, leading to a net transfer of angular momentum from the primary's spin to the satellite's orbit.^[6] The underlying prerequisite for understanding tidal acceleration is the concept of tides themselves, which stem from differential gravitational forces exerted by the satellite on the primary. In the equilibrium theory of tides, first proposed by Isaac Newton, these forces are assumed to produce static bulges aligned with the line connecting the two bodies, representing an idealized, non-dissipative response.^[7] In contrast, the dynamic theory accounts for the primary's rotation and frictional dissipation, which cause the tidal bulges to lag behind the equilibrium position, introducing energy loss and torque; this distinction is crucial, as tidal acceleration pertains only to these secular, dissipative effects rather than short-term, periodic tidal variations like daily ocean height changes.^[8] The basic mechanism begins with the satellite's gravity creating two tidal bulges on the primary: one facing the satellite due to stronger pull on the near side, and another on the far side due to inertial effects relative to the primary's center of mass. When the primary rotates faster than the satellite orbits—as in the Earth-Moon system—this rotation drags the tidal bulges ahead of the satellite's position, generating a gravitational torque because the bulges are asymmetrically placed. This torque accelerates the satellite in its orbit, increasing its distance and orbital period, while the reaction torque decelerates the primary's rotation.^[6]^[5] The theoretical recognition of tidal effects on orbits dates to Isaac Newton's Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1687), where he first described how gravitational attractions produce tides and qualitatively linked them to perturbations in celestial motions, though without quantifying the frictional acceleration.^[7]

Tidal Bulges and Gravitational Torque

Tidal bulges arise from the differential gravitational forces exerted by a satellite on a primary body, such as a planet, stretching it into an ellipsoidal shape aligned with the line connecting their centers of mass. This deformation creates two bulges: one on the near side facing the satellite, where gravitational pull is strongest, and one on the far side, where the primary's own gravity dominates over the weakened satellite pull, resulting in relative outward displacement. In bodies like Earth, these bulges manifest in both the solid crust and the oceans; the solid Earth deforms elastically by a few meters, while ocean tides can reach tens of meters due to water's lower rigidity and freer mobility.^[9]^[10] Friction and material dissipation prevent the bulges from perfectly aligning with the instantaneous sub-satellite point, introducing a phase lag. In the oceans, frictional drag against the seafloor and continents causes the tidal bulge to trail behind the equilibrium position as Earth's rotation overtakes the orbital motion. For the solid Earth, the viscoelastic response—where the mantle and crust behave as a viscous-elastic material—leads to a time-dependent deformation, characterized by a phase lag angle δ between the applied tidal potential and the resulting bulge. This lag, typically small (δ ≈ 0.01–0.1 radians for terrestrial bodies, e.g., ≈0.05 radians for Earth), quantifies energy dissipation efficiency, often related to the tidal quality factor Q via sin 2δ ≈ 1/Q for weak dissipation, where lower Q indicates higher frictional losses.^[11]^[12] The misaligned tidal bulges generate a gravitational torque on the primary, as the satellite pulls more strongly on the leading bulge than the trailing one, creating a net rotational force. To derive the tidal torque τ, consider the satellite's gravitational potential inducing a tidal deformation in the primary, modeled as a perturbed quadrupole moment. The Love number k₂ measures the ratio of the induced tidal potential to the perturbing potential, accounting for the body's rigidity; for a fluid body, k₂ = 1.5, but it is reduced (k₂ ≈ 0.3 for Earth) by elastic resistance. The torque arises from the interaction energy between the satellite and this lagged quadrupole, yielding the standard formula:

\tau = \frac{3 G M_s^2 R_p^5 k_2 \sin 2 \delta}{2 a^6}

Here, G is the gravitational constant, M_s the satellite mass, R_p the primary radius, and a the orbital semi-major axis. This expression is obtained by expanding the tidal potential in spherical harmonics (dominant l=2, m=2 mode for circular orbits), computing the phase-lagged response via the complex Love number k₂ e^{-i 2\delta} ≈ k₂ (1 - i \sin 2 \delta) for small δ, and integrating the resulting torque as the negative gradient of the mutual potential energy with respect to the angular misalignment. The derivation assumes a linear response and neglects higher-order eccentricity effects.^[12]^[13] This torque transfers angular momentum from the primary's spin to the satellite's orbit, slowing the primary's rotation while expanding the orbit, while the phase lag dissipates orbital energy as heat through tidal friction in both oceanic and solid components. The torque's magnitude scales inversely with the sixth power of the orbital distance (a^{-6}), making it highly sensitive to close-in configurations, and depends on the rotation rate through the tidal frequency (affecting δ in frequency-dependent models). Material properties influence it via k₂, which reflects rigidity, and the dissipation parameter sin 2δ (or Q), where efficient dissipators (low Q) produce stronger torques for given geometry.^[12]^[1]

Earth-Moon System

Historical Discovery and Evidence

The earliest recognition of the Moon's apparent acceleration in its mean motion dates to 1695, when Edmond Halley compared ancient eclipse records with contemporary observations, noting discrepancies that suggested a long-term increase in the Moon's orbital speed.^[14] This qualitative insight laid the groundwork for quantitative investigations into what would later be understood as tidal effects. In 1749, Richard Dunthorne provided the first numerical estimate, analyzing ancient eclipses to quantify the secular acceleration at approximately +10 arcseconds per century², confirming Halley's suspicion through systematic comparison of historical timings.^[15] Pierre-Simon Laplace advanced the theoretical framework in 1786 by linking this acceleration to tidal interactions, proposing that perturbations from Earth's tides could account for the observed motion, though his initial model overestimated the effect.^[16] John Couch Adams refined this in 1853, correcting the secular term to 8.85 arcseconds per century² by incorporating more precise eclipse data and orbital perturbations, isolating the tidal component from other influences.^[17] During the late 19th century, George Darwin further refined tidal theory in the 1880s, developing viscous and elastico-viscous models that explained secular changes in Earth's rotation and the Moon's orbit through frictional dissipation, predicting historical configurations where the day and lunar month were synchronized at shorter periods.^[18] In the 20th century, confirmation came from reanalysis of ancient eclipse records against modern ephemerides, revealing cumulative deviations consistent with tidal slowing of Earth's rotation, while atomic clocks since the 1950s provided a stable reference to measure ongoing deceleration without relying on variable astronomical timings.^[19] Geological and paleontological evidence extends this timeline deep into Earth's history, with tidal rhythmites—layered sedimentary deposits known as tidalites—from the late Proterozoic era (~650 million years ago) in South Australia recording approximately 13.1 lunar months per year and solar days per lunar month of 30.5, implying a closer Moon at about 58 Earth radii and supporting gradual orbital recession.^[20] Fossil records, such as banded deposits from ~620 million years ago, indicate 21.9-hour days based on cyclic laminations influenced by tidal and rotational forces, including Coriolis effects preserved in sedimentary patterns.^[21] Post-2000 computational modeling has addressed gaps in these early theories by integrating high-resolution ocean tide simulations with orbital dynamics, reconstructing paleogeometries and varying rotation rates (6–24 hours) to simulate the full 4.5 billion-year Earth-Moon evolution, revealing dynamic dissipation rates that refine historical estimates without assuming constant friction.^[22]

Effects on Rotation and Orbit

Tidal acceleration in the Earth-Moon system manifests primarily through the slowing of Earth's rotation and the outward migration of the Moon's orbit, driven by the gravitational interaction between the two bodies and Earth's deforming oceans. The Moon's pull on Earth's tidal bulges creates a torque that opposes the planet's spin, resulting in tidal braking that lengthens the day by +2.3 milliseconds per century. This secular increase in the length of day (LOD) arises from the dissipation of rotational energy in the oceans and solid Earth, making it the main long-term driver of changes in Earth's rotation rate. Over time, this cumulative slowing contributes to the growing ΔT, the discrepancy between atomic time (Terrestrial Time) and rotation-based Universal Time (UT1), which has reached approximately 70 seconds since 1820 and requires periodic adjustments in global timekeeping to maintain synchronization with astronomical events.^[5] Conservation of angular momentum transfers kinetic energy from Earth's rotation to the Moon's orbit, causing the Moon to recede at a rate of 38.3 mm per year. This ongoing recession elongates the lunar orbital period, presently 27.3 days, as the Moon spirals outward in a nearly circular path. The process will eventually stabilize in about 50 billion years, when Earth's rotation period synchronizes with the expanded lunar orbital period, halting further changes and establishing a mutual tidal lock.^[23]^[24] These effects extend to broader geophysical and climatic consequences. The progressive lengthening of days alters diurnal cycles, potentially intensifying weather patterns through extended periods of solar heating and cooling, which could influence atmospheric dynamics and precipitation distribution over geological timescales. Moreover, the Moon's torque stabilizes Earth's obliquity at 23.4°, confining axial tilt variations to 22.1°–24.5° and thereby preserving consistent seasonal climates; absent this lunar influence, greater obliquity fluctuations would trigger extreme climatic instability, including ice ages or hothouse conditions.^[25] Post-2015 observations reveal subtle variations in these dynamics, attributed to evolving ocean tide patterns. Data from the GRACE and GRACE-FO satellites through 2023 indicate minor fluctuations in tidal energy dissipation, linked to climate-induced changes like sea-level rise and altered ocean circulation, which slightly modulate both the rotational slowdown and recession rates. A 2025 study has detected a small climate-induced increase in the lunar recession rate due to enhanced tidal dissipation from global warming.^[22]^[26]

Angular Momentum and Energy Transfer

In the Earth-Moon system, tidal interactions ensure the conservation of total angular momentum, which is the sum of the Earth's spin angular momentum L_{\text{spin}} and the Moon's orbital angular momentum L_{\text{orbit}}. The gravitational torque arising from the misalignment of tidal bulges transfers angular momentum from the Earth's rotation to the Moon's orbit at a rate where \frac{dL_{\text{orbit}}}{dt} = -\frac{dL_{\text{spin}}}{dt}, resulting in a gradual slowdown of Earth's rotation and an outward migration of the Moon.^[27] This transfer is accompanied by changes in the system's energy budget. The Moon's recession increases its orbital energy, given by E_{\text{orbit}} = -\frac{G M_{\text{earth}} M_{\text{moon}}}{2a} where a is the semi-major axis, making E_{\text{orbit}} less negative as a grows; concurrently, the Earth's rotational kinetic energy decreases. The difference manifests as energy dissipation, primarily through frictional heating, at a rate of approximately 3.7 TW in the present-day system.^[27]^[28] The dissipation is partitioned such that about 80% occurs in the oceans due to turbulent flows and friction, while 20% takes place in the solid Earth via viscoelastic deformation in the mantle. The efficiency of this process is governed by the tidal quality factor Q, which quantifies the ratio of energy stored to energy dissipated per tidal cycle; lower Q values indicate higher dissipation rates.^[27] Over geological timescales, these dynamics drive the long-term evolution toward tidal locking, where Earth's rotation period would match the Moon's orbital period, projected to occur in about 50 billion years. The Sun's tidal influence currently perturbs the Earth-Moon momentum exchange and contributes to the observed imbalance.^[27]^[4]

Quantitative Models and Measurements

The quantitative modeling of tidal acceleration in the Earth-Moon system relies on secular perturbation equations derived from tidal torque and angular momentum conservation, assuming a constant phase lag or quality factor Q for dissipation. The rate of change of the Moon's orbital semi-major axis a, known as the orbital recession rate \dot{a}, is given by

\dot{a} = \frac{3 k_2 M_\text{moon} R_\text{earth}^5 \Omega_\text{earth}}{Q M_\text{earth} a^5},

where k_2 is the tidal Love number of the second degree for Earth, M_\text{moon} and M_\text{earth} are the masses of the Moon and Earth, R_\text{earth} is Earth's radius, \Omega_\text{earth} is Earth's spin angular velocity, and Q is the tidal dissipation quality factor. This model captures the transfer of angular momentum from Earth's rotation to the lunar orbit, leading to a gradual increase in a. Empirical determination from Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) data, utilizing retroreflectors placed by Apollo missions and continued through modern observatories, yields \dot{a} = 38.30 \pm 0.08 mm/yr as of analyses incorporating data up to 2024.^[23] The corresponding slowdown in Earth's rotation rate \dot{\Omega}_\text{earth} arises from the reaction torque and is expressed as

\dot{\Omega}_\text{earth} = -\frac{3 k_2 M_\text{moon}^2 R_\text{earth}^5}{Q I_\text{earth} a^6},

where I_\text{earth} is Earth's moment of inertia. This results in a secular increase in the length of day (LOD) of approximately +2.3 ms per century due to tidal effects.^[5] The cumulative effect on timekeeping is modeled by the quadratic polynomial \Delta T = 31 \, \text{s/cy}^2 \, t^2, where \Delta T is the accumulated difference between Earth's rotation-based time and uniform atomic time, and t is time in centuries from a reference epoch such as J2000.^[29] Measurements of these parameters combine multiple techniques for precision. LLR provides direct ranging to the Moon's surface with millimeter accuracy, enabling orbit determination and recession tracking over decades.^[30] Earth's rotation variations, including tidal contributions to LOD, are monitored via Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), which achieves sub-millisecond resolution in polar motion and universal time.^[31] Satellite altimetry missions, such as Jason-3 operating in the 2020s, map ocean tidal heights globally, revealing annual variations in tidal dissipation of about 0.5% that refine input parameters for the models.^[32] Refinements to these models since 2015 incorporate advanced ocean tide simulations and solid Earth responses to address discrepancies between predicted and observed dissipation. The Finite Element Solution (FES) ocean tide model, updated from FES2014 to FES2022, integrates higher-resolution bathymetry and assimilation of altimetry data from multiple satellites, improving tidal loading estimates by up to 20% in coastal regions.^[33] Additionally, post-2015 studies on mantle anelasticity, using viscoelastic models constrained by seismic and tidal observations, quantify internal friction contributions that fill gaps in Q variability, enhancing long-term evolution simulations of the Earth-Moon system.^[22]

Tidal Acceleration in Other Systems

Satellite-Planet Interactions

In satellite-planet systems, tidal acceleration primarily affects prograde satellites whose orbital angular velocity is slower than the planet's spin rate, leading to a gravitational torque that transfers angular momentum from the planet's rotation to the satellite's orbit, causing gradual orbital recession. This process is most pronounced for satellites exterior to the planet's synchronous orbit, where the tidal bulges lead the sub-satellite point. For example, most of Jupiter's prograde moons, such as the Galilean satellites, experience this acceleration due to Jupiter's rapid rotation (period ~10 hours) compared to their orbital periods (1.8–17 days).^[34] The recession rate scales inversely with the semi-major axis as a^{-11/2}, reflecting the strong dependence of tidal torque on orbital distance.^[35] In the Jovian system, the inner Galilean moons—Io, Europa, and Ganymede—are locked in a 4:2:1 Laplace resonance, which maintains their orbital eccentricities against tidal damping and prevents individual recession while allowing collective outward migration of the system. For Io, the closest moon, this resonance-induced eccentricity (e ≈ 0.004) drives intense tidal heating, deforming the satellite by up to 50 m and generating frictional dissipation that powers widespread volcanism, with over 400 active volcanoes and a global heat flux of ~100 TW.^[36] Europa and Ganymede experience milder but significant tidal effects from the resonance, sustaining subsurface oceans beneath their icy shells through ongoing dissipation in the ice and rocky mantles, with Europa's ocean decoupled from the shell to enhance heating efficiency.^[37] Unlike the Earth-Moon system, where the Moon recedes at ~3.8 cm/yr, the Jovian resonance stabilizes the inner moons' configuration over billions of years.^[34] The Martian moons provide a contrasting example of tidal acceleration's varied impacts. Phobos, orbiting inside Mars' synchronous radius (~6 Mars radii), experiences tidal deceleration and inward spiral due to trailing bulges, with an orbital decay rate of ~1.8–21 cm/yr depending on models, potentially leading to ring formation or impact in 10–100 million years.^[38] In contrast, Deimos, exterior to synchronous orbit, undergoes slow outward recession at ~1–2 mm/yr, with negligible evolutionary changes over the solar system's age due to its small mass and distance (~6.3 Mars radii).^[38] Beyond the Solar System, tidal acceleration drives inward migration in close-in exoplanet-satellite analogs, particularly hot Jupiters, where disk migration halts at a tidal barrier (~0.03–0.05 AU) before stellar tides cause further orbital decay.^[39] This process, combined with planetary tides, inflates radii by 10–20% through internal heating, as seen in TESS-detected worlds like WASP-121b (period ~1.3 days, radius ~1.9 R_J), where dissipation contributes significantly to observed bloating beyond irradiation effects.^[40] Recent TESS data from the 2020s reveal dozens of such inflated gas giants with eccentricities suggesting ongoing tidal evolution. Modern numerical simulations of multi-moon systems incorporate coupled orbital-spin dynamics and variable dissipation to model long-term evolution, revealing instabilities like Laplace plane disruptions that can eject outer moons while accelerating inner ones' recession.^[41] For instance, in simulated warm exoplanet systems (periods 10–200 days), moon-planet tides drive inward migration of satellites below the Roche limit, altering planetary obliquity and spin equilibrium over Gyr timescales, with applications to both Solar System and extrasolar architectures.^[42]

Binary and Stellar Systems

In binary star systems, tidal forces act mutually on both components due to their comparable masses, generating bulges that exert gravitational torques leading to orbital circularization and spin synchronization. Unlike hierarchical systems with a dominant primary, these equal tides dissipate energy through turbulent convection in stellar envelopes, transferring angular momentum between the orbital motion and the stars' rotations until the system reaches equilibrium, where spins align with the orbital period. This process resolves aspects of the Algol paradox in semi-detached binaries like Algol (β Persei), where the formerly mass-losing secondary, now the more massive primary, achieves rapid rotation through combined mass accretion and tidal spin-up, preventing the expected slower spin from evolutionary expansion.^[43]^[44] Tidal torques in these systems drive orbital migration depending on the spin-orbit alignment: if stellar spins exceed the orbital angular velocity, torques transfer angular momentum from rotation to orbit, causing expansion and recession; conversely, sub-synchronous spins lead to orbital decay. Energy from this dissipation is primarily absorbed in the convective zones of the stars' envelopes, heating them and potentially enhancing mass loss or activity. For close binaries, this migration can alter evolutionary paths, such as delaying mergers in white dwarf pairs by circularizing eccentric orbits and expanding separations through pseudo-synchronization, where spins lock to the orbital eccentricity rather than the period.^[43]^[45]^[46] Observational evidence from space-based photometry confirms these effects, with Kepler and TESS missions (2010s–2020s) analyzing thousands of eclipsing binaries to measure rotation periods and orbital eccentricities, revealing widespread synchronization within ~10 days orbital periods and spin-up signatures in short-period systems. For instance, TESS data on over 1,000 eclipsing binaries show tidal quality factors (Q) constraining dissipation efficiency, with synchronized fractions increasing sharply for periods below 3 days, indicating torque-driven angular momentum exchange. In white dwarf binaries, such observations, combined with asteroseismology, demonstrate tidal delays in merger timelines, as circularization reduces gravitational wave-driven inspiral rates.^[47]^[48]^[49] Theoretical models describe these dynamics through the Darwin instability, which destabilizes close binaries when the orbital angular momentum falls below three times the total spin angular momentum, triggering rapid decay and merger if separations drop below a critical radius (a_Darwin ≈ √(3I/μ), where I is the moment of inertia and μ the reduced mass). This instability sets limits on stable configurations, particularly for mass ratios q < 0.072 for main-sequence stars. Recent gravitational wave detections by LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA, including post-2023 events in O4, constrain tidal dissipation via the quality factor Q in neutron star binaries, with GW170817 providing initial bounds on tidal deformability (Λ < 800) that inform Q values around 10^5–10^7, filling gaps in models for compact object tides.^[50]^[51]^[52]

Tidal Deceleration and Orbit Decay

Mechanisms of Decay

Tidal deceleration, or orbital decay, arises in systems where the satellite's orbital angular velocity exceeds the primary body's rotational angular velocity, or in cases of retrograde orbits, leading to a reversal in the direction of angular momentum transfer compared to the standard acceleration scenario. In such configurations, the tidal bulge on the primary lags behind the line connecting the centers of the two bodies due to the primary's slower rotation, resulting in a gravitational torque that transfers angular momentum from the satellite's orbit to the primary's spin, thereby shrinking the orbit (da/dt < 0). This condition is met when the satellite is interior to the synchronous orbit radius, where the orbital mean motion n > Ω_primary, or for retrograde satellites where the relative motion enhances the lag.^[53] The torque responsible for this decay can be expressed through a modified form of the general tidal torque equation, where the magnitude remains proportional to the tidal dissipation rate, but the direction reverses based on the relative velocities: τ ∝ sign(Ω_primary - n_orbit) × (dissipation factor). Although energy is continuously dissipated through tidal friction in both acceleration and decay phases—converting mechanical energy into heat—the sign reversal ensures that the orbital energy loss dominates, causing the semi-major axis to decrease while the primary's rotation accelerates toward synchronization. This framework builds on the basic torque from tidal bulges but inverts its effect for sub-synchronous satellites.^[53] Tidal friction plays a central role in driving decay by providing the viscous dissipation necessary to maintain the lag angle of the tidal bulge, with enhanced friction in close, fast orbits accelerating the inspiral process. As the orbit shrinks, tidal heating intensifies due to increased strain rates, potentially leading to significant internal energy buildup in the primary or satellite until the system approaches the Roche limit, where tidal disruption may occur. This dissipation is particularly pronounced in bodies with high tidal quality factors (low Q), amplifying the rate of angular momentum transfer and orbital contraction.^[53] Theoretical models of tidal decay have evolved from classical viscoelastic treatments to more sophisticated frameworks incorporating frequency-dependent dissipation. For extreme cases involving high velocities or compact systems, post-Newtonian approximations account for relativistic corrections to the tidal field, modifying the torque and energy loss rates beyond Newtonian gravity. Recent simulations from the 2020s emphasize refined viscosity models, such as turbulent convection in stellar or planetary envelopes, to better predict dissipation rates and orbital evolution timescales, revealing dependencies on internal structure and composition that influence decay paths.^[54]

Examples in the Solar System

One prominent example of tidal deceleration in the Solar System is the Martian moon Phobos, which orbits at a distance of approximately 9,400 km from Mars with a period of 7.65 hours. Tidal friction within Mars causes Phobos' orbit to decay inward at a rate of about 1.8 meters per century, driven by the gravitational interaction that transfers angular momentum from the moon's orbit to the planet's rotation.^[55]^[56] This rapid orbital period, shorter than Mars' rotation, results in the moon rising in the west and setting in the east twice daily as viewed from the surface. Due to this ongoing decay, Phobos is expected to reach Mars' Roche limit in 30 to 50 million years, where tidal forces will likely disrupt it into a ring system around the planet.^[57]^[58] Another key case is Neptune's largest moon, Triton, which follows a retrograde orbit inclined at about 157 degrees to Neptune's equator. This unusual trajectory, likely resulting from capture during the early Solar System, leads to strong tidal interactions that cause Triton's orbit to spiral inward at a rate on the order of several centimeters per year, as modeled from Voyager 2 flyby data and refined by subsequent astrometric observations through the early 2020s.^[59] The retrograde motion enhances tidal dissipation in Neptune, accelerating the decay and heating effects on Triton, which manifests in its cryovolcanic activity. Over billions of years, this process will bring Triton within Neptune's Roche limit, leading to its tidal disruption and potential formation of new rings, estimated to occur in approximately 3.6 billion years.^[60] In the Pluto-Charon system, mutual tidal forces have resulted in synchronous rotation for both bodies, where Pluto and Charon always present the same face to each other, with an orbital period of 6.4 days. This double synchronous state arose from intense tidal interactions following Charon's formation, likely from a giant impact, which rapidly circularized the orbit and locked their rotations within about 1 million years.^[61]^[62] Similarly, Saturn's rings may trace their origin to the tidal disruption of ancient moons that decayed into the planet's Roche limit, with debris from such events contributing to the current ring structure and inner moons like Pan and Atlas, as supported by dynamical models of past satellite instabilities.^[63] Recent observations from NASA's Juno mission, extending into 2021 and beyond, have illuminated tidal dynamics around Jupiter, detecting subtle gravitational signatures from tidal bulges induced by its Galilean moons. These measurements indicate minor orbital decay influences on moons like Io and Europa due to tidal dissipation within Jupiter, though resonances maintain their eccentricities and limit net decay rates to negligible levels over human timescales.^[64]^[65]

References

[1]
Tidal torques
According to this estimate, the deceleration should take place at the rate of 35 arc seconds per century squared. The measured deceleration is about 26 arc ...
[2]
Tidal Acceleration in the Earth/Moon System - Stanford
Oct 28, 2007 · In accordance with Newton's third law, an equal and opposite torque must act on the Moon, increasing its orbital angular momentum, thereby ...
[3]
Secular tidal changes in lunar orbit and Earth rotation
Jun 29, 2016 · Small tidal forces in the Earth–Moon system cause detectable changes in the orbit. Tidal energy dissipation causes secular rates in the lunar mean motion.
[4]
Tidal Locking - NASA Science
The Moon continues to move away from Earth at a rate of about an inch-and-a-half (4 cm) per year, its drift slowing as it goes. The energy propelling it away ...
[5]
Ocean Tides and the Earth's Rotation - NASA
May 15, 2001 · Tides affect the earth's rotation in two sharply contrasting ways. One way, caused by tidal friction, produces an extremely slow secular change in rotation.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[6]
[PDF] Observed Tidal Braking in the Earth/Moon/Sun System
This phase lag in the tidal response produces a torque which causes a transfer of angular momentum in the earth/moon/sun system.
[7]
Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica
Dec 20, 2007 · The theory of gravity had too many loose ends, the most glaring of which was a factor of 2 discrepancy in the mean motion of the lunar apogee, a ...
[8]
Gravity, Inertia, and the Two Bulges - Tides and water levels
On the “near” side of the Earth (the side facing the moon), the gravitational force of the moon pulls the ocean's waters toward it, creating one bulge.
[9]
[PDF] 18. Tides - CalTech GPS
The minus sign recognizes that the tidal bulges are ahead of the planet-satellite line because we assume ω>n, the mean orbital motion. From Newton, T = Idω/dt ...
[10]
Tidal elongation
This is partly because of the presence of the continents, which impede the flow of the oceanic tidal bulge around the Earth, and partly because of the finite ...
[11]
Deformation and tidal evolution of close-in planets and satellites ...
Standard tidal models consider an elastic tide and delay the tidal bulge by an ad hoc phase lag in order to take into account the body anelasticity (e.g., ...2. Model · 4. Tidal Evolution · 5. Equilibrium...
[12]
[PDF] Tidal torques. A critical review of some techniques Michael Efroimsky
Aug 26, 2012 · G. 2 lpq(e) sin ǫlmpq + ˜τ , (33) the sum standing for the ... 3. 2. GM2 sat k2. R. 5 r. 6. Q−1 sgn( ˙ν −. ˙ θ) + O(i2/Q) + O(en/Q2χ) + ...Missing: M_s^ R_p^
[13]
TIDAL FRICTION AND TIDAL LAGGING. APPLICABILITY ...
We arrive at this torque by setting λ = λ. ∗ and. M1 = M. ∗. 1 in the above expression:13. Tz(r) ≈. 3. 2. GM2. 1 k2. R5 r. 6 sin(2(˙ν − ˙θ)∆t). (30). Naturally ...
[14]
Tidal Recession of the Moon from Ancient and Modern Data
As long ago as 1695, Edmond Halley1 was led to suspect that this mean motion was in fact being accelerated. He seems to have inferred this by comparing ancient ...
[15]
(PDF) Dunthorne, Mayer and Lalande on the Secular Acceleration of ...
Dunthorne uses three of these eclipses to clearly demonstrate the presence of the secular acceleration of the Moon, and to estimate it to be equal to about 10″ ...Missing: arcseconds | Show results with:arcseconds
[16]
[PDF] A concise history of the theories of tides, precession-nutation and ...
The solution to the problem was given in 1687 when Isaac Newton (1642-1727), the English mathematician, physicist and astronomer, published the theory of.Missing: recession | Show results with:recession
[17]
XVII. On the secular variation of the moon's mean motion
XVII. On the secular variation of the moon's mean motion · J. Adams · Published in Philosophical Transactions of… · Physics.
[18]
[PDF] The Scientific Papers of Sir George Darwin
The tidal oscillations of the mobile parts of a planet must be subject to frictional resistance, and this simple cause gives rise to a diversity of ...<|separator|>
[19]
Historical eclipses and Earth's rotation - Stephenson - 2003 - Wiley
Early eclipse observations are the principal source of data for information on long-term variations in the Earth's rate of rotation.Missing: 20th confirmation
[20]
Tidal Rhythmites: Key to the History of the Earth's Rotation ... - J-Stage
The recent recognition of cyclically laminated tidal rhythmites provides a new approach to tracing the dynamic history of the Earth-Moon system.
[21]
[PDF] The Day is Getting Longer - EarthDate
620-million-year-old Cambrian deposits that reveal 400-day years and 21.9-hour days. ○. Carboniferous corals from 350 million years ago record 385-day years and.
[22]
Long‐Term Earth‐Moon Evolution With High‐Level Orbit and Ocean ...
Sep 23, 2021 · Long-term Earth-Moon system evolution is estimated with backwards-in-time integrations using high-level orbit and ocean tide models Rapid ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[23]
[PDF] LUNAR TIDAL RECESSION. James G. Williams, Dale H. Boggs, and ...
In this abstract we summarize knowledge of the secular rates of change of the lunar orbital elements and the Earth's rotation. The majority of the terrestrial ...
[24]
https://www.universetoday.com/127263/when-will-earth-lock-to-the-moon/
[25]
[PDF] Evolution of angular momenta and energy of the Earth-Moon system
Aug 10, 2003 · Tides raised in the oceans by the Sun and Moon on Earth dissipate significant energy, and transfer angular momentum from the spin of the Earth ...
[26]
Long‐Term Earth‐Moon Evolution With High‐Level Orbit and Ocean ...
Williams, J. G. , & Boggs, D. H. (2016). Secular tidal changes in lunar orbit and Earth rotation. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 126, 89–129 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[27]
[PDF] THE SECULAR ACCELERATION OF THE EARTH'S SPIN
Tidal friction is increasing the length of the day by about a millisecond ... change in the length of the day has amounted to 1.4 ms per century, but ...
[28]
Extrapolations of the difference ( TI - UT1 )
Furthermore, over the interval since the year 1620 the deceleration has been even less; the LOD change is 1.4 ms/day/century, which accumulates to 25.6 s/ ...
[29]
Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) Data - NASA Earthdata
Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) uses laser ranging to retroreflectors on the moon, providing data on its dynamics, rotation, orbit, and gravitational physics.Missing: 2024 | Show results with:2024
[30]
Fifteen Years of Millimeter Accuracy Lunar Laser Ranging with ...
The Apache Point Lunar Laser-ranging Operation (APOLLO) has been collecting lunar range measurements for 15 yr at millimeter accuracy.Missing: recession | Show results with:recession
[31]
Summary | Jason-3 - Ocean Surface Topography from Space
The altimeter measures sea-level variations over the global ocean with very high accuracy (1.3 inches or 3.3 centimeters, with a goal of achieving 1 inch or 2.5 ...
[32]
FES2022 (Finite Element Solution) Ocean Tide - AVISO.altimetry.fr
Jun 27, 2024 · Improved bathymetry in many shallow waters and coastal areas · Globally enhanced and refined high-resolution mesh · Globally enhanced altimeter ...
[33]
Long‐Term Earth‐Moon Evolution With High‐Level Orbit and Ocean ...
Sep 23, 2021 · Past and present tidal dissipation, and the related evolution of the Earth-Moon system, are the main subjects of this study. Our novel approach ...
[34]
[PDF] Tidal Heating: Lessons from Io and the Jovian System
Among the several tidally heated worlds in our solar system, the effects of tidal heating are most prominent within the Laplace resonance between Jupiter's ...Missing: recession | Show results with:recession
[35]
(PDF) Tidal Evolution of Exoplanets - ResearchGate
Tidal effects arise from differential and inelastic deformation of a planet by a perturbing body. The continuous action of tides modify the rotation of the ...
[36]
[PDF] Tidal Heating in Io - Lunar and Planetary Laboratory
The anelastic component of the deformation and corresponding energy dissipation can be characterized in terms of the phase lag,. δµ, between a periodic forcing ...
[37]
Laplace-like resonances with tidal effects - Astronomy & Astrophysics
The first three Galilean satellites of Jupiter, Io, Europa, and Ganymede, move in a dynamical configuration known as the Laplace resonance.
[38]
Comparative Study of Tidal Evolution of Mars-Phobos-Deimos ...
Aug 10, 2025 · My results predict that Phobos is losing its altitude at a rate of 21cm/yr and is likely to crash with Mars in 10My whereas recent Mars Express ...
[39]
Formation of hot Jupiters through disk migration and evolving stellar ...
Once the protoplanetary disk has been fully accreted, the surviving hot Jupiters are pushed outward from their tidal migration barrier and pile up at about 0.05 ...
[40]
Hot Jupiters: Origins, Structure, Atmospheres - AGU Journals - Wiley
Feb 8, 2021 · Hot Jupiters may arrive through disk migration to half the corotation period, more consistent with hot Jupiters' observed orbital periods. High ...
[41]
The Coupled Tidal Evolution of the Moons and Spins of Warm ...
Oct 31, 2025 · Aims: Here, we study the coupled dynamical evolution of exomoons and the spin dynamics of their host planets, focusing on warm exoplanets.Missing: multi- | Show results with:multi-
[42]
Analysis of Tidal Accelerations in the Solar System and in Extrasolar ...
Sep 16, 2021 · The article is presenting simulations for tidal accelerations in multi-body planetary systems under the precondition of having only few physical and orbital ...
[43]
Evolution of binary stars and the effect of tides on binary populations
The presence of a companion introduces a tidal, or differential, force, which acts to elongate the star along the line between the centres of mass, producing ...
[44]
Tides in asynchronous binary systems - Astronomy & Astrophysics
A binary system is said to be in equilibrium when the orbit is circular, the stellar rotation period and the orbital period are syn- chronized and the spin axes ...
[45]
[0807.4870] Tidal dissipation in binary systems - arXiv
Jul 30, 2008 · A binary system conserves its angular momentum while it evolves to its state of minimum kinetic energy: circular orbit, all spins aligned, and components ...
[46]
Tidal Dissipation Makes the Binary Go 'Round - AAS Nova
Apr 1, 2022 · One possible way that the orbits of binary stars could become circular over time is through tidal dissipation: the loss of energy in a binary ...
[47]
Tidal Synchronization of TESS Eclipsing Binaries - IOPscience
Sep 3, 2025 · We present a catalog of rotation periods, orbital periods, and eccentricities from eclipsing binaries (EBs) that can be used to study the role ...
[48]
Constraints on tidal quality factor in Kepler eclipsing binaries using ...
The resulting effective tidal quality factor has a frequency dependence given by Q ⋆ ′ ∝ Ω tide − 2.6 (Barker & Ogilvie 2011).TIDAL EVOLUTION MODEL · Q ⋆ ′ FORMALISM · Q ⋆ ′ CONSTRAINTS
[49]
Observational Evidence for Tidal Interaction in Close Binary Systems
Dec 30, 2007 · This paper reviews the rich corpus of observational evidence for tidal effects in short-period binaries.
[50]
[PDF] The Darwin Instability - Mike Lau
Consider a circular but unsynchronised orbit of a binary with component masses M1 and. M2 and separation a. We denote the moment of inertia ...
[51]
Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral
Oct 16, 2017 · On August 17, 2017, the LIGO-Virgo detector network observed a gravitational-wave signal from the inspiral of two low-mass compact objects ...
[52]
Measuring neutron star tidal deformability with Advanced LIGO: a ...
Oct 19, 2016 · Compact binaries remain the primary target sources for LIGO, of which neutron star-black hole (NSBH) binaries form an important subset. GWs from ...
[53]
Solar tidal friction and satellite loss
i. If the primary's spin rate drops below the satellite's mean motion, their mutual tidal torques reverse sign, and the satellite orbit begins to decay. For ...
[54]
Tidal dissipation in evolving low-mass and solar-type stars with ...
Aug 6, 2020 · We study tidal dissipation in stars with masses in the range 0.1-1.6 M ⊙ throughout their evolution, including turbulent effective viscosity ...
[55]
Phobos: Facts About the Doomed Martian Moon - Space
Dec 7, 2017 · The doomed moon is spiraling inward at a rate of 1.8 centimeters (seven-tenths of an inch) per year, or 1.8 meters (about 6 feet) each century.
[56]
Phobos in Orbit around Mars - NASA Science
Jul 20, 2017 · Phobos completes an orbit in just 7 hours and 39 minutes, which is faster than Mars rotates. Rising in the Martian west, it runs three laps ...
[57]
Tidal disruption of Phobos as the cause of surface fractures
May 27, 2016 · Also, stress from orbital decay follows a 1/a3 dependency, where a is the semimajor axis (currently 2.77 RMars, decaying at ~2 m per century).Missing: rate | Show results with:rate
[58]
Poor, Doomed Phobos
As a result, Phobos is spiraling in towards Mars, and at its current rate (1.8 m/century), will hit the planet in about 50 million years. But at some point ...Missing: decay | Show results with:decay
[59]
None
Nothing is retrieved...<|control11|><|separator|>
[60]
Astrometric observations and analysis of Triton during 2013–2019
Jan 15, 2022 · 15 January 2022, ... A Plausible Minimum Value of the Neptunian Tidal Dissipation Factor Estimated from Triton's Astrometric Observations.
[61]
Tidal evolution of the Pluto–Charon binary
where K = 3 G R 5 k 2 Δ t \begin{equation*} K\,{=}\,3 G R \begin{equation*} K\,{=}\,3 G R^5 {k_2} \Delta t\end{equation*} ... 2 = 6 × 10−5 and C22 = 10−5.Missing: formula M_s^ R_p^
[62]
The tidal–thermal evolution of the Pluto–Charon system
The orbital evolution of the Pluto–Charon binary takes less than 1 Myr. •. Tides, despite intense for a short time, have not affected the thermal history much.<|control11|><|separator|>
[63]
Origin of Saturn's rings and inner moons by mass removal ... - PubMed
Dec 16, 2010 · Previous ring origin theories invoke the collisional disruption of a small moon, or the tidal disruption of a comet during a close passage by ...
[64]
Raising Tides on Jupiter with Its Moons - AAS Nova
Apr 21, 2021 · This detailed mapping allows researchers to detect the tidal response of Jupiter to the gravitational pull of its system of moons.Missing: Jovian prograde
[65]
Equilibrium Tidal Response of Jupiter: Detectability by the Juno ...
An observation of Jupiter's tidal response is anticipated for the ongoing Juno spacecraft mission. We combine self-consistent, numerical models of Jupiter's ...