Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Triple bar

The triple bar, also known as the tribar and denoted by the symbol ≡ (Unicode U+2261), is a mathematical symbol used to indicate , , or between two expressions or objects across various fields including , , and . It represents a stronger form of than the standard (=), emphasizing that the relation holds by , under specific conditions, or in all relevant contexts. In propositional logic, the triple bar denotes , meaning two statements produce identical truth values regardless of the assignments to their variables; for instance, p ≡ q indicates that p and q are true under exactly the same conditions. This usage underscores tautological relationships, such as : ¬(p ∧ q) ≡ ¬p ∨ ¬q. In , it signifies modulo an integer, as in a ≡ b (mod m), where a and b differ by a multiple of m and thus share the same when divided by m. Additionally, the symbol often appears in definitional contexts, such as ħ ≡ h / 2π in physics to define the reduced Planck's constant. Beyond , the triple bar is used in for material equivalence. Its adoption in formal logic stems from developments in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, distinguishing invariant identities from contingent equalities to ensure precision in proofs and derivations.

Description

Appearance

The triple bar symbol consists of three parallel horizontal lines of equal length, stacked vertically to form a compact, symmetrical that visually extends the equals sign (=) by adding a central bar. This configuration creates a balanced appearance, with the lines typically aligned centrally and separated by uniform spacing to ensure readability in mathematical contexts. In , the symbol is standardized as U+2261 (≡) within the Mathematical Operators block, where it is rendered with consistent line thickness and proportional spacing across most and fonts, though minor variations in stroke weight and height may occur depending on the . For instance, in common digital fonts like or , the bars maintain equal proportions without serifs interrupting the clean, horizontal lines, facilitating precise alignment in printed and digital mathematical expressions. Visually, the triple bar is distinguished from the double bar (‖, U+2225), which features only two parallel lines often used for parallelism, and the single bar (| , U+2223), a solitary vertical or horizontal divider, by its specific triple-line structure that emphasizes equivalence or identity.

Variants

The negated triple bar, symbolized as ≢ and encoded at Unicode code point U+2262, consists of three horizontal bars with a diagonal slash overlay, denoting non-identical or non-equivalence in mathematical and logical contexts. This precomposed glyph serves as the official negation of the standard triple bar ≡ (U+2261). In some scenarios, the negated form can be approximated by combining the base triple bar with the combining long overlay (U+0338), though the dedicated U+2262 character is recommended for consistency and compatibility across systems. Stylized variants of the triple bar, including bold or italicized renderings, occur infrequently in to match surrounding text styles or for emphasis, without altering the symbol's core meaning or assignment. These are typically produced via font attributes in systems like , where bold mathematical symbols are supported but not standard for operators.

History

Mathematical Origins

The triple bar symbol, denoted as ≡, was first introduced in mathematical literature by Carl Friedrich Gauss in his 1801 treatise Disquisitiones Arithmeticae, where it served to represent congruence relations in number theory. Gauss defined congruence modulo m such that a \equiv b \pmod{m} if m divides a - b, providing a compact notation for residues upon division by m. This innovation appeared in Article 2 of Section II, exemplified by statements like -16 \equiv 9 \pmod{5}, replacing verbose descriptions of divisibility previously common in the field. Gauss applied the symbol extensively within , particularly in his development of and proofs of key theorems, including in Articles 125–146 of Section IV. There, congruences such as p \equiv 1 \pmod{4} or q \equiv -1 \pmod{p} facilitated the analysis of quadratic residues among primes, establishing the that \left( \frac{p}{q} \right) \left( \frac{q}{p} \right) = (-1)^{\frac{p-1}{2} \cdot \frac{q-1}{2}} for distinct odd primes p and q. These applications demonstrated the symbol's utility in streamlining complex arguments. Following its debut, the triple bar rapidly spread across European mathematics in the early , becoming a standard tool for in texts and research. Mathematicians adopted it to express residue classes and solve Diophantine problems, building on Gauss's framework and influencing subsequent works on algebraic structures. Prior to , no records exist of the triple bar in print; earlier notations relied on phrases like "congruent numbers" or explicit divisibility conditions, with double-bar symbols (such as || for or approximations in inequalities) appearing in unrelated geometric or relational contexts but not anticipating . This foundational role in mathematics paved the way for the triple bar's later adoption in logic during the late 19th century.

Adoption in Other Fields

The triple bar symbol, originally introduced in mathematical contexts, found adoption in logic during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. In his 1879 work , Gottlob employed the triple bar (≡) to denote the identity of concepts, distinguishing it from numerical equality by emphasizing a philosophical notion where two expressions share the same conceptual content. This usage marked an early expansion beyond pure , influencing formal systems in and laying groundwork for its reinterpretation. By the 20th century, logicians adapted the symbol for material equivalence in propositional logic, where it represents the biconditional (p ≡ q) meaning that two statements have identical truth values in all possible scenarios, as standardized in modern symbolic texts. In the sciences, the triple bar was introduced to chemistry by Joseph Loschmidt in 1861 as notation for multiple bonds in structural formulae, with the triple bar specifically representing triple bonds, such as in cyanides. This convention, building on 19th-century precedents for multiple bonds, became widespread by the early in texts depicting molecules like (HC≡CH), enabling clear visualization of shared electron pairs in unsaturated compounds. Similarly, in , post-1900 adopted the symbol to indicate homotypic synonyms—names based on the same type specimen—distinguishing them from heterotypic synonyms and ensuring precision in taxonomic revisions under the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants. The symbol's influence extended to computing in the 1960s with the development of the APL programming language at , where ≡ denotes structural match or depth equality between arrays, reflecting its mathematical roots in equivalence while adapting to array-based computations. In user interface design, the 1980s saw the emergence of the three-horizontal-line icon (visually akin to the triple bar) at Xerox PARC for the Xerox Star workstation, initially created by designer Norm Cox to represent collapsible menu lists and later popularized as the "hamburger menu" in graphical interfaces.

Encoding

Unicode and Standards

The triple bar symbol ≡ is assigned the U+2261 (IDENTICAL TO), introduced in Unicode version 1.1 in June 1993 and categorized within the Mathematical Operators block (U+2200–U+22FF). Its negated variant ≢ holds the U+2262 (NOT IDENTICAL TO), added in the same version and block. As maintains synchronization with the (ISO) and (IEC) standards, the triple bar was incorporated into ISO/IEC 10646-1:1993, the inaugural edition defining the Universal Coded Character Set (UCS) architecture and Basic Multilingual Plane. This alignment ensures identical assignments across both standards. Pre-1993 systems relying on earlier encodings, such as ISO/IEC 8859 series or 1.0, lacked these code points, often resulting in non-rendering or substitution with approximate representations like triple equal signs (===) to maintain compatibility during text interchange. Support for U+2261 and U+2262 has been widespread in major typefaces—including , , and —since the early 2000s, driven by the proliferation of Unicode-aware fonts in operating systems like (2001) and subsequent macOS releases. In cases of incomplete font coverage, modern rendering engines employ fallback strategies, such as selecting a similar from an available font or displaying a like a hollow box.

Markup Languages

In , the triple bar symbol ≡ is produced using the command \equiv within math mode, such as $a \equiv b$. This command is part of the core distribution and does not require additional packages for basic use. For the negated variant ≢, the command \not\equiv is employed, which places a slash through the symbol; this also relies on standard math capabilities. Advanced variants, such as bold or double-struck forms, may necessitate loading the amssymb package via \usepackage{amssymb} to access extended symbol definitions. In documents, the triple bar ≡ can be inserted using the ≡ or the numeric entity ≡, both of which render the Unicode character U+2261 in compliant browsers. For web rendering optimization, CSS allows specification of the unicode-range: U+2261 descriptor in @font-face rules to load fonts supporting this glyph only when needed, ensuring efficient display across devices. Other typesetting and input systems provide equivalent methods for the triple bar. In , users can insert ≡ by holding the and typing 2261 on the (ensure is active). , a TeX-based system, employs the same \equiv command as for ≡ in math environments. In , the symbol is entered using the notation [Congruent].

Uses

Mathematics

In , the triple bar symbol ≡ denotes between . Specifically, a and b satisfy a \equiv b \pmod{m} if the positive m divides the a - b, meaning a - b = k m for some k. This relation partitions the into equivalence classes modulo m, forming the basis for . introduced the symbol and the concept in his seminal 1801 treatise , where he used it to explore properties of numbers under division. For example, $10 \equiv 4 \pmod{3} holds because $10 - 4 = 6 and 3 divides 6. The triple bar emphasizes relational or conditional in these mathematical contexts, contrasting with the symbol =, which denotes literal or numerical sameness without additional qualifiers. By reserving ≡ for scenarios like m, mathematicians avoid conflating absolute with context-dependent relations.

Logic and Philosophy

In propositional logic, the triple bar symbol (≡) denotes material between two propositions P and Q, meaning that P and Q have the same . This relation is formally defined as (P → Q) ∧ (Q → P), where → represents material implication./04%3A_Deductive_Logic_II_-_Sentential_Logic/4.03%3A_Semantics_of_Sentential_Logic) The truth table for P ≡ Q is as follows:
PQP ≡ Q
TTT
TFF
FTF
FFT
This table illustrates that the biconditional holds true only when both propositions are true or both are false, such as in the case where P is "It is raining" and Q is "The ground is wet" under conditions where rain directly causes wetness in both directions./04%3A_Deductive_Logic_II_-_Sentential_Logic/4.03%3A_Semantics_of_Sentential_Logic) The triple bar serves as the standard symbol for the biconditional operator in truth-functional logic, a convention established in and Bertrand Russell's (1910), where it distinguishes from the unidirectional (→). In , the triple bar represents definitional identity for synonymous concepts sharing the same sense, as articulated by in his (1879), where it denotes equality of content distinct from mere arithmetic equality (=). For instance, "bachelor" ≡ "unmarried man" captures this synonymy, emphasizing cognitive beyond referential . Philosophical debates in the 1950s, notably Willard Van Orman Quine's critiques in works like From a Logical Point of View (1953), questioned strict identity versus mere equivalence in ontology, arguing that intensional notions of synonymy undermine extensional clarity in commitments to abstract entities.

Science

In chemistry, the triple bar (≡) symbolizes a triple covalent bond, where two atoms share three pairs of electrons, resulting in a strong linkage. This notation is exemplified in the dinitrogen molecule (N₂), represented as N≡N, which features one of the strongest known chemical bonds with a dissociation energy of 941 kJ/mol, contributing to the inertness of atmospheric nitrogen. In , the triple bar denotes homotypic synonyms under the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and (ICN), indicating that two or more names apply to the same based on the identical type specimen. For example, if Species ASpecies B, it signifies nomenclatural equivalence rather than taxonomic judgment, a practice formalized post-1905 to differentiate from heterotypic synonyms based on different types. In physics, the triple bar is rarely employed but can appear to indicate definitional equalities in physical laws, such as thermodynamic identities within equations of state, underscoring their foundational role in describing system behavior. Unlike its abstract applications in , the triple bar in science prioritizes empirical representations of phenomena, such as molecular structures or taxonomic types, over purely theoretical equivalences.

Computing

In the APL programming language, the triple bar (≡) functions as a primitive with dual monadic and dyadic roles, rooted in Kenneth E. Iverson's array notation developed in the late 1950s and implemented in the 1960s. Monadically, ≡ computes the depth of an array, representing the number of nesting levels in its structure; for instance, ≡1 2 3 yields 1 for a simple vector, while ≡(1 2)(3 4) yields 2 for a nested array. Dyadically, it performs a match operation to verify structural equality between two arrays, comparing their shapes, prototypes, and recursive contents element-wise; thus, (1 2 3)≡1 2 3 returns 1 (true), confirming an exact structural match, in contrast to simple value equality which ignores nesting. This operator, introduced in early APL implementations like those at IBM in 1962, supports efficient array manipulation central to APL's design for mathematical and data processing tasks. While the triple bar is a core element in , its use as an in other programming languages remains rare and non-standard. In functional languages such as or , ≡ does not appear as a built-in but is occasionally employed in or type-theoretic discussions to denote isomorphic types—structures that can be converted without loss—differentiating it from value equality operators like ==, which perform shallow comparisons. For example, discussions of type isomorphisms in literature may use ≡ to indicate equivalence between data representations, such as lists and tuples of the same length, emphasizing structural rather than nominal identity. This limited adoption highlights APL's unique symbolic heritage, where such operators enable concise expression of complex operations unavailable in alphanumeric languages. In algorithmic , particularly within , the triple bar denotes relations, essential for operations like . For , used in protocols such as , often employs ≡ to express conditions like a^e ≡ b (mod m), ensuring computations preserve equivalence classes under modulo m without revealing intermediate values. This notation facilitates clear specification of efficient algorithms, such as the square-and-multiply method, where repeated squaring and multiplication maintain to avoid large intermediate results. The symbol's evolution from pure mathematical in the to these computational contexts underscores its transition into 1960s-1970s array languages like , adapting abstract equivalence for practical algorithmic .

User Interfaces

The triple bar, visually represented as three horizontal lines stacked vertically, has been repurposed in as the " menu" , serving as a compact toggle for hidden navigation in software and applications. This originated in the early at Xerox PARC, where designer Norm Cox created it for the workstation, the first commercial , to symbolize a list of menu options in a space-efficient manner. Its adoption surged in the with the rise of , becoming a standard in platforms like and ; for instance, integrated it into its via the 2009 acquisition of , influencing widespread use in apps such as Facebook's 2011 redesign. The design rationale for the hamburger icon emphasizes practicality over symbolism, with the stacked lines mimicking the appearance of a sequential list to intuitively suggest expandable content without occupying valuable screen real estate, particularly on smaller displays. Unlike its mathematical origins, this usage derives no semantic meaning from or ; instead, it prioritizes to maintain clean interfaces. is a key consideration in its implementation, where developers must provide explicit labels—such as "Open menu" or "Close menu"—via attributes to ensure screen readers announce the icon's function clearly, preventing confusion for users with visual impairments. Variations of the hamburger icon typically retain the three stacked horizontal lines but may adjust spacing, thickness, or orientation for contextual fit, such as vertical stacking in portrait-mode apps or subtle offsets for . A common enhancement involves animations, where CSS transitions rotate and cross the lines to form an "X" shape upon activation, signaling the menu's closure and providing visual feedback; this standard has become prevalent in modern web and UI frameworks like Bootstrap and . Today, the icon is ubiquitous across websites, mobile apps, and desktop software, appearing in over 90% of top-grossing apps by 2015, underscoring its role as a non-semantic, purely navigational element divorced from any logical or mathematical connotations.

References

  1. [1]
    The "Identical To (≡)" Symbol - Mathematics Monster
    The ≡ symbol is primarily used to indicate that two expressions are identical in value or form, meaning they are essentially the same in every conceivable way.
  2. [2]
    Logic symbols - GeeksforGeeks
    Jul 23, 2025 · ≡, Identical to, Identical to (equivalence), a ≡ b (a is equivalent to b). ≈, Approximately equal to, Approximately equal to, a ≈ b (a is ...
  3. [3]
    Equal Sign in Maths
    In some contexts, the triple bar or equal sign with three lines means congruent or, more generally, an arbitrary equivalence relation.
  4. [4]
    When do you use ≡ and = in equations? - Physics Forums
    Mar 23, 2012 · The three-bar equal sign signifies that something is defined as another, such as in the formula for density. Additionally, the discussion ...
  5. [5]
    Equivalent Symbol (≡) - Wumbo
    The equivalent symbol is also used in math to express an identity where the equality is true whichever values are given to the variables occurring within it.
  6. [6]
    Compendium of Mathematical Symbols | Math Vault
    Equality-based Relational Symbols ; x ≠ y, x and y are non-equal, 2 ≠ 3 ; x ≈ y, x and y are approximately equal, π ≈ 3.1416 ; x ∼ y , x R y, x is related to y (as ...Probability and Statistics... · Geometry and Trigonometry... · Logic Symbols<|control11|><|separator|>
  7. [7]
    ≡ - identical to - ASCII Code
    The triple bar, or tribar ≡, is a symbol with multiple, context-dependent meanings. It has the appearance of an equals sign ⟨=⟩ sign with a third line.Missing: typographic | Show results with:typographic
  8. [8]
    None
    **Summary of U+2261 IDENTICAL TO:**
  9. [9]
    Characters names | What a symbol and sign is called - Prepressure
    HTML entity: &equiv; – HTML code: &#8801; Also called the triple bar sign. There is also a not identical to sign (≢ – HTML entity: &nequiv; – HTML code: & ...
  10. [10]
    Earliest Uses of Symbols of Number Theory
    Sep 7, 2017 · The congruent symbol used in number theory ≡ was introduced in print in 1801 by Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855) in Disquisitiones arithmeticae:.Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  11. [11]
    Disquisitiones arithmeticae : Gauss, Carl Friedrich, 1777-1855
    Aug 11, 2018 · Disquisitiones arithmeticae. by: Gauss, Carl Friedrich, 1777-1855 ... PDF download · download 1 file · SEGMENT DATA download · download 1 file.
  12. [12]
    Modular arithmetic before C.F. Gauss: Systematizations and ...
    Shortly afterwards, Gauss, in the Disquisitiones Arithmeticae, proposed a new formalism based on his method of congruences and created the modular arithmetic ...
  13. [13]
    Frege's Begriffsschrift Theory of Identity Vindicated - Academia.edu
    ... Begriffsschrift view of identity departs from Frege's usage and employs the usual double bar instead. Except in quotations, we will use the triple bar for ...
  14. [14]
    Frege's Begriffsschrift (1879) – An Ideal Logical Language (Chapter 4)
    May 18, 2019 · Frege's Begriffsschrift was designed to provide the logical inferential machinery of mathematical reasoning.Missing: triple | Show results with:triple
  15. [15]
    Joseph Loschmidt: Structural formulae, 1861.
    Note how C=N is differentiated from triple bonded CN (structure 238). ... Loschmidt draws a cyclic 1,3-dioxetane isomer! This compound remains unknown to ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] The Code Decoded - Plants Index
    the two kinds, use the identity sign ( ≡ ) for homotypic synonyms and reserve “ = ” for heterotypic synonyms. The term synonym is commonly used for a name that ...
  17. [17]
    APL Symbols Meaning and Code Example
    Sep 28, 2013 · This page is a list of APL symbol's meanings. Monadic Functions, Dyadic functions, Operators and axis indicator, Create Math APL Keyboard Layout.
  18. [18]
    A Brief History of the Hamburger Icon - Placeit Blog
    Rating 5.0 (1) Apr 13, 2020 · The hamburger icon was designed by Norm Cox for the Xerox Star, the world's first graphical user interface.
  19. [19]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
    ISO/IEC 10646-1:1993 - Information technology
    Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS)Part 1: Architecture and Basic Multilingual Plane.
  22. [22]
    IDENTICAL TO (U+2261) Font Support - FileFormat.Info
    This is a list of fonts that support Unicode Character 'IDENTICAL TO' (U+2261). ... The default image is using the Arial Unicode MS font. View All. Font. Andale ...Missing: bar | Show results with:bar
  23. [23]
    List of LaTeX mathematical symbols - OeisWiki
    Relation operators ; ≡, \equiv, is equivalent to ; ≈, \approx, is approximately ; ≅, \cong, is congruent to ; ≃, \simeq, is similar or equal to.
  24. [24]
    Not Equivalent Symbol in LaTeX - Math-Linux.com
    Mar 2, 2025 · Using the \not\equiv command. To write the not equivalent symbol in LaTeX, use the \not\equiv command. For example: $$x \not\equiv y$$ x ≢ y.
  25. [25]
    How do you code for a 'not equivalent' sign in TeX? [duplicate]
    Sep 9, 2015 · You can use $\not\equiv$. And you can always have a look at “How to look up a symbol?” for ideas how you can easily find a particular symbol.How to write a not equal to sign in Latex pseudocode - TeXCommand of not equals symbol - TeX - LaTeX Stack ExchangeMore results from tex.stackexchange.com
  26. [26]
    HTML 4 Entity Names - W3Schools
    yen sign = yuan signTry it. ¦, &brvbar;, &#166;, &#xA6;, broken bar = broken vertical barTry it ... ≡, &equiv;, &#8801;, &#x2261;, identical toTry it. ≤, &le ...
  27. [27]
    Identical To ≡ symbol in Word, Excel, PowerPoint and Outlook
    Jan 31, 2022 · Identical To ≡ symbol, also known as the triple bar, is a mathematical symbol. The three lined symbol means that something is identical or like another value.
  28. [28]
    Modular Arithmetic - Interactive Mathematics Miscellany and Puzzles
    Gauss (1777-1855) in 1801. Two numbers a and b are said to be equal or congruent modulo N iff N|(a-b), i.e. iff their difference is exactly divisible by N.<|control11|><|separator|>
  29. [29]
    Congruent Lines - Interactive Mathematics
    The symbol for congruent lines is a triple bar, or "?". What is the difference between congruent lines and parallel lines? Congruent lines are identical in ...
  30. [30]
    Earliest Uses of Symbols from Geometry - MacTutor
    The first appearance in print of Leibniz's sign for congruence was in 1710 in the Miscellanea Berolinensia in the anonymous article "Monitum," which is ...Missing: triple | Show results with:triple
  31. [31]
    [PDF] List of mathematical symbols - Basic Knowledge 101
    May 19, 2018 · For example, depending on context, the triple bar "≡" may represent ... isomorphic is isomorphic to abstract algebra. G ≅ H means that ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Chapter 02 Summary - Introduction to Formal Logic Dashboard ...
    The vocabulary of PL includes uppercase letters, five operators— tilde (~), dot (•), vel (˅), horseshoe (⊃), triple-bar (≡)—and punctuation marks (), [], {}.
  33. [33]
    Arithmetic Equality and Equality of Content | Frege - Oxford Academic
    Apr 4, 2025 · In CS, Frege distinguishes notationally between arithmetic equality (represented by the double bar '=') and equality of content (represented by the triple bar ...
  34. [34]
    Single, Double, and Triple Bonds - Science Notes
    Jul 20, 2021 · A triple bond forms when two atoms share three electron pairs. The symbol for the triple bond is a triple dash, as in N≡N. The most common ...
  35. [35]
    Common Bond Energies (D - Wired Chemist
    Common Bond Energies (D. ) and Bond Lengths (r). Hydrogen. Bond, D (kJ/mol), r ... N≡N, 942, 110. N-O, 201, 140. N=O, 607, 121. N-F, 283, 136. N-Cl, 313, 175. P-P ...
  36. [36]
    The 2011 edition of “The Freshwater Algal Flora of the British Isles”
    In accordance with best practice, a double bar “ = ” indicates a heterotypic synonym whilst a triple bar “≡” indicates a homotypic synonym. “ICN Art”.
  37. [37]
    Triple bar - Wikipedia
    The triple bar or tribar, ≡, is a symbol with multiple, context-dependent meanings indicating equivalence of two different things.
  38. [38]
    Depth - APL Wiki
    Sep 10, 2022 · Depth ( ≡ ) is a monadic primitive function that returns an array's depth. In the APL array model, the depth of an array is the number of levels ...
  39. [39]
    Match - APL Wiki
    Sep 10, 2022 · Match ( ≡ ) is a dyadic primitive function which indicates whether the left and right argument arrays are identical, taking into account ...
  40. [40]
    A Programming Language - Jsoftware
    Oct 13, 2009 · A number represented in a positional notation (eg, in a base ten or a base two number system) must, in practice, employ only a finite number of digits.Missing: triple | Show results with:triple
  41. [41]
    Data.Types.Isomorphic - Hackage
    The class of isomorphic types, i.e. those which can be cast to each other without loss of information. Type isomorphism is an equivalence relation ...Missing: triple bar
  42. [42]
    Chapter 3. Defining Types, Streamlining Functions
    Defining our own types also improves the type safety of our code: Haskell ... The two types are isomorphic; they have the same shape. 9 comments ghci ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] This is a Chapter from the Handbook of Applied Cryptography, by A ...
    The standard deviation of X is the non-negative square root of Var(X). Handbook of Applied Cryptography by A. Menezes, P. van Oorschot and S. Vanstone. Page ...
  44. [44]
    35 Interface Innovations that Rocked Our World - Xerox
    Hamburger icon. Having been invented for one of the first ever GUIs – the Xerox Star – in 1981, the Hamburger icon instantly became shorthand for hidden menu ...
  45. [45]
    The Truth About The Hamburger Menu - Marketing Insider Group
    Mar 23, 2016 · However, the best known app to adopt the hamburger menu was Facebook. Facebook gradually progressed toward the design, starting with a two-row ...
  46. [46]
  47. [47]
    Is a Helpful Hamburger Menu for You? - New Target, inc.
    Jan 3, 2022 · The Hamburger Menu, also known as the "collapsed menu" icon, was designed as a space-saving tool by Xerox in 1981.Missing: rationale compactness
  48. [48]
    Are Hamburger Menus Bad for Accessibility?
    Oct 11, 2022 · Hamburger menus can cause accessibility issues, but can be implemented without barriers with proper markup, like ARIA, and keyboard  ...
  49. [49]
    The hamburger menu: pros, cons, and our favorite alternatives | Nulab
    Mar 7, 2019 · The limited screen space on phone displays made this compact menu design ideal. In fact, the primary reason it's still used to this day is ...Missing: rationale compactness