Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Lisp

A lisp is a speech sound disorder characterized by the misarticulation of sibilant consonants, particularly the /s/ and /z/ sounds (as in "sun" and "zoo"), which are often substituted with other sounds such as /θ/ or /ð/ (as in "thin" and "this").^[1] This functional or anatomical impairment results in unclear speech and is one of the most common articulation errors, especially in children.^[2] Lisps typically emerge during early childhood language development and affect the precise placement of the tongue relative to the teeth and palate. Common types include the interdental (or frontal) lisp, where the tongue protrudes between the teeth; the lateral lisp, where airflow is directed over the sides of the tongue, producing a slushy sound; the palatal lisp, with the tongue raised to the palate; and the dental lisp, where the tongue contacts the teeth excessively.^[1] Prevalence varies by age: speech sound disorders, including lisps, affect approximately 23% of preschool-aged children and 5% of U.S. children ages 3-17 overall, though many resolve spontaneously by school age; persistent lisps occur in about 1% of adults.^[3]^[2]^[4] Etiological factors may include developmental delays in tongue control, anatomical constraints such as ankyloglossia (tongue-tie), or habits like prolonged pacifier use, though no single cause is universal.^[1] Diagnosis involves clinical evaluation by speech-language pathologists, and management ranges from observational monitoring in mild cases to targeted speech therapy; surgical intervention is rare and limited to structural issues.^[1]

Overview

Definition and Characteristics

A lisp is a speech sound disorder involving the misarticulation of sibilant consonants, primarily /s/ and /z/, but potentially extending to /ʃ/, /ʒ/, /tʃ/, and /dʒ/, due to atypical tongue placement that disrupts the precise airflow required for these fricative and affricate sounds.^[5]^[6] This disorder can be functional, arising from learned patterns of articulation, or organic, linked to structural differences, resulting in substitutions, distortions, or omissions that alter the intended phonetic quality.^[7] In typical production, sibilants involve a narrow central groove along the tongue blade directing high-velocity airflow over the alveolar ridge to create a hissing or hushing noise; in lisping, this airflow is redirected, often forward or laterally, leading to audible deviations.^[5] Phonetically, one common pattern features forward protrusion of the tongue tip between the teeth, substituting /s/ and /z/ with interdental fricatives /θ/ (as in "thin") and /ð/ (as in "this"), producing a softer, lisping quality; for example, the word "sun" (/sʌn/) may be articulated as "thun" (/θʌn/).^[5]^[8] Another characteristic involves lateral airflow emission over the sides of the tongue, creating a "slushy" or wet distortion of the sibilants without clear substitution, as the air escapes bilaterally instead of centrally.^[9] These airflow anomalies reduce the high-pitched, concentrated frication essential to sibilants, though the exact manifestations vary by individual and language context.^[6] Lisps can compromise speech intelligibility to varying degrees, particularly in connected discourse where multiple sibilants occur, potentially leading to listener misperceptions and communication breakdowns.^[8] Beyond clarity, they influence social perception, as listeners may associate the distortion with immaturity or reduced competence, contributing to teasing or exclusion in social settings.^[10] In children and adults alike, persistent lisping often erodes self-esteem, fostering avoidance of verbal interactions and heightened anxiety around speaking, though early intervention can mitigate these effects.^[11]^[12] The term "lisp" derives from Old English wlispian (attested in forms like āwlyspian), an imitative word describing imperfect pronunciation of /s/ and /z/ sounds, akin to similar terms in Dutch and German.^[13] This etymology underscores the disorder's long-recognized auditory hallmark in English-speaking contexts.^[14]

Prevalence and Epidemiology

Lisps, as a form of speech sound disorder involving distortions of sibilant sounds such as /s/ and /z/, affect a notable portion of young children globally. Epidemiological studies estimate that speech sound disorders, including lisps, occur in approximately 8-10% of children aged 3-6 years, with broader ranges reported from 2.3% to 24.6% depending on diagnostic criteria and population sampled.^[3]) In community-based samples of preschool children, sibilant errors manifesting as lisps are particularly prevalent. Prevalence appears higher in English-speaking populations due to the phonetic complexity of sibilants, which are among the last sounds acquired in child language development.^[15] The condition is most common during the preschool years, peaking around ages 4-5 when children are actively refining articulation skills.^[3] Spontaneous resolution occurs in 50-75% of cases by age 8, as many early errors self-correct with maturation.^[16] Gender distribution shows a slight male predominance, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 1.5:1 in speech sound disorders.^[17] Lisps frequently co-occur with other speech disorders, such as articulation delays or stuttering, in 20-30% of affected children, based on clinical and population studies.^[18] Key risk factors include environmental influences like bilingualism, which may complicate sibilant acquisition in multilingual settings, and prolonged pacifier use beyond infancy, potentially altering oral motor development.^[1]^[19] These associations are supported by longitudinal cohort studies from the 2010s in the UK and US, highlighting the role of early habits in speech outcomes.^[20]^[21]

Classification

Interdental Lisp

The interdental lisp, also known as the frontal lisp, is the most common subtype of lisp, occurring when the tongue protrudes between the upper and lower front teeth during the articulation of sibilant sounds. This positioning results in the substitution of the alveolar fricatives /s/ and /z/ with the interdental fricatives /θ/ (voiceless) and /ð/ (voiced), producing a "th" sound in place of "s" or "z".^[22]^[23]^[24] Phonetically, the interdental lisp involves the tongue tip advancing forward between the teeth, directing the airflow centrally over the tongue's apex rather than along the alveolar ridge, which generates a fricative noise characteristic of dental articulation. In the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), this substitution is transcribed as [θ] for /s/ (e.g., /sʌn/ realized as [θʌn] "thun") and [ð] for /z/ (e.g., /zu/ realized as [ðu] "thoo"). This pattern primarily affects sibilants but may extend to affricates like /ʃ/, /ʒ/, /tʃ/, and /dʒ/ in some cases, though the core error remains the frontal tongue placement.^[5]^[22] Identification of an interdental lisp often relies on observing the visible protrusion of the tongue tip between the teeth during attempted production of /s/ and /z/ sounds, making it readily apparent in clinical or casual speech assessment. It is particularly prevalent among young children, where it frequently emerges as a developmental feature due to immature motor control of the tongue, typically resolving by age 5 without intervention in many instances. Examples include pronouncing "snake" as [θneɪk] "thnake" or "lisp" as [lɪθp] "lithp," highlighting the distinctive "th" substitution that differentiates it from other lisp variants.^[24]^[25]^[26]

Dentalized Lisp

The dentalized lisp occurs when the tongue contacts or presses against the back of the upper front teeth during sibilant production, resulting in a muffled or distorted /s/ and /z/ sound with central airflow but improper dental placement. Unlike the interdental lisp, the tongue does not protrude between the teeth, but the contact causes the airflow to be directed too far forward, often producing a sound resembling a slight /t/ or /d/ blend with the fricative.^[27]^[28] Phonetically, this lisp is transcribed in IPA as [s̪] or [z̪] (dentalized alveolar fricatives), where the subscript ̪ indicates dental articulation, or sometimes as affricated [ts̪] for /s/. It primarily affects /s/ and /z/ but can influence other sibilants similarly. Identification involves noting the lack of tongue protrusion but audible distortion from dental contact, often requiring closer observation or instrumental analysis. This type is less common than interdental but can persist if not addressed, and examples include "sun" as [t̪s̪ʌn] or a lispy "tsun."^[5]^[23]

Lateral Lisp

Lateral lisp, also known as side lisp, is a subtype of sibilant distortion in which airflow is directed laterally over the sides of the tongue during the production of sibilant sounds such as /s/ and /z/, rather than centrally through a grooved tongue position. This results in a distinctive "slushy," "wet," or "muddy" auditory quality, often perceived as a hissing or whistling sound with excess saliva-like resonance. In one study of children with mouth breathing and associated speech disorders, lateral lisp accounted for 17.2% of the observed speech issues, highlighting its commonality among articulation errors.^[29]^[5]^[30] Phonetically, the lateral lisp typically involves the substitution of a lateral fricative for the target sibilants, producing sounds such as the voiceless alveolar lateral fricative [ɬ] for /s/ and the voiced counterpart [ɮ] for /z/, or more precisely the extIPA symbols [ʪ] and [ʫ] to denote the lateralized friction. This can also lead to affrication, where the sound takes on a stop-fricative quality, further distorting the intended sibilant. In auditory perception, these realizations are frequently described as "wet" due to the lateral airflow creating a sputtering effect, distinguishing them from other lisp variants.^[31]^[32]^[5] Identification of lateral lisp is aided by the absence of visible tongue protrusion, with the tongue often positioned too low or flat, allowing air to escape bilaterally along the sides of the palate. Unlike the interdental lisp, which features frontal tongue placement and a "th"-like substitution, the lateral variant lacks this protrusion and is more likely to persist into older childhood or adulthood due to entrenched habitual motor patterns. This persistence is attributed to its non-developmental nature, as lateral lisps do not typically resolve spontaneously without intervention.^[31]^[33] Illustrative examples include the word "slither," which may be rendered with a pronounced side hiss or slushy distortion, sounding akin to "shlither" with lateral emission. These variations underscore the spectrum of lateral distortions, often requiring targeted phonetic assessment for precise characterization.^[29]^[27]

Palatal Lisp

The palatal lisp, also referred to as the palatalized lisp, arises when the tongue is raised too high toward the hard palate during sibilant articulation, causing the /s/ and /z/ sounds to be produced with excessive palatal contact and resulting in a distorted, often "y"-like or "sh"-like quality. This placement directs airflow posteriorly, producing a non-sibilant fricative or approximant sound. It is the least common type of lisp.^[27]^[23] Phonetically, the palatal lisp substitutes /s/ with [ʃ] or -like sounds (e.g., [ɕ] or palatal fricative in IPA), and /z/ similarly voiced, leading to realizations like /sʌn/ as [ʃʌn] "shun." It mainly impacts sibilants and can affect clarity in connected speech. Identification relies on auditory cues of the "ee" or "sh" substitution without visible tongue issues at the front, often confirmed via spectrographic analysis. This type typically requires intervention as it does not resolve developmentally. Examples include "zip" pronounced as [ʃɪp] "ship."^[5]^[28]

Etiology

Anatomical Causes

Anatomical causes of lisps primarily involve structural abnormalities in the oral cavity that disrupt normal airflow and tongue positioning during sibilant sound production, such as /s/ and /z/. Ankyloglossia, or tongue-tie, results from a short or tight lingual frenulum that restricts tongue mobility, potentially leading to compensatory forward tongue thrusting in sibilants and contributing to interdental lisps in some cases.^[34] However, evidence indicates that ankyloglossia does not directly cause speech disorders like lisps in most individuals, as compensatory articulatory adjustments often produce normal acoustics; its prevalence ranges from 4.2% to 10.7% in newborns, with a male-to-female ratio of 3:1.^[35]^[36] Dental and oral structural anomalies, such as malocclusion, anterior open bite, or diastema between the incisors, can alter airflow dynamics and facilitate improper tongue placement, promoting interdental lisps by allowing the tongue to protrude between the teeth. Anterior open bite is the most common malocclusion associated with articulation disorders, including lisps, as it interferes with precise tongue-tooth contact needed for sibilants.^[37]^[38] Diastema exacerbates this by creating a gap that encourages frontal tongue positioning, leading to whistling or lisping sounds during consonant production.^[39] Children with speech sound disorders exhibit a higher prevalence of severe malocclusions compared to those without, underscoring the anatomical link.^[40] Neurological factors involving mild motor impairments, such as hypotonia in cerebral palsy, can affect tongue elevation and positioning, resulting in imprecise articulation and lisping errors. In cerebral palsy, low muscle tone disrupts orofacial control, contributing to speech sound disorders that may include sibilant distortions resembling lisps.^[41]^[42] Acquired anatomical changes, such as scarring from oral injuries or post-surgical alterations following orthodontics or dental implants, can restrict tongue movement or modify occlusion, leading to persistent lisps. For instance, retainers after orthodontic treatment may temporarily induce lisping due to adaptation challenges, while scarring from trauma can permanently alter oral structures.^[43] Studies link such occlusal disruptions to a notable portion of persistent articulation issues in adults and children.^[44]

Functional and Developmental Causes

Functional and developmental causes of lisps encompass non-structural factors related to motor maturation, behavioral habits, environmental exposures, and psychological influences that affect tongue positioning and sibilant production. Immature motor development often manifests as delayed tongue coordination in toddlers, where children exhibit frontal lisps due to incomplete refinement of oral-motor skills during early speech acquisition. This pattern is typically linked to broader delays in speech milestones, such as late acquisition of fricatives, and resolves naturally in many cases by ages 4-5 as motor control matures. For instance, studies on preschool children have identified shared genetic and environmental factors between motor immaturity and specific language impairments, including articulation challenges like lisping.^[45] Habitual patterns contribute to persistent lisps when immature articulations become reinforced through imitation, lack of correction, or maladaptive oral behaviors beyond typical developmental windows, such as after age 5. A prominent example is the tongue thrust swallow, a retained infantile pattern where the tongue protrudes forward during swallowing, which can distort sibilant sounds and lead to frontal lisps by altering airflow and tongue placement during speech. This habitual misarticulation is classified as a functional speech disorder, arising from learned motor patterns rather than anatomical issues, and often requires targeted therapy to retrain proper positioning. Clinical observations indicate that uncorrected tongue thrust affects articulation in school-aged children, with myofunctional exercises addressing the underlying swallow-speech linkage.^[46]^[47] Environmental influences can further shape lisp development by impacting oral-motor practice and sound mastery. Prolonged pacifier use, for example, may weaken or alter tongue and jaw musculature, promoting forward tongue posture that hinders precise sibilant production and increases lisp risk. Speech-language pathology perspectives note that extended non-nutritive sucking beyond infancy limits opportunities for varied oral exploration, potentially setting the stage for lisping patterns. Similarly, bilingual exposure can complicate sibilant acquisition due to phonological interference between languages, delaying mastery of sounds like /s/ and /z/ in one or both systems during preschool years. Research on bilingual preschoolers highlights variable speech sound development timelines influenced by dual-language input, underscoring the need for culturally sensitive assessment.^[48]^[49] Psychological factors, including stress and anxiety, can exacerbate existing lisps by inducing muscle tension that impairs articulatory precision, though they rarely initiate the disorder independently. In children with speech sound disorders, heightened anxiety states correlate with increased articulation errors, as physiological responses like elevated stress hormones disrupt fine motor control of the tongue and airflow. Evidence from child psychology indicates that such exacerbations occur in a notable subset of cases, often linked to comorbid developmental language issues.^[50]

Diagnosis

Clinical Assessment

Clinical assessment of a lisp begins with a comprehensive history taking conducted by a speech-language pathologist (SLP), which includes gathering parental or caregiver reports on the child's speech onset, developmental milestones, family history of speech disorders, and any associated behaviors such as tongue thrusting or oral habits.^[51] This process often incorporates standardized questionnaires and tools, such as the Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation (GFTA-3), to evaluate articulation accuracy across word positions and identify specific sibilant distortions like interdental or lateral lisps. The GFTA-3 involves presenting pictures for the child to name, scoring errors in sounds like /s/ and /z/, and providing normative data to determine if the lisp deviates from age-expected performance. Observational screening follows, where the SLP listens to the individual produce sounds in isolation, words, and connected speech to detect distortions, substitutions, or omissions of sibilants.^[52] Age-normed benchmarks guide this evaluation; for instance, the /s/ sound is typically acquired by age 3 years but mastered (produced correctly in 90% of contexts) by age 8 years according to ASHA-referenced norms.^[53] Similarly, /z/ mastery aligns with age 8 years, helping clinicians distinguish developmental delays from persistent disorders.^[53] During screening, the SLP may note contextual factors, such as whether errors occur more in spontaneous conversation than structured tasks, to assess functional impact.^[54] A multidisciplinary approach enhances the assessment by involving SLPs alongside dentists or ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialists to review potential anatomical contributors, such as dental malocclusions or structural anomalies affecting tongue placement.^[55] For example, a pedodontist may evaluate oral motor capabilities and dental alignment during the same session to provide a holistic profile.^[56] This collaboration ensures that speech observations are contextualized with physical examinations, avoiding misattribution of functional lisps to structural causes.^[56] Severity is rated qualitatively by the clinician based on factors like error frequency, intelligibility, and communicative impact, often using scales derived from percentage consonants correct (PCC) metrics.^[54] Mild severity involves infrequent substitutions that remain intelligible with context (PCC 85-100%), mild-moderate includes mild noticeable distortions (PCC 65-85%), moderate-severe features more frequent errors affecting clarity in conversation (PCC 50-65%), and severe involves frequent errors leading to significantly reduced intelligibility (PCC <50%).^[57] In a case example, a child with a prominent lateral lisp on /s/ and /z/ scored in the mild range on the GFTA-3 (2nd percentile) but demonstrated 100% intelligibility in connected speech, illustrating how contextual factors influence rating.^[58] Another session might reveal severe impact if substitutions persist across types like interdental lisps, prompting further evaluation.^[59]

Phonetic and Instrumental Evaluation

Phonetic transcription plays a crucial role in evaluating lisps by providing a standardized method to document precise articulatory errors. The International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), particularly its extensions for disordered speech (extIPA), enables narrow transcription that captures subtle details such as airflow direction, place of articulation, and manner deviations. For instance, an interdental lisp on /s/ may be transcribed as [s̪͡θ̪] to indicate dental frication with interdental protrusion, while a lateral lisp is noted as [s͡ɬ] to reflect lateral airflow escape alongside frication. This level of detail, beyond broad phonemic notation, helps clinicians differentiate lisp subtypes and track changes over time.^[32]^[60] Acoustic analysis complements transcription by revealing spectral characteristics of lisp productions through tools like spectrograms and formant tracking. In typical sibilants, /s/ and /z/ exhibit high-frequency noise with concentrated energy above 4 kHz, but lisps distort this pattern; for example, lateral lisps often display diffused energy with elevated third formant (F3) frequencies around 3-4 kHz due to lateral airflow, visible as additional low-frequency components in spectrograms. Praat software facilitates these measurements by automating spectral moment analysis (e.g., center of gravity, spectral skew) and formant extraction from recorded speech samples, allowing quantitative comparison of distorted versus normative sibilant spectra.^[61]^[62] Articulatory imaging techniques offer direct visualization of tongue dynamics underlying lisp errors, enhancing diagnostic precision. Ultrasound tongue imaging, placed submentally, provides real-time mid-sagittal views of tongue elevation and grooving deficits, such as excessive anterior bunching in interdental lisps or lateral spreading in lateral variants. Videofluoroscopy captures dynamic vocal tract movements under X-ray, highlighting airflow disruptions during sibilant production, though it is less commonly used due to radiation concerns. Electropalatography (EPG) maps tongue-to-palate contact via a custom pseudopalate, revealing atypical patterns like incomplete central contact or lateral leaks in lisp-affected /s/ and /ʃ/. These methods collectively inform targeted interventions by quantifying articulatory anomalies.^[63]^[64]^[65] Normative comparisons ground evaluations in developmental benchmarks, with databases like the Child Phonology Project offering age-specific data on sibilant acquisition and error rates in typically developing children. For example, accurate /s/ production emerges by age 4-5 in 90% of English-speaking children, with persistent distortions beyond age 8 signaling disorder. Post-2020 advancements in AI-assisted analysis leverage machine learning on acoustic and imaging data for automated detection; datasets like PAVSig enable models to classify lisp distortions with over 85% accuracy by analyzing spectral features and tongue contours, streamlining diagnosis in resource-limited settings.^[66]^[62]^[67]

Management

Surgical Treatments

Surgical treatments for lisps primarily target underlying anatomical abnormalities that impede proper tongue positioning and articulation, such as ankyloglossia or malocclusion contributing to interdental lisps. These interventions are indicated when non-structural causes have been ruled out through clinical evaluation.^[44] Frenectomy, also known as frenuloplasty or frenotomy, involves the surgical release of a restrictive lingual frenulum (tongue-tie) to enhance tongue mobility. The procedure can be performed using scissors for a simple incision or laser for precise cutting with reduced bleeding and faster healing. In children under 7 years with ankyloglossia-related articulation disorders, frenectomy has demonstrated speech improvement rates of approximately 70-96%, particularly in symptomatic cases where preoperative impairments are moderate to severe. Post-procedure recovery typically spans 1-2 weeks, involving minimal discomfort managed with over-the-counter pain relief and instructions to maintain oral hygiene to prevent infection. Following frenectomy, many patients require adjunct speech therapy to optimize articulation gains.^[68]^[69] Orthodontic interventions address malocclusions, such as open bites or dental misalignments, that can precipitate or exacerbate lisps by altering tongue placement during sibilant sounds. Braces or fixed appliances realign the teeth and jaws, while techniques like rapid maxillary expansion (RME) widen the upper jaw to correct narrow arches or anterior open bites associated with interdental lisps. Pre- and post-treatment evaluations show improved speech clarity and reduced lisping in patients with malocclusion-linked sound disorders, with articulation enhancements persisting after appliance removal. RME specifically may initially disrupt speech due to appliance adaptation but yields long-term phonetic improvements in affected children. These procedures are most effective when initiated in mixed dentition stages.^[44]^[70]^[71] Other surgical options include myotomy or specialized frenuloplasty variants for severe tongue muscle restrictions and cleft palate repairs that resolve secondary lisps arising from structural deficits. Miofrenuloplasty, a myotomy-assisted technique, significantly enhances tongue movement and speech in cases of moderate to severe ankyloglossia unresponsive to simpler releases. For children with repaired cleft palates, secondary surgeries such as pharyngoplasty address velopharyngeal insufficiency, indirectly improving articulation errors including lisps, with ENT studies from 2018-2023 reporting secondary speech surgery rates of 5-30% and favorable outcomes in hypernasality reduction that benefit overall phonation.^[72] Surgical treatments are reserved for confirmed anatomical etiologies, such as tongue-tie or dentofacial discrepancies, after multidisciplinary assessment confirms structural contribution to the lisp. Risks are generally low, with complications like bleeding or infection occurring in less than 5% of cases, though reattachment of the frenulum may necessitate revision in rare instances. Most patients experience uneventful recovery, but follow-up speech therapy is often essential to consolidate surgical benefits and prevent compensatory habits.^[73]

Non-Surgical Therapies

Non-surgical therapies for lisps primarily involve speech-language pathology interventions aimed at correcting articulation errors through behavioral and rehabilitative strategies and are typically the first-line treatment per professional guidelines. Speech-language therapy (SLT) is the cornerstone of treatment, employing techniques such as articulation drills to teach precise tongue placement for /s/ and /z/ sounds, often progressing from isolation to conversational speech. Mirror feedback allows children to visually monitor tongue position, while oral motor exercises strengthen the tongue's lateral edges and promote proper elevation against the alveolar ridge. For persistent lisps, traditional SLT contrasts with the cycles approach, which cycles through phonological patterns to address underlying processes in complex cases, though traditional methods are more directly targeted for isolated sibilant distortions.^[74] Behavioral interventions complement SLT by incorporating positive reinforcement, such as rewards for accurate sound production, and parent training programs to facilitate home practice. These approaches enhance motivation and generalization of skills beyond therapy sessions. Efficacy studies indicate substantial resolution rates; for instance, a program using clinician-led establishment phases followed by parent-implemented transfer activities achieved 50% of children reaching 90% accuracy in conversational /s/ production after structured intervention. Broader research on speech sound disorders supports that weekly SLT sessions over 6-12 months lead to significant improvements in 70-90% of cases, depending on severity and adherence.^[75]^[76] Alternative methods include orofacial myofunctional therapy (OMT) to address associated tongue thrust patterns, involving exercises for proper oral posture and swallowing to indirectly support articulation. Evidence for OMT's direct impact on lisps is mixed, with high-quality studies showing limited attributable improvements, though it benefits co-occurring myofunctional issues. In the 2020s, integrations like biofeedback apps (e.g., visual acoustic tools providing real-time tongue positioning feedback) and devices enable home practice, while teletherapy platforms have expanded access to remote SLT, maintaining efficacy comparable to in-person sessions.^[77]^[74] Prognosis is favorable with early intervention before age 6, when neuroplasticity supports rapid skill acquisition and spontaneous resolution is common but accelerated by therapy. Case studies illustrate therapy-induced resolution in persistent cases, contrasting with spontaneous correction in milder, developmental lisps by school age, underscoring the role of timely SLT in preventing social or academic impacts.^[78]^[5]

References

[1]
RECURSIVE FUNCTIONS OF SYMBOLIC EXPRESSIONS AND ...
May 12, 1998 · It is the original paper on Lisp. There are html, dvi, pdf and Postscript versions of the paper. Up to: Send comments to jmccsstanford@gmail ...
[2]
[PDF] History of Lisp - John McCarthy
Feb 12, 1979 · This paper concentrates on the development of the basic ideas and distin- guishes two periods - Summer 1956 through Summer 1958 when most of ...
[3]
Homoiconicity, Lisp, and Program Synthesis - | SIGPLAN Blog
Mar 25, 2020 · The capabilities of Lisp (in particular, S-expressions and homoiconicity) make it a natural fit for code generation and hence, program synthesis.<|control11|><|separator|>
[4]
History of LISP - ACM Digital Library
LFP '84: Proceedings of the 1984 ACM Symposium on LISP and functional programming. This paper describes the development of LISP from McCarthy's first ...
[5]
Lisping - When /s/ and /z/ are hard to say - Caroline Bowen
Nov 23, 2011 · A lisp is a Functional Speech Disorder (FSD), and a functional speech disorder is a difficulty learning to make a specific speech sound, or a few specific ...
[6]
Glossary - Sibilant - Speech Therapy PD
A sibilant is a consonant sound with a hissing or hushing noise, high pitch and intensity, produced by air through a narrow channel toward the teeth.
[7]
Is a Lisp a Speech Impediment? - Connected Speech Pathology
Mar 7, 2024 · A lisp is a functional speech disorder commonly called a speech impediment. A lisp is characterized by difficulty making specific speech sounds, ...Missing: phonetic | Show results with:phonetic
[8]
What Is a Lisp? - Open Lines Speech and Communication
Aug 8, 2022 · Lisps can affect a person's overall speech intelligibility and can lead to communication breakdown, as clarity of speech can be impacted. A ...
[9]
Lisps | speech-pathology - Wix.com
When a fronted lisp does not have a sibilant quality, due to placing the lack of a grooved articulation, the IPA transcription would be[θ, ð] or variants ...
[10]
Eligibility and Speech Sound Disorders: Assessment of Social Impact
Feb 26, 2019 · The purpose of this article is to discuss the social impact of speech sound disorders for children, specifically in the public school system.
[11]
Social, emotional, and academic impact of residual speech errors in ...
Children with residual speech errors face an increased risk of social, emotional and/or academic challenges relative to their peers with typical speech.
[12]
Why Do People Have Lisps and How They Affect Speech
Rating 5.0 (199) Feb 15, 2024 · Lisping affects both children and adults and can significantly influence self-esteem and communication, often requiring intervention from a ...
[13]
Lisp - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
"Lisp" originates from late 14thc Old English awlyspian, meaning "to pronounce 's' and 'z' imperfectly," reflecting the act or habit of lisping.
[14]
Etymology of lisp - onomatopoeia - English StackExchange
Nov 15, 2012 · Its etymology reads: Old English wlispian (recorded in āwlyspian), from wlisp (adjective) 'lisping', of imitative origin; compare with Dutch lispen and German ...
[15]
Quick Statistics About Voice, Speech, Language - NIDCD - NIH
Jul 8, 2025 · The prevalence of voice, speech, or language disorders is highest among children ages 3-6 (10.8%), compared to children ages 7-10 (8.8%), and ...
[16]
At What Age Does a Frontal Lisp Become a Concern
Jun 21, 2010 · Other sources indicate that 75% of the children have acquired the /s/ phoneme correctly by age 4.6 (Caroline Bowen, Kilminister and Laird, 1978) ...Missing: prevalence | Show results with:prevalence
[17]
Relationship Between Speech-Sound Disorders and Early Literacy ...
The prevalence of SSDs is highest for preschool-age children, and the condition appears to resolve in 75% of children by age 6. In contrast, language disorders ...Missing: lisp | Show results with:lisp
[18]
[PDF] Childhood Speech Sound Disorders: From Postbehaviorism to the ...
The prevalence estimate for males (4.5%) com- pared to females (3.1%), a ratio of 1.5:1, and the differing prevalence estimates associated with the three ...
[19]
Oral breathing and speech disorders in children - ScienceDirect.com
The co-occurrence of two or more speech alterations was observed in 24.8% of the children. Conclusion. Mouth breathing can affect speech development ...
[20]
Prevalence and Predictors of Persistent Speech Sound Disorder at ...
The estimated prevalence of persistent SSD was 3.6%. Children with persistent SSD were more likely to be boys and from families who were not homeowners. Early ...
[21]
What Causes a Lisp? - WebMD
Feb 18, 2024 · However, children as young as three years old can work on lisping with a speech-language pathologist.Missing: gender | Show results with:gender
[22]
External risk factors associated with language disorders in children
Aug 6, 2025 · To identify possible risk factors related to language delay in children, such as bilingualism, socioeconomic status, maternal and caregiver education level, ...
[23]
The effects of prolonged pacifier use on language development in ...
Feb 20, 2024 · Previous studies have suggested that prolonged use of pacifiers may have negative consequences on language outcomes in infants and toddlers.
[24]
The 4 Types of Lisps and What They Sound Like - Expressable
May 23, 2022 · The most common type of lisp is the interdental lisp. The reason it's called “interdental” is because the tongue protrudes between the teeth ...
[25]
The 4 Types of Lisps Explained - California Scottish Rite Foundation
Feb 9, 2024 · A lisp is a common functional speech disorder that affects the articulation of the /s/ and /z/ sounds your child makes. The earlier this ...What Causes Lisps? · Treatment For Lisps · How To Prevent A Lisp
[26]
Frontal Lisp/Interdental Lisp | Speech Therapy Ideas & Word Lists
A frontal lisp, or interdental lisp, occurs when a child pushes their tongue out between their teeth on sounds like /s/, /z/, “sh”, and “ch”.Missing: IPA symbols
[27]
Speech Sound Disorders in a Community Study of Preschool Children | American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
No readable text found in the HTML.<|control11|><|separator|>
[28]
How Does A Lisp Impact Speech? Types of Lisp Speech Disorders
Dec 3, 2024 · A lisp is an articulation problem that causes the inability to pronounce one or more consonant sounds.
[29]
Lateral Lisp Exercises for Speech Therapy
With a lateral lisp, air is forced over the sides of the tongue for sounds like /s/, /z/, and “sh” instead of out the front. This results in a slushy kind of ...
[30]
Mouth Breathing and Speech Disorders: A Multidisciplinary ... - NIH
This group of 407 children comprising 123 (30.2%) females and 284 (69.8%) males with a speech impediment was categorized into speech sound disorders or ...
[31]
Consonants - ASHA Journals
The lateral lisp involves the use of a voiceless or voiced lateral fricative for target. /s/ and /z/ (or sometimes for target /9/ and /@/). As lateral.<|separator|>
[32]
[PDF] extIPA SYMBOLS FOR DISORDERED SPEECH
extIPA SYMBOLS FOR DISORDERED SPEECH. (Revised to 2015). CONSONANTS (other than those on the IPA Chart). Bilabial. Labio- dental. Labio- alveolar.
[33]
Is a Lisp Ever Normal? - Graham Speech Therapy
Aug 10, 2016 · So, at what age should I be concerned with my child's lisp? For a frontal lisp, I recommend a speech evaluation at around age 5 and before baby ...Missing: gender distribution
[34]
The 4 Different Types of Lisps and How to Correct Them - Expressable
Jul 16, 2025 · A lisp refers to difficulty pronouncing the /s/ or /z/ sounds. This is because of an incorrect motor pattern of tongue positioning.
[35]
20Q: Ankyloglossia - Myths and Evidence Regarding Its Effects on ...
Aug 1, 2024 · There is no evidence that ankyloglossia causes a speech disorder. This is because simple compensations in placement result in normal acoustics ...
[36]
Diagnosis, Classification and Management of Ankyloglossia ... - NIH
Aug 30, 2025 · Its prevalence in newborns is estimated in the literature at between 4.2% and 10.7% [3, 4, 5], with the male to female ratio of 3:1 [5, 6].<|control11|><|separator|>
[37]
Prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment of ankyloglossia - NIH
Five studies using different diagnostic criteria found a prevalence of ankyloglossia of between 4% and 10%.
[38]
Impacts of Skeletal Anterior Open Bite Malocclusion on Speech - PMC
AOB is the most common malocclusion associated with articulation disorders. Pathologic speech impacts communication and self-confidence, which impairs social ...
[39]
Open Bite: Symptoms, Causes, and Treatment - Healthline
May 15, 2018 · Speech. An open bite can interfere with speech and pronunciation. For example, many people with open bite develop a lisp. Eating.
[40]
What Is a Lisp and What Causes It? | Colgate®
In some cases, dental malocclusion can be directly linked to speech disorders. ... However, malocclusion doesn't necessarily cause the speech disorder, and ...
[41]
Malocclusion in children with speech sound disorders and motor ...
Jul 1, 2022 · Children with SSD and motor speech involvement are more likely to have a higher prevalence of and more severe malocclusions than children with TSD.
[42]
Speech in children with cerebral palsy - Mei - Wiley Online Library
Jun 26, 2020 · In total, 82% (69/84) of participants had delayed or disordered speech production, including minimally verbal presentations (n=20). Verbal ...
[43]
Speech Disorders in Cerebral Palsy Explained
Jul 28, 2022 · Hypotonia is a common symptom of CP. It occurs when muscles are not able to maintain tension, causing them to feel “floppy” or “limp.” This can ...What is Cerebral Palsy? · Types of Cerebral Palsy · When is Cerebral Palsy...
[44]
Malocclusion (Misaligned Bite): Types & Treatment - Cleveland Clinic
What are the symptoms of malocclusion? · Cheek biting. · Difficulty biting or chewing. · Lisping or other speech issues. · Misaligned teeth. · Mouth breathing.
[45]
Malocclusion and Its Relationship with Sound Speech Disorders in ...
anterior open bite is frequently associated with speech disorders, affecting phonemes by altering airflow and tongue placement. The review highlights the need ...
[46]
Motor Immaturity and Specific Speech and Language Impairment
Previous studies have found an association between motor immaturity and specific language impairment in children.
[47]
[PDF] Speech - Tongue Thrust - Cincinnati Children's Hospital
Individuals with a tongue thrust usually have a “frontal lisp” during speech ... Myofunctional therapy and speech therapy are done for the treatment of tongue ...
[48]
https://www.tandemspeechtherapy.com/2018/05/24/pacifier-use/
[49]
Pacifier Use: an SLP Perspective - Tandem Speech Therapy
May 24, 2018 · Pacifier use has been associated with conditions that are considered risk factors for speech and language issues: Ear infections: Prolonged ...
[50]
Bilingual Speech Sound Development During the Preschool Years
This study is the first to document developmental changes in the speech patterns of Spanish–English bilingual preschool children over 1 year.<|separator|>
[51]
Phonological Speech Impairments Due to Anxiety Disorders - jhwcr
Aug 25, 2025 · Anxiety-related physiological changes—such as muscle tension, shallow breathing, and elevated stress hormones—further compromise articulatory ...
[52]
Association Between Emotional Disorders and Speech ... - PubMed
The results showed that speech and language impairments were positively associated with anxiety disorders (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 2.87, 95% confidence ...
[53]
[PDF] Clinical Reasoning for Speech Sound Disorders
An SLP should (a) perform a detailed case history, (b) conduct routine assessments including an oral peripheral assessment and a full hearing evaluation,. (c) ...
[54]
How to Fix a Lisp - Connected Speech Pathology
Feb 28, 2022 · Lisping is one of the more common speech problems, with estimates suggesting that as many as 23% of people attending speech therapy struggle ...Missing: global | Show results with:global
[55]
Children's English Consonant Acquisition in the United States
Age of Acquisition Criteria. Table 2 presents summary information about the age of acquisition of consonant phonemes at the 50%, 75%, and 90% criteria.
[56]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7299882/
[57]
How to Treat a Lisp | Talkshop Speech Pathology
Interdental lisps are common among children learning to talk. Both interdental and dentalised lisps can be a normal part of a child's speech development, and ...
[58]
Pedodontist's Role in Managing Speech Impairments Due to ... - NIH
In dental clinic, speech problems are screened by assessing child's speech-related neuromotor capabilities. It also involves assessment of child's capacity ...
[59]
[PDF] Assessment of Speech or Sound Production
= 25% (PCC score). ○ Determine the Severity Level by using the following scale (Shriberg and. Kwiatkowski 1982) to determine the severity of the disorder: 85 ...
[60]
Considering Breadth of Speech-Sound Disorders' Impact When ...
Jan 3, 2024 · He presented with a lateral lisp while producing the /s/ and /z/ phonemes. The lateral lisp was prominent, but his speech was perceived as 100% ...
[61]
Speech-Language Pathologists' Perceptions of the Severity of ...
The top five factors SLPs consider when judging severity are types of errors, intelligibility, perceptual judgment, normative data for speech sound development, ...
[62]
[PDF] A Procedure for Phonetic Transcription by Consensus
The procedure includes explicit response definitions for mapping narrow phonetic transcription onto dichotomous, nonerror/error scores and 17 rules for ...
[63]
Computer-Aided Evaluation of Sibilants in Preschool Children ...
Aug 4, 2025 · ... sibilant sounds is presented. The method includes the use of the ... Automatic acoustic analysis 7 can also be used to differentiate ...
[64]
Polish multichannel audio-visual child speech dataset with double ...
Oct 2, 2025 · The paper introduces PAVSig: Polish Audio-Visual child speech dataset for computer-aided diagnosis of Sigmatism (lisp) ... The sibilant ...
[65]
Ultrasound visual feedback treatment and practice variability ... - NIH
Ultrasound imaging allows the client and clinician to observe tongue position and shape, to directly cue changes in tongue position or shape, and to evaluate ...
[66]
Defining and Remediating Persistent Lateral Lisps in Children Using ...
The present report describes preliminary results from the use of electropalatography to remediate persistent lateral lisps in two 8-year-old girls.
[67]
Intervention for lateral /s/ using electropalatography (EPG ...
Aug 9, 2025 · Visual biofeedback using electropalatography (EPG) has been beneficial in the treatment of some cases of lateral /s/ misarticulation.Missing: videofluoroscopy | Show results with:videofluoroscopy
[68]
[PDF] Developmental Phonological Speech-Sound Normalization
Analyses characterize the sequence, rates, and error patterns of long-term speech-sound normalization in relation to developmental perspectives on the nature of ...
[69]
The role of AI in the diagnosis of speech and language disorders
Automatic detection of articulation disorders ... Automatic detection of speech sound disorder in child speech using posterior-based speaker representations.Missing: lisp | Show results with:lisp
[70]
Speech and Language Outcomes in Patients with Ankyloglossia ...
Feb 11, 2019 · Children with preoperative moderate and moderate-to-severe speech and language impairment attained better speech and language outcomes after frenulectomy.Missing: lisp | Show results with:lisp
[71]
Experiences and Outcomes of Frenotomy in Children with... - LWW
Following frenotomy, improvements were observed in symptomatic (96%) and asymptomatic (≈70%) children. Overall complications in the frenotomy procedure, ...<|separator|>
[72]
Frenectomy: A Review with the Reports of Surgical Techniques - PMC
The present article is a compilation of a brief overview about the frenum, with a focus on the indications, contraindications, advantages and the disadvantages ...
[73]
The effect of ankyloglossia on speech in children - PubMed
Conclusion: Tongue mobility and speech improve significantly after frenuloplasty in children with ankyloglossia who have articulation problems.Missing: frenotomy lisp success rates
[74]
The effects of rapid maxillary expansion on voice function - PMC - NIH
The hypothesis of our study was that RME therapy affects voice quality because it results in an altered, anterior placement of the tongue.
[75]
Miofrenuloplasty for Full Functional Tongue Release in ... - NIH
Aug 20, 2021 · The results of this study clearly demonstrated major improvements in tongue movement, speech, and neck muscle tension in moderate to severe ...
[76]
The Rate of Secondary Speech Surgery After Cleft Palate Repair
Feb 24, 2025 · Reported rates of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after primary palatoplasty for cleft palate (CP) range from 5% to 30%.Missing: myotomy ENT 2018-2023
[77]
Speech Outcomes of Frenectomy for Tongue-Tie Release
Overall, frenectomy for tongue-tie was associated with an improvement in speech articulation (0.78; 95% CI: 0.64-0.87; P < .01). Increasing patient age was ...
[78]
Treating Childhood Speech Sound Disorders: Current Approaches ...
This study explored the intervention processes used by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) to treat children with speech sound disorders (SSDs).
[79]
A Study of the Effectiveness of the S-Pack Program ... - ASHA Journals
This clinical study evaluated the effectiveness of the S-Pack Program in eliminating frontal lisping behavior. The subjects were 10 male and 8 female ...
[80]
Effectiveness of Orofacial Myofunctional Therapy for Speech Sound ...
Findings from high quality studies showed no improvement to speech that could be directly attributed to OMT, and lower quality studies yielded mixed results.
[81]
Articulation Disorder: What It Is, Types & Treatment - Cleveland Clinic
Outlook / Prognosis Early diagnosis and therapy can help prevent speech problems from worsening or affecting learning and socialization. A child with ...